New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-02-21

the ADDRESS. was Lord Dudley Stuart, VINO COM
planned OF the omission 10 tne roy speech Of any
alusfon % Kossutn and the Hungarian refugees
and in doing so he coutrssted in s5rong lsnelarge
the conduct of the Governments Of England ana
America. IN the reference those gu USED patrols'
~ K'-crc T-seapt irea o-d5- B., L ssr'o,-
In tie House Of Commons On Friday ni5nL the
7th inst, Lord John Russell developed his pro
posed measure in reference 20 the Papa agsre''
sion. TIE house was crowded az q very early
bour. ard shortly AFTER its sitting Lord John Has
sell proceeded amidst profound silence, 70 explain
the nature Of bis measure on the Papal aggression
The noble Lord commenced by aluding 10 the
deep responsibility OF bis situation. AZ 70 retro
erosion, be only proposed TO recoil step 0acR
wards but he would defend himself from attack
The Pope had last year departed from the usual
policy of the Vatican IN the appointment OF an
Irish Catholic archbishop.
The prelate appointed knew much about Rome
bat nothing about Ireland With Government,
on the contrary, he took prominent part In the
proceedings Of the Synod, which denounced as
goddess the colleges established by the crown
and, in general, tried to rouse the feelings OF the
country against the Protestant proprletors Inese
matters were symptoms OF encroachlng intentions
and tendencies. COncomitant with these, pro-
ceedngs had taken place in several European
countries manfestiDg the same splrlE and under
changing Wears Apostolic in this country into
Bishops and ArchbishOps.
This alteration was effected without the know
ledge and consent of Government He had indeed
been told privately that such prospect was on
foot but be told his informant that be would con-
sent to no such arrangement, aud DE believed the
matter was then dropped de thought that
friendly power, such as the Pope, had then given
up the intention of insulting the Queen. he denl.
ed in uneauivocal terms that Lord Mimic had
sanctioned any such arrangement, or that IL mad
been communicated 10 him. He had consulted
the law officers Of the crown, but they dld not
think the assumption of titles illegal, or that 1t
could be efectuaIly punished, but they said the
introduction Of Wears apostolic was certainly
illegal and punishable though from the dlsuse
into which it had fallen, prosecution might fail.
The government determined, therefore, not 10
appeal TO the law, but to the Legislature After
much deliberate consideration, they had decided
neither to attack the law as II stool nor TO intro
duce new measures the effect OF which might be
dubious He saw bat little difference between
assumption by Catholic prelate OF the Arch6lsh-
Oh of Canterbury, than of Archbishop OF West
minister The change from Wears apostolic to
bishops gave the prelate in question certain rights
over properties bequeathed for religious purposes
He proposed then
That all such Gifts and requests made Catholic Pre-
ajes shall be null ard void Chee That any scL done
by them their official capacities should DO uull add void
beQueathed should Al once pass 10 uhc
md that all Catholic funcnOnariss should Do pro-
bibted FROM assuming Jules derived not only from any An
gicsn diocese bu from any district place in the United
Kingdom" Chee1
Such were the main features Of the measure.
He counseled Cardinal Wiseman TO use in this
dispute mild and conciliatory spirit bat if the
Vatican preferred war to peace and attempted
to carry out its halfhinted designs, then in the
long struggle which in that case he saw pending,
he would, with all his might resist that attempt,
however plausible and slight it might De. The
noble Lord, who spoke for nearly TWO hours, then
resumed his seat amid loud cheers.
The introduction of the proposed measure was
strongly opposed by all the radical members, and
eventually the debate was adjourned till Monday
In the Lords, in reply to Lord Stanley, Earl
Mimic lord John Russells father in.lawl said
that he had assured Lord John Russell OF the in
correctness Of the assertion Of Cardinal Wiseman
but that no authoritative denial was considered
necessary To the best of his memory, an intima
ton Of the late proceedings had never been made
to him.