Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1851-06-13
,,, M ;, ,.,; la e.!i.c.tu oil tie \ \. Esrh.h- Post
= 49, MEER AND WILLIS.

" r.,fys n i> case ~, Mary Imam daughter ~ I'll
49,, "' iI rnn,,n and her husband Mr. Cud,ington ,
go. N. Jersey who prosecute Webb for the recover
- 49,, .,trr. which ne wronncuv drtains The CON
n Sci, forth that Mar, Inman had correspondence wit
y p Willis in the wear IS H. then being about 10
.; ace us un boarding school, which was simply sent
n,n,I and literary and not nj all criminal in any respect
h, which TOOK place without The consent O he. parents
u. therefore, i!ad1i-cd and improper. Her father comm
. "a, Eunl Ira uf lI fc, sired 10 procure III. let
ART ,nt.orz,d his ,y) friends Mr. Gcorgc Bucshau an
.n.. v,t.o, v',h +, rarnns WINES IN deliver ,hnm n.
i:n ,y;t, "a L, w,l ,orah ,,1uired and nr,ni in
>, IT, go ,"r.r raw. ,b,u, ,y,r IA lIr no,an nor any u HI
i, RI, 1a,,nrs ,r. s,;; i, V.bLs nnssessInn and i
49,! 49, 49, ;,t A. wI,i. ho use.I ,ho,r ., ,r, Ia
~ -, -, i.,,,i,,, .h,r,o .ou,s, ,I;.. II,
'a'Ss ,'I a' 49,, , f ruth ~ !, fro,
rb c,n,nI,in, hnn sssarcra,rs thai the cor
a ,;,t A. tvI;. ,,,,,. an, NJ disrussi,n of Iit
~. ~, WINS. ;c, " eit -, ,h =, i,t;tj
10y .' :. hhn, mar j. absolutely and nm
"aS ro-.l"ah VI i t','us"'i' 'ii: w. - @ sa 49,
i''',I"'! NM" mo- n Is = M; ,I, ~ 49,. I'D ,n,
HGIeu "y S'iu -Nlth'ci J. '''iSi " H'"' ~
improper association or connection whatever WIN te sa'
WINS; that ihcrc Is no lo"hdauon h NUN 1t" any
at want ot virtue anu chastity nladc against !hG iaih'' ia
~ lnndn that il is absolutely and GnTnlicdiy untrue INA
the father u the plaintiff became hciFi-oohcn VI ""' HE
death was IN any manner causec or eSpeclIea .: reason
any correspondence or ASSOCIATION when han hkem pace
tween the said Nathaniel p. Willis and the plaintiff On th'
contrary that the latest hour vi his e her ater justly
entertained the most undoubted confidence IN hcF integrity
and virtue and that he never AT any time, made any aes
ton against the planti Mary lnnan in respect o e sait
correspondence with sad Willis except that OF The aciieC
ndscrcon Of .ing party such correspondence
without the knowledge OF her parents, while an Inmate Oh
her fathers house, and under age -.
These statements are sworn 10 oy mary i''a 'a ''I
husband and they ASK order from the court L" restrain
Wcb from exhibiting the letters any body, aud 10 compel
him l.. restore them Ia the ghf Annexed is an
nt,yit o, George uckhau who says that he was one oi
rh Iy n,.uns ,n,nnI.d bv Henry lnman 10 ask Mr. VIII
is tr h, ,rr.. ,I,,t ne and Wcoo asked Willis 10 meet
them M Buckhau. office which he did, but did not know
II -. ~ ,,, ,in,. tf.,r when IN, was requested 10
I,,ar , ,,r hr s,id r.. nrI.y. he had some notes in
hi. which h. would willingly reinluisI the
dav which he did first wrapping them in paper sealing
/ -.
NJ ur,an These two interviews between the parties were
THROUGHOUT of a courteous n.turc-nuhing like threat or
y,. held on to said Willis nor any charge
~ ,,.r, ,,,,, -, his having seiuccd IN: plaintiff Mary
Irrr,n mr. rh,t urrrv lnmn had any idea suspicion
] ,h, ,ry i,n3,nnrr intercourse had vnken place be.
, ,,,, WIN. and ,,,. dammit
'",'h - mus anu Wv ,,- ,h,, ,- sorer,I v.ars b.frc
T., ' t,, -, iI.r Io,,@n n. was IN. most intimate and
G ,,;,i .nJ ~ Jom,u. INIT he was always consulted
no I,u,n n ,ny On his bust ness affairs The most
. f,'y c,rr.rns. Thar they were in tho habit oil hav
IN, conversation upon subjects, but that
lnn ur,n nnv either directly Indirectly
49, ,,, Mn, ,,,s. ,v,n In irnlnne that he had
sI r % a i, h, 49, ...,.inn mat his daughter was
h , ,,o ,,,r. .,r1 y,,u,us or that the notes or let
. 49,, H., ,,a,',sI ,nv ,vid,ncc or ANYTHING tend
!e's "''';r' y ~ i'"n -, n,.,,, nj chastity
mi - vince .'' ,,, ever was affected BY any
, , , L. I ,sncion ~ If he had been that lie
,1 n n,ro.,,d ,h fac, To The Geponen On the
:, i,, 49,, 49,, =, ,,, ho,r of Inmnn's den ill.,
,, 80, ,rG.t c,nGJrnre in the chastity and viz
nc nav ';'' L, - r xnrrssed Or minated the
,'c III MS ''i""''','' M sntnS.,c. win Willis was
'ehS' su>''" ,' A. ,L siu,n,y in,scre., Tn. first
c'''" :" "'' 49, ,,,, -,
hho"'I"7c u'ai W ,.in, INV ,,,,r;ssi,n ar eyi.
timt me corresponding u,r in,n VA hrnngh TN. ar
I,c. i, ,hc t,u,irr & ENQUIRER y. lacking Mr. Willis.
IL" te-'."- al> nat ne deiiindsd s e'e's .. e h
lnm.n und ii' ntoD promise" " S'' , ~, % a. -,
never u'"' :, ~ '''s va. hi,; ,rnn,i,.d win Inc
open 'he pac"as', VI l" HIM ~ i ~
contents. ;, -, t1,r nay, ,os,iGos ,ha,
Mrs. Henry lhhan' "!ap" VI t'e'"! ''N -; ,na,
nc.t"*F she nor ''ei ""Spi'u 49,, - 81 GU , 49,,
Mary had been sriuccd oy WIVES q" ia we e'iio P'"'
related nany improper intimacy lie correspondence "as
simply an ndscrrun which though cehsuaoc was u or
sr,locd youth and th"ughtIrssne:s on me pa
o Mary oir- lnnan asserts tnat Sht na' 'Ie',ueh i ,
nn"Serei conversations WIN f lHhah VI" ,Ii VI, i
Jet ni ne correspondence anu y. f ' ,itv r his
ina: ne never Ma io"o' y. "'i w.. " w. al ,n
daughter She "a! lu.'hct INA. s'o '' I I VIZ 800,
referred Ia from WEBB, ont ina l"ouSh "" p,ia" so
render them, lie mas never oo'e s'' ~ " 49,
swchS Ia hayln. made Such "e.h'nu' II, VI" , -, w.
plaintiffs and that Webb PROMISED ~ ue'i'ci "'. W "'
plaintiffs al the proper time Judge STANFORD oic'u'se'
win such state oil facts granted le ofnctS p'alcu .'
Tia" New "rk correspondent oil TIE D"''''t" sun '
der date ~ VI" lp,m .S'., s"s :; a., S., r. rr,
again Yesterday wI"n Mr.. Weoo attempted 10 read an am