Weekly national intelligencer., 1851-11-22

, \ uC ANCW 1 oih liuco SccUiS W have llS
philosophy disturbed by the taunts of the "pro-
gressive press of that city account of its having
given publicity to the Letter of an 4tache concern
ing KossuTH, which was copied into our columns
on the 9th instant; and, in its number of Friday
last whilst excusing its own agency in the matter,
the Times y says:
sMr HALL knew the writer Of the letter. and
It's publication. We gave insertion, publishing his
at the ,ime for the purpose Of showing who
sponble for it and accompanying it with editorial sictufe
expressing doubt of his assertions and denyng empha
cay possible the justice of its denuncation Of Kossulh
and his companions The National Iegencr copied the
letter, with comments but expressed dissent from the
latter and said the of the Aache were confirmed
by other aivices"
We take leave to remind the . Times that we
expressed no such dissent from its structures as
might be inferred from the above paragraph. We
simply said that if the letter stated facts, we could
moi share in the regret that it had been written.
Here is our own paragraph relating to the subject
S'Copying into the preceding columns, from the Ne y
York Daily Times of Monday, letter from an Atache
TO of the American Legations abroad, whose intelligence
and character vouched for by the gentleman who under
bis name has caused it to be published be
proper also to add the comments of the Tmes" upon the
letter thus admitted into its columns We do matter
Of courtesy TO contemporary, and because share
in the universal regret" which the Times supposes
will be felt ha should ever have been written" II the
letter states facts whatever may be the general regret that
such facts exist do perceive that any blame
upon those who make them public. On the contrary
IN disasu'ing The public mind of erroneous Impressions
under whose influence it has been wrought into feveris
excitement, il for the purpose of nveglg this people,
nd OFr ranrc a
oPogess, or Of revolution, of aspiring individuals in the
oerent Governments Of Europe, its publication is surely
meritorious attn
Nor did we then say one word about g the
statements of the Atache being confirmed by other
advices. We had eight days previously, at the
time OF the receipt of KossuTH's address to the So
clalist democracy OF Marsees, made the following
announcement:
we learn from letters received in this city that it was NJ
kossuths desire TO stop Naples Genoa and Maseies in
ne csmedo have many endsto his Euro
pesn enterprises and he is said have manifested much dis
satisfaction that the fgae Mississippi was not bv her
orders touch at those pos nmang tha, he was thereby
prisoner STILL ard suggesting the desired INDULGENCE
would be sanctioned by the people, if the Government,
should disspprove it,"
What is contained in the above paragraph was
<Iuc dI TIE tiHuc anu 10 yCt Hucs cuCH letters
are above described received in this city, and
the fact coming TO our knowledge, we deemed it
our duty to make it public, in the same manner
that we have since made public the contradiction Of
the story, the authority of the Officers Of The
Frigate Mississippi; and, having thus done neiihe
more nor less than our duty, we have no regrets
concerning the matter.
=.