New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-01-24

md 10 complaining Of the refusal OF the Court TO
bssr the BaikonirT on behalf of the Bar. The law
gives the Bar no right 70 be consulted IN the ram
Inc of thetarff of fees and previous instance
when the Judges promulgated new tarin OF ices
without consulting the Bar the latter made no
complaiut whatever, and for the simple reason, no
doubt that the scale Of the tariff came pretty near
~ m 10 their own notions. q.
The Roman Catholic sgitation, growing OUT OF
the late proceedings Of the Pope IN England mas
rot had any effect upon political parties mere ouI
the Mirror of yesterday, the Roman Cataohc or
Gan threatens the detection Of that body from tne
Reform marty Of Upper Canada If the liberal Pro
testant journals continue 70 speak so irreverenty
If the Romish religion and the proceedings OF the
Pone. IL even threatens on the part Of the Cath
ocs that If these tauns OF the press do not cease
they will make common cause with the opponents
Of reform In spite of this menace It IS obvious
enough that the Roman Catholics ana the tories
many OF the latter being Orangemen-could
never heartily unite for political ends,
a sharp correspondence has passed bctweenthe
Church Of England Bishop of Toronto and Hon.
NJ De Blaouiere, Chancellor of the University oil
Toronto. on the subject OF the charter to winch
the former gentleman, when In England attempt
ed 10 obtain the consent oil the Secretary OF state
Mr. De Brsquiere charges the Bishop with first
having framed charter, vesting in himself and his
successors. without control, the whole power and
authority of the University admlnlstra-
tive and executive; and then attempting to get It
converted into royal charter, without consulting
those interested in the matter or permitting them
10 obtain q knowledge of the charter which he
thus attempted to get legalized. he therefore
requested a copy OF the document with view 10
its general PRONUNCIATION. The Bishop IN his re-
pIv insinuates a want of delicacy aud honor on
the part of NJ. De Blaquiere, but promises TO
transmit a COPY on condition that the applicant
will first favor him with copy OF slanderous
document which was laid before the Councu Oh
the University. and also an authentic coPyot the
violent and abusive speech with when NJ oe
Blaouiere introduced it, The latter rejoins tnas
there wasno violent and abusive Speech ana '.,a1
the document in question was drawn up lot , sue
purpose of upsetting the Bishops SANDERS Inc
Bishop replied that he must decline turther cor
respondence with one who has applied such IAN
guage to the Bishop Of your Diocese and your
senior in age; tells his correspondent that he Is
ANYTHING but a gentleman, and is not TO be De
Geved. NJ. De Blaquiere, who is member oil the
Legislative Council, promises to move for copy
of the intended charter in the next session OF Par
lament That the hon. gentleman has correctly
stated the efforts and objects of the Bishop there
can be no doubt.
Annexation dismissals have been revived al
though year has passed since the annexation
agitation. Mr. Rueeshun of this city, who signed
the Toronto Annexation Manifesto, as Secretary
TO the Annexation Association, about year ago,
has lust been dismissed from the Lieutenancy
of the Militia for that oAense. Why an otfense
passed over for nearly year, should now be Wis
tied with punishment is a puzzle that am una
bile IN solve