The primitive Republican. (Columbus, Miss.) 18??-1852, 1851-07-03

ceH W Ollo III 4dNOIs III INC house, q ma 1
GRITTY of Northern members voted against q
he measure, while fye-eights of the South
IN members voted in its favor! t
1.-THE Utah BIZ. I
This measure passed the Senate August ],
$50, without opposition 1t had been or
Tered to third reading the day before by a
-ote of 30 to Is. The vote stood: Ayes
Northern Democrats IL; Southern Wings s;
Southern Democrats 49, Nocs-Northern
Wings 10; Northern Democrats 3; Adolf T
lionists 8; Southern Wings 2 According
10 parties the vote stood; Wings s for, u
against; Democrats "a for, against; ADO
itionists 3, unanimously against it. Ac-
cording to sections, the vote stood North
IL for, 16 against; South q for, 2 against
Mr. Jefferson Davis voted for this bill
Senator Foote did not vote upon it, although
in its favor.
This bill passed the House Sept 8, 1850, |
by vote of 81 to 85 Aycs-Northern
Wings 10; Northern Democrats 81; South
ern Wings "a; Southern Democrats 81
Nocs-Northern Wings 43; Northern Dem
ocrats -; Abolitionists IA; Southern Wings
none; Southern Democrats Is. According
to parties the vote stood: Wings 81 for, 43
against; Democrats 60 for, % against; Abo-
litionists IA, and Of course unanimously a
gainst. According to sections the vote stood
North Al for, 70 against; South 81 for, 10
against.
1t will thus be seen that for this measure
a vast majority of southern members voted,
four to one in one House, and ten to one in
the other; against it in each House, five
eigthths of the northern members voted. 1t
will also be seen that a majority of Wings
voted against it in each House, and a large
majority of Democrats for it; in the one
body nearly three fourths, and in the other
eight ninths.
1t Will also be remembered that A g.
Brown voted against this bill, against the
vast majority of his political friends and the
southern members, and in company with FIVE
eighths of the northern members and the
unanimous squad of Abolitionists; and this
he did five minutes after declaring that, ESQ
help him God, he was for resistance /" Poor
Mr. Brown
III-THc California BIZ.
This measure passed the Senate August
13, 1850, by majority of 81 to Is. The
vote stood: Ayes-Northern Wings To-
Northern Democrats Is; Abolitionists 3
Southern Wings 3; Southern Democrat l.
Noes-Southern Wings 5; Southern Demo
Gratis IA. According to parties, the vot
Istood: North % for it; South for, Is a
gainst Against this bill Senator Foote 70
ted
This bill passed the House Sept. Z, 1850
Iby vote of 80 to Sc. The vote stood
Ayes Northern Wings Ga; Northern Dem
ocrats 45, Abolitionists IA; Southern Wing
II; Southern Democrats TO- Nocs-South
ern Wings 10; Southern Democrats 46. Ac
cording to parties the vote stood: Wings s
for, l0against; Democrats So for, 46 against
According to sections the vote stood: Mort
123 for; South q for, Sc against. OF TIL
9 slaveholding States, Maryland and DelaTar
e voted unanimously for it; Missouri voted
r to in its favor; Tennessee Z to 4; Ken
tncky to 3; while votes were thrown fc
c the bill from Virginia and North Carolin:
o lIV.-Sa4pression Of the Stare Trade 1
\ tie District
I This bill passed the Senate Sept. 16, 1851
: by vote of 80 to 10. The vote stood: Aye
!; Northern Wings 8; Northern Democrat
!; Is; Abolitionists 3; Southern Wings 4; Sol
q thern Democrat 2. Noes-Southern Wing
. II; Southern Democrats u. According /
parties the vote stood: Wings II for, Il
: gains5; Democrats Is for, II against. A
cording to sections North q for it; Sout
i 6 for, 10 against
This bill passed the House Sept. II 1856
L by vote of 124 to SO. The vote stood
Ayes Northern Wings CO. Northern d
2 mocrats AZ; Abolitionists II !; SoutheI
e Wings 2 Southern Democrats 2. No
I, Southern Wings IA; Southern Democra
u 45 According to parties the vote stooC
9 Wings Ga for, IA against; Democrats 4
2 for, Is against. According to sections Il
g vote stood: North 40 for South 4 for,
20 against.
q twill thus DC seen that on the last ty
= bills, a majority of both the old parties yot
te for each, while southern members from ca
q party likewise voted for them.
1t may. as well be noted that upon the sla
er trade district bill and amendment was offer
er to substitute a penal fine for the breach Of
! provisions, in place Of liberating the sla1
Le, Senator Foote voted for this amendmel
ptlwhieh however, failed Senator Davis {
ne posed the amendment, declaring that thou
he was not equally, yet heWas utterly oppos
IT to both amendment and bill
Who shall wear the Pantaloons!
u 4 The Baltimor Sun thus chronicles
- progressed the pantaloon- movement ane
IS the damsels down-east We venture how
It to predict that few Of the blooming port
s 2 lIof the sex, even in the land Of eisass, ]
~ ~ resort % Bloomer-ism Those WHO can
III attract attention Of excite adnifation IN /
til ticoats may rush INTO petitions N sheer
soeRera RS
g. PRoGBEss o. TIE ElY GosTuaiE.
new costume for ladies appears destined
the work a revolution IN u eW England, at les
Use In Boston, when llle5 % get hold Of an
24;; or motion the5 pursue with %
! seend alist, energy writer in
ISIS ellef, there, tells of meeting eleven
era dies eaeEln the new costume, the col
eT8of short walk n Washington street,,
lre-lthe Journal nd the Traveller are cles
Gof out n favor Of The novel rig TIE Fra
ST LEI, Of Friday SAYS
Bloemeis m IS e1id5nl p fhe asee
TIN ant Hrpin every Quarter We bear ef lal