New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-12-24
0 {. NJ Vs. s-wA.t ~~ n. Character o. NJ.

Nil &C ohece.d Mr.. J. vas atrsisced by Mr. n to
be va. ret prsosr poree psr.,ssi.s, =, ss,'
btre g. cehue h'msef
Mr Bake sd Le ad no, mean 10 hs uairao,d tAat 10
az ssyA,ts sgs4ass the character Of Nr. ].
hs 'aa ssa The tssNasOsy 81 Jgld 60 serlssd- nv.
bee. &c cssts b 7 ss car cs.ri g. sss
iete, t~hsh lis stsB byvts shethss "a tsso,saS
aid as ospet 10 ueasure apsa ,ss cart, sesiss
t. II cane f,c@ M Solsosa Yssasss q nes,ss 20
se ca - ss from sars otse Psres psEsAs ass I've
Nr oC TIE Cur Tia, On. .sos 20 ssssN
-, selisn tse te,eI I'll \ had os"s r,st ssd be SD
NJ N,E be dad rot ts'ns he ~osd se rseniaed "
'osa Lv--ssro. swv's-ss,sis A,de A.s,r Hsu,s; -.
AC,uEh-isr<, fa ftssyVsa's hers ~erv ,oas ,.s-
ce< On - Mr. y sDp ha Ica for dverc. "a Peaa-
syivsn.s Ia. eefese me u ~as "a Jssssr, is>s
C-Nss sivea Mrs FOREST TO appear rotation
oSis.ssd Iy Sir orc. The Lss.l.sere Of Psssss-s:
hseuo erct tibanAi a. the Asto hcasA ssa
MI WA not b. nd ~ attend 10 nstes But evsa
~ hst. The other slte rrst acs thai csmnss %
scaets &C riss tsd eeen yea from Pearsyvmn II hss
b. had sprssrvd u night "a lind q Jsdy'
n,Ss D. vi Oh che w'ua asNe 70 ae co n I'D Sss
r.tacr to hsse she testimony but here ~tl 10 mach
tho kue shtied aRS be.ts A. once ~ DO sha oss
M ves B-rhey d. rot propose to nsu. the case. sss
The Corn ihovsht the question not sami.s.bls
The witness asd paper sssn 10 hi@ BY M Vm Il.
Tie vtH sad the paper here prcsssd (shs Jaa a
letter. Wa aosssted that proceeding IL s 80 ~ Me-
TIE Csg tAoush We Rad meth ns whatever to do With
those 2 oceedpgs a, the Astnr House.
th,n G mmoB s the library shuts up az ocoos aad hs
wnhes 10 get an auhonty 20 show the Court On p'sas -
the moving.
Tbs JUDGE AID he believed he would have to csannvs.
and wo'k 0u' hls Jlb Of sir hours day
Mr. Van b said be had q deposition Of Nr sssA.
The Judse ,sd Mr. snish Is not very ts6nts name.
MIR V an b. SAID, Samuel S. Smith
M ARA and Ma; ss' sas. n ar "a
Mn = and Ianie.oa IN cneiSnst csns to @ .soss
as r The e sS s % a ,' - ~ss 'ss .ss Ss
+. than with suy one else Mr. aud MIS- y, MI s.e
myself had engagement TO visit Phreselcslst: Nj.
nv to
home; Mr. y. 90, IA before me "a seiss back .
WAS not With u.s. suns and SU as We we're soas Gu. NJ
inquired Tor him am uader the impIessoa no hn
ssS Dir md Ms .dyocs ed it. and we were al csss
Iroyeh, en- sOng 70 She fh,enaos's.s ,hesse. l az
sse evening" S had saSSa Sir yss ssi Ne
tut recently did NO, observe any such conduct .! M
phrsnoosms; think came TO ne H,,sl sfser Nc sst
Ma hal previously gone wi'h Mr. ,. TO a. sr.'sts
and Ne r.tuned had be teen At Aoms Tue stuns wssh
have lasted sr hour think he accompanied Mr. sad M
r. 20 tie when they departed ther we're goso tsfcs
weeks aud rs,uod this before going TO the pere-
Sir Van then offered dence the Csnsusla' ist-
ter. MIR. orc. objected. The Coait would hear hss-
nent.
by that this letter sent by MrJanesorte nre
Fone' AID he had several me nths IN pcssess,oa sse
to another parry after has been sasSa tnetss
have been issssc The e,%Sr, MS on.
grug TO her drawer started back sud said he has set ne
I'nissn Hsss ,ss ~ ssa.ncs s.s .is~s
that Nj Jameson and Mrs orest were IN the eom N-
sehsr at Cincinnati. aud he aiter~srd oAtes ssse
MIR orc objected to the letter being read. Suppose
that parry placed the stand and absent-supsese
the Of degraded character suppose him pco asdtA
ether rich who wiling "a give half his fortune 70 get ia
of his wie-supposs Efforts to get him nssx-
cssd AID TO induce that party asress
euses and says she cannot compel HIM what ieasans
situation husband Is n who accuses bis wife w,0
o,t IN MIR Iam anUly
black white and that came IN her wy,o De so.s "
% hat and % at " one ,oseS.r
room in Cincinnati, and the testimony (which We eeeu
has got that Jameson leter alss said that he called
twice Mr. Forrest MIGHT set Mt Jsmssca "
letter evidence must rt be shown that thai ldsnao
letter was in Mrs forre,ts possession Inc sstuensh
%~sy Row he has GOT no one 70 prov. hs csr-,her
spark Of evidence showing his Is the letter THIS
Mrs. Fouest alluded to. and then We VIII be rsaav '"
sir Van Buren, said there was any obscca bssSe
overassn Jameson has aek having ss,,ss ..
and has been said that he wss intoxicated a. no un..
way aud i has been said and again tina, Mrs $50
60 far trial. and furh'r !, is pretended thn Isasv
atck T. her, when Il has been beeSs tee Cvut
months. This proceeding is not By Dir against NJ
but The and he s, s.5 .sn.s 70 q. @
keeppg Mr. away and also that Mr. had oneroe ~
soy s.s 8 s. sss i. G1s e & .os
Mr. r@' &c further conesSSa that there e nothing e
show That ih particular letter had ever been IN posses
sion Of MIS- y Suppose " she had sckno ~lsdge1
that she had had letter from Mr. aud hat Mr. he'd
got b. that 20 the proceedings at the Astor House
neatly elapsed Dlr might N the mesntlms have
got al other letter ftem Mr. Besides which. the sams
a. MIS- 4. N Mr. 10 net init
The Court sad the paper without date OF dirscscs
The question TO- whether the letter Il 10 oas. osa -
read All that is known absut letter 10 that qaure1
overheard between Nr. aud Mrs y. but What fw =
unknown. Next morning Mrs. Y. came TO drawer a.
made exclamation that He has got all my ettsv s.6
foolish Of Jamieson's. that did not ~ant hin -
see That h I'LL We have Mont have this isttss bs-
ore the Commits at tho Asor House, ties dsd - be-
ns jam es0n's Land.
There pfoof when written, sddres,edt v
Mrs Forrest, eyer her possession. IL 10 not soun1
In law or logic that shall say thus 10 the letter. n
must he proved. Any could write such letter 70
the only thing woudb DO whether she kept -
perm ~ hun her As TO this letter hsd supposed
Il 10 he ressed 10 Mrs that would have bsea Apsg-
lant, a. would have shown she had such Letter 10
would be eTlOus 60 man woman to admit such sss-
A. the stands. therefore. exclude &c
A. the thero slight demonssr ssssa
OF at plauso. which wss suppressed -.
lofcDoen