New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-06-03

r,btc hut herspeech was characteristic OF her PEN
and was received with roarS OF applause.
Nr ROBINSON said hat the sum OF what is oe-
r,arffd BIZ this reform IS The doouton OF IA laws
making distinctions between the sexes IL does nov
follow that such legal changes Would oe loo"t4 -
total revolution In the spheres. duties, ana puIsAle
0ftte.o,eS but each would ,hen be free 20 act ac-
,1rIlro 10 his or her nature THIS reform would hol
eyreI woman from the kitchen " the nursery X
would merely leave every one peTleci-l L1o 'o 'o'
low such pursuits as NAV be congeAi;l,
arr R.RvrR thought there should be a ptritct
al.ty between the sexes and eSpcc-aliY >Ho,
iii gcsrctlsm OF the husband De oaAlshtI rom we
domestic circle. John Wesley laq--' '.1s 'o WI
shou1l In all respects obey her husband lie was ell
r,.ted in tins belief and having married a VIE ne
applied the rrle 20 her but, the more ne eXeTieI Ms
ailihCrltv the worse she grew. she was capaole oi
making herself her neisnoors ana A,I -.aI 1'S''-
most vrefched. And size dd not iali 20 40 So. 20
long us .rul ed the >Crlvtural rule Us unlCrsiool
H. But at length abagdoned tina: iyrannc al coc-
triue and admitted my vile 20 perfect lAuepeb!-
ence all our dlsdgreemeuis and ol>coriS ceased,
and our domestic relations became HARMONIOUS ana
agreeable" He would not have u inferred that tAey
did not previously ENJOY much happiness iose,hef B.
but. lille all things were generally pleasant thefe
was occasionally = period o. great clscord. arising
ont of his ignorance OF wOman's rights and Sincc
ms enlightenment they were totally exempt from
dlscord.
tced the Scrptural argument, saying that she was
NOT in the leas troubled with TINS difficulty. We are
commanded IA the Scriptures 20 learn of our aus
hands IL home Now. when woman OF hlgn quail
hes great mtCll ECnce, extensive learning. ana pure
morality. chances 20 have q vie. diSSlpaed wretch
FOR a husband how much can she learn of nm AZ
home1 II our enemies demand an explanation OF
Scripture from MS. would reply by asking them 20
explain the difficulty have noticed she would
be glad 10 agree with Mrs. SwlSshelm IN me use
Of severe terms but when the conduct OF man
IS absolutely tyranlcal. why may he not De
termed a tyrant She referred with great eject
10 The Hungarian heroineS who applied 10 De admitted
into the Army 10 fight for the freedom of their coun-
try They were told that 1t was improper that they
would De insulted and grossly abused by the rude
soldiers But they persisted IN their application
were admitted. followed the Army IN rs marches,
fought m the battles, and participated n the pleasures
Of many frumphs for freedom. What was the teStl-
monv of these hcrOme>' IL was that they were
treated with the utmost respect by the rudest OF the
noble soldiers Mrs COe would not say that woman
woud ever be disposed 10 shoulder the musket. but
she cited this example 10 show that the objection ire
oueutlv made against womans voting, that she would
be insilted al the polls. Is without foundation
Nr. Goes speech was the first eItempOre one she
ever made ard II worthy an orator of established
fame.
THIS Convention Is composed OF true women, many
of whom are superior m talent, and all IN moral eX-
cclence II they are specimens OF masculine Wo-
men who unSeH themselves the Lord grant that their
tribe may increase IN tins land.