The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1851-05-04
SUNDAY MORNING, MAY 4, 1851.

be- we're there together but not all their meetings were
not private door between them and Witness
open; knew from Warner only who esabshed the Police
Garetfe; Warner was on friendly terms with wilkes;
Tho employed by him about the eounteretinS
u Dr. Mohat's pills. never heard conversation between
those persons about surrounding Drury with evidence
believed that Thompson in the plan 70 convict
Drnry witness was at the office TIL seven or eight
night and had seen entries in the books Objected to-
Mr. Whiting claimed the rule to be whore they showed
aconnccton in conspiracy they might give the acts
admissions OF sny And they might now a though il
affirmative charge OF conspiracy-and directed
the witness to state them accordingly
Witness could only refer to conversation With Warner
Mr. Clark proposed show that Warner had told the
witness that II Drury could be arrested on counterfeit.
Ing charge, that Wilkes would .oon write him down.
Mr. Clark would ask why they excluded thi. examna-
ton' lie called upon Mr. wsrin- 10 admit IT, for tho
fake Of elictng the whole truth the Attorney Gene
raj Of the State would do II he personally present
and tat wac why hsy required public officer OF chnr
after here to cond"ct this prosecution.
MIR. Waring perfectly indifferent in the matter,
except ~ far he duty impcl,I him; and he did not
i.i justified In admitting any inc ympeteu testimony
The conncxion between Smith. AMI Warner vt that
tine was for the discovery OF the who sent the in
formal machine" as they called IL thorr = reward
ohrrd h. believed by the state did remember who
hain. the Particular language Of tho ayertisoment
did not remember u largo quantity Of handlis being
printed ard in Mr Warmers Office secrc,ei and never
exposed to the public Wilkes client of
Narness could not say Warner had been partner with
Wilkes in the Potce Ga-tte Of his knowledge.
was Jshr, before he (wtDess) knew Wilkes did not
know Thompsons handS riting-had only him at
and once an o. L. from him, but could prove hs
writing. f1he anonymous letter TO Ashley was shown to
witness and the head of the barrel Witness would
other ~ 'A'
Georve W. symonds was then calei-He was .hip
canlAef; Lived IN New York. remembered the evening Of
the nth February; had followed Thompson and Farm
ham along with .ate-; saw them (farnham and Thomp
SOM come out of the alley and go up the differ
ent sides Thompson had a cap on; afterwards saw "A
man he believed TO be- him around .hs block ami
down stanton street, with hat on. ne (wi;ncss) had
w n.-. nrrDa .tai
Gates statement as TO the moycments OF Thompson and
iainhnm on The occasion. IL was between seven ani
light ocloch-ncarer eight
Thomas A. Bostwick and Waiter Hudson gave similar
testimony.
Mr Sydney Stuart was recalled. The dies produced
were tae only ones he heard Of did not
know whether they for half douJoons; had never
examined them: there advertisement for uers
q properly tahen from Mr. Drurys house, and several
ffs5xs tsna from all parts OF the country nothing
ever Claimed not single article the al, cti-ement
was N two, three or four papershe Herald coaler and
Iiae: could not say who instrumental in putting
that advertisement in the papers he might have asked
the reporter TO notice it, did not know whether refer
,nee aas made to sith attended the examination Of
Mr. Drury. and took notes for the prosecutions
heard Dir Drury say that the bls good suppo-es
that he did IL wocd have attracted his attention. the
robbery was spoken Of several times but had rccol-
lection ~ any particular conversation Smith the
day amer The arrest, and he then applied him for
search warrant the things already seized had not then
been delivered TO witness thought he said something
oi having got some things. and he wantci
more; witness told him the magistrates warrant
Judg. Eimond,, who was then sitting In the supreme
Court. The circumstances of the arrest gone into
on tc trial Of the torpedo IL subject of
quiry could not "a, What the mode described was. nor
whether ht there lin court during the whole exani-
nation hrrr we're no letters or papers among lhe pro-
ify de- tcrcd 10 witness Jenkins never gave him any
thing taken from young Diury when he WAS arrested
was quite .,;re a. ts that
Cross tXsmlnaticn-It Y,ry usual thing TO sl-
vr'iisv To- owners oi prop~iy might possibly have
s,'n ine by the magistrate, Or somrsims Sitne>, ii it
Mr.. Cluk cscred 10 sho~ notice IN the Police
Cassitsas they lad sho'Fn the connection between likes
and smith. (Admittedl. MIR. Clark then read IT,
NSrt,seso, S ,hiqE 70 mai. soasiss' .soss the
qrns y A. n G. smith. a. III, ronbs eth Nov. isse"
hr, Nhltns--sIr stuar. hsi ststcd II was usual
the-, was n2.hng u,ual in this y unparalleled
eass tia. ~ nsn being charged with coun crfriting and
having - house ri1'i III. would ask witness whether
suc. case vas tT.r AnoYn before (ohjceted TO and
ruI q Out)
seaman Jthnson wa Al the :r.er Market station
house eien ,.syfab stated 70 officer Clark that ne had
warrsut l- I'm. sims gsios' Farnhsu hut thu Dis
iEc, Attorney II brooklyn advised him not 10 arrest
him, for hc sas one q Thompson. principal witnesses
ags MT pTlny, No pre-en but officer Clark ami
tie wtne-s lil no; 1neino,r that h. mentioned the
D!sts.et Attognp! name.
n. Edmoni- he keeper Il he city prison d'roscd
that hv n'smberad NJ Drury being brought 10 ths
pri,cn in NOyrmber, iSi5 witness there when
h. wns placed IN IA, iemse -de wss there when his
family DpTaCd ~ zee him; there shon coupsc APP
Piled 20 sec him. Dill not thlnk he "a. youn. Drury
brought ou' for Identification His mode Of identifying
60 pee tie pr.uf ar among number of others and
bring thY who Is TO identf, him forward without
tho slghttst rirr 90 persons or character This ~as
eth' a!.t don" Ia The corridor once dome In da
u<ni. He d. lt authorize spith 10 take him out The
maetrtsatc sent for him in the usual way for rxsnn-
ten." Thcsc orders ara always in the form rhl-
Wa uisl and saii nothing about idcntic alton
Mr. = ydney stuart recaie,-Rs member Drury being
brought out iUr examination young Drury was brought
~ !" VI" hack 70 IN 81 the police occ; had heard \
NJ q. smith brought him up
Cr.st NnnnCd 1t W.. usual for The officer Who made
TIC airss 20 have tho charge q the prisoner throughout
Ie-eaHniinttion--No t1Aminati0n wrs hat Thcrp
but ihp tufEn order.