Southern standard. [volume] (Columbus, Miss.) 1851-1856, 1851-10-04

with demanded
% south lhdl n nga G that the Wm moH was
charge
a f dsI h So of South R s9 p gratifying the ana
This important question first arose before stated during the session
bills framed for those territories
the on the part Of South that the restriction d the Mexican laws
should be removed and protection and security afforded peculiar
the South GLOWING
"Tha without providing by law the admission ofslavey
sos the tie % 81 % sH em 3 a &
men framed condition
and property conformity eon a28)
The committee a9p@nts ed which reported bills
omaaf property and leaving the Taeaa z Sb
These bills baduPo Mr. cLT Raoa Of copr9 from
substantially the and which EN FooTE yield
With the ' OF aS b b @ removed F DF P
the following amendment ote bills based the general declaration contain
co cs with its demands
date o1 the q Ussa sd 'i s s 5s 5 s
species Of y legally Union and
This amendment too observed did provide special benefit
of re property alone but was general act rPeang any MEXICAN
ges5s Of property. legally held in United States
wiot the South rallied with energy
TfTsse form Of Mex
as Whether they et os 1o left Here ss that me F Fo
T6e Southern were aroused this threatened deecton the at
e s0s Foorr declared had eonyD at thai be Mo @ as
ready aboed appealed to him not to abandon them Mn FFy to whom
hs Foor also referred having Convinced hof the Mexican
him in the following language. CAP. llI7)
tain that Inc laws Mzo this gbe not in foP here nb a
should adopted which commend the rejection the other from
UPON h question the Validity 4 e % w He se d4 n
e Vs nS rG o5 pa 3 s nut n On | haSe
speeies of property are 3 @ this s3f psn5
laws were existing and in force from the hangs the subject and
tories subject themselves litigation BY which they might be
operates eacuy against the rights OF holding this species proper
amendment Senator Nj is in fact mere decla
enabling persons holding species properly exercise
slhough the Senator from Mr. @ FooTrJ agree pe s
P amendment i the and P bm to 5 Sst o @ nf laws f PPo5h
ed not by the existence or force of the Mexican laws but by the d
This solemn appeal passed by him. the dle which needed
HE had n subject repeal Of Mexican
warning oraeI he opening
c ~ on Ri iI 1sP 3Ss1S SbsP hound
doubted myself whatever capa-
6 Ghsvng in New MeTfo Utah you'd found @ the
Msa ~ null and vod Ge Ap s5) the law" Of
e Ass9 these s ss 5 the c g. t5 S United States was
APs s 1g % a s a G e. eyo
Compromise distinctly declared
MIR FoorE referred the of the m CA1Houx)
that the Of new territory acquired BY into the Union
9 this his heart sssentd but his Judgment could not yet HEWs
would be
We the hopeless question: placed
b y M t6 h answer ms own And this
has the uaness read the people clear and crushing
but STOOL, could therein"
But Inthe debate proposed
California decided to
decided under the Adjustment Mr. FoTE
that doubt existed risk property to country
He said, (Con. g. 1S478,
There
who
could hold
SO that they could not interfere with the subject
IN sRf s2 SsI"' as s' as that % eGf ' ss in the territories
contend that slavery
against appea! And suppose MAJ
he will be
of
When this, other things regard his
romh
toun
Clayton BILL extending
the
Mr.
appealed
basis of the Clayton bAp l4o) Mr. FooTE.
had miserable
sinking had his
silent the tomb Driven from position which could afford shadow
shade his determined
himself under the frivolous plea tatin slor estimation, mne
useless" He says,-lAp p. 147I8)
induced excited local that which
and iAusory."