Columbus Democrat. [volume] (Columbus, Miss.) 18??-18??, 1851-09-06

f i'aa..y cod h'-sieTa 'a'1ileu
.glri' 'h- institutions NJ 'h- saub With al +
Peee'railesii LA ua..i fss rosiios Or To
Union parig j. iobolt.he Nonh 30 be r7a4,.f.
''a2 a- Y 81 a'a 20 feeaire haiihs Federal Cos
e'HH-ai fai' elr0'i' ~ f.sssr nas araulr5 3
liaf 'n.'iaaesi This sera'p'iga a,iiis. l..
s1fie'epi Pra.,rfiou b ~ institution n slarsr
irorl De aggres.isaasi can-sess; beeaase h
eonii'u'io7 coniers urdr c,rcress sa pn,ssr o
lerisio'e urau he sn5ise,. either flr The altoea
iiau erestabiishmsn, u .iarrry "a he SIDE, 3
fsrraey.ys.
The weakness II tbc Po.iliaa af lljlmar,
Clayton ann Davis i apparent; fir, By contend
ing f9f al arlsa5meai IF he constitution or h.
Pfo'sesian q tie fights Of .ars iaiefesi. ihey
sa'nii ihai The eoaaaaioaas Il Is. is cot sptFeien,
FIR tias purpose. 1,isnoaaswer or them 70 -,
that The North having The mi ,ri,y viii notable
BY the present constitution; because if that be
tue, do They not cat ihe most ridiculous figure
IN calling upon The same uascrgpSloas majorlfg
70 amend The constitution 10 make il more favor,
able to The South II the Moth viii violate the
constitution now to Interfere With slavery. viii
his same North have lhe rlasaaaimiiy 10 alter
tie constitution 10 favor siaseryl TIE idea Il
absurd Its too pfeposlerous to be ssbsnated
e i@'e Aiiud q IN intelligent mani
l. !. esidan; that the proper course for III
Ssate Rights mes islo s,aad by the Constitution al
j le; and deny to Congress the right to Interfere
wils slavery either in he States, the territories
d The Y 3. or The District Of c luntia.G &. Il call
upon ihe State Rights arly ihroeshoat Ire whole
country to rally 10 The mainlainance Or these
Bui 10 bandon ibis ground and loak
g ihe NORTH tor additional amendments i ds.l
sefffoi d Slife rigls, and yielding the ronstitu
luton q The laliindariaos a The colniry. lis
principle Of sabwssSioa 10 federalism, to which
we will never consent; nor 10 VIC believe TINT
lhe Union Parfy Of Mississippi will 80 fir d..
IFahc isset either q ask the amendment, Or suJ.
~ 70 lhe infections n cur rights as guaranteed
lNthe present Constitution
he souih can 'iaitelu2on ,lie platform IF Tie
0alon party; and 10 the support Of this piatfs.ia,
IS doctrine Of STATE rights, us understood. not
'yQalltnanao and Davis, but by Jefferson and Mad.
sor, mist b. relied upon.
NV y The time S,r The Soaih Is present ii \
lle North these doctrines as al nittmalum -
ne Drmoeratic STATE rights party hus been re>
Undated hy tbs people a. unsound-as hypo.
r'iieal prolessloaot State Rights lofeludp tapIn
Mo tae support q federalism, Nav ri Il IL
by thc convention ID November that
g rely mon the constitution RI il IL, aid that
n syill submto 10 violations Of that constitution
Hscllig the risat' u The Smth upon The snljec,
! slaseFY Lat Inc Doctrine &c STATE rights n
y ppfliN, be asserted aNd ail lrne men Ia ihc
,ofei, "h7 value the stability Of Inc linioa be
afn|Sed tafa'ls n iis support. With he s3uth
sissa, aud cafsect principles relied upon. our Y,
opss are iiif lae best but ii aniied, and we are
tsappgiacdin arIesi.ng Tie inroadsof federalism
Nd abolition, we with At least be prcpa,ed lor
elrllcc aud lADErESDENcE.