The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1851-05-03

there letters would b. required TO mark the various sizes
the trade; he believed a full alphabet
Q.-Are these cold chi~sLs
one Of the Jurors eorrsss-d Nj Clark What are
they IAN amendment Mr. Clark, amidst visibility
adopted
bars with; wtness had hms. iuse sush ses OF tools
all except the letters h. did not them now-they
were only for the brass and German silver trade he
he had worked FOR him al dAerens tm@s OF and on ala
not when at the mill use these tooA; that not in
his IL partment.
Gross Ssmined-IIaA known Mr.. Drury for ID or II
years witness when he first knew him with his un
Gle in the trade he followed now-a refner and
pneter had all the ngure- bat not the letters
the marking merely dsne with the punch and a
hammer; was employed by Mr. Drnry about four years
ago retner and sneker the business carried
al bis place the assayng done in the office and the
sweep melting in the hop opposite the office; did not
know one-Eyed Thompson; had never seen him to Lis
knowledge.
Ills Honor, Judge Edmonds was then caled-IIe was
Judge Of the Supreme Court In New York. remembered
the time Of Tbompsou. arrest the torpedo charge was
about that time bat cant exact time applied to BY
officer NJ. O. Smith for search warrant; the ground
which h applied TO him that the warrant OF the
police magistrate would not extend to the county OF
queens would be sae trust the magistrates
that county with the knowledge OF the proceeding
BE wanted it from the supreme Court which would ex-
tend aware that Smith had, the day previous
mace seizure there. and taken great deal Of property
away! dc hot suppose h. would Aave issued the warrant
~ had known that fact rceoected he surprised
whtn III heard that the eizur, had been made the day
btre aud found fault 9TH what had been done; for in
the search warrant had no. been returned TO him.
The return made had been made to the p5ce officer and
not 60 him, he (ludge Edmouds had told Mr. Smith TO
Keep the things and return the warrant 10 him; he
Was the presiding Judge the torpedo trial;
md also. whcn an application lad been made by
hr prury TO he trili on this counterfctug
charge; presided in that court throughout the year
be- n mtInlend the examination of Of the officers
eho ARRESTED Drury the question relating to this charge
Fl, m the theory # the defence being that
pirBcy had been entered into to charge prury and at
tho came time TO put counterfeit money upon him. and
that the ground upon which lie admitted the testi
mory-that officer jenkins had stated then that he
caught him by his single hand H. said be-
eau ~ the impression that II made in his mind; the
idea conve. ed to his mind that it all done
Lulpose by that nular mode or arr. It. catching man
not take full notes, he had done for years
except in capital case where he has to report to the
toyeiLor.
trost- examined Made objection to The property
naming with the roIerty Clerk Of the Police thought
that the best place.
Ec-examined Had some recollection of an applica
tion being made 20 him TO obige them to deliver in
ventory Of the thing they had taken away, and his
making an order that Somc papers be returned to Mr..
Druy: motion me- de 10 quash the Indictment; Mr.
NsEaeryoor the Clerk ct the oyer and rermnsr had the
original papers filed.
The Court here took recess for ten minutes
Mr.. Charles A. Rarcyea caed-Wss a coun ,ellor at
aw-under partner OF MIR Horace f. Clark recollected
the preliminary examine lions Of Mr. Drury the tor
pedo and the counterfetng charges against Mr. Drury
before Mr Justice Lothrop attended and took counsels
notes those produced were them thought he present
at every meeting in which action hal and took
the notes, Mr. Clark took notes himself. relied
witness to do generally accompanied Mr. Clark there
and they remained pset her heard Mr. Drury Ray
hing about the character Of the bills except that
h did not know thing about them II he had said
any thing it ould certainly have attracted his attention
knew Mr. Iexow present ut some, If not all the
meetings reporter for the Police Gazette; witness
car tu in taking his notes did not remember the
sion Of any little adjournment between the
examination the two charge, but found by his notes
that began directly after tile other ended
Mr. Glars ,as then called and saddle appeared re-
lrotaniy a. witness but did 20 a. his associate insist
ID On II.
Eaamintd by Mr. Whiting He wa. counsel for
Mr. Drury ha been fl, the day subsequent & his
srr.st; had been employed the 10th OF November,
1919. which was the Saturday; he had continued
r. In that time "a one Of the counsel in the torpedo
ehsi e until it terminated and upon this till the pre-
sent hour, he attended The whole IT the examinations
Lefoc the magistrate. with Eapelyea; NJ. LcSow
mistaken in suppo,ing Mr.. Drury said those bills were
good; witness remembered the conversation referred TO-
the circumstances Of Mr. prury mentioning another
matter namely that he charged with the robbery
would lot pretcnto say the precise time or who was
there exactly but his impression that Mr. Rapelyea
va there and also Mr. toodman after the robbery 81
the District Attorney Office, Ar brury mad remark
IN substance like thisthe precise words he could not
give for he made no ueuornduualiuiips to the loss
the four potas. he expressed concerpulant about
the loss. sasirg. they might b" good they
may have been good inttmatin- that he hsi not
that ncinent lie followed it ZAP by another. ~
charged with having stolen them. or having robbed the
District Attorney cnee Witness understood all these
matters to he addressed to hin Mr.. pruy did MT
speak to any Else bu, q hin or his associate; vii
said WHO charges you " AMI understood biin TO
Mr. Lcxow charge sou " III imprc. lion, however,
IL wa AZ he fret stated don't think L. made any
nent on the subject e ali twas between the Two exa-
limitations
Did Nr DruTy At any time ~ TIM; those biz.
were good
Oh, ct,d To- aud altered
DIN all yDur intercourse with Mr Drry. from the
DAY a your employment down 10 the present has
MIR DTury admitted. ia any way, that h. had ever
ihosf four bills alleged 20 have Teen found IN his
posse.sion. OF knew whether they werc good or Mt
otj'ct,d to AMI ruled out - a communication BE-
tween counsel and client
Mr. hitlng-Wheu YOU make these communication
evidence against ~ put tn. question purpose
that might have ;hc teacdt Il ny exception i.Xcep-
Memorandum signed ~ ur sydney stuart be-
spoken 81 in bis evideI here handed - witnc-
N, kr,w the paper; thc memorandum 10 he hand
writing il dated the 2lst January 1850, IND bad
Leu made whsle the circumstance WIS fn-h ~ lis
muy Mr stuart aud hc had s"ttlcd Tho form % ihc
rciAndum - that there might b. DO d.pute about
Il h, lwitLe) bad perfect recollection Of The fact. In
go mort - The me iuorandrm ~ coHyoraiionw with
VT smith ~ the prt-ence 4 Ar stuart; ~ PIT.
ClaILl had charged smith with snosing th1t
itut money bad t.en put into SIR. Drliry's htnd
That introduced ttt saicct aui L" lTithess) bal tod
sni u that ury had told him that Ac Druryl hst toll
miih board the beat III the frrry hou.e, that
M pUu had given bIn those tils Just bgt'sc his NJ
F-t smith conceded tLat Ii va. - AMI the cotvcr.a-
ti went about other mattcrs the ui u their
going The Cat rriue f,uy AID other things On r..
aiming - ilis su'jcet smith faid, vi. taAe that
bach I v clL sir said witne--. ~ vii make memo
T9ueum q i was Ut cir t. state TINT shes smith
t.e IL lack be said II Drury told me at all u vas ~
tA dice icc ala not At the ferry whom lac - -att
~ LnBk form that they ne ~ thh Police Court
aua vItie this 5aorandum upon u; had never seen
th tin smith had produced. until this TRIAL never
l#e.4tf n -itil trial On the torpedo caarsa when
II sad hr had found count rfeit money 81
is u. house @ MI produced The cuunterfeitirs
-e thought i wa. Ga the fret trial ~ ~ torpedo
II D, C,urt--Couli ri y mistaken abyut that III
MT pr lurrd 81 tho runtrd ttin- charg"
not made he .ulstrt II u charge the hfst tor-
RI. 8 tisl l. aar n lai,uarv sud cAdsd in Fgbrutry
.-m il Concluded On th~ - r. believed . 49, L. -