New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-12-18

The one - whoa he Is wTiisng-gi MI spcak Of the
hvuoirt IN the open grove--it will say IL DO net
Court you. aud you have asSu ec me tia yOn 30 nos
cCUot my love IL speaks only the fes n.s Of the
writer outthe declarations Of the one TO whon /. Is
ecc'essed II speaks OF the pride Bliss, lore, A.
arc ssysss to other matters how inSisnf cant they
are as 10 matters that preceded them. and closing
~ tn some Ines how happy they Will he IA cash
others arms. snd closing Win Ass
This found IN Mrs E's possession c rht OF
nIe months after It Sss written Yoa nav s,ys
SuioOUs woman might have had such letter
thrust UPON her, oai would she have preserved
Il Wouic she not rather have Sh0 an 1. 20
hcr huSosnc--oetwetn whom ana hcrNi tao
nsoss unslo, I'd happiness apparently existed that
TIA S-thls letter. pTeserssd N connec tioa with let
tiers fIom Ms Z : own sister, aac ha2,iy fSa4i n
Ms F'S drawer. That Genes from the irisios
r0onl-fion the b0adolr Of Mrs 4, AID there can
Ne mistske about it. The letter vii be presented
N elidcn 9 aItu you can snc explanation Ne can
ro; frl SIX months S';cr ;hS reception 81 this los
ter. Jameson came "a this City and MAS Shlt Up for
mere than IA hour With Mrs r N Nr. 'sh0use, and
eier wss Sc. ey HIM directed 70 the care Of
Nfs NoCfh'es. Mrs F's sister. When Mr.. found
tho 'ci;cr alluded 20 he feli that his appioess
gone 'sueysr Without convection II her eptirs
gullt the feelings OF Mr.. T. toward her would nos
have admitted OF separation lie wished - do
without exposing htr. and IA snsser 10 her ur-
sen, eTtrestres 10 that effect he rems'aet In
Tee house with her from January . May. the tins
o. breaking Up kouSGkeepiug she wished a keep
sake and he save her the copy OF ShaSSpsfe, 5,t
lot ~r'teO N y from her loving husband, rs usual
sue NieDtN ncflfdis Nultu gave tcI-- totG
her to take any hing she pleased aud at her TO
Guest, with view ID appearance, accompanied her
to Mrs Gowns finding himself ruined man ne
gave up his hopes snd plans here and wen, 10 reice
IN Philadelphia, his native city lie never dreamed
OF exposing her. and Il MAS not tu Decem0eI hsIhe
ascefiaIe that Their separation had been attributed
70 causes implie.,irg him, and ne returned 20
and Tie facts regard IL that Will be shown IN evi-
cence. She Gehied that she had stated the Of
difficulty, but IN week afterwsrd she wrote % Inn
rk.tr k.
did not wish to expose her, although she HAD ruaed
HIM aud bad done that which wearing out hlslife
From The reports abroad I was necessary 20 take
Scmt action, ana he applied 90 The State OF Pennsyt
wanna for a divorce. stating nothing, that could he
avoided. 10 lmpiicate her The testimony was
taken here. AS tie Astor House and notice given 70
Ms r 20 attend With her witnesses. The divorce
passed The Lover House, but WAS stopped 10 NE
Soi ate, ou the gmuDd that n matter for the
Iouis. lie then filed a bil. by the advice OF has
counsel ard, on coming here. VAS met oy three or
tour suits on the part OF Ms Forrest, aud required
IA give bond IA $l0tCo Ia prevent hm leaving the
State, not 20 put his property out % MS haBts-a
man who never sold dollars worth OF property ia
ms life and other matters. The testimony ia the
case before the Legislature OF Pennsylvania dis
cicsed facts AZ when Mr. r. was surpused OF Goa
duct N The absence o. Mr.. 2, that men OF iissle or
10 'aintancs with HIM ~ere IN the habit OF va
ting us house and converting II INTO a scene OF DTS
Slptuor Nc.-a co'erie, az the head OF which was
Nh D. Willis and his wife SO far Forgot herself
to Coyot this Kind Of life Ia the simplicity OF her
k'pl three dsyS and nights at his house tnat MRS.
VOORHEES,, who, Ike Ann Flower, had been charged
OF hayi0 child before she married and whose
company Mr. r. did not wish her 20 keep, had been
continually there Capt Calcrat was seen. late at
night wllh a dCCa,cr, &c, with these two ladies.
Mr. Van b.. after other remarks said he had person
ally examined the Witnesses, and dii not come, as
the other sice cid with mere assertions. Mr.. Van
y. sa'd. IN regard TO servants, the remarks IN as
10 heirtostimony were improper they being present
Mr. Van b. then stated what he expected TO prove
actual improperly on the part OF AIRS. b.
As to Ann Flower. the counsel said he did not DO
heye word Of what had been said against her she
had been debauched IN that house by Capl ". She
never had any complaint against her conduct as q
servant by Mrs 4. As 20 the sailor spoken OF, he
COM eCted with one OF the bcst families la Philadet
phia. Capt Howard and Mr. Jameson. who knew
nine months ago, that testimony IN regard 10 thems
would be gwen. If II IS omitted 20 call them, II Will
be foy the jury TO say how wise It WAS 10 cOunseito
inpugn Their witnesses, when they dont bring thoir
own Witnesses 10 TESTIFY
The counsel made other remarks, and said severM
witnesses. not all OF whom are servants, will 10
called.
The Count then adjourned TO this forenoon, the
Judge saying the first thing IN the morning vii DO 70
consider the question as To testimony relating 10 ad-
missions OF MT L.