The New York herald., 1851-10-30
Law Intelligence.

CoURT OF APPEALS, syRAcusE-Ocr. 2l.-No Ill
respondents, submitted upon printed arguments and
points. No. e3-Gray, appellant, against Davis, re.
spoDdent. Submitted upon printed arguments and
points No 1a3Davis and another respondents against
Carr, administrator, Sc, appellants. Submitted upon
printed arguments No 199-The People defendants IN
error against Powers, plaintiff In error Argued No
Lyle, executor &c, appellant, against Murray respen-
dent (not in the calendar) Motion to dismiss the ap-
peal granted, with costs by defendants No 42-King,
respondent against the Merchants Exchange Co. appel
laLts Motion by appellants to open the default taken
against them a. this time Denied, unless appellants
appear before the court the morning Of 23d
inst ready to argue the cause. No. rs "a reserved
Corning and another respondents against smith,
impd &c, appellant Argued
Ger s-After argument Of 100 court called and passed
irom llo TO 120 inclusive except No. 1l6, which
was submitted upon printed srgums ns and points The
court then inquired whether any cause the calendar
vas ready for argument, and there being none 1t ad-
jturned until to morrow morning to hear the argument
Of No AZ which had been set down for that time
Nos. 81 92 "a, called and passed. No 95-Coemsn and
another administrators sc appellants against ade and
called and passed No. ica-Wsrner and others, re-,
spondents, against Lee, Pres't sc, appellants judg
mtnt affirmed by default No. 104-Called and passed.
No. lo5As and others against Patterson, appellants
argued. Nos le7 and 10S-Called and passed. No 1C9
Thompson Treasurer &c, appellants against scher-
msrhorn, respondent, argued.
Der. 23-No AZ, James g. King, respondent, against
the Merchants Exchange Co., appellants. Court ad-
journed die. The decisions made this term will
be publit he'd hereafter.
DECISIONS
0cr. .25-Judgment Of affirmation with costs of the ap-
peal to repordeIt-Dennis Mccarthy against Charles
Marsh and otbers; Franklin Poor against Robert Gull
ford James Monroe and others against George Douglass
william ". Dyckmsn sgainst the Mayor, &c Of New
York; John benjamin against Nancy Benjamin; Aleta
The Herkimer County Mutual Insurance Company;
yecob p Lyron against Stephen Q. Waterbury; Betsey
Knapp sesinst Samuel Knapp; Corneia Beach Lawrence
W Nathan Brown; John w Hoard agt. I. Garner; Eli
jsh swsrtwout against Lewis Curtis and Others James
Cor against The Mayer SC, Of New York; Annie T.
Butler sgainst Walter Cunningham and Alex FORBES;
IfIrc0r John Heega IN n mi
sgaipst Watson h. Lawrence; Henry ID. Hewitt and
otbers against the Washington Mutual Insurance Com
psny Of Cbcipnat james Lloyd against the Mayor SC
Of New York Samuel Drake and wife Isaac Robinson
Heoise De Chsgary against joseph Jenkins Theodore o.
Ven Wyck and others against William Seymour aud
Others james J. Ring against William T. McCoun; Dun
Hsggart sad another against Edward D. Morgan and
anotber Robert Dunn and another W. Edward ID. Nor
gan ard another Decree Of the Supreme Court affirm
ec-Gideon Tucker and another vs.. Jemma Tucker and
others Judgment Of the Supreme Court reversed and
judgment ordered in favor Of the plaintiff on the special
verdict with costs in the court below-Foxhsu Park
and others executors Of Bcgardus, against Maria
Bosardus Judgment Of Supreme Court moaaed by
loo to s2Ilo o. and the whole Judgment from
s3IT 90 TO f24S7 80 No costs Of appeal al
Kir gtton Mutual Insurance company. Judgment OF
The supreme Court revered and judgment rendered for
the plaintiff the demurrer with costs to the plain
TN Of the appeal from the special term Of the supreme
Court 10 the general tsrm-Jesse Ioyt. Abraham o.
Thompson and others Jud gment Of the Supreme Court
reversed and that of the Mayors Court affirmed with
the cots Of the writ of In the Supreme CourtJo
,iah Lawrence against Nathaniel sanord implesded 40
Judgment Of the Supreme Court general term reversed
with of the appeal from the decision at the special
term and the decieions st the special term Affirmed
james Hoire against Daniel Baker Judgment reversed
90 far regsrc the land described in the appellants
situate between high and low water mark costs
20 abide the event-Charles Howell against samuel b.
Rugges Judgment Of the Supreme Court reversed and
Judgment of the Recorders Court affirmed with costs OF
the appeal from the Recorders Court 10 the Supreme
Court-John NJ Bull vs. Wilder Rice. Appeal dismissed
with costs, but without prejudice 10 q appeal-Chas
o. Petit vs Henry II. King.
Cases Lying Over Moss W. Ayerill; Moss Judson
Jevett vs. Miller Seymour Wyckoff; Brainsrd
Cooper; Wall vs. East River Insurance Co seaman VS.
Low; stnnsbam Dysen; Executors OF Ferrers W.
Pearce and others; State Of Ohio Pel and Others
Wrioht "a Miller