New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-12-17
THE FORREST DIVORCE CASE.
Cntharfne y. Forrest Us Edwin Forrest-Ed-
win Forrest rs Catharine y. Forrest.
SUPERIOR COURI-BgYORE JunCT OAxLRr

SUPERIOR COZ RI-bkfORE JUDGE OAhLFf
Catlariae ". Forrest agt. Eden For
rest, ant the rsrsrs,--Tbs was calei, and the
respective counsel signihed that they we're ready TO
proceed. Messrs. O'Conor and Chase appeared IN
behalf Of Mrs. f.. and MesSrs John Van Buren, and
Robinson for the defense.
special or struck Jury, consisting Of panel Of
sixty, had been summoned the Jury vas called in
OF c OF the rooms Of the Superior Court IN the main
City Hall But "a, hrst calling the lst answered.
ard some Of these were excused, t~o on account OF
b; vlng summoned as Jurors At tie Court and
!, or three from other cause lev Y.h.fs maxns N
attendance paRe Of twelve was called and TOOK shsr
Tse follow ng are ~ name, Of the Jurors snPsnesd
stephen V. bieeks. William Earle Horace Beals Iheo-
de,s D. witt Dane Fda-il, Czrin n Merry pelanaa
p PAGE. nonas b Parris HesH ID Ben ann. John
{ Tnsstpuch, FreoeIes Slsrinser, Josa Cas~eh
The Court laid ~ tie Jury that the case ha, oasa
considerable notone'y ard Il the Jury nas M mprsssi0s
81 opinion N the case the time 20 declare H. -Four
OF The Jurors SAID hoy had read good deal Of the case
WAs fcr gentlemen lndge IN them own mads wnstler
lhsy could AZ the and Impartial yerdiei
atcesslty Of deyoans the tns nsoesssryJ and ~o
ststce that he thought that a. hoogh he had Rad The
testlmOuy retained his The places Of those vino
eft the boz sled b. <se's, and tbs proceedings
thea removed 20 the CIrcui, Court room 49,
Sir Forrest took sea BESIDE his counsel, as did Mrs
aecompaI led b. hsryOunget ,iste " the side OF hes
Mn % COu0r opened the case Hr - IN sSlfon
bruaght by Mis- Forrest - sb,sn divorce from MI y
hT hls della but may properly be called per-
laps proceeding the part Of M 70 gel rid u Mrs.
She voluEta paLty m cCmAS INTO me san. as
her hsbs and always been. ihos. ~ pnya'e LIE
MIR orc then detailed at very consdefabie length me
clrcU ustaLoes which have for the greater part O,en
slresdy publl1atd. Hr b., 1851 went % kES and
and became Introduced 10 the FAM - Dir Jon sci r.
eebTaed a whose family c1ntsfsd Of ns VIC.
CathaFire nov Mrs = ihen seeo ~ Ah"lsl
osuzhisr. younger than Mrs. =, and ,hiN di9 ~
Il but was tEfn a chtd Hf OF salo 81. tac
Mis- Il lived together happily tii 1877, WIen ~
.ouettng WIS ,aid ny Mr. ,, ~hea ms.f esSs. ~'s
nftd word which u 10 n0i necessary 80 " 49,,
va, rot til afrsr that thai any ctaze ~ Hpopi'v
sea-nstAIrk 3 nas maae. Aftef"A sue Ws. "
800 - NJ, parke (sOl~ln. AMI subs 9uea,i 10
tnse .,neya,e from Mr. , II vs. sirS'e tAt NJ -
- fsc',,r,d efrer SID 70 have bee wraI'ehtp VI
bg Mr. Jam son. fsiloF Acior ana ici VI
NJ O'l sad 20 The Jury. the NAV rely up1a u d Is
! !. ,s,fecrIv innocent The second VISIT u Af
80, "a TnslaLd N winch he was Accompanied
- NJ. V.uesf and frsm winch he reformed N lSt
yns al.o referred - b. Bis. OC. he returned: sn
n =, 80 soured and lIsaDD ,mte, Dir , going 10 she
.sl.fufe Il PsAnsy 20 procure oiTofce 70 ~hlch
~. aereed do anything 70 cOniOrm 10 the
,sL,s al Mr. provided ne made No charges AGAIN. hsf
tr Which her lar fsne would De tafntheo-Dai M. -
tboWe ht he mus soneh more than tsnDtr winch
a.. ~oad and opposed her pro eat aru hf
y failed IN has Application, although IN The io~sf pisnsh
- the IerI-larure II passed. Nj. OC. sPoke
II Mr. Pierson and Nv Lawson Is Trends Of
Nr y Through the testimony OF woman ana
Iox seven sddonal DersoEs. besdes MI Jsmfsoa, wee
INDICATED IN improprety, 70 Ms y, but all would 30,
and he do not succeed before TIE LeBs-tufe
la, vas D. supposed by the influence 81 M p. hn
ting the " od Of resdebce IN oennsyvszia 70 oas year.
sfsd o. two IN order to suit fer divorce
lie becaue a. BE states resident fPsaasyvanis and ca
srd suit IN the cmsoa Pleas n Phllsdslpha tor 6vsrce
and Mrs s. west TO the Supss1s C@0r here. ase 90
tened an Issnc'sn restraining him frse processing