Fayetteville observer. [volume] (Fayetteville, Tenn.) 1850-1966, 1851-07-15


give lt our tuu acqulescence, now that
It $ tie law; ard as TIE .y0u37 ais the
best witaess against ITSELF wer VII
progF BY ii tLat acquiea cencs IS tie
one hing needIal. It avs:
q here can Be no difference il
priaqple GA which 10 raise test, SO
long as We all agree 10 4ustaih them
and demand thtir l;ithful exec tion. .
Afl yet its eaitd as4aiils Us be-
-causd We will not "a y Bith hi IA that
the South gained Ill I viii th size
'sas e TITLED, and that the whoie aiiaair
was settled strictly . : Southern
principles.
Ia E Jouad is agai b upon the
stand lie says: ave asked the Oh
seryef whether it gas e If or against
The c pmpromise, and That the Oh
seryef replied, that it " ls upon tie
Demo cratic Trousdale platlolIs. i
No+s reader, .woukl you bellows any
Demo crat would take e. RECEPTIONS to
that Hosition? Ne, you would not;
bat we viii show you man calling
hlensell one who does it is tie ed
tor of tie Lfasoia Jo pratt lie
says q title lahguage Immediately
follows ouranswcr: This Aowplatf3an
OF Which Che Observer b rs taken lis
stand. sc; and further I'D says:
wv propose to show n DIV that Ehe
orectial OF this new standard, the ap-
plfcatidn # tbs new test, IS the ca se
ef all tie co. 'fusi0n that @xists;' &c.
DEM ocrats, Do ,you / ear tha.2 fhe
FguuoE saws .hat he nemocrItic
/
Troasdlle platform is l.. E ,ceusa Of
III the confusion that ex;s IS, Y lat
else emi he mean, when he tells Il 10,
lpon obr telling him that We are b.,
hat Ilatform? Nothing else, on
lords Have lost their meaning. He
$50 says that We do not say thcraIis
my ifitrence between TroRsdIs did
on t. he Compronlise. Nbt
Q. G4npda4 hymns its praise hs
'pphon]ously almost as the JoaruaI
Itself, bile Il asdale condo ms every
eature @f it bat one, and that be,
liuIs Of but little account; and it's
epoal Es I'll reatened. lie Only
'uts M Will it because it is the
aw of the LAM a. He would not kaI ten
oted for it, while all recdllcct- tn 1T
said he would have veto Id
or it. If t here is not a difference
lfre, we conf4Ss it would lie hard TO (
nd one, Tfousaqle is as|IfE ahcdd :
f GappbeH in opposition TO Il L I
Compromise, IS C@mp5eR il ahead @f,'
he Joaf pal, ID L we are Ydrv much /
aislakea, The J9mnd also htt9mpds I
Q prove by tie gFas1Wgaoh Union >
hat thdre is be difference between s
hem. Read what the u pn says. I
nd all IwilJ SIZE that it is nlisrefre- S
cnted al well us. It is sBeAking Of !
aiapJe1's views Of the COMPROMISE: Z
ellis buppott Of the Cclnpromise |
) not more available again sd efforts |
o repeal or 4 bodily it thd al 1roas- t
'de'S ad quiesd cree in il. The only a
iffeRhnc$ is, that the former raises a .
houf for the measure and declares !
is willingness to make it the iastru-
1ent Of tlectiH g Mr.. FHmPre Tresi- !
eat, Will st the latter refuses 10 adopt Y
declaration IN supported BY j as,ice, > III
C. - G
That s Wharf.-The " tajdn says 2
nat. Can5p6H praises ii for the beau i
les he Fl hds id it, and I-oi.sdpIe ac- a
uiesces in il fbr the sake Of peace. i
ome Up again. you Jo'srnq7 mana- c
GU say that you "questi3ncd the Q
'5scrcer 70 knd W if it would unite il
it'll Ch3flS and his adherent is in elc- t
ating this new platform, which re- t
lures every Democrat to reason as d
ley do on this question Or forfeit v
is claim to hea Democrat his claim c
} be tr le friend Of the South, and 7
he answ4r is substantially that it d
i'll. Nov what is the 7Ru III about c
is matter? Why, the ID cl4ration 5