New-York daily tribune., 1851-09-26
LAY vo1r.

Rev. DR. Gregory -. > Rev DR. Bcrrian .-...l
To there was no choice by elihor order
Aher some conversation on the situation Of the
question aGectr.. tie night Of Tie Brooklyn Church
~ two votes, tn iao.e took recess un,i O'Clock
thss evening.
lTbs members Of the Ccl.lnton generally speak
very low anu inOistmcty, thaI hu feN o, the au-
dience can hear This partly occasions crowdng
Of the aslos, and standing mp all over Ae house,
which iutcrfcres greatly with the docorum an poo
pristy OF the proceedings. We would suggest nat
Sho whole some exercise of the lungs ON iho part Of
sneakers would promote better Observance OF that
apostolic Injunction. Let every thing be done de-
eertly and IN order We should presume that any
OF The Delegates were enough accustomed TO pubhc
speaking 10 make themselves oasi!, heard IN any
part Of the church D y
EVENING SESSION
The convention reos>CmblCd Al o'clock, yoStCr-
day evening, pursuant 10 adjournment The Presl-
dent stated after calling the Convention 10 order,
that the question hist order the consideration
of the Report OF the COMMITTEE on The lncorpora-
lion OF thuThCS IN relation 90 givGs vote 10 the
Chapel OF ChTlst Church, Brooklyn, situated al
PushwIck
Amo,on was made by Rev Nr Egenbrodt, tha,
the ChaJol be refused vote, on Tie Ground that
t~o votes were allowed in this case, 10 one church
having chapel, there might be no lnui put 10 such
cases IN future.
Mr. FLOYD Smith expressed himself in favor of the
motion, and spoke strongly against the claim Ia two
votes made by Curis' Church on The ground that
the application OF ST Georges Church toT Two vetos,
which Was made IN 1910 vas refused.
Rev. Mr Eigcnhfodt SAID that the application OF
81. Georges Church MAS before the tonycnilOB
for a year, and that = had finally been refused.
During the last seventy years no application OF TINS
kmd Mas granted by The Convention. The Rev.
gentleman said l. would be unconstitutional. ana
and present a dangerous precedent lie then read
extract from The Journal IN reference 10 =.
Georges Church, wherein IL Nd> resolved tnhi no
church shall have an additional number OF votes for
VhapclS connected with them.
Nr Many msdc amoiOn fo lag the question on the
tsbie, ~h.yh was dooplVd, a> was also a motion DIS
posing of TImlty Church, Nmdham. which also ap-
pied Tor two voics on the ground that there was
Chapel attached 10 Il.
The Convention nc NJ proceeded to ballot The sec
osd time ior the election oi a Provisional Bishop.
Nhie the tellerS were engaged IN counting the
vets a suggestion was made bV Rev. Nh. LOansborN
that The election of thr Standing COMMITTEE for The
current year Uc made lhc special oror for 10 O'Clock
Tomorrow ttaisl morning.
Hon. John L. spencer approved oi taiS suggestion
and hoped It would ec regarded with favor " The
NOnsen
Rev. MIR. Schroeder sand Tia, he had feared tins
morning that The acuea taken by The Convention
would not result m anything decisive toward The
elecuon oi Bishop tie thought the Con, eaton
should inst make aIoVlS'on Zoe the Bishop before
the election tooA place and moved that an apYopra-
ton OF 500 should be made annually !0r Bsnop
OnderdonA
The Secretary Informed The Rev gentleman thai
there Mas an annua appropriation already made for
Rev. Mr., schroedeT-li ,ha, be SO, have nothing
NcrC TO say.
Hon }. &. Spencer desired to know when the
COMMITTEE On tue Episcopal Fund addrt SSCd BlshOp
ondcrdonk IN relation 10 klS salary.
lie w@s informed that the communication WAS al
dressed 10 The Bishop On the iih ol Tie present
Nenth
moiion was made by Hon. J. c. sneneer. thal
the Committee Dc requested 10 communicate with
he Bishop on the relations existing between Alm
and the kplscoaa. Fund.
Judge BETS gave bret sketch OF The history Of
the Episcopal Fund, and the manner IN which II
was lnve>tcj. Two questions. he >ui, arose from
a consideration OF tins suolcei-whethcg The Con
venion is hound 10 paw him the interest Of $4,000,
which Is the amount of the Episcopal Fund, from
the time of his Suspension ana whether u should
be paid 10 h,m by The Trustees OF the Fund. tie
believed that the meney could not be obtained nom
those Trustees except ,, orier OF the Convention
and II Il should see az 10 pay Bishops who were
called IN for the performance OF Episcopal services.
they bad porieci igh, 20 do So ana B,>hop ondtr-
esnk could no; recover anything nom them IN aw
tor 50 dong.
The Secretary read from the Journal of lS3s the
report OF the Committee On the Episcopal funi,
which contained an acknowledgment, Of the oolisa'
Mons of the Convention 20 The Bishop, ana Of lis
tnlare 10 fplhll them.
Judge Belts said tha, nom this II was eviden; thar
no new promises should os made II The Ccnven-
hen dsd not desire TO pun itself the position O.
ci magnificent promises but OF small performance
ne n,eisss on The Fund. he >id is Si23o, OF which
$soVo had been appropriated for Bishop oaderlonS
leaving only $i,'so for the Provisional Bishop 20 oe
etcted ias ne would nnd 1t impossible to support
himself upon unless he had oihef means of Gsiray.
ing his EXPENSES. He though. tina, the Clergy nsn
OF tnS pio'ese exer'ed themselves among their
psrshloners, the fund might DC - increased IS 10
allow OF larger appropriation. bc.uy made .,r the
support Of the Provisional Bishop
At tins stage OF the doNStc tae ProSieai aaro.ced
thai the ieiers were prepared Io gave tie scal. ~