The republic., 1851-08-15

"Hn this manner does convention assembled under
the regular Organiza of the Democratic party
treat the s1hortations of the Warrington Union, and
all that class Of politicians to place the party upon
tDhat they call national ground by declaring IFS GPro'
uaI Of the Compromise, at IeGsi its Geqescenee IN
hatmsast of Mr.. Fillmores Administration. The
slghtest alIusion is NOT made 10 the Compromise, un-
less 'the reckless squAndering of millions OF the
public money by the Administration is meant to
condemn the payment of ten millions TO Texas Tor
land TO which that State had no right and part OF
which she was allowed to retain-receiipg money
without giving a consideration in return, and get
ting good title to a country which previously be-
longed to New Mexico-and unless, by the 'indis-
criminate and unprincipled prescription spoken
of it ia intended to censure Mr. Fillmore for eject
ing from office those who did not approve of his
policy in the matter of this Compromise. This is
not altogether improbable, since al the Democratic
Oonusnton of the county Of Fulton, called to elect
delegate to the General ConUentiOn of Ohio, the fol-
otoinE resolution iras passed, by i0ay Of istrticng
the delegate regard 10 the sentiments Of his constitu-
ents:
'ResOlusd, That zoe detsst the course Of The pre-
sent Administration for turning out of office men
merely for not approving Of the infamous Fugitioe
Slare ldto'
''There is yet to be a Free-soil convention held
in Ohio, by the more Jealous enemies of the Com
promise, who desire a decided condemnation of
that part of Mr.. Fillmores policy The resolutions
hare quoted shoto ceTy remarkable dgsrsnse TO
that feeling If consciousness of its strength and
its universally in that great State, well as con-
viction of the necessity of treating it with respect,
had not been general in the convention, there surely
would have been some politician of the Union and
argus school ready to propose sanction of the
Compromise as the test of Democracy, with string
of resolutions to that effect in his pocket, and
conned speech in its support on the end of his
tongue.
"Ths friends of the Compromise of the Ohio Con-
uertio are silent because they desire the Of The
ticket they nominated They are TOO polite TO think Of
defeating the candidates the erecutiue Offices Of the
State, and for the supreme bench, by declaration Of
dogmas dsfying public opinion In this State there
is a class of men, protesting to be Democrats, who
pursue different policy because they have diff
ferent motive. They are set of projectors and
spectators, who, greedy for the opportunities of
gain it may bring them, hope some advantage
from the reign Of ofspeculation which is expected to
follow the administration of the nine million law
by Wing canal board
''It is their object, therefore, to divide the De-
mocratc party, and throw the election, if possible,
into the hands of the Wings. To effect this, they
are making arrangements for a schism in the Dem
ocratic Convention about to nominate the officers
composing the canal board. They threaten to bring
forward the Compromise in that convention and to
persis in requiring vote on its approval
'We showed the other day what the result of this
course would be. What the motive is which die
tates it will be clear enough, we think to our read
ers, when they see the different course pursued by
the same class in Ohio. IL IS a polite class-they
are polite tUhersser they are found In Ohio The
spsct ,v ,ohich they treat TIE popular feeling in reia
tion TO The Compromised polite method Of obtaining
support for the candidates of the Ohio Convention. In
Ne,o York their determination to defy aud shock the
feeling of opposition to the Compromise Is polite
method 10 defeat the candidate Of our Democratic Con-
vention, and secure the triumph Of the Whig party
Can it be possible that there is such sys-
tenn of tactics prevailing with party claiming
to possess principles; that in New York they
are so corrupt as to sustain the Compromise
merely to divide their own party, secure
triumph to their opponents, and divide the
spoils2 What morality Convinced that pub
lie Indignation has driven them from the offices
of New York, they resort to scheme so fla
gtious to participate in plunder that they can
not monopolize; whilst in Ohio the Democratic
friends of the Compromise ''are silent, because
they desire the success of the ticket they
nominated"
This disparagng view of the motives of the
friends of the Compromise is from one who
ought to know, being one of the ablest advo-
Gates of free soil and free trade in the Demo
cratic ranks.
We hope the Union will publish these docu-
ments, and reply to the structures of the Post
upon the morality of the Democratic party.