New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-12-12

Judson, Geo. Wadsworth.
SUPERIOR CoURT-Before Judge Oakley.
-Datid and Henry b. MeiriHs agt. Thomas Cdrniey.
Sherif-To recover the value OF quantity OF
watches, money, &c, said 10 have been IN the
Broadway Bank, but taken by the Sheriff on an exc
cution against James IL. Demarest, OF New Orleans
al the suit OF Marcus c. Stanley
Demaiest, II was SAID, "A Jeweer, was roooeu III
Chaeles by a nan named Hiram Notary, who came
to New-Xork. MIR. ID sent letter to Messrs Mel
Vile jewellers. Ia Maiden, lane, CeScr0hg tne loss
and Offering a reward OF 81 600 Mr. Stanley, Win
Mr. A. Nj G. Smith, &C, II was said, effected the
arrest OF McGary at Philadelphia, who was brought
here. and considerable property fo9na upoh nun
which was deposited as stated. Mr.. Stanley got
Judgment and execution for the reward. and Messrs
Melville claim to be entitled to 1t on assignments
from Demsrest. ... -
The questions are, whether the property and
money found on McGsry were those, or the pro-
ceeds of them, which had been taken from Ds ana
whether Demarest made the assignments WIN
view to avoid the payment OF the re""u' oe@'eu
Before Judge SANFORD
Samuel Beman and WIFE agt. Geo. 4.
Green and Geo J. RadfOrd.-To recover damages for
ALLEGED illegal disposSession of plaintiffs from Store
No. / Astor House, and assault and battery oy MI
r, an officer, as to Mrs H. ,. =.
For plaintiff il was said that Mr. G. bought out IN
February last the stock and good VIII ana lease o.
the store shirt store) from Mr.. b., but that Mrs b
had the privilege reserved Of occupying part OF TUG
store, and taking orders from old customers; VII
Nav, 1852, bot that Mr.. IL, IN April, goi an oh'OOi
and diSpossessed them.
In defense it was said the bill of sale vas abso.
lutte, without resery stion that Mrs Il. mteriered
with the customers of MIR. G., and he repeatedly
notified her that she must quit, &c
ClRcuIT CouRT-Before Judge Ming
Chas ST. John, Henry A. Burr, and Aha D. Iaytor
against Buffalo Mutual FIRE and Marine Insurance o.
Plaintiffs occupied part lot Nos. and : Haeue-st,'
al the tine OF the explosion for the forming o. nav
bodies &c They had, among other insurance,
40 OCO al the Buffalo Office for Insurance ag tlns5
6re They say their loss was greater than all thelf
insurance The present suit IS 20 rec over Inc S2VoV
For defense i. was said the loss was caused by
nlaintifs negligence as regarded the steam ooieF
ard the introduction of larger one than was therc
Al the time OF insurance, that the rlsk was IN
creased, which made the policy void, and also tha'
the loss was caused BY the boiler and not oy nre
Ii was stated by Professor Reneveck thsS suos.'u-
tins a larger boiler did not increase the risS 80
The Court charged that unless the explosion Q, .ne
boiler WAS caused by gross and wliliui neglect pa
tfs are entitled TO recover. Verdict for psntins 10
amount and interest.
CouRr OF COMMON PLEAs-Before Judge
Voodruff-Georse Brace against John j. V. hestsr,
ref SksriF--In relation 10 printing press ievleo
upon al the old establishment OF Plercy heeu' uu.
claimed BY Mr.. r. as having been previously oough'
by nm at a sherif's sale, the bona hdes OF whica
were denied already referred 10. Verde; ior pMn'
TN selO Damages, and assessing the value OF the
prODeytv at 5000