New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-11-04

dAp1e, ths, What ercouSas.nrnt d,e that
Unisa brethren If the South Esca Cosv-oEcs has
nominated mIrei ticket giving the Anu slavery wen
predounancs Cold comfort this In !hs state OF hass'
the Union Saietv Committee felt called upon 70 ia-s-
sTe, otherwise they you'd prove false TO iheI uast
They DID not wish To set e7aTae TIC Get oil tneir orn
They had no eesIs to form party ,ad TO oe oAaea
with seeking eresards Of Office IheT resolved to select
,nd make best ticket they could from the candidates
ii the two parties They got the best information thai
could he hal and selected those who most favorable
- the Union They aware that some whom they
select ed from DO Tickets have heretofore favored
the Anti-Savery party. But the Committee had COED
believe thai they had changed their minds.
ard surely persons should be allowed 10 change their
sentiments especially At this important Crisis IN our public
Aas II impossible for me 70 Law before you Al The IN
formation obtained b. the Sub Committee IN whose atofs
did rot participate will submit. however, aew remarks
the individuals you have picked out for consderaten
As Mr. Randall. they al personal production for
ham ON reliable information thev aSce-tained that he
hsc tate sosj deal OF the South. and had
entirely changed has former views IN The subject Of sia
Messrs NJ Alpine and Wright are veil knowa TO be
pom the Enlargement OF the Canals, / observe Tsu
dwell much more eNtensve than the a1esi OF
serving he Union. Doubtless Of the local
character of the election But although local all
portsnt reference 10 the Union for .he reasons above
stated. lOu of course. viii not suppose that entertain
the idea that you attach the most importance 10 these Ca
taS ' = C1il sue " t VI
our tnNa i-ofouI Rrpuouean Cove nment'-oi our as
which uniurs Itself to the breeze Of every and has
lately outsrrpped Britsnuiss proudest chvtry on the
If the Committee should have been mistaken As to the
change sentiments OF two that
Is no leaS Why mon Mon should rre iher Ticket anu
take the ticket either Of the parties which
the anti slavery and.dates decidedly predominaie
The Committee not been unmlndul of this subject
u canal enlargement The law ats favor has passed
Altha % be done Administrative. They are 'asis
ised no one on their VIII follow bad precedent
attempt nulhfy that Jaw the haZan of Treason
The, satisfied on the other hand ifhsr elect
ed that The Jaw will be faithfully earned out The suhonea
ettss only TO confirm their previous information
A. IL the candidates. on the hs side t. whom you refer
MessS Patterson, Seymour and forssth the Committee
satisfied that they svmpshze with the An-Slayery
and sence that point confirms them IN their
views You say they nave accepted tIeir mona t.u
declaration Of principles which would Ond them 10 Obef
the Constitution aid the Laws passed under IL one
vord uron Subec: II the and measer-
ness this declaration the Wing Platform. Of which
the Committee complain These candidates are pledged
to sup ont law when shall De decided 20 ne e9nsltu
ti-rd hy the judiciary We have always undersio,S
tha Laws shall be obeseG unit they decided to be
unconstitutional. The murders and uot> AZ CHRISTIANS
and Syracuse the fruits II hat erroneous doctrine
tae, pledged 20 sustain the COMPROMISE measures and
not 10 asate them anew and Keep up hat dahser'Is et
element No, at ali There nothing hcl3 al IN either
OF these platforms - encourage the Union mea OF the
Sou'h on the contrary. thu wing platform expressly
ne uch' u agliaton-impiyng IN no eG l.ocai
terms tnsr disposition TO asltae Else why insert the
uro onh gard ught hch the abstract nobody
DISPUTES " Ga them patty sewers thing The intesrv
tins Inmeu. the hope and STAY II Repuohcansn
thror ghoui the world 5 thrown IN the background.
BIT however may dhel on iheSe interesting SUBJECTS
Sincerely your obedient servant.
Now.YoIk i,t Nov 1851 GsORGE wooD.
NEW YORK, Nov, !. 1851.
GEORGE WOOn, ESQ Dear Just At the moment CT
staring FOR Albany have etter from John c. Spen-
Esq.. dated bany Oct 81, 1891 IN which ne mas Ia
ken To ailude ard indirectly To the action
which might take n elected 20 the ONCE 81 state La
glneer. sc. ..
Nr Spencer does great ustce all of hs intfns
toDS or he careful To- speak gusrdedy and especially
when he remarks that "a successor TO Mr. Seymour,
the present incumbent to that Office would ne tempted to
disparsge predecessor by capnclous changes etc.
These remarks Wh poor grace rom Mr. Spencer,
under whom served several an Engineer oa the
Enc Canal Enar cement and 20 whom have been known
as one Of the earliest and most consistent advocates oihat
work
may add. without presumption that aided materially
po, ed thereon until the law Of 1912 suspended the works.
and also the which have received the
prova of the present Engineer and the Canal Board
are essentially those which originally adopted II
should h. elected shall feel great interest IL the mai
conple0E that work and will endeayor to the best OF
ABILITY ont the present laws for the competioa
II the Enlargement and the Lateral Canals
Respectful your Ott seTvt, WN. } NCAIrlNs
SCHENECTADY. oct 30th, 1881
DrARSR this onent received yours Of the 2Sh las
does my surprise that some OF the Wig pa
pers in NewYo should say that opposed to the En
of the Enc Canal but this region nnd where
my Vows often and openly declared and knswn oph
icns are well understood, hut such paper mas been
found and It's statement TO that purpose SIMPLY matter
of Ok 4. and so ress rded
Jhwe not now nor ever had l. Any conceansnt ia re-
fsronce 10 this preston have beon the decided
friend of the enlargement policy doubted, an common
both Wing aud Democratic as % the con-
aty of the FIRST Canal bill but when became
law have always maintained that It must be- and Won
he honestly and fully carried out AID executed
ii elected 4 shall 50 act
am, very respectfully.
Yous Obedisnt servant.
J. c. WRIGHT
M