The New York herald., 1851-10-15

..sra, oF r,R ,ryosxxn ,prsuvrv,,.x c,r-,cu
wAvEaLy LACE. BEroRE THE pRxsRyrrry yos
HEREsy.
eouetine In January last, Rev Mr. Little st the re-
quest VI several members Of his church delivered
mon the subject Of Obedience TO Law In which he
ss Understood by some Who we're TO teach doe
crimes at variance With the long est principles
the church upou that subject
t,-h-.u -. -. -. -, -....,.. 49,. ~
II "sy oe ven mere 70 explain the position uAen oy
this eect in regard to obedience to civil governments
Reformed Presbyterians /: will be understood
commonly known under the name OF "Covepsntsrs !"
and the sect to which the church In ~svery place De-
-c,.., =, 4, g - .onn..,., ,,,.h ,,u 90
Aof en'S''SS v '' " y ""' ~ %
verpments that are not founded on strictly moral ana
Cbrstizn principles consequently they are not found
,., once or xsrcisny the elective r.. ncbss s,thsr
Hs -. -, =, =, 80
An o~ss DH"'n or America Du' NOT onV oo sney re-
to vote or hold ss but they far st least the
stricer to refuse TO yld obedience even to the
xixhteous laws Of a wicked government Such Va dis
:, " ~
ncty understand to be their position and the ques
Zion Ct heresy involved mainly in this last psint
apuears from the proceeding. of the trial
-. -. -. :, ~, -, = -. -
iHe "'s' e'en' ~ 'ne hDo' "sei 'escnins faase doc
trne Specialization first teaching that the providen
-.i.n.;o.,, -. s;....y - y" ''h
1-,'1''
charged in tae libel as having been utt.,sd hv IN. m
,,sso = R,, !, r., n. -, A.. a.. - -
nneneAtte 1t to conscientious Obedience! We
answer in the affirmative God som stimes permits 20.
xs,,rsn. to a~is, ,or ,h. 90, 90. No.. .
~ eNA0' ~. ."e gnu vi tue suo'essi some
mes lo' ecoorge out no matter for what reason he
permits IT, the simple fact that IL exists Is sufcie ot
reason why ". should yield It conscenciou, obedience
Al~n osh.r .xo-..;,,s ., .,,.r ,r,no-. srs 81. -a
The vii upon this ana other charges contained in
ths I;b~, ws,. az minsd last week and the court sa
iourned TO Mousay October 10 for the hearing OF the
cumming up Mr. Little appeared and defended himself
an vsrv an ami -oou, Mt of two hours in leurth
The SOC, CD ts@ would not rhape BE- of sufficient in
fres TO our readers 70 give IT, even in condemned form
Sss of hs main poinSs however was that some of the
it>sses gor the prosecution unable to distin-
,,,;sb ~ sppear-d the evid .nce the difference be-
sre s " judges Of shoe leather and Jack planes al
uding to til trades they followed than Of mst.phy
sbr dcoursa question being of metaphysical ma ture
The Defendant tso made an pher point by contendng
that II he oey the laws wicked COVER nment he did
n not for tse of tht government officers but
sr ,c, Axe ne tou God and not to Yards man
No reondss having been Isie the part Of the pro-
Cont rbso a'
Mr Irrrr : oAsetea 10 the Noae-,,.>r (Mr Carlisle of
N..lurgl saiu1ics ing upon his rssa because in the
fsr. MAJ. n. haa srns.ssd an onnior hore hi. CON
grsyaon 10 tbs aisconrse in austio,, III hav
ING 6en vttsn ont ami M blshd afr IT, ds,,sery by
th svtbar chs-.ctsri-;ne !, in ts-ns ,hat o, a ~
!. co,dl -n1..Sr- =, 4, e " - ~ ~
w. Mo1-,.-a. rhs Cor,, v. % ,bo o,;a.,;o, &c n.
IittIe now ,re.~nted 70 tSsm-whs, eoSr,e viz, - ,b.v
fsSs r,os IL. ~ 'Ae'
Mr. -, have another objection. tha, ON I,..
p,a.z s,sni,, W Fysns sais 70 NJ c.riis. ths, hs
could no, ssav ,py ionger and voula move an adonrn
s 81 ths 60; t,i Jsnra-v. ~ Sb;cb " r. rni;ad
VI ". ~. ~ - 80 a. .s 30 49, rn.;nIi,r
anss o, Wsu. '-' ~ Ss Ss, 80 80 =, - ~ ~ "a ., s sas'y e.
ne ,,o,cIion 81 bsyiaS msss ,ss q .ncb
nooeIsso. Ca Ia o ~ - vi,b NJ Ex.n. ~ " ~
senupeat "A az. s,''u ~ w. -. N,
nj ~ tttA - = III 80 - .-oSs 49,. "a u S @ ...s.ss
tor that s 20 oe 'a@eh oe' 'N4 P0O' an P'ep~ieN
20 pslns -., ora;,,sr.,v Ard s,-;ti,y his A.,
upon the table IL never Yet asked man to vote AMI
before TAI. Court WIZ u'.eiins Su|r @ ,asis an
in,s" 10. - IN Wnssrstr viii not Allow him
setto get mo paeslohm al ~ ne, ns "a !, -. ~ a. o.
or dooe the e'tsnee VIII m se..,s II aos nm o"r,s', "'
hcne 7 he sys bssn eufRc..utly respeo,ful
,sns. any msmi..
W. ~oo~,.-os-ue has no rixht 20 saw that asked
~ w,,arnI an, sS-sia IN. Moderator /.
-, 49, s-.n,,ls a. MODIFICATION
d. soo hrrs arose as to The right Of the accused
% en.i sDy aa Son,s contsn5sa thss he has no
MN. =, " vr+d sgsin.t the MODERATOR unless he
rn,st e,-x.rs iih.I on cersure AZ that could not
trsa 20 ne Va hss n r;,Ss 10 rhs.ass ,ny one
81 49, ,rrs,sa his c.se spa ouyat 10 contend Tor
a., ,a, ssrsn ,bs chaiisnge xss made ard he aid
hs nroos Ne Should he allowed 10 p-ors IL and IL
ss SeSe S Mo,srsor y ans Ssna BE- .xsaiustsa
Rev Nj Tsy.-,T ctntsbd.d that the right upon which
81, ,.,, go. 49, ~ Ti,J-tsc. 10 deprive him Of il
q. hi. e1urt Who had previously distinctly
~ p,o'.y - - ns,,y unIrr rial va not a Gt
m.she,fosI NJ ~ in Srusnt 1por his case
The c. snS-Is 10 true that Nr Carlisle Il charged
,x,,h ,ro,o, rcf,, an opinion upon tn. libel
AZ, - r-Thsre i NJ chsrge / wish 10 have
,,srnr at a.s4s ara ssslgn nv reason Tn-re IL
Iit.l oor charge have stated my objection merely,
md h.,s I'd 40 lmpropfiety q language
tn e. fvs-I would ike 70 know II Mr. Carlisle il said
eob.,s given al opinion the in question,
ON ,on, pub.hei sermon Iurporting 10 be the
that deiiversda
Nr~s-.-r think A. the Moderator Is charged, he
ought % va. COR his proof
Nr Isrrtr-I cali that member % order, and ask
him 10 retr,r. h. language did charge the Mode
4 Isve a rCh 10 r. m f1rxa
snd fos ,ssssus To BE- shown % object any member
.s.ros-Did ssy ycu charged me With any
.hsnr
-, q, pnas,s.s.d Won Possibly however.
-. ~. IN nro,-r stste 20 n. owing 10 the
- = ~ n a. al.oui M
a. TsN--Nr r,d.r-.,,a Nr Ii,,la 70 have simplv
~