New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-10-27

Court CALENDAR-Thls Day.-CIRCUIT
CouRr-Nos 49, 723 724, 6s5, 704 72j, 726, 727 72S,
100, 73O ISL, 732, 1888, 735.
SUPREME CoURT-Genetal Tern.-Pnbhshed on
Friday.
SUPERIOR CouRT-SpecialT erm-Befere
Judge Duer-D cisions. -H0tchtnson ast. Ro-
gerS and Slamm Motion TO set aside execution de-
med
Necman agt. n. d Al. Otto-HuH ast Coiton-Hea
agt Emmett trustee --DemuTrers OYerruled.
Laurence agt Kenp.-Report set aside
Ftrdinand {. Black ads Frances Black.-Detaut set
aside.
GENERAL TERM.-De cisIons.- Joseph I. Street
ads Joseph Bartieu-On payment of costs IN the
original suit, judgment to be vacated
~ Y state Telegraph Co. ads. Reuben W Wash
Jpru- Order at Special Term reversed.
ALfrtd p. Peck agt. Robert Usher--Motion denied.
L. s. DISTRICT CouRT. Before Judge
Judson ID C / s. on.-Wm Walton agt ne Brts kd-
d,uS-The schooner Splendid, lying AT Pier No 81,
T.. r.. was crushed during storm on the ga DEC,
Isa9 by the Radius, lying outside OF fer, and SUNK
Action is brought for the value. The court con
sideTs that 1t III the power OF the Radius, be.
fore the storm got too violent, to remove ahead OF
the schooner, and 1t her duty to have done SO,
even If she had placed hawser across the COCK 10
e able her to do the penalties OF the corporation
ordinance against a hawser across a dock, not APP
plying in a of danger, SO AS to enable her 10
haul of Decree III favor of owners of the schooner
SUPREME CoURr.-Special Term-Be-
fore Judge DUER - ID eel slonS.-Slnnh Coddlng-
ton and Mdru j.. has u7fe, against James Wat
son Wet5.-The Court considered that the cur
cumstances under which the letters were placed IN
the hands of Mr.. w created trust. the execution
of which this Court can enforce the letters were
10 be delivered to Mr. lnman not as has own proper
w. but as the natural guardian OF his daughter MIS-
{ and for her benefit. and she, on her marriage, was
entitled with her husband. to demand their delivery
and possession The suit is properly brought IN their
nameS and to have been brought by Mrs lnan as au-
mlnlstratrix of her husband, would have been I'M
proper Demurrer ovenued, with power TO defend
ant to withdraw the demurrer, and answer, upon
payment oil costs.
SUPREME CoURT.-Spec Term
The Nec Park The argument as to the validity Tor
regularity of the law authorizing the Common
Council 10 Law out the Park was continued on sat
urday forenoon before Judge Edmonds, ex-Judge
Jones resumng his remarks IN support OF the valldi'
" of the law.
another, al suf IF Chas ". Lynch.-Moion OF de-
PENDANT to sav proceedings denied and stay of pro-
ceedingS on the execution vacated
CIRCUIT Court. Before Judge Ed
warGs-Stephen Weeks against j. ". Laurence
Action for SANDER, which was tired In 1870 ana a
verdict given for plaintiff, but new trial allowed.
The parties were partners IN the crockery ware
business and dissolved In lsil an unfrendly state
of feeling. 1t is SAID, existing between them Inc
present suit as based alleged lnslnua;lon OF
Mr. L.. while In the store of MeSsrs. ComStock &
Son, that Mr. w had stolen check OF about Sl0S
from him that they were IN the office together MI
L. had lust drawn a check but a customer coming
in he threw the check into the desk and went to the
front store 10 attend TO HIM, and on MS return
went TO his desk, but found the check gone lie ln-
quirCd OF stephen If he knew anything about IL,
and he SAID he did not that he U) drew an
ether check for a smaller amount, ana made
up the payment he was about to make IN
bills On his bank book being written up afterward,
and his paid checks returned, he was aSonlShed to
fnd the lost check among them. On being asked by
Mr. Comstock If he meant TO inslnuate that MI. W
stole the check, he shrugged his shoulders and sad
-" These the facts, form your own opinion
For thus lnSinuating felony against Mr. w the
suit Is brought.
In the defense it denied that there was any IN
ientlon 10 charge felony, and that the paItles beng
partners at the tlme 1t could not be So
The Court held. tina, partner clandestnely taking
a check IN this way, and appropratng the whole OF
the money to hsownuse, whereby the partner would
have 10 lose half, would be felony and II such
charse was here made il was a charge of felony.
Sealed verdict this morning.
Court OF COMMON PLEAs-Special Term
Before Judge Woodruf.-J0seph PUgh agt. Ann
Pugh.-Defsult set ASIDE and defendant al liberty 10
answer. The examination before the referee OF
Leonard Barter. otherwise Leonard Barton also TO
be set aside The sum of IS per week 10 be allowed
defendant also $50 for some past necessities, ana
lend the SUIT.
for trlal agreed upon.
Lorthso De Angels agi Susan De Angeles An al
lowauce ordered. The evidence VIII excuse the past
default, but plaintiff must comply with the former
order by PCS ing The money within % DAYS
CoyRT OF COMMON PLEAs.-Beiore Judge
lnsraham Peter Nc,,Sotreqdsr agt. R0bsr' " DsSr-
Shd-ln tins case already referred TO- beng IN ac-
non ior a saSlt and battery, the jury gave verdict