New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-03-27
Circuit Court. WEDNESDAY, March 20
Before judge Edwards

Scorillc g. CO. against GriGtk.-To re-
cover fom G. as common carrier, upward OF $500 being
The value with 90 damages OF quantity OF patent meal-
OF 6rm at Albany hut carried to Troy, and not offered at
the place where directed till six seven weeks serward
when they were refused and action brought for the value
already Te'ered TO.
The McCOuD, II appeared never stopped a. Albany, and
was said UNDERWOOD by lhe person putting the goods
board The Captain gave receipt to deliver the goods
N Albany.
showed contract 10 carry themsnd the first question lie
whether the Captain authorized agent OF The
10 bind him An agent has right to blvd his principal
within the scope Ofthe geuer agency and special nsruc
tons do not limit the responsibility Gs between the pnci
The question then it, what was the character OF the de-
Iendanfs line Of bsges The testimony that it line
bowen Newly ork and Troy, and thal never stopped
going up n Albany. The Captain testdes that he in
he habit Of receiving goods for Troy aud beyond but did
not that he ever OOk any or hs OF Troy ls for
the Jury TO say whether The lac for general places
limited 10 Newly OIk and Troy. II Is also said that there
wass special agreement between plaintiff aud defendant
convey the goods OF former ether Albany Troy.
On the other hand It said plaisA had been Informed
that The business Of the line confined 10 Troy. IL the
Jury come 10 the conclusion that The general sgency "
elodtd Albany or 5ns! hTFS y i6ev viii ind og psaG
esbeyywis lee Tor defendant
IN the Jury should consider it binding contract, then
The question win be az to the rule OF damages There no
prt tension that The goods bad been injured or de eO-d
N hey had been, the delay might alhorzs an abandon
meht Of them by the owner snd night OF charge on ihe
common carrier bui as is the rule VIII be The difference
10 the arket price, The time when they should have been
delivered aud when they were actually rendered sealed
verdict ibis forenoon
Woodtcard 4. Cromwell against John Glib
bon and Jared Hiicor-To 40 80 quirtas
dried dsh Counsel for plaintiff said that the defense had
been made for MI Wilcox by Mr. Geo W. NJe5 on the
ground that Mr. w. did moi purchase them the day
case he gave notice MI Wilcox substitute another a.
toruey: bnt he decred saving he la not wish inter-
poee any farther defense Nercict for plaintiff $3.50 IS.
Court Of Gene nj Sessions. WEDNESDAY, March 26.
Before Judge Bebee aud AID. Oakley aud Chapman
The Trial Of Isaac Il. Jeiseu for Rape
on the person OF Miss Ulbna Gourgas continued To-
day The defence introduced several witnesses who testified
that hey had frequently the complainant walking up
and down Green with the purpose OF meeting soms
These witnesses also tethed TO the fact OF Mr. Jew
ell frequently meeting Miss GOurgss One otths Witnesses
Mr. James w King testified that this had become 50 CON-
mon occurrence that the remark was called FORTH there
goes that gal again JeweIt Will % along Directly The
evidence defence being az length all H. the prose
ton proceeded to Gdduce rebulung testimony Nothing
new the httory OF the 10 concerned
ven and al 81 O'Clock, NJ, the testimony both sides
closed The prosecution before the close OF the testimony
offered TO prove by Valentine Mott D. that Mas GOur-
gas had been injured In her person This was ruled out
and the Court adjourned for the day. The summing up
will TAXI place tomorrow Thursday when Il hoped the
will be finished IL has already occupied altogether
too much time proposition was made by the senior
Counsel for The Defense that the should 10 the jury
the charge OF the Court without comment by Couu
sci The presiding Judge however, said he would rather
the comments OF Counsel and 50 II arranged that
the should be fully summed up this morning.