New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-09-13


-, ,hst two OF ,heE Members desired an ADJ.
lonal Resolve
Rssohsf That We ArpTcse Of the aims snt pr,ac,
olcs So, forth m The resolutions adopted by tie
Democratic State COnytnros held al syracuse LAD
yCar-wh.ch resolutions were - iolloS
Rss,hcf. That the Democracy ~ TIE state o. New.
York appcciatug the value OF nioE and Frsietnit,
and standing upon ttcr ancient priaci ,c> present
their candidates ~''h z conffenln Itutnce UHoa
tte united ari CORDIAL supper, 81 All Who desire ne
aScercancy 81 g principles m he state anINaload
Councils
The ihir5 Re>o.ulo- tepreca,e> the course
Of the Wig National Administration. ani the
fourth. the acr0n OF the Nhc STATE AimniNla
ton
Rcso',ef. That. devoted 90 thc prn pie, All
forms ~ orr Confederation ard rrreri-- the nights
~ all sections 81 our cour,r, as members OF coa,.
nor Brotherhood. We CHERISH tnc Union of the >taie>
- the Rock Of cur Political Government eni ten-e.
cate all sectional agitation c'tner % the Nth or az
The South. calculated 90 impair ~ sacred Obligations,
ar threaten H. perpc'uiN
R.s.f.f. That ne Democratic party OF NtN.Nork
are proud 20 AVON Their GcCl'y aat Devotion 20 the
great principles OF The Democratic Ntr,y q the
In',n. - declared m TIE National Denocrsu, con.
,eruou>. held m $50, 1874 ant 49, ard ,hat hey
look forward r hope ans co htcrcc 90 ne conn lcic
triumph OF 'ha; party u lS'-
RsS0iff. That We congratulate the country uroR
he recent settlement hN Conere>> ol TIE questions
which have unfortunately cnlcct ihc people 1T iAe>e
states and Resolved further fhAi me tosStlns-
ton 81 ne United States Is the only Bond " mon
among u>-a'Ac obligatory npon The several states.
and the people thereof AMI, % preserve inc lnoa
unmpairet. ever requirement 81 that Constitution,
and especially every duty cpoiucd by H. must DC
strictly observed.
Resa 'ros That The Democratic party OF New.
York VIII NEE; their brethren 81 other states N Ma
uonal Convention and viii cordially support the
candidates nominated ihercat, according To the
uSaee> of the Democratic party
rrTl. lose .....Itrf..,r ..r. .'.nre.,ffns ND
con8smnne the Wing management Of the Ca.
nails - lavish, reckless ana corrupt
VI Fowler. from the unouN OF thc Com
mittcc. presented the following resolution a. an
additional one
Rrso'r,f. That the Democratic party Of the STATE
of Newly ork vii faithfully atherc % the rcren,
settlement by congress OF the questions which have
unfortunately divided the people of chs state, and
agitation.
Mr. Morris presented the resolution read by
Mr Fowler and while he supported lhc rc,ou
tion Of the Committee claimed chat they diinot
eo ior enough The people II his section de
maudcd the resolutions which he presented. AMI
nothing short o' o. in hI, opinion. would secure
the harmony of the party
Mr. Nyc declared fha, ,hc report ct ,he Com
mi,tce was the result of mutual concession and
compromise and tha, he and his friends would
view the least addition or alteration Of that ~
port by oyerthrowlng that compromise
Mr Wright. of Schenectady. Hunkor, sustain
cd the report of The Committee rs ialr measure
of compromise. upon which AN could unite
NJ Clarke. of Washington. luulkerl also
sustained the report lie considered mo- daer
ence nm substance between the resolution pro
posed bv Mr. Maurice and thc one contained m
the report
Mr.. Sichcs, at much length, supported the re
solution of Mr. Maurice, and called on the
Convcntiont 20 follow the example of Penn
sylyana and Massachusetts and adopt resou
tons which should affirm the determination OF
the Democracy OF this State 10 adhere % the
Compromise Measures. and to refuse their coua-
tcnanoe " sanction OF any opening OF the Slave
nv agitation TO vote against the resolution
would De TO reafim contrary doctrnc-to do
that IN his opinion would be TO lose the vote OF
the Democratic party IN this section Of the state.
Speeches were made by Mcssrs Gartun. Og
den, Wright. Clark, Story, Ladew Owens and
Hogeboom, all Ilunkers. declaring their adhesion
to the report OF the Committee, and dep'ecatlng
the introduction Of the resolution bi Mr. Maurice
as tending to place them IN a false position
Mr. Hogc boom asked hat the resolution nigh,
be withdrawn.
Nj Clarke moved 90 lag it upon the table
Here arose sharp debate IS to whether
the motion was IA order
Messrs Morris, Sckes nnt others declared
that the adoption of the motion would be an act
Of gross tyranny 20 the minority. Mr. Sickles
called on the Convention to face the music
The Chair ruled the motion 10 lay on the "a.
BILE as out of order pom that decision an ap-
peal Vas taken Then came another sharp de.
bate on the order when the decision Of the
Char was oyernled-5i 70 M
The question required Of the motion 70 lay Do
the table the resolution OF Mr. Morris
Mr. Sickles asked that the motion 10 lay on
the table should be distinctly stated to have
been made with view to avoid DO expression
OF opinion with regard to H.
Nj Grover said that the people out Of doors
were supposed 20 know something, and would
understand that
Mr. Blmsall said the motion 20 lay On the
table. so far from being considered Az effort 10
avoid am expression Of opinion, was ihe strongest
condemnation Of = measure which could be pro
posed
Mr.. Wagu declared the motion 10 lay on the
table a cowardly attemP, 70 ayow responsibility
during this time there was great excitement
IA the Hall. and the Gtm0s, confusion and dIsOf
der prevailed
The motion to lay OIL the table was carried
ayes =, nays 50.
Nr Wright moved he adoption Of the repoh
Mr.. Wight denied any such inference
Mr. Sickles warned the Convention, that ~
lsi9 the carrying Of a motion to lay resolution
on the table, led to the defeat Of the Democratic
party.
Mr. Nye replied that 10 1850, when the resolu-
tons were not laid on the table, the Democrat
State ticket was defeated By the State Of New.