The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1851-10-12

Judge required sdjudcate according the
certain The true sonu ae,9n Of those provisions Wen of The
questions alluded 10 are necessary
sn dor ny and % what extent
do not eae 70 The appropriate action judge
attempting give any deeision upon them But IS they
are 50 interviewer win, each other that, difficult 10 separate
enon and both parties he district behalf uni
requested my opinion on ali the points argued proceed
Soasn in .o eu, ne g0ld
NON sssa . his clause Of the 9th
Of the 1s as % % 81 s s and me as
carry proyons The provided
y the ea Of . amount Of me claim n each o. these
claims, far found any
%
satisfaction for such injuries TO individuals as su Dc sss
@ y s On o. y s % be s S S
and well understood the import of words used this term
ministers Attention was not called to hi. snuao1nary
"a under treaty. and tina, he so Known mo, wen % Ss s
as sss Nv Ss public E
law the municipal laws Of our own country spain
sns s s ne
many s1 he States. and
and and w ns be nn Sss ana
tina, art for erpanaionlsee Campbes Grouus
chap II ss and principle in Dwarf:
ss:% s
Also vide ass. &C. Also; Kent vol ~
;ss . e ss@ at the
the C. from which we Of h.
cess law mus! Of necessity me, nothing short Of Judicial pro
had judicial eou't q judicial fuckers
Chsnceor Com . 10, edition, and By
% an" so.s q e. a
s IsG so cS on M hs ES pp
@ % s 5 s s pn Se oy su
according prescribed deter
mining ,s propenysss, ALSO % cokss Inst, So and 10
ar sy by sn
The and Judgment, dsessn, must
h s a
position conectand amer the most dslberation
premises. that The these Judicial decisions
and necessarily consusv appealed
udieia! tribunal authorized to and re-
supervisory appellate power
hs act Of Congress to Secretary Trsasa
he authorized BY that act to alter reve and mody them as In
az s
ghu be given TO the Secretary The power TO revise or reform
onl; Conferred Judicial tribunal
age the G or mr. Of The
would be and voidvde Is, whea
Bu, the view fh point, and solution Of
the and that such the construction of
treaty. borne provide. that these nlue
should be established @ "a M
"
Of S upon Ss naoa s
perhaps may ousN which
should and . BY IL:
T s should inc not s
necessity annu tho whoe Every nation of course possesses
hi. no e.s ihan any
they have vide M y0 na p o %
such law joint resolution the Of the country would of
sss:; s. Fl
attempted such On act
ss have or % ns; sssn ss ss, ~
entitled on h face OF act carry 11 effect the @ article
executive departments of,he in giving construction
the ns.s ss ns hs
eHne and the treaty. give TIA.
monte with the and render them with the
tom :. would virtually nsy The sc hsmselss and
The provisions of the treaty The laws themselves useless nuga
Auori,s, hardly .Dp,sssed sustain this
Rep a and 6a Also Mr. wits opinion already quoted ss
sad ii ec"S seS ss s "a
on can properly be given % hs'e as which ,. be entirely con
hs
s1y sia span Grhs WORD ao a.sd IN the Is,
terms. or so 70 Be i III.
The NANTES. intent OF this provision Of the act Of 1913 that the
mat aiecisd 50 should BE- Hence III s the .1 a,eadme% Of
law provides likewise for the thing far the first section of
Is there anything then, act
s wG initiates a x -. % ws 's. wi.
ond provides
ions uAen Of the with the evidence which
fed and equitable within The provisions OF
treaty shall the amount hereof se And the rs section o.
the Of 1884, there the further prevoes the Secretary
awRrd be paid
suffering the actual subjects OF
Spanish and Also that award be paid for depre
Florida into that
Of And these
Of the made obiga
authorized ndudcate and de
provision thai The claims should be
within from the this sc
follows course that they were equally obligatory the secr
could the law authorized
award Here, bep would ample FOR the
OF thai which cophdcd
quoted without
constitutional law
When record OF presented
list Whether the injury had been
operations OF the American army in Florida.
3D. That had been suffered by spanish oser individual
Spanish nhabtan under the provision OF the law Of 1890
tua Spanish subject
I'd. That had been established by process law.
1917 That had not occurred
and troops Of the United 1919.
5h. That claim az for 1879 1870 filed
and presented to the Judge within from the
act o
All Secretary might rrhruly properly
law and all this In fact amounted
his that the
tnby within the provisions which, apprehend IL
with us and equitable
treaty. The law in effect requires the Secretary before paying
that and in which the Judge had
dcon and provided he satisfied those points, then
thefeofn
Jurisdiction Of Judicial tribunal
render judgment
appellate decision Judgment and
reform amend H. in whole part difference OF distinction
called conform
to execute H. either officially otherwise hghy exercise