The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1851-12-31


ienanes Of the Law and constitution he hsld 10 be he
suic and plan duy of al 10 the hall, aud he called
ali 10 pause before thus violating them kossuih had
no, been invited 10 ibis county AZ an eas, he had
been offered place Ia ouf VIDE dous oui hs hAd ptt
been imported az yiopaganeist he lko"suh) secuted
The idea Of coming here e8is bat announced his
purpose 10 be eject change 10 The Poiy o. ls gov
eminent He would not endorse iAsi psos,sun ., m
wilma him here He much etYosso ~ Mt axA
ray 10 giving KossuL an nsa. sad be slEesd 70 Prove
that refusing invite hm here insoved no'hs u lhe
sort This lhs hts, inss4ncs IA "hicn iss"'uhsn
had been esssyed ia the hall
Mir GENTRY again YAK ing the hoof, said that be had
NOT been a siaae.t u HE House rulee pr os az
gument, Mr. G. held. had rested the idea t1ss the
Uou.s had oyedden the rules aud constitution AZ lis
.1,ion he held thai ben the House vent ino Con-
mee Of The Whole tbe STATE ot the umipn they could
report anything taes ne conuass thought good oi ne
M a1dng rule "a the House aud ssBssd al considerable
sngtl, 10 sustain this position, hoiding mat Mt was
syidsaily disposed TO come us isSy us he4,s
paIsSg IA g eofgta and GENTRY on the rules when
bir c. continuing, aigued tha, OCCASIONS would arse
al liules wbieh lbe House oteh aio sSN WIN lis
fuies reversing plday decisions as 70 rue made yes
,s,5sy ~ old not agree with blr STEPHENS in hold
~ hat al invitation bic House carried with an
implied promise 70 gfshl an lna'l s ~ ieaues. ne
rouu,,, opls; and even II kersuth did come TO involve
a. al war with European powers be was not for treat
ing hm rudely bui iof roo"lns k,ie many symEa
~, UNANIMOUS on ihis resolution ihoagh he would throw
no ipui4on tbs oisss % nose aho were disposed
10 differ from han uison ihls point
Nh RANTOtJL was Tor the adoption OF the resolution.
Koseah came here The essnlaye OF the great
American revolutionary principle lie was here as the
Irvreseni,ng that principle among all who had fled to
America from oppression IN EdfoPe This gave Kossu,l
hi great claim On his lSir k'sl sympathies.
Mr. mex, related al egth The history OF the revolu
,ion IN Hungary and argued that if this goveramen,
should perish viii perish BY me encroachmens of the
central power ia resisting which Hungary had fallen Ii
l az. IL ..
European representative OF The great principle OF own
liberties R.pubiicanism IN Europe had fallen only for
want OF proper distribution OF The powers Of govern
meni when in the hands Of The republicans In France
II had failed because all the powers OF the government
had been thoughtessly concentrated IN one assembly
The OF The Continuance OF conedcraied gov
eminent here must cone Upon Us hn mao 9ssa slated
The pre, genius who had defended the institutions OF bis
coug,ry against Capitalization he did not know what
was a, The bottom oil The current ndisposon 10 welcome
our brother conparlo and coaboreT IN the defence OF
/ State rights
If he had mol been brought al the national request and
expense. it would be all the same TO hun, (M, r.
| He held i, not to be question OF endorsing Louis
Kossu,hs views OF the duties OF this government He
was not surprised at the difference OF OPINION manifested
on these resolutions all men would differ except where
all were fools, where fools were ruled hy persons OF
sharp mind. He added That he glored ~ welcoming to
America the great champion OF American principles.
Mr. EWING. OF Kentucky, was opposed to the reso-
luton holding that enactment would be an endorse
ment of the views OF kossuih, which he explained al
length TO be such would involve US in war with foreign
governments He dsliked such pfecedens, and thought
| that Louis Kossu,h novel an exempar oil The
States rights principle MIR. RasTouL was an advocate
| OF the doctrines.
The strct conslruclions,s who could power in
this government iospend pubic money IN works OF ine
nal Improvement were here called on TO sanction pTecs
dent for The expenditure of millions in conserving pn
cple in Europe II had been proposed that we should
unite with Great Britain TO establish The supremacy Of
this principle abroad This Mr. e. could not consent
10 do and he went on TO show that Great Britain
should interfere in the affairs OF Hungary che would
hardly consent TO change Of hef policy with reference
to Ireland and her colonies, which were held by her IN
oontravention of the views she would be then defend
! ing
On motion of Mr. ORR, the committee then rose-ayes
| ST. noes co.
| Mr. JONES, of Tenn (chairman) announced that
the Committee of the Whole the stale of the Union
had had the state OF the Union generally under consdera
ton, and ad come TO no conclusion thereon lJeneia
| laug hter and much confusion
MIR. FlCkLlN, Tis,ng to question OF Order argued
that the duty Of the chairman repor, the facts OF
the committees action now. While IN committee reso
luton had been introduced and discussed to which The
chairman his report had not made the slightest ausion
| Mr. JONES' Of Tenn. had reported according 10 ih'
rules, he explained Until the committee came TO con
cusions business before II, the chzrmans duty
making report simply etaie that the commte.
had had the state OF the Union generally under considers
ton and particularly business that had been referred &
the committee. That business had not been referred
Thus his report was IN order. Aat
Mir FiCKLlN made a few remarks 10 show that hi
view OF the duty Of the chairman Of the Committee OF th
Whole on the Of The Union reporting corree,
| MIR CLlNGMAN desired TO move the usual resolution
to stop debate the Presidents annual message NV
minutes after should be taken up in COMMITTEE
the Whole on the state OF the Union.
Here motion made that when the House ad
journed they would adjourn over until Friday next no
| az reed to
1t was then novel that the House do now adjourn
| agreed 10, by yeas and nays
! And so the House adjourned.
|