The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1851-11-18
IKOss nth In England.

We again devote large portion OF columns 10 the
demonstrations made in honor OF the Hungarian patriot
and hero and TO his eloquent and powerful appeals
the British people in justification OF the noble cause to
which his life has been devoted We wholly misudge
the character and sentiments OF the American people II
these great speeches OF kossuh be not emneny fitted
the chief OF them ALL the Address 10 the citizens OF
the United States-,o extend and 10 enkindle anew that
profound enthusiasm in favor OF the great Hungarian and
his Of which his glorious has already laid
all through the country, the firm foundations
In this invite the special attention OF our
distinguished fellow citizen. Mr. ex Secretary Walker
responded TO the spirit of the occasion in which he was
called TO take conspicuous part.
II is matter OF regret the presence Of these hopa.
BILE testimonials presented by the people OF monarcheal
Eogland in favor OF their sympathy with the cause OF
liberty in Europe that the organs OF this administration
should have been slow and reluctant recognise the
merits of Kossuh not abstanng from The publication
OF most injurious impu,aions upon him, and even now
pertnacousIy excluding from their columns the Address in
which the Hungarian hero sought to make known to the
American people and government his cause his county,
and his career
AS the Republic has iii TO make some attempt al
apology or pslliaon upon this subject, deem proper
to lay before our readers the following cogen criticism
upon The course of the Especial organ" by its able wing
contemporary and party ally-,he New York Times.
From the New York Times, Nov. Is,
The Washington Republic desires to be understood that
il has never published line in dsparagemen OF Kos
suh either in its columns in lis editorials Ii
explains the reason why has published Kossulhs
address 10 the people OF the United States. thus
"The Republic Is friendly 70 the presen, administration
established by the American people The Union Is 6iuer,
unreenng, nnscrupuous opposition press, daily miuep'
resenng abusing, and insulting me mbeis OF .ha admins
rrpsnare oG kossuh In this country as the preferred
and treirs organ Of communicating THIS addresto The
public, saving only we understands spl,ar p,ss renas
the address OF Kossuh bad been furnished ne simua-
sly with It's insertion IN the lournas 10 which we feef
sboud been most hnppy 10 publish u us dotn
mont Of more than ordi~ary inioo but when most un.
cautiously in our Judgment, The agents Of M k9.sus
and ntoersnt opposition journals they cannot Justly expect
that any Pposay M
lsiicn a document OF this description
Every journal of course has right TO establish such
rules as il may tit in regard TO what will and what
il will not publish We canno, help thinking, however,
that wrong done the administration by allowing II,
upon such grounds TO be placed in position OF seeming
hostility TO eminent and popular man as kossuh IL
IL hes, 10 serious point ~ That nos
| suth desired to conhne his address TO the party
IN opposition TO the administration, without more conclu-
sve evidence than exists here In the first place the ad.
dres. originally 10 Gov Uhazy and by htm 10
| Mr. Tochman at Washington.
And. in the place. !. is not correct TO say that the
| Union and Evening Post were alone furnished with
copies OF it, copy sent 10 the Daily Times certainly,
and we believe 10 The Express and other papers OF this
city, before its publca'ionin Washington. i was assured
Iy document OF "more than ordinary interest,"" and
would have been quite acceptable that account as
well az on Others to erends well rs the enemies Of
the administration :.
The Republic is bitterly on New York journals
for the enthusiasm they have exhibited in regard TO Kos
su,h and ntma,es that their feeling IS not shared me
country generally Taking credit to tseii Tor never nav
ing reprinted or counenanced any OF the d,spaagng
statements that were circulated concerning him, me
Republic apparently iorgels the following paragraph
which appeared not long since in It's columns
1.-THE statements brought by former mail In reference
to Kosuth's Disagreement with Captain Long of the ME-,
ssipp, and the United States consul at Marsciles ana
which a, the time unwilling to credit are nop cor
Armed. il IL TO be regretted tor kossuts sake thathc has
isctod himself TO the possibility OF misrepresentation in
with his conduct towards the prcscnatves Of
this corntfyrondwcf which, 10 say The fcon 81 ~ mas an
| trcndiug argracions a,peot"
The Republic moreover, even now cautiously seeks TO
erce the feeling Of Irish fellow. citizens against
Kossuth, by saying thai
| an Kossu,h failed TO express a single sentiment Of
| .v,,p,by Tor poor Ireland, While he cuogzinR, IN
terms OF nnboundcd extravaganoe the liberal Institutions
and purposes OF England
Even This adrot stab is not likely to do The object Of il
| much harm. Koeeuih may well euloEze the T" liberal
st;,u,ons and purposes OF England when contrasting
them "A he was then doing with those oil Austria ana
his enemies would doubtless have Icoced TO zee hm 90
to England for the express purpose o. returning nanks
for their aid in releasing him from prison. ana enhsng
their sympathy behalf OF Hungary ana 'nen
lence OF The radical which these same persons nave rep
resented him 10 he They doubtless disappointed ana
that his has sadly refutcd oil theis
predictions. But the foreigners in this counsIy cannot