The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1851-01-14
Law Intelligence.

Law Intelligence
SUPREME CouRr OF TIM UNITED STArEs.-No. 20.
Jacob Stradsr ct al Christopher Graham. In error
to the Court Of Appeals Of Kentucky Mr. Chief JUS
missing this for the want of Jurisdiction No 49,
The United States, appellants Baptsts Guile ct
theSppsllees. No 40. W. Oakley plaintiff in error,
- John II. Bennett ct al. The argument Of this
cause was commenced TO- the plaintiff In error and
continued for the defensnt In error.
SuPxEMI CeRRT or THE UNITED STATES Jan NO
20 d. Preston ct al rs. G. Bracken mo. 80. j.
McNulty Is. J Bstty ct al In error to the Supreme
Court OF the Territory Of Wisconsin Mr. Justice Nell
son delivered the opinion OF this Court absting the
writ Of error In each of these casss-No II. j. Ian
the United States for Missouri. Mr.. Justice Catron
delivered the opinion Of this Court affirming the judy
ment Of the said Circuit Court in this cause g.
7. Henderson ct al Lessee OF the State OF Tonnes
see. in error to the Supreme Court Of Tennessee
Mr.. Chief Ju.tice Tsnsy delivered the opinion
risdiction No. 49, 8. W. Oakley, plaintiff in error
John II. Bennett ct al This cause argued for
the defendants in error.-No. AZ x. Blanc, plaintiff
gued for the plaintiff in error.-No. 80. Canal Com,
mi,sicners Of plaintiffs in The
State OF PsnDeyvania The argument Of this cause
was commenced for the plaintiffs in error.
Urrrp STATES SUPREME Counr, JAN. s.-No S5-J.
G. Wilson W.. G. A. Sanford, ct al In error to the
Circuit Court Of the United States for Louisiana Mr.
Chief Justice fancy delivered the spinicn Of the court
Diminishing this case for the want Of jursdiaton No
So-canaI Commissioners. plaintiffs in error, vs. the
continued by Mr. Aricks for the defendant In
error and concluded by Mr. Porter for the plaintiffs
Rhodes ct al This cause was submitted on : printed
argument by Mr.. Butterworth, fer the appellant No
This cause wa. argued by Mr. walker for the plaintiff
In error and by Mr. Attorney General Crttepdsn for
the defendant In error No Ss-P. Mednl, plaintiff 10
the court on printed arguments, by Mr. Butterworth
for the plaintiff in and by Mr. benjamin. for the
defendant in error.
EupnPnE Cornr or rur UsfTrp SrIrps JAx -
Rule No So. Ordered, that when q Is taken up
fos trial, upon the regular call Of the docket, and
10 prin.>d argument will be received unless II Is fled
before the syal argument begins, and the Court will
por,e argument This rule to take effect after the
present term NO 49, Charles Gaylor ct al. vs.. b.
wGsr IN error t ch Gireui. Court q the
opir ion Of this Court, afrsps the Judgment OF the
ssid Circuit Court with costs damages At the rate
Of six per centum per annum. NJ col John Hender-
plaintiff In error, vs. III y Moron The plaintIff
in error having fled statement thai the matters in
controversy had been agreed and seted be- veeu the
parties this writ OF the Circst Cart Of the
U 3 for Louisiana dismissed at the cost of the
plaintiffs in error No SO r. G: Stockton, appellant,
j. G. Ford The argument oil this cora.
msnesd for the appellant, and contained for the
appellee.
srPRrMr CouRr OF THr UsuIrp STATES, Jan. 10
7. N Van by Ike Esq, Of Tennessee, was admitted an
attorney and counsellor Of this court No. log JeGker
Tore Co, appellants, VS.. J. ID. Montgomery. No
Ths,. to the
OF the court the records and printed argumsnts By
Mr. Coke for Jscker, Tore Co. and by Messrs Key
Appellant W Jane q Ford. The argument Of this
csus. concluded By Dir walker for the appellant.
Brooks. ct al. The argument Of this cause com.
msnced by Mr.. Attorney General Crittenden for the
plaintiffs in error.
CounT OF AprrsIs ALBayY, Jan. THE Chief Judge
nsea I hoa ss sessions
nom to Ok y This being motion day the following
motions were decided :-Bly denburgh. appellant,
against Cothes respondent. Motion to dsmiss appeal
denied with costs Van wyck and vile. respondents,
agsinst Seymour ard wife appellants; Mai-on, appel
liant against the came respondents. Motion 10 yacats
order entered, Diminishing the appeal Of Msison,
granted on payment Of costs The Farmers Loan and
Trust Company and others appellants against Carroll
j. Carroll 10 modify the decree entered In this cause
the 10th October last. 70 hm granted In part.
pslsnt Motion 10 the order entered dsmssipg
the appeal granted on payment OF costs q procuring
the order. Raymond and others, sppelsats, against
Pprdy and others. respondents. Melton to dismiss
appeal granted with costs Raymond ard others, sp-
psilsnts against Brewer aud others, respondents Mo-
ton to di,miss appeal granted with coss Ward sur
yivor Sc appellant against syms and others respon-
dents. Notion by appellant that the r,iais, Lied In
the court below b. returned TO this sourt that the
judgment Of sfflrmsnce heretofore rendered, be va
Gated, and that the cause be re argued SC denied
with co,ts. The opening argument In No ". re-
sumsd and continued until the hour Of recess p NJ,
and not concluded.
CovRr o. ArpyALs, Albany. Jan. 1e--This being
motion day, several motions we're made, and the fol-
loving decided i-Thempson APPELLANT sgt BOVINE
Thompson and another respon dents Motion TO dismiss
appeals In these causes granted BY Default Jacks and
appellants sgt Nichols, respondent mo l0l.
Motion by appellants to vscate III. default entered In
this caus. on the I'd inst granted on terms smith,
appellant agt Lynes and other. respondent mo ls
the 4th inst granted that the stand as No.
tsh on the calendar.
PHOSPHATE OF LIME 1t seems singular that on