New-York daily tribune., 1851-07-29


And the plaintiff did accordingly pseplfe nm ~
for he iourrey and did hold himself n re 'aess ~
go - requested I days notice .,. -,
And the plaintiff on i:e 1ay OF oc.gs.,D ,e
tho year last AFORESAID. lac "A l1e "!.s.'o,,
ceivsd a note from the defendant IN ne del.A4-.i
own hand wrltlng requesting IN pia-I... ~
town for Great harrington Imine ld'e.t a. -
services were especially required a, stiI 20 - ~
S.antan, snd hose associated WITH hlfn az alole-
,,e rlain.iT not beng able 70 leave hs resi-
s,nrc IN ftc CIV OF New-IOrk ID the morning ~ 50
80 -, ,of,eS departed IN tie afternoon Oi me
er, day after the receipt Of the note, and arrFei ~
C,est harrington AFORESAID, late IN the same ngAt,
and tnen and there met the defendant at the Hotel
called the Berkshire House" on the Register o.
which Hotel the plaintiff wrote ms name as " D. =.
Bacon, New ork' 1
And the defendant ascer.aning that the Pa.ntlf
had so writien ms name. wen; 70 the sad Register
and altered the plaintiffs name as writeh oy lhe
plaintiff on the sa Register, 50 as 20 make u appear
10 be some other name than Bacon Ana the pitn'
t beng Informed bv the defendant Of the SAID alter
alton examined the sad Register, and hnilIg taat
his Signature had been thus changed, le"rolG lhe
altered letters, and o5terated the MARKS ndIe y
the defendant upon 1t, and exPosiulated WIN te e
fendant the absurci:y OF thus presenting MN a.
an object of suspicion to those who had already seen
his name as written by himself and might lInDlte the
subsequent ATTEMPTED falslhcatlOn 10 some bal mo-
tive MS part as If ne we're criminal seeking 70
disguise himself
And the defendant stated 10 the plaintiff TIA; he
feared that some o. the agents or friends OF Horace
Day In the village OF Great Darlington might DIS
cover from the Register that the plaintiff was IN the
said village IN company with The dcienGant, anu
might thence infer that the plaintiff was employed
by the defendant TO write IN hrs defense against the
sac Day and the defendant had several private m
toryicws an5 consultations with me palhun. ~ tIe
SAID village OF Great Darlington, concerning the M
slnees OF the defendant and the business OF me
Berkshire Woolen Company before mentioned win
special reference to their lawsuits against Horace
II Day
Andt defendant on the next day, TO wit on the
day Of September, IN the year last aforesaid DE,
parted on his return 70 the City oil NeW-l OK, ana
requested the plaintiff to remain IN the village oi
Get HARRINGTON for the purpose OF studying tho To-
caltlcs IN connection with the contrOversies ana
lawsuits IN which the defendant and ihe berKsnIre
Wooden Company and others were Parnes' against
Horace II Day.
And the plaintiff did accordingly 50 remain in the
sand village and did wholly devote himself TO the
business Of the defendant, having no other purpose
III gong 20 sand village.
And the plaintiff in pursuance TO the instructions
OF the defendant did VISIT and examine the WORKS OF
the Berkshire Woolen Company IN the sad village,
and the dam and water power belonging 70 inc sdlu
Company, especially N relation TO another dam con
stnciod "A Little below on the same stream by horace
II. Day, IN consequence OF winch u was alleged by
the defendant. the Dam and watcr-WOrks OF the sdlu
Company had been greatly INJURED AMI controversies
and litgations had reSultodbctweenth said Company
and the SAID Day.
defendant visit various localities III and near the
SAID village. IN order 20 prepare himself to write de
connected with the controversies ana disputes De-
tween Day other parties aforementioned
And the plaintiff then returned to the City OF New
York on Monday, the - DAY OF september, ana an
nOuncod his return Al The defendants once ana sig
nie 70 the defendant that he was ready To iurhlsn
the proposed written articles, whenever they should
be called for.
And the plaintiff occupied himself with the pre-
paratiOn and consideration OF the facts for the com
position OF such articles or arguments upon then as
might be required by the defendant.
And during the months OF September, OctODer, NO
mI( AN
eight hundred and fifty the plaintiff at the request OF
the defendant continued TO call at the aforesaid resi-
donce and Office OF the defendant. for conSultaonln III
regard to the business OF the defendant ana TO col
lei and receive information IN regard 10 lhe move
menis of Horace H. Day, and 10 be prepared 10 de-
fend the interests and alleged rights OF the defendant
and of those associated with hlfn when attdcAei py
the SAID Day
And during the four last aforesaid months the num-
Der OF visits and consultations thus ma &c oythe pl-
m to the defendant, and al his request as dioI'Sdu,
was not less than hiieen
And the plaintiff being urged by the defendant TO
come more frequently to the sand Office OF sad de-
fendart represented to the defendant that on ac-
count OF the public and conspicuous character ol the
place 9s Broadway, the SecreSy desired by the de-
lendant IN regard to the employment ana association
of the plaintiff with the defendant might idl 10 De
preserved and plaintiff, therefore, suggested To the
defendant that for the purpose OF nailtdnlhg Such
secreSy IL would be better that the necessary lnler-
views and consultations should take place either al
the private Office of the plaintiff or at the residence OF
the defendant To the prOprlCty OF which suggestion
| the defendant assenied. and appointed interviews
with the plaintiff al the defendants Aforesaid resi-
| dence
And the plaintiff duly attended in fuliment OF such
/ appointments aid beng agaln requested by the de-
fendant 10 meet HIM al 9s Broadway the plalnln re-
ntWtd ms attendanCcS al the Sdld once OF tht ut
| fendant, and continued them by appointment ana
request of the defendant. during the months OF Janu
! AIRY and February. one thousand eight hundred and
fit, one, the number Of such alcndanccS during The
/ sand two months being not less than twenty.
/ And the defendant also called IN the month OF
February al the Office OF the plaintl AT NO - East
FouIteenth-st, IN Sld City of New-l oIk, ana con
suited the plaintiff IN regard To the sad business OF
the defendant, and called repeatedly at the SAID Of
fee OF the plaintiff for the said purpose, and Tor no
] other purpose whatever.
] And IN the month of January one thousand eight
/ hundred and fifty one, the defendant informed tue
plaintiff that the aforesaid Horace Ii. Day was then
/ IN the City OF Washington, endoaVormg 10 procure
the passage of bl IN Congress TO alter the paiehl
laws of the United States N such manner a. 10 IN
Jure very materially the Interests OF the defendant
and of Charles GOODYEAR and other inventors am
paitniCes associated with the defendant or repre-
Scntod by the defendant, and employing hlm TO de
fend their alleged rights AMI interests. And the dc
fCnddnt requested the paintln 10 hold himself IA
readiness 10 60 to the Cly OF Washington 10 attend
on the sessions of Congress when II should oe neceS-
Sary. order 70 counteraci the pretended mtchina-
tons of the said Horace II. Day, and prevent the
passage of the said bill IN Congress
And the plaintiff agreed 10 go to Washington
whenever the defendant should 80 require during
the sitting OF Congress then IN existence.
And The defendant agreed 10 give The pdlltlh Cue
notice of such necessity.
And the defendant IN SAID month OF January, re-
queSted the plaintiff 10 wrto certain articles Tor pub
hcalOn IN the newspapers. setting forth 10 The pub
hc the injustice OF the course of Horace Ii. Day IN
denying the exclusive night OF Charles GoodyedT 10
certain modes OF preparing and manufacturing India
Rubber. And also setting forth the alleged great
losses and grievances that would be caused 10 merl
torVuS inventors and pateneeS by the passage 81 the
aforesaid hli in Congress for the alteration oil the
Patent Laws OF the nted states
And tie p.aInlh IN pursuance ot such instructions,
did compose and WIte SCrleS OF articles for the
defendant. and furnished them 10 the defendant.
who accepted them and pronounced them 10 oe com
plete and satisfactory.
And the defendant. on the - day OF February,
IN said year one thousand .ght hundred and fifty
one, placed note II the plaintiff Office, requesting
the plaintiff 5 attendance ~ the defendants Office.
Aud the nlalntlf on he RECENT Of Tie sud vote