New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-10-31
SUPREME COURT-LEvI $. CHAT.

g UPREME COURT-LEVl 5. CHAT.
NFIEID, Attorney General OF .he State Of New YORK
PANY or THE CANAL BANK or ALBANY.-In
pursuance Of order OF the supreme Court OF ne STATE al
the undersged Receiver OF the Canal Bank Of Albany,
hereby gives the hoaers ~ The outstanding c'rcu-
hating balls II the sad Canal Bank and 70 ne per-
sons holding the certfcAes gwen by the undersigned
such RecelveE for the balance aiming unpaid on notes or
bills SURRENDERED wing the hrs dividend az SKY
per tha, they required present the SAID notes OF
bills and certificates ~ pay neni - The sA Rscete AZ ns
Of his notice or default thereof will DC prsclued
nom The beuef OF the fund provided for the payen; OF tho
SAID notes bills and cernhcaies aRd from ll clam by
OF holding the AMI hsf the sad fund Will 10
esed VI uuder the direction u the SAID Court for the
benefit Of the other creditors q the sand Canal Bank IN
such manner as HAY he hereafter determined For the
greater Of those holding the sad bulls and GER
same vii also be PAL on prsseiats to the Commercial
Bans IN thu CITY ALBANY, Isqs ,s'S ,,,rr u.
ie7 law2SF AND WHITE, Receiver.
alta SURROGATE'S COURT, held
gates Oice the Civ OF New York. On he 9th Of octo
Der IN the one thousand sShi hundred and ny cue
Present Alexander W Bradford Surrogate. In the mai
ter OF the Application to mcssae ease or sell the real
estate Z James Greg decssssd On resans and ding
james nf s @ CIV & New YS zoe
authority 10 mortgage ease OF sell the real estate 81 the
hsi all persons Interested IN the said James
Greg deceased appear before the Surrogate of'he County
OF New York at his office, IN the CITY Of New York, on
the fifth day OF November aet, n 10 6clock m the
forenoon u that day then and there 90 show cause why
authority shOud re to the said administrator ~
moease lease or sell So much z the real estate OF the
sad Jaaes Greg deceased IS ;,s DC .pssn. to rsy h'
NEW-YORK SUPREME COURT -
Y city and County OF New York --fhomss Hant VII
ham NJ Richards Isaac Rogers Cuban Hook and iohn
,ars Sans. fgs kSy a. Isen n,n
ed. You are hs~cb, sunmone ens required TO answer
the complain, in this acton whsch win be nied IN the
a, The City Hail IN the City OF Ne~-Yo,s, and to
copy Of your aswer TO tho snd complaint on ths
way IN the City of New York within twenty days after
the service Of this summons you exclusive OF the day
plant within the time aforesaid the plaintiffs thus action
Will amply the Court for the relief demanded IN the
coz ''''"'- O GOODMAN Plaintiff. Attorney
The rompia int IN this action tiled IN the SAID Clerks
office of the above Court Oct %. 1851. oSl ia~owF
NEW-YORK SUPREME COURT
Y City and County of New ork-Georse a rro~-
bridge and Oliver J. Noyes agans, George 5; Raynond
and Joseph Greenwood Summons. To the DEFEND
ANTS above named You are hereby summo@d a,d re-
oscd the compliant m this action. which DO
filed the Office the Clerk Of the C.s and County OF New
cory OF your the said complain on the suosct-
her at LIS Office No one hundred snd SIX N 'bs
tins you exclusive If the day % such service
and yoo fail 70 answer the &C cnmpn WI, wv" ~ , Inc
Court the relief demanded IA 'he comtssm -Da'sa
HrS s scmpau in this s sc.oa died IN the SAID Clerk.
Office Of the above Court October 49, 1851 o3l lawowF
NETWORK SUPREME COURT
~ City and County II New-York.-The Watertown
MANUFACTURING Company against George Eaymonn ana
DEFENDANTS above named You are hereby summon
ed and required TO answer the COM liant IN ths acuoh
which will ne filed the Office VI the Clerk OF me ty snu
Cortv OF New York at the CITY Hid IN said CITY and to
"A copy OF your answer u the sai compiin on ne
subscriber ms office. No one hundred AMI sly bruan-
way IN SAID City of New-Ycrk, within twenty days aitef
the OF this summons oh you exclusive o sne uo!
SUI and II you fti u answer the sao Complain,
within the time Aforesaid plaintiffs an tins action VIII
apply the Court for the relief demanded ~ re com
plant. Dated May 30, 1851 ok. 1QoDMaN,
The con plant in this filed IN the SAID CLERKS
ONCE of The above Court October 18Th, 1881 oJl lawowf
SUPREME COURT-City and County
J1G rdh0 bsaI Rsa SSn% asans, George
: RAYMOND ard Joseph Gteen~ood Summons - 10
the DEFENDANTS above named No" o are ne,op1
summoned and required t. answer tas oOSm pa Nh ~
Tim acta. which will be filed IN me ONCE OF me t,eiS
of the CITY aud County of NeS-iotx az the Wy hsni
complaint the subscriber. at his office No one nun
dIed ana ok IN sso Of bs summon. on YOU e"
elusive II the day Of such service aud YOU ia an
plaintiffs in this action vii, take Judgment against you for
The of nine hundred dollars w,a a,eiss zoo" sno
one bsss9s the costs of this action Dated New York.
june 2, 1851 r. GOODMAN, Plantlfis' Attorney
The complaint in this action was ed IN the snd clerks
Office of the above Court October lS. 1851 81 is"twF
SUPREME COURT-City and County
~ Of New York David A Herrck and sael W Scud-
der against George s. RAYMOND and Joseph Green
wood-Summons To the DEFEND ANTS above named
y are hereby summoned and required TO answer
the compliant N this action, which wall he filed N the
ONCE OF the 0ers Of the CW aad CoaHty 81 I've! New"
copy of your the SAID plant On the snoscnoeI
his office. No one hundred al SIX btea" ~ saa
city within twenty days atter The srrYte OF lH's ~ @
ON you, exclusive Oh the day Of such '.Lcs ana you
fato answS the said COMPLAIN whn Ins ,e ~",
the plantiGs IN ths action~l tsSe ~ Iao ~
TO- the sum Of one hundre' al senenSY 90 y" a,.-
thosard eght hundred ami hy one lesdss the costs 81
THIS acton Dated Nay ~, ~ p,,n,r ,,o,nev
The COMPLAINT IN ths act lied in the said Clerks
Office OF the above Court Oc!obe 18Th, it'i OH ia"owF
SUPERIOR COURT-City and County
- ofNew-York-Rlchard FIELD. Joan Merritt, Charles
u Field and Daniel Kan Jr. AGAINST J"c vandeIpooi,
George Mouat-To JACOB vANDERpooL, Jr sn:
You hereby summoned to answer the 1'mIass IN th
action Of winch copy herewith served ap"n y1u 5a
seiye copy OF your answer ne at my oh,ce N1%Der
10 Chambers street New YORK CITY SItha twenty day.
atef the service hereof exclusive Of the day of such
,egyice and # YOU fail 70 answer the comah' AZ aiofe-
said The plaintiffs WIN take judgment t9r me sun o. sn1ss
hun ed and fry dollars with interest from the
Jay ofJuy one thousand eight hundred and o-
ehe with seventy FIVE cent eIpens q tSs son
Ssl lawewF Plaintiffs Attorney.
NEW YORK SUPREME COURT
~ City and County of New York James DIVE
asn EsySSfDS ia s5s You are
hereby summoned and required % answer she c2mL LAM
lh a;,lon .hch vi. p. hisa N tae =, he SS Hall m
the Git, ofNea York and TO serve coy q yoar ansxsf
10 he sad complaint the subscriber, AZ MS ONCE NO
one hundfed and Broadway. IN tbs sad CD w'nh
twenty days after he service Of this summons en-
elusive Of the day Of such selce and you fa 20 ans
wes 20 the ssid complain, within the tune Aforesaid inc
plaintiff this action VIII apply 70 ,on,o iof 5', 'e
lief Demanded IN II compliant -Da. ed Nay 3Otn l81l
r. GOODMAN. Plaintiff Attorney.
The eomy Mt 10 THIS aetia was nsd "a me sto c'ei.
Office II the above Court October 18Th 1851 osi la"C"F
TN PURSUANCE Of an order of the Sur
rorate Of the County Of Ner-York notice = asfsy
gwen all persons having GAINS AGAINST E'i THOMAS,
late II the City II NegYork merchant deceased " pre-
scot thu same vouchers thereof 70 the suscnbes az
tie Office II Robert GOf No Broad-,reet, the CitJ
OF New before the thirteenth day Of January
merit 90 Dated New-Yors the ninth day of July, 1891.
ROBERT II GOPF AdnlmstTatof
NIL lawsmFs ELIZABETH THOMAS, AnanstrAinf.
IN PURSUANCE Of an order OF the
1t....,.. A Nnr- Nnrk y rfUy