New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1851-11-22
COURT PROCEEDINGS.

---<0---------
COURT PROCEEDINGS.
CouRr CALrNDAR-This Day-Circuit
Cout-Nos 500 626 s23, s2i, $685. SOC, 81, 49, $50 to
So.
SUPERIOR CouRT- Monday-No 10. 81,
o.. 40. SO, 1875 13S 1856 IL, 5 6 81 ll3 AL l42 49,
AZ, 1874 So So &c. 1856, 49, 1853, 1885, 49, 81, H. ,, 46,
&c. 6', 81 A. Il, iO2' l2S; 10, 100
SUPERIOR CouRT.-Before Judge Paine.
--Frederick W,SSmoa against Fernando Wood-To re-
cover the value of 500 barrels corn meal, the de-
sCnse to which was, that II was OF bad quality &C
different from sample, already referred to. Verdict
for plaintiff, : ,lg5.
Human lutheran against Benz Al5ro.-Action Of
cjec,ment IN relation to night of an alley running in
the rear of let's, corner OF DivSion-st IN Eldrdge.
To be continued Monday.
CIRCUIT CoURr.-Before Judge Edwards.
curtis LGaby against Oiirer len Sheriff of Steu
ben CO.-To test the validity Of taking back goods
by giving bond, which had been sold on credit on
the faith of statements by the purchaser Of his aol
lty to pay, which were SAID 10 be untrue. The
goods, With others. were purchased by Mr. Freeman,
of SmIthport Pa, he saying he was worth $4,000 to
$4,000. They were OH their way to Pennsylvania
ard at Corning III this State attached by the Sheriff
on a debt for about 81 600 due Humphrey & Lansing
of this City by freeman Earle, who were proceed
ed against as non resident debtors. C.. & l.. took
then eoocs from the Sheriffs hands contending that
on account OF the untrue statements of Mr.. l.. on
purchasing title had not passed This has been
already referred TO. The Jury considered the testl-
mony to show the statements not 10 have been cor
rect, and gave verde. for plaintiffs for their goods
(Which they have, as stated ABOVE, III possesson,l
placing the value at $241.
William b. Draper against Iheo. Roneyn ana A.
bort Babe To recover the amount OF note LOT
$500 Ii is defended by the sGorser, on the ground
that the holder, for consideration, extended the
time after the note due, to the maker. by which
he holoer lost his claim on the endOrser. Mr..
Badc II was sand By counsel for defense, is a Ger
rtf,. 4fea Icre fg,li
INTO the business, as branch OF his establishment
Of selling Western land 10 German emigranis
Messrs Romeyn and Watson, counsellors at law,
became interested with HIM MI. Draper had
large quantlty Of land in Michigan which he EN-
ployed Mr.. Il. to sell, and occasionally adv tnced
nm uoney. His note, Endorsed by Mr.. X, WAS for
q loan. On It's maturity Mr.. Babe not paying H.
and Nj Watson not wishing the credit OF u. - be
'0s, in the market. induced Mr.. Draper, on the
promise that he (W would also assist to sell his
lands. not 10 press II.
CIRCUIT CoURT.-Before Judge Edwards.
--Wgl p Draper against Theo. Romeg1l et GL-To re-
cover a note already referred TO. The Court con
cuded that there had been 10 bargain 10 extend, II
beng mere assent not 10 press pay men', ana ve!
dlc was gwen for plaintiff in amount and interest,
va. GatesiiH against Philip Red and Geo. H. GOst-
chiS To recover 1892 for nine head OF cattle SOFA
Il, Is alleged 10 MeSsrS Z. and e. VINO are butchers,
IN August 1850 The suit is defended by Mr. g. who
states that SIR Il. bought, and he &C. bought OF Il.
On the other hand, II was said, that the piI'les
GENE together, and Nh G had hail OF 'le o't'ie al
ter Icing slaughtered The case is on
CorRT OF OYER AND TERMINER.-Two
men named Steekennter and >hafer' indicted ior
The murder Of Basil Blair, by staoOlng' ie" Gays
snce were brought up for arralgnment put the
Judce holding the term Judge hing opened WIN
AID Conklln and Miller for the day. not belhg pres
sent-probably prevented by the stOrm-they were
renamed TIL Monday.
Court OF COMMON PLEAs.-ln { h M
bers-Before Judge Daly-HabeaS Corpus --Lovuls
D. Tevnsley, committed by Justice osoofn, On
charge Of disoTderly conduct preferred py the new
York Exchange Bank, IN his coming to the BANK
ard presenting notes of country banks OF whlch Tue
Bank was agent, III a manner calculated 10 annoy
the officers of the Bark, by orering one oil! auef
another, &c, instead OF putting them IN Packages
and thereby provoke breach Of the peace, was
brought up for discharge. on the ground, ISL maj
the affidavit on which he was committed dld not
contain sufficient to authorize the magistrate TO com
mi him for dsorderly conduct ana %, That the
magistrate discharged him IN authorizing the Jauef
10 permit him to go With an oicer 10 mo Dali IA
$50 and that, on his return, not having been aoie
to find bail, the magistrate haa no auinorily W IT,
commit him on the same compliant
The latter commended that the affidavit contained
sufficient to authorize the magistrate 10 rea1 II as
case of disorderly conduct, tending to oreach OF
the peace /, stated that he came day after day aud
presented bills for payment, 81 al time ana 'ha.
on the last he came, and was tod ne must
go, in order 70 obtain an exchange OF MS DIS III
The beck room. which he did but he there refused
10 sort them putting the bills OF particular bank
together ard went gain into the front or BANKING
room. and threw $l2 on the counter and demanded
spe CSC. and his ooJect was 10 annoy, &c MI I.
I'D the intention was to prevent the banks from
exchanging so as TO throw all the business OF ex-
changing country bills for city or specie INTO the
HANDS OF the brokers.
Vr Rrady re plled contendlng II would be danger
ors 10 the citizen to give Police Magistrate power
~ commit in case like this. every Sigh, occa-
sion II might De construed into dlsordery conduct,
&C. He also contended that the magistrate hau us-
Charged and could not re-commlt.
Tfe Judge considered that there was not enough
N me affidavit 10 warrant commitment Inc de-
PENDANT had night 70 go to the BANK as agent, 10Y
nayirg the bills they had one rule of presenting,
and he chose 10 adopt another but there was no
thiyc done that would necessarily provoke the on
Gers 70 breach Of the peace. He was discharged