Worcester daily spy., 1851-10-07

The Tlanscriptof yesterday pronounees state
men false" in relation to the omission to furnish US
with the Horticultural Reports in season to publish
them simultaneously with that paper, and says:
s'we have taken great pains to furnish the Spy with
all reports designed for publication in its columns, and
haze done in to their simultaneous ap-
pearance in both papers,
The facts in the case are these. The fist report
being that upon pears, seasonaby brought us,
before STAGED, by member of the Committee 1t was
printed copy, which he procured on his own indvd-
ual responsibility, for us. The report "on Flowers
and Decoraons,' which published in the Tran
script of Friday, offered to at all. That
vegetables" which appeared in the Transcript on
Saturday, was brough to office Friday after.
noon, considerable portion of it after hands had
left the office for their and after the time for taking
In hand any matter except advertisements and the
news by the evening mails. 1t would, at that time,
hare been very iuconvenient, and next to impossible
for to get it into the next mornings paper and it
not, thereore season for US to publish it simutane.
ousIy with the Transcript.
! The Transcript says further
''It was through our courtesy, that The Spy was fur
nished with corrected copy print of the first Re-
port
We have the authority of the Chairman Of the Com
mttee, for saying that was not through the courtesy
tesy of the Transcript that furnished with it.
When he left the manuscript that office, he stpu-
lated as a condition of his leaving it, that he should
have copy in for us, that he promised
it and furnished it to Us his account, and not
as the messenger Of the Transcript; and that but for
the asserting to that condition, he should have fur
nished the manuscript first to In question of
veracty between him and the Il Transcript, The public
will not hesitate which TO believe.
But, says the Transcript, we indebted to its
courtesy for ga corrected copy prnt of that report
This obligation may be appreciated by those who will
compare the report it appeared in the Transcript
with that in the Weekly Spy, in the former of which,
they will find multitude of typographical errors,
which are corrected in the Spy such as Long Grace''
for "Long Green,'' &C., &c. In the Daily Spy, ow-
ing to the absence from the city of the senior editor
who has the special charge of such articles, many of
the errors of the Transcript went uncorrected.
The Transcript travels ont Of its way, to charge
of the editors OF the Spy with dscourtesy toward
of the managers of the Mechanics Fair and of the
managers of the Horticultural Exhibition. This, the
editor alluded distinctly denes and we do not be-
leve that any Of those gentlemen will thank the Tran
script for its mpertnent intermeddng, in what is
none of its business In this connection, we have
another instance of the character of the Tran
script. 1t SAID that the junior editor of the Spy in
hicted
ga censoriors castg ion upon Of the managers
of the Horticultural Exhibition, because il was adver-
Iised in the Transcript and not in the Daily Spy when
the same advertisement had been published for some
time in the Weekly Spy, and marked for the DAILY
also, but had been cGreessLy omitted from the atter
We happen to have the best possible proof of the
Sheer unmitgated aisehood of the latter portion of this
statement. We have the original advertisement lust
it was brought to us, with the mark written out at
fall length. Weekly Spy" and no other mark on it
whatever.
We should not have, taken the trouble, thus to ex.
pose the dsingenuousness and falsehood Of the Tran
script had been concerned but ourselves and those
connected with that ricketty banng, and we trust that
combination Of circumstances may again give us oc
casion to waste much time and space or such con-
cern.
DESTRUCTIVE FIRE,-Thc sleam nlanino and