The Lancaster gazette. (Lancaster, Ohio) 1846-1852, 1851-11-27

less subject to mdew and is not so liable to injury
by Ay. The farmer is frequently prevented by ram
from narrowing in his grain alter A. Is sown, whicn
narrowing is not necessary IN seeding win the Ma
Chimes as they complete the work at once.
This Machine for convenience. simplicity and
cheapness is superior to any now in use. The price
being $50 for Machine with 6, and 500 for one with
hose.
ACCOMMODATIONS.
Hocu1va TOWNSHIP, FAIRFELD COUNTY, ONO,
july %, 1850.
This NAV certify that purchased and used last
son one of Moores Patent Wheat Drills, and without
hesitation recommend ito all wheat growers one
Of the most valuable improvements offered to the ag
ricultural c0mmunitytor the simple reason that it
does the wor, beter-taes onetlird less seed-saves
from 25 to 30 per cent of labor in putting out-and
will in my opinion give yield of 25 per cent more
generally, and upon lands liable to freeze ou! when
sown in the common way will give more than double
the Weld. ] drilled some 10 acres last fall for my
neighbors all Of whom with me in the opinion
that it has many decided advantages over all other
modes ofputting out wheat drilled a field for John
Arney Esq, who sowed another field in the common
way and believe all who have examined the two
fields give it their opinion that the drilled field will
nearly il not quite double the broadcast in the yield
Notwithstanding the field sown in the common way
was the freshest and strongest ground
In field of mine of fifteen acres had three acres
sown broadcast, two bushels of seed per acre. the
balance ofthe field drilled with one bushe OF seed
per acrethe drilled wheat was much the largest and
when we TO harvest the thickes on the ground.
This machine operates well on stumpy, hilly clod-
dy ground which have fully tested and have he
station in saying is much better than either the Pow
or harrow JOSHUA CLARKE,
FAIRFIELD County, OHro-We the undersigned
hereby certify that we have used Moore's Drill, made
| by WRIaHr and SELRY in seeding Wheat on our
farms the past year, and have hesitation in saying
that is decidedly the best mode of seeding Wheat; &
we intend hereafter to seed all our Wheat with the
drill We take pleasure in recommending it to all
farmers a valuable Improvement
Thomas Duncan, Frederick Sites,
David Ewing, John Durnebreger,
! July Is, 1851. Daniel Keller
| REFERENCES.
We are PERMITTED to refer to the following, who
few ofthe persons that have purchased and used
the Machines:
Emanuel Stutzman, Charles HartzleI,
Joshua Clarke, Daniel Kutz
| Christian Rugh, John Arney,
| Noah Reem, David Wilson,
George Ring, Andrew Shaw,
Samuel Kirkwood, Frederick Sites,
Daniel Dunkle, David Ewing,
Fairfield county, Ohio.
The subscribers have in their possession the patent
right of the counties Of FAIRFIELD, Ross and PIcK
AWAY of the State Of Ohio, for the above Machines
and would respectfully announce, that they pre-
pared to fill all orders with which they may be favor
ed either personally by letter. from persons ivin
in their counties. The above Machines can be ha
in ChllicOthe, CrcleviHe and al their Shop IN Ian
caster. Address, WRIGHT x SELBY,
Lancaster, Fairfield county, August Z, 1851 IA
Caution! CautiOn!l CautiOn!!
All persons are warned against using or selling l.
others to be usedany machine infringing upCnMoorc'
or Pennock's Patents, (Which we own,) in any of tn
above Counti0s. Farmers held equally liabl
with the manufacturer, The following letter ha
baen received from S. & NJ. Pennock in relation to
Drill now being made by VIM. & c. Kuqp.
KENNEL SQUARE, February IL, 1851.
lfessrs. Wright Sc Selby- GentS;--Your favor o
the llth inst, Is this moment received. You ask
we consider ShermaH's Drill an unfringment upoi
our Patent, We have never yet seen the Drill Ii
question, except amode oft in the Patent Ohice bu
from what we have seen, in addition to what we cal
learn, it is our opinion that 1t does infringe upon
very important feature OF our claim.
We understand that Mr.. SIS Agents in your STATE
have told that our opinion Is that his machine does
infringe upon ours. Mr.. S. and we have never ha
any correspondence respecting his Drill; but we d
not wonder at his making such statement, as we con
slider him quite capable of any such buslness-h
having already defrauded us out of large amounts
money, and at one time come very nearly running vi
Yours, &c. s. < NJ. PENNOCK.