The New York herald., 1851-10-15

The cIEnI-It is not nseessssy 10 Do II. It would
no. alter the mind Of any IL thl court
MT..sa-9s Evans = G b.; - dsci..sSi - is not true
division Of the question was called for and the ques
ton being taken the rst objection it was not sus
Mr. LITTLE asked to have his exceptions noted to this
proceeding.
The second objection in relation to Mr. cs converse
tion with Mr.. Evans, stated
Mr. LITTLE hoped the Court was not ready to vote
upon IL.
Mr. wrLrE thought there might arise very serious
auction mpsrtslity IL IL could be proved that
member Of the Court desired another to stay in order
have majority one vsy or the other.
The CIrRK (actips as Moderator) proceeded to put
the question.
Mr. Llrrlr-I do think there manifest injury done
to my rights by
The CIERK-ws have begun to take the question and
according to rule, We cannot stop.
The objection was not sustained.
Mr. LITTLE expressed his dissatisfaction and entered
his exceptions Het then objected TO another member
e the S tSs
Mr. THoMPsor hoped the court would indulge Mr..
Little, By letting him bring forward his witnesses.
present, he desired the Moderator to citation
Mr.. THOMPSON demanded trial nov, inssmuch as the
prosecutor considered always ready for trial.
Mr. LIriLE SAID be could not achieve impossibities,
unless he got the assistance OF Prof Anderson augh
ter) He had not himself got ins, ananeous trial and
MI. rHoMrsoS-Mr. Little knew what he bringing
up, and ought to have bad his evidence at hand.
W Il.
which not enough. He, therefore, moved that the
| objection be not sustained.
The CLERK said that il tie voted not to sustain
the DIGESTION it would be equivalent saying that il
Mr. sterritt here inasmuch ss he is the only wit
ness, they could not sustain the objection.
Mr. CRYsIIE remarked that this was Of the n
avods be hard hips that person had to encounter
Still he did not see how they could exclude Mr. Thonp
son on the evidence Of one witness There WAS no re-
Mr. THOMPSON willing take his oath that he had
not uttered what Mr. charged
The iOuh he ken onn nj tba nj
lection, 1t was carried.
Mr. LrrrLE entered his exceptions for sending for
the witness
The case was then submitted TO the court.
Mr. STEVENSON hsd his doubts whether Rev. DR.. Will
to open his mouth.
Rev. DR. wmsos-H there be any objection, 1 will
leave the house
Mr.. eIEyFNsON.-I have my doubts.
Mr. WiLIE copcurred In expressing his doubts
Dr. WILsoS.-Well there are enough TO msnsge this
tina! without me Exit DR.. W, muttering out some
ing amid considerable merrimsnt on the part of the
audiepee
M CRysrIr then proceeded at .ome length to main.
tain that the charges in the libel had not been proven
and made q motion TO that effect.
The CLERK asked for a division Of the question, by
taking up each specification separately
The queston then came count drst specification
first given al she Of this report which
commented on, until the hour arrived for the members
go to tea when it moved and carried to take
recess till IA O'Clock in the evening.
EVENING SESSION.
The discussion in relation to the first count and first
sp.ceatou was continued Nothing Of interest to
readers in general was spoken until Mr. WyLiE made
repsrk that Mr l. had taught false doctrine, he (Mr
" had done the same thing and would do so again.
The expression Of this sentiment responded to by
loud applause from the audience.
Mr. 1Honpso~-That Z, Ia the story where We stand,
exactly would move On adjournment
Mr.. WYLIE was exceedingly sorry such demonstrs-
ton had been made
Mr. LlrriE requested the congregation to withhold the
expression Of their feelings in future and assured the
Court what be knew Of the character OF the con-
gregstion, that 1t would net be repeated Those who
applSuded him mainly children and the Court need
not tremble ct a breath.
The ClrnR-we have had plenty Of evidence what
the character Of the congregation is
Mr.. THoMPsoS 1t is insult TO the Lord Jesus
Christ
Mr. s VI wuso~ bad apprehension Of being dis
tubed again in the least Ye thought that the per'ors
engaged in the oatbresk would upon little refec-
ton that It improper and refrain from IL IN nture
Mr. sHAw asked the privilege Of having the reading OF
part Of the testimony related to the question be-
fore the Court.
The Moprs.roH would grant the privilege far as Il
related 10 any spec iho testimony
Mr. sH,w wanted the testimony Ct two or three wit
nesses for the defendant read entire
The CIFrK-I will not ~ ad 10 entire. am not going
70 read what nobody hss right TO ask.
The MoprR ,roR Whose testimony IL II
Mr. sHAw-SCme two three OF the wi,nsssss sor the
defer
Mr. sn.w-For myself not that have any hesita-
ton in my mind but have not before me now that
testimony Witch think than covers the extracts
from the testimony made in benalf Of the prosecutor
Nr 8 then Proceeded. rome length 10 -xpi4in Mr..
Litte's position saying that be Mt euaentIJ hsd
ia the entire sermon taken peculiar view o conscience
and t CpeTston aud seemed 70 take for granted that
bis hearers understood him, which II seemed now every
person did not and here the great cause OF The
difeuly. Mr. L. had taught that conscience operated
between God and ourselves and ala no, make the con-
stituton law of the nation A. the basis OF s opera
ton.
After furthtr debate the question was taken by yeas
and Dsy, count hTs specific. .ticn trs Of the libel
and resulted In the sustaining of the charge the vote
standing 81 follows
Yeas or those in favor q sustaining the chlrge)-s
VI Wilson A Stevenson, J NJ. Wilson. u. wilson
h Williams. J. Douglass, W Thompson j. Virgins, John
Evsns. Brown 10.
N.ys-J. Crysti. 8. o. wyu. o Fleming II. Glass.
ford W stsrritt ShAv-e
Not voting NJ Besttie. J smith, s. Carlisle, W.
Brown
The sour then adjourned 20 the next day at o'clock