The Hillsborough recorder. [volume] (Hillsborough, N.C.) 1820-1879, 1850-07-03

IRON . esute 81 tnly m eF nalneisa'l
md Ne 6na tna saInsldy sngatlt y =
.hobls sEari % q jusi he nIny q lerlles
lhal exia hslHesn lhs Norih una eo1th,
and Ihu o Slrsnglhen he bands q eloth-
srhooS spd gire forss 70 lhs psrp<iuliy
Of fhs Usios. Whsssvss ths result he
deserves and VII rcsivs Ne sppiHsse q
shs frsss nsss Of his eoustrymsn. The
national zeal 10 bic sole Object He hss
no ambitious spds 20 Crafty. 10 seeks
she prosperity Of his fellow citizens. The
honor and de glory OF The Republic. His
lie hss been one Of usefulness. sslfszeri-
Gee and undoubssd patriotism. Even The
highest Office in The gin Of The people.
eould not add In The slightest degree 70 his
reputation. His populsriy was never
greater than nor. and il Is nsiionsl and
confined 10 no section. Every where
throughout The Union. Henry Clay has
troops nf enthusiastic sdmirsrs and de-
vo.sd friends. They love he man. they
admire the salesman. they appreciate The
patriot PAl LSsss.
The Hillsborough Democrat sxpresses
% wonder and amsxenent." that The Edi-
snr Of This paper. a. one Of The commiiies
oflhs late whig Convention which report
ed the resolutions. should have sgresd 10
those which recommend the submissiop
OF The subjeei Of free suffrage 70 The peo-
pie Tor decision. ID ehargesus with hsv-
ing. two yssn $50. % poured forth the most
viruleni sbvss sgsinsl The author Of this
noble principle. and oil his defenders and
supporters" The Editor regrets that he
has moi The flss Of the Observer % proof
Of What he ssseris.
He hss reason TO regrsiii; for there 70 no
foundation irhafersr for his statement.
We INDUCED in no iruleni sbuss Of The
author Of ihs free suffrage question nor Of
Mr.. Reid. land they ere net ihspsms per
son-lhs Jpn. SSnyiof e slsf oi Illinois
bsis the miiss orifidS a. ~ that txsi
for q els ION altNszs -! Che ESAos
hsd D. a ou kflss Ne would have found. 10
the Otssvsf II Aug. 20. lsls. The fol.
lowing reply 20 The Wilmington Journal |:
- So Ear from the Observer opposing
Free Suifrsgs before the Election, it.said
nothing on Tho subject, except 90 far a.
necessary TO expose Reds miserable at.
tempt 10 humbug the people. As regard.
ed the merits Of Free Suffrage itself. the
Observer took no part either for or against
i,--regarding il 10 not proper subject to
DO brought into . heated party csnvsss.
but rather a. one which should be decided
by the people in cool. calm. and dispss-
sionsis manner. and free from oil party
hiss"
We regret that The Democrats not able
10 discriminate between opposition in
lsts. 10 the springing upon the people,
40 party question. for party purposes. OF
a change which they had never called for.
and perfect willingness, then or now.
10 LEI The people decide the question for
themselves. We defy the Democrat to
show tina, either DR.. Hill. Mr.. Rayner.
Mr.. Boydsn. the Editor Of this paper. (all
Of whom il mentions by name,) or any
other member ofihs Committee. ever was
IN favor Of rsfusing 70 the people the rieh,
10 decide lhequesiion for themselves. In
deed Mr.. Rayuer presented bill. in The
last Legislature. 10 get vote Of the pso-
pie on the question; but il was rejected,
not by Wing votes alone, bu. by votes Of
members Of both political parties.
Fayetteville Odssrrer.