The New York herald., 1850-02-24

ArDss and ~. oonfsetossr; do not rssollsst sny-
thing about Clsrk's having addressed lady; Do not
believe II Clark married men that be would ID
in -, property h.ld Sy cI.rs
Dsspsu and Csilsvst repeating ths svi
depcs given BY them before With slight alterations
and addtions which VIII bs noted In the brisf OF the
attornsysI
EccLEsiAsricAL RECORDS, ovvaED Nv DsvEspA~rs. au-
LArivE TO THE cnAsas - ssoAMv AeAissr lEsoss
DEGRArek-MASs,Acxo % DE0aAsos AND ZglINs.
DsGrsuas to ooptrsst marriage with Maria Julia ar
rere native OF this city written II the formal style OF
1874 Tbss followed he ususi pusc.sious Of sh. bans
Previous g the fourth sed last paelis.sou os.sass
petons the Bishop to dispense hin from the fourth
pobttcation - Lent 10 sbost to ooum~ncs, Witch
would postpsns bis marriage; svd be has smbArksd
wa. The di.pensation grsnt-d aud the parties
regularly ssa tov nsiy married With ell due pomp sod
csrsmony. Thee docnments all sllsye that legal
tDpsdimsnts exist TO the marriage
THE sIoANy AGAINST pEGRA ANoa.
decree Of the Vicar General Thomas IA act states
ssst . rspc.sss that ,,c ,spcns .eo @.ssd
bsrbars Jesubells who hes arrived hers from frAnes
and that vas reported aid Ds0rsugs had suo:hsr
is oppcsed to the pfroepts Of Holy Mother hurh
su order m therefore nsds that Dsrsngs be arrested
ssd hsld subject ths Of tue law aud that .
p~rsons Who cen give Information the subject may
oom~ forward.
Then follow the evidence iu the case the osa,s OF
had worn to Deirspgss capacity CO marry his n-ng
leaitinsts son; to his psrformins Christian aets,
he vas not epasged to any other woman
DsHs 6srbsrs Jesnb~lie, being exsu'nsd on the sl
leasd cbsrss Of .iesuy asaiOss Dsirs.xs says snAt
married to Detirsoge 10 was her Intention TO do 50.
bot a. be wss going s~sv chs changed her mind Sas
vent TO Phils phiH; while there U-rsnxs
t. oome to this city 70 nsts the msrrisgs Co
which che did net consent This -aev-n years be-
fore. She cav him afterwards 10 Bod~aax, bat they
0SYo hat therlru rvled mn rf1eyC
soumeynia M. Bernsrdy and hts wife we're vic
Leseer.
get lveiihood kpsw De Orange; it sss b. wh. toll
bsr Co New Orleans; she knew before she ise
rb.n oonss the testimony of Msris Zalims ';Srri-rs
ksr,si Who stated that about year before shs nAa
heard states IN this city that her husband
Stsd In the Narth end In Consequence sne wished TO
sseer,sip WHITTIER it NOT and she
city for Pbilrd-lphis and Ns~ York. ~hers che Ted
every sxertion cItaiu the truth Of the report suA
che i~srusd only that hs had csuresd . wsmsn. wn-u
bsr 70 her not utinx the 10 did not take
pscs, snd che married another wsn shortly after
The has heard In public recently that her husband
married TO three women bus che does not bsli-vs
H. and the rsport gives her unessness ~ she Is
Jerome D~Gr~pss, slss being svora Says that he
nrst ksew Bsrbsss Jsubel Dc Or in Nsw York elsvsa
nsrried to her, although be wished to aud
Rad ssked the oonsent Of her father hut he rcfass
o~p p~bt poor; he ts~ the ssd Doans Be- bare
in SordeAux b. accident; be became acq"sotsd WITH
b.r husband Nj Soumsyi yiiistt Who at eud~d deponvut
~b~n SICK aud be (dspooeDt) visited th-m sttsrwsds
be also confirms the siatsmnt OF Maria Yilsr he also
stss that tstipg Il e. sot~d that this charge ~oud
rsusy fs his wife bs,os sstsdst Of as Ia .uss,
he bso us+d exsrtous to procure the necessary do
cpms pts TO estabissh mia tuuoo~nce.
Upon these proofs the Vicar 0.uera orders that ell
pr,c~~sipgs against Jsrous Ds0rsogs be spsnasd,
Copneotsd with these Documents ere several other
Instr ume nts of proof
Ihe poser Of attorney Of DeGraugs TO his wife,
Marie ZuIips Csrri~re to sstsod hts s9sirs In hts
abtence be being about to Europs to alter
property which hsa LETT him This po dassd
twenty rixtb Of March 1901
2. poser Of sttorasy signed by oil the Csrrisra to
Jer DeGrsnge, to rscsivs certain property which
srrS si ,s sewers. so,s Of
BY Narie Cssrssrs stylisG hsrrs the agent aud
Legitimate wife II " General Gsroatmo D~GrHngs"
The last Of these scts s dated the sixth of
1901.
g. The vir Of simphorisn Csilisvst, the husband OF
Ross Csiisvst in which be refers . sam Of moasy
~hirh had been rrmitted to him by Jerome DsGesoss
fr which DeGrapge had received bis poser OF stt rn-y
previous TO his dsp.rturs for Francs In ssis .iii NJ
Cal avst prefers as tutor OF his chidren - Lsse-
ton DorgsDoie, TO bis ~ifs.
trrr ruIixr vs. JshoMr pEcRAsoS fos ALffosv.
On November 9, 1905, zulims Us0rsos- nsr nus
band for sIinony, In the County Court OF Ns~ Or
hans alleging that shs is his is~fui ~tfs. Jerome
sis. ey ssnsrA d,snn. Anosn'J ,a.s o.ousM
1876
The sefspdsuts to attack the credit and character
Of hacsu- Despau the principal witness VI c,uplsin
ant and only witness OF the marriage produces
cord OF suit brought against her oy her hushaod fr
- her s.mn n' ps0" ,,,, ossss .rsr'
"ibe relation Of which you'd be too affecting ~hicn
nshes it necessary for him TO prey for '.0arstion
fTt m his wife. Maria Sopbta Carriere" 70 which Ma
dane Dsspsu answers Certain dinculties tnsn
In regard the dspcsitcp sf Dsspsus property the
,usr, g. isos H. Drsp.u dies another p.rriop alleging
that 10 notoriously known that said sophie Csrrsrs
bss ,ev~ra times deserted the bed aud board sf your
petitioner end even that che is nov out of the ter
rt.ry without tn. consent OF her husbsnf aud that
sbs Il leading wandering and rambling life, -,tnout
sny regard Tor 70. phsspls. o. nosos S ana s,c.nay
he forfeited On February IL judgment vas r,udsr.d
by Hon Josbua Lewis sgsinst Madame Despsa, for
letting her rights to tbs property acquired In the CON-
muhiy.
WILL or Hssr cLasx.
The viii of May clark mother Of Daniel Clark made
22d Nov.mb-r, tsiT b.q-saths the baix Of her pro-
psrty to Der children. one fourth part to her grand
dsustt.r, Csroiine Clark taiter-sros csro.s) ma
daughter her Daniel Cisk" siso, the sum
$40 her grand daughter blyrs CLARK oom sony
called kyrs Davis apothsy natural daughter Of nsr
equal with the other hsirs Il .ss had sot other
provided forn Her executor Joseph Reed, Of
thi.s'.his vie sppo.ss Is,s ID x sea , ..! :, & 10.
foilov Of ssle dst.d I6tn Nay, fsos. of
certain lots, By Daniel Clsk to Josspe D 8 esil.
fer Nyrs1 ON 4th June lsss st Mstansss Belize ,sss
copvsys these lots 10 w w whitney aud nyra his
ssc. 10 1870 Of certain property 70 San B. Davis for
the miner Myra Clark
nsr. cLAsxs rsrrros ycs ALinovv.
On tie l4th June, ltlI, hyre tlssk through samuel
n. Davis her eusfsr sa hfrs petitions hoa Josnus
L.v,s alleging that che 10 the natural daughter Of
Daniel Clark, -ho made . .iil spvo,atipx Rsif ssa
Chew his sxseators without mailing soy provs'oo for
her support the coDtin useon of her edusstioo,
Which had been begun during the lifetime Of her ssid
fs her In gentssi ssd sxpsssve style That her ss'd
father haa frequently exeresed his inteston TO hs
fiepds of educating ssd supporiins her II hls o-n
rama q lite ana npy providing for hes. That snns
iDstrp snecutsd In her favor ey her father,
which had been shown her. She prays therrfore,
for sl the papers bsiessiBs 20 cl.rk Esd for 90 s
lo~srce Of his estate Defendants sns-er dssyirg
that Myra the child Of Clark svsrrins ns sii of ls,
and the srscudop Of 10 They dsay thss Ciarh ever
gave any issFuotons In regard 10 Myrs, dsrsog his
lifetime On 18th February, 1ss, % motion u horatis
Davis, tkis suit for Aiimony dsscoptisssd.
MasafAoe corraasr ov cs~gnsI EoNuss rxsptnroS
oa~.s ctssr wsfrrsv.
This Get vas psased before W. Lssis, pstary
pubc on the Ttb May, 1870 Ifaiesss tnsr fstessioa
90 fcrth~th late the bonds of masrinooy thst
there shalt be conmvutty of acquess asd Gsiss be-
t-esp tb.m; ssch shall be bound for the debts In
CURED before msntses
The property Of oss. Gaines, srcushtisto marriage,
sepsists II -
s24e ser.s sf Isns near Memphis, Tenn, sstA
seco scres Of East Florida land. ......... 5000