The Lancaster gazette. (Lancaster, Ohio) 1846-1852, 1850-11-22

Iingsgalel yesterdays iSsue-onc ar
dcle says we can do "no harr;' another
article says when the Sentinel 6ayFs, we
bite" Be mo.e careful gentlemen.
Your readers are not all tue iooIs you
take them for.
JUDGE ELLs.-Tnis individual, OF
rather Editor Ellis permits some Uiac@.
guard to employ about one column and
half Of his paper, mol TO wipe away tie
disgrace which attaches 10 Judge Ellis
for his very repreheasible conduct at the
the late primary election, bnt t, see how
near he can initiate the language Of the
fish MAJ ket in az attack upon us. Now
all this is sheer waste Of time. paper
Ink and labor. We're there any posi-.
biity Of ruiilng our temper and coaxing
US into defence 0f nurself, il might an.
swel some good purpose and fer a time
prevent MS from exposing the Judge
But that is impossible. We are ouly an
humble individual in the Wing party;
we are no candidate for office aud donot
expect any we hold no place of public
trust and have no implied oath 10 violate;
and do no, consider nurseIf stretching
our vanity To its utmost extent, worthy
'of defence especially in our own col
umus. The Eagles bcckguard can
move a,uue as fast as lie pIeases. As
long as he occupies himself in blackgnar-
ding Us, ii is probable he willrefrain from
other acts @aich night possibly accom-
tplish what the writer desires. Our read.
ers are in no wise interested especially
in us and would rather read something
else than an eulogy Of the editor
With Citizen Ellis we have nothing II
do. With Editor Ellis we can have moth
ing To do. He is only employed as f
medium through which to bIackguar'
! the Wing parry-he is only tocl 70
others to work with aud concea! them
= selves. At this time, it is Jadge Eli
we are after, the individual who presi
{ ded in this township a few days since a
, Judge Of the primary election and who
10y The testimony of Numerous witnesses
has been proved of dealing unfairly TO
wards one oi' the Loccfnco candidates.
Now why is it that the blackguard
/, who figures in the last Eag'ehe has done
so before, does not clear the Judge o
this chargel If the Judge is innoceut
why does he not bring forward thos
: names he alluded to, and prove his nno
/ cence? If he did not act unfairly Ia
r wards Col Sharpe, why does he no
: bring forward evidence to convict our III
!, frulants Of falsehoudl We have state
q the charge clearly and succnclly, wh
does not the most Hnpntalde Judge com
/. forward and meelil Does he suppos
: that his readers are such consummal
fools as to couslrue an attack upolf us a
y defence Of himsoEl And is he not Z
= ware that members of his own party sa
a that he neither possesses the principle
u Of a democrat nor the elements OF a
honest maui For a moment let the Ci
zen forget himself and the tool spea
" for himself, aud let The Judge be defer
&c ded He slaLds impeached upon The e
/. Idence of several witnesses we wi
!" gladly publish anything which goes
g exoneratu him, Abore all things els
"a !" remember that So far as we are concer
IS ed, our thoughts will not for a nome
II, !" turn upon ourself and forget Judge I
r. lis. With this fact in view, it is high
III probabythat the next Eagle may atlen
'e 10 defend the Judge.
u y TnE MCDoNuGH BURGLARy.-.Mo