The Hillsborough recorder. [volume] (Hillsborough, N.C.) 1820-1879, 1850-05-29

1tfetHlHaFF steps % fiie falt ~ Nolr1 res
aasEIhnFiss ths establishment q ss..r EoF,
scFnmenss.
Mhils considering he -ctrrumsisRees
and rezsans xhy czlilaxzi. should he ID.
mial~d iais The Union. he considered hal
there ~ere rqasi considerations why Ter
risesi@l foseraRenls shosld BE- given %
Utah and New Mexira- lie. eonlrasied
the plsn nf srtsiiag this question Win The
zee which cane 10 Congress with recon-
nrsdaiinns frau high quarter. The
pan Submitted m The annual message Of
ahe President Was. that California be ali
.misied inia the Unien. and ihsi Inc ierri-
tories 81 Ui.h and New Mexico shall be
3sfl 10 settle this qursiiun themselves. He
had come 10 Washington with sincere
desire In cooperate IN all things with the
Executive branch Of The Government. bar
he also had come here 10 carry oui. in all
Eases. the convictions Of his. own delibe-
rsle judgment How far did the plan re-
ported nv ihs eommiliee differ from thai
Submitted by the President The Two
plans agreed so Ear as the Presidents re-
COMMUNICATIONS Coz scisrm extended. The
admission OF California WAS recommend
ed. aud II is now lreeommsndrd BY The
committee. The President did nor re-
rnmmend any legislation Tor the terrific
ries. But he mr.. c. thought that IL
Congress .ftiled 10 gise The territories .
government. IL would fail in sscred duty
TIA people placed under the Sovereignty
q The United S;sies. and who were enii-
lied 10 The consideration sad care 81 lhs
government.
II was said that Tho people NJ the terri
tories would eth have government; bal
IL would not he = government 10 which
they wrrc eniiiled. They have been
berel, Of that Sapreme gosemmen, which
they hal when under tie snvereigniy of /
Mexico. by The treaty the uriied States
soirmnly gusrss,isd ihs people Of those !
territories protection Of their persons and
security 10 their property. and the rigitof
religious liberty. How can This he done
withoui proper governments! j. il right
for US TO say 10 The people Of Utah sni
New Mexico thai they must take csFe Of
themselves. and when they ara ripe for
St-ie government we viii receive them
as State inta The Unioni When will
,hey be ripe f,r Stale in The Union!
Win Congress be doing lis duty 10 leave
them in This abandoned staiei
When tho Presidents annual message
x'as sent 10 Congress. there was eause 10
suppose that any attempt 70 forE ieTiion.
al governments fm The territories would,
In consequence Of The odions proviso. lead
70 seems "a excitement. aud result il
danger and alarm 10 The country. Since
shal time great change kas taken place; ].
she proviso has been thrown oul. The
glorious North has shown herelf willing /,
20 iesuce the country. and has aba,ed /
her demands. The Sou,h--lhe elorions /
sen,h-equsl 10 all things ia the North.
Ia. rome forward and shown Disposition
10 meet on rommon platform Of conci.
iisiion and harmony. They have both
conc 10 the rescue. Mems mints hsvc I
changed. and become moderate, and ma. /,
joriiy can now meet with feelings and do I
sires 10 settle difficulties amicably and
peaceably. Ia
lie believed that The President would. 4
ander The CIRCUMSTANCES. ~erc he At ibis q
lime to communicate 90 Congress. recon. o
mend thr, territorial governments be e.. :
tablishad BY rongre,s. Z
lie then urged The strong and immedi-
aie necessity on The part Of Congress Tor
speedy and saiisIaci ny settlement ofthe !
question OF the boundary between Texas
and New Mexico. On all these subjects I
shere had been no great diversity oI opin. b
son in the committee; al ssemed anxious .
that there should be an s;iempt u'a,le TO .
eel;le them. fhe sum proposed 10 be
esseE 10 Texas WAS LEFT blank. and when :
The biz came up Cor the final action he !
wnnli nGve to insert the sum lhonahl Of
.by the committee. 4
The nexi subject before the committee
was the question Of inserting these mea- Z
sures in one bill.
lie iher referred 10 The parliamentary .
Jaw. and the objections on thai account q
srged by the Senator from Missouri Mr.,
Denton) 10 the union Of these bills. lie
sa,! that all the Senator had read upon the
subject of lacking was not applicable
70 the parliamentary law Of this country.
in The United States parliamentary law
fsipre was no such Thing known as iackingI
in tie Entsa.sh sense OF The terra. Tack
ing. 4. understood il The British parlia- !
ment. was very different thing from the s
Union of snch bills as was now proposed. Z
lie explained lacking. as understood in 3
England. TO be as follows:
All money bills--bills ofsupply, &C. c
originate in The Eouse &c Commons. and =
when they are carried up 10 the Lords. v
they must be saken as they came from the
Comm ms. or rejecsed. The Lords have c:
ne sswer 10 change OF amend snch bills. Il
hui must pasa CT reject them as they come e
IN from the Commons. The Commons. 4
Z. -..,, -, Al. hsch a. a