The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1850-07-03

might DO beneficial In quiesins she OF sne
But 10 ne there are aood reasons why son,Sen
men should not insist on such Congressional dcaraon
Mexican ceased 70 exist spoa e"s ns
Territory sseoad the south has twice AZ reed co sabmit
ton compromise. Third clause in The Bill would 6e
an abandoamen q The principle Of
venton, aud violation Of the constitution These reasons
apply win equal force 70 The modified form IN which The
address recommends the Missouri comPromss. and IA my
and popiey insist the express recognition by Con-
doing dis Ms % surrender s hs sad
ground Of non-iaierven,ion ON which we have stood
peace and safety anu this prIncpe acknowledged and
acted upon AT the North Every high consideration CON
% maintain this principle until is Iuih and justice shah be
no longer disputed There be safety 70 the Union
ressIonal nonn,eveniion. II the northern people viii
and poeS o sps s ageresons q l.na,cA
be pres ryed The South can have no peace until the ss
very agitation I excluded from Congress; and this only
as worth PRESERVING they adopt the principle Of non.
stand hrnly and unwaveringy the same platform To
obtain temporary benefit Or % make issue that viii be
strong N the South y VIII no, 90 70 surrender even
y the feature in the plan Of adjustment before the Senate
highly Il il stood distinctly apo"
ton because congressional Intervention is
doclne, and precisely that fact which causes the aSo
Luonss 70 oppose r. have no hope thar It's adoption
wicked Of political These have yet
be met and rendered poweess by combination Of the pa
otic Of all parties the North this struggle
they will have 70 unite upon the principle OF nonnisrvsn-
tion should be reconced therefore, % the adoption Of
the Senate plan Of adusnen!, because beleye Y would
give strength and support the doctrine which alone
believe the Union can be saved With these views. made
an unsuccessful effort in the committee strike from the
address SO much makes acqaisscence In the Missouri
line 70 depend express recognition by Congress OF
the right Of the southern people carry slaves into the
riioy south Of the proposed line regarded this amend
ment A. not only @ make the position Ia the adj
ton, but also 70 avoid makiRg proposition which had tho
appearances Of abandoning the principle Of congressional
non-lntervention.
will be observed that the address amended in
convention as to show that the panof the COMMITTEES Of
Thirteen would be acceped II 80 amended to secure
substantially the South tile rights asserted Ia the reso
tons have given comparative view Of the two plans
proposed and consider the plan Of the Committee of
Ihireen with the notifications suggested securing the
rights Of the South asserted in the resouons eecnay
a. the Missouri Compromise why those
who ready to acquiesce in this latter may acqni
esce In the former fs s A -NsssF' x AZ
mistake the resolutions AZ proposing
the Missouri line as tAfinatwDs. The committee
Pressy declined TO propose the line Of 30 80 stia
tam, and the resolutions fully and explicitly the doc
ine OF congressional intervention, which doctrine
the Compromise reported by the Committees Of Threen
was founded. E Asys#@
Very respectfully,
5 A. O. p. NICHOLSON