The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1850-12-13

the Of the climate and the ehsracler Of
the soi and from other circums,ances-hat New Mexico
irion slave trade In the Disiricl OF Coumbia Are
NOT these objects Of sufficient masnl,ude TO satisfy any
m'asfa'e' f.aona'' northern wishes
.whs. rights are sacrificed What concession OF power
and suthori.y Is made by the North In this measure
.,To what power is the sscriice made here !.
measure Let him tell II the Moth not almost
everything, and the South nothing but her honor
Yes. the honor q paying with her money and blood
And what says Daniel Webster Hear him, also, July
Is, 1850;
wha, doe, she gain sy i What does she Io.s BY 7,
whaiis quite object themihe annexation Of Cali.
orna tiee State with her present oonsutlons very
She gain. that She gains si.o si the aaisiins The
New Mexican question, and the Texan boundary. which
all these maers because most Immediately msnscng Evil
fsuch consequences be arrested ~ lhs OF
leo she gains the settlement Of the Texan boundaryoo-
Now. the question: therefore address myself
The Norhls lns i The probability Of the exclusion
and strong and conclusive. that should upon il
act upon the same degree Of probability applied to
other questions in civil, moral, and social life
Iiit be not il anything further is necessary 70 DO
added to that, here we have laid before US an auhen
Il Is agreed all hands have the ultimate right Of de-
so s y s, asy a sa9 T. south
gain and satisfactory mode or the recama
tion OF slaves. As to the territorial acquisitions, am
bound in candor TO that taking Maryland for example
! Mas huses loses--that is, nothing st ALL"
| Thus you have the opinions Of these eminent men on
the Compromise, which told is favorable to
the South Now let consult some other Of the great
OF which is generally attributed 10 Mr. Brooks, repre-
sentative in Congress- from the State Of New York;
.From the borders Of Missouri the Pacific ocean, and
from the British domnions there the north 70 Mexico on
south, a held be held. Wherever
there State govern rent s especially prohibited and
y ss ocai %aaapa Mexican law consess has
repealed that Mexican law, amid the most violent
slavery south Of ss 3d. though 90 10 do BY the
whole united southern vote Liberty everywhsIe in all
The territory for which southern blood shed, well
as we'll as northern which tue South had saaa
rights with the Northal is ours Why heap Goals OF re
have carried everything before without reproachng
tina South more i further, and eopardDg the
This is the language OF q bold man, who speaks out
| his sentiments in manly and open manner. "All is
ours,' he says; "all of that land for which much
| southern blood shed-so much southern money
spent" I"All right" exclaimed some one in the crowd
II it be all right, let surrender at once and be all
slaves And now, be asks do not heap Goals Of fire on
the head OF the South do not wrong her further; do
not impose further upon her patience and submission
put limit upon your ambition and aggressions Oh. fe
citizens when has the oppressor been satisfied ss
ing mercyl But told that although these
grievous wrongs, must acquesce in them, because
such men as Cars Dickinson and Webster had declared
vinced.
silence read speech, delivered short time ago at
Baton Rouge. this pledge. given in regard to the rress
bic influence Of these grea! names What are the facts
point-has been defeated in every direction His
less enemy has been returned Congress in his dis
tric against all his influence. And the grea defender
hill
the Compromise. and everything else. has been thrown
overheard How is it with Dickinson in New York }
national Union party there means Fish, instead Of
Dickinson Cass has Jared better. All his influence,
backed by the popular Compromise. could not reeec the
the Detroit district Congress last year So much for
the weight Of their great names.
But we are told that We mus, not doubt iaat the ius
facts this poinl There have been four attempts to
execute this law. Two Georgisns went 10 Massachu.
e Ss1 aass. %s. .y
were three times arrested put under bonds for $4,000
and finally compelled to leave the Sate without their
slaves. This is certainly peculiar mode OF executing
the Compromse, and mansstins devotion to the const
tuition AT Detroit, too, effort made by q slave
2 avail Of sy and as
to take $500 Tor hs slave; he would have taken much
less, am sure, to get out Of the scrape he was in.
showed bis title to slave, running through three gene
ratons Il decided that the title not established
In another case, in New York. three persons tor
ward and the who claimed the slave had been
guilty OF perjury:
And these fellow citizens, are the evidences OF the
good feeling with which assured the North will
carry ou that bill, which constitutes chief compen-
sation for the concessions Of the Compromise Let me
read again from the New York Express, that conserva-
i've whig journal
:" Discomfort. however, Is bit,er--never bitter
now-betweea the opposing elements Of which
speak The South Is soured by losing all political
In Mexican scqusions and by seeing the admin
istration OF the government virtually pass from It's hands
The North, amidst Ire greatest victory ever
slavery, in the exclusion Of slavery from California,
and i virtual Limitation the places where Is yet
carry It's solemn compact surrender ugi-
slaves for it is but cheat for
posed the details OF the ugve-save law, we OPP
posed Itself The stipulation in the federal
pact edious inexecutable yet and NULL
lers In spirit and 10 fact Freemen will be slave
catches daily told Ia responsible organs oil the
public press. SIAvEcArcHiNG unpopular and 70 be
popular nulher only Of the laws, but OF the
Constitution itself"
And thus you find the whole North proclaiming that
the passage of these bills has killed slavery forever and
yet we, who proclaimed that such the purpose and
object Of these measures and therefore opposed them,
are branded as traitors!
How did the Louisiana delegation stand these bills
As regards the California BILL the delegation voted unan
imously against it. My colleague and myself then stood
New Mexico bills. voted against the bill selling the
boundary OF Texas, as could not conceive how we
could with honor, not only suffer ourselves to be ex
cuded from the territory, but also, and further. be
mucted in damages TO the full OF millions
My colleague sck. and did not vote that ques
ton T.How would he have voted r'l I understand
that he said in Baton Rouge he would have voted for H.