The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1850-07-03
THE UNION

necessary tendency 10 divide and distract the SouIh
performed il st duty aud that In the South al least
qsiss - given % the that assembled for
cesiu In the discharge OF duty OF avoiding topics
calculated 70 divide and distract the Soath.
As member OF the committee resolutions, de-
sirous o. carrying out the views here expressed On this
ground yielded reluctant the resolution in
mise the question upon the line of 80 deg 80 min north
latitude u seemed 10 me- and SO said % the committees,
that our true policy lay down clearly and specifically
the prime Piles which rested constitution rights
ana % declare 10 our northern that we win submit TO
further aggressions of these rights but Il did
me 10 be either entirely consistent proper that at the
same me we Were asserting our rights We should volunteer
upon those rights would back far at least 20 let
have ~ I eans % s q oS s
Perhaps aversion 70 this resolution was the result OF
our IT, 10 aoas that Clearly an
70 submit to nothing wrong compromise which involves
our adversary as mark Of pusanmisy and il this igh,
cannot bur fear the ofer OF he Missouri Com promise will
Of 50 deg 80 min slavery snail newer exist ba. south Of
Il slavery may exist or not the people shall deter
side Of the ias ard the other The south
has been standng or trying 10 stani, the doctrine OF
its willingness surrender the doctrine for the purpose
buying peace II the North had proposed such compro
have considered and assen,ed shall be agreeaby
disappointed II the North does conclude from read
ness 70 compomise ON 30 deg 30 min, that
much in the assertion rights profess
TO be. and AS am sure wa are.
committee, surrendered objections. and consented TO
report the resolution but avoid any
add another resolution expressive Of our just appreciation
Of the efforts Of those members Of Congress- who
and expressive Of the hope that in their
efforts would result In plan of adjustment that would be
States. IL seemed that IL there any propriey
in declaring readiness to accept the Missouri Compo-
readiness acquiesce any plan adjustment
would the honor and interests of tho South The
inee, and therefore withdrew t. did so the more
readily, as supposed even then that It would be the
Compromise pending in the Senate supposed that
the Missouri Compromise was proposed only because the
proposed and because, by these repeated
recogntons of it might ieel that could again
only accept but propose IL without dshonor But
the Compromise proposed by the COMMITTEES Of thirteen
was not alluded 70 In our resolutions took il for granted
that II would not certainly thought II should form
the subject Of discussion 10 any address that might be
prepared
the Committees Of Thirteen seemed to me so papabe and
ha %. a ao s 19d Be-
the on our rights by our northern brethre and
their determination resist these aggressions 1t had
occurred to that would suppose either OF these
objects oosd be BY any discussion Of the
against IT, The embraced in IL
and most clearly could not be regarded northern ag
gression OF the right of the convention discuss that
any other subject have no doubts but the mpocy Of doing
mind obvious, that greatly astonished
when the address read the commitiee, find that
.ea % o. = was e mos, elaborate discus
My objections TO The policy Of discussing the measure at
AL were not more decided than my o6,scons 70 The man,
that fairness and bcfay in stating the objections the
@n'a %
objections the address which induced present
counter mast refer TO il in the shape in which it
After closing the argument against the several measures
embraced in Compromse, and acqutling those who
have supported from all Improper motives. the address
..But If provisions oorrso,,
compromise IL is comprehensive scheme OF emancipa-
ton and, IL passed BY Congress. will only heap indg
the savehoding States. should arouse ihe 10 renewed
effort. TO vindicate their rights and institutions"
This portion OF the address stricken out, the
ton Of General Pillow but constituted part OF when
the counterrcpon made. refer now for the pur-
senon should have been willing 70 the friends
o. the compromise as supporters Of "comprehensye
ure no whether he lives North the South,
embraced within the terms OF the denuncation OF the
scheme and these terms offensive IL they had
beea intended characerize body of northern fanatics
Who the supporters of the Compromise in the Senate
Who is Its real originator The South had
rer and more devoted friends than most OF the senators
who are supporting the scheme J am sure the South
Fooe who is the originator OF Yet f The view OF the
taken by sns aahor Of IN, =, Is correct
over TO the abolonisis, and are advocating COM
Prehensve scheme Of emancipation Before such an
imputation attempted 10 be fixed upon the sup.
porer oil the Compromise 1T would have been prudent
the author oil the address he fully satisfied that his
views Most will be slow 10 believe that
more than one half OF the southern senators Ito nothing
oil distinguished northern senators who have ,ympa.
thies with additionally dull 10 have dis
covered that they supporting comprehensive scheme
OF ancipaon IL would require infinitely
more powerful and conclusive than contained in the
address satisfy that such shregd, Intelligent
and watchiu aboliionists Hale, Seward, Corwin
their followers In the Morrill, have overlooked the fact that
comprehensive scheme OF emancipation has been pre-
sented by southern men, and rejected with dsdain by abo
onss This singular fact pressed upon the mind oil the
author oil the address The question forced itself upon him
ltonists do not support the COMPROMISED He could give
but and that was, that naughty ianaclsm,
inflated with disdains accomplishing its objects
BY iadircfton Does that answer explain the strange
lonists disdained reach their ends BY imdirscfon
Much OF this very address taken up showing that Is
exactly In that they seeking 10
accomplish their objects. To relieve himself from a
the author ofhe address the whole Of
argument the mode by which the aboltonists seek
abolish slavery Tue fact indsputabe that the abo
lonsts denounced the Compromse with much bitter
hres-one from the North and the other from the South
This brushes death the conclusion which the
gument of the address arrives, and necessarily throws
doubts the correctness OF the views which led 10 The
South Is indebted 70 the magnanimy Of the abolitions
for saving from comprehensive scheme OF emancipa
devised and pressed by southern friends
and would have been Inappropriate In the Southern
unanimous fanatics who have avencd from us so great ca
tasuophe - rMl
prefer relieve southern friends from the mpuia
ton OF supporting comprehensive scheme of enaiioipa
ton by showing the views which have led the sntho
OF address his conclusion PROPOSE
then, briefly can, examine the views forth In
the argument
As 10 the admission Of California; the address states the
- ll~