The Texas Republican. [volume] (Marshall, Tex.) 1849-1869, 1850-10-26

the country il ours but that the citizens are
mott How ia il that he POUNDS in the
treaty any right at all in Texas To the
country Is it because Texas claimed the
country at the time Of annexation, aud the
United States asserted this claim for her
against the Republic Of Mexico. aud made
i, good BY the sword! There is no o,her
ground on which the title Of Texas. under
the treaty, can be placed. Then when the
ni,cd States achieved the right OF Texas
to the country, did ihe not achieve for her
also the RICH, to the obedience Of the IN
habl,ants who nigh, choose to remain
therci This would seem to follow ~ =
necessary consequence; but ]. appears that
the Judge is
- ~ Inswk srsst c,,;iek
Profoundly II he'd W a"slvuch,
And eau Distinguish and di,.i,
A hsu I~tI south and southwest s1s
After drawing the line al houndtr, he.
tween the ui'cd states AID ! rNlrn. the
treat, goes ou 4" say, IN e." 'il .'.''el"'
Nexicans nov established H. f. it,, r-
preriousig hsionnne ~ v, ., md which
rcuiain for the funpe Wit ia 'he liu.iie e.
shall be free To cnn'lnac ~. 'ry 40"
reside, or To REMOVE" Ne. gam, II ~"
second paragraph Of the same n''i'le. II
says These VIII" shall prefer I" remain
IN hc SIND ,errnoriss. may retain the TILE
aud right. Of Mexican citizens, ar nrqulre
those of citizens OF the nitcd states.
Furthermore, the nh article of the trea'v
\ IL
iorics aforesaid. shall not preserve the char
actcr Of citizens Of the Mexican Republic
eoniormaily with what is stipulated in the
preceding article. shall br incorpor"'ed INTO
he inion Of the inned !S,nies. and h.
admatcd Al me proper time. Ito be Judged
Of by the Congress of the United States,
70 hc enjoyment Of all the rights y rf''ens
of The Inusd Nic'es, according Ia the prin.
ciples OF the constitution and in the mean
time shall he maintained aud protected IN
the ENJOYMENT of their lhcrt, and prop.
erty, and secured in the free ch-
loymcn, of their religion. without rcstric-
ton From Ties" passages. u appears,
SAYS the Judge, that the iul'afliant' ct san
ia tc are to be taken n. citizens % the
United States, ms contrndis,ingui-hcd rot"
citizens Of the State Of Texas, While the
country Is to be considered paw :" 'N's'
Allowing such t" he The 'n'''' 81 70"
treaty. las We SHALL rle,l> show = cscntl>
It is not. can III. General t'nv-rn'nrn'. b,
the exercise of the treat, making power
divcst State of It's sovereign pave L" eS'
tend its laws throughout ~ h'n"s IN" !"
enforce the obedience ~ all parsons vi"
ma, be within her bounds 'i'a'' II"
this righ, of each Stat" !. not taken AWAY
by the constitutions ut tn" f''eF' '"e"'"'
ment, no power I. gwen h' t"H' '"'''""
ton to the Federal ''"'"rh'n,'' I" ''N"
away this right "t Il state : ~" nv II" S''
of its own eau the 'rd"ral ''""'fn"''" Hr'
quire power above the Goa h'i''"n or
ORGANIC law o' 'fs "''ns, nus ',.', Wv
labored inbfir oi the '"d." = !" "h''" "s
hasto'lcd ~ faithfully tnntle''" ,,'' 2."u"o'
But this is not all. nor the hall. where
is the d'stincton between ri'ihehs " ''N"s
and citizens o' the h'''" '-'"'
not ali III" citnens OF 'rsas r",A'"s w Wv
United states ana w""'" 10, '"'s' '",'i"e
OF santa re have become '"'1'ns :" ~.
nlted states ~ becoming '"'f'"s ~ Wv
State oi Texas ana would ""' o'''N "",e
been protected IN the enjoyment OF '"e"
liberty and property an" 'e'"'.a II. "'
tree eNercis" OF thr'' fehR"", "'"''"' =.
s'riruon, under the 's~s "' ''sss Nv.
same as nnder tn" laws o' '"c '''''' '-. ~
C'earl, all THIS Is undoubtedly ''"'' W"
why - II that the treat. II c"hs'f"'' w wv