The New York herald., 1850-01-19


ties and quoted the law, sho~ing that parties hsv,
no right to combine to drive actor from tn,
q dispute relating to the prices Of admission n n
that case man went to the theatre with the letters
o. r. told pricesl upon his hat he arrested and
immediately discharged. He then brought an action
for false imprisonment the trial Chief
Justice ansfeld believe 1t laid down the rule
systematic tumults widely different from hises-
People had right to hiss but when persons vent with
the settled intention to damn piece actor
conspiracy, and they went with the object Of
mutt and noise 1t was riot cite this to prove that
the right to hiss actor of the stage an undis-
puted right Of any who goes into theatre of his
to be indicted for conspiracy There is no preteaos
to say he went for the purpose Of . conspiracy This
right has been exercised from time immenorisl. A
friend has put in my hand the book of kr Dunlap in
which he rays that In the time Of the
at Rome, Ammo Urbis Condite $50, they uuder-
chow where Senator should sit and where the people
Scipio Africanus lost his popularity from this arto
cratic and sincerely repentsd of it after
wards. But he only fixed seat for the Senator's See
however, what progress made after this STEP
The KnigAts and Tribunes had specific place.
Roscius then awarded eighteen seats for them Otho
during his consulship, was Missed when Roscius was
acting This Is the first mention made Of hissiug;
ought te have acquesced with the Kissing
Cicero however called the people out to the temple Of
Bellona where be madeo hsrapgue, and pscifed them
with the tribune. Our modern Cicero calls the people
before jury-an institution later but more favorable
to popular liberty. The right Of kissing actor has
beer exercised from time i'm emor il has been ex-
the woods. towards Cook and Anderson towsrSs
other Englisbman, towards Power aud towards Mao.
people without the least Intervention Of thsse
ants. On the latter occasion the authorities we're
knowing the common law they refused to interfere
an In the decision of the pe ope
and published placsrd announcing his acquiesencs
and withdrawal Up to that at these defendants
did not interfere TO pay their ftv cept,tbs
rame as other people On that Monday evening no
part was taken by either Of these defendants MIR Ryn.
RVndprf has ho m
his right to that title was present then and MIR Fuller
also, The editor OF an evening paper. MIR Fuller sst
there dis,urbipe the pay RSpdefs vas nnist so wa.
O'Donnell; they did rothng Fuller swears thew did
nothing; he saw them do nothipg He was not &C.
said, what, are you the leader of thi. esns,D Ryn
said he had nothing to do with t he did net sp
prove Of It, he to the police officer to get him to
arrest the persons who throwing eggs and chairs
en- the stage When Rynders asked Fuller .wbat mar
ty he meant?" Fuller raid oh, the peace party, OF
course Now, gentlemen, do YOU think he meant as
he epoke! Do YOU thisk there MAS no speer
with this preston which led to his getting slap in
He Was grossly insuited and slapped bis face Whst
connection has all this with the joiictment ths
DEFENDANTS? Not the slightest NON canna
that this Transaction shows that he excited n riot
neither then nor at any other time or place The
tmopy ,hows what he did was ected with riot
riot must be 10 he terror of me p.oDL, Now nass
from these transactions Of the Nonday onv
that he was seen to come out of an Omnibus. ard was
heard giving an accurate description how Mr. Mao
ready had been received that evening The ev.
idence proves that he did not approve OF what
was done; he Was going to get = police ofnoer
when be met Mt Fuller. Another thing; Rynders
stated the Park meeting that he had bous ht tea
with his money, and had given asay the tck ets
to hiss Macresdy If so, 1t only cons siracy to
hiss Macready The public cannot say there
Was any impropriety in sustaining Macready There
IL pretence that it wrong give tickets to ds
orderly persons to sustain him, TO persons who were
not able to buy tickets for Themselves Ths perrons
who went had hit hiss IL they thought proper to
do SO There is no evidence to show there was any
riot that hght now come to the evidence Of those
bsndbls which the prosec ution has brought forward
shal briefly state my view and how far it possi-
BILE for them to excite riot The prosecution prove
that man came IS Park Row and said that he had
heard that the Brtish of the steamer going
up to the Opera House: oDonnsll said to him, :. /
Lets put the bill In the window Rynders urges
him not TO do It, and expresses his opinion " the
ter In terms which shsl not here repeat. When
the bill Was stuck up, come one remarked. &" That
would give the Brtish the tooth nche.n Rynders re-
Piled That's the talk now let's take drink" Ano-
thsr witness tsstifes he said Don't talk SO that
may lead to o disturbance The manuscript OF the
two bills was given by another man who has not been
had this BILL and had IL printed, but Rynders had
nothing to do with IL. One copy put up the
Park wall another in Hudson street. There Is no sy-
dence that any was induced to to the theatre
them everybody looked upon IL as joke (Nr. V. b.
here read the bill and commented upon it) II does
son of opinion, calling upon the working peopis
stand by their rights against the American committee
wrong am ,pdetabls IL ipritss ~ free
OF opinion that night snd deprecates ell violence
Is II possible the public prosecutor say that this
bill excited the people to violences 1t deprecates
Violence requiring only free expression Of opinion
Such Is all the connection which nv clieAts have with
these bills ls IL IN being In that where they
brought, that makes them responsible The
keeper Of thaIbsuse. MIR Miner, has been acquitted
because there was no evidence against him and apt,
Ry nders was only cssiopally Ia his hotel come
now to the other bspdbill. made by q man who
personsted one Of these defendants IL had on 1t
the words: John Bull and vie Ours 4" Was
IL ever heard that public ;prosecutor called upon
men TO answer such grounds what does It provel
They we're fdered by man who ~ not known. 10 be
sent TO Park Row You may rec herein the desire to
inplieate Captain Rynders by nybody. That bill was
give TO man M know n on the OF the hotel No
rs They were paid for there by the strange man Who
took them from the boy. There Is connection be-
tween Ry pders aud this bandbill There s no proof
that this bill excited a riot R,nders told Cameron
the printer positively that he had 20 do With
It, What we're its coutents' What was ia II, IL auy
one vas connected With that bill n was Austin and he
has been acquitted BY you on noi, prossg, because
there vas sise personation Of Austin What do th.y
next show agaipst nv clieptg He vas at Abslr at
O'Clock aer the people had been kilisd He VS. much
e1cited sgsirtt IN. Authorities and damned them for
nrirg upon the public There can be no no prslencs
that this would stir up riot There IL no as IN this
country that . man may not ave his opinion about
the snthsxiti.. .coord,c, - ~. M.