New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-03-20

~ d, r.l l5I,o. s4s5 ......:......-..... -
90 ee,' ~. -. ~ - 5- "a '--' 49, ~
30 saJoaus siet $40 e.. each 81
80 sth ave ena s7il q; glIloo 20
Do DO -t'l" -,
90 % ~t4.Y.--------.--
o. cor ''h - -'' To- :. co,, me. % 5.y
M ". H. FRASKLIN, SOS 4 CO.
20h-st and - l5f23 tsl'
90 % 20
EsY DCMos1 HosAcK
Hove aud 40 trrl 100
COURT CLEsDAR-Tbis Day-CUcua Cont
Nos s22 Ss4 40 $50 to As f53 70 Az, 80
Sspe1ior doe-No. 6 . % a, a. 50 So G., 60 to g.
Coasaon Pic1s~No's s3i Sc u, SO 500 353 5s2 SIS
81, S63, go 70 J92
SUPREME CoURr-Special Term b eiore Judge
Mlchell-Jlc0b Corpenier ys IsaQc an Aadel MIR {.
entered suH for libel In ihe Superior Cou II ms cry
against The proprietor OF The BROOKLYN Eagle. IN reson;
believe 10 statement thai Mrs had mol been noihed
IN cIynrce suit Motion Uss made for change OF me
place o. trial 70 Kings County. Which was granted be
moved back New York, prncipsiy he ground thai
through The which have been made The people
procure lair and impartial Jury trs a. O. !na he Is in
formed that Judge None OF Kings County hss exPrested
sentiments nirieal 70 plaintiff NJ Cns appeared for
the application. ana Judge Lon opposed decision "a
| served
Conui.,,ne, Of Jror'- TAe srgmea! IN tits case DID
! not Iats place YESTERDAY.
CoURr or COMMON PLEAs-In Chamber
Before Judge ingrsam-Hlbea, C0yJufA wit was sued
by Thomas Clifford requiring his wife Mary 10 produce
persons Of his lhree children two boys about and T.
and little girl about years cid OF whom lie AIMS ne
and custody. On Inc part Of 8rs G. she stated that
M. c. len her, taking The children with him, but
they returned, saying Their father had ireated hem
and she has recently maintained them by Der ind-
yid1a Industry buhods restraint over them. The boys
az BEN. denied tha be ireaed them the mother 90 be
perited thcm At al proper times. Decision as TO
| The little gd postponed
| sUrEKoe CoURr.--Bcfcrs Judge Oakley
w. Csyke r 60 Va AIeyeh1ns Bank To rec over s. 600
| ne amount of check On PheniN Bank, given Mtf 49,
!g4j rs Carpenter Ncrmlye. brokers, John 7 sml
Co Tor a draf 10 that amour. on " sent with other
frAfls. by \ Co Philadelphia 10 }. Il / Co and hy
the Deposited in the Merchants Bank on Their own
stopped payment sleady referred TO The letter To- is
| 800 issvlnS a - Sfso d.ior. io c axe a Co The
srlrf aso ncosed the and oher draas sight and
otherwise 10 The amount u stico and nouee OF laslng
the Mechens Bank deposited tbs cheok On the
phcn Bank besides other securities 10 mo amount Sj.la
which had been received from c. Co IN the Merchan,
Bank Ohe check certified by the PLenN Bank and a..
whols with their deposits, placed to The credit OF : Co.
leaving balance against item None Of The drafts drawn
on T. 4 Co by G. CO I'm thst letter psd 40 they
brought action against the Bank 10 recover me SV On
The gTonnd that ue had not passed 10 T. Go. The
case as already sied has been 20 the Cour Of Appeals
aud sent bsck, fOr new trial In answer To motion Tor
nons,if Judge Oakley Yesterday stated that thA Mer
chants BsDk had right IN this check lhan John T.
| Snith Co could have had The two houses OF \ Co
ard q Co had dealt together Tor number Of years the
dTsN LEI the amounts be " hat they would 10 meet which
hev sen, esch other drats payable In The osdiusry
| course Of thst arrangement, the drafts when daly
endorsed, became the property OF he party u Wnom
All ,ry observed by tai third pariy 10 Tn. case IL Jnc
T. Smith CO amor receiving that letter on he 18Th stating
s he BALANCE ~ih L. Co wac agags, them. .osiug
dsns lo large amount With notice In e same letter Of
having bcen drawn galntt them end II John 7. Spill
% hat linn. before tbo.e drRhs hal been nc. onaed
the conclusion 10 STOP and not the drafts drawn
agSn-l them and which were MOI paid they themselves
1 iA.us nd on nass &
len 10 Inc jury rom the testimony WHEELER or not Ire de-
termination 10 stop inside above. To this l@ coun
eel for the Bank excepted, particularly hs The Merchants
naa Esso ~ suA nes y Xxx ~ NJ ~ s,b S,r ,or
| loaned 4 previous dsy 10 J I ;. 4 Co
llIwss shown by testimony hat Mr. Mir John 7 smith
dled Ia April 1874 and that HE surviving partner NJ
tudelhi continued he business IN The hrm ualoe MI
VIM W smith, so OF John 7 continuing 10 me establish
uisnt taking direction IN tHsirs though II 10 sad no.
psuneT Ga the 5h May lstA the day previous % he
dtai. beng sent Mt Underh! IN the Cay foI fsste
Inc elb snd reports were abroad thai be would not re-
nirn-Ihal VIM W Smith, anxious TO know what WIS Tie
pursue. deferred accepting the drains draw
by Co. and consulted b. friends, who advised N, II
the absence Of Mi Undsrhui was no, worth while for
sseaeny about u O'Clock that day i, determined
sgop IN he time me check question having been
received from Csrpenter Nrfmi.yeS for She dram
from Phiadepha aud deposited IA The Merchants Bank
On The other hsnc % was said isoa the unasgs eourse
pursued 10 dfSs there appearance previous 20
Thai hour, ofan intention 20 stop
down Il. refusal Tor The BAnk uo, having paid
Tor the check ana parted with nohng bat ceded
pas Of an Sntccedcui debt Il derived Tile pro
vlded The situation OF Smith Co A. The tune OF It's beng
given 10 them by Carpenter eruelya bad no rghs 10
confer one spd this vii depend upon Nc fact whether
they had previously determined, without meeting tbs
drSfs drawn upon them by CLARK Co 10 stop PaJ usn
Verdict this icEenool
ssofL aAd p C0,ca aad 0tA<rsR Rev. John SHl.ih =
| CsIhouc clergyman died viihou leaving Will Ia Feb
3 bng Possessed Ht the Tine Of house and lot No 3
Overst which hs had purchSsd, and u occupied o.
Rev Mr., Mehenas hessrs rhcmsA P.sriek and Peter
rrAt next u hin 10 lbs property. he being Cetholc
clergyman. married and ieavsug 10 huLy, J
they AL partition OF The properly between hon.
thai Couu VII decide 10 Tie dcfencans Nc Dermut
aud Cotton, &c who claim some uue from said John
| y. Smith IL stS I'd 10 opposition T. The Cain
that Mr Smith ,en slgo two sisters the said Jane
McDeuuou and Alice Cotton. and that The latter tied
lew DAYS AMER hog brother leaving four ctiicren-
The said citizens hosevef and u cista
ID ON teha Of TIE erote that the sisters n crseqaeEee
cannot inherit To faect his q stated ihAI secs can
property held hy senA provided later Obtain BY
rndeJ si these evidence ;hst the deceased, MI >
ciuTen. because The ccrtncsie q nAfarHx Anon
saown. whcb aker ou N the City OF washington -
lSS Is IN tho ~ Rev. John SAITH and 40; John y
@no stated deceased have Nrved =: Philadelphia from
Londonderry IN Ireland, IN lsl6 IL also eonrndsd hat
she neuraixSoa certificate Is informal 10 ohSr respec
end Nod, and hat Mrs Med since ne desh OF hef
efother ess oeeOCe cEec Proof 70 De presented that
Mcn NE we0le subject 5e referred the general
, | Term On We qaesucrs Of lAw-For plAra[ Mr. A II.
Dana Tor Defendant. Nh. q. c. DevereuX
CoVRT OF GxNxRAL SESSIONS T,,essa0-Be
foFe tie ReeoSder ard Aldermen Frsnkin and Coaeshn
lRt1ife A1aSdACAisy the opeCinx Of Coart Law
renee SeeasSn wAs called trial charged with mar
slaughter N NE ns 1eg N causing ne eeash Of Jele