New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-09-17
THE BRIDGE n R0rsE5 FoIAi
Nr FDrroR In the Commercial ard Money article o!

TIE Tr.tuae OF The 9Th ns the following nonce appears
don't know nFon what an,hcriy n1t tho So
, ~, Tho pFense view 20 Ike question Of Gedins
fdSn at Rouse Point accommodation Of the Vermont
Canada s5en.bur Raca have come 10 decon 1d
to taid log The bridge
Ike your.ef others dot saoD upon i0hataNthority'
biz statements made On The contrary others ee war
TAINTED In the etIeron that there proper authority
tr,uch abatement saat II Intended hereby ssaer
hist the repor, OF he Cuwm!dee will ns such e5 Is
prlioned INIT that statement III m time declSrug
thai tie Cor muee have 10 deciS1u tsornbte 10
building The bds = oud be equally su'hoLed az max
contained IN The statement above quoted.
itisuue that the Hon. Benatofs who we're appointed
Commee examine the Premses Of The proposed nrldse
sud 10 collect inoTm' non on Ma subject nave htt@y per
what authority II can be saiedp h Ihey "tave eome 90
tcvoy Of the grant Even II The Comnhtse hsYe arsIdv
hgeed uptn report (Which it is conf eGty heeYed, Is
he fact bose Senators IL Is presumed sro 200 aons
Of what popTiety requires 10 maze sHCn fopO 10
the public before heJ had presented II 70 too bssEsue.
The above quoted, therefore, should not have
public mind with rtitfsnre 10 question Which for three
years bgS excited much attention. Rod which h4s bsen su0
eced 10 much e1irat eoua entertainment from tbs man'
IN which certain Individual and local interests have
seen fit oppose lie 6hloRd Conpsoy 10 their app
ton 10 The Legislature Tor authority to build Inc bridge.
No objection the fat tina. those local aud In
diYcuA oppose tho building Of he bridge under
their circumstances 10 NATURAL ard perhaps may % con
Edefed easonhbe that hey should 40 So Dqttls camsd
hz The manner In which This opposition ha5 been CONDUCT
ed IN fairly obnoxious 10 objections II Is sdmHsd maj
The parry prominent in tie application for grsn to build
The bridge and tho party oromlneD IN opposition TO tbs
eun each prompted 10 sCcA GcHon mhlpy ~ direct
personal local nlees aud therefore the 1..emsnts
aenied BY either party shonld BE eneaee win caution
II with ieaouIy.
The quesuou 10 be decided BY tbs Legislature s
what VIII besl advance The interests Of lhe Ogdelsburg
RsIroed Company and he counlss through which inp
RAliotd Tuus; It WHIST win be,I promote h9 trade
ind business Of certain towns and Of certain contemplated
Railroads the veal aldo OF Lake Ghampsini s 1t
vbs! Will beat conform 10 the viewH OF tbs citizens OF
certain eatcIying ctS lbs eIs le OF upper psu
Of The Hadion HtVeT SIS Ia connection with their recuaf
views the subject Of bridges The question decl
ced by the Legislature Whist will best BubserVe The gen
cTsl welfare OF The whole community mo Btdge, or
Biidge /! this scceptsdon OF The question that
the Legislature lsst Winter decided not 10 act IN his
upon representatives. from either Of the parties specially
interested, and wisey postponed tbs consideration OF
unl Information should bs received through dlslner.
esied ,ouTce In nccodance with ths determination me
8tsIdng COMMITTEES on RallTosdS In the Senate ap-
pointed q Special Committee for that purpose.
Ths OF action tns part of the Legislature
promptly asIeuled b. HE Railroad Company oy all
he frends OF thsi enterprises and sIch S he conycAon
OF tie propIiety aad advantage OF HE bridge when
bdeed With reference 10 he general welfare OF s!es
that they without attempting 30 ldce public opinion
by HtpiIdper statements can patiently await report OF
thai ComU tks TO The Legislature, and WILL with equal pa,
uence IObmi! 10 any other ordeal OF nvea gallon wdlch
dEegsdiDg individual and local interests shall drec! IN.
Quiry or sLd the common welfare OF he wnols comn1-
rii9 OF lhe Stale OF NG~.YoRK