The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1850-02-01

remainder of the business transacted by the court Thi,
expense will be saved by e government by require.
sn e hold court on the western i,Snss, q the Sa,e
ton and very careful consideration by the Judiciary
Committee at several sessions and is now reported by
them would ask that it be taken up and put upon Its
passage.
The question being taken upon the motion to take up
the BILL il was agreed to.
1as sass 60 ~ss to
Mr.. BORLAND remarked that the bill did not provide
for the appointment of an additional Judge
been absent at the last meeting Of the Judiciary Commit.
tee and hence was not aware OF the reasons for pass
the bill The chairman Of the Judiciary Committee, and
seats % and he would therefore suggest the proprey
allowing the bill to lie over until the chairman should
be present 70 explain i.
ary Committee who had reported the bill to the Senate
in his seat, and would probably be prepared TO give
the necessary sIy p explanation ,
BILL except what has fallen from the senator from Arkan
sas Mr.: BoRLAND 1t seems to me certainly agueston
of doubtful propety to say the least whether this bill
should be passed by the Senate understand the OBJ
ject 10 be simply to provide for the holding Of add
onal court at place where there is held now in
that State 1t provides for the appointment OF no add.
tonal judge and no additional marshal Then it would
seem TO me, sir, that the proper method 70 reach the evil
which the senator from Arkansas would remedy, would
be to pass bill TO establish court at that place, and
not to create district in that State because, in my
mind, il is perfectly clear and obvious that when you
have divided that State into two districts, il you have
not now, you will have coming upon you, with all
moral certainty, an application for another Judge and
Now, sir the question arises, whether the business of
the State of Arkansas is Of that extent and whether the
business which comes before that court for adjudication
is Of sufficient importance to justify the division Of that
State into two Judicial districts have not examined it
carefuly-indeed have not examined il, but Judging
from what would appear upon the surface, there but
few States in this Union where additional circuits and
additional districts are not required in degree much
greater than in this State. Now il seems to me that if
is the holding Of court this point there should be
bill providing for that point, for which bill would
vote with great cheerfaness; but il such bill this is
passed for the division in that district at this session,
you will find il necessary in my opinion, TO provide
another Judge and other officers in very short period of
h Mr. BORLAND / stated, when presented this bill,
that il gave rise TO discussion, would not press its
sdeation will agree, therefore, to let the bill
now pass by, and will answer the question urged by the
up; and will endeavor call it up at early day
move TO lay il upon the table.
Mr. BADGER. II my friend will withdraw his mo.
''0S Nj. ioi BoRLAND. OR MIISn'C Certainly, sir
MI, BADGER. 1 would merely remark that have per-
sonaly objection 10 the bill in either of the forms
which IS propSssd there y an accumulation 81 81
wiling ss 'ss a9sS & ss n Ss fs shape an RsSsss ssss
sens 1fsSa sss z yGs ws $ to s s
ton of the two senators from Arkansas and also Of the
senator OF the Judiciary Committee who reported this
bill how s IS right and % put s
reasonable addition to his salary II understand the
purpose OF this BILL it is TO require the Judge to hold two
as 0 ss n s
discharged; the object of which is to afford ia
cities to individual. and the public and the transaction
Of Judicial business 10 that district which will produce ca
court and, consequently, far as can everybody
is to be benefited everybody accommodated and Ieev.
3D. large saving made 70 the treasury OF the United
the unfortunate gentleman who holds the office OF judge
of that district beg also to suggest that IL the bill is
to pass in the form IN which i is now presented. The
now paid to the several judicial officers Of the district in
consideration Of the additional duties thus required Of
them, will have considerable restraining influence in
from Maine, Mr. HAMLIs,l namey-the speedy applica
ton for the appointment OF new judge marshal and other
officers merely mention In this IN order that gentlemen
alton will now renew the motion to lay the bill upon
the table for the present
MT BRADBURY / will net oppose the motion to lay
on the table, but, when il comes up again, shall be pre-
pared to state the grounds upon which reported,
and upon which think the passage OF the bill is re-
The bill was them by unanimous consent, passed over
informally
REMOVALS FROM OFFICE.
Mr. SMITH. Mr.. President | desire TO call the
attention of the Senate to the resolution, submitted
days ago by the honorable senator from Maine, Mr.
BRADBURY,1 calling upon the President OF the United
States communicate certain papers in relation to
movas from Office. The honorable senator submitted
his views upon the subject 10 the Senate at the same
time and now wish TO know whether il is his purpose TO
afford to the senators upon the other side OF the Senate
an opportunity TO do the same and TO make some reply
to that speech.
Mr. BRADBURY. Mr.. President, desire to state, in
reply 10 the inquiry OF the honorable senator from Con-
necicut, that il my wish and my expectation when
the resolution was up and under consideration few
days ago. that the debate should continue until action
should be taken on the subject was desired.
however, by some honorable senators on the other
side Of the chamber, not to call II up the next day
or Immediately after. have been socitous ever since
TO have il brought the attention Of the Senate at ss
eary day as possible When was about to call il up
few DAYS ago. senator desired that il might be post.
poned til Monday next, TO which yielded have only
to say that the sooner the subject s brought up Tor the
consideration OF the Senate the better hope that some
early day may be fixed upon to resume the discussion oi
the resoution or rather, would prefer that II should
be taken up nowhis morning and ii that be agreeable
TO the honorable senator from Connecticut will now
call up will therefore, move that the resolution IN
question be taken up and disposed OF.
Mr.. DICKINSON. hope that that will not be done
because the floor has been already assigned Tor the day
to the honorable senator from Virginia, MT HUNTER, !,
for the DISCUSSION OF the resolution OF the distinguished
from Michigan, 10 relation to the suspension oi
diplomatic relations with Austria.
Mr.. BRADBURY. Then withdraw my motion.
Mr. SMITH. do not desire the subject to come up
for consideration at this time but submit the proprey
of making il special order for early day would