New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-04-23
NFW-YORk TRIBUNE.
cav COCRTs

''"" . D. ,,.l.lk q, h.s AS. F.., De-
........-., ,. ~sxYo-k ~ h.s daaea'er y e.-
49,. ....-u.,t power 2, he- ~ give ty a.e.
.,r 81. s.d o~op.ry O. any o. bis mad d..
s-..,.I ats b, t1e name ni D'.n.-' '''1 .-''
bic or.ne~ts tJa nephew, "ho -..- '4'
,c.,,-,a ,..t .f. power remains 1aezern,sa. I.-
....st,u1rs 81 fre property drsr-l-s :.
~ 80. relrs 70 .aH lr 0u.y ~ tle maze ifr- j.
-. ,-at tfe male a s~eu1a1,s n teceose p, ..'
...tt1. t.a.. ID. o.. death ~ Marc ara ec-.
80 - the property. Reference ordered 20 a.e-'
cain az o, fhe rs~-.es and tie rents ar1 p'J.,s
o,.ts altie event
~, y Jl-r.4rl 80 NJ~ft9 u LT"r- I.f.'
~, . -tstt.l ro~gere vie al. a--t@l prnr
,oo~tys-e vas set - in ba-. Tie 'o1ri '.-1 i'ai
,yo.,,. tho tile IF a second mortgage 8 a,s,.i ~.
tt .-..-.,s ,ea 8 -n. t.1 f0 me r-.fert. 4-r'.
d.. L,,5., "a f-st mo1gsee. the tte ~ 7a0
sts9.yte Slows god reason = ay o was .ei-
i, ,l...ass. VI tte m9-t-age- fhe statute n'
90, ,.... -.... s..f al. . las r0' been done D..
So csc nor atramote1 Judgment ior p'a.i'.'.
lel. II T,1ntta. q. Vii. vs. lin ) F.'1; 1h,
o., alton n bord gwen O. reiease i1e s'.a r.h'e'
Ni-ylIs fitted on, As floating Iheater Pan.
nfasole 90, g1e at'acain1 crelt'rs "- s'ti'-'
f3rnshed ~ tle steamboat az s,.h '-.
.,,yer arc9lnt TIE case comes or h.. o. "1-
......,i...s from Cont below Iud-u-utior aiata
IJ,.toDh,, [epea &c. Thar B1uf0rf PAM
90, covered .o1 CI- jury by fne bite OF ale
-" ,.J IT,. foy-t fe.4tb the oNl-|
.Il. .- ..F -.a.
ltlt,..g ., Ia been acc.s.0rad % bi-e
Vn',s "o 80, ,e koa,s vas sho1-t. AZ
mshh'"' - g., 80, sto,t have.
me Z H. 'N' 80 .,l ,,,l .rra,.f ,..
been aH""eo' '-.' ''
a0nhm, entered 90, =, .fN... VI
Af1HsoH -""h " - '1ycc,' - 500 ,o,.4
Nj y. recoyefea J.ps"''' ~ $50 -. l-,,..-
oo'u'' l' ~ ., uo,'oo is made for p new
public administrators. Mo.,"N - .f.....,,..'..
trial The Court sa1 una, rn' P-,- tJ
issn af'nt % 'ne vi 49,, .ss..,, T,,s,.r
arcopntaD'e ''' properly ~ ~ -, .t.,. fs,.
regulations concerning "' "eP. -
not provided any i'"'e ~ 49,. 81 .
40 tend sns. hof mace an! t"' ..
prcsi1Ds neil0n.or thai '' Die ''' ~
Sc 'p1r - "i opHi'n u"a' '"o
corn trt denied
Hm rgo W Hfnfg b,""'''IN .''
Fof colu d Zee ~ defending the sfIa's', .''o.
Mrs IS AGAINST suits brought iof me a5p's VI
husband The estate Mas IN u.' l'"-1 -,
tee me '"''' ~, and NJ
suits deien1ed by dHect"n :" "' "
without me sahD'pn VI V' - ,.. D.. -.
covered lhos' "D'' "o rt,.r...a.,, e..
cree o. special Term N'il"o' " '''''
cost Of appeH. 20 elther party -
Iqcob Cram # ai ads Jac0D nm, " N. -
make tie owners OF ship Hoitnsuef name TOT O' ',
Of Exchange drawn by udcf "a COTTON sh'fi'''
from Mobile to Havre, the bills having been pro
tested The Court stateu 'ne PuH 'P.t "'
been setucd 10y tne 'Iui' " HPPI d. ~. c.,,,,s
the Marine and Fire Insurance BanA OF "'or-.a
vs lansey, that discounting buns oIa"h %" m''
rhandi@e or p,"1'oo 'o's '3' r-c5.,. n
goods Inc us.'l"' - -" t-I aIorIcu.t ,le
the drawer j. ''' pm! 49,. 900, J., ~ ...,,
pend upon soine V'''' i -, ~ ,,-,las
even she"h t'''' " as a" ~ 49,, G,,, IAN de
ing the bills, that there WIS an! "'"
missed with costs -, ma, a.. s.l..
John N Moore ads " N. ~ hH'G-V" sHV
OF silver ware "here s1'o Iasn nan ~ t.,t,
Snd note gwen Tor baIaHce' uu' gu"
pIaiuth alleging unouhnr' 'ePir e', 80
DICT was gwen Tor P'Sht1' 'euu'l'"5 '' I.,,..rI
II was contende' Dtoi' O.''t''r -, Il,
should nave one'ed oa'H " ~. a., - ,
appears We sn''' Il, IN" =, -. NJ, -
iession ohduHsm5m ~! u'.,u ,,,t,r.
made 'or ne" u'a' III. ,i' 'r',o,,, a,.l docs
delendahtnH '"''N ~ =, ,, -, d.. uiair
hot "nei !" .,,t ,L,., ,,,, M the
'iu Gun P'o' instead ofib. motto
lo'r' VT, l"'- men us '''o
Motion ier ne" uIa u0"' .oo;,s,
r." wa" aus y,'""D 80. - b., bir,s.It 49,
alleged ohu"'s'i VI ny IT.,
goods, but the note IN la.'' eiuoiseI u! "
whose given name also oesan WIZ" T.. f
vas given against defendant m O"ui' ocoN, a,'
appeal made Inc ,""It nV'u 'in' We ~
passes note and ackho"ieuEts hS 'SSP,p.iN'D'I,! /
T. 1oes not matter whether signed 10y himself %. I
not The endorsement nnsn' oc '" T a.,
case 10y heure or an! 'h''s e's' N'"
med, with costs c..p..A |
Ohrc' Let Presdentoi unNe, Lee =" ia.
ads Hiram ~. il"Hr MI -" suT' !" Som
II Smith Co IN t0i'' note 10 .v"''' N," " /
they sent to defendants Bank al Buffalo D. II : !
\ Co tailed on the 18th Ga 23d they gave an oIdei
~ MIR W on the Oliver Lee Bank for the amount
ON the 18th Mr. w presented II, ult II was no., |
paid, the Bank alleging that II ; Co. Would
Toe indebted TO them II appears, however ther'
was balance IN favor OF j II ; %. 'hs' dAy on
their books The Court considers they are haue.
rs 1t was merclya note -Nei Tor ''"e'toH' "'P"''
of referee IN favor of plaintiff confirmed
Nafh} Weed e al ads RaHrg y Chcnfy Sul
by propuetors OF paper at Michigan t. recover OF
plaintiffs IN asui Tor advertising tne property win
! Crprt thor, Tho Referee reported la favor of