The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1850-04-25

am not u besy 10 disclose Mr. CISytoa has il before
him Sc much - was publicly done i Of course Known
M Po'I 10 h: annual message Of December lsa7, after
The establishment q new mission 10 Gasemsia. ~ far
the most popnlons and powerful of the five Central Ame
s sd %ss o Ia
daiiares early IN April He not able 10 leave the
s Win III h @ 4 e sa ss s
psrmen well those Communicated Mr.. Bancroft.
q 81 s% NJ a bun
fortunately % long detained on hs way 2 Central AmeIica
reached he place Of bis assnaoa ans Mr. Po ad
minrtrafion had ceased exist This Of
% M M o Se
Is apisua,e Inc last administration have given 90
Is now too late in the day dispute H. They We're
as ii he q Whilst
Mexican war was raging, although they well knew how
hostile that country US and hoy pzz sody z Msaeo
We believe the preceding statement to be substantially
correct as documents already before the public and others
suich are in possession Of Mr. Clayton, will fully estab-
sh Yet that gentleman. and the cabinet with which he
connected have permitted II they have not instgated
and encouraged the fouest and shameful misepre-
sensations Of the and policy Of the last admnisa
ton. andof Mr. Buchanan particularly, the immediate
predecessor Of Mr. Clayton reference to the subject Of
foreign aggression upon this continent, in the favorite
organ Of the cabinet in this city, and through the medium
OF the iayorite confidential correspondent Of Mr. Clay
ton. in his confidential paper in Philadelphia Further
comment upon such conduct ID unnecessary, further than
to say that ii is TO be TAKEN suppose, fair
pie Of the sense Of honor and the dignity Of the present
administration. l
The Missssippian is pleased to bring the Union into
the same category with the National Iatsigsneer We
leave that paper to take care Of itself The MISSISSIPPI
plan ought to know that we too have found fault with
the which the wing organ in this city has taken
in its garbled extracts from the southern press The
wonder is. how the Missssippian should blend
the Union in the same sentence with our neighbor
When ii intentionally says. that "when once the
Washington press is suspected and looked upon with
dsrust as borne down by the resisess current OF north
ern patronage driven into submission by it, demagogues,
enlisted the projects of presidential aspirants, tied
down and made the serve creatures Of adminstra-
ton counting northern supportwheher that paper may
be the Inteigsncer or the Uaon," &c., &c., does the
Misssppan to say that any part Of this hypothe
sis is true Of the Washington Union? And is it Mr..
j. Marshall who can countenance this supposition
Can he or his partner with whom less acquaint
e) mean TO nsnuae that either Of the editors OF this
paper "borne down by the resstess current Of north
ern paonagethat either Of them is "dyen into sub
mission by its demagogues' either Of them is "en-
listed in the projects Of presidential aspirans"and
more ridiculous STILL that either OF the editors OF the
Union .tied down and made the servile creatures Of
administration counting northern support :" There
confusion of ideas and extravaganza of suppostior
in this whole passage, If il be really intended to embrace
the Union, which we should seriously regret to in
the columns Of the Missssippian We are the friends
Of that journal and would advise it to be little
more particular in the character Of its expressions o.
more liberal in the appreciation Of its friends.