The daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1848-1851, 1850-02-12
Supreme Conrt Of Lolisiana. : |.
-Dec.ior r.reuds:ed on Moodas FeI,ras-v !, iss3

when he wss f,erapfiug.ie. .ssatSs from Jbescu.s
tody Of def-naah's, bs ID s.trestetiHin asan mn
asa a5edabe ltyps dgGe9if Of lLs iowsr.e e5Iri
s,sT s,ssP1sS r i-lsse f3gt'tisPd damages afAesd
:. .FftLdwEs, Joussos. ET Al, AppAlanis, ss.
DIcgFss n AZ. ~ .'YfetssH attachment issuesoh
ts p4ittvlbfSing fiia sIGbuui sad bead giveoiri
ace9t pteseii lEssw for Ahe aGoDot rsquissd tges
aI'fgtgmgfit y " be Iiainta9ed tbduph, t6e.ds5t
5riRiiegs caFn6t exceed the atnounB Eed in fe
aliieiivit -. JutigIFeFIt For PlaidlfA 8
:. s.HEtfs. CT PHIBoDaux, Apr sl,an,s, u.s. BEATTY !;
Administration. ..Fe adjudication Of the piya's
prnf Isy4of 1le deceased spouge is.a nudity. It's
on'y the conirnunits prop riy which can thus be
sFansfsrred. y. .Judgmeataffirmed. ~
affiansd! =: - -'.- = = ~,
sfNpIcs: OF 'DUsBAR,r g Apr sllanis, vs. r. A.
,WooBs..s.A qeeslisn Of ieet. Judgment ,re.
yetsed, and one. rendered ,fot platnjE 90 . -
AHtRAM SfGLEh Us. Alleys GsuTRIER Er 40.
Ap+ 5l,ans. sJudgmsut reversed, and caase req
inaeded fof'Ibe PirFose ofGaEihg fIr,ies.
s .AEExIs GAUTBfzR EF Al us. b. sDEssBRq,
sApl lls5nt., Jddgasht rerefsed, and 3nen-suif
4 .RERNps APP 5Ilaht, ts. Asceok Ers Az Pc,
sssser raetien 20 proof ID al psasff vas,in ,poses
sion within Ire year bci1re ahe aileged -disrurb
ianee.s, Judgment afifpied. -
sSUccEssIoN OF FABEaY DEcoUx bEsoErEEs
Dscot t&. OpTsHengahds sApIe Ilait... IA "a tysean
np-ap ;a freIn juylgmeut in his oYyIt vorehel.
,the sEJoifnnent ~ adm nstrator -
HEfBs DR. DAFENPoRT,. "A ppeFianis, is. LA-
BGtIk.& LANcDRY. lleos Cases =. Alter a laTse
Of many years though notsufcieHt to support pre-
srriPteu, the .Codrt VII more readily -come to a
CONCLUSION Of paYmeht Of the debt than when the
Judgment is sought to be sensorced Immediately
alter ns rendition Ajudgment rendered in 1875
was presumed to be paid on the testimony of
single witness. the sttorney Of sthes defendants Il
the original suitSwho ,wOre oulyto the best Of his
recollection. gRhe. Chaaeecy doctrine Of a. sale
demand recognized. :. ~ Judgment ,foT defendants
affirmed inboth cases - Il r. e: ~
RAG UEr. Is. GAUMoucHE, Appellant. i Parole
evidenre inadmissible' 10 prove s1bmssiob to ar
-biEsfionf and the award thereon. L. G. 3066. .
Judgment reversed, and rendered1or defendant
MARfENI 1s. MAJkIsN,. Appellant J. A com
stable, under ap execution from "a Justice of the
Peace, seized and sold certain creaits a nnoastoa
was sued out and honoGogated.s ithout deciding
whethef The giles, under execitons issued by jas
tees OF she Peace are within 1he fnontron la, the
| COprtheld stiat the advertisement was TOO Vague
| toscoRvey title the Purchaser. The advertise
lneit IS in these words 'Alt the snTplus funds
1feredits. rents ssand esins in the hands Of p q
Mautan, .a4tes The ,caims Of the Congrea atron 0
the I}onS atliolic Church oF St. Francis as Vic
i tor Maprian, No %, and Belonghgst to Victor Mau
rian; and which were attached on the 26th Of oc
tpbeE, Is 6, at the suit of the Congregation of th
Roman Catholic Chveh IS Victor Nladr an, Nosi0'
s YATES as. PHIPPss Appellant. wv here on
mortgage is givea >tp' secure the spsincAoal, and
subsequent one to osscufe the interest, cospledwit
condition to release aporiioh of the PROPERTY he;
4 under the FIRST mortgage, the eredaoTscanu6t pro
ceed bythe ca e1ee t5le2 on both, without siowiH!
acgnpf ance With filecpnd. ton q order olsezur
4 dismissed. :. - - -
| EDwA RDse IS GAUkR. Appellant q Order G
seizure and sale sethside from want Of certainty il
the descrp on Of thesnfoftgaged property. - Whei
the proceedings ia rem the pfopefty TO be SEIZE,
and sold must be designated BY some defnits' de
scnptoh.' v r.
/ PUCKER, Administ ator, as LEFEvRE Ell. AL.
An action of boundary {. The defendan tcontendet
that no judgment could properly, be febdered, be
capsethere Vas no prooes verbal as regufed blythe
I Code, Aft' S37:. The defendsGt permitted arepor
OF surveyor and his testimony to be ,admtted a.
Msnt affirmed h ned t. ~. /,
I FusEtIEf res FusELIEF, y APpsllant- ,'S Judg
| mept Of the lower court reversed, apdone.Tenderet
:. MArxsEst WHiITrs Antel,aSt Ss s., 5S 1Terpssa -
JET yRevoeatory .actiob. :. Judgment for de
! PENDANTS affirmed. = '.,t ~: -
S9NDfcs. OF DuSBAR,, ApPetapts,' Us. r. A
moons y, ! hlS suit IS on anote signed by q 7
os al.a q " sS p iiase ~ =
seribsstGe 9oteseeSfsd y tSsss ,sa bS.t5s tye
There IS mo evdence,to pfoye,tle delivery, OF Iii
note and the dscrepanqySnot accounted f5Es,
yJqdgrneHt iRiayoF % defendant atifmed. -,
L W WILI1A5AfS''A ANp SAVAGE t's ;NAReiesE il
e so =. taSSe 70 IN s'9P R
aet Of Ise9.g The dsisnee;wss, tiat no eompeIsa
tse;r saye 10 stop a Sc sd ;eoonlv
clam for dana sing IRON Ii.
delayef PLANTERS in obeyng the summ9ns ef the in
sPestso.s; { Sadglela tor a,nLls aud d%islsss % "
Hr', a - -,
scrs ~ ta t,r -
land Of Gl6mgS,ts, when 4 shosd be acyes, is de
4 fActves. andan. .iniuactioh'wiHb sustained agans
the sale under such an erroneous description"
,'Hagl'ieht ~ ! teSefsea,,
"MssL, APielaat, III ~ ;t; Decide
r. obsssl ~TS s % 'i s's " .
1 1fDA,TFx. a. p,ras5oNS. lyAp Ap,slinnt Jpdgnsn
Of ile io,eers 6oint, based OnitsTesdict Of iun
cohitgiaed., A.; -, - =! !. :
A,ns,,..,.At =. =, rl,s7, H.
nss5sa 1u sotron.,atis ssso.naos,o ~,