New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-02-16

tbs DRuRY JURY.-The Polior Ga-stte states
ilai me jury stood for conviction to for aega,tal the
Herald hat understood BE- exactngly the
yerses for seGual 10 for conviction Where two such
highly moral respectable and always reliable authorities
deer, we val not pretend 20 decide
SUPERIOR CsURr-Beore Judge Pane Tho
People M hehaf Of F,Iaklia y MsEioH TA-cd5-- &
MsyV The plaintiffs proceeded aga.ns. thifd party IN
Deg SlliWeI warrant ard NJ NJ became surely for ~
appearance A. The time specified ant from time ~ time
cording TO al curument The eNauiusuon under The
occupied several meetings from the Fall 10 the Spring
sud finally lie party did not aprear The present sciion
her entered against Mr. NJ on tho surrey bond
cover between sno and sloo the amount OF the debt Ia
teiruse among Other points, vas said thai pAinntA by
conserving ths, the APPOINTMENTS &c should axe place
without Mr.. Ms know edge, released him. veriiS, for
ziuui', subject 90 ne ornion Of The C9ut-t., PLAIN
uas aes.rs Burrl Davidson For defendant M An
HssSy ~ Coak ~ RURcrd Rics-ro recover for ease
Of stall No p Clinton Market The case brings NJ the
question 4 ue 10 the stalls The case l. Of long standing
e = sad The stall. rendered of little value AFTER
shops licensed To BE- continued hi. forenoon
For plsnnf Mr. sehsfer and MI Stevenson Tor deend'
ani Mr Cowles and Nessrs Holden rhayer
Hoo srEArINe-Tbis morning M Holden oi
sixty ihirst Ninhevenne found hs hog pen open
ami ight poikers valued at So among the missing.
ATTEMPT To- BURS-An attempt was made last
nigh, hre the house No "a Ssnonsi by icliow Who
threw into the window quantity Of urpeniine lilo es'
capped.
sArvspiY aossse. Feb. 10.
CoURr CALrvDAR-1h.s Day-Cucpa Court
Same Yesterday
Co~~cr PisH 10. %, los. us ~ III. 49, IH. tt2
Superior Cou,t-Tran'6sred Term.--Nos. ~ 81 to g.
>HP'e~e Cor-t-.ienesa. regn.-Pue.isaed yesterday
3d. o. ~ ~ M, l5o j. u, l3A 49, 49, lil lth fo9 ~,
5 20 80 ~ l59. it0 l6 lS5 1915 1873 10 III i& -
3 Is IS IS l' - " . " - q: y d o. 80 IA 81 d. '''
CIRCUIT CoURr-Bciorc Judge McCoun John
Densays' iHd Vifs Martha ilayg md otae, SUIT 70
e-i hete' The VIII OF he late onn Da's was Destroyed
hy himself or by ID. direction aud i MS Pfrs.nee srs-oy
referred ln Tnis Yesterday given 10 the Jury
The Judge 10 his charge alluded IA The testimony ~ Mr
McAdam a. 20 ne execution oi e W hs oring '-n o'
licr N Drg had beea taken scs Mrs ID al hrs saiif
ma. Mr. d lad no WI. snd lien inuma.ing Iha; inc va
might 20. be produced ne coming IN Of MIS- Perkins na
sister % Mr. b. who cut "a By tho will being allow
81 but $50 year for lie while me esiae after the death
Mrs d. 20 to TIE children % snOlh hafss,er AM
Mr. ID reqss sting Mr. McAo bond BY hlch Mr.
Perkins engaged pay Mrs $500 provided Tor b,
% VIII sHG soo to Jo psg L@aoW also S ssqq SsSe
i wssslws,- considered Of Sir and Mrs. DArg AM
was ughtup by them, untl difficulty occurred lev
wears ago relation slave thai SIR McA al drsi r.
used but aferward drew up he bond, and Mrs Perkin
sho - since desdi signed Il, also 10 he testimony %
Mary jane Perkins VINO said she present when Mr.
Darg called for his viii amt tore Oh hs signature aiiri
which Mrs D. ssked him el her read ~ and She took d
another bur back gave me paper sgan "a
Mr. when be cyan tore ~ then handed u Ia hi - and
unouy Ok stevens Mrs told her Immediately sfsr
.,ard hs the viii nOtde.rOyed Dut MAT soc had
substituted an old Que which Mr. D. destroyed aud Mr.,
ths a.. ~ 10, not iu presence Of Mr. d.
The stated thar there this iegned issue,
,Lree questions for The Jury 10 lst Did John Darg
have WI duly executed ID. Did he destroy uiai viii
himself Cd b.d other person destroy 10 his pres
lnce and b. ais dir eiiOn
AZ the trst point conceded that he had within
fezard the Others must presumed, In law, that be-
destroyed The vii iselI y having been len IN his posses
siou and Il a for the testimony 10 show he contrary
The Vii having been shown "a exist tho aw renders u
gcce-say that proofs Of bis having destroyed u hmsrl or
ha destroyed by some person In his presence, and
.F AMI request must be shown 81 two cfediblr
n The jug believe thsf The viii destroyed BY
D. Darg Bis last Will and testament, aIbougn h.
posed that he destroyed, and hat Mrs. Darg al
ARD destroyed The VIII not m - presence he VIII Is
CYn-dered, Ia ias not SsirOyeiths requirements o
slsuIte not having been CONCERNED iOnirino here "A
JUoher remedy for the heirs Il 20 be con
.lIefed The Court, IN referring 10 tho evidence, sug
sesird whether tom the circumstances, wa mol
Hryuahie that Mar Perkins mistaken ln saying
sat Mr Dsrg tore lhc paper ifsi handed 10 hun
lclOrs Ars Darg assed hm a. ct her have u and sfe
tlot 10 20 anodI-r Mrs ID could have motive IN
wishing 10 read t. what cOntanef snf
,e wished substitute another afsr 1r. Dars bad looked
write is own read any writing except bic Ovn
#. probable shs would nave taken before sho let him
Ear u ms name would have been useless for her Ia
DO sierN ard 1heu II the jay suppose hal M ID de
.rOged vii hey viii consider whether not NJ
II sound dspOsng mind becaus u 10 requisite mat he
sboud be- 90 b. revoke VII 10 maze 0ne-The COur
ed otler points u testimony Nj sanford
presented exceptions ~ ne charge, and tho COur sdOum
d Verdict his or,ncOn.
CJUKr or CoNMos PLEAS -- Before Judge