The daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1848-1851, 1850-08-05

q n ~ VIZ me-, " sss u i country The
AZ p, a. s q q. Va sa ~ a sSs. s
\. ',sde sis sS9 W. " lsomess he iaersls q
81. s sssd s sas k hon ; ssssss %
, & s sss "a s1 ss , sss ss SS'R Gssss
's 's ss s II % s q TIVE Sss,s 'a s s s
= ss s sx 8 ~ would "a q Gial i;i sss nothing
% y 4 I'D aonsieuous pesIiia ~ nc country
h,y M ~ fsrs q s nrSs ts Nv shoaTh liz
iiuf9ffanl mes 81 cancellation
,i5ss ssassiss Which, compose The yem reported BY The
cenaiee Of e e what Wi se .hs eondiloa
M 81 Itch fhs Nolh gains The admission Of silornm as
% @ sss ss ss g Ss~ ss es ssy and
deegs e nysk q W. suaees.y e SeaEress ees New
and re Other eresmssaress that New ssxeo viii uu.
sse asas he DstFid. Of Ccegbla Arc not lhsse OBJ
S P's Hss VIA s' Wit s' scas sss r.
N4n ssy tne aa.i:on ey Congses o. The danseons pri
& y s ass II liz s ,s M@S no II f
ea tss se esaase nss N dispute gains efficient fng
sn 81 slavery ST. may hsppe 'l'ss noi GONE
IA Il. s.a ny ss 81, ~ g y e roP ss q ss
geslqEnla adaped 70 slave aho 10 which slaves vii Be IN
sron power. eeasssssio "a, esaipaiion
sasnoe g AZ unlawful suihcs oset re lasnisnon o.
ten II she get slave tenfosy iQ tAlItorpa New
esa 1s n. 1ss %so ss ii. asa s
n npqsn allan. b ssisiued hsIs Hse four eoaq
es9s ai IL s ~ ss' q Ss
s &c " nv E e @ "a u e aas si' s aaj
cntfEeo in the pursuit OF IT, But that
son ia al hs guide which are given o BY he
God nceies,s " lis duIy o. submIs.io % lis VIII
s7ibs ID eriaieu. That southern ssgsry sxended
hUa ~ pteion q any porllon Of Caiornia Utah and
New neXzcot why cuuread fuf nj
SsS. Hhsi ) L thai ds.racls The public mlnda msIe
81 s s. seuiioss nd 9aasn 10 some
I'VE anrsa years sine o9sse y rs Ss, q a sspna
neh SOONER our pcserig viii read te siey Of present
aSs se ma s Ne e oys s sye 81 the bso
when he Fsceln.s the wcheEs aud the persecution
or carrying aay@ 70 psah and New Mex Ico. where
,s.s sSsnes ss bsa ' ne I sO
now while this part Of the subject a mean those who
danger and great and an imminent danger.
whlrh they are incnrng. venture prediction likely
gsnnsn ~ that il Texas includes all lie territory
ssg am about 10 STATE s les likely 10 spep by he
e!rent q me bonndaryl venture 70 say that
ms o Texas Al all venture TO predict chat the a orthern
population tine population the upper par OF the Rio
process Of time eresaly outnumbeF the populai ion holding
slave upon ne ali and Ie lower waters Of Fexas; and
slavery and WILL eitner be abosned oEi limits etteetua
gave the same in eer which wrote some six yeas
ego from Raleigh IN the arollna. SAID
they would usimates become tate. And Issy tla
shs onabay very great q all Texas beconng lre i
hs 5snae e lIs scnIes q even limited BY II Paso
she interest daS, and should be tie inclination OF Inc
ou 10 look at facts and nature they
themselves Inc facf mat Il is mpoasibe however
ssss Y. may be II ne OPINION q any o. tnen TO carry
5 s P5s ;s s9s supnss9p maf iase made
OF Tins difficulties
leen them 4 there anyLhns Of which the outh just
sing them of he oprouuityo Carrying their sav
ny sS = be- re- s s s ss s0 sg s s @ + %
s s Mn Iy ten 4na r.. With Which would hass
vision winch docs the government the Terro
Ies q establish Or prolibt slavery Introduced at
amendment introduced II their instance which ~
p.y ssssias tnA any slass iIym als Lerrlory shall
Dc Anlists thai Tie Vi The provision for against
ui1n. Now. what eompsiaE san the scala make Il Inc
whole sshenls saIr.sl oal The soutn gains virtual
q ay poNsr Dangerous 10 The nslitEOn OF slavery within
X, ss @ aa % q saee ayss hoa
LIS quie uieas0n bic for gentleman ium The S1Dfl
coanif1 inaispuiabIe ii Is as clear as The lille ii y
olef STATE territory IL ne Union. There
as Of shs lrom the mouth ofthe Rio Grande
o Sq M q a.. s . rass e. a Ss SS Se
70 ns sos y sqcn sass Sea rease q appeal TO The
Ton which The question. Texas ti.s moment
Threatens, understand, by tofue Of enforce
emit Be done otherwise satisfactorily dons BY com
IL go aa ISL go nss 81 e S II " bs M
bodeaing the kO Grande. uut Oh the controversy
u he wict Poso d san,o teitory q
ine ~ sianae ana shs gsss fugve slave bill which
bh b. able TO show The progress OF my argument, iii
sssy "A s Il ns as1 Sa%ba az What more soo a
South ask Cen does nothing 10 inquire her. denies he
NV ~ come here i shall b. admitted with u wt
g. slavery as sy choose WHAT more LEI me ask. can ib
lspsai that. # The South does gain the sanction
OF her tight carry slaves the acqulsit oas,
baaie according q her own doctrine on e has no con
snisnai autlty u confer such privilege, and beau
sy run ~ ns and bersass Ia Tie iaits q Utah
aa Asw Asxeo the laws Of nature and Sod "a
cgnpae Of small measures recommend
OF by The what has been conlenled for By
some y lie southern during the progress Of this bill
the ine Of 81 deg 80 min 10 be run OH 10 The Pacific
Lei consider at question under aspects: first, with
9ut provision that may be carried south OF that le
a Ss run l1 W is ds SaIs
Z + se gPon re qns ,ae g ~, s S,5 2. ne line You
% the arr 4 would bc Dbherated b. The Inst blu Of wind
n The dFst hlow. am that there gentlemen who
inaan thats OF the consttuon the right 10 cary
slaves onlh Of that line already exists, and that course
Ire q ReIr slaves south o thss Inc hnS tSe
CONSTITUTION 1 bad no heard that opinion ayowed.
1pnpons, The most ndeensibe position that ever
fake BY The eonst nt0n neither created
sliluu1h a1leceen 10 the constitution and il WINS d.
pendet ~ the States not upon The will Of Congress- but
law OF the respective states The constitution Is
hel and passe the SUBJECT oil the institution u
rather deals with tact fact that exists with
a. has,g essea sonnusd q being rs csioe for i in
PROVISIONS IN tie which relate the eel Of
slavery Iners that which SUBJECTS slave property TO AKA
q lbs pgpuslon ii xas tie raio u repiessnation and
that which provides the recovery OF fugitive saves Thai
the whole extent 81 the constitutional provisions upon the
SUBJECT q slavery Ii instituted slavery, es on
rsin ina whn The bosom Of tie stats than Is esponsi
pc Joy NE poecn yf any 9th personal PROPERTY depend
y u pso1eehcR upon the States and not upon congress
Way, i sid that. upon the high seas vessel of whose
cdfsu slaves compose wouu be under the protection oil
the consultation aud government Of the United Stat.s Sol
womb Dc upon The ocean, and why BECAUSE there s no
setaIaie uflscon exng there any nation bnt there Is
eoai.non jurisdiction common to ali Dag which
noA Al INC masthead d the ship csres with The laws OF
the nation 10 which the vessel belongs But noulelf ie Va
81 sets ont OF mai the get luto sepa
rats territorial luiicton tbs iug and the slp and Inc ear
90 become subject 10 the territorial jufsdcon Anil ar ~
icascf uadef the OF the sgitntio OF s iine
stAt " ny s rlAt is nor Of the Tree Saies N
asi leaves the OF rharleslon cargo OF SAVES Nd
ealers the OF Boston New York the iouet sle
elcne INN she bafhoFne m0me, she GENES within de
ftloal jurisdiction Of The laws OF Massachusetts, or New
KulA s laws operate upon the saves determine te
iual condition Ispeak OF CASE in winch lhs,
vi ysahany carried there Il they carried there Will
p i coiaent o. M they may cou se be- nursued
lqef ne pr1tison Vi the contution which relas IL fe
Aes4 Bat they arr voluntarily carried, the instant llsy
n tey are subject the laws Of that rrorial Iuriscton
you were to cargo Of into The port oil Iye
yoei y q tIe, does pretend that the dag OF Inc Uni
t4 rtsles would protect Them. they the terri
dlal jurisdiction Of England France? No such thing
ts a IKE the Rlch has often cited IN asg M hi
y iae slaves which wefec the Bahama islands, whieh
f3,s, eoreqnent the OF God. d. THAI (,Feai
Ah Nas peud ~ comfy 1t not IN strict justice in that