New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-12-11

~
IN, ,yrttsn request Of three of the Directors, 20
.a1l . ,,co1;,,, If the Directors
VIII THIS Association may sue or be sued
III the name OF the tfeSiafn1 or IN, ..!n9 Ss.1 \.
'nF ~ V', Y"rl ma the financial bssi
Ia tue ~! " " ~ 49,, ia that Citx
"eSS Us ''N NsSo- - -
LAW COURTS,
C,,.pr ,,vnn,R This Day SVie,70r CoNfs
Me- "a ~ 81 II 81 %. lol l01. Ill. ~. lis
ttf n, 90 to5 l96. l27 l29 1871, l3i, 1877. 1873.
IN = ira : 10 20 4 \ i12 2l. % 36, Is. LEA.
"A az , o u s. 1885. 90
Cjr-,j Coi,!LNos. ,o56 232, 30, OBS. is.
as
Common Pleqs-Nos. 673 6ls, il}, 7lS, 797 rae.
?3Q. IA, 741. $40, III, 776, 7oS, 7o9, 100
c.,,.,r -fi'oncrol Term.-bs
svrKEME Gov HI a. 55nixSis@, 10 ne
Tore 0n ne f,intr, grntIrnlcn, after oxamins
luz i Iu..U' "9 n,iftfd 10 practice Elias
toii - - p,,.hhco Ion,cs q Bullock Amss
II 90 I, -, and Elliot T Farr.
n J aiusNV'' '' 'A' -
SUPERIOR CoURr.-Tho cases referred to yes
terday are still on in the two branches OF this
. Court.
,,,nl Lv1
CIRCUIT CouKI'-,neore 'uG89 " '';T.
lis y Gd5ett vs. " Wt"H 'Ieecf' 40 49,.
$3.50 the amount OF a ON VI C'otiiS an oT 49, 49,
furnished to MIR Hull, in l8i3 ss'd 70 nave peen 50
by order and guarantee OF M!' w "i'uu 20 aad
Mr. H also lived in the country To be oonte 1,1
For plaintiff Messrs kirkland and daoett y ono'
wood; for defendant, MesSrs. BRADY DS''f0ss
p-c--- Id, co1vlas Joh.
MARINE Gov eioLo 'U1 ~ tSo yerrantv Of
e. Carson VS. 'ohh iioIS wv cold chan
[o,sr mare and SIS in money for young sorrea
ho u"S Years DID, At the end of the receipt by
5cfenda1t are the words 81 The horse kind asd
sound Act9n Is orou6 ttsr 10, nlans posses
SHOWN 'ha' tlc ho' se' 49, 80, t,osiors On the
session, was oaulky on many oScnStIn' - he1
Paft Oh ueienn.s IN the recent for some
peei. Us tot ho Ind possessed him up to the tims
irUi!In' ,S iso enid tLe nlaintiif was not
u .; ratc Of borees The Jury found fer
,Ha;4,ia $50 For nlnntity Mr.. Hardman fer
pp"r,ann+ Mr. Still
"'iI 1'' - w S,,, pcoysaU-plsints,
w. S -, f,,rctoeo tv,o leases Of defendant on
'iao " NJ io1 Droncy " far S715 and p.d
~, 5ST 40 nornost none liz contended that
ti,ii' is wore rcrrreented to BIZ ordinary leases
wbich was not the case, and brings action to re,
co,er LncL the sos He showed that the agree
rne,,t was ms stated One IF the leases provided
jt tbo leesoc sball my nil toxps and ossessments
,.(;cl' ,no, he ossessed or imposed This the
C)urt aid not consider os coming under the term
@or,iinnrv lense," and gave Judgment for plaintiff
/ fr - ,1lcb however mt carving costs COSTS
.u .aniad nf,o;nst ,Io;nt;F For nIointE Mr. Pet.
az. 81 .a. .lotoon3on+ Mr. u u NicboIs
'V' > IVA -
Us. DISTRICT CoURr--Bef ore Judge Judson.
/ O,c,crs bark Bf0,cDDa VS. schooner Wa3kingt0E,
oyJ Tho 1erryse-Cross libes to recover. on behalf
of The Mazeppa 81, COG and the reverse, $4,000.
f,r me Washington. alleged injury by collision.
| TLa case was uD some time since before Judge
Hetts To be continued this E--.., Ia. Is
Uo1on,a Nn,sra r.. -grohooh- :, vi s sno
- ,o. s, o. - liHet elu Aiol'"H' foi '"'
y "''''" 'oH' 'uf' cutting
rGrRr or Co,ruoy pfE.q-Ref,ro I.dx.
WoodrnH.-julia T5rn5,lH vs. YHo,on@ 8 IT, IT,
/ blia.-To recover $500 for three weoks ongags.
,ne,t or the Rowerv Theoter in Ig4a ne a
/ Jonsensc nj slO0 pcr week. and $500 20 alleged
not recoints Of twn bnno6te which sbe vgos ar.
titic9 70 The caee has heen trieJ hafore Iyhe.
the Inrv conId moi agree The dcfnnsc l. that
Miss T. made the engagement with Mr.. Jackson.
az that TIME me acting manager oil the lneSseI.
ana assigned et tue agreement 20 MN tnat MISS 1.
Gid not iulhil her engagement the Terms peiAs
that She was 70 procure maze cancer 70 perform
IN the same pieces, Whch, on nght Oh lfth August
she failed to do, and 1t was also charged that some
OF her trends caused to be introduced TO tho inca
ter that night various dlsordery persons, VITA
view 70 compel Teo. w. omhn, VINO was aA-
nounced 10 dance Win d!oYannl Ciocco' 70 danas
with plaintiff, and in consequence OF which dis
EuFoance took place. the property OF the IneeteT
was destroyed ana the reputation oil the AneaE'f
al well az that OF defendant as a manager, were
Efeq'y hufep, aliu o LOT "hIch nc Claims u"inaSe"
n me sum Of SliOoo'
In reply the allegation OF having, through ner
friends, introduced dlsorderiy persons totGe mouse,
is denied. She was ready to perform on the night
mentioned but was prevented and the difficulty
arose from the disappointment Of the audience, in
CONSEQUENCE Of an attempt 10 omit part of the per
Torrance adyertised
Il was said that plaintiff expected Mr. Smith 70
take part in the pieces that she did instead of In
the pieces with Giovanni C., bat he denied, that
evening. having made any such engagement The