New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-06-04
Important Points of Practice.

SUrREME COUNTS p ecial erm.-BetOre
Chief Jasuee EdIaonds decisions ERes G0uLIyd azd
lha,leffe hs t'le Va GRes 4 CasiiG n " mere mar
ned wOmsn Is panuh in case aud Il 10 necessary for
Der 10 ue by her lext friend where she has merionous
Of scou and Is unAOe procure respeslsbs
htId, sue viii be allows 10 a f0ynd pIupris,
some 0cer Of me Coprt a. her next 1gpd Mouon 10
suife Ire OF G. g eenied, aud she Eosy-d 10
10 "a lorna IuPeF by her silo - her s1d
D,ossr Warner We. Railzhd and Harrington R4aToa8
CA may be brou sht under lhs Code Courts
sgsns foreign Corporation, though has neither pro-
reTtv ofhcers or agent In he SAis and n NAV be- IL
meneed euker by serving lie summons the President Of
the Company psreor. though OFT Of the sac by
rubisL,pg m two newspapers ia this Sale Motion 10
qussh Tho prsce, dngs denied Toe Judge ed hist
he Code but whs would DE he effect IS 70 he jg1g
mert was not for him 10 say
nav ssue against nonresident absent debtor Ia
action for WING such a. uesPass OF Essal anu baer
provided q mode which the may DO served or
al commenced The oce VI an attachment IL zach
sui nit himself the Jurisdiction Of eoufu-aOuon
aside attachment denied win costa The Court s'aei
that the Code provides c0nrsc T recovery VI noasy
bul not on assault ard battery, &c
Tfsw Vs. BiOodSooG- Motion granted, 90 payment Of
Bep5 w. Wgson vs. El.4bsh W-gsoa-MArnage decls-.
ed VOID By reason Of defendants former marriage.
DaAtsi C. CLARK Others vs. Ian Da'ea aaG Others
The proceeding supplementary TO an execution though
substitute for per ssde creditor suit onnsrly
grsei.sd and such sun Tie proper pToe eeains wasre
10 i've passed upon; Demurrer eveuaed win leave 10
answer on payment OF coss
vision CCoe thai allegations IN pleading specih
cay eODIOveEied shall be Isken uoe does ooI warrant
pleading being used or the purpose OF ooaioag pArua
discovery by lhe insertion VI Avsfmeus not
lsadtE buI which inserted merely for 1e Pu pose u
obsipps AZ admission their truth facts Ouy csa DO
inserted In pleading Circumstances going 10 prove ihsse
fcls viii Dc struck ont especially when inserted for me
purpose Of obtaining an admission PieaaDgs esn no
longer he used means OF oosispg discovery 10
case The provisions IN the Code th4l ale
ali be regarded tue, apples ony % those
fcis which nscessGTy 10 coz uie PsEJs cause OF
defense Notion " slrkc 0ai aVefm-nts grsn.ec.
JantF ~ Srsith ads AbSAeze Bayyot1s-rhe geasral
term The DiscI having refused open lh-
fault II would Be proper for MS COau Interfere.
Motion ePen The default denied, vihcai e0sts and with
Opi prejudice
barnabas H1R Eef Gds JaAs ~ L1fsoa The complaint
kGs not 0sassed On delay 10 the PTocesdn % no
silt PRIOR 10 The defendants application MOlOn 10 Dis
solgs atsehn enteenied
Peter Il. beach va ,. ". Bssk1az The Office % En
avefIsenI IN pies that the Dssty has egs sIE
fcieLt foUnd beef Il merely - Save his Il. from
beln ino AcmtAcu snd puts tbs other party
To bs proof II bis cls ~ TIE parts maAug q avsrmel
L1yug ~ any otn-r ceicnss u1ccf Il Insn
mercy 20 cunfuvrr he ruth Of bis ~ eTsafys proof
NelQn 10 TtleT iebeS eos - a7i-e eye1i Zoe leading