New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-09-27
Jd9lee srrTcERthen withdrew tho motion solsy

JUICE SPENCER then withdrew the m)tion solsy
o.. the table.
DR. WHITEHEAD OF St ThomasA desired to know
TIE shape in Uheh this question was presentef
1t hsd taken three forms-frst, es an appeal then
as a petition; and finally as paper. II Il ware
al appeal, he should object 10 its reception; the
precedent might be act for impaaohmenss OF the
ection Of the Bishop who is Ell octo the presiding
etfcer of the Missionary Committee. D.. w. did
rot believe that no appeal could legally be made.
= petition, az such, he Eoald racSivo IL IL ~eIa
uere paper, the subject Of which !. treats shoult
be announced before hand. He locked at the
principles involved in toe discussion Of this qQes
iou az vital in their character
Mr. HAWKsLEY followed in explanation OF the
purporr Of bis paper, appeal or petl!lon he stld
the pariah Of Marlborough believed ltseif grosiy
nisrepre scented by the Missionary Committee, add
demanded to be heard in appeal Inc appeal 40 ~
ever would partike in great measure Of the na
ture Of petition e repealed the alur cast upon
the parish yesterday, that it was poor and feeble
raising perhaps aevenfy.fi7 dosra per aunum for
the support OF its minister. 1t was, certainly not
wealthy, though it did raise sam some wat
larger than tho one named. 10 be poor was
ereas Inconvenience but it was no disgrace. He
dtsred that the matter might be faithfully consld
Rev Dr.. VIaToN and FLOYD SMITH, ESQ aus
famed tie demand OF the Pariah for investigation,
and redrssa itwrong had been done
the Committee and spike in behalf of the mnori
ty in favor Of the right Of sppes sotne Convention
directly.
Rev Mr.. PARKS, of Trinity, moved that the Mis-
sionary Committee be authorized 10 pay the stipend
to the Missionary at Marlborough.
Mr. EIGgNBRADT moved, as substitute, that the
subject be referred to the Missionary Committee,
with full power.
The matter was hbally referred to the Commit
tea; a resolution offered by Mr.. y arlaon being
adopted, ordering transfer Of all the pap efs ID sne
case 10 the new Committee.
TIE BISHOPS CASE.
Dr. j. AUGUSTINE SMITH, of New York, gave
notice of preamble and resolutions which he In
tended to offer for the consideration OF the Conven
tion at convenient opportunity. The resolution
relates to the case Of Bishop Onderdonk, as fol-
lows
Whereas Dc tw several occasions, resolutions bearing
ed by this Convention and there lie at present before
third ekoluon o. DreciIey the same import and nase re-
solutions framed 10 give no ntims'on whseYer
The mode OF relief sought IA to which sentiments dls
nercelly oppote prevail Ia this body;
4nd 1ofcteds On so momenoun al occasion can or and
propeiy obviously que that the actual views and opln
Of every member here present. II sIaeo q! all Bhou
be clearly expressed as to leave 70 possible room fo
doubt only for thu Just and reaEonba Rali5iaconofte
different congregations pfesented on this ioor but more
particularly 10 Svod leading The RI Rev. Pahers OF the
Cturch into error, Therefore,
RsSoipfd fhet reeo.:on OF ici6 connection between
Bishop Onderdonk and his Diocese would excite H.
dignaion and ill4eeiDg In the aud would more.
over bring little disced upon the Church throughout
Inc Union.
The preamble and resolution were laid on the
table; and
The Convention then took recess till P M.