The daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1848-1851, 1850-05-14

yer himself received themocked them up In his drawer
sn u eau , nor N' money and had de-
Mr. Sect How sau,, rnS to know me AT w,.,,own,
% %crs bs 10y w ~ S Sa 1 1Ssr ?; n tune 1
reis5r .,c., M, s.v,,.h. .,,..v, .,.,. A.. -
M LaTas. All yes-YOu state thatshe afterwards got
ui GsSe,, N,co,s kro, To-, :, . L. ,oos
VA S Sa u, TSs school 70 him Homer New
married year Previous his wife was Miss Ballard she
arrived at New Orleans two yeas ago and asan NH Mr.
Sever think be paciicng law IN Fulton New York
Peween ts yeers ~ ana 1871 ms vie have met a. Miss
was to tbet tbe wpse ill., h. Ssses
tn ,y;,rs- 49, - L;hl 80 ~ ~ 49,, 80 M,
Sewer nd ali Sst he ,a, a. se 49, nnn
one Of the mot eloquent speakers IN hat town.
.9nsWr Ihave, ST. know The facts stated in regard
70 he marriage and abandonment put rstean8n
Of the published in the New York American at the
r LarIe Was it not generally stated II your circle Of
ss mat NJ sever aesertea ~ nst;on IN fbs city NJ
Ns, VIZ ~ o r Io bn, IN te town Of Homer Il
was generally UNDERWOOD that he had deserted them
Mr. LarVe Was further reported that ne had acted as
deal ana dumb man ana Deggeu uousn'u1 t"e N"uieii
NJ So, made leva 10 this Question and answer
nn'' oefeI ni" 80, -" -o 4 $500 ~ ''
admissible.
Dirces organization resumed The last time saw the
knew the lady, her father. and her brother do know
/
taken Sven vsaT ~ 10 e', Ell yop are ms
tween Is17 and 1873 recoec I,i, P ,ht o. mime pc
John Quincy Adams his famous toast Of Ebony and
i9 q3at $40
as reeoiect evsry svp, Inu tnk II was after oi9,
Mr. Seper You have NO person Il !,
maniager
married resided n Se sHn mo, q have
on think you lived with your wife four years. and then
mother saying that you had Children and hat @beS yoS S
you % % Seves was warned that II she returned
| IT, n;.,si. D ei ,ner irehuS "ouu desert her.
proyed nv hin he, al swoln NJ anu M Larue
vs, naI ia y; 'as sseces o. t9e aledzed libel which
S;n, ~ lie med were taken from
thew were nc punsa'o N le courier ano that
in The ,I4i ~ ~ "ne Vi then commenced
q prpv., s,' a's VI I ~. senlenSei
was member Of the F e SDoul A. Eeais
Sever was in that body. - 49,
70 you know that in 1893 Mr. Sever stated to the Council
eorS ~ Were Circulated IN regard to him, and that he
VeS sr INV sSusauon'
What were the proceedings in that casep
The Conf ruled tbal Il wa. u'N Is sesi 'Su'Ony
WI harue then read that part OF the aedged libel which
,,vo ~, -A "e'e' M" e''eu piaeA mai On diSsoute
IDs, ~ mn,
but peyeS mad rso tpe ceee entered on ~ duties
was made, 49, S-'e"''s "' ''a' "e'oie II
Mr. LarHe. Did he resign in consequence of The fact
thas si ne report would be adverse to him?
X ~ ttnsssi cannot say 81.
Courier and Enquirer charging Mr. Sever with the crime Of
melt
Mr. Lsru read that marion Of the ill.,, 60
the ,bn,-o ot.~ ~ $500 = ~ - W ins =
'he ABOVE charge
MI Sever addressed the Court the Court sustained the OBJ
Mr. IaTs rsye notice tba, l.. ,orla tai. III; 81
tons to hi. dscon 'a' '' "0u'u AAe O Oh eAcep
SAMUEL LOCKE sworn. have known J. G. Sever fer
heard him say that Levi Woodbury. was an Oh Feiera
and that he knew him b-;ler than he did said il
that he thought he mi ht he mistaken ~
The evidence for the defence here closed.
III
Courier which contained the eedyed libel rs evidence Of the
design of the defendant: the Cont peritted IL N 90 tn The
jury
Mr. Sever stated that he wished IN vivo anna 60.
and occupying me Witness stand proceeded to say
tat ne was never member or Secretary of the Tammany
SoSey. ne denied the conversation as detailed by Mr.
ne s'a.eu nat ms resignation IN the Council was
,; &c ~ Ie q. ueta 81 ~ tIe hOe ne had no re-
Eoh uat ne nsu ehhofen VINO understood
NJ = - - NJ NJ e. eNioseu
married ar pot % WI sever say yes or no. whether ne was
Mr.. SsDer. know what am about, sir know what
wish TO say etc.
Inc court cehsaed Mr.. Larue for his observations.
The testimony having closed both sides there re-
cess OF five minutes When the Court again met the Counsel
agreed to submit the case to jury with argument.
Inc District Attorney read the statute defining libel.
Mr. Larue asked the Court charge the jury follows
ls Though Is not necessary to state the whole OF libel
,bs ges me most offensive parts BE- selected,
not be sst ont cont inousy in he plesdin~s VIC must
The correct mode Of setting out selected passages in
said lihel thera 1.as ~ Z pt " WHICH
az not N a. anu " o9nalieu ec. and that where
different portions of such aedgei hbeious articles withopt
pursuing the form above set FORTH verdict of guilty can
iei "a Th,, ,hs,. ,b, 49,. ...,
the nnbc or n IL psay sceqse1 eier 10 me interest O.
me publication, no judgement OF guilty be rendered
faba d Na y express or necessarily implied proof OF
3d That by The comnoon law in all c.sas xybsr nm
nation granted for libel private person. ii must be in
ms aihdaylt hat all the facts which it contains and
IT, Go ~ $500 80 i eu alu
~ C'u.l lu ~ eh'eIaln tne ABOVE, ana tnen pro-
NhN 80 SIose VI hs tehdIfss MI
iFue again Requested te court 10 charge the de-