Weekly national intelligencer., 1850-10-12

FROM THE SAME PAPER OF SEPTEMBER Ia
We that the Of peace not be
ctualy served by the Magyar insurgents than by the Frank
fort speech makers. How the Ausans conducted the
in Hungary very commonly related; how their antagonists
proceeded appears from the authentic documents which we
have recently published GIBBoS laid it down as rule that
in estimating the conflicting Of bellgerens attention
should be paid rather to what each party Of the other than
what alleges for ITSELF There undoubtedly grounds
for suspicion against maniestoes drawn up by party in pow
with the obvious view of usying its acts but there
equally strong for msrusng statements made by
vanquished insurgents Of the cases. indeed the latter
is tie weaker since to the motives Of exaggeAton common
both parties would here be added the engendered
defeat and exile certainly imports less the Austrians
than to the Hungaans that their proceedings should be
cupaed in the eyes of the world for the winner always
dispense with aids which the loser i'll sord to spare
happens that the genuine of information respect
ing the Hungarian nsurrection by ABUNDANT
We easily observe by comparing other the state
mens of the conflicting parties with the reports of an ine-
gent coesp ndent how much of the truth would be ecover
ably lost but for the evidence Of independent observer In
the Of Hungary, however, this practically
withdrawn. For months together the actual seat of
closed country to Europe and only make oul
deductions from the testimony of parties necessarily interested
suggesting partial conclusion To great extent we are
thrown for our guidance on probabilities alone, and
scarcely much to that pesumpons of this kind would
induce to credit almost all that the Ausrans aege of hs
Magyars the Magyas of the Ausians. What know
certain s that Hungary being unanimously animated
with hostility to Austria and comprising in its population
distinct and hitherto econceabe races agains
the Imperial Government, and for time successful,
maintained its ground That the Magyar general,
popular in the kingdom proved by the forces exered n h
that it was not universally has since beer
concusvely asceained These conditions Of acon couples
with the necessary exssperaions of civil war, suggest in
evabe consequences proceedings Of severity agans
both prisoners and "traors y while there s of course,
difficulty in anticipating corresponding rigor on the part
the Imperial troops All considerations, in fact
prior prove that the Hungarian have
bloody and remorsess in its character there the small
est mprobsbily in the catalogue Of executions which
columns have contained We will 20 further, and
that such Deeds together with the prsas inevitably attend
ing them, little than ordinary incidents OF such
war last year raging the banks of the Thesis
What, then, s the conclu.on Why, that war is some
thing than il depicted Frankfort, and tbs
there developments Of its evils beyond the reguls
and systematic carnage Of encountering squsdSons.
To say that, since Hungary in the right and Austria
the wrong the atrocities Of both sides morally chargesb
lon the latter Power alone, TO beg the whole question