Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1841-1853, 1850-09-12
The South Bend Register.

Mr. Brown well knows and has known that the ru-
NOR which alluded in the most delicate manner,
is and has been current in the State, since ne be-
came the publisher Of the Sentinel Thus far his silence
has lent confirmation and it singular that he
has thought it worth while correct it, until up
on the eve of the starting Of nval paper. We are
bound however believe him when he says that
neither Bright Cass have any special interest in
the Sentinel "-SOutA Bend Register.
If the editor of the Register had been as anxious
notice the denial Of Mr. Brown as the false charge that
has been urged against him, he would not have add
ded insult to injury by making the above statement
He evennow makes lawyers, orrather pettifog-
gers bubble on the word special, by placing it in
italics, when any sensible man would have knowntt to
mean, that if Gen, Cass and MIR. Bright be indeed
Democrats, they could not fail 10 take some interest
in Democratic newspapers, particularly of such as
are not doing them injustice.
The editor of the Register is without the ex-
cuse he alleges His old master, John d. Defrees,
made the inSinuaton against the Sentinel in almost
the precise language of the Register, which was
promptly repealed by the editor at Washington and
endorsed by his son the publisher AT least his un-
qualified denial now should be sufficient. The State
Sentinel of June the 10Th, 1850, contains the follow
ing denial We wish the editor Of the Register not
to overlook ii on this occasion. He evidently feels
bad enough already and we do not publish it to in
crease his opinion of the injustice of his acts,
and we conclude this article by saying, that if he
wishes TO become fully acquainted with the pecunia-
ry standing of the publisher of this paper he will be
gratifed by full exhibit, when he comes to the
Convention. But here is the denial of the Sentinel
published only nineteen days after il passed into the
present publishers hands The editor, in the Sentinel
of the 18th of June last, in to Derees said
What does the sapient editor of the Journal by
ntimang that the hand Of the Hon. Jesse ID. Bright is
PLAINLY dscernable in the recent transfer of the Sentnel
Does he that the editor pledged favor the
election of Mr.. Bright, that Mr.. Brghts money
ally had any thing to do with the purchase OF the Senti
mel If 50, tic is only false in in eUery
So far as Cen Cass and the Presidency are con-
cerned, the vritsr Of this article as committed or
old Joe Lane against the tcOrId if nominated by a
Democratic Convention. The Sentinel is for the
Democratic nominee, and will take ground for nc
man for the Presidency until nomination is made
The editor of the Register is quite lavish Of hi.
pufs Of the editor of a paper in this city. VIVA
interest has he in that concern, that makes him
lavish of his praises Is it an interest he takes il
the prosperity of the Democratic party; rather i
it not interest growing out of hatred to th,
State Sentinel. He also now takes sides with w. r
Ellis and condemns the politics of the new Dem,
cratic editors at Goshen
| A fellow fcells makes him 1voldron,s kind~