The Texas Republican. [volume] (Marshall, Tex.) 1849-1869, 1850-04-18
DECISIONS or,THE SUPREME COURT


These COMBINATIONS, commenced in our last
will be continued weekly until concluded
EVIDENCE.
IN ~, POSSESSION ui = note payable 10 y.
n =, h,a,rr by the plaintiff Is primd Jdcie e'i-
J.nc,. of M, ownership and right 10 sue Soch
,.,,.....ion /, presump,i,, proof OF an aver
p, MI. IN the plaintiffs petition. that ihe
"a nat, VA, sold, Transferred. and delivered 10
~ valuable consideration. Thompson
8 h,fier, 100. ....-,
>, Ac,nunt books containing original en-
,nt of thcm-eite. evidence, but may
-. evidence by the Intervention oi cN'nn-
-, ..,r,,,m,tauecs ldergod ' F"'fo"' ios'
=, XXb,r,. an account. copied from Trades
-. b,.,k.. had been compared wth Tue on
,,,ral ,nt,,e,. and found correct by the "nne's'
e,,h, va. himself u clerk OF tn, tf"d.''i'"h NJ
-r.h account was made) ANA was
.,,l,.nr,. without objection to H. II !,
,,,,,o ,f direction IN tss- court mat The
,i.,.,,...l,,.. were not produced. And, IN
........-,. Il MAS rnlr,i that 1t was error IN
a.. -, :, e>,lady from the Jury all such
nam. CHARGED 10 the aeen2n', The s"it ana ue-
-, - ,,h,,h could not be- distinctly proven
h. IN, Testimony 81 the witness, gwen upon
IL. avn RECOLLECTION. Independently OF his en-
tre. Jga,riaai Parrot, los
"a In. competent for the Inry to determine
the h''' o' "''f'"-, ,'tn,,,t,.d.,,,,.nt Of the
tom e"whi"" 'F'''' .',.,.,.,.,,.,.s ,ron WHICH
parties Nnd o'''' -. l.. d,,u.n
IarAey, Pagt's ADM l3'
= ., ,Jo.a
J. The mitn~ ell P",f -,
iHs- ui li- adversary WIZ ''' 49, -.
mcnt upon fe''''' W. -, ,hn,.,,,
no can-e "l ",'l'h '' -,'''.,' ~ n
d, fcrdN. DO lhel' 'e "''''',', ~ I..
Ist ~ a. h"n'sN'' 'o' ,..,,'..,,sf
been compelled to pay '"' "'o y. ~ w .,.'-
who plead " Ire>eI'P'i"u '"' ,,,.,.,
he.d mat tm' genera u' ,b
to 1T uP the TINE "N"1 ''" ~, '1.,,'..,,ii
surety had PaFa 'he "'"'' wv ,l, 80, ,l,
not appr - ihin L IL 'I'S u'"'' ~
deier,c. thai he hAd '"' "'"'''" ''''''7
statute OF limitations W ''e ~ "s'"'' '',''
bt Their common e'o'o'' '''" W.
teth 3'- H. -, In.
The practice OF h"'1 ~ ,,
en' ilm's ALTER me answer '' ~
rEi first obtaining inc ""N' w ~ -
ineguiariy not 1" l.. s""'''o''e" w.
s.g. 3il
Where sui was brought N ,1e u''''
Wv ne it'N"' we 49,
te State ct Nai"in'' upon " n''' N'' V.' y"
fhe petition, uadr l'i 'b' To H' P'u''"' 'f
iaai name, and ihe P.'""n '"n''''" 81" "'''
mrui that the Pah'ln- N''' cur ,'''' '''
DO allegation Whot''i' ''P'', Wv ',''',' W
or capacity "a "H''u 'h'N '"'"' " va wv" ~
demurrer. that lhe P''ln'n WIS "'"'''o as"
in-uiiccnt ~ the 'Aih' east u WIS "'''''''
that where lIt l"'1hin> are - d"u'''' w.
ration created hN " P"",T NV " wa, ""'
necessary That they 'h'p'" awe "'"' Wv ..
a corporation A. 10 >u'p ,",'' ''' ''"' ""''
ludically kn"" the '''' pu, "n',' '''E"
corporation bring SUI me F'"'''''N '''"9' AVE.
and prove ihrf 'R" eN''''"' ~ o'''
p"fa,o 10 c'the ih'" !" ''''''''' NV" "''''"
n BINS - N'piH"''"' % L.
Is. II a cou'r "t ''''"n pv Nl"N w. Wv : ~
formally ~ deitet'''f ''"',u lN 'e '"'''o''i ''''
'ni"fm"il'l NAY ~ E''"'." W.
Tory exception ''t : "'' H''"'" W.
emP'"rl tN''Ph"h' XIV "''N NJ ~" '' W.
l"rmni a'rrmen'. """ "" '''' ''''
shown "nh'ui 'h''"'o- w. ,''', ~ 80,
1t = the du'N 'i .ne P''', 40 ~
hhs'ii 'I'""s' Wv '."'', =! - Ill ..
sh"" '"" ~ nc ',' y, "a ,',., ,a,,,,,,
u'"'' 10 """'" '''' .I.,,, ,.,.,,
'ff &, "", "e - d..a an, H.,
Nd'R'" WV" '"N I- q