The New York herald., 1850-04-11
TWO CENTS.

ney Island; there has been no ousness trsusactiaa
with him except that purchased . pen there, -
ssS s%o worked T with % Sn :' Ssf na: ".
stymers have never written to received ietesss
before becsme scqusin,ed With Kate; % uss = -
the name Of Mrs Shsnfroy; MIR. Shsnfroy used -
| Mr Cooke and Mr. Rsnnes. called ,Ts. lady dsva
stairs let them I'M she did not say than Mrs Doyle d
% no. 1--WE there but that Mrs shsnfroy .Sd stsend:a
moved to Broome street before went TO Norfek
street; am separated from NY husband slcut three
years; tL six months since him last; Thought
II dd not look we for Csthane TO be out s,s late -
ten o'clock have been out ato that my w. ts
being proper time, depends upon what Is done,
have never received from Mr. Bagey note contsvnng
money.
Marx Levy examlned-I am an iE,porter residIpy ~
Maiden lane met Catharine Runn-tt In W sshinsC Ven
market she addressed me- and tosd her she had ~
at Mr. Rutterrs in Yorkvie; she carve TO nv sscss
afterwards two three times; she nvitsdg
her manner at my store was such ss feld no@ thtnk
becoming ina young lady towards u strange gents-
mns.
Elisabeth Quin examined--I In MI Psdeyx
months was chambcrmsid and waited attabas;
have seen Catherine Runpett come to Mr. Bssirys
house she brought things from the rket tho rsss
time she then came TO the children; nevrx
knew her to unless she had errand; she
selves !; whom she would bring She things sss wesaA
come to the kitchen and sometimes 20 TO the mar
sery 70 ses I the children never r knew her 70 take
with and the other servants in the kitchen L
her In the parlor.
Jeremiah Lynch, pen maker, In Bagieys employ; IA
posed had con nvcrsation with John Runnett view
days after In the Of Bagley Smith he asked
II would do him n favor said certainly he shea.
borrowed two shiilings from paughtsr) he asked
me IL 1 would carry message to Mr.. Bsgley. ss he
go TO his ONCE he then said that be was very sorsy
that the Smiths made tool Of himself and his daughtsr
he nor his daughter would have appeared against hI
but for the Smiths he said he had nothing at Al
agains br Bsgley that he tho best man he had
ever wor rkaHf fpr md le ite Tn or N
again he said II Bagley would meet him st ths
"Saraccns Head" he would see him thcre; ds-
lvered the message TO SIR Bagley and no said he hao
objection to see Runnctt they met was thers;
Runnett repeated to Bagley the way the Smith
appear this suit against Bagicy but for thc Smiths;
he raid he had nothing to say against Baglcy sbeut
that id euricy headed son Of . b (mcaning
Mannng) who was the father Of 1t asked him viz
said he could mt get anything Of them said ~
knew his daughter bad that ho would not believe
her that they could not trust her alone to fetch watsr
without watching her through the window. fiers
Catherine in the Court and hystercsiy cried Qua
did my father say that!' aud she burst into tcsr&
She removed by her father and another person,
and passing the witness she asked why he was Al
lowed 10 swear such untruths Witness oontinued-
RunDett said If Bagley would give him $50 aud cm-
pioyment he would give release from AN claims; ths
result that Mr.. Bsgey refused to give him .ons
cent; at another interview had with Gunnett subse-
queutIy he sent up TO the ONCE for and asked
to tell Mr. Bagey that he wanted $50 for thu suppose
of the child 500 for ios OF time aud $50 lawyers
expenses; went up and told Mr. Bagey, and he saiA
he would not give cent 1told Runnctt Mr. Bsgiey's
reply; he got into passion, and swore he would Pwe
the TO Mr. Bagcy, that he would put the osse
to Mr. Cooke. his lawyer, and give him all he could
make out OF Il; the room In which Catherine worked
accessible to all the men Q.-Did you ever hesr
of Runnett threatening Manning and Van Brunt re-
rpect ting their testimony, Al charged him With IL
and he said II more than the d-d son Of = -
deserved; have noticed everything that impro-
per in Catherine while she in Mr. Bagiey employ
lwitness here detailed immode-t questions aad
answers between Catherine and one 81 the Dcnl
Cross-examined by Mr.. Morris-I am n married
man; my eldest child IL girl about fourteen years a
age; went with the Smiths at the time ~ the disco
luton. and left them, and have been with Mr.. Dagisy
since; witness for Bagley In the suis be-
tween him and the Smiths; he got verdict of ~ 600
against the Smiths did not Bagley offer Ruuncst
paper nj the Saraccn's Head and ask him 10 sigu e
William H. Phillips deposed that he employed ia
the ofnce Of Bagiey & Co, In 1stT and AS tho de-
careless; she told me she married. and her hus-
band at her wagcs not raised beyond -
per week appears by the books; she had SAT- whss
she came first.
Mr. SANFORD put In evidence letter of Mr.. Cooks,
plaintiff attorney dated December 1872 which stated
In TO a note from Bagey that he had oh3so-
ton to compromise but that he (Bagleyl should taks
notice that Runnett had created lien the suit ~
the amount OF 5000
Michael 0Nen deposei, that while Catharine Rus,
nett preparing the little room Wilcox measured
her leg while she standing the table, she tsiA
him 20 go way, and she put her frock down
swerpg TO his name, Mr. Sandford applied for and sb-
tanned bench warrant against him. The Court rec
mt about fve o'clock The case win be resumed thh
m ~