Democratic banner., 1850-11-27

l-s,,s bI5OHh Pc s. LOnis EptsliigssssE.s,iis
ltmportaAf necisies-.-1 1lercA9H4A FAX
LAW 6ho6nsfitufioRa1!.d !.dsxa
The Snprens,ceszAsh snessine fcided
che iiipsstsns case u the .Stase eG'cssv,
dsCrssr1y & o., ihhvol5iaE .ths cSHisisu-
u he scs 81 he ,isss ssssiSp, tor
ltaxipe ss4 linsnsing Meschaats, RslaN Fs
lpuhlish. .thA aeeisioa entirss - dslissseAqby
IJudes Bireh, ,sud ocoscurFsd in bya aJesgs
IRylinay 56dgs NsptOn aisssh,1gssa q ssn
[ VIZ as extremely rstiks.ds, q, I, M result,
lbsii.Eipg ne de- ihas ths ,assti Ada ss-s
he yiolasien both of shs- -esassilGtiea q this
tStsis andaefthe Usitsd ststessAiWssen-
tgrasuiatsthe.merchsss Of thseb6re State
laponf being relieved BY tkis teetien Ebm
lthe opsrous, UNJUST IN ,snsqlnal and post. .eP-
llFpresaiYe axslion,s imposed uPoH shsn by
Itbsslasts kegislature; aads sRessengsstulate
Eths peihtesseis4essipss sAtsiAg siSssily
erased ftbbssk bsAi 6r 6rr ststuts book lay which
ldisgrscsd ;it: We bsapss sulirsfnturs ;lsssla-
Ition viii aford;pq sueh. exsnpls ofa plain
Idsparturs from ihs prineipls .nssqhaiityDin
the imposition oftsxes.sa ,aoiRiFo ADS 10
The decision, Il win 'bsp perceived, pfo-
|ceeds upon the grSnnd that the law violates
the constitution of this State. From this
decision, there be no appeal 10 the Su-
preme Court of the United States, ~ tkere
might have been, ifithad been decided alone
npon the ground that il violated the consti-
tuition Of the, United States. aThs decision,
lis therefore final snd conclusive. Bot We
will not oetain the reader from the eaeeis-
ion itself, which is drawn up with the usual
ability ofits authors. =. .,,,....t :, -,
supreme Court OF AEissOnrt. e. 4,
OCTOBER TERM, 1850. ,5v, 81
Monday. November 18Th. f., .gsr.
Hon. VIZ. B. NAfToE, Chief Justics5 assd
Hon. JoHH F. RxLAHD and JAHEs q. BInGH,
The Sateys., Wsynaan Crosrs d. al. .Appsusats.
Appeal from Tie 81. Louis Crimirag CorTt.;s;y
By the nineteenth sub division OF The thirteenth
article Of the Constitution, II is declared that sail
property subject to taxation inthis Stats shal Be
taxed IN proportion to its value" md 4 would
seem that whether reference be had % the mezn-
ing most naturally and directly impaired md con-
Iyeyed by Ithessntense itsslf. or I'm euunsxio1)
ITO the eolenpcransous' occurrences which F.sb-
ably Contributed to suggest and 70 ahapeii, sdar
Language is, perhaps inadequate to sfnrnishba
lcoinhipatisa Of. words, - q, ,text, which E1lld
less smbigaonsly denote and enforce an obsery-
lance Of The greet political maxim upon which
they were, doubtless, predica.ed. -,
Concerning the tnere grammatical signficatian
fof the sentsfft.e there oan probably Be no disa-
lgreemerie of opinion; and when Il Il considered
in connsxionswith the eotemporsry fact, that IN.
der the terns of our admission into the UniUB,
1.-The State was, on the same day the Conss;t1Eicn
was adopted, binding itself by ordnance 10 fof-
bear 10 tax certain descriptions Of property, aAd
THAT in virtue Of the residue Of its soyereignky
lin tba.respect, s'all other property was s.Ijsc4io
the sentence would seem almost hs-
Itorieaiy, no less than verbally, to have been
Ipredicated upon the design which was entertain
ed to repudiate, and repress al favoritism or op-
preston in the nature Of chss legissiion or ot6-
sTwise, BY ordaining that IN Missouri, q in'oth.
or States, general pro-rsta assessment and ts2-
alton. asi sisimPls aud comparatively unaxp pensivs
lin its enactment and execution, % It WAS nxa-
Iringy just and equitsble in its design and itsed
shouA bt interposed - the irreyes-
sbs rule n action and Of right in The State they
al Although Writing here, instead Of an essay essay
upon political economy, mere and more rigid
|lfdicia olinion, Il may not, perhaps, be wholly
iinpermiasibls so isr % anticipate The legitimate
csitieism 10 which this virtual dena' Of The dis.
erstion Of the Legislatures may subject eO.ordi1
ate department Of the government, a. 10 fsmath
il was doubtless present TO the reflection and TIE
forecast of the statesmen who founded our sys-
TEN, that unless the temper and the disposilisp
of those for whom they were acting in that day
and in this, should become exempt in The future
which was before them from the inhrmities IN:
piled in the record Of al the past, discretion In
the majority 10 tax according to their judgment or
their wiH, would find its periodical possible, II
not .psohable denouSnent in the comparative
( (perhaps spscious) exemptions Of the many or
strong, at the expense of the weaker classes uf
the community. It was doubtless, therefore.
deemed and acted upon, that in order to avoid tbs
despotism Of even an unchecked majority or
anen of like passions with our own" = subjts-
ton and adherence to the constitutional requisf-
ton we are considering theory and ia Pres