New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-01-29
RON, o. A,u,1..r ALosRxrv-M oad4y-

% aIA Dc iouId fuat ~ cIieIt b tt'i'''f'
NazIcc. Sc ire BIT the ssosuoI oi ih' p'"'''
son"
potRD or ASSISTANT ALDFRNEV- NoHd2y-
President s,rr,ev8n, ie ..s Char a.. -... ,..~.. ..
ri - = -,i Eiver For Hose Cari o. be- ->'ied ,
Fa-st brtste, A.causs and Do iafnrfs q i-i
i.slf ffsts avenue ttf De- 'Fe1'd 'e'"s-' %
a. sri fa.i Rlger...T.a accold ~ 70 graded ,a.f~
g1'e.,s ana Harlem RIVER. ~, froey.ns oa..l ana
o-sl4 o. one OF 'te aeNers ~ a.ai d. bowen f-
ffbard tn ..sixh sfa R~st ~ 5cvenh-aY.
srd pave &c. Ty.cy-se .crhst between fra ed Sec
OIL sys....Oi Vim H. Adams M o''@rs i3r Es'.r1ac
iar,ugh -.X.hav Carnfre and Naucg Vest BT1%1 a
saG oher s'fee'-To special Ccagl.il'e cDus.sinZ Yf
sssl Al Avord " ard and Hary ....Df Hose GO No
:. r~ rev bose Several ye' lions iGr -'effrnu
..Ol .. stepheus Church corner ClE-sue and b'o>Hs
81. slr TAO gas lamps. Graltcd
E,aort, f1orG>o -Pefniirng Sherry : Ryrsr1 Ssg
.fsror % r oLr their Cupoia Ci CrT
ii.l instead Of present OF The Commission
s.ing - hss ne power 70 appoint lighters b.
s hedge hD-'.f thar ihs street. shsi be- isnted vel
- me, can be- lighted with oil Referred.
F,1- Controller resyc ~ f--ries f'Jf 81 Bac'l',
-es =, pred .17 and lave not been rene" 81. lr
Crropief-.i vas leased Boa Az for wear. a. cen!
vesf subject ~ renewal s pre-" - be- agreed UPON ray
4'so f,r years. 1872 O. 500 feer g. nD re1t"
81 10 .ho,s. tom TO-, o. Cana.l Sl71 rr'rY sti"
ss,ac a he others The ieases a. Mess-. stevens
Fsoar'le md Bsspfion i favor Of rai-ins COMM
acf "a lie Ney-l Oh No.ntieers adopted. ari
Mr-srs Rafr Boycc Roger DesA and sands spHo ni'd
Pelof,oas A&p'eA Tlai Broadgvsy below Ws.iF' hs
ferr.ed Iha' The suhircf oi tie rebuilding % nsnt-
Eleventh - letwccn Third NM fcu-n avenues be -
paved &C.,. Th.l ire ydsaai BE- placed On J. corner
Two n0.f end avenue .Ths' lie RESOLUTION passed ~
Isi, 90 oiltune passenger cars 80 e hln"n hiF-' "1i
rood corning below Thlriy-sec0Hd-s; be- repealed
p,eqmbie and Rr.iu'iou by As.i.'ar, AID S'ur,eysni
stating a he Ne,r io,k ETp,c receives, under me feso
utor rmpIoyingf io publish oNcs pfVceedinss nu1 Hd
io1 fsf ntror employed !yr The same Iufpo.e aad
tat ne Ieaourou appointing j be fe.cir ic, Mo,9r,
N'f'' s'"i' i'' ',f'i 1870 -. ~ - =. -
~ reouesf sss rest J. rr.'.ess ior ODE appointment
of NE Coaqneyctoi ie,iag Pest Nr'7 lo'k I7D'e o1d
Vs, Y-yk Sun provided farv do rof charge s7yu
wear each . Assssst hd ofthe Tghth suages seed fhsf
TIE matter referred o. select COMMITTEE, corsi.u.
ofAssis'ani 40 Sands Alrord and Dean
Payers from Board u fidenen A. 10 portrait OF Com
molor Chauncey--reai.Te 10 outdoor p0nr-io ai'ef -.
gue SO u.s. and building pier foot Of Tiry-eighh Il fR
we're c0ncurred b.
Some other papers of minor import were ara u7on hr'
the Board al Oufned 10 Monday next
CouET ~ CoMMoS Pleas GenJ0i I0m-Bc
fore NE hr,t Judge Gnemipm) uui Judge woodruff.
Judge Day l. s dc eiLrd al his house by irlsposou
Dsr,ioni 90 - ,a n F,ris Seiigr'aa Sa7lDei - Noe
given Cruon Insurance Co 'etoie insolvency Of aH-r
Gnc transferred 10y tc Company 10 ralnh as par cos''
81 for notes advanced ly him - ne Company Tae n""
for s20 b. drawn by al muuIhs pa'sbis io
their own ooler, u.t rndur-'d ny them hessfs : BOO
defence conenied il,i 10 s'ocE hut prem l1
note VII ca 90 % oiy bad been earned wlici amount
fheg lad .u,D Court which a- accepted hY paihs AID
.u brought t0 recover s,s ~ being tu once ''h into
res On HE ual e Jun, Doe ruug AZ he Court CAV
verd C Tor defendants aud motion 10 made tlf new iia
The Court ia dec stated Inst beng Intended merely
premium note The Company could only claim Tor earn
inr. and n VS. shown that RAD the COMPANY continued
rciuaiu solvent The, would have lad % De makers lsyef
the latter paving me note maturity, 90 lie party % ~ u
il lad been rcd to excess over what the Company
had actually earned by premiums Tor insurance u Vas
cOu'cnded Tor defence ai the note transferred v he
CJmpunv nliei Inc r,elna loan and as further security
ing In fact odent det II he pauuh nsd
further uNhts r. regarded X than the COMPANY u was
els how ever iu re, that uote of Air keog|s. orr
ginalv given Withdrawn, and lbs substituted BE- Wac
also stalled be Trial that pauiG at the uu" ol taking
ar 90 M h
error The question is whether peinlt hai notice or
no. New lnsi grained co-'s 'o abide NC event
james C'opseg afPelnf We u ~, " Rate rcsToaee1' -
Appsei 10 iS, Jaqss T., n, az 5 , IT. WIS
second Story oi house. ~. IL Waisst The lease wa
signed bv Edward Z Cooper ans Mr Cropscv -guel a'
Agreement 10 bc auswtra1le ter tue rent OF Mr. Mar
Cooger. On TIE uls 80 Was commended he had NOT made
himself nt e for liz. rsses that Edward G. Cooper
them could sign IA lease 4, wa shown That LcwArf
Cnpo. aud IN vit. ~ ha wac said however o be Mats
q occupied Tie pfein's's The Judge M The 'urI below
overrU-d me objections and gave judgment in me !end
lord 10 amount Appeal ID nsde THIS Court sald ne a
biV 81 surety 10 be construed strictly ard could Tot
bow 10 be held liable tor contract made hy a
ifd person. without Testimony showing ouof or "'sisho
liza person becomes sueJs ehor for married woman or
az insane person ad '-cn person ,erIies e PREMISE
TIE turc legally bound Iui such doe uo appear 90 is
case Jud. ueut reversed
Fago 8 r'.fuo.e respondents =. Hcy VI Sta.oeA ep
ptraut Appeal from Jusncc Second stfici Cont A.
uoo Tor ca cn'ers ~. a'd materials IN ht'-s 20 "'
the J.stCe gave iudi meui ivf plaintiffs l' 80 Wv ~
Ila. = partly on tNc ground iihi lhiNNi-, Nt' ~
uuu-resdcs did Eoi give security Tor costs ari iai ll'N
ale hound do so by long Well as short summons u
the iortucf point deuied
This Count There N M be mo- pFupuciv Ora o4cw ne more
than plaintiff claims Where mechanic cannot show
The uur consumed doing hc voh the cost of funi
li.is la i al bet, laNn the measured and es
mated tv person. acquainted with ihc business There
>ss no error he fgh - plaintiffs 20 proceed bS long
summons Had hvy elected lo proceed tA short summons
inoy must have given security Judgment below reduced
500 ".
ia. Is laas. respondent " " % usssA appellant AZ
pea. tom Justice Third District Court Tho paraf nHoN
constable levied upon quantity % WINE 81 d" FiFnN
Hotel corner NoNaru-sL and brosuwav yu cNvcgn'i
arains Eliza T. tiuyt 81 the sale defendant ee!o" ho rh
~ bottles champagne al 81 per 0cue and Ma sent il s
STORE. hul refused To receive nor Was Delivered N
seoueuie the constable reso.d 90 rs cents and hfegg m
Aciiou below o. difference and uS Jdslc" gave
Judgment he amount Appeal j. made appear That
Tie WINE did not belong Mrs Noyt hut o. Sanue fa
ker THIS Count remarked thai Constable may reco' cf
against persau who has hid al goods sod ly hnA ON
pooof OF lie execution and safe without proving lie iuis
rent and he can either resell without noce " hcrr rG-
Ger refuses 90 ,ake and brEg action for difference or cue
iur whole amount The evidence here shows, however.
thai the property dt belong 90 The defendant IN re a.
ecuuou and therefore Tue vested IN L. co1s'sile ~
meat reversal
Those Hands Again Statement Of Dr. biselow'
r. iis Edii0rs Of ne Rostsa !is'a!4
n.a Al Tod D