The New York herald., 1850-05-16
Brooklyn CITY Intell,.ence.

srrREMr CouKr.-GrsrriL Trsm1iIon w rMs.
Coun, presiding and Hon. Nathan ID. Morse and John
James ~ Cob5, ereirs .amis Doris and oiksys ppeal
TO set aside report of referee awarding $4,000 TO the
plaintin The argument was continued from Monday,
at the opening Of the court yesterday morning. De-
eision Reserved
Pierre Nortor sssiss, Dsr,d Ty,cn-Bill Of ercep-
tons 10 set aside verdict Of jury rendered In the
county OF Richmond, before Hon IL r. Edwards, Cir
cult Judge, in November, ls4s The original suit was
an action for trespass, the defendant having built
nshing hut above high water mark the plaintiff own
'-- the land and the defendant the right Of fishing
The jury verdict for the plaintiff Of SIX cents
damages and costs Of court The ouestio Is whether
the dimensions and character Of the hut In question
wac and necessary to the enjoyment Of the fishery,
reserved In the deeds given In evidence, and that
fishery In the waters to the premises In ques-
tion cannot be enjoyed without the OF such hut
building The argument In the ease concluded.
-ameiio 4. Smith against Eliza INN CaTefscn. This
was an appeal from the decree Of the Surrogate. Ar
gued and decision reserved
svrRrnr Cornr GrSEEAL Trrn-Eighth Day-The
court was opened yesterday morning at 9o'ciock.-
Present Honorable 7. MeCoun and Justices Morse,
Brown Brown and ssrsalo, presiding Ghe latter gen
turn from Europe) No T.-Robert Neamsn VS.. The
ST. Nicholas German Roman Catholic Church was
called on This Is an appeal by deneants (appelant-
from judgment entered port Of referee The suit
was brought in this court for work done by plaintiff
In setting door be and arches 10 defendants church
building. on an implied assumpsit the defendants
looking ON and seeing the work done without objec-
ton Plaintiff ohainedrcport awarding SOS and the de-
fendants now move on case TO set the report and
judgment aside The defendant not appearing judg-
ment by default was entered for the plaintiffs. No
a3-rifst Religious Conzrcgaton or Society OF south
old. We Joseph G. Albertson Motion for new trial
granted with costs 20 plaintiff No. 30-John J.
sproul vs. Heman X. Howltt-notice for new trial
granted costs 20 abide event. Nos 81 aud 40
served for argument to-day No ~ called aud passed
No. 5o.-Joseph W. Tompkns, against John sontce
guardian for " illiam y schotts infant. Motion to
dismiss appeal from the decision OF the surrogate
of NcstchestCr county Denied No. 80 Franklin
u. CoIwin aud Ira g. Coruin against Jabez Corwn.
Argued and decision reserved. No a.. John wicks
and others against James Luystsr Appeal from an
ordcr-Argucd, ard decided that the order appealed
nom b. modified 10 allow app liant TO put In
swer '. the complaint on payment OF costs OF dcmnr-
rcr that the respondents have leave To amend the
somplant without costs and that the said order be
ycrssd, 10 far q It directs reference; that neither
party have costs on the appeal. No s. phebe Burts
against fiss Jarvis. Argued and decision reserved
No. 30. Charles J. Howell against Samuel ID Rurgles.
Jsdgment by default and appeal demissed with costs
No te. David Nightingale against Wyllys Arnes. APP
peal nom decision Of Judge Greenwood, of the City
Courtthat the defendant not liable for his acts
IN driving away end impoundng pigs. by order of the
Board of Health. The cause when the court
adjourned.
Cirr CorEr Before Judge Greenwood. .-TssoB Oar.
penisr aEoi.sf Syraaus n Slc,H sabeia .iaorss,
This action was brought to recover he possession o.
lot 81 ground n Court street, Brooklyn. formerly the
properly VI the plaintiff The defendant. lStillwclD
claims. unteT deed TO him from William Jenkins
late sheriff CT Kings county upon sale Of the said
lot. together With other property. under two
tons, on tvc judgments one in favor Of Thomas u.
Cod6ington Tie other in favor OF Paine Sumner,
ngains he plantin 10 Is claimed the part Of the
plaintiff that the sherihs deed 10 void, upon the
ground that the judgments were satisfied before the
sale under the executions b. fne imposed upon h
hy the 81, RENE Court, under attachment egainst
him for r'a',et u duty in not proceeding upon such
executions The defendant claims that the judgments
mo- ati.ltl L. hu we're purcta.ca by aud assigned
20 Georvt !orkns the son Of the sh,rH. who after
such asst proceeded 20 hsve tie property sold
under the executions upon which sale the pr5ptrty
vas procured - the defendant stiilweu
sourH nrooatgN sst,sGs BANk.-An instilutipn q
this Kind has ben started in Atlantic street.