Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1850-06-04

,,i
CARD public expect Of me any further nose
n Parker or his pamphlet hut hope lew lines VIII lie
r0A % Tie paupet has devoted 10 pages TO the purpose OF
u" m, ",sh and mdeneanors and YET excepting
rr crrdcatcl EVIDENCE has been a'dured "i u,cin
W assertion. May lnotcomnlenceby asking what wel-hcan
-s gan c the assertions OF one Who HAVING charged an
,ae ne.roe. and pucketng The money, when cohNlc,
' flies I'll Ia another theme without rari@ |" Fh1i
& M, past oae mth presume, he would assNat"s poefea
,s>troa upon other foundation than ms o"N "oED
Ne a.sr' as bS %,G. A . and IN $50 ss67, Belonging
.s, w.lou accounting here;n n.a, ne ho" ns %
a Ian--a he accounts bonds anu "'e papers
s., ~h agency from II c"ieneelen' down % 'S pre-
- @ ,sun'y ior paolic nsicccnno,ifed Of Tins TACT
- 500 aud iucicd by the hiiieresi Ice Is not Sae.
w nv receipts hands MI pa:ker had no! zone 70 he o.
@ tx, ccuq and proved beyond p"S.io, n .. aIao'
M oi and seg'ae aesailon her ra' s H. t
@ plrr s year week his possession ma. '' sti! Istr'
na AVS have ~l"ne. " MI ; n,rad be,"r .I
mime i, .uy ciette IN her account How riel 10 he sure 70
tni...e opportunity thus offered lam 10 prove my quit
end h. labcr> VIVA. can iie pH3!c think OF such
approved by Vim l. Weir on behalf Of
~ na.,y gentleman Is nephew II Mrs Bailey ami
sp,,ping weeks w'h ms aunt as".e M SCI. =, ~ - ]
H. n,aila eut Of atc"unis-aler Aeeiis 'sl d. ms au
mn week tc;urned them approved as above stated anu
i,i me ia show her pauers perhaps .ish
r that Mr Weir presented 10 ne order s's@et
% Gay money paid hn yet safieea 10 snaor Ms r4ss'
consideration al my lending Mr. Weir sto a
% my Surely.i be confessed IN this pamphlet
tor appears h, nsss, sS" ?Sa. and accounts. they have
nieoied ;l clerk OF Wesmorelani coun'y-le a'rf '
.,aaon shall r;e no &C oun Win WIS nnas! neISg.' o.
cause that she incapable oil reading OF an
account, with her because question The sany Of ;ne
Ne he exercise But Tor my own 'hicaioh
mi protection prefer these transactions from tecnlni
pe should be settled before commissioner une decree :" !'
i. 10 appoi; Mrs Bailey csiaieatd whilst Wiz
= Mrs. Bailey hersr.i and The those eiled
property therefor i"ye ,s . nj mo ., sa IT.,
M lrn sold q! Mrs Bailey without her consent, Re
ne; publishing ic ao med statements III conflict with
M n.c,. but w all believe Mss. Bailey, being ablc
4 writing, lid not understand The meaning Of The ctr!l'
rtksr iona A. Parke. aud must therefore have beer
..ne impossible. II Mrs Bleys memory Is not entirely
w s ~ fanny and ,merendence is equal to any man
uai," farmer BY VOCATION he consented superil
a ny whilst managing his and no less entitled 10 con.
acr and respect that HIS certificate also explains IL
AT manner open Mrs b 5 dwelling, and IN what manner
m work io myself which charges Mr. very grave
/. a'esea asaias me
sa ,irt Julia Bailey speak of the Three
eli h John C,cler J and always sail she glad they had
eea >J from her statements judge thai she desired and
requested The sale OF them JAS H. MuKfih'
aa s,er, upon my snows=e tina. Mrs Julia l. Bailey
H. C-sr The dwelling Mrs Bailey. together With her
rented BY Mr. C'cier ad possession Of The house was q
py Mrs Bailey ow work Tor Mr. cficher was hire! 70
m pursuance Instructions. and with The arrangement Mr.
'-'''' '' JOHN C SMITH
ls.ca,y necessary follow Parker through his pamphlet
.a: Time suppressed ali impor
~ At es Mt 1 Psr a y must Certainty tai s ap
bie f. he first which was associated as referee wia
Nh &C.. Lewis recollection al paper being
- n a whether found or By whom wa, ." wi %est
ee vi r@ker iaor ani the papers were all deposited u
lie e., Office Richm'n! coan,y If True have no doubt Mr
thai cowered benea; his glance on this occasion
l dared look him In The face. Probably
make exception. Tor he paid IN hiS case lee '
second Involving several thousand dollars 81
associated with the late Lawrence Berry 81 ledc'
Dmhm all for The defence hal then Just come TO the bar The
eitwo three OF the counsel being present. beside
M Va "1 and am 1r,nnes it, linen. a. the oown
TIE five. aud Come 10 The bar must surely have
judgment o Mr. Parker because did not file
exceptions hc oion oi the court 10 enable him. by carrying u
M 10 the Court o Appeals 10 exori favorable compomise
where We're Mer ranar his door neighbo.s
al counsel aud must have known his wishes the p!ai"
bb what became "i the tour sen or counsel BIt II l.
aei ui"n such trash Tie goes on 10 accuse ne
hn- become suddenly f!ch-at one e lans ihal derive
Blly another Time by sesn. her negroes and lastly.
Unfortunately Tor Parker eracy aud my own covenis'c"
his arsumen' Is not true large portion u uie pro- r'
paid What inancier, IN Mr. Parker- oi
lrr suitr thousands and tens OF thousands o d"a'
Through hands without paying Tor The iic barren ienc
which surely living creature ever heard me boast *
indeed that lac VIII not sustain MS bold anu happy c"en
NJ Is is Mr. Elliot Braxion who Is referred 10 as making
ears cited onp - will hesitate deny wi;ho. seeing
him. l. he c,e r made Mr. Parker else
n-i expressing any such otnion as 4, asefi9e 70 MN, 10
but II it said by any individual doubt not he
oHGi be himself destitute OF TRUTH ana worthy associate
i, companion in lappahannock
Ia much Tor Mr. Parker and his pamphlet, is with and
with OF profound regret that one who has &C
srs bs slon in surrounded by those
shade oil his ciraccris reflected should nave desce"
exhibition OF his feelings and prncipe'
j. present occasion Mr. Parker well knows maj '
towards him long after he ceased 10 deserve
respect am writing not Tor The puro" OF assaiins h'
ei-ctIaily.) vinicate
Provoked the pamphlet now published though exceed
rly thing OF the sort ever read has yei awakened
BOSOM emotion rather al and
principles we'll fortune seem to nave been pom n
Aa together amid the trials aud the storms OF adversely
Holm GRIIt'IlER Jr