New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-09-12

-;,,,of preliminary Of theirs, me
maf AA"'o - WHICH they were suspected u o1,I5
$780, nv the cGcum' lance V'es N'ii w ~ y.
Ibhoeh1 ,sss Yrgnlin and the lafge aH' ''p'
BARRON hioh the allow apce OF com 3ou.d tatef
OF nops! =, her Virginia elaine "ouid dtsfloIt9
est VI 10 ". Some of them seemed %
b,s i'm outAtions as rather persona! ny 'n7
Re tbs VirginisDs hare tahen arenafRsoe d'-
w. ~ interest in this matter Senator NASoN
So,,owed the minority report nelofs i az p.n.0o'
-, N complaint By Mr. RICH Ako9o' u
seSoi' - ,ro something OF " moss the other
open ,al.o waR Understood 10 be good deal OF
oSS az I'D drilling among the Flrelnlans Wl:n
ssn IN ,fis feature Of the controversy 40
So.ien 10 iropute anything 70 the coatereef De-
ue ,b.tpeemedto be rather oyer@eenng ue
yons - m, this BARRoS Allowance through by way
~ - - rrecedent" Ny own opinion OF the merits OF
a. cnntroversy ig not worth much, perhaps oos
IviI ven ufe 10 give it, and II 49, that tne p'@4ct
81, of these cnpouud iptereat allowances, 80 fnucn
{. voeue of late, ia all wrong oorrupNngly wrong
IN On further and give the opinion, that the
49,, WI oVes debt OF gratitude TO Mr. Com mis-
Sione, EDwAkDB for his firm stand againstit, What
80 NAV be bis merits or dement's, az In officer
- thor osrticulara-and that is controversy with
wbich do not intend TO NEEDLE
Tho severe charges against Mr.. GIDDISGs, OF
having felonousy distracted certain papers from
the files Of the Post Oblce Department, has hz
lied out as YOU will zee By reference to the unan
;moua report of the committee to which 1t was re-
ferred Nobody who heard Mr.. GlDDIEGSs safe
Ynept OF selfvindication, when he asked for an in
yestgation Of the charge made by the correspond
ent Of the Boston Ah0s, watched his emphatic
words and his truth umed countenance, tepart
from any knowledg @ Of the moral traits OF the 40
cused) could have hestated moment about con,
GLIDING, as did at the time, thatthe charge would
prove TO have been utterly unfounded in fect how
ever honestly 1t might have been preferred.
The Senators from California were admitted to.
day, presenting deeply interesting scene, espe-
cially during the drawing for the long and short
terms, the latter Of which fell to the lot OF Mr. FIRE.
MONT Mr.. BENTON seemed deeply interested in
the Trial OF luck and he gave evident signs OF emo
Eiop not only at this particular stage of the pro-
ceedings but also when the Senator's were press
ing around his heroic son in law, to extend the hand
of welcome. By e-by it is a curious feature 10
our nystem Of Government, or rather it s curious
lIustraton Of the pay OF our public sentiment,
that made it all right" for the btserest oppo.
nents Of California; admission TO be tbs prom pest
30 extend the hand of welcome TO her Represent
atives now that the angry controversy s over and
she s oRe of the great Statal Sisterhood
This was the Gaze with such rampant SouthroDs
az DAVIS Of Mississippi and 5oULE OF Louisiana,
whom noticed in the groups OF greeters. Bus |
will not dwell upon a scene which is the province
of your more graphic senatorial watcher, "S 7. A,
90 describe. | am sorry am not allowed to des
efibe similar scene in the House When the
Rep esentatives from California in that branch OF
the National Legislature (Messrs GILBERT and
WRIGHT presented themselves, the opposition OF
the Southern extremists showed itaef ia protest
for nuch it sgainsttheir iuadmssbllisy on
Constitutional grounds. This was made by hr.
VEEABLE, and supported in a Characteristic
speech ! was in hopes that, after he had his day,
the waiting Representatives would have been
sworn in. But MIR VENABLE soon found an oppo-
ser, and the consequence was an adjournment after
frequent sigma Of impotence on the part OF the ma
Sorty OF the House, aud calls for the question, pend
ing motion for the previous question.
am requested to state in behalf of Mr.. BoOTH,
one of the Representatives from Connecticut that
the telegraphic report Of the Yeas and Nays on
the Boundary Bill has led you into an error in your
analysis, based thereon. Re v0ted, and against
the bill, az no doubt his colleague Nj. CLEVELAND,
would have done had he been present You had
Mir BooTH down absent not voting" While
on this subject | will take occasion to say that an
error occurred aso in the telegraphc report OF the
frat vote had Oh Mr.. BOYD's amendment to ssid
bill II omitted the name of Mr BUTLER Of Con-
necticut who voted against lacking it to the bill
There are other votes OF Northern men which l
should have been pleased TO correct had itbeen
allowable SlGMA'