The New York herald., 1850-12-27
Law Intelligence.


surRtnr CouRr oF rBE UsrrD sf.TEs.-Dte. IL
Present ss yesterday. No ~. q J. 0sylsr ct al
plaintiffs in error, % u. wilder This cause vas
argued the plaintiffs In and for the det ndant
In No ~ n n. Peston 1t al piainths IN err
ror, - Chas brachen Tnss cause vas suom.tsa "
the Court the record and printed arguments for the
PLAINTIFF In and for the defendant In error NO
80 John McNslty, plaintiff in error Us Bstty 1T al
THE csuse tubmitted 10 the Court on the record
and printed arguments for the plaintiff In error and
for the defendants In error. No 81. q. s Oldheld
plaintiff in error "a WIN n Marriott The argument
a. this cause wa. for the plsntia in
and continued by MT Attorney General Orittsndsn Tor
the defendant in error.
Drc IS Present as yestsrday No. 20 p. Hogg, et
all plniptins In error j. Bbmeraon IN error 10 the
Circuit Court, United States. for New York
Mr.. Justice Woodbury. delivered the opinion OF this
Court, sfiruipg the judzment OF the said CHcut
Court with oets and damages at the rate OF sir per
No a. a a. oldn.id pIaintif in error, rs WIN. ".
Marriott The argument Of shi. cause was concluded
tor the plsintin In error. No 81 stmpson plein.
sr In error, % Baltimore and swquehsnha ballrosd
Company. The argument Of this cause was commend
cd for the plaintiff In error
supR,nt CouRr rms UyrEp srAru-Dse 10
Present as yesterday. No. 81 . stmPson, plaintiff
In Baltimore and Suquehanns Rsif osd Com
pspy The argument Of this cause vas continued ior
the defendant In error and concluded Tor ths psntn
baltimore Railroad Company plaintiff In error - The
stste OF Maryland Tbis cause vas ergued ior tne os
ndant IN error No 8i A. VillaoOce et al appel
lsnts ~ the United States The argument Of this
cause was commenced for the appellants.
DFc. 70-Myron wilder. Henry V Davies, aud
Livingston miller, rsquires OF New lo ORR Francis
Parsons, Efquire, OF Connecticut, and Nathan Evans
Esquire, OF 0he were admitted attorneys and eoun-
ssllors Of this Court. Ne. l2-sherbsrne sears r..
Joseph r.. Esstburn. IN error TO the Circuit
Court OF the United states Tor the southern
district Of Alabama Mr. Chief Justice Tansy delivered
the opinion Of the Court reversing hejudgment Of
Circuit Court In this with costs, and remanaps
the for further proceedings In conormty 10 ths
| opinion OF this Court Ne 81 J A. Nillslobos et al
sppellsnts, Va. United states. The argument 81 thu
continued by Ms Yulee for the sppsllan nts
by MT Attorney General Crttenden for the sppsiess
| and concluded BY Mr. Bsrrien, for the appellants
Dtc. 2s-R. IA MAR, ESQ, Of Louisi Ans, vas sdmi
| ted an attorney and counsellor OF this court No
! IS Henry Webster vs. Peter Cooper. On Ger
uhests Of division in opision between the Judges
he Circuit Court Of the United Gates for Nsins NJ
Chief Justice Tspey delivered the opinisn of thi
court, dismissipe and remssding this cause TO sal
| Circuit Court No Lessee Of rhos Henderson 81 al
psintifr In the g. Of Tenn. This cause ~
sre~ed By meesrs Bibb cod Eston for the plaintiffs
error and BY Messrs "a. Kwing and Stanton Tor u
dsfend ndsnt In error.
Dko. N-Mo.es fsorris Bsq, Of New Hsnpshire W
admitted an ett,rpsy and counsellor OF this cour
| No " Isaac Isndes, plaintia In error. vs. Joehus
| hant This csuse was argued by Mr Bradley for ~
.infa " error, and BY MT Gamble for tss dsfeuas'
w sz~,