New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-10-10

...,oa .hou,d he carefully inquired in'o,
III b1 se " nich nierf s. al Ine NJ a,slla .ho1tt
NH rnect Nv ard al oihsr cin1enf nof any, shoii1
peiLul, Ever 10 silence; nor eau ~e comprenend WY
The conduct of fey sPsc'hc ndlslouaei eslehug NEE
- nm Tor dissection, h hes equally Involved In tns
n e., charge are perm'ued 10 fema'n uodsturbed
Tbs seton OF Commit ee OF Adorned by waichwe
srs compelled abandon the pve alton, siIhough
great personal relief 10 us deeply regret Tor ne sake
OF The Iut,ituion 10 - hch attached Whatever
lime Justice ri eh have required should willing
aveu thai The truth MI. hi be developed.
Wa hAve attempted 20 dischsrge our duty, promptly,
honestly fesrles'iy sud though ttenvetas cation o Whcn
we RopoiCed bas been altogether incomplete, ws
feel that the fanlt ltes not wi US H..
Chief Eagtr The rsuEal OF Tho COMMUNE
of Aldermen permit fall ingsslieaiion aud upon tae
consequent, efata o. youf Cor nuee longer 70 ac 1.n
them OF ccuras declicee 10 continue Patuai eksntuE
tor, IN which those very likely Included IN hs charges
were he lhe cole Judges. -, -,
Chief Engineer (hy bis Council, Horace CLARK, Esq
slated 10 The Committee Of Aldermen that ha oealfe1 70
produce evidence to Prove any paH OF Inc ssteHeus
IL bis report which they you'd admit to bs true ana may
Committee perempsoy retuaed 10 alml any pAf' oi
said report IN true unistE pr yeo .t
the 10 loving Resolutions and ask 10 be dt'chsr2e1
Reioed approve Of the pursued by the Che IN
Annual Report before the Committee Of the
Boara Of Aldermen after that Counee BY thef ef3s 10
ful examination and charges, bad co-e
the Committee from this body TO decline sitting logger WIN @ @
Rslord That the evidence by the JOINT Committees IN the
opinion Of tbs body fully ssiains the 'iaienenls ana 'as
S by The b ess and En5 5 Of b -9 eo 0
statements and charges O!e
Engiaeer Annual Report merit and should receive l f ana
further that the evils therein presented
Department should be nelatey asd earey reformed
NetcIert, 0eodtr 8, 1850 loPHAK MILLS
JOHN P. LAcOUR
In reply TO an inquiry, Dir. Mills at.ted that the
proposition TO examine the statemen ts Of the Re
port il relation to bell ringers frat vas at the aug
gession OF Mr.. Clark, Council for Carson.
The Report wss tnen unanimously accepted and
adopted,
Oh The question Of diachatgug the Committee
he vote WAS q close one but " wss decided IN tho
affirmative,
The resolutions then came up separately. The
first one was carried with bu! one negative.
On the pecond resolution, che Secretary saw no
proprety in endorsing The report gong back
go far es it did sven to the Of 1r Anderson az
Chief Engineer. BE did not, 30 far as be had
knowledge, think the Report in thn particular to
he entirely correct He had not 30 Intimate E.
knowledge OF the uptown bells.
Mr. Mills explained tho effect and intention OF
the resolution; he deemed that the statements OF
the report had been proved, in so fsr as tne evl'
dence went
MIR. Moffats Of Hose Co No. 80, explained some
of the careess ringing Of Jefferson Market he'll,
especially on Saturday nights. He hoped some
thing would be- done to provide for proper ringing
Mr Hope said thatthe resolution referred TO the
evidence offered and not TO the real experience OF
hremen he anOWeQ IDAt tho TosOlutoh "1o Ga,
tirely justjiAble
Mr. Mills explained tho power and manner Of
the appointment of bell ringers, as well as it could
be understood ia the confusion Of laws on the sab
ject
The resolution was adopted, with only three or
four dissenting voices
The third resolution was then adopted nnan'm'
ouRly.
Mr.. Manifold, of Engine ., offered the following
resolution which was adopted with only one dis
senting vote
Reached Fhat the course pursued by Kesss NILS Hope
and Dacour tbs COMMITTEES appointed by 3he BODY TO acs
connection with the Conmiuee CT the Board OF Alder
men) 10 investigate ,he CHARGE and statements ma by
our worthy Chief Engineer Alffed Carson Esq 10 ale
las Annual Repor, the Common Council In protesting
sgsnr unus, and unreasonable cour.e by tue
Committee Board Of Aldermen, and their whhdra7-
al from the meeting of said CommtIee, declining to &C.
under their decaon mees the entire approval OF ns ooF
Considerable discussion ensued in regard to
printing the report in pamphlet form, but the mo-
lion to print was laid on the table, and, after the
calling of the roll, the meeting adjourned.
| p1np rs