New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-06-21
LAW COURTS.

COURT CALENDAR-Ths Dsy-Circun Cont
Nos. COS, 6sJ, 1873, IA, 7i5, rs to 7J2, 690i
Reserved Causes Nos. -, 5-3, ~, i29. 30
81, 46l 1923. 1925, 40, $50, 6sl ESQ., 67s pol, ls5
GIG, $50, 626, 1926, ia, 35s, 7i6, 49, 90, a.,
%, l9s.
Common Plcas.-PAET Nos. 393 and odd to
400, 4O7, III, 4l3, AIS, C63, Az, All, 4l9, 3l5.
PART II.-Nos a72 49, 54, $40 and even Nos.
TO 5Gs.
Superior Court-Nos. 81, 20, IOi, 10, 1872, 40,
10 l94, Sc, $50, ljj, 49, l6l TO l65 49, l2i 1876,
%, l2G.
SUPERIOR CoURr.-Befo Judge Oakley
Ge0Tge Andf6CS vs.. James Mcclure and Peter
GGligan.- Oficer q. levied under execution
against Sir. Frazer at stand W ashington Market,
upon qusntity Of butter and cheese. Mr. E. had
previously occupied the stand bat did not at that
tine. Mr. 4. claims TO have owned the stand and
prop erty and brings ection for the value. Verdict
Tor plaintiff, $500 For plaintiff Mr.. C. N. Potter;
for defendant, MIR. scoles and Mr.. Musey.
CouRr or CoMMoS PLEAs-Before Judge H.
grshem.-LGtting VS.. Ndnn.-To recover damage
for placing partition in store corner OF Broadway
and Chambers 81. by which plaintiff had 20 move,
Sc Verdict for plaintiff, $780, For plaintiff, Mr.
Blunt, for defendant, Mr. Niles.
Before Judge W codruf -.NWihdre and pife Va
AhL. PobOr.-Suit for alleged assault and battery
by an officer Of the Twelfth Ward on the person OF
Mrs NJ. by selling her by the neck and causing to
her injury srd much alarm. la defense, it was
said the officer levied upon flock OF geese at Har
lem. belonging to the plaintiffs, on an execution;
hat Mrs NJ. drove them away that he then went
and got a warrant and assistance. and went TO the
house Of Ar -. to recover the property. He de-
BiCd asssutiug Mrs. NJ. in the manner complained
Of or doing more than his duty required in getting
posse,sion Of the articles levied upon, which hc
Jailed to do. 1t was denied that Mr.. ~ ever had a
flock # geese. Verdict for defendant.-For plain
tiff Mr. j. Cook for efendant, Mr. Allen.
CIRCUIT COURT Before Judge Mtchell-Eli-G
Ann ArnOld VS.. DEdiey p. Arnold Action for
divorce, already referred to-Messrs Graham and
Holmes re using TO stipuste es 10 the cross charge
both points remained 10 be passed upon Mr.
Moves occupied several hours in bis usually able
ard effective manner ON the summing up on behalf
Of plaintiff
The Court, in its charge, thought, from the a1
missions ard the proof, there was no doubt OF the
innocence Of Mrs Arnold, and that the Jury should
find her lot guilty. 1t will then remain for them
to say, from the evidence, whether or not Mr. A is
guilty Of the charge as respects him. As to the
MesHs Beck, the Court thought they bad well
sustained their character. The letter OF DR. A 70
Mrs A. written after the suit was commenced, In
which be states het be is innocent oil the charge,
was referred 10 by the Judge. The Jury VIII take
il into view almost " ith the solemnity as II he had
sworn TO it and weigh it in the same manner. Iney
will compare its statement as respects the yo1ng
woman who with him, with What he stated a.
the time and Judge as 20 its correctness Inc let
ter also states that the yo1ng woman VIII DE pres,
eIt on the trial AID testify IN bis behalf one nas
not been brought forward by him on the ual'
and the Jury will thiLk il that has any weight
Mr.. Graham made sundry exceptions to pom"
Of the charge.
The Jury retired little before o'clock aud
about G. return into Court with verdict ID 'ne
charge against DR. 4. is correct, aud the cha,ge
sesDst AIRS. A. Lot couec!-thus hndioS 4 Ve'dlc'
for plaintiff.
Court OF GENERAL SESSIONS Before the lie
corder ard Aldermen Chapman and heiy'-HV-
etry ~ he Second DegTre-Mr. Lapham was
Gale 10 trial, charged with having IN his posses
scn, with intent 20 pass IT, counterfeit note pur'
noting TO be on the New Haven County Bank
The BILL on which the indictment wss based vas
Of The determination orS5O Henry HotGkiss, Pre.
sident Of the New Haven County Bank, was caled
to the stand, and proved mat the oii was spurious
printed from a geuaine plate but the Signature
was counterfeited. The principal witness sealus'
the accused was man named hogebln WIZ
that he had seen large quantities oil the 1Oove ue
scription u money in the possession Of Lsphan;
ard that te wanted witness to take some OF IL ana
psss il He vas finally induced TO take some.
This witness and the accused were srresteu %.
geiher in Broadway. Hugenin having sO'7 "a avs
possession while LaPmam had noIo' 80 80
A. NJ c. Smith and Sir Stewart. CiefA o, rOhce'
made n e arrest and from Information ne nsd ON
Ger Smith was induced to go to Hudson where ne
found in the house II one Brockway aoo1' si-OUO
in this sane kind Of counterfeit money p'ocA"ay
was the workman " 10 printed the oiils Tor the
bank, and there fore had access to the piaIes Inc
re- - Hugerin who, II appears is professional
gambler There were several witnesses examin.
e. on each side and the case consumed the time Of
,bs CONT for the whole day. The case was sum
med mn by A A. Phillips FOR the defense and by
the Assistant District Attorney tor tne prosecutor
The Jury q, late hour had not agfeeo'
Tur MosrRsA1 FrKE.-The Montreal Herald
NJ Tuesday contains fall details Of the late disas
trous conasersiiOn 10 that city The number Of
buildings destroyed was 9o7 insurance rs.
A Rsmber Of the buildings were douoe houses, so
thatthe dwellings actually destroy cd mus De owe,