New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-06-24

he bad paid for the assessment &c. and that the
owner has six months after that ia which 70 re-
deem-reiundIng to the purchaser what he had
PAD with ~ per cent in addition. notice from
the Controller TO the owner is not sufficient. Such
notice not having been given by tho purchaser to
the owner in this case the latter would stil have
nghtto redeem by refunding, but the assessment
beng irregular and invalid, the Court does 10. de-
eide the case upon this point.
Suyddm, Sage s. Co. vs.. IVn Jenkins, Sheriff
o. hng's Co--Replevia in relation 10 500 barrels
Flour. The suit resulted for defendant who elect
ed TO take value instead Of return Of the goods AMI
claimed that he had right to the highest price the
Jour would have sold Tor in the market 20 the time
OF The decision OF the Re'eree-hed, that the vsge
oethe market price at the time Of replevn. with in
terest to the time OF decision by the referee, the
defendant nothaving sustained any special damage.
Report set aside unless defendant reduces the
amount reported in accordance with the above.
James L'AmOreorz Va. JPm. B. Astoy.-The
Assignee Of alease 10 not responsible for the rent
beyond the time he actually occupies. The proof
on the part Of Mr. LA. should have been admitted.
New trial granted. Costs to abide event.
Jarris Martin implicated, ads. Geo II Brddford
and Joha a. BirdSaA- On an endorsed Note made
Ton County Bank. Parol evidence to show the
parties did not endorse in the order on which they
stand on the Note wss improperly admitted. New
tnel granted. Costs to abide event
DANIEL Nestkietkw0ite, ct al VS.. Eugene s. TIE
baud, af1.-By foreign house TO recover $1,000
or $4,000, the value Of notes handed TO Victor C-as
sou then partner Of Mr.. T. but now deceased By
Mr.. Rhodes, who is also decessed said notes. It
being contended having been received by Mr. K
Tor goods belonging 10 plaintiffs, 10 whom balance
was due OF some $4,000. Mr.. c. died intestate,
and his partner, Mr. 7. administered upon his
tate. Ii was shown that the notes had been hand.
ed by Mr.. X. TO Mr.. G. for latter to get discounted
bat he did not succeed. Mr. T. claims that Mr.
Cratsou discounted them himself and therefore
became the owner. The Court does not consider
the proof to show he did so. Report modified, and
the notes, or proceeds OF them declared to belong
70 plaintiffs instead of to the estate and receiver
to pay such over TO them costs to be paid from the
fund.
Ha,brouck VS.. HeyicOod.-Decree OF Special
Term reversed.
BogQrdus VS.. ROsexdale Manufacturing CO.
Same.
Hsssins vs.. Naturalization to set aside report
denied.
IMO,her ads. Kndpp-Ssme.
Barnard ada. JohRson.-New trial denied.
Breeck vs.. Cole-Same.
Holt ads. Mdlt-Same.
Van HouseR vs.. Clereldnd.-Same.
Van Auken VS. SteTart. New trial granted on
payment Of costs.
koynddrens VS.. Freneh.-Report confirmed as TO
Sagehorn and set aside as 10 French.
Ragner vs. Van Buskrk.-J1dgment affirmed
Merton ads. IVest.-Judgment for plaintiff on
demurrer.
ORIGINAL BRANCH Before Judges Oakley and
-Decisions-.JOhn H. L0rerre ads. Mary
Picrson. Ezecutr7z, drc.-On a claim for 5000 or
500 by the late Joseph Person, lone OF Mr.. LIS
Attorneys for taxed costs in bis favor in suit in
which the referees made report in her favor. Mo-
ton TO SEE aside report denied.
Hancor vs. Ja9pes.-Judgment affirmed
Nod vs.. BaA-Jndgment for plaintiff
OBrer vs.. Kd y-Report set aside and refer
ence discharged.