The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1850-02-22

ser that thar Grst design ,oas 10 throo The ,ho abolition
srsagh favor Of the federal party. Convinced that they
could not transfer the democratic abotionisis like many
cattle in The SHAMELESS, federalism, and satisfied
that without their aid, the federal party be defeated
they next resolved to get up independent ticket and
thus If possible, by drawing of sufficient number Of
democrats from the support Of the candidates Of their
party peveat election, II the federasts them
selves succeed This nnquestonably their design As
circumstance bearing upon this point would refer TO
the fact that 4ibe Cady Is in nomination. By the fede
rass for the office of OF Merrack county and
Geo Kent for senator in district No a. Is there demo-
crat amongst the abotonss who will allow himself be
duped by such petty and contemplate intrigue We do
believe there many who will be used by
iederalists for such purpose.
This article. referred to in the speech Of Mr. Sanly, and
repeatedly cited by the abolition editor Of the cabinet
ogan cooboraes the charges which we brought against
the leading fedealss Of New Hampshire, in article
to which the cabinet organ replies But having the files
of the Argus and Spectator before u.s. we find abundant
testimony to sustain the charges which we have alleged
In the election Of March, 1899. in New Hampshire,
James Wilson, now hand glove here with the wicked
shareholders" whom he so vehemently denounces at
home the candidate Of the federal party for governor
He addressed by the agents OF the abolition society
oftha State and then gaze his adhesion to the Of
aboitionsm. We thus announced the fact in the paper
which we were then conducting;
UNION FEDERALISM ABoLIrIoNIsM.Th last Her
aid Of Freedom [he abolition oganl contains the nterrog
atores Of the Anti Slavery Society candidates for
Office, and their replies. Four Of the federal nominees
have answered, and one of the democratic As
pected, the fedora nominees have recognised substantially,
the doctrines Of aboionsm. General Wilson, who last
year gays oeraby respectable and independent answer,
In his late letter admits that he has received light
and yields himself the embraces of abotionism with
that fent Of modest reluctance which certain mercenares
Of the world know how 70 assume. when they barter their
vitue for money favor 7hs nnon Of federalism and abo
if0aisB this Stale be considered complete If
before there any doubt a6on It, Which coid not BEL ard
henceiorh they be regarded in principle and
object they have long been secretly The few dem
who have joined the slavery party through pure
and honest motives will how vilely their conf-
dence has been abused and will separats themselves
from the dark and -omened coalition Abolitioaism has
taken the very which ant-nasony before
1t has fallen into the of federalism The excitement
got up for other purpose than help federalism.
The object Ct the leaders and is get suf
cent number of democrats turn the scale against the
democracy, and then throw the whole in favor federal
ism.
And yet the cabinet organ attempts to make its readers
believe that General Wilson. now representative in
Congress from New Hampshire, who ayowed himself an
abolitonst and entered into coalition with that faction
ten years ago, together with the entire federal parry
with which he acted tainted with abolitonisn
than the democratic party which scorned and epelled
Gen. Wilson knows was his political antagonist them as
he now and who denounced and opposed the dark coa
tion between The federalsts and abotionists Of New
Hampshire, in which General w. was one of the high
contracting parties General Wilson has since protessed
be abotionst; and yet his conduct is endorsed by
the cabinet organ and his political associates are the
southern phigs not excepting Mr. Saniy 1t is thus The
OF the South has been betrayed, and the Union
brought into its present danger.
That there were at that time very few democrats
who entertained abolition sentiments, do not pretend
to deny So there in every slaveholdng State in the
Union; and we repeat we believe the democrats OF New
Hampshire at that time free from the ain OF
abolitionism the democrats of Virginia As party,
for years they fought federalism and abotonism
bined until they with pain and Indignation that
southern higs could moi appreciate the sacrifices which
they made to preserve the constitutional rights of the
South, but preferred the federal aboltonism OF the
North to the democracy Of the North, and aided the
former in prostratng the latter. among whom only the
South had friends Thus the Souh betrayed By the
trhigs Of the South
There is but little in the article OF the court
gan which il is necessary to notice. 1t recants the state
men that we helped 10 the Anterior resolutions,
and at the time asserts in substance, that those
resolutions were false and eacheous TO the OF the
South-in other words, resolutions which admitted fully
the rights OF the South under the constitution and sought
in the most efficient way, protect those rights and which
were approved by the southern members OF Congress,
the cabinet organ false and reacherous to
the cause Of the South
We deem no comment upon this absurd statement
necessary, except that il is made by paper, one of
chose editors is an aboiiona and ioeh itself has not
aDoccd and dares not apow, us opposition TO me Wmot
Prouso
p. SSince writing the preceding article, the cabinet
organ has cited resolutions alleged to have been passed
by the legislature OF New Hampshire in $780, relating TO
the introduction of slavery into Territories. When we
prepared our article in defence OF the democracy OF New
Hampshire we had in view only the period Of time CON-
mencng with the reascendency OF the democratic party in
that State in 1922 to the present time. During the era
Of amagamaton, the government OF New Hampshire was
generally in the hands Of the ederass and very poba
bly, was the time Of the passage Of the resolutions
fered to by the cabinet organ For the last forty years
the federasts OF New England have been preaching
aboiionsm and whenever they had control Of legis
ative body they have not hesaied avow their adhe
sion to that political heresy.
John l.. Dawson, who so near regeneratng
Andrew Stewards district at the last election, are
glad TO see, has again been nominated by the democrats