The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1850-06-23
From the Petersburg lnteigenccr, June 8.
Petcrsbnrg Daily News for Disunloa.

From the Petersburg IntelIgencor, June %.
Petcrsbnrg Daily News Dlsunlon.
We have attained the object sought by our article on
when Ral article was written that he issue rendered Sy
the Daily News was more less than dissolution
Of the Union Of the States rather that the passage Of the
Compromise bill and his rejolnder of yesterday shows
that we were entirely fight. This being the issue, we
meet 1t at once, and al the time, return thanks
% ns b io y unlike many %a whom hs Co.
believes dsunion is ineuiiatis" But he shall speak
for himself;
We win speak plainly DIsunion isineyitable. with Or
Ionized in sentiment aud feeling We have hopes Of
efecting any change there The time has passed
Nashville Convention, OFFERING ANY BET
for concentrating southern feeling hopes Of
republic vanished IL may be patched up, TO hold
together five or longer but, far welfare
UNION IS GONE We have hs rs
sss . 's's'' now We d'i'' 7 TOO long, force may o
ment which some OF those whos you have clothed with
power have long entertained, but which they have not
thought proper thus far to express in words " Disu
union ID inevitable, with without this Compromise,
unless the North is evoutionzed in sentiment and feel
ing. We have no hopes Of efecting any change there
now The time has passed" The time has passed, and
we must now go TO work TO divide the army and navy,
the public lands, the public debt, the dock-yards,
arsenals, &c DC, "peaceaby," between the southern
nation and the northern nation; and when this is
peoeed6y effected, the southen nation must arrange
with the free States OF Ohio. Indiana, Illinois, Mich
gam Iowa, and Wisconsin, concerning the navigation
hs wor ne sres sssPp we empaaszs
10 bring ourselves 10 the conclusion that the Union could
be dissolved geaceably;" and in voting at different
tunes Tor the Virginia resolutions, believed
that resistance all hazards and 10 the last extremity
could mean peaceabe separation OF these States We
believed them as we believe now, that in the event Of
certain action by Congress- the South should resist
even 10 the dissolution OF the Union; but knew that
that dissolution would bring and bloodshed. That
action by Congress has not yet been taken. and il is
hara ,f fha
clude that action and thus preclude the necessity OF
sietng unto the dissolution OF the Union, that
advocate il. In what does the Compromise plan mill
tate against the Virginia resolutions Does il provide
for the Wilmot Proviso, the abolition Of slavery in
the States Territories does il abolish slavery in
the District Of Columbia or the slave trade between
doctrine OF non-intervenon by Congress with the sub
ject OF slavery which every southern has contend
Nicholson letter. and which the democracy TO a
advocated in is4s But says the editor OF the News.
what becomes OF the slave trade in the District Of Co
lumbia, and what becomes Of your own resolution on
the same subject Now the resolution which we offer
ed designed simply deny TO Congress the power to pro-
hbt resident OF the District OF Columbia to dispose OF bis
slave Slavery exists in the District of Columbia, and
the owners OF that species OF property cannot, in our
opinion, be denied the power Of dsposng OF that prop
erty Nor does the Compromise plan forbid this, bat il
only prohibits the establishment oil slave marts in the
District TO which buyers and sellers from all parts OF the
Union may resort 10 trade in slaves. Such laws have
been passed in Louisiana, Mississppi Maryland, and
right we refer TO the action OF the last legislature OF
this State, BY which majority in the house OF delegates,
OF nearly three 10 struck out that portion OF the
second resolution which denies TO Congress the power TO
abolish the sidue trade in the District Mr. Pendleon-a
democrat OF the strictest sectade the motion to strike
out. and in doing 40. gave precisely the explanation
OF what was meant by the ap trade that we have gwen
above
But the editor goes little further He prefers dis
union but will take the Presidents plan, IL he cannot
get disunion. rather than adopt the Compromise. Hear
him:
Between the plan OF President Taylor and the report Of
the Committee Of Thirteen have hesitation IN say
ing, II copusd choose, would take the Presidents
teaves all Others open questions, does not the
Compromse which, the contrary, IN the specons Karb
IN which comes before Is make southern men par
ties TO their political degradation
And all this is said in the face OF the article in Mon
days paper, in which the editor conieRded that should
not todu-that we had" control over our own actions
n0p but could not tell how long might have H. &c.
Inc PRESIDENTS plan takes in California, boundaries
and ALL and leaves all the other questions" open Yes
open for that party which the editor tells is daily in
creaslng IN strength, and OPEN for the other party who
are daily increasing in Weakness open- for the intro
duction OF the Wilmot Proviso into the territorial bills
OPEN for the continued violation Of the provision OF the
constitution which provides for the reclamation OF fugi
may tend TO Cypress and inure the South Such logic
y IN keeping with the doctrine that the Union be
peocedbtv dissolved.
But we have said enough The editor Of the News is
Tor disunon nor when : we can control our own
The issue is fairly made up between us, and put
ourselves upon the country
NEW BOOKS. Just received
The shoulder Knot Sketches Of Thcsfod Life
me Professors Lady, BY village the Black
rs.ss uook ~ a.. p.vo,,,o.