New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-10-18

Tie Ciif cp ~ a 5'irsili ''ll ,i.sl7,c,
more Of ii.>, 5,rrr55 ~ l. ~ y" ~ 80 .5.sl.,
md Barr yes,. 'o ,lr.i'S en-. i'a.s.
fhitie.uh Ward pol{-e aud i,.i1j II. .lz ~ 5fs "a,
uor-bulse iirouzh lise 5rr5reSs ~ i, " - ~ f-,
tau of the Tbiitesih War,l oa,Yr,, I,,,,,f -, IN, -
touly refused tu ,hea pqersi 81. ,j,-..sn5
strongest Uncertainties al is4r $500, T. - ~
he lrorpirv, however jude. Af.atrir,.t ~ 5 :, 80
AinrAei Court. held Them hf e the raorr,,s,s .g, ~
$9lno keep be pence: wtca ghe sco+l,plrgs yvebt f
cNuitWeiy o car lhe inrAH> Of o1r uoble sr-ul-1,
e W hile WIS awaHs '.e ma. Of Johnson and barry
ane only itN' NM l.ol =, - sSeis4H91 N. ih
era'le ~ COMES p e ''t'iA - sias.Ei' "a me >-yrn
leenlH " ard ne CAsilAt V H. = t5 on ue tice
bel '0'Ht, e. 49, La. 49, - ma
seats himself behind me Jnasf Wi5h Taon ne es'sc IN
eN4niheN allN'uS COM -, -. , 5ti
WhoN eH!fl'u On ~ t ,,oo NJ ,Is ,ri.,n,rS
AMER MS lt"' iyHt u..t :. i, moi ~, mo
SCI ny hp.5'E' ana P'',a ~ ''' ''AN' ' '
hItHt 10, 1.,i,. U,,,,f,- did,
The inference mere clearly Is tht Jug u'i
charged these men wren NjY s'ioNn u''t utcii
Rnd without sufficient h4l Hnl '.# s W.. St,s;,5 I'M
procured through ne Hi1uepce ol NlSl'ai Co. b;s
tut statement OF .N1elpl t aeA.i s,,isn Fr,nk
llV'o'i,s "a tf a. p '1uSetls ,i. -; 49,, ~, con-
neced with the mntter md had been walnS Solhe ine
Tor him: while waiting lie learned from he tiuet t' IN,
cui'E 9t ne prece'ns nights lhai ne o!G NC N''
was GLAD he was present 10 hear the testimony Tor ne
could NOT expect the udee comm, without evidence;
lh0t he Went 10 the udae and afer some conversation
with him. MOI relating 10 the disturbance AZ the hre v ID
guilty. he hoped he wund ROT show Them anyr,rcv that
he dosirosoi seeing the disturbances al hrs stopped.
made of some OF tl iltv ones thni he t, lci aud lid
not know what wa, done yith these men until he reAl the
resuif i'm the Chiefs renort
On reference to the a6dav of Justice Monitor, will
be tint bese persons discharged ON giving bait
10 keen Tie peUce because there sufficient evidence
to delain them any other charge: and TINT the bail
coed. they being in each case trcelolderS.
In all these cases where the Chief complains OF the dis
cl0rar of parties bY tie Police Justices aud the Grand
Jury the cause has been OF tie OF evidence against
them
Itmay be that The Aldermen sometimes discharge imr-
iiaie these eases. Hnd only when the Cur
CunlSticrS iasy in te instance OF the discharge ny
Alderman MurEis. and then only security or pro
mise appear tie next morning. They nave appeared
and the eisano their nna discharge mas been hhsf rom
th, O.
whose evidence would deau them 10 appear ana e9! Id
the matter
With respect 10 the various clubs and halalt ana ot
their rafui and horrible acts and other murteroGs butch
cries" the Chiefs imusingtion has led him from
These clubs composed in most instances OF small
BOYS from HE ul 1910 /! wears aud although they nj
one time during he latter part OF the previous and he mrs.
created hois and fights among several companies OF the
Department vet they never committed me luruSis, nor
guilty OF the horrd oulriSes charged on 'hcih ny
| the Chief. H..
Your Committee do NOT desire III any way no use
vino have been guilty oi Wl"nR; iI' IT,, -, {l 10 ,I
RACES of the various cnhs meioed by num- nor 40 luy
think thai our city whose name Tor peace ao 1000 or1sr
has been Justly praised, should ne gwen ChaIHclttlo i
clubs and haudit, "bulchcrcS and othrrorfloe ouH"97
which it does not deserve and which, M e ianghaSe Oh io
Chief threaten TO rock II ana perhaps tils county, 'os
deep foundations" 49,. ~. ,,,o ,r ,,o l,si
They have however learned that at the me OF me am,
cIts win these boys preIm" r ,S T nnsr of both
Boards consulted frequently Experimentation to the means
Necessary ,% pteT pc an" a eso cn. and y the vigil
lance Of HIMSELF well as of the members OF the PHhc'
gS, Ie i ANYTHING is heard Of them
The charges Of the Chief in relation to me Commute oi
the Fire Department nre nlSo grossly aislheo ~ III NO
seen by the statement OF Auer5a, ,s ~ M &
Your Committee nave leaed from lli oas ~, n IT,
instance, after the reception oi me papers of Wv,
respective Boards 10 ths oihthlct, rtli ~, ~, 800
against amy Ot me companies OF ieitocls, ny ,jt
in each case handed TO me Ohel LOT he PURPOSE o' "o'
| ing the Witnesses OF the Dephfliheh" L. a. ~,
Committee hive Investigated the carggs, ol'eh conS