The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1850-10-08

may be anticipated In the future, in which the active
% NH usnos, verge % hsp asssry 20 ssrssls,si a.
pa~sio~, and this a the peril Of just. and indeed
be In circumstances different from that now
and ws SS a ne
Of sand pans baren rocks sscts.ed valleys and frozen
history and pressn, sabs,antaies must quiet suppose
OF rather orbd-any considerable complaint against the
When Texas was annexed to this Union her
limits within the Nueces on the west the Red river In
~ deg % Sss oa y III lands Wing S
Nueces aud ths Rio Grsnde TO which she had shadow
e and between Red river and the 42i deg her claimed
northern line which she had other plausible preenee
Of right than written in her paper dec'a
sss oas ha i 70
Heervng the right In the contract oil annexation 70 adjust
and reay with Mexico by which good te was Obtained
either Texas United States the may be-
and human lie. iflhs actual ,,ls, rs obained dom Mex
leo accrued Tcsa. did 70 tmainl, did itno because
Ia the ptoseca ion Of her clam In other words
although We advapced the consideration of H. did so
a.. asa,s., S.r Lawyers would call her d,ls oSn
s'raenye" one-,one good by estoppe we held ! good
,ie Of Texas Northern politician, very generally heidi
and, by the way few southern ones heldhaI by equity
proper and joint eosthat is, the United States whole
The disposition finally made by the Congress divided the
opposite q sides Sa",s sS Sua sass as
BY Texas Of slave sol 10 Tree SOIL Of the quantity EN-
purchase q that free sol territory 2! the
Union for the shareholders Weare thus PREPARED o ap-
prehsnson 81 It tina, the friends Of the bill whe
somewhat toleaniy believed obe neither
The boundary bin csssen BY Tssas Of 10000
10000 below, $1,000 stoye the line q u deg 81
nln 2 be 81 s3HS oG s. continued il New Mea
by Mr. Gays b and 50 surveyed as to conveniently and
WAR m antar tI,i
roIy Is j. not likely g d Dc 90 through The identical part
most sou.herly part i w BY Write Of the pny oi the
5 saa n M. ' q <. e %e; pss.a
thgeniy resting overit Az all events. the payment the
af. q G En
enable har I. sppy to the coniedeacy the additional
a. me shs s ~ " 40 y
posed by general concurrence OF southern may be
the discretion win which sae Is clohed in re-
spect 81 dividing o. remaining unit On the whole il is
probable that the .aveholding interest are moi more
weakened by the proposed cesson in virtue Of the
embseea il ibis cesson may al some dstaD, day be made
the material OF additional and sepaate ffee State than
free soil eupdy 80 high as e go iortq wanronly
fabreds States there would seem tobe no occasion TO feel
at a loss tor better materials ont Of NeU Mr,co
Are not the srgdients in avSr the b. review,
tessbe IN surveying the relations bear the cIed
laws of nations and comnon integrity, pay their
ciansf Some of them TO the door OF the nations
.sni,ea rsvssss we are daily dserns from the por,s Of
Texas into own treasuIya pledge Of older date Ihan
when We received he,. And am about TO put the ques
uon TO the nalions conscience - there any honorable
escape from them And If this be so--and is Il not 50 lis
the whole made up in favor OF the bound
bill But suppose we honoraby and safely evade
these demands yet we not called on by the most per.
considerations meet Texas in the honorable and
praisewohy effort she Is making 10 do justice those
who la her necessities assisted her. aud to whom
she pledged the very funds which we, with full knowl
edge OF the facts, and with view TO our own aggandze
subsequently received from hetI Must she not be
supposed feel keeny the OF her State
IN hls discrepancy and conflict Of claims between her
creditors and ourselves her custom receipts and other
sources OF income aud will we, despite PLAN conpcity
on our part WIN the category IN which she stands and
cur IN thus enabling confederate, sonihs1s confederate
reevs sef,s n, from such e.sI any emoama.sins
tI 10 do jasici Is her honor SO deeply endangered by
self And now long viii il bs possible 10 cover beneath
cloud OF passion the nature OF This issue
nature which CONCUR IN behalf Of ih. bill Poor ana ixno
the population OF New Mexico, there are vel
a~ ana aS ia and
they be bLues that they should be altogether with
eminent and the principal nls Of Texas by exe1
aud scarcely traversabe Wastes oamed by wild
Texas and airs TO be 10 her and
governed by her, II at all put the question 20 Aner'can
tiuonng OF Poland and are running the world Ia
quest OF objects OF exercise, IL other things uniting render
procedure to wrea from New Mexico ner ca pai distribute
territory, and sink her people integra members
States which to them but loreignl We have proved
courage. VIII not, other things conducting a.
display little magnanlmiy
Again usage similar in past history founded il
Of county among The eorsdsrate', demands our
povai OF the PROPOSE Texas desiog H. Will Georgia,
who has performed the act, obleci Especially
demanded " the critical exposure OF the troops OF tbs
government, and the excited militia oil Texas, who, III
obedience TO Orders. liable any moment to col
nson that would probably involved qoences In
comparison with which, into what inssnifcance does
the patty dispute pending about lew vaiaeiess acres o.
land sink
It's taken for granted that will maintain that il
would have been either wise In Itself 10 embfo the coun
try sudden war; and thereby OIL the States OF the
Unon pat OF then from opportunity 70 act upon
ther deliberate Judgment the gravest oil all political
questions them, Of a dissolution Of the Union,
quite Just say humane. the unolending sodiey
vi ths confederation and the aroused militia OF 1exas,
make Offering their blood propltiaory sacri
lice the god OF battles much less can bring myself TO
believe that could be demanded OF tue representative
standing the. foot OF the altar OF the constitution, with
oath support IL fresh upon him, that he should be
prvy purpose the presence OF magazine beneath it,
When tn House was voting on the Texan boundary bill,
il had before the Senate's Utah bill, framed, IL was,
on a departure from the Of the Missouri Compromise
line, recognition south and prohibition north OF II,
With the of every southern senator Of both political
parties endorsed upon IT, The New Mexico bill in the
House the time, resting on the same principles
The cession IL Is proposed Texas to make IL 10 believed
by members OF epne, will probably In itself convey
IL made, suppong the title of Texas to be good the polit
no difference between the value OF the Utah and
New Mexico bills The New Mexico bill had more favor
South than the Texas boundary BILL as was proved by the
that southern members voted 10 annex II 70 the
ser amendment, and to secure It's pas age, who
after the union had been effected, declined to vote
iort the South stood Tor the conner