The Arkansas banner., 1850-07-30
re, shs Asks,a n.....,

". se expect communication of hivs order, severe indeed. bat ia all respect worthy of yoar columns Uaasr this apprehension awaited the appearance. Of your psPer ~ith more thsa ordinary plcasur, Guess my surprise. thea, readiag over sars. seld, tissue ef abase eqaally bsrmless aud viud,c tivs.s FOdomSwssde Feplete with hlngsgsss species of rhstOric in which have no saIil, and which Is taoght n0.~hsrs go well as la Popish coileges,-- Such eOmmaaicatioa as :" Ssarsfela's,'' might, wish propriety. pass asnosiced shsii make il tho occasion however, of saying someihiag which hope, wiIl nos be aRpleasaat yoarssIves. or an- profitable ts year readers If l do not re,ert oa s Sars6eld'' his personalities, R Is not because might DO, do 90 with ferrtbis ssseYay bat Sccasse have no desire Io make him feel uapIeasaatly and because the eommaai,y have asali,lle islerest in him as iu me regarding us both us bat tho aus, upon the chariot wheel, compared to the grave sub- iect we discuss sCa&e majsra
 As to Bishop BYRSE, who, coRsrsry ts Mr Car rosFs cypress rcqssst. published the letter which called forth my ssFictsrss justice requires that should write what do not like to say of an absent man. It is well known in this commanity. that this individual has preserved unbroken silence. in public. to the strietures upon his church pub liely and boldly naade.ia Little Rock. This was done with the usuai policy of Roman Priests. to raise the cry of persecution, aad make capital. to which he is welcome. or this do not complain. Bat why does he. in his letter to Col REARDoN, discIaiming any agency in Mr CARROLL becon- ing aeAndieale. attack me, ia a maaner at oucs 90 plain as to be evident to all who know me, and yet SO covert to preclnie reply, without expo sure such torrent fVitnpeTatioa ss''Sars6elds aF,iclescoatainsl And when did reply, why did ANDREW bYNRE leave our shores. in the twilight oi the morning, to seek refuge from the cnstigaon he provoked in the shade Of the Vatican or a, li,s him sach an one as " Sars6-id," whose ouly wea. pom is abasel Such course might appear. to an impartial obssr4sF. to say the least. sH,naaly.
 This iadividuai also claims to be .' Bishop sf La- tie Rock" tie, to To sure, Is nothing iu itself; 1T. therefore, he chooses 10 assume such tie and keep il to himself his church. no one will object 0aiy, think he may we'll style himself d Bishop of Mexico.' or Emperor of China" as" Bishop of Little Rock" But, when he pargdes h:nlseLf be- fore with his assumed titls, he becoes offensive and deserves rebuke- Such a style is properly sumed only by Bishops. belonging to an established church, and is improper and offensive where all re- IigiOas upon level. Such s,yle purpOrts that he is LAe skop of Latls Rock to the exciusion of all others who may be acknowledged Bishops by those to whom they minister and that Linie Rock, as a city, is under his spiritual direction - Had Bishop BTRNE only claimed to be ' Bishop of the Roman Catholics in Little Rock" there would have been grOand of ofenss This hs Is, and nothing more. Bat in the name of the many citi- rens both Jews and Genlies. living in this beauti- fal city, who rejec, his Episcopal authority, pro- test against the assumption Of the style '" Bishop of LiuIs Rock" by Aadrss Byrae or aag other msH.
 '.SarsGeld" says, in his second paragraph, il :. FeilOw-citizsA" insis;s on knowing what the dag ger prefixed 10 the name msans. shuddcr s' the moral Obliqaity of his heart. IL s the cross! and not dagger" So~. the question 10 the name Of the character Is oae 0f fact Priaters havs al- ways told me is [ a dsgSer" Every work man in yoar OiTics knows il is dagger" The proper name given to il by the trade is dagger By what process does character which Is else where [" daggsr,' become cross whsn pretixed to the name of ANDREW BYRSEi II it De the cross, and proper prefix to a Ba'Hs, why to not all chris tans use it2 why is it not used by all Romsnists There Is no reason why such holy emblem shou i'd be reserved only fer The Bishops and lhs higher clergy. Strange mistake which confOauds dag ger with the crossf Yet it is one which Rome has often made She has carried both for ages-ths cross in her left hand. the dagger in her right Is 1t net sol Let history speak-the history of the worih for thousand years history of every land where her conqucsis have been borne.
 am prepared, therefore, to naintain no, onI ' that the character prehxsd to the name of ANDREW BrRSE is dagger. but. that such eub!~m sc- cords better with his oath Of office and the spirit o his church than does the cross
 In the debate between CAMPBELL aud PEacELL. u Ciucnuati. the oath of office taken by Romish Bishops read by MT. CAMPBELL and admiiteu ss genuine by Bishop PEKcELL This oath contaia. the foilowiag passage: Hsrsties. schismafies and rebeis to sa'd Lord and hs torssqid successors cia to my utmost poscer persseate and oppose = See Debate. 2so.' What is meant by " opposing 2 and prosecuting heretics and schismatcis, may be learned from other doctors of his church. Peter Deus, whose work was adopted by the Irish clergy in 1898, tIs best work and safest guide in he elogy. and reprinted In lsj2, by Richard Coyne. printer to the Roman Catholic Coliege, al MaynOO,h, Ireland, says that |" notorious beretics quay be deprived of christian burial have their goods confscated, and be subjected 10 other corporeaI Poaishments. 1aey may also be pu, to dsath: for, since forgers of mOney and other dstuTbers of the public peace are punished with death, so should hrretic who forge the fsi h . Sec DeBs. vol ?. p Pes, s9 trhe copy from which quote has beeu pronounced ssaEiee by tlis Priests iu Liitis Rock Thss same doctrine was taught and maintained al lagth by Beilarmine, president of tho col ege oi CsfciRals which condemned Galiileo for teaching that the earth moved ronad the sua. who vas ca nenised after death and placed amoog the calendar of Roman Saints This doctrine has been tau ghs by-inany councils of the Romaa church. provincial.