The New York herald., 1850-04-12
TWO CENTS.

| WI hcKenny, being called, was asked he k.s~
woman named Jane or Shsnfroy, who attended Ia
| hrs kemps saloon In broadway
Mr. Sandford objected to the mode Of examiuattsu
Here Mrs lngle entered the court and the witassss
attention being called to her he said he knew her a.
| Jane lngie. and by no other name he knew nothing
Of her general character; Mrs. Komps saloon was .
drnk'ng and smoking saloon where they sold brandy
| ana water Mt sixpence q tumbler.
| m sandford objected to the testimony
| MT Morris said he proposed to prove what tbs
character OF the place that IL grog shop IN
Wnlch MIS- Kemp employed number Of young
% ~ order 70 csptvats young men, and that i'm
] place there
The Judge said that witnessed In ,hi, city can b
procured TO provo anything and unless Il is admitted
10 give evidence Of their character there would be
no safety for any man. II it could be proved that
witness lived in a house OF common prostitutou he
would receive It but he could admit testimony a
| the krd frs' w"s "Ts-"h fRnled out
Witness said he knew nothing Of the lady's chsres-
ter and only raw her once or twice.
Joseph Butler deposod that he employed Bag
| conduct Of Catherine Runnett. nor anything moro
forward than Ia generally In girls OF her age who
work In manufactory; Manning used TO work IN the
| Crosse xamned--Oth girls, named Hetty and Sc
rah worked In the small room. where Catherine after
wards worked; they were employed there before Ca-
therne came to Bagley's. and Bagley used to work
there with them; Manning had worked In tho front
room till about May knew that the seat which Man
ming occupied commanded a view OF where Kate waG
and think he spent more Of his time looking at hes
than he did at his work Qsughter) mean that there
H. general levity among girls who work In factories
Mrs Mary Taylor deposed that she kno VS. Ru an it's
family II years; did not Catherine very oftsn
but what she did see OF her she never anything
amiss OF her
Mics Mchai r. Rutter dcposed that she knew the
Runnetts, and never saw anything reprehensibis In
the conduct Of Catherine.
Cross-cxamincd- saw Catherine at any other
place than her fathers house and the house OF Wit
ness's brother.
Mrs Elizabeth Jones knows Runnctt's family for 10
years. never knew anything against cathcrinss eoo-
stephen D. skidmore-I reside in ss Norfolk street
there Is female named Mrs Ingle residing In thsf
house Hooks at tho ladyl never saw her in my
Richard Wall deposed that he works for Mr. shan
frhw sees the lady in court has known her as Mrs.
Shsnffaw and Mrs Ingc.
Cross-eXamined-Ncve addressed her ss Mrs Shan
frsw but has heard others address her as such am
barber. Q.-Did she ever come to your shop to gst
shavedl Gaughterl A.-No I have gone to her
house when she sent for have had controversy
with her l am under bonds keep the psace not
towards her in particular Qaughter but also towards
| another young lady named Ward Odd you svve
commit an act Of violence ON that lady A. No rx
| cept In self d fence Caughter my head shows
run fro m the m Qoud laughter) ! am lame
liam J. Wood was in the employ Of Basley 90
has been In tho email room and has seen Catherine
RUM II aud Mr Bagley thtre generally found the
door op there was once could not set In. but
don't know who was In II then never saw anything
Crots-oxamined-I am now in Smiths employ; I
went tn them after the DISSOLUTION aud witness
in the cause between them don't remember that
the lsslution occurred In consequence Of what told
the smiths Q.-were you active in promotns
A
objected to- ruled out. and exception taken
Witness continued-I have frequently into thvt
room without knocking; that was my general practice;
In her usual poitiou She always at her table II
her work; don't know who opened the door; Mr..
Baglsy standing at his table; think there
lapse Of minute before IL opened; mentioned
what have told to Mcssrs smith some time betwess
the middle Of January and lst Of August can't tell
the time any than that; never to my rcooa-
lection. said that knew nothing against Mr. Bagiey
and considered him an honorable man; never said
h. u
nard; don't rccollect how often found the do0r
fastened; BagIey and Catherine were always thss
when IL was opened II was more than three tim sA nos
mor. Than nve; IL might have been; entertan No
ankind feeling towards Mr.. Basisy; ~e have always
spoken when met.
De Grow Dedson was In Bagley's employ; Manning
worked in the back room when Catherine first wen<
there and continued TO work In II for six months AFTER
Mrs Mary Jones has known the Runnetts for this~
teen years has never seen anything bad in the eco-
| duct and dcmeanor of Catherine.
| Mrs. Elizabeth Davis gave slrnilar testimony.
| prrtScr EsoPrSrp.
| Mrs. Inglc recallcd-My residence Is 70 Norfolk
street. door TO 5;my saying 81 yesterday wss
mistake I never took iunch in the small room. 10
visited that room. except 70 soc Cstharne, and on
another occasion to visit Henrietta symers; havc
nsvsf been aadre.ssa ~ the w,n.-. wall a. % Mr..
ward he came In with club. and struck me with IL
The Judgc.How did he get the cut on his head'
Witnesr-Ho took the Kettle Of boiling water, ana
attempted TO throw u on Mrs. Ward; she then took
mp hs club and struck him In sofdefsnee Qsushts);
Cross-eIamnsd-f have never gone by the name oS
sbanfra~; folks may have called In joke Nj.
Henry shanfraw boarded with me.
Mr. Morris-its not Mose, Is Il, loud lsushserl
Witne's-No; oscupy the upper part of the house;
u numbsr W; don't forget tho number. OLeughter)
u T. Rcstrsw-Rcsides In Harsimusj I know tho
Runnstts; they lived next door to the conduct Of
ssnsn. osnn p, rhs r..isng there wa. ssry loose. ~ss
sfcspd TO the top " the house and throw things st
pa~ers by this was in 1915 aud az she attracted the
attention Of my workmep. who were building house
opposite che used TO stop and talk fellows In the
.srests and u male ale asew at the pump Qaash.erl;
with young msn. Q.-Do you knov the neral cha
raetcr Of Catharine Runnstt for truth aud verseyf
Avery bad; che cfteu called great liar, In my
presenes- though IL Il an ugly name 10 call a lady.
(Lauehter)
Cro-s-. iamined--Tbe Rurnetts wer. tenant. Of my
fsshsr.in-law. and ! lived with him don't know
thst he Vas minding Mr. Bsgeys case of gold pens,
=, the fair IN ~, when ,.w her there. o,whss
did you tell Mr. Bagley what you knew Al don't
think there is any necessity to tell that.
Mr. ssndford-Thers Il no objection 10 your snsver-
seen u this trial. that you came to Mr. Bsgsy A
II Wa Q-Ani you never spoks TO him about ~ b.
Mr. Manning recalled, and stated that hs worked In
the front rom then In the back room, aud vent 70
his old place in The mont room again.
David Pollock know- jeremiah Lynch never he's
heard anything against his character for truth ssd
Mary BusheIl was called for the plaintiff aud de-
pcssd thst she knows Catherine Runnstt fr three
year., and never heard anything against her chactes
The formsr male witnesses wcr. recalled and tee
,lh.d that they never heard anything ssains, her
Mr Morris. rad the smds,It of John G. Bernard
before the Police justice
Van Brunt had not been tasou under the bench
warrant at this stage ~ tho proceedings and the ev
dsnce here elo-sd With the exception of fcs 9us~
tons 10 Or. tonsstock.
The Court adj ourncd NJ quarter pat I've o'clock,
70 ten THE morning.
brooklyn city Intelligence.
ttasoss cass Esosp The case of the Rev John
c Greene against John g. Pierce and Ann g. pIsrc>,
HE wife for alleged -apdcrous words made u.a ofsy