New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-07-02

wi 'hal "a, not sunicient proof OF such regula-
lions as 10 this Company
10 meet this non attendance. plaintiff proved BY
ns physician who attended him for year, and
VINO IL an NJ d., that be was al the time lAboring
uh1es an external ELECTION Of the throat, fro
"hicn' Tor period Of about fur or five days. hs
could LOT make any great exertion Of voi,s with
out being subjected To extreme pain. Defendant
insisted that by the frs, section Of the Regglatiols
PROOF o. such disability could only be made by the
Doctor appointed by the Director
ieei The force of the remark made by defend
ANt unset, that It Is ndispe - the
ctssiul conducting o. such an institution the
opera Company that strict Discipline should be
malHtained, and am disposed TO maintain a rigid
adherence 70 the rules aud regulations aud 70 up
noa the infection OF the penalties when they arc
violated; but feel bJund 70 regard the rule Of svi
eehce which requires all cases OF penGltv Or for
ielture, strict proef VI lie being incurred Toe OBJ
Jeeton 10 the evidence o. tue attending physician
who IS regular NJ d. is technical and strict, and
before defendant can avail himself of it he must
snow that ne has fully complied with what was TO
De zone on bis part. The rule is ia these words
sickness must be proved by the doctor appointed
by The director Nov though it is proved that
there was notice posted up in the Opera House,
that DR. Quinn ass appointed by the director yet
u mas not ben found IN khis tTiGl that De- Gain
was doctor, or that he had taken degree IS doc
TOR OF medicine or that he was authorised BY the
Medical Society, 0r bad regular license 10 prac-
tse, which think was necessary in order to con
sntute him doctor, so es 70 show a regular ap
pointment under the rule and Ehish do not feel
at liberty in such a case 10 supply By inference
As far there is evidence that subject il went
20 show that DIR. Quinn prscticed upon principles
Of homeopathy, and that such practitioners are not
recognised By the facuty Of medicine, norby ma
jority ofthe public as rcgllar prdc'ul0Rers. Under
these circumstances am Of opinion that defend
ant was authorised b make proof OF his sickness
h.. IIpey he sif,t4 w
made 20 my ssts'act on think the defendant is not
subject to the fne | therefore give judgment Tor
the pleiutif for Sl0O-w with costs. For plaintiff,
Richard Emmett FOR defendant w. G. Russell.
MARINE CoURT-Beiore Judge Lynch--James
Ryan vs.. RoJe1t II. Person, master, and VILLAIN
B,zby, chitf engineer, of steamship PkRadelDtia-
Plaintiff and another individual, the day after the
Philadelphia left New. York for Chsgres, in May,
were found on board their names not on the pas
senger or crew lists. They were "sIo| avays, IL
was charged, with view to getting a passage to
Chagres. They were told they would have to
work their passage TO Cbsgres aud back They
did so TO C., being employed as tiremen.
The present is an action Tor assault and battery
and false Imprisonment. 1t is charged that alter
they got to Chagres Capt 2. caused them TO be
placed in a hole under the saloon, called the specie
room, which is partially lined with iron, aud which
was dark, hot, and offensive to the smell; that IN
forcing RYAN into il, who resisted, they assaulted
and Mr. b kicked him also, that he was placed
in irons which hurt bis wrists very much,-they
were there till next day when they were allowed
to 60 on deck. Ryan jumped overheard aud at
tempted to swim on shore, bat was followed by the
Chief engineer and others, in boat, who caught
him when be had got about 300 yards from the yes
sci; he was brought back 10 the vessel, placed in
irons THE Captain was on shore at the time, bat
said the eBgineer had done right and returned to
New. York. For plaintiff it contended that
the Captain having set Ryan TO work he paid
for his passage to Cbsgres and that under any CIR
cumstances the Captain had no right, after Ryan
had Jeff the vessel 10 arrest aud bring him back.
He rad OILY civil remedy against him On the
other hand it said Ryan was trespasser, and
the Captain had a right ~ bring him back, AID
used no more force than vas proper. Decision
reserved.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAs.-Both branches of
this Court commenced, yesterday, the July term
before Judges Ingraham and Woodruff. The
Judges have made rule this term, which is unique
in July, that trials will only be had where both
parties sgree-a measure which caused much re-
gret TO sutors at least, as the City Hall, with its
massive walls and well.ventiated Corridors ap-
peared to be about the coolest place in the City
and Jurors and witnesses had walked good way.
Many of the cases, we heard it sail, will be none
the better for the keeping. Under the rule, none
Of the causes on the Day Calendar were brought
In ChamJers-Before Judge Daly.-HIJeas Ger
pus-A young man named James FEzytooOns,
who had enlisted in the U. s. Army, was brou GIT
up for discharge on the ground OF minority. IL was
proved by his sister and another witness that he
was bat about 10. De was discharged.
COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS Before the Re
corder and Aldermen Morgan sand Smith-rhe
July term of this Court commenced this morning
with the following calendar; MAY hem, attempt
to commit rape, robbery ,; forgery, 3; burglary
4 bezzlement 3 grand larceny, l2; false pre-
fences, exposing obscene prints, l; indicted, %
witnesses, .; bastsrdy,3 3; abandonment, a. To
tai CO.
The Grsnd Jury were not organized, there not
being sufficient number OF Jurors present 10 form
quorum.
TRIAL for Marrying Girl under age toRhom
consent Of PaTeRtS-Camilo Donnarnmmo was
called TO trial charged with having induced grl
uader II years OF age to marry BIN without the
consent OF her parents tn affidavit OF Rev J.
Cumming was re sd, and from that document 1t sP-
pears that the defendant was married on the ON OF
April to Anna Louisa Corras. The Rev. gentleman
thought r m her appearance that she was near
l6 years of age. J0hH COyras being sworn, testl'
fed that A. ma Louisa Coras was his daughter
and that she was born IN May, 1887, and had al
way lived withhim up to the time OF her marriage.
Witness never gave his consent 70 the marriage
OF his daughter, and the defendant never asked
witness for bis consent and never told him that he
was going to marry her Witness had told him
not 10 visit his house but tina, il ne wished 70 see
him be must call at his office On the morning Of
the 9Th OF April the girl left her fathers house 70
90 70 cstechlsm at ST Peters Church. She did
not return and witness saw no more oil her tlli the
9th of April, when he ascertained that she was at
50 Leonard St He iouud her there and took her
tome Defense introduced Witnesses to prove q