The New York herald., 1850-04-11

enaes.orrd 70 NEE, the Jus. Of the House
yS.I rule: o. order In .Ass, sad..vs
%srs my dsSssass: iass and Ss.,os. sTros r.
Is. r.: ;:s '% isss:.
hf dsss S ns ss: - s pe:
sr sqssy political parties nsn1sr ~ as rs
nS sfs, sn
Sss % % %s the q .s at s any
osiys 70 be my duty have sa,d word dene thing
= sSs z
ssss Hs e ay from sL snis time
pass and be forsottsn
stashts and to 4e world. Of the industry ntesenos
has s,pss
great and i%portsns public interest, and the
.esh matters shown by shs reports and
so~mss and Although ali tie great and Important y1s
positns for your have not been
sa sS yssS tss
The Of iahors become fact Of our
as ies.S Is;ss q .Ss opinion = III.
s ssd % sns % wants 81
tsS"s their full susrdnS the honor TSo p1o-
hsrpae.s spa Snio" our Beloved coaa.y
not sS II "a
sn and the %
srduous duties Of the present session.
on esS c n'cSn favor and
tic. ?, s., nee vSi has e far S life sTs
ndnes my ardent wishes for future health.
Sai io~-Gs%bers MIXERS sa sascticnsts fsrs.si $50
GovERNoR's VETO.
Pous ocLocx-The Governors veto OF the bill rela-
tive the Court of Appeals and for relief Of senators
therein having been read in last evenings Journal
Mr. TowrsErp remarked that IL the House shall deem
tho argument of the Governor conclusive, then It
would be it's duty to affirm the directions; but II Il
otherwiaQ. then IL its duty to
regardless Of the directions Of the Governor.
This bill he believed right In principle and policy;
and as IL had undergone the scrutiny Of tho
judiciary Committees of both Houses he trusted that
the House would deliberate before 1t refused to affirm
Mr. r. proceeded at length to argue the necessity Of
the immedia passage of the bill.
Mr.. H. GxrrSr trusted the bill would pass, and sent
to tho Senate for their opinion.
Mr. Fskr referred to the particular ease for which
this bill designated to reopen that of John Mason.
who through the nstgation Of his sons was in
duced n few months before his death to cut of tho
rights his legitimate children By the code tho
turs termination and II was the object Of this bill to
this bill.
the passage Of this bill 1t not right for the Le
gsature to sit in Judgment upon the decision of the
Court OF Appeals, nor to determine that suit shall
BE- which had already gone through all courts
Of the State lie spoke at some length In support Of
Mr. WAxrMAS sustained the veto on the ground that
the Legislature has power TO interfere with settled
suits The Law which this bill designed TO remedy
may have been wrong. but that would not justify
second wrong. If the Legislature has and should ex
ercise supreme power there could be principle set
tied and no suit closed. He trusted that the bill
would not be passed
Mr.. MoyRoE dissented from the positions OF tho
Governor. Highly though hc esteemcd him NJ
and a public officer, he believed that IL was
the duty Of the Legislature to pass this bill. IL
might be that this bill designed to affect .
particular but In that particular case former
Legislature had done injustice and he desired to 70
dress the wrong by securing TO the parties In this par
ticular the same rights that they had enjoyed
but for the Injustice done by the Legislature That
act had changed he issue Of the sut In question and
ne now beieven tIst Jurcv rv4ufrva tne Pau~-so OF
the bill
The previous question called, and the House
refused to pass the bni-syes II, nays s. not two
thirds.
The House eoncurred In the Senate's amendment to
the Dorheld Plank Road Company Also, to tho bill
for the relief Of the heirs Of Jno. Pooto.
Some private bills were passed when the House took
Q recess to 7. Both In session at sk y. NJ