The New York herald., 1850-04-10

reason than that my folks didn't know was married;
when went TO Mrs. Ingie's remembered the caution
that Bernard had given me Of her character; 1t
the only place knew to go to; told any one
that my husban had gone to and left me 5000
$500; told Mrs Frazer ! was MARI married because !
in; Iknow Gimbrad's shop in John street; he is an
engraycr Of cards; WAS there in September, lsis
went at Mr. Bagcys request; ordered wedding cards
in the Of Lewis; It was W. II. Lewis, or j II
Lewis; 1 don't know II my name was on 1t; know
two three persons Of that name they all mar
ricd men: gave that name, because when Bsgley
suggested the name OF Smith. at Mr. Hutchns' Office
why it did never told Mr Phillips was married to
Captain Lcws; he said. Your husband u captain
and said yes" do not know for what purpose
got the cards made they there suppose for
never went for them: never had but one OF them,
and that gave TO Mr. Bagey; 1t was after the am
davit made did not call for the cards. because
never had any for them told Gimbraid was In
Bsgley's employ. but did not tell him that ne
Clarence fitzgerald about weeks ago; he asked
II the account which he In the Poice Gaze,e in
how that got into the paper, but Mr. Bagley
told Mr.. Smith. his late partner got it put in;
me, because | knew he could not do : with clear
conscience; papered one OF the while was a.
Baglcys; two OF the men assisted me; they did not
take any liberties with me- my father remained With
Bagley after the Smiths left the partnership and when
he len Bagley he went to Smiths employment don't
remember any hostile feeling between Bagley aud the
| Smiths my father working for the Smiths when
! tho proceedings In my case took place before the
justice; my brother il still working for Mr. Bagley;
the introduction to Mr. Bagley's family. which spoke
OF yesterday. took place in the shop when up
first to Mrs Bagleys house, in Abingdon Place it
with marketing; 1 went upstairs to Mrs Bagey, to
tell her had brought tho things Mrs. Bagley was
playing ON the piano and she spoke to me about bust
ness; went to Mrs Bagey some three or four dozen
times. hut never brought marketing there than
three tines used to go and see Mrs Bsgey and the
business to the kitchen; / went sometimes in the
morning and sometimes in the evening; went To
her when she was sick and when her children were
sick.
To Juror-My brother is not yet out OF his time
he is an apprentice of Mr.. Bagley yet.
Croes-s mination continued-I have been TO m ,as
at Mrs Baglcy's sometimes with the girls; and dned
once with Mr. and Mrs Bagley Saturday evening
after had brought up the things from The Market
fret suspected my situation at the end OF june, or
esginnts Of July; the child was girl With dark eyes
room With any except Bagley, when the do1= was
locked he used to lock the door himself; one d,
tore my dress going UP stair iotyed the p5r TO
mend II: was then alone; Van Brunt came TO the
door while was mending It, and told him 60 away
girls working in his establishment; wa called Kate
by the men after Mr.. Bagley adopted that name IL
customary for the men to come that room at all
hours Of the day and walk In without Knocking thcre
was secret method with regard TO the mixing OF the
gold. which Bagley uscd to do himself but do not
know whether II for that purpose he had this lit
tie room parttioncd OF from the Others when went
to Mr.. Hutchns Office to make the affidavit [ told
him my Catherine H. Lewis. and Mr.. IL wrote
IL Catherine H. Lewis late Catherine u. Rennett; did
not read it-Mr. Hutchins read 1t for me- said no
thing about my husband. nor did tell him was
married; Mr. Bagley told him was; | did not say
him. when he asked my name that Z" suppose must
give the name OF my husband as have been recently
AFFIDAVIT produced; also, the one sworn In Mr.
iIutchns' offcel was often st Gurneys; sat there
three four times for my dsguerreotypc; never
gave any IL them away: have one nj home the 9TH
ers may be at Guruey's; know young gontlcn' n
named Greene; the first time saw him was stand
ing at the street door when he up; there wcrc
daguerreoypes hanging In a frame, and hc asked ne
was not one ~ them Mrs. Bagiey, and said yes he
spoke to me for eight or ten nnutes he told mo he
kept store; vent 10 is store sfsss this converse
tion. and rot shawl from him. did not pay him for
L ru<x m he vi ksuf e
90 with him to the ntir; hd not; won't wear ths;
I never msdc appointment TO meet him. don't
reeoieet meeting him ty appointment; my father did
not know of my acquaintance with this youag msai
AFTER DARK: have him in the market; l used TO
do our marketing In the evening; do not know
Woodoridec; know there was young man named
Andrews In the store with Mr.. Grccns had cnnyer-
sston with him he sad he had acqusnt,nees In Jcr-
sey city, and he would call and said Al So"
he called hut was out never to but iys halle In
my life; this acquaintance with Green. aud AndreNs
occurred In lsts, the ysas after the tran-seion In
questionl have not been promised anything II this
suit succeeds nor have told any tina. have.
John Rutter being examined. depos.d that he knows
mess asked to the general character of Csths-
rine kennstt; but tho Judge saidSrueh evidence
. not n'eossary until ihe defendant had proved her
character to be bad Witness continu-d-I recolcrt
Mr.. nagley bringing Mr. Rennstt and Catherine in his
earrngo TO my house; he treated her in a gcncmauiy
manner; I went TO Mr. Bagley in September. lSts at
the request of Mr.. Cook. Mr Rsnnctt's attorney;
asked him was he aware that Catherine Rcnne.t had
len her fnthcr~ home lie said h. had been told
raid believed her father had -uccccdcd in finding her
aud that ON her mother questioning her -he confessed
that she pregnant by him h. answered. any
one could that he aid he no, u be scared
and that he prepared 60 meet the parties; that
not wish him 20 do SO bu, fhe had any communie,,on
10 make, would bear II to Mr. Rcnnett he said ho
would see Mr. Rennett himsst personally told
him did not think Mr.. Eennstt would sec him
don't think had ever sesn Bagey more than
or twice previous to his coming 20 my house.
Crosg-exnmined by Mr. Edward SANFORD don't
know whether II was visit ~ Mr. Bsgey's or the
Rennstte b. drove them In his esrriege to my house
you supposed L was friendly Wit q Bsssy q Il
npPced " ts very friendly for be TOOK soms brandy
and water With me. ,.ausa.sTJ Am -''"Sa
years; I eonrder Rennctt one Of the mo-, hpue-t
and innocent men that ever lived: trusted LIN
with thousands snd thousands Of dollar.
posed to his going into Mr.. Bagleys for him
occasion when cstharine Rennctt and lady csne
EDWARD s. Rsnnett. Cbrother Of csth.rnel srsmin-
cd Deposed 10 HE sters absence from houie, for two
three weeks he and hL father vent e. look fJr
her his father found her afterwards In Bsgiry oire
heard Bnglsy 10y ne didn't know where shs h"
.o sa'd y, soue 'psni ~" es,y'e ne .ouis DC
poy applied 70 Bsgicy to release him from hi. sp-
prcntccfhp after this trsnssetion and hs would not
thetter produced Bagey handed this letter ~ witness
to give 10 hs father Il was time In December
last fIt was saying he expected TO have soon him
Mr. Bsglcy throwu out of work f,r about mouth
In consequence of the di-rolutioa ~ psrtnershp With
Nessr. Tnith VLe;tsr from Mr. Cook (piaintlds soil
eitor) 10 Mr Baslsy. produced dated iSYcb isio
The evidence for the plaintiff here closed, vith
liberty TO produce tho Doctor who attended at ths
birth ~ the child he not being present
Mr. slo-sen then procesded 90 the case for the
defendsnt who. he said was not from hi. poeltinn,
allowed 60 be witness IN the trial bus he has denied
the truth - the aecu-ation under solemn oath witch
y put In in the pleading; under these eircumstenecs
the jury would -. that there was no witness g.
tradct the rtstsm,nt ~ girl In such particulars
are here dcseribcd He pronounced u, from sr.t TO
last scheme not ony for the purpose % destroying
the dsfendant character hut ~ hching from him hi-
means. Cuunsrl then stated that On application
made by the plaintiff before police justice 10 siise
the child upon Raglcy, which. upon evidence bsing
offered by the defendant dismissed. Mr. slo.-cn
here went Into statement q what the defendant In
tended to prove; they would bring witnesses who
would depo-e 20 the general lghtnc+- of the xirl'-
character 60 her ndsceney and certain arts iescbcd
by council which would prove that she not
modest girl before she won't 60 Bagley'.. Two Wit
would prove that they wcru Intimately familiar
with her about the time o the alleged od.uce n lag
ley and the inference would be that the child the