New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-10-02

duv 94hcurs then relieved by reEu ar pc tnsf
no kept thsi tower otvscances or absences
themselves every DAY the sIsoubouIe my orders from
II, captain 10 repor. myself every day. have oucs
b. eu called Ward duly, but did not gpby the advice
OF Nj al deracn eni aud asked bis advice the Chief
a. Police required I'll dets ed 10 report themselves for
duly New Years Eight; went 10 Mr. Anderson ADD asked
,frrs and he a6yised e not to leave The tower left
he Jt deftop Meb To weF in December, 1885, war mo-
sd by he captain my self Al the s'ston house
fr palToI dut, informed the Chief Engineer next day,
yed the crder hs slirg on wa, noi al my own
Fugse'roD hui YER much agau,t my III idit u
find outfe OF my TemoVsl or VINO oloiIi henIy
Bailbtn sueceeotd me- have mol been on may to%e
an he on; wsH on TIA! tower in SEPTEMBER ou'
Cress E1omi1td y have bsen policeman l!t.s over
I've wears hsve bten fireman; have served atogeneE
about four Yeas; have Known Nj Canon 10 or II Yeas
k1ew bic sce; have known him perrcrsy or years
duI't krs w whether be knew ~sa pohce,nsni lsaw
bin On Jefers several es and on Union tower
everbl ules; be here business attending 70 me
hell the rigging OF III ho never made shy compeih ~
pct scquain,ed with Haniphsn In The frsi place while
lupring 10 ffes he told nee be wRS beIFn8er AZ Union
hrflef; can't ssy whether my son had beeu fireman
sRreree ha, old me he had been fireman during the
.ua | did that extra duty don't Know ms mere ~Hs
my fslufe to give sn alarm; the only fHuIe VS.
the 1lhrr man Ts8 Sephsp Lsmsn aegson, Oo
Roche ard 8atarge | should conIider were nesher
velyc ecale Que son teher know that either OF
'ht pep cleo he du,s don't know that theJ dlai
teere answering whether bsve ever neg ecea ply guy
Did coIdiDg the q my ability don't thlak any
policemen do he duy there Yves DO negiec' IN ae rug
thai Of IN giving RIArm 81 lpSt l0NeEi no
Roche left because the Alderman aod Assistant iorgoto
spport him when his lime ran out Laughter DOM Know
"hether any one IS appointed In bla place d,o no re-
III Eighth Ward; the only person that olG OF ihe va
arson thai was or dsys after the vacancy
ctnl recollect M CsrsonS repy over week aer that
Mr. Bararge came IL wss In the Summer nme whle vas
stJt eigoD Market doli know any Instance when h- BEL
rave aEr fer lie Cd district whenl The FIRE In The 9Th
iecollec Of their srAiDg ne when the hre vas IN me
6h have dor myaelf; struck Two v hen lhe hre WAS 10
HI Sd have Known 1t TO be done In other pssnces; Then
hy Il because he hT6 was go nRu me
Inc thai il a. Impossible 10 tel. Ehich diaulct u wsa
In The OF tho other persons think was pretty nls
he anne IN bal hey call 11 nn anGw
LegnPerce IIhiuk from liquor In 1886; hinS
the fire In Vacks the bell airucE SIX when ought
[A!d Wood here remarked that the investigation oughi
10 corfF I'd to the period OF Mr Carsous official efm
and ihatit had no hing TO do with lhe eySIsm
Dir ect ,esumtd Il did not think Inst there was any I'M
proper person at Union MARKET but al Jsaerson
Aid. Wood asked the witness 10 conhne hmsoi 70 me
D;reet r.spnfd AT Jt f5rson Market known Improper
pelsont The duly, not for 'hst ther
10 do their duty nuicen used TO
call II hospital have known men to be on there 80 pei
ruperp who drank when that never knew st are
10 rjpp the he'll meant 10 speak for myself although
lave many lin not furg myseif have Known men lua1
con-, krow whether they bad been hfemeni ara now
speaking of tboae who had been my partners =,
Cv0setr0 lined The iDcom peient persons bpoae ~
vsre eraon ket about December 1916 Az don't
rscoec whether aver tod anything about nese sce u
MT Carson or TO Mr. cls before; have spoken OF tnen
TO other persons; the fscts got out
she exsmin alton this witness having concluded some
dscuaou epsued as to the limit of the investigation, Mr.
Brady de.7ng 10 confne 1t 10 The positive special charges
and MI Clark contendine should be much broader
embracing In fact the system OF buslneslof the epaft
men 40 far as The Aldermen and officers mplcasd were
concerned. with suggestion that this matter should OF
.eiled al the next meeting, the joint Committee
Adjourned to Wedr eiday evening (today) att o'clocs