New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-08-09

iron he peope - yet more ~
svo.I o. h- pun lp-s ~ or g-l'n " lznol
"a r.sv greatly eDoro b-rcefs' AAa ~ u - l.s
rt. s-..u o from ne ee-lts t1il nsfe 80 s-@
!, cetd ar usr, also 90 10 is-in pr -
reason ior rrsuu-- ~ COO 'bd 81 49, -. -.
tosto ue aofli tal .aOa den aod 81 every An-f
Ican crz-D 10 ul ct snefsi's 20 pfsseif7 OH iH'-
Tt,i re.os-t'ni'y "a TIE American Minister At
ih, Cou 10 cause he proc,ecu - 81 Ibis n-epDg 20 D.
,psse on 90 he records Of The LsgAnon snd ~ be Puo'a
$ nav . hi'e deeply vh h: f.y o. Gene
rs Tsy or 10 tf.r e,n, aud request cur Minister 70
uaLfuig copy d llsse resoluuorsto Aem
TIE lew Outstion In The House OF Commons.
In the house Of Commons, on Fnday, the @o'h
ut the Speaker tJok the Chair az IL o CLOCK
Mr. w o Stanley took the osths and bis seat Tor
the City Of Chester in the place OF Sir John Jervh
appointed Chief Justice Of the Common Pleas I'm
rnecistey after Sir K. lDgis presented petition
from Bath sgAintt the admission OF Jews mo faf-
lament, u Oh wGs received with derslve cheers
fr, M the Ministerial benches but with much ap-
plGuse from the opposition benches. Exactly al
quarter past twelve O'Clock Baron hothschild pre-
scented himself at the bar, and advanced u the Ia
bic beta cen Mr.. }. A. Smith and sir. w. z. Wood,
and having presented his qualification, which was
accepted be said, desire 10 be sworn upon me
Old Testament At the request Of the Speakerthe
Baron withdrew, taking bis seat under the SPEAK
ers gallery he was frequently aitersard in COM
municstion with different members, and parsieu-
larly with Lord J. H0sselL Sir X lngiisimmediateiy
rose and said that ever since that Houie ha1 Oeen
a Christian Legislature no man had ever prssumed
he used the word without ofense-to oner =
take bis scat without taxing the solemn oAtas Ia
the usme OF our common Hcdeemsr. be sh)lid
have OH cted 70 LIE B lons taking his seat even
il he bad offered o be sWom on me B'5lc. Ai.er
some further obke vstilns, the Hon roneg coz
GUIDED BY MOVING mat Baron hOthscnllds htFing
d. anded TO tase his seat Ia TINS House, aud q De
sworn upon the Old Testament the House rcilsc
to alter the form Of taking the oath. Much excite
ment prevailed during Tho Hon. Baronels speech
The Att.rney General, without expressing any
opinion upon the question, suggested that the
same course should be taken as was taken 10 Tbs
case Of Mr. O Council when be applied 10 take his
Sc at for the County q Clare; and ne woud move,
as an amendment that Baron R0ibschild De hesri
ct the bar by himself, bis counsel or agents. In res
pc CT to his claim TO sit and vote in Parliament upon
iaki g the oaths on the Old Testament Nj. Z.
Wood cOnteBded that the amendment dill not meet
the case, ard said that there was no need OF the
House being informed upon the question oy ooun-
sell because no Jew vas prevented by law from
taking oatbs upon the Old Testament be should
therefore vote both against the motion and the
amendment Afr. 8 WOrtley said he had always
supported the admission Of Jews into Parliament,
that he protested against the House being taken
either by storm or surprise he would move that
the debate beiadjOurDod 10 aford time FOR further
consideration. Lord J. Russell considered the pro
pCsa for Bn I'D urnment TO be reasonable and con-
sistent with the character Of the House, which
ought not TO decide question Of 80 much import
ance without due elaboration, at the same time he
considered that the san course ought 20 be taken
in this Gaze as ia that Of Mr. D COnne s-a course
which would by 10 means prejudice the case OF
Baron Rotbschid. He hoped that du time would
be taken Tor elaboration, and day fixed fo5 far
lber discussion which would be convenient TO the
Baron.
Sir b. Hall blamed the Government for delay in
the settlement u the question, and said TIE cleo
tors Of London would longer DC trihsd with
Mr.. Ans,ey urged that the object OF the Attorney.
Generals motion, and the motion for an adjourn-
n ent, was 10y mutual understanding TO throV the
question cut TIL next session. The present Parlia
INT might not then be in existence, so tna; II II
v ere dissolved without having settled this q1ss-
ton, itwould be always liable 70 the charge OF neg
lect Of duty. Mr.. Newdegate condemned the az
tempt 10 iCrce on decision az extremely objec
tOnsbe in point Of precedence and character. tie
had supported an adjournment Of any conclusion
uIon the question till next session, az proposed by
Lord John Russell on Monday last NJ. Osborne,
IN rafting speech, warmly assaiiel the conda-t
CT Lord John Kussell on this BILL totally uuwJr-
Thy Of bis character, and said Ii the Jews had NOT
been a all body he would DO. have ven,ured
upon such policy. An understanding hal been
entered into between toe Glyernment eud Mf.
" pole 70 postpone the decision Of the question.
Ar. " Bipole SAID nS haQ entered into no arrange
meIt. (Cheers) Mr. Osborne, amid much cheer.
ing urged the friends Of progress not to be dragged
81 the wheels Of any equyoca,ng Government by
conserving 10 any further delay. he asked the
Speaker whether he was empowered TO administer
tie oath 10 Baron ROihschild in the House the
same s. the Judges had to Jews in courts OF jas
t-e.
The Speaker, in reply, said the result would 10.
depend upon his answer to the question; bat be
had no objection to ssy tina, he would not permit
any alteration 10 be made In the usual moFe OF al.
the oath. except by the authority Of the
House.
Nr GoulburD, in long speech urged the propd-
ely OF further consideration, and supported the I'd.
journmsbt.
Mr. Aglionby advised, for the sake OF all parties,
that the debate be adjourned without a division,
but insisted that there was no necessity to hear
Baron Hothschild himself
Sir +. Thesiger supported the adjournment aud
urged the proPriety Of the whole question being
discussed when the debate was resumed.
Mr. Hume called upon Government 70 withdraw
the amendment, and that counsel be called in he
81 d, In that case be would support the adjourn.
rent OF the debate. He accused the Government |
II deliberate intention OF insulting the citizens OF
London, through Baron Roihschid by delaying |
ncussion upon the question Of bis admission.
Lord J. Russell, 10 explanation said, the motion |
proposed by the Attorney General would give the /
Baron an option OF appearing by counsel or no..
Mr.. Hume said that be did not wish 70 appear, /
and suggested that he should be asked the cues
ion. After few words from NJ Walpoe, Mr. /
W. ?. Wood. on the part OF the Baron, said be
p as authorised 10 state that the Baron had no wish
10 be heard by counsel upod the question before
he House, which vas, whether be would take the
path, containing the words upon the true faith Of
A Christian After few words from Mr. Stew.
.rt, the Attorney General said he would willingly
"lIndrAW his amendment whenever the debate
vas adjourned. Sir J. Graham said he considered
he motion Of the Attorney General as withdraw,
md advised the friends Of Baron Rothschid no. %
oppose the adjournment upon so grave question.
some desultory conversation took place sf;er
which the debate Was adjourned. An uproariouI
discussion then took place 70 ihe day upon which