New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-10-11
LAW COURTS.

THuasDAYi Oct 10.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT The District
yueee Of Correction Judge Judicu) has this
diect for snort lime With ys~ aid IN clssri1g OF
he etstdar hch has hecr unusually heavy cvtns 70
he recent lndlspositon oflhe Judge OF his district The
following csseA were ui-d before him
"a u uei A Wicket, executor &c g, ssmuelW socur
suIYlYor &C This libel filed Is years ago b7 )hn
We'e welt owner Of the big Lesuds, against Nahsni
Putnam and Samuel w SlOcum, part owner OF hs fhip
,n5 G tcoys[ csmags' for Dy to the brig whs
10, and Tie tide sweeping the ship sgnrs The big The
amount claimed Is smsl, buI The costs probably, viii be
heavy fhe liheans died and tie case Lay dormant for
ssyerAi yearl Decree TO- ibsls1 to BE referred
s'n smount For Hbelsnt, Ness Burr, Benedict Bebse
For dtlsnd1tS, Ae,srs SlurieyBnt al d Marsh.
fixtures ordered.
Some quits sgsns baik Superb were given IL favor OF
Ub-lenla.
The stfGaboa Co~merce ads Aatsh,io gassar-In
sun 10 recover SLIGO loi' sustained By the Commerce
comlT In collision With ard Snkpg the sloop Index in
the Hudson river. decree made for hslsnts aud
aTefeIetce 10 ascertain damase. fhs up
al owed more damages than had been clsed -Ars umen
vas heard Mi Van SsntTo ord Tor appeal and Af G. c.
Benedict oppoted.
SUPREME CoURT--G enerai 7 orm-J Join
Brouner, ads. Henry Cohsa!-Rghi or ockho doris "A
suit wF5 brought lime aimee In S13stior Court
cover $3.50 peualJ uncer the following p1Ta!9n OF he
sAtute
che hook CT bGoss Of ary incorporated COMPANY Of
TIL, Stale in hch The transfer Of tiscE sry compa
bs be reetered epd the books containing the
OF tie EccL holders D. any ouch Goa csuT s.a al ali res-
fonable tin.n ouru he uGus honrs OF ransscting bus
ness he open 10 Inc examination OF every lockho der Of
such Cor5sn7 for 50 ds9s previous to any eection Of d.
recora: ard ii any officer Dsvng crsrge Of any books
ihs upon demand by stockholder a; Aforesaid, fefse
neglect 10 exhibit such books or permit hen 10 be- e1a
mir ed aid he SHALL for every such of forfeit
the OF $3.50 the noety thereof The Of The
people Of hif etae, and the other m1ieg to him who Win
for the ssme 10 be recovered by SETON If debt In any
court ofrecofd .oSe her wi the costs of such ut Rev.
Staut7s % ed 6e3
the Esat River Mutual II Company, Nj Co.
ihesl 'tochhoder Che latter applied for lave, pfa7ous
10 election, to the rausfer book which shown
him and he commenced taking copy oflhe names when
Ar ihu the look, end prohibited htm taking copy
subsequently application WIS., msde with Ike effect Mr.
as3 ng Ar G. had no right 10 Act to look except at hn
name, but he might lock 1t tbs books, bu aot 2Se
COPIES This repeated four FIVE iimeB Mr. g. OolnG
ntorred TO the penalty hut hs ss he had tassn advice
but slated in The superior Court the Judge
been forfeited and verdict rendered accordingyfhe pre-
seni lie appeal
Mr. Dillon, or behalf Of Ar. BFowner, coniended that's
Atocihoder has right TO look beyond bis own name
while Mr.. Thompson, for Mr. urged, that Htockhol.
der has full hight TO examine The oooka and ne plea'sS
take copeE Decision reversed
COURT OF Common PLEAs-B efore Jajge Ingra.
hsm.~Edunrd B. Child vs Fnldin1 Cant BY The Pu0'
Iher Of he Lad1 0pn aPsns ihe superintendent OF the
binding department al the Trect Houss for alleged msi'
cloun prosecution already refened TO
This cese was Concluded and given to th' Jury. ar
Brety defense contended that The testimony showed
The eTices in Ire Lads O,oa moi on be untrue but the
to have been 1ndeseryed referred The fact
OF The occasion hich E G. tookhol1 ola young a1Y
put her out amer She said she would publish MIN
he IS years he has been supentendent-aS much In ME
conended that tho verdict ahoud 5e for defend
AMI. v.
f Bryan, behalf Of plaintiff, commended that SUN len
bad been shown In The eanony to authorize lhe pq9ica
ions in question snd hat the prosecutions were malicious
&c The question for he Jury H. he same as The case
Rad been ed before The Recorder Whistler tho pI6lca.
ors lrue and had with good noIiTes and nothaoe
ends Sealed verde. this forenoon. ,,-
Before Judge DAILY August Froost vs. hermann
cion for elege SANDER already retef ed
to- Verdict for plaintiff e25, which carries Ike amount
Thomas j. Parker VS.. I'm. Dunlap-Ro recover $50,
alleged to be dus DErteepe and book keeper at Dun
jrp,s Hotel in Fuon,t Tho defense is that nothing is
duets plsiDif wishing 10 learn the business OF mar
keeper for three months Without salary Waich
par OF the me chargedhal be never was bar. keeper
and has been overpaid-besde which, he WAS great
inu,y 10 BY OF lot. and conss
que nj inability perform his duty &c To be laInned
his forenoon. For pf AeSsrE Southa!d and Cochran
For fdt. lBe:Ts Strahan snd French. y, az,
Special Term-B efore Judge WoodFuit-lFtG
liam u alians IS Eliza Jane HiAilmsTba was an &C
lion for divorce, in which decree ai entered Tor p
tiff by defendant Mrs w. Gomez H. asking tdsl me
procredr % vacated and she allowed 10 defend The
application OF posed. Motion denied.