New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-08-12
LAW COU rs.

COURT oR GENERAL SESSIONS -FrIddy-Be-
fore the Recorder and Aid. Haws and Ball
Plea Of GuiAy.-Jos. Marshall plead guilty to a
petit larceny on an Indictment charging him with
burglary in the third degree. At the suggestion
o counsel for the prosecution, the Court suspend
ed Judgment.
Grand Larceny-Wm. II. Arnold was tried on
q charge OF having, on the 18th Of July last, stoea
$50 hAndkerchieis, valued at sl45, the property Of
RObt. s Noyes. The evidence adduced Of a lar.
ceny having been committed was conclusive, bat
ss il did mol appear that more than s25 worth Of
the property was taken at one time, be wa found
guilty Of petit larceny, and sentenced 10 the Psni-
Tertiary for months
Grand Larceny Eliza Murphy was tried for
stealing $50 from her employer Mrs. Mehan. The
money was not found upon her person, and no ev
idence WIS adduced to prove directly that she
stole it. 6he WAS, however proved TO be guilty OF
stealing a bonnet, shawl, &c. and was convicted
Of petit larceny and sentenced 10 the Penitenhry
for three months.
Burglary ia the First Dergee Charles Fairchid
was tried for burglary in the irss degree in hav-
ing on the llh July last broken into the premises
of w. w Osborne, 27s Grandst. and stealing
thereirom property valued at $40. Ii appeared In
evidence that the prisoner and man named
Adams lvho escaped from the Courtroom on
ThuIsdsy) were observed by officers Campbell aud
Brown at the corner of Christie and Grand ats.
with lot Of clothing in their possession. Upon
being arrested, the prisoner fought desperately
and wounded officer Brown. The Jury rendered
a verdict Of guilty, aud he was sentenced 70 the
State Prison At hard labor for 20 years
Pea of Guihy.-Catherine O'Nel pleaded
guilty 10 q grand larceny, in having stolen s54
from man Dsmed Richard Smith, on the 7th OF
July lalt. She was sentenced by the Court 10 two
years Imprisonment in the State Prison Ad-
jOuned.
COURT OF CosAos PLEAs-Saturday-Speoia
Tam-Beiore Judge Daly.-EmlAId Sanueis, By
her Hext freHd, against Judah or James SGmusls-
Action for divorce on the ground OF non msInte-
nance and III treatment Plaintiff AYERS that 10 lS49,
she being at the time q widow, having one hid,
abe ntermaried with defendant-lhat at the time
Of her marriage g. had considerable personal pro-
perty-,hat after the said marriage the said defen-
dtnt ceased TO pursue his usual employment OBJ
tanned her private property, and reduced her 10 the
necessity when sick, Of selling some necessary ar
ticles OF furniture for malnten ance-thaI he mas
used violent language toward her, and on one &C
casion threatened to strike her with knife-that
bis business is that Of tailor and he has been em-
plOytd na cutter, and could make, II he chose TO
work, by bis said business as cutter, $50 week.
She prays for divorce, as set forth in the BILL Toe
subject was referred, and the Referee reported IN
favor of divorce. Decree OF divorce granted from
bed and board, sgreesby to the statute, for ever
the parties being At liberty TO apply hereafter tor
modification Of this order and the plaintiff also 10
is a, liberty to apply for an allowance from defen-
dant for Der maintenance.
Habeds Corpus A writ was sued out by Theo
dore Z. Putnam directed 20 )hn 4. and Ann w oof-
head and Mary Ann Pansm, requiring them 70
produce the person Of Theodore A. Putnam, little
boy five or Elk years of age Of whom the said Fheo
core L. lis father claims the care and custody. IL
appears that suit was entered some months since
BY Mrs. Mary Ann Putnam against her husband,
Theodore for divorce and a. injunction was al
lowed st the time restraining Mr. z. the father,
from interfering with the child, which was In the
custody Of its mother, who with the child, resided
with her father and mother Mr.. and Mrs. Wood
head. On Friday morning Lass Mr. Putnam obtain
ed an order from Judge Edm1nds removing the IN
unc;ion-the friends Of the mother hearing OF II,
the child was take oh somewhere, l. was said, BY
its mother on Friday, and the present VIII was 49,
,ued by Mr. Putnam requiring her and her father
and mother The parties tppear 10 be highly re-
spectsble bat these family quarels, 10 the sor-
row Of ell round, will unfortunately come in
10 produce IT, Mrs.. Putnam, on the officer serving
the writ was Tot 10 be found, but Il was served on
Mr. and Mrs. w. The latter feeling, probably,
tha. refusal belonged TO ladies prerogasive, tod
the ofEser, il was said by counsel, II at she wO1ld
not come for al the judges in New-Yo,h. sir
Wooohesd appeared, and made affidavit that ne
knew nothing Is 10 where the child is-it had been
residing at his house with It's mother FOR the laSt
ten months, Until Friday morning. when it left, and
be does not know where 10 is, nor has he any con-
trol over IL
1t would seem, from the testimony OF Dr.. Under
bill, re alive Of the child, Ms aderhlll and
Mrs Woodhead being sisters thatsome little ruse
bad been employed BY the ladies Of Mr.. w FAINT
" 10 get Mr. p. and bis friends OF the track. Dr..
&. in answer to questions. admitted ths. Mrs.
Wooohead and 4 young man, her son, came to bis
hcuse in q c.Iriageon Frday-he did not see them
get oat Of the carriage nor re-eDter it-does not
Know that the chud was in the carriage and taken
into his house-beeves Is vas not.
Onfurther questions the Doctor stated somewhat
uawIingly, having previously inquired Of :he
counsel. that Ms. Underhill informed him that
something had been taken from the carriage TO the
house, but il was not child-it was fe.tner Pl'
low. with shaxs wrapped round l. rhis an
pourcenent az may be Supposed. created some rs
lie smiling, and 70 some Of the parties, probably, dis
appointment Does not know Why Ms W par
tcularly came TO Mrs Underhils unless o.lns
sisters, she thought she had 4 right 70 some hfie
| liberty Witness does not know where the child
| IL, rOr where Mrs Putnam IL.
was stated BY counsel that While Ms Wood
tsT5 ,rS her saa wen. 10 ora csr.iace. win what