The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1850-05-17

es in England has been. IT. 10 increase manufactures
and exports I'd. i has had tendency to increase the
prices Of manufactured goods 3D. the large exports have
been attended by the usual consequence yz large i'm
pors) in England. precisely as they have in this
country; and, 4h, 10 reduction OF the prices Of
produce. The grand result is as stated by the writer
whom we have quoted thai he cork people Of Eng
land are selling dear and buying asap-precisely the
same results produced there here by system OF low
duties The agricultural classes, who in England
the monopolis protected classes alone complain.
The manufacturing classes. who are the monopolisi
classes here, complain, but without having much
cause In both countries the unprotected and labonng
MANY benefited instead OF the monopolist and pro-
tecied Few.
But the system OF low duties producing another and
greater result rapidly converting Grsat Britain
info republic, in which all titles and privileges win be
destroyed. and all classes reduced to the same level 80
far political rights concerned The writer above
quoted says the reduction Of the prices Of agricultural
products has caused the agricultural classes 10 reflect
and come to the conclusion that English soil, however
prolific il may be, cannot pay the rents and
prncey revenues to landowners, many of them deriving
their titles from the violent intrusion Of their ancestors
in the feuda ages and holding them without adequate
consideration. Should the system Of low duties con-
nue. giving to the people Of England cheap food this
process Of thought will 60 on, only among the agr
cultural classes, but among all Others until revolution
in the tenures Of landed property effected rents re-
duced restraints upon the alienation Of land removed
enance from the lfebood OF the labor Of the country
~
PEELED to engage in useful and profitable business and
thus to earn, like other people. an honest living.
Such are the glorious effects which The system Of low
duties producing in England II is democrafiSing the
people and reYublcaniring the government if we may
be permitted to coin words with which express
emphatcaly meaning. We do not, therefore, won
der that the astocracy Of England making death
struggle procure the repeal Of the present popular low
revenue system Of their country Nor do wonder tha,
the monopoist classes in this country are making an
effort TO procure the repeal OF low-revenue system
The English systematic system of the radical Golden
stands in the way of the arsocratc monoposs OF that
country. and system stands in the way OF the would
be ans,ocrats and monopolists Of this country. Both
systems however, showerng daily benefits upon the
laborng and producing classes of both countries, who
win never consent to their repeal
The Gaiphin Cabinet votiag issslr Good Enough AS
10 H."
We have heard great DEAL and seen a great deal in
the wing newspapers. from time 10 time. about voting
yourself farm" Such a disposition to agrarianism
however, has been ascnbed by the whg press, BY way
OF contumey, to democrats But we never heard OF q
democratic cabinet. after due debeon in solemn
cave, voting itself good enough it is for the party
that put in power when that party desired to have
go out But the following extract which copy from
Washington correspondent Of the New York Express,
indicates pretty clearly that the present cabinet have done
that very thing The writer. under date of the 18th in
stant says:
There cabinet meeting yesterday, understand.
take into consideration what best be done in
Of the growing dissatisfaction among many Of the wings
here
The conclusion arrived at have the best reason be-
eve, was, that "rHERE COMPLAINT
cARrKT" individually in the aggregate.
The Presideai IL said, xooUIEscED in
the verdict
Therefore, the probability is, there will be nochange
the cabinet for the But the fact that such consul
has been held and that such compliment conclusion
has been arrived producing breeze Of doors thai
may ripen into squan by -andby
Thus the Gaphn cabinet has voted itself good enough
for its party and the country. as it is" and its usous
chief has proclaimed the fact in due form the world II
the proclamation somewhat resembles consus
eqat commanding faith and credit to be given to fune
tonay whose official existence would otherwise not be
recognised The Gaphn cabinet may, therefore, hence
forth be regarded "xed fact" The administration OF
John Tyler had its fixed facts and why should no, thai
Of General Taylor! They are like each other in one re-
speei, viz: the former had not, has the latter
national party to back it They differ however. in this
that Mr. Tylers administration respectable for abil-
ify and democratic in much OF IFS poey whereas Cen