New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1850-03-16

| n - IN NJ
ssIess6 sssTsls vermont sssry MOneg s.oas DO
Rsebard Albert Jerhsns New jersey KoSen 90.
a b Msry.And DAVID "a. New York CT; HsaTy 81
ssxni Wsr- Broolns Col NY Joaa Wsangtoa "l-NiA
! e~-Jerssy.
TIE graduates then received diplomas afer waien
Dr. Wsts delivered AZ address tie importance Of ne
1nues which ibey Lad Gov entered supper COZ
! elaoed The ceremonies
CoMPLNEx1 70 CArT WILSON, Thursday
Car. J D wilson. q he f.vonte steamer Empire Cry
reeeivea con.ugnnent Which 10 l@ss crecAole %
Hose WHO oes.ogrss IT, tasn % he worthy oeer foT whom
i wa dss zned TIE ceremony iook pscs oa poaTa -
SIN Aner psyisking = collation., Capt Bskef rose and
ssed hat be hsd beer ore Of the Pa.sengsT Wio no
shared 10 care eId kindness q CAPT "Ason Dung -
recent voyage frol Caagres ue De HSa been 7c'ea
By seVersl q rs feo psssengers 20 present silver
trumpet which be had the honor 20 produce % Capt WI
80, a. Sigh, okea Of their nga scmrs1sn Of -i a.
D.virs.or ard mar. Re then handed 70 Capt " Hcs
sperdia and cprous'y.wr0ugti trumpet made BY Bal
ToaDknsk B.sck covered with sketches Of ;ropc4
gu, borasrsd wh rca scrolls, ana on re one s1e va
TIE following Inscription
Pr-sea,,s % ca7-J y wa's'. %, Oh. ''-,r bog. ra
| Nsr.t -.
On ne opposite .ids wac he following.
D. .. C-s- Foss Csp, JON G. Bal. J,sa A. D.rs Gee
s..,f B-sbD- Ps.2s. Jsa-, hossh seriaa A ORE
/ Eor tsPt Jseoo +" h. cert Z r ac.-r.sn ca ~, ="
A Z l-ss'ot. G.o-s- - Tloap.or ~ p Mons.
Tae gallant Captain received il with The following aP-
prophete remarks
fee deeply and .elsbiy he high compliment you arr
besto"ing upon ne, and u i far 70 presume ls a.
privileged ron ibs tine forward, 20 bio" ny O"a u-
Pc, and II 90 hope hat rs ogdesi tones may pioean
The praises Of my generous heod' who are A'osy CO.
fe.ng roa me valuable and beelaiul token OF Their re-
CARDS Gentlemen, uu.i shan have DE pleasure o.
meeting yov sgzn, aDd when DO uis moment WI fs'ei
| % ny thoughts, - one o. promo sau'iscion
| CORR CALESDAR-Ths Dsy.-Ctreuu CENT
1 Qrf az
ss, ST ~ 81, s75 j7i s7s 81 @ ~ 81 3d. ~ 'e
| BOARD Of SUrEFvIsORs-Tms Board met yet
terdsy afternoon principally with New 10 he resolution
approving o. he project 10 'he cmias code az 70 ne ec-
Com. S,iesa Of ,1ees seasons when va sdopie5 sfer
argument with dnen's. The plan Is 70 hsve g. ed
uOnsl Judge be called the City judge, viii concurrent
criminal powers win the RscOrder-and the holding, f
stead Of the Special Sessions Conf twice week A. csc1
he election Of me City Judge IN January next y sp-cs
Jasuoe and two Alderman and after ih,l BY ne CRY judge
| and two Aldermen
CoUKr oF CovroS PLEAs-Ia Chomjer-Be
| fore Judge rgrshsn Hs5ess Corpls-yohH Fer1ia 70
John Ed,oa,l md Application by Mr r. requiring
Mrs ?. his wife, and asO Mr. and Mrs Edwards Mrs IS
ahef and mother 70 produce The persons oihs two c
ody III and Mfs r Young persons natives Of Lon
donhey sent for last year by Mr. Ecwards and
rived nj New FORK Ia he shin German ATE, rss1Dr n
gener at Housekeeping about three months, in Nancs 81
we believe, Mrs tOos her Two children. and went 10 her
'abeTsnd the three have since resided with he fsre
and be- family MT IL employed clerk a. an esRh
ishmeni in ths civ To entered ts proceeding ge
possssson Of his Children which resisted each psi
averrng oufness 10 the other which does not appear o.
have been sustained by proof
The following extracts from the opinion OF the Judge
given yesterday IA rcndtfDg bis decision 70 whether De
father mother should have the children.
10 this case the reaor and bis wife sre vNg sepsrsfe
and spnfi from each ouer IA coUse Of DIE
which has psce shs las The children sought 10 oe
obtained under ie VIII Ia her possession, OF whom
three YEAR, and ire other wear Of se The per.cs
alteration bei"esh ne icalof on NE one side' ara hs -
and her family the other have led mutual recurnu
uOns which have been brought up the present ou
The isiheT has q right no doubt, by common law. 10
tue and custody Of his children but Courts ~
their acon on such cases nfe governed IN great degree
ny what VIII be for the happiness and welfare Of the chill
dren themselves.
TIE age OF these children Is such as to r-l..
der highly necessary Inst they should have nohers
care. and 20 take The youngest especially from her
lime would be N Judgment injurious to the child
pefhaps fsa 70 lie existence and especi4y when
from the situation Of the resor in Ibis country be having
40 female relatives TO whom the Of such children could
be conhded. Adopting tlC conclusion that there
nothing shown the par OF Tho wife ofuuf ness s 20
conduct OF charac,er er ihe Of these CHILDREN au3
believing that their waiHre viii be promoted for toe pre-
sent by leaving them under mohers care am Of Of'r
on that the discretion vested In by hs statute l regard
20 their disposition will be best exercised by leaving ih
for The present In her charge The sher should be allow.
sd 10 see them al reasonable times and refused remedy
may behereaer directed In cOncluding these
remarks cannot avoid suggesting he parties the pro-
puely Of settling the family difficulties between them
which appear 10 have arisen from TRIES and which duo
regard to their own nieress and The welfare Of their
children, render highly necessary, aud especially does
II concern the mother Of these children If She he
=
mat The reasons which dictate the present dec,sou viii uo
always exist
The parties and their friends aud the children were pre-.
sent and deep feeling Of JOY (which produced ,ears) on
he one hand, and OF sorrow on Ihe other, o5ser
Before Judge Woodrua--IiooeQ, jane, & Co. Vs. T.os
T~mIyd Mr. and some Of his friends being in London
action Is brought In defense want OF consideTnn snd
aso the statute 81 limitation up apPeared
niece o. Mr purchased for her use OF The exer
sVe house plaintiffs 10 London, sire being thereon credit
various goods thai she subsequently became married
gsausmsa ~hS og s"' ~ e9nsr9a,nse oi hls ma'lage
TO prevent appreheuded proceedings against the husband
for the debt gave The acceptance IN question expecungs
said TO be refunded ty The husband In the
Tense it is said that Mr. did not New from
Europe TIL lsf after which he resided tor years
NewJersey, and had not resided IN NewYork above
or three years wheu the suit was commenced.
The Court charged that between drawer ard accepor
swsn' OF consideration IN dfuh may be shown the same
as IN note, but devoives upon the defendant show
that there no consoeaaonaa sccegtan for the
c0innodaon OF ihe drawer given simply Tor snecc
den, debl of i!d party would show Of consI.
.rauon-hut II the acceptance given 20 prevent
against third parry that Is sufficient consideration 90
uake tie acceptance valid Verdict EOS plaintiffs including
and Irving For defendant mr { " SandfoIS S''s
Special Tern ecisions.-Rosanaa Gasio,d against
George Goso'drhs case was reioricd back Two or three
dNs t.uce Tor additional proof which subse Qaen
taken by ne referee and decree for divorce from tie
| marriage uc granted
CIRCUIT CouRr-Boiore Judge Edw ards .-Akr
Coitsr Sast p Io0Esoad agsinsi Dr. Z Tor a.
eged malicious prosecution, &c already referred TO
defense Of probable put In AMER testimony ha1
been heard nonsu' was asked for and granted
|
| REAL EsrArE-The following shows the {, ans.
actions In .ots Al the Exchange yesterday
Bi A. ). BLEEcKER co-Nar,h DO
lot Sixteenth Avenue r. gstc $500
DO ADJOINING 'n .Veau- 4Seo -----.----- t'"
%. On l,s si,c. =, ;.,6 a.
S a.. ,AAS -''''''--'----'
o. % e',a s,slS, .eo esse.. .-...-..... .i''