The New York herald., 1850-03-13

forgotten there was West: Bat thefe 10 . Wsst-s
esnservstvs wsst-whsrs the spirit Of naticism doss
not walk abroad unbridlea. They bslievs that this
Of Mexico slavery was abolished They believe that
slavery existed there 1t does In the American
character between man and man. we're never repealed
and win remain in full force until altered BY the new
sovereign II he was right there is NO nscsssty for
tuition NOV. or .s any other time TSs North and South
csn meet on the platform of the democratic party
non intsIvention. y He expected no union with any
party who have always been forward In their countys
welfare and It that party that acquired the terri.
been strict cosstluotioni:t: and the larger part
being democrats, they have ct most always been
suecessful In obtaining political power In the
have succeeded had II not been for the West who I'd.
vocste the old republican doctrine Of State rights and
Mann q rsasonabls ana said that il wa: good thing
that General Jac5son was not alive. He did not be-
nsvs that the Union vas going to b dissolved. All
people Of hi; State undsrstood on
or prohibit it, but wherever they undsrtsSs to protect
property they are bound to protect slaves - well -
Mr.. GoEMAs would not consent to the Missouri oom.
promise He would not vote for slavery slavery,
the other side Of that line. He would trust
themselves anything against their own welfare and
opinions Il they & in their psi;n.ry mssting:,
1t is amongst them, that Is their businsss.-
He repeated he would not vote for the Missouri
compromiss line, because he was . non interven-
~ understood them fsrcibe resistance. As .
lawyer, he understood that when person 10 engaged
in an overt act 1t becomes treason. The Western
undertake to resist by force the constitution OF the
country. Organize your territory without restriction
to them Let California be admitted with proper boun-
daries, as shs is The South cannot consistently
reject her Come up and get rid Of another bone Of
contention. Settle the question OF the boundary Of
Texas Abolish the slave trade in the District OF Co
Iumbis There is not Southern but will do this
in connection with the settlement Of the other quss-
tien
Mr. BUTLER, (whig) Of Connecticut noticed the oh.
lection to the admission Of that she not
regularly organized. He would ask, there had been
clause in her constitution permitting slavery whether
Southern men would 60 against the admission! The
the government was formed there was no North and
South The latter however raised the issue slavery
to aggrandizs themselves It WAS admitted in the
Southern address and in arguments this floor that
every thing quiet until 1885 After that time the
South brought Florida into the Union, annexed
Texas, and by hook or crook, must rob Mexico, to
acquire more slave territory If the South had not
shown and practised this principle OF
there would not nov be free soer or Aboitionst In
the North He would vote for the provso whenever
up 1t was not necessary to tell the House that
1t unwise and humSug Can any Southern gen.
emau deny that the SOUTH for the last fifteen years
have eought for territoty to extend slavery?
Mr McMuLLEN, (dem.) Of Virginia, asked whether
the gentleman thought that slavery does not exist In
California?
Mr. BurLER-I most relisiously believe that slavery
does not exist in California
Mr. McNuLLEN-If Ii IL does not exist there, why do
You propose rupsrhuous legislation! Why insist on tn
odious proviso?
Mr. BurLER-Because | think that gentlemeu
say II is unnecessary deceive themselve or O i've
ethers. We have been told that the Southerner alt
Q market there.
Mr.. McMuLIEy-I will ak another question: say
you want to adhere to the principles Of your fathers
Were not the people of the North opposed In 1916 to
the tariff system, and now 60 for 1t!
MIR. BUTLER-f the gentleman means the tariff act
Of that year, not that the North were ever
opposed to It, IL from the South and the South
opposed to it, But what has that to do with the
question of slavery Does any gentleman deny that 1t
not the object Of the South to carry slavery to Cali
fornis?
Mr.. EVANS (whig), of Msryland-Mr. Calhoun said,
last year that he did not want to extend slavery.
Nr BUTLER What MIR. Calhoun said last year, was
not what he rays this year. Laughter) Gentlemen
want to have equilibrium. This was the doctrine
of Mr. Calhoun and the Southern address.
Mr.. EvANs-The South do not want to extend slavery
to California
Mr.. BUTLER R-Mr Calhoun's speech and the Southern
address the foundation Of a your speeches. You
cay that slavery is not curse.
MIR JONES, (dsm. J Of Tenneseee-I don't admit 1t.
Mr. BuTLFR--It admitted BY your fathers. In
conclusion he spoke about the necessty Of excluding
the evil from the territories.
Mr.. DrssKy, (dem.) of Ohio then obtained the floor
--tao ooA-Asiltse ..1
The House adjourned