New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1849-09-24

Law Courts.
surssios CorRT-Befofe CHEF Jusucs Oati-y and
Judges N-nderpoel and ssndf'rd.--D ecis l0ns-
lgaiies fusr jeseps E@Se Relative 90 factory
New Jeftcy Assignee n" bound % pay over 10 receiver
whsi collected before irjaoo1oo, but rsiain u 90 abide
event
| Ca.d'n, Ord as O'ps Bs,ns-To recover difference
IN value on purchase Of bales 81 French bsns-s Which
ptrucu article The rule ofa-s.e was properly admitted,
t'ndng show that IS Customary IN lh- purchase OF
French barkets 20 rely upon sample A'o th.tth- other
ponis Of the ruling on The tfiai we're coffect-Nsfdid
was given for piainufi ns~ uisi denied
Robert E-vcf Dsiasag The Count arno-nced ih.i
a dec Sion u ths vi 10 rendered next week unless
counsel show cause relates 90 he delay which 70 las
lwedaesday. 10th, will be The last dsy for ang issues
Before Josuees-3uer. Mason and Campbell Ca,dne,
g. H,riInd and ofses. tsecvfo,s q Jars hoo.ssot
ssfsld The taioR Theological SEMINARY and JIma 4
RaIet Bill 20 settle The CONJUNCTION of DE viii OF James
Roosevelt decreased. sud determine he rghs of the De-
fondsR. The Union Theological Seminary are enuutd Co
twoihfds oi The iunds uoN n hr hands o nscNecu0f
brloc. io the share Originally drviasd % the deeu
Bailey and that the devise sud bcqucs 10 hR ~ Tie
remaining oue-l!id not revoked Held siso that he
and hsQuef Bailey OF the fevsfsouay estate.
aud interests mentioned In the viii not revoked.
Decree accordingly Cosis OF ell hs parties 10 bs paid
JOIN y Pai~e, SPECIAL Resssrr, Ars,y yais. ard
ofAe,s Bin Cor foreclosure Of mortgage Held The
payments and sei-oH which lie defendant lses
relied were subsequent to valid assignment of The bond
ard mortgage su Of Whch be had notice. and could
no, therefore he admitted defense Decree for
p.nu1 for principal and inerss proved 10 be due with
costs.
jim l. LeCraoken Ja~e, 4 Iaesiias afS Others
Foreclosure Decree for psinuas, Of reference aud
TSo,, P,afr vs. JOIN 7 Ggel,isf aa8 oissy.-The Couf
will not stav proceedings n suit 10 fofcccsU mort
gage given for he consideration money on NE gfound that
has been brought O. recover possession OF The mort
gaged premises by hifd party, Claiming under an a.
verse lille. lis only sfef eviction where ne premises
err- snd that In order 20 prevent causes Of scuon-Ds
crr.s for the plsinur, with costs
ff..ft t,rarfN and efhrTs SstaaH Sage q Co and
otse, party ~ho advances money on bills ot exchange
against goods cous gn-d 90 iofeg port and Eases
fia IN fI4|ffH f alt acc
can only resort In he proceeds 81 TIE goods sha not
equal he advance TO the personal responsibility 81 tho
persons fo1n whom The shipper may have received the
GOODS aud between whom sud The pairr there was no
previous contract TO make good ne dsaeieney-b de
lssls Pses ana otas,v vs. Robe-i Ede- sad oers-A bin
was ned snd injunction granted 10 NE
from clvcuug mating loese on ne fHsANeluc lu in7
Ciy OF New-York The Injunction Siterw ard moii-
led allow the csiend.nis 20 erect their building
and 10 commence business saoscs-enuy eomyau. vs.
inside. sud Ire defendants were indicted conve.e- ara
huea Tor maintaining nuisance hea nav ne on. ~s
not prcms'uIey lied ihAt ne Indictment sna eouNcto1
OF he defendants justified The compliments in their pro
oeiiugs.snd hist no~ perpetual iolneAoa 'a'aa Issue
with costs TO the cnmr'aiuari-
U1liIa CAauEcrt 1ad Others Edt,STG p issss 1nd
<1roa y NucA1nf-held that ss Ibis bill Wa not tire
until several monrs aief me aeienoans MeienNh. %
made lte advance 70 Edward Losee-ihougn before he
had teoa Fepao-snd uasmaeh A. Il does oo appear 'ha
Merchant had any knoNlrcge u A9 NsncAeAt az n
eni and he money having been paid 70 hin lncc a. or
der Of the Court OF Chsncesy Two years before his d
led he has The better equities and csnnet no. De
called uron 10 pav over the morsyrhe bl As 20 Ner-
chant uusl be dismissed with costs
CovKr o. Common PLEAs BEFORE judge UlshoefeT-
Nance :. akiAs ". Hcsry hha's-To recover dam
Axes n promise 90 ausrsn.ee "a Two Roles, feirrca 10
~. saturday The original Transaction, u ~as said wss
Mr. Jensius oxniuc Nj W s5oco secured By mortgages
on he Tauerss real and personal property t-ierg-s 20
Nh. wi ard formerly Mfs W stsoil Of v hon NJ 4ios
" smith was the trustee. The loan. sgrcet upon,
WAS in Delaware 5ritge Co bills Toe Two notes ioi
1 referred 10 ere renewals. and eid bot come "iiin
he trust agreement The ave rocs drawn by az >.ln
lea .p lea n the 600 sE3 which 10 = claimed MI W l-
Ira ~ hose name was not rron re. a1ol- WAS cn
he : so rorsl sgfced 60 guarantee, Gso were hei
i,eiu he trust agreement hui NJ >mh -s'd ne clnsi-
~ IA GOOD faith that greefneni wss bcurd Tor
Them PARTICULARLY 81 no cfisusl notes ~ ticn "efe
~r,i.i, were sui in rxisicccc. tor oc.casc 70 Was o.
.-a has Dir " prom sd 10 ssrSu!e- n orter 70 lee
IA na.t be promise 10 give ~rtcn Su.fsrlsrl 20 ma
n. ,x.l ~. = so tavug % the sSoos, PAID So sn1
- - are now 10 the hanss - M. Gssasrd Tie i've
80 81 which he guaranty : claimed were paced h
Inn hv Mr. the hfsi paid Al maturity, pet ne srco1
protested and The Temsinoer ~itharH~a' arc ne
nj srous6t The testimony Vas cor fcu1s he @lry
fluaa ior plainiia sl,-.o 70
SALVAGE 10 GOvEENNSNr NfsstLs-ihe VII
49,, o. ,p board an American vessel which Was wrsck