The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1849-01-08
LaW InlelliRence


THE New CouRr OF ArPKALs.-During the present
the Court Of has been composed Of Judges
large and Of Judges Jones Of the LIST district Wright
OF The 50 Gray Of the 9Th, and Johnson Of the 7th
Of Of Ss
9th, and Hoyt of the Sth. Thus constituted, the
Court will CONNIE nee term in this city Tuesday
Justices Wright, Jones' Gray and Johnson, will as
sumo the duties Of justices Of the Supreme Court.
Judge Wright holds term at Delhi the LIST instant;
Judge Jones in New York. on the I'd Tuesday; Judge
Gray sits in general term at Utica the lst Ind
Judge johnson at Rochester on the 1st
ns s Ss has L.
and learning OF those who constituted the Court have
gene very far toward confirming the hopes Of Its
friends.
The January term, 1870, of the Court Of Appeals
will commence in this city, at the Capitol on Tuesday
next There are lo4 cases on the calendar Of which
Jedediah Miller U al, Plaintiffs In error vs.. Hen.
~ r. Seberder, defendant In error; Stephen Van
Rentt.iasr, pian,sG IL error vs. Jew Jewett, de-
fendsnt In errtr; Jew Jewett appellant, Ste
/ Richard Roe, appellant, vs., John Dee, sppsss;
error, Simon Canlif, sfendsnt in error; 8 The
Cohoes Company, respondents, against John M. IRE
main, appellant John Hay respondent ssainst the
ttla.r, sppeilee sgaipst Seneca Jones, appellant;
o. stephen Van Rensselaer, appellee agt Josiah Jones
lsnts, ast. David Russell and Aida his wife, respon-
dents; IL Derrick Lansing and others respondents
sgt David Russell and Alies his wife, appellants; IL.
dent, ct al 49, Chester Brown plaintiff in error vs.
Samuel A. Curtis, defendant in error; H. William p
Van Rensselaer,, respondent. sgt. Thomas w. jones,
appellant Is Lawrence Clckman, I'd, respondent,
sgt. Frederick Cbckman, appellant; 10 Josiah Sher.
man. ct al agt Stephen A. Dsggett ct al IT, Francis
Aim,tIopg, It al, plaintiffs in error vs. Livingston
Compton, defendant in error IL Helen Quacken-
tu,h, at al, appellants vs. Wism Bradley ct al, re-
spondsDu 10 Daniel Wslrstb, plaintiff In error VS..
Darlin Thompson. defendant In error; 90 William
kimbsll, dai appellants vs. James @. Furgeson, ad-
rr,Dstrator, sc respondent; Fl Julius Candee, pre-
eide mt, &C. appellant, Russell Lord al, respon-
deLts 70 Ausburn Brdsall, ~ al appellant vs. Jona-
than Widger ct al, respondents; % Isaac Plat, ct
a plaintiffs he Trustees Of the First Con-
gregatiopal Religious Society In the town Of franklin,
oeiep ntr in error; "a Eliza Vrooman, appellant,
till in David Howell Skidmore, defendant in
error; 26 Lsnuel Sawyer al appells nts vs. Eleanor
Clark, a. al. respondents; ~ The ChenaDgo County
Mutual Insurance Company. appellants, vs. Nelson Il
Murdock ct al appelleer 2s; Zasock Pratt president
sc appellant, VS.. VIM Wslsworth appellee; 20 James
80. John c Mather, appellant, va. James II Eldredge,
sppelee 81 hlvan Stewart ct al ADMINISTRATORS, SO
ssprt, n vs; Bsnjsmin Andrex, rs,Dondent 81
administrators SO responder 80 Harry Jennings,
appellant, vs. the Cbensnge County Mutual Insurance
tees of st Peters Church in the city Of New York
oi Anna l.. Gallagher ct ai surviving executriy &c.
snon s. in error a. 49,
lsye ct al. defendants in error SO Henry NJ Western,
appellant vs. George II. Kelley, SO respondents 81.
ct a., respondents; 8s Nichoss @ fortnight, appel
liant W Retert Ainslie respondents 80 John Cochran
at al plaintiffs In error, W. Anthony II Van Slyck,
thtrjf So, defendant in error; 30 Vim. Wooden, ap-
reliant, vs.. Geo Waffle appellee
SurRENE CouRr OF The UNiTEp STATES, January 8,
ls49 No. "a James Erwin, plaintiff In error, ps A. J.
Lowry. The argument Of this continued by
MIR Brent for the plaintiff in error and by Mr. Bradley
for the defer dapt in error
The U District Court at Baltimore Is engaged In
the trial of the U rs Richard ii Key, charged with
robbna the all in the post Office Of that city In which
be clerk of some 81 900 belonging to Messrs Gil
more Co. Of Cincinnati