New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1849-09-29
ANIMAL Episcopal Co.vsntion OF the DiseeSe
af Sex.York.-TaiRD Day. FsIDiY, sept =.

occups1 the TINE that should -a-e 'e'n hefo-'' - e
dr.i-s Of ole ministry re ccr;lnu-d a. -ore
70 .t-sk In Opposition % the proposition rfqaiiI az
Delegates 20 b c0mm-ncAnts before 1eib. eA-.ea -
s-sf In The Convention. .,
ReV. nr Cox moved t-ss To ~hole 'nsiness Os SO
on tre tshie-he would rOve nat u p po-lPene1 on
TIE next Convention 5ui thsf would only siFr cause ol
more debate. The motion ~. carried
Ine report u a.. Committee IN NoninAt9ns sp
pointed yesterday. and ~ ~cn l'es q. g. 7fANll- -
Chairman w.s read lle following -re NJ rsrnes Of
zoe Executive Committee for tie Trer i '.t tlE-s-
Rev. Mr.. j. Cox. Crsirmsn; Rev pfs halcn ana az
i0r md Rev. M-ssrs Lot, Jones -nd f--aH' ia, 81
ne Lsrt-C g. e. Rowland stewart Brown, =. T.
DUNK arr 49, Cornelius Oakley. tsis and Cspt \" J.
Jercer.
ne question On the above nominations Va pat 70
The vote when they were confirmed.
Ire suo ioined resolution was adopted
F-.aI-s~ Thsf 20 boz recommended % Co A.ss.o1ary
Cllr 'rfI- Appointment i ni-- en-fr- 90 sac-1
d hem By ibe members ' or colfcl residing A. 'nrn
s,sac-s.
toe Convention Tor - -ction. The hef. gentleman
prefacrd . By rv appropriate remarks setting forth
tee necessity that exIsted FOR TIE adoption ~ The
resolution. lie sad. 10 callns the attention ~ TIE
House % ny revolution g." intended % nave made
fev rc,srfs explanatory c some points IN That
re-0 ufru. l. ny i-.crron D. explain TIE design
snd 81. .it Of - wiling thst vote should be- t.
k.n without debate A sr1srf1te has been offered
rg the main pont, though Wa d.bcisnt 90 some
respects yet an favorable % ts adoption. there
f0ro srespf IL In eu ri he original resolution which
drawn Up ~ n gel. some days previous 90 tne
Convention of .sst year. To was drawn up without
consultation or advice from any human being. acted
o. y own sense Of duty 10 tnis 70 j. ssic that
the resolution contains monsfrous proposuons-tnat
,is nsdiOus-throWn into tnis House % blow up me
Convention vow sssure the member ~ his ~ 1se
that there "a no c-usa for alarm here am coft-n
there a part oi t1st resolution hsi can be- cono
rcftei The undouotsG OBJECT Of the refoIuion =
has been stated Vas the restoration % bshoP Ondfr
donk 20 his ofsco. Th. not the case. Thar j. msy
follow from this measure, Is very likely, and heartily
hope that such may te toe consequence vi u ou % has
much big her sim the of persons honor
OF rignfs OF Bishop On1-r1ohk, ~ any other bishop
~ object Of that resolution IL q reach the sentence
pronounced upon him; Of its righteousness OF M
rghtoous sag nothing but n 10 efecs upon ne
Church. we have ust CruUnds 81 compliant To may
be that cur Reverend Fathers, IN prlnlu1sing that
sentence have made mistake. ! wish % give them
opportunity of correcting &c. To secure % the
Church Of Nc1lork her just rights, 3 ,h0 object OF
resolution. Il tie Council Of bishops cannot do
justice 20 the Church IN tie Diocese OF New ork, with
out restoring Bishop Onderdonk, irt him 20 free. ]
have desire that he innocent should De punished for
the guilty TIE - Re Dioces@ sho-i1 no. hc made o.
sud-r viii conclude here ~ fepest'ng inst cart
" accept ihs substitute fha. has 5een present-d.
point Of ordrr vas here raised upon the question
of tue Convention tgs.ng Up me res0.slon 0f o.
Sherwood 70 Ia not boo ,usea up by the la.i Con.
Tenon bot referred over 70 the scton OF the pr-scn;
one
flsv. Dr. HrSsEE ss;5 80. Fooa ,a= resolution csne
Up he Intended he as substitute &c H. re printed
he preamble SID resolution in gester1sys paper. Il
wi be found 81 ne nd oil the report
Rev. Dr. SMITH took ground against the rostcra-
ton Ct the Bshor, his opnicr thss IL hc
were re.ati.,sd more evil. wcs.a follow from It u ~
bene1ts. B.ssoy NlieIlonS Tss condemned By h.s
prrrs in e-erll co-ar scsuss Of th1 conclusion ihey
had er ve- -i regarding MS alleged cfitninaty ln-.
never took int c1r-deratic1 Wa. m-ght resnt from
toe rourfe .ccy so~ g.. &. pursue. ll.s Convention
hss &C i,hc-ent 10 act H. ih- csset cannot press
IL restor.LOa oi -te si'nop vpoa nc General Cen
vaniiOr without gfes: Improperly. .sTy agitation
r.ff nn an .l..r u III
r1cnr z. s'f IN Irrerrsn uoon II aud cCri-e u.n
the justice injustice 80 the senience j. VIZ ssy IL
Is unjust accuse ,ar hghes' ---y 90 CO.'S .nufcn
q injustice ess Whether THIS 20 q - def-i1 ned io
cas, m npuistor upon ile General Convention bY
slg ;a,s resolution & s a possible tF't the tis1ops
scceao b. i1ls rcqlc-., unless We csa convince
ihfn tia. they have convicted and punished iugo
cent brother Can We hope 10 establish hs innocence %
their salsiecrln U..hOu; evidence ani whore is 10
Iacre is not i'e 1e.orC us nor Is ilere, % FAR a.
am swfTl, solitary proof 81 ii IN existence. Ne
complain OF stc grievances arising from inis state o
tnlnEs and say Sc arr certain g nis Innocence, 0gt
ogr Impressions ere nothing. We must nave prOCi-
Tho sgistiou oi Ire question this foor is 90 ell
;iurs sttrr-ed wis much m-ca.rf - sooner d. tts
brcl-hf before e puuc, than cases never before
Hc.i- 90, sre creal..sd They may tot render me
tam cd Bishop Oa1,r3olk imprsclcshio, Aut they
plaEe is iifAy Improbable. Z hope these Oh starred
resolutions VII Be allowed % Iemsn upon TIE table,
TINS restoring thst harmony Vnch 90 been ~ ieas
assent
Rsv ". SHERWOOD ro.e 90 reply. Ha sa.i 10 ia.
bern sisted ih-. hsve accused cur Se7 Fathers oi
To- lsticc Ao- appeal Co., the meIua-rs Cd THE Hsus-
70 anything cd thl' sind ever came from me Ard aas
&. come 90 iAs o. cA.... ...a cor noaias - a1J
tribunal % the innfcn the state Of The Diocese
wlthou; tong falsely accused - b. the restoration
Of Bishop Oaderdonk stated tha' had nothing % 60
with % ] expressed H. wish for the regfrsal OF bis
sentence End that may lo zone but my resolution
wac drawn up Vfth view 20 To pesce Of this no-
cese. Is friend OF Bishop Oncordons. would sup.
port this irsliufor-ss sl enemy. would vote for TO
lection. in my mind . is ihe only pos.lalo mode
% restoring harmony. The terms 81 !. are in accord
snce Nith thcse cd the canon We're that sentence
sors1t Che shop Of hew-lerk would Dee pat To clrl.
muaicstion with his own Dioccsc, and We could settle
our own business much better ih-n the House Of
Bishops
Rey. Dr. McvIc,sAs rose and addressed the Con
ventioD but his remarks were naudlbio 70 NJ.
Judge JAY followed the Rev gentleman he said the
resolution called upon us 70 pray 20 the House OF
Bishops tor that relief which certain canon says we
entitled O.. Nhst Il the relief which 10 authorizes
the h0us. ot bishn7s % give To remove when they
mink proper an unlimited suspension.
Dr. ulcBrr rose 90 explsin. lie ad not ailuds o.
thsf particular canon.
Judge Jay proceeacd o." contend hat they c-uno,
place any her Bishop but the Suspended
the only relief they grant = O. rtinstate him.
The motion before US 10 % ask the ouse of shOps o
remove this grievance BY restoring Bishop Onderd0nk
o. bis See The speaker was here inerru pied by call
Of order" 5ut siiefward SLOWED % proceed IN
continuation. he said Be had proofs Of the Bishops
guit and De prccecdn. % refer 20 them. hen be-
ess stopped BY the murmUrs OF he Convention
Rev Dr. WHTEHOrsR of n Thomas Ia this City
hs1 consulted with no member previous 10 drawing
mp tho following resolution
I'VE we're unable 10 obtain a copy Of Dr. White.
houses resolutions The last taree were Isid aside
and the frat to the effect that The Convention AK the
Bishop to resign. wss e. reported below, rejected