The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1849-06-27

The southern wing orators and papers railing most
bitterly against what they call 'the infamous coalition in
Vermont between the democrats and free soers y de-
clarng at the same tine that the northern and western
wings WILL to a man. stand by the rights OF the South"
and that the democrats will abandon these rights that
General Taylor will Immediately veto anything IN the
shape OF the Wilmot Pfoviso, and that northern
wes n wing will aid by his vote thus "o degrade the
South" We commend to the consciences of all such
the following 'precious morsel," which cut from
late number of the Indiana State Journal the organ Of
the party aud the pet OF the administration in that State
Southern democrats be ys not humbuggsd by thus
uhitsned sepuehrs" General Taylor to be sustained
by the same dupcity that elected him Southern whig
members OF Congress are be chosen because they de-
nouneed the free soers, and northern and western
by coong these same free -soilers to their embrace
Verify, this is-"heads win. tails you lose"
From the Indiana State esdns whg Of the STATED
WORD TO rREE-s0IL wHIGs.-Many persons who
had been identified with the wing party all their lives
who were, and still are the sincere advocates of all the
great wing measures-deteTmined that they could
for the wing candidate for the presidency because
he bad not made specific pledges against the extension of
slavery. The great majority OF the whig party OF the
North believed that General Taylor stood pledged
interfere with the action of Congress that subject by
the OF the veto power and were satisfied with his
position. The inaugural address Of the wing President
convinced, believe, those wings who did not vote for
him in November that Should Congress pass law re-
s,eing the introduction Of siaUery into New Mer,eo and
California, it tSotad certainly receive has signature
There few rho honestly believe that he trouM
teio ii, hocerer much interested political ag,taors may
deem their policy TO create contrary impression. The
position occupied by the democratic parry during that
election cannot be forgotten General Cass avowed him.
self opposed TO the passage OF any law in relation to
slavery in those territories JOSEPH A.
WRIGHT the present candidate for gopernor rendered
Esy sa ss asoea eos si = tbs SLATE s o"s
ground against Legislature interference U the question:.
Many Of them pronounced The "sItension Of The ordt-
Fitch the eleCtor in the ninth district went little srther,
and that chaste Language for the of which he is
celebrated, pronounced it a "woOy- headed humbug"
Every single wing editor and wing eecor in this State
occupied the ground always maintained BY the wings OF
the North-an incorporating opposition to sdueryser
tension. They yet maintain that ground; and should've
northern wlgs have the power m te ne1t Congress, they
,cN sngrot that doctrine upon The aso organizing Ms
neD territories, else they tyM unorgdn,sed
There can be nothing more certain than the happening OF
that event.
didates for governor and lieutenant governor, for
bers of Congress and of the legislatures gentlemen who
have always BEEN and are now; the advocates of the
tension of the ordinance of 1857 territories
Opposed to these be found those who were the adj
vocates few months ago. OF the Cass interference
doctrine; and honest such advocacy, yet entertain
the opinions whatever their present avowal may be-
This question must be determined by the next Con-
gress. II cannot be longer postponed Our State cleo
tons will have powerful influence on It's determination
Such being the case, is not the duty of every 10
cast his vote where It will contribute most to the accom-
plishmen OF the object had in view There exists no
possibility of the election of the ree-so candidates for
governor and lieutenant governor, of single
Der of Congress- Then what is to be gained for casting
your votes Tor them BY doing you may prevent the
election of men who agree with you every single po
neal question: including the question Ma, you place
ab0re oil others Is il the part OF wisdom thus TO act,
and can you reconcile to your convictions of duty to do
so? Reflect upon these matters.