The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1849-12-15

Twas Tivol sbout the 2olh of March; think
;hs 2, Of I'll: ssrs
the n,s Of fssruary IT.. ,.,~.., A.. 49,.
application being made the and the loan being
bad when applied to Mr. owen on The subject this loan.
OWEN was to get S% g examine the title the
S s s W isd e: when ss
b. to Omen Ike aa say haze s
deed At Mr. Owens afterwards cannot cay when M Has
hrouGk first called in New York eanaOt say how
Mr Owen relation this matter fret demanded
W. sn'
read those at the time myself and Mr. assbrouok
isIes % instIa:tsd him when ssnsIadsi make
lore after Flat o. YsSsu.1y think Il was At Or
ai. ss9.en tho mini .. aaf sna ,s 18Th
Of March he ,Gd IN me he going This city and
the .SpSs: that b
is 'sri SSen was did Sc he mSrtY1ss
AZ ss,Sas
ssny the Hysa
know whether il was or not; have charged my
Ss % owsn 1G Tsns and
$500 paid do no. rsccset whether HssSrouot helped
sS,S: ssi me-
meiiss,; piece Of that mortgage was taken;
cannot say whether it was sent to me.
mr. IN the supreme
mortgage and to
were my attSTne,s in that ease In this transaction
we're the province OF lawyer; LEFT the legal
S ss Of th'y " ss
sent NJ Owen cannot Ieeoleet precisely when hrst
Tpthillto~p, had some With Mr.. hisPaw in
hsIrousi tssve arrested on the warraH had
whether seos or he
the ocer who issued that warrant not deny that it
M sSicnsSos %su say
pSpG ss arep this Mr.
rseoise hat 4. the
ne s.s sTsas
. a in asn s @ a b es na s'
one Of demanded the specie The money was
occasion and paid specie. called
TO D. Ssep s mon &
the Is a. the difference the
Ei IF s:'i e :sa ss% sss ~.
IN: assd The the ani s
sos s snS the Ts
net say that dd not compare The deed from the POush
Direct ns.unss Qin to the settlement of this
matter Mr. Hsebronek offered TO include the property
ps,Iens q interest kept way did not
gage became the property, as understood RAINING
met ana proceeded with the testimony. "s--
Th0% n, L. Davies called and prssds.t Of the
him q s ssT%sfy Knew The properly s
mortgage given for $500; he gave little over 5000;
called en- n: a. s a n s ssSs h.
clined he urged II, and persmpsorily refused.
f., Which n I! vas time sold IT, there
in proved after We soid it.
John Rutser reside ughkespse Paper
shown) That signature the paper Of
the character who certified as to the
and s,asd me e could endorse the estimate; told
LndsrT and considered them competent judges Of the
REdva,a n. Owen sxorr:-I attorney and conssl-
Tor 2. law hn1T h Mr. DSpoy:,sr and M Hs.sr0pss;
sTsys in ~ Sss sas
ssa rs rom Svs. except ,9s as
i ssS az
the information could whous leaving he c.yi wrote 70
Of p % Of S s hass e'T' used Nd
ordinary care and diligence in the matter; business
paid the S s. When was the balance in
when esneiuded isSouS "a have
paid over one cent Of the money If Mr. Dspeystsr had di
varied from The description till after the complaint
Cross s.amined.Mr pePeyster and Mr. HAsbrOuck called
s a @ s
under ordinary that II had been convinced
that the had been removed and the property
tured should have paid to Mr. Hasbrouck the
held by me-
lanes o. Lin dermApI now 1896 arst Judge
OF Ulster county gave eerthoate OF property
knew the popert he aid he wanted valuation for the
purpose Of Getting loan; IL hts Tuthtown property
that menobed knew the property, but better
quainted with 10 tive than present. there
are IN the statements accompanying the valuation Of Wit
ness brother tannery valued at y5v tavern 5000
dwelling house, $3.50. besides shed and stables, and
tenant Rouse; these are not included Ia the mortgage
Map shown TO witness, and The descrp
ton Of the property reeed in the real by de-
PENDANTS couIse Witness should have difficulty in
defining the property described in the MORTGAGE the TIVE aud
halt des grated ~ the "MoCullooh tract
rally known BY that name at Tuthilltown.
Sylvester heCarriek and Thomas n. rrsey intro
dued witnesses to that the crossing Of the river
from Tlyoh was dangerous in the winter.
Neil Gray Secretary of the Fireman Insurance Company
introduced TO that the heretofore al
luded to- effected MT Hasbrouek has kept the in
sursnce some OF the policies and Mr. pepeyer the
others.
The prosecution here rested and the defence introduced
their hrst witness
Abram CrstW no proved that he drew up the deed OF
us from Joseph o. hasbrouek to Geo. e. Mitchell in trust
for the def Edant's wne.