Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1849-11-30

Is IL n
sed the system of removing his own alpuI''i ar IN
min hieyc, and pick;oches and i Is propno'' Nv n,n
few more OF the sort lett leahs', ''r. -; III,
however We hear of specific complaint '" I'm, p f,,oi
M ,on doubts his capacity and that he Is nuch pe..
for his mission than Col. Webb Tor the alohii ~
a excepting the peculiar htiiss oi MS i' i, What
rios for The court of the bloody butchers oi Hungary
nr Inet is This of ours be sure. II Is to be hoe
they themselves will under this new class oil
!, Ii We commence REFORM lei us carry IL "i'@
|
Mr. Rurkc Of the Union and the w hiS'
Tho Whio in publishing the Unions conclusive aic'e o'
the Rev abduction has saved the trouble we aess'"
10 lei the community the Jist1catioh al Tue '''
, ron facts cannot be avoided By such choice and Gle
oapt eypressions as foreign organ loads Veh'''
skunk ..blackguard DC When its readers shall see
tho Unions article and the Wings reply fear not the is
sue The Wing against the Union lsiSe lighting giant
with straw
But why did not the Wing also republish the next article
i, the Union in reply TO the Republics assault on Mr. Burke
rs Wiluoi Proyisos.? On Monday the Republic 'f'''
was heraded the readers of the Wing with he l'''s
CANTON of Mr. Burke of the Union convicted OF being an
aJoIi!ioaia A
This is gross and wanton assault as the Union article
which wr publish below supply the Wing a'a@ ula
swerably demonstrates. So far from Mr. H. being I'LL ap
Hons, he shows that he n Northern man. introduced
bill with the Missouri Compromise and has ever heh hu
il now an advocate ofat How much better ana
Missouri compromise than for Southern Wings. the Editors
of the Whe among them for Fillmore an out and
ont Free Socr and advocate of the abolition o slavery in
the District oil Columbia. We leave il 10 all candid men 10
saw Mr. Burke has completely eXcpated himself ana
| convicted" the Wing of wanton injustice:
| THE "PICAYUNE" ORGAN AND OURSELVES.
We have before alluded 10 the prodig immensely Of
,aen, and tact which preside the columns o the minor
ornan OF the cabinet published in this city. In the mere
penogrery of politics ii is nnrivaled and peerless Lack
ing The power its antagonist IN fair argument II
adroy lilies the usual petty and dsngenlos SHIFTS 81
such minds namely Misrepresentation ana cersnn Of ne
positions Of its opponents II Is true an a'e ana skul
polemc would disain such patry resorts bu there are
some minds that only distinguish themselves by ther
ski: in clubbing petiifoggng and prcvaricaion Such
be the distinguishing trait OF me senS that cor
Gates through the columns of the Rtpubhc
few DAYS since referred the election Of Speaker,
and stated the fact that Mr. Winthrop the federal candidate
was iree-socr and abolitionisl and that he had voted
for every ansavery proposition which Mr. Gddngs has
voted for when he relieved from the y Of voting
by his position Speaker.
Well how does the Picaync" organ meet his charge
Not by denying that Mr. Winthrop has given all these votes
that he voted for the Wmot Proviso and The abolition oil
slavery in the District Of Columbia by DENYING that he
is rcc-soicl and abolonsr The amount OF The defence
of Mr. Winthrop put forth III the RepH'c IS mo- tat ne haS
not voted for every proposition which Mr. Gddings has
voted for but those of Mr. Winthrop do not make Am
and abolonst although they convict poor Mr.
Giddngs OF being SUCH without the possibility ol escape
Such in substance is the absurd and ridiculous defence put
forth for Alr Winthrop by Of The asiue and profound n
teects whose Examinations daily dazzle the reader III the
columns Of the Repnbhc .
Another ground OF defence is that the Junior editor OF This
paper is Wilmo provs1is This Is II mere tdlSehood
which the writer Of the article i'll the Repubc Knew wen
! he pcnncd II.
He bases his charge the which for the
cusion of slavery in the Oregon Territory all ct which lies
obore the Missouri Compromise line That provision
braccd only the Territory of Oregon; whereas the "iimo
proyiso embraces all territories then belonging 10 or which
might nj uny time be acquired by, The Tinted States
The Wimo poyso and thu rovso Tor which W. voted are
therefore essentially different in principle and IN application
4 tho lDI T.
pc here but will 20 further and show that the writer
Of the article which audc lalsies orr position ai
msrepescnts with his wide open and with
| Ddire prcpenSe.
Al the very session during which voted Lor the pf"yiso
10 the Oregon bill for which many members ron ne Stare
hoine STATES also roied including the former federal Speak
or ohn White of Kentucky only voted TOR The Mis-
sou Compromise In its application 10 IrNas hui rs nitro
ducd bill containing" that rtry compromise AID rofea or H.
We NEVER voted for the exclusion of slaycl from territory
living south the Missouri COMPROMISE line; but, on ihe
trary constantly voted 10 lave The qucs'I" Of slavery to
the decision Of the people who might inhabit such terri
tory.
Some weeks ago made, from The journals OF Congress
full exposition Of these facts showing that We had always
adhered 10 the Missouri Compromise. The writer o The art
Gle in the Republic doubtless that exposition aud yet
nth f kno,rlcdge Of our course upon that subject he has
,bc and rcniacy charge with being In favor
Of The Wimo Proyso Il is of piece with the base trick
PLAYED upon the Richmond Wing ana the forgery Of the
Pitisburg Jouna aud We Suppose We may regard 1t Is
specimen ofegtimate Taylor Iactics
In the same article which a!!uce, the wiite after
referring TO a circular of Mr. Stanley of North aoina IS
slcd during the late congressional campaign Ill that Stale
in which he Saney alleged that he once, in the House Of
REPRESENTATIVES. charged face with being abo
litonst gocs state that the reported debate shows
moi nu:y ina; Mr. Stanley made the charge, bit produced the
proof" This Is another faselood. which the proof
cited in the Republic se! exposes. Stanley did no on the
occasion referred make the charge ha: we ahol
ZIONIST did he prove H. pretend 10 haze piGred H. tie
only asserted that there abotionisis in New flamp
shire who were formerly democrats and prove that state
mcn and that abol0nst he cited an arti
Gle from Argus and Spectator "a paper which toncr
IL condced) addressed democratic aboitlonsts. II
is therefore, false that Stanley SIGH charge against
us and proved IT, the writer Ut the article in The Rcpc
well knew when he asserted The contrary ii ne had sufficient
capacity comprehend the passage from SANKEY'S speech
which he cites in Support Of his statement.
We have before The aric. in the Argus and Spec
ta.or alluded by Stanley; and when he sla! make
Their Issue with upon his devotion the OF the
South o5otinnism shall publish it, and perhaps
we shall do il before Mr. Stanley shall give opportunity
We do deem IL necessary it in reply 10 the
echoes of his caumny, although il would them with
shame and conf sion.
Blu, il is little remarkable that should be charged with
being friendly the Wimu Proyiso by of the conduc
tors that does and dlcs avow its approval
or dsapprova Vt thai measure, but who injustice is not
done him. is both W;mo Poysoist and abeiilionisi.
We have used plain language i'll noticing the caumnies OF
the Pepubhc When wfuly and knowingly mis-
enrescutet we mean be understood in reply We should
scorn 10 be guilty such conduct towards any opponent If
we cannot meet our brethren Of the press by the weapons
which truth places in hands will not misreprcscnt
and lie about them knowingly aud wtuly.