The daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1848-1851, 1849-02-10
Guprssae Court Of Iouisiana.
Condensed Decisions. :. New ORLEANS. Feb S,

taken IN the individual , I the under 6
ACT not suscept biz Of aifca ion bv fan il, meeting,
and one winch ill not be binding on the mncn,. An
sentatyes will rot be sanctioned VINE i exceeds their
ava able means and calculated to involve them in
sYNDIcs OF A DUNBAR MRS. SARAH WOODS.
.4ppea from the SrM Judicial District Court Parish Of
Vest Baton Rouge. No l206 in the Supreme ut....
RosT j.. Per euridm At the Syndics ale Of the pro-
perty of the nsoven Apanas Dunbar made on The ed
Dec 1871 John Holmes purchased slaves for the aggregate
of 4l2 no. payable onetenth of the purchase money
cash. and the balance credit of one and three Year,,
with interest at the Of ten cent annum after the
maturity of the respective instruments Six days after the
purchase he flied petition in the Court of Pobate ales
Ing That he had purchased those slaves OF this
minor children of the nsoIyen and investment Of
H II ss Be
convened 3 the purpose of taking into the
ha psSer Of the p was that
the undeI.tuo, be authorized give his notes behTf
be bound thereby on the ana Janna rs
chase for the best of the mne and
for Their maintenance and education. hey recommended
his NOES paved for On the da The debe atoms
Of the family meeting were homologaed by the Count and
of the slaves in his capacity of under On The follow
dy he na Of IN
Geedng: All TIE slaves purchased except one were then
his
has been paid and the plaintiffs now sue the dc who
The defendant denes her Liability and pleads the want OF
bought for his and benefit and hat the slavs be-
hys q be s he ss
Of authority In an under to make such purchases 81
family meeting and that il it could. the iamiy meeting
srd is gal null and void or he issue tha. formed
and the plaintiffs app ca ed
I Of v ..
parity of qn.ru but he did comply with the decree
.nd
in bis own name there vas no CONTACT to Iality The
the minos We are saiifSd that AT: fss G. G. not
o to like n fad that T sale wa
which emit the defendant relief The of The
meeting nor the Court Of Plobas appear to have inanred
for granted that they sufficient the price the
Ian Of PREDECESSORS he Of Dae iesu-
ioDsns the S was intended TO BE- ated and
wsss ms hs% I'm, s and S
not bound by such 1t aledged that the
Be
purchase 1t does not appear that the defendant after she
cannot therefore be equed them l. it be rue.
sledged the Other side that The minor were sup
Inc under.tutor has his action for indemnity.
We of opinion that the plaintiffs have failed to show
The stipulation amrni, under which they claim The
ud cement is thereto affirmed with costs" Phil ps
appellee.
SYNDICs OF A. DUNBAR Us. MRS. JANE WILLIAMS AND
HUSBAND. Appeal from the srth judicial District
Court, Parish Of Vest Baton Rouge. .Rost, J....Per
uriam This siular to that of the plaintiffs
u.s. Sarah Woods Just determined No. 1906 of the docket
this Court and for the therein given is ordered
hat the judgement be affirmed with costs" Same counsel
Is in the above reported case.
Where partner shown have boarded and lodged in the
family OF hi. and It not h S
o!msr will be held to pay reasonable sum for his hoard
Nhere partDer shows that he was N the habit OF pu
chasing articles Tor the OF his partner ana
paying debts for him and rendering accounts Their Of to
prma faeie proof of his claim. A partner will not be
allowed conventional interest on sums advanced for an
ordinary partnership. uDles there is age, M mt in
Mitng of the u 70 ay t. H the absence 81
for the cement Of partnership the Cour will inquire
the private accounts existing between the partners.
auditor in the Court below. cannot be noticed BY the
Supreme Court.
rom the 18th judicial District Court. Paih of Points
Coypee No 1l73 in the Supreme Court. ROsT, j..
Per curia,n This is action for the settlement OF &C.
counts OF ordinary partnership formerly existing between
he parties The Distr ct Court gave judgement in favor Of
he defendant for the of $685. with legal interest and
he plaintiff appealed
The accounts of the parties the application Of
be plaintiff referred auditor who discharged his duties
with great and made lucid and we considered report
The plaintiff opposed various grounds and upon that
opposition the judgement appealed from rendered The
oo wing grounds aedged in the opposition are Unlisted
the appeal 1t urged that the plaintiff was En-
Ouly charged win Onena OF Inc nOusenO
by the PENDANTS family, while he BOARDED and
lived there fhe defendant AYERS that these charges are
ract of partnership existing between them and hat they
included in the deed by him to the pain
icing these items. Admitting conenoed BY the
Plaintiffs counsel tn at the fist Of these facts not sallsfac
Oy hoWn, and that there contract IN re aiioI to
he plaintiffs ex enses IN the defendants family she wa.
3 The p!sntff complains that ,he defendant ha, been
Wo noies Of the plaintiff each for The sum Of sl13 o which
he defendant aledges he ha. pal and o. variety OF sI
rhe notes and articles composrg this it, found in he
rendered the plaintiff It is not shown that she
in the has, Of making puIchas.s of thai hs description
his course Of dealing establish prma Jaee the defendants
he OF sl33 70 for interest at the Of ten cent
nnum. We consider this ground well taken The partner
er.hp, either of the partners chant and al
hongh in private each pa.trer entitled to m
al interest those wthon' an agreement n writing
enens Charged in The books kept BY the
endan and in the accounts rende ed by tim 10 The Nun
dsed as proof Of such an agreement Tn
educed from ten 10 five per cent The OBJ ctlon that ms
ct inquire into he private accounts existing betws HE
clearly un,enabe and the other errors ALLEGED in
rgument specified in tbs Oprotob 10 the report
the tor. ard can not be noticed 1t therefore Or
b Of
galn the plaintiff oI the sum Of s2o Ss wm ,. M
bsc Gou ho. Of this appeal be paid b,
,ndant and aellee 8. Lacose for plaintiff and appel
suit in which person of color obtains judgement
form sdcata in another SUIT between the nephewo OF
such Of color and the same %ner such
ment estab lshes rem ipsam and n"hing more.
DAUpHISE AND JEAN LOUIS, E.P. C. Us PAULIN AND
IAaIE LOUISE PICARD. P, c.....3ppem from the Si1h
Judicial District Court Parish OF lberUtHs. NO 'Ni
, the Supreme Court .EusTIs, G. J PR euriam:
MI ,l,,f Of InnIxf