New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1849-06-02

when he cane into he frort parior' ny ~ -
met Mr. " tod snd went MTG ne "a. ~, Sos NJ.
mel hin We passed the lne u DAY D. sssra ~ - 80
Walker and 1,w her hea-in ga, ~ - "a -, -
We another aty tnr loure ~ 20, 81 a.. -, "a
nrs shaw iav there said 10 vs. NJ a. 40
AMI shawl BE- could not have seen W. ~, 49,. -
az she had hite eai; tod pm ~ - 49, 30 scr
he CUTE ucsfed they Ncrr. asAed DIM H ~ ns' r'ei
Mr. Walker fhst day 80 ~ T'puel ~ - ~. Wsissr
finding M " aad myself were iaiAins h %. TO- lao'
and getting lasr m. hghi sar Noniu 20. ssl 10.
n and rappti wif her psrasoi on ne Nuu ptol doof
40 ,fepped oui. .he sad N gong ,ad no yog
" not % come In. Mr. Walker. MI sAer = nere
she said no. DO not VISA o. see hin o'd Der she
sr com. in I'D toOS hcr by fle and made her come
m he spoke very pleasantly 20 her and SAID bow do you
do Mar (" she sqoke rather cod ID Inn. o4i az down Oh
he raror AZ uly persuasion. .sd. Il wi eave you
anne heard them anerNard talking together very ia-
te - and loud 81 heard size said 0 him she would
have her rghis-Lef married rshs .he woui nave-thai
c,as,,-lIaei i stated tbs before 20 he Ds,r-- A.
farrey hen be- ca.5d a, my house. declined 20 o
go Pie course. % NJ. " NJ Walker called 40 uy house
about a week before the ah MAY. 1916 and Mr. " came
shout week afierv arl De- came w.tl hers BE- ii not
give use "a ben De- trf came, bur ii s1 aerDlrd
lie engaged board Tor te Told p That her
nauc was aser- NAT .le "as conncv on oi ns ,he
Walker. and ais owr name Mr.. Walker both ot one
name -s.d she : corae.1on % miae, 'nl be
80 boarded here two or Three weeks before b. came
he did to boAri. olt 'ook and SEPT there
was ater found Clr nry we're marrai never saw Any
marriage ceremony between them Understood they were
son. except That size would AWAY tay with NJ
" and return with him. Mr. Wsker va confined AZ nav
house June % MS premature. sfnr, rre. Or
Henne'e my family physician. attended Der, Pc it uos
see the child 10 person ssw o. hni msseifi dd no
thus proper for ay person 90 bl srf. do
wish 20 saw what iii with 90 M orc sad he might
sferwari rut The question a ess offensive shane. 2
not more ihah twomonihs child. D. that; r -
not alive; 90 nor snow whether u vas turred or nor.
have myself had several children The Q3tsi -1
how The child va. disposed u wa again asked by VI
OC. tlt me witness from delcacy. asHn rels,F o4l
Mr orc pressed the point The Attorney General fhoggtt
90 The case of frs 90 that age % was nor necessary ~
proper 20 require the answer sought l. Ma aii
hY Nr orc that here any itea of ega' mprorreta
he occasion The Court len The answer - me q scre
uon ~ witness. Who declined 20 answer Mr. W sS~f
bad begun 90 sleep there A. that rwe he not te
a. he time ot hey confinement he was ont of ownt hr
len her quite .. o, severe cold; when be- ZEN did not
know az hai time they were married nor had any person
told I asked her. loh.ected tol. be- was Shscnf,
fhnk nearly week iprr which he event fook p ace
Mrs Walker 70 board with agsn the end Of
80. ~ I. 49, , ~ " - -, - ~. ~ -, %, NJ
Weiss ! sn the wife OF Mr. Da.y Mr Walker. 81 the
time O speaking about divorce and SAYING De hsd am
pie reasons id say What fhe reasons don't
herovn know. edge NJ and Mr.. " did no, NEE, any
other cmc my house last Winter than ihe spoken
.aia she expected 20 meet Mr. W there have seen Mfs
Walker write, and received TWO or three letters from her
wrote to her, believe twice cannot testify a. 20 Der
| hand writing \ note was admitted 70 was written by
| deceased, and i ~ follows
81 have MT received your note Of Dec a. viii see
ycu al Mr. Dodses tomorrow morning u yen desire 70
| af u or q o'oloos.-Dec 3D. NJ W
Bif7ess re.p7ed The time that Mrs W came snd said
size expected io see llr Walker there, he did rot come
she waited for him or hours ihink o was in Jan ee'
might have been Dec Mr. Walker and myself sai i'k.
ing half IN hour IN the front paror al ne time spohr o
before Mrs Walker raped al the door and sad she was
gong, would not have introduced her fo Mr. Walker
had She not done he bad asked 90 see her he a-
pcared deli GIFTED to see her.
Ter Mr. Walker came from the country. A. the time Mr.
Walker VS. lick aid nor Tell bum 81, hat has learned from
Mr. Wgker prev her sickness chat % was rlns
MATCH bpt nd HIM his wife was very sc~ and '0ld
hu THAT mad hsursned 40 which be seemed surprised.
rnH4 a. nN ma "A here NH ~
bedroom which be- had never before seem ne did not -
,,,,, hi, .if b, vent ,, Az shot DO O'clock. he came
there Sleep think. that week she Was nu the meul
ing hand. be- came there day % her during Der
scsre and very attentive sner he came there iiry
lvtd and wife, and continued until hey went io
make visit t0 Mr. Wells N.nih-s before going to -
Louis. never heard before Of their gong On = Lo-
amy Iouiii Meck, sworn-l- niece of Mrs Day
tween and three wears knew Mrs. Walker, nave
,,el p,l soper nl-. law Dl ms , " and Mr.
meeting az the house the Mrs Daily spoke Of ast
uo- "A. 10 ne divorce between Mr.. " and Nrs Daily.
spoken Of The, M the back psror Wa 90 the hall
The paro door being open remained and overheard ine
conversaiiou hy request Of aunt
John Holman. sworn Live no Cortland, about miles
noh of Peeksk. lived there io or u years previously
lived At The HOLMAN Mills on &c Croion RIVER nave
wife sud NO chi drcn. knew Mr. Walker, during me
time she " 'h me. Nr Walker came there previous
ard engaged board himself snd Mr. Walker % Wa
an nr ve.r. AGO. early n The Srrnf they both came u
dv aerNarf they boarded with ne thu1t or MOI cutie
weeks they lived aee ier a. man and wife. and We sup
posed would not have received them take
bDadcrs boz summer. had clergyman boarding win me-
iOt ecird 10 said by prosecution me testimony
was only 90 show a respectable house Ny proper
| ~ adj oins that OF Gen Van Cortland.
4 mig Wa shown. admitted to have been taken from
the finger of Mrs Walker by the Coroner sitter her de-
res.e the District Attorney said thas certain inscriptions
On the inside and be wished be shown 10 ihe jury
bat h wss ob ected 10 Mrs DAILY was Asked II she knew
Of Mrs. W having such nnz while az her house VINO
replied she noticed any but diamond ring Mr. W
had the production Of the ring permitted but was
withdrawn
TIE Dstc, Attorney here said they rested The case for
| the prosecution
Mr. OCouor then moved h. the certificate Of the record
Of the divorce IN Connecticut from Charles Miller De
struck Of he testimony not containing the answer or
plea 81 defendant Argument was heard. The tour de-
MED the motion. not record OF Judicial pro-
ceelng but act Of the Legislature of another STATE
granting divorce question arises, however, whether
-h- divorce bee recognized such 10 this STALE ne
age having taken place this STATE. ihe donic ~
.- llsbad being here although that of The wife here
and the charge being for which divorce could not
been obtained To this State TIE counsel for prose
-unun VIII present their his point before The
charge = me Court being gwen 20 the Jury
~ OGonor then slated that Mrs 1871 and Rev Samuel
l. Southland have appeared rnesse- m Court and De-
-ontenied Thar the prosecution should produce The ie-t
mouy by which fhe indictment found by The Grand
jury and also exhaust their before resting The
Attorney General replied fhe Witnesses were present and
bound do stated By opposite counsel
Decision fhis forenoon hich the Couf al ourued
-------------~-------