The daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1848-1851, 1849-07-28

Mssfrs- Editors Of The oreseenYour paper Of yestsr
day gvesa copy Of eaDiGs issued against by Mr. T. o.
Stark Receiver Of the Atchsfaaya Bank. presume that
twas accidental omission your part that you did not
also give the endorsement said capiss stayed by order
Of the Plaintiff
Recognizing your right and the entire propriey Of your
exposing any transactions of mine a public officer rely
upon your Of Justice to publish the following state
ment which prepared under the supervision of the
Receiver and acknowledged to be true and every
particular:
Of lhe Aehaiaaya Bank was upon tableau filed BY him
were daows 10 lie amount Of about three Ra2ded do
la together with other charges in the abeau BY this
judgment an indebtedness fixed upon Mr. Walker for
about six hundred and ninety dollars Mr.. Walker had
notice Of the Ii4 Of he oppUston this aoeau. but by
note 20 me CLERK OF me Conn, asked CONTINUANCE the
ground Of sickness The opposition was accordingly con.
unned to the pext rule day which day Mr. Walker not
appearing BY counsel OF in penon, the opposition tried
and snaIned and Judgment rendered against him Subse-
guenty Mr. Walker showed to the LiquidatoF and
Receiver receipts for the payment of claims amounting
to a275 heeabouis which claims he had been ordered %
NE iSdpmepi rendered ma they bs 1 s II; Upon
the TRIAL Mr. Walker then expressed his willingness to
satisfy the judgment rendered if Temit tar were entered
lie s6Egestion Of the Receiver rule was taken By NJ
Waksr 70 establish said credits, which has yet been
The Judgment against Mr. Walker is stifappealablst to
L the supreme Court under deYOlutiye appeal.
a noe which the Receiver LET, for Mr Walker at his
office Notifying him be would take capas if the claim
this notice. which supposed to have received was
the Immediate motive to the uing Of the capias which,
The following certificate win show that the change for
rent which in my absence struck out Of my tabeau
has been charged and received by other Liquidaton
Extract from tabe1u Of LiquidatOr Of the Merohants'
Bank filed l6tb Of December, ls47 Expenses Of Office
R, snI q s6 ooa filed 9 81 Of September Si
FgtA District Court If Mlo Orleans. hereby certify
the two extracts above stated to be copies from the
cever Of the Merchants' Bank OF New Orleans on IN
10th of December, 1917, and 1871 Of September 1913
Clerks Office, 9th Of July isls '''' D'g''' 0''A'
Third District Court Of Nso Orleans. No. 1884
A. HoneE and Others, STOCKHOLDERS Of the Bank
certify that the following Is true extract from the abea1
TIED BY the Lqndaor IN the above case the Gath Of
Ia faith g6egof have hereto signed my name. and af
1919 Louis R. CoURTIR, Deputy Clerk.
In confirmation ofthe above statement give the fol-
lowing certificate of the Clerk of the Fifth District Court
showing the pending Of rule to reduce this Judgments
rule taken at the suggestion Of the Liqnidator.
= STATE OF LOUISIANA as. ATCHAFALAYA RAILROAD
Or 0n moiioS Of SsxsndeS st sf Sga'E fe2
Railroad aud Banking Company show cause on Saturday,
rendered on The last a6eaa Of said Walker ' again B
should not be reduced by amounts paid by said Walker mn
DER Judgments OF the Court for which said Walker has re-
Thereby certify tie foregoing to be true extract om the
minutes Of the Fifth District Coutof New Orleans and
DO further certify that no action ever had BY the Court
Clerks Office 9th Of July 1919 10 Ospo'S CLERK
From the abOveit will be that during my absence on
The ta Of the opposition my tabeau which absence was
caused b. my Of notice of theeontiuuanee the Iou
dator Receiver who had previously obtained Ms rent
Of ooe Liqudaor of the Merchants Bank (see certi6
cats above succeeded in having charge for rent sse0l
together with fees of attorney and other neces ay expepse
Of the Lqudator disaowed by which he made me debtor
instead Of creditor Of the Bank That he refused 10 enter
up rtniittT for sums for which presented him yopobs
whose validity he admiited-sums which had been ore,
ed by Count to pay-and when offered TO- pay him the s
anee he suggested take rule 10 reduce the ipd
meat according TO the voucher, Pending that rule when
the Count is not in session Try rules he took ,
published in yesterday Cresosnt for $3.50 though he ad
the due is considerably less and that had fsoueptlv
Offered to pay him the judgment reduced by The amonpt
orNyhich presented vouchers. That afar this the Ion
daors Office having been declared to be unoons utiona
advised by counsel that would be protected h. H.
receipt Of officer who was not recognized BY anv Is,
You perfectly welcome gentlemen. make what Won
out Of this, any other transaction Of nine in which
yOu think the public interested.
Your obedeut servant, ALEXANDER WAtxEK
In reply TO the note appended TO the article the Crescent
Of my being principal editor and Of the proprietor Of
the Delta newspsps the relevancy Of which to the subject
matter Of your allusOn. il would be difficult 10 understand
can Qny say that your statement Is wholly untrue
A. w