New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1849-11-12
Law lO1Fts.

Law COuFtss
supssns Cousr- Csa1ai Ters Before Judges Jones
snd E1vsrds. - y aIiam W Dvek~as vs. The naEoy q
Nsp Yovt This suit In ejectDsIt broasht ~ MID
chester County obisnsd by hs Crstoo Aquedoc Commits
vionefs under authority Of The statute 40 sppDcsn1n va
nsss On esss o. ine ~ a1 -. .. Of a. % .ssrdsd
the owDsrs Psint6 and sE brothsfs and sisters were
IN o1ssuoo Within The time, a. commended By defense
,faIsfed BY statute. tender was made 10 JOnhbsn
sh Se h.d been awarded BAT he refused 70 secsp
H. and the Corporation entered into possession, assuming
DOE was therefore broavh before Judge Barclay Ws.
chester County 10 recover possession o. TIE sod Ibe
plaintiff ives nor suited on the ground MAJ se'os, ~
kiutif nov moves this Court for new trial on The
ground that tender was not made 10 due season bot that
evan fit he'd been made ss ssged, Jonathan DJek'
man authorized, In any manner or form, by ne
tenants Ia common TO eeI fo' them and
only for himself and hst the obss not bound Nv HE
acts Arguments was beard Mr. Wallace ADD Mr. Dyek-
IN person Appearing for he mouoo sno DIT DaWes
and Mr. willard opposed
svpsEns Cousr.-SpeeiaI 7~s-Before Judge I'd
nopds.-D &C sions .-HW'a~ G,ssns W Emsiias
Gyesas suit for dyoroe-chsIge Of inbdey not sus'in
John Wsrsn, a. al 70 Cortland Ps.~, ct alto eel
aside assignment Of isie b. v. Rhodes Co Motion In
Special 7~m-Bsfcrs Judge Edmonds -CoaU Cot -
THE h suit by wife against her husband IN reison to
her separate estate Ia sui. for divorce pnsiDd treat
msni also pending The suii is broushtin Mts = own
name The Code sang that actions can be boush, 10 Che
suit hs couns. for defense urged hsiin an action OF This
snd The wife should be compelled to give security for
oosts Judge Edmonds was Of opinion that suit by .
wife her husband for sopsfse estate can only be
sIed BY friend Tho Code only altering the common
law, which prohibited wife bringing action In her
own nsmc behalf OF all The suing by next idsnd Il
proper relates costs Tbs counsel for paotf thought
tsat the words alone could properly BE-
commended mssnipg TO sue by next friend" as,
the latter had been Intended the Code could easily hsye
expressed a. The question 10 held for edyisement
Cousr ov Cosfxos PL,.s-Tbs suits Depiis Darid
for hbe snd Smith Gods for alleged slznder aud
Hbsl already REFER ed TO, are stiil on.
Special Tva-BcfOre Judge Ulshoefer Thosds n til
FOE W Hafr NJ luton Motion fer slmony and for
counsel fee 10 defend the suit granted.
CpeeIr CousI-BefOro Judge Hatbut- Catha'tas
ISatAlgas Balda, Ring and ott~s-To recover value
VI alleged have been invady taken iron the
hoase VI Mrs 40 Broadway, In 1871 For defense Il 10
ss thai Tho furniture taken uodef oha,ie mortgage
given by Mrs. T. which mortgage was assigned 10 Mr.
Baldwin, that exercised ss far Is possible 10
tshs other ARTICLES than those included In the mort
gage, aud that Mis r. daughter Of plaintiff wss present
and vas requested to poni out any that might
wise ke For plaintiff II 10 alleged that much more far
niure taken than belonged 10 the mortgage aud thai
the whole matter was Invalid tender OF the smo uni
sctuay due having previously been made which latter
10 denied To be continued this forenoon. For plaintiff
Mr.. Allen and Mr. O. Hudson, fof defendants, Messrs
slosscn echsll