The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1849-04-05
Sups rl0r Court.


Arm 0.-Lucrefsa Redmond 10 Monisgue HenSyicks
ct aI-This action Of repevn 20 trv tina titIs
Of the parties to quantity OF household FUR allure
1t appeared that man named samuel Esls, r.nted
housS in Vack street from the dsfs urs-ehss in
May. 1874, he left defsndants prsm,oss, owing two
quartsSs' rent, about $244, and hired poxtisn Of
plaintiffs house In Beach street to which he ,sd
bringing vita him the furniture he had in Vsrick
street, together with additional furniture which he
had purchaeed After leaving tho sst strset
Soon after he took porssssion Of plaintiffs house he
executed to her mortgage Of oil the furniture to Sc
Of his removal from prs msss had ii
the defendant issuad landlords warrant aud ievisd
on tho whole Of tns furniture to satisfy ths rsnt in
srsafst the time he l-fs. The plaintiff caused writ
Of replsvin to issus, and rsplsvinsd them and nov
claims to hold them on the following grounds First
she claims the entire under her MORTGAGE seoondiv
she claims them under the exemption law or such part
OF then a. Il covers and thirdly, she claims that
portion Of them which Esls purchased after he mad
shown that followed the goods a. they had
right to do before the thirty days had elapsed and
this suit CONNIE need; snd, therefore. tina; the
lien under the mortgage did not take effect They
also to show that the mortgage was not re-
nswed from year 70 year. ~ required BY the status.
The jury rendered verdict for the plainti vAluioe
the property ct $500 ressrvibg the raised b
dsfe.dsnt' counsel for the consideration Of full
court. ..r. .f'I
Before Judge Sanford
Wm. e: LtDisd 81 IS Hs,eu!es r. JOnes.-This
was an action on draft for Sa37 81, drawn by 8 r.
Hazeweli and accepted by defendant. Paymsnt was
refured when the draft became wAs protest.
w I'VE nun peymeut usual proof OF mana writing
and protect was given The dsfsaoe that the par
ties came together after the draft protested and
entered into = negotiation, by which the plaintiff
agreed to receive three drafts upon . named G.
Wills residing In Wscon,in, each draft to be for
$llo 10 In payment Of Hszewell's acceptance, aud
that plaintiff was to pay the defendant In cash. the
difference between the amount Of the tares drafts on
Willis. and the draft In suit The Jury found q YER
diet for the plsintif fer $3.50 60.
Before Chief Justice Oakley.
APRIL A. George Rickarfs u.s. .amgusfe Ttrle~.-
This wsssn action for assault and battery The par
ties are GsrmsDs, and belong to two military oomps
MES which genes ally out together upon public
casiops % the 10Th Of May last General Scott ar
rived witt to this city, and both conn vent
out usuao meet the General after the business Of
the day over, the plaintiff and defsndsns, with
Others repaired to reecory in Chatham Square and
had some drink after which quarrel oomme ncsd be-
tween Plaintiff and defendant 1t was alleged BY
plaintiffs council that defendant threw him on the
floor and while down jumped several times on his leg
and brokeit. In consequence Of which plaintiff was
confined to his bed for "a weeks, sad has not yet
recovered the use OF It. The defendant put In plea
Of the general issue, denied the piaiutifs allegations
and insisted that n his leg broken 1t happened
through his own Dsggenoe and misconduct The
jury did not agree TO the time the court adjourned
and were directed to brsg in sealed verdict
row (thie orning)