New-York daily tribune., 1849-10-26
Court .THIs DAy.

Court Calendar. .THis DAr
IS srs.slos s s 5 @ s 49, = s Isl g o So ST. 3 s 81, s
10 SIS sos, So7 TO 37+.
mont term
Cousr or Oyrs AND rss~rsEr-Ths irixl Of Charles
H. Carpenter charged an sccessorySc was continued
Testimony presented 10 SHOW that the parues WIN
whom he boarded were mistaken IN ssyns .ns. usa
brough from hin a. Csld~ers that month Testimony
also pre- sented With view 10 show that hr G. was
Roe irtrodoced him as Mr. Carpenter, from Nsw-YoI.
add they oos defendant seeing him ~heo arriving into
Court being the person On the cross oxaulus
ton would mol positively bat hinks II 10 Tesu
mouy also offered show the reputation Of the two
witnesses who testified tbs Other day al having seen hia
in Roxbuiy, To be good Adjourned 10 this forenoon
| Daly-Hrtsos Co'pus-Johs J. Tsckev ~ Pasi F'shs,
S-n-~e noticed sne appiieauop . few csys since. Of
M for and custody Of bis two children, and
ne decision of Judge DAILY that she children should
unue remain With M Smith, who had brought them
up The followipg IL the opinion fJuige psy In msk
D1i. J~rhi. is sn application BY Johs J. TUCKER for
the custody Of his infant children Catherine and william
Tucser. The applicant Was married TO iDe polnsf %
i,s IA rv unbspoy and 10 have separated kequenily
Afer The birth of the youugeH child, VINO nov years
OF axe they separated hnaly, and tho fsnef hsvnx e
The children che service and placed mo children
IA the Aims Houss Ehzsb-thtown 10 sbouta year sac
smith They we'd ogsther IL the assumed relation vi mac
and wife until desh, which took psce 'st SumineI
r.,e m.rrts5 bat nc other evidence Of marriage
has produced)-and shs bad shIse sniden ~ hn
~ o. wss% are .ss sOw y.wo1es her Children e% The
House and ihcy have been brought up and ~ppofwo y
The respondent from ,ss! Tins 70 Ihs pss'sn Ie,o' % D
pcsni Tucker, msrded another woman, which marsss
s. n. a @sss Ss.sI .ss ss,Is ssso ~so s !.
i've. h wife He nov ssas s;, sss s; s;s:gs.aso, m %
compelled 20 rerqaish the custody o. voc 20 s coz
rvivng parcnio Issl be refused that they be places
10 ms custody of ihsr gr.ndmoIaei of o. .'sM Ins
,,d 10 the possessloa uness he sn plht person 10 b.
tn,rusted with sher care. Moral disqaanhesuon 10 .
| osr-rt h. ons OF tho snoogest reasons maj can or
prsed OF his uIflness 10 discharge the psrsnAl
duty snd hat dsqaAhhesnon etsis % ,,sS m
.ad i'' !. "a .dIi 'i' eos.Siuus Win woman whea be
awfay married for The DEAN ., ns s "s ,sss.s
no. ..s. ss, We hcs va. before ore a1s .
hin - liberty TO m S sI sssoes sssi a9t 'TSsn 20 s.e
',s ne. p,G S.os os. .sdsn ii should ss placed
custody OF fa!her rho has been nvns Ia n cpeo stse
.a wose es oDpsssd 20 ne !sos Ou0s "a sssh,
poey II 4. law Bal iss susnss ssa.ars s1isu ~ III.
ease Of the ileits eonns1ion between os @ v.ss -
besw % her and The fsbsr be would be soausd % DS
posses.lon The rule Of is. oeinS wnsss sos csu,s
gree The relation Of thsss p.riss hs &c
.9s. sss sS., Of =. s:, :d :'E r..
respondent Eressns he.ssors mA0'i " /. ne dss,
Il trrff -
usss. Ss. essa Of e essss eOset.
mt, non: g.y.ssL Il. :sa a.. sss w. siss
lhird psrues any are found CON .,a as .nsls.ss
ss'fss ~ Z, hem ba f'os sddsass before no
ss ~ss no, T-sl asne~d 10 slyps shsm 70 stssr Ise
!: 20 sic :sy . .iss siis s.sS
| 80. ~. msinssuanos, eduesnsa sed worldly twelfafe
| .aees .ss Tho can save noihns assh for Iss
1 sao1 void bs altogether 700 precefoss. sne = 70
.pss ss .sss s.,sss ;. 10 4, ssss es.sss u hon o.
ssls % nssisa them an lefi 70 ds'srnlns 1ssfoss
ssI...a me t.ss sss ss % AH, ,o.,1 s% s
f.Aes b. bat sddei:d % ia.snpsrsaes
- ~ 80 nor. .s s.s s. ss q .: ..
he hAs ..Issdy upoe h.s hsad' Ies & ysss
weekly income from bic badness more tnen sameist,o
ne sappon OF he family iseudnf Asse ehi es
sss ported for The past noe yesfs tnoogn uoae
no i-sa ons DO co. 10 some guarantee, noss
vsry sronx thai he viii eoeunee 70 90 30 hefese'
.iss s.s. sreo =. essr.a hey are strongly
- hin lie has sde no dstincnoo oess so .osm ~.
y. OWE sAs ,sa ss, s% .as ,Ss ..ssms he hes iep'
tasm at he com schools until Ihs eonuovssy oss
and hey bear tie srterral svid -ces OF ossnx 49,
sDd csrsfally ssoa Chr Up should he nsgert mem n's
snsr n viii Be good f renovins hsm fom ~ = ~:
custody hat ,r de present hinh u for tss r7
ehi.dssa thai lhsy remain where sSeJ "'
Sp,ss,os Cocsr-Besoss Judge vsndsspoot-hsess
II <ssf Tk.tA IA INseafgsfsfnl3 o. bs~Wb
-, 70 ,,-,ov-r Insurance.. referred 10 yss,efcG ~
Mh,r ore III the eoaasel 10 ire case having o-afo o.
,rs ae.s of r.laaYe I've UNDERWOOD sss1fJ ne ia'
1 ,h-r hs.r.rr Of this csse was postponed ~
R.eSr. Jsas, sasdfsrd :. ss.ss r is.f vs JsSs
E,,.st-Ieiou for alleged libel already rsfsrr.1 so
m. ou e.aos for the Jary vas wts<her As S
w.fs fair report of Judicial proess4inSs esa -
"a. rrsss In soeordsnee With the report @ tns Ss no.
re. Jarv anrr hssns % three hoer. - -
80. sna we're dlschHssd oa The sdjoufn"s0' I" w
| Cosrt
| -siesSa CbeellJ, fssr.h
..,, IN. sstn CordsIs charged Vic - sr..
s,srn .cms elosh~s bale nstse 20 ~ = s,eSed oeco
ned saa se 30 ssd dsssrssd, but ed no' 'oaea
any Of he eoassa~-
vr.r ,os L,,r.sa,: nth: ,ssss L,Ss''i n.s rio1's
VII sAii "e sr,s ssv vsnnsb The lst day OF February
s, II ss,ass asfsrssea prevents: We % sa.'' zoe. %
49, ~, NsI,sna. vrsssl from New orissns 70 &C
svs the smifrsnts IN the South western STATE:
.cs :. oar funds IN Justify Ico'osisssioa Herald
~ Mr.. Hesekish Craw ford, On oversssr on
.,sa,sucu rear sArevspors. la vss rsceasly moroes
| - ~ . sisss women Who pcfeoee1 he Gomez 49,
a. sorfsssed immedassiy upon osng spprese..s,s . -
"a :. ri,>s, "A 4 negro man on the piensaecs -