New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1849-12-25


suY,.tos cousr Before judge vlndsrposl - BsL<lss
"a R.stzs and oths,, lcuoa 'or ege1 malicious 2f9.
rsuos already referred 10 THIS case was Jesief9sy
ssnrsed up sod gvsa tie Jury Counsel FOR he de-t,
insi,irg there PROBABLE esuss. Wills ne solu.'
Wa e0s,elied for % tbs Other si3s Fsrdiel ",os "a
Lhs 4 M,0rev jim r Baeoa ard W daos" !, = !,
Silt Assigned PAGER psinaf e.niessi -. a.
ziv.L merely a. sscDny fog bail for "
defence iEsistii ~ss f0E icds0Ieenrss syto.o' A.,
DAY FoE phE NJ r. S.rtford Frr o-i'' "
h.ls s.d M. y B q uuL
covEr o. Conuo~ PLsa.-fn chs n e'',
JssSs Ulsoo. tef Hatsa' c'LrtA. rec ming tn-
q beha u lh- mo.csr 81 M Marcn's o., 5,|l, n.
saperio.eudaat Of IRE H01ss Of fefikS :" - n
ns,,c, on Nt- yifl "a q IL yesfs u az " - -
sv-,fe1 al bee IRE larlY cJ1nii. !.
ef.ae ee also Il. .:oP.e a. va, re CIR loe
mother AID c.d IL 6eep gnsi.' srs.6 n would. .sm
st-f pee SIC 49, ri 10 ~ he row husband T
Ser nathe- Who became onlieo " %. 49, -
- eLa "a. w Ii.Is sfI - NJ well drssse5 sod
49, good care hss hee9 tssHn OF b-f c'upeshoo'
a., lar i.hef (Tho resides 10 ms cy aug hst :
b,t IA va. ssid hst coLe nO,a''g fo' sc1
49, ,o 40 uo,sr, for tss chl;) thai hsf mDloef "a
a9ggsd ser. when Der fsihef gaze hsr a. "a
br 10 20 20 The ga e:c sleep en- sne ga ne
estssr hssdns oft, snd bopDs "a she 'sd 70 nave
sgh seton u re Police y @nch y i1ghss we CO
sa3 eIeyeot her from go.sg On - sR-in neos appicH
iss A. tho Police Office. ben comp sint wes sbei out
"a ,he ,er,h-o IT, saying hsi ire child "ss dto
sasaon-so1.e, n o. ~. lag Jl.iee comniMeo ths
dsys 10 The sref OF all parties Inc molef ssyink
.as yss DOT q VIA! lns paper co1I-iood ~nici
,be W. cslsd 70 swear 70, aud & vas f from her ~
t0n or wish have ths child so separated on her Tie
ns gin Ia an.wer question II she oic not sey since
r,fomsd her adopted father had r1gge1 her, ssi1
~. ,se dc but she deserved H. ard b. rsf always been
ssS 10 be, ard given her everything 'be required Her
fshsF abs SAID, tod her 70 come 20 him lsne yea PIG
sy wee'i9e a. s nn1 re Shege ts91sd stl
who sp cared 70 be highly lesp- able mao ana 70 oout
viii tea, good care " her j. was iDlmsIed OF 'he g
temsu DO bfoughl nor thai such an ssn9n' Wov9
Gea,aj T~m-Dscistons --sFEcr.L Y.ETsEs,HiT.
Bank If North Ca,eh'd Lsois q Wtson and Others
o, bill Of exchange drawn BY spsea. Pa.ngi.n's
"a which verdict OF $500 9ea for plainun, sub
Tbs Coars said The question which ari,es 10 this cs'e
10 whether The defendants have by hsF acts CONVERTED
limited partnership into genersl one sna ms1s a..
bsls slated the AID tho scs "a to he bill II sp
pess 10 us, therefore. mat ne statute hs, bsel
10 Two particulars VIZ IN Carrying on DCsne's 10 -
name OF The firm AfGe IL dissolved, and 10 The transfer 20
the special parnsf o. share 10 ne pOperJ Of me h
,snt The ac OF tho cefepds1s in too strong hght bu
where express admission wst made mat inc hfn wa.
d,,ovsd 90 the 7h May ard partner withdrew, AID
,seo that, bill was pied on the 8:h 10 the
the frm, view IL IN no Other ngh IMAM as VOL
non OF the section Of the statute The mode In when
the b drawn would Tend to oncusioD that was
made aud accepted 10 cary cut the provisions OF hs 10
.1,nmsnt by which the ft.i Was dissolved aud II 90
,ssre cor BE- no doub, OF ne equity OF no ding liable to m
payment those who had expressly covensneo 'hefe'o-
Verdict confirmed, with cos!s.
Ice p John y. yolf appellant In suit By CLERK 10
Marie Court TO recover $50 amonths salary ser being
discharged the ground that the CLERK had been o.
gsRsd for lobger Term ihap employed, verdict IVES
given for plaintiff, and appeal made Tbs CouIt sMo by
s66h section Of the code appeal this Court ae 10 give
Judgment according TO the lsuce OF the case ana may
ahm the Judgment veveTss II for error OF law or IsC
ths Court also said II will not regard technical errors 90
deiects We know Of no better rule - adopt than that
which exss to tred before Jury In IBIS Cour
pAny IN case Ike this has night 10 claim Tor no
wager s the end OF each monh fa discharges
10 IDLE and get Olhor employment, he hiss nsnI
oehsrge for the f lime enRseed, but be gels olher
employ equally valuable, he csnnot csim Aud ca
"a difference "
e.ss got oher employment weeks after, leaving his
situation with defendant but the point was not raiitd o.
the hal or tie appeal and this COurtls not wiling TO m
terfes n tons the fact to show ths not 10 be COO
sdored settrg between the psriesa night to recover
for subsequent claims Judgment below am med
lin Cungeu vs. Stelh,n Pd'khursf--Rspsft referred
bset.
Hos,y Ca,psnf.y appellant Ben Bioek''d9e Ar
peal dismissed, with coats.