New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1849-12-20

1
W.T. at .-e ksTr hJNsge- s.!ss1 aim % IN. ol.
and Rev Continents sm fsly convinced Of tie our,s,
motives Of TIRE C1uEse! Tso preesesei sri ~ eol.
ssgua 10 mSnszics - II ire hers 81 ts stssi
y u - rsgrattst thsi ths hairs OF such = Al %
H1sciui<n vas were seeding jcsrce In Aner,rSn
Courts fn- - ye.rs without s1ccess-ani thet ;-c
@, sctors raised d they wers susisnsse So cal
stec 3 pfrs IT, cssa r. "a -af-uie - n 70 nc 10
s0n tasr ~ Soy g1rs before. hcscusko, IN AL Gitsr
periods u rs is tom the g-a 81 toe struggle for
American tr-eoo ~ hs cesth showed uolmis7d love
flr liberty Hs persona merits 10 or country eev ~
ed him from rsnk 81 Captain to thai Of General
be shed h God 90 the battle sslts FOR hs ard flr our
country. sr1 received reward from rs ia 2 not
change h. principles turius TIE FrencA Revolution In
Is il emma l. Indignantly ctet the friendship 81
.ss car Alexander. because az The position which
Alexander took toward be native and, Poland IL 10
cce - the memory and character Cf such msn u 10
dee = nsrcas honor. that the heirs o. flca
man Il they are his hers recover 70 due 20 Ihe
10 this country snd aai no further delay be allowed ~
Anne rcsn Courts Of usiice. Thoss who hold the funds
consider u ns mor. duty not 10 Withhold orSsr rom
h0icu,kos heirs WAT 10 Due from them Mr. Johnson
expressed nope ihai the Court vii be prompt 10
ssirs taer decision In this csc
Attsr NJ. Johnson concluded. IL -u sgrsed os,wssn
tas Council ~!th the consent Of toe Govt; that Mr.
z caA-- :. Coke sasu made h.s cosag Argument for
see 3ernarraais on Saturday uozt
w4ssIvor5N. o. c Saturday, Dec. t.
- RrCHAH1 ?. CoKE ,i'-et to-day he s-Eu-
rnrl; g.. .As .4n.ii'rsor OF Tho personal es,ats OF
CO. Roao-d sna o- ;hs sUrete: OF ths s;ier T. tbe
g7cts.r :; g Ho.-ir,kos estate. Ne spoke n
-'gh ,si ul oi H9slssso. hnl s0Us3ve-fsi epoa ihc
sy1c...s af re r'o.Ezphy IS given BY Hon. R,verdy
!o1-.o0 -.-5 conclusion c - srguHien. sfe heirs
60 K-.e,,,se. ~ C-r1 r'slrl.incd IA; those uao
,,.-..; ,lru..sv-s - be- the next I'd; ka 80 K'sci.
sss0 c-.-e .-sa.e ~ spBrs.5s o. hos-'lik, in--.
%, .rd d. 81 % -Hni-re1 Q. lais country ~..'' .rc
l-auIr-fs. irum 80 zee. 81 ia memory rcstt ;.or
claim io ~ gag bat 80 WI. 50 sXr-r.scd 20 20 tssta
..saiS.5 tfio,ao0s ot i1g- and >O6 msy t7ss eject
.5- rc~ck nj. -.s1sa g ihe - D.. ~ q, under Witch
a- r.ui .sirsnts cain t1es nct ~. Ct h'scirsSos
property .a .f t..-.a -t--s sol iss Ogg1-ri Co1r:
.s1 no tAfisdicin g. ssaosn hsg W.. 50 tn rev eEa
f-s 49, 93ies 90 1873 s-t $40 lie msin-
is led that ths W. Of ls5. upon which the compis'r
ania roly as not been o.'d wita ias Bill wh!-h Mr.
authorities cited ~ both counsel of the camu slnan;s
49, against ;hsni. snd sussia the objection ~ mutt
isriousn he 'sit iAss the com2.llaan.s uoi i'ty
s5mPls1 against delay p. they sre not ibe prrsoos
.ae ,res-ntsi claim % tte estate Ia 1919 ard rnt
IHiiu 20 The bin u fha compsiltl;s VI As tiet a
~elr -. for the nrst dime
Arar Mr. Ca IL concluded, Ma o. IOchman rosa and
al thrf tna earned couns-i who sat doga miscun.
caived sconstrusd ma biographical stat, mont OF
hon. Rsvsrdy Johnson TIE latter, speaking ~ ho,-
c.-ss.. sal ihst ko.cusco I'D uog chsRgs his oya.
JuraE the French Revolution ard 'nc olan.sl
20 the other sce. commenting upon H. ccuied kose
uscos serving In the French army taking psri
the French Revolution. This 10 puttax uto the fps
ot Nr Johnson what be dii not say and Gid Rot resn
t1s.y Here The Court said " Inis has bearing
apon he demurrer" watch wssrepssted ~ Mr Coke.
snor o. r,lo'n8d Nsj T bgi IL /, INSTRUMENTATION
which iDput@s srOss ignorance Of history, sod inera
fore ! d. IL due 70 HOa. Riverdy johnson, Who 10
sb.ert, g. cOrTeo,lt
Major r th-n claimed the rsh, 10 reiols to .ouls
Dor Of tha argument Ct Mr. Coke upoO the ground
nat ihe alter Introduced new matters which being
granted he said that the counsel tbs other side in
stead - arguing the temurers enlarged the mer
ts of tns case. We not before this Court 10 try
whether the Orphans Court hsd Cr mad no, the power
% ssAb ish ih- VA Of 1916. and 80 revoke the pro
bsies the wis OF i19- and 1896.
Ti't question could b, brought hnrc only By al a9.
Pea ftn dacison cf the Orphans Court. snd this
too .ot by TIE holders o. t1rd, Of hoscusko. hut
~ those VINO usy have Interest Ia susislniDs tho wis
0i lbs snd l-06 These Who ara Interested Ia the
WIN a. li9-, which. 10 sustsined, would eNhaut the
Whole iund have NOS spreslsl from AID DO not cor
,sst The decision Of the Orphans Court rayokng mo
probate iao.e-t II ne soSer. y ssr IA w., ~ 49,
murVer Jfcy sh01e S.Wef t17 oil oi toe ConyiHn-
ant Gle bill Of lotprpeacer. AMI Bring moneys due
from than into this Court In support of til, srgu.
r.elt Nsj q. referred t5o Court 20 29l OF stOrys
Eguity PesfiDRs and b Alords 70 atty Feetlug by
Jeremy psges - 1f2 l43 IL reiutst tho Charge h,t
zoe VII q l-lh not b'eD l.ef, ~ ,shiDg 10 of'e
~ from smops The psPsrs which vera Is tbs time
unler tts ~or'rol q Nr Coke sud sh0Nny it 10 the
G. Iur. IotlsMr CaSe answered that ~ Ess taken
FROM 'hs pOck ard J3H nov pat sIroug The Papers
r1- c1srse 4tat eonufica s0ny sose u'4rsrs bur
t1 eeCfuu I0atI uptcH IT, Tin GlthL ser pussc@-
s5t called L pom the clerk yroduc. he c0ckei, sua
f.. h.u this DONE BE- ssk4t him 90 tei the Judges
how many exaiJ's vers f'oi by hlf1 With ih8 bl. -
Gn4 an.<e- being sven "sE," NJ 4. handed tho ORR
glal ti % Hon. Judge Dunlap, and requested nn =
count number VI exll5iss roisiftd u 10 zee Dbl
aud marked the margin. The Judge, altar sNniDio
tax tee bill. sad " stu, Mr.. Coke Whrrrupoa MAJ
7 sLc. 81 have nothing mJrs 20 sag on NE SUBJECT
but ill add that vers not the WIN Of 1910 Med, H
would not be foial--ss Is 10 ne srIaenc, 30 support
charges Of the bill 4 could therefore bs produced A.
another siege Of iha proceedrs' aud II SUN oojeShln
were worth any Thing Il would 90 10 az ior'H Of Inr Dill
could Dot therefore be- sssxued upon the demurrer
Sret'sas reier your H0noTs, IN this respec 20 siJ
OF st,fy's Equity Pie-dings' Nj I then explained
that Comp sinsnt Of The Estko orsnch sFe mo sae
persons who presen tbsr claim o. tno estate Ia l-y
ard rno ed b.ll 10 ls23 some OF tham then sctod
~ tutors add guardians, b~ing themselves minors go
These nov lIed iii 10 iaeir ~ nalnss ths nisres
o. oihers represented by John / Ennis ~ This city
~ administrator the same ksskos, who died darias
The euIency Oft this protrscted litigation no bfsnen
OF Zukowski. came, for tho hsst Time, before ms
American Courts 10 lsi5 They srs descendants 4 the
second ssier of hoscusko and the Essos, ~ao are lie
sr-udsnls OF hs rat ,slef Co noE contest iher rshss
The intares: OF some Il the Zaik0xsks 10 represent
IL By .mpsl ; William, administrator % thosa Who
sc d-a3 ani some q them act 10 taeig own
So T. concuded that o'hsr poinis Of the Argument Of
ST. Coke &c; being H.sttnrs snt having u-sa a.
rrssv fuiv .rgqed ~ Hon Reveriy JbnsIn snd hlm.
-f he 5Inis.ef tho t. TIC dIcisico % m 80
-.i-a ils CONT :ook u11er .asseines.
krslrcxY Cos,rITUriosAL CosygsrfoN.--