Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1849-10-09

against
David w. Moore and others Defendants.
The defendant above named no. having entered his
appearance aud given security according 10 The I'll
Assembly and the rules of ths cnuri aud II appear
ing by satisfactory evidence tat he Is not an lnhabl
tant of this Commonwealth, iii- ordered that the said
defendant do appear al the rs To he held tor the said
Court, The frat Monday In November next, and an
swer the bill Of the plaintiff; ma that copy Of ths
order be forthwith inserted insomc newspaper pub
shed IN the city Of Rich'n0n, FOR two months sue
cessivey, and posted ut the ront door of the State
Court House in The said city. .Copy. Teste,
Aug I5-cw2m r. ROBERTS. Clerk.
IN NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.. Ar Rules held Ia The
Clerks Oifce Of the 5upeior Court Of ChancrIy
for the Richmond Circuit tho Oh day OF August, 1850
Churchill Doggett aud Geotr w Anderson, mrr.
chants and partners, trading uhrr the name and style
of Dogge't aud Anderson, Plaintiffs
against
Edward N Gillian and othr, Defendants.
The defendant above name not having entered hi-
appearance and given srcurit according tn the act 81
Assembly aud the rules vi thii;our, AMI II appearn.
by satisfactory evidence that snot an nhahItant 81
this Commonwealth, IL il ordtsd that the said defend
do appear At the Jules 10 held for the sdld Court
the first Monday IN NovrDer next, and answer the
bill Of the piainti's; and hata copy Of ihis order t~
forthwith inserted III spaper published IN the
city Of Richmnnd for Two mnths successfully, and
posted nj the front door at thetc Court House ~ tie
Aug. ls-ewam r ROBERTS, Clerk.
IN overwhelmingly a Court held i"r
1 Halifax county, AT the tnrt House thereof, on
Monday, the a1tli day OF AUgU, 1919:
George u. West, Plaintiff:
against
Isaac Hart, Defendant
The defendant not haviug.nterrd his appearance,
aud appearing by saiisilri evidence that he IL
inhabl,ani al THIS Commonwealth, u Is ordered,
that the said defend do appear here The fouith
Monday IN November next, I'D answer the plaintin's
bil and that copy ot This cder hr forthwith Insert
ed III the Richmond Enqner for two months SUE
crsSvely, AMI posted IL III front door 0i the Couit
''s s.", Of s .nls s"sn'y A'gy4T + ar
IN Observation-Disclosures : Al Rules held In u.
th. Richmond Circuit, tie 6,tday of Augu.t, lsi9;
William Is Gordon, PlanIlh
against
Joseph II Talbot aud other Defendants
The defendant above name not having rnirfrd BIS
appearance and given srcurS according 10 r ac' 81
Assembly and the rules Of TAI Court, aud II appearing
by satisfactory evidence that - not an nhabllaht 81
tins Commonwealth, II Is ordret that tho said defend
ant do appear the rules to held for the said Con
on the first Monday ia November next aud answer tr
bill of the plaintiff ADD tina a copy oil ms ofhrt se
forthwith inserted in some newspaper pubh.o w Us"
city Of Richmond for Two i"nths surers JTsf anu
posted al the front door Of he State Coure House III
'"t A su,a i u;.yc '' RoBEars, c,e'l.
| IN acknowledgements Court Of onan',
ly Sessiun, held for The ounty Of Nortinmbsta.a'
NJ the Court House, ON Mo,day, the 18th day :" "u
gust, lei9
Cyrus Harding, Gua,dIanio Harriet Blaekrrby: Of
IllIh Oi NIiliiui DlaChrrDy ltCtdseui S"'"F'
Harriet Elackcrby, Thomas BIackerby, JOSEPH
BLACKBERRY, John Angel and Sally hs w'ir, VINO Inn
Sally Blackerby prior 10 her marriage with saii J"hu
Angel, and Thomas ReyleT ind Betsy his we, WI VIZ
wa. Betsry Blackeiby prior her marriage WIN sou
Thomas Ievier, Defendants.
The defendants Thoma. Baeterhy aud Jo'rph
Blackrrby, and John Angel lad vile, ana ihoi'a,
Rrvier and wife, not having entered their appeadn,
and given security accordn: TO the act OF hssem"l
and the rules of this Court, aid IL appearing W ss
factory evidence that they are not inhahtans VI VIZ
Common II Is ordered, that the said deicndan
do appear before the Justices II our sara 1oui', a.
Court House on III. second Monday In November nett
and answer the PLAINTIFF bill; and that copy OF WV
order be fnr;hwith inserted in The Richmond EnquiIf'
paper published In the CITY Of Richmond, Tor tSo
months successfully and posted al the front door oi
Aug 2-ew2m J. r sTITH, &C.
| IN CHANCERY-viEo tsiA AT Rules held 10 ihs
CLERKS Once Of the superior Court Of Chanee f''
the Richmond Circuit, the OH day OF August, le4y'
Jacob z. Baysrs aud Matilda his wife, plaintiffs
against
Alexander 9. Brown one OF the Executors OF James
Brown, deceased, Baylor Walker and sarah his VIE
William Z Elliot, Administrator OF Joha Cfadjoti'
Jr., deceased, an d other, Deien6ahs'
The defendants above named not having enter
their appearance and given security according to'
act of Assembly and the rules OF this Court and nap
pearng by satisfactory evidence that they are nov ~
hablianls Of this Commonwealth II IL ordered tht Wv
said defendants do appear the rules To be held ~
the said Court, on The first Monday in hnvrmb-f h,i
and answer the amended bill Of the plaintiffs; ana ths
n copy OF this order lie forthwith Inserted 10 s1mo
newspaper published In the city OF Richmond iof W"
mouths SUCCESSFULLY, and posted al the front doo'
the State Court House in tho said city.
A Copy. Tests. ,,.r
Aug. l5-cw2m r. ROBERTS, IieIe.
FIFTY DOLLARS REWARD. =,
DAN AWAY from the subscriber. 10 me iI6SIY
IL August, two BIacksmiths. JOE and ~. .n,,.
Joe is about ak feet and.a half high of ,1rsyi,
plaxi0n, and ABOUT twenty two years o'u ,ias oi q