New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1849-03-12
Cavaiaunc and the Ministers.

On the 18th General Cayalgnac mounted the tri6
to complain of an article Published in the UaiOH,
cusing him of endeayoDg 10 teduce part Of the army
OF Paris from their duty no had not he ssid, prose
culed the journal for libel because being ked
private individual be could not therefore have forced
the journal bring forward proofs of the facts alleged
gainst him he thought Il better TO come forward 10
the tribune and inquire from the Minister OF the In
terror and General Chsngarner II any thing had come
to their know ledge relative 20 the accusations.
Leon Faucher declared that he had never seen the
article In queston-thst the Ministry had commubi-
cation Of any kind with the newspaper In question
and hs regards the charge itself II any such aega
ton had reached bis ears he would have repelled il
with ndgna,on, utterly inconsistent with the char
of Gen Csvagnac aud also with the services be
had rendered the country. Gen. Changarnier also
denied all communication with the UaioH Newspaper
and expressed his surprise that Gen Csvagnsc could
supposed that he could have anything with
the matter Of which he complained.
Gen CayHigusc then declared himself sstiafed and
in reference to an expression used by Gen hang
ner who had complained that he had not come 10 him
privately % ask explanation, be stated that his
for bringing this subject before the Assembly was
IN order that the contradiction might before the
country The affair then dropped. 20 the dssppOint-
msnt Of the members who expected 10 have heard
explanation OF assertion made within the last
few days by the Naf'oaa to the effect that II conflict
had taken place between the National Assembly aud the
Government on the 10Th day OF January the Govern
ment had determined at once to arrest Gen Cavagpsc
and two other Generals. That part OF ths story
however passed in silence II lie said that the two
Generals whom IL Intended 20 arrest along with
Gen Cavalgnac were Generals de Lamoricierc and lie
Bretorr
France Retrogade.
On the Goth NJ Ledru- Rollin announced that the Min
lister of Foreign Affairs had consented 10 reply 10 his
questions respecting Italy when the debate that sub
ject commenced. He stated thst In bringing forward
ns interpretations his object 10 ascertain whether
the French Government knew anything OF an intended
Intervention the part Of Piedmont and Naples, with
view restore the Pope to his temporal throne and
pu, down the Roman Republic.
NJ. Drouys de Lhuys declared that the French Re.
public by means intended to admit conjoint re-
sponsbility It's part IN the various insurrections
which might take place in Europe that il had idea
Of ackuO wedeng the Roman Republic without having
first sscertsned that II could fully approve Of the acts
and intentions of that body that u most anxious TO
have the Pope placed In such position suitable
his honorable position of temporal prince and head
Of the Church but that as 20 the means OF etectng
that result it did intend to discuss them In the
tribune.
~ Ledru Rollin again addressed the Assembly, bring
ing forward arguments similar 10 those which bad been
heard from him before when he adverted to the stus
ton OF Rome but nothing that be said was OF nature
to draw forth any farther reply from the Minister for
Foreign Affairs The speech that of the celebrated
Protestant clergyman 81 Coquerel, who passed warm
euOgium the character OF the Pope Affirming that
IL France restored the Sovereign Poni TO his throne
she would act wisely; 1t was, observed the reverend
gentleman, because he firmly believed that Papscy
must hereafter perish thst he desired IL to remain firm
in its place until last tell 20 pieces not BY the neg
lect OF Kings and Republics bu, by the sbsndonmento
believers.
NJ Theodore Bac then proposed an order of the day
uo,ire declaring that the National Assembly persist
Ing in its order of the day OF May - expressing
wish to see Italy free, and Poland independently passed
the order Of the day Alter short discussion, the
Assembly indicated firmly It's intention 70 vote the
order of the day pure and simple, that NJ BAG thought
IL prudent 10 withdraw that which be had presented
and go the question dropped