Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1841-1853, 1849-12-20
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
November Term, 1919.
REPJRrED FOR THE STATE SENTINEL BY A. O PORTER,

=
TUESDAY, =, 1879.
HaterlORse FIckls Error the c. SMITH.
The court . no objection the Of action IL his case
the cause for the want .aieienr Of aea
m ssOr va, the bs The "Ss's JSss
Fr obtained Judgment for Of which he remited
Held That the ads%s% for right
a., r. .4rmsd- Wright atty pR; D. Pratt,
Lenssi Hopping ct al Error to the Jackson c.
Per Can In this the ser~ aeas and judgment arc in the
TIL. Ne1er the Ia. NOR
70 a. % o ls IN o w. .@e Reversed H.
P. Thornton, p'G.
Cord" rs Miller. Error the TiPseeanOe &C
zee SsS ,d & sn ~ p0 ss @1 ;s .Ss
iaeuI the Sf
and the last ntegsne. from them being some fifteen
being shown TIA, hey had residence esThers PresumP;
Prima eia for proof of the hand writing made
. s,s e. s. or;h ATTY for Pf; r. C. Gregory tor de'
P carG Indictment against the defendant for acting
The only objection made indictment that the ,ermiu of
es s q" hs " The
The STATE &c. Nelson al Appeal from the Wander
burgh &C PrRKIS,J
rial wbabe his liSrDse exercised by them personally or by
acting authority they may
ton defendant their grnt for the and safe Of the pro-
{ required Of themselves.
der such ercumstance will the officer for
him to make hi. accordingly for not selling the
CsadsHin Ftasr. Error the Orange C. BL.cxfORDJ
that issued BY under
Otherwise apprornrd in aid act from said road
thereby pledged for the redemption Of the same.
hat The Which should s%e under
road that should afterwards accrue
fs prOme broken by the STATE the holders Of the ert
BY individual special
himself but by for which agent. sru.ed
7Hey al The State. Appeal from the Floyd c. c. PER-
corporation by elected
continue their offices after the of
the until superseded by the election of other in their
The tenure of the Office School to be deter
mined by the rule where like words used in the
1881, provided School
hold his office for the term OF three years. and until his successor
Bur The Act q is,s Gaw. Isa, 80 contained such
legally hold his Office beyond the for which he elect
BO1sr u.s. The Madison C. C. affirmed
BOHssr 7hs State Two Error the Madison C. c.
shortly Miller Appeal from the Delaware PKRkssJ.
plea of justification in action of SANDER proved
fe jury, filing of plea of
should the Hd
should the damages though evidence be
jury ifhey hou the
evidence addud by the defendant entirely sufficient
beere from the conduct of the plaintiff that the
charge ,ns such might be GIVEN IN evidence nit
wide Byrket Mcmahon BaekOrd $50 and should have
apR %dS to the count Tor Malicious well as that for
repetition defendant
damages much less could repetition of them the defendant
counsel before the jury and audience be taken
by the jury for that purpose.
SANDER the Attorney given evidence any
noticed tending malice the Of his client
keller .sdm'r., &C. wadd Error Jackson Probate
petition Kelley, administrator non weddel
e Ha s5 nd a Ta d P s
which came to his hands Upon accounting, the Court found
qurng the administrator bonis pay the
directing Kelley assign to wedde Judgments belonging said
discharge of said first order Held That both
does not authorize compulsory order in favor Of removed or rer
the 10 former. Reversed
The Board cou,nscnsrs Of stis,aHd County rs Hids'dad
The dsIa.'iS eo%s", ,he The first for board and
is bad The Board Of County cannot
The second count was for boarding and lodging furnished de-
The third with
s See psron peed in the
Poor House By The overeeT, Of the Poor in this win be
was placed there as PsaPeri and Il no. proper .ee, for ths
and the commissioned could not sue for man,enanee
The IIo,o" made for the poor Of the sa'e charity which
commissioner Of county as in thi, tor the
aGilisOn .. Satto.: Appeal from the Pulaski C. C.
JSander. The declaration
unmarried woman and of the Mi-on
then alleges that the defendant the presence Of divers
spoke and published the following false sandrOus and
eious words addressed to Jesse MsOn and concerning Tho
ing with siners (msanng plaintiff thereby
that said Jesse had been guilty intercourse with the
plaintiff and the the defendant
I By he @ sS osf ao, ,n
set forth in said count. aciionahle.
the defendant mt. aqs said the hssE. Of
la re
spoke of and said Jesse the plaintiff the
false, ssnaeous and malicious words namely, "Ai
ever showed in sleeping with sisters (meaning tn
Plana 70 the last remark the said Jesse replied 81 say no
Their do - thereby meaning
been guilty with the ant and st IL
S aa s s ouS s Other
for not averng that the plaintiff sister Of Jessison
> said count. were were not 9stiol able ;sarmsd.
Miller o. Elliott Error to the Franklin c. c.
plea alleging defendant had no, r"krn his said
The State scs as Bak 500a on general
the bond was executed under mistaken impression OF its esa
+ e ct. al BlacEf s77.
defendant cannot be allowed to contradict the statements
mattel and il the matter Of esSpPe
on demurrer to the defendants plea.
obligation by deed discharged deed
declaration covenant upon bond whereby the defend
ID bre,cn Of behalf pay
panth 1000 dollars quidaed plea alleging
bond not understood the pas obgng the defend
Of breach pay 1000 dollars qudated damage
that the plaintiff had damnfed defendant
practice of medicine, IL bad.
The defendant in this agreed for valuable
that II he should after specified time, practice medicine &c
within limits plaintiff should of him 1000
hquidaed damages. Held nothing
show that the parties did not intend what they cear
expressed. See Green Price 10 Mees Welsh $685. Ssints
Furguson Eng Court of Pleas, April le49 New
York Legal Obs 1885, Hamilton overton all Bsck 2et
Reversed.
nottingham the Madison c. c.
J-Accordiny 1885, the widow
decedent which her
band had during the legal te nnd also in III
al