The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1849-09-13
Common Pleos.

Before Judge Ul-
SErT. IL -Dtrovce Gave JOHN Wasrs Pei-inx
WstTs-This was = suit for divorce uadsr til. code
on the eroundo' adultery The plaintiff ~ss NJ "a
court: but IL stated BY his counsel that at tby
time Of bis marriage he scarcely Of -; ths. ~
was young man of very simple mann-rs-s mere
povice in love sairsn fact one Of tn. most arrsnt
bunglers that tried 'upid's psti~n,e Tho lady
was In court sud very sprucely dressed She With
her counsel and seeRed To he At tb. Of aide Of tbi,
nj least With regard to what took place prsviors to
the marriage whether the courtship long stand
ing and romantic and sentimental affair, or whether
left In mpen-trsbe darkness All that ss,uttsd
to know on the snhject At this .iie OF tn. grave Is
boarded at No. as Lsursus street hous. KEEP. nv a
Mrs Reed and that at o'clock In he evening
church In canal street and then and there b,i the
knot tied which only Judge Ulshoefer jury csu,d
nplcose. The counsel continued to that the
family Of the young gentleman discovered tina MAR
riage they had himself and his wife brought hons In
order TO give them subsistence After they had
sided in the family for weeks Of the
Of IN thought he ricites in the
movements Of the lady. Tie thersupon set about ma
king enquiries Into her previous life and d
that before her marrisge she . woman Of vitious
habits and that afterwards she continued the -s.s
course OF life Upon thss. discoveries hSving been
made the present snit was brought The first witness
called for the plaintiff was
Mss MrL, Knows the defendant her name ~ar
Cstharire Stone. when witness first kue~ hsr koows
John Waters, her husband knows Mrs Reed lived
with her ut a. Lsurens street at ths time Of the
rsge witness boarded there f,r three moaths John
Waters frequently there before the msrrixxe he
there TO visit the defendant: rsmem her. they
the marriage; cake AMI vine we're uDrocured Ia the
morning they left the house at O'Clock In the
evening to be married aud returned at eight O'Clock;
there WAS u wedding party; Mrs Reed witness Ne.
Walfb, tho bride aud bridegroom. aud other men,
coBposed the party witness knew the defendant for
two years before her hrst At Mrs smith's, in
Howard street 1t was house Af as ignaou witnass
lived there ms cham bermsid n IN named .niel
NJ Pierce come to Howard street with her; thsy slept
there together frequently was before her -riags
witness afterwards vent with her two " three to
Pi-rce's saloon, In Broadway; she called Pi-rce her
nan Dsui~l" While at Mrs Reeds sh. vas vi-ited by
. Fr,pcbmap whom she called "Frenchy ~ does uot
know him by any other nams hs usually came thsrs
on Sunday mornings: she had bedroom To her-eif;
IL was of the sitting room: he Ia the habit IF
Ing there after the marriage; he vas thsre the
morning Of the marriage; they west into the bsdrsoA
together.
There four I've other witnesses called na~e-
~ johnson. walsh. Pierce and 80 other u
whom proved distinct acts OF adultery the part az
the defendant The evidence for plsntin "a. THAI
closed DEFENDANTS council after q short eonsutts-
tiop with his client and stated that the ~vssSs
produced on the part Of the plaintiff took him Iftts
shack and although the lady In the ost SOLEMN nsu.
still protested her innocence, that IL a moo
strous conspiracy got tn ron her ~ her
her honor and although he believed every w,rd she
ratd yet not having any ms ans at hand to daserovs
the plaintiffs eyidsuce he thought IL beat txks
mp the time ofthe court and jury by going into de-
fence He would, therefore, submit the uodsr
directions OF bis honor. Judge Ulsboedsr briefly
charged the jury vhs 10 few minutes rendered YER
diet ell the Issues tor the plsintin