The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1849-01-20


cannot thus organized 1t would Be necessary toin-
ara New Mexico II Those are to have ecvsrnmsnss,
let not gentlemen sneak them in, but bring bills
ne then Withdrew his amendment.
Mr. ScHEN ex said, that - delegate was admitted
lne other dsy,iit was incumbent ON Congress to pro-
Wae Tor the support Of the territorial govMnueut.
When iowaw0 admitted into the Uuion ss State
four times % much territory lett when Wis
eon,in was admitted ss State 1t Is, very sompsn
anything done BY the House could be no oailsd. A
.ntsman In bis seat called to order He did not
W. have sam,ttsS so t, m
not admit one from the other In the of Wiscop-
rln small piece left out in the Of lows four
one and not for the other! He hoped that govern
msnt weud be given to Iowa, in anticipation or what
tsnd Geleeats here 1t was to save the consistency
Of the House that he proposed to provide for Iowa.
Mr. MvLLxs was understood to accept the amend
Mr. CoLLAMKR said that there could be no appropria
tpp except for such objects provided for by law
MfScHENeK-lsit not provided for! IL.
The CHArwn.N could not say whether or not it was
provided for by law He did not deem 1t necessary to
decide the question; and was Of opintou that the
amendment was in order. piIgD rf9,ilJi 5I l.1 3|
Mr. Boypos moved IAN amendment, that he might
havean opportunity to deny that vote OF the House
could establish territorial government They had
voted thet oerisia gentleman lNr. Sblsy) was sntt
lied TO seat delegate fiom Wisconsin, but this by
~ Of cops.s.s al ,h sa Inc
ritoral limits There no territory Of Wisconsin 1t
hpsrsoty idle to talk about it territory 1t would
be just ~ proper or this Ia little to taka
IN iowa u gentleman wished TO 20 the dgure, the
whole length, take in New Mexico and Catornis. ali
ut once, ,r..ff = II 49,. m go : - = :,
Mr. VAN DyKs moved to strike out the approximation
for lowe wAs NO time to argue the question whether
there should bs delegate from Wisconsin, the gem
tenen who presided him WAS disposed to do IL IL not
true that any law Of Congress this whole rsr.
rtory eff the Sas the law OF Congress braces but
portion Of the territory The State VA, carved ont
q n In INIT h. a
peal the old territorial ent which was given TO
the territory Of Wisconsin. If so the people iiv
without the State OF Wisconein are outlsWs Shall
say that society is dissolved aud that there ia
no mt Of any k,no! The territorial law re.
mains as before there being no act to repeal s. l
t.man to Withdraw his amendment 80 49, 90
Me-. Van pYKE-I don't withdraw. j mean to strike
out the humbUs. voice: They both humbugs ~
The question was taken, and Mr., Van Dykes
anne ndment wss rejected. sirl o. ssiilq ha- n M
Mr., WILTON moved to strike out the sppropri All IN
for Wisconsin. What the gentleman from New Jer.
tey (Mr Van Dyk-) said Of WISCONSIN, was able
to lows The boundary Of the latter was out down by
tsbsh territorial government over the territory re-
naming. But fragment Of territory remains He
either Of them be- 1t Is Iowa. hars is Eve times as
much territory remaining that State as of WILSON
sin. II We admit delegate from Wisconsin, we must
admit onefrom lewa We Will have next year. The
Houte has, effect made ut least two territorial gov
ernmsnts; how many more, he could not say.
Mr.. DunH said that 1t struck him Is most extraor-
dir ary that the vote taken admitting the dele
gate nom Wisconsin without allowing any discussion
opportunity to read the report 1t occurred to
him. that there NO for the claim Of Mr.
Sibiey as reprssent atve The territory of WILSON,
sin embraced the whole territory Of Wisconsin, and
when che was admitted into the Union it wa, as a
STATE u was that territory which was admitted into
the Union. 81 4FI aJ fla.t sI
Mr. THomrsor, of Indiana, tended that the terri
torsl existed with those who occupied the
territory Of Wisconsin, they being shut out Of the
State by her admission into the Union. If not then
portion OF the Inhabitants were disfra o. hissd.
n al Inv
Mr. THoMPsoN.-I ray that the territory OF Whcon
sin exists BY your own got Can you disfrs
These people when W.consn was admitted Is State,
were entitled to all the mmuuities privileges ana pro-
lection under the Law, and Law has been passed
taking these rights from them. BY your own act you
sxi. nded laws over them.
govsrnmsnt lsit for WISCONSIN 10 nothing mose than
sepbstry, We voted the gentleman (Mr Sioleyl in IA
voted for him Is mark OF repsct, but when he looked
at tns question, ne could not do 1T. .,., .t..i
Mr. L'NDE insisted that territorial government stn
remained IN force but gentlemen could argue that
the admission Of the State made void ths asked
when was the law sbrogated? After further remarks
point from which they started This mxttsr ha,an in
fun he believed and now the gentleman had got at It
~ nc oUmmsnusa nto 'ne earnest consid-
ditcu..on whether there was territsrisl
sun no, .1 ne w4Sia Fay; tnst was the hrst which
state Of Wisconsin has bee taken out OF t A. TO the
question about Iowa there Is no getting over IT, The
ousssinn cond not =. sstiad hy snsn Wisconsin. Inc
b;,i ~ ~ " '~ ~ - "AsAu"cn' 1o 'ns
The anne ndment to strike out the appropriation FOR
Whconsn was agreed to; and the question was now
stated on making provision for Iowa, when
MIR DICKINSON remSs ked, that he voted for admit.
ting delegate from WtcoRsin, because the people
had acted in tber sovereign capacity, and without
any regard to any law whatever When q delegate
came here, 1t was for Congress to say whether he
should take seat not He thought that ths House
could admit delegate for California and New Mexico,