The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1849-06-03


RED Under some good advice she went thereto the
State of Connectcutwhen Miller thought 1t best to
nsr
Legislature Of connecticut In her petition she states
that c. Miller inhabitant Of the State of New
York. Till now, Thomas A Walker had
her When did he first her? Where did they
meet? No one car tell. He is not permitted to tell
She had been for some time eQuivocal kind of
widow expect to prove she consulted counsel IL she
could marry that divorce which she had obtained
and was told she could not She and Walker we're not
married She never asked him to marry her; and she
would have married him If he had asked her for
she dared notshe would have been guilty Of bigamy
without being married to him She was cheerful gay,
joyous but very bold and had an tendency
isudsnum. and. when she was recovered She laughed
and said, Why, fate 10 against o." One reason no
doubt why Mrs Hill was not called IT, because she was
present on one of these occasions This acquaintance
with Mr.. Walker took place in 1845 It's origin is -
dark the marriage Mr.. Walker, 1t Is said by wit
ness, was very attentive her She involved him. by
had been trying to disentangle himself from the
nexion She wrote him letter full Of love. She was
happy in this life, she was determined to quit 1t.
We are told there private marriage. He passed
country to the house Of q reputable man; but tho
character Of their connection easy to be None
Of his family knew her In 1S46 he sought TO get rid
this Connection and went to St. Louis and LETT her
She followed him So much constsncy seemed to win.
Perhaps n she could have made a wife, MIR Walker
would, in that distant place, have been content to
marry her He left her in May, ls47 From that day
till January February, lo49, they never met. MIR.
alker left st Louis; she stayed there more than
year He LETT her net with an intention to abandon
her but frm that time he found out facts which had
occurred while he away which made 1t impossible
for him TO marry to live with her. For sufficient
reasons therefore, he determined to have to
do with her She remained in st Louis by advice from
her aunt and friends, in New York They wanted her
not 10 come here again MIR. Walker had no intention
to pa by her house to her True he did watch
the houfe; but be had no jeslousy-he had certain
knVwlt Bs object In looking was to see II certain
persons visited thai house; II was curiosity He did
not intend to shoot her From st. Louis sne wrote to
fIit nd in New ork to lee her house; her friend
refused She then to her friend for her let
tiers to be returned back TO her She received q
letter In reply (Which was read in evidence.)-
When Mr. Walker found out that there WAS pcrson
in New ork who talked about bliss with his wife, his
curiosity was reasonably excited therefore no watched
her During the long period OF their separation she
wrote To HIM iept atedy; Mt time in most tender
Terms, then In mot terrific terms praying horrible
upon him aud his destiny. At last when oil
upavailing she thought Of trying n suit against
nj 10 make it appear that shc his wife TO some
Of her correspondence ho returned u blank envelope
she wrote, and most xiouiy solicited intcrvisw
Now, o. the suit, Mr. ahar had desired it: for he
had other m, ans OF proving che was not his
lie could not get q divorce, for she not his wife,
and he could not her for calling herscf his wife
She, nrdipg tho could not draw MIR. Walker to meet