Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1849-08-03

| tic pate. We have here now an Intelligent dn'
accomplished native OF Cuba, who is Jealous
liberalist and hampton @. annexation. re ha
magnificent voice, anj in giving full effect Il
| the splendid air from The Puritani, 'Suona La
| Tromba," was struck with The emphasis viii
which he parted forth the magic word Liberia!
Al The close OF every nights ball We have
rirh treat in his tine music, and that OF some cx
| c.,Ienl singers OF the other SEE. Tonight NJ
sang with unusual spirit, after hearing The new:
from New Orleans. W. r. n.
FIuouIga STRINGS, SATURDAY, July 70.
HOUSE OF DELEGATES.
The House resumed Inc consideration OF chap
Ter lG7 ON "nolces and notion" and adofle'!
verbal amendments Of MIR LACY, referring 10
The recording OF bonds taken by an cillcer, on
which Judgment may be given.
Chapter 1876 changing persons name;
suein. IN The names ot persons who are deaoi
and The ondef of tenants IN common.
Chapier l69-Oi The county or corporation IN
which proceedings are commenced.
Chapter 100! process, ami the order OF pub
ON molten Of MIR WATSON, the "a section
was amended so as 10 cohtinc the process 10 The
county in WHICH The ac,on is b!oush. ihal is, 10
restore The old law.
On motion Of Mr. HARRISON Of L., The
same section @aS amended, So as 10 make pro-
cess Ielurnable within ninety days after lis date
! 10 The Court, on the frs day OF term, or in The
clerks Office on some rule day, &c.
MIR FAULKNER moved 10 amend The h
section, so as 10 provide that, il more OF The eli.
/ Gers ct corporation reside wihl The STATE, Il
copy 81 any process or notice LETT with any agent
OF a corporation, a. any office or depot OF such
corporation within this Common wealth. ten days
previous 10 the return day thereof shall be icem-
ed a sufficient service ol such process
Mr. f. cited The case II the Baltimore and ONO
Railroad Company-a corporation holding It's
power under a joint charter from Virginia aud
| Maryland-iur serving notice on which no pro-
vision was made. This corporation was con-
e,anty bringing itself into collision with INFER
ests in Virginia, AID committing wrongs; and
| sill there was no remedy, save la lhs accidental
prcsence OF The President or Director ~ The
| State. The Legislature had last Winter made
The provision, uu il had escaped the notice oil the
| Revision COMMITTEE
Mr. BOYD thought The case provided icf ty
order Of publication 10 non.IesdenIs. lie thought
persons residing out Of The STATE should be treat
cd as those in the STATE, and lie feared injurious
! combinations might spring oul o! flr Fauikners
amcnimen, ar4 The ,5.h sec'ion, which PROVIDES
isr Inc suiticieRcy Of notice 10 On" agent, driytr,
!
nlr FAULKNER said the order u publication
applies 10 nenreslden! persons oh'y, ana not COZ
| pJra..ons.
! Mr. WHITE said The law ot 1889 had
not escaped The notice Of The Revision Commit
Tee. MIR w. showed that, IN The same lith) Sec
| lion, the case was July provided tor.
MIR FAULKNER had not observed The pro-
vision, whic:i Gas lisiac!oIy, and III wiihd.e v
| his amendment.
Mr. BOYD moved 10 sIike out The bh Sec
lion, as il wculd afford opportunities 10 break up
a Stage line or o!5er common carrier by service
o! notice on d lailhiess agent Common CARRIES
should al least be placed on The same luolns as
nou.resideu!s- are entitled 10 he notified by a
publication oil toIr weeks.
Mr. HARRISON OF l.. sustained The section rs
eminen,y proper, 10 allow justice 10 be Obtained
| TOR injuries aGne by COMMON carriers. The
agent was the proper person on whom 10 serve
the notice
Mr. POYD though, he case provided for ELSE
where. Al al. r:ea,c he thought notice by pub
LEGATION should be eiyea--t-t .of he present ne
Withdrew any amendment.
Subsequently,, Mir Il. moved 10 amend, So as
10 require an order Of publication 10 be made Tor
| four weeks in case OF suits against common car
rie!r-whom Mr. 3. only desired 10 place on The
same fooing : 3 o:tef persons.
Mr. WHiTlLE sail :h2 Object Of the sirin-
| gency Of The section was 10 induce common car
riers 10 have faithful agents.
The amendment was lost
! Mr. WILLS moved 10 amend The l0ih section,
So as To provide thai, in anv case al law or equ-
~. on affidavit, that defendant is ioI resident
] Of this State an order of publication nay he Ell
| tered asaiasl such defendants Mr.. WILLS did
| not think that aDsccnGIs ,.c5!ors should Ee emit
] lied TO Inc delay OF an order OF publication
MIR. HARRISON, OF L., thought the Code
carried out the present law, which provides ior
an order of pablo lion against NONRESIDENT dc-
lcndanis, AS we'll as ab.tonting debtors
MIR. MONCURE Of 5. said The Gaze could be
| provided Tor in the Attachment law, AID Mr..
| WILLS Withdrew his amendment.
Chapt. l7l-Of The rnes pleadiEss generally,
ard judgments in The Office. CONTINUES The rules
| three instead OF six days
On motion Of MIR WATSON, The Isl section
was amended, so as 10 provide further tor rules,
| where term OF Court tails on The ilFsi MON
day OF a Tcn,h &c.
A1er remalss from Messls. WILLS, WAT
! SON and MONCuRE, it was Adopted.
Chant. iT2-Ot payment ard sctoft.
| MIR. WORTHlNGTOE moved 10 amend Sec
lion d,h on Payments and set offs 10 &c described
in a plea or account" by adding: although The
claim vi the plaintiff he jointly against several
persons, aud the set.olI is Of debt, not TO all,
bul only to part u them, this section shall extend
! 10 such sct.of il i! appear that The persons,
against whom spch Claim i, stand IN the rela-
| ion OF principal and surrey, and Tie person emil
lied 10 The set.oif is The principal!
Explained by Mr.. w. and MIR. MONCuRE,
Of s, and adopted.
| Mr. WATSON, so AS 10 allow the deiendanl
in spccia plea Of se,-t Il 10 alirga any failure
| of consi.eraii OF coGi!ac, as we'll as fraud.
| Charter l73--Qf the itath or Change Of par
lies. aud The dscoainuance q causes not pro-
| secuted.
| Chapter ia OF the removal OF causes pend
J ing in one court 10 anoher
Mr. HARRISON of Prince William moved
70 amend The first section, so as TO allow. on The
| motion OF any party "d.fndont," a suit to b.
removed roG, County 10 Circui, Court.
Mr. MONCURE OF S. opposed the amend.
ment as unnecessary, and il was rejected.
| Chapter Us. o. the appointment, oil commits.
soncrs in Chancery, the reference OF accounts
10 them, and the proceedings hereupon.
| On Mr.. LACY'S motion, after prolfacied
| critical discussion CT words, several sections
| were amended, SO as 10 conform 10 he change
10 the chapter on f!uciary settlements. requiring
| them Ia BE- made before HE commissioner of the
Courl by which he iiiucary was appointed
| Mr.. WATSON moved 10 amend The 7 h Sec
tion, by inserting afer ''given" The words "and
on any day on which The cause is b-iofe him.
take doposilons" Messrs. MONCURE, and
| HARRISON oil l. though, il was unnecessary,
and alter a long debate The amendment was re-
jected.
Chapter l7G. OF evidence as sec,ions.)
The 5h section vas amerdrd oa motion oil
! Mr.. LACY, 50 as 10 aulhoIiz' copy of
wiling Gle i suit. 10 be filed 10 anolher suit