The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1849-06-15


We take the following from late Washington Union for
s purpose showing the deception to which that Journal
is ia the habit of resortng in its violent crusade
pendent Of the New York Evening Post holds the
@Thes have got their men appointed throughout Wis
consn and Ohio Rufus Hing nomihally but the Seward
the Omer ss'e, without any one suspectng what was
Ing on "A. 81, A., >,
ranged everything satisfactorily in Ohio, where there
ten new in Office who already prepared cry
TAYLOR will not husded men in Office in the north
er States unless they inherited from the last admins
usoo who viii not be waiting the close OF his term with
Ills is wing authority for the Seward and Ewing
bnaona comb naiion looking to the OF all the north
ern States for a Wilmot Provso candidate.
The New York Evening Post OF the oldest, and
formerly OF the respectable papers of the demo
erac party here cited whg authority for achaIge
which the color ofplausbility sustain it,
When such experiments made upon public crcduIity,
and such offered public INTEL gence who will re-
specl the of the print in which they appeara
North american.
Yes, this is an instance OF political dishonesty but
il is the North American that is guilty of the offence
We call attention particularly to the words we used in
the article which provoked its insolence Any one OF
common sense who will look at them, will see that the
North American falsely asserts that we have cited the
New York Evening Post as wing authority. We did
not make any ausion to the political bias of that sheet
We neither designated ii whg, democratic, native
journal and we did intimate that it either slave
nv or anti savery--barnburner hunker-Cass, Taylor
or Van Buren,, its predictions; and the editor of the
North American must have known this fact if he read
our article while he was making his impudent criticism
The words which quoted were attributed by us not
to the Evening Post but correspondent Of that paper,
as all may see who wLlook at the extract above. Be-
ahad adj hepn infOr
that the correspondent alluded TO was whig and we
have received the information since. 1t may be
difficult in this-Mr Clayton's--age OF nave-foregn-
wing Democratic noparly Taylor republicanism to de-
fine precisely what constitutes whis. Certainly no
community of principles is required in that party
hatred Of the democratic party is considered suf-
Gent and we insist that we have given wing au.
thority for the coalition between VIM. II. Seward
and Thomas Ewing, and the success with which they
have bent General Taylor to their purposes and made
hma cloak to their schemes. When ascertain that
our information is incorrect, will then make any ne
cessary and proper correction most cheerully but
must respectfully decline to give any weight to the
ton of the Philadelphia North American Hardly more
than week has elapsed since we exposed one of its
tricks, which could have been conceived only in fit OF
political dishonesty" Without blush and with face
hardened to shame, it asserted that Edmund Quincy and
Wendell Philips free soil leaders of the one portion
of the northern democracy, when they never had any
connection whatever with the democratic party-when
they are known be as violent abolitionsts as VIM H.
Sewardhating the democratic party for the annexation
Of Texas and the Mexican war; and belonging to that
school of political philosophy which is taught by the
sachems of the whig camp.