The Arkansas banner., 1849-11-06
laIisa neessk N 9,nnasn.

sss.s|n.s.s.
 1ansfnn maanA fm cmna6a.
 He s1sse ~ AnxkxAyi6n 70 1IiE Przrsc. -
 s S5esh pSpsfs espy sl,s AAddfss.s. In favor
 Ns4sx1aleA U the Uaalsd States. which wns
 F44 8H tuadEeds ef fhN afsst breasiaspi citizens @z e4z5&4i AaasKatlsn, however, h not con.
 t1sN3 M tho Gepflesnsn wlle sign C, except wiih s4 feae4ffettee ef Greet DFtiain. This was Beees- ssfE. e aars ihssa from lhs charge ef ires. Is'e IafeiloH easnmsaees ullb the assurance tAsk V 9nets bslong ip nli partss, origiIsa, aad AzNH1As &Ms Yet ase akteed upos the advantages ~ e6.xtsAiie1s a esiES ts psffesm . eem,nnh duay asWNtnR ont If common 4ssca@iiys and gre deter iea ~ tafget all past differences fn order ie pre- nse14 eonss1ea end. lt thea sets feftf ths evils Ntieh lief E1nada " FrpEesnuttaKa asaarAl pFes- psqt ef Fptn sad dsssy provincial gsvarament and e5sn corporations esnhafFshsed--hankiaR nad etsgE espnfistw greatly appreciated uteand eesNmefelal latereats sRerOspsrsas-eatalesu almost M1AeieaAie ea any tsrms >,TveFs, lckss and canals alfa0g annssd-~espltai disaipsted. esmmeFes de- ssfeEea. and every symptcsn apparent of uutlon f1st MpkinE to decay. HSviag traced ths~e evils o ehe NAadonnlsnt ef the ancieut pogiey of Enaland tn tlse want q martsis ts . ensnbraas sud e1pen- aiFe kassfnnents aud to tlss hlser sninositiss sf pHfsazs and Eneiionsghs deeiaFsiion aext caAsiets tbe fenedlas weh have bean Preposed for the syiIs ua1ef which Caanda suffers. These proposed Eenhsz di6e nfN alaied Co he--
 Inc revival of Pfeiecsioa ln she mzrkefs In the Ueitea kiagdsm.
 1hs pFpisctioa of home masufsctures.
 q fsdsgai union ef tbe British American pro
 The indspendsnce of the Bsisish North Au,e- Fiean provinces ~ fedsrai fepahlic. sud
 B Reciprocal frse trade with the United States asepscss the rrodacas cf tas farm. the forest and ske miaa.
 Theaa sssnesiies shs .dsclaraien" considers to be Nialoaasys nuaitslnabie. lBsaiiicieat, and says ths3 ssibe haai remedy consists iB friendly and peaeeable separations from Brisizh eonnexion. and nnion. npon equiiabie terms wIth the great North Amesican eoafedsEasy of sovereign Staies.r 0n ils point it holds ths followSag ismxuags followed by Aa eaumefdgISRei the bcse6ts which ihe sn- psxalien of Canada would eeafer on the U States
 Tho proposed aaion weud rcader Canada field for Asaeriean capital nto which it would enter as freely for the prosecution of public works and pri- vats enterprise as iato any of the present States w1eld equaiizs the value of real estate upon both sI&& Of the beandaFy, lhereby probably doubling II emes tle ea,iss prsssat yssas sf property m CauaAa, whilst, by giving stability to instisn tsi,s and introducing prosperity IL would rase pMhiia sud pFtvate credit ft would increase our eospnscfco both with tic Uailed States aud foreign eouatFiest whilst il would uet necessarily diminish, te Any great s1leht. intercourse with Great Br tsin- intD which ear products would, for the most pari. eaierea the . mo terms as al present u wonlt Ffder our rvefs and canals the highway for Inc t5Ut4t&f&lf00 10 1ua expOFtB Ir0m tne WfSt, tise taeaiculabie benefit of our country. IL would alse issSoduee manufactures into Canada as rapidly as they have heem introduced aio tho northern 5intes; aud te Lover Canada especially. where wa ter pxissseges and labor sbandauf aud cheap it would niiFsct capitsi. enhancing the value of pro- psSiy and agricultural produce. sad giving Fenume SHtve employment tU what is ui present conpara- tivaiy Bou producing popalaiien. Nor would the Uhissd States merely furnish the capital for our Snannfactnres
 The simple aud economical State Eoyernment, in which direct Fespo instability the people Is dstiu- guishiBg featafe would be substituted for system st once cansbrous and expensive
 Ia place of war aud the alarms Of war with nrighber, there would be peace and amity between tiis country aud ihe United State. Dissg nis between the United States aud her chief f not ouiy rival nnong nations, would not make lIle soil of Canada the saagainary aFenn for their disputes as under existing relations must necessarily be the caaa.
 Bat other advantages thau those having bearing oa eur material interests may be fcretoid It would aslaDge the ground of political contests between faces and parties, aay and cbIiierate those irrta Hons snd conflicts of aud recrmina,ioa that haee hitherto dishguTed cur social Gabric Already tn anticipation has it's harmonious influence been fsit-the harblagsr. may n be hoped. Of lasting ebllsiea of disseasioss among all ciaSses, crs~ds. aud parties in the esuntry. Changing a suborai. psss tor iusispsBaeHi condition, we would take our stntioa arBeag the nations of the earth.
 Ne hays new no veice h the sffairs of the em- pires de we share ln its honofs and emoIaInens England is eur psTsaf State with whom we have no e4ugfig, but towards whom we stand in the simple relationship cf obedience. Hut, ss citzens ef tie bned Ssstes the pabiic service of the na- tiea would Do open 10 us; 6eld of high and hOno- fsbis distiactioh, on which we and our pssterity might shier on terms af perfect equality.
 her would the amicabls separation of Canada lsoaa Grsas Britain he fsaaght wilh advantages to ss Hfone. The relief to the psren, State from the Jsfke expenditure now incurred in the military oc- cnpaiism of the country-the removal of the many rsnsts Of collision with tho United States which result From the cengruity of mutual territories so sxteD<lse- the benefit of the larger market which the iacrsAsisR prosperity of Canada would create, are eoasideraiens which, In the minds of many of her sblest sistesen, render incorporation with the United Stafea desirable consumnation.