New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1849-11-03
Law Courts.


L. Dsraer Covsr-la Admiralty-Beors Judge
ssus-p &c sion. -W,iisr. N.a~ '. Ja~s. k-ls :
Yol IN &c sS q wage. ey The run receive III.
money IN advance. Tho vessel erson oie'ed gale Of
Ter iosing her anchor and euuns away soh mssv,
aud her boar stove riss-S IA ht soar eytthe
N|mcheI shs groardins goiDg into The hsbor ,pd
shortly sferwsrd relieved BY steamboat ART lowed into
The s.rso! The ws.s' S:: cod and mSss &c. ms.
At Nantucket and he libel sngconunard Win her when
sac wa. lowed to Newfo,l By s.e.@eo.. SEQ. to he,
IN coupens aton for the uns he desiu.d H.
dinNy period OF run between boston aud New.fois
The Court held that the agreement a stoss cum ~, ~
hiring for The voyage. spd thai as seaman tool
rlsk of delay from ssss OF weather or disasters Al
with the ', sssl While che AIDE .nd-svong to
proseeu,s IL held that no ..v.gs .stsees we're p.'otmes
tbs hbesnt 10 abide by her and render every sstsnec
his powe 10 usvgs.ips her To port-lh. iarsne haes
surety port OF necessity. The could not isks
HE support from the vessel during the period of hs de'.n
roi, aud demand extra wsgos without claiming his die
charge ard showing hl. rig ~ to #. LIBEL dismissed
J'-e, MDpsp d ~ W TAs B,v Col hsps'd -kheer
lions Cornmis eIs report The ground Isksn Sgu
men, vas that the .onsr has nsJudged Jn ih-
facts In proof before him.
Held ths exceptions osght to have disregsded the
Objections the report; but dsreg sfdug that IRE
suany, beld, that the deeisioa OF Comissousr Opon
matters Of fact when Witnesses examined before him
will a. general rule, be adopted by the Court
destroy II he excepting p'iv nus1 produce coausp
srasDe o. .. sssc Of '
lie d Ia ih. case tho prcof satisfactorily supports
tho report Exceptions ovenuled
u g. CoxmIsuossss orycs-rhs sssmpsaon 10
relation 70 The charge OF smuggling referred 10 vn IN
day. resumed, tbs mailer stspds sdjoarood
Cou.r ov Comsos PLs.-sp.esai T~~.-sefor. Judge
plains execution for tl9 IS wss levied upos mn
tho suit of Mr. II. also pectsdly another execution
sssiass him was commenced sh vso 1919 did
ows Mr. H. but ON tbs contrary, Mr.. h. owed hm hat
he Mr. James MALCOLM 10 defend SAID snlI fof
him. no Informed him that was on the Calender for
sept but be surprised The lsh " that month 81
the leyeyinE him OF the execution, and for hs s
lime learned that Judgment had been BY d,fssl and
!hs! reference mad been previously ordered Of which
previously put In eat ineo0ed by mstshs to superior
Court instead OF Common Pleas. and ths !hs default bed
90 sskag M NJ dasfenI Imes, before the .yyag u
said xscut % said cause he - Informed hs e ~
ming was gonf on we'll Ne m.. ,sa o. ao s.S 900,
made Ia res.rd to H. He also stated hst M refused
sis,ii 81 The feis Ne He moved that tbs pro
e.edinss be sss ssds &c Mr. Lspslsh appearing for The
90 tho part Of M. Hssrnss We. denied thu, he Owed
Mr. O. anything Tho claim OF said II. sgsiast said q
was for sppesrng 10 40 suite OF which he des.oa
bat which dsf,oees wefs without mert-.sst said
only charged hs sxed eosts without proving cbafxe Of
90 Is for counsel fee. bien he ~ss snIiued-h.
.a ~ Of Of u. ds%sS Ss s spP:::;d 20 s s .
i % ,. sdvsri:sd By ID. sheriff SC,
Mr. Malcolm in bis sndsvit denied tho posit!uons OF
M O. Hsfo,nd, N fect ss Iheis vas no good define.
tho merit" that ,et.senes you'd only efssss o'i .sd
he tod hin, aso ss 70 tho eoss d tho mouon ana
.a,l.sa n~ q g.y and cav. se..d: i.:. sns .s',:d
II xas induced BY The ssd ~ TO delay execution on the
| DO. and Go cid 90 for come tias. Ae..,
Mr. was summoned 70 give evidence - 10 The point.
The Court, on the notion said Il nsy be ha, this
newed motion NAV urn cot to DO wholly lo,ensbh Bat
ths point 10 whether defendant duly sommo Cd me
oraer attorney and witosss 70 sppesx and lss,fy Tue
Inc Court 10 issus . summons We are not prepared 70
cay hat this subp0ns OF 'ommous doss Dot eeG2y,n
Dripss Ii. wi,ssss ~i,bn The act The there
fore heard ID November. SO and On
order why sstsehmsnt should 20. issss
sssiasl Mr. n mast nads re,unsbs on usi dsy ssd
ssfved on him. suggest tbst, fhr Mssoms tssumo-
:% q; .. BIZ .... :a:' no ps.
Nrsd BY the .su Of .sHon'ibs attorney ne NUS '''
a.ssaa ssoss s ss!.,d.y 90 s.s. d.d
90 no 16soo Of psss S., ..d ssass e Y.
esis roessdinss DO osnisd win eis eos :" "
The plsiauG 70 Tho defendant
cou,r O, orrs Asp rsasIsss-rhsi Of cAs.ts
sss snoosy re Jury hs csss rsnsisse 70 ssssca
, IRON , Turned, ' S.sSes q sos guilt
cov,, or SPECIAL sssmoss-S,t4ss sos. Mag
,.s xhrsm or s.ssIl1x 0s Psoi.sosiafJ mon
"a r saith ssssudss TobU gfsnsin hesd W. ;Jss
Ne srisa, Ped lSesoy m,sssi n.asn,. i.a,,.s
nav 60 days. Rlensrd Taes assssi Dg Onesf h.rr,1
Guy P1.os 20 days Josn Thor p'oo ssnt "a Sessy: %
an Ian Beoao, Clsrs Of Futon hsrkst PsaiSsnusys
moahs rbonss Hurst slsslibs sost noole. roei'
rsntlary Adjourned unui S0cock T1ssdsy morning
BROOKLYN
Krsss Co couRT or OYga Asp TBnhiSSh-fhs case
Of tss People o. Jacob Carpenter, med ysesr.
day morning ct The ocssins Of ns Court. ;Cnsi, h,a
Ss.ss. sTi he s,S.ses o. he 70 Il 81. s.s
would b. sdnusd or not ne .ss followed By ~. Vn
SH e. he Fec cu no sss sse co.
admit The evidence, and Me-. Cdrensf, the VIE OF