Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1849-06-05

II, q
sloan. Harwood, Amber, Rogers, Pafrio''- -
M WOODS renewed his amendment '"1
zinc dlo adjournment r,;sr
Mr. SLOAN cnquired if, al the tauquie,
Strings. the Legislature would not be ds'ui luz
nv The influx OF persons from hiChhiohu'
anGria and Washington. ,uar,-,.
Nj TYLER.-Iu 1882 the io%n OF warren
ION was great ihoroughiaTe, and YET lneie sS
M cholera there. In reply to Mr.. 9LOhN
Mr.. 4. said, that II The Legislature TOOK poses
SION Of The place, there would DC no ,unuA.
Moreover, the company did mol asseuio'e q.
Pauquler until the Is, August, oy wh'ch ''u'
We could gel through our business.
Mr.. SLOAN suggested, that II the c''iss SUI
Tered from the cholera, persons wou'u I hsI;s
me Pauouier Springs. He couio ho' oe'es
,ha members would not be without CHOLERA eA-
citempntthere For hi, reason ne shou,u 'u'
,.;r he motion Tor an adjournment sine ais
Mr. SHACKLEFORD had supposed, alel
all tba had been done, that we shouiG no' no, I.
had these speeches from gentlemen. nc ""o' !,
subject had, he thought been eIhause4 -, al
rhr gentlemen, except the senator iloni ha
lin wno advocated the sine dte aulournihs". naa
commended that Richmond was periecuy n,an"J
and ,.ere now willing 10 remain here, ailn"ue'i
cholera was here--seven deaths having occuiieu
rom Saturday, 10 Sunday evenins-and ye' 'hsy
| object 10 Fauauier as 100 unhealthy, lnoush 'h'
| cholera never had been there. h,,s
Mr.. STANARD meant that some 'ne"ioSi ;
would feel unsafe al Fauquler.
Mr.. SLOAN made similar exp 'aud.'on
| MI SHACKLEFORD-Thes senaemen
have no tears OF cholera themselves, ou''n un'
1ertaks 10 be alarmed on account OF DINER iheiii'
"a, Ha Ala moi choose 10 put himself IN The
| bseninp Of those gentlemen. He believed mai IN
Fanouier we should be as safe as any wnefe else
II; was neriectly salubrious and never was lln'
| tested by The CHOLERA Or any other disease. nc
| cholera gentlemen say, is nct contagious, ou
/ oImosnheTic-- we cannot therefore carry IL WIN
us Senator'S undertake 10 speak lof meiioei'
in advance, lha, q, Fau4uier they Will De alarm
| Cd The Legislature, II vas certain, would az
,s,rn from, Richmond-Alr. S. protested agalns
b,.akino IN this session without some attempt e
comnele The Code. The Fauqulef Springs can o.
easily reached and he was sufpliZeu ihal gen
tlemen who prolcssed ~ lie 50 ANXIOUS 10 nnisl
he Code, and who are SATISFIED maj Inc Woi
could mol be done here, should oppose tue onb
mace. which can be agreed upon. Every Deie
gaze from the District OF The senator rom n'cn
| moud, had voled 10 60 10 Fauquier.
Mr. STANARD would ask who mad brougn
forward this resolution Tor sins die Adjournment
Did il come fro n the Senator from Hampshire
or myselt1 Did il not come from gentleman
| who had been uniformly in favor oil removal
nhe Senator from Frankln,) ami VINO aVoW'
that, al Fauquer, he will be under Inc same a
prehenson as here1 He believed that remoVa
10 Eauauier would break up the session IN SOME
Two or three weeks, and subject he State 10 srea
expense and embarrassment, from lruiiiess
| session. He believed il better to adjourn now
regardless Of he votes oi members esewheIe.-
Fauouier had climate similar 10 that Of h'cn
mond-had not The btacins mountain a'inos
ohere-and he would not leave The CapNol unii
We had place offered US winch was oe'e' '"a'
| Fauquier.
Mr. WOODS was not surprised that the Sc
natur from FauouieI could see no difficulty II
advocating the resolution, which was gIeal la
vor 10 his people, and whose Interests ne wa
PERFECTLY justified ia sustaining. But, SAID MI. w.
The Rappahannock river passes by the rauquie
Sprin2s-and, as Ina, river communicates WIZ
the hay. the Cholera might follow The wa'er an
reach lhal place He should feel as safe here a
in Fauauer. Is il right thai gentlemen shoul'
DRAG US 10 a place which we do mol believe 10 o
safe Is there any controlling reason why 'h'
Code should lie completed nowf he saw none
and he asked il minority should compel some
fily members 10 60 10 Fauquer. SIM ne wou''
submit, unless he could see reasonable excuse
why he should not 90 there He had resisted Il
the best OF his ability
MIR. DANIEL called the ayes and noes OF
MIR. WOODS amendment for sine die adjourn
ment, which was lost by The following vote:
AYrs-Messrs. Scott, [Speaker,l Thompson
Woods, Daniel, Opie, Dennis, Sianard, Sloan
| Harwood-9
NoEs-Messrs. Tribe, Tyler, Darlington shac
ketord, Tate, French, Amber Rogers, hlcCau
lev. I>bell, Parriou-ll.
MT. STANARD-Ths die, he believed, wa
casI- and he had ,sa!jJSGIo29 " use44%Se d!eeth
he had feared and infc, upon portion ol th'
Stale serious mischiei-he was tree tom rtspon
sibility. He trusted that, upon the hnal vote
gentlemen would vote irrespective Of any suppo
sed necessity or influence from intrinsic cause
but would look alone 10 whar is due to them
selves and their constituents. He trusted TIA
gentlemen would lake care how they adopt mea
sures 10 remove The capital.
MIR. STANARD called the ayes and noes
The resolution was lost, by divided vote
AYEs-Messrs. Tribe, Tyler, Barbee, Caring
ton, Shackleiord, Tate, French, Dennis, Rogers
McCauley and Pariotl-ll.
NoEs- Messrs Scott, (SpeakerD Woods, Da
MEL, Thompson, lsbe Opie, SIanard, Sloan
| Crump, Harwood, and Ambler-ll.
Just before The vote was taken, Messis
| CRUMP and BARBEE came in 10 The Senate
/ and cast their votes.
Mr.. SLOAN-A joint resolution is already il
| force, thai when we adjourn to-day, We are Il
meet al "sume other place" He suggested thai
the resolution be fescinded.
| Mr.. STANARD-Thal resolution means
| nothing Ii is worth no more than P'ece CT the
paper.
,liuion always in session, and that resolution Is
| he voice OF The Legislature. We could not thus
eel rid of the difficulty.
! A conversation Then took place as 10 The effect
| o! The JOINT resolution adopted on Saturday
| MI SHACKLEFORD moved 10 adjourn, bui
arcened suggestion Of Mr.. ROGERS, 10 take
| a recess until a. P. "
Mr.. ROGERS sustained The motion, so as 10
| take time 10 deliberate. He wished 10 under.
| stand what position We would be IN, in The pre-
| sent curious case of affairs II zee adjourn now,
We shat be totally IN the dark.
Mr. WOODS Thought il we took no oihrf
action, We would necessarily adjourn nnt ftc
some other place" he would lind out io-ncr-
row. and would be happy 10 have The gentleman
with him.
Mr.. SHACKLEFORD Do gentlemen
mean 10 break up in row, and no, discharge
ne dntics with which the people had entrusted
,hem2 He believed mat, under The joint rcsou-
non, we should BE- forced 10 adjourn sine die. He
mad moved 10 adjourn, OF 10 break up The LIE
,islature, bur 10 show gentlemen in what a false.
position they Stood in adopting a resolution 10
adjourn today, without naming place Al which
hey ar 10 meet tomorrow.
The Senate then took recess until 4, P VI.
MONDAY AFTERNoON-Jus 4, ls4s
The Senate Tc-assemhlei.
Mr.. WOODS moved reconsideration OF The
vote rejecting he resolution 10 adjourn The lcgis.
la,ure 10 Inc Fauquier Springs.
Mr. lSBELL explained the reasons which in
duced him 10 change his course npon the question.
He believed, ant Now believes, that there was no
real danger in this city 10 men Of reasonable
prudence, or thai there was ANY occasion for
precpae retreat from this city. Blu, since the vote
today, he had, alter tul, and tree conference
with members CO mr. 10 The conclusion that, unless
We in The Senate ceased our opposition TO the
wishes OF large majority Of the House and 10
majority OF the Senate, many having gone
away, we would have voted TO defeat The great
nhipct fnT which VIZ hal assembled VIZ the