The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1849-09-16
rrla. or ,he Aston place r,loters.

Alexander Hoesack Thomas Green,
The court filed at early hsur this morn
ing by he usual spectators and large number jurors
summoned to appear and serve
Mr. BUSTED far his client. Douglas and also for Mr.
Cornell in the behalf OF Adrsnce stated that the
guar panel OF Jurors having exhausted and only
Six Jurors sworn they w-ud now cor sent to 20 to trial
before those six lie made this proposition with view
20 avoid the objects ns which might arise to taking
Jurors from the array summoned for this morning
Counsel anxious TO expedite the business before
the court and dispose Of this
The DisrRIcT ATTORNEY said the reply to that pro-
position Is simply that 1t cannot he DONE
Mr.. ss,TH next offered, ioformally, to interpose
challenge To the array.
The DIsrRcr trrosrEY refused the unless
counsel made hiS application in due form
MIR SMIrH then applied to the court tor time to pre-
the Tho court refused the app'i
cation and the butinets OF procuring jury was pro-
cseded with.
I,sac ". Tompkins. vheelwright. Of % Stanton st.,
called and challenged for principal cause
have Termed and expressed an opinion rs to the
persons engaged 10 the riot was there at the time
have formed opinion If the guilt Innocence Of
Mr. hudson especially. Challenge withdra aud chal-
iisnged for favor. Does not know MIR. Judson. Has
heard OF Ned Bupfline.
Challenges all withdrawn aud Mr.. Tompkins sworn.
MIR Tompkios teore taking his seat. said. Gentle.
men my mind IL made up. To the CouRr-l have,
think made up my mind in such manner as to dis
quality me from acting as an Impartial Juror -
The CouRr decided that the JUROR need not serve.
hir SAITH for defence objected to the withdrawal,
and the juror retired under this objection
sworn un der the usual challenge Challenge for prin
ciral cause Withdrawn and challenge to the favor.
u
the leest that he keeps very bal compapy could de-
eide ss to the guilt or Innocence of any man.
Challenges withdrawn, and juror sworn
David Rodh called and challenged for principal cause
by Judson-Has formed no opinion az TO the guilt or
Innocence Of Judson. Challenged to the favsr-Don't
know MIR Judson; has heard Of Ned Buntliue: he sup
poses there many men Of that name MIR Rodh IL
tailor and resides az 81 Watt street Challenge With
drawn the part Of Jud son Challenged peremptory
the part OF the defendant Bennett
Robt Creighead printer at il2 Fulton street of the
q ed aS q q
the defendant judson thinks he has bias In reference
to him but does not doubt that he could act as an -
epge not true and the juror was chasng-
ed by Bennett.
O. Ey DIsTricT ATroRNrY.-Mr. Creghcad, do you
know Mr.. Bennett!
A-No sir.
The D,srnrcr ATTORNEY replied. that he was deter
mined to show to this community how this affair was
conducted.
Mr. BLAsxmAr ssid that he had rights here, aud for
his client Bennett he vas deteruned to defend those
rights the attempted intmidstons OF
the District Attorney or his associates. Mr. Creghead
IVES set a.ide.
Charles Butts called and chsliepz ed Has formed
and expressed an epnon in reference to this matter
SIT aside by the court.
Ersfmus D Root called and challenged and chsl-
lesge found true
Alanssn u scuddsr. A Hammond street, dealer in
dry goods called and challenged az usual Thinks he
could try the imparially in reference to jud
SON from what he has heard and read he considers
that he lie no gentleman he don't want to be on tns
jury but thinks he could verdict in accordance
with the evidence atduced Challenge found not true,
and sScudder sworn and took his sea. the eighth
juror.
Edward NJ Day Of SO Henry street, called and chal-
lerged for principal cause, by Judson. Ho does not
opinion to the guilt innocence Of the persons
arrested ON the plight Of the 10Th Of May last. Mr.
Day was fet aside.
Joseph s Thorre Of 100 Wooster street, challenged
for principal las fixed and settled opinion in
reference to the guilt or innocence Of the defendants
Samuel r. Sherwood, OF 1877 Spring street, called,
challenged sworn and set aside, on same grounds rs
siis,n Stuff sos West street, called-Doa't under.
stand Epalifh well Set aside
jeremiah II. Tawlsy, No 10 Fulton street, fruit
chant, called Challenged by Judsop. Don't know Jud
suppoees there guilt the part ~ some per-
at the Astor Place riot he believes there riot
but who the perpetrators Of that riot he doer net
know The Court decided the challsnge for principal
to be not true Mir Smith took exception to the
deciion of the Court, and challenged the juror to the
favor. Has prejudice against Judsop.
Q.-By DISrRicr ArroRsEy. DO you consider your
New York ana the d,fcpdant Judsen; aud could you
give verdict according to the evidence!
The juror thinks he could Challenge withdrawn.
Thomas p. Cooper, called and sworn; lives at 100
EasI Broadway; Is grocer Challenged as usual All
John q. Savage jr. No. 30 Harrison street, called
ard sworn. Challenged Has expressed an opinion
ret aside
John A. Applesy called. aud ejectea on the came
grounds Ms the preceding juror
Gotham 2. Taylor, Of l22 Monroe street, grocer,
called psed by Judson and sworn; thinks from
what be has seen and read that be Is bad member OF
society Challenge finally Withdrawn, and juror
Abel T. Colllrs called sworn and challenged. Has
both formed aud expressed fixed and settled opni,n
does not often alter his opinion when once formed.
Set aside
James Copeland called, and set aside account Of
David newman. 81 Broad street. grocer called and
sworn as the twelfth juror
This completes the tedious buriness in which tho
Court has ben engaged for four days
The Counr discharged the Jurors until IL O'Clock on
Monday morning ins'ructitg them especially az to
their intercourse with any In reference the
subject Of his trial.
Mr. ssIrn now arose and repeated t. the Court what
he lad before stated. that hs had been mployed
counsel for Mr. Judson In this only for the pur
pose 81 attending To the procurement Of .hs Jurors who
try the His professional duties la this
respect being now accomplished he should withdraw
FRI m the cste.
The D,srr-r Arronsrr ordered all witnesses for the
prosecution Co be In attendance at IA o'clock Moo
day morning And ths counsel for ~. defense calad
upon the witnesses for the defence also TO be Ia atcn
csrce The Low makes " obligatory the part q.
witrsfses TO be In attendance from day 20 day until
the conclusion Of the case The Court will take s'rn-
are not promptly on the spot.
9be examinations Of witnesses. then, viii commence
on Monday. The follosirg Il n list VI
surous sworn
!. Josepb Brosnsr st6 0reenwish .trcet
Cornelius Dewitt. nquor dealer. l5j Amos street.
3. David Page, public house, corner Of West and to-
kokep streets
4 Patrick Do~pey tinsmith 3s7 Grand street.
o. Robsrt Watcrhonse groc.r. 81 litt street.
Q. Cfas. Blackstone. grocer. us Amos street.
Z. VIM brouping. 3ol Washer ton street.
:. Alsuscn scuddcr. dry goods ~ Hammond street.
o. jeremiah ilsray fruit merchant 10 fulton street.
10. Thomsi 2. Cooper, grocer, 1903 East Broadway.
IL Gorhs- u. Tay Tor grocer. ~ Monroe street.
H. David Newman, grocer. 81 Broad street
CHOLERA IN BosroS.-Wc perceive that the
cholera still exists in Boston, not exactly increas-
ing, but certainly not diminishing. The wise
Boston authorities console themselves with the
remark appended to their reports Of deaths, "All
foreigners" This Is very much in the same vein
in which tits said the authorities OF that city sen, an
advertisement for publication in tn Western and
Southern papers, TO this eiirct-"pablie notice
The Mayor. Common Council, and Board of Health
Of the city &C Boston, beg leave to state tina, the
cholera has not yet made its appearance in Boston,
L Il IL !.