New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1849-09-15
A.ror.pIace Rlot....rHIRp DAY.


i
The Court vas opened yesterday morning at
| lit o'clock snd the usual formula Of business gone
through DE attendance bea. large a. that Of the form
| e. dH5s
Broadway tie was challenged as o. principal cause oy
| NJ Bl.fsel, counsel for Douglass.
Anel series ~ queslons 90 both sides The challenge
was Withdrawn b5 Mr. Bl.ieed md Alr Dunlap wa Pc
rempiory challenged by Mr ssiln' counsel or another
Psr'cs D5wley. insmiih of537 Gfandst vas next In.
| trntlcrc.
BE va. challenged a. TO principal eause.
Nr UNHury said l- wss not member oi me military
oI cor-t4Hulry force. NOT the Of action
te night question: reads e papers, bui has formed no
,r. a. ii or Innocence OF aly parties charged
D.e- Mr Jgdsou, tgi has heard q him and read
Challenge vItlirawu. and Mr Patrick Downey sworn
Robert Waierbouse wa. the next name called. Hewas
cha .enrel AZ io principal cause.
SIR Narfholse said be- was a grocer, A. 81 Piu St
was suauVe OF Maine. and consequently aH1fre Inc
5cI. does not kllw Mr. Jllson blt has heard oi Nrd
Innocence of le prsoners-as not been military man OF
constable Generally reads The papers, and read hat
| line"
The challenge Withdrawn. and Mr Robert Wsierhouse.
Of5l Pin 1T grocer. sworn iu a. The nm Juror.
Sir Charles C. Bucssiole, grocer Of li5 Anos-s was
The question. asked Of Mr. Buck.tone were similar
se propoundei o The rect a. sisted N our report zee
ierfay Mr Blackstone said be- bad resd the Newspaper
accolnis but bis family Wa SICK az The tine OF the occur
rrrce ard DE paid 10 paru GUAR attention 10 thr aual
e has formed no opinion as 20 the gu or innocence OF
Douglass. Jldso1 or others
Chalenge Withdrawn and Mr. Blackstone sworn ~ as
toe iirfhJuror
NJ c6are. Watson halter. ~ Chrysae-st being next
urfsvorsbe opinion OF M Jadsol but had particular
opinion oi me gum or l.hvener ol Hns oi we 1890 II,
Mr. Smith hen submitted The case Of The competency OF
| the Juror 10 the trirrs-
AMER much consultation the tners found the challenge
| true and Mr Watson was dismissed.
ssndord c Brown, dye-wood dealer. 95 spdns-st was
| nex called and challenged a. Co principal cause.
Amer e usual questions, Ar case -" as submitted 20 ne
tricrs, who sad Ire challenge was Tue aud hr brown
rcf4sed ard d.suai'sed
Mr George Blssa.l Jr vas called next IN turn lie
was challenged 40 20 prncipa cause and favor
lie laid be was a ilm1er-deaer Do housion-st near
Macdolgal had read ihe several uewspApef accounts
tle Transaction; hss formed or expressed no decided
opliun the quit W Innocence Of Any person 10
dced n ths transaction but not as 10 Jldsos aacef
man. my Impressions in regard Co inst poin are
desAcg uyarFaae and ihai opinion has been increased
| by TIE mode of proceedings iu Court
The ,riers fond bin mn a. Jaryman, and Mr. Russell
was allowed f0 depart
Mr Davenport hardware merchant residing a, B; Lex.
| % fton av was ,he " next customer"
| Mr. Davenport wa. challenged persmptoriy BY Mr
| III Robert q Dohbs. painter, cor. Of Houston and
Greene 80 being called upon and challenged ~ usual
said had resd the Newspaper accounts Of The ransac
ion had fends relations, any body u his scquan
6s. head Of Mr. Judson: has rather an 1navorae opin
ou him, but has formed opinion his guilt or IN
nlcenc- n his TRANSACTION Aly OF the others charged
l. ansuve 0f he United States considers himself impair
Mr. Judson having exhausted hn I'VE perrmptory cha
elges ile uers now .en 10 decide upon The com
potency those h-cicd TO by Mr. Jlison. The Court
~, - 80, y, -. - ~s,rf 80 -, ID .,,.e As
pereu piorr- 90 be- made oct Of panel Of ~ Jurors
M suh thea argued 10 the irrrs hat Mr. Dotns wa
ncomp because be- was pre- udced against Mr Jud
co., aui tleV said The and good end Mr
D1bbs le TO- A. ths stage Mr Bisrkman appeared
ior Bennett ard ST. sherwood Tor Mathews, ard oos
Mr Charles Balwinsie grocer. wa. next called. and
said he had heard VI le MOT 1li had formed opinion
tl- guilt or innocence ui any Of the parties
head of Jld.0n or Ned Bunine % doe. not understand
Englsh vel. doe. not read % much has heard q he
A.ior place riot, believe Hose " 10 arrested
guilty The case being submitted 10 he trefs hey found
that be- good juror tIf -sperru pior cha enged
by The counsel Tor Msh-W. and consequently refused
George smih being nchl calico va refused on me
srolai of al lrf4voran.e opinion iowAd Mr Jlds0n.
Jlst-s Wagner was refused oecsase be 5ld ro. under
Clares Bsyn. being next called said he knew none Of
the pares charged beyond the reputation u Mr. Julsou
bat iai formed no opinion ~ 10 nr gum or Innocence OF
ite prisoners hast decidedly 1nfayorabe opinion u Mr
Tie triers refused 10 allow Mr B.evn.
Mr william B-rs next on the l-i and testified that
be las heard people IA against Mr Jadsoa BAT does no
place much dependence ol what people say has formed
20 opinion q. To the guilt Or Innocence u the psrles
NJ Beits va. accepted By Jstsoa; Bag peremptorly
| cha -ersei by Mr ankmsr ou behaf0 Of Bennett
Josiah A Waller being called upon. ald be- had 90 un-
favorable opinion % Dir Ju1son boz uon relation 20 ihi.
| trsnsaruon Mr Waller Va. fo1ud 90 be Incompetent.
Lawrence Wise0un, being ca 3D. sad De ih0ushi J-d
son wssa bad 1ss-snd M Wl'eolrn Vas also found
Incompetent
James Devoe. being challenged q. prsseribed by law.
sad he had unavora5e W -ou q Mr. Ju1scn A. 10
bis moral charaeieri ae lived a. - sxtns- and Is q
sd verdict ~ ne evidence sssaesa Tie u.srs re-
Csr..ea Pru.cse. being called. sad be- Wa on tie
grouni of lhs rof and believes hose engaged 10 D. and
arrested are guilty.. NJ Prlsche was refused
| EbtrA bunckerl01 sai- be- krew rote ~ ne parles
had formed opinion as 0 The -t ~ innocence u itc
accused Mr Jlisoni bad read ,-r neNspapers j. a
| commission merchant residing =. ulMillcAs- SLi.-
| le1-ec pereupiory - cOluse. Tor Dolg.a-s
Foes-1s {. Fef, .siur Ia Ilompso--st being called,
sad be p-eu1ced Against Mr. Jlcson very much aui
tai-ss 1r co--- md verdict accoi-lak =, r. -.
irrrs i9und the challenge true, md Ny fei VI" a-s-
james Mcsauey being also cha eueed - he res .sid
BE- Rad formed opinions lot On re ground me
r'--- 90 nrr1ii lac 10 rru-- p. -i1uf 49,
81 l police military hss no existing be- Aseilsi A.
ore nlic.e1 5 dry goods dealer 81 hy1s.on-st
i have 20 ~ pfr-slo-s 10 o. auo1 90 re k-. =. --
charged ! never saw J4cs0a before nave leafl %
| lr a. Ned bgrLlue'
TIE gentleman aso sdies ihai be lad got a. uaflvor-
ae iu rrs-lr against Jl-sll since De- lac been l er
Bus has 0ih-r orlor further flsn ihsi considers him
| sell an impsr-ia. Juror without bias
The Ti-rs f-lne him good Juror, ol. De "a pe-no-
uiy challenged by counsel Tor Bennett Mr. Bl1Znan.
TIE Court fere remarked that the rErf % prrr1piofy
chsenge much ab1sed a This case. uoe - inan be
lal seen before MAJ be- deemed . .19eci 20 Pc
rrblsel severely, &c. Mr >nlh asked Z NAT remark
vas intended a. censure for hm Toe Oc-r f--d lla'
be- intended Tor Tie counsel ,or -1- defense -lr
saith it=n sad be dl1 not fee. himself g-iy of ga--l
nat % wss -ti -= laV gave as clen .ll l- Nsla
always praclcr % 81 defiance VI rrlls- ~ AJAX ron
Colr-s. J-r-s. Cuurs- any one r-e M 6-a- ana
here rose bar before be spoke Judge Day acquired u -
uy % ne point A. issue The Court tod hin o. 81
down ihers as DO issue AId re AZ -ir tnen closed
I-e next J-rlr Vas Charles N-eman, go sad -e ea
not understand Englsh. and dismissed.
Morris X. While excused. wing . family natter.
The Clerk here announced the Jury parcl exhausted
ard m Consequent The proceedings were siopprc
t. Dslrci Attorney asked for lAesmen, ana ne N0lli
| ordsrct ueS panel q 100 Jurors.
M Busie-c counsel flr Doug here asked cave %
withdraw, owing indirectly 10 lae asn1anns tnd fee-A
OF CClr ard AFTER making trW remArk-, walked Oh
| Vi The rolal. via as papers under rs arm .
Tae Court here ordered he asJoar1nsni a. II oeoe1
| LIS days
There Jzrors Obtained now-tnree the trs day
AL hrse yesterday. A. l1s i3e twelve VII be oo-
| iAi,ed .tsr fssr days sEllS