The Arkansas banner., 1848-10-31

ts shoss siready eegnizaas of the fact. and e,,.... stances connected wish ss. an sf eeiu,.. ,A., '. wOnld es svsa ssss satisfactory "to tAese wA... gecd opinion Is important b sstA sf us, than .,,. silence. You and are alsssay satisfied win A. conversation alluded Co; because lI eovsi-t.s ,, snal explorations of eevrospOndeAee, of ,h. -. ieuiars of whtch we alone were coeui..n, r. make it clear aud inselligihle, and sasi.l.c,o,r others, the same amount Of kaowiedre sf ap ,A,, had preceded R, is necessary. unless we .,n...., them to be gifted with the power Of dlyiaier on, thoughts and feelings. or of insaisivtTy pe..e-so, themselves of facts and circumstances. which ,v' derstand to be knOwa eaiy to ourselves. i la this view, cannot think otherwise th,u e., If any publication he made st alt it should ..h-.. our whole correspondence on the subject. ,a,.,A., with conversation, which was in ust,,l a,,,,, nasioa of it.
 l am as aveFse as any one can be, to making esA. iic anything which has beca done ia private, or written in the freedom of confidential ia,rrcOu,- f aor should ever have proposed such proceedi.y But as eau difference, ia this resrsct As tween private lsi'ers and private coarsrss,Sos-.. you PrpPoss the publication of the latter-and IS deem the fouaea indispensable io a clear uadsrs,,.. diag of the latter, net willing to have them seParased aud, therefore, suggest the proprie,y, f any publication at al be made, that ii should coa siss of the whole.
 1 h were answering your letter in mere cold for mality, might hvrs close itwi;h proprie.v. Bu,. so, Ou, to do 90. frankiy aud in the same sitll of kindness which l understand to charac,er1e your communication, candor induces me to aud |, few words
 You speak of having beea satisfied to leave tAs matter between as, as itnOw is, while you ihoaeh, Knowledge of my allasion to yon, ia my letter to the In'ciligeneer. was confined to ourselves As said te you, last night, you greatly err H yoa at. tribute the direction of atieBtian to you as the eb Jeci of my ausion, in that letter, more to any re. marks of mine, than 10 your own. I must hera repeat, ,hpt before 1 saw you. eu ,6y return from Washington, learned from several soarces--utihe mouth of the liver and at Little Rock that you considered the silnsion to yourself And, a, the Springs, you cannot have forgotten that you told others so, and, farther-that, until an cxplsnaiioa took place, friendly relations, between Us could ne. be resumed. You came to sec me, and explanation did take place. 1t mata~i, and embraced our i previous conversation. Both declared 1t salisfc. tory, and friendy-even cordial relatOas wese re- sumoii sincerely, know, oa my part, and as I bs. ieve on yours. And Of snolhcr thiag feel sars. no drought or feeling has been entertained aud no word Irss been uttered by ia aay scase, iaeo,n. patible with such relations.
 asn, wi,ls high respect.
 Yoar most shs servant
 SOLoS BogLfNp.
 Lon, T. B. FtoeRNOS.
 i.iTrLE Rock. Oct. 27th I DrAs siR Your note of lEis nsoriing as bren fsliy considered. The feelings expressed tn t to- wsris mc rreprocaie Bat regrc; te say. il Is not sai factory hen wrote yon al Washington, private and confidential letter, ia which cut of -pcct sBd kindness to you, sud sRryiy with ne dea of proposing anything dIsisouorah1r, l expressed my earnest desire to see hoih yoBF.4f and Col. Scvier is the Senate you answered my e tee deserved, in the inos kind and respeesfai nah Hrr, tlauking ne fer my good opinion, sal Wisf to you, but twhiio mol mau festing any iadis Eation hiuiing B, 3ishossrj courieously ipiorne ing me. that you couli not consent 10 withdraw from the contest with Col Seyier. When sought intcryi with son, in re:arl io ycur letter. io the Van Barsu iuu-ligeneer. written abept tn iime Inc oue 10 nic, and speaking in len's of reproduction oi propositions Haae o yol, 10 wtb draw from that contest, and run for the other cancy, as dishoaorabe, and accordingly repeiled by trh i All s.,f caoeefra that 1 had any explanations 10 make. I had surely doue sOs no wrong. In conversation you admitted iha, my letter bore such construction its face as you pat upon il, but that your idea. of the asiure of inc proposition not from il, bai from com. manicstoas from otiers and reports of what otli- iaa said IL dil not aced, that should explain anything, do remember that did explain anything. Yoa had nothing oB earth of NiIich 10 complain against ule. Ton dil me ample asiee in thai conversation. and l as ssdisied But l can noi admit that taere any ma,aal explanations, as that woaid imply there tnatnas wrongs. Your of those words ia your last note, indicates that your e&pianatiOn to baAed on, aud caused by explanations made by i0e to yea. Ihss canno, admit. The osgecsoa, aud others n'ofe grave, apply to yoar ProPosilloo, To pab'ish our former letters, as weii eoBversaiiOn For tho publication of whole conversation ihers s no Be c-s~ity That II wholly friendly on both sides I cheeFfuliy admit. Bat as cannot, for mo- .meni, admit that there was any one word ih my original letter so yOa, warranipg or Josiifyins your letter to the Inteiisencer, caanof agree tisat in any way required to permit the pn1'e to See my private letters The original grievance Of which eoBpIaias was thsf yca alluded to hy letter and myself SEjustifysbiy and improperly You admitted hr aliusion was to me, and Il seems 10 me that yea cannot make |. condition to your doiag me public justice, that the original wrong should be douhiy increased by the p1S'iesto" "' the original letter. which you had DO right ever to make any pablic reference You base your e'a'h' to the psbIiestioa of my first letter and yonf re- spoase to il, on the gr0uHd that require 'se pap