New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1848-03-03

S,rssa, Vcvss-tN Eaatt,- nsnits Jsass IA
Neras fs''sesr .. tales sf'eeshf g. ih~ 'luW sns
10 Ne w.'ts, aus rth,hs, rts,,ytsr'su oha'sh
,lsis ~ MeAnlsysl erhs wss hin 50 iefeeios" i"e
sneGste' 10 whish doefcos wete tuf rin lrsy 'hs,
eNirnsSH sss pfcHisrd Tho Cruft aLet heNitf mo
evidence. usae - assrs CO.. BY no hili a.. H..
~, ssfvi Nsrs - Httsas .tturiis NJ faisfri ~
$3.50 eaiNs JAS ka di APrlissiien io diveiee uoni
Nss ana bc>A Hea that complainant msy have tne ave
snd sns~v ~ no chldiru 20 Tho frenne OF sbs"ao.
ri,nt srd cruel tfrsrcnt The pait 81 Mf 20 eem
rlSinsat N ,s.r
tArs o. Oar ,cars a. n mo Maine Court m which he
va. su-d by D. The. 0uunins HI. ofmer paitnei sra
- .-,s,s s 40 house % him tChanbelst adjon'
Ice Nsfh east corner hroadv 81 in which ceioneo no
rl-.8 principally eviction cautnh by nirFra ilPioFoi
rasr sfer coming iuio Court twice No believe WIN
49, go. N =, lad ssfec4 BOT The plaintiff fDr o. cid
not sn.s-f aud n1u,ut ordered. Ga that oocssi
=. ir thl. ALLEGED 500 treatment 10 complainant sno her
children IA requiring them olive on the OfshHm system
The dolenee IN tho present instance addition u We
understand. improperly between Mrs u. and DIT } Z.
rv.n.-thc arsi As relates @ Mr. Cunning. 70 Justify
The abNudoumentand the latter In oPposiuon 20 u,
retaining the ard custody Of her children "hen are
A., charles Fdward. opened the case 70 the Court He
.aid The parties married IN July, lsSo ana have h4a
four children the edetc which Is oead-fhM IN 800 me
defendant abandoned lis family aud has pot snos po
vitcd for thsin-iha while sh- has been faithful % her
nisrase vow he has been guilty Of cruel end inhunsi
conduct 80 a. 10 make o. unssfe 10 live with hm-thzt 10
Dersns.r 1886 while sh. wa in delicate situation he
i her 5r the West Indies and not lsaylus proper pro
Vision Tor her suppor-that acr his return his conc
wstd her on The birth Of her child was unfno ano IN
human not allowing her proper nourshe1 or s9eu oo1
A. she reeded-hst he aterward unhnd 20 het $40
her children hst be wanted them 70 ss+ ohoppeo pa's
and Jaw ,exeabes-fh4t he believed ia eating -n} 70 ns
,ud overriding except animal food-that bis family ar
yest Was 10 have but Two meals 80 - hours, one D.
eclock In the forenoon and the other Al TO 0clocs az
Of the Cirahsm system Description t IN
his mode 81 treatment as 20 1000 and
ne ~. eaast child disdhgt he has been known 70
fhrov food when procured erent from his plan ont Of
,hs window 60 Mr. T. stated other facts Of tais KIND
ald proceeded 10 call his witnesses.
The testimony vas principally such IS on the previous
on the part Of Mr. b. diet ADD apparel sneh as not
having children very warmly clothed or ughtaeea &c
The lsst witness Mrs AbuTtis lstepmother OF MIS-
Rurde . she thought the conduct Of Nh cold and IN
lind 10 his wife: Al her confinement ore time, he Nes
sbout going town. snd she assed him he IS not
going 10 ace hs child hrst ne replied that the chi "as
On ly an ANNA On the examination Mrs A ssd
she asked him. that time II he going out 70 see his
goss: Mis g. II said, kept goats > she spoke II lot
10 very kind Euner she felt hurt with his conduct
toward his wife never him in passion believe
him TO have erteTtsned much affection for his wife at
the time heir marriage be CAPABLE OF eeng
his wife knew the time Of their marriage, that he was
an advocate OF the Graham system and lived according
TO IT, 80. ..-,t
Mssss Bur6ell Cunning dentist and kept viii
be recoec ed, in Chambsrsst corner q Broadway. -
Mr and Mrs. Burdel, also, Mr.. and hfs Cunning NJ
Evans and number Of other persons ere present a. WIZ
49,,
This trial is proceeding in the Board Of room
and will continued to-day at u oc'ock-for alaun
Nj Charles Edna ards and Mr Moncrei for defendant
Pierpopf and Mr. Edward Sanford