Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1848-02-10
DOMESTIC lNTEti,Gvy,
rur ', ,n "a it.,'"s R'pt,'ic,. ia ~
or 'D prp spENkER OF THE HOUSE

fIp Son
p',y as me 'oie # their rerrr,ea,,, wing Of III.
gfess "r III .fLottionit Mr. W,nh, natives In Con
NJ " III" 'ioasf OF REPRESENTATIVES a., 'ne Spa
aa'e '""'"e'" me" with northef,, E,I;,@, 'aetd, are
80 NV '''esi III rest of he South al Ia. .,' saenf
h;eh ,,., s . themselves In regard To b. par
IVY IA We t"'nnil ted np,n III. int, res, oa t,ge
slinel's HE laundering ndiyn a,i,, f - VI 'h'if on
areAuy caused severaof them Il, address l p'pe has
~ u'e'' Conduct with view of appeas,n ~ Apalat.
'"'1' 'os',in'n's and we doubt moi th,, ., 'e @ral-
''',.a u Do hkewise. ''''fs viii be
We are no, sarrsisrd tber.f,,a =,
OIL Tue h'chn'"nd VIII. and the CbsrL,,osn;,e tfr,
10 pa'ia"' me cortirc ii ihpirsou,bern , adFucale
and particularly hat Of MIR. Goegn of,b sni .atyts
sal i'is net. Unable To deny that The ,,h; .oa.rs.
Is no," 90. .1'o."'on'sf aud timot Speaker
qnenily unworthy OF being trusted nv SIT, AMI onse
ia'Vrs these journals altemp, find ior,. epesen-
ior HE election Of such man. In the Won, precedent
Democrats iof John w. Davis Of Indsn, =, southern
W. iio"se ID lo4" whom they sIleye vo,.J iaNr Il
bill. '"'e - the Ore,,,
lin are The circums anccs conneci.l viii, Il
uie abolition wing speaker, Mr. Winllt,n eo"rs' Of
efl supporters The same or al all siml,r2 s south
cafe would have its Traders believe thai iha1 Ady-
r. A. - ,'', US 'o' III N Speaker. is that ne ,
,'ke MI DAVIS tran an Il slavery clans ~ I've facd,
NIL lhis indeed, were small ,,lI.nee .J ~ o'ga
Is attempted tn be- l.de appear by Il, AIy WIS rs
evidence OF Mr. Wiaihr ps Inhibition IN he only
""o "'"',,'sN nave been comparatively hul. s,'l '"''s
g',a 10 H. IN, II mus be perfectly well known :" e,
A"sFa'e !nai Mr " lnhrnp is. and always L ~ Tho
ra4h dbohtto,ia aud enemy n Hc SoaL and oeeata
Ell himself oi repeated ocra 'ons M iite- So
and sentiments and 10 strike do,rn U,e -" 'e.lngs
NE eonS't"t'o" N regard 10 sare,y, WIZ "@" n
n's''' N'P ines, aci' concealed from il, ,,a1 I '''
Perhaps thai 'nrnal is M, fond Of seachi, h'lers!
dence IN such cas- S? lfsl W. take H.. Tt 'pf fvl-
eng 1t ourselves, and calling the attention adH-
cate 10 il 49, VI ne ldyo-
In lsii, Febroaly 81, during debate ,noo,..,
OF Mr. b ri: N''' III 'hesPerch
What was tae vote Of MasSacl use,ts,,,..
'rade4 Massachusetts voted in favor IF r "t save
Ton connected with thli trade and n5v Tho l'l'-
fom mat Star Mr.. " INruRorj prannnc, i aa
,'n'.o' 81 st's,! within tins D,lrl i rs IN hmm, n
ab'mlnabe Traffic fie would eavr !, =, '''''p ana
man 10 say whether an Institution nncs . r sf.'e-
The State Of Massachusetts, deserve as ,v., Wy
ton y "'s' we're chndenna-
Mr.. WINTHROP said he had hiol an,b,,,.e.,
use # 'le terms. ''' me
Here it viii b. seen that Mr. \Ni,l
slarclB. in The District If Column, "'",'n ed
nlan anil d6ont'ndth traffic" and ,n,,iG Il Il. " I
OUNCE 49," ms ia"-
Ia the same arFrbrnary o3th The fIloyio,
among o'hrfs o a sn'l'ar nnP9r,Nas intrau,9J by A.,
Belsrr Ion HE acton Of the iloIse: } WI
That III eff rls If the ali ,pjoo;st or,,,b,. -,
induce Congress 10 interfere with qtl ,sfi ms If W
10 'ak nhcill'ni steps IN relation thereto are c,l,Ii
to al 10 the most alarming AID dln rar m, c,nsc,,.ns
ana ai all 81 III etfi> have an inevitable tendency in
dh:4'Sh the happiness Of he ,npe and ,ndauger ,he
stability and IrrmaHeiey of The Unin and ouuht no, 1,
lions
It will beohserved thu, this r. 3 luton takes strong
snihern grounds AGAINST the abolition of slavery and Tho
lanara designs ofthe ali ,ons,s 1t was passed by,E.
larte Hailrity Of Is IL %. /, e\,u,ni, lin. .,,nI
mes. We iial ihat The DcA)cfa!ic Saeabcr, Jim N
DAVIS. voted loF Il, ard HE iboitioa mir SneoL r
Vi. " in'traP, IN Company with h~ abolition assoc
Mes' hessfs .idams. hiddiaes, T. Co. voted against
Il HE year March 22l Mr.. Df,npo le from the
select t"nrn1se IN resolutions Of The L,gisl4lurs f
ifgloia and Alnb'na, N r,g1ld 10 ,me anpndnpn !.
iheem-hnn. Ir Tn a5 ltion Of stare repressn,ntina
proposed by the Legislature nt Massachusetts, l.od.
report. acc inpan"d several resolutions on wbrh h
called tr the ayes afd noes, and d1anrd the pfeyi
qn'siion Am NJ HE resolutions o. Mr.. Dromgoae vs.e
the following:
'hcs0fred. &c That The rule established in TIE com
shtn'"n as the lass If rrI' s,u,aii,n and direct
iaNal"n resulting from spirit of concession and COM
promise essential To the formation and preservation the
union OF the States, ought be held sacred by the friend,
of The Union.
ResoIrcd That proposition to alter or amend the
cons iiinlon ii relation 10 presentation and dlrec, tai.
alton among The STATES ou9 ht be recommended by
Congress but thai every such Proposition ought b, 10
promptly and decisivey Condemned -
oh Tie hrst OF these resolutions, affirming principle,
recognised BY the Cunsiiiu and 81 essential IN he nor
manehry OF The Union and the security of the Soulh,he
vote stood ayes l3o. Is la The list Of the E,rn.r
Is recorded he name OF the Dtmoerafic Speaker Mr.
DAVIS; and m the latter, thai oftht .ibotml Uhig Se,
ker. Mr.. Umthrnpi
pom The Second hese resolutions. te vote stood ayes
y, noes Al. Among the former. is The name Of the
DeancrHiic speaker >r DAVIS and , non, the la,,er
the fboia'on Mig Speaker Mr. UInttrop
mnch "'hff testimony, III proh III DIf. ), lutrops cb
oftionlm, could be addnced but the above is 81 lcent
convince every mind. In eich orhe instances l., which
we have referred, Mr. w rotcd ,cith he .4boiiouisn
opp ton to the South aaiihc Compromises If the Coa
MhHoH, While Mr. Davis voted invariably with the
South