Burlington free press. [volume] (Burlington, Vt.) 1827-1865, 1848-03-24
COURT CtLEND AR.


s,.,,r,,, o,,,,r ,,-,.,,.,.,, ....
D .,,or,,,, g. H., L.. g.
Reported Tor Inc fTee ITess 10y gentleman OF tile Bar.
-, =,
we give below the decisions made at the annual
session OF the supreme Court tor W INDIAN County
WELLS I. towARp eL at.-Ih,s was an action Of
aSsuinpSit npoh t"o pTouuN.'fy notes The facts APP
peafhg III me case nom the peudnG-, winch "ere
'"uli'l,"us were Niu' the h"l'a were MAI" payable
~ oI' he @ ,Nr' W "'i' o' b'nu exc
.uIcI ny 9"u i'NucI 10 we utf,'"4Ht>' c"hliuoned
.liat Nv "ouu CONVEY 10 We "eitnI9ut'' within one
! g. - ' 10 w i''," III ",ih, gan on thc
i , , i ,'.'l,' .i'' 'Iie a nud-
LUZ " o'' "''', a' pay 'I2 % peNieF tie
w ~ IA 7''' WI .",n 'l1 III tx Uohlbr and
w i !, ~. i" ~ way "t'.' IH' execution
', U,,cb, AMI ,t ,',i -, ~, ~, J." question: 10
",.. ur '' '' ac""'i'u w DINERS until
"'tr' ~, l''I'' ~, ,"u Hl' Whrl II was recon-
agH'u 10 ,''. .'' .'' va ''' .e 'ene ct Dexter,
",'r ~ tti,t nv ,i 'i.,u ~ ".l'ulei J"dg-
''v,rr1 ~ P""lI'l.
I'M W 10y ~! anu " T. btHINy .r plaintiff,
~, i,i', ''," N,l.'s LOT ''I'"alht-
~ w i ,,''H v'.,l'a'u hl iie notes aod bond
stinnotions ,.r, ,,' ,,, ,ui'u'' "iI Iuai the
ter. by decnr AVN The t ',' ~. 'd ''1I DeI-
ans hon, r,,Ii7,r,,,' 'u il-e'.u ut ueirnd-
lint Dcxtcrs condurt .bnni b 'e ,'.l 90 YET
~ Wv t'''I N'''h excused tle performance on the
P'IIt o' ll't u' eHGah'S
oii J." t'nl 'i' % Inc notes m question,
',', ~, o' my 'u'i"- u,!e was condition
ri ID xt'r in "gg 10y psN',T ami the act
o,I, IT, H. w., - way eng '"iu FURNISHES no tX-
cuu9u1i Pte''d'nl. Nor can the conveying away
his part unr-. il was 50 iutcnIe an, " ,ae' On
appear. 1t might have been done Ia. ,,g'..L IH'
ucnt of county conn reversed - ''''1'"NS' JUG
S>,,,-, -. ~ ms
Win ono c,, IT, ms VIZ, Was an act"n on the case,
~, -, H., 49,, W iHc 'd'l> Were agreed up
pn. S,u,,',i So 81" VIE IL ioHoWs-
Rrovyn t,r h. - - ~ - - iH'iu 10 VIM. W.
sam, tir,e JIi,i :, ip'-' ~ 1917, ana az the
place for tin, bruetir ot Brn,,, I,.,' 70 N'p' ON Inc
ybn r., ,, ~ Va nluM H"'l"s SAID three years,
cows or ,hos,. ,,,,,L ',' W W., 'h' SAME Zen
surnosaI in,.r.s, ~ ,h IT," ~ an respects lie
urnr b,, virt, ~ ' WV 49,, ~, Ihr cows Was levied
.''I' aiG Mas ur'hased Al the sheriff 5 sale hy the
in the PISS on Of Of Brown '''S4 IN ihe meantime
ing said term ot tr. ,,,rs ~, ''nl'y ana dur
an, i XII G W 'y' yours le cows were attached
Air ,b x;, a. u property OF Brown,
dr,nnn,l,d H., , -. III V vn' years the lInuuh
nc,,n II, rsc,,,r -, ''''"l''' ana brought thus
IN, county c,,rt ,r',', ~, -.
dc,m,lon, aysc,t'J N"'' Judgment Tor Falntt, and
The ease was arrucd for rIoir,,1,t,. ~
for defendant by 81 ~ l'",,,''' "y n Aty's, and
tn J ,l;"' oy y, =, -" S'H't ahd T. ID Bradley
contract the whole property IN the co,ys r,s.j a.
Brown I'd, That il 1t were otlcrvIs.. tL. i'' 'a ~
1S ol inc lessor was not subject % attachment
during the term. aud that nothing p1s-i n, t. ~
MI by the sheriff. sale. f@''''
bLNNlrr,J. The interest of the lessor was NOT lin
PIE 10 seizure on attachment OF execution and r.n'l
h p Ne soH thereon during the tenn and conss,uutIy
sale. As to the other point we think II , Sn'iln
of the COWS To Brown, and not a ,lI, tI ~ " ',u1l