Weekly national intelligencer. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1841-1869, 1848-06-03
l,64s, 900 So
Treasury DEPARTMENT., 6,2s5, 294 SIS
Registers Office, December l, ls47.
DANIEL GRAHAM Reoister ;, n
6,2s5,294 SIS

Registers Office, December l, lS47.
DANIEL GRAHAM, Register
The third item the above statement is in these words
"Sock issued in ls47, 81, 096, 100 co."
that audes only to the stock issued under that loan OF
under the act Of July % 1885, during the year s4 and up
to that time, be correct for the committee have
amned the booksn reference to that particular point but that
would not give tho information which the purports
to exhibit It is perfectly plain that if ascertain
the amount Of loan that still unappied available
that me must take into the calculation all the stock that
had been issued under that act previous the date of the
statement, whether in the year 1916 ls47 And is
dent from the statement ITSELF that it is not confined excu-
svey to the year of which the date gven for the item i'm
mediatey preceding the alluded purports stock
issued in 1916, S4999 l49 As when reference state
ments and in the Secretas report shows that 1000
of that amount issued during the quarter ending Sep
TENDER 3d. IS47.
The above mentioned of ST. $780, I49 AS was stock
issued for specie deposited and the stock mentioned the
third om of statement that which had been issued in
funding and whether intended not should have
embraced all the stock that had been thus issued prior that
date.
In statement A. page SO of the Secretays report have
the amount of Treasury notes that had been issued under the
act Of July % s46, which funded previous June 80
lS47, stated at. ,93l 900
The committee have shown, page II Of this
report, that component part of the of
So, 32s, 27S, included in statement B, was stock
issued to fund Treasury notes, issued under the
July % 1916, during that quarter, period sub
sequen to that last above stated the Of l0ll50
making the whole amount of stock issued in fund
ing notes under that act, up TO October /, lS47
from data taken down from the Secretary's report,
TO be- Observation-Disclosures. 2,94s, $50
Instead Of Gas per statement G) ...... 2,096, 100
Difference. $4,000
Again, the Treasury outstanding, of those issued
under the Of July % 1896 on the LIST Of October s47
is. in statement G, put down the Of 81, 1885, $50
The committee undertake to say that this sum is far below
the actual amount Of notes outstanding at the period referred
TO- To prove this assertion they submit the following
men the principal data upon which il is founded being taken
from the report of the Secretary.
In statement A. page &c. Of the Secrearys report we have
the amount Of Treasury issued under the Of July
81 1885, after deducing ST. go, 900 which were funded
set down at the sum Of. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. SIS, SOC, 500
Now, the amount funded must have been is
sued IN the form OF Treasury notes. and therefore,
in order TO ascertain the whole amount of notes
issued that amount must be added to the above,
that is. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. i,9sl,Ooo
Giving as the whole amount issued previous to
January 80, ls47 .,................... 7,437, 500
In statement b, page 40, we have also given,
as the amount of Treasury notes issued under that
act during that quarter the sum Of ..... 100000
Making the whole amount ............. 1887 800
The books show that up to this time there had
been redeemed, exclusive of what funded,
the sum OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES. 2,79l, 700
Leaving the sum Of ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. 1886, 100
1t appears, page 20 of this report, that the
whole amount Of stock issued in funding notes
under this act up to October LIST, ls47, was 294s $50
Which being deducted leaves for the amount
Of notes outstanding at that time the of " l,947, $50
Instead Of the stated by the Secretary. l,255,s5
Difference OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES. 500, 100
If these calculations Of the committee correct and they
appeal to the books Of the Treasury Department for the proof
then the Secretary reference
TO the issues Of notes and stock and the available
the Isl Of October s47 under the Of July 22d 1885, in
the form adopted by him, in statement G. should have been
as follows, viz
Of the loan Of 1916, loan Of 81 200, 900 90
Stock issued in 1876. 81, 999, l49 -45.
Stock issued IN lS47........ 2, GAS, $50 90
Treasury notes outstanding. l,947,950 90
$685., 249 As
Available on the LIST Of October ls47 - l04, $50 IS
Available per Secreary's report ...... l,64s, 900 SIS
In the second part Of statement g. which relates the loan
OF s47, the Secretary has been quite unfortunate In his
figures that just disposed Of though in the final result
the difference falls upon the other side.
The words and figures Of the report as follows
vi the loan OF ls47, loan Of So, 100000
stock issued ................s4, S3s 500
Notes outstanding. .l4,023,75O
1886, 1894
In endeavoring 10 prove the above errone
ous the committee again drawn upon the report Of the
Secretary for data wherever deducbe from that docu
and contradcted by the books Of the Department
In statement A. page SO, find the avais Of Treasury
issued under Of January %, 1s47 after deducng
ST 22l, $50, which funded under the said act put
down at .Sl1, lag, 800
To this sum Of 81, 22l, $50 the committee have
in another place taken exception being too
much, but IN the present calculation il i'm