The Lancaster gazette. (Lancaster, Ohio) 1846-1852, 1848-05-26
IN CHANCERY.

Louis Sepps and Barnard i' ''iH W.
Sepps, Of the Kingdom of
Wiite nbursh. aud Samuel
Btler, FaiIheldComty, o.
Y ME above named Defendants non-residents
ui the State Of Ohio, are hereby notified that
on the 28,h day OF February, a. d. l348. the Com
pluinant filed her Bill Of complaint therein. setting
forth that her intesiate vas the only child of uuc
Louisa Charlotte Wurtz. (ormerly Louisa Char
otte Scheidt) by her first marriage. That said
Louisa Charlotte, afterwards intermarried with
one - WurtZ, and had as issue of said last mar
riage one child, Louisa Wurtz, now Louisa Sopps
aud wife of said Defendant Bernard Sepps. That
said Louisa Charlotte Wurtz lately deceased, in
Fairfield county, Ohio, intestute, leaving a small
amount of personal property i'll the Kingdom OK
Wittemburgh and small tract OF land Or lot in
the town of Lancaster, Fairfield county. Ohiu,
known and described as follows: "a lot OF ground
56 feet front on Columbus Street and running
west from said Columbus Street the distance OF
los feet along aud with the south side OF Street
laid out by Thomas Sturgeon aud Charles Wagen-
halls, ont of Ou.Lo No. l2 north Of and adjoining
said town OF Lancaster That said Louisa Char
lotle purchased said lot when tue same wis vacant
and OF but little value That coHiplanant's inteH-
tate was for long me prior to the death Of said
| Louisa Charlotte. living with and providing for
| her-and at his own expense, erected d valuable
improvement on said lot for the comfort and con-.
venence of his said mother. That Subsequently,
to the death of said Louisa Charlotte. csmpsin-
ants iutestate aud defendants Bernard and Lou
sa Sepps communicated with each other in re-
gard to the estate and property Of said Louisa
Charlotte. aud agreed 10 and with each other that
compliments intestaie should assert no claim
against said estate-tmt defendants Sepps' were
to have all that part of said Louisa Charlottes o.
tate left in the said Kingdom OF Wittemhurgh and
the cunplannnt's intestate have the estate left in
the said State of Ohio, and pay all her (the said
Louisa Charlotle'sl debts. That afterwards and
on or about the 4th day of May, A. D. 1876. the
compliments intestaie sold aud conveyed said
lot in Lancaster Ohio, 10 oAe Samuel Bttler.-
Tlata part ofthe purchase money has been paid
the residue now due but that said Bittler refuses
to make further payment until the apparent inter
est of the defendants Sepps is removed.
Prayer Of the Bill, that tRe contract or agree
ment aforesaid, between compainants intestste
aud the defendants Louisa aud Bernard Sepps be
executed-that the property aforesaid be declared
free and clear from all interest or incumbrnnce IN
favor of each or both Of said Sepps-that said
Btiler be required to make full payment Of tbs
snid purchase money aud that he be protected in
his tile by the decree OF the court and for other
general relief.
The said case will be an appearance To the June
Term of said court for the year. A. d. l848, at
which time the said defendants may plead, an
swer or demurr thereto.
MARTIN & EFFINGER,
Solicitors .for Complain1Hts.
April %, ls4s Swsl Pf$lc,to