Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1848-11-14

cessiyeIy, and posted al The front door of the cour
house of this county Copy-iesir, -
Oct 20-cw2m WM HULL, eh.
IN CHAHcERY VtR.IsI.:- In Iienrco county
L Cauit, september 5th, le1s:
Jacob Sneed, Mary Sneed, William Blackburn, lay
ior L 81 .cK bum, Absaom Blackburn, Charless War.
brtton, $, ncy Warhrtton, Christopher Z Waflfitol
Francis Williams and Susan his wife, vino was Ssah
Warbritton: J-mima Seaton. who before her marriage
with Fleming Seaton, now deceased, was JemlnlaWar
brItlon William WarbIiton, Woodsun Warbhltoh,
James Franklin and Mary his wife, who was Mary
Sneei; James Philips and Eliza his wife, VIII wa
Eliza Sneed; Nathaniel Bridgwaer and Nathaniel
Glenn, i"'"ut>-
against
wife, Virginia and I.ucy Ellen Blackburn. inian ch'.
drrn of Nathaniel Blackburn, dsceased William Rtrd
and Elizabeth his wife, who was Elizabeth snrei ~.
san Snecd John Sinclair and Jane his wife VITO "as
Jane Snsed, John s;nred. Alexander Sneed, George v
need and Della Sneed the three last Of WHOM are IN
der tie age of twenty yiars; Charles BihgSi'ri,
John GOode aud Agnes his WIFE who was aGns bfls-
water, Elizabeth II Douglass, Sarah \ u Douglas, Ma
rietta Douglass, James Douglass. Samuel hiry ahd
Kelsey his wife, who was Bersey Newman, An New.
man, Mahala Newman, Arena Alley, MalVna Airs
and Crawford Alley children of Eruhrn Allies and va.
ia his wife, who Marin Newman Watson VIEW
man. Fleming and Harvey Newman, infant th'idirn 81
Ro. Newman, deceased; Samuel Brown and L.ihr ~
wife, who was Leihc Newman; Joseph Newmai folly
Newman, Ann ; Newman, Nathaniel Brldgwatf' ~
len grdewater, Francis Bridgwalrr and Henrietta
Bridgwai-r, infant children of William Brdswaer, de-
ceased; the SAID Virginia aud Lucy Ellen Blaribnrn
Alexander sneed. George w Sneed, Della Snte., RE
ming Newman, Harvey Newman, Naihaalel Bfdgaa
ter, Ellen Brdswatrr, Francis BrIdrwaer an hen
retla Brldewaler, being infants under the age o"rh
ry.one Years by Loitn Ellru, their guardian ai'en,
assigned rs the Count 10 defend them in this SUI,
Defendants.
This dag came the Compainanis and filed thar bIl,
and the defendants, William Snsri, Thoma' :ea'"n
and Mary C his wife, Arena Alley, Malslnd AHtE.
Crawford Alley, Watson Newman, Samuel Brown ana
Iethe his wife, Joseph Newman, Polly Nsam,n and
Counsel,
said bill, which the plaintiffs replied sehe
rally; and the motion Of the conplainaIts, lne
Court doth assign I.oin Elicit guardian ad nrm 20
the nnnt defendants, Virginia aud Lucy Ellei BACK
burn Alexander Sneei, George w Snerd, Driasntso'
Fleming Newman, Harvey Newman, Naihanie Bfids
water Ellen Bfdcwa.cr, Francis NJ Rriewdef ana
Henrietta Bridswater who therenpon, filed trir an
swers To which, also, the plaintiffs replied genday
and II appearing In the Court, by satisfactory evidence,
that the following defendants are not re'idenn ~ NJ
COMMONWEALTH wi: William Reed aud Eizlpf."
his WIFE susan Sne.d John Sinclair and Jane IL VIC,
John Snced, Samuel Aliey and Kelsey ms VIZ; hsa
Newman ami Mahaa Hrwmani-and That me rsiH'n'o
Of tho defendants, Charles Bridgwat,r, J"hnIo'arn
ani Agnes his wc, III abr,h u Iouglass Sdah =
DnlrIa.s Marietta Douglass and James Dor. Ass
wholly unknown: IN me motion ~ me 'n'nli @
hr Court doth ori-r that III" said defendants appear
here IN or hrnrr ihr first Monday IN Herrihrr next
ana >wfT thr bill II nr plaintiffs, and thai copy OF
,h,a order he published fur Two months successfully ~
.nu. newspaper published ~ the cry OF Richnohu ana
,n,iber e. ~ posted al me front door 81 the Cnr house
Of this county. y opp este, .,, . !, .
sept y cw9w LJrii u Ei'i-Ei =
fN,u,NCCaY-vin Rules hid In the
I,efn IN. 49,. :. ~ 49, Ron A, ~ p,tohr $50:
the h'canoh@ ,ieui., ~ ,,,." a., ,f Eb,cea r..
aieaahtt pd,o" a"u 81, ana p,,s,b wlte
A aS1 B,acsoarn Nancy jennings; aann b,,',a.
wood,on ana E.rlina his wife, NJ ill4n aha ~
~ his WIFE, Rebecca Britain, John Britain ann ~
| 5frila Britain
against o....,..,. ,,.,.,, IA ,h.,
william u b"'''"' o'"!''''''' ''''''' D.rntauts
~. .sfsulapt, above named no, hayig entered
their appraIaur. and .ivrn security, ACCORDING 70 l
ACT al Assembly an! he rules II tbs Court ana az
nearing by satisfactory evidence thlt they ,ir not inns
bitauts Of this Commonwealth, II - Ordered, nav -.
said defendants do appear The rules 10 be held of 'e
said court on The frs, Monday in Jinssry nett am IN
swsr the bin Of the painiid. and that copy Of th-
der be forthwith inserted IN some newspaper puoH,'
in IN. city Of Richmond for months slicrrssl'tp'
aud posted a, the iron: door Of the State Court h'u'
IN thr said city copy-restr.
Oct li-cw2in hobbh'S., @.-
CIrrks OtEcr Of the snperlo. Court II Ihanc-ry ~
The Richmond Circuit tie 7th day Of October. ieis;
| Charles u Yale, PianilH
against
defendants.
The defendants above named not having en'eie'
their appearance and gwen security, s'so,"' u No.
marina 10 evidence that they not ma
h,n,s NJ ,hja rommonweath II il Ordered, 1n7t W
Ia \ aanea, ~ rhr rui.. to b. held for nc
san d n M si. ManSay IN January next ADD an
ss, rho nm NJ the naint;ff. and that copy Of ths VI
s"fi tue WI " ur pa,.'i ,os,, n,r published
as oe ,,. ~ pennd f ,Yo month. sncce.siss,
nt nos,sa =, The on, door of the state Court house
aN' p 49, go, ~ '''e ''o'' :. Conv 1rs,r
! eis sain CITY. 'oP' % pSnrRTS CLERK
o9l ll-cM-n - - -.
IN CHANCERY-V isorsfa AT Rules he 'l =" ia
/ CLERKS Office of the Superior Court OF Chah0