The Lancaster gazette. (Lancaster, Ohio) 1846-1852, 1848-06-02
IN CHANCRRY,

Scheidt, deceased.
rs. -. ,,rt. >~pa~
Louis Sepps aud Barnard -
Scpps or the Kingdom Of
Wittelnhlrgh, aud Samuel
Bi'ter. FuilteldCouniy,
NliE above u1lued Defendants non.residens
of the State OF Ohio are hereby notified thal
on the 28th day OF February, \. D. 1913. the Com-
painant flied her B i'll Of complaint therein setting
forth that her intestale was the only child Of one
Louisa Charlotte Wunz. tiunnery Lonisa Char
lotte SchcidD by her first marriage, That said
Louisa Charlotte, afterwards inermarred with
one - Nuriz and hid as Issue of said last mar
riaes one child, Lonisu Wurlz, uOw L0uiSa SepPH
aId wife OF said Defendant Bernard Sepps. That
said Louisa Charlotte Wuriz lately deceased, ia
Fairfield county, Ohio, ntestate, leaving small
amount Of personal property IN tue Kingdom Of
Wiiiemburgh and small tract OF land or lot. ia
he town of Lancaster, Fairfield county. Ohis.
known and described as follows: "a lot uf ground
j6 feet front on Columbus Street and running
west from said Columbus Street, the distance VI
l65 feet along and with the south side ofn Stree.
laid out by Thomas Surgeon aud Charles WageH-
halls out OF Ou-Lut No. II. uorth Of and adiuinink
said town of Lancaster That sad Louisa Char
o,Ie purchased said lot when the same was vacaS.
aud OF but hi,e value That complginant's nltes-
tate was for long time prior to The death OF pid
Louisa Charlotte. living with aud providing fSr
her--and at lis own expense, erected u valuable
improvement on said lot for the comfort and Goa.
venieuce OF lis said mulher That subsequently,
to the death of said Louisa Charlotte. complai1.
ants intes,aie and defendants Bernard nnd Lou.
isa Sepps communicated with each other iu TO-
gard 10 the estate aud property of sad Louisa
Charlotte. aud agreed 10 aud with each other that
compianants intestato should assert no claim
against said estate--thnt defendants Sepps were
TO have athat part Of SIid Luuisa Chaiutic's ss-
tate left in the said Kingdom Vi Wntemburgll and
the complannnts intcslate have the estate lett il
the said State of Ohio aud pay all her (the said
Louisa Charnttes) dcbs. That afterwards aud
on or about the 4th day o. May, A. D. 1876. the
/ compainant's interstate sold and conveyed said
lot in Lancaster. Ohio to one Samuel Blttler.-
Thata part ofthe purchase money has been paid-
the residue now due but that said Biiller refuses
10 make further payment uulil the apparent intos-
es Of the defendants Sepps' is removed.
Prayer of the Bill, that the contract or agres'
ment aforesaid. between compliments mtestats
aud the defendants Louisa aud Bernard Sepps be
execu,ed-that the property aioresnid be declares
free and ce1r from all interest or incumbrince ~
favor Of each or both OF sail Sepps-that said
Bitller be required to make full payment OF Tho
said purchase mu'iey and that he be protected IN
his title by the decree Of tile court aud tor othec
general relief
The said case will be an appearance 10 the JnHs
Term of said court bn tile year. a. D. l84s, q
which time The said defendants may plead, an
Iswer or demurr thereto
MARTIN & EFFINGER,
Solicitors far GOmgtainssAh
| April aS. 1915 6w5l pfslOSe