The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1848-12-30

acts you are Ia take into considerations end ON the
whole OF the evidence Myou come to the conolu ion
that Governor Hill had good reason to suppose which
10, in the language Of tho Law. that he had probable
to suspect the parties Of collision then he not
liable but H. on the other hand, you should be Of
opinion that he did not exercise . proper precsuton
In the steps he had taken, then the Law would imply
malice, and he would be liable. The jury found for
.4tigeii Gorasz ps The Predemt Of the Tradssnen's
Bank Of the city Of NsW York This was an action OF
ejectnept for strip Of land In Chatham Square:
The plaiptn claimed a. one of the heirs Of Daniel
Come who conveyed the lands in 1859. for certain
The deed contained clause that 1t should not
that covenant was broken. and now claims the pro-
perty on that ground The case was tried, by con-
dict Judgment should be entered for plaintiff. sub
ect to the opno OF the court on case TO be made
Before Judge Sanford
Philip Hone and Darid Booker, Receivers, &c. rs.
Thos lyse--Thit action q promissory note
for $4,000 The alleged that 1t given to the
American Ip,drsnee Company as part Of their capt.
tall while on The other hand the dant insisted II
wss given in advance. as security for premiums on
general policy of Insurance, and that the company
bad failed before the amount Of the note was earned
Sealed verdict ton orrow (this) morning
Before Judge Oakley
DEC 2S -Wiiiam II Frostps Geo. NJ Saul, Jonathan
S. hitney. ct al - This action promissory
the Mutual Pelican Insurance Company 1t after
wards passed into the bands of third party who
passed it to the plaintiff The defence was that 1t
given security for premiums such policies OF
Insurance the defendants might effect at the Office
Of the Pelican Mutual Insurance Company; that poll
cies to the amount OF about $500 had been effected
(which they were willing to psy) before the company
falt d. and hence the balance claimed with
out consideration Verdict for the plaintiff for Sl06 &c.
subject to the opinion Of the Court, a ease to be
made
james c. Bdidrin Us. .4ddingion ID. Fry-Ths was
action OF guarantee to recover $3.50, the amount
Of bill of goods sod by plaintiff to a person named
Loyejoy. The defence set up was, that goods we're
fod to Loveoy his own credit and not on that Of
the defendant. Sealed verdict.
Before Judge SANFORD.
This action on the The plaintiffs re-
side in New Orleans and the resides Ia this
city. The plaintiffs purchased quantity of French
blankets from the defe pdant by sample as they aege,
and had them shipped here and sent TO New Orleans.
Upon their arrival at New Orleans they examined
and appraised by merchants at the latter, who pro-
nounct them damaged, and that they were 40 per
cent below the price for which they were purchased
the plaintiffs inspected the goods before they pur.
chased them and were fully of their quality.
Adjourned.
Before Chief Justice Oakley
DEc.22-Samuel Jones ct aips Ch. ". Booth at als.
This action OF assumpsit to recover balance
business in this city The defendants carried the
business Of cloth manufacturers in Delaware county
1t appeared that defe ndants were in the habit of
signing goods to plaintiffs upon which the latter made
by their acceptances the defendants after
wards failed, and upon winding up the accounts the
above balance appeared to be due to the plaintiffs for
which they bring the present suit. The suit de
Tended by Of the parties only namely Alsnzo D.
Booth, who sets up as defence that he not q
partner in the concern in Delaware county, which
the only question in the Sealed verdict
morrow Saturday, morning.
Before Judge Sanford.
Berne and Burnside ps. Do,d.-The jury in this
cause rendered verdict for the plaintiffs Tor Sl133.