The Charlotte journal. [volume] (Charlotte, N.C.) 1835-1851, 1848-08-23

were highly credltabie 10 the speakr!s
10 their taste ia selection, and their eiocu'
ton. -.
We bespeak for Mr.. Freeman foil
school when his next session commences,
The Academy is situated in retired ana
healthy section Of the village, removed
from the noise and confusion " oil bust
ness and surrounded by pretty grove
Ia the Academy is fine selection OF As.
Economical Charts for students in that
branch Of study.
As noted as the Democ rats have been for
their resorts to low and pi,iful modes OF
attack, as notorious rs they have rendered
themselves, by resoriing toevery species Of
flagiious cunning and petty disgrnceful AT.
tiice, they are in the presen. campaign
excelling themselves, eclipsiag their an
cient renown. A small amount Of evi.
dence which they cannot gainsay, will be
sufficient 10 establish their title to the claim
Of being the princes Of humbuggery.
Some time ago, letter purporling 10
have been written by Mr.. Criiiendes TO q
Mr.. Anderson Of CINCINNATI, was copied
into nearly every Democratic paper in the
Union. This letter, if true, was calcuia.
ted seriously 10 lnjure the prospects Of Mr..
CIitiendens election, and to affect the pros.
poets Of General Taylor. bu, i, turns out
that no such letter was ever written by Mr..
Cril,enden, no such received by any of,he
Andersons Of Cine inneui. The Union the
first paper 10 make terrible rant about II,
now says:-
"Mr. Crtteuden now publishes card
positively denying thai he ever wrote such
a letter TO CINCINNATI, as has been attrib.
u,ej 10 him. Letters from Mr.. G. con.
firm the suspicion that il is a shameless
forgery. Editorial of the Union.
And who fabricated this A." ,hdmeiess for.
gery7" Why some shameless" Demo.
crat. And who published this shame less
forgcry1' Why the Union and all the
rest Of the shamelen" Democratic 20
pers in the United States.
The Democratic papers Of our own and
neishborios States. have been endeavor.
ing to palm off on the community as truth,
that other shameless forgery" no, bare
faced lie, tina, Taylor said "a An of the or.
ficers Of the n. c. Regimen, ought to be
discharged and the privaies shot" and
what kind Of testimony have they7 We
refer 10 The Pender evidence to be found
IN another column, BY which il will be seen
that Lieut.. Fender stated one thing under
oath, and another upon mere assertion,
now if Lieut.. Pender be capable Of telling
the truth, he certainly is TO be believed (if
a, ally on oath in preference 70 a naked
partisan dictated statement; and on oath,
lie gives the lie 10 his statement, and the
ne Vhe circumstances warrant The harsh.
ness OF this lAnguage) TO every article en-.
iorsed BY Democratic editors making cap.
tai Of il. IL addition TO Pendef's salt con.
'ic,ion OF the lie, General TAYLOR unquali.
hediy denies having sadr use of such ian.
ruagc, and on question OF yeraeuy be.
tween him and Fender, no one not denen
ted by political dishonesty, will for a mo.
mcni entertain the idea ,ha, Fender i, en-.
titled TO enough consideration to enter the
contest.
Another Of the piliful, shameless espe.
dents they resort TO, is, endeavouTinr to
poison the minds Of the volunteers aeains,
Tay Tor, and lryiag to make the people on
The other hand believe that all Of the vol.
un'eers are opposed to Tay or such "tact"
IS beneath. entirely unworthy. the emnla.
lion OF a dlsaifed rivalship. Such arc
lew OF the means resorted 10 BY the De
nocrats 10 secure The election Of Cas-.