New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1848-03-11
How 10 Save Postage, or the Village Post
masters.

CouRr OF COMMON PLEAs, MIDDLEsrx.-Wm.
Hayden al Jas Jafse-Iae plaintiffs were pfopfctofs
OF tue Boston DAILY Anas and the defendant was
Al Wilmington Mas. in stf and until the Spring OF 1916
The asa wa, appeal from the decision OF Juscs OF the
Peace The plaintiffs claimed SIS CO. subscription Tor
Ds.fy Alas from May, lsu 10 Sept. 1870 The CLERK IN
tina Office showed that the OF defendant appear
ed upon the orsaa book Of subscribers, entered May.
Isi& In the hand writing OF witness. - subscriber iof
the Daily ALas for SIX months The DOCKS OF une onies
showed that the PAPER was stopped oo sn.
that no usymept had been made. The witness could not
saw whether dedsnt ordered the paper or some other
person ordered to be sent 20 defendants sddress-out
be iesfed that among tbs terms Of subscription on eaca
paper were printed no subscription stopped uni ali ar
rearages are psdnd subscription discontinued IN.
less BY positive order. ~,
ONCE that IN the spring OF 1874 he received orders from
the eesk 10 seni paper addressed 70 Mr. james Jsques
wimnglon and that he addressed and sent the Dds A.
las 10 Mr. Jsques und the Fall Of 1886 The Aaass col
lscnssgen proved that be called on csiendAnt IN sep
tsmeer 1876 with . bill for two years subscription who
aim ne I'D not subscribe for the paper but naf
WGl.sa n Carter ordered he papa sen. IN dtfHde"rs
same ~ srdcr a< pssia9e-d.fesdda isns Posf-
1asiar a. AZ nH< r< pSper rp ordoea M !.aues "a
rled ,hat ne had received the paper and that M Cs
ter Informed him. few dsys afer the paper commences
coming thar be had ordered the Dss, Aa sent 70 aeiend
ant for Ak monins that be. the dssndan nas consented
the pagers Ginning In bis nsine ana inst n.a sssso
vita Carter 10 pay part The EXPENSE int dsienosnt
had never ordered the paper discontinued or pAd
psinurs ali
wead enly pay &c an month"; and me aeienes y .sauss
ihs. Garter only wo lifole Carer esuneo .nAt ne
hal real paper tor the us specced sna ,nat ne sue
eseaei Jsgses Pestmsssf In me spring o. ioo ana
amer the rost ofes refosed nom deisndants stofe
sisasss clsn the pApet 10 defendant. witness sed
ne inssa tho paper fct hrasc and ought 70 pay Tor H.
e. J. Wells Instructed IN, jay that II Cartsr called
gpoa Pnt aas directed the paper sent TO the defend
eat 10 his atarsss without declaring that any other par
sse ~as interested Ia the same ard the defendant upon
eAasS thess facts consented 70 the arrangsmsn sno
sxtsed 10 responsible for part Of the sxpcpss ana
sAs pspsf sens this would b sneient 70 snthoess
The lar, o. nsa the plAntns. although the eesencsn.
understood and Agreed with Carter that hs r.speso
shcala " 60 hlm and rot the plsisf6A ne e.nns
hsv,es NJ knewisdSe 81 tAta asrsssens o''"
fssaAni Ard Carter. verdict ief rAA'nu"-
fu~txlir or Ms cLAr -lhsrpcsca 70 .ne ,'sa 40
II NJ n..,., .,sr< ssss ecsuine. and onna snss no
n. a,, M saii.lsaSth portrait OF Henry Csy:
- -, -. e.rs,,alsr 10 10 an ssmuAns picture Ano
'. az. 80 sns statesman ~ he nov srpserA u
=. , al dee health Asa with all his faculties q
$50 -, - * 800 IA vsasssns prime. The countsnanee.
s'e' 80, ,xur askasls hx ifs ecsaty. banning Win
',ss sst Ne S.scs inss the eyes Of the spseestsr
80 "a raAs e all sweet sesord" This fal isnssh.
s,s wss PAINTED fsf the Corporation q washington,
~ ,. AasAsess sasrssst and the esrAvsusd:s-
,v sss 900 large " Subscribers. also seee-
"a IN M nssAsrS s,st ta' length pssirat % pAeie
~ sasss II "a msss Admirable picture. and % tocd
tsA.s.ss ~ ts rsnlaa u rsssealasd thsoees 49,"
lEapsssscss. ~.