New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1848-02-12

sufEmok CovSr-Bsfore jucss VsrderFosi aLisbiiit5
Of Express Lines-Sfoffa-d Lsterlns ty boitonj Vs.
Iorg and Railroad Co. Action 10 recover daGsse sus-
tanned by tour Of six goods sent tom New-fork by
Adams 4 Cos Express 10 the steamboat New Haven,
containing the goods being accidentally thrown into lie
dock a. Ayus Point, CooD where the Noreich cars are
taken. add wet by sat water. The accident occuued
inJan 1916 The l. l. Ralrl al CO sued lrtle amount
a. common carriers, being owDtrs u the Ne~-hsyen
n se nee l. that adams CO. vino contracted and I'M
dtfook cary the goods through ana not The nef' OF
tie boat. liable 10 appears th-t Adams Go coz
tractsd the L0pg lslsaa Railroad Co. o. D. entitled
10 carry each Way every te DA.saee eta.ss sAo Goa
tenis A. Co. 20 pay about $50 me nth Tor the priv
ess to send scent always with the crates. snd the
Company not 20 be liable i0E any loss or damage The
Company was no o maze contract OF the Kind "lh sry
m, Coart In its eharss held, IN relation TO Expre..
hnss soch tina. Of Aosms Co. tha hey became toe
common carriers sad not Oh. ownsrs Of tls steamboat
their contract being exclusive, and tue goods being
trusted their especial TIE O. the am.
boat, therefore, Ia this case, lot liable
Then the question Of neglect ia tie crate bsag
thrown overheard. o. that the jury may pass 10 49,
pears that getting Il shore a. Alyl's F0n Il vas
wheeled "a the plank and fell into ne dock and a. 10
whether Mr. Gould, the agent Of he Express Line vino
had charge Of IT, Nas % baIne ~ the persons be ngr
the boat the testimony 20 b coltrsdc1rr sud
he Jury must decide upon u The J1fy after snort 90
berssoa, considered thar the persons belonging ne
boa o. blame, and verdict i0r plaintiff OF
: $50 being pTscipsl aud inierest-F pi.fs Messrs
Kiuba.. asd sayrei Tor oidt ~. Horace T Can.
CIRouIT CocRT-Bei1re judge stIonz--sulan Lxagarf
I'm Jonir. sherf 20 recover aaa ssss tlr alleged
neglect 10 net st5us al execution ~hch had been co.
q ned ia BIS oicia capacity, s.als. ls predscessr.
saelir Acksri sna ~ noi nalns e-ln wl'lin on cs
The claim which execution irfu-d pencrg
before The qre- Ctart ald good surety Flr@n Tls
Court ctargeo that tfs sheriff liable 1tsss OIL nt ect
ior such damage a. riainta hls lctgs ly slsai "a
Verdict for pz.run so leaving ne appeal cass sal
psudi1g -Fcf ptr Mcsrs. Bt~ea Boz dol1 and Bar
loW Tor dat nessrs. Blunt am ady.
John DR. tifsr ta4ryita IIer15 H4rt'i and d.
20 II hfes-T5is c-se called 10 . acti0l re-
cover damages for nausirg 10 said lr {. IN lao s
teng A ths' time the ~ tie BoWey rnesie
ard Dir hsmhin Proprietor s1d Manager 10 leave his
house wn-Ie 10 was uDssl aca Gldc CUT, when be
driven g th- Luustc Asylum. sud piscei there lura
nc but be brought b-oe Judge Oakley ihrss fgur
Gays aiterw ard habess c9rpl. 1nc discharged. d.
Reese the ceTlcats the The a-iOl = 'Cr
iase imprsoImeut snd ssssut ard battery. T. proceed
Ibis ofencon-for llaraH Aessrs Wlnans auc fifsscr
For defendant MslsI,. W hung and J. P Hal
CorSr % C,,DicN PLr,s-Beiofe Judge Day.-Men-
Heafs H. 9, als >tsriH. ftisr h4Ilrfa aa Ileo.
>siras. To recover b.ri of il--Illily To- lev
Nc Rsed, bar the goods alu-i. b.sge, f.r
rent Nerd ct for plsinuH Sel-fcr ra.ut.n MessIs.
j. C. Hsit aud EDWARD >sldi1rd l defendant Co Do
hsar sd M kulshted-
JsrrD STATES Dlsflicr Coz Er- Before s3ze Bets.
Jssph IsiHss q. the ship O2lrlcs, lscioisi
"a sstts rfsr. cf crue .Lc unusual palis-
usui T. sesi--a aitLdEes BIZ q'ta 90 ~. s-y and
y doubtful % the Jury ~cld c. sr1 --rf-rcet
Mt. J. % pay t4e n hqe c1as-s
M,xiNr Corxr- Before Judge Waterman - Csopsr "a.
Ncnlreugi -Act4cu Tor tsuszes u O. s isufrc tas-rn-
M ous essuirs The frout doo q the hogse kloEu tie
Northern Fkchsngr beccs s il ~ icl palnfr se .
dsucux school and ptnz fh- schuafsto 20 tIr1us u
The bsf-f0. Sucicnt at aPres ~ ~ sustain 10 cas-
. ucu suit ordered -tui fialN'lf 90 AKIN Tor le-
iendsni Nj A d Resell