New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1848-03-27
FrsN fAs bas.en -tftas, -oiH w.
"a Plain Talk with Boston"

.,..,,n. .,tele With ri. title appeared ia Tbs New;
yesA rtlesre Of saturday Which tsauite' s =, ,h-
sssnnssal TIE stticc would apply muen osue, - ,hsf
.sss 81 Ns~VoIs ,has to Boston The
asNNAks of ths city have PfeesH..o, ,h- Vice
has M fsardsen wAste.er upon ~ns y, 81
rsst asle. q be In The imsslnsiloa " &c 49,. of DO.
~ sss. ssss rsssi.sS sisS Of 'sy gIePyy1: t.
@s,.suls.- ugcs either frssiSens's OF zee 70
Sn.s al o. aisyossd. the wise men Of 1othsn
wAs,. Ne have been eompa,sa,ey shss. % -. y. -
S.ycr. AsV. ~oissd thsm,eive, up tn'o Tespeotsoe
s,ss Of .yeseston aYoa beth ihes. matters meet.
- .ntrt ,etinss have thetc been helo l"nt iese
- vr-ips the 81 different individuals daily ~
sea- IL New Yois pApess 20 say no1aios o. tns
Npenssssiie whls Central Committee and tae year.
AstA day sossis aaa speeehes oil she ardent '0''
Ma, rssS.e.y s,.ples.es Tie T,sans the perfect
l.sS 81 speculative mania Ia this eiiy N tne t
s,ss ard &c slinDs 70 msie Investment 10 NE stosNs
IN which he has made a. oeeps plunge i-insf-
~, learned wlsSo BY experience, sod TO" feu'e ~
i. srs~n iste u.klus Investments in s.sPeeuis,on
vkish hss hitherto proved unproouenvv eteeie -
ie,h esc h.s ss' sso ~ ne f,S,s OF
ssSp suite opposite 70 s case q ,ha IpSseS
spshss % se Waiss ne .y s sYtSs dos eIosns
s-,Sx. ~ith hone in HE mou h, aud espJib MS
nsa .ss s.':s dSSp. Of ' 81. S% .SS.isps brss
us sss bach 10 the shore WITH o's Of nons co.
srS-sss i1is ns ~ n, ,sIns !. held advocate Of
d. rcnsstoa Of Mr. Clay ana slthoush then piei7,
In fexarQ 20 the wee FIc-ioont
isSeaied yet IL Ia equally well known that tney are III
syerner seward Ths teen the speculation 70 ~nlen
IA s~.s rvites investment %, s.ots as aid
Lac Superior Copper Stocts at an early Peioo Oh 'ns'
hs,ary and we have not become ssu'ued 'h3' ii WI" F0
asS ..s,n, uIswarmness toward the Clay movement
does arise from az a''Ia', 9, M sns q, .sssbo
.sss have siysn repeated evidence Of what they thna OF
soh and shoad shst gentleman be again honlna1o ~
axe Nsl,ona Convention, they will again show ther aoNo
op 10th the aud TO his prineiPies w psnes
he~evsr that be has had HI. chance The nas IN me
y.eosy bat 10 disastrous and overwhelming defeat
everything looked Ike triumph all the snes' 4, as
tom general channel but we were beaten =. sbs
ssus Of the times a. favorable no~ ior mi, .y Hand
we're then, have the rsns swollen the stream, .,
81 DER waters into broader o. deeper bed Are ihey
rot rslhsr divergent they do not uleiy refuse
sss~ .roos rsiae.sDes to thus gathered tOsether
Again: ss regard, the Wings Of Msssehosett., they
,.ss rsI Thew nominated Daniel Webster, sststesmsn
every way equal Mr. Clay, TO the least snd one
ws,. s..sss.:s. siss he whole weight Of and
irAsesee the ~hose strength OF ms usn1y ,;
and ne hsiese ana repeat hsve before said that
be placed in Donns,ion py the WING Nssons LII
lager vote than Mr. Clay. There Is native strength
IN the mar power IN his works, which Ia the hss VI
lie r.tor We are ready and desrous Of entering upon
this spe< nlstiop The nomination 10 que 70 'no
ss,s. M Wss:.i.s Free STATE .s1 ,b mI Difference
\. h no, sood one Is IL not Mig one But how has
ne Tr,s~at it With de.d silence Il h:. pro
tse cold shoulder 10 The greatest Of Northern
ssS now because We viii not our M, ~. oe
10 with II for its favorte, we ave 10 90 tolu es
ssiacs propensity TO speculate IN the rIesiaenSa.
slecession not forfettipe the Vice Presidency. We
prefer Northern man this time, candidate snd
could have he'd beyopd all DOUBT II the NoInein
sxpicis rood fsth the result of the National Convention
We shall give the nopnee our hearty support we are
sorS he 10 the most justly ep,itled It We hope he
will get H. Asrersr he should not De ne sucees ono
aid x ce-ssni,sH go ssah fr ei"dds TX TO TO- one S
who. however much ~e love and respect MN, WI" IN oS If
hames Judgment jadsins tIom me s.,iss IN isti
srsrs, fail OF election - senaiy as DC alieo Id '
Remarks By The I'i6une.
Although the Alias did not see fit to copy any
portion of our article on which it comments we make
room for its answer entire. We wish our readers
to see the important question Of the Presidency IN
every practicable light, SO as to be prepared iof
wise and efficient action.
We should have lightly regretted the non'pao'
LEGATION Of our talk by the Atlas, had not that
Journal very seriously inexperienced It's purpor'.
For certainly. nothing farther from our thought
than TO find fault with Massachusetts for her ex-
preston Of preference for Mr.. WEBSTER as our
next Preside candidate. Ii lie but natural that
she should regard him with affection and pride as
one Of the most able ard eminent champions OF her
cherished principles. So far from reproving her for
This, We have given emphasis and prominence to
every public demonstration in his favor whether
lie Massachusetts or elsewhere. Mr.. Webster ID
not our frs. choice we have seriously differed
from him in regard to some important practical
questions during the last six years bot we do not
.be less esteem him oour very sblest and trues
Whis Statesmen, and shall support him with s
hearty slacrity ii nominated by the Wing Nationa
Convention. We trust the demonstrations IL hi.
favor are not purely speculation; and, though
We do not esteem him as eminenty popular anc
available we shall avoid any liAening OF bis nomin
alton 70 bad investment, whether in Lake
Superior Copper Stock or lawrence cornerots.
Months ago. the Wings of Massachusetts made
formal prssentmsnt OF their first choice for Presi
dent; the Wings Of New Hampshire followed il
their footsteps; New York has made no such de
nonstration a. yet, although her preference is DC
cidsd and tolerably well known True, our jour
nails have discussed the matter. as they DO slmos
syerything-soms on Che side, some on another ye
we doubt whether New York has evinced more c
epStAt8tfc iHeAsa Nits itS@'" ~ ~ '-N- -
ton Our City General Committee has once ex
pressed its preference oar Young Mems Commi;
tee ditto our State Central Committee the onl.
central committee We have has maintained a pei
feet sisnce respecting it. We have heard of Gu
who doth fear each bush I'll officer but, really
40 think our cotsmporary's multiplication OF "sC
mes OF resolutions" from some Wing Committee i
this State is inexousable either by his repugnanc
or his apprebensions
We cannot agree with the Atlas that our defes
in isA was overwhelming; when a change {
1850 votes in this State or saving OF two fiths
the Eanti Texas votes thrown away on brney
would have given US the victory. And as the A
las gravely asks whether " the signs Of the time
ere a. favorable for Mr.. Clay now as they were !
~" We will gently remind it that New-York wa
then under Loco Fooo rule throughout by virtue
maioritiss Of Ten 10 twenty-five Thousand; an
nov this same New.York is under Wing rule b.
virtue Of majorisics ranging from Eleven TO Thirty
Eve Thousand, and our opponents have two distinc
ossanizations throughout the State and two se.s {
Delegates 10 their National Convention. There
r. III u. 80 Al n,