Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1848-11-14

'lri Il llran al the Faculty
~ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Ruies held in The
Clerk Office Of The superior Court Of Chancery for
Charles : Peasants, frederick w Peasants Jehir
PaImley aud Eza Ann his wife, Elizabeth Lown1s, |
Elias |. Lnwnes, Elizabeth W Lownts Elizabeth Har
vie, Sarah Ash James 4 PIeasanis, Henry Wenck and
Sarah u his wife, LYDIA Keller, Elenor Lownes viii
liam Lownes, and Elias l. Lo~nes. guardian Of Re.
becca Lownes, Plaintiffs
against
James II Crew, Benjamin J Crew. L Crew, George
) Giahs aud Mariana his WIFE, Maurice James and
Charlotte his wife, William ii Hughes, William II
Hughes, junior, IRA Payson and Mary 6 his wife Ca
leb Luwnes, Lewis Williams and Elizabeth \ his
WIFE Mark Howard, aud other defendants.
The defendants above named not hdvii entered iriT
appearance aud gwen securt, according 10 the ac 81
Assembly aud the rules Of this Court, and appearing
hy satisfactory evidence that they are not inhabitants q
this Commonwealth, il Is Ordered THAI The SAID defend
ants do appear a, the rules 10 be hedtoT The sdd Court
on the first Monday in February next and answer the
bill Of the plaintiffs and that copy Of This order be forth
with inserted III newspaper published IN The ciy
Of Richmond IL; two months successfully, and posted
the front door Of he STATE Court house IN the sid
city. Copy-Trste,
Nov l4-cwam ROBERTS, Clerk.
IN CHaNCERY-vlaas,.:-A Rules held in the
Clerks Office Of the Superior Court Of chancery for
the Richmond Circuit, the lth day of Novrmurr, le'e
Joseph Burton, flanh:
against
Thomas Is Noryel and other defendants.
The defendant above named mol having entered his
appearance and given security according 10 Tue ACT oi
by satisfactory evidence that he Is not an inhabhnt OF
This Commonwealth, II Ordered that the Said deiehd.
do appear the rules To he held Tor the saih Iouf,
the first Monday III February next, and answer tne
bill Of the plaintiff; and that copy OF TINS orurr br
forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published III tis
civ III Richmond for two months successfully and
posted the front door 81 the State Courthouse III te
i said rty a Copy-Trste,
Nov ii-cwam ROBERTS, Clerk.
IN CHANCEKY-vI RorS, AT Rn!ss held N The
Clerks Office Of the Superior Court OF Chancrfy i"i
the Richmond Circuit. the 9th day Of November, irio
Matthew Maury and Rulsnn alaury. partners trading
in the city Of New York, under The arm ana >ly.e "'
| M,nrv nioth.,s Plaintiffs:
against
William Maury Of Liverpool. aud other Defendants
The Defendant above named not hasirg entered M.
appearance and given security, according "a thr a't =.
Assembly ami The rules oil this Court, AMI II appearing
by satisfactory evidence that hr Is mol an iniabilat u
this Commonwealth, II is Ordered that me saii Geieha
ant do appear NJ the ruleS 10 he held Tor me 'aiu
on the first Monday In February next ana answer lne
bill of the Plaintiffs and that copy OF ms ofuer DC
forthwith inserted IN some newspaper phiistn y" 's
city Of Richmond, ia" two months shccessse'S, INV
posted at the front door oi ,nr sle
'hi To r,t iyi-ewam '''' ROBERTS, Clerk.
IN Observation-Disclosures t Rules held IN tnt
Clerks Office of the superior Couf OF Chancery io'
the Richmond Circuit, the s,h day OF November iSlo
Sydnun Grady, riah''H
against
Henry Chotlry, and another, Defendants.
The defendant above named not having entered NJ
| y,
Assembly and hr rules Of tins Court aud y "plrafih
by satisfactory evidence that r Is NJ" an inha3,iatl
this mmonwri II is Ordered, that thc sara utich'
ant do appear the rules 10 be- held tor Inc salh oi
on The if>t iundy IN February next. and answer III
hill al the plaintiff, and that copy "l this oiGef u
forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published IN ~
cly Of Richmond, Tor twn months snecrsslVr'y. ~
nos,rd nj Tho front ot the state Courtho>e III III
'' Nv ii-cwam ROBERTS, Clerk
~ cHANCERy-vrRe AT Rules held in III
Clerks Office 81 the superior Court OF Ghancrry .
the Richmond Circuit, The 9Th day OF November isi'
Samuel Miller, i'iin''"
against
Isaac DrIapains John Delaplnine, Augustus
| ci,son and other Defendants
The defendants above named not having enterr
their appearance and given security, according 10 u
act al Assembly and the rules al TINS ConH, ana u u
bearing hy satisfactory evidence that they are nn mn
bitans Of this Commonwealth !, IS ordered, va. !,
said defendants do appear at the rules 10 be held Tor
said Court on the irst Monday IN February next n
answer the hill of The Plaintiff, and that copy :" IN
| order be forthwith inserted III some newspaper pn
Ished in lie city uf Richmond, Tor Two months s'icct
p siyrly and posted the front d"o Of the State Cu
i. house. in lhr said city copy-Irsir
II Nov li-cw2m RUBIN = 'e'N'
: - NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS.. AT Rules held IN 4
clerks Office of tlr Superior Court at Chahceiy
the Richmond Circuit, the eth day Of November ia
Charles Osborne, Ilaiht'h
against
William Maury, and other DrlcnhahtS
The defendant above named nut having entered
apnearance and given security, according 10 Tie act
Assembly and the rules of this Court and u appear
by satisfactory evidence that he u not an lnhabianl
This Commonwealth: IL Is ordered, thal tue SAID
fendant do apppar nj the rules To he held Tor The ~
u Court on the first Monday in February next, ana
10 swer the bin Of The plaintiff and that copy oil y
order he forthwith inserted IN some newspaper p'
ished i'm the city of Richmond for two months slcc
sIvey and posted NJ the front door OF the State Lo
house, in the said Clty Lnpy. nesr, 60,
RI. Nov li-cw2m i. hohchi - 1'e'"