Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1848-12-08
~ CIIANCERY : VIRGINIA In Caroline Counts
Court, October 9th, 1918:
Warmer Mason Plaintiffs


against
Reuben Turner and Clarissa his wife, and others,
Defendants.
The defendants, Mathew d Pea,ross, Francis Hodges
and Clarissa his wife, Essex Epperson and Mary his
having entered their appearance and given security ac
cordlng 10 the act Of Assembly and the rules of this
Court, and appearing by satisfactory evidence that
they are inhabitants Of this county II Is Ordered
That the said defendants do appear here on the first
day ul tile nexi January Court, and answer the bill OF
the plaintiff; and that copy Of this order br forthwith
inserted 10 newspaper published IN ,lr city Of
Richmond for two months successfully, and posted al
the front door Of The Court house Of this county.
oct l3-cwam jouN PESDLEToN, OK.
IN Observation-Disclosures. AT Rule, held in The
Clerks Oiiic. Of The Crcnit superior Cont of Law
of October, 1919:
Howell Chas!ain, Executor OF Richard d. Borum, de-
ceased, Pialntll
against
William Wauhop, Individually, and partner Of
the firm of William Wanhop & Co Thomas Forlan,
Jr., also "a partner, Thomas Leigh, David Shelton,
and Thomas Torian, Sr. Defendants.
The defendants, Thomas foran, Jr and William
Wauhop, not having entered their appearance, and II
appearing by satisfactory evidence that they not in
habtants OF this Commonwealth, II is Ordered, That
the said defendants, Thomas 1'oran, Jr., and William
Wauhop do appear here on The first Monday IN Jann-
ary next, and answer the plaintiffs bill, and thar co.
nv of this order be forthwith inserted in the Richmond
Enquirer for two months successfully, and posted al
the front door of the Court hnnsr Of this county.
~ tOpy-ltsc,
Oct 20-cw2m WIN HOLT, D c.
IN EhNCERY-NfEGISia All Circuit Superior
j Court Of Law ami thancery, continued by adjourn
ment, ana holden for The county Of James CITY and
CITY Of Williamsburg, AT the Gnnri house In the said
city, Saturday, the thirteenth day of May, thou
sand eight hun bred aud iofty-elsht
Chesey Jones, Plaintiff
against
Elizabeth Crawford, Benjamin Ford, Mary Hughes,
William a Ford, Sally Henley, William : Bacon, ad-
min i.trator Of Lanie Ford, deceased William Wood
wnrd, Henry Woodward, and other defendants.
This cause came on this day, L. br again heard on
The papers formerly read together with The report Of
Curnnis -iancr Moody winch report no exception
hath been taken, and argued by counsel oH con
sideratun whereof the Court, not now acting on tir
.aid report doth adjnige, order and decree, that The
funw M accounts he taken before one ol The COMMITS
,ioDers Of this Court 1s An account Of all payments
which nav have been made by Nelson Jones Tor the
land in the bill aud proceedings mentioned ID hat
amount was paid by Daniel Ford on account Of the
same land 81. What amount, II any, has been re-.
cr,yed by the Defendants either at them, for real es
tate belonging Daniel Ford, which the said defend.
ants derived from sad Daniel Ford his heirs. ilh.
An account Of any rents wrhmay have been received
hy any of the parties for The land, III The bill aud pro
crehIngs mentioned. prior 10 The time the same was
-old By the decree Of this ionrt;-which several nc
counts the Commissioner u Ia examine state and settle
ana 10 thr Court report, with any matters. specially sa
ted irrmrd pertinent by himself. ar which may be re-
Cupy-Trste, TIL. .. CDGhlLL, I.