The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1848-12-01
INTELLIGENCE BY THE MAILS.
PHILADELPHIA, November 30, Il

| NIELLIGENCE BT The MAiLSs
| ~~~~~~~~>~~O~~~~~>~~-~~~>>
| PHILADELPHIA, November 30, 1913.
arrest Of Burg rs.-Rako Dad Accm,s'---7hs
Chester County Bank Robbers--P Political Move.
msnfs, &c.
Police officer Broomell, of this city, has mads
an important capture of two young English bur-
glars, who hal William Stanley and Wp
Harris They arrested IN house at rhir'
teenth end Federal, in which were stored the
products Of two burgla recently committed in
this city.
John Grammar, men in the employ of Render.
ten Smith, Esq, was killed last evening on tho
Morristown Railroad, by a locomotive coming in
collision with cant he was driving. The shock
ing accident occurred at the Intersection Of Broad
street end the Railroad The driver is believed to
have been asleep at the time, he paid no attpn-
uon to the alarm gwen by the engineer The
horse was also killed.
Ben. Pratt, charged,w with participation IN the
Chester county bank robbery, was a day or two
since liberated on $4,000, gwen during the alb
sence OF the Attorney General from the city On
his return he made an inquiry into the efficiency
OF me bail, END not being satisfied with the Sc
curlIy given, Benny" was carrcs.ed again and
committed to await his trial.
Mcc'owan, who, with Pratt, was allowed new
trial, has been nominated police officer bv one
OF the Commss oners OF Moyamensing, the post
he formerly held. The citizens of that d,str,ct
seem to have an abiding confidence IN his lnno-
ceDce.
The Effort to found Taylor Republican Asso-
citation, with the Alison letter as their platform.
seems TO shock portion OF the whig parry leaders.
The most OF these stood aoof from the meeting Of
last night, whilst others, Mo ton Nc uichasl
among the rest, go into the measure heartily.
The Fanny Kcmbie Butter Divorce Case
PHrLADELrHIA, Nov. 30 1913
This morning the court room full as ever.
The respondents counsel had 1t pretty much their
own way Messrs Meredith and Choate bsn; ssbsnt,
having pt rformed their DUTY.
BErI. q. RHARo, Esq counsel for the respondent
cited several cares to the court bearing upon
OF law assumed upon their side Of the After this
Hon. GEO. M. DALLAS commenced the closing argu.
ment upon the part Of Mr. Butler, the iibellant He
raid that 1t was fortunate for the county and even
for the court that recess had taken place yesterday
until this morning IL had relieved not oniy tn, uu.
hearers but the court some what from the az
feet Of one Of the most beautiful, displays
court juetics those words have bee uttered
by whom they may, the diction beautiful, so
cassc-the argument so imposing that cannot bus
feel that 1t most impossible not have i'm
pressed by the strong almost irresistible effort the
counsel who last addressed the court to have
led away by them in spite Of There o.. in the
selves and by constant repetition, constitute an eIo-
quence which goes directly TO the heart There arc
listen to the word mother without thrill
which softens the best feelings of his nature Il
which cannot but most powerfully affect him, when
accompanied with the information Of feeling and the
power Of graceful gesticulstion Mother wife daugh-
ter sister these are words which, In the every
human being summon up the most fond emotions, and
have only to be heard to produce the thrilling sf
iects MT Dallas then alluded complimentary to the
high moral md ntele OF Mrs. utter and
the many virtues which distinguished her q, Q womau.
MIR. Choate, In his address, said that Mrs. Butler
felt that she never could live again with her husosnd
She could not live again with her sba ndths sdwis
eion was frankit honest Why then Is 1t In
mor. just is legal that that which wrong in
itself should, by course Of law bs legal II Is true
that they can never live together aud wife, in
Gods name let US not give the sanction OF law
ann lie at II ncnn ffErlv tnO
am tho colleague of my friend in carrying out the
wishes Of his own client, and We hope to do SO easc-
semby Of the 18th OF March, 1915, is the la = upon
which we found the proceeding before the court and
commands man 18th the first c9n.idsra,ion ss psascA
Mrs Butler In the Language Of her counsel, bsng
convinced that these parties can live togs-
ther, has renowned and denou need the IN arrsys
live with her husband, the tie thai she Eas brokss
Dallas then alluded to the answsr. .Ud tn. Mr.
ture Of the allegations and pronounced 1t to BE- q
venomous hbel-the distilled essence of bad feeling
The letters are lar more besutful than those from
Heioise to Abeiard; but they are studisd-studrd-
copies OF them treasured up for when wife keeps
copies Of the she addresses her vbsn
every tile susion is carefully boarded Kept in
the secretary or portfolio the inference irresistible
they are studied Now, what Is the character OF
the answer There are no uenials Of the aliegs-
tons Of the libelant; with eli these facts, and al
nswer to the allegations OF the libel Is IL possible
that to an allegation Of dsssr;ion without reasonable
u a.
sonabe cause altogether Where is the allusiou to
probable cause In this entire paper IL denies merely
meaning OF the word wfui? n What ssv. Jad.s
Rush, the former President Of this court! Wilsaip
means" on purpose He who kills silfully,
kills on purpose. Mrs. Butler Left her hu 80 ad's
hou,e on purpose left to go abroad she iefs on
purpose-shs, therefore, left w,ifully What IL mali
oous? ~ IL Is necessary epthet to b. used ana
Inferred, from the very act of desertion II the wife
absndons the husband, who hssitatss in saying
that 1t is mslicously done? 1t Is a necessary ia
ference Ihe court infer malice ON the far
Tase the case of Major Oney The Jury there fou nd
verdict specially setting forth the facts wthous soy
court aoJudged him guilty OF murder, and he was
hung. In this case, IL Is necessary 60 have urv
trial the court may infer from the that the
desertion WAS malicious. The court muet determines
causes for deserton be alleged whe Their those
support or contradict tho allegations Of wful, msh.
cous dtserton. But what the set forth ~
justification? Are they ajustihcation2 Is it CAUSE
ar set out In this libel, because wearied OF his
pei turbabls calmness it eat NE wild Is that orur
ty! 10 caute to say that l.ft beca ne refused
to take me to my distant friends s Gauss to say hs
refused to cross the Atlantic to pace the arms
BY jury lsita cause TO cay " he wanted the house
painted" Il can't stand the smell Of pantn aud ~
must have trial by jury =! or Is IL cause TO ssy"I
an woman of acute excit able f,eingsi that Is ano-
ther reason why my case should got jury. Butt
am hot only wsman Of acute and .xc,,soie feelings,
but my husband Is la the habit Of cDntradioing mo
can't bear contradiction; and thss 10 IL reason whJ
should go to jury" Or is 1t q say, 81 am
r wouan II boundless af.ct [ require .lirium
Of love require tina; my husoa nd snail dissolve in
an ecstacy OF sttacL ment my soai is all dre-hs all
tnow therefore qure the privilege OF going before
the jury ~ The Answer ad usits that Mrs Batter, At
the time specified in the libel left husha I'd and
staid away: and she does more than deny the ADJ
jecti,es "~ifu and malio lous.n But take tho rea-
con, which Vas the main one 30 powerfully argued
upon by Mr. Choste 1t was merely thus thai theso,
their own agreement were not aud wife Well,
this p,s Is good one, IL it 10 true put in the psa
that they were never married., and 1t will os sn-
swer But to say that the husband and tho wife can
by their egr, nt, nulfy the marriage tie, In