The daily crescent. [volume] ([New Orleans, La.]) 1848-1851, 1848-06-03
Senator Parham-

Senator Parlam recently made a speech to his
constituents in explanation of his vote for u. 5.
Senator last winter, an extract OF which speech
was given in the Louisiana Republican OF last
week Senator Parham, however, not beng salts
fed with the manner in which the report was made,
has published the following card:
A CARD.
review of the remarks made by town on the oh
1t has always seemed 10 the duty OF those WING at
to draw on Their imagnaons for materials suited TO the pur
pose. will however, believe that you nave Rho"hsy
few Of your naccuracles st lie says he told Mr. Ken
of his promise and he did not dappove OF It, IN ti
assertion, attribute language TO me never used sdiu
that when told Mr. Kenne of my promise 70 r segu ne
further stated that we still friends and that he at-
buted improper motives 10 but never SAID or thoue
of saying that approved my for Mr. Soue-on the
contrary he much regretted referred in my remarks, as
you must remembe TO his statement as made IN the senate
isiana Courier I'd lie SAID in substance, that the Wing
party with few Democrats and Mr. Wlm9 at 1ne nead
aim a blow at Southern rights" cannot CONCEIVE the
ing when you penned the foregoing paragraph 1t is
that uttered such sentiment either IN words or
strGetion unequTocaiy deny ever having charged the
Wings OF the South with being in favor of the Wimot pro
ea I'm me lo he f E n OF OF b Gs Waehmn the CON-
against the Wings of the South, will freely admit that
you say this we Hope is than NJ. P. intended to
say lin another part of your reDieU cannot think
that Mr. intended to make the charge the Wing party
as he did and make allowances for the necessary
oosene of remarks made under the circumstances ten
der my gratitude for great charity You hope amt
think that did intend thus charge the Wing party
and yet you attempt the impression the pub
lie mind that only made OF the language attributed
to me- but SO intended. You with often during the
five days remained your village, and pretended as
much friendship towards how did happen that
you did solve your doubts both and
intention Were you unwilling should explain lest you
might be deprived OF an opportunity TO Willy me and deceive
those not present VIM. 3. PARHAM.
To ]. J. Berry, Esq, Lake Providence.
To which card the Editor of the Republican in
his paper of the Both, replies in this wise
As to the second and last inaccuacy Mr. P. says that
such construction could be put his language the words
quoted his card imply. Mr. P in his card does not
deny that he have made this charge anst the w g
party OF the North; In his remarks, do not rehaembfr
that Mr. F. qualified thing he said apply 1t to the
North than TO the South though he might have done
Yet If he did where the difference II the charge was
made against the Wing party of the North and the Wings
of the South act in concert with them party they are
certainly implicated, for they pdrficepS We
appeal those who heard Mr. p whether have not cor
ecty reported the substance of what he said that subject
AT least the impression which lett mind and
Others with whom conversed, under the same I'M
preston We did presume that Mr. 7. would make so
preposerous charge that the Wings OF the South
favor of the Wlmot pOvsO that they AboItlonlsts.
He denies specially that he charged this the Wings OF
the South. This at least, implied admission that he
did make the charge form and to extent BY
reference to article ii will at that did not
say that he made this charge the Wings OF the South
specifically and will not consent that this shall be made
| the issue.