New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1848-05-30
REMOVALS.


DE,,0VaI.-G MARslGLIA. h:s,ouca- portrait s1a
Ii Iersscspe psnler and norer n any u nese taes'
II The works q any selos. or a-,.s'' n r,o b
" efe be- AL be happy - zee - ol l'e4-s - 1o-
sr.,. ne 5sgs cige DO .nsIe iAe 'Ai..'s - -
s.Tlr, u ie Fine Ats Mo have paif'aleI In ~ -
80. III fas cy. 90 culGlge le4f i-lIO14se'~ -
ft.'- ,5rier. SILL De z. rLflly arrn1td il .,,.s
AZ Msr..ga VIII the most Profound reipcci 'o' ule .@
- .,'- y, ,ylsrb sr la. gurd himself, ana Also 'oi
tie upright tt loaorsoc .neiaefs ~ l.e ~ - 1880 -,
and vfh se deep re- ec if le Plos y -, - se,r
u particular flI iJse who 1l' il4g7 D, ilueN. 49, 80
~ 4. ,-.-er.,. rcsesrs parcI lfirulol % le iNvN
~ . ~ -,',,rs- rs-rsr colla.nalon. Of gcll-nie1
iaanpear4nra. cJlst-liy trlgoyed ~ ulsA,-N,' ~ s
Nh "a o-..sr L. sver. logged cr s ieiia.es % ne s'le
49, - -. ,rtss.s ,a.-r,l -o-rflcF when
please, then. ready ID disappear "len Necessary .uv
.-.- ~, 'r.-,.- -i-lrsr.,s, tv ir.Iiai.ng
ol al. SIGNATURES ys.h their isi. aands colnei.ti-
n. waea .1 wan. Ol anything ana ior-ls waen lii- ue-
ccssery On te month % Nay, lsti filse4 r. az
ces -pa IN s STATE. sne % pc S.es % $500
l-f and Jersey on acclut I'd slsp.'ol ~cAl en-
,erlaed of lc c0u-pscy shovcuseaor' in or-ef ,.s.
my ,lenis ana The pubic should be- wale ~ AIS .e -
utze as having taken place OBJ >tl1itori Nonl -ecI -
-.-lr w. : ieeoreeA sceVf.,-- ~ az "a" ~ - So
cerA ere AMI so n ilt y Of New ora ana n Ne'aiA'
fact 20 nay marriage mdspunh.e. aud renders anytaus
zone .s"lls. my I.--'' '-cs n! VIE ei' nay 49,
information rvsIcc,ng tie matters referred nay public
ATOMS 20 send DE SAME .o me u wiring A. ,r line
lmrnluutd ihAt Lai peeh llefnt4 Mar rr iAen - en-
yraIs oI Proclaimed lcr.c ny dau .ter, ant then
II
ms wife. ami ,A % s,afr ,lsf yyil bee ObAs lei
person WHO VIII give me- snunuafcn az 20 who said
gn j.. and where she resides ana w also rerUuerate
tiem Tor gre Hviur 4el ua. "at, 1 sn - .ll'h
Ton n order make ms Ilr laie fuf le mQostufe 90
which she as been sl anu as' 'o'e y no 4,e Peg .sia
parents OF sulrlis an every oct seisoA VIC ,iieN tn3
her, both fhs any her state a. they have AL
been guilty Of con'pira.y wicl maees no. oaz ,..u,
selves. bu, those wlo aoet or ad mem Aa3e ~ enil
prosecution. also referred 90 paper suid io re sneu ~
me- and 70 be an sninupua agreement ~.len uss.' 10
ut ioi gerry or u'iheu nom Ale ~ pa >. Ici ~ 80
aro nos cuufm al tlat teu stated Do relation 90 mat
paper. as reason believe the same paper io
nave pcen "fsci WISH To pe more particular ON ~
tom[ a- found SAID paper u he hands OF ia" yer IT'D
Nc"-Jr Jersey who, q seems Kept mandatory OF 0hef
peoples signatures, uron one occasion beng m New
Jersey, received letter from him hch purpOsted %
coman copy 90 paper ,sued Bog ue, 0u whcu rv,eu'
upon my showing ruuni among my friends, ley one and
a. declared that q was my ors ila signature and my
whe' VINO snor y aiier pens pm Ne"-lofS' upon Oe.ni
shown by me, declared thai % copy bat looked
very like my owu signature aud handwriting l now wish
To stale, M eu"Aniilu. '.a. Ay taft ~ t .'us -
name O Charles c. NuvCrs, lawyer, On Newly orh, private
counselor OF my wife, employed ana pad by ME - my al
louey ana an intimate 'isiei ui ny "ouse - ,ase ~
fraudulent. have been and w be Tie acts 81 uat nd-
vdua, any person acting Tor OF undef Ah oI oy Ms
authority a. nellvf ac nor eg V'ei p.isou w a. ~"
pointed such trustee by NE uso wish Z" inform ne gen
uenau WIZ ssIed iAa paper a. Oolhi7sVnsi VA
not te person wac acAnuw lciAed ueloIe u o' tlS
must have been the husband u he irae VINO ssned -
witness some Oder person 81 ue same siaHp oF cTN
ter; AMI unuk mat sad Iomh-s.olef anu most ~ H'
profession should be very careful hereafter how persons ac
Auow.ed- M instruments before them are Identified, ior
him that u my knowledge never eAecule1 any
paper before him Of ie Tenor % ai which aa been pro
luccI certificate. and have found very strange
that li, name occurs 20 me proceedings m ny VIE suns
olf evidently shows that he also one 0 Tie &cquaace-
/ Of Charles g. Hayeus However, al / nave 10 say To-
That never knew anything Of the agreement ne ceihes
10 until the month Of July, l8i2 my wife having alb
seconded from my huuse on lie llm o. june lltSee4ns
And hope the pubic viii be- very careful how they e
the hands az such men drew Up MAJ
said 20 be- my on'e-luptal Agreement ANA maize ei'e
trustees Tie hands Oi the females who were use -
Witnesses unless ey wish 10 me destruction Of heir
property aud the honor and lives o. meH families drought
about by the Efforts knaves tn the matter OF July
Ia ID lie
my house, aud not knowing what Wa, was tod ny a
friend rs nature and having searched Tor IN me Register
Office without success. sent Tor my wife and informed
her thai had searched for tn hc Resers once uai c"id
not ind i, and sue answered ihai was not recorded De-
drawn che Intended nor accofinE TO
her desires and Instructions, and size sald t sue ad el
copy 10 my bureau, which aerwart ouud--snd uis was
prove beyond doub, Now wish that Charles g. Hayens
the lawer counsel OF my wife and The drawer OF ts 9eu
meu should answer the following queslOns Flint, why
hen he met me IN Broadway and Told me tha he me-
acted counsel lawyer for my wife, ne ana MOI
wait for me 10 give an answer instead OF running away
And how Is that my wife, "hen spoke 10 htr aoou ~ as
serted the same. when both Of them knew well ha ~hat
they said false and also knew that t was my wife hst
Introduced Ravens 10 me Wlsl yo4 nc $40 ~
whether YOU advised my wife 70 leave my house WIZ
own ifee VIII ana ttcoiu ~ ug'Hei az W 800 49,
any person 10 had previously been Counsel ~ my vines
case, nierered this matter and whether any o. tue soc
tors IN Chancery sut or any u tne Culnse on e %
side gave any advice TINS iam0u. or rather infamous sun
Jcc wishfO know who the person was who TOOK away
my innocent sou nom N! nousg ana OosVui anu Il y. NS
20 give the Wish ~ KNOW why you h1Nt
/
OF my wHes Chancery expenses ana Mso ~ WIZ W
manied who suggested draw up the ane.nupna agree
meu and how many copies made oi the same, ind
now request sou Ia answer bon 81 sald le'is. "l ~
know how you deny that you were my wfes Gun
Sc before all facts which you mus, be aware can bring
70 prove YOU such for you know was hsr M,f9ouoea h
before marriage, her COnfsel ana Lawyer
wish Ia knOw did wish purchase real estate
before our marriage from man whose aliiy ooa.ueu n
rs who owed me money, aud whether you dt nCt eA hie
the price and ne 10 The two lots oaes aud "he'het ~
few days you DID not recommend me lOs very u-n! uil
promise 10 that everything was nght ald "h'str III
months after yon did not send IA your Dh io Jl ~
and whether on the lO 81 May, 49, ne receipl 10, a
amount was not signed by " Moore Havens,' and ne
names OF The individuals occur NO lees man hieen
times the abstract Of The tile 10 the Ofs and yet honu
that yOu you declare 10 me IN The open street a'
yUu had acted Lawyer or Counsel III my timhy
wish 10 know whether about June, 1884, when the s N
Chacery was commenced agansl my wife, did not 20 TO
YOU with the subpoena served ON her ana whether yYl
Charles O. Hsyens her private Counsel did not appear Tor
her In thar s,h. al least YOU deny, for an IN
spectOn OF Tire records OF the Court II Chancery VIII sho"
"Moore Hayeus, solicitors for defendant" and VIII also
show what reliance be placed upon the integrity Of some
members Of your honorable and learned profession IN ne
CITY OF NeyYork These records will also show that IN INC
sh Of my wife her former husband you appeared pa
ike manner for her and Moore Havens, SOLICITORS Tor
my wife and her mother the defendants IA the tt suit Ana
fJrmy wife alone, the the las one these STAND
out IN bold relief also wish 10 know II you had never
been my wiis Coun.e how YOU such before
die Fx1nuer IA Chaucery on the 18th February 1885, when
u the presence Of Mary o. myself your partner ana me
opposing Counsel you cerihed 10 ne EAinheI qua, NY
n8rnag took place April 1887 and am very glad 20 nave
discovered the s OF Witnesses The name Of Lewis EhZ
Rer5,r n of 3 Barcaysf am Old acquaintance and pro-
"4ioure Ravens" solicitors for my wife and my moIef'i
law and md m that lsi the name Oi Cnares ~
Ravens then Of Nassaus Attorney az Law, and should
be glad the testimony gave bur unlOfu
naiely have a copy Of H. tnd your names up
pended 10 my wes answer dated the Zih Of April 1885, 90
collectors for defendant and do you not recoect mat on NE
OH January 1889 you applied 10 me- for money 10 pay Tie
bill OF the Examiner Chancery, and hat you gave met
receipt for tue amount signed Moore HtVens per = ~
Hayensn And IN January, 1882 did you not act AZ solicitor
for my wife when the appeal was Drought 70 ne ChancSo5
in relation ~ the suppression Of certain tesumonyi ana dd
sou not tell tat time that you bad new partner WIN
grrat deal Of business and wanted me 10 select some
solicitor those you would name, 10 be substituted IN
your places and did choose the nsi the let you
gave me and did with HIM aud receive hfy
dollars from my house aud for greater security went
partner al night and asked aim about
the matter and he gave the following extract from your
register: fih January 1882 order was made by The
VlceChmceor. respecting testimony which wa appealed
from. While this appeal was pending Mr.. - was sub
.fled SOLICITOR and the su carried by the sub.
stuie beginning with the examination u Witnesses on the
18Th Of May, l84 and on the 18Th was called myseif and
marriage certified %, and the pm OIL inuary 49, the
decree made 10 the suits By Hon. Murray Holman,
IN favor Of my wife; aad all this you doubt forgot when
you stated that you had been my own my wies
] counsel or solicitor