Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1848-11-21
IN CHANCERY vrRelrr.:-In !

| Jacoh Sneed, Mary Snred, William Blackburn Ts,
Tor G R &c burn Absalom Blackburn. Charles Wst.
| hrlnn, " ucy Warbritton, Christopher Warbriton
| Francis Williams aud S'san his wife, who Susan
Wafbsitt M J-miIa Sraon, who before her marriage
with Fleming Selun, now deceased, was J&mima War
| brltion; William WarbTlhon, Woodson Warhri,ron
| lanes Franklin and Mary his wife, ~ho was Mary
| Snred James Philips and Eliza hts wife, who wa,
| EliLI Snrcd; Nathaniel BfIus"alrf ana Nathaniel
| Glenn, PidDuf>:
| against
| William Snred. Thomas Seaton and Mary G hi,
wife, Virginia and Lucy Ellen Blackburn. lnfan, chi.
dfrn Of Nathaniel Blackburn. deceased; William Reed
and Elizabeth his wife who was Elizabeth Snred; Su
Snrri. John Sinclair and Jane his wife who wa.
| Jane Sneed; John Sneed, Alexander Sneed Geotpe "
Snr-d and Della Sn-ed the last OF whom are un.
der the age Of twenty y-ars; Charles Bridgwater
John Goode and Agnes his wife, who WAS Agnes Bride.
water, Elizabeth II Douglass, Sarah A II Douglass Ma.
rieta Douglass James Douglass. Samuel Alley and
Brlsry his wife, who was Brtsey Newman; Asa New.
man, Mahala Newman, Arena Alley, Malvina Alley
aud Crawford Alley children Of Reuben Alley and Ma.
ria his WIFE who was Maria Newman; Watson New.
man, Fleming and Harvey Newman, infant children oi
RO. Newman, deceased; Samuel Brown and Lrthe h.,
wife, who was lethe Newman; Joseph Newman, Polly
Newman, Ann Newman, Nathaniel Brldgwaier, II
len Bfdgwat-r, Francis Brdgwatrr and Henrietta
Brdgwatrr infant children III William Bfdgwater, dc
ceased; the sad Virginia and l.ucy Ellen Blackburn
Alexander snerd, George w Sneed. Della Snrrd, F.
mine New man, Harvey Newman, Nathaniel Brdgaa.
ter, Ellen Bfdgwatrr, Francis Bridewaer and Hen.
retIa Brijgwarr being infants under the age oi TWEEN.
ty-nne years BY Loiln Elicit their guardian ad l.m
assigned by the Court 10 defend them in this SUM-
Defendants
This day came the compliments and filed Their b,r
and the defendants, William Sneed, fhoma, Sraton
and Mary his wife, Arena Alley, Malyna All,y
| Crawford Alley, Watson Newman. Samuel Brown and
Leth- his wife, Joseph Newman, Polly Newman ana
Ann Newman, thereupon, by Counsel. nled their an
-wrrs said bill, which The plaintiffs replied gene
raliy; and On the motion Of The compiainans The
Court doth assign I.of.n Elicit guardian ad litem Il
The infant defendants Virginia aud Lucy Ellen Back.
burn, Alexander Snred, George Sneed, Della Snr.d
| Fleming Newman, Harvey Newman, Nathaniel Bridy
/ Underwater. Francis nj
Henrietta Bridawater, who therrupon filed Their IL
swers Ia Which, also, the plaintiffs replied generally
and il appearing To the Court by satisfactory evidence
that the following defendants are not residents 4 THIS
| Commonw eatl-to wit: William Reed and Elizabeth
his wife, Susan Snred John Sinclair aud Jane his wife
John Sneed, Samuel Alley and Besry his wife Asa
! Newman and Mahaa Nrwman;-and that the residence
OF the defendants Charles Bridswater, John Gordon
aud Agnes his wife, Elizabeth II Douglass, Sarah 4
Douglass, Marietta Douglass and James Douglass Is
| wholly unk known: On the motion Of The complainant,
hr Court doth order that The said defendants APPEAR
here before the first Monday In December neat
and the bill OF the plaintiffs aud that COPY al
this order he published for Two months successfully H.
newspaper published IN the cry OF Richmond and
another copy posted at the front door OF the Count house
of this county. Iopy-T-ste,
| Sept ~ cw9w LOFrlN elicit, II 4.
| ~ OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES AT Rules held in The
| ! Clerks Diiicr Of the Superior Court OF Law ami
Chancery for The county Of Halifax in The month OF DC
! tober Isis:
| IIyram Hudson. Hyram II Crank, Joseph w. Crank,
and Mary Crank which said IIynm II, Joseph W.
and Mary are infants, and sue BY their next friend,
| William Crank, Plaintiffs
against
| Charles a Ballow and William I Baow, Executors
Of Jesse BaIlow, deceased William I Ballow, Jane
Booker, VIM Montgomery Ballow, Elizabeth Balio1.
| WIN II Ballow, Henry Balln~, John Balnw, Edwin
| Ballow James Ballow, George Bliow. augustus I
Walton and Mary his wife, Louisa cognit, James u
Goodman, Zac 7 Goodman Charles Goodman Little
ton Goodman, Thomas Is Goodman and Elizabeth his
wife, John Gnlhfey and Martha his wife, Samuel Bag
well and Nillianna his wife, William Wright and
| Jane his wife, who was Jane Coleman, Sarah Cole
| man. Charles Coleman, Hannah Anderson, Henry Al
drrspn Sterling Anderson, Charles Ballow, John Il Bal
low VIM r Ballow. Jr WIN Rallow. cat'iar'nr Baiiov
Nancy Hudson, Thomas w Dowiy and Mary ? ms
wife, L & Jones and Elizabeth his vile, H'1ekiih
Ford and Elizabeth HIS wife, Samuel Wallace aud Ann
his wife, Defendants.
The defendants. James Baiow, George Ballow. Lou.
isa Cul1uit James u Gooman, Lit,leton Goodman
Sarah Coleman Charles Coleman, Henry AdrrSoG AMI
Charles Baow, not having entered thrir appearance,
and appearing by satisfactory evidence that they az
not inhabitants Of this Commonwealth, II = Ordered,
That the SAID last named defendants d" appear here "h
the first Monday IN January mex, and answer the PLAN
tiff bill; and that copy OF this order be forthwith IN
serted IN the Richmond Enquirer for two months src.
ces-ively and posted a, The front door the Ccur
house OF lh, county. Copy-Trsle,
DC, aO-cw2m WM HOLT, OK
rs CHANCERY-v poisi.:-- Rules held IN he
Clerks Office II the Superior Court OF thancery To-
the Richmond Circuit, tht siAth day 81 October isi-
James VI Boyd Plaintiff;
Joha ~ Royd and other Defendants.
The defendant above named not having entered H.
apr earancr and given security, according L. The act ~
mhy and the rules Of this Court and appearing
by satisfactory evidence that e Is not nm nhaiant q
tins Commonwealth, II i Ordered That the SAID y
PENDANT do appear al the rules 10 be held fof ne sali
Court the first Monday In January next and answer
The bin ol The plaintiff and that copy oi THIS order tr
forthwith inserted III newspaper published 10 The
city i: Richmond for months suscrssivrly, and
posted At the front door q The State Court house, y M
M Itt 'nnN-
Oclll-cwaa ROBERTS Clerk
IN Observation-Disclosures. AT Rules held IN Tic
Clerk : Dffcr of the superior al cbancery az
the Richmond Circuit, the seventh day Of October -ie'
Frederick Stoevrr, flainiin;
against
Henry Chorley and Elizabeth his VIE, Nathaniel y
Chorlry aud Elizabeth his wife, Judah Ii"bson, WI
liam Roberts, William Young, and other
Defendants.
The defendants above ma ed not having entered
their appearance and given security according To the
act Of Assembly and the rules of this Court, and u ap
pranng by satisfactory evidence that they not mia
bitauts tins Commonwealth, IT'S Ordered, That the
said defendants do appear nj the rules 10 br held io The
said Couu the first Monday IN January next and an
the bill OF the PLAINTIFF and that copy OF tins or
der he forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published
IN the city of Richmond for Two months successfully.
al posted the front door o the State Court house IN
u oes il~cwam ? ROBERTS, Clerk.
IN HAACERY-vIRGIsIA: AT Rules held in The
Clerks Office Of the superior Cont Of Chanc-,y Tor
the Richmond Circuit, the fith day Of October, s IL:
Alexander Barlow and Liilish his wife, Rrbecca II
more sally Frazer, Obadiah Powell and Patsy his wife,
Agnes Blackburn, Nancy Jennings, Martin Britain
Wondson and Evelina his wife, NJ DAVIS and Ma
~ his wife, Rehrcca Britain John Britain and Ga-
brella Britain Plaintiffs;
against
William 81 Burton, Benjamin Smoot, and other
The defendants above named not having entered
heig appearance and given security, according I" NE
II Assembly and the rules Of this Court, and u ap
.lx.. rIatI h.t Uaf
hants of this Common wealth, IL is Ordered That the
said defendants do appear nj the rules 10 be- held for the
said Court the first Monday in January next, AMI an
the bin Of the plaintiffs. aud that copy Of this or
der be forthwith inserted in newspaper published
in n. city OF Richmond or two months successfully,
aud posted a, the from door 81 the Stale t"nrt ho'"
IN hr said city copy Testn.
Oct Il-cw2m ROBERTS. Clerk
rs CHA>CERY- yineisI. AT Rules held in ths
Clerks Office OF the Superior Count of Chancrry ior
The Richmond ''Ircnit, The IN day Of October, 1875
Charles - Sar, Plaintiff
against
Burgess Long ami Eleanor Ia, wife. and other
Defendants.
Tn, defendants ahnv- named NOT having entered
their appra aud gwen security according 10 The
act o Assembly and hr rules al Tins ouft, and u ap.
pring by satisfactory evidence that they are not inhi
hitan- o this Commonwealth, u ~ Ordered Ihat thr
said defendants DE- appear - thu rules 10 be held Tor he
said Gonr' IIir iirs Monday IN January next and an
swerthe hill Of The plaintiff and That copy oi thIs OF
der b- forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
IN thr city Of Richmond for Two months successvrF,
aud posted the front door Of the State Cont house 70
the said city. Copy-Teste.
OCT II-cwam ROBERTS, CLERK,
IN uaNCERY-vrRoIri.:- AT Rules held m III
Clerks Dihce ot the superior Count Of Chancefy -
the Richmond Crcuit, the 9Th day If November. l51'
Matthew Mlury and Rnt>on Naury, partners, tEiiih6
in the city ct New York, under the hrm and style !"
Naury Brothers, Plaintiffs.
against
William Maury, oil Liverpool and other Defendants
The defendant above named not having entered ~,
appearance and security according 10 The afl :"
Assembly and the rules Of this iouit and appearing
by satisfactory evidence that hr Is not m nhafant :,
this Commonwealth II il Ordered, that The SAID dernd
ant do appear lhr rs To br held for The -au Iou,
The ir-t Monday III February next, and answer ~
hill OF the plaintiffs; and that copy Of th's order W
fnrh.ith inserted Ia newspaper publshen IN VIZ
city al Richmond, for 1870 months successfully, ana
oo,lrd n, the front door Of the state Court house ~ me
| said city. GoPy-Ir5.r o,,n. =, !,
Nov ii--rw2m hobERis, 'iek'
| IN CHANCERY-vEniNIA Al Rules held IN tie
Clerks Office ~ the Superior Court Of Chanctiy i0f
/ 10 a. he 7fh 10 of