Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1848-12-19

Isaac Delaplaine, John Delaplaine. Augustus U
Clason, and other Defendants.
their appearance and given security according To The
aer of Assembly and the rules Of this Court, and IL ap-
bearing by satisfactory evidence that they not nha
bitants OF this Commonwealth II Is ordeied that the
said defendants do appear The rules To be held for the
said Court the first Monday in February next, and
answer the bill of the planf and that copy OF this
order be forthx th inserted in some newspaper pub
shed 10 the city Of Richmond, for two months success
vey and posted al the front door Of the Stale Court
Nov i4-cw2m F ROBERTS Clerk.
TN CHANceRY-Y,nelslA:- AT Circuit Superior
Court of Law and Chancery, continued by adjourn
ment and held for York county, the I'd OF November,
1913:
wife, VIM L. Vaughan and Sarah his wife, Samuel
and Lucy Deneufve; the two last named Of whom
infants, suing by said VIM L. Vaughan. their next
friend, Plaintiffs:
against
Allen Chapman and Sarah DeneufvilIo, widow of
Robert J. Dsneufviile, deceased, Defendants.
AmonQ other things the court doth adjudge, order
and decree this be referred 10 the commits
Of this court to take an account OF all dsots due
from The estate 4 Robert J. Deneufve, deceased, the
intesaie In the peadings mentioned; and all persons
who may have claims against the said lntestae, are
hereby required to exhibit the same for settlement be-
fore the by the first day Of February
A. D. eighteen hundred and forty mine; and The said
commissioner lie TO this order TO be published for
sgh, weeks in the Richmond Enquirer, newspaper
published In the city Of Richmond, and TO be posted al
the door of the Court House of this county two Sc.
vera court days; and In default OF their coming In TO
prove debts by the time above named, they all
be excluded the benefit of this decree; but the per
coming in TO prove their debts, not parties 10
this suit are, before they be admitted creditors,
10 contribute the plaintiffs their portion of The ex
penses Of this suit 10 be settled by the commissioner
EItract-Teste,
BOLIVAR SHIELD, Clerk.
The creditors Of Rober: J. Deneufviile, deceased.
are hereby notified that Monday the 18th day Of
January next, shall commence taking the accounts
ordered by the foregoing decree, al olce, IN the
town Of York, between the hours of III, A. NJ, and $,
p NJ, at which time and pace they are requested 10
attend with their papers, vouchers and other evidence
ALEX. C. GARRETT, Com'r.
York Town, Dec. 4-cw2m
IN CHANCERY-vlRoISIA:- AT Rules held in the
Clerks Office Of the Superior Court Of Chancery for
the Richmond Circuit the llth day Of November le4s
Joseph Burton, Plaintiff:
against
Thomas Norven, and other defendants.
The defendant above named not having entered AIS
appearance and given security according TO bc acL OF
ana Inc ,ues Pr. TINS o. IT, an nabtant Of
this Commonwealth, 1t is order.x tnai me sao defend
ant 90 appear al the rules prarv next and answer the
Hi, af The nainiff ed that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted some newspaper puoaisneu ia .n
nos,ed Al The door II the State Courthouse In The
'a So cry! !yy:-ewam ROBERTS, Clerk.
TN CHANCERY-yIRo AT Ru,es held in the
the Richmond Circuit, the 9th day Of November, le45
Charles : Peasants, Frederick w Peasants, jehlsl
Parmley and Eliza Ann his wife, Elizabeth Lownes
Eiias L Lownes. Elizabeth w Lo~nes. Elizabeth Har.
vie, Sarah Ash, James Peasants, Henry Wenck and
Sarah his wife, Lydia G Keller, Eenor Lownes. VIII
liam Lownes, and Elias L Lownes, guardian Of Be-
beccs Lownes, fiaintins'
against
James II Crew, Benjamin Crew. L Crew, George
Gibbs and Marianne his wife Maurice James and
Charlotte his wife, William II Hughes, William b
Hughes Junior, Ira Payson and Mary his wife, Ca
eb P Lownes, Lewis Williams and Elizabeth his
wife, Marx Howard, and other Defendants.
The defendants above named not having entered their
appearance and given security according 10 the act OF
Assembly and the rules Of this Court, and appearing
by satisfactory evidence that they not inhabitants OF
this Commnnwe il Is Ordered, that the said defend
do appear The rules be held for the said Court
on the first Monday in February next and answer The
bill of The plaintiffs aud thar copy Of this order he forth
with inserted newspaper published in the city
Of Richmond for two months successfully, and posted
Al the front door Of The State house, in the said
Nov l4-ewam - ROBERTS, Clerk.
~ OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES AT Rules held io The
Clerks Office Of the superior Court OF Law and
Chancey FOR the county Of Halifax in The month of oc-
Hyram Hudson, Hyram Crank, Joseph W Crank,
and Mary Crank, which said liyram II, Joseph w,
and Mary are infants, and by their next friend,
William Crank, Plaintiffs:
Charles BaIlow and William T Eallow, Executors
OF Jesse Bailow, deceased; William 4 BalIow Jane
Booker, VIM Montgomery Rallow, Elizabeth Ballow,
VIM Balow, Henry Baluw, John Ballow, Edwin
Ballcw, James Ballow, George Ballow, Augustus I
Walton and Mary E his wife, Louisa Co,quit, James
Goodman, FAC. T Goodman, Charles Goodman, Little
Ton B Goodman, Thomas B Goodman and Elizabeth his
wife, John Guthrsy and Martha his wife, Samuel Bag
well and WillianRa his wife, William Wright and
Jane his wife, who was Jane Coleman, Sarah Cole
man, Charles Coleman, Hannah Anderson, Henry Al
derson Sterling Aderson Charles Ballow, John Bal
low, VIM I Baow Jr, WIN Balow, Catharine Ballow,
Elizabeth Ballow, Dianna Baliow, Thomas Hudson
Nancy Hudson, Thomas w Dowdy and Mary his
wife, 7 l. Jones and Elizabeth his wife, Ilezekiah
FORD and Elizabeth has wife, Samuel Wallace and Ann
rs wife, Defendants.
The defendants, James Bai'ow, George Ballow, Lou
isa Colqut James II Gooman Litlleton Goodman,
Sarah Coleman Charles Coleman, Henry Anderson, and
Cnarles Baow, not having entered their appearance
and appearing by satisfactory evidence that they
not Inhabitants of this Commonwealth, il Is Ordered
That the said last named defendants do appear here
ne hrs Monday IN January next and answer the plain
lfs bill and ,nat copy OF this order be forthwith in
serted IN the Richmond Enquirer for two months sue
eessively, and posted al the front door OF the Court
DC; ao-cw2m wM HOLT, elk.
IN CHANCERY-VIRorsiA AT Rules held in the
Clerks Once OF the Superior Court of Chancery for
III. Richmond Circuit. the ah day Of November, Is4s:
Matthew Maury and Rutson Maury, partners, trading
10 The city Of New York, under the firm and style OF
Aaury broiheis, Plaintiffs;
William Maury, of Liverpool, and other Defendants.
me defendant above named not having entered his
saanee and given security, according to the act Of
ny and The rules of this Couit, and II appearing
satisfactory evidence that he IL inhsbitant Of
@ commonwealth, is Ordered, that the said defend.
appear al the rules TO be held for the said Court,
sn a hTs' Monday In February next, and answer the
forha NE Plaintiffs and that copy Of this order be
civ ~ inserted III newspaper published In the
49,. hiehmoad, for two months sncccssvely, and
said city. .oo CO " ,"e T.s,s ~ '"e
Nov l4-eSsm ROBERTS. Clerk.
ir,.cuhNCERY.-ViRois AT Rules held In the
m Once of the Superior Court of Chancery for
aiSHuon0 Circuit. the 9Th day of November. lS48
. esf Osborne, Plaintiff: