The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1848-02-25
Law Intelligence.


sursaIoR Coupr. February 2t.--B,fors judge Van.
derpoel- Martin n HooeH st al ps Ma,iaus Warns-
3 ns was va. an "oS% on for $500 The g;
his discharge In bankruptcy and secondly that he had
paid the amount Of judgment To this the plaintiR
replied that tho discharge In bankruptcy fraudu-
lsnty obtained The Judge, in charging the jury,
csptuated the evidence in relation to the manner
which the defendant obtainsd his discharge and told
them that II they satsaed from the evidence that
II was frAudulenty obtained the plaintiff would be
titled to verdict Verdict for plaintiff, S507.
Before Judge Oakley
y. DeImonieo u.s. The Mayor, &c. # NeW Yerk.-Th
this which was an action Of tresps for uudsrmin
ing the plaintiffs vaults In front OF his hotel Ia Hanover
street In consequences OF which, 1t fell in and destroyed
large quantity Of liquor, the jury rendered verdict
Robert W Lc.ober ss. Jucr5 Ls Roy--This was an
action for the recovery Of IS 300 the amount Of two
pronis:ory notes II appeared that plaintiff and DE-
partnership In February ls4o in tbs mauufeoturs Of
lead pipe The defendant put IN $4,000 and the PLATA
until April 1896 when It was found to be losing con-
Germ, and IL was dissolvcd the plaintiff taking the
machinery that he put into tho concern; Mr.. LIE Roy
taking the rest of the assets and agreeing pay tn
two notes above mentioned. ncw partnership wsS
David smith, who entered into cement with the
plaintiff to manufacture lead pipe g., for thsm and for
no other person The plaintiff alleges that Mr. 10 Roy
had to take them up himself Ths defence set up WAS
that the machinery for which tho notes In question
ordered to be constructed by the old Arm Of Lowber
LIE Roy, and did not form q part Of the machinery
originally brought into that nrm by the plaintiff Robert
were handed over to Jacob Is Roy, - part Of the
assets that he immediately sftsr sold them to the nav
firm OF Thos Otis LIE Roy Co; that they again sold
them to plaintiff who gave the latter Arm mortgage
them as security; aud that Thomas Otis lie Roy Co.
afterwards took the notes ut maturity account OF
Jacob L. Roy Adjourned to tomorrow (this morning)
For plaintiff, Mr.. Cutting; for defendant, Msesrs
Ketchsm and Gerard.
COMMON PLxAs, Feb A-Bsfore Judge Ubhoener--
Muurics Duffy and wife rs. Samuet Rust-Action for
assault and battery. The plaintiffs let premises In
Pearl street to defendant they afterwards elected him
battery was alleged to be committed when defendant
was leaving the premises Sealed verdict. For plain
tits Mr.. Shsfsr for defendant, Mr. Allen.
CoUkr GENERAL SESSIONS, Feb 24.-Befors Re-
corder Scott and Aldermen Adams and Crolius.
Trial for Arson concInded-Tne trial Of Mary Jane
MoClanghey (oolored), Indictment charging her
with having set fro to the premises Of Mr. Coursep In
Ninety third street resumed this morning when the
following additional evidence adduced on the part
OF the prosecution
WILLIAM DAVIDSON exsm.nsd.- On the 9Th Of Fsbru-
ary l5a7, met tho accused between three and four
O'Clock In tho afternoon the house OF Mr. Coursen
something about having been arrested for stealing eggs
but held no conversation With her
Tho then submitted to the Jury, who after
brief consultation found the prisoner not guilty, and
she was discharged.
The Court then adjourned until tomorrow morning
CoLRr CALErpAR-This dsy-C.rcuit Courf-2s, Is,
as 81 80. A. 49, 8S 80 g. 35, 81 co. ST. 81 S. 81 81,
S. 81, 327 Superior Court-2 s5 S6, a. 40 ia. lo2
1862 49, 49, l46 l48 l63 1884, I04 1876, 1877 to AIS in
elusive. Common Pieaslst part66, 81 90, 6l g. %.
ID part-53 5i %, So, 81, 3l7.
TRIAL THE TURN.opr WEAvERs-The exsmina-
ton OF the Of the who mentioned last
week had been arrested for riot commenced ON 6atus
day. and has taksn up most OF the week A large mum.
ber of witnesses eighteen to twesty-hsve been
examined for the government, and about tho same
number for the defence Fall River Monitor.