The North-Carolina standard., 1848-08-02
.YOUR OWN FILLMORE"

"The name of Fillmore adds greatly In this region
to the popularity of the ticket writes correSpon-
dent of the Baltimore Patriot from an abolition re-
gion in Ohio. ENactly-and it was for this very
reason that his name was tackled on to the ticket.
Without that eaven of Wilmot Provlso aboltlonlsm,
the barnburning abolition Wings of Ohio and New
York would not swallow it. 1t Is bitter dose all
round-in the West, East, South and North. They
swallow the pill in the free States because, though
TAYLOR is STAKEHOLDER Fillmore is with them heart
and soul, proviso, and every thing else; and In the
South they SWALLOW Fillmore because Taylor goes
down first, and they must not be seihsh! Ii they
are generously permitted by their Northern brethren
have the first Office they must not find fault with
the character of the offered for the second office
This would be ungracious. 8 Fillmore adds greatly
to the strength of the ticket with the abolition
Whigs-of Ohio, and Taylor ''adds greatly to the
strength of the ticket" in the slaveholding States.
Tickle my back, and I'll tickle your elbow Swal-
low Taylor and We'll swallow Fillmore :" We take
TAYLOR, SAYS the North-we take Fillmore, returns
the South. The North says Taylor "beeves slave
ry be the country, and desires its exter-
minaton, and is opposed the further extension of
slave territory, and will therefore, swallow him
the South says mustn't be selhsh-that would be
Fillmore" What an arangement!'' it is called
by New fork paper. The STAKEHOLDER and the
abolitonist on the et!-molasses and vine
gar in the pot. What's molasses to us is vine
gar to them-and what's molasses to them Is vine
gar to US!
'sThe name of Fillmore adds greatly to the strength
of the ticket among the abotionists of Ohio-mark
that and the name of Taylor adds greatly to the
strength of the ticket among the shareholders of the
Southwark that! Now, subtract Taylor's name
from the ticket here and who among the slavehold-
ing Wings would for moment think of voting for
Fillmore Not one, we venture to say. He could
not obtain hundred votes in entire State and
he would be opposed mainly the ground of his ul-
traism the proviso and slavery questions. The
South could and would not support him. But
how is the matter mended by putting Taylor's name
back the ticket! Does it change Mr Fillmore's
views! Is he not the same man he was before-the
same sympathizer with aboltionists and the oppO-
nent OF the South Is he not the WiiIord FIJI
whose nerves were shocked at reading adver-
tisements offering to buy and sell negroes in the
Washington papers Is he not the sam: NiALard
Fillmore who said he interested in the claim
to property in man. in the District of Columbia, and
wanted to abolish slavery there without the consent
of the people, and without making them any compen
sation! Is he not the same 1MiALard Fillmore who
voted with Giddings and Sade to instruct the Com
mittee OIL Territories to introduce bill repeating
law passed by our own people in own Territorial
excluding free negroes from landing
our soil to excite slaves to insurrecton and insub
ordination! Is he not the MiiIard Fillmore
who voted with Giddtnss and Sade against laying
the table a petition asking Congress to pass law
protecting negrostealers and ncendiares in the slave
States and asking to have the privilege of sending
through the Post Oace, into Counties and among
onr people, their insane insulting, and outrageous
holding community! Is he not the same MiI0rd
FtiLn'ore who voting against csnsuring Joshua n.
Gtddngs for introducing resolutions into the House
OF Representatives in which "mutiny and murder (by
saves) were Justified and approved in shocking
to all sense OF law, order and humanity' In short,
is he not the same MiILurd Fillmore who has been
proved from the record to have acted and sympathiz
ed with aboiitionsts, and to have maintained posi-
ton hostile to the compromises of the country, and
the Permanency of the Union go If he is all this
single, and we dare the Wings contradict it, what
change does the addition of Taylor's make to
the ticket! There is Fillmore, just he before
he went on and it is impossible for US to lose sight
OF the fact. And are the people to swallow so OBJ
Iectlonable man, simply because Taylor is on the
same ticket? No, never! The politicians may say
and DO what they please but the people will never
SO stutlfy themselves to vote for such man. If
the Wings expect Southern for their tick
cts, they must offer candidates who can be trusted
Ii Taylor will do, Fillmore will not. He never gave
vote or made speech in favor, and he is even
now arrayed against us question of vital mpor-
a tance to the South-the Wilmot Proviso. Let the
wings show the contrary, if they can. The people
VIII Iepudlate their ticket. Let the people of the
Tree States take caro- of their IS own Flmore'-the
South wants none of him. Bio ..r0 = 80
TnLLtLossee FLo,.;dIo,,