New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1848-09-01

Ia ,..s .be-, 20 remember thai they we're bound
hv ,b.fr solemn 0afhs ~ discharge from iheil n-n
IN that they mient have heard before " 49,.
Court and thif they nefe sworn o. arcllf 'ee,'-
inc 2. the t-rce end ftl EYED nee alif' i'I t'
rog q NOT but te awfre ihfi tnr 4.e-t'. "N' |
ii vital snd deep importance p The puo-t pea
90 The country and q c9-A- Hr P-s IS .Le.-
1erty cf The prisoner on tris- "r-.i l'
frfv & apply tfr.- md er--r n-s with a anxiety %
enable them Oh arrive ~ air and il't cnn,- N H
from de attention they bad uallie.ty pli % me ftfl
heightened proceedings bel was sure that "nait ~
sut .hev srrivei ~ w0ld he consccn'ilusy ani non
..- come D. Tee short question. ilr consider ations
rereid the prisoner intend t0 tepost TIE Queen 81
i.vv var a-sn-t her AMI ga De Dec Are sl-A us -
tsrrors by those pu bHcations relied on Inc Only
.,i.r.e er THIS sui crt were tle publications. t-ffn
selves ard 10 considering tl. l . VS. Necessary % t'
certain -r.i whether or not tney were -9'nea ~ '--
urs.rerl Next What were the meaning Qi i.N-t F4-
f..r.r.4 and thirdly were they published with ile
uri.onrrs kDorleiee ami did they express % nifn
tons he Lori-h.n then proceeded az s.est ens'n p
examine into tie article relied on BY the crown % en.
able tie Iry o. form an opinion upon ilese iNf"ilai
Questions on me conclusion OF bis charge
The foreman asked whether the Crown hsi arlsni
o. refl., stamps o. such paper AZ tae fi'f f'of
Tie Ch.ef Baron said be- was not aware the crown
has any such right bad ever attempted o exercise y
n 4 4 Du-y Wa then placed % ,he bar. ard
claimed permission o. pead not guilty
The Attorney General objected and spp-rd I.l d
uo.rrueirnt 6f the ri al I'LL the next Commission. on
ihe ground that 'eiter in M Du-y nantWriun a,d
been found n possession 0i NJ. -riin % hrien' imp
eating him lDlfy n ihe crime % hi-A ue.'2l '.''
that g m -ht he necessary % intct him Tor mar ei.
Nr Haft ana SIR a.. Lo-hrn cQu'tnied tat taf
prisoner vss entitled 20 have hs plea recorded
The Court gave 10 inal decision though incinec 90
give the Grown fhe privilege required ato1rninS ''e
argument rl Thursday morning
40 seven clock messenger was sent % me Jury 90
know they had agreed wlcn vas stated mat iAefc
wss every probability 90 an agreement and tAat intl
would soon return into Court with verdict
% naIfra.f .frfn Jury returned % their box
when the foreman handed down the issue psper % the
CLERK of THE Crown, VINO tlcrtupcn sad,- Row say
you. gentlemen. is John Martin guilty OF no' guilty o..
the charge laid IN the indictment " 1a-.y.
The foreman sid the Jury wished o. recommend the
prisoner t0 mercy consequence OF the letter upon
which they ma him guilty having been written in
ufi-o and under circumstances 90 excitement
The Court resumed s sitting ~ lU clock on Inurs'
day morning.
Nr Kelvin l1oi ODoheriy was placed at the bar %
stand bis tra second time Tor the same offence with
which be- wa. previously charged namely to compass
aud imagine the ievying OF war against the Queen tnl
% tep0c and deprive her Majesty tnc style, ute ana
honor NJ the imperial crown. ON tle lrsr occasion me
Jury d..e-rcCd and the Crown in The cNrrci-e obi N-
ursrorafise ulf him s-aiu upon bis TRIAL. PRISONER
couus, chs suscd the of the Jury on h' ground
-h,- b. nsf ,n .rt.ared in an unconstitutional man
u,r aui .I.fly aud -uety to the prisoner pre-.
lIce 5 0nl discussion took place ucr- were ~
pointed who Ultimately returned - their verdict in'i
iae pane. bad been fairly end .mparuaiy returned
The sWcarin. 90 the Jury was then proceeded WIN
The following Jury was sworn
David Alexander. foreman, W Carson, Joseph X.
Cumm.u- John Cannon. James Wilson. George Lyons
WIN b. Lowry. James Hare. jaime. Hunter, John
Harris. Sanuc McAlister. tnd Francis Walker
The Clerk 0i the Crown then gave the prisoner ia
/ charge of the Jury.
The indictment charged him VITA the same offences
A. those alleged on his fret tral-namciy. the com
passing deyising Sc 90 depose the Queen from her
/ STYLE honor and royal name sovereign Of the
g. ni,ed kingdom and with levyng war against her
Majesty Cor the purpose OF compelling her to change
I her measures
The solicitor General stated the case, and examined
one or tNo Witnesses IA support Of the Indictment