Anti-slavery bugle. [volume] (New-Lisbon, Ohio) 1845-1861, 1847-12-10

week subsequent 20 this, the witness came
down from Sandusky in a stage coach, in
company with Mitchell. In conversation
Mitchell said Parrish was n very conscien-
tious, good man--had zeal it was true, as an
abolitionist, bat had treated him as a gentle
inan, and he had nothing to complain Of him.
At the last term Of the Court Col. Mitchell,
after the testimony Of the plaintiff had been
given in, wanted the witness Ia take a walk
aud desired to know what Witness would tes-
tify TO-, in order to be recalled it he had stated
any thing wrongiuIly, 10 set himself right
They walked nearly a mile together and re-
turned in company. Witness told Col. Mitch.
ell what evidence lie would give, as hc has
given it here. Col. VI. recognized the LAM
guige he had addressed % Mr.. Parrish as re.
CARDS his being a "law-dhidlnn man'-arr,ed
to much that was said, bat was silent as TO
some parts.
Cr0Ss-er1miHaii0H.-Nhe Mitchell offer.
cd - produce his power Of Attorney, (accor-
ding 10 these stdicmeut~) Parrish said he
would In'orpoSe no obstacle, and therefore the
power was not shown. No interposition on
Parrish part, between Mitchell and either
OF the slaves was mentioned, except his tel
ling the child when ho shrunk back that it
was not necessary 10 shake hands. No az
rests were maIe-bul the conversation clio
SEQ p WIN tne words respecting d "iIl[ EIaI'
ring the statements Of Mitchell and Parrish.
l.. p. N135icy's deposition was then read
rs 10 the statements made by Mitchell and
Parrish as above; aud agr,ed substantially
with the testimony Of lles,rs. Bcerbcr and
Barbour.
.Iy5a Ijqckc,', J,posi,ion sust,ined the olb-
CT evidence Of these statements.
E,o. Bar6er.. the iu,rIrc before whom the
rr,raelinrs vtra bsl .rs,,i,s th, r,,i,,l.
~ p,rrish9 and Nitrholj,s un,.,cat. at tho
Cont House.
CyL Sioaafs deposilion saws that Inc state.
mont of PARRISH o. MI, .',,L,r o,,L %, III
rrpuo,t. He vos roun..I rnr Cnl NifchoII
WHO was arrr.teI IN =, ch,rn ~ |nG ,ot CaI'
Mitchell wished parrish rI,rn. nnJsr o,,b tn
Give a statement or tie tran,,n,i,ns -, tho
,Gltc. to prove that his NJitrhru'.G conJnc,
las becr renilcr,,rIv 81 onnnsal
asLino the question On ,be Ground ,,b,l i,
was irrelevant. Col Michel rcorastsI Of
the Court Thai i, ,oirbt N, ,sLeIL,rd tho
statement followed o fTbo Substance Of il
was what has heer d.iaiIoI Lr 1I.s.rs nso-
cher and Barbour auJ NiIrbggI ,uracd IN !,
as by him Tins corrected.
NJrgb Gy,yjy'x danosi,ion US ,Lor road
T. testified that She wa, in tlr bolss If IIr
Parrish, when Parrish wanted lime to r, to
tie door; and Jane WAS unwilljnT. and he
iriycd fear and auiltion. but r.. parish
advised her 10 do ~. The Jenoncnt WON'T
in,o The hail aCrcr bar and s,w tho wtoi.
transaction. ar. Mitchell stool ontqiio ,Lo
gatn-said he wontrI f. tia H. $500
And boy-and parrish ronli,I 80 oanIJ ,n, a.
# withnnt I,vG,I ,n,har,i,,, r,Ia III w, ~,
advance toward NIiIcLoIl-n, III Niii.h'It
want IN rnne i, Ara, r,Ia ,It "'y1me'i
Harrison wen, into Tho i "r n d '" s'Ti anu
NAMED onen A. p,,,isI, onn" "'V I''' lii
ing viii, Tho mon -",, t'a , ~ E,
bowed IN Mrs p,r[I Y,a ,"s5 ,arHi,r ~
tho dcor and won't ~ io",;".r NJ -
on ,bc s,ons INA /" 800 |,i ! 4i',s"
Ill aGnr ,Lrc man Iort '00' ""' ~ '''''0 ~"
TLe ,estinonr ~ tho 1.c,n1,,, L,r;.r
bean conrinJeJ' Wr S.nLery m;sh"J -
" ~ :,