Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1847-07-27

Alabama as fully vouching for tie Wing PIinci-
Piles of Gen. Taylor. He declared "ffom aulho-
rily which lie could mol question, that Gen. lay
Tor was a Wing, that all his afilniues were " h's'
lha, he was Wing all over, 6ut not a partisan
or one ,rdo ,could prefer partyfo duty
We pass over The words in Italics, 10 which
the Times deyotes a long homily, winding up as
follows:
awe believe tina, flour institutions are 10 be pre-
served. 1.-THE GOVERNMENTS ever to be administer
cd on line true principles OF the Constitution, II
must be through The steadfas', unccasins and con-
ceried exertions Of The patriotic wing parry OF
the Union. To talk OF disbandlns mat party, ana
10 propose It's extinction, is 10 cast impula,iohs
upon the motives of The great statesmen VINO nave
guided il, and 10 stullity all who belong 10 H..
We come to The endorsement Of Mr.. Hiiliard
who says lha, Gen. Tayloris Wing. OF course
Mr.. H. measures Gen. rs Whiggcry by his
own. Let us see what that is. In laIe speech
made in The Congressional canvass Ia MS AIS
lrici, Mr. II. fully justified his vote Tor The Ia.
rilf Of 1916, which, he remarked win a shIus OF
the shoulders, he thought, strange as u m'sn'
SEEM" would prodnec more rcren'e than the high
Tariff Of 1912 These sentiments are July ap-
proved by The Wing organ OF The district, which
prtlshes 10 The world that Mr. II. "avowed that
his Tariff views were the Wing creed Of Alaba-
ma, as laid down in the unanimous resolutions
Of The Wing Stale Convention, during the Clay
canvass Thus, then, TO he Wing IN AlaDa-
ma, one mus, support the Tariff OF 1916, and
in his sense, no doubt, Mr.. Hlliard regards Gen.
Taylor as Wing
Again, as 10 the war, MIR. H. who voted for the
preamble 10 the war-bill, declared that "as we
were engaged in it, il was necessary 10 prosecute
il with vigor." On this point, too, we have no
doubt thai Gen. T. is an Alabama Wing, differ
ing but little from the Democratic doctrine. To
be Wing, therefore, according TO The Alabama
standard, is 10 have principles very unlike those
OF Whggery in Virginia and farther NORTH
Here, Wing is expected to advocate Bank,
high tariff, opposition 10 the war. Here Mr..
Bous and The Richmond Wing lay i, down as The
true Wing doctrine, 10 Withdraw every soldier
from Mexico, and refuse 10 vote dollar for The
prosecution Of the war. The Express, Wing
organ OF New York, says:
"The next Congress will not vote surplies-Tely
upon III AL 10 carry on profilles and thritlless
war,-bul will first demand what we are fight
ing for and when il is known, vote according
10 The answer"
The Wings of Tennessee, on the other hand,
take the same ground on the war question as The
Wings Of Alabama; fer Gen. Brown the Wing
candidate for Governor in Tennessee, in his
speeches before The people, says II am for prose-
cutting the war vigorously. tcoald vote millions
for its continuation" We have quoted these
varying opinions Of Wings of different Sec
tions of the country, 10 shew that Whiggcry
assumes such a protean shape, that Gen. Tay
lor, may nominally be Wing in one quarter
OF the country, and at the same time lie
denounced as a Democrat in other sections.
Lei US, Tor instance imagine that he like MIR.
billiard, is in favor of the Tariff Of l84G, and
opposed TO protective Tariff; and, al The same
time is in favor OF the prosecution OF The war un
Wing as to receive The nomination and support
of the Wings of Virginia, or OF a Wing Ma
,ional Conventions Such Wing we are in
clined 10 look upon him, in other words, as very
little Of a Wing at all. We have seen it stated
in some of the Wing papers, that Dixon H. Lew
is means 10 support Gen. Taylor Tor President,
because OF his Southern States Rights doctrines.
Will man with such principles receive the SUP
por, Of the Wing party? II SO, their principles
must have been frilered away 10 nothing!