Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1847-10-12
The Host Brilliant Lottery
EYER DRaHN IN THE UNITED STATES!
SlGO.OOO!, SAC. u 500 ,J089flaSlol


The Most Brilliant Lottery
EYER DRaH.V IN THE UNITED STATES!
S;sI1GO.00D!:, $40 S6b s 100i6 $40 = aA,4 1885, lo6o!
Being The lowest 3 NO. Prizes.
The Isl and "a drawn Nos, $l,0O0l
| The 81 and Sd, or 81 and 4h drawn Nos, $500!
ALEXANDRIA LOTTERY, Glass S, for lS47, TO be
drawn in Alexandra, on Saturday, the Both dag. ofoc-
tober. 1917 underthe supsrintcndence OF Commission
:" MAGSlFIcENT SCHEME.
grand capital prize Of si 90 ' S0o
splendid prize Of i Is'SSo
do. 5000
do. 1000
aE0 n,izes invest 3 Nos3o OF a,D00
63 prizes list and Cd drawn Nosl Of i,oW
1876 prizes (2d and Sd or Sd and 4lh drawn Nos.) 5oo
l26 prizes t4th and 5lh or 5th and 9Th drawn Nos 25n
l26 prizes 10th and 9TH or 9Th and 9Th drawn Nos) l5J
q 1896 prizes OF AZ
PRICE OF TICKETS:
yyholes slO-Halves 2O-Quarters 1O-Eighths So.
Certificates Of Packages OF a5 Whole Tickets, s472
no- do. 25 Half do. 2JG
s.: %: s a a;ss,s d. &c: l5 y
~ Official drawings forwarded as soon as received.
az Orders for Packages, Certificates, or single Tick
cts, In the above Schemes, addressed TO the undersign-
ed. attended to by return Of Mail; and. when requested
ceIvrd. Address JOHN NJ. CLARKE,
Aug. % Richmond, Va.
IN CHANCERY.-vIRoISIA:-Al Rules Eeld in The
1 Clerks Once Of the County Court Of Cumberland on
Monday, the 4th day OF October, l54I;
Thomas D. Walton, Plaintiff:
against
IewIsJ. Walton, James c. Walton, Martha S. Wal
ton, Cornelia Josephine Walton, Edward G. Walton,
Thomas II. Hewlett and Jane Ills wife, formerly Wal
\ ION, Martha Walton, widow and relict of Edward Wal
ton, deceased, and Samuel Hatcher, Executor oil Ed
ward Walton. deceased. Defendants.
The defendants James c. Walton, Edward G. Wal.
ton, and Thomas II. Hewlett and Jane his wife, mol
having entered their appearance and given security,
according TO the act Of Assembly and The rules OF this
Court, and it appearing by satisfactory evidence tina,
they are NOT inhabitants Of this Commonwealth, II Is
ordered, that the said defendants do appear he 70 on Inc
first day of December Court next, and answer The bill Of
| the plaintiff; and that a copy of this order be forthwith
inserted in some newspaper published in the city, Of
the front door fthe Court house of this county.
Oct. l2-cwam B. b. wooDsoN. C.
IN Observation-Disclosures AT Rules held in the
the Richmond Circuit, the 9Th day Of October, lo47:
Royal Parrish and Felix Matthews, partners, under
the firm of Parrish l. Matthews, Plaintiff:
j.. Thomas D. Novel; and Sarah his wife, and other
Defendants.
The defendants above named not having entered
their appearance and given security, according to the
act of Assembly and the rules of this Court, and il ap.
pearing by satisfactory evidence that they are not inha
bitants of this Commonwealth, 1t is ordered that the
said defendants do appear at the rules 10 be held Tor
the said Court, on The first Monday In January next,
and answer the bill of the plaintiffs; and thata copy Of
this order be forthwith inserted In some newspaper
published in the city of Richmond for two months sue
cessively, and posted at the front door OF the Capitol In
Oct. isAeew2m P. ROBERTS. elk.
TN OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES AT Rules held In The
the Richmond Circuit, the 5h day of October, ls47:
George w. Goode, assignee Of Jesse 7. Smith,
asains, Plaintiff:
Ivory P. uodgden, and other Defendants.
The defendant above named not having entered his
appearance and given security, according to the act Of
Assembly and the rules Of This Court, and IL appearing
BY satisfactory evidence that he is not an inhabitant of
this Commonwealth, it is ordered, that the said defend.
ant do appear ut the rules TO be held for the said Court
on the first Monday 10 December next, and answer The
amended and supplemental bill Of the plaintiff; and that
a copy ofthis order be forthwith inse rted in some news
paper published in the city Of Richmond for two months
successfully, and posted at tho front door Of the Capitol
Oct Oct iaUewsm r. ROBERTS. Clerk.
TN CHANCERY.-VinoiNIA:-A Rules held in the
1 Clerks Office Ct the Superior Court OF Chancery for
the Richmond Circuit, the 9th day of October, ls47:
Jones Heller, Plaintiff:
against
The Protection Insurance Company Of Hartford, in
the State Of Connecticut, and another, Defendants.
The defendants above named not having entered their
appearance and given security, according 10 the act of
Assembly and the rules of this Court, and il appearing
by satisfactory evidence that they are not Inhabitants of
this commonwealth, u Is ordered, that the said defend
ants do appear at the rules TO be held for the said
Court, on the first Monday in January next, and an
swer The bill OF the plaintiff; and that q copy OF This
order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper publish
ed in the city of Richmond for two months successive.
ly, and posted at The front door OF the Capitol in the
said city. ACopy-Tcste,
oct. i2-cw2m 7. ROBERTS, Clerk.
IN CHANcERY-vrRcistA: AT Rules held in the
L Clerks Office of the Superior Court of Chancery for
the Richmond Circuit, the 9Th day Of October, 1877:
John J. Taylor, Plaintiff:
against
David Minge and Elvira his wife, John A. Heron,
Thomas Adams, and Joseph klapp and Anne his wife,
and other Defendants.
The defendants above named not having entered their
appearances and given security, according TO The act Of
Assembly and the rules of this Court, and it appearing
by satisfactory evidence that they ae not Inhabitants OF
this Commonwealth, 1t is ordered, that the said defend
ants do appear at the rules TO be held for the said Court
on tbs first Monday in January next, and answer The
bill Of the plaintiff; and that a copy of This order be
forthwith inserted In some newspaper published in the
city Of Richmond for two months successfully, and
posted al the front door Of the Capitol In the said city.
A Copy-reste,
] oa. l2-ew2m PoWHATAN ROBERTS, elk.