The Arkansas banner., 1847-02-17
fy 4kr nrnn4,


 fsF aks Banasr.
 | N0nld seem li.ai sCascasis to beswal- Iowsd alive by AResponse.S oT tke Demo craN Bni he will try and be like the boys n0se that wouldn't stay bIcwed. @Responsen Eisiryinr to raise false issue. Casca did not deny io Nell, honesty, good standing, and all that sori of thing. Ca ihe contrary, he represented ham to be, as he is, most worthy citizen The charges sought to De brough: srains, Col. Miller, are ialse. and the one by @Lumpkin,' in which an iusinu- aiion is made sgainsi his honesty, is worthy Of the distonorsbIe source from which i, sprung. again repeat that Col. Miller pos sesses all those high qualities and noble vir- tues that make the nan;-sba. his standing, as citizen, is equal to any mans, and that, as member Of the democratic party, he en- lioyed, 10 the full extent, their confidence, ] was proved, I,y his election twice, as the de- mocratic elector of this State.
 4Responsen would assail Col. Miller's politics, and create the impression that he is not democrat He asks, 'swhere was Mill ! Ter in the days of Critienden and Sevieri" ! answer, for him: He was battling for Crit ,euden. He would scorn to deny il. Where is the sim Has not Responses second hand master--he of she Democrat--proclaimed that we had no politics until we become a Stase-that local questions, alone, governed the voting' Then why charge, on Col. Mil Ter, as political sin, an offence deemed in- nocent even by Woodruff himself, Who was Crittenden' Aye, Rober, Criiienden One of Gods master pieces-a man of match less talents--of great heart--a man who never deserted fIiend-who was honest bold and upright. In short, the very anti podes of Chester Ashley. 4 member of old fiickory's military family. Il was, in his ef' for, to shield the reputation of his chief,iar from an attack of anonymous correspondent. in the Gazette, that he drew on him the wrath of William E. Woodruff, then it's Editor.-- We'll may Miller be proud of supporting sucl man.
 1 But, Miller failed 10 vote for the demo I cratic candidates for the Legislature. Wht were theyi Madison Clarke was one. Neil and Chapman, both, treated his pretensionl with contempt They voted for him by No l land; but, it was, to save appearances, they 1 went against him. Clarke got about 20t votes. Silas c. Walker, was another. WhC is he: A man for whom more, and by whom less, has been done, in return, than by any have ever known. There is mystic tie seemingly, binding him to Chapman ant Neill. Eeill succeeded in getting him palm 1 ed off on the people of this Judicial Circui as Prosecuting Attorney, although Chapman failed in raising ''pony purse" to affect tn, same thing. Where he is now, God onl, knows, and if he ever gets back to his Cir cult, ! shall be disappointed. He is one 9 tte men.Niller yefused 10 roic for,
 1 Miller is too independent for the Receive here, He has 1t, now, all in his own hand ! --ihe two officers are one and the same N \ Catholic ever believed stronger in the inialli biIi,y of the Pope, than NeilI does in Chap : nan. He is honest in il, hence can be easily led away. The one office is now no checI on the other.
 "Responsen seems proud of his Ashley collar. He wears i, as any other dog would Has he moi been here long enough 10 learl something Of the early history of his mas ter' Has he ever heard of the assassination of Garrett' He had best beware. He i too zealous in his masters cause. N I again say, that Neil voted for Noland and that Chapman voted for Rnggold, fo Congress.-for Fowler, for Governor, an, for Egner, for the Legislature. Now, hoy comes it that he IS orthodox, and that ever, democrat must dance to the tune of his fid dle, or he rules of the floor.
 CASCA.