New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1847-09-10

To ~ tftiT ~ ~
-. 81, ps-nit me 70 complain little OF
-. IN Tue.d.y. psper and to reenfy what
-, ,.,orrse,ly stated You say truly. that have ire
o,env xri,,sn for The Tribune for which ioouseD's
-. .,a have given heretofore, my grateful sesno"
-. son.t,rne. have closely agreed with you
:, o,1s,. differed a. 10 secondary positions While coin
-..,,,,. a. other. have been in direct and an
,--r.,Ic o,n,.ltior vet always think, IN snneI
-rsoctfsl however decided the terms In ~nien 'uen
onnosi,iou uay nave been expressed IN mo .s'ei
80. too .ucn comm unicsiions have been ever
-, - -rtop. articles 10 The Tribune very or 70
So Il nv p.y OF thinking Even after Prot busns
public chsenEe and wsger. should Gave 10 no.A.-
10 90 with this vile book. Il you yourseh nss 10.
Cd actually 70 invite reply The one W, on ~
80. al o-ono..s ~ say nor 81 which bad r1nt
70 say considered what had preceded X eontsneo ~
per.opsl iruDu,son on Prof ssthe term Is common
ly used thst "a no reflections on nls inu. i,s 10
bot Only strong rsprob-ton Of BIC srsn.e Yo'.N"n "
rs.peci 10 the book Here you inierered ana yerenp
tory declared that the msitsr must oe Carried 10
iher in your columns Certainly tnen ! mao -,
consider myself shut oct and had not tue ies'
,housht thsf You would receive any other communcH
lion except from Prof r IL WA necessary, tn-reio'e
IN eek som. other channel for . reply. sihousn !
should certainly have been glad to nave nso "
in ,ba .,e napsr "a ths, which bad contained the pre-
viou, articles and for the same readers No man OF
course would think Of impeschins statement OF M,
NcEirsth but he IL mistaken In the ides tnr' ,ns.s
proposition from a. respond 10 The lrioune' sno
tia, there WA no ohjsctiOn 10 L. There WI" every
reason 10 suppose that such proposiuon' s'er tSus
public announcement would not have been seceptrJ
In consequenca OF your delay IL PUBLISHING froi
answer there was desire o zee the proof sheets 20
prevent being too late for the Weekly observer: Tue
mere fact however Of your closing your columns
would not have been complained Of az you hai per
Ici rishi do II any time but II ~ss nov nsn ~
you under the circumstances 70 take 30 decided gAlS
and chsracter'ze my communication IN terms 81 olen
sye snd calculsted 10 bring o1um upon ICE "lNe'
You hsd no right unier the Ct cumsAnees - represeh,
me a. glsdistor. Intruder, or as one VINO nac
involved your paper in ccutroTersy ~nicn "ss S1n
tpil and which Il xoulj have avoided You nsi heVe,
aided any such appendix 70 mar the effect 81 any oi
Prof T. communications OF this | comps an ana
think With Justice 10 respect 10 Prot b tine raus' de
,ernine whether hs finds the new friends better ana
more faithful than the old. lou may REGARD 'nl' -
rrvs,e or m hlish II IS you please would somc~ ns
prefer that you should put In SEINE spare corner OF
Tn Tribune. although want 70 have notnps more 70
DO with any question about the book Yours, sc IL
Our readers will remember tha, cur remarks in re.
spectt T q long onslaught on Prof Bush we're eel'
ed solely by I incup patton of The Tribune in that
article - confederate or chsmpion OF Davis 20.
Had he chosen to let us alone he might have written
and We should have published at discretion sth 5ugh
l. saw III TO be Extensively severe on sEedenoorsisn'
400 hsre,cs generally who had not nvol' ed
,t,,..lve. In the controversy What we had done N
the premise. Wa. simply b tell our readers ~ oreny
a. rr.ctirsble VIVA, wera the import and drt OF the
p.vis pook-how Il proiessed to hsye been produced
and ON shst grounds il caimei attention snt eredenee
Our review may have expressed some opinion with re-
gard 10 q. Literary reriis, bu, certainly none win
regard to it. Theology We simply stated ito leading
points. as We oftei do opinions with which we utterly
disagree either Ia reports Of Lectures sermons
and Speeches or In the Letters and Messages Of
distinguished men Very often We have been aeeosied
with want 10 answer Dr. - speech or lee
,ure reported In your paper this morning and nave
replied that We preferred that the answer should o'
given To the world the matter objected TO- wner
v. would report Il II deemed of sufficient public Interest
It L. Ia almost the only man ~ have allowed L
oyer.,ep this rule snj while We greatly prize MS com
uunicaton. for their SIGNAL ability pungency We d
wish they were ale ess prone 10 theoosiea scrmony
little more regardlul OF the feelings Of III Sc who holC
ouiulons adverse 10 his own. We do rot think IN
.oundness Of the bold ayermenis with regard 10 th'
.uitword Of D.viss book have been fairly In Issue
our columns and really does seem 20 us thu, the fac
of An trate youth a state OF Mesrieric trance nav
. iny enuuciated certain views of the Universe and u
Laws may be- stated public ilurnal without suspc'o
ma. the found ATOMS OF Religious Conviction are hse
b 10 be- upheayed thereby. The pillars OF Eversslin
Truth stand little too firm for that I'd Irio.