Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1847-01-29

from Northampton TO keep COOL The gentleman
from n. had been informed that the bill would DC
r,commi,,ed; and does he think that that Com
n,ee would report bill which had been reject
ed Does the gentleman hope 10 ffishten tbs
House BY telling them Of the large amount pro.
posed 10 be appropriated2 He hoped the bill
would be reconsidered.
Mr.. DORMAN said The gentleman from N.
would vote agains, the bill, no matter what he or
auy other friend might say. He would vote
against i, in any event. He hoped the gentle
man would make speech against the bill ne
had hoped that he would have done SO the o'nef
day, but he had been disappointed.
MIR. SCOTT did not consider the gentleman
from N. as much OF an Ishmaeile as the sentie-
man from Rockbridge represented MN. lie
heani that even the gentleman from Northamp-
I'm would be forced 10 vote for the improvement
Of The work beyond the Blue Ridge. tie conid
sss NO earthly reason against this motion. II
.anoot certainly be the fixed and unalterable pur-
no.e Of this House TO refuse relief 10 those who
nave suffered from their works having been des'
lroyed. from those who come 10 US informing u
of l6edapgers they encounter. II was not Inc In
ten,on oflhe motion TO reconsider, only 10 reform
The bill according 10 the views oil The irienos Oh
mi. work but 10 reform il according 10 Inc views
OF this House. x,.a
Mr.. DUNCAN did not wish TO be regarded as
one ofthose who did not desire 10 give Tue iiehus
~ his hin some chance TO perfect it. he had
yo,sd AGAINST The bill, and nigh, do so again
Hs woud vote for The reconsideration 10 allow lis
friends to perfect the bill, so that even he might
vote for it. ,;u
MIR. YERBY only wished the friends oil The Dill
10 STATE what would be its general character.
MIR. MOSBY felt i, 10 be his duty TO vote for
The recon,ideration. The rejected bill not only
contained an appropriation OF S6i2. 600, but also
had section in il for The prolongation OF inc
charter; il something he not DONE The charter WIN
expire in May next, which will certainly De Inc
case unless immediate action be taken upon II.
This reason, he hoped, would operate even upon
the member from Northampton.
MIR. VERIFY said that separate bill might be
brough, in for that purpose.
i The vote was then taken on reconsiderinS Inc
hill and agreed to, by the following vote:
AYrs-Msssrs. Brown Of Albemare, Hart, Layne,
Harvie Powell, Shelley, Johnson, Byrd, Scrusgs Boak
small, Thompson OF Botetourt, Bambrek, M S@s
Mosby Lacy Irving, Chisman, Love, scott, Smtn
Hll Of rayeite and Nicholas, Evans Stillman street,
Csrp.r. Wall, Carson, Leake, Carroll, Calwe DaIra
co,t Lee, Duncan, Lancaster, Hunter, thompson OF
Jefferson, Patrick, Richmond, Harrison OF Loudouh,
MCINTYRE, Poindexter, Raymond. Oldham, Brown OF
Monongaiia, Edmundson Of Montgomery and Pulaski.
Penow. Newton, Watts, Edgington, Davis, Newman,
Syme L,ner, Tunstall, Cackey, Fairfax, Stone, An
derson Sturm, Sirother Mayo, Cook, Harper porman,
stctisy. Tate Holiday, Gillespie Homer, Castloman
Coodson, Stephenson and Floyd-14
Nors-Messrs Jones of Chesterfield, Custis. Finney,
NeDearmon, Burwei, Bennett, dickinson, Thompson
OF Dinwiddie, Roane, Jones OF Gloucester, Major,
Howard, Wallace, Gaines. Robinson, Gresham, Ed
mondson Of Lunenaurg,. Banks, Browne Of Mathews
and Middlese1, Kelly Happier, VERIFY, helms, Oliver,
Mcpherson, Ta,um, Cooke, Daniel, mcElhenney, Mo-
rison, Hill Of Shenandoah, Goodwin, Fitrhugh. Free
man, Bocock and Chandler-4U.
On motion of MIR. DORMAN, the vote ON its
ensrossmenl was also reconsidered, and the bill
was recommitied.
The House then took up the joint order Tor the
incorporation Of the Potomac and Ohio Railroad
Company.
wilhou, concluding, at quarter pas, 8 o'clock,
gave way 10 q motion, made by Mr.. LACY, 10
adjourn.