Wisconsin herald. [volume] (Lancaster, Wis.) 1846-1849, 1847-10-16
Michael and Joshua Woodward VS.. John

sumpsit--dismissed by plaintiff.
Samuel Hill vs.. John r.. Jones-as-
suinpsit-continled
jonathan Moore VS.. Nathaniel w. Ken
dall-replevin-v for defendant.
Robert Bloomer vs.. Chamberlin s. Rood
sulnpsit-dismissed.
Robert Boomer vs.. John Barton--irover
continued.
Rood s Blackman VS.. Alden Adanls--as-
sumpsit-dismissed.
James G. Campbell VS.. james C. Wright
-assumpsit-iudgment for plaintiff.
Lozenzo Bevans VS.. Jesse Howell-as-
sumpsit-same.
William R. Road vs.. Hiram R. Beebe-
asslmpsit-same.
spaulding s Henry, use OF Il. Spaulding
VS.. Alexander C. Inman assumpsit -
settled.
'Tompkins and Tiel, adm'rs of Samuel
Tompkins, vs.. Elisha Hayward-assump-
sit-judgment for plaintiffs.
A. johnson & Co. vs.. Albert B. Warren
4
-assumpsit--settled
Hezekiah Messmore and wife vs.. Grif-
fifth ssumpsit-continued
Baker s Wanzer VS.. Albert B. Warren
assumpsit-continued
Edward Bridge VS.. Orlando A. Boynton
ssumpsit-continued
Trowbridge, Dwight s Co. VS.. Warren
s. assumpsit-non-suit.
| S. M. s. E. Langworthy VS.. Seaton and
Hopkins, adm'rs of John M. Hopkins-as-
sumpsit-demurrer.
Barnett s. Seaton VS.. Samuel f. elise
assumpsit-settled.
Barnett & Seaton VS.. David Jones-as-
sumpsit-settled.
VIM. M'Cully vs.. Henry NJ. Gillett-
debt-demurrer.
Elias UT vs. James Blundell - debt
continued.
Manchester s. Denton VS.. Alden Adams
f--debt-dismissed.
Orril N Adams and Albert futile VS.. Il.
+. Observation-Disclosures.
George w. Dodd VS.. Adam Keith =
trespass-judgment for costs against defend
ant.
George w. Dodd VS.. Michael Treese-
trespass-continued.
Augustus l.. Gregoire VS.. Robert, ct ais.
-trespass--continued.
John Walker VS.. VIM. Mckinney -
/ eiectment-continued
Eli Myers VS.. VIM. Amsbury-rcplevin
continued.
N. Corwith s. Co. VS.. Isaac Bear & Bro. !;
assumpsit--dismissed.
Jarret Garner vs. Robert b. f. Scott;
assumpsit--dismissed.
David BARLEY VS.. Samuel Else; assump-
sit-continued.
Daniel Pearce vs. Basil Bounds and Cor
don Day; assumpsit--dismissed.
Dewitt Beckwith VS.. Henry c. Bushnell;
replevin-continued.
Robert Bloomer VS.. Oliver S. Johnson;
assumpsit-settled.
Jonathan Chamberlin, for John III. Bar
ton, VS.. Green Woodbridge; assumpsit =
judgment for plaintiff.
Burnet Restine VS.. Emalus E. Wellman;
assumpsit--continued
Peter Carr vs.. Samuel Lemon; debt
continued.
Mary M. Hugiii vs.. Thomas Hugill; as
sumpsit-continued.
Hiram C. and James M. Grant VS.. Jo-
seph Hail. assumpsit-dismissed by plain
tiff.
Basil Bounds and Gordon Day VS.. Robt.
l.. Weed; assumpsit-continued.
Van Allen s. johnson VS.. B. f. Woods,
ct ais; assumpsit-dismissed.
David j. Seely VS. James S. Woodcock;
assumpsit-continued.
Mills and Warner, executors of e. War
ner, vs. Hiram Cawood; assumpsit--contin-
ued.
Henry Smith VS.. Orrin Rice; assumpsit
continued.
Simon Hornback VS.. William Richard
son; assumpsit-dismissed.
Christopher Bell vs.. James Dyer; as
sumpsit; continued.
John +. Lyman VS.. Matthew Woods; re-
lplevin-default and writ of inquiry to next
term.
CRIMINAL DOCKET.
The United States vs.. VIM. Morris, ct
ais; indictment for riot-nol. pros.
4 The United States vs. John Rountree; in