New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1847-02-17


sUPERroR CouRr-Before Judge oakley-Hsary C
Thompson John Yy0R-Action for assault and battery
and false imprisonment in relation to order for s.
gwen by son OF defendant already referred TO- Yer
diet for plaintiff. sltO-For plaintiff Mr. H. Is. NcNesl
For defendant Mr.. Whiting and Mr.. IOnner.
Henry Fischer VS. Thomas H0lld1d-The plaintiff keeps
"a public house corner Cedar and Greenwich sta. The
defendant is blacksmith By occupation. Mr. r the
plaintiff was board German emgrant ship, one day,
seeing passengers who had been directed TO put
up at his house. Mr.. H. the defendant, was also on
board had difficulty with young man in the employ Of
plaintiff. The latter demonstrated, when he him.
self struck by Mr. H. violent blow In the face Action
IL brought for damages No defence offered. Yer.
dictf plaintiff SIS which also carries costsFor plain
tih Mr.. Wordsworth.
Philip Hone and Darid T. Bokss Rseeirvs offhs AmsrL
Mutual ms Co. -. The Mutual SAFETY ms. Co1hs
American Mutual insured for Herckenrath & Van
Damme $4,000 on their stock at % Broad r. The
American reinsurcd $4,000 OF the the Mutual
Ina Co At the great IRE in lS45 the store aud stock OF
H. s. Van d. were burnt The loss Of stock els 600
which the American was called upon 20 pay. They
10 Of the Mutual the $1,000 rensured The
defence Is that the American FRUSTRATED b. tho fire.
and can only pay 80 per cent that previous 70 com
mencing suit for reinsurance company Is bound 10
show that they had paid the loss which was not done
IN this cascthat Tensuring company has only 10 pay
pro loss the same II originally nsuring with
another company and that If the American pays but 80
per cent Of It's share IL call upon the Mutual 10
pay greater amount than itself Verdict for plaintiff
$4,000 H. subec, 10 the opinion and adjustment Of tbs
C0urt-For plaintiff Mr.. b ID. Siman. For defendant
Mr. Theo. sedgwick
Paues Dereia AdmiaisHa,oT &C. vs Cafleyia, DereliE
Adn,E Sc-Acti0n on note given by husband Of de.
fendsnt, who was lost ia the ship England IL
shown that he signed the note by person guiding MS
hand. For defence Il eonteuded that there was
proof that the note read 10 him. IL does not sp
pear that be knew what he doing. IL was shown.
however that be could read writing though mperiectly
This the Court considered sufficient Verdict for plain
Tiff s243 g. For Plaintiff, II d. Lspsugh for defendant
J. I. Brady.
CouRT or COMMON PLEAs-Bet0re Judge Dsly--Ih
People Va. John l. hA1sisy and r. CocArdn.-suit on
bond given BY defendants that Mr. h. would provide for
his wife and child whom said he had abandoned
The testimony showed that Mrs X maintained hsrsef
having been employed housekeeper At Mr.. Actions,
baker Pearl st. and two other places The coun-
sci for defendants contended tina, the Commissioner had
no night to bring the suit Mrs X. had obtained
aid from the city Tue Court held tha, the parties
liable notwithstanding. Verdict for plaintiffs 500
Fer plaintiffs Messrs Porter and Mcmahon for deien-
dant Mr. McGay.
Isaae Ramos - EiaS Fire IAsDaHc, Co-The building
In which situated the clothing store Of Mr. H. No.
l03 Chathsns csugh; FIRE Ia Dec l5i5 and the stock
was Injured by nre and water 10 the amount ID Ia
alleged, Of $500. Mr X. insured 81 600 each at
the Etna and Bowery Offices The present suit 10
Of the two brought 70 recover the amount Jury
empanelled snd the will proceed this forenoon
FOR pitt. hesss. Graham and Carpenter for d;dI
Messrs j. z Hal IhofuCzon and WOOdhull