Vermont phÅ“nix. [volume] (Brattleboro, Vt.) 1834-1955, 1847-05-06
VERMONT PHOENIX.
BrattlcbOrO, Thursday, May Q, IS47.


Windham County Court.
The April term or our County Court commenced It's ses.
sion the 9Th uli Hon Milo l. Bennett presiding
sisted by Hon Emory wheeock snd Hon Jas n. Phelps
The FIRST for the Jury Of Eee,nrn, in
favor Of s'ah, fdnr # Fuller } Pollard; but aNer
sone hours spent upon IT, continued application of
Defendant
For PA, c. q J. D. Bradley; for Def, Walker &
Kellogg aud a. Keyes.
Luthe sargtaAf John Resre.
This action Of Eroncnt brought to recover for
lands lying IN Battlybofo The controversy in relA
ton to boundary line between srms owned by the
parties along valley OF wheisiobe Brook A large
number Of wtn examined upon both sides, mainly
TO show where the channel Of said Brook different
points Of time, extending lar back the revolutionary
war The Defendant Introduced record Of the County
Court showing that in ISIS there Of spass
upon the freehold pending hieh John Reeve PLAIN
til and Luther ssgeani Defendant and that the Plaintiff
that recovered Judgment and introduced psfol tss
mony, tending show that the real question that time
gaed und sdudeacd Of title, and in relation
the pie in controversy, and claimed Il the
Jury found that the Court should charge the former
adjudication conclusive upon the parties. The Court
charged and verdict given for Defendant Ex-
ecP,ions by Plaintiff.
The argued for Plaintiff BY l. Walker and
J. d Bradley, with whom wss A. Reyes For Defendant
by o. l. shaaer and W. {. Bradley, with whom was e.
kirkland
.Msyr.feid 4. NescsL rs LrciEs Hort Z. J. g. Reee
This action Of qHi tam under the statute alleging
tha, the Plaintiffs creditors OF Wilson Davidson
and that the Defendants a1eulrntly took from HIM con-
veysnee Of the property DESERVED in the writ for the pur
pose Of deauding the Plaintiff There being no evideBee
eHding to prove joint fraudulent contract upon the part
Of the Defendants the Court directed the Jury 10 Grutn
verdict for The Defendants upon that ground Exceptions
by Plaintiffs.
For Pla., J. E. Bu,ler w C. Bradley and J. d. Brad.
leyi for Defis, } Roberts and O. l. shsner.
State Isaac Pran.
This was an indictment, against the Respondent for oh.
'anng eeruin notes and securities against himself Of Ma.
than Miller, 10 the Of $500 or 5000 BY false
Preenees Il tried the last term Of this Court the
Jury moi agreeing 1t agsiu tried and the Jury re.
turned verdict OF not guilty.
For Prosecutor, Il w. Smith, States Attorney for Re.
sPonden,, Z Kirkland aud c. !. Walker.
n Bhtn,y rs. q. O. DHnAam.
This acton Of indebitable sssumpst 10 recover
for several tons hay and boots shoes sold the
Defendant appeared in the Of the trial. that the
soles question delivered under special contract
aud In exchange for ledger and wsgon no price for any
Of the articles being fted And the Plaintiff commended
that the wagon had been delivered according to the
terms OF the contract The Counsel fof the Defendant re-
quesied the Court charge the Jury that the action could
not be mainsIedhal The declaration should have been
special The Court charged and directed verdict for
the Defendant Plaintiff look exceptions to the charge
For PHI, A. sloddard and ". e. Bradley; for Den.,
Walker q Kellogg.
State RS. PimpfOn.
Indictment for assault and battery. Plea, not guilty
verdict, guilty The Court assessed the fine a, g..
For Prosecutor, r. W. Smith, States Attorney; for Re-
spoodeu, Walker ~ Kellogg.
Raasden 1t al rs. Johnson.
This aeliun Of trespass for taking one yoke Of
The continued during trial, on application
Of Defendant
For PHI, q. II. White and o. L. shsfleri for Det, Rw.
Saith and j. F. BuIler.
RomsdeH Smik.
This action Tor false imprisonment Plea, not
guilty., and special defence That the Imprisonment ehsg
ed by virtue of against the Defendant and an
other, for tiespassng upon the freehold, demanding $50
dana grs-upon which taken Aher the Plaintiff
had made lrma aeis case the Defendant introduced
copy of the original writ, certified by the Justice who u.s.
sued IT, together with the return Of the officer showing the
Of the Plaintiff The Defendant offered to prove that
il by virtue Of such a writ that Plaintiff was az.
rested but by virtue OF demanding 800 damages and
therefore beyond the jurisdiction of the Justice The DE.
PENDANT objected that that fact could be proved by psro
because il would he coniradcting the record The Court
sustained the objection Verdict for Defendant and review
by Plaintiff
For PIT, J. E. Butler and o l.. shnferi for Den, F. H.
White.
This completed the Jury trials which lasted ill Saturday
night of the FIRST week
lcE CREAMs-Thanks 10 G. G. Lawrence, Of the Pho
nix House, lo those delicious Ice Creams They efIeoiu
ally relieved of hl OF the "blue devils which
had been treating oursef for several days Previous
token Of especial regard Tor paying subscribers
We advise all who have for the "genuine article
10 give Mr. l.. a call.