New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1847-11-02

Hurlbut -Iiabeas Corpus Michael Dunn who had en-
listed while 10 state OF intoxcsoo was brought up on
application Of his friends and discharged
superior CouRr-In CHAMBERS Before Judge
Vsndespoel--SttirsH UayraHt An individual who at
Rived Ia this country ow months since from Ensano
with q view, ss alleged To buy a tsrm Al the West
plsoed In the hands OF Messfs. Prime, Ward & hing
1900 fer safe keeping. and went West TO select tue
farm. On his return TO New York be found that the
Arm had failed, leaving bin with but SiO lie then
issued stlwiii warrant against the members of the
firm and they were brought up. Argument was heard
aud the case IL under advisement
CouHr OF COMMON PlKAs-Beiors Judges Ulshoet
far Iasrshsm aud Dsly-D g si ons .-G0hrcrHeW y
BODY w. Havisoa p Ltsc0mb-ln proceedings Tor avs.
possession against tenant In not being able 10 cocet
rent the sttornes for plaintiff. who were successful
claimed full costs Ia the amount due the same as for
debt their bill taxed by Judge Daily al VOL ~
the paymen of which objected 10 and suit brought
Nv the statute 40 the Court said (reiauve 10 SUN
mary proceedings by landlord 10 recover possession
against tenant who does not pay bis remit the prevail
ing party RECEIVERS costs and can maintain an acuon
therefor. Verde, for plaintiff confirmed. ., 49,,
Sapse vs. Jesse C. htRa0-Simisr case, amount snd
decision. The premises In which tho parties resided
were In Twenty -sixthsl -
Ei,,a Vhini,sev Va. Joseph Horie aud Sarah Ann Hey.
,.rrAc,iou against the Justice landlord for
inc tenant from demised premises verdict was rem
dered for plaintiff against both defendants The Court
sad the Of 1876 does not destroy the right OF land
lord 10 tenant where DC cannot cOces hnich'
Judgment for defendants.
Dapid A. Msiss va S,aos b. Bonvd-lt would seem
from lhs letter produced. that Mr. Clock was
authorized 70 act the defendants agent which 10
newly overed evidence NOnsuit set aside aud new
trial granted on payment OF costs d.
Aloa.o b. Lane ads I'm CAdaHoey and Joseph y
MUs Appeal from order allowing the plaintiff 70
proceed and setting aside the nonsnt end subsequent
proceedings ON terms Appeal denied, without costs
Danid Wekr, Il al. vs.. RangdR w. M1uh-lo re-
cover value oi planOtOrlo loaned by Messrs. w 10
Miss s Oaiman at IS per month bat dsirssned upon
and sold for rent due by her father with whom she re
sided 100 Forsythst verdict was Teuderoo Tor ain
tin OF xl60 The Court considers that the affidavit OF
the landlord was detec,ive.-Ncrdet tor plaintiff con
hrmed with costs
Sea5nys Hrecser vs. Card H. Sryk0.-Same Nor
rssoE TAcsas and Ssysr yr-Action OF ejectment rel
alive to property demlsed by Mr. 5 senr but whose n
torest was sold on execution Either party may move
for a argument &c.
Lfsdsley & Cool We Daaiel Drss aud Isaac Nrtga -
Action against the propresors OF the steamboat Hendrix
Hudson 10 So045 being the value OF bundle Of
goods sent IN the n 10 Troy The referee twice re-
ported In favor of defendants the ground ths the
plaintiff did not satisfactorily prove ihs, the package
he'd been delivered board Report Get aside In pay
mept Of costs.
Pace and Porter ads r Ginedis-The most the Cour,
has right to do TANKS 10 10 grant iegned issue 10
Try the alleged fraud Appeal sustained and order TO
vskod but without, costs.
UNirKp STATES CoVKr-Bclore Jads NslsOn. In the
cass OF Charles A. Parsons indicted Ton embexzDg s
from letter directed to Ann N. Parsons snd enveioped
10 C. H. T. but lcft with defendant ui the same name.
special verdict taken f0uncec on the ednlsson that
the defendant received and opened the letter which had
been left with another person iaF him 10 bic absence and
opinion of the Court 10 whether u Gomez within tbs
V,sf Las