New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1847-02-11
Court calendar. ..TnIs DAY.

c,srr,r couRr-Nos 81 70 81 inclusive.
srpypon CouRr-Nos 90, 81, IL. -, o., -, 10 ~
n 100 IN Ils 81 A. a., a. iel 10 49, la3 49, 49,
III l3a. TAO III. AZ - 80 ~.
caSsoS PLyAs-Part Nos. a. o. 80, AZ. o. 90
,oo s3 10 lOs a. Part 2Nos 10. &C. &C. 1876 80 los
nc lss l46, 1885, 30 a, ia -. 50, pa.
couEr on COMMON P1FAs--Beiore Judge Ulsboefer.
RusssH .s166iasa al vs. Charles Stanton e 0i-To re-
cover the amount OF check loaned Mr. Mulligan, one
q the firm Of stanton Co For defence il was shown
that the partnership had been dissolved short time
previous 20 this and advertised. but the law requires
that dissolution special notice of the fact shall be
given the dealers with the firm. which not shown
10 hsTe been done In this case. Verdict for plaintiff
$3.50 the amount and s74 37interest
A g. Sands a Co. VS. dndreU GflbO1leN aud Others 49,
For a quarters rent of premises 100 William-st De
fence eviction account Of the side of the building
heing torn down and a wall erected for a store put mp
b. Mr. Cohen. To meet this clause in the lease per
hitting il was alleged. Verdict for Naturalization
plslniif Messrs. Wetmore and Cowes For defendant
Mr. Blunt
Before Judce Ingraham-ln the suit Christie We Bon
ding Mr. II. Alien appeared for plaintiff, and Messrs.
Brady and Warner for defendant
zhra Reed vs. John " Lat00n-Acton on an admitted
account for about $1,000 held by Mr. r. against Mr La
toon together with smortgagc On the Pearst House,
owned subject to the mortgages, by Mr.. - Defence,
that the clsim had been bought up by Mr.. Daniel 4.
Baldwin an attorney for the sake of suing which is
tary 70 the sisuie and that he is the real plaintiff This
Is denied both to the ownership and Mr.. b. being
lawyer Go be continued l-fOr paintn Messfs jordan
and Barnard for defendant Mr. Jas. T Brady.
CIRcrIr CoUET-Before Judge Edmonds -Pefr Smith
"a Ofsrv Johnston Suit on check fos $1,000 placed
against similar check Of Mr. s. on the Presidential
election Of lsH Defence, that the bet on behalf
Of MI Roe. lmerchant tailor) who offered TO pay the
loss $40 cash and give security for balance but Mr. =
would not sccept H. and round exposing the trans
seton and finally sued tho check. The Jury consider
ing the check 10 have been given wager and cOns-
quenty VOID in law. verdict rendered for defend
sni-for plaintiff Mr. Weloch aud Mr. Tallmsdge; for
defendant Mr.. James NJ Smith Jr
IN Carrie VS.. 4. D. Mach IS C0-To recover hslfths
tmouul u last payment by Philadelphia Insurance Co
70 the brg Tallahassee. owned Jointly by the parties
sbd 10. on the coast of Mexico in 1881 Defence, that
Mr. Spencer of the firm. was specially authorized
10 obtain the money and that he only is liable Verdict
for plaintiff s.f2 26--For plaintiff Mr. Buckham and
M Doyle. For defendants Mr.. Ward and Mr. w. l..
Nesrb
svvrnOR Before Chief Justice Jones john
Mas,vs Harg To obtain the amount of
quantity d passengers tickets Tor persons carried
through 10 Pittsburgh Verdict for plaintiff, s2t6 80
fdplsiahf Mrssrs. Marsh and Sturieyant for defend
ant M Voiee aud Mr.. Blunt.
Before Judge Oakley Jossph CiWhW, We. Robert
tGl'oR-To recover OF the owner Of premises corner
isgh and HOLSTER SITS damages for not fulfilling his
ssfeemen, 10 relation 10 rear premises Verdict for
pxatn 80 and costs-For plaintiff, Mr.. d. w Clarke ;
~ defendant Mr.. Cowdroy and Mr.. Brewster