The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1847-04-21
ALBANY, April 10, ls47.

ALBANY, April 10, ls47.
The Judicial Distrcts-Final Movement in the Senate
Legislative Proceedings
In the Senate this morning. the question: whether the
State shall be divided into judicial districts finally
decided Mr. Johnson on reflection apparently, in
duccd regard his motion made Saturday that the
Senate do adhere" to their non-concurrence in the
amendments of the House to the Senate BILL of
stringent and dangerous character and therefore with
drew it. The effect IL the Senate had resolved to sad-
hers would be to leave the House without any alterna
| tive other than the Senate bill. The motion of Mr.
johnson being withdrawn Mr.. Jones moved that the
Senate do "insis upon their in the
amendments of the House 1t then appeared that the
withdrawal Of Mr.. Johnson's motion above alluded to
simply diplomatic fent designed to draw out the
| motion made by Mr. Jones. Mr.. johnson immediately
do adhere to Its in the amendments
of the House. The ayes and demanded the
motion-they were as follows =
Ayes-Messrs. Barlow, Burnham, Crook, Hand, John
| Nocs-Backus, Beach, Clark Denniston Emmons
Smith. Pan Sehoonhopen-la: wigs in italics
So the Senate refused to adhere"
Mr. w schoosHSvrS .hen moved TO amend the mo-
upon" and inserting the words " reccdc from
The ayes and noes on this motion follows -
Ayes-Messrs. Backus, Beach, Emmons Hard, Rug
| giles, Van schoonhoven-6
Nocs--Messrs. Barlow, Burnham, Clark. Crook Den
nston Hand, Jones Lester, Morris Sanford j. B. Smith
| Talcott, Wheeer-l3.
And thus the refused to reccdc from their ati
tuue OF non-cOncurrcnce.
The question was then taken upon the motion of Mr.
Jones, that the Senate do insist upon their
| currcncc and 1t resulted as follows -
Ayes-Mcssrs. Barlow, Burnham, Crook, Denniston,
Hand Jones' Lester, Norris Sanford, j. d. Smith, Tai
cott Whceler-l2
NoEs-Messrs. Backus, Beach, Emmons Hard, Rug
glcs Van Schoonhovcn-6.
SO the Senate insists upon their concurrence to
the amendments of the House. Every wing voted in
the negative upon this question Among the Senators
who purposcy lodged the vote upon this last important
question. are Ira Harris antrenter, Orvilc Clark
sentative democrat Joshua A. Spencer conservative
whig Stephen C. Johnson anti-ren democrat, and pro-
badly two others. You already advised that
the House, Friday last by vote Of 81 to a. insisted
upon Its amendments the Senate therefore insisted
upon Its non-concurrence with full knowledge that the
pose another Committee of Conference; the Assembly
will not do IT, most assuredly Thus when the Senate
finds IL cannot frighten the House into compliance 1t
will probably propose another Committee Of Conference
The House will probably I" adhere" TO It's amendments
tomorrow.
tending tho time in which Chancellor Waworth may
take the oath Of Office commissioner the code was
pending, Mr.. Walsh, Of New York. made highly
poctical and sarical remarks In opposition to the bill
Mr. w said he glad he did not the chance
lor he seemed to be so very important parsonage.
From what had been said in the House. he inferred that
II tho chancellor did not accept this Office the crops
would fail the earth would TO revove upon its axis
and the angels would stop playing upon their harps-
The chancellor had been in Office thirty years this should
satisfy his official aspirDgs and he should be willing
to retire but he is not he s ambitious 10 I'll two Offices
Mt the same time Mr.. w. deemed his taking second
office a piece of shameless and unbushing enrontery
lie would vote against the bill.
The bill passed-ayes So, noes 90