New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1847-10-04


Law Courts.
st-psKMH CouRr-S pefiai razs The Sspiem Dor Sre-
csl Term Judge Einouis presidios closed on sstur.
d.y After session Of hve weeks during which about
haze hsen decided except some hgs six. which VII
probsblv b disposed Of to-day the Judge has made
IL hi. practice every Monday morning 70 dispose OF 81
the business before him the previous week
The October Special Term begins today Judge I'd
rnoass urasding We understand there vii be- some
900 equity causes the calendar beside special mo.
tions AMI toe Judge has announced that ths montn w"
BE- devoted 10 Calendar Causes except an houf every
morning devoted n spec.s motions
Judge Willard was 20 have held this term and Judse
Eimonis the Circuit Rochester but An exchange hsS
inz been made Judge r. means during the month, 10
Commence the mode Of taking testimony IN equiy
causes prescribed BY the Constitution
UNITED STATES CIRcUrr CoURr-Bsfore Judges Net
SON and Beits-Dscisiou Jordan l.. Mod vs. Paiip
Roiiiars and Un Abreodk-Mo,oni tor Injunction sssias
defendants to restrain them from manufacturing stoves
10 alleged violation OF plaintiffs patent The Cour'
considers hst the patent reissuod By NJ Mot wss tae
same that originally obtained by hin In leJ3 and ID
should BE- protected In H. Whether the invention IS
new ard useful and whether the stoves which the de
feBdants are Masking and vending 81 improvement
are questions of Tact which are OF opinion SAID me
Court should be settled by the sui, pending al law We
unwilling 20 tstarfnn ne them upon the Imperfect and
COZ dieting statement Of facis presented Ia the plead
ing. sn. afiiaviis before We shall postpone. there
fore the Issuing Of an Injunction until ths psienee hiss
established bic riehi at law.
P,ier r. Roach a@iSHss Of Rober. BelL vs. The Stew
boat Josepk r CoF,s The J + {. zone Of the Terry
boat. bet reen NewYork and Fort Lee) was lioeled Tor
bill Of repsirs ordered by Mr. Coffee. IL was defended
by Mr Isaac Newton. who claimed TO have purchased
the bos, and denied that Mr. zach hsi sny len upon
her The s,rc, Court decided in favor OF ina hoei
liant. snd E9pes 10 made. Argument was heard ~
Judge
CorRT OF COMMON PLEAs-B fore Judges ulshoefer
lnzrshsin and sly-D ectsio n s. Cornelius dhso1
vs. Tie Mdyor, Aldermen. Sc of Ma, Yus-Nr. A. ~s'
one Of the City constables In January, 1876 he com
meuce1 suit against the Corporation % recover SIS
H. being fees for serving writs for Mr. stephen am
mons Corporation Attorney, prior 10 October p 1874
GA the trial reccip, in full was exhibited gwen bJ
MIN on the said 2sth October 70 Mr. ssmmons. AMI by
the latter presented and allowed, With others TO the
City Treasurer In November lsiI Mr. Summons at the
time b-ng indebted to the City 500, o. aud Leaving so
g still iae by him Ia tho City after allowing the receipts
A nonsuit was ordered ana motion subsequently, mad,
20 Get uAside Nonsu confirmed with costs. the Cour
considering that Nc 10 giving the receipt to Mr. sam
mons made him his special 10 collect the amount
and he should look 10 Mr. : iHrit.
Sarah NJ GsRnisg I'm Norton and Alfred Roach ads
Sarah d. Cos Action for entering inc boerdinl -hous'
OF plaintiff II Warren st. making noise and carrying
of cortsn household furniture chs'tel mortgage VA
spoken OF In demurrer Judgment Tor defendant on De
murrer.