The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1847-07-03
LAW INTELLIGENCE.

yet recovered pm "ns"
Law Intelligence.
July 2-uSirEp STATES CIRcuIr CouRr-Pres.pt
Judges Nelson and Belts - The Unftd stor, vs. IA
Ship Reeo'der her Cargo Tackle. 4, oad h.- Cv,,,,
Il his was libel filed under the .ct of March is,7 =
After the conclusion of The war IA le5 conv,nten
entered into IN London bew tho Slate 70 y.rn
m.nt and The governmtDtd g. Britain tbe lrprsTsI CO
jet of whc was to regulate the trad. and nfire Of
both countries By that cow ntio ~, Ertitt govern.
m.nt reserved TO Great Britain the o1cufts trade ~
her American and Asistic eooniss eoniune tie asds
Of the United States 10 her European dspsnosroh,-
Very afterwards II found that this exclusion
very materially tended to cripple the trade Of ned
and on the 3D. Of December 1916, President adisop in
his message called the aft' ncn Of Congress the sub
Foreign Relations, Of which The late Mr. ForsytS
was ,hsiImnn That gentleman drew up arepcrt end
IN March ISL! an act Of Congress was psssed declaring
That after the s0th September then next, goods.
wares or merchandise should be imported into the Uni
.sa ssts. rom any foreign port or place except in YES
se OF the nted States, or in such fcreen vessrs
truly or wholly belong citizens or subjects Of IT, or
OF which the goods wares or merchandise the
is a or growth or from which they be Hfse
and cargo being nsbi. to forfeiture This W.. VS.
70 some extent retsliatory act but Mr. Craw-
ford who was then Secretary Of State ieuSd cir
suars to the different collectors of New York Botton,
&c ,nstructng them that the did not contemplate
connnng the Importation Of merchandise the growth
OF manufscture Of any particular locality by the people
OF such locality but that open all The suSscs
or citizens Of the nation however detached its DEEPEN
no %gh, Se to import such goods merchandise
upon up to lsa2 when MIR Forward entered on the du
Ties OF secretary OF State and his attention being called
10 bs SUBJECT he put different construction the act
of 1917 and instructed the collectors to seize apy yee
and cargo that might enter the port Of
what he believed to be the true construction the act
Some time the ship Recorder owned by Messrs Hem
derson, Roydom and Others, Liverpool merchants ar.
rived at this port with cargo, consisting of cases
Of gum u cases Australian gum copa GASES Of asss-
fntda &C., the growth Of the East India colonies Of
instructions seized the and cargo and directed
tue District Attorney to libel her The ground taken By
Mr. Butler u.s. that the prohibits the Importation Of
KOOuS, wares and merchandise
any other than vessels owned by the inhabitants OF the
chandse are the growth or man acture he Therefore
commended that persons residing in England cannot i'm
duce OF the East Indies, although the people Of both
countries are under the executive head or sub
jects of the same government. q ~ Tl-T
Mr. +. B. CurrINc, for claimants, was heard in reply
ana insisted in the hrst place, that the govsrnm 1t
having acted for thirty Of Mr.
under one government however distant and sspsrsted
they might be- and which declared that tho ctisens ana
foreign vessels into the United States 1t Was TOO late
for 1t now to recede from those instructions even II the
wished to give It. Fit susceptible Of such con-
siruction the United States government might With
with cargo of goods manufactured in Scotland or With
the produce Of the Isle Man the islands of Jersey
tain and will not be pretended that the productions
Of these places would DO liable to seizure In this port
though imported in English ships MIR Cutting argued
the case at considerable length insisting the pro-
ducts OF the last named places could be imported in
which part and parcel of the British empire mjeht
| served.
! In CnANcERY, July 2.-Decisions-Before the yios
Chancelor-Demarest Demarest. Decree for dl.
| yorce. -
Claxton VS. Claxton-Same decree
Pamer VS.. Palmeri-Decree for divorce with oesty--
reference as to alimony-complanant have her chill
dren.
Henry vs.. Dunn.-Petition of j. Glare denied. with
taxed costs 49,
Beaumon VS.. Moore.-Motion to dissolve Injunction
Secn matte h.~
tor receiver granted.
watkins vs. Ross-Motion to discharge ne sssst de-
Robinson vs. Leazenbee, &c.-First exception 10 mas
ters report allowed far to adjudge that sale win
compel purchaser to complete title denied with costs t
be taxed as single bill where services were pa pasru
Inc ten per cent to be refunded and ees
Costs TO be paid by tho adult parties Motion Of WIN
H. Jolly infant defendant granted far as to permit
hl1 unless decree Is waved to file original bin in the
McCorker vs. Brady-Order that DE- BITS Oft. Nee ork-
costs to parties, respectively
Brakeman VI. Bogardus Motion to dismiss bill Dc.
MED. without costs 20 either party
Austen vs.. Sackett, Wife and othrrs-p .c-eed that
Mrs sacket, or her trustee, Gil.s h. rutitl,d TO
the whole surplus except that ITS up to the death
OF y II sackett belongs to the general assignee bal
ruptcy. All the exceptions Of the assignee and O.
thompson save the nth overruled without costa to
either party.
Cook and Wife vs. Bamen.n.-Fundin court ordered
TO DC paid to petitioners In full but without prejudice
secor P~l and Hay-Pctition 10 6Ie supple,nentaI
bill. denied with $40 costs.
Day W.. Dsy-Pstition of defendant for further ad-
vance, to enable her to defend suit, denied
Vermilyea vs Curtis. inant appears to be en-
Titled TO the relief sought but there 10 par
Ties Order that suit stand to enable coup
to have trustee appointed for creditors of MITCHELL 90
a. 10 make him n party, on paying the Of the
hearing.
Jones vs. MasonDecded that the former suit in tbis
court by defendant contrasting the will Of father and
the decree thereon are bar to his Of any
suit at law to recover heir against trustees of the
will Injunction continued, aud complanants costs to
Mason vs.. Jones,-Decided that the power given 70
trustees OF Will OF John Mason to increase the annuity
TO complainant does not enable the trustee to rduce
the same and having once increased 10 to the income
eighth OF estate they bound pay itcver
after ut that rate Tbs suit Is Detective for par
ues order That suit stand over, payment of the
costs OF the hearing to enable complainant file gup
Jones VS.. Palmer-Bill dismissed, with costs fff,
Gregory vs. McDermott ct al-Exceptous to report
overruled, except that the costs charges Of eli the
parties whose solicitors the master are to be
paid, and the debts Of Mrs ONe out of residue half
to go to Dillon and wife and half to Eliza McDsrmott
CouRr CALrsDARs-on Tuesday next, July e--Ths
lcndar Of 2sl causes Judge Oakley presiding The nrst
twenty causes not set down, will be on the calendar Of
Tuesday. a-sl
CoMMos PLrAs-Tuesday next, Part ist before Judge
ulshoener Nos io5, 90, 49, loi, 49, 49, o. ~ a. 90
Ola before Judge % Nos aS aSd
All the courts viii open on Monday morning next At
Sg in s a OF ss s
over to Tuesday, without taking up any business
| IL
News FROM HoVDuRAs.-We have file of the
Observer and Gasetfe of Belize, Honduras, up to
the 10Th Of May brought by the brig Telegraph Capt
Young. We ind no political In the papers, but
interesting commercial article in the Observer, from
which make the following extrsct:-- rs~-
The exports Of mahogany for sa6 have exceeded those
of1si5 by 2s49tl superficial feet the total shipments
for so being e9l9507 feet and for ls46 feet
or this quantity s6462 feet shipped to this United
states and the remainder to tho ports OF London and
Liverpool There has been an increase Of 2l2Ssl feet
which was sent TO the American market The total
value Of the exports Of 1896 Qncludng our
limits the property Of our merchants hcre) gives in
crease OF f9l 1851 6 sterling s45 whilst that Of the
imports has fallen Oft 699l Gs. There has also been
material falling OIL In the import and export trade with
the United States: decrease In the value OF
the imports to the amount Of f7,755 Or. ID
and Of the exports El0o4 IS I'D In the former case
occnsoned, doubt. by the great reduction In thu