The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1847-12-28
Law IutallsSanos.


false imprisonment The defendants keep tailoring
establishment In Broadway IL appeared that Mrs
that on the morning Of third of Nav Last IA
the latter coming down her sister handed her
he book which she kept with the defendants, and
qesed her to call at the store and collect the balance
That due her for work Mrs Snyder took the book
aud came down IN Of the stages but the book In
the stage She called however the store mentioned
the circumstance Of her losing the book and asked
they Had any objection to hand her the balance coming
to Mrs Ford her sister The keeper said they had
not took down his book, settled the due which
was So and paid 1t to her Captain Hail. one the de-
fendsnts, was either In the store at the time Mrs
pricing and fitting on coat, and standing within
few feet where she stood After rome time. he came
down TO the book keeper, and told him he liked the
coat and thought he would have It He returned back
to where he was trying put II back the counter
put on his own coat and after returned and cried
out to the bookkseper, that his purse gone The
book keeper asked him where he had left it. He
swered on the counter within two feet Of where Mrs
snyder was standing and again repeated the remark,
that his money was gone The book keeper said to
him, Captain Hall, you must have Loot your money
somewhere else Mr. Lanpher one of the dc sndsnts
then and asked Capt Hall who he suspected had
taken his money sreped he did not know but that he
had it when he into the store and that it was
bookkeeper again asked him where he had been
In the morning; he replied that he had been in tive
places but that he was sure he brought the money into
places and il he could not find it. He Hail.
then went out and Mrs Snyder said sh. would remain
that the person who might happen and the pass book
would to the other for which her sister
and would collect money due at those but that
she would GENE back again In about fifteen minutes
after she left, Captain Hall back aud asked the
bookkeeper where she the latter told him her
and hunt her up" He then went away. and was soon
after followed by the bookksepsr who overlook him at
81 Pauls Church in Brosdway: they then went into
Fulton street where they met Mrs Snyder she spoke
ts=l aud asked Capt Hall il he had found hi, money
Hall replied be had not, and that he had just been look
ing for her. that 1t very strange about the money
and asked her II she would step back the store She
went back with them. Lanphier Hacey, Thompson
fhar
then In the store Hall said he brought the money there
when he came In that there was there but them
selves, and 1t was very strange. Lappher then
up and ssd MIR Hall, that is bold assertion who do
you suspect having taken your monsy'h Hall
he had when he thu the .os. t Lana.
phier said. we don't like to have anything of this
Kind ssschins to . US ill mus. be .s,sshsd and
Thompson said he would be searched Mrs Snyder
said she would be searched Hall then said he would go
to another place, where he had been In the morning
although he confident he brought the money into
the store he then went out and shortly utter return
ed with policeman. After they came In he told the
policeman that he had lost his money and to do his
duty Mrs Snyder stepped up, and said she was will
ling to be searched by either OF their wives 1t O.
nay agreed that che should with MIR Hacsy to his
house in Oak street, and that she would suffer Mrs
Hacey TO search her She accordingly went with Ha-
Mrs Hacey, but nothing found. While they
away Thompson, the book-keeper, observed something
countss He took 4 from where Il rs and Il t t%
out to be Captain Halls purse and money MIR. Hall
came In at the moment the money was given to him
to Mrs Snyder, which he did This the subject OF
the plaintiffs case as detailed by Thompson the do.
PENDANTS book keeper The defence was that it was
inevitable mistake that no force or violence was
used that Mrs Snyder submitted of her accord
be searched and that when the mistake discovered
an ample apology was made that she went away SEEM
ingy satished that at all events Johnson Lapphiere
and Hacey had no concern interest In it except that
lthis morning.. For plaintiffs Messrs Gerard and
Platt; for defendants, Mr. Joseph L. White.
p.er,T T1rsS .,U MeSurnsy Us: Tho'.
value In money Of ten quarter casks Of brandy The
plaintiffs case as stated by counsel is follows-A.
H. Powell, OF the drn Of II Powell Co., the 4th
casks Of brandy in dispute. The plaintiff delivered the
The next morning Mr. McCarty the partner Of Powell
went to MI MAYORS store, told his clerk that he was
one OF the owners Of the brandy and wished to have
The clerk supposng that all right let him have 1t
Mr. Nylor shortly after in and believing that 1t
was surreptitiousy taken, went immediately to the
back to bis own store Subsequently Haskins
suit against Powell & McCarty. MoCarty alons gave
issue execution forhwth Upon this execution the de-
PENDANT as deputy sheriff levied the brandy and took
brandy purchased originally from Haskins by
Powell MoCsrty for $780, for which they gave their
ty came to Haskins and told him they would able
to take 1t but that the brandy in the same con-
dition then that 1t was when they received it, and If he
gave up the note the brandy would be returned Has
kins agreed to McCartys proposal and the brandy was
sent to him next day. aud in day two after Nayor
came with others and forcbly took It away and
lastly that the sale to plaintiff made with vie to
protect the brandy from the creditors Of Powell Sealed
verdict to morrow (this morning) For plant Messra
Allen and Hudson. For defendant Mr. n. B. Blunt
SUPREME CouRr, CHAMpERs Dec 81 Befors Mr.
Justice Jones-Ia Re Madam ReaeH-It WAS stated in
the Herald in the early part Of lest week. that two ap
pcaions were made in this matter-ons TO admit Ma
dam Restel 10 bail In the in which she was con.
vcted in the Court of Sessions, of misdemeanor the
other to the indictment lately found against her
Sessions ma COur of n and
Terminer. His Honor gave his decision this morning
denying the application to admit her to BAIL but granting
the other He made eD order at the time hold
her to bail on the indictment, in sum Of $4,000 The
ball. 1t seems will be given in the of the week
Counr CALrNDAR, Dec. 2s.-Conmon Pieas-lst part
ga Vandervoort vs. the Mayor, 60 SO John Carr VS.
the Dry Dock Methodist Episcopal Church; 81 After
bury VS.. Littell; 81, Ely ct al Cooley ct al; 49,
Hutchinson VS. Lane ct al; 10, Dusenbury vs. Myers;
49, Douglass Horton ct 81 McClea.try vs. Beyane
I'd psrt-4l Brucevs Westervet; IA Badson VS. Utter;
49, Burk vs. Utter so, Bseman, ct al. VS. Hsu1hen s4
Haler vs. Biehn SO, Martin ct al Mccormick Ut al;
80 Sherwood vs. Haunenforch ct AL o. Plat ct al Bag
ley "a, Moselsy vs.. Rshniean; o. Grant Ut al. VS..
Holden. Circuit Conrt-Ths same calendar as yes
terday
Trial an the Cherokee Ndfion.-A trial of consdera-
bic interest vast take place tho 27th Nov In Cana
Kah-lan lita who had been arrested on charge of
having sold as slaves, certain free negroes who have
been taken of South and again sold Our this
subject are very plain, and should the accused be
viced he will doubtless have to abide the
Of their Infringement Cherokee .aduoeoe, Dec Cd.
Breach Of Promiss-In the Common Pleas Court ut
Plymouth, Mass last week, before Judge Werd Betsey
Bradford obtained verdict for $3.50 against John b
Hathaway for breach of promise OF marriage.
Stage Proprtetors Responsible for their Drp1sNirs
Henretta Glenn has recovered damages to the amount
Of $4,000 Of Walker Graham, the proprietor Of stage
line, In the United States Circuit Court for Western
Pennsyvania for injuries she sustained by being upset
In one Of Graham's stages.
New Books.
FRENCH GRAMMAR: CouNr D.LApoRrE-This
Is indeed very valuable book which is written on an
excellent system and will undoubtedly, be appre-
ciattd In our city, as 1t Is already in Boston Nj De