The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1847-02-24
Law Intelligence.

SUPERIOR CouRr, Feb 23-Before Chief Justice Jones
in this which was reported in Yesterdays paper
rendered a verdict for plaintiff for $l2 damages.
This an Of rover o ssa. of
be converted by the defendant The plaintiffs are dry
goods merchants residing in Beaver street, and the de-
fsndant kept millinery store in John street In the
spring Of is4s the defendant purchased quantity Of
credit give collateral paper to be approved Of by the
plaintiffs The goods were delivered bat the plaintiffs
allsg. the defendant did not nor would not give the
insist that the title to the goods vested in him. and
they bring rover to recover their value The
is adjourned to this morning For plantif,N B. Blunt
for defendant, r. N Morrison.
Before Judge vanderpoel -Langiy, ct al, vs. War.
ner-Ths was an action for money had and re-
ceived. The facts are nearly as follows: a judg.
ment WIS obtained against plaintiff in inferior
court he afterwards obtained writ of certorari to
the proceedings into the Superior Court of
this city to have the judgment corrected and
gave notice OF the certorar the judgment was accord
the Court above the parties issued execution and COM
PEELED the plaintiff in the present suit pay the
fence was technical Verdict for tho plaintiff subject to
the opinion of the Court in Banco.
John AZ Delapid vs. John Mairs.-This action
OF repevn The plantinfsent quantity of perfimsry,
consisting Of fancy soaps cologne &C. to be sold
mission. The commission merchant Ssiled and made an
Of his creditors The plsntif subsequently replevined
the property and the present action to test the title of
the parties TO it. The 10 adjourned to this mornn g
For plaintiff Mr. Sherwood and MIR. Willard For defend
ant, Mr. H. Dodge.
CIRouIr COURT Feb. 23-Before Judge Edmonds.-
Edvsrd Ksdrney ps Robert Spiser-This action
OF replsvin, brought by the plaintiff, book binder, to
possession from defendant of quantity of tools
used in the book binding trade alleged to be loaned by
plaintiff to defendant, Who carried the same business
ct ana Pearl street defendant to have their long
az he kept them in good order and in addition he to
do plaintiffs binding and receive certain per centago
therefor each week, the ainG to be at liberty to
claim them at any time In October, l0l4 plaintiff de-
manded return Of the tools, but refused he then
Issued writ of repsvn and repleved part and now
claims the value in damages Of the residue The defence
was that defendant purchased them be paid
for at intervals in work Verdict for plaintiff, finding
the value OF the property repevlsd at $780, and those
not repleved at $500 with cents damages For plain
tin, Stephens and Hoxie for defendant, e. w Niles
CouRr OF OYER AND TEnMIrEh, Feb. 24.-Bcfore Judge
EdmoRds, Aldermen Benson and Cempto1.-TRe People
vs Joseph G. .dshiey-The Court declined yesterday
morning to give any decision the motion made by do
tendanps counsel Monday TO quash the Indictment in
This cause, but referred to the Supreme Court the
May term, for further decision.
CouRr CALKrDAR.--Circtit Cowt-ll, IL, So, Q7o, 10
IS 81, 81, %, o6 IS, &c. lo0 Superior Cowt-6l l3l
~ lOO 3d. H. l02 JOB, %, 1885, l35, &c. I79 ia 1914
l54 1864 1862 g. 81 126 1885 1877 1888, 1885, 100 1871 1914
Common Pleas LIST Par-l7 81, %, as az 81 IS 81 80
Al I'd Psrt-l34 1874 VA 49, 1870 1872 a. 1885, 1888 l9O
70, 1885, 1885, 900, 400 206 20s 40, 60, A, rs.