New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1847-07-30
law Courts.

. corv-tn Chambers-Beforc Judge
ptnond, Babsas C0yuS-IhoHns hfoSh csoihe,
sEer NE understand, by trade sni having WE hhu
~ hn8ren the eldest years OF age) was brought on
80. corpus pursuant 20 Adjournment IRON Tower
-. Island and hs dschAr.e demanded on The GROUND
.h., he rad enlisted while In state OF intoxieailon
Esoob /, Appears enlisted on Tuesday last Jesumo-
va. brought up to shew ,hs, he was intoxicated 90
~, dsv aso on the Sunday and Monday previous nc
rs3ed we believe corner Centre and Peeri sS 10 "
,,lop 10 the discharge Il was said By those VINO sn
listed him. that Keoeh called At ooe OF toe The
r8,s kept in the bArTOor' Centre ~ hoJo.n1s ~
Hsrlern Railroad oico) aud stated that be "en'eo " ~
hat; he stated In snsTcr b question thss CSC Il,
married He was taken 10 the P'n5c pa ~, an
Wsshing,on ~ examined and enIisteu ITO INV
pssr 10 b. intoxicated 1t the time. a., ,e,sroopv
Judge Edmonds took time 10 examine iuo "''"''N''
and will decide the application this iofenOIt
named John Rqs1s D' .,i Of the colebra
al which place be enlisted the hon1ay - ~, "a bi
oon a. he Fourtb Of July was Also DiossD ~ 80 -
discharge dsrnanded from The same caus, a.,
wife and three children, and IS 49, -
V,s c,,,e IN In Efforts 10 procure MS oA.haisei ana
:, e' 49, "a Cooper made the application on her
$500 81 failed however, 10 pfooucc tshniohy OF
~ ting Intoxicated snc Rogers was rtinshoed 10 ihe
Island.
s... cors1-In Chambers-Before Judge
o.ttsrT-af p Bard W J. PlatHy -Stilvell war
rspt 10 resfion horie already referred To- dec
sion In the above case has not been rendered
M,RrSy CouAr-Beiore judge Smith Henry l..
arnhQ q.
for wofs ar labor on what Is termed the Model o.
Eew York" which IL now exhibiting in Philadelphia
te work was done 81 the instance and request Of Mr.
y p Balden. Of DEF. ndant by whom the model was
so 10 and admitted but Il is contended that Mrs b.
4 the owner end her husband deceased, was 50 st
the time and that she hs not being able 10 pay Is
responsible.
The 10 bis testimony stated that he sold the model
10 hs father Mr Janes Beldo previous 10 the death
OF latter which took place In Februaryhsi hs father
had previously mortgage on il for $1,000 ard Mr. Ge-
rard Halock for s. 0O-hst he himself at tbe time the
work done. owner, &c. but he does not know
who lie owner now.
Il stated that the model dovized By deceased
10 Mrs and that she recently csimed 10 be owner oil
when attached Ut Philadelphia for claims Sgainst MI
EP.B Mr. B. stated In bic testimony that hf consider
cd the model 10 be worth $4,000 5000 but At auc
ton il might not bring 5000 The principal defence il
that r. Beden did authorize the work 70 be done
and IA not liable Other testimony was tskeD. Judgment
referred -For PIN Mr.. J. +. Cary for def Mr. T. G
Benedict
Before Judge Waterbury JONES r. Wah9S vs. Elias
e. Dvaks--nr w contracted with AID d. % place Gro
ton pipe In house No Beach u belonging 10 latter
The price be 500 most Of which 1t IS agreed ha'
been paid but Mr.. w. to recover SIS for extr'
work The Judge considered this 10 have been included
in the aud the extra work was said to have beer
charged high. Judgment for plaintiff s. ~.