New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1847-07-29

quences Of the great Hale storm in that State, the
generation Of the Doughfaces is by DO means ex
tinct there.
tTy" The EIDrcss undertakes q reply 10 our arti-
Gle on the divisions Of the Wing party Of our State
but does not oondescend 20 state whether tits will
ing TO submit 70 the next regular Convention OF
Delegates representing the Wings Of this State
the matters in difference, and allow that COnyen-
ton to decide what shall and what shall not be
deemed ground Of exclusion from the councils asd
the support Of the Wing party All we ask is a
fair appeal to the Wing party itself and that bulls
of accommodation uttered in its name shall have
some other sanction or authority than that Of two
or three newspapers Why is it that the Express
X Co can never get State Convention 20 register
their edictsl Why do they not say whether they
mean hereafter TO go into Wing Conventions in or
der 10 carry their points if possible, and, when
overruled there 20 turn against the candidates thus
nominated and endeovor to defeat them? Is this
honorable
The Express proceeds to charge US With " sane
tioning the murder Of Steele, intoxicating princi
plies which make such n murder iustiiiable homi
eide supporting arson. robbery, theft and mid
night plumber" SC. Such charges are easily made
by one as thoroughly INSCRIPTIONS as our adyersa-
nv, who never yet has allowed his readers to see
for themselves what it is that the Anti Renters op
pose or what they demand and who attributes 10
them whatever notions may seem to subserve his
ends Our readers know how unmeasured was
our condemnation Of the killing Of Steele how tho.
rough is our hostility to all boodshed and to all VIC
TO hot ha death pl
Steele was deeply lamented by the Anti Renters
themselves and with obvious reason if they had
regretted it on no other ground than that of ITS in
luence on the popular apprehension oil their cause
That death was a powerful weapon in the hands
of those who wished to stihe oil inquiry into the
Justice and policy of longer egalizing and encour
aging vast sggregaons Of the Soil in the hands OF
any individual, aud they have made the most OF IT.
Our doctrine uniformly was 'Nindicate the SuPre-
macy of the Laws bat do not the less consider
the wisdom aud justice Of any law by which
portion of the People deem themselves oppressed
and injured We have spoken no word inconsis-
tent with this, either in reference to the case Of
Steele the Finkles, or any other as the Express
very well knows though it studiously and stubborn
" conceals the truth from It's readers.
The Express speaks of our speaking our senti-
...cuts on TINS and other subjects,
"under the guse of Wing gsrb. and thus make every
Wing In the Union responsible for them
How so ? We started our own paper. in our
own time and manner aud have continued it with
our own means sustained by the payments Of
those persons. Wing aud otherwise, who have
seen fit to take The Tribune. No Wing Conyen
ton or Committee ever commended it 10 party ia
vor. nor did we ever desire anything OF the kind
How. then, is every Wing in the Union responsi
BILE for what we think and say, any more than for
the conduct Of any Wing backsmiths shop or land.
lord hotoll We protest against doctrines SO sub
versive of all independence in the Press or the
People. The Wing party is n0f responsible for
anything the Express may say, nor yet The Trib
uue. There are lots Of Whig papers that Justify
Slavery, and the Birneyite organs parade their ar
ticles as samples Of Wing doctrine with regard
10 Slavery So of War or anything else on which
the Wing party has no uniformity or peculiarly Of
opinion, and makes no pretence to any. This mat.
ter is really too plain to be argued.
Says the Express in continuation:
But Il social wrongs" trouble you, why do you
not act socially rishi Why MOI, in your profitable
Newspaper carry out your Fourier prneiples and d.
vide with your workmen every Saturday nightt
Now, although Truth would be no less important
because 'oi our uniAithfulness to It's dictates we
have answered this taunt several times already in
our columns. but the answer never reaches the
readers OF the Express. We respectfully request
the Editor to allow 20 answer it thoroughly for
once in his columns promising to publish at equal
length whatever comments he may see tit to ap
pend to our exposition We dislike exceedingly
to seem to vsunt our own fidelity to our convictions
but the course of the Express leaves no slterns
tive. Once for all, we stand ready to answer the
above questions unreservedly, if the Express will
permit us to be heard by its readers and we viii
not occupy a column at fsrthest. Shall we have
the opportunity