The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1847-01-30

ment on the table
Mr. LEAKE inquired whether, by common consent tn,
words or disapprobaton" could not be inserted in The
proyiso after the word Z" appreciation"
The SPEAKER Only by unanimous consent [Cnes Of
g question" u The Clerk will call the roll
The yeas and nays were then taken on the amend
ment as modified, and resulted as follows:
YEAS-Messrs. Atkinson, Bedingcr, Benton, Bggs, ia,
Black. James A. Black Bowdon, Bown, Boyd BGuE
a CHAPMAN, Reuben Chapman, Cobb, Collin CotirJl
Cnlloni CuInmns Daniel, De Mot, Dillingham;, Douglas,
Paran Fckn, Foster, Fries, Carvin, Giles GoodyeaI
Gordon Grover HIamin, Iia,inanson, Hastings Henley
Hunt Charles J; Ingersoli, Jenkins James H. johnson
ntlrew Johnson, George w. Jones, Seabon JONES' Kaut
I.ieon Lumptn, Mclean, McCIcland, McClemand Me-
Daniel, Joseph J; Mcdowell, Mckay, John p Martin
P PoTns ypr r, Perv Phelps Psbnry Rahbn rf Rs
Relic Ritter Roberts, Russell, Sawtele, Sawyer, Scan
mon Alexander ID. Sims, Leonard H. Sims Thon,,
Smith, Robert smith, stanton, sarkweaher S. john
Strong Jacob IhomPsoH) ih"F w nDo W dreMy
NAYS Msfsrs stephen Adams As f,, barring;
Bay Bell Milo" brown, Burlington sonF Ear', w,iamE
Culver Garrett Davis, Delano, Dockey, John III Ewing
Edward H. Ew,ag Gently Graham sa. GEd no Grnpl
w Houston, s, d. Hubbard, Hudson, Washington Hunt
Joseph r.. lngersoll, Daniel T. King, Thomas Burr
Marsh, Miller, MoseIey, Pollock ramsey Rhet Ripley
Julius Rockwell, John A. Rockwell Rnnk, SchencE
Stephens Stewart Suohm, Thibodeaux, Thomasson, Ben
jamin Thompson, Tildep, Toonbs Tr9pbo, Vance, Vim
ton, White, Winthrop, Woodward, and ioung-I0
So the amendment agreed to.
MIR SCHENCk. Mr.. Speakera( confusion.]
The SPEAKER The Chair cannot hear viii the
House please come to order!
Mr. GENTRY Mr.. Speaker, believe--[grea, con.
fusion
The SPEAKER 1t is impossible to hear. The Chair
must insist on the maintenance OF order.
Mr.. GENTRY Believing that the adoption OF the
luton would be insult TO General Taylor and moi
complmen[great confusionl--l therefore move 10 lay
il on the table. Renewed confuson.]
The SPEAKER. The motion is not IN order.
Mr.. DRONGOOLE. move that, by unanimous con.
sent the resolution be referred to select committee
-[cres of no." jim order that it may be put into
some shape which will meet with unanimous approba.
The SPEAKER The motion is not in order The
question is ordering the resolution to be engrossed
Mr.. COLLAMER inquired whether the question could
The SPEAKER. PROFESSIONALLY not The Chair is
certain that, from the organization of the government
question has never been divided on ordering to be
Mr.. WINTHROP understand that the honorable
gentleman from Tennessee, mir CocKEl made motion
TO lay on the table,
Mr.. WINTHROP. understand thatthe Chair decided
that that motion was not in order'
The SPEAKER. The Chair so decided
Mr. WINTHROP Will the Chair state the grounds Of
that decsion'
The SPEAKER The Chair will do So 1t is
not in order to move to lay on the table for the
and seconded on the suspension of the rules, the rules
have been suspended; and in justification of the decision
of the Chair the Chair refers to similar decision last
session.
Mr. DROMGOOLE here rose and made remark no,
audible, on account of the confusion
The SPEAKER. The question is the yeas and
nays on engrossment.
The yeas and nays then ordered, and resulted
100, NAYS Ga.
So the bill was ordered to be engrossed and reada
third time.
.n,p plutio, 1,ir1 ,rhn
the question being upon its passage,
Mr.. MCDOWELL, of Ohio, moved the previous ques.
ton.
Mr. DROMGOOLE asked his friend from Ohio 10
withdraw the motion for moment, in order TO have the
word unanimously stricken out of the joint reso
luton.
Mr. MCDOWELL declined
Mr. GRAHAM moved that the joint resolution be laid
upon the table; which m otion rejected.
The question recurring on the demand for the previous
question, it was seconded, and the main question was
ordered to be putt and being put follows Shall the
joint resolution pass p the yeas and nays demanded
and ordered and, being taken resued-yeas 1903, nays
60, as follows, VIZ:
YEAs-Messrs. Stephen Adams, Anderson Atkinson,
Bowton, Bowlin, Brodhead, William G. Brown Cath.
cart, Reuben Chapman, Chapman, Cobb, Collin, Cu,
Dromgoole Dunlap Edsal, Elicit, Ellsworth, Ermun Fa
ram Foster, Fries, Garvn, Giles, Goodyear, Gordon Gro
kn o"gh G. s Houston f. Hu5 5Sy Hu Uss @
B Hunt, Jenkins, Il; johnson. a. Johnson Geo
Leakc LETTER Leb, LaSere, Ligon, Lumpkn, Mclean,
Mccleand Ms I, Mcdaniel. Joseph Mcdowell,
ter Roberts, Russell, saw!sIlc sawyer seammon, 4.
D. Sims, Leonard H. Sims, Thomas Smith, Robert Smith,
Starkweather st. John Jacob Thompson Thurman Tib-
bats Trsdway, Wentworth Wheaton, Wick, Williams,
Wilmot, Woodwork, and Yost-lO3.
. NAlS-Messrs. Ashmun, Barringer Bell, Milton Brown
Burlington, Burt. John G. Chapman, Cooke, ColIamc,
Crans,on, Culver, G Davis, Deano Dockery John H. Ew
ing, Edwin H. Ewing Gentry Giddings Graham, Order
ton, Samuel d. Hubbard, Hudson, Washington Hunt,
Charles j. lngerso, Joseph r. lngersoll, Daniel 2 King
Thomas Butler King lewis Long MeGaughey Mcllen,
Rockwell, John A. Rockwell Root, Schenck Severance,
Truman Smith, Caleb B. Smith, Stephens, Strohm Ihbo-
deaux, Benjamin Thompson, Tilden, Toombs Tmmbo,
Vance, Vinton, White Winthrop, Woodward, and Young
81
So the Joint resolution passed.
The title having been read
Mr. COOKE moved to amend the the same, by striking
out the word thanks" and substituting therefor the
word censure," to make the title read &c A JOINT
resolution of censure to Major General Taylor, his Off
GERS and men,"
Upon this amendment Mr. COOKE demanded the yeas
and nays which Were ordered; and being taken, re-
sulted-yeas f, nays 1T.
So the proposed amendment to the title was rejected,
and the said title reads as follows Joint resolution
OF thanks to General Taylor, his officers and men,"
by which the JOINT resolution passed: which motion
was negatived.
Mr.. HOPKINS said that the gentleman who moved
the JOINT resolution, Mr. CocKE,] who was present IN
ms seat when the roll was called did not VOTE and he
(Mr desired to know OF the chair whether there was
not rule which rendered it imperative upon gentlemen
in the House at the time of the calling of the roll to
vote.
The SPEAKER replied that there was such rule but
the char had power to enforce the same Upon his
direction the rule was then read by the clerk
CALL INFORMATION
NJ H.