The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1847-10-28
The Chair thought the precedent remarkable a. 4

Il
The Chair thought the precedent remarkably n.d
Mr.. SEYMOUR was unwilling to withdraw the rs,~,,.
ton he believed that gentlemen ready to plss a
NJ the moment IL introduced and that ibsir c
stion mad arisen from the debate which had followed
not from any we'll founded objection 10 the
ifthey would calmly reflect upon the resolut,on W ~
.ney would acquisece In IT, He regretted this
upon the resolution. IL was due to Mr. Britton.
1r Evans moved to lay the resolution on the table
a. thniNoER sueg-sted that IL IL TO DE LARD on
NJ oi, preamble should be attached to it stating
the reasons for doing 80.
Mr. EyAss said that he did because he had doubts
would bring him out (Sensation ~ '''-
Inc CHA,s-lt'n making bad worse He ho' jed the
mover would consent to withdraw the resoutioy 4
nr sHYmoUn still refusing to withdraw 1t,
hev' Dr. ooLrr rose and withdrew his ,ondng Of
The motion lay the resolution on the Ia, s WAS them
put and carried " W." '-''
The house having agreed not to enter tie resolution
on their minutes Judge Chambers sxpre sed the hops
mat Inc reporters present would take notice Of the
proceedings
The committee on canons who were directed to en-
qurs INTO the expediency Of Amending XXI OF
1892 entitled of toe oicas ing OF ministers Of this
church In he churches within the parochia cures OF
other ol-rgymen having repo rted additional section
the subject called up ,nsideraton and after
roessage from the House of Bshopo vas here re-.
ceved stating that they had concurrea IA the amend
mint proposed the canon entitled OF the Remission
and modification of judicial sinten and had passed
the same as amended
The ado bt<d by The concurrent vote NJ
the Two houses, Is as folio Sv6-
% The Remission or Moti fcaion eli Judicial Senfsn
- ces ~ the House Of Lishops
ms bishops OF tbs Oh arch who entitled to seats In
the house of der ramit and
any judicial sentence witch Az have bean i'm nos.d or
nay hereafter Dc lamp ssd by bishops acting collectively
60 judicial tribnna modify the same SO far as to de-
snate precise pc rod OF time or other specific contin
sncy on me ose hrrepeo of which such sentence shall
utterly cease and be OF no further force or effect Pro-
yidei that no e Ith remission or modification shall be-
exesps AZ meeting Of the house of bishops during
the PRESIDING bishop the application of any five bish
object Of the meet lg being given personally tooach
bishop, or feft at his usual place abode provided
mat such rsn,ssoa or be assented to
by number OF said biz hops not less than majority of
the whole number entitled at the time the
house Of bishops; and provided further that nothing
IN this canon shall be understood repeal or alter the
provisions OF canon X&XiX, Of 1882.
Rev Dr. JARVIS said lac had been instructed by the
communities on canons to move that the Epis-
copa vfitatons be laid over to the next Convention
which was agreed to.
the in authorizing the use Of ransations of
the Prayer BOOK did not sanction any inference which
ferred to the committee on the PRAYER Book.
Kew Dfi MEAD, Secretary, moved that the house ap-
point committee to inform the House of Bishops that
the hoAse mad compated its business and ready
adjourn.
sOhe member suggesting that the concurrence of the
hose of delegates woeld be required in the can
o1s which the House of Bishops were acting upon,
Dr. MEAD said his object was not to exclude business
ready did not wish to be detanedb the
House of Bishops.
The motion prevsi ling, DR. VAN INoEN and Mr. BAL
LEY we're appointed committee with instructions to
wait the House OF Bishops inquire whether they
had any communi cation to make to this house for its
action.
Rev. Mr. MASON submitted a report In favor of pro-
curinga translation of the Prayer Book in the Danish
language, and recommending that edition of the
be prepared and pu bishedn the French language
The report accepted
Judge CHAMBERS having just learned that committee
had been appointed to wait upon the House Bishops
ard inquire il they had any business requiring the
very uneourteous He did not see how the House of
Delegates had right to send officer to the House of
Bishops, and say to 'heIn Gentlemen, you are very
lazy, want you to hurry up" He hoped the order
would be reconsidered After farther discussion
the vote to send said committee reconsidered
DR.. MEAD then called up the message from the House
Of Bhops proposing final adjournment this day. (ths
9th Oet.) moved a on tho part OF the
house He thought 1t showed great want of respect
contempt even-to cake no notice of the message
A message FROM the House Of Bishops was here re-
the House of Delegates made to the second
Of the joint committee, entitled or the penalty
Rev De- HAwx Ks moved that oonnmttes of conference
be appointed the part Of eas House OF Deputies to
consi usr and report uPo-. Sle same.
D'.s Hawks Ac5 Jarvis, and Mr.. Wharton were ap-
poi ated on that committee Mr.. Wharton declining,
~ dgs Chambers substituted in his place. Dr..
Flawks eaid that ne in favor Of concurrng with
shS Heure OF Bishops, it would proper that he
should not be appointed that committee The Chair
house then resumed the consideration Of the mes
cage from the House Of Bishops in regard to final ad-
unless the house adjourn ut an earlier pc.
Rod it would adjourn sine die Mt IL O'Clock to
rhurdsy) and that the concurrence OF the House Of
Bishops DO requested to the same The motion was
passed
message was here received from the House Of Bish-
opssiatng that they couourred In appointing commit
tee of the entitled or the penalty
Of suspenson,n and had appointed Bishops JONES' Hop
kline end Lee on the committee.
On motion, the house then took recess until seven
O'Clock
SESSION.
The convention re-assembled at seven O'Clock the
President taking the chair.
The joint committee appointed at the session to
take into consideration the resolutions of the Hon Mr.
Newton, OF Massachusetts, proposing sundry amend.
ents TO the constitution Of the General Theological
Seminary submitted report with the following
lst That the general convention has no right to in
er.re with the already vested rights Of the dioceses Of
ID. That the general convention has not power ex-
cept with the Of the board Of
ana OF the general convention, to alter the
constitution OF the seminary.
30 That the adoption Of Mr.. Newtons Ist I'd, Sd,
and It'll propositions is inexpedient.
9TH. That the committee DEEM IL most expedient to
refer BACK the 4h and 5t propositions to the general
convention, without the Oppression Of any opinion.
the convention as rdbject worthy Of consideration.
MI WILLIAMS, Virginia, moved that the considera-
and that the solutions together with the
Oh R .ne non MIR Newton, be published meanwhile
nsv Dr FORBES moved the adoption Of the resolu-
ti1ns AZ pended TO the report.
Ho sir NrwroN. Of Massachusetts hoped the reso
would be adopted and the subject be disposed of
'st the present convention
The question OF postponement to the next general
convention was then put and carried.
The committee on expenses,to whom was referred the
resurers report then reported that they had audited
the report and found 1t correct The balance remain
ing hands the treasurer S2sl o. Several
quotas remained unpaid, but sufficient funds remained
to pay the s me.
The Secretary then called up the message from the
House of Bishops, directing the Treasurer Of the Con-
venton to furnish the registrar Of the House Of Bishops
the amount necessary to drfray his expenses