The New York herald., 1847-10-17

think even I've times Sometimes have sndsavorsd to
calmly with you upon our dinsrenoss ana nave
say that might afterwards regrst the words
you impute to me presume have used 70 you ana
msny others of similar import not with view to irr
tate annoy but to bring to your mind the necss
sty Of treating kindly My nature Is TO De leo
60 do anything by kind and aectionste treatment even
beyond The bounds that prudence would dictate My
dear Ruth what is your nature! strange compound
much that is good and some III tie tnst Is oao put tps
bad truly buleve is beyond your control what nas
led present difficulties the deprivstons OF my
marital rights (thst which no man will be deprived oD
and my poverty, which would not admit OF my induig.
ius YOU In eysry thing you wished and that should
like TO grant My dear wife forget the past and
mutual Of kindness and affection see II We cannot
regain what have lost In the past by dsuby enjoying
the Let b ssn hsr
and Paris. Mary will then be OF an age that she
should be brought out in the world Ruth think OF
your children and Of their father think OF your
friends think of the people large think OF the oaum-
ny you will have to endure II persist in your deter
and then we win talk upon this matter calmly and deli
berately had been In Manchester on the arrival
was In Paris and received it yesterday morning as it
is cannot leave without sscrncing the interest OF
others to my Own private isslinss which nave mo mo
Gsd grant that may not return to find my house d.
vided against itself Ruth, whatever you do, wherever
YOU 60 shall have . watchful eye you, for love
lam yours, for ever,
g. 3. LfNDE.
put kiss here for you; bessech you to take it,
here also for the children
COMMON Pleas Oct. l5-Bsfore Judge Ulshoeher-
Geo Nichois vs Wm. c. Dnsenbury This was an
action OF covenant upon sealed landlords sgreemen'
between plaintiff and defendant by the terms OF whch
the defendant agreed build and dwelling house
on lot No 2s9K Grand street, by the lat Of MAY lsaS
according to certain plans and specifications Inc de
fendant did not complete tho building until the 37th OF
May when plaintiff took possession and removed into
Ot fancy goods ne paid tSs 70 n'ss the
premises until the middle Of August ls4S ana then re-
moved alleging that the house leaked badly and that
wards Of $1,000 which he sought to recover In this
action. The tried before and verdict rem.
dered for plaintiff for oo Exceptions were taken at
the trial and the verdict afterwards set aside ON
the ground that damages for injury to goods could
ordered new trial On this trial, the Judge charged
that the defendant having pleaded non est tset"M,
merely put tho making Of the deed In Issue and that ns
remit that plaintiff had removed iu consequence OF the
untenantsble condition Of the premises and that the
Jury might allow general damages, the rent he had
paid The jury, however, render,d verdict for de-
fsndant. For plaintiff, Mr., Joseph Blunt and Charles
Rapelye. For defendant, Mr.. Robert +. Winslow.
Der i6-IN BANco Frances Connor,
Geo. W. Matse snd oihsrsThis was an action for as
sault and battery verdict was re dered against shs
the admission Of illegal testimony The question was
argued this term the exceptions The Court In CIV
ing judgment stated that Of the defendants namely
the Chief OF Police was present when the assault
alleged to have been committed and the only EVIL
dence come citing him with it the sending him let
20 create susp,cops the author
letter Mr. Matsel appears TO have acted IN the as
pesrsd before him voluntarily for the purpose Of
examination, he had q right to require her
to remain IL only for examination witness whstheI
he exercised any improper conduct not must be dec
ded another trial appears to us there Is nothing
as the jury have given OH the last trial We think
therefore new trial should be granted New trial or
dsred costs to abide the event
SasueI Thompson, ct al, ads. j. Stokes Dickergon
This was amoton for q new trial made by defendant
counsel upon bill of exceptions The defendants gave
diseharge of plant Ts against William West
jr. and VIM. p Cox. non resident debtors On the
six cents costs The first point was that the plain
tih's demand against Cox did not amount to Sl0o :
The next point that the resident debtor 10,
whom defendant gives his bond 10 not either with oi
without release, competent witness The defsndant'f
also excepted to the Judges charge and that the
against the validity of all the points raised by deen
dants counsel and confirmed the verdict with costs
SUPERIOR CouRT-ln Banoo oo~DeetsonsL'onu y
Livingston jr, vs.. Luther Sohoan-Judsmeh1 Vaca'eu
Jacob Cram vs. VIM H. Moore Order made at Cham
bers set aside without COSTS without prejudice to re-
| new the motion at Chambers
| Bowers VS. Field--Judgment affirmed.
Baly Observation-Disclosures reversed
Doughty ct al VS.. Bunting Judgment reversed
SUPERIOR Covnr, October leIBefors Chief Justio'
an action Of assumpsit similar the OF Maraed
vs. Douglass tried last week, depending on ike stat'
the to take the plaintiffs goods OF mark
et was peremptory and that defendants had in part
assented it, There verdict for plaintiff Tor 0ve
$5000 subject to the opinion Of the Court ON Dill
exceptions.
Before Judge sandford- Oakley vs. HoWldnd .aspim
| waH This action attachment bond enter
ed into by defendants the agents Of Mr. Baker wh'
resides at Trinidad dc Cuba In the West Indies Th'
tried before, an reported s now by oonsen
on trial before Judge san without jury The
WAS not finished when the Court adjourned.
| liz CHAMBERS Oct l6.-Bsfore Judge Vanderpoel-
| Habeas Corpus-A man named O'Neill, who wa
charged with enticipg countryman to gamble will
him. and winning from the countryman $50, at som
hocus ocus game, was arrested yesterday and tempo
rariv confined at the Sd ward station house. He wa
brought before the Judge afterwards and his dis
charge for the ground that he should be eithe
fully committed or discharged On the other side, !
was said the magistrate who held him In custody ha
sent for = material witness and that he had AUTHORITY
to detan him reasonable time to await the arrivs
Of such witness The Judge took the same view, AM
remanded o Neil.