Democratic banner., 1847-03-22

1 ~ 49, - N'''b ~ , = Il - / lS'tf ilt.tii
no ccnsu1e to Gen. Taylor, but thanks lit
stead of cfnsnr". That WIS wl.a, they had
voted; and the reverse OF these PROPOSE
Itious was just what The g~calicman from
Massachusetts AID lis co-opcraturs there
;ta'l voted by Tie series IF votes thew had
ri'cn that day.
Bat things had gone p,,; ma Cen. TAYLOR
retained tie command OF the army. The
"G'ainistrntion had given him their ull:m-
itrd confidence. Th"Yr hqA been 10 act OF
act of unkiudnc ss-nothinr
he av"rFel, up to tlat hnmr, to Justify the
charge. But he gentleman stated another
evidence 4 this hostility. 1t was because
ne found lii the MheNgcac&r If that .4aorn-
M, q tie j.iH-fnrit vas both papers
az Oh! army order revived, prohibiting the
publication Of private letters, and reports,
and 50 foith from the army. 1t seemed that
1t was an army order adopted in 1925, and
had always been IN existence since, but BY
some cause omitted in the publication of
1911. Because that was now rerublished.
and sent forth to the world, the gentleman
discovered a conspiracy, or rather the evil
deiicc OF former conspiracy, to sacrifice
Gen. Taylor. And how did he onnec it
with Gen. Taylor? Why, lie said it was
undoubtedly intended for him. Where was
Tie evidence? What evidence was there
that army order was intended to appIy
to Gen. Taylor? Why, because, he said.
Il letter ofGcn. Taylor had been recently
published which was a violation of that Or
der. Well, if Gen. Taylor had published
2 letter IN violation Of a standing army or
der. WAS il not time that his attention was
TO the fact, and that he was requir-
TO conform; to ;hc regulations of Tic army?
but he said General Taylor did not
tie letter. That was the very
r%ointto which lie Mr.. Douglass, wished to
him, Mr As!.mun. Ii Gen. Taylor
lid not publish the Letter. hv what right did
&c say t~.attle ORDER was intended for him?l
Ike order was intended solely for the man
r,.n violated It. Ii Taylor did not violate
:. by what right did they say 1t was imten-
10 apply to him. If he did vioEAte it,,
it not right that his attention should
IL called to it Aud ii he had violated the
Of lis supariors-wlich SuppusitionI
Eouid be Il al he Lad violated his oatli-al
.rpposilicn that he DIR. D.) repealed and
''' III "''' IA l-Hi.h:j "shru
! '.' "'i'l'''''l"t''t '-"I hol "e"i' hAlul!
wa" ''i1-'iG''ty "a" ~ '"r attention oil
=" ""'''' I" l'' ""''r' '''SI'a" " "l>f'l>SihSI
''a lF"'" tt' Srf' zee ~ 4" violation OF ti'at
.f'.cr would require mere was no at
"'''ll$s iiii,: iIrFc WAS no Gu
'F,t'"'''' % ,hS iiHtn 0f'rr-no ait"SloH
. Gen layi'F-"nu he I -Hr H. ad"pie"
Il" 'NF"A'a'!." Q. Tie gentleman i:oni
"mh's>"'. VIZ. living. ',"t 'hrFc VS. u"
'!I|ncrH ct co:'c u" ll2i tia' ''th. ray
''h.'H'',' or ilI'h"ch' t'at It"'r 10 "rl
'"h!'Shcd.
'4". living her" SAID he wished 10 make
| r,".at!; III : NriAnat'"n' ii G;n Taylor
% iHra",.'as.H M:'',|'' ne WI''chI
~" come 10 IRE "r'.:' 'r",Sl ,t "a" not
''|'u = -. .'p''A'i"n' % III ''"' E'"
e ia" N''''t. " '''' "."'F as ""'" is Il h'
~, "'".'" ''' V'''''''E'm' -,
, 60 I,'" t!'" ~. >''c
''"' = H'a; AYR .'%' N!''''"" ''"tF SCI
""''""s'H !,"' II acc conc '"''' P""!c'
- was 81 gun! ~ Il AZ 'nu "'r''"S FL"-
axe" '''r "i"cF' l"''' Id" ne not lh0i'Sh-
u " IL y" '"r E'"'t, man
i|n' le"nrS['r MH' lie i'1r' II. --c""rS'
" "'"' 1'!"' - "' W
Ter.