Anti-slavery bugle. [volume] (New-Lisbon, Ohio) 1845-1861, 1847-12-10

ing to a totally different transaction, aud tho
objection sustained by the Court.
Mr.. Sttnhcuy then wished TO ask whether
the slaves had been seen since thu door VAS
thus closed behind ttem-to show that tho
obstruction had been tiertual."
This was objected to by counsel for defen-
dant, on the ground that the fleet of the OBJ
struction formed no part ui the cause OF action,
Rich would have been equally completes
whether any ultimate results had been produ-
ced by the interference OF not. The OBJ
lection was sustained, and the question over
ruled.
Mr.. S%tanbnry then wished to put the ques-
ton whether Mr.. Parrish did not afterwards
say that the slaves were that night no longer
to BE- found in his house. Thi, question was
objected to as irrelevant, and pending the de-
cIsi1n regarding IL, the Court adjourned unlil
9 o'clock, Fnday morning.
Friday M,7ning.
The court met pursuant to adjournment,
and permitted Mr.. Stan0eny to ask his ques-
ton.
CoL M1cheU proceeded. After his con.
versatiun, | heard Parish say the slIves left
his house that night. The power Of Attor-
ney under which acted is here. (Ihc pow
er was produced and proved to be authority
to Mitchell to arrest the flgiives.)
Cross-E determination.
had been several times in pursuit Of these
slaves before. Wn-n [ saw Parrish said
nothing about wanting 10 arrest the slaves bo-
fore they came out. NJ Parrish was after
wards called as a witness 10 the Court House
without my consent. ! did not pay much at
trnlion to hat was asked Of him. During
the trials there he made a statement Of " hat
transplred al the gate. / don't know that l
assruted 10 any part Of il; ] certainly did not
to all. | tnlnE Parrish admitted ! had made
the demand, but not that he pushed the wo.
men in The house-'here we dlTrr. lie may
have only waved them In, and immediately
closed The door. At the Court House npth-
ny was Sl'u o. 'a'f U'aI, ana Mr.. P5I-
't'n us'' ~ o'l.' N"'"S III ''e pace OF 'lu-
u'tI J mummy never YEA Hr' harbour
~ an! o"'' fe.Sph '"d' MI afileh I'dd con-
uuc'tu "l"Se' IN d gent euh i'ly Ilannrr-
'''i' ! ""u ~ 'G'eo" 10 eo'"P'i'i "' nun
nor way 'o "1u %T"' as an a'o'ld"h'sI, OCT
=" 4" ." r'V',' mann "a "c ias' 'e''i OF lhls
o'I'' ~ ''No " wan" WIN M b'ioouT'
p" NV ~ a. ~, 1N' 'es""'o"y agreed ana
0'''|' " 9'' ! vas ",""E' "u' we ul5d-
go ~ 0''" P''"us ! was einPI'yeu 10
c"'c" '"'Ne PT''""S "' 81 20 per Gay ana eN-
Pons'S P"'u-'"N' 40 ln''fest IN tlIa SUIT
save w. cS'a"',>u'n'h' 81 '"f FrIhcipie'
""-'eN - D''S"'" t'S''"t' 70 me Suo-
; ~ Il ""o,e - ,d' as REGARDS 'ne 'E.ns-
p,rgi.L NV ~ So ,NJ' ne '"'nNs "''
'''iI" P"'"e" Jane ana Harrison GARRISON,
= '"'' '"r nOusr' Ta,a ne ana
N'N ,' '"0 :, J",'5 '"'N0u ''e i'"'er
I , "I'" Gu tht"n--oGt 'hey nau always
It'V'.I ""o"' '"'' pushing ia o' Tue slaves
:, w U'5 '.n''I>oUo" WI" Jane al mo
e .,,I ~ ", y ".' S"uHS ms
w ''' 'I' Wv "'N o''d u''o'e sh"
w." ~, '"'''" ''' "'"IsS Nt'S''F AN
u,r"' '''''"e' was '''"e'' ~ All 'heSe trans
~,
ms c."a'nS me evidence OF TN plaintiff,
j." enc, '"' ''ut','S o. we utiThu"h1 were
"'" N""'o' az" mo-
Mr.. Beeeher says, on the first Of March he
heard two statements of Mr.. Parrish Of the
transactions at the gate-one al the request
OF Mitchell, oF Sloane hls attorney, whilst
Parrish was under oath. The statement Was
that Mitchell had cnlulred OF Parrish regard
&. Ing Jane and HARRISON Carlson, and had told
he had authority otdk' them away-perhaps
said they were ~s.aves--'nd spoke Of his pow
/ er OF attorney. Parrish replied he would not
D ohJrct or resist out would see tina; they had
r a tar traj, ana II Mitchell could make cut a
/ ieghI i'ght ne should have Them. Mitchell
said he did not wish 10 tIke them away
e W'ihonl-ihat he was a law abiding man,
= lhe woman was brought out first By Parrish
/ and then she brought the hoy. After both
= agreeing lh"t all they wanted was a fair trial,
;, Ml'che'I ana DrisNrlI went away without Ia
d KING or demanding the slaves. Before Par
| rlSh made TINS statement he requested Mitch
Ell TO correct MN II he erred, and Mitchell
agreed TO 90 SO, A''tf Parish mad made his
e statement Mitchell tod hun he had forgotten
l. %oo"' MS N'Sh'ns 10 shake hands with Il I
N nuy' ann l"I''s" men T'l't'd mat Mitchell
F. u"u "es'it" l" Sh4Ne n"hds WIN the hoy, but
ar me hoy shrlnN h''i'"d his Mother, and Par,
IT risl, Sa'd III was necessary 10 shake hands
y WIN me gentleman hiii'Aeli then got uT