The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1847-12-23


desk of this office.
single copies, In wrappers, for mailing, viii DO ready
at the office on Saturday morning.
Law Intelligence.
SUPREME CouRr, IN EauiTY, Dec - Before Judge
Edmonds-G George W. Bruen, Surriror Of Thomas Il.
Smith, Us. John Hone & Song, Errs and snruiuors.
During the years 1928 and 1929 the Of John Hone
Sons and Thomas H. Smith s. Sons had dealings to.
Homes claimed balance of over $3.50 OOO fer which
suit brought In the Superior Court where it was
sent to referees Afor meetings Of the referees
the claim finally compromised by Bruens direct,
ing the referees to report against him the sum Of
$aoo o0e on whioh judgment was entered up against
him: In 1889. that judgment having been paid salts
faction was entered on the record
In ls4, Mr. Brusn fled the bill in this cause claiming
that In that two had occurred In
charging 10 T II Smith Son note of J, Hone & SONS
for which 1t is claimed discounted for
time. The other in charging to T. H. Smith Son the
sum Of $4,000 which ought to have been credited
item For this Of s o. ,aesrss ID sn
since 1886, this suit was brought
Ths case has been on argument before the Judeefor
tree days: Mr. N. D. Elliagwood and Mr.. Evartssfor
the plaintiff, Messrs J. Author, Murray Hoffman aud
Lord for defendants. Judgment reserved.
SUPERIOR CouRr, Dec 22.-Bsfore Judge Sand ford
The Coiiiston Case Tandsrbih ps. The Richmond
the plaintiff in this for $4,000 MI SAMUEL sheI.
White and Mr.. Hearn, for defendants.
Before Judge Oakley Daniel Wiliams vs James B.
street The plaintiff let the house in question by lease
for from the 18th September 1915 at tho yearly
rent Of sa45 payable quarterly in advance. together
with the use Of q steam engine In the Tho de-
fence that the lease rescnded the plaintiff hay
ing eonssntsd that the defendant should assign his In
erest under 1t to Measrs. Hart Hilbert which he
did and the latter entered occupation Of the
premises with the consent of the defendant In regard
to the steam engine the defence that defendant
only to pay for 1t according he It, that no
used only for short time while he occupied the Pre-.
misses Sealed verdict this morning.
Ma
derrick II Miller Winslov L. Whit,ng-This was an
action to recover contribution In 1874 an attachment
COX as non.resident debtor upon which occasion The
plaintiff and defendant bond a. surety for
Wileo. in the penalty Of $lloo, upon which tho at
brought on the bond and judgment obtained against
both parties upon which an execution issued and
the amount evsyed out Of the plaintiff property leav
ing, as he alleged the defendants property untouched
The plaintiff now seeks to from the defendant
half the amonnt levied Adjourned TIL this morning
For plaintiff, r..H. F. Clarke; for defendant Mr. E.
Sanford
GENERAL SESSIONS, Dec 22-Before the Rscor.
der, Aldermen Smith and crolius; John MoKeon Dis.
tct the opening Of the court the trial Of
Mary Reed, Margaret Reed and Dennis VIM, Jr for
receiving stolen goods, was resumed boy named
told him that he had bought rolls of linen of bow
named Patrick Pew for which he paid So At this stage
the proceedings the court directed Mary Reed TO be
discharged from the Indictment as there was no evil
dencs to connect her with the offence The case WAS
then opened by the defence and the was that
the articles alleged to rave been stoen In posses
sion Of Margaret Reed. year before the goods were
stolen. Two females we've produced who to that
mis- Winn guilty and they sentenced to the State
ison for two years and nine hs.
Counr CALENDER FOR THs DAY-Circuit Court No.
50, Ann Moore vs. Albert Comstock 20, Socrates D.
Hall W Herman Swift ct al 80, Carrot M Msybee vs
Geo Cakes Ct al e5H, Robert j. Cheeseboroush VS.
De Slayer 40, John Doe VS. Richard Roe g. Duncan p
Cs% 1nSn.a y, squire Dnses Is Ephsst Emmons
az a |. nm Run IL
ct al 5s, Jared Pratt Robinson; a. John Leeds Va
the Mechanics Fire Insurance Co Of the City Of Newark
Hudson vs. Henry 8. Quaokenboss; ls, Willism Eos.
ter ct al vs.. John snffsn, implicated, &c II, Jonas
wss I smith s' BE- R.T:
st.ltz 80, John Green VS. John Ryder ct al
Sspr, TO- Court Court w VIM Moffstt vs. Isaac H.
Bank 60, Lewis G. Dinant vs. James Coekroft y; Il5,
The MERCHANTS Mutual ms Co Va John Under.
BevlDe ct al, VS. Claudus Dow SO, Thomas Lsqrett
y s John B. Scott g. Harvey Hart VS. Jane. Berthe
Loomis vs. Henry Horton; 426, Martin A Howell vs.
Marinus w Waine 49, Isaac F Snow Carlos Petrie
81! Mathew Joics ct al vs. william Adams a. Robert
vs. Geo 9. Cunningham; 100, Lewis Rogers w. Geo c.
D'Kay; d, Fredk 7. Feet ct al, vs.. VIM. r Taylor,
81, Helen o. olmstead v, Robert Elder 49, john Bro
Yer, kecr, VS. Herman Bernhamsr; 90 VS. Jacob g.
riatsi la2 John Gihon vs. HOra,io Frystt 1873 Ass.-
Lawrencevs Nathan Brown l25, came Va. Geo Dryden;
l26, Josiah Lovettvs The Pelican Mutual Insurance.
company; l27, Maria Banner Samuel Joyce; I2e,
Thomas Otis LIE Roy vs. Robert w. Loeiber; 100, VIII
liam b. Furniss va. Gerard Bancker; TO- Henry ii. Dex
ter vs George Wa.rss; SO, John r. Browne We.
Chauncey Street. 4, The People Of the State Of New
York vs.. Loren Jones' 1t al; q, Samuel Van Benscho-
ten VS. Emmett Rush. ct als rs, Gustavus Sachi vs.
James A. smpson; LOG, William Willis VS. Horace c.
Scott; 65, William O'Brien ct al Charles Is. Fos
wick; 81, Peter j. Il Rohland ct al vs. Charles Johan.
nosberg; 81, The Merchants Mutual Insurance CON-
pany vs.. Reuben Hart Towner; o. The Merchants Mu
tual Insurance Company jeremiah l. Taylor; LOT,
William H. Hermer, ct al. VS. william Weisser; 10s
Common Peas LIST part No. 30, Elisha L Baxter vs.
The Mayor, So; Is, Wm. Snyder and wife vs. John
Johnson ct al 40, Elizabeth Feek VS. David Boyce 6s
David Vandervoort The Mayor. Co.; 90, John Carr
ads The Dry Dock NJ Episcopal Church; 81, Robert
B. Attsrbury VS. James L;te G5 Ann Elisa Fetris w.
Frederick schwstze; 81, Eugene Eley and al vs. James
t. Co ,ey ct al TO- Albert Comstock and al vs. Cas-
per C. Childs; s. Same VS. Hiram Fuller; 90, Same We
WIN Bryant. Second part-.N l6, Catbarina Sure
welt; 90, Samuel McBurney Tho1. f. Fiers; So El-
win Hicks and oil VS. Jonathan d. Wilson; 81. Augustn
w. DAILY VS. Jacob b Curtis 81 John Ferris ct al
Simeon Draper Jr; 3il, Bridget Moher VS. Charles
Lock; 81, Leonard Wytth end 81 Va. Charles c. Flags
and al ~. Robert e. Bell VIM Ellsworth; IA Ran
dopba A Baldwin VS.. James Utter.
SuPREME CoURr THE UNIrXD STATES, Dec a.
No. 8 -Berjam g. Sims II omss Hupdsy. In
error to the Circuit Court United STAYS for Mississippi
Mr. Chief Justice fancy delivered the opinion Of this
court affirming the judgment OF the ead Circuit Corrt
IN this cause, with costs and six per contum damages
No 9--Wn NJ Gwin Of. al VS. c. Il. and A. Barton
spp Mr.. Chief Justice Tsney delivsred the opinion