New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1847-11-18

COMMON PLEAs-Part mos. -, a. ~. II. g. =,
a. g. o. %. g. g. %. Part Nos = 80. Il, So 81
50. s., 90 3d. "a.
Law Courts.
UsIrKp STATES CIRcuTr CoUET--Before Judge
Belts Trial for c0nfniag he Masn-A young man
named Peter de Russia. seamen board the ship
Edwina, tried on charge Of whs, ia called " conn
ming the master that 10, Selling hold Of him during
difficulty between them. II appeared thst early 90.
morning while the vessel was on her voyage from Ham
burg this port. De husss ~ the wheel and the
captsn reproached him for not steering right difficulty
ensUed and grspple occurred In which the prisoner
seized he captain by the throat (Oeng the
IL said aud the captain called 10 the second mate
for assistance. The Jury found the prisoner guilty, but
under the circumstances OF the recommended him
10 the mercy OF the Court For UUited States Mr. Mar
bury for dfdt Mr. Benedict
EnoeaUOriAe 10 make a Rec0h-s seamen recently
belonging TO the chip Mortimer Livingston named VIM.
smith, lat, VIM Smith, %. Geo Freelove John Lewis
John Brown John Peterson and Antonio Fssnaro were
then placed upon trial, charged with endesvorng to
make revolt during the late passage OF the ship from
Liverpool One Of the VIM Smiths shipped At Liver
pool and the other NewYork The charge IL that the
first named Ia the habit OF interfering with the pas
sengers. and was forbidden TO dc Being found In
the mdst Of alteration which occurred between
OF them slterward, the captain ordered him 10
aft but he refused and being powerful man the
officers unable 10 get him AFT aud f6sky be appeal
ed 10 the crew, portion OF whom rescued him-an.
other difficulty took place % brscing the yards hen
the captain and be had alteration and he seized the
captain by the thros, and called him but he also
escaped puDlsnmert on mat occasion as We'll As the
other, There appeared to be deficiency OF testimony
10 ali of the defendants being concerned In the rescue
and the counsel for defence contended that no man
should be considered guilty unless proved TO have been
personally concerned In the set To be continued this
forenOon-For L. :. Mr.. Msrbury and Mr.. Bebee for
dfdts Mr.. Clifford and Mr.. Richardson.
In Chsmbs rs-Before Judge Belts Hdbeas Car
yus- Thomas Ray colored man arrested and In prison
descrter from the schooner Silss Wright hsd
writ Of habeas corpus sued in his behalf and his dis
chsrge demanded the ground that although he placed
bis mark to the shipping articles for ak months be sup
posed be was only 20 go 10 Newbern C. and back the
shipping articles not being read 10 him &c Decision re-
ferVed. For applicant w Jay Haskeii Ess
SUPREME CouRr-s pecisl Term-Before Judge
Edwsrds-D c isions.-Decrees OF divorce were gran.
ted the complaint of Bridget Gva4hfy against Nj.
chad Gra9hiy Edpard Henders0H against Sarah Am
HeadUsoH Charles Srdu0H against India n SnaiiOn
John HarrtnaaR agsns, CatharilC A. Hartman the de.
Ia this case without declaring the child egmAte
the complainant to amend bill II be thinks proper
There various other decisions on exceptions to
masters reports, &c.
In Chsmbers-BeforeJ Judge Edmon3s -Tesiimo.
tai the last two days In the of Prime Ward
Co. the object being In the present inquiry 40 TO the
answer they gave Nj sherman. counsel for the Jefer-
son County Bank when he demanded settlement OF the
claim, sc. The testimony Is important tending 10
show an unjust refusal TO pay, otherwise agrees-
bly, 10 the tenor OF the SCI,
CoURr or COMMON PLEAs-Beiore Judge UlshoeHer
4ffMtT tERNtJ VS.. NanAff M dtrWQ - ne plaintiff
sleges that Mr.. A. agreed sell him house Ia Tenth
e. between Fret and Second avenues and that he Es
elero was 10 90 on placing improvements which he
do but considering the tito defective plaintiff refused
nnsy 10 purchase the house and brings action 10
several hundred dollars said 10 have been aid
on. In Improvements. The claim denied A non.
suit was granted For plaintiff Mr. T. Glover for de-
PENDANT Mr. Nelson.
Before Judge Dsly-JohH Shoemaker Vs. Nallan FrV
To recover damages 90 alleged verbal warranty OF
horse. The proof not being sufficient nonsui, was
ersnted.-For plaintiff SIR. Van Hovenburgh for de.
iendsnt. Mr. Bryan aud Mr.. Levy
In Chambers-Before Judge Daly-Habeas Cor.
pES-Wllism Chapman. young msn Of respectable
connections who enlisted In company with young Pink.
ney discharged by Judge SANFORD day two sg0l
while, As seged IN state Of lnioSicsiion. brought
ny, and his discharge demanded Testimony taken
MAnINK CouKr-B-iore Judge smith TAomas
Bogos SiEelair LiJs0r-Mr b. 10 proprietor OF
hackney coaches In Carlisle 81 and Mr. l. blacksmith
and horse sheer or arrer ia Church a. The sclOn Is
TO recover The value OF horse which is alleged 10 have
died In consequence Of careless shoeng snd Subsequent
improper treatment by defendant ola brother, In Ell
iorts 10 cure The horse alter IL became lame.
Il appeared 10 testimony that the horse being then
sound taken TO the shop Of Mr. L. srd four shoes
pat OF him When the driver returned the same nIgh
ne SD the horse wss ss IN one o bis hOOfs and Mr. l.
wss sent for. The brother u Mr. l. In bis presonce
cut the boot aud wsrm Wsier applied The hoof
nnAlly fell or. aud pOuces applied but ihe horse
died In driving % The nails during the shOeinz
the horse ainchet and u coBienjcd inst the nail then
driven caused the lsrner-ss while the other hand IL
" as averred that the lsn-ness from piece o
wire which had got into he hoof and which taken
out BY Mr. L. brother TIE Court charged that n the
injury done 70 the horse by is being Improperly
shoed. the defendant s sole. lie - also liable should
the Jury consider that he In The habit of practcins
sEeternsry surgeon and attempts - offer bis service.
~ such, although be may rot receive compensation Al
TIE Tine be having right 10 charge Compensation
and the horse died from The unsku treatment Of him
sell or bis ssenl The Jury found verdict for defend
AZ, FOR PHI Mr.. !. Mccarthy and Mr. 5. O'Connor
Tor def. Mr.. Shsher
r. The Boston Wsig. the organ OF the deter.
minedly Anti-War, Anti Slavery Wings OF Massa-
chusetts thus speaks
MK CLAYs PosITIoS-We shall reserve any general
remarks have % make upon the position taken b.
Mr. Clay, until receive f1 and authentic repor, Of
his speech. so far understand the pgrpor of toe
resolutions they cccapy slmos, the identical ground
which this pspor has taken from the oufset-anc the
speech views ire action Of the Wigs IN the House OF
Representatives who voted for the War bill exactly As
viewed H. We are exceedingly grstined In SAILING
this confirmation OF our position from distinguished
Mos, particularly srst1ed 10 know
Ia iron a stakeholder who IL willing 10 sive
weight The objection which make to the prosoel-
ron Of the snd 10 remove Il We are rrjoiced At
al' a. ives "a c0nhdencs that 81 may yet 20 right N
the Unon.