New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-11-04

49,, 49,. - -. $50; ,,sIf h, a. s,o,r Is PRODUCED
Sa5 i, ~ ers o-s signed sp3 exhibited 3. each and
v.r - "a t>isys Who shsIl make careful Ge>crip-
ROW - 70 ,s,s-s. oo.on OF lie document aud by tie
800 ,rbo sSsii bsy. nroduc.. il; II he kuews sign
ybi.h ~. ~ 90 s;Stsatie yyhoIe under penalty OF 81
60 So y,i,s re C,Isrs " *, should have received II
49,, ~ sS--,srty
So 49, ~. ,T.-ssii,-s j., France hv thu. Law And
f,-,ishs, ay.sn.vs evidence OF the authenticity Of the
= '.., ~ =. - !, sb,plS he considered that
- -enri ~ ssr nro--frrs merely relates 10 what
49,. h.f,rs ne Ircsr o; Instruction Il
lAs .aAel 90. y. 80, a., ,S,svS,Siy x-i ,b,
Mere Transcript OF she' pr9SeeN!Ss ,,ys!, -; ~
-: 5,,yf,v " has .y;rr, ss they had gpon which
purpose o. slo",ng ; " ~: 80: S &C :, srys,tr,n
20 atIla'E = -, ,,H,,-;,, ne C;,,r-
--,-r 49,. and S,r,.s ;hra,gh IL Official ehsz-
80 go; =, al 81 s.ssr,isl nsT1;,rlars II II comes
Ne so ,-,,s,v ~ nn- ~ Al Ali events
~. .,,.I,.itr - ,raviahIs ~ my mind th.: IL Is
.t Is & ~ ~; - :, *. CO.., :, mt he prisoner on
- Sfsrrs s,i - .borG h., her. remark ei tAsi when
-sI ,-s,- Tor tr.t ;.sncs he, refused 10 sn,wer sry
on.ons or SION hi. name ana PRODUCED no evidence or
,vitsss m M. bShslf This vSs cora II * te bv the
slyr ,fhs Counsel VIII now proceed 10 examine the
vi,. ~ ~. ,,i,,ss.ss With = view of as.ertaiuirg
,ybasS - ~ -, i,s,- r-,,,a rs b-.n made out
coming within The provision OF The IonVenuon-snd
seNouH Nue-et - s''N'' a. N-S'--e ~ - 49,
VIII infamous pVnt;sullsI+ -, ID =; -, ,;, -,
In France the Charnore de Gonst sards N reiAon' %
me FI4>uHe1 ZIG SAINT a. e' 80 - -, ~.
.ri.-S, =. ~ -, ,s;., ,s tis .Ttv
-; :. 49, -, ~ 80 ~, .,,.r r-,,ri,,., ..s,r,,slly
- 80 r.. - -. - r. So. -. .ri ~. Marty n,
IL t-ih,ra ~ r,ai !, vii aIso he seen that
., ,,. s-,,,, = ,os ,bai - rony of the
, - a, ~, -,,.,j;nss rsi,,,,sI AGAINST ths
eNloeiSe 49, 1,.i ~. EIinS ps-,,r,ey Srssrh on
F, trrr ~ ~ Denjs How, ran. II, then
,iri
INA, sur .ots g. ~, ~ Ia Cnsil hsl ps.sr,i
res 'I t a.; ~, .r;,-,S /, - trni Their.
Upon .ne e; VI IN, .,c, To- C enc, being he
= 10 -, ,.. hsS!!, ,ba I,13rs NJ In.
SSFte VI ;;.-,tI, ~ IN. S,,Ss a,tnrnry,. bu, il
@ ~ - ;r,;sr-S ,,t nss5,,,,h NJ ,h ,aption
- ,Ss,sri.r; o ib ra<ti,nony n states fsc of Itself
> ~ 80. - - s,,r. ,,hs,a srd WINCH
'! ~ ~ .sS - ~. Nsnsat ~ rrr.r lrba evidence, OF
,b here clearly established the nature and char
VIC " " -, -. ~ ,r;sT,s- .,3 he
80 Va :, - ,s i,,r nf ,b.m war, in M.
,rcr .; Niyy.r ybIl acting in Ms capacity As
sIp1oH VI - 49, -. ~, 6,,, ,,r ~
s,otaS AT rs ~ -, sI.E h oS,ceS bis Srsrsss
49, IN which ,br fra6 and cr. Was r..rp.rsied viii
a'- ~ - s - ~, -, ~ ,ss,,,,,,n,, ~. ,,.
piaP u 80 49, ~ Sb,,sr;, ard Who WAS a. b.
svnr. his head Clrrk He SAYS he, wss ernpluyed bv
v,.r,, ac, a. f,Iloys vhsn ,onsc.lr INTO his OF
. * - ~, H., ;,, ~ 49, r,,r, md rr...f,. a.,
ny N.Y. ie oA,u ~ s w. $50, a. cr ,ssbl y, hSr
@ 49,, a. ,si., S ns,i ~ ScbvyarI Who wr,t.
TOW, "ioI. ~ :. ~. le Gu ~ - ,, ~ 1900
by the prisoner decuons hs ne ue W'lhess a0|epe9
a mandi c george >cnhe19ouFhol S'naS au
mat me >a, oaned haG oeen palo IN soou cs,c peNe
by The hand OF witness our OF the money Oh >cliedoou
a. MS verbal mandatory whereas lnfl me- sne
do not Know ScnHrdoourh, anG neHsr saw az
So . 40 , g 90 ar iii I'D n ,i ,nnv 10
atu 'tat Ie '.le " ,i, ~, - =, N-,I
tn sHosvr'oets % u.e * & ~! Tt.~ -
~, Nv , n5 ,yote IN bs ssin4 f,rs w.r.u.ed
aso ac Aio 'e :, sv ~, ,i ,h 49, sni b, tbsv
y s'ereo'yp eu :" az i ' We 80 ~ , -
I'm rI - 80. NJ hi ys,jNTs 90 i,n.d and Witnessed
1 en- $500 81 - ,i 'aa,,,ss ,cbo .;.,rei
,ous q, ; y, 49,, ,.d -, ,a. int the consider
80. J 'r H., rr,sanra nf thes,. witnesses m good
auu "as pau Al ~ p, t - i 80, :, 80" -,
"e".c P,eVes vi pt 49, - a. ~, ;no,,-, ,cJ
uut .ie,@se' ma ~" y, 'an p, - i,7 ,rr he
made the deed III apparent sooa leGat Iorul,, nc
money, or pretended so 20 90 out passcu on the
obligation To some ihird party an III no instance as e
testimony OF M the W Illnesses u 80.
ger the prisoner pay the unfortunate parties 'he .u
amount ou aIways eservng le srea'cI po'T LOU " Si
sell and IN numerous instances; reserN'hs ue "a I
aIuvuu-a IIu'o NE''P'. "'' " i, - - ~.
and swndng could not oe wen lnlsgihd ana carried on
win success wnlcl co9.u ohy pe at',, tei W . IVY i
timaion which Ihs office Of Public Notary was held aud
which II Is supposed could only have Teen given 20 nd
vduals of the highest character and most reproachHhe IN
iegrty, and IN whom The most unlimited confidence y 10 pe
placed and this Is as evident FROM INC evidences ana tcst
muuy Of the witnesses themselves and the manner IN which
they placed themselves unhesahsy N Ms p""er as rs
well known historical iact nave never seen ehal ~
testimony more iul ana coinpee IN Hl us paris earh
OF The thryone witnesse, being Iny ana entirely Goroo
grated IN his statement by the otherad all coming dreoty
within The plan OF operation detailed by me clerk ana en-
poyes OF Metzger leaves no shadow OF DOUBT upon Inc
mind IN respect 10 the guilt OF the accused
These crimes, far the evidences OF the witnesses
show have most OF then oeen prpe'rau sh'e IN uetr
OF the conclusion OF me SohNshuoh-shd IL oy nun wa
wanting ~ the authenticity OF their depositons 20 when
wou.u Ienu a., tnei ~, u. W. M ~ - ~ ~ t,'S5
MAGISTRATE IN case OF ms Shatac'eI ' oot"
6y me production OF one az me very oo curious me,'o''n ~
D"e ~ nc ' ~ t ~; SAe ,. ~ ii n,,h, NJ
clear account ot MS transactions between pnche NO
ary at Bo'eton and MeZger from whom Dinche was TO
negotiate 9ai ana WHO oeis pesehe' WIN tIe , ou.
saon which he was IN favor Of schmedborn and dated
Nov ith 1873 as also WIN pocufnion Tue witness h9d
made before pnche lie declared ha A. 70 the later ne
knew well; but rs 10 the obligation he declared b"
Knew nothing about -and that he received nothing nor
any loan ot money! consideration he!i-thus showing
it manufactured document, which i, j. proved.
made BY Meilger. who received the money from
Scmdbonrn II Is supposed but never paid any ot II
| 10 Klopienstein.
The testimony too OF the witness hariI, VINO details
transaction which took pac. between himself and The prs
oner in APRIL 1875 that being date OF obligation.
which the prisoner obtained from him for ~ 900 francs
der circumstances prec -ely similar those detailed in
tie estinonyc f the thry-ye Witnesses IN the documen
ary evidences the fact too OF his having the prs
pu-r " no resided at that time within mile Sanagui-
mines every day and IN 10 the day France of
hi. han followed him and Traced him through n circui.
ous route In Europe here he passed fictitious
names and unit. his arrival in NswforS leaves
doubt upon my mrd To the intrinsic character OF The
whole evidence being sufficient OF Itself for all purposes,
connected with this preliminary examination and that To
exclude upon any technical inoHnality would be incur
ring responsibility which no Magistrate IN Tue r2hHl
md proper discharge of his duties would be JUSTIFIED IN
assuming
COndering then the evidences against the accused nj
least my duty committing Magistrate IL CON
cerned sufficient themselves 10 govern my acting II only
remains asccrtan whether they sufficient To
establish crime recognized by the Code Criminal OF
France, comprehended b. the teaty Forgery IL Defined
by the Code OF Criminal Instruction, Tile ~ CHAP a.
being in general what Is contrary to lfulh-by rDrds IN
taking false oath IN giving false testimony by jact'
making false weights, &c IN counerteng the hand'
writing the signature Of public or private persons, IN
composing false deeds In altering documents by means
of ensures, additions surcharges SC Forgery IN
writing L. divided INTO principal and Incidental the bat
ter Is the forgery that Is generally ar'ing from an acon