New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-08-31

twas proposed strike out the words, but not 10
exceed the number OF Justices IN the other Districts in
proportion 10 their population so as 10 provide more
1udces FOR the City OF New-lorh TO be elected there
il required in preference to employing the State judi
clary generally.
This produced all argument about lazy judges. Mir
l1pEN spoke rather iavorsbly OF the Newl ork bench
in that respect Mr.. STEPHENS SAID that II the tour al
lot;cd 70 tie Cy could no, do the work Judges rom
other Districts might assist in trying causes Nh RUG
GLES was willing provide thstt should be the duty
OF the Legislature or the Governor TO ASST 70 y York
sufficient number OF the State Judges 10 do the bust
ness IN Ssrcsr
On DIVISION . voted against and Only - 10Y stilSihs
out the above words.
II WA neN, proposed that there nigh; We more than
Judges appointed IN each District II Authorized by
law
holding ;h, Cuur; in Monroe County he found much
business to be done he called the Court al farmers
hours in the morning and in few days got through
with The business Usually Courts meet al IN the
morning and why should bc diteren! IN the cry oil
Newlork lie had been told that IL New.l orS Cty the
Jurics are summoned 10 DC al Court AZ tei-,he Iudse
comes IN 81 Lat three he goes on asain ana me aay
work l. done. Why had farmers 10 begin tae!r "otA
81 daylight, and judges only NJ II And why should
We pass law 70 give Newlor Judges 10 hinder
Jurors witnesses and the public business ana uphold
thls lazy. idlc practice
The motloc was lost
Mr. Srow and NJ. M-lKvIN proposed tina, the Judges
should he elected for twelve years and ~ ineligible
the Bench thereafter
NJ. CHAryIgIp appeared 70 be for rotation in Office
lie had heard that the old supreme Court Spencer
Woodwork &C. the most active political engine IN
the STATE and he had no iouo; OF II whatsoever, They
went through the whole trayersed every pst OF il
and there was one rlsn oa thsi Bench who never
happy unless he WAS meGdus IN poArcs-and. he would
SSk would hH; man. that Judge, mad he enown That he
depended OF, the People Tor reelection have ioeotien
10 which psrtv ne belonged The gentleman from Ei1
had proposed twelve wears As the tenure OF once ne
would FOR t6a-out wanted Judge 70 oe ine!sao!e
III proposed tina, the Judges shall al ,rsvel through
the State before lS Mark ths, read the above s;i
remember Mr. Chshed's remark the other day tina; he
had his steadily upon getting travelling Bench oil
pSrtisans OF his party
Or. w. T.NIoS had heard no good reason why q
Judge who HAD served eight years well ana faithfully 20
the entire satisfaction OF The country and with full
knowledge the Laws should not be reelected ir pre-
ference S;othcr person OF whom the people had Sr
less knowledge Judge could only be reelected by in
spring the people with confidence ms talents and in
,ecry Would il he right rlsce in this Office man
of - snd when his experience : OF consequence
al - 10 send HIM into reurernenti
Mr. Stow asked II public opinion hsd condemned
tho reelection Of Presidents snc whether the reeec
ton OF Judge was Of less conseqnence'
To preven, the reelection OF Judge would be in
.iuce him to lock forward to another Office No pro
poses TO render Judge ineligible to United States Offices
during his tern. OF Office The President hiss vss patron
Rge-,he Judge is 10 have none
The on the election Of Judges for Il years and
strike OUT years storf :Tm, wss As follows
AYIS-Messrs Bergen, Bruce, Caades: Chstseld CLARK
Cook Cornell, Forsyth, Gardner, Hart henbe Kirkland
Ms-vin, Nicholas, OCeror Parish Perkins Riehraene