New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-03-04
Business Notices
TO HIS FRlEND 5,
Fam p n DAY


From r. H. DAY
s The advertisement. OF Charles Goodyear which has
I sppesrad repeatedly IN TIE Tribune and other pa
pers over the rarue III. ", Hartman, and paid for aud
Inserted b. Mr. Goodyear by us direction appear'
rem he vapers which he srco ID tusered, would
to chance -sdder to be impeachment or my
integrity A. III readers Of The Tribune familiar
10 with article referred To- deem Only necessary 10
II publish an slaviJrnshei Voluntarily, by me sumo
l2J W II arrsn before hy NV opponents
Is as their instrument, AMI will trust speak 81 1eJor
- employee en,piogsr
TO ALL WHOM II MAY CONCERN
Southern District or Ner- YORK, 81.
deposrs aud says That he Is acquainted with ,hs
featuring OF Jspsu.gazed leather and cloths that depo.
neu in the year 1915 manufacturing by loAs the
said Japan glazed leather aud cloths. hs Ia said year he
manufactured rubber cloths OF which tho piece marked
No A. and eypith shown. /. sample specimen
of the cloth then manufactured by hun. AID composed
and mtdc up, teporsnt verify believe 81 the follow
ing Ingredients and articles 10 VIII Rubber sulphur and
dry white lead and This depCnent was engaged ~
manufacturing OF the said last mentioned cloths a. eHry
The Summer of 1892 Ana deponeEl SAITH hist between
The piece herewith shown !. specimen. marked No ?
that said cloth composed OF rubber. sulphur, White
And deponent saith ,hst between tho years eore
said manufactured sheet rubber, OF which piece marx
ed No CTS specimen, aud herewith shown; that me
ingredients OF said piece as teponent believes are rub-
bsr sulphur white lead AMI lsrupblsck And deponent
saith, that between the wears aforesaid. he MAINTENANCE
cloth apauued OF ~ hich the exhibit marked No
l. a SAMPLE aud ge tile ingredients and cOulpCs ton
Of The same rubber, sulphur white lead nnd holst
ln.eed OIL all which depoaent manufactured before The
year 1856 ard thar the Invention or combination wac well
heponent ma others, al me tnc ard opponent
saith that part CT maruiacture AMI finishing Of sid
cloth. was III; hghl Of healing sNd cloth Is ovens
bv artificial heat and that said method OF heatng was
year 1885 W HARTMAN.
sworn before me-, ,hs "a September. lsA
$ RAPELYEi. T. : Comuissoner.
Regarding the conflicting testimony Of Horace Cutter
Is see mis- affidavit published by Goodyear also that pub
II .hed by me would appear cenr enough 10 Any man
Is ~hs the crcumsiRnces and connection exi.tiry
70 between Cutler ard Goodyear the time gvea.
20 frankly confess believe Horace Cueris honest
2linending man, and although he is opposed lus
- get fear!essly That Horace Cutter would
Is into court before Judge and Jury and deiber
2: sely The staerent-which his affidavit. recent
. ly put forth by Goodyear, him making and
IS which Is contredicei by his afdsvi, given me be-
Il fore | had seca the one - Goodyear And this afi-
% davit given Eespous= my appeal his
- Justice for guessed Il Goolyea- Instruments had got
nc affidavit from hn, you'd have been one disiorDg
81 this incid-niinto seeming isrepuabe my part
p and mg past experience such rspec! eal rrese1;
53 formation h4s made good S1,e,ser.
"a The fact IT, Cutler entered my employ wiki The foil
81 expectation. II both parties slited moving his
20 family TO New Brunswick, aod continuing IN it, Before
81 entering my employ he did give any inoTms-
any process OF making any hing and did never
any time. my yv0tsmeu workwoUen ON
10 any subject whichever. lie f,i. prGpoI:d to qll
niy eapi"y the day before be- did qn coudr-
u ton at II would pay him ofmoney f2rlaorma-
10 ton OF the process OF making -ueh rubber
Il shoes he had consg ued representing ihst would
- be better hin, Tor connected wih he family
&c yel with the understanding ii s,i required hun TO-
Il would come back witt Ms family. M Cu.leTs 0gyn
4s oath me ard conlrs1icoa by he f5r Good
20 year a. before oh.siaed says
80 Opponent Jartter sa,, that 10 eaiIig sud
81 Day and >ngggtHg ht enpoy tbs dpoent hQdaetr
IS the India Rubber husinessrhst the said Day did
81 not first call thin depoGeu bu hearing that BY the
OF Day engaged IN the manufacture o. Ini!a
30 Rubber a. or near New York Opponent made t- frat
81 advance heretofore stated and sought money
50 out OF ae circumstance OF hs knowledg. Of tne 5g-
g ness
90 Here thea ly position tie only gsln-t NE II
81 Charles Goo1yeat which have sltai b-for-i- rot
a. cuTren, .5uh.' sd :ha abog-J " Hirp,u, who
80 Is now the defender OF CHARLES GooDYEAR-hls
81 name Is put forward by CHARLES GOODYEAR MIN
g sell as his champion.
&c CHARLES GOODYEAR s aa7ear. by ,l4 above,
s. pays tie sIPeHs, and erlp!oy. " HARTMAN 20 say,
So smoug other 'hngy, that BE-, HARMAH avs f5. 20
% GOODYEAR the merit Of th- discovery
10 Probably hundred HAR5lANS nigh, t-, loGnJ 20
Il The whole United S.ses who would 90 ihe thing.
- and permit their 20 be- uSei bal LA, would
- mske the mater eay 4iferent-not-sny
"A ~ The annexed affidavit Of this J W. HARTMAN,
- Lsaea in connection WIKI his previously published f'as.
10 ulen;s, VIII tell is tale sirB gerS who - not knox
II ". HARTMAN sa vel al 90 J. ". HARaiANmby
7a be better known by per,sl Of hs sd7 above which
gJ.W.HARMAS made himself voluntarily sna her tod
different different persons thai IL true and
81 that he could subs!aniaie Ms OWE oath By
% Witnessed And Tai. J. ". HARTMAN hss SAID before
3 made the afHdsvshsi hs hal 1ore what
u a. .ts.-s in Ms affidavit substantially
. Presenting lhs. cGve MADE och no, Sc. %
IS That J. W. Hartman was the inventor ocls Sissgc
81 Rubber shall dispute With sp, hif employer
&c Goodyear, about The mailer.
- I have learned 20 look upon J. ~. EARIAN ass
30 dangerous msc, bat il .e-fa- GOODYEAR has aa9pt-
81 cd ann bi- snd pays lie pagers 20 publish
81 the defence made by HAR3fAN Hue all otter eianp,-
IS snf fed l. the bed tina, ore bulJ w HAR-
81 MAN VIII G.tend u Tor GOODYEAR Then, indeed
IS may well haul OF.
% But before DO word 10 my friends and the pub
81 lie. The exceedingly Iksoe snc necessity
80 which has exposed my name often 20 nav u for
80 he protection OF nights AID business as.aes
100 in saying word u M deiebcs thereon.
lel lei hen, have IN instance resortes: 10
lg2 fAiehood preysrcs.ion II is controversy FOR he
Los defence Of my 5usress egain. III. combined oce Of
oi numerous bad men, OF teFen, professions IN their e.
5 forts TO uphold Of toe supendous suds Of the
ee times.
l07 Again have supported ard proven every statement
ice omy own Of which ny opponents have given sem.
100 olauce OF diproof b any other authority har .ser
lilo own assertions, or the contemplate qbbln
III As my opponents have laid especial upon TIE
III meats made by regarding he case Washington
Us say In particular reference tha;n statement, ARE
III TRUE and repeat ny previous charge that ,hcs7 who
lis die publish deliberate false statements did publsh
Lis statements false by indzcou papers and other
III ces and charge The creatures Of Goodyear ard his
lla coaedess.es 10 cave been the Information
lls REPEAT that xhat publi<d e connection Ipu5
10 !l<a strety, ezsy md 10 seal.y TRUE and no