Richmond daily Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1842-1861, 1846-05-15
NIRGINIA 40 a superior Court oi Chanee.

~
y for the Richmond Circuit hell Capitol CITY
Of Richmond Monday March IOtb IsIS;
Ca ter Barton and Mary g. his wife, Ihas
Robert Heay a. administrator Of Samuel w IAyre deed al
Administrator DE- bonis Of Peter Kemp deed and admins
Thomas Tec deed Chaunesy g. Ghs~o administrators
OF Richard ~ segar deed who sheriff Of MddeeI county
Street late shenn Of hddeeI and such committee -
minator de bon Of the sad Henry Herman, deed Fan
wen Administrative Of Sterling seawe John Gau Joseph ~ Go
and Thomas ~ Perkins Of the last will and saen
Of Price Perkins deed Sheriff OF the county Of Buekhfhan
and as such administrator with the viii anneTed Of Robert Yves
deed, John w. West, administrator with the wi
annexed of the aid Robert West deed Thomas West Rob Chew
efeeu'of Chew who wa'eEeeuI Of Hannah Kemp Gee
andJee snead Sheriff Of the county of Henreo and administered
deed Dcns
This cause phintfs APPEAR to proceed.
against the dsendanu Fnncis Bowen and Elizabeth O. bis vii
and Thomas West who are out Of Commonwealth In the mod
prescribed BY law against absent defendants they sin falling 70
and this day upon oEnab
and EXHIBITS herewith hird, thereto defenda
Robert Heaey administrator Of samuel Layre, deed 40
niralor De bonis Of ree Kemp deed and adinis
tor of Thomas Triee decd and the exhibits aed
he answer OF Richard NJ svEar his NE adniaiof
heny Hehrman deed and repeaons n the said aners %
the sad original bn confessed oer defend
shove named the hf amended bill Of the plaintiff. aiken
confessed aio an tho defendants above named and the SEQ
amended t Of the plaintiffs taken for confessed the Def
dant fhomi Street. administrator as Aforesaid Of Henry HeeH
was argued by Couse Whecupon NJ the instance
the Cuuns for tho plaintiff doth order that the
referred 70 ono of the commissioners Of The Court who h direct
I gvns due notice to the parties to state and setus the io
ing accounts and report any matt
spesy stated deemed pertinent BY himself or which may y
|
la-hn account o. the administration of Samuel w Laye
on ue esae 81 Philip T. Gynes deed In taking which ae'o
e commissioner shan distinguish possible between any dova
Wv nued ~ the sah Layfe administrator, before the ~
ay oi hsEusit eighteen hundred and nine and such a.
have been committed ancr that date.
Ndy-heeounts % the adminsti OF the defendant ha
THOMAS Thee.
Sdy-The account % the administration Of Richard ~
ron ne estate Of Henry Hsfman and account o. the ~
sauon ofChauncey O. Gtwod upon The estate % The mid "
Scaa and an account ~ The ~ ne aid HeB We
man under The control o. The q Mddescr she's
how much thereof Liable psntifs.
fhiy-An accoun ~ the o. Peter Kemp which
The hands r Hannah Kemp and
court0 Of ne estate % annsh
John Chew her davisse sbewIpa how
tste- have been adninstercd disposed o.
shiY-An o. Of ,he estate Of
Wes dscd BY Price Perns shsrG Of Buckingham county
/ atUinstratof.
e,h5-hn account q the administration q estate q
Chew deed, BY Robcu Chew, nj.
| a CopY-Tens
| N. ?. HOWARD. Ce
| Corhmissioucr's office,
| RIoHroSD, lfth May, 40
| OF liz pursuance of the above order Of ca
the pauiss named and Interested eau.s are hereby "a
| that stall commence 70 dutsu enjon~d on
MONDAY The feth day Of JUNE neu ensulns A. 10 oeo
NJ vhsu they are required In lhis once duiy ore
viii such accounts evidence and coeuments wm enab
fal@ hose duties and rspou hsrshom.