Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1846-03-05
.porctgM EmtrlltNrNrc.
FURTHER EXTRACTS BY TIE CAMBRIA


Looking toe London papers received by the LAST
sieam-paeket. most oil the contents OF which, far Ms
they particularly interest the lulled States, have al
ready nnnd their way ino the prins this side o The
water, there Yet some thugs which have escaped
lhelr scrutiny Among them IL the following passage
from speech oil Loud Ashhutton-thal clear sghled
and sagacluus siaesmaG-vety remarkably confirming
What we had occasion Yesterday Ia tenaIk nrun the
probable etrc on nur agriculture ui The repeal al ih,
Brush Ceru>lswS:
/ "Prdecton had existed in England from the days NJ
the fanlarenets, Whit Tie mhue lnr 81 country op
pnsiie. the continent ffauce belgium. Holland,
and Pus>a--ndted, almost every country IN the
World. m9narchcat Euwpr we'll as republican Amer
les, had lis protective laws aud regulations. Tue mo-
bile lord then ed on the speech o Lord John
Russell. recently delivered at Glasgow. lie dennd
thai noble birds stalemen, thai England he worst
cultivated country III the word, Within his Lord
Ashhnfuns) recollection the produce u the soil III his
neghborhaoj he'd augmented fifty per cent. aud he
wa certain that NJ branch OF industry md advanced
nov more steadily advancing than the cultivation
oI the soil. I.ud John Russell had drawn charming
picture OF Two najlons oi the Kindred Eng land
and Amt rica-1he inmer clothing the latter. and the
latter feeding the former. Now he O,ord Ashburlon)
was lar ron saving any dung against the people al A.
merlca, with whum he had had the advantage of negu-
atlon the part Of this country. He believed there
we're many most honorable amongst them,
and 0r himself he saw no ground tH aprreheudme that
there Was the least likelihood OF disturbance between
the Two countries. lie believed that the good al
the county world oyepower any disposition OF that
KIND but must mol toreet there two parties 10
agreement; and What II America should refuse To take
our clothing. well knowing nj the time they did that
we were compelled by the circumstances OF our post
ton, 10 take their conf This was an illustration al
the case, hrb had been often put, Of the danger of
depenrg On foreign countries for the supply food
Why, the very last time had differences with
merlca She laid an embargo upon and shut her purls
ganst Blush shipping; srd II was clear tia, IN The
event oi recurrence Of difficulties, her first step would
be again 10 shut her ports against u.s. which case the
supply from America would undoubtedly fail But the
supply au,t npt BIZ expected from America; ard We
could not have better proof Of this than The Tact TINT
at this moment American could come here thrunph
thnada, Al duly ol fopr diHHe, sud Vt # the re-
drns We're examined il eo,H be faUpd that niae ienfhs
ofhe foreign corn N England Wds from The Baltic,
M0H2h the duty on corn from lis sLor,s tca, rfTLEN
sHiLLiNtsa quarter. This WAS entirely owing 10 the
low prlce oil labor in the north Of Europe"
la the last Nirginan published an account of the
speech of NJ Guizit against the United States and the
course OF France in lhe present controversy Of s coan
try with England and this morning We follow il up
with the remarks Of NJ. Theirs and others siding with
us in our controversy. Those against in the French
Chanbcts, a, present number about sc majority
TRANSLATED FROM TIE PARIS JOUR
NAL lie COMMERCE" OF FEBRUARY
THE lSr
Mr.. Berger has delivered in supnor, Of his amend
ment VIGOROUS speech which has produced lively
impression. He opened the subject rrary by quoting
the last nessage ot The President Of the United States
! The affair o Oregon is imminent. The convention of
1927, Which proungs the treaty Of 1873 relative the
possession IT the disputed territory Will shuy be de-
nouncsd the question solution spunpr OF
ater hele dangerous contingencies Inch France
may be called upon To act part, 1t Is his part that
Nr. Berger would wish 10 determine by his amend
ment.
The Minister Of Foreign 4 irs hsd declard. in the
general discussion, that bal he had done the qnes.
lion OF Texas hui the first step the he
ieuded 10 iollow constantly With the United
States; now tbs ronrse was detestable aud not
d ifticnlt Tor Mr Btrryer to prove it.
Why did the French Government lea rne Itself with
! England against The United States respecting HE sn.
nexalion Of 1txas2 Mr. Gnizit has put suh The pro,
tecon OF with his Republic the defence
of the independence of Mexico, the supp OF the Amer,
lean equilibrium. Messrs l'hers and 6aut took up1n
themselves reduce his reasons 10 nothing Thee is
but one reasln hch had decided the French Cabinet
on this Occasiuns entire c0nde scenSon Tor Englan'
The proof Of this be found In the diplomatic papers.
1t was only in January, lSii, upon Communication
from Lord C0wey, that the Minister Of Forean Affairs
gave instructions To agents IN America exactly con.
iurmabe 10 those the Blush Government had srR, To
theirs Now that the Oregon question presents Itself,
what do thry2
Here again. as in the STAR Of Texas, as in every
thing lave any business with IN every quarter OF
the globe all Yields 10 BRUSH interests. w hat s1ni-
ps said Mr.. Brrrye, tins declaration Of neutrality. at
once premature and unreasonable, made by lbe Minister
OF f. rrrr Aalrs before the conflict beglns2 is not
a suri OF he.IlItv To the United States! What more
cnnIi we do against ihcm? Certainty, we know very
well that France would never declare against The
tnlled States touching such question: 1t would be
Madness In declaring herself neutral then, she has
given the American Union The only hostile demon
siralinn that she possibly cond make. The neutrality
spoken Of must be defined. Is II such neutrality as the
English aow-to visit vessels aud recognise false
blorades? France ought al least IN declaring her neu-
ifay To let II be understood that she intends To MAIN
tain the great principles Of maritime fteedom she has
Ways defended. This the aim OF Mr.. Berger in
his amendment. Il is moi that he hcieves in wal
between England and the United States; England vii
give up Ia The United States she always has dune
fur thirty years. Bnt since neutrality has been pro-
claimed, must at the same time proclaim The condl'
tinns which is expected that Will be understood
and respected.
In The Chamber on the 20th. the same subject wa
brought up by NJ ThIers. lie begun by saying tia
the annexation cf Texas had been consummacd, great
ly to The dissatisfaction Of England as II appeared -
and als, judging from The course Of the Ministry, It
the dissatisfaction Of France. After quoting The Ian
quspe of the Message npon the subject, he said tia
while France exchanging words of the most lively
intimacy with ENGLAND. her relations with America
were becoming if not hostile less friendly This
der any crrus he should regret: under existing
circumstances he thought 1t most unfortunate. lie
feared the conduct Of France in regard to the very
Gus dispute between England and America, had no
been sufficiently crcumspect; aud what MAIDS The mat
Ter sill more serious the theory put forth by t.,
Minister OF Foreign Affairs. He alluded 10 The matte
now he said moi for The sake OF opposition. but TO pro
woke from the Chamber. what he called The clearing
up of the serious question which might be brought
forward during the session.
Texas he sind. was OF great importance TO the Un-