Virginia free press. (Charlestown, Va. [W. Va.]) 1832-1916, 1846-11-19


Never wa5 party pm 70 greater shifts span
vkloa to hings an eIsass fSs tslssi. has are
ibs Loeefseos, for ibsir REQ, shd dsfss, IN Nee |
York Atone sIns !, 1, shi-, sad smother that.
which procured Tie eleetsa u Yssss, the WI
ssndiaate fst Gsr.tpor, The Asis itsa, move
neni has btea ssfz.a upon with siiiily. and
they il seems are lphsys tbs credit 4 stunning
he iablss.f The Bsiimere PlIiet has isag
article, SOts bsajy u Mssls, su'ef faesa and
figures. which shos Ihat Mr Ysuns might have
been elected vishosi single Aati. Rsat vote i
those eoah,iss shsrs this party prevail.
The esu1iiss mo-, sgeeed BY ibis isnaeret,
are Albany, Rensselaer,, Columbia, Greene,
schObsrie. ulsist. Delaware, and saIlissn,
which nov give Young soubinsd majority Or
1854. Mr.. Polk rsesiEed 10 ihoss counliss,
eombineb, msj.rtJ or 1854, which sddsd "a
NJ. ., show Wig gain Or 9,7oe. Az lhs.
majority 81 Mr.. Yeusg l. over 10000. il is per-
fseIiy clear 8hsi be had no need 10 gsia sios 4
vote 10 the Anii-Rent eisirieis 70 have elecleo
him. n ihe vote hsd STOOD ia thu dislfie. - Il
was Al tie Presidential election, Mr., Yo1ns
would sill haze majority Of s94 and d course
slectiog hin, had their been no such thing asap
Anti-Rent party. But the .coBhec.ion OF Ms.
Youhgs name with Anti Ren,ism, had the efFeet
Of reducing his rote 10 other sections Of the
State.
10 the city Of New York the following saieisl
vote will show how seriously affected hIr.
Young was BY this connection:
For Coysrnor-- Weight. IL r! g. s6s
u AT0
Lieut. Goyernor-t;srdiner, L. r. q ,9s5
II Pish. Wing 1851
Ills here asen thai Mr, Young fell behind Mr..
Fish ,09s yotes--and thar Wright run ahead ci
Gardner 5o9 Ioles. II isvery clear from ihi,tha;
Nj. Young .losl 1908 Wing votes in Nov Yerk
city, Of which COZ usrs given to Wright Nov,
IL We deduct fom Mr.. wtish,,s whole VOTE, a,
given above, these GOD wing votes, and add to
thai # Mr.. Young, ihe 1898 which be lost ia
New York CRY, We have the following resali:
Nj. Youpg's vote, as given above, and es,ima,
ting his psll in lhs Anti, Rent district 10 be
What The Wing vots was 10 1914, IS 1913;
To this add the yotss he lost in New
/ York city, on account efNAp.I-Rent 1906
NJ II -
Add he -. isIsa:
Mt. wrisAr' whols vote. sgiIen
above, is 1854
Deduct Wing vote received in +
New York city COO
Ard he has y 1893;
/
which leaves q Wing majority Of $50
4 So That, had there have besnIno such thing a
Anti Reutism, the Wings would have cSrriet
the State, and elected all their candidates !by o
yer 26oo majority.
There was, however, another element Aeoa
,isues The Psuiel,) in this canvass (Nattvism
which drew OF from the Wing psrty st,ers
theusard votes. In the city ef New York thI
vo,e for This party vas 4,ol57-of ihe,e il is
very fair estimate TO claim tina, 5000 Of lher
we're wings and 1000 Locos.-- Had these vote
been cas-, between the two great parties, -ih,
WING msjority you'll have been increased tW,
thousani that Is, ii would hays been about a.,
coo in the Stale.
Thus We think ithas been completely Demon.
s,rated thatihe "ToEef Of Strength" the sCa,o'
Of bis age, silas Wright. was beaten for Cover.
nof In New York, not BY Anti. Renters but aione