True Democrat. (Paulding, Miss.) 1845-18??, 1846-05-13
Sno,.iF,s Sale of Judgments.

Fees and for other purposes" passed by
the legislature of the State OF MISSISSIPPI,
and approved February 24th, lS44, ana
in virtue of sundry executions TO l'le VI,
rected from the Circuit Court oil Newton
county, Mississippi, in pursuance oil salu
act I will proceed to sell at public auction
to the highest bidder for cash, at The Court
House door of said county, on the 4lh
MONDAYI MARCH, 1916, the follow,
ing indomcnts, 10 satisfy the Clerks ana
S6e1iT's fees. &c, due thereon, to-wlt:
n Mofett VS.. Levi Mcdaniel and Geo.
w Rovd: Judgment, 23d Oct. 1888, for
ZIG 0S; Clerks fees IS 80, Sheriff S DO
So rs; jury tax So. -,
NJ. & NJ. Carleton vs.. James Z. M,La al
rim: Judgment 23d April, 1898, S293 o.
Clerks fees IS 90, SherlfI'S IS 70, jury
tax SO. -, NIL.
Judgment against delt goth Oct. 1899 for
Sl65 Ia; Clerks and Sherih's fees Sl2;
jury tax S3. -
Albert G. Teas vs.. ]. II. Parker; Judg'
mont aoainst def. 18th December, 1911,
Sl05 80: Clerks and Sherlft's fees 50 W;
jury tax So. c., N
Mary Hargrove, Ext. VS.. Samuel NJ
Turner: Judgment against def. Dec. llth,
1910. SiI4I % and cost; Clerks and
Shenffs fees ST 81 1-2; jury tax oo.
Mary Hargove, Ext, VS.. 5. 5. Schue-
make: Judgment against dcIt. Dec. llth,
1911. $50 Al and COST Clerks and She
riffs fees $l3 81; jury tax ) %
Albert G.. Teas VS.. Michael Thomas;
indictment against def. April %, 1889, for
GI22 II and costs; Clerks and Sheriff S
fees SI1 80; jury tax ) 0O.
Mary Hargrove, EX, VS.. Samnol Nj.
Turner judgment against def. Dec. l1th,
1910. 1862 IS and costs; Clerks and She
riffs fees $l1 S7;jury tax 3 90.
William Rhode VS.. Thomas Blake,
Judgment against def. Oct. 2Sth, 1889
SOS 16 and cost; Clerks and Sherllfs fees
Sll 81; jury tax 3 90.
Solomon Sutton VS. Joshua Collins; judg-
ment against def, January 3D., 1888, SOB
90 3 4 and cost clerks and shentIS lees
Sl4 62; jury tax, 90,
Anthony Stamps VS. Daniel w. Sandel;
Judgment against def, April 24th, 1888,
SOU w anu Coo'j CiN' . ''iN
$ll 90; jury tax 3 90.
AW Finley VS. James J Nichols; iddg-
ment against def, Jan Cd, 1888, So %
and cost: clerks aud sherlll7S fees $l2 81:
jury tax, 300.
DIN Russell VS. Lttleton Crabtree; iudg-
ment against def, Dec ID, 1910, SOB Vi
and cost; clerks and sherill's $l5 81; jury
tax, 3 90.
BIedsoe & Samuel VS. A G & II Teas;
Judgment against def, April 23d, 1888,
40 Is and cost; clerks and Sherltts fees
$40 IL; jury tax, 300
Bovd g. Mcdaniel VS. James Nichols,
Judgment against def, October %, 1888,
s5l 81 and cost; clerks and sherlltS fees
SI2 10; jury tax, B 90.
James Murray VS. Daniel p Johnston;
Judgment against def, October 22, 1888,
SS5 &c and cost; clerks and shCrltiS fees
SI4 90; jury tax 3 90.
John Allen VS. William w Therill;
Judgment against def, June |, 1912, $50
and cost; clerks and sherills fees, Sll 20;
jury tax, 90.
JC& &C. rnett VS. Solomon Johnson;
Judgment against def, April 23d, 1889,
SI20 81 and cost; clerks and sherIitS fees
II G2; jury tax, 3 CO.
John g Arnett VS. Solomon Johnson;
Judgment against def, April %, 1889,
1913 81 and cost; clerks and shcrlllS fees
Sll 62; jury tax, 3 90
UB Brewster VS. Albert G. Teas; iudg-
ment against def, Oct 3, 1889, S3027 So
and cost: clerks and sheriTS fees Sl2 ~;
jury tax, 3 CO.
John II Owen e. John c Thomas VS.
Lodowck Robson; judgment against deit
Oct 90, 1889, So 90 and costs; clerks
aud sherilrs fees SIS 62; jury tax, 3 90.
JE&H Calhoun VS. George G IIamlett;
Judgment against def, Dec 18th, $40,
S5l2 80 and cost; clerks and sherifls fees
$40 81; jury tax, ) 90.
Samuel Compton Smith VS. Andrew J.
Melowne; Judgment against def, Oct 20,
1899. $50 90 aud cost; clerks and sherlils
fees SI2 IS; jury tax, 3 90.
WP Jones, use, &c. VS. A B DUMMY;
Judgment against def, October 30, 1889,
5000 q and cost; clerks and shcriils fees
SI2 80; jury tax, 3 90.
Nathan II Gatin VS. BQuimby; judy
mcnt against def, Oct 90, 1899, Sl4O 81
and cost: clerks and shcrllls fees SlI 90;
jury tax, 3 90.
Word. Porter & Co. vs. George l. VIII
liams: judgment against def, Oct p, 1889,
4 Il