New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-02-28

"Tnee has been no trial decision 10 any Court al
Washington, in which connected In any way 'ih
the rubber business, had an interest"
(Signedl II. II. DAY
In the Tribune he also says.
The paert Office has not decided thai Charles Goodyear
was the Inventor The machine which Solomon C. War
is Ginning patent for"
(Sgued) Ii. II DAY.
He also sbys 10 the Tribune
1.-The statement Of your fTtibsne'sl Washington Cor
respondent that of the questions in tho India rubber
controversy so long newspaper has been decided
IL incorrect" (Sgned) ii. Fl. DAY.
Confirmation OF the above statements Of II. r. Day
The Commissioner says has been" and Day says he's not
all address sed to intelligent reaiers''
The following letter iror the Commissioner o! Patents |
submit to intelligent readers prove The correctness Of
previous statements. The statements above
HORACE H. DAY.
USfrEp STATES Patent OFFICE
W,sHfSGToS ClTT, d. c. Feb 5, lsi6)
SrR-You are hereby informed that the OF the To-
claims aud those OF Charles Good
year upon which hearing appointed 10 take place on
the third Monday in January lSi6 the question OF priority
of invention bee decided 10 his favor Is co
py the decision.
those concerned An appeal lies from this decision under
The provisions OF the 7h the July 1915,
snd llth section of the act OF March Sd, 1889
Yours respectfully, EDMUND BURKE,
Commissioner OF Patents
Solomon c. Warner Of Mes-rs Norton Lawrence,
81 Pine -stteet, New York.
Da7 says the Patent Office has decided" The Com
missioner -ays II has been decided 10 lis Good
favor" Yet Day publishes the letter Of The Commissioner
TO prove the ecness Of hs statement
Commu nicstlons
To the Editors Of The Netr- York Express
GENTLEMEN In your paper of Tuesday there ia sals
ment under the signature OF Mr. Charles Goodyear
.sning copy OF plea put 10 by Horace II. Day. and
sworn by him in defence ofs sui, agsinst him pend
ing In this plea there of my warranted
by the facls clsnlng for the honor OF making
LusLE or METALLIC KuBBEa Mr.. Day In his plea says
Ertract from the a6ddvit al H. Day dated and
Nou. /. 1885, fe tn Court
And this defendant (Day farther says that Nathaniel
Hayward s the frs and origaa msentor discover
OF the of sulphur, in combination WIKI Indian RUB
ber the manufacture oil india rubber goods claimed
In the letter patent " Aud this defendant farther says
that Joseph w hsrman OF thi. city used sulphur, white
lead and India rubber In combination In the manufacture
ada rubber goods which goods he then exposed TO the
action OF high degree OF heat, &c.
Sworn and signed, HORACE h. DAY"
Alhoug Oh have many experiments India Rubber, and
been fsmisr with Inc experiments OF Others yet
have authorized Mr.. Day 10 clsim for ms Whist his
plea claims All India Rubber manufacturers al all CONVEX
SAINT with the business agree with in ascrbng Mr.
Cioody The merit Of this discovery gave Mr Day
der oath such information had, and the ny
experience but nothing would justify setting and
making that wes II any way the frat discov.rer Of
the invention OF the peculiar composition known isol5
rubber about which there has been of late much contrc-
versy. | am respectfully &c. J. w. HARTMAN
tcF The above Is advertisement, paid for By M
Goodyear.-ED