Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1846-09-08

TN CHANCERY VIRGINIA AT Rules held in the
Clerks Office of the Circuit Superior Court Of Law
and Cbancery for Gloucester county, at the Courthouse
on Monday, the 9th day Of July, 1876:
Stephen Adams, Plaintiff:
Robert shurlda, NJ. w. Kemp, individually. and as
Sheriff and Committee Administrator Of the Estate OF
Sarah ShnrIds Defendants.
The defendant, Robert shurds, not having entered
his appearanc and given security according Ia the net
Of Assembly and the rules of This Court and II appear
ing by satisfactory evidence that he Is not IN nhdh
tant Of this country j is ordered that the .ald defend
ant do appear before the Judge of the SAID Circuit %
rior Cou Of Law and Chanccry on the rst any o' ne
next term and answer the bill OF The palnli ana ina'
copy OF this order he forthwith inserted ~ some news
paper published the City of Richmond tor TWO moh.'
src.ssiyey and posted At the front door Of the Court
ho use o. ,.m n,s tS""' JOHN r. CARY, c. c.
TN Observation-Disclosures. AT Superior Court OF
| rh,ncsrv far the Richmond Circuit, he'd II the Ca
ni,ol in the CIV Of Richmond, June 20, 1876:
Edmund Christian, ria'h.'n
Thomns ) Dcken, Committee Administrator Of Fran
c;s Nelson deceased, and Committee Administrator DE
honis non OF Francis T. Slubbs, deceased and sidney
s. Baxter, Attorney General of the Commonwealth OF
Virginia, go. pe,eHo
AMI. their answers the same To which answers The
nIantiff replied generally: and, theienpon the cause
beuc dockrlpd by consent Of thr parties, and by IKE
consent coming 10 be heard upon the hl answers
and rcplica'iOns aforesaid u,on IN eNhit MED WIN
The bill and upon the Affidavit of j. VI. Conlinc, iaken
o. behalf Of the plaintiff, and being argued by counsel
an consideration theieGf, and on the motion oi Tue
plaintiff by counsel, and with the consent 81 me ap
rndants b; their counsel the ourl doth ofdrf th nc
heirs of Francis Nelson, decreased on The part oi NE
mother Amy Still, deceased, any such tnefe DC, anu
If not then that the heirs of said Amy Still deceased,
on the part Of their mother, or moiris, Is .e ease
NAV be- do on or before the first day Of the next term OF
this Court file their petitions. praying 10 ne haue oe
fonda MS in this cause. and exhibit Win sao petons
the evidence of such heirship; aud mat copy OF is
order be forthwith inserted IN some newspaper pun
ished in the City of Richmond for eight weeks
,ivev and posed at The front door OF The Caplto, N
| said city Copy. Teste,
July i4-e2awew !. kobbhIs, y. v.
TN cHANCERY.-yiRaIsiA, to wit:-At Rules holden
i In the Clerks Office of the County Court OF Aeco
mack on the 10Th day ofJuy, 1916:
| Edward Taylor, fiainlin:
| against
James Taeker or Tucker, Samuel Colonna,
/ Defendants
The defendant, James Taeker, or Tucker, not having
entered his appearance and given security according t
the act Of Assembly and the rules of this Court, and
appearng by satisfactory evidence that he is not an In
habltan of this Commonwealth, II is ordered that the
said defendant James Tacker, or Tucker, do appear
here ON the Ist day Of September next of the SAID
Court and answer the plaintiffs BILL and that copy o.
this order forthwith inserted in some newspaper pup
lished 10 the city Of Richmond for two months succe
svey, and ported al the front door Of the Couthouse
| Of the said county. A True Copy-Teste,
| July 2l-ew2m J. J. AlLWORTH, =. =. u