The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1846-12-09
In Cnnncery.
uan auu;o III S,udfor1 Vtca Cho

Hon. Lewis II. SANFORD, Vice Chancellor.
DEC. s.-Allen and WhittleseY II l.. Stebbns and
Order fer receiver to stand unless in days
eeendsn pays of all ground rents, back taxes tax sales
ssckett " Thompson and others rider that suit pro.
coed against Surviving defendants, was when j. H.
sacksu died Costs of both parties to be costs in the
Ravens " Eldridge and Babcock Defendants relieved
costs heretofore ordered and $40 costs Of this
notion in ten days. Otherwise denied with taxed costs
Matter of New York Contrbutionship Insurance Com
pany On petition of ~ Dubois. Order that receiver
petcner by paying their coats and charges on molten
Sarah A. Baldwin v: Moses Baldwn.-0rder that de-
suit and psy such sum weekly for support OF her and
her children, as shall be fixed by the Master ON
reference
suexcePt the amony is to be for complainant aad her
People ex.rel Brennan VS. Donahue. Defep dant ad
Judged guilty Of the contempt alleged. and fined the
REALTORS debt interest and costs including costs
attachment and to stand committed till be paid
E Haniord vs. j. j. Haumond-Mo,;on denied with
So costs, without prejudice to renewed motion when
Hardmsn Phillips VS. g. Clark and others-Order for
receive. Of the norgsged premises but without preu
he has paid on the first mortgages.
Wilson & McClellaad VS. Il. wilams--Siotion for at
taehmept against defendant granted, for violating nunc
ton
CT. Cromwell VS. Cunningham and others-Motion
10 amend bill denied. for want Of jurisdiction,
II. Dennis Va l.. s. FordMoton 10 dissolve injunc-
ton and that complainant give security denied, with 50
costs.
william 8. Tsole vs.. De Kay and others-order to
take answer Of De Kay and wife from the files, iegu
lar and bill to be taken confessed by Mrs De Kay
compliments costs 10 be costs in the cause.
II. Smith Jr vs. O. A Hoyt and otheu.-Inunction
difsolved-de ndsnts costs to be the cause
Gilbert Allen W. Levi Hubbell and othersDscree for
alsEsst part Of premises to be first solddefendans
WI. and NJ De Witt to pay the extra costs occasoned
BIZ putting in their answer.
C. Partridge Mcnck Backes ct al--Iniunction dis
solved Defendants sosts TO be costs in the cause
Alice Laor and al. v. a. Crommeln and othsrs-pss;.
ton Of T. T. Lyde granted-premses 10 be Sold and his
costs paid them schenck lien under the decree and sur
plus brought into Court. -
q N. Williams Field Vermeuls and others--pe
nurer 10 bill neutrality-suspicious. may amend same
on ray ment Of costs.
James Bloedgood Carter VS. t. T. BIoodgocd-On eoui
~ rsGerved-defendsnt to pay the costs OF the suit
H. Wilkes vs.. r 8. Henry--Plea Observation-Disclosures
10 answer and pay costs in 20 days, &c.
Francis Price VS.. II. seely and T. b. Wakeman-- Dill
dismissed with costs unless complainant 20 DAYS pay
into Court residue Of his third Of original psrchase and
u 81 satisfy Master that the lands weehswksn are not
ircumbered except by the Bfinkerhof mortgages.
q. L. Raccy and wife vs. j. Tyson, j. Cibberly and
others Demurrer allowed on the ground Of multifari
ousress-hill ismissLd with costs.
P. W Longey, administrator, SC. Va. James Norvsl-
Demurrer siowed-bi,l dismissed, hut without costs.
Mary 4. and Elizabeth Green vs. s. Storm and others
Defendants exceptions 10 Masters report allowed AZ "a
the between May end July a. is4c and az to the
fee paid counseithe residue overruled-com
exception allowed as TO the rents uncoected so far as
90 dire receiver to assi collect them and
yender further aceount-no costs 10 either party.