New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-08-24

The e1oeTc, tis colR,r < Judiciary aud
an e thu; tre these rer courts Spre and ChoHoerv hare
practice tank he atd 59, eyidi no: 10, taken nc rs
step, end ticy n0Nd 50 l0ag kt,p up tls de
ti,1ct 0rscHt:aiioH H find yoOr judges 1s bench
eoourogs oRd crlruG;i"S ese rely eclls. He wished
the jurisdictions placed under one court one Judge
order that the practice might be- reformed II GenUr
were abolished understood him 70 saw il would
abolish half the business Of The supreme Court-and what
gained by demurrer Il yields sort Of ihe 20 the
mysteries OF the system Whc.. party Iputs Tat
where whereas should b. he made TO pay the
and suffer D: The delay and tnen placed ut where ne
was before. and nes TO begTn again.
Compare Mr. Chat6ed's admissions with MS legisla
tive course, and that OF his political friends They
Wright and the Regency knew ell this jus, well .
years ago they DO now What remedy have they eTer
sought to provide The judges lawyers bred-la'v
ycrs placed By The Wright Van Buren,, and Regency
party on he bench the best and wsest Of their pro
le-si0n and Mr Chathed j. LAWYER OD-erve LIS 70
marks which have pacedin italics, and say fyou can,
that hlr. Richmond did wrong wnen he charged TIE Law"
gers a. a BODY with being Iukewarn refouner.
perceive by this evening Journal that ir Rhoadcs'.
remarks today VII be gwen, at length The Reporter
also mentions Mr Taylor have said to-day that the
tenor OF his remarks in recent debate had been
apans the Union o! law and equity jurisdictions but
against aeis aielganaton into one form o; practice.
missed that He also reports Nh Chatted 70 haze said
that without union The forms u procedure aHa practice
OF the Courts. (ay and EquiryJ every effort at e
gal reform would be futile assUredly did near
that either. did think his Sec leaned that
way. Next week however and the voting VIII set al!
these matters night.
Mr. Nicholas calm, deliberate, rejecting, and very
independent Delegate from Ontario has the floor fox
Monday.
continue TO select from the cany materials sen; up
facts the vast treasures locked up
der the key OF the Clerk Of Chanccry in your City.
Comments hereafter. How much is in old deposits and
now much is in Law cannot tell from the paper sent up
Ctancc~y Funds iohaeds oj r. EmHei. q Clerk Of
Isl Circuit
uninvescd balances, sc-G suppose that much OF
these unclaimed. Where goes the interest )-ier-
y Thomson Sll70i Frost '. Brown $3.50; Grlii'ng
:. do. $I25 Johnson :. Williams S22c Hazard y
Bovine: Roster y do 1920 Duryca DO 500 WICK
OF SllJ and So Abel SCI Van Aruinge v ioulc
Sl.l33; Mcclure '. Jackson $40 Van Arminse y
Yuule IIalsey) 81, BIC Warde sl27; Morris V. Hart
$500; Robbins S6c3; hm. lns. Co. :" Farnam sol
Shaw v. Shaw S276 Genet :. Genet 500 Corwin V.
Co S2lG Minchin V. Merritt Slj2: Co,tcrcl :. Jec
S2ig; E,nbury y Grenzeback STAG; EmInons V. WI.
hanson SGD Iaight y. do s2i6; Fire Department V
Peckham S97; Benncm '. Walker S22', Chanccry
Fund Sli0--tWhats tina, again D Oppenhclm y. hctch-
um sl,2Gl Mason :. Murray $297 Bach V. Hall s2gi
Clarkson v Wcstervelt sl6G Gray 1928; Van elect =
Blake 800: Chry.tic V. Dairs 1919 Ferris Y. Brush
si2 Lovc;t v. Little $500; Bogcrt Y. Brooks Slji
Smith (matter of 1913 Force Size $3.50 \. River
Ins. Co Hall Sl36; Marian Y. Larson S2i9 Skce Y.
Nicely $50; Francis y. Francis S!99 Palmer V Watt
:.
Turner :. Zeiss sl3l3 Lord Brown Sl59 McCrack-
en- V WaIan sj26 Mutual ln-. Co. S9il Aspinwall v
Pirnic $3.50; Fountain Sllli Leonard y sherwood
s. i2l Bishop Arpistrong Sfjs EnH Ins. Co v Ball
SO2: Mayor &c OF n Y :. Bogcrt $il14; Thompson
y Post Sl2i0. Conovcr y. vudyke (ltydcr) :lil
Buchan =. sumner sl057 De Buytcr y s. Peters
Church s. sos Torrcy y. Shaw S23- Schcrnlcrhorn =
Anderson Sil2 Frost v Peacock Se2i Hays v Lounds
1878 Halscy y. Van Amrincc 500 Co!vn or Colron
Mccoon s77s Cairns Emmons s2'.i "a, Lawrence
sc Receivers, sl99; Mason, Trustee Sab Bates Y
Brodie 1853 Brinkcrhoi Y. Lawrence S2i9 Carpenter
=. sackc,t Si,i6i Carpenter '. Post sA7 Mooney
y. o'Connor sob, Smith v smith s267 n Y Lie
& Trust Y. Feeks Sl,2ls, Bell Y. Hunt 1888 Low
EFT v Western Si33 DOminck y do sLII
Beam '. Clark $500; Griffin y. Wanmaker $4,000
Hubbard v. Dollinger S59a Haughwout y. House
man SlO6l Fash v Fash 5000 Jefferson Ins. Co
Hyatt S273. Smith v Post sl263; Haync v Farley
SG77 y y. Life Ins. g. Trust Co. Y. Benton S3677;
Hoytv. Butterheld 1912 Conover =. Vandykc Price
1899 Crornmelin V. Roosevelt 81 COS &c. &c.-Sc6I 5l
Chancellor SANFORD says tina, these balances are "
nc uniares,ed in the Manhattan Bank in Mr.. Emmcts
name But he says nothing OF the interest, nor now
long the money has LAIN Se7ooo at per cent yleds
Why did Messrs Murphy and O'Conor desire TO pre-
vent inquiry here
CAauccry Funds u, Life and Trust Co
The following sums yield per cent interest and the
principal deposit only is mentioned Not syliao!e as
when the deposit was made or the amount oil interest
accumulated Mr. Sandiord says this return Is al! right
The titles OF the causes only are given
Aymer v Reeve So l26 Boldly V ketchel $50 Boilcs
v Tucker 1886 Bliss V Dean S2,l26; Buchanan v Mac
Namsre S2i3 Bragan Do. s297 Crolius v Iicoout
Slli2; Contrib. ms. Co Si52 Gregory v McDernott
S5l3 Hogc s3l3 Hunter V. Ludlow $3.50; JET in'
Co v Carter 81 66a jackson Edwards $3.50; King
S31lO; Leort v Windlc S6Il Minchin Y. Merrill Sos
Merch'ts lns Co. V. Grant S,3ls Ostrander V Dubois
81 $50 Orwell Primrose Si3s Perrnc y smith Sos
Palmer Sjs7 Raynor $500 Sedgcwick V. Bodies sloC9
Stewart y Do S7l2; Smith V. Montague $3.50; stake,
Stoke or Stuke Robertson So.iOl; Schwartzwaelder
v Sebert S652, Trust Gov. Bdwell Si99 Iargce Siol
lallmadgc Sl,373; Tilou Allen s!,o5l Iempleton V
Bcssonette S77l NJ L. Williams S4O6 White V. Yves
tern s7O6 Wkin S202l F. \. Williams Sl,s23, &c
--S5seS.
Bonds ami Mortgages held by the Clerk
Beam V Clark S25Oa2 Conover Y. Vandyke Price
Fountain Sll,379; Haeht V Haigh >ll.3l2 jackson 9
Edwards Sl2,652 Labagh v. Magaw SlO590 Mason y.
Murray Sl2,3ll; Orey V. ortley Sl3,7l2 Pearsall v
Pearsall (dower) Sl35 l65 the Gnlunts Sjl50O
matter OF Post SS6Ole Rogers Y. Sccnback S25,s05
SchicAclin V Bates 1889 Torrcyv y. shaw Sl1iio:
Van Amringe Y. loue S29,66i Ward Sl2eW WMdci!
SCI 467 Baldwin $500; Burger V Brton So5io' Bates
v Bmcc S5s05 Bcalc y lnnct S3,257 CrHney v do.
s. ]27 Craig v. do S7.l2c: Crommeln V. Roosevelt
S365l CaEinan y Bunting SS,.6l Covenhoven v WI
kus So l65; FOCAL v Turner S4,l19; Francis $1,000;
S6.75l; Gregory v McDermott $3.50; Hlycr V. Hill
yer $500; Hicks S7632; Hewitt Daily SISSY Janda
V Anderson $2,3s9 Lyons Lyons $500 Lane v 10,
gers ST. $40; Lord V Brown sligo; Morreil v w GOD
$1,000; Morris V Stevens S55S2 Murray V. do. Sill2
Mcsurray $500 Nicol Y. do. S3,03?; O'Nev. McDer-
mott $3.50 Rot, V. Rof 80 Schcaelin =. Hays
Ann SlnltN SH,IOu, SDHN v -udN SfSN'i
ncr V Pcn $500; Stevenson v do. $2305 Schie;icini
matter of $500 P. & L. II. Smith 1860 Stgyker ',
do $500 Smith do. $4,000; Sedcn V pearsal $500
Tcmplcton V Bcssoncit S2Ss2; Theal V. North $3.50
Tillotson 81 s64 Tallmadse $1,000; Titus Bloodgood
So 20 Van Brun 5000; Van Bcurcn V. do S2VSl
Van Duzcr $3.50; Van Dyke V. Beekman So,i63: WI
kins v Harlem Canal Comp. S2,iii Wyckot - 49e
Woodruff 4 Williamson $500 Wilson sIOOoi Smith
l.. S.odSs.-Palmcrv Wau>ll,6,6 Burns $500; Hill.
ycr v Hillyer $4,000; T'allmadge $500. n
TIKI SLAVE TRApE-Ou late CoaSM at R'o.
M Gcrdor-Iho papers recently announced the par.
don by the President OF Captain PendIeon condemned
some time ago having been concerned III the Attn
can Slave Trade also the acquttal OF Captain LIBBY
a, Portland tried for the crime. Both these ndl'
vi,iuals were prosecuted We presume in consequence
of information communicated 70 the Government by our
late able and interchangeable Consu! at RIO MI Gordon
On what grounds or for what Mr. Gordon was sus
pended in his Office have not heard That his efforts
10 decc, and expose the agency OF American e!iLehS
and American ships engaged in the traffic for slaves
were very constant, vigorous and effective we know;
mass of papers containing abundant and conclusive
evidence of the extent and arocity OF this traffic as
connected with American vessels and the councnance'