Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1846-11-17


Joseph X. Anderson, Plaintlh:
BENJAMIN Churchill and other Defendants.
The defendant above named not having entered his
appearance and given security according 10 The act OF
Assembly and the rules Of this Court and II appearing
by satisfactory evidence that be Is not an nhabant Of
this Commonwealth, il Il ordered that the SAID defend
ant do appear the rules he held for the said Court
on the first Monday in December next, and answer the
bill Of the plaintiffs and that copy of this order be forth
with inserted in some newspaper published IN the cy
of Richmond for two months successfully, anu posted
al the front door OF the Capitol III the said city.
Copy-Teste,
Sept I5-cwam PoWHATAN ROBERTS, d OK.
IN Observation-Disclosures AT rule day, held IN
the Clerks Office Of thr coGnty Court Of Madison
County, on Monday, the 5th day Of October, 1916
Thomas y. WEIGH, Administrator with the Will an
nexcd of Churchill Gibbs, deceased, and Elizabeth
Gibbs, widow Of Churchill Gibbs, deceased, Plaintiffs:
Jane Emmett, Penelope Rixey, Alonzo Gooch and
Jane his wife. Henry ". Barnes ana Louisa T. hlr
wife, Mary Eliza Stiothrr, Churchill s;rother, Walter
Strolhrr and STROLLER, children OF Renbrn Sirnrr
aud Judith his wife, and the infant rhili OF Harriet
-, dect ased who was Harriet STROLLER. diu@her 81
said Reuben Siother and Judith his wlir WHOSE names
are unknown; James w. Walker and William Walker.
John X. Bnhannnn and Cynthia his aitr, Charles X.
Ghbs, Turner Gibbs, and James Grssb, and judith hs
WIFE Defendants
The defendants Churchill Strothcr Walter STROLLER,
and - Slfnher and The infant child of Harriet -,
deceased. John Il. Bohaanon, Charles X. Gibbs, Turner
q Ibis and ia. Grgsby aud JunlIh his wife, not having
the ac of Assembly and he Rules Of said Court, and II
appearing hy satisfactory evidence thl They are not ~
l.blians OF this STATE; melton 81 The plaintiffs u II
ordered that said defendants, wEoarr Named a. absent
do appr.r before Ill. County Court of Madison on Tie
fourth Thursday III December next. and answtr iir MI
of the plaintiffs and that copy Of this order he pub
lisled in the Richmond Enquirer newspaper printed
in The City of Richmond, for eight weeks successfully
ard another copy POSTED al The front door OF Tie Ioufl
Copy Ttste, BELFIELD CAVE, Clerk.
Oct. 21-cw5w
I'm asNCERY-yIrci.I,: AT Rules held IN lhr
i Ci.ks Once superior Gonrt of c,ancrry, for
the Eichmord Circuit, the 5ti day Of ocober loio
Philip ". Thompson, William NJ. Thompson Juiia
Thompson, George g. Thomp. on. and the said fhii'p
w. Thompson. Trustee for Isabella j. Sully ana hef
children, f"'n''hs'
against
The defendant above named not having entered his
app-aranre and given SECURITY according 10 Tie Act 81
Assembly and the Rules OF this Court. and II appearing
by satisfactory evd'nc thar hr ~ not an inhabitani 81
this ComlronweaIIb II il ordered that the said defend
ant do APPEAR r rules Ia r held Tor he said I"ir'
IN the st Monday III January n"St, and answer tilr
amended and supplemental bill ofihe plaintiffs and that
cory al this Order hr forthwith inserted III some news
.apcr published IN the City Of Richmond, for Two months
successfully and posted at the iron' '-- " 10 apit"
A Copy Tesle, r. ROBERTS, ID. ok.
Oct. 6-cw2m
IN OBSERVATION-DISCLOSURES Al Rn-s held In the
1 Clerks Office of superior Court Of chancery Tor
the Richmond Circuit, The twelfth day OF September
lSG:
The President and Directors Of The Bank Of the Stale
If South Carolina Plaintis
against
Alexander IIagan and another, Defendants
The defendant above naned not having entered his
ann, arance and given ncrnrdn. 10 the act o
Assembly and the relies o this Cont and ii appearing
by satisfactory evidence that lie j. moi nhabtant
this Commonwealth II is ordered, that The said defend
do appear IT the rules 10 he held fer the said Court
IN the first Monday december next, and the
hill the plaintiffs: and that COPY of This order be
forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published IN the
City Of Richmond. fer t"o months successfully, and
posted Al the front door OF the Capitol IN tho said CITY,
A Copy. Trsle,
PUWHATAN ROBERTS, d. cik
Sept. ls-cw2m
IN Observation-Disclosures AT Rules held in the
Clerks Office of the Circuit Superior Count Of Law
and Chanccry for Cumberland county, on Monday the
7th day II September, lsib:
John X. Wilson, Administrator Of Elizabeth stone,
deceased, fiahth'
against
John w. Wilson, Executor Of Robert Ferguson, de-
ceased, Robert Blackburn and Lucy his wIir, william
r. iiIckerson, John Hickersun, Thomas Powers hnd
Hugh Raine, Defendants.
The defendants. Robert Blackburn and Lucy Black
honrn hi. wife, WIN. T.. llcherson Jno HicaHson and
Thomas Powers, not having entered their appearance
and given security according To the Of Assembly
and the rules of this Court, and II appearing by sais
factory evidence that they not inhabitants Of this
Commonwealth, II Is ordered that he SAID defendants
do appear nj rules r held in the Clerks Office ol the
said t'nurl, the frst Monday IN January next, and
answer the hill Of the paint and that copy Of this
order lie forthwith inserted in some newspaper PUBLISH
ed IN The city OF Richmond for TWO months successive
~ and posted a; The front door Of The Courthouse Of
this county Copy-It-ie,
Sept ls-cw2m b. d. WooDsoN, u. Z.
~ Observation-Disclosures AT rules holden in The
4 Clerks Office Of the Circuit Superior Court OF Law
and Chancery for the County Of Charlotte, the 9Th day
OF October, lc46:
Iittltjohn McCargo, Executor Of William II. Cali.
cote deceased, Plaintiff;
John ~. F. woodson. William s. Woodson, Ca,ha-
rine r. Woodson, Joseph Tanner and EIinora G. his
wife, and other Defendants;
The defendants above named not having entered
their appearance, according 10 the act of Assembly and
the rules Lf this Court, and II appearing by satisfactory
evidence that they not inhabitants OF this Common
wealth. II is ordered that the said defendants do appear
before the Judge Of the said Court, NJ the Courthouse
of the said county, the first day Of April term next,
and enter their appearance, and answer The plaintiffs
bill and that 4 copy Of this order be inserted in some
newspaper published in the city OF Richmond for two
months Excessively and posted the front door of The
Courthouse Of the said county. Copy-Testc,
Oct 2o-cw2m WINsLoW ROBINSON, Z. z.
IN CHANCERY-VRoIn,A:- AT Rules held in the
Clerks Office Of the Circuit Superior Court Of Law
and Chancery for buckingham County, Monday, the
9Th day Of October, 1896:
John J. Walker, Thomas II. Flood, and Willis P. Bo-
COCK late partners under the style and firm Of J. J.
Walker Co. Plaintiff
Ioho pye Defendant.
The defendant, John P!ie moi having ehtefeu mr. ap
and security according Ia the ACT o 40
semb!y ard the Rules o this Court, and II appearing ny
satisfactory evidence that hr mol an lnhabian on t'
country il is ordered that the said absent defendant 60
appear the rules TO be holden Tor the sad Court on
the first Monday In January next and answer The bl o
the plaintiff and that acopy ofths order be forthwith IN
serted in newspaper published In the City Of Rich
mond, for two months successfully, and posted at the
front door of the Court House Of this county.
Oct. ao-cwsm K. ELDRlDGE. C. C. s. c.
IN NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. AT Rules held in the
Clerks Office OF the Circuit Superior Court of Law
and Chancery 70. Buckingham county, on Monday, tht
John Y. Crutc, Plaintiff:
against
John Pyle, Defendant.
The defendant, John Pye, not having entered hl' ap
pearance and given security according 10 the act ni A.
senbly and the Rules ri this Court and Il appearing ny
satisfactory evidence that he is not an inhablant o ms
country Il is ordered that the said ubscn; defendant do
appear al the rules TO be holden for the said Court on
the first Monday in January next and answer me o -
the plaintiff and that copy Of this order be lorlnWi
inserted in some newspaper published In Inc Iity OF
Richmond for TWO months successfully, and posted at
the front door OF the Court House Of this county
A Copy. Teste,
Oct O-cw2m II. ELDhiDoI, Y. y. :. =.
IN CHANCERY-VIReIsIA AT rules held In the
Clerks Office OF the Superior Court OF Chancrry ioi
the Richmond Circuit, the twelfth day Of September
1916
David Curie, Plaintiffs
against ,
The Projection Insurance Company Of Hartford, in
the State Of Connecticut, and another Defendants
The defendants above named not having entered iiei
appearance and given security according 10 the act oil
Assembly and the rules OF this Court, and Appearing
by satisfactory evidence thar they are not inhabitants
mi, Co mon eth IL is ordered, that the said defend
ants do appear the rules to be held for the said Cou
on the first Monday in December next, and answer the
hill Of The painti and that copy Of this order be