Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1846-08-25
-
SITUATION WANTED.

GRADUATE Of William and Mary College. Va,
N who has had experience in teaching and can
produce satisfactory testimonials OF character and scho-
arship, is DESTROYS OF situation in some Academy or
Private School. Address-post paid-X. Y. lamp
ton, Va aug. io-cwu
Do Wing requested To copy.
~ CHANCERY.- In Chesterfield Conn
L ~ Court, August loth. lsib
Grorre W. Laprad- Administrator dc honis non, with
the viii annexed, 81 james Ferguson, deceased,
against fiaihuH
Richard FERGUSON, Benjamin Ferguson. son of re-
liz Grnrr- Ferguson, Nehemiah lrr.uss"n. benjamin
Fcr.usscm son 81 Robert. Joseph X iircwnis and his
vile Juanh, IN lhrr proper p-,son-; Also John Fergus
son. Sarah FERGUSON and Julia fsrgussni infants oil
tender years, Dr'enaah.s.
bill and the defendants. Joseph X. Brownly and judith
his wife. having entered their appearance and gwen
security, according In the act OF Assembly and The rues
of this Cont and appearing by satisfactory evidence
ila they inhabitants of this Commonwealth, IL
is ordered that the said defendants do appear mere on
tfr first day Of the November iern and answer Tho
bill Of The plaintiff; and thai copy ot tins order ne
forthwith! inserted in some newspaper published IN tho
city Of Richmond for month, ssively and post
ed the front door ri til Court house OF this county
Aug. ls-cwam r. roINDEXTEH, {.
IN HANcEKY.-viKcistA:-At Rnics held IN The
and Ghanccry Tor Gloucester rnmny At the Cuuhhou-e
on Monday. The 9Th day Of July, lsi6:
stephen Adams, Plaintiff
against
Robert Shurds " W. Kemp individually. and ~
sheriff and Committee Administrator OF the Estate Of
Sarah Shurlds, Drfrndhits.
The Defendant Robert Shurlds, not having entered
his appearance and given security according 10 The act
Of Assembly and the rules of This Court and appear
ing by satisfactory evidence that he is not an inhaoi-
tant Of this country ordered, that the said defend
ant appear before this Judge Of the said Circuit supe-
nor Court OF Law and Chancery the irst day Of tho
next term and the hill OF the paintii and that
copy Of this order he forthwith inserted In some Eews-
paper published in the city OF Richmond for two months
.ueocssvcy, and posted at CD. front door ot the Court
'' JuIy a"cwam JOHN R. CARY, C. q.
IN CHANCERY.-v,EGisi.,t to wt:--At Rules holden
in the Clerks Office OF the Count! Cour; oi Atco-
mack, on The iUih day fully, 1876:
Edward Taylor, faH'ih'
against
James Tackcr or Tucker, Samuel coonna,
Defendants:
The defe ndant, jaime. Tacker, Tnck-r not having
entered his appearance AMI gwen security according
the act az Assembly and The rules Of this Court aud Il
appearing by satisfactory evidence that he Is NOT an III
habitant OF this Commonwealth, u "fdeien tia ths
said defendant, James Tackcr or Tucker, do appear
here the Isl day II September term neat OF the said
Court, and answer the plaintiffs bill and that copy OF
tins order forthwith inserted in some newspaper pub
lished city Of Richmond for tao months success
svey posted the front door Of tn" Courthouse
Of the said county. True rnpy.I.s,s,
IN CuASCERY. "A, 4 superior Court of
Chancery for thu Richmond Circuit. held al The "a
rio the City Of Icmond, on the e;;h day oil June,
1886:
William Brand David iiuckste2 and Fanny his wife,
William II. Timherlasc and Matilda his wife, Benia-
min Brand, Eo5er, Band. junior Amelia Brand ElZa
Grand Joseph 4. Brand, George &. Brand, ana LOUIS
Brand, The las, five OF whom are infants under The
aye years, and by Amelia Brand their
mother aud next friend lanes W. Williams am ann
Eliza his wife, Benjamin +. Brard ana Henry h. mn
berlake and Mary ms wife, PlaintiIis;
Eliza l.. Crenshaw, in her right, and rs Admit
nistratri1 of the Estate OF Edmund b. Crenshnw, de-
ceased and Administrative de bcnis non, WIN no
viii annexed, Of Benjamin Brand, deceased, John
Brand Chiles Brand. Saran Robertson, Fanny Brand,
and flirl hls -.
and the Trustees Of the General Assembly oil The rfcS
tytcrian Church in the United States Of America,
The defendant Eliza l.. Crenshaw, by Counsel, this
day with the leave Of The Court filed her answer 10 the
bill Of the plaintiffs, To which answer The plaintiffs ny
Counsel, replied generally. NhrreuPon, thi- rau-r
came on h. consent n the plaintiffs and oi the said DE
lrp.ant Ia heard 10 her upon The hi, the sah
answer repl thereto, ard The rahhi'- hlrn,
and was argued ny Counsel; consideration whereof,
il appearing thai than iw years have tlaseds
III. qualification OF Edmund B Crrnshnw NJ Executor
Of BENJAMIN brand. decrased the Cont, on the appi
on of the plaintiffs. doth order and require, That all
n.rsons who may claims against the saih Behan
Brand shall exhibit The same Tor settenehl ps'oie s,
chaeI b. Potaux, one of the Commissioners ot ths
Court within the penod OF three mouths ana thnt CO.
nv II this order br published for eight weeks IN me
Richmond Enquirer aud Richmond wing, Two OF 'nr
arsrs published the city of Richmond and b.
nosted al The door Of he Courthouse Of ald city, and
also the Conrtb house of the county o i'e"i'' y"
Two several Court days.
And tie Court witrout nj this time deciding whether
or M The devise and brGue- III the i clause ol the
,ila ne he =
go, n,r Of he Commits 0ne5 ~ ms thnrt aerrNsih
,y., s,oebs bonds ard other 'gsoHa' estate ct HE sad
p,u,.n,n Brand remain for distribution, and what real
.a,r he died seized Of, and. also the value al such
raj STATE and make report thereof 10 The Court, win
aov matter specially stated dcrmsd psrl'nrn; by him
,l ~ iic may hc required by any Of the parties I"
tr 20 stated. a Copy-Tfstf,
Iu,ya;-cwsw POW. RoBERTs, u. elk.
IN uANcERY-vIEcrsi. al Rnes held In The
j Clerks Office OF The Circni Superior Courts q" law
and Chancery for Cumberland County, on the hrst
Monday in June, 1916:
Daniel Martin and Elizabeth his wife, formerly
fIud2ns) Thomas II. Hudsns and Frances Hnd-
gins, iiah''ns
against
Martha J. Smith, adm'tIx OF PolndeaterP p. Smith,
dec who was administra,nr OF Thomas Hudgns, dec,
Albert Hudgins George w. Dowdy and Jane his VIE,
Robert Hudgns Henry raghy and Snsan his wiie, tei-
ia,nln iIndcins and James F. fluarins, Driendhnts.
The defendants, George W. Dowdy and Jane his
wife 10, having entered their appearance and gwen r.
curly according the aat- of Assembly and The rules
al tins Cont. and il appearing hy satisfactory evidence
that they are rhahitintS Il this Communicable, IT
il ordered that the said defendants do appear fere on
liz frs; day al the August term, and answer The
lin Of the plaintiff, and that copy of Ibis order be
fnrtb,eh inserted in some newspaper published IN the
l.uy of Richmond for two months successfully, and
o0s,ed al the front door Of the Court icuse OF this
| county. Copy. Teste, -