Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1841-1853, 1846-10-29
PHILADELrHIA,. October I7lh. Is46.

and seemingly routed but find in il no cause for despair
any feeling than present The reasons
for this defeat and Various though the wings
will not Of course recognize them as genuine legitimate
In the first place, the terrific, such
recolIect and certainly did keep back greater number
OF our voters than Wings: the latter live to the
country towns and To the polls Many democrats
s,renuousy in favor of the principles they
consider II recommended by General Jackson and as hav-
ing received the extreme JUNCTION of MIR. Polk. Macy
opposed the reelection of Foster the Canal Com
missioner, and among these, prominent and influential
men, such Senator Cameron, Governor Porter and the
numerous friends these gentlemen have Governor Skunk
had enemies in the party. and Foster was considered
has candidate Foster defeated and it would prevent Gov
Skunk from being n candidate for election; hence their
anxiety that he should be defeated.
In 1885, when the party split upon Wolf and Mullen
burg Gov. Skunk took active part with the former, and
in March, 1874 when Muhenburs nominated il
on'y BY few votes Skunk. The excitement was
very high, and after Shunks election (MuhIenburz died
suddenly short time prior the eecIion) his appoint
menls chiefly Of who had been opposed TO the
nomination Of Muhenburg; hence great dissatisfaction
has since existed with Gov. Skunk. In addition this
he had been secretary Of the commonwealth under Gov
Porter and resigned upon quarrel that Porters nhu
sgsinst him also
To have elected the Canal Commissioner against such
odds. would have been almost miraculous Even as it is
the majority will be very large. But again. the vote
was small. and convinced that the entire vote will
not equal that given Mr. Clay and probably not so
much by than the native difference Besides the
weather. 10 what is this owing Our detection produced
by already stated and undoubtedly by the tariff aso
The tariff not oug at all all tariff candidates.
aud surely the anti-tar Democrats had inducement
for the reelection Of men, such Moses Mclean
Richard Brodhead Dr. eib and others the PENNSYLVANIA
delegation whose election would have been sgnally hailed
ebuke the tariff of 40 We had issues to bring
voters; almost all the candidates of the
opinion and the only difference could have been about
Where The tariff question raised, the tariff Of
&c succeeded
Charles Brown opposed the tariff of A. and against
whom all the camOr raised in consequence Of his
approval Of the tariff Of 40 is elected in district which
gave Mr.. Clay 1000 majority. Col Florence. an
open and ardent advocate Of the tariff of 46 reduced the
majority in his district from 1900 300. while g. j. In
gersoll. tariff Of AZ man, elected by somewhat
duced majority.
Manayunk, perfect Manchester Of Lowell, containing
nothing but factories and manufacturers gives increased
democratic majority-because here the tariff matter
fairly canvassed open grounds at public meetings
tended by men, aud children. These of
the reasons which have brought about this result but
what will come from it Success and victory Like
produce like osct, and here you have some past
incidents for examples
In 1920 the federasts elected Hester, Governor, bat
routed the election, Shuze the republican
candidate having than 25 600 democratic majority
out Of about 100 900 votes. In 1895 Ritner was the
Wing Governor and the Wings in like manner carried
the whole Legisaure-ihey gerrymandered the LegisIa
tive districts suit themselves but 1886 the democracy
swept the State and Adams, uniform federal county,
Democratic, defeating the notorious Thsd
deus Stevens In 1888 they fought hard-it the
buckshot year. but Porter succeeded by
$1,000 In 1910 Harrison carried tie State but in lS4l
Porter with many enemies the party carried by $4,000
"a majority almost unprecedented. In 1914 carried
by 1000 majority out Of 100000 vctes-next TO defeat
while in ls45 elected our Canal Commissioner by
30 600 majority Next year we shall have
and carry the State by 0000 majority Our party rallies
only after defeat has always So and very cha
makes it certain il will so continue The agricultu
raj interests will rise rescue though always
Pennsylvania is Democratic State, and always be
relied when there is proper issue to induce full
DEGRADATIox IN EURoPE.- Grund, writing from
Brussels To show the of the lower classes in
Europe will select Berlin. literary and scientific Berlin,
the quarter Of St. Giles London, the Fau5ourg St
AnOnine and ST. Marceau, Paris. The population of
that educated and scientific city is, according the last
census 353 900; $4,000 males and 10000 females,
among whom 10 0Oo prostitutes and 1000 criminals,
and 900 persons receiving public charity to the amount
of IA 600 Rx dollars Berlin il is further ascerained,
contains 5000 weavers having average four children
each and being all PauPers unable to procure sufficient
bread for their families This makes additional number
of 10000 poor besides 900 public pauper children and
1000 poor orphans be supported by the government.
The official statistics give the following recapiluation
10000 prostitutes.
10000 sick in consequence Of vice.
5000 femae servants.
1000 natural children (foundlngs)
10000 criminals.
1000 living in almshouses.
200 prisoners Of the police.
600 receivers Of public aims
10000 weavers and children.
1000 charity children.
$500 orphans
5000 poor and sick in the hospitals.
1000 beggars.
1000 convcts Of state prisons and houses of correc
ton.
10000 poor sick, criminal and debauched people in
the most literary educated and model city Of Germany
The modern SPartans (he Prussans) live,
very great extent black broth; bu not exactly from
choice And yet the proportion of paupers in Germany
is less than that of France, Italy, Belgium Holland,
England 1t only TO 30 in England it is as
to 6; and 10 Holland as to !!
THE MARK ETS.
CINCINNATI Oct 22.-FLOUR-'The market opened
aniiestina hni mn lie