New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-07-24

DECISION OF TIE SrrazNK CoUxr-The Commissioner
Rcycrt Tor tie widening OF Snail portion she Boom.rg
tAe Road from 2Sth 10 S<th sts. distance less than mile
presented &c Supreme Ccc-, the las; Nay term
for confirmation when appeared that the o. 81 s54
bad been allowed oy hs Commissioners and assessed UPON
me land along TIE Improvement As their costs and Charges
the improvement over Snc aoove The awards
showed 'or me lands taken The allowing OF these costs
were eeete 20 or tie ground that such ess could OF
ISR De caaed. AID hist they should be taxed pursuant
20 Jaw Zee court seat the report back TO The Coucis-
SoreTs 20 have the costs taxed They after~ ard
taxed Or NJ. William P. Haet, cae of the Clerks Of the
Supreme Court and who WAS OF tie Commissioners al
s5.3ss s The Commissioners then presented ;heir Re
port again 70 tie supreme CouII Utica In the present
July M Mott opposed tie eon6rsiioa Of the Re-
port upon tbs ground that Mr Hae,t oush, MOTTO be al
lowed 10 be ;he Judge in his case 50 the Court
decided sn1 ordered The Report back asaia
SrrxxIok Cor,r.-pseIsIous .-Frsnas Laraora
acs john 3. CoStar-Tro immigrants who arrived IN this
city were Charged By an individual with falsely assuming
names snt cane 10 New York with orders tickets sent
BY said individual 20 dis brothers s, Liverpool TO enable
,heW 10 come out The immigrants asserted that they
bought the tickets 81 Liverpool To avoid prosecution
which WAS threatened BY the individual endorsed
given ttrue in surety pay the amount should r
ne sScerx.re1 that the ugr ants came honestly by
the t:ckets This note held BY Mr. C who suet the
eadorser 81 the termination Of The time which the note
given aud obtained Judgment against hin In Jus
tees Court. Appeal made This Court held tia, IL
the duty OF the individual TO write his brothers
Liverpool and ascertain IN regard 10 The tickets. -Four
months had elapsed from the time Of giving et the note
OF the suit aud biz writing
pria fac!e proof that claim any ,oGScr existed
that the sui, should not have been commenced judy
uleot reversed
.Saas Pa-ter VS.. Vim, ERsraon. Executor OF Parker
In relsuon 20 a given by deceased psiuur iume-
disely previous 10 his Death. Motion OF deendsn,s de-
MED.
Gas BslitH e. Va. John Jttrst ct a-Moton grant,
e. according u order % show Cause.
Soctstss Le Commerce, jas Lisrsrs FydsiRLHe ran
Datams.-Appesi dismissed and osier at Chambers
crnsd.
CoUSr or COMMON PIrAs.-Beore Judge Ulshoaer.
-Hareraii Bank "a. Day s NeeeR-lhe Hsverhill
{Msss} bank bought of Messrs d. 4 n. Broadway,
OF their celebrated patent Bank Locks paying for the
same 80 receiving written warranty that the said
lock could not be picked. &C Much having been said
TO the nipregnsoe character OF the lock (Which sp.
pears Dc trgly geniouI con,rvsnce) ocksmth oi
much celebrity named Hall belonging to Bostou gave
notice 10 the bank OF Intention III sndesvor TO pick H.
and be succeededt said stsr various efforts in draw
iue shs eoi. and obtaining admission. The warranty
having thus failed the Bank required that their money
SHOULD be refunded and Mersrs D. v take back their
lock The latter contcnded that the could
been picked within the legitimate meaning Of the term
snd refused ~ refund Action Is bruusbt Mr.. Hail. In his
testimony stated that he the ock and the manner
in which be proceeded To- DO but refused show the
mode IN which he actually turned the bolt alleging that
IL was private matter OF skil which hs bound
70 dtscose II was also alleged that the lock had been
picked IN 1912. For defence various testimony pro-
duced showing the almost utter tmposs6iiy OF picking
the lock opening Il by false key To bs concluded
this forenoon For plaintiff Msssre. Bradshaw and Cor.
for defendants Me.ss d P Hall and D. D. Field.