The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1846-02-05

tate 10 cast MS vote IN opposition 70 tho and
ed their conduct high handed and outrageous act Of
injustice towards such might favor change in the
administration, and did not hesitate to tell them So say
present result would end in their overthrow the next
time II Is also said and doubt truly that upon the
payment Of the last dividends the President had the div
dend book brought into his ROOM and the
payment for the purpose Of asking the stockholders for
their proxies presume this will not be denied II So
directors would have made him present, equal to
years salary for although he is first rate man in his
private relations, he is not quite the for such
tion in the opinion Of many Of his friends II is thought
that If the voting had been conducted upon fair prnci
pies, Mr. Robbins ticket would have carried the day
but by the policy adopted Of using ceored paper for
one ticket all such in debt the bank or such
might desire accommodation, were naturally fear.
full OF voting the he ticket lest they should be marked
If the coloured one succeeded, and thereby make
mics at head quarters.
Fair play is jewel and those who practice differ
second 6e and this will be proved at the next election
at this bank. Nous veyrons. OMEGA
The EXTRAORDINARY AFFAlR.-In our paper of
the 9Th inst. we published the following paragraph
from the Netc York Herald -
sirouLAR AFvAIR OK STATEN lsLArp.-we have re-
ceved an extraordinary statement, signed by Eugune
81 IN. 1sny az but
actions in which the names Of his uncle 10y his wife
sde,) the Rev ndefonso Medrano, Formerly Catholic
Priest there) Carlos F. Hernandez, Spanish gentleman,
and Miss Mary McKeon, together with several others,
appear in remarkable and striking position We de-
Sas s s TO Ss
ceedings even if true. appears, however, that Mr..
Medrano the clsrgyman Mr. Hernandez, and his three
young children; Miss McKeon, and nurse all embark
ed board the packet ship Frsncona for New Orleans
Monday last Mrs. Hernandez, who is a native Of
this CITY, left behind without husband children; and
is represented to be in state of mind bordering de-
sraction. .n
1--WE have heard much more, together with full his.
tory OF the origin OF these transactions but forbea fur
Their at present 1t seems to be unhappy and heart
breaking affair all rounA-and but for the connsxion
which Catholic priest has in the business ought not to
be alluded TO Drogg-but public teacher
ii public matter" tx
appears that the parties in New York interested in
the capture Of Medrano (who had sbscondcd with
bis nephew applied to Francis. H. Upton. Esq, now in
tive to Louisiana law; and after proper deberaon and
the careful preparation of documents the
davits in the premises for procedure both against Me-
drsno and Hernandez The Fanconia reached the city
The officers Of the law were on the watch vigiiant
and active. Mr. Youennes, the Captain Of the Guard
s ss p made mad III M
DEE, who has already arrived in the city has common
ced suit OF divorce and claims in her petition the pro-
visional guardianship Of her three
Margarta, Cecilia Eugenia, and MERGED Antonia-the
eldest Of whom is but six years Of age The children
ton which her petition presents AZ to the prevsona
care OF her children similar to those decided in Penn
in our tribunals in the cases Of Bullard vs. Bulard and
Of Mrs. Waggaman va. her husband suit has also
been instituted in the United States Court behalf Of
Eugene Brunand W. lldefonso Medrano in which the
plaintiff the nephew, claims the Of 800 900. As
these suits pending before our tribunals may be
to say nothing of the facts stated but we
cannot orbear the expression Of our warmes sympathy
for the anxious mother snd solicude lest the law
which takes Of the depths of maternal aHec
ton, and weighs not humanity and mercy in the balance
against arbitrary and artificial rights, may deprive her
OF those children who are her only solace ia her solitude
perhaps the only tie unbroken which binds her earth
But her Is in strong hands, and il to be submitted
to wise and impartial tribunals and may God prosper the
right We learn that oryme: Carter and McHsnry are
SUPREME Court DEcrsIoNs.-January Term =
Judgment OF the Common Pleas reversed and that
vs. Gilman, Jr-shuIer vs. Wsidron-Carpenter W. Earl
-Mather vs. Perry-Houghton vs. Unidentified and
Jud9msn y: povDupdck W. me- Me-
Vonner-Broadwel vs.. Geltman-Leland ct al. vs. Hall
ct al-Colegrovs vs. Breed ct Godfrey vs. Carroll
-Hallock w. Gillett-Blunt ct al. vs.. Wright Judg
ment afirmcd-Tice NEWFOUNDLAND W. keifsneider
Rice .Churchill-Dsvidson vs. Brown Harrison vs.
City Of Buaalo-LeweiIen vs.. oimsted-Rogsrs Vs. wal.
len-Buel W. Boughton-smith vs. Sagendorph-King
vs. johnson and wife-Abbott vs.. Yo.tClark survr
Rawson-Ketchum vs.. sawyer Whitney VI. Mellen--
village Of Auburn vs. J. T. PattenThe same w. B.
Patten-Smith Root-Johnson W. Johnson-Beadle
Thompson vs. Smith-Burghart W. Rice--Beach vs..
Gray-Bowyer W. Park-Kelly Va. Mood and Darby
fs0pIs rs n ss rs9ps
den Wendell vs. Crandsll-Rchsrds & Richards ads.
Hawk-Hsrrington vs.. Bigelow-Cooper ads. Turner
bun, sheriff &c-Van Dyck ads Pierce, admr-Buts Va.
Edwards-McCulough ads Harger Harger-Besley
ct al ads COivills jr-sarksr vs. Bucklin- walIath
Pitts ads wilder-Anable ads the People Burke et
al exrs vs.. Luce-Farmers' 4 Mechs Bank, Michigan,
vs. Van vechtcn-Rutz ". Puitz -Brggs ads
the Supervisors Of Onondaga-the Chenango county.
Tsy sM.a a.. cnssr
New trial ianted pay ment of costs-BIasdel ads
Eaton. New trial sranted-Nugent ads: the People.
New trial denied plaintiff deductng $ll % from the
verdict Gardner ads. Houghton Day. Proceedings
& Law Va stowel froceedings re.
snd 1:n 4.
nell vs. Todd & Todd-by Queens C. p. Turrsn Car
man ct Ably Onondsgs c. +. Shepard vs.. Philbrck-
by Jefferson C. r. Coon vs. Grovsr-by Monroe c. P.
Baker, sxr vs.. Robbins-by Ulster C.P Masten i'm
d s%s sn1ss
Judgment for plaintiff on demurrer with leave to amend
on usual Commercial Bank Of Buffalo vs. Spar
W.. Holmes-Besley ct al ads. Colver-Schuylsr ads.
Kellogg. Judgment for plaintiff demurrer, to I'd, 81
and 9th pleas Of Clark and ndsnsnt for Clark on de-
murrsr to replication to his Id and ID pleas leave to
amend on usual terms Commercial Bank Of Buffalo VS..
Sparrow Clark. Judgment for defendant on demur-
rer.-Leave TO amend usual ierms.-Mller ads.
wneeler.-wo Woodruff ads Wells Manhattan Company
ads. The Trustees Of the First Baptist Church. schee
lady. Motion In arrest Of judgment denied-Nay and
Wife ads Harper Report Of referees set aside costs
Downing err. ads. Bennett.-Borst W.. Neh and Nc.
DonneL Motion to set aside the report Of referees de-
MED on PLAINTIFF deductng 50 81 from the amount-Ee
70 vs. Becker Motion to set aside report OF referees de-
ads Prince Motion TO set aside report Of
referees MED on the plaintiff reiinqushing $40 % Of
the sum reported suydam adj Peck Motion TO SGT
aside inquiaiton denied plf reducing damages TO
cents costs this notion. Robertson ads Wilson
Papers defsctve-Aiosher vs. Wright--.4ibory Argus
Corn was selling at Corpus Christi few days