The Mississippi Creole. [volume] (Canton, Miss.) 1841-1851, 1846-08-29

rae EFQNlstpNa 81 Oh Sci ht inc leAielas
iufs of tbo State Of Mississippi, entitled San
bet 81 ensure tn collection Of lu tax fees,
end fof other ppFp0ses,' passed 24ih day 81
February. 1914, tha undersigned Sheriff D The
county of Madison, viii, Oh the Third Monday
the 2lst day Of September, I846, expose 70
public sale, at the door Of The court house y
said county, within the legal hours, all me
right, title, claim aud interest WHICH the seve-
Tal plaintiffs, hereinafter named, have IN and TO
the following iudgmentsy rendered in.the cir
cult court Of said county. at the dates fespec-
lively designated, to satisfy all costs accrued
and a%ccruing On the same, viz:
w Eakin Val g Napier, judgment 18th Mo-
vembeF i84i, fol- ,T64 10.
DIV Haley, assignee, SC, vs w n Legrand'
Judgment 9t6 November L84l, for 765 u.
ii s Tappan VI Il Sanders, JR Grigsby and
wv Wade, judgment 9th November 1871, for
900 90.
Ihe Gitizen's Bank use &c, VS. T. Smith, "
M Towns, AZ w Smith, w Wade and VIC
Crump, judgment 10Th November l84l, for y,
1853 76.
w S Bailey VI Baldwin Hudnall, Judgment
18th May l843, for l0,0i6 or.
Ell Powell 81 90 w David Anderson, ludg-
ment Oh November l84l, for 40d 32.
Everett Lewis Vs. w r Anderson, judgment
gist May 1871, for l,l65 90.
II Stone survivor &c, use &c, ys Jesse Ma
bry, Judgment 24th May l34l, for 222 90.
The Citizen's Bark Of Madison county, vs.
/ Sims. DOrrell Wright and James Pigg, ludg-
meDt 24th May l84l, for 1914 40.
Tie Citizens Bank Of Madison county, vs.
u Muse, judgment 22d May l84l, for rs 90.
The Citizens bank Of Madison county, vs.
UP Clark. d Smith and Iohn Briscoe, judgment
2Ist May l84l, for 1888 So
The Citlzen's Bank Of Madison county, VS.
s Ellis, D Matheny and J Logglns, Judgment
Gath May l84l, for 486 65.
The Citizens Bank o. Madison county, vs
s Ellis and Lcgglns, Judgment 4th May t04i
u { Peayce " NJ S GoG, judgment 25th
April 1897, for 256 73.
nj Buckner VI. D Mckay, judgment Oh
November 1888, Tor l09 II.
EH Powell ysJ 9 Walker, Judgment 24th
October 1887, for 81 48.
III ERichardson use III John w Ray, vs M 5
Goa. Judgment 25tb April 1887, ior leO W.
Ferr4days& Bennett sury az, vs Noble and
Bssindnail, Judgment 9Th November l84i, for
3,982 44
Fhe Cftizenfs bank Of Madison county, ys
ILMuse, Judgment 18th May ls4l, toF 2,iVo
The Citizens Bank Of Madison county, vs
kG Anu6TsuH DFs ~ n HuelAuu hhl
Anderson u, judgment 6fh MY ls4l, for gay
S6.
Tbe Citizens Bank Of Madison county, vs.
TNoble, WI Wade, i n Grigsb and Henry Il
Shrock, Judgment 9Th May l84l, for 6i6 20.
The Eitizen's Bank Of Madison county, VS.
ID Matheny,I Loggins and J Read, judgment
6sh May l84l, for 7l7 ".
The Citizen's Bank 81 Madison county, vs
BIG Marshall and w Wade, judgment 9th May
i84i, for 1881 90.
The C~ilizen's Bank Of Madison county, vs.
CIV Terrell, e r Anderson, J H Walker, W
II Fleming, j "A Young and A A Lynch, judg-
mens6th May I84l, for 1893 29.
The Citizens Bank of Madison county, W.
RIG Anderson Sr. r q Anderson If, w T An
derson and A Donahoo, judgment 9th May
1871, for 637 81.
LCampbell, &C Herbert and w N Winboufn,
judgment 9Th NAV l84l, for28O 70.
The Citizens Bank Of Madison county, VS.
Archibald Clark, B Clark, A Clark, CS Spann
and r Brown, judgment 9Th May lG4i, for g
sou SO.
r TidweIl use Of w Ferriday, vs Andrew
w Smith, III Smith and g ? Ayre, judgment
lst February 1910, for l,l6l 81.
w b Farer vs. r Richardson and Mathew z
Cayce, judgment Slst January 1910, for SO So,
President and Directors & co, OF Miss q Ala
RR Co. use Of G w Allen, vs. Austin & Hobbs
and r M Williamson, judgment 9th May l84O,
tor 1863 20.
Com Bank Of Natchez use Of w Ferriday,
vs. Il King, j Shrock and "A D Matheny, judg-
ment 9th May 1870, for 955 sc.
IN Cox, VS. Lewis Watson, Judgment 4th
May l84l, for $50 90.
w + Walker Va s D Livingston, judgment
2lst November l843, for 1888 SO.
E Powell use Of Cas Cox & co VS. John {
Boyd, Judgment 10Th November l843, for l4@
OBI
Henry Hamblen, surv admir- &c, VS. ] Morton
Read and K M Williamson, judgment l7tt
November l843, 394 06
Hubbard g. OFT ys Henry Phillips, judgment
18th November l843, for 222 90.
o P TaIlatelo & co, VS. J w Comfort, iudg.
ment 18th November l843, for SO 75a.
S Mathews We w w KeaLhley, judgment %
May l843, for ~ 80,
u Wells use OF B r Allen, VS. Henry White
CT Searles and JStone il, judgment 9Th MAY
I843, for 60 10.
w II Fleming surv &c vsR P Chambers AM
w Mcdaniel, Judgment lst may 1888, for l9
or.
III III Hart & S Lavender ys o b Green, n
Atchison and ] H Cheatham, judgment l3t
November l843, for 1853 ~.
] Wushburn use Of ! Slpde vs. ] Gaydor
judgment Goth May l843, for "a SO.
Lincoln II Murray use Of Josiah Newman '
Barr, Judgment 26th May l843, for 81 81
w Hoy vs. w Herty, judgment 25th Ma
1843, for 1853 81.
CIR Taliafer6 & co We w Staples, JUDI
ment 26th May l843, fol I06 rs.
G p TaliaferO & co vsS Thornhill, judi
ment 26th May l843, for 5l2 20.
CP TaliaferO Il co vs. N w Staples and G
Adams, judgment 26th May l843, for 262 0
w II steger u co vs. 9 Briggs, judgment
December 1842, for IS AS.
g w Clifton use of w E Harrald vs. Saml
Packet, judgment 23d May l843, for 6,984
N w Ilatch & B Whitfield, vs. H Christina
Judgment 18th May l843, for 100 80.
w ? Cook admir- &c VS. Holloway, iud
ment 18th May i043, for 1902 95.