New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-03-27
Business Notices
from the Gazette Times
THE NOTICE GIVEN TO QUTT-By Day TO Goodyear.
INDIA RUBsER.


THE NOTICE GIVEN TO QUfT-By Day to Goodyear
INDIA RUBBER.
The banded combination" determined 10 ore< III,
public mind 10 believe fasehood be truh-seeing tina
GOODYEAR esn no ger avoid the issue The powerful eo
now making TO public opinion is evidence OF no
weak they feel their 10 be.
Ny Counsel gave formal legal notice To thst OF Cha
Goodyear tire pretended inventor OF Metallic Rubber &c
that should before The Judges the dni'sG Of "a
Lax from Ccur. unless h 20 tG This was done
months since Seeing escape from longer delay
my prlous opponents making their las, dy
ing effort See how men who have nothing 10 lose and
every thing 10 gain, can hghs
The Combination say, tie recent case AT Warrington
being the application 0. hs and original inventor
Warner FOR patent his invention which he alleges has
been autulenty pirssd and patented By Goodyesr has
been decided OF Goodyear ha, he was the inventor
f,cy a. NOT 50 decided The Commissioner of Psieuts
says twas not Mylawyers snd Gooiyears lawyers know
that i, was no, Yet the Combination put forward tire fol
lowing from the Paten. Office, having tie appearance Of
ssei,1onr when IN fact nothing bu; PRINTED FORM
USED By THE CLERKS IN THE OFFICE TO IL
FORM APPLIC ANTS FoRP ATENTS. AND IN CASES
OF INTERFERENCE, OF THE PROGRESS OF
THEIR CASES BEFORE THE OFFICE; yet in this
csse ii IS put forward and published as the decision
record" &c. for purposes CT deception
TGoodyears Advertisement
L. S. PATENT OFFICE,
Washington City, Feb. s. 1876
SIR You hereby inot med that II The cas, OF inter
ner upon which hearing was appointed 10 tase place on
the Sd Monday in January 1885, the question OF priority
invention hiss been decided IN your tdsoT
Yours, respectfully, EDMUND BuR6E,
To CHARLES GOODYEAR Com u s'eH's'
Aboveis what the continuation pat forward TO prove
their ssehood that Office had decided Goodyear TO be
the inventor. Now read the copy of The decision Il
self the origius of which have received und er the hard
writing OF Mr. Burke himself and viii show IL 10 any ore
(DECIStON)
In the matter Of interference
between the claims Of Solomon G.
Warner applicant, and Charles Patent once,
Goodyear, Pateniee, for certain REQ D 1870
improvements In shirring India
Ierea, upon due examination OF the testimony submit
ted by respective parties fully appears that one
ziah Warner made machine for shirriug lnda huoher
goods prior 10 the construction or Invention o, sn.a
machine similar purpose by Solomon c Wsrner-snd
whereas farther appears that Charles Goodyear
the operation of shrug by msehiney prior To the MAXIM
of said machine by said Amaziah Warner Now there
fore IL is hereby decided that Solomon c. Warner 10 mol
The first inventor OF said machne for shrng inaa kuooer
rsbrics and such entitled TO receive patent there
for (Sgued) EDMUND BURKE,
Commits sioner Patents
From the above decisions Mr.. Warner has appealed 10
he Judge OF the u s. Court for District OF Coumbis and
what is satisfactory lhore be no delay By Good
year. il being in which he is not legally party In
due proceedings in Chaacey cause the patent granted to
Goodyear 10 be repealed for fraud
The decision above published not show that God
year invented constructed any machine OF kind and
such the evidence but which my opponents do lot wan
seen by the public.
u Warner applied his patent in 1914, IA mark thai
it was soon after Goodyear had taken out the Patent
Now the combination publish and say, Warner applied
the Patent Office the Patent OF Goodyear aside and
l1t the office refused Sc, aside &c. Now, they know
this deliberately false the Office bas no jurisdiction TO set
aside patent Every lawyer knows this, yet these men
who have every thing to gain and nothing 10 lose can
cheapy publish alsehood practice fraud and like Gil grades
of dishonesty the loss would bring hem up just they
were" This their fate in prospect this is admitted by
their acts of delay and combination.
Their contemplate threat TO prosecute merchants is HARM
less The merchants Of New.York and Philadelphia
derstand the character of Goodyesrs Patents" about
nop The Combination are prosecute any respectable
merchant of Newly ork Phllspelpha-ey dare not do
the cloveu mas been and merchants oil
fools or knaves; aud wrong and swndlng provided
against and Congress will increase the provision.
regards patent rights and for which have sbored sss!du
ously and am still sboring. HORACE II. DAY,
25 Maiden Jane; after lat May % ortlandst