The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1846-03-03

John Parsons
vs. Asbury q. On the equity side Of Worcester
Howard and county court, State Of Mary
Others, heirs at land, February equity term,
law OF David February 8, ls4G.
Howard.
I'VE bill IN this case states that certain David
II Howard, late of Worcester county, hath de-
parted this lie indebted TO the complainant will
appear by exhibit A herewith filed, and is prayed
70 DC aken az part Of this bill Of complaint; that
leusrs ot administration on the personal estate Of
the said David Howard were granted and commit
ted by the orphans court Of Worcester county
aforesaid TO u certain Elizabeth Howard his widow;
that the personal estate Of the said David is INSULT
elent for the payment Of his debts that the said Da-
vd died seized OF certain real estate lying and being
in Worcester county aforesaid that the said David
died intestate, leaving the following his only child
rem and his heirs AT law; Asbury c. Howard, Mar
eellus J. Howard, John ID. Howard, Ellen ID.
Moore, wife of Thomas J. Moore, Julia Ann Laws,
wife Of Jonathan Laws, and Louisa c. How
ard tina, the said Louisa c. Howard and John d.
Howard infants under the age OF twenty.oD
years; that all the said defendants reside IN Wor-
cester county, and are in Worcester county, except
Msrcellus ID. Howard, who resides in the State Of
Mississippi, beyond the jurisdiction Of this court,
and Thomas J. Moore and Ellen Moore, who re-
side IN Caroline county; that all the parties are OF
iuu age except Louisa e. Howard and John ID.
Howard who are infants under the age Of twenty
one years The supplemental bill, filed the eighth
day Of January, 1876. states that Elizabeth How
ard, administrators ofDavid Howard therein named,
hath departed this life since the issuing Of the pro-
cess In this case; that Jonathan Laws, therein
named, hath also departed this life; that Louisa G..
Howard, another Of the defendants, hath ntermsr-
RED with u certain William Wimbrow, Of Worces-
ter county; and that since filing the said original
bill the complainant hath discovered that John ID.
Howard therein named, resides ip the State Of Mis-
sissippl. The bIl therefore, prayA that the real
tate OF the said David Howard may be sold for
the payment of his debts by decree Of this
COURT and that subpoena may issue for the said
Elizabeth Howard, administrative Of the said David
Howard, Asbury G. Howard, Mareelhs ID. How
ard, John ID. Howard, Thomas J. Moore, and Ellen
d. Moore, his wife, jonathan Laws and Julia Ann
Laws, his wife, and Louisa G. Howard, command
ing them TO be and appear IN this court 10 answer The
premises. II is thereupon ordered and adiudged
that the complainant, by causing copy Of this or
der to be published in newspaper published IN
the city Of Washington in each Of six success
siye weeks before the fifteenth day Of April next,
give notice 10 the raid Marceus ID. Howard and
John ID. Howard, the said absent defendants OF the
object and substance Of this BILL and warning them
to be and appear IN this court, in person by So
icitor, or before the ID Monday in August next,
to answer the premises and show cause, il any they
have, why decree should not be possed as prayed.
Test: GORDON M. HANDY, Clerk.
Maryland, Worcester county, SC.
hereby certify that the within and aforegong is
truly copied from the original order Of publication
of notice now on file in Worcester county court
In testimony Whereof hereto subscribe my name
and nffx the seal Of the Worcester county
Il. s. court this twelfth day Of February, in the
year Of our Lord eighteen hundred and for
ty-six
GORDON NJ. HANDY,
Clerk Worcester county court.
Feb. l7-law6w