New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-02-03
Inv COlrts.

SUPERIOR CouRr-rhc only tried yesterday
an action OF assault and battery brought by one
butcher against another for assault at shop IN the
7th.avenue. Verdict for plaintiff SO, which carries
Ike amount OF costs.
The Court was occupied most OF the day in hearing
motions and giving decisions.
York and Erie Ridlroad Compaay-The pialnuh oo'
tanned verdict against the Company IN gu acton Tor
services in canvassing for subscriptions &c SUBJECT 10
the opinion of this Court The Court considers Fhat
Cen Lyman was an interested witness not having re-
ceived a release. New trial granted.
4nR Far VS.. Richard Mor.imer.-Thc plaintiff entered
an action eectmcn recover possession OF property
corner Wall and New streets. Motion is made for new
trial The Court considers that than 20 years hav-
ing elapsed she cannot contest the validity OF the par
;tOr. New trial denied. 49,
Ed,eard Co5b vs. The Baptis, Ciurch IN O!jcrst-1he
plaintiff erected the Church and entered an action
10 recover balance due. The detendents claim OIL
ofpartcuars The pairi states that be handed heary
all his accounts and papers 10 one oil the individuals c'
nected with the church. and asks for discovery al tho
papers. Motion for discovery allowed
CorRr or COMMON PLEAs.-p. & WaLkT IS Der
uGrd AiGre1 and EdcGrd r Cr-e1Act!On OF replcvin
10 recover piano forte which taken from store 81
plaintiffs by the officers claiming il AS one when ma
been in possession OF Mrs. Marshall No. ~ Bowery ana
levied upon for under landlords warrant anu SUD
s-auently taken away. 1t appears that plaintiffs mad
hired to Mrs NJ piano forte aud got it away after the
levy but the taken by the officers was not the same
To be continued this forenoon. Forplsniiii l. Doyle
Esq For defendants = w talnes ana james j. ptauS
E.qrs.
H.nry Di1oa va BuisrfeM $ Brotdrs.-Acton 10 Re
cover about 1000 being asserted value OF clothes cor
signed to defendants aad burnt their store No ~ TX
change place the great IRE in July last but when II
contended defendants should have insured To De con
tinued this forenoon. For plaintiff u r. CiaIA' Esq for
defendant Daniel Lord, Esq.
Richard f. Mount Jr. rs AGRd SEyddr1 dpd Ph,oe Sa
dam-1hc report this Ia paper Oi saturday
last was Incorrect IL is therein stated that Mr. Mount
charged the defendants 500 for drawing mortgage sc
and undertook invest their money. sc. No charge
was ever made for services would The defendants
have had TO pay had the transaction been com
pleted The error arose from the nominal damages
which are usually laid in tue plaintiff 5 defamation
Moreover was proved the trial that the plaintiff and
his partner had refused the responsibility OF advising mo
loan on any particular property. The confidence OF the
plaintiff in making the advance Tor ie" hours was
abused and the verdict against the defendants surprise
Court and somewhat tineed by The popular pre-
jucc against lawyers aud the circumstance of the de
PENDANTS being females.
ASSISTANT VICE CHANcELLoE's CoURr.-.NGtW b..
gardus and Others Trinity Church Of Nen f0rf NM
others This il an action Ouc.sNth oi what
was formerly called the Queens Farm on the westerly
side OF Broadway The grant, was made by Queen ann
to Trinity Church in 100 The plaintiffs cains nght
of properly heirs of Cornelius B9gardus son 0f Annek
Jams who IL is averred bad possession and owned the
property in 7G is con,euded hgt the grant OF Queen
Ann was void she granted than belonged to her
The bill also seeks the Trinity Church corporation
discovery of their income "a by their charter and the
provincial law of l76i the church was prohibited from
accommodating property beyond 4JUO \. J. currency in
value year while the yearly income now Is over $500
600 portion of which il is claimed belong plaintiffs
Ii il commended tire other hand That the church has
legal right ia the property The argument CON.
menced Yesterday sn0 will be resumed this forenoon
Brady Esqrs. For defendant Me5srs Benz +. Butler D.
P. Ogden and Dunscomb