The Mississippi Creole. [volume] (Canton, Miss.) 1841-1851, 1846-07-18

Il g Taliafero &cos We S Thornhill, iudg
ment 26th May 1913, for Sig 20.
CT Taliafero & co vs N w Staples and
7 A dams, judgment Goth May I843, for 262 90
Y i steger y 60 ys Briggs, judgment 81
, c w Clifton use of w E Harrald VS. ssaml N
Pickett, judgment 23d May I843, for 1894 12
7 W Hatch & Whitfield, vs. Christmas
! Judgment 10Th May 1843, for l09 &c.
w T Cook admir- &c vs. Holloway, judg
: ment 18th May I843, for ,202 ,95. !
. 1843, for $50 r83. II
y sCP Taliafero5& co vs. 8 D Livingston, iudg
ment 18th May l843, for, Tl8 35:
i FeIidag 3 Bennett sufv &c VS.. Martha I
tunnels Ex'rx &C. judgment 18th May 1843
for 4,3l0 86. i ~ q ~
VIC Ifansborongh use 81, j, M Towns & CO
Y $ 4 GgdIaaafald. adsnsns "a NAY ia4s,sfe'
- M Ateh'pson V z G Herbert, judgment 5th
May l843, for27l SIS. @
RMcKee vsC Myers and H Christmas, iudg.
ment l9th February l845, for 54s9la.
Henry Hafnblaa vs James Adams, jud ginent
9th May 1913, for 4O7 So
i E H Powell Il CO VS. Heard & Livingston.
adm'rs, judgment 28th November 1843, for $40
! T Barbour use of J Williams, vsR S Fargu-
son and J Sutton, judgment Both November
l843, for $50 81. 80
- B downing vss Dougherty, iuda nent 18th
November l843, for 29O co.
The Citizens Bank of Madison county, vs.
s M Flournoy, w Hoy and r Gtigsby, iudg-
ment 18th November l842, for $40 TO-
s Deans VS. A King, T Bray,sA Allen, D Fore
and G NJ Price, Judgment 25th November l842,
for 1900 38.
w H steger & co VS. N Briggs, Judgment Sd
December l842, for 81 772.
M Hancock use. of R M Latmer, VS. S D
Livingston, judgment 25ih November 1912, for
1874 40.
M Atcbison VS. G Herbert, Judgment 25th
November l842, for 283 GO.
S Blount VS. A King, T Bray, A Allen, D
Foote and G VI Price, judgment 25th Novem-
Der l842, forl $40 Ia.
L>Mitchell nse of w R Chambers VS. w
Leggitt,j udgnient 25th November 1912, for 1874
M S Hancock use of R M Latimer adm'r&c
y, D Livingston, judgment 25th November
1912, for 1877 81.
The Citizens Bank OF Madison county, VS.
J White and T Mulhn, Judgment 18th Novem-
Der 1842, for 252 So.
E W Pittman use Of S NJ Old, VS. I Spencer.
judgment lth November 1912. for SO 25.
Stone jr, admir- &c, vsJ c Boyd, judgment
18th November 1912, for 2O3 80. 1T
Hansbrough & benson VS. A w Smith, .iudg-
ment 3lst January 1910, for $40 50.
b Herrod use Of JJ Ellis, VS. w Anderson,
judgment Goth November 1912, for 1878 "a.
Compton & Masse use of Compton & Old
ham, vs. X M Williamson and w C h ewsom,
Judgment Gath October 1887, for 356 "a
+ Marshall VS. W Jones, judgment 23d Nay
1912, for 400 l2A. ~
Chewing g. Dawson VS. G OFT, Judgment 81,
October 1887, for 8,520-l8.
q w Mcdowell use tf Germany VS. Vinson
Sanders Sander and Hanna, judgment 25th April
Cash, Cox &, co, We John Read, judgment 10,
May 1842, for SO 81.
Cash, Cox g. co, vs. W N Thorn, Judgment
10th May l842. for 1876 81.
Martin, Baird & CO use of s Brown vs. VIM
? Cook, judgment 9Th May 1912, for ZIG 3d.
Compton & Massey, VS. JohnsW Leggitt, udg-
mcnt 18th May 1842, for 1874 81.
R Tidwell use Of w Ferrday VS. T Bray, C |
B Green and w Wade, judgment 5th May i842
for 345 SO.
J Bailey vs. Willie Lyons, judgment 9Th
May 1912, for 1856 AZ
J J McCnughan VS. D Hardeman, judgment
1th May l842, for 324 70.
The Citlzen's Bank of Madison county, VS.
I II Christmas, H Christmas and Christmas,
Judgment 9th May 1914, for | $50 90.
X Tidwell use of w FerriGay vs. Bprrough
md N Towns, judgment l2th'May l84l, for
Tidwell use of w Ferriday VS. D Atkins
md s Hodge, judgment 10Th May l84l, for
1891 43.
R Tidwell use of w Ferriday, VS. Williams
84l, for 81 90.
R Tidwell use of w Ferriday, VS. D tkins,
Judgment 10Th May l84l, for III 80.
8 Pope, Kirk & CO, Bede Johnson, iudg- J
nent 3lst January 1910, for 208 AZ.
The Citizens Bank of Madison county, VS.
White, w N thom, T Mullin and VIM How,
Judgment 18th November l84l, for 2,742 SO.
R Tidwell use of W Feniday, VS. M Towns
nd Joseph Burrough, judgment 10Th May I84l
Or 1903 SO. i
N Tins & T Bowden VS. T Donnahoo and :
L Clover judgment 3lst January 1910, for
% 95.
r Mckee use of FSpinnette vs. Myers and
Christmas Judgment 10Th February 1916, for {
4 SO.
Hays use of M GAYS, VS. w HOY, Thos a.,
iulin, w E Harrald and Briscoe, Judgment !
9th May 1914, for 1908 so. {
Henry Hamblen VS. Desmare and II Taylor
irv &c, judgment 23d May l842, for 4,2O5 80 9
w. S. BAILEY, Sh1.
July A, 1916. 4
sHERIFF's SALE.