The Mississippi Creole. [volume] (Canton, Miss.) 1841-1851, 1846-09-19

J W Eubank vs. S Holloway, w Hol-
loway, A Holloway and R Eubank, judg-
ment 4lh May l84t, for 1,649 38.
John Hall VS. James Clark, Judgment
2lst May 1910, for 1876 90.
Caruthers, Harris & co, VS. A A Nc.
Willie, judgment 20th May 1910, for
Ago SIS.
Commercial Bank Of Manchester use
&c, ysJ II Andrews, J Il Walker and 0
J E Stewart, judgment :, February 1910
for 1853 66A.
B NJ Jinkins VS. S M Flournoy, judg-
ment 4th May 1S4l, for 172 10.
Douglass e. Thompson use &c, VS. S.
Hornsby, judgment 9Th May l04l, for
100 3l4.
w liam Walker VS. E H Powe !, judg
ment 4th May 1871, for 3,243 90.
William Walker VS. M Barrier, judg
ment 4th May l84I, for 3,243 90.
H H & S Hart use &c VS. Peter Smith,
A Clark and DE- McCarty, Judgment ~,
May l841, for so Oh.
HH&S Hart use &c VS. P NJ Garrett,
s v Mitchell and N Atchison, judgment
goth May l841, for 245 81.
A Curcicr VS. W B Martin, J H Baird
and J G Napier, judgment 26, May 1871,
for 306 40.
J Elder vs. &c Boyd, ju lgment goth
May 1871, for asa 40.
W Mcintyre VS. NJ C Cayce, Judgment
31st January 1910, for SO rs.
G May6eld VS. E Fl Stone and w Den
son, judgment 26, Nav 184l, for 357 33
G $ Oglesby VS. U B Oglesby, judg-
ment 4lh May 1910, Tor $50 %.
II 81 0 Anderson &. co vs. ] Clark
an John Briscoe, judgment 26th Nov1r
1872, for 1927 60.
r N Thompson use &c VS. Abram A
Melville. Judgment goth November
l842, for 300 80.
w Mcintyre VS. C R'Crawford, iudg
ment och November l842, for 427 90.
Lynch 1. O'Rilcy use &c VS. w Wade,
judgment Is, November 1912, for SO 424,
J II Baird use 8c VS. Bede Johnsog,
judgment 26, November 1842, for rs 81
Earps, McMain, Haven and West VS.
J J Ellis and A A Melville, judgment Is,
November l842, for 349 81.
D Robinson VS. J c Boyd, ED Cash,
W f Cox and w f Harrald, Judgment
18th November 1842, for I46 08.
Lydia Parmale admr'x, use &c, VS.
Israel Spencer, Judgment 18th Novem.
Der l842, for 256 80.
Huddleston q. Wildly VS. H A RunneIs,
judgment 25, November 1912, for 1876 70
w Mcintyre VS. J R Grigsby, Judy
ment 25th November 1912 for 81 SO.
S Townsend VS. J J M,Caughan and
T Humphreys, judgment25th Nasegz7i
b. $40 f1r Isl
Mitchell, Callahan and Gillespie use
&c, VS. John Duke, judgment 9th May,
l942, for 26o 10.
w s Rainer admir-, VS. J R Grigsby,
Judgment 10th May 1912, for 292 87a.
W Raynor admir- Vs. T Heth, iudg
ment 10Th May 1912, for 5I8 81.
Builitt, Ship a. co, VS. W Joiner and W
benson, Judgment Goth November 1912,
Tor 1852 81.
Staunton e. Buckner VS. E II Powell,
Judgment Cd December 1642, for AIS rs.
w Drane, use &c VS. R NJ Williamson,
judgment 9Th November 1912, for II 60.
Dyer Pearl VS. J c Boyd, Judgment 28,
May 1914, for 1000 30.
Forsyth 4. Atterbury VS. Williamson
Smith, judgment 4th May 1843, for ass
70.
Hamblen &. Latham use &c vs. John J
Henry, S M Flournoy, R N Cox and W
Hoy, judgment 9th May 1910, for 9,o40
90.
CPTaliarero &. co VS. VIM Smith iudg-
ment 26th May 1916, for 148 SO.
G W House use &c, VS. R M William
son, judgment 18th May l846, for 1898
&c.
Wm Hardeman VS. WilliamF Walker,
judgment 18th May l843, for 267 25.
W Swan vs. J H Cheatham surv &c,
Judgment 10Th May l843, for 9l3 33.
G w Tllley VS. &C Herbert, judgment
9th May l843, for 1898 33.
w A Pegram VS. G W Allen. c w Cliff
ton and Allen 8. Bennett, judgment 4tf
May l843, for 4,760 90.
Elias Johnson VS. B R Allen, ex'r, &c
Judgment 92d November l843, for 1885,
As,
E&.sAS humway use &c, vs. Phinea.
NJ Garrett, judgment 22nd Noyembe
l943, for SO 81.
R Christmas surv, &c, VS. Israel Spen
Ger, judgment 2sth November 1843, 70
81 "a.
w. S. BAILEY, SA,f.
July 4, 1916. 42-t
INsOLvENT NOTICE.
WE the undersigned Commissioner