Rutland herald. [volume] (Rutland, Vt.) 1823-1847, 1846-07-30
TIE TARiFF-.A VETO MES.
CAELs

VIII NC Np'httu, Nv tHe VttScW COUki'N,
and MrNk Rays bill substituted IN us stead
Now, why should any lone entertain this
oplnlonl Dors Mt every body know that
Tie democrats party, 50 called, will sustain
this mcnsurr2 Arc they not the champions
OF the Tariff OF 1897 Aud was it not
proclaimed before the election, by James
Buchanan, he now Secretary Of State
that siaunch old Fedctalis,---,hat MIR Polk
was a better Tariff man Than Mr Cidyl'
And dill no, James Is. Polk, himself, write
lclcr 10 John X Kane, which letter was
interpreted to the people Of Pennsylvania,
by the leaders Of the invinc IDLE mud untcrt.
fed democracy, to mean, thatMr PoW ~0S
in mror Of he Tariff of42!
Now, let every body quiet their fears -
Is no; Mr. Polk PRESIDENT Well suppo
sing thutMr McKays bill passes thctlousc
IA very supposubIe fac, and then is sent to
the Senate and the Senate should vote up.
on it, and by the aid of Texas, there should
be u tic aud that patriotic C) consistent Ci
Tariff advocate, Mr. Gcoge NJ DIIlas, OF
Pennsylvania -now Vice President, and
having u casting vote to MouM (l
the thing be possIblr) give that vote IN fl.
vor Of Mr. Mckay's bill, and the bill hav.
ing passed both Houses, awaits only the
signature OF the President to become n law
Well, we say surprising al this and sup
posing the bill to have crossed the Exccu.
tive threshold, and is now un lor tho eve Of
james X. Polk Does any body suppose
that Mr. Polk will sign il1 Can ihorc be-
any body who would presume to suppose
thu, Col James X Polk, the head & from,
Of the modern Democracy, he who was "a
better Tariff man than Mr. Clay" would
do such m nnll.dcnocrntic thing, ms to take
up his democratic pen, aud with trembling
fngrs, write the woids-James h Polk
upon the flcc Of n bill which repcals the
Tariff Of 422 Impossible reader, impos
slble II he took up his pen n, all. would
II not b" ior the purpose Of writing A We.
TO MESSAGEf Would he not send
for his old Federal friend James Buchanan,
Mo"cM M1t he had a drop ofDcmocratic MonJ
~ my rcp''. he mooH toko lancet and lot
a cut" ana for lngcrsoll, the viper, who
once declared that "if he had lived in the
days Of the Revolution, he would have been
a IORYl'to come up Immediately to the
Executive Chamber, and prepare a rcio
mcssage' Certainly, he would, for Colo.
mel Polk, like his party, is rery consistent;
and he wouldn't like to have all the wol Id
know tina! he was the champion OF ,luIar.
III before the election, ard the champion a.
Galnsl II after.
Now, who doubts tu, ,ha, Mr. Polk will
send IN Veto Messagc2 We know that
all things are doubiful, Mr are rcyy uncer-
tdtn-nnd we know, also thai Democracy
is Tie Supremacy Of Man orsr has actions; &
hence putting this 4 tina, together, no other
inference can be drawn, ,hnn that Mr. Polk
will follow the example Of John Tyler, his
democratic predecessor, IN the leadership
OF the democracy, and send in Veto, which
viii be received with universal oy,undoubt.
,d'y, by those who vouchCd for his oTlhod-
o1y on this vrScd question.
Who thinks there won't be a Veto o
Don't the dcmocra cy always come up TO
the mark? Did no, heMassAchusc,,s Dem
ocracy, with Marcus Morton Mt their head
proclaim 10 the world their ho.lIlles 10
the Texas iniquly, and are they not bat.
Ting against the extension Of Slavery7 or
couIse they are; nobody would suppose for
momcn!, that they would
"Crook the pregnant hinges Of tho knee,
That Thrift might follow la~nug."
Did no, Mr. Baghy and Mr. BfinkCthoh
dec lain against Texas, 10 the Senate and
House, and, al course, we cannot suppose
tha, either one OF them voted for the bill -
Did not the doughty democracy from Ohio
with Mr. Brlnkcrhon al their head, strike
for higher wages, & come out vii a man.
ifcslo agans, this British bill Of Mr. Nc.
kny's2 And who is there base enough to
suppose, for moment. TINT, no,wIthsiand
ing their ears were bo1ed and cuHd by
Grand marm Richie, and a severe Aigcl
lnlon administered by the whippers they
would back OUT AS we have been told,
By high authority, that Mr. Polk was bat
ter Tariff man than Mr. Clay, and also that
the tariff Of AZ would be safer in his hnnds
lhnn IN Mr. C's, | must ask, Mr. Editor. if
the British bill Of Mr McKny's passes the
Senate, il we have not right to cXpcc, A
FETo MEssAGE FRoM JAMES n. Polk,
| told democratic neighbor Of mine,
the other day, that | thought the Tariff of
'42 wns safe and that II wonldn! be re-
pcaIcd Ills eyes Frightened up, md he
seemed TO rejoice; says he, "how'd ye know,
Ia 2 anything new from Washington -
IN OF very" said J. We'll, said he, what
makes YOU think soT He was evidently
on The anxious seats, as he is deeply inter.
csled IN branch Of manufacture which he
will have TO bid Good bye to, if this bill
.
him tina, had it from high democratic nu.
lthoriiy, the Boston Morning Post, lha, Mr.
Polk was firm and dicnifcd man, and
would carry on the principles ofthe party
aud that the dcmoc ratio patty was always
true to It's princips, and, in looking over
some democratic papers, discovered that,
before the election, they were committed 10
rhe Tariff Of ls42' and, as M Polk was
firm and dlgnfed, the party was always
true 10 its principles that il Congress with