New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-03-31
INDIA RUBBER.
70. children.

INDIA NJ borh-
Efforts on the part OF Il. Day deny 10 30 away
with the effect Of late decision OF the Commissioner OF
Paten.s in the MISTER OF ntar-resce between Solo
mon c. Warner Charles Goodyear, wherein the claims
aud preer or Warner aside, have made
1t necessary for in the absence Of Nj Goodyear 10 de-
fend The foul and false ssserGors OF one who
has qne much and far less 10 toe than the ma
ory who appropriate 10 themselves the result OF
other mems labor and then, by The aid OF ga d"e and
which few so well understand how raise seek 10 preu-
dice the public by arousing lis syGpaies in his IA
vor.
In my efforts this matter right before The public,
have con,en,ed myself with he publication of the record.
from Ocr believing that they woui be credited
In preference 20 assertion OF whose mental vi
sion has become eclips-d by the " iaVs delay
In recen, communication published in most OF the city
papers, Day
The combination ssy lie recent case Al Warrington
being the application Of ana gna inventor War
ner for patent for his Invention which he alleges has been
raudueny paIea and patented by Goodyear, has been
decided in favor Goodyear that be was the inventor
"ISAY 1T WAS NOT 40 decided. The Commissioned OF
? uleGis says il was not"
Here is Days assertion; the language OF the
Commissioner of Patents, copied from communication IN
the Day, ard putished by him in connection
with tho article containing the above assertion.
Patent Office February ,, 1876
Whsre.s upon due examination OF the testimony by the
respective parties rally appears that one 'nd;hs Warner
made machine shrng India Rubber goods PRIOR 10 the
construction invention of similar machine for siniar
purpose, By Solomon C. Wamer-and where's 1t Jrthef
appears Charl-s Goodyear mars the language Per
formed the operation stirring by machinery to the
making OF said machine by ssid 4mn;,ah Uarner-now,
therefore, hereby declared tina, Solomon c. Warnfr
nor the r inventor said stirring India Rub
Der inbrc, and such is entitled 10 receive patent
therefor. [signedl
EDMUND BURKE, Com Of Patents
II the au guage the Commissioned of Patents
proves thing lie claims OF Solomon c. Warner Days
proteee aside the decision OF the
Commissioner 90 and besides, To render the claim
of Solomon c. Warner still hopeless and in the nh
all night claim aside from possession) which, by
the way rather important Than otherwise the part ct
Mr. Goodyear in the premises the Comms'i0n-r mas dec
ded that one Amazsh Warner has claim prior 10 the one
contended for By Solomon c. Warner.
In the recent Wspnper controversy in which Mr Good
year and those in his many and valuable discov
cries have he1n reluctantly dawD there
has msnifest disposon the part of Day 10 intro
duce matter entirely foreign the point issue and in such
manner lead those not acquainted with him 10 take
for granted every thing he committed to paper whether true
n false and who purchased AMI ald hIs good
in direct violation OF GoOtye patent have been made 10
believe that The delay In prosecution has been owing 10
want OF proof 10 guhsan,sl- hs claim ard in he
the of his goods The damages that must anu
will he sustained aGs them in suits about 10 be comnenc
ell by the Psten:s-. MERCHANTS WHO SELL THE
/ GOODS MANUFACTURED BY DAY SHOULD BEAR
/ IN MIND THAT UNLESS THEY ARE FULLY S.
CURED BY A BOND OF INDEMNITY, THEY HAVE
NO REDRESS FOR LOSSES THEY MUST SUSTAIN
! BY THE TERMINATION OF GOODYEARS SUITS.
AND NO MAN BUT DAY HAS EVER DENIED THE
VALIDITY OF GOODYEAR'S PATENT FOR SHlR-
RED GOODS, BY WHATEVER PROCESS MADE
! AND CERTAINLY IF DAY Is SINCERE IN HIS
! OPINION THAT GOODYEAR HAS NOT A VALID
PATENT FOR THESE GOODS, HE CAN HAVE NO
! REASONABLE OBJECTION AGAINST SECURING
| THE BUYERS OF HIS GOODS AGAINST JUDO
! MENTS AND COSTS OF SUITS.
| Day says the Patent Office has not decided that Good
wear was the inventor; has only decided that Solomon c.
Warner the inventor Day himself has sworn in his
answer Goodyssrs BILL file n the Uoiled States
Court, that Solomon c. Warner the INVENTOR the Com
missioner OF Patents has decided ths he Solomon C. w mr.
nsr is the inventor, Dsy admits now unless Day
means up other person To contest Goodyeafs
right OF invention than the Day has already
the inventor The validity OF Goodyears Patent is ore9eo
established by Days oath and the decision of the Patent
Osice.
But let Il, remembered ha there three other Patent.
embraced in article OF SHRED Go0ds which Day is
couuterfeing GEORGE BEECHER
Agent for Goodyears Manufactures,
t,,,o,-,, H. rae &c.,, r.norLsd Inv nm eminsnt plys
i"toN ''' - Loo "''1 - .. -. lid.
clan that there ID scarcely complaint WIN winch chdreh
a'e aeed ''a' iaa' lo' " - ,a,
py ae p,e'enee u ~ ,-e
we'll others who have the OF children 10 employ
such will destroy these snas thereby preventing
wan, of the d;sse,es which are proapc.d bv Them, and
which frequently prove fatal To those are desrous
OF procuring medicine that VIII efettuay destroy worms
! . diam
nothing equal 10 tilt Ia harmless, yet effective See ad
verisemenL
-. n,,o-,,, ,o.,ir,oia, fo,, pb,,s;cians and nth
80 1 'N' =, $500, W,
r., - i, iowa ,;o, c ,,,ovr,s both IN chill
'''"s' u.s. o.-,,,,;.,, -. So ,'..,;o,ors !,
uiI u f ai.a a. e. No 40 Iobnst Retail nrire %
cents Der bottle n2i TuTh&Satti
u.,.a,,.,o-.- ,o,, oir,.hla ;rye,,op
has already attained fame which few OF the sas c!asA has
eyer yet eqIaigu a7 .e T nb from, ,S ioyn.
riIs ~ II. comnosj,iou vast number OF diseases are
engendered By unceany state OF the head me pores OF
me sK9 Of "ncn anOuls hh !; ha o on,,ad mos,
positive PROOF OF its efficacy anc the aty endeav
]