New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-08-28

L-ga Practice; The People demand ia- !..er, ard
caano, obtain i without The expenses o:
Litigation Dc curised IL lzuta!iziHg ruinU1= C.
lays Z END. Here have supreme
Court ho!oinE tour terms ear ana cisposIs a. eac1 Vi
something Ike Uue-fourh OF The is Ca!eac az
leaving hundreds untouched though they oiiea more ne
Chancerv IS fairy choEed with case ;ha; re
reached 10! res5s- plausible, scheIlas man
yers-d In the game Of Law only &c; large property
hands ne fortune out q; Il before
le Law viii restore II 10 the rgh;ui owner -'e i'T'
/ Tribune, No. 1851.
ALBANY Wednesday. Angus; %. 1876
/ IT, ile EdE0y Of The Tribune:
SIR. It appears to me that when our oreia;hers
beyond sea 800 years since in Germany England Scot
land France &c took stand against 4 welorgsnized
state monopoly Of Priests who would let ou; them
selves expound Cod Law and vino held tro-rH the
mos, dreadful puui-hIneu;s against Freedom Of Opinion
and translators OF bibles their task gi-r
tic than that winch their descendants about 10 begin
very seriously on this Continent, in reforming tie
uf,-Ira ambiguous antiqua,ei anti Republican but most
profitable ar; and mystery likely b. fastened
NOR, upon society this stat IN t!i IL deiormy ~
"a niaiprv OF the Convention sitting IN tn= CRY
under tie fascinating British and Roular names u ON
mon l.p,v Equity. Bat let no man despair Bishop
Uughcs and Bishop NcCOskry are a. inucn opposed 10
state Church now the most decided Puritan OF New
England ever 20 they lay and heieve them-
And H. a. r Marvin tell ihe administration o; Pub
lie Justice : condition IN the Western states
fhuu il j. here tho VINO do not 1--we by the adlnlp-tra
non OF thr Law there are to be piticd
TIL. 81 ~. Judge itl-Ec-- Report establishing
new Court of Error extra. 20 correspond with the
aupslare Jurisdiction of the Law Lords. they
called in the House OF Peers and win the old Cour; OF
Error here the which very much taken up N
reversing decisions the supreme Court, adopted
TODAY in Convention II 10 Il but tine number in il ia
yor much larger. Several gentlemen voted N the
negative bec,lu-e thu machine Tor enabling the G!-Aoi
81 debtor 10 keep the cuuidiu- creditor little long
.r out OF hi- money improved 20 their liking
Ia the United states Courts Il bring an acton tor
$1,000 tie Circuit Court there l. but one appca!-to
the Circuit judges sitting supreme Court. our
Convention have provided appeal 10 supreme
Court the Circuit and then The old -tep-Sn appeal
from that again 10 the Court OF Errors provided II
No aud mali he Judges OF the final appeal may be the
Judges who tried the iri appeal. and OF them may
| b. the Judge vino tried the cause III Circuit With "a
careful observation nothing IN this but desire
20 enrich the profession OF the law at the expense OF the
peace aud comfort OF the public. II The lst ApPeA!
Judges are competent why have second set Il they
ur, not why erect mock tribunal 20 delay Justice.
| am dCnagoguc, ready 10 say "ltt 40 hol lh!HH
because i, is popular. have braved popular opinion
where though, II wrong and, with Wesley can re.
member that when Christ earth the people,
when Appended to cried Cruelty him cruelty MN
But public opinion ii does not stop this work now
will dcnouncc hereafter bitterly a II mas the ardy
proceedings Of our present cuforou7 appeal trloana4'
it's the cnterprsing the honest, the industrious the
wealthy the merchant manufacturer mechanic and
irreholier and ability that are 10 suffer by
! this movement The poor have nothing 10 lose
oppose this Court because consider II ndispt ssnoc
society that properly should be protected not reyed
/ upon,
Suppose the Appeal JUtccs IN different Districts to
rive posiic and conflicting decisions upon their oaths
/ In some things What follows That another Appeal
Court shall be- constituted make the doubtful law Just
what il plcases Certainly not Let all such uncertain
be- reported 20 the la'vnakins power. IN order
clear and distinct statute expressive OF the true
meaning the law. may be passed Must every man
pay new fee and wait year longer Tor !usuce be
in some few cases Judges may diner - 10 tic
meaning OF II British rule
Mr. Bascom Is the steady opponent OF this extra Ap-
peal Court-so Is Nj Richmond Though an expe!i-
cnccd lawyer Mr. Bascom repudiatcs Auglous Consu'
tuition under the prctext OF desire 10 get uniform
decisions There is feature in the character OF
that eminent lawyer legislator and statesman Id
nund Burke which is more 10 De admired thhn MS ma
tired al legal which keeps society IN perpetual
turmoil by endless litigation Eminent merchants ana
mechanics OF your city have often told me that they
often lost debts OF magnitude rather than make pad
| worse by placing the debt IN a lawyers haId-
The fret division this morning upon the PROPOSE
ton By Mr.. PATTERSON, that there should be elght
Judges in the Appeal Court each Of them TO De elected
by separate district THIS was osol against f. as
follows viz
AYss-Messrs Allen. Archer Ayrauli F. F. Buckus, H.
Backus Baker, Bascom. Bruce b7indage BUT Csndee
Chamberlain, Cook CrooGer Dana Dodd O9T.nn, r ian
ders. Geuha!d, GrAlam Harris, harrison haw!eyi T.
Huntington Marvin Miller Morris Sehoia-, Fsf; RAJ
erson Penniman Porter Rhoades Richmond sa.ishuy'
Shaver Shepard W. II. Spencer, Strong, Iaggar Io"-
send Warren. Waterbury, Worden wight w D.
N@ss-Nles,7s Angel Bergen. Bowdi>h Brown, Bun.
D D. CaIuphc r. Campbell. j Chatneid, Clare, I $as'
Conely, Cornell paniorIh, Gardner Greene mar non
man HolchksS. Hunt, Hunter, ~ Huntington Hutchinson
HYDE Jordan hembie Kennedy. Herman. hins-!ey MIX
land. Loomj- Mann. Mcneil Men Ne,l- Neon. ION
or Perkins Powers. President. Rlker, Rugges, - JoH
Sanford Shaw sheldon, Stanton Ss2es setson S!vaSH-
hnmrr Tsf J. J. Taylor W Taylor I.'dea TGnl! acne
I Van Schoouhoveu, Ward. White. N'beck, Wood law-
ser.-6l
Doct w TAYLOR proposed to have Court OF Appeals
consisting Of Il Judges them be elected on ONE
GENERAL TICKET by the STATE and the other OF the
Supreme Court Judges having the shortest time 10 serve
The duration OF the judicial tenure 10 be wears Twelve
yoted Tor his plan namely himself. and Messr7 Allen
BERGEN Chatied Cornell Dorlon, Martin. Miller, Nor
RS. OConor. sanford and stow. The noes wereso-ihe
ahsenlecs ~.
/. there not great inconsistency III Mr Conors con
duct He argued against the General Ticket =ystetn
yesterday and ne voted Tor II today
Mr. PERKINS did wish 10 provide seats tor tour
wo1ll out politicians IN Court OF Appeal, 10 III down
there with -four oil talent ana business habits
/ Nj CHArFIELD proposed 70 compose the Appes!
Court from the Appea. Court OF the supreme Couft o.
eight Judge 10 be- elected by general ticket ana 70 oa
Office eight years lie having an eye Gs ne Saii !'
crday 10 get OF party men nominated ana elected
rieu OF his party they being the best
! Ayy,-Messrs Allen. Bergen, Bowdi,h, Csmhreeng,
panior.h Hari, Ho,caAls Kennedy. Mann McNiti Nor
ton OCouor Porter, President, sanford Shaw alnadst
Vachc Nan >chooaGoyen, Nsrd aierouFy ME " IL
/ beck-2N NOES, 81. Absent lS
Mr.. CoNELY proposed 10 amend by having Judge
elected each year. snd one u 70 out yearly Lost
! AYES ~ Noe. not counted.
s:st OF ech, judges elected from four districts mo
which he would divide tie state in each district
and 20 alternate, also Ou- Judges from the supreme
/ Court When men elected partisan Judges, the
belief VIII be Ina, they the far OF parrats N every
political case tina; may before hem. >hal! we
iab-h the OF las, upon the principle that
one halt il Judges shS. again ~ IL Judgment upon
/ tie very Cause they uiay have already tried
/ Mr. BxowN-lt i good objection TO Juror thst he
has made up hs lnd question OF TACT but l. no
good objection Judge tha; be 'aay have ulstc up me-
mind wrong on abstract question Of law which can
NJ. Srow.-l; has been attempted IN France There
YOU may challenge the Judge os ae same reason maj
You ,ay challenge the JUROR. The Judge VINO : slreAy
committed by his published opinion ana decision oe-at
NOT surely to bc enabled influence tae ultimate dec
ion OF the case appealed from III Judgment on as
(Mr slows proposition the vote was - ayes Noes
The Ayes
Mrssrs Allen Archer AyraglL Bergen Cal1ee, Ihs'-
field Cornell DoJn Harris, Marvin Miller Morris ->-c
o.As O'Conor Parish Patterson PelHIiAn h-ciig .
W n Spence Stow, Waterbury. "Orle!i' ana w D
Wight
Judge RuGGIES WHO Gas returned, and Is II good
health proposed TO amend section , By ADDING
No member OF he Court OF ApPrA. shall have vote
n Tie decision OF question ch he HAy have iNsi
written opinion II lie Court below
NJ. Srow ad.aoaished ~ whs; ne IN The