New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-05-28


CouRr FOR THE CoRnEcrroN OF ERRORS The People
va Rooert Morris of lhe SuperU,s"rs Of the City Of
Mao York-Action Of deo To recover $3.50 Of Mr. for
refusing the 9lh July lSi TO perform HE duty IS
member OF the Board Of Supervisors. hi declining 10
audit and allow the OF James Lynch ono OF the
Associate Judges of the Court Of General Sessions
The case originally tried before Judge Kent al the
Circuit Court In Feb. 1912 The minutes OF ths Board
of Supervisors produced at that trial. W hen Dill
shown to have been presented from said James
Lynch for years salary amounting to S2VOO Alter
various proceedings majority OF the bosro refused 10
pass the bill Mr.. Whiting was NJ the tme District AT
torney Judge Lynch wrote To him. shewn on the
trial. stating regret in having to present persons In
their hQh official stations but he would not be- deferred
by apy false delcacy from doing when they set up
their individual opinions asains, the decisions OF The
constitutional authorities, &: aud requested him To enter
| action against Robert Il Morris, Mayor Felix ON-ll
David Vandervcort Moses G. Leonard. Elijah Purdy,
Abraham Hatfield Samuel Rradhurs, Cornelius B. limp
,oa Edward s. Innes and Frederick r Lee, Aldermen,
all OF whom voted against the resolution 70 pay US su-
pervisors Of the City and County OF New iork
Various points defence set up In the trial, among
them that the law under which Judge Lynch WIS appoint
ed unconstitutional If was not asked for by tue or
poraon Of y. York, not PASSED by two-hre vote &c
Judge Kent for the purposes OF the trial, overrued the
defence and charged that the law was constitutional and
the Supervisors forced 10 audit the bill according to
law The Jury ga-e verdict for plaintiff in $3.50 debt
aud costs The carried, on appeal 10 the ST.
preme Court the judges OF which supported the views
taken by Judge Kent and decided that The panf ought
TO the amount OF the debt together with SO Is
costs.
Farther appeal made 10 the Court. Decision post
poned TIL December.
Puer H. Rar1ous vs. Eugene Ablan and Rob.. r. Boyd
Hr. H, merchant Of this city purchased ct T. Aoan
Co., merchants ofN y, 10 nil an order Tor Mexico
ak bales of cottonade purporng 10 contain $3.50 yards
for which he gave $3.50 s5 He shipped the Roods To
Mexico and paid s23 % dutie. on them there besides
commission ia New York and in Vera Cruz, sg7 % MIX
ing in ALL $3.50 e. /. turned OUT ia measuring the
goods at Vera Cruz that there we're but 300 yards
Me.srs Albn & Co refused 1873 -, the difference ~
bur .fTva lr,Fp
duties paid in Mexico c and II Is the rule of the
of that country 10 refund Ia auch case
the whole 1921 % wac returned 5y tor the duties
although II no mistake had occurred. the duties would
nav. been but 65 % SIR Hrsous entered suit against
Hessrs Abin & Co tor s5l3s9 being the difference. DE-
ductipg nat bad refunded. with interest IL was
tried before Judge Oakley In the Superior Court, 10
Nov Is4C Il appeared that aessrs Aloin & Co had
received the good. from ths Bank olHdcNry At Ham
burg and The mistake occurred by the goods being
marked in such way as 10 make the neasurment
appear as In Preach names, whereas The meas
urement By the Braosn,sune. which
much shorter. Tie goods were shipped 10 Vera Cruz
In The original packaees Judge Oakley considered asr
DIR he'd rsht claim for duties and commission
paid 10 Mexico and nonsut was allowed The case
carried TO the Supreme Court, which snifmed me
decision the Superior Court with lO3 ~ costs and
farlnsr appeal Ia made 10 this Court Me'srs Whst d
Greiz ana Daniel Lord, j. appeared for Mr. b., and
Aessrs 9asrn Strooz, ard Chss o conoF for Aessfs
Ablou 81 Co. Decision postponed 10 Dccrtaoer
sr-pasxE Corar-Msy Terrn-Olr readers will
douot!-ss recollect that man BY the Dame Of Louis
Napkisui-s a f.w days since made certain cnsrz-s
against Jonn AsDebester EGG ~ nc sc;d OF bis
Counsel upon hs TIA! for grand larceny 10 the Court of
Sessions Sir. Manchester the line pronounced the
charges false. snc demanded an investigation.
The Supreme Court have since that tine. made
thorough Investigation OF the whole matter, ard have
fully erVn1ated Sir A.nchester IRON The charges made
ssain.t him oy Nanki-1ies.
IL appears from tie papers submitted 10 the Justices
Of the Supreme Court ihat the sa;d Mapkieus is
npost1r ana thzt induced By c-rtain Individuals
who are not very friendly With N.. Manchester
70 make said charges. they proui,ing, il he would 90
80 TO ssTe bin from the State Pfison.
The indIVidsa prompted hiin make the attack
well Manxieuies himself have utterly failed In their
object he saved himself from STATE Prison having
already been sentenced sing sing and they et-c,
M Manchestsrs reputation .os SUPREME Court having
decided thai be had done noshng the premises
could in the least impair biz standing al the bar
Before foil Bench-In the Gaze OF Mr. Manchester, an
attorney aud ccuEt-!o. Of Tue relative whom
notion made charges preferred by al the
Sessions connscticn VIII ADVICE piano .o.ts &c
The Court considered Of NJ Manchester sc-
client, and Dismissed the moticu.
In the Of ne Pe2ps Jobs T. Eey for an aess1
libel Dr.. Haine published the Court Journal new
,r1al was granted.
Ts adv Wri,d-Motion 10 aside report Of referees
denied
Dcf.aisn Farse-JuGsnent tor pisntic for part o!
premises. SEE otne. decisions In another column
[. 5. CacrrT cocIT-rhs cass Of Deg Va Hsyer Is
Sill
Corrr OF Cosxos PIEAs-Setore Judge Tngraham.-
Te,encs A1rae2y CO Ts. EGcdr-ar Edgar !et Ar.
Nurphy premises 40. Ts Wellington -, who re-let 70
Doo5eily Murphy not conforming TO the terms Of hi.
Lease wss proceeded a.tns, and ELECTED DcnneMJ
wards paid $40 NJ Z OF his tenant Il ID DOW
commanded tie: Tie proceedings aSsiss, Murphy 10