New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-07-28
miscellaneous.
roLcER's oLosAoNTAN,
ALL-HEALlNG BALSAM

5LL-Er AIiNtT BAL.S.tN.
DRTSCTPAL OFFICE REMOVED 20 l6 Fulton st-l6l,
I'd door West OF Broadway "a door opposite - faui'
Church Yard
DR FoL.Ek's Reilly To SHERN,~-C ontr,ued.-The fol-
lowing question nOr ari- Are ne aidayIi- and -i-
unonia have produced true, can ouIg -sy thar trey
arr all from persons uuIupcachabr character they ar
VOLUNTARY and USsoUGHT. Il they are tue. i'u 'nN
nave proved Coucu-ivey aud 10 the satisfaction ~ al i
,-re-ir in Tire matter that iie lNvE>r TOR aud ORIGIN
,roK OF the Oo-aouInn t>re Rvan> affidavit and Mis- Gel
-lou' letter. thai ~ possession 81 Remedy winch
sherman breyp noiug about. introduced INTO tle
concern and i every one IN ay WAY connected Wlth tle
establishment considered M -o.-t-rt Mr. beari-iry
al. dar!t John Srrgs,'- do Mr.. shjmrs testimony
that was The ACKNOWLEDGED I>vENTos amt osIGINA-
TOR Toy Sherman had sole night The Uo-aonian Gown
Ia the lslh cay OF May 1916 tt M->,rs Backmnn ANA
u until June 1916 Even then h. never hunted al lie right
"a, . Oo-annlsn teIu 10 any other person than uyse,i
Now doe appear a.! probable thai all i~ business
was -iraagen ms part d-iTuuh Sherman 90 any WAY
My calculations mp 20 The h-i par OF ne month oi JUNE
1916 ttr establishment tor MANY years Ia
cu.nr such had hen tue Understanding and such Wa Ji
agreement entered into brtWeeU Sherman ana myself
~ To GUARANTEE 10 me II should be. and he "h- stS-
SATISFIED 81 his words Mere TO be beieYed that
The and be- hus conducted 10 the
ru, Where there any need Of c -tratagrm 80 OEd
II complained OF Surely on my part there was none
3ir. John o. Langley l. travelling agent IN ne New
Eng and STATE. for Sherman salary of from Sl+N 10
5000 per auuum He IN Sherman'- employ. lie !
most generally occupied with travelling. consequently
knows nothing HE business of the Office IN New orr
He she city twice or tire" tines during 'he
when rrence existed between Sherman ani Myself and
when insny bitter words spoken both -idrs. Nr
ral-pirei, mp but side of the story do not
know That hlit him iorit iil II l. more pleasant 10
justice done. Had Mr. Langley related TIk WHOLE
story The matter would have appeared IN quite Err
ENr liGHr r say nothing ol the pfoyochton: nothing
OF The par be- himself took in eudeayOrng to reconcile The
difference nothing 81 the conditions on which ne Oiosa
brought into III" concern; nothing o e merits
OF the CASE But whrn the separation was hual and he
knew that Ire must espous' one -id- or , otr, ~,
for Sherman stating the same time nt ne cared nut
it'll, the right OF the story he got hi sl0oo and Sher
mans Oo-aonIah Wa 10 ne h' =" .nat Ie NaS plely
we'll known Through New England and thai must b. care
1l aud no; hi- ground with any of my medicine
that lie SHERMANs Man aud must PM sherman DO
.auuian Trough II luirntun to do Mi Langley
Injustice Aly acquaintance with HIM has been shor sd
never hnd any difference VIA NM nui mus u" permitted
to the facts uud iien le pubic can Judge
Its certain thai Mr.. Langley i. 20 say h' east
mistaken both u 30 occurrences and words For % WI
appear evident thai DR- SHERMAN NENtE PkojEc TED
fi Olos ,o>i,S " III, article mine and Icy examining
liz atidays IL "it be lnnd liht hh"u"tl lt AkIieLt
1910 CONCERN AMI introduced Ia Sherinnns notice
sherman opposed from the very beginning 10 have h-
Introduced ana lOoh particular pains l" ma u ' our
OF In, question entirely much lhai wien bud finish
ed writing the pamphei and proposed that The name OF
SherInans Lo2euge Warehouse should lie mentioned ~
place OF sale. hr objected 10 70 altogether and wished
ti- number alone PM Ia
~ il regards bringing Or Sherman terms" lie calls
h. uIn mot aware that ANY such expression passed my
- or that the thought entered INTO my head Ny coun-c
non with sherman and my i--iug- toward him
try of different from amy thing lie ns- limited A.
Thu -rerof h. G. Dagg.I- purports 10 b. repetition
think itumece-snry viii merely state lhri my conyrr-a
ton with him was entirely different from that with Mr.
Langley and bore resemblance toll Whatever At til
ure uui. The viii hc repeated. and then
certain he VIII remember ALL Mr.. Langley ana Mr.
Daggers Viii then have fair chance 10 tell ALL THEY
SNoJy My acqusianc with Mr. DacVer- i also short
nor any ~ feeling ot any KIND previous 10
thl- outbreak
I shall conclude my reply to sherman tomorrow. II has
,s, tp more room intended hui The serious
charge sherman iia made siust seemed tore
uuiT, his Nphclincss my part vus prepared to
In advertisements, acuiIsI me-, but could tor
believe urr lie intimacy that mud existed between for
wears that he would far descend H. 20 bring charge. OF
ie unGr,. OF hose which he ha- brought against one Who
looking back cannot remember single TINT he has
ever committed witch urnerted instead OF pro-
ducna injury Bur he in- chosen pursue ln-
The consequence mus be on Ia Own head.
RDHT Il FDIGTR