New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-12-02

VICE CHANcELLoR's CoURT-Beiorc Vice Chancellor
%andlord.-GOHld Banks y ca. y. d'sTtcaR ITde 80,
ciGBThe bookstore OF complainant and the new ould-
!nCs OF the Society adon each other on Nassas me
society's buildings being the OF Spruce and
Nassau and occupying the site OF lot IN spruce ST
which the Society bought some years ago tor loO IN
addition TO what had been improved for their old Tract
house The rear this additional Sprucest lot formed
also the OF Gould Banks & Co.'S store on Nassau =
The remained unmproyed after the Society bought
IT, FOR about II years, till ne last summer when tney
took down Their old building and also the building wlcn
was on the front OF the lot in question and erected
range OF buildings which entirely covered the whole
Ground nearly including that in the rear OF G. b
4 Co.'S store leaving but space OF four feet which
nearly excluded the light from the part oil H. B.
Co.'S building Previous TO that portion going up u T.
* Co. fled bill chnuccry claiming right 10 pur
chase of the Society that part OF the lot alleging that
when the spruce ST lot was sold they made veToal
agreement with the officers OF the Society that the latter
should purchase the lot and sell them the ht pro
porouel price that they did purchase snd offer
ieet OF the said q. B. Co. Tor $1,000 but the
latter wished 10 have is eet- inches tor thStsu when
the Society word tha: they had concluded TO sus
pend the negotiation Tor the present The bargain was
contaminated and the rear OF the ot continued to
remain unmproved the compliments obtaining light
from it usual for their store Matters thas remained
from 1895 10 1910. when cumplalnhnis hndng the 90
ciey were about build the said OF the lot re
newed the application for its purchase but were refused
and the bill was filed To compel them to consummste
their original alleged verbal agreement II was denied
the part OF the Society that they ever made the orig
mai agreement spoken Of and as there was no agree
in writing required by law. the bill was tIs
missed.
II stated the argument OF that bill tina, G. b s.
Co could have the benefit for light, OF the four feet
space which had been left between the new building and
the OF their store With a view 10 avail themselves
OF this c. 3 & Co enlarged their windows, which was
objected 10 by the Society from the alleged tear OF hre
and they finally commenced putting up SOLID wall ana
hsd got il up 10 the second siory when o. b o. Hp
piled tor an Injunction restraining them from proceed
nE The injunction temporarily granted, and tAe
argument in relation il commenced yesterday w
Edward Sandtori appearing IN behalf Messrs u e y
Co and Messrs Bidwel and Holden tor the Society IL
was coniendcd by Mr. : that the Society were nhU
enced by malice erecting the wall winch Is denied
the danger from ire being presented in excuse Inc ar
gument l. still on.
CIRQUE CoURT-This Court resumed rs calendar
Yesterday judge Barcsloo presiding having temporarily
exchanged with Judge Edmonds An action brought by
Porter & Ballard against John q. Curtis 10 recover ior
bill of goods sold Samuel WilcoNson Tor which Is SUD
he said he would pay but denied. was brought on.
CcURr Or COMMON PLEAS Before Judge Daily
Thomson s Tan Escktef ) Lehman and Pter Byrhts
Action OF trespss= which commenced some days
ago but postponed yesterday 20 recover damages ior
defendants forCby keeping open the scuite door in tue
lower hall OF No 30 Johnst. leading 10 painhts
millinery goods store in the 2d story OF said building
The defendants engaged in hosting skins belong
In, to Messrs Oppenheimer Cc from the cellar but II
IS eontended that they had right 10 keep the batch
open Verdict for plaintiffs so which carries costs
For plaintiffs Messrs Remsen 4 Ihayer Tor defendants
Mr. Ellnswooi
There Is case before Judge U!shoeter Of Sanue!
Myers against the Sheriff for alleged return OF an
execution ass!nsi Henry D. Knapp