New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-09-08

After the iull exposures which have been MAUI
oi the origin, character and objects OF '"0 49,.
aare.up among certain Wing Ne"spaP',' III.
State we thought no man could muster tue "UN'
.;,, ,bo,,b several might have the oasehe's ~
M .,o as.a;lao,s with the assailed-thoSe !" "o
.<.,.on.od rho row with those who SIMPLY ehdea'-
ii - ,rovent the mischief they were bent on
g.. ,vbo have abored to prevent divisions ana
-.e,;,,ions among Wings with those who set out
81 6,r,ent them, in one common censure we nave
bean disappointed. The LckPo'1 Co"T'er-ohe
among the three or four Wing papers IN the whole
s,st. that could have been induced TO do it-gives
the following as Editorial
Those papers that have got themselves into war OF
about candidates not only abuse themselves
H., Az. scandal 10 the Wing party Occupying the
position they do they have no right TO engage IN such
quarrel II they cannot live In peace and harmony WIN
me other members OF the household let them ma inc
door az soon as possible The great wing party Vi inc
star, have principles at stake that too important IN
tsrests TOO precious be wrecked by dsGrhceu nsu
among leading Editors. Certain we are, could shooe
Editors under the feeling that every where enter
tanned the country toward every one oil thcm IA re-
ference TO this quarrel they would either abandon thc
places or hold their peace ever alter Oiteh very oc"
of lh,e have veteran Wings complained OF tneI Son
dnn and denIored the consequences oil the seDseless
wranrle they are engaged IN. feeling OF Huish"'!on
is becoming aroused in the country ticic .' o.,
merit in the controversy al nrs IL nus al :, ,rA
Of Gentlemen OF the Albany Journal ~ !. iriouiie'
Express and Courier Enquirer, for the sake OF lhe
Wing cause do cease your quarreis owe over So Jul
snosites ill the Election shall have passed ana ire
common enemy been beaten
Neighbor OF the Lockport Courier we ask you
To answer us few plain questions VIZ
Who begun this controversy about Governor
2. LII what spirit did they begin 1t
3. Have we or any one on our side denounced
.nv men or class of men i'll the Wing party as IN
worthy of its suirages
g. Have we threatened to oppose any Que who
may be nominated by the Wing State Convention
or predicted the defeat of any one
:; Did not the Courier and Enquirer, IN one oil
It's frs. articles Oh the subject, declare that it would
not recognize any radical of The Tribune school
as Whig and that, if any such should be nomi
mated, it would oppose his election
6. Did not the Erpro>s, also in the beginning oil
this controversy, assert that the whole business OF
selecting Wing candidate fol- Governor had been
cot and dried at Albany las, winter that even
the chief Offices of State had been parceed out
among tho managers and that the Wing Conven
ton was simply called to ratiiy what had thus beer
IN unfairly and smreptitiously settled beforehand
" I Did not both of these papers threaten the re
gular Wing candidates with the opposition OF 30 90
TO 40, 600 Wing votes ut this end OF the State
i. any one sympaihizine with the Evening Journa
and Tribune should be nominated for Governor
g Were not these iilrnnations eagerly paradco
in the Loco.Foco journals as evidence that the
Wing party m0s what they assumed it bc--conupt
and intriguing on the hand aristocratic and fac
tious on the other!
g. Now, sir what should we have doncl Would
not silence have been claimed as "a tacit assent
10 the truth of our advcrsaries charges Were
not their articles calculated to drive from nearly
all tho Wings who condemn Slavery or desire the
extinction of the Fcudal Land Tenurcs In short
would not the implied acquiescence of the Whit
Press in the antics of the Courier and Express:
have ruined the Wing cause in the State beyond
redemption How could've have kepts ilencc ailt
been faithful to our duty Will You answer