New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-02-11
LAW Courts.

SUPERIOR CouRr-Beforc Judge Oakley-Jo.tph
Walsh vs. Joseph S. TreadpeH-The plaintiff carpenter
By trade was passing the upholstery of Dir Tread
well SO Broadway Amy 81 in the forenoon Of 3st
May last having box OF carpenters tools on his snou-
der when he was Knocked down and injured bya heavy
roll Of carpeting thrown from upper window II
Mr. rs store One of his feet, in particular was much
injured and he ia still suffering from the effects OF the
blow Action is brought damages IL is said,
for defence that Mr. T. took all proper precsuon to give
notice that the carpet was to be thrown from the win
dow and that plaintiff afterwards said that he alone was
to blame he heard the notice but being in hurry he
thought he could get past in time The Court charged
that when person into danger when he might have
avoided H. the law leaves him where 1t found him-he
cannot recover If he did not bring the injury upon
himself by negligence then the estion ID II 1t was
caused by the careessness OF defendant II was the
jury are liberty give such damages as they think
the extent of the injury may Verdict for plain
tiff s225 For plaintiff Messrs R. NJ. Tyson and T. w.
Smh For defendant Gersrdus Clark Esq.
Luna Palraieri vs.. Fredd Schuchdrd and F. " FG-
ursActOn damages for injury done TO sugar
on board the bark Pomona, arising from neglect it is
said in pumping the vessel! already referred to-
Verdict for plaintiff, s2l70 i2.
Before Judge erpoe-Ezecmors Of Smith HdrTion
vs. Edgar Hdrrioa-The defendant is merchant tailor
corner Broadway and Chambers street The action is 10
recover the amount OF bond OF upward OF $1,000 for
money loaned MIN by HE late brother. plea of usur
is up in defence The case will be continued this
For plaintiffs, Mr.. Cutting. For defendant Mr. N B.
Blunt
CouRr OF COMMON PLEAs-Beore Judge Ulshoef
fer-Hartiu SeOng vs. John S0t'ce-Actlon to recover
damages malicious prosecution in the defendant nav
ing entered criminal complaint at the Police Once In
relation to money paid TO Mr. 5 found TO be
short and rendered back when Mr. L. put into his own
pocket A nsnsuit asked and granted For pitt, A.
D. Russell Esq; for diff Messrs. Brady and Maurice.
M,ron H. Durham Timothy II. Main-The plain
tiff had been clerk with defendant who is extensive
dealer in eggs believe, in Veseyst. The present &C
ton for SANDER 10 defendant, while at Philadelphia
speaking of plaintiff thief saying he had taken $40
from fellow boarder at boarding house, &c. To be
continued this forenoon. For pltf. Mr. Niles for dit
Messrs c. w SANFORD and W. Mulock.
Louise Rowland Vs. Henry Peek.-Acton for SANDER
already referred to. Verdict for plaintiff SIS.
Before Judge Ingraham.-Agnes Cochran vs. ptHeent
Lecompte and Laurence Duour-Action of respass, TO
recover OF the owner Of lot No go Greenwch-st. and
his builder damages for asserted injury 10 plaintiff
premises furniture &c adjoining, while in the process
of taking down one house his lot and the erection OF
another The Jury considered that the defendants mad
xercised all due precau;ion, and found verdict in
their favor The has occupied I'VE or six days
For plaintiff A l. Jordan and B. L. Billings, Esqrs for
defendants, Messrs P & II. Wilson.
MARINE CoURr-Before Judge Waterbury.-Gaspard
Ot,arsana vs. Joseph B. BukeTo recover balance on
paintings for ST. Columbias Church Verdict for plain
If in amount, being $50.