Democratic banner., 1846-07-04
J57S,s Z. f~:o8GEl:

We COPY he foregoing %afti"l' f~a:s =;
last number Of the nemncra:ic .~;~rn-r.
which as a specimen oryetH.j - :,:r, ~. .,2
elrCanceI.l logical argument :"."cri@h,:
thinking we hnnr xii! "c ed; ;ng IL ori
readersT, as it has DOUBTLESS hes bcrmt,
those Of the Banner.
The above IS 4 trne coy Of iii cTtcec:
from one Of the most I r-I Eic' a%r:icics
ererrennad by the cradiie cdit.r of t,c
journal. II Is s"i :. 10 cnr hnt
tie editor Of the Journal, WHO is rccu,iar'N
ant in the use Of his "a;c!h tnL: / rrm".
ever cn!;i Lave iEAi'rdit. He rot cu!,
overwhelms us. but al common s~nsc !,
the use If his rhetorical Gnur:,':"s, lis -
rentAcse:, aal lan@ ana w;nA;i rx:ntC"cc..
We are so:ry thas We h%ye "a: ron:.' :.
give or readers the whole article, ff i!
woallbe exceedingly Interest," = 20 tics.
wLo are fond Of ctri.2jE s. THcy :aey.
however, fo:!n some o. lion Of the ~aii::iv
from tie following sentences, witch Il t,c
Journal man WI! narsc va viii ~ca,f,>s TIT
We are fonI 81 "rhr:oricll ~cIcgancr."
"Now tie om'v ~; '"t;nn rc r.vr hrq..,
raisci 10 gen. Wilson's Il: * ~ tt scr.
az the second district. w''i"': acc;:.S sat- ..af-
or an, eais Il: Carc Girar:r.r, i.ahina 4
district ~Tcr..aiS somewhat :"'"1v;E;"::t.
lon-. 3Gt t." counties !T::- - ~ .
b" ref,rencet :ha nan, x oa I: . s,s
side of the Missouri, and i,a:;3S . n"i.rra:
community and indemnity Of Interests aa..
pursuits; and tIiS d;g!:iat IS tie rilr -. 81 -
pose 70 be referred to il the a,o"" pcicr an
der the figure Of ST. 1"ast with IL" Innr
horn" Sc" Bat c-"n admitting for tie
sake OF argument t'i.t tits district lrnn,
s~parsent3s of population or other cause j.;
thus ':-5". AM tint or. district oat q tie
five i2tlas rendered o*jectiolab!H, it is ariy
oheatI rs 2li as t.. arDm:naDi- iii coli
crct@ IN the senate and f's'.a.i IaS Hai
tie h,ii % liz tIc state eli into Sr3a'3r.II
districts and TIC "New cn.rty hi!,; ~ al
unScuDIiOg7 mei9r:rv urn TIC ne.k> q: :Er
prop!e If t.issta'a, withtia wy, (wL:ciI
thev DID MT pretend to G"-rl rf IrIh~r-
ing It impoSSib!" fort:e w!i!;to r!""i 4 sin
gle in"nbar1f Congress-; aid "~:t:Iou: any
regard to t"e irLeTa>:< nr cJn"eni.Gr" -
the people," of lie d]i.i,:.nt ,.i~.r:r;%: -.
Of GIrlwing the wL2!a p1r.r + =. s;st"
still rlore than i WIS h.f.:a, .m'1.." .....!.>
OF n minority 81 tac p.jD."-t.uS ~ IN"
session sab;Hct;r~t' tie erie ms ciI::, f. :
tsgerrrmandPr" If ;t:c west f:tI, lat an
Observation-Disclosures ~ VIZ, I've T."
were licsn;cd 70 rae lie man "";iI i r..
Of iron"
T!c gentleman admits t:rat lie voted c,-
Gen. Wilson'S s3::s;i.#}", Iut ary:cs I'd;
he should not 10 Condemned for t!,"t -c:,.
because az he had cn!y LcaiG cI.:,ct;c: s
4. uEgsd to one district, marked qnt BY i,at
substitute, It was only one f:5i. > bad SC
the original bill. Now &c must tell e..
gentleman, that this is extremely bad logic,
though it has not the merit of s.arlyGnoi;.
ty." The district alluded 70 by Lin ia il
our opinion, frc times as bad, as any onn
contained in the original lii. Put there
are objections to other districts mar ed cut
by the substitute. There a. other districts
in that sub ;titutc bad %enou;'l in all cen
science; but the one alluded to BIZ Lin is
outrageous enolyi to cause tie bIus:: Of
shame to mantle the check Of every one
who voted for It VIXEN he wouii talk CT n
district bill-unless indeed ke has los. tic
sense Of Same. Gen. Wilson's substitute.
says the editor Of the Journal, gaze t!Icm
an opportunity o. e!cctiasa VIII. reprcscr-
tatire to congress. Aye, il gave item an
oPportGniIyo of e~Iecting tso wing represcn-
t~atives; and t!at We presume was. lis re-
deeminS feature with some. The aut!.or
q thai substitute had taken care to mark