New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-10-09
W.. Tassnrr and our Albany Correspondent.
- 4 Ulstakc-I Sudden Chaase--Opfa'on az
the West

1tr TQZGnTI
~ 4 Aistake--A Sudden Choage-OpiaiOn az
tie Wet.
ALBANY. Oct eth 1886
crs. Mr.. Taggart has half column of complaint
Mr. oConcr calls it with the weapons Of his own
P.olsrs" Apees said TO the shoemaker amateur,
oY ~ no, be bad hint
"a. only remark matters Of fact with relation TO
a.couot OF his conduct On the lawyer monopoly. Is
~ Toucht in fairness 10 have stated that he voted
Ws. Mr. strong's motion And didn't ] do that =
ska- - nv letter of sept l. and you will there ind Il
luz s,d Mr TAG 5AKr's name among them, 90 Ayes.
No "a absentees and dodgers did not Hisstate or
iee ~ or name Of one Desa;e Of the cei0le l26.
q, Tssgart quotes my assertions that he was for
III sena,e Di-ucts on Tuesday. and FOR large Judi
si1s n,c.s on Wednesday, and that any Member mad
e,yer 70 get the question taken on the general ticket
me 10 single senate Districts, M.. T. now says
at,ssn wss. And any Member had. Where is the
.aesisDed pcrrefsion
,bs. Is to take far from the People nc pos
.ond If Mr. Taggart disked that why d:dn, he
- 20 amend By inserting judicial Districts hr. Muir.
~ sen, IA one side-Mr rs Is Immediately in front OF
Pas President When ne wanted 10 stop debate on
tS.ts-s amendment moved by Strong law inonop-
~ he was on his legs in an instant 10 previous
Or If he had forgotten that and felt himself 70
rc,;nc against his conscience Tor Single Senate DIS
=. shy didn't he risc and say so: There were 2
.ters Before Mr. Baker stopped debate and ne would
- once withdrawn his motion to allow Mr. T. To
p.s.;r his position and renew it Who doubts that
T. Browns move not the frat madc-it was
..rtba,ner's The latter moved TO strike the whole
..on out-idr Stow then moved 10 amend II. Could
80 T have followed Mr.. Stow or preceded him,
Had M Tsggart really been resolved on Tucs
In vote against Single Senate Districts, why didn.
Sdoitf II found in the minority would nave been
Wing uncommon aud ne well knew that the vote was
NJ final one he could have moved reconsideration,
~ n, Brown did Even that would have been liable TO
s,npe thereafter by vote. The Convention has yet 20
- final vote that very question Of Judicial Elec-
o, and another the adoption OF the article OF which
|. forms a part No Member had any cause five weeks
- NJ vote Yes II he meant No for 1t settled nothing
NJ r well knew
Tb,, his constituents in favor OF Single Senate
rs.,rcts he had shown by voting with his colleagues,
NJ Richmond and Dir Young. In their favor for Sena-
m. The proceedings in old Genesee also show this
Wden he had resolved 10 change his vote ON Wednes-
NV Nessrs Backus (both) Bull Croker. Hawey Mar
Ts Nicholas Patterson. Penniman Richmond Salisbu-
- Spencer Stow, strong and Young expressed public
eriuiop in the West. side and Mr Taggst stood
try and alone express it the other side the CON
7,t OF night Members are but Committee to pre-
rare for People the Constitution they desire 10 have
HNr Ta2gayt, by going round 10 the large old cum
rous 3Omile long Judicial District is right Ill the
sber Western gentlemen must be in the wrong Is 1t
20, The People 10 elect they must have the pow
Of % nominate. In Il single senate District they
have that power Taking the whole Eighth District
D.stber they have it not. Mr.. Taggart's unexplained
change of principle helped to deprive them of il. Yet
bs hsd voted for Single Senate Districts for Senator'S
Add Why Because the Eighth District was too lS:ge
sd the nominations too lar removed from the People.
Abe has now fixed il the battalion OF attorneys in Ba.
uyis will have quite much to say in the matter OF II
Judicial Election the electors of Gencsee. Ny Oh
let as citizen. has been to get as good Constitution
siopled as possible X.