New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-06-13
Law Courts.

Law Courts.
n 9 CIRCUIT CoUnT-Before Judge Belts -F. Dl-
rand 4 Co Va. Ed,oa7d Curti. CoIlec,or-Mr D. paid.
under protest Is cents per gallon duty on wines tue
Collector couteuding that 1t YES imitation Port ana ma
Die TO that, while plaintiff averred that 1t vas woet Is
called red vice OF France and subject 70 but Genus
dp,v Action 10 brou sht TO recover the difference YER
dict for plaintiff 1926 sl For plaintiff Mr. Dillon, for
defendant Mr.. Hoffman
US COMMISSIONERS OFTicE-Before Commissioner
A GsrdIper-Wilan Johnson, a seaman of the ship
Incas was examined charge OF asssulting the mate
with dangerous weapon. The charge was not sus-
tanned By the proof aud the complaint was dismissed
SUPERIOR CouRT-Before Chief Justice Jones Bernard
MIRA. by his next friend Patrick Kelly EdHard Z.
Ta,ui-Nr j. was passing along Mott-s.. near Bayard,
In his pedars wagon, his dog running along side Of ia
dog belonging 10 where lad Nurty keeps sprung
that of Jesse and in the ehort 10 sepa ave mem oeo
took place Murty and j. Action is brought for
assault end battery II contended that Murty him
self was TO Verdict for defendant For pltf Nj.
Blunt and Nj Mulvey-for def Mr.. c. W. Sancfort-
El-abe,h Pandey VS.. Lockha7t Co Mrs P. being in
deb,ed 10 L. L. Co. on judgmen, for SIS and costs they
entered proceedings against her under the Stwe act
and she was arrested. Judge Daily, on the case coming
up for hearing decided that be had urisolcuon tne
law prohibiting the Imprisonment of females In csses OF
civil action and she was discharged. She now brings
the present action TO recover damages Tor aSe
ent For defence commended that the proceedings
under the Stiwe act were valid, as the charge was
fraud &c On that point Chief Justice j. SAID ne would
not now give decision-the Jury must consoer rom
the decision of Judge Daily that be did not have urdc
dict this forenoon For plaintiff Messrs N B. Blunt and
Brown e. Matthews; for defendants Messrs James l..
Brady and K. Reed
Corar OF COMMON PLEAs-Before Judge Daly.-O1-
den Haqgeytv vs. Hamilton Murray.-Mr. II. bought OF
Mr. NJ a note for S2,50o drawn by - Wilcox and en-
dorsed by Friend whittlesey, of Connecticut and William
H. Simpson, Of New-York. The note was originally paid
TO Mr. W. E. Noyes for dry goods furnished who gave
to Mr. Murray in payment Of bill OF goods Mr. Mur-
raw did not endorse the note. 1t was subsequently
claimed By the endorsers that the note was void having
been altered after endorsement by the maker Action
Is brought against MI Murray recover the note and
interest Mr.. Simpson In his testimony said the note
had been altered words payable at the Union Bank
having teen added. The Court charged that person
passing forged altered note Is bound TO make the
amount good although he may not have been aware OF
the fact If the Jury consider that the note had been al
tered they would find for plaintiffs but II they thought
had not been So for defendant The Jury returned YER
dict for defendant.
For plaintiff Messrs Brady and Martin. For defen-
dant Messrs. Gerard, Cutting, Moore and Ravens.
Vim Rentrick Samuel Nc1iHiSter and James Besfs-
Suit 10 recover rent OF house No. I3 Chatham ST. esseo
TO VIM McAs,er for 500 year, with the suret, ship OF
s. McAllister G. Co. scaled lease. MI Beilis' te
coparner Of s. McA defends the ground that the part
nershp surety given without his consent The jury
considered that he had ratified it by after assent Yer
dict for plaintiff. SITS IL.
For plaintiff Mr.. Hammersley. For defendant, Messrs
Sach and Willard.