The Mississippi Creole. [volume] (Canton, Miss.) 1841-1851, 1846-08-08

= HnvlnsstVus JuuSun0ht tIh may ISL
for gao is.
Lewis Dinkins, " " Walker, judg-
ment 9TH May, 1874, for l3f Oh.
John FL McBlair, vs. Madiso0 T Moore,
Judgment 10Th May, 1912, for $50 81.
John C Martin & co, VS. ] @ Napier
and E H Powell, judgment 9Th May ls42
for 1903 SO.
VIM Dalty eco, vs. G Napier and
E II Powell, Judgment 9th May, ls4s,
for "a so.
w B Martin 8 90, use &c, VS. John 81
Howcolt, Judgment 9th May, la4s, for
l97 go. 4
Sanders Scrogglns, VS. Thomas Hud.
nall judgment lIth May 1910, for l09
Sc. Il 4a
James Morton, VS. Thos Hudnall, judg-
ment 9Th May, 1910, for 276 81.
Andrew R CraddOck, VS. Abner Lack,
judgment eth January 1910, for $50 90.
John Gadsby, vs. John c Boyd, judg,
ment 2lst November 1843, for 1874 49,.
Leigh, Maddnx & co, VS. @ w Robin.
son and George Robinson, Judgment 9th
November l841, for 746 rs.
VIM Alexander, vs. A P Towns and
] N Towns y co, judgment 9th Novem-
Der l84l, for l,408 40.
TT Whitney use &c, vs. A Fl Dinkins
and s Branch admir- &c, Judgment 18th
November 1843, for 152 90.
Martin s Hancock, VS. Jesse Meek,
Judgment 22nd May, tS43, for $40 334,
= Tobias Gibson, vs. J ] McCaughan &
co, judgment l4th May, 1914, for Ala 90.
H&TH Christmas, use &c, VS. Israel
Spencer, judgment 20, November l843,
for rs IS.
Tappan, Hardy & CO, use &c, vs. T s
Anthony judgment 2Sth November ls43
for 373 Is.
esquire & co, vs. E II Powell adm'l
&c, judgment 14th May 1888, for 5l4 rs.
Topper & Rollins VS. BR Allen, admir-
Judgment 18th Nov'r l843, for 1873 95.
Arnold, Russell g. CO, use &c, VS. Wm
A Brickell, judgment 26th May l843, for
1897 80.
King, Anderson & CO, VS. N w Staples,
judgment Gath May l843, for AL 90.
CP Taliafero & co vs. N w Staples,
nent26th May 184S, for 9l5 81.
Wning & co, VS. William Smith, W
ESM and w 3 Harreld, judgment 4th
May l643, for $40 SO.
Joseph Cooper VS. M Hunt and H S
Foote, judgment Goth May 1910, for 81
284 64l.
WorIey g. Welsh VS. Williamson Smith
Judgment 18th November 1910, for g.
1914 "A.
J w Eubank VS. S Holloway, w Hol.
loway, A Holloway and R Eubank, judg-
ment 18th May 184l, for l,649 S8.
John Hall VS. James P Clark, judgment
2lsteMay 1910, for 1856 90.
Caruthers, Harris & co, VS. A A Nc.
Willie, judgment Goth May 1910, for
426 So.
Commercial Bank Of Manchester use
/. &c, vsJ H Andrews, J H Walker and @
E Stewart, judgment z, February lB40
for 1853 66a.
!. b M Jinkins vs. s M Flournoy, judy
ment 4th May 1s4l, for l72 10.
!, Douglass + Thompson use &c, vs. $.
! Hornsby, judgment 9Th May ls4l, for
| 100 3i4,
w liam Walker VS. E H Powe !, judg.
/, ment 4th May l84l, for 3,243 90.
William Walker VS. N Barrier, judg
ment 4th May l84l, for 3,243 90.
HH&S Hart use &c vs. Peter Smith.
A Clark and D F McCarty,% Judgment ~.
May l84l, for so Oh.
HAS Hart use &c vs. P M Garrett
s s V Mitchell and NJ Atchison, judgment
goth May I84l, for 245 81.
A Curcier VS. w B Martin, ] H Bairt
and J C Napier, judgment s6, May l84l
for SOC AZ.
Elder vs. &c Boyd, ju lgment 96tt
Mayll64l, for 454 40.
w Mcintyre VS. M C Cayce, judgment
/ slst january 1910, for sc rs.
G MayReId vsE H Stone and w ] Den
son, Judgment IS, MAY ls4l, for S57 SO
II G S Oglesby US u B Oglesby, judg
ment eth May 1910, for $50 &c.
H&H o Anderson & co vs. J P CLARK
an John Briscoe, judgment R6th Now
4 1912, for 327 SO.
r N Thompson use &c vs. AbEam A
Nc Willie. judgment 26th November
. l84a, for 800 SO. Il
w Mcintyre VS. R Crawford, iudg
ment 26th November l842, for 427 90
Lynch q O'RiIey use &c VS. w Wade
Judgment is, November i842, for SO 4ga
! JH Baird use DC VS. Bede johnson
Judgment 26, November l842, for rs 66
al Earps, McMain, Haven and West "
!. J ] Ellis and A A Melville, judgment 10
November l842, for 349 81.
D Robinson VS. J G Boyd, 3 D Cash
!, ", n Coy and w e Harrald, iudgmeni