New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-05-05
Law courtr lid eferreaI

Marine CoURr-Before Judge Waterrnan.-Snedsa
Shenet & Co va. Daamf Bats ACTION TO recover for
feed and saong Of cows brooklyn 3D. per day esch
and cen, per week for expense OF watch. srea-
dv referred TO- The defence that the cows
be fed with swi from the d!stery but that the psio-
It'd. diluted il and fed the cows on sw and waller he
Jury thought even sw ard water worth sixpence day,
gave verdict for plaintiff OF $40 so being the amount
Of claim.
Hannah HIDE We james Il. Smida-Acton 10 recove.
damages 70. assault and battery already referred To-
THE plaintiff 10 th; case s sns.s isd{ aes 9cegPa.
Jury varied evidently /. Ii sad TO hat should be the
verdict One gentleman who had known the defendant
we understand. By profession for long time and had
nothing against him IL favor OF verdict for defend
ant, another Of the Jury who single man, was IN
favor Of giving verdcI for plaintiff Of 500. These
were the extremes verdict finally agreed upon
10 favor Of plaintiff Tor Sl25
Before Judges UlshoeIer. lngrahan and Daily-n re-
laton to Mr.. VIM B. Mech, the young counselor and
attorney whose difficulty with Mr. Horace F. Clark has
already been alluded TO- the following order made
William Mech, one of the attorneys o! this Court
having in open Court Monday last assaulted one OF
the counseioTs Of this Court and having since ackno
lodged his in Court and submitted himself 10 its
Judgment: II is ordered by the Court tina, Mr Mech
be- and ne hereby suspended from practice as an at
torney in this Court during It's pleasure"
Him. H. BLectdon1t SIS. Henry Duch1.-Thc plaintiff is
a young German, and sued IN assumpsit to recover
Si3 50 clerk in the grocery store OF Mr. Ouch
err On the trial. shown that settlement had been
made and s0G found 20 be due OF which $40 were paid
farther Offset claimed end the Jury gave verdict
for plaintiff, Of so The counsel for plaintiff contended
under The circumstances that this should carry coats
but the Judge who tried the considered differently
and allowed certificate the effect OF which was " give
costa the defendant. Appeal is made. The Court
In its deci.ion said Two questions of fact are in
volved lat Was the plaintiff claim established at the
trial, $500 and was treduced By paymenbi If !.
500 and not reduced by payments, then the
plaintiff ought have certificate Of costs; but if il
WIS not over 5000 or reduced under tbs same By
payments the defendant entitled TO the certificate
gwen by the Judge. I'd Would the demand in dispute
and established the trial. exceed 500? If so. the
plaintiff ought 10 have tie certificate but if the demands
did exceed 500, reduced by payments spe
officially made sech then the defendant is entitled To
tn. certificate.
Claims demands established at the trial mean sub
ssting unquidated items, in open account
Appeal dismissed
Hin. omar VS.. Ferdinand KrarGt.-Order ofjudge ep
peslcd from reversed. without
Menzius n Case vs. Charles Decoe-Order appealed
from reversed 10 require defendant 10 pay costs
Of opposing motion 10 stag proceedings.
aaron Van Vaiteuburgh Vim. J Burrett.-lt does
appear that tho attorney has any other for
first name than letter B. Judgment for plaintiff on ce
murrer