New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1846-02-10


SUPERIOR CouRr.-TNlly rs. Post-Action for alleged
malicious prosecution already referred to. Verdict for
defendant.
+. PaLuieri RS r. Schltcfard aud F. " Farre-Action
TO recover about 600 from the bark Pomona for injG
~ done 10 "A quantity of sugar shipped AZ Amsterdam
but injured by salt water owing negligence It is said
OF the persons board not pumping the vessel alter she
got port about three feet water being In er pumps rs
shs lay at pier No North River, week after arriving
here 1t denied that the injury arose from negligence
Verdict this forenoon.
DEcIsIoNs.-Chds. Odkieg VS.. Nm. H. dspmndH-
Commission allowed.
John r. Anderson vs. w. Coleman Wats-To be ar.
gucd by Counsel.
Moses r Beach vs. James T. Rosrs-Judgemcnt for
plaintiff.
Vim ". Licamore Henry Warias.-Report set
aside, unless condition presented be agreed to-
j II. Fleetwood vs. FeliI Acknowledgements Tor plain
| tiff.
Jane H. Ferris vs. John Pierce aud 0thers.-n an ac'
ton of eectment where there are several co-tenans.
separate actions must be entered Plaintiff may elect
which OF the defendants choose against whom jud 2
men will be in her favor. Judgment for defendants MS
| 10 the others.
Joseph Compartment e. Sheffield and others.-New
| trial ordered.
Francis Mason vs. Joseph Apple6y-Action where the
plaintiff, obtained verdict for $50 for injuries we'd
from dog belonging 10 Mr. A while MIR. NJ was passing
| his slaughter.house. New trial denied.
There were two or three Of demurrer also de-
cided.
IT, S. DISTRICT Court Creditors Va. John ". Hull
Trial 10 test whether or not Mr. H. of the late firm oil
Hull & Smith, is entitled discharge in bankruptcy
The jury returned verdict saying that he was not Gu
| titled 10 a discharge
Camden and Aa16oy Railroad Co. vs.. Bark Lotty-The
bark fastened, the 10th Dec. to pier No North
River, but during that night her oo"
gave way and she swung round upon the steamboat
independence belonging plaintiffs was consider
ably injured Action il brought recover damages on
the ground that bark not properly astened "ncn
Is denied. To be continued this forenoon
CIRCUIT CoURr.-John f. Kinmiei vs.. HIN. 1feRte.-
! The plaintiff was a clerk Putnam 81 Co. brewers,
! q advertisement Il
paper of the robbery OF carpet bag from the City Hotel
Albany containing $4,000 in bs and reward OF $1,000
offered for the recovering Of it. he induced to us-
pect coach that drew suddenly up to the door OF
boarding house opposite into which well dressed ie-
male caused trunk be quickly put get IN herself and
the coach drive OFT He followed the coach in wagon
Il drove first Boston steamboat landing, but got
there TOO late the boat being lt then went TO the
Battery Hotel Seeing officer Sweet he called him, and
! the result that Daily the man who mad stolen the
money and female with whom ne conaoed. were ar
rested by officers Sweet and Walker and nearly the
whole OF the money found them and restored the
owner VINO gave Messrs. 5. and W. the $1,000 nc had
offered reward The plaintiff contends that he. in.
stead of Messrs s and w entitled to It, and brings
action against the recover the amount. The
Circuit Judge having received subpoena for to-day the
Court stands adjourned TO "Wednesday, when the
will be resumed
MARINE CouRT-Gdspdrd Oad1i0na vs. JOSEPH B.
Burke--The plaintiff Italian artist, brings action
against the pastor OF the Catholic Church Of ST.
Columbia. situated in 25thstreet, a of
500 being balance due for executing large paintings
the Saviour the Gross the Sermon the Mount and
other Scriptural pieces The defence is that the work
not properly executed which is denied. Verdict
this forenoon.
Court or COMMON PLEAS Louisa Ronald vs.. Hen
~ Beck The plaintiff recovered Saturday verdict
OF $3.50 against DR. Hene for libel The present seton
is for SANDER in the defendant speaking OF the plain
til house as being bad house and preventing, by the
certain emgranr passengers going 10 board with
her. She keeps German boarding house in Washing
ton-street. No defence made The Jury had been
IN o. HUlpo nj adj
agreeing. They directed 10 render sealed yer
dict this forenoon.
DECISIONS IN CHANcyRY.-Janaes g. King and Others
vs. b. AlcYIcker and oaters-DecideG the compliments
are entitled % enforce the cancelled mortgages given 10
the American Life and Trust Co. against DR.. McVicker's
lots for the s25 900 due them in June. leil the
purchase of the Trus. Co certificates.
John L. LGpreace administrator DC Of Isaac Laurence
James g. King and 0theTS-Cross suit.-Decited that
complainant morgagee Of Vickar has right ofsub.
rogaton the securities obtained by J. G. King the
extent Of w Lawrences deficiency in the payment
the Trust Co. certificates according the apportlon
mens 10 May 1871 such deficiency is coll ected
OF McVickars lots. That J g. Kings equity under his
second mortgage against w B. l. Ia no greater than the
compliments whose equity Is prior in time and must pre-.
vail. Ths, the lota formerly under the Trust Co
mortgages. and ID lci2 conveyed 70 King ia trust K as
and MS beneficiary necessary parties De.
accordingly in cross suit which 10 stand for
parties paying Of the hearing Right of subro
CATION declared All other questions reversed Decree
for sale IN orig na suit for the SIS 600 and costs
II. " Rs<d VS.. Small & NlLes-Decded that the re.
ceyer IN toe suit against H. Weed mad the title 70 the
claim against small Miles, and that did not pass by
The transfer to n Weed Bill dismissed with costs
SmGQ + Mules 70. H. 4 " Reed-Cress bilI-Bul dis.
missed With costs OF the and hearing bur not Of
the proofs.
MteiGel s. NeefHs ys. Il. Ycnde1eer and olders-The
Court ted thar the defence Of usury is wholly unbound
ed Decree for foreclosure and sale
dies. Jones and olheTs vs. Edptn g. Clayson-Com-
planans rst exception TO Masters report stating the
accounts OF The New York Gazette allowed Decree
cordingly Each party 10 pay their costs OF suit
The VEG York Dry Dock Co. The AEericdn LII. In
irrcnce aud Trust Co. James Morrison aud o:ters-De
cided that there was variance between the bill and
the proofs and that the compliments bills OF credit for
$50 coo sterling or sO0o0 and the deed OF 10 Sc
cure them executed in 1873 1surious and void and
must De set aside That the transaction Is be decided
by the laws Of this State and the defence mus. prevail
against Morrison he holder. Decree according
IN b. The usury In this decided by the Court