Jeffersonian Republican. [volume] (Stroudsburg, Pa.) 1840-1853, 1846-05-07

our neighbour Siegfried's article on "1ar!t and
Free Trade" n his paper of the 9th of April, I
and shall endeavor 10 give ii in a melhodical
manner
FIRST, our neighbor thinks we soar entirely
above our sphere, with The Imagination that
Monroe Editors are the organs Of their respec-
live parties, and then says he does not publish
by authority, but expresses has o,on opinions
Our neighbor certainly is modest man. We
were willing TO concede that his paper ,cas one
of the organs of his party in Monroe, but ne
mus, know best Yet if i, is not an organ, we
should like to know wha. it's. Parry papers are
generally considered organs (however humble
or inefficient they may be) of their respective
parties. The publisher Of the Monroe Press
is therefore respectfully desired 10 describe the
hermaphrodite character Of his paper. In the
meanwhile, even under the fear Of incurring the
renewed censure Of soaring above our sphere,
we must insist ,ha, the Jeffessonian Republican
is, and always has been organ Of the grea,
Wing Party.
Second Our neighbor expresses it has
O,rn opinion, that there are two kinds of Wings
in this country-namely, the American Wings
and the Royal Wings, the latter being the ones
who are in favor OF Protective Tariff. Al
though this is expressed as private opinion,
ten seen the same slang reiterated in the ac
knowledged organs Of locofocoism. But the
opinion whether publicly or privately expressed
is no, true, the very reverse of the proposition
being the fact. The Wings who favor protec
ton are far from being the friends of Brush in
terests. But the locos, who oppose protection,
and 60 for free trade, are in favor of admitting
British goods, &c. into this country 10 The in
Jury of our own manufacturers and laborers,
and justly incur the reproach Of being Royal
Loco FOcos. If we are 10 judge from The pri-
pately oppressed opinion of our neighbour, he
mus, be the Prince of these Royal, Aristocra,ic,
Loco Focos.
Third Cur neighbors anecdole Of the lal-
an who did not understand English, is I'VE ex-
press this as a public opin'on) very inappropri-
ale in an article in which no three lines in sue
cession are constructed according TO The rules
laid down by Walker. man who is in the
habit of violating both the Kings English and
Common Sense in every article he produces,
should be the last 10 attempt TO ridlcule any
person. people who live in glass houses
should never throw stones"
Fourth The alusion 10 Philip and his
! Eunuch, is terribly mysterious. We shrewdly
suspect our neighbor meant something by it;
but then what that something is, we cannot d.
vine. The curtain is entirely too dark, and the
vulgar comprehension. We must here reques
that in future, when our neighbor is expressing
his oun opinions, he will employ more "di
dphanouS" curtain, SO that the slightest zephyl
may fan it and the idea be exposed in its true
posture.
! Fifth and Last More about the boy
As our neighbor does not like TO hear us say
P-"Shau," we hardly know how 10 reply. Th,
two expressions are so intimately connected
with each other that il is not ia our nature Il
separate them. We must, therefore, need
make use of it again, even at The peril of of
Tending him beyond forgiveness.
The above is fair reply 10 the " Tariff ant
Free Trade" article published in The Monroe
Press of the 10th Of April last, in answer TO ou
article on the same subject, Of the previou
week. If our neighbour, sees proper to repl
TO this, an important question will arise. Wha
will our next article be like! We hope it ma
be more like Tariff article than the present
1t shall not be our fault if il is not.
A Norris Co. Ihreshing Machine.-Mr. r. X
Tuttle, Of Morrstown, has invented fhreeh
ing Machine which. according 10 the Jersey
man, would do credit TO the genius of any Yam
kee. 1t is driven by crank, which can b