Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1845-01-03

the said Commissioner is hereby directed 10 state,
settle and report with any matters specially stated
deemed pertinent By himself, or which may be re-
quired BY the parties 10 be SO stated
A Copy-Tesle,
CHAS. HOWARD, Clerk.
COMMISSIONERS OFFICE,
Ricimond, lSh Dec., 1914.
Pursuant TO the foregoing decree, have APP
pointed the 9th day OF January next for The at
tendance OF the parties al my office in The City Of
Rich ond; on which day, by ten O'Clock, a. NJ !
they are hereby notified 10 attend with their ac'
counts for settlement
Dec. ls-wtd JOHN SHORE, Comr.
TN CHANCERY-VlRGIx taken
/ in the Clerks Office of the Circuit superior
Court Of Law and Chanccry Of Prince Edward
county, the 18th day Of November, 1874
Edward Dillon, Henry Dillon, James WcbheI
and Nancy his wife, Berry Foster and Fanny h;'
wife. Lucy Dillon, Thomas Dillon, and Jane
, Dillon, infants who sue by their next friend
George Mckay, Plaintiffs
against
The children Of John Dillon, deceased who are
unknown, Fanny Rather, Manson Harway
and Nancy his wife, Benjamin Buster and Eliza.
beth his wife, William Dillon Allen Watson
curator Of the estate OF James Dillon, deceased
and Mary Dillon, in her own right and as 40.
minislratrix Of James Dillon. deceased, DTS.
The defendants, the children of John Dillon,
deceased, who arc unknown, Fanny Rather
Manson Hardwav and Nancy his wife, Benjamin
Buster and Elizabeth his wife, not having entered
their appearance and given security according 10
an Act of The General Assembly and the Rules
OF This Court, and il appearing that they are not
inhabitants Of this State: On The motion Of the
plaintiffs by counsel, il is entered al rules aore-
said, and accordingly ordered, that The said de-
PENDANTS, the children Of John Dillon deceased
who are unknown, Fanny Rather, Manson
Hardway and Nancy his wife, Benjamin Buster
and Elizabeth his wife, do appear al rules 10 bc
taken in the Clerks office Of said Court, on the
first Monday in February next, and answer The
plaintiffs bill, and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some one OF the public news
papers, printed in The City OF Richmond, for tive
months successfully, and also posted al tn,
front door of the Court House Of this county.
A Copy. Tcstc,
Dec. o7-wSw j. J. WORSHAM, c. c.
TN Y-VnGlNlA:-Ata Court hclt
L for Cumberland county, the 18th day OF Oc.o
Der, 1874
William Thomas Balow, Jane Booker; Heze
kiah Ford, and Elizabeth G., his wife,
plaintiffs:
Against
Charles A. Ballow, admir- Of Jesse Ballow, de-
ceased, VIM. Il. Ballow, son Of VIM. Ballow
Montgomery Ballow, and Elizabeth r. Ballow
Win. II. Ballow, Henry Ballow, John Ballow
Edwin Ballow, James Ballow, George Ballow
Augustus L. WALTON, and Ann Eliza his wife
Louisa Colquitt, James H. Goodman, Zacharial
T. Goodman, Charles J. Goodman, Litlleton B
Goodman, Thomas b. Goodman, and Elizabeth
A. nd RIB y
wife, Samuel Bagwell and Willianna his wife
- Wright. and Jane his WIFE, formerly Jane
Coleman. Sarah Coleman, and Charles Coleman
Horace Anderson, Henry Anderson, Sterling Alder
son. Ghas Ballow, John +. Ba!low, and VIM. I
Baow. VIM. Ballow, Catharine Baliow, Eliza
beth Balow, and Diana Ballow, Thos. Hudson
ana Nancy Hudson Hiram Hudson, Thos w
Dowdy, and Mary P. his wife, T. c. Jones, anc
Elizabeth A. his wife, Mary L. Crank, WIN. I
Crank. Joseph H. Crank, and Hiram II. Crank
and Samuel Wallace, and Ann his vile,
Defendants:
The defendants Samuel Wallace, and Ann F
his wife, Henry Ballow, John Ballow and Edwin
Balow. Samuel Bagwell and Wil!ianna hi:
wife, WIN. H. Ballow, Horace Alierson, Henri,
Anderson, Sterling Anderson, John T. Ballow
WIN. T. BaIlow, VIM. Ballow, Calharine Ballow
Elizabeth Baow, and Diana Baow, Elizabeth
~ n,
seph Fl. Crank, and Hiram II. Crank moi hav-
ing entered their appearance and given security
according TO The act of Assembly, and the rules
of this Court, and it appearing BY satisfactory
evidence that they are not inhabitants OF this
Commonwealth, ii is ordered, That the said de-
PENDANTS DO appear here on the FIRST day OF Inc
next December Court, and answer Inc bill OF Inc
plaintiffs and that a copy Of this order be forth
with inserted in some newspaper published IN The
city Of Richmond for two months successfully
and posted al the front door Of the Courthouse
OF This county. A Copy-Teste
B. B. WOODsON, c. G. c. c.
Nov. 2-w2mtS5
TN CHANCERY.-VrndSlA In Hanover
/ Circuit Superior Court, October 18th, 1911.
Martha Ann Harris, Barbara W. Kelly, and
other Plaintiffs
against
Charles P. Goodall, Executor Of Henry King,
deceased, and other Defendants
Among other things dccreed, the said Court
doth further adjudgc, order and decree, that the
defendant, Charles P. Goodall, Executor OF Hen
nv King, deceased, do render before Commission
er John Shore further account OF The rents ana
profits of the Real Estate of Henry King, and OF
his transactions as Executor Of the said King;
and that the said Commissioner do by advertise
napers in the civ Of Richmond, require The crc-
ditors Of Henry King, deceased, 10 appear before
HIM and exhibit their claims against the said
Henry Kings Estate in the manner now required
BY Law. A Copy-Teste,
PHILIP B. WINSTON, c. c.
CoMMIsSoSER's OFricE, !
Richmond 9Th December, 1914.
The parties concerned are hereby notified TO
attend at nv Office, in the city of Richmond, on
the 1-lh day of February next by len o'clock, A.
NJ, with their accounts for settlement.
The creditors OF Henry King. deceased, are
also notified to attend at my Once, IN me city
aforesaid, on the same day, and al The same lime,
with their claims, properly authenticated, against
The said Estate.
TN VIRGINIA: At rules taken
in the Clerks Office OF The Circuit Superior
Court of Law and Chancery OF Prince Edward
county, the 4lh day Of November 1914:
Jesse MichauX, Sheriff OF Prince Edward Co.,
and Thomas 7. Totiy, fiain'ins'
los G. Williams, and Jane E. his wife, John
w Richie. Ed. J. Roberts and Culhbert Roach,
Defendants.
The defendants Roberts and Roach not having
entered their appearance and given security &C
corJinr 10 the Act of The General Assembly, and
,he rules of this Court and happening that they
are not inhabitants Of this State on the motion lion
q the plaintiffs by eGnnsG osr. snI hs' 5e F sad
JeIendanis Roberts and Roach do appear at rules
TO be taken in the Clerks Office Of said Court, on
The first Monday in February next, and answer
the plaintiffs BILL and that a copy aa: q Of this r oIdfs
newspapers printed in the city Of Rchmoi d, for
tuo months successfully, and also posted at the
front door of the courthouse of this county.
A Copy-Teste:
SCHOOL AT WEST VIEW. =
MFRS. JONES and Miss RANDOLPH will
lvl continue their School al DR.. Masons The
ensuing year. The Session will commence on
The first Monday in February next, and it is re-
specially requested, that those who intend send,
inp pupils will make application before thai
time, either TO Dr. Mason or Mrs. Jones.
III w