Richmond daily Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1842-1861, 1845-10-03
RA.AxuAD DAILY WING.


- JESS hOxT ~ TEE LITERARY LINE,
THs hckExssss Pvssaesssss-Ths cAisf e Polio. 1.
sassssd In an avssgspn Of the eireum.,sness ..udn,
- Cook Co. Ia Boston, under whose name ,h,. hooL
ps'foh. YES undoubtedly publi.h~d i'm thu civ R.,
gees Suinger Taylor Co. and other publishes, h.r.
have bssn sssd with melton from the Chancellor 10
restrain thsn from paying tho proceeds of Tho ..,s
When The exsmiuston 10 concluded re ,h., ,;,. N. -
sull--Mssaias Nsss
or eourss, ths Chsncslos he's sssu,,d nj. Injunction
against paying The proceeds of the Book TO The prn
tiers and publshs, mus, be that Jssse Hoys or somebo
dy else hss made that ks 70 fAs frws smd ysrfsbs
iAor Of the rork! WIN. L. Mscksnzis elaine 70 DO the
suihor Of tho Book and hes pa, his tho title psye;
u Mr. Hoyt or Mr.. Butler disputes this clsiu want
copy Of the affidavit tor publication. Who tell US
where TO find ~
We insist. Mackenzie and the printers be done
oss OF the proceeds ot their WORK by Oy Co., that the
Cash sh. be fsry distributed among all the contributors
70 this new "ehid VI thir,ysix fathers. Mr. Butler ouvb,
nave m"rs perhaps TOT his share IN II than any
unless DC john van Buren, whose letters rather 60 ahead
among the "foang Deulocrscy' Stephen Allen should
BE allowed s' much ir his one letter other,
hsu doren Thsd Phelps 10 shoot aud sweets dollar
hne would DO moderate toe his contribution. Bennett
should DO fairly paid but let him alone take VI
himself In oil matters where tho ser' involved. Mar.
snouid nave a least tho amount Of tho entchsrse'
h"nehphcabes-And by the way, the female conuibu.
Tor 10 this Politicians Keepsake should have Chance m
nsso nef Pqssnf le''ss, and you will say Here they
INK washington Feb l9-Addressed TO Jesse Hoyt
ESQ., ~ l. lrnvael Nv ARLINGTON, 18Th Feb. 81
IVY Oer S"-fo on mnss either work for Judge 8.
t'ae"n'I o' yourself, u you do not wish Taluadge
s',"e o"ise OF -. a. lo"rict Auorney.l
n oro'nef works like CartHorse la the matter, and
"as' .e s''N"R wen lot hm.
"' d. iou"eD only yielded to Judge SIS claims over
you' on seeoan' Of mis- 'he Judged peculiarly unpis.s
IN, h'usuon IN Pecuniary point Ut view.
10 hep the Judge. The decision OF tho matter IL TO
70 10" WIN 'ne ~. y. neutrality-suspicious. and
oena'on-and they are all pretty much to commit
tod to Taliinadge Great haste, sincerely yours. HB"
Endorsed BY Hoyt "H Butler, Feb. 24.h. 1884" Ad-
dfessed lease hoyt, Esq. New York"
"WAsBiSGroS, Feb, 2lth. 1891
Ny Dear Sir can oily say in relation to the Office
was the subject OF former letter. that have be-
come TOO late IN The day Tor any hopes OF
iahmiase aha oahefianu are set aside, as Is very
hkeV ney WIZ oe,u the matter referred to the Delegs-
oon' 'nink nr. rimonds Will succeed
90 " Fnor InisM Is 9uaiiheauon and recon-
snuon 70 inc iasor " party surely YOU will give
INT LASi NAMED fERsoS
Hu'"" Py' u you really want the office, that you did
noAay 30 ~ inc commencement oi the session. You may
~e' however WINE 10 oamofeieng. who hear Is com.
wv 'o. a"s NC WIN 10 ao'e. 10 tenyou oil the diff
su mn,' ao''' "e '"an'
son tho Delegation will unite upon they ngree not
TO disagree upon either OF the hrst named pesons-but
W oP"''" Su"o"o' VIII DC 'he man.
rh MIL, of.o.