The New York herald., 1845-01-24


rist as mere memento Of the death 81 Christ ana nd
no dimcuit there and therefore . not the subject
ken yonthey are spirit and thev are lie Now Pc
corng to the meaning Of the Catholic church they are
sPri and Life but in other meaning are they spirit and
ct ALL There something in tho words Of Christ that
belongs TO faith and the reality Of life bat again is
Now to sy ha his mesh
permit that SANDER our Saviour 10 passf win You
permit me tS have recorded in the pepper. this sy
the esh of Christ prorth nothing that Christ gave
hs BODY in vain for u.s. and not being (dd could not
h sv go, ~ @ S who 3D.
redeemed that the hesh Of Christ proAe evry hing
the sHs pfe q paid = heaven
true that his flesh profteth nothing You must fnd
another meaning for these words, and you have ui
II the difficulties Of the former expressions of our Sa
viour " Afer this time some or his disciples LETT
him, and walked no more with him" why Because
they were scandahzed but a confirmation ana agsrava
on 9 j, force as they understood It from HIS Ts and
language used They seft him, and what does our sa
viopr He turns to the two remaining disciples ana
says Will you also leave :" will YOU also bs scan
Peter, with and manly conhaence-that prs
tine vgor that animated him on former occasons-turns
' III q sSs Il sss,s S
words bow TO thy wisdom we confess thy divinity
ana humbly rscefvs civ ststious truths thou Hast
yon candidy and as friend, does your doctrine mop
position to that OF the Catholic Church. require this ex
preston from the month O the aposs Where was the
dimcuity where was the demand on Peters faith in
sayiDg those words 3-where the difficulty which made
his disciples leave him, it he spoke Of mere memorial
There would be none Every painter NAV hand tbat
representation down to posterty without any diicuy
therefore coold not be subject Of faith But Peter
says believe. and are sure that thou art the Christ
the Son Of the living 0od-thou art the Omnipotept
thou csn'ss 40 IT, Yes and that is the language Of
the words Of eternal liie"-here' il the bread we
adore in the mystic celebration here s thy body given
for the nourshaent Of mankind which adore and be
iievA Thus, my beloved friends you have the magiif
filled: Now where they fulniiei7 We read in the
took bread and Scssea 10 IS
gave to the disciples, and said take eat this il my
rs noonday and unless there is something IL the context
leading us to give 1t metaphorical or fgrative inter-
prststion. the iangsgs is so clear and explicit that is
wise Here Is the fHinent Of the promise the bread
will give is my flesh for the life Of the world" He
given for the life Of the world WhatDbread7 The bread
10 his hand. The Language was simpe-there was no
ingenuity employed in \ Look Iinto St. Mark. ani you
the blood Of Christ There il the doctrine Of
this is my blood Of the new testament shed for manyI
evidently and clearly showing that the chalice contained
his blood shed for many Again when go to ST. Luke
tive" this is my body which is given for you this do
in remembrance Of me-" This is my body which was
scr the salvation Of tue world I s Was It mere
breadf Certainly not his body was given-it was nail
ed on the trees and because Of the sacrifice Of that body
viorof the world in like manner he does to the chabce
In the original text this passage my friends is so clear
thst it s impossible misunderstood it-"th Is the
the Testament il ny Ga which ha
poured out for the salvation of ankind Now believe
that nothing else than the blood of Christ to be shed
Now what do you think Of the fact that this text
taken BY John Calvin and Beza. and with assurance
no scholar can pardon in criticthey said nhs
be mistake in the text there must be solecism-we
will change "-and they changed il 10 to read "this
is that chalcethe New Testament-in my blood which
bility of evsding the sacred text. Now ask you will
Won permit 1t in the ordinary course readng that
when text initiates against yer notions will erss
til Certainly notapd therefore you must condemn the
audacty Of Calvin and Beza for their Interpolation Of the
holy pages and that the very time when the reformfr
brethren and destroying their establishments r.
.ooh Of their opposition to the sacred scriptures But il
like the Jews said .uhis il hard saving who osn hSsr
let as soften IL down." This is spirit Of truth;
his is not the spirit Of the Catholic Church Nor the
They want the TRUTH and although they have been long
benghted and msled, think see day dawning on
hGrISn snG that %0nS the varOp. sign. Which
wanderers into the true sheepod II our Saviour says
that the bread his body and the chace contained his
6led to. the letter the promise We read in st
Johns gospel Turn to. st. Pauis.- first Episle
g the Cornthisns 10th chapter, 18th 80 speak
to wise judge ye what say The chAlice Of behe-
iction which We bless. s it not the communion Of the
blood Of Christi and the bread which wa bess not
BRETHREN ask you, j. not the chaoe We bless every
morning altar the blood Of Christi and i not The
ne address my dear dissenting brehrm The bread YOU
ecsive in the mystic supper Is hthe paft.king of the
without any hesitation, yes7 No. nos something must
. added but without that something cannot be admit.
~ T0od be he scs Of hs
,erod within the last 800 years Fancy = yourselves
hat the Apostle Paul were addressing you now from this
leu the altar this morning wes really the body of
Christ Could you say simply and plainly "yes" would
70 IN the q
and" Remember my friends, hatllong ago your Papist
ancestors condemned in England to the faggot and
say to you, come back 70 this church, where
IN explicit answer can be- given. Listen to the
M ss
which also delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus the
'ame night which he was betrayed. took bread ard
sa this ID my body which broken for you; this do in
remembrance Of me, kc"-"wheref0rc, whosoever shall
the p sss sss and d1 sads this ny
rink q that cup For he ,Sa. sassS @ S and drnish n
vorthy eateth and drinketh damnation to himself not
lescerning the Lords body" Now, beloved brethren
sk You dspsssionatey TO consider This awful He
hat eateth unworthily of this mystic bread eateth
lamnation to himself" Why Because he doth
rot discover or understand the body Of the Lord;
hem, if | eat to my own damnstion, by eating
his bread unworthily-certanly that bread must
the real body the Saviour Otherwise could NOT be
considered as guilty Of prcfsning that body and blood
much less could be Condemned for not'' discovering
he body Of the Lord" for the body not there I
,euld not discern it. Yet am called upon to discover
I, and II do not, am condemnable II is1not but the
APOSTLE to the Genttles who speaking to you The
trumpcter of salvation in pristine ages says that
en you eat this bread and drink Of this cup unwor
hily eat and drink dannetion to yourselves Thus
Catholics understand IT. Why Il not discovered by the
Of the Christian word1 Can there be smother revela
ion7 Let conclude by simple observation You have
,eard our divine Saviour make simple assertion" this
my body, &C." and that sfter promising to give to the
world something superior to tbs manna Of the desert
Vow suppose that he meant representation ID be
by faith the body and the blood Of Christ
sl you be able to vindcote the character Of the Ss
Of the world for veracty and sincerity Suppose
vou should give to your child during these holdaysa
of toll vOu