Richmond daily Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1842-1861, 1845-12-01
RICHMOND DAILY WING.
r'... az i-..s,;.,z rsrs...s..
\ QUESTION ANSWER I'm

L. Ifr~...s
A otirs1.In y .s,,.,.a..
T..I.., o., -, "N'" ""1o.
d, 's"et quar- Pfopounds 10 M the following
'"''t'"'y, WHICH. by the way, We answered We,
ago, bai 10 which bas. no obectiop b,p~ I'M, , a,
solemn fortn 10 t,.,,,a uo,. 6,,,. - .,,.., ~ "
..yyhs, .,,, =. -, "A, (, -. -F''~'"S'
ain,, ~. ,I,,i - - a - ~. s's.'A'u's' some yssn
=, a. On lie h'or VI ihs Hose Of Delegates
Wv. o'ua't " >nsusts with wish " stop the Canal ii
Lbh,hburr, did you reject the idea with "a ,,,h and
shle explicitly that such wa. no, v,ur ,ne,i, r, ~
intention OF the peo,,,, Of ,.u, ,,yn
awe h,y. ,-s, ,e,,,,,, dr., .'. a.,
-, -. -, .' ~ '"u "u' IN" W
""-.ea'"hs nave operated On your mind. TO induce
aae OF opinon' and when that change oi opinion took
r'iec No improper co,sicpu induces THE qse s,ic
and hopo nothing will RESTRAIN yor from giving t,I
apJ o.oi.,, .,.,-.r. $3.50
as, -. -,
''"o'' w. 80 ~ "usos'' ever
mAuo 'ne teiehea 70 ny ho Lexington paper. but
tits On tnstcfai circumstance, and BY The
charge hss been more Than either nsnuatcd or eot
~ made by other gencu,en on the oor of b, o,. .,
Delcsa,rr and ON each, srcn,,,, 49,. ..,, 'e "
:, - 4, :, =, a.. Nps'ee r" as uh'ound-
' ~ ~ Va! sueh ih'enuon existed, otter on
e PAR y, "'' peVpo " Luxembourg, 50 lar rs VIC were
e"gnzsnt OF their ntebtions OF cir
Affirm that on each Of the oec, siopa q,
tpok. eandidly--sni We demon,,,.,.d ON, .,,.,, A., ~
voice. both proxy for the c, ,roa,,on OF ~
the annual meetings Of the ,,oek sot.r. .na =. 60 "
delegate. In the Legislature - in M. C,r., ~ "
every ptop. si,ion uresc,,,I Il, ,h. ..sia,' "s
carving on tho Vol. mi -, a." ,o' a'o w
ball giving the aid asked ts from N, v,, Is9q %, 49,
time the canal w.s nearly co,,,l IA =, tt,k H.n
We advocated u loan 10 the lame, Rive, md - -"l
Company Of millions Of dollar ,h.n the sum ,,sd
sufficient complete IL. c,nnecto, ~,;,h IN. or; -
u.ul the beginning Of IN, pr...,, o., .rL",L ~ ''
not been without sPprtAensions sioce the oncnio h
canal between Rcuload and Ly nchburc u, win
the OF testing aud at ,h 80
dicons OF the PROJECTORS Of in, ,ni,,n,i,. hv 80,
that their paons Of its beneficial effects xond ~, a.
nstrously Disappointed vet we game, ... ,h :, - s'
y doubted the cxpediency Of IL un,I "a, ,
ter, when in the course Of the discusson ON ,h ,,;
toa cl the Baltimore aud Ohio Rail Road Compsnv de-
Ve'opncnts were mods of the OF on &C.
Neral competing routes, which led IA lat.r Ia
tue subject and we became satisfied Thai nh. y,,n;, IT,
u compile ted Oh the present ,au could nave, .,,.,. LII
them, and its farther ,,o.ec,,;on ~ ,ha,
pan ought Ia b, arrested la letter written by s from,
Richmond the 9Th January last we ref,uei to h.,
dc'eiopmen. and to tie doubts which they had gwen
rse. Tins letter aud published f,,
the purpose vi arucn. the the Trend. I the
sehee the suh'etin order that II the iset, w.r moi
stated correctly they might by reclyng p-mp,lv ,b s,,,r
remove the doubt which could not foil TO be engendered
py an admission OF their tfn. But reply wac IN AIDE.
ga the 9Th OF Februsry, ia another letter from Riehna,d
snd published in the Vrgnan We again invoked The AZ,
ieniio, Of the friends OF tho Canal to tes.
but they su resned silent We have since had acce. 10
other sources Of information BY which W. have h..o,,.
satisfied of their eo,r,cines,. sd h.,n - ~',s, e
did moi be.ita,c ,nenIy a., -. 49, ~ sn'u' we
were compelled n, ,Jo,, ,h,, 10 c,t p., ""'su We
lanes n iy,r iun,,x.,,.,., D.. :. - - VI "e
folly so ,ross as 10 a,n,,n, -, ~ w u" ae' VI
W, were aware las, .,,,,,., -.
ground IN favor of Rrr,s,,, an. n,,.. -, - 'ooN
that onr Ioc,,ion v,o,Id subj, 49,, -; ' '''
hem nd rniarn
made to excite .g,n,, ms N, ,s.o.s - H. Ie
counties ah.ye us WIZ f,,n .,rrnaa.. So 1870 " 'e
subject believ. lis, ,h. .,r,',;ao - - t -, wv" we
q, buchanan - will N. u,,,,'., -. :, - ' ~ n
besides the CONSEQUENCE. of The ,ec,,,"d =, ~ Du.'
which enable. ne T., regard .n.L i,nnn,.,; -, ,,
eoranimity If t,mnsr wc h.S. -. ".,, pe',.'
s,undnes, AZ Tho onnion I, az 1, ,La ' IN, e
men. of many cth,rs f,r ,emy.J cro,, ,h az I-s ~
the loo al consid.,at,,s hy ,yli., Z, :, .iI.l 80 - "
troled The editor of the n cbn,,nd WI "a -. -
intelligent y.nIem.n a. ,h., $50 - s a"e my o'nei
49,.
as Ourselves Wbv, B.c,u,a In ,Ji,,;on ., ~ -"
above given Ma. G,yc. ~ ,yLi.h 49, 80; y, ". III
experience every where in Eo,nn. nd i; ,h fr;,t
tes tesrfes in the .tronp.s, m,n,.r in f,vc, - -,
mode of Improvement n sses.ipg nv, r.n, . 49, 80;
30 Decided ,bet bo mrs,h ',s,.i - 30 su'.',o'p
pt.iud,c, and s,,cI.d ...Sa.,,t ~ =" t pe'"'s in
be,itates IN ,w,,L,, ., >, . sss,lI " 'oe"se' wiz
can ever succeed IN ATTRACTING ,,,s. - - -, -.
Ohio river 10 Ricbmn,d M III :, -, - ." 80
Lly by aRsiI Road which IN ,h. r..;i;,. - ~ ~
m> nts ss well ms its greater eTain,y vii ony. -
senrer, and freight from o,o,,, 80, ',i ~. =, 80
delays and with n speed equal IN ,h,, III ~ w
obtain upun rival rou,e. a c,r,I -. 49," \ -,
= rsh road Tor the tr,nsno,,,,o,, ., -, -
alune-and If we were Iook ing ~ - " s'e1s
for remuneration for the c,.i ~ 90, 80 .'e, ,
perhaP. be vice To adhere TO "vsu
every body knows, this not the case. Aud even
hOe persons who in favor going on with the Gu
Eat least to Buchanan give very though uu
designed, expression OF preference Tor the iva IN I'd. OF
improvement when they htm9te the willingness Z. al
don the water line aud TO adopt the rail road tia,
place. II we were disposed aspetse their motives ss
some ~ ours, we might ask why 10 thus
rgness 10 subsute beyond Buchanan for The
superior mode OF Improvement II canal be preferable
10 railroad, why instead OF asking that 1, shall be car
red cat least to Buchanan do they no, insist upon 1t. be-
lug adhered 10 Tar Coyinstnn- the point which
was originally designed 10 st,pi Nay, 1t may be askcd
since the proc,cably Of u continuous water comnuica.
on sli the TO the Ohio asserted, aud indeed un
desiood to be the iSyoe scheme the able President o
the James Rvor Kanawha Company why do rhcy n,t de-
uand as Allen T. perton Of Monroe, who il at lest con-
ssen IN what we deierentay conceive 4 great
doe-) that the letter ,y.n shall be adhore TO
throughout the canal be preferable the rail road why
do those no willing make its terminus
wish To inc upon those them the inferior sys,em
IT, the other hand the railroad be the better system Tor
those west of them. why Do they insist upon having the
eanB the Inferior system, below eat eas TO
We pause for reply.
We will add here. (parenibeticay) tina; when We were
in favor u going with the canal under belief that II
would bring trade from Ohio amply sufficient TO JUS
y its construction, always eonbled the idea that It's
passage by this place would initiate aanh our prosperity
That opinion ron1ins unchanged. Consequently i, is
from apprehension OF injury Iynchbrrg That We are
now disposed stop IL but firm moro enlarged and OBJ
considerations Of State policy The prea, Enc ca
,t.s a.. Al n