Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1845-02-01

|
avowed mis- morning.
MIR. LEAKE felt il his duty to state, that i.
did not believe the Wings had Withdrawn NJ.
Daniel because they thought he could not t.
elected Several Wings had told him, that lhe-
should vote for Mr.. Rutherford, on principle.
| hostile 10 prescription.
Mr.. WHITE. wished 10 know if the genilena,
! from Warren had meant any aunt upon tie
Wing Party.
MIR. FUNSTEN said, he had distinctly state
that his remark applied 10 those gentlemen alone
who had charged the Democratic Party with Ic.
prehensible inconsistency, and that he should nv
withdraw it for any man.
Mr.. WHITE said he was not satisfied will
the explanation, and should, under the cireum.
stance, vote against Mr. Rutherford.
Mr.. BROADDUS Of Caroline said, that lie
remark Of Mr.. Funston could not apply alore to
the gentlemen who nominated Mr. Rutherford,
but 10 the Wing Party, who justified all that these
gentlemen had said.
Mr. PITTS thought that it was not proscrip-
ton 20 turn ont enc man, and 10 put in another
man equally competent. BIN, with these opinions
| he had reloiced that The Wings this morning had
magnanimously withdrawn their nominee, 50 &,
10 sanciiy their principle OF opposing prosciip-
4 ton. Since they had been received with a aunt.
ing spirit on The other sidd he fell bound 10 lake
| firm stand, and 10 meet the issue that had beer
rendered. Fle should vote for Mr. Daniel.
| Mr. LEE had intended 10 vote for Mr.. RutLcr-
forod but since. by the action Cf the other side.
the valor OF The Wing Party was put al stake. lie
| called upon the Wings 10 stand firm, and 10 sAo.
their metal
Mr. TAYLOR of Norfolk Borough did n.
allow his principles 10 vary with the occasion
and he should show to-day that he had the personal
| courage 10 maintain disposition. The remark Of
MIR Funston had been unpleasant but The gen
tleman from Warren had discamed il as a iaun
upon the Wing Parry. Even had it been IN
tended as an Insult 10 the Wings, il should have
no influence in changing the solemn convictions
of duty. He should carry out the principles al
ranced b. him before.
Mr. ANDERSON rose 10 pour oil on the irou
bled waters He hoped The genlema n from Wa,
rem would withdraw the remark he had done ;.
but let him do itagain. (ticre Mr.. FL NS'rEN
said that he had explained, not withdrawn.) TIE
gentleman from Warren had expressly said, thu
he did not speak al all for the Democrat
party Will this House them visit the indi>clr.
lion Of one individual upon highly compee&
officer? Mr. A. returned his thanks 10 his irien
from Norfolk Borough for the noble examr.-
OF iorbearance which he had manifested MI A
referred the gentleman from Hardy 10 the VIII.
officers in the Basement SioTy oi the Capitol whg
had been always kept in office BY The Democrai.
He asked that the delightful feeling, which ha
existed this morning. would be restored.
| Mr. WITCtIER said the disclaimer Of lie
taunt had not come spontaneously, bit had beer
forced by the conviction OF the effect il might have
on The result oflhc election. II did not therefore
| have the effect Of removing the impression ;t~
made upon him 10y the taunt. The Wings had tee!
forced into this position and there should be /.
chd's play now. He should most chceriu!ly 50.
against MIR. rutherford. He should vote 1,
Wing, and on principle
MIR. BROADUS of Culpeper when he 70,
before, had not expected the House 10 be IL i l
present condition. He should scorn 10 answe /
the calcchisn of a gentleman, who hal
| RICH, 10 calcch2e hm-but, in Difference II NJ
Wings and Democrats Of the House, he m
nounced the principles on which he acted. I'LL
had always been opposed 10 making this roi,.I
cal oice-and he asked, whether he deserved lis
iaunt for want of sincerity in his course. HI
did not need, nor ask, The Wings 10 support hr
on this occasion. against such grossly unjust i,
tacks. lie hoped they would vote according
their own convictions OF right, irrespective
himself He hoped gentlemen would vote j,
their own responsibility; he knew how 10 NEE
his own responsibilities.
Mr.. McRAE Of fenrico rose 10 make an e.
PLANTATION. He did not consider The taunl Of li-
gentleman from Warren as personally oteu>i'-
10 himself. The withdrawal OF Mr.. Daniel ~
der the circumstances, no one could regard 3,
dshonorabe or improper. Mr.. MGR made
statement of facts in Justice 10 Mr.. Broadus 81 II
himself II
Mr.. WHITE had reviewed his conduct all
still adhered 10 the principles he had belcrt!
avowed He could not for himself or his cci
s,ilnenl>, bear the impulations OF The scnema.
from Warren, and he appealed TO the Wli.
now, . rodcrn their character.
Mr.. LEAkE was requested 10 inform he $
nate OF the nominations.
A message was received from the Senare
Mr.. WALLACE, that they were ready 10
into The election. II
Mr.. JACKSON hoped 10 be excused I'm i
vol NJ.
Mr.. WITCHER objected
Mr. HARVlE hoped the House would eNtn Il
The gentleman. lie (Mr. H. knew circum>'arcaIl
under which he could no, vote II
Mr.. PRESTON took The same view +;
Mr.. WlTCHER protested against lesa.i1li ii
the bargain made by the member from Wool
The House excused Mr.. Jackson from yvti. II
The vote in The House stood as follows IL
FoR II. L. DaNIrL-Mcssrs. S1n,haIl, (Spe. II /,
err Pitts, Brown, Fulton of Augusta Fralcn
Cameron, Campbell, Scrugss Pendcton, MyerH
Flood, Moseey ,Beuhrng Fox, Toler, Broad II
of Caroline, Lacy, Broadus OF Culpepcr, Il H.
son, Garnet, Gr,ysby, Marshall Of Fauquier / III
mundS Of t., 1yree, Payne, Helms, Frrr II
Mcpherson of Greenbrier, Winston Lee, Nor rs
of Ilenrico WooltoD, Turner Of Jefferson. r. IN
ner, Smith, Wallace, Mayo, Farley, Rar Ia
Grub, Taylor Of Loudoun, Parrjol,, Bin Ia
Hall, Baskerville, Preston, O'FerraIl, KILN Hc
bell. Watts Happier, ferby Oliver, Edeing Ia
Cooke, Dey, STROLLER, Moore, White Minor u
phenson Rice and Fulton Of VT. u
For JOAN RrTnrHrooRp.-Messr>. LASH
Harvie. Powell, Thompson OF b., HAYS MIN
Blick Harrison, Marshall of Charlotte Wni-E OF
Thompson of Dinwiddc, Street, Brooks, Car u h
Loveli, Leake, Parks, Battle, Edmunjs d II Is
fax, Stovall, Blue, Ward, Ba>>qll, Goodwin b al
den, Davis Of King & Queen, HAYES Fan in
Gordon, Banks, kidwel Pool, Wade Ham u
OF Monroe, Taylor OF n. b., Middleton ~ ~
OF Orange 4 Greene, Mcpherson Of Page i NJ
ner, Cav, Hamilton Of Preston Anderson. b'
MEL Of Prince George, Macrae ot p W!lli9H al
Sturm Franz, CooteS, Mary, Cowan, Kane, ~
nison, Stckley, Tate SebIe, Hedgman. DiiaE :
Freeman, Newton, Peery, Funsien, and Cooa'f
fl
FoR JAMES LANIER-Samuel w. WOOD
The vote stood, ON Joint ballot Rnthei. II
rs, Daniel -, scattering mo election. n
The second ballot resulted as follow. ie
Rutherford 60, Daniel GS-samc vote a. oei az
with The exception Of Mr.. Wood, who vote III q
MIR Daniel, and Mr. Brooks, who did NJ, ~ u
all--or al least, his vote was not recorded Ii
Before the Joint vote was announce Nv
DANIEL. Of Prince George stated that hr aoi
heard that one Of the members Of Franklin 't3
Brooks) had voted for Col Rutherford, ant IN;
his vote had mol been recorded VI
(Here MIR. Leake inerposcd and moved Ia
the bell he rung Some time Afterwards H.
Daniel rose and stated that he had since Nc IN
stood that the gentleman from franklin dh IA Y
wish the matter brought before The House w.
Mr. d, therefore, should moi take HE re-? f4 :"
biliiy of bringing il up himself) ~
AT half past !, the committee Of The y ~
returned and reported the following a he L.
vote:
For Daniel 30 Rutherford r. La"
So Raleigh L. Daniel was declared duly ( i'm
ed Councillor Of State for three years EaiD
Mr.. FUNSTEN inquired, if il womb IN
order 10 advert to The proceedings Of The dal -
The SPEAKER replied that il Mouli vi