The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1845-02-12
Com mon Pleas.

Before Judge lngrabam.
brought to damages for iamaon OF charac
ter alleged have taken place under the following cir
cumstances Sometime in October last, defendant, with
any Just provocaton entered plaintiffs store
and there openly attacked him in the presence OF his
customers with the opprobrous epithets oil thei and
scoundrel and also previous thereby great
ly pjnrng his character md station in society For de-
fence shown that the particular occasion above
violent creation, in which both parties did not make
Of the most choice language. The Court charge IN
favor Of the plaintiff and the Jury rendered verdict
for plaintiff 500 damages, cents costs.
james M3yiarfy vs. Patrick OConner-This was m
action of brought damages for an as
sau and battery alleged to have been committed upon
the person Of plaintiff by defendant It appeared that plain
tiff, along with some Of his acquaintance met on the
evening Of the 4h November last at No stone street,
to attend ball for the purpose OF making up sum Of
money for poor person. and while there enjoying him.
selves he had alteration with the wife OF person
named Beehan, when defendant up plaintiff and
without any provocaton knocked him down, and hurt
his back IN consequence of the fall For defence 1t was
contended that plaintiff drunk and that the only wit
plaintiff had adduced was IN the same condition and
could not therefore be proper plaintiff
not struck at ALL but fell from the effects OF too much
liquor Verdict for defendant
Before Judge Ulshoefer
Moses Specrs vs. Patrick Concentration brought to
500 So for merchandize sold by order Of the
plaintiff defendant in September last appeared the
property in question, was sold by Mr. Rudd with whom
plaintiff to settle by delivering lime OF the above
amount For defence it was commended that plaintiff
equally liable with defendant he had given the latter
A. Williams for plaintiff, Bell & Co for defendant.
Robert Dingie and Henry II. Dtngie vs. .a"sustus II
Brahe-Acion Of replevin the value Of hides
unjusly detained by defendant appeared in evidence
that plaintiffs who dealers in hides, delivered one
hundred and forty nireto Mr.. Gazer, for the pur.
pose getting them converted into the leather used for
The construction of soldiers BELTS agreeing st the same
time to pay for SO preparing them At the rate Of Ss per
hides SO them delivered but when the remainder
presented, they found to be in such state
that plaintiffs objected to pay for them at the same rate as
the So they much damaged, it was alleged, that
the hide was preferable Plaintiff. agreed to fulfil
their bargain in regard to the So to which Giazier OBJ
unless he paid for the remainder OF the same
these remaining hides afterwards delivered to defen
dant (who sgent of Glszier when plaintiffs issued
repevn and had the goods seized in the hands OF deen
dant Verdict for plaintiff cents damage and cents
costs, valuing the property detained at $500.
Henry Coulter Thomas Mc.7dam-rhis was an &C
ton bond TO $500 given by defendants and
others, under certain proceedings had Stillwell
warrant Verdict for Plaintiff $500, with $3.50 damages.