The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1845-06-30
EXTENSION OF PATENTS.
GcIRouLAR.l

4 PArEsr OFFICE, June 81, iS45.
'NHE undersigned, constituted by law board 10
| decide upon applications for the extension of
patents have adopted the following suggestions and
| hereafter apply for extensions.
The questions which arise on each application for
| an extension are
| l. Is the invention nopel?
2. Is it useful?
3. Is it valuable and important to the public'
4. Has the inventor been adequately remunerated
for his time and expense in originating and perfect
ing III
5 Has he used due diligence in introducing his
invention into general uses
The two first questions will he determined upon
the result of an examination in the Patent Office
as will also the third, to some extent.
To enable the board to come to correct concur
sion in regard TO the third point of INQUIRY, the APP
pcant should, if possible, procure the testimony OF
persons disnerested in the invention, which test-
mony should be taken under oath.
In regard to the fourth and fifth points ofinquiry,
in addition to his oath showing his receipts and
expenditures ON account of the invention, by which
its value to be rsccrtained, the applicant should
show, by the testimony Of dlsnterestcd Witnesses
on oath, that he has taken all reasonable measures
to introduce his invention into general use and that,
without default neglect on his part he has failed
to obtain from the use and sale of the invention
reasonable remuneration for the time, ingenuity,
and expense bestowed on the same, and the intro
duction thereof into use.
The report Of the examiner upon the novelty and
utility of the invention, will be ready fifteen days
before the day appointed for the hearing which will
be open for inspection at the Patent Office copies Of
which will be furnished to all parties interested, if
desired, on payment Of the usual fees for copies.
In case Of opposition by any person to the extern
SION OF patent, both parties may take testimony,
each giving reasonable notice to the other of the
time and place of taking said testimony, which shall
be taken according to the rules prescribed by the
Commissioner of Patents in cases of interference.
All arguments submitted to the board must be in
writing
In conclusion, the undersigned would remark,
generally, that monopoly of his invention is Sc
cured by law to the inventor for the term of four
teen years. This is done with view to cOmpen-
safe him for his time and expense in originating and
perfectng it. At the end Of the time for which his
patent runs, his monopoly should cease, and the in
vention become public property, unless he can show
good reasons to the contrary The presumption is
always against his applications; and if he cannot
show tina. his invention is novel, useful, valuable
and important to the public and that, having made
all reasonable effort to introduce into general USE
he has not been adequately remunerated for his
time and expenses in discovering and perfecting it,
the board cannot grant an extension,
JAMES BUCHANAN,
EDMUND BURKE,
Commissioner of Patents.
S. BARTON,
Solicitor of the Treasury.
Thepublishers of the following papers will pleaae
insert the above notice twice each week for two
months, and send their bills to this office for pay
ment, viz: Union, Constitution, and United States
Journal, Washington; Republican and Argus, Bal
timore; Keystone, Philadelphia; Union, Harris
burg; Morning News and Jefiersonian, New York;
Herald and Gazette, Providence; Post, Boston; Ad-
vertiscr, Lowell; N. II. Patriot, Concord; States
man, Columbus, Ohio; Kentucky Democrat, Louis
ville Courier, New Orleans.
June 23-2aw2m