The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1845-07-01

II 5SRobert IL. Johnson, OF UWpestoH, 10 au'no'I|oo
receive subscriptions to the "Union," in Texas.
We are requested to say the same gentlemen are
horized to make collections for the "Globe."
ur TARIFF-IT MUST BE REDUCED TO THE RE
VENUE STANDARD Robert =. Walkers letter TO the
4iior Of he MssissiPPiaa
Messrs. Bancroft and Walker have just struck a
ow-one for the "repenus limits, and the other for
,sy,renle standard (which is calculated to COM
md the attention of the nation. We said, some
.eks ago, that the tariff system must "be reduced
,br revenue standard'' and that the tariff of lS42
an scarcely stand as the permanent system OF this
EAT country. 1t is too unequal in itself-too OPP
essiye upon some interests, too partial to others
. favorable to the rich, too burdensome to the
borer classes of the community. The sooner it is
dueed. the better for ALL 1t is better even for the
manufacturers themselves to understand on what
ey are to calculate. 1t is better for the rich capi
lists to have moderate and stable duties, than those
hich are too high, and, on that account never fix
but always unpopular and always huctuating.
is better for the tranquility Of the administration
We had determined, most respectfully, but in the
ankest spirit, to follow up the remarks of these
10 distinguished secretaries with a few observa-
ons from our own pen, in this evenings paper, and
rcpublish the substance Of an article which we
nd in the "Clarksville (Tennessee) Jeilerso-
tan," and to reproduce two very interest
facts which we fnd--one in the Rich
end Times and the other in the 'sPhiladelphia
,duirer.n We had these several articles on our
bile for our immediate use to-day. We intended
show that the tariff of l642 ''must be reduced to
he revenue Standard" that it calculated to PAM
er the manufacturing or favored interests of the
untry at the expense ofthe farming, the CONNER
AL or the oppressed interests; that whilst the man
acturers were deriving excessive profits from the
riff monopolyswhich they enjoyed, the farmers
ere burning their candles at both ends, receiving
mailer prices for their productions, and paying
gher prices for their manufactured goods In the
pport Of this single proposition, we have invoked
e statistics of the article which we republish this
ening from the "New York Evening Post"
were about TO make these appeals to an enght-
bed people, when suddenly a new ally appears in
e field. This morning, we find the following arti-
in the columns of the National Integencer.n
e lay it before our readers, with some thanks to
|at paper; which are the more checrfully offered,
cause we are so seldom under obligations to that
urnal for valuable and liberal political articles of
is description. We thank it for calling our atten-
pa to the debate at all Since reading the sketch
II in the "lntellgencer," we have glanced our
les over the last "r<es~, York Albion" (Which has
St opcuod an exchange with the ..Union. ,,l and we
ID the whole debate in its columns, from when
"Natonal lnlelligencer" has, probably, made its
stract. (Our own exchange with the principal
pndon journals is now in train Of arrangement,
not yet completely
We find many more speeches in the Albion than
noticed in the lntelligencer; and those of Sir
pbcrt Peel and others reported more in erierso.
e shall probably hereafter give further extracts.
. also find the following interesting remarks from
editor of the IN. Y. Albion" upon the position
the English Premier, and upon the results which
ay be expected TO be developed by the great move
ents of the British people, and the liberal opinions
their Prime Minister. We put these remarks of
"Albionp in the foreground, because they fur
Fh key to the position of parties in England,
the anticipated results Of these great questions
free trade and the protective system.
From the Albion.
LORD JOHN RUssELL's RESOLUTIONS
IN reperusng files by the last steamer we SEQ no
beet Of so much importance, that big with
Of the future, the subject Of debate which took
Ik trfpt a ms NJ
London papers pronounce this debate piece OF
Y manGuvre, and intended to show of nay Lord John
MS wing adherens in sort of grand fed-day exercise
her than as pretending any marked result from the
ITSELF or the vote taken on it Such, indeed was the
mon entertained OF it by members Of Parliament them.
re for we find that, the second night Of the discus
m the House was on the point Of being Counted out
phrase 49, because less than forty members pres
bu the course Of the speeches that were made opn
were given and admissions made by Sir Robert Peel in
cn TO his views free trade that have astonshed the
sevaye party and brought with them the direst apprc
s,ons oil the future. Bells Weekly Messenger, always
conservative paper and high in the confidence Of the
PARTICULARLY that portion Oft representing the landed
pey Of the kingdom, takes most serious view OF the
snslrs denounces the Premier for having deserted
omises. $50 '' ~ ~ ~ e " ~
should be borne in mind, that BELLS Messenger is
az means violent papers the contrary, it has Away
and considerable in its views and its language;
unluesonaby speaks the sentiments Of the Duke OF
nmond and the landed aristocracy. This want OF CON
nce in Sir Robert Peel has been gradually reaching its
height; but it IS the declaration Of the Premier and
John Russell in the debate that has spread so much
,eailon IN the conservative ranks Sir John Tyrell
sir Robert Peel had lost the confidence OF the con-
ben r. u that be the case said Sir Robert 4 will
et oT the course have taken, Turning TO Lord John
en ne sad fully admit all the principles involved in
evono and third resolutions' Now these resolutions
nat al lars fnposing protectite duties impair
E6agg labor and acosdiy that The present lars
M S oce@snts ~ agriculture These bold declare.
put hat says Lord John Russell the wing leader to
In I'm Tvr MI the al.
M ofcancs imagine, II they should propose vote OF
NOR T., IN her majesty's ministers that should
I'm rnil 49,