Mobile register and journal., 1845-02-05

nllsous eIasnlliun, "We have nui s hsar at pftssa ;u gp any further Into ihe particulars of last weeks doings" "Dearh's domgs" they may be tn the late sangnne hope of the National lnlellisen
 IL IS strange, but tel most amusing, hat Ike the poor lrishinaa's back, tuu ean never whip these men to their own satisfaction. No,s they cry out for Trraiy. Il cat only be done by treaty. Like
 the currier, leather k he only thing that Is good Tor furtI6cainn-ihe lnielligrnctr, well knowing, of course, that ii has been tried, and cannot be ac. quired by freaty-and that according to his advice of course, Texas would be forever ost i0 us. Hnl il is most amusing To sec that in 1903. when Mr. Jefferson obtained Lonisiana, the Federasis, and Mr. R0>s al ihe'r head, maintained that ihe erriio- " could he acquired hy Legislative action alone and nol by treaty. Now, the wind blows the other way. Thus, the Feela alistS are consistent only in their inconsistency, by recommending that mode pre- Cisely which would mol fail o defeat Ihe great ob- Jrct m View. Surely the Intelligencer cannot have forgotten, that the Federal party tried to exclude Lpuisiana by all the means in theW power. They denied the power admit her, and even threatened orce 10 prevent il. They loo, talked just as eliby oi dissolution then, and war, ard blood as the m re modern disciples of the Federal School cnn do al the present time about Texas.
 The N. InteIiigencer, however, is SD much nc- cupied by its own notions about neaiise cnInpacts and, ''tbe jont action nf the Senate with the Executive pnwer," 10 the excus ion of Ihe power af the House of Representatives. thai entirely strikes oni of ha Constitution lhe clause which says thai "New Sta'es may be admitted by the Congress ino this Union, ,.-fno b, the joni action of the Sen aIe with ihe Executive puwer," mark ye! but by 'the Congress J Does the integencer deny, that does mol require understanding. contract ca II il what you will, between lhe United States and the new Staie, before Il is adniliedl Why, iiat proposition woull he absurd. Does il coniend that none hut "New States" can he admitted, which are ed of the thea existing territory of the II. SIatesl Then, we ask the Intellrsencer what be- mes of thai remai hable opinion of Mir. Madison Gin the 4th of No of .'1he FedcralisP) "A sec ond objection to be made Is, (on lhe objection drawn
 from the t1fenf of country that the immediate object ol the Federal Constitution Is tu secure the Union n the tlB'seen primitive Sla'es, which know to he pracl lcable and io add b th'm such States as niey oriSe ID meir boSoms, OR IN THFIR EEIGHBoR- HOODS, whieh cannot doubt 10 be eQuaily pracra- ole. And uhii brcomes. too, of the prectdenA of the States of loulsiaua, Missouri and Arkan. sas, West of the Mississippi. which have been cur we'd out oi nemly acqnued territory, net then in sour own bosums," but ly ing in our eelbor- hood?"
 | fstaw, the argument cannot hold water. The whole article of the Iutlligencer io a last and des- peralr effort to prevail upon the Senate io irample l the interests of the whole Union unter their feet, and la, he interests, ihe rights and the feelings ol ihe South al ,hc feet of the abolition spitt 1T ihe Senate should be infatuated as 'o despire he will ut lhe people, and disregard lhe majority of 22 q. their Representatives, Gud ihe hg part, say well lRchmond Enquirer.