The Cecil Whig. [volume] (Elkton, Md.) 1841-current, 1845-03-29
In Chancery
22nd March,
1915.

John g., Francis ", and Ju-
sephine Linton.
The object Of this Bill is to revive the suit Of
Jane Kidd and George Kidd against John LIN
ton, which had Ubated by the death of the sud
Jane and the said john Linton.
The Bill states that IN the year 1917 the said
Jane NiGl administrator OF George Kidd The
eldor and George kitd flied their Bill in Chaa-
Gerry agligst the said john Linton to procure
the sale Of certain mortgage premises therein
mentioned Tor the payment oi'a Mortgagcd debt
due to one George Kidd the elder; that after the
fling of the said Bill the said john Linton am
awercd ana the cause was set down for hearing
but postponed in consequence OF some suggCs-
tionsp the then chancellor, that afterwards the
said Jane Kidd died and the said George W.
Kidd was duly appointed administrator de bomis
non Of the estate ofthG said George Kidd the ell
der and has taken upon himself the duty Of ad-
ministcrlHg the same, that after the death Of the
said Jane the said john Linton Also departed this
life having first executed alast will and tcsta-
mcnt, so as to pass r0al estate by which he
devised Tic same including his interest in the
morigagcl premises to his wil5 Martha Linton
for her iiio to be disposed Of at her pleasure
keeping IN view the benefit and advantage ofAis
children and appointed her the cXccutriX there
Of; and that the said Alatha has taken upon her-
self TO administer the said estate without taking
out any letters Of administration.
That tho said John Linton left at his death
the following children viz: Elizabeth who has
since intcrmarrcd with one Washington Cham
berlainc, Martha who has since ntermalried
with ono William L. Moore, William Linton,
Lewrinna Linton, Greenbury Il. Linton, John
c. Linton, Francis A. Linton, and josephine
Linton, Of whom the said Washington Cham
berlcinc and Elizabeth Chomberainc William r.
Moore and William Linton are non residents
and that 20 the said Children descended as his
heirs at law whatever oftho said AlOrglged
promises was not devised to his said wife Martha
or the said children.
The Bill then prnys FOR decree rcviving and
rcinstatiag the said cause SO that the said
George w. Kidd as adm'tor A. b. ct. should bc
made party instead Of the said Jane and the
said devisees and heirs at law of the said John
Linton should also be made parties instead ofthe
said Linton; That the said proceedings be had as
il said deaths had not taken place and the re-
lel granted which was prayed for in the original
Biil, and also iOr slbFGGas against the resident
and an order Of publication against the non re-
sdent defendants.
Ii is the1cupon adjmdged and ordered that the
Complllnants, by causing copy Of this order TO
he inserted in some newspaper published IN Elk
ton once in each of three successive weeks before
the twenty second day Of April next, give notice
10 the said absent defendants of the substance
and object of this Bill, and warn them to appear
III this Court to answer in person or by solicitor,
On or before the twenty third day of August neAl
to answer the premises and shcw cause ifany
tacy have why decree ought not 10 pass as
prayed. True Copy
Test,
LOUIS GAssAWAY..
Reg. Cur. Can.
March 2ath lsi5--Jw