Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1841-1853, 1845-09-11

for a new paper has been issued by a f. Morrison
and s. F. Covngton, to be published at Indianapolis
and to advocate Gen. Casss claims TO the Presidency
This Chapman thinks is infringing on his rights
and comes out heavy the editors, juntos, sc. 1t
is domestic quarrel in which take but little In
terest-but if Chapman thinks, it is project to
break down the Sentinel, hope 1t will not succeed
The Sentinel has been the most efficient organ the
party has had at apolis--and since Chap
mans rooster has been on the watchtower, the party
has never been taken by surprise-from minority it
has increased to a majorty-and instead of constant
defeat, it now knows nothing but rictory. We are
content with existing affairs. - Corington Peoples
| Friend, Aug. 30.
think the revival of the Democrat will be any in
fringement on our rights personally any more than
is the publication of the Indiana State Journal and
Quarrel with it only the ground of principle,
and for the sake of puttng the people their guard
against the tricks of political gamblers. 1t is there
fore not such domestic quarrel the Friend seems
to suppose. But it is one which concerns the whole
Democratic Party, and involves the important ques-
tions whether the party is willing to retrace Its
steps of the last five years; to re-insta in the
agement of its Press here the same men under whose
former influence, or want of influence, and msman-
agement, the State always Wing; whether they
will go for Protective instead of a Revenue Tariff
for all sorts of Banks and against an Independent
Treasury SYSTEM for merely taking democracy, but
not acting it and for keeping up an ncesSant contest
for no other end than to keep in Office set of hypo-
critical sharks who are politicians for the sake Of
plumber only. These, and not any thing in relation
to personal interest," the questions to be de-
cided by the Democratic Party. Dollars and cents
have nothing TO do with the subject But so far as
g
that if we stopped the State Sentinel now, we could
more money during the next two years at least
receipts from the public printing alone, thar
there is any probability OF our making by subscrip
tons to the Sentinel. We have always expended or
the paper more than its total receipts for subscrip
ons and at reduced prices are very sure to con
tnue to do for the present. So that the "Friend'
will see that with u.s. the pocket in this case does no
predominant over principle, but the Besides
we know enough Of newspaper business TO know tina
the revival of the old Democrat far from injurine
us, even in the matter of circulation, will benefit us
People love to bear fight, if they don't care
which whips That would help us to more subscri
bers than we should otherwise be likely to get. Th
would be the course of things so long as the Demo
crat lived but its existence would be merely gal
rac, it would be but transtory, and its proprietor
would before long be coming to US with their hats
their hands, begging to take their books furnish
the Sentinel to their subscribers and let them off will
empty pockets.
When we said that either the Sentinel or the Dem
ocrot must ego to the wa' we meant in politica
sense alone; that we could not pull together harmo
niously and hot that we should be injured in tn,
way of business Such an idea as the latter is ludi
crous. We not afraid of cork, have Away.
worked, and expect always TO work. We neither de
pend gambling nor stealing to sustain ourselves
our paper. Consequently we have no fears of mel
who never get up before breakfast and have not dom
an honest stroke of work for ten years. That's all