New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1845-06-23

press the Commercial Advertise &c. denounced the
Cogrers movement a. contrary the wishes and feel
ms Of the true Webstermen and treated the p1opos
non with dersion. All other papers IN Mr. Webster 10
ere.t passed over IN silent contempt, and the bitor
Of the Courier then attempted 20 escape the universal
rIcule Of the public, by making sncakns pretence
that he not serious IL proposing the nomination
Mr. Webster himself had TOO much selfrespect 70
sanction the Courcrs absurd advocacy 81 hi- cam
He dsclamed the proposal ior coalition 60 i- t.t 4
December l-43 he deridci the nomination OF M Gay,
and declared the expectation Of his election perfectly a0
surd.
IL for Mr Websters friends decide On the value u
inc Coarier- advocacy and # those who bought nm II
1913 think they have got their moneys worth NOBODY
nas any more rgnt 10 complain that the money wa
thrown away. than they had when the United states
Bank made a similar and equally proitaoie purcn
The opinions Of the writer Of the My-ery u lnqulty
in regard TO Mr. Nebsers course and position since
the election OF President HARRISON already sufficient
IL well known 10 all whom Il may concern, and need
not be repeated here for the sake Of those VINO are gno
rant a. 70 making i object, in the development o.
the Mystery Of lnquity abuse Mr.. Webster and hi
friends the writer Wa never able 70 discover any OD-
ieci7 which he could desire 20 accomplish IN so dong
The editor Of the Courier and Enquirer sees u 80 al
nculf ind "obe ct for such course tna ne -l=
gests that the must have been paid by somebody
20 abuse Mr.. Webster and paid 700 win NE money
Of The Pipeaycrs" whose ignorance and folly 10 pa!
ing' Others 10 abuse them he pathetcaly deplores-
Pau "payr PAY j. the perpetual idea OF me vens
editor of the Courier How any man can innh Of biNh-
the truth 9r0s il more ihan ne can pierAu 10 eAPai
Toe from pure malice he knows snatura but the truth
he thinks too precious be gwen away Therefore the
man who tells political truth without Receiving mo
new for H. must be " insane
The writer wasted hardly thought on Nj Webster
or his friends while he employed Ia his long ano
"thankess labor All MS personal relations 10 MI Wen
s,ers friends have been pleasant II was no object u
offend them and il might have been advantageous ="
please them but he could not turn out Of hs Way !" DO
either. His mind occupied with very diefeh'
class OF subjects.
The Editor of the Courier ssys thai the Mystery Of
luiquityn would be unworthy OF nOtce on lie "IlIers
account bur requires condemnation i0r the sake OF L
shing hose who have paid for the writing OIL H. IN
Editor Of the American Review then, j. the only really
,ufv pav and II he has not been punished suicientS
for b. little PAYMENT OF less than two do ars page y
the miserable pelting which he has had from AL -lie-
the Editor of the Courier may finish him ne writcr
Of ihc Mystery Of inquity ha throughout tni7 discus
SION, iet TOO much compassion iof me p''"I u''-u
! and childish character Of the Editor o. the he'e" u
expose his folly and egayoceiion as they should nave
| been exhibited. ,
In his note 10 the editors Of the Express. and IN the
whining representations when he mane 10 inc ",lf'
er the appearance OF his letter 10 the Courier loI jun
ll he insisted on the importance of the alterations made
IN II at the Courier office by di,c'saoH 20 as 10 s',
uasssgee signhcatlOn wholly contrary 70 NE "-h h'
know edge The writer assured hun that ne need leh
no personal resentment for the MEASUREMENTS into "hcn
he had allowed biz hrs; & Int 10 betfsy HIM because
| not the writer's hab 10 use Vio'ent means VI -
dress but the editor was advised 20 exercise more eau
II
est he might tall INTO the hands OF some ruder person
who might resort 10 personal violence IN rc'th-e oi
inconsterae impefiinence. Thus assured. the edioi
hos grovn easy again and regards the aicfat
,,adc i'm his letter without his knowledge a. unimpof
ant because there actual insertion ofnew words
but only an ai' ration in the significance ana iofce d"
| those used by himself He owns thst me ia-t par ="
that letter written by another person (why noi con
less that was Of the COurcrs men0 hut now, le
he fret time, says he "recas IT. not reiroit H. u,
was willing acknowledge to the writer IN person Una
| Ill; hp Ia mot I
worth while specify any insertion or omission OF
word in what written by another Tor MN 10 seh
He -avs now that the writer must have known tnat
he Che Editor) could not have seen inc pai"gr"p" W
question without rejecting the whole. The winter n'i
,hcr knew nor cared what thought OF the piece Oh
| what would have been done with Il, by person oi
| whom his disregard was never conceMed whenever ~
tried 10 interfere with him. The idea mat the tdt"
WAS revising the prooisps OF the article with view =
The exclusion Of any portion OF H. never entered the WI
iers mind Had lac known that the Editor was pnIposn-
| such thing be would have taken the "ho.e Hlei'
away from him in instant, before person 30 heoui
tent could have had opportunity TO eensure OF re
| iect"
The Editor deccves the public in saying, OF implying
ina, he would have been hurhencd with "IeynP Tor M
pamphlets equally he paid for the article itself III
| Knows better The writers proposal was 20 luhlsh i
pamphlet his expense to distribute Il gras 10 in
uhscrihcrs of the Review and as 10 The editor P9y
np" for them in that case either for the pfuns o W.
| yri,in, nobody ever heard OF such thing before
The editor Of the Review concludes by a-kn.-
| Whom does the author mean 10y my political aoN
sers-unsound corrupt trcacherous, SCI 10" my
ID Bhoay ," Why the very individuals whom the ediio
named 10 the writer IN private conversation al the t
ron House i've six weeks ago, when he spoke hn9u
! making the Review great Conservative Journal, o
the great organ Of Conservatism The writer iearne
from him the names of those in this city who counst e
| and a-recd with him la his Native Amercansm, We
-ierisn and Conservatism. and gave HIM ms opinion
Them IN Quick time IA for making out the Democrat
Wings of New.Nork TO be opposed TO reform and ir'
rress and rs for attempting 70 Identity Nhssery VII
Conservatism that is with rotten Toryism OF explode
Federalism the writer did not withhold the fun EXPIRE
sion Of his contempt and adherence Of those who he.
notions 30 Incompatible with the name and purposes
| Clay.Whcs And now. the editor asks the writer .
the Mystery of nquiiy 10 print the names OF the &c
TOR. friends, Let that editor 20 20 those persons an
cc, their consent the publication of their namef an
then if tl,4 desire public controversy and ihorous
investigation Of their political characters and conda
the writer viii be most happy 10 do them lustee-sH''
ic vinaciivc lOnceyadcd justice Nithoui tneir cor
sent he will not crafty their little proege by brne
Them before the public but will leave them 20 the sifn
obscuriy which they consider most favorable 10 the "a
| complishmen, Of their insdious treachcrous scheme
for the division and overthrow OF the Nhig party.
. MELANCHOLY CAsuALry.-A very sad affair o.
q