New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1845-07-28
poIyGs IN OUR LAW COURTS SATURDAY.


Is cH,uBrKs -Josspi n Plr,a Va ss~hsl Cei-Nr
entered an action of assault sad battery sssins, NJ
4 charging hfn With making violent and enNfVfosed
assault upon tim striking HIM sevcfai.nes IN ihe sec
with his nsr. hlscking one 81 us eyes A.o' Nhk n.n
down sc Mr. Psffcn, who i a counsellor ~ nN %
..r,a some time since. understand ca behalf ~ Tue
nr,nrietors ol the Aston House Judgment against NJ
goi for sl.co for board tie recently hcd creditor
h,l with a view 10 reach money pal 10 Mr. { by me
r Government for his experiments IN the sub marine
b,,nery and Mr. Coli summoned 10 sppcNr aud an
.wer before the Master IN Chsncery NJ I. eNsd
: said upon Mr.. Psiisn used violent i"SuAS, Az" IN ~,
,,i-,,i he assault aud battery complained OF Inc
uise ordered that be De held 10 ban IN me sum 81
sisO Nj Pat,cn also complained. We understand, 81
-r Police and Mr. e. was held 10 bail 20 appesr al INC
Sessions.
CovRr oF CoNMo> Prx,s- psiisi9Hs.-Cdt afrine ~
rs f others el rs estate Of Moses Lyon, aecfase vs.
Vosfs NIrshdl--hcion wa- brought To recover ,ae
amount nt A note, the defence 20 which WAS uiai M
N,rshsu had obtained a discharge frum ne Deus ~
decree I'M bankruptcy To this the plaintiff urged haaa
IN obtaining the discharge but dd not 81 iottn '' Ps
tcusr fraud required by the act On t1e wy. ~
charged fraud from The fac, OF cfssnfSs OF
hsvinr appeared the schedule and aiso Want OF NJ
c, The jury ON the trial. found 'erdict ioi Psn.a
of s2il 70 cents being the amount snd motion > '-s
% 49, the verdict aside The Court IN its ue'H''" -e
IN opinion n length and concluded AZ ivi""'
a.. we are disposed 70 nuiiy entirely the 49,
mr. what WAS d ne under Il when Il existed 'e Se,nsc
IN the case established m y" ana ia l'.'
did disregard the law ami W. ihinS ne" t - i.s
e. granted costs 10 NNOf liit rNtiiN "a Wv
wy ~ oian,i 20 lie sud serve pro iun' h''"
n the fraud with liberty 20 defendant II su'n u',
NOT nl,d before notice OF trial "a move ~ '"'A Wv" ~
replication" - h,,nsb,
On check Tor 500 which psnh held and gave W ~
John & Oakley 90 get cashed who 20, >l'v i'I H.
ave $40 a. Mr. BURNETT for wno.e cst"' Pl',nl"
rscs,vfr The check protested ana passed. again y"
Inc hands AZ Rurtntu'- receiver. I'm NJ eNanh ttos
,,f,rc the Master Chancery Burinet ackno~l'os.d
h.t $40 had been paid upon the cheek me jury NY
ufh-fandine gave verdict To platinum i'f 'u' .e.'
mount which the Court considers ci'sfS "sshs. w
,ncc As % the aycrpl,nr that The check was s',oi
notation for The benefit OF BURNETT, that -htu" US"
cen shewn the ira finlend'd 20 be ascn a. 'sns'
lf II plaintiff sfipusics 20 infO" Oh s.o Nei''' ~"
fmed. Otherwise new trial allowed
Treisriek NcGagn Repbsn GnrFer-Ihis - an &C
on tor SANDER m charging psinur Win being III VI,
habit Of visiting houses of m fame IN NcwJtfre> s''
That his wife compelled 10 90 snd get Nun away -.
The declaration Is demuffrd 10 on ihs giouh" W '"e
act Of visiting houses OF ~ fame not teng pens NC sc
ton for SANDER cannot be- maintained 10 thi' 80, 'V
died that the laws OF New Jersey. which the pa'nun Is
charged BY defendant with having NoH'n' '"n-''
ifurry penal offence. punishable 10y me "iu i'.
pnsonmcnt SC The Court considers tn'' w 49,"
can be maintained. Judgment for planun on ''noi'I.
UIlqm Ufiss Va John T. Udks Action 10 recover
for painting house In Brooklyn which was f.i.f :" 70
Me.sis Andrew Warner. Ihos Jcrcm.h. hnn WI , =
Mayo who reported in favor of plaintiff TOP $50 Ve's
Motion IL made 10 s-t the report aside Moroc granted
md unless appl cation made within ten days ~ 'hAnse
he referees referred back 10 the same. -,
IN tie mau,r Of John " Reynolds, whose estate nsa
been attached under The statute as 10 absent or conce
"a ebtor. Application made that the attachment BE-
discharged. Mr.. r. was engaged Ia business IN New,
York made an assignment for the benehi Of PREFERRED
cred0r- and len for Europe but returned. II 10 con
tended that the attachment wrongfuly sued out
The Court does consider the proof sufficiently strong
20 that efiest and arrangement IL spoken Of sPpli
cation denied.
Ia m. matter Of John H. Chadtcick who asks 10 bs re-
eased from imprisonment where he s for non payment
Of ahne. Application granted on payment Of costs