Mobile register and journal., 1845-01-23

GEkMAkY.-lt ''ereeeds all power oT face" for MT Clay to speak about the financial emiarrassmenis m the trade Of Ihe c"ulrv produced by the triumph Of the Denoeracy With his consent and probably wHh ms adsIre. the whlg members oi the senate lectedsihe treaty, concluded ai Berlin by Mir. Whea- ton, With the Zoll Vefen. commercial confedera- ey ot German siates-the most advantageous iO the United States of all the commercial treatise that have ever beeu formed between our government and | foreign country. The population of these German states amounts tU twenly-eight millions of souls, whose cotton manufactures exreed in extent those of France and are second 10 tl,se of no nation in Flu rope, excepting Great Britain They coBsuDe more tobacco than any other people whatever, and if Mir Gays friends had not withheld the power by reec- ling the treaty, they would i'll the course ola few years have supplied the greater part of Belgium, | Holland, Austria, Denmark, and all the north of Europe with that article, esteemed necessary of life in those countries. The treaty stipulated that raw cotton should be introduced into the ports ofthe German confedeacy DUTY FREE; rice al one cent tobacco at one cent and ha; lard at cent per | pound.
 Rice Is imported into Germany in great quantities, which would be still augmented, If Mr. Clay's irienus had permitted the duty 10 be reduced by Ilie confr- nation of the eaty. And lard too! only nag inc the market which has been lost to the western states | for ihIs important article of their produced The principal, perhaps the only supply of this ingredient m all German cooking furnished from abroad would have come from this country. Remember still, the population iu be supplied-amounls to twenty. eight millions. Is 1t too much estimate the quantity of American produce they would have consuIncd but
 'i the iatal rejection of the treaty, pound of lard, one pound ol tobacco, Tor each indivilual - Here, then, Mr. Clay's political friends have closed | a mal ket upon American farmers where they might have disposed ot twenty eight millions of pounds of tobacco. and Ihe same quantity of la d-to say noth
 ing of cotton admitted duty free, and rice at one cent per pound besides number of other articles of minor importance.
 l We have already said the cotton manufactures of Germany are rapidly ncreasing-ln former years all
 the various kinds of cotton goods brought into
 that country from Great Britain Al the present mos nent she imports scarcely any of that kInd of goods but cotton iaisI-In other descriptions she not only supplies the wants of her own poI ulation, hut has driven the English manufactures of many ma, kets on the continent, which they thought belonged to none bul themselves. The consumption of raw cot- ton in Germany has increased 260 per cent in seven Aears ending with lSIO-which Is a rate of accelera. lion exceeding that of New England factories. IL would inevitably have happened in the lapse of few years, with free importation of cotton, that the German coned"racy would have out-s,ripped all | Europe in the consumption of that great American staple That coun'ry has the great advantage over England, that che produces twice much inod as her population cOisumes--c0nsequently they are more pleniiuly and cheaply itd. Perhaps here per ceive the reason why tie tariff men in the Senate | j-c,ed the ireaty-they saw rising competitor in Germany more be dreaded than England. But, what ap"logy Is that 10 the people of the cotton grow ing states Tor dep wing them of vast and growing a market for their pioducel
 word more respecting iol,acco. While the com mercia concderacy ol Germany was willing lo take that article a duty of one cent and half per pound Austria pays a duty on il of six cents, Russa of twelve to twenty five cents, England of seventy tao cents. and Frarce prohibits its importation, excepl when she wants li to supply the royal monopOly.- Is i probable that large po lion of ihcse nations would have been supplied with tobacco from the Ger man ports, had Mr. cla,'s friends permitted the treaty To 70 into effect?
 And ,e, Uni, defeated candidate for ke presidency and his parizats have the cfrontery 10 charge the
 democratic ,run,phas the of an mag ginary eln- bmrassment of commerce! with depressing the value | oI American secmiiiesi
 | Another provision of the treaty is said to have stipulated that . heavy tax OH emIgrants 10 foreign count, les liom oi the German States. was he remitrd favor of hose bound ihe United States This exemption would have brought increased nuul- bers o hai estiinabe people, and o the richer class es, to ths country ini perhaps th's is another and stronger reason why the treaty rejected by our Native merican-Re RepsLlicau- Senators, with the advice and consent of Mir. Clay New Orleans | Courier,