New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1845-08-28

~ Having been absent from the CITY Tor a'e"
dav. 7 nerce;ve with a pleasursbe surprise on my
return that the Erpress has only perpeua'eu wv
new calumnics upon me OF any consequence -''''
Friday evening. One OF these is the perVer-'oh o'
nv allu.ion to frothy rdriHgs Thich ne ihooe''
owen comjated' in the lnhdel Convention "
mean Christian doctrines or arguments "heh
heard him make no allusion TO Christianity ou' F"
the rawlings Of those Tnfdels who had PRECEDED nun
in he discussion and who insisted on making '"'
,,,-,,io, q mere propag ands Of Inhdelty Mr. owen
o.,ed this and urged ths, the Convention should cay
what wa. for and merely that II was asa" o'he'
<oe. b.ef-,hat j, should take the highest ground IN
.uupor, Of unlimited liberation Of Thought and Vpn'on
and unbounded Charity for all mankind these sehu
rn.u,. we considered sensible especially IN contrast
with the ravisg. which they resisted ~ all our readers
mus, have understood. Had the Express possessed
,itbe - much practical Christianity as Robert owen II
r,i'5 not have so grossly msrepresenied us-hno as
The xpre.s dare. us TO specify some Of s appeals 70
The peiudices Of the ignorant we cite this one ~ be
ginning.
An,her occurs in the article Il speaks oil the
'ule Community at Marlborough. Ohio. ns one Of me
yyyi.r hot beds when the very letter II gIoles from
our columns describes tina, community ss formed IN an
,ogo, Ism to Fourers fundamental principle Of A''o
,n,ed or Joint Stock Properly like Bank or ha'oA''
With regular yro rata dividends 10 Capital and LaDo'
ADD On the oppo.ae principle Of Communism or
qua ~ in all thing. Again The Express PcN' 0.'
iha article part Of what Is said about the
sgnd ~ (Which appears be far more stret '''e
i, ever was in the Express oiiceJ Du' 0h""S .''
rncni that part ofthe members "eni 70
ne, q ,yorsb, and ,hereupon broadly asserts that
-. M ,eligiop and no worship Sunday. We
s.el g, all mortified tina, the author Of such per
.ioos and knsvories considers the church in which
We " Drship a funny one
i, the same paper the Express quotes denial Of
the n, Of that paper read whole classes out oil the
hip party for alleged hereses in regard 10 Irish s'ars
socia Reform, SC and with air Of triumph asks,
We'll. j. here not an attempt ldnify the Whg party
ruth se dodI mrs p
Now the man cannot be such blockhead as the as
sumption Of good faith in this question implies There
are Wings who are severally Shareholders Emancipa-
ioni.ts Infdels, Quakers Catholics, Jews &c &c out
ih.s Toes not identify the Wing parry IN slavery
Abolition, Infdety Quakerism, Catholicism, or judaism
Waa we contend for is the right Of all Wings TO form
cher and advocate their opinions on matters en-
,i,.v foreign 10 our National Politics and II any man
as.er. that certain principle measure s condemned
nv M. Wing party we demand chapter and verse for
such condemnation not in the ipse dirt Of some
sorid and unregarded hangerOn OF the party Out IN
some authoritative declaration OF its principles through
National or a, least state Convention Whoever IN
dcrstcs without such authority to read men by thou
sand out Of the Wing ranks s guilty Of nsufeabie AFRO
once and either inical reckless Of the success OF
the Iarty.