New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1845-06-14
-;.;o ,,,, !, was the duty OF this country TO en-

v;c,on ,hs, il was the duty Of this country to en-
courage immigration, &c
:. q The very money which purchased this ar'ic'e
was furnished by Mr.. Web'ers ir'ena' sn' ''e
Pipe layers
rb;. money was not furnished by the General
corr,;,,ee either f." late or present IN l'fi'
1.,.or lst5l but BIZ the Central Clay COMMITTEE
which met at No. ll2 Broadway in l-ii-
T. The author is knows to be the same per-
who wrote series Of pamphlets against me 'o.0-'
za,ion Society which were mos; iavorADiy iO'''''
and vehemonily commended by the Courier 4i-''
Enquirer. -,-.io,,..
He boasts Of having prepared the re-oui0n-
passed in October, 1913, in fifteen aius % .'''
Civ subsequently ratified by the General Mee'i"-
), v.,;oD.l Hall and re aHrmed By the wings o.
the interior Counties ofihe State IN nui''e'O-
incs. ..o-.holos.
u.;so Temporary resident opS nevertheies-
q corsden, of establishing a residence and securing
ILL - ,,,ssistence in this City. Yet he i T.
,o-.,, If our citizens their habits &c &c
70 - The Mysery of Iniquity is the work OF an
.o,,led and wandering imagination, and OF BRAN
Iahornp under mos, unhappy hallrcinaiion Is
i've q ,-oauc,ion Of deranged intellect" and does
no, belong to a sane mind
n The author is mailman, an unfo-iuna'e
dreamer" whose condition calls for the promp,
interference Of kind friends TO prevent more di7as
,rous consequences as well as 10 secure the none
Of the Pipelayers from being squaadcred on him
and to forbid hisfurther employment 1.-THE Genera
and Central Committees to abuse the Pipe-ayer'.
70 The article holds up Daniel Webster as
traitor to and deserer from his party and his trend
a. noli,ical cheats and knaves' One Of the great
objects of the article most unquestionaoly the
;niurv of Daniel Webster and his friends.
"a II contains gross contradictions &c &c.
Th;s ANALYSIS of the comments OF the Courier anu
Enonirer makes it evident that reply IN deiail
If necessary would be extremely tedious BOTH 10
the author and the reader, and would require more
sosce than can be easily obtained in the crowded
columns of daily newspaper Breviiy IN reply j.
enforced not only by the character OF the assaani
I'M, by the exigences Of space, time and pubic pa
| tiencc
| For these reasons, no attempt will be made al
present, to decide which of the Courier : two opn
ions as TO the lie and literary character OF The ar
Gle is the correct one The question OF the sanity Of
the writer NAV also be adjourned a. one rather EN-
barrasspe i'm discussion and interesting 10 IN.
individual than to the public.
| But the various, contradictory, hall retractei
charges of the Courier as 10 money given TO t.,
writer Of the Mystery Of Iniquiiy by the Genera
Committee and Central Clay Committee, es an IN
ducement to the production Of the article or com
| pensa,on for it, require notice. The Courier ma
made this charge in every possible coneciural torn
has stated once its personal responsibility aho
as of its positive knowledge, what ii was compelled
to re,rac the next day and confess 10 be an actua
falsehood; and has then made the charge IN ne''
form as positive and as wlliully false as the first
There is but one term by which this silly, baseies'
fiction can be fully and properly characterized.
isa lie-a wilful wicked malicious lie The Courel
is defed to name one person who ever stated to II iha
the writer was paid to write the article by any Com
| miitee or Association whatever, or by any person
except the Editor of the American Review, wh'
gave for il merely his usual rate OF compensation To-
political matter.
The complete history of that article with the &c
casion of its preparation, and the causes which IN
duced the author to consent after much solicitation
10 publish il first in the American Review, contrar,
to his first intentions viii show this, and viii b
given on Monday Morning.