The Cadiz sentinel. [volume] (Cadiz, Ohio) 184?-1851, 1845-06-25
l concur in the above, and recommend it, after using
various kinds oron machines both in this country and
in England RICHARD DYMOND,

various KINDS OF IRON machines Doth IN this country ana
in England. RICHARD DYMOND,
Miller in Charge.
Having in operation several of Lull's patent smut
machines, within the last two years. would say to the
milling public that they are decidedly superior in all
particulars to any iron machine, and think them
perior to any thing that be made of iron; on
bount of the durability of the material of which they
constructed and the ease with which the edge
be replaced should they become smooth, would recon-
mend them as requiring but little power.
SAMUEL. HALEY, Millwright
McConnellsyille, Ohio, Feb. u, 1915.
This is to certify, that have now in use in my mill
lwo of Lulls patent French Burr smut machines, No
g. 2, Zone for wheat and the Other for buclIwwheat
and ryeO and find them to clean smutty foul grain
i'll first rate manner and believe them to be superior
in all respects to any iron machines. w. DAVIDSON.
Bridgewatel, Beaver CO., Pa. Feb 7, 1915
We are using LulPs patent French Burr Smut ma
chimes, which has been in operation two years and
gives entire satisfaction, We would recommend them to
mers, for cleaning wheat well, for permanency OF
their construction for cleanliness, for the small amount
Of power required, and last though not least for their
durability. We doubt not they will last an age with
trihing expense. STONE, THOMAS, g. Co.
Malta Ohio, Feb. 10, l645
am now using, in Pritchard and Laher's mill, one
of Lul's patent French burr smut machines, and /
think it one of the best machines have ever used du-
ring an experience of twenty years for the purpose oil
cleaning wheat unequalled for durability, and requi-
ring but little power JOHN COURTYARD,
Miller in Charge.
sandyvilIe, Tuscarawas county, Oct. 10, 1913
oheerfully recommend to mers Lulls patent French
burr Smut Misunderstanding used one for the three
past years, and cleaned from 250000 to 100000 BUSH
els of wheat with it, find operates as well now
when first started without dressing repairs of any
kind. thinkit unequalled in all respects
JAMES DOSTER.
McConnollsville, Morgan CO., O., 1915.
w. w. Wallace: DR. Sir-We have the French Burr
mi mai pf UoV in
ton 1t is the most complete thing we have ever SEEN
1t is worth more for cleaning wheat than all others
in use. e. HALDEMAN and Co.
Cherry Grove, Illinois, Oct. 10, 1874
Having for the past year used Lulls patent French
burr smut machine in mill, we cheerluy recon-
mend it to miers as the best machine for cleaning
wheat we know Of Itruns light cleans fast and is We
ry durable. EVANS and McFADDEN.
Stone Steam Mil, Pittsburgh, Feb. 1645.
have tried one of Luls patent French burr smu
machines in my mill for more than year and
find it cleans grain WELT when first started. Icon
slider it to be in all respects superior to any iron ma
chine JOHN McCLAREN.
Moon tp, Allegheny CO., Dec. 20, 1914.
On seeing the superior manner in which LuPs pa
! tent French burr smut mill cleaned wheat, we aban
doned the of the iron machine, and put in its place
one of LulPs 1t is in all respects superior to any iror
machine we know Of MCCONNELL and ADAMS
! McConnellsvile, Ohio, March 10, 1914.
am using one of Lulls patent French burr smut ma
clhes III tle Union MINIS III place OF an iron colca
machine thrown out, and think it has equal for du
rabity, etc. J. BARTHOLOMEW,
Roscoe, Ohio, Oct I, 1913. Miller in Charge.
have used for one year one Of Lufs patent Frenc
Burr smut machines, and feel confident in saying
is the best article of smut machine have seen
use; and do cheeruly recommend it to allpersons VIII
are in want of smut machines. J. F, REYNOLDS
i Canal Fulton, Stark CO., O. Oct l8, 1845.
All orders directed to the subscriber at Nos 144 an
LAG Liberty Street, Pittsburgh, will be puncnaly
tended to. w. w. WALLACE.
April 16, l845-1y