New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1845-07-26


Ar CHANBrRs -Idmes N'laf r. joan GAlyfa AZ
Ctfrks Gayflsr.-ihe planted : one Ol the 0G poke
oficer. The defendants have lately been appointed V
fcers of the tih Ward new police They met NJ MOo-
ana. evening and without ceremony. marched him O
the station House The pa.nuH attorney Nj Hus
this DAY obtained order holding them % special d
in the sum OF $4,000. 20 answer
L. N,ssu,r's OFFICE -farcsay on hs "a "a
George Ione. s'ecragc passenger on board The SAP
Cnruehs from Liverpool WAS examined before Con.
I'D ssiOusr Morton ON charge OF rob1ng another pa
-eugcr. named Ml..sm owens 81 4 40 80 o. m sot
contained IN purse IN the inner wa's'cosi pocket n
owens which Wa. taken during the night from aaaer
the pillow % owens Jones band was seen on the r.
,w and a purse Identified - belonging % Owens, So
.eQueniy found upon him. Committed
CorRr or COMMON PLEAs.-ChGrles osborn " U-g
>nui Action OF lrovcr 90 recover back Piano fOfe
Mr. Osborn being manufacturer OF such. and Mr. SnA
having purch1.cd az him advancing him $50 % r
and agreeing a. pay >2i5 more should the piano be ~
proved OF Mr. smith Al the time Of purchasing, bad
ms, been married and was engaged IN furnishing A.s
house The plaintiff claims that he received notice
some time after from Mr. smith. thar he should not Keep
he Piano and wished him 10 refund The $50 advanced
and come and get 10 Plaintiff states that soon 4. he
could raise the money he went ;O Mr. smiths Office.
corner William and Wall streets, offered % refund And
I'd take back h, Piano bur Nj : asked HIM why be nSd
not come before and stated that % had been sod oy Hal
idav 4 Jenkins Further proof showed that VIZ smith
.od out IN. furniture auctiOntnc piano ore was bd
N 40 hrst bur ultimately sold netting bat so. Il was
also shcwu by professional men, that ths value ~ ne
piano had been greatly overaied Verdict for the de,n
liant For plaintiff Ncssrs Tyson smith TOR deitn
liant Mr. Lockwood.
JON Cqngbey vs. John p and Thomas Cummings. j..
Tn, plaintiff - a Miller by occupation. lie was EN-
poycd by Mrssrs Cummines to sup'rnirndlh' ,i''hoh
steam Touring MIL corner H'ih street ana itNih
avenue and atfNard ~ conduct tho NH, AZ salary oi
1900 per auuum. nlicultl,- occurred and Ne-sis 1
dismissed him. lie brings action to recover several
months salary under the terms OF the written agreement
There bcing variance Of date in the oyer aud ~" ia
.trumcnf on which the action il based objection "as
aiken, and the plaintiff permitted 10 withdraw Juror
80 a. 10 amend.
f;,or,s 4 >hufslat rs Hiram Birdsau and Georse n
Action 10 recover costs and counsel tees ip
suing attachment against the lagcrsc~n Bank Ma
rylsud. and resident debtor named crawford by
which property IN thu. cry worm SNVV was attached
Nr RAYMOND the opposite counsel. stated that be-
thought counsel fee Ina each oi so would be lcs
.uuahle making ia al $500. Verdict for latter amount
MARINE CorRr-VicfOr Va. UiNiGm..-Aciion Of ro.
yer o possession of the KEYS o house bought
1y plaintiff AZ sheriff sale and deed given by thr Sher
n l. commended Tor defence that the deed = null and
void having been given previous To IN" ID months
owed by creditors 10 redeem. IL was also shown.
proof that no creditors had ever redeemed Decision
re-ervcd
John n GouM and Heary = Jackson ". n ia'sy-
Libsi The plaintiffs aud defendant are DagucrrcoyP
artists having rival Offices M l22 Broadway Defendant
mas been engaged IN the business Tor ong time an
.eel specimen. OF his hkenesscs exhibited IN front
bee building IN Broadway lanuf- are very young una
Obtained apparatus took some lessons and so ug
nrrc four weeks ago flNal establishments w" tntr
% plaintiffs being the -s'ond story, and that o Dc
cnlamt on the fourth The present Is ma action TO r
cover damages TOR libel In defendant causing bills 10 =
printed and placed the door, follows Caution
4. couple Of young beginners have opened room
he head Of the second stairs tor the purpose Of Inter
ceptng person. their way 10 my gallery this noufe'
d,emed necessary, Sc
The other wis rs follows The old established room
No the head of the second rfsir-, opened jun
3D. las for the base and di,hon0hbe purpose Of inter
rptng persons while on their way up 10 my gallery Noe
lO and n"
In mu CATION of damages II was shown that one oil me
plaintiffs did attempt intercept persOns gong 10 w
ln-eys rooms. II also shown that pianu's hAa
printed bills stuck mp the stairway, as i0lo~- ls"
nOtcs-The old established daguerrean rooms are NO =
on he second iOor' On the outside Of their door "a
story. in a frame was the following Old established
daguerrean rooms. No connection with new beginners
the 4th story y b No charge unless satisfaction be
gwen The old established rooms, II will De- recoAeci
ed were really those Of defendant IN 4th story
The Court charged that accusing plaintiffs Of establish
ing for the base and dish norabe purpose N IN
fercepting customers constituted libel The defend,
admits the libel lie does not attempt 10 justify ami
therefore the plaintiffs entitled 10 verdict How
iar the facts IN mitgatsn II Tor the Jury determine
Verdict for painitso cents damages and cents costs