New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1845-06-11


lulginc in such statements a. this
@Tbi. they pretend j. for the sake Of peace ne
80 con-inualy offering brioes 20 England 10 Die1h =.
esce under the pretence that they are opposed 70 -
rnzand wa. bI1bed with half the STATE o. Sa-nS ~
~ Oregon although she has nsni % noh' % =. :.
~ U Or.gou because she demands the CoilinDis 70 y.
.rccs.h In laf a. and The Mexican boundary coi.rs
q leaving the United states one degr, gu, ., D' r
hey own on the The surrender o. ~ - -
and VII Ike the surrender Of the So'tH
farv. b. Droc 20 iel'Nei Chilli ""
psrng ia Csiiorna .le
man who does not know without book ua' l''
mouth Of the Columbia is'Nortt Of me iofA deg'e
# Noy,b Iat,fude. and consequently more than j0"
jegoee, North Of the California line j. surely yer!
poorly qualified 70 rebuke the ignorance Oh o'n'r-
The News's article il foil Of misrepresentation
II represents those who differ with II on tins que-
lion ~ arguing in favor OF assumed nights OF ih'
c.-.;,,,. nation Now the British claim TO the Co
l.robia River. and We have seen no American pa
nor tina, sustained or justified this claim. All we
,,bo stodv these things tina, make for Peace contend
for f. that orr Government shall not PIT the Amen
can People clearly and agranily IN the wrong IN 'i
o,,es or,be whole civilized world. Already nearly al
The leading French journals have pronounced "4
claim Of our Government 70 ne a-hoie Of oregon VII
reasonable and indefensble. We have mol s''n
ono co-,a;c,ing oxpressio, from an influential ana
gisin,ore4ed source. Now suppose our UO'0."
non, shsl declare TO the world and proceed 10 MAN
; b.. frce ,ha, d. our right 70 me rho.e Of OfeeO"
. cl..~ and uno1estionable, after having ioriwen'3
.,.-s assoo,ed 10 an adverse possession and once
sr,.ll,. oa.-ed 10 take half Of it and concede the
%, 70 England-will not all rejecting men k"o"
no, ,re are wrong VIII not the general sent
-, ~ Cbristendom be against US And II We
hall proceed 10 extend our jurisdiction over tern
,orv North Of lat 49S which we once offered 70
-,,tc tho boundary we shall certainly be opposed
md the result will be War. Can any man say thai
re shall be euiltless Of the bloodshed thus coca
stoned
We consider the real question between the TWO
Countries is whether their boundary shall follow the
parallel Of ss9 to the Pacific or shall leave iha' par
,llc on striking main branch Of the Columbia ano
ollow the river down to the Pacific On TINS ques
ion we stand on the American SIDE because We
consider this the fairest and best line ou' Il '"7
ammo, be smcaby settled we are for submitting
no whole difference to the arbitration OF some I'M
partial power, to be mutually agreed upon and IN
Jlcitly abiding its decision
The News speaks Of a British claim preparing ~
Cai,foraiai If it were true what IS that 10 US -
Have we letters patent securing us monopoly o.
he business of spoliang and overruning o'her va
ions7 Let us see how the News goes on
The possesson of California opens an endless dispute
20 our Texan boundary, and these lntefHhhoie o,'Pu'
ire ~ he kel, lp 70 avoid war Now, war Is only 70 d.
voided bv AZ once giving England 70 understand ihH he
ncroacbrruts ON thi. continent have CEASED Inc mat
will then end
Very well. gentlemen if this is your game pay
out Extend your jurisdiction over all Oregon
f YOU please turn the flank OF Canada and GU
england of from any approach to the Pacihc ocean
# Won awe her into subsection by this strong game
he credit shall be all yours if you run against o
NAG don't Law the blame on us for we believe the
Law has gone by for such operations We are op
posed to the occupation of all Oregon by our bo'
,rnment for we do not believe II IS all ours ana we
,re sure our claim is not clear and unquestlonable
,ut. whatever we may do in view OF our approprl-
,,ion of Texas and the foundation already laid Tor
milar performance in California we ought to speak
mildly of the apprehended encroachmenis ol
thor mowers To be consistent we should call II
extending the area OF something or other
- Before the Courier and Enquirer assumes
o lecture us on Repeal, II should. al least kno"
.omethine of the subject 1t talks OF " raising
money for the purpose Of paying him ~ Conneh
or the utterance of such SANDERS &c. about rails
ing funds for the purpose OF supporting him.
and that he must look for his salary somewhere
Use" The Courier seems ignorant OF the Jdc thai
he Repeal Fund i totally distinct from the
Cornell Rent" The Irish people once year rais'
F, sum sufficient to support O'Connel None oi
his contribution is made in this country. The he'
peal Money is sent TO Committee OF the Irish PEG
ole-whose Secretary is Mr.. Ray. Mr.. o Council
never pockets penny OF this Fund unless he earns
il AS honestly a. ever the Editor of the Courier
earned his money The Courier concludes
We have homebrcd sandorcrs enough without pay
n ten or fifteen thousand dollars year to foreigner it
buse US LLOYD Garrison and James G. Blfney 40 II a.
-sther less sum than called upon 10 pay Dame
OConncll for the services
From the way in which We talk. II would
appear as if the Courers Editor had been the prin
cipal support of Repeal VIII he be kind enough
10 inform his readers how much time or money he
has expended in this cause