The daily Madisonian. [volume] (Washington City [i.e. Washington, D.C.]) 1841-1845, 1845-03-12
SUPREME COURT UNITED STATES,
WEDNESDAY,, March 5, l545.

On motion of Mr.. Noryel, George + Hand, Esq
Of Michigan, was admitted an attorney and counsel
lor Of this court.
Charlemsgne Tower, Esq Of New York, and Dan
el y. Cooke, Esq of Ohio, we're also admitted allor
neys and counsslors Of this court.
No AZ. Bernard Permot vs.. Municipality No. one
Of the city Of New Orleans, error 10 the c cour'
of New Orleans.
Ir Justice Catron delivered the opinion Of this
court dlsmssing this writ Of for the want oil
jurisdiction.
No. 81 The United States VS.. Richard King and
Daniel w. Coke, in error TO the Circuit Court U. D.
for East Louisiana.
MIR. Chief Justice fancy delivered the opinion OF
this court, reversing the judgment OF said Circuit
Court and remandng this cause for further proceed
ngs to be had therein in conformity 10 the opinion
Of this court.
No 62. The United States VS.. VIM. Marvin. on
appeal from the Superior Court Of East Florida
Mr. Justice Catron delivered the opinion Of this
court, reversing the decree of said Superior Court
and remaDding this cause with directions to that
eour, to dismiss the petition OF the appellee.
No 60. VIM. Mcfarland VS.. WIN. NJ. Gwin, in
error to the Circuit Court u. 5. for Southern Dis
trict OF Mississippi.
Mr. Justice Mckinley delivered the opinion OF thi.
court reversing the judgment Of said Circuit Court,
and remanding this for further proceedings 10
be had therein in conformity TO the opinion OF TIN,
court
| No. II. Robert Brockett ct al, W.. VIM Brocketi
ct al, 90 appeal from Circuit Court for Aexan'
dris, ID. C.
! MIR Justice Mclean delivered the opinion of thi:
Court, affirming the decree Of said Circuit Court il
this cause with costs.
No. I4l. c. Carroll VS.. Orrin Stafford, Treasurer
&c, on a certificate Of division from the Circuit
Court U. s. for Michigan.
Mr.. Justice Mclean delivered the opinion Of thi
court, in this cause, and ordering il to be certified
the said Circuit Court
Isl That the statutes Of the State Of Michigan
did in fact authorize the assessment and sale Of thu
lands in question, and that the said statutes we're In
tended TO direct the assessment Of lands before III,
patents for them had been executed by the officers
the United States.
u ID That the lands IN question WERE before III,
date and execution of the patents for them, subJec
to taxation by the State Of Michigan.
! Sd That they were subject To taxation by the
State before the execution Of the patents for them
and competent for the State to assess and Ia,
and sell them as the absolute property of the CON
psinant, and at their full value If he owned theu
in fact.
Ably and lastly. That the remedy by bill in equity
and the relief sought thereby in this case are proper
No l73 John o. Pages administrator VS.. Ruff
h. Page, on appeal from the Circuit Court U. s. fol
Maine.
On the motion Of Mr.. Evans, this appeal was dock
eted and dismissed with costs
| The Court adjourned to the time and place ap
pointed by law, having disposed Of g. cases during
the session Of "a days, and leaving 100 on the
calendar for next term.
! n b. All communications addressed to the Clerk
of the Court should be post paid otherwise they may
remain in the post Office.