New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1845-07-18
poISGs IN OUR LAW COURTS YESTERDAY

L. : pfSrRrcr CorRr-in Bsnkruptcy-ln he
matter OF Robert " Ogden. Of the hrm Of >cueier Wi
cox 4 Ogden Thi. case OF compulsory bsnkn,u,
cy Of Ncw-iork arm. but the petitioner s,rrxsra a.
piled 20 b. discharged from Bis debts H. reside. n
NewOricans The creditors DIRECTED ~ the d.ch.r,,
and the matter referred the early part OF SILT
M CAmbrrilne Comm. ssoncr IN Ban< rcp,cy % a..
proofs, Meetings held which the rs.r--cr,s.
Counsel present. bat NJ Ogden did app~ar n
person. Motion . now made hy NJ Manning a. Coou
that the Coniuiss he compelled report Tn.
Va opposci sni the certificate OF the Comm .su.r
read stating tho facts Shove mentioned NJ Nannn,
con;sni,G that A. Mr. OGDEN resided IN New Orleans
was necessary thc part Of the creditors they ~eea
h. Testimony to send commission % Nc~ Orleans
The Cont held that such no, the case Tee D..
roner asks power 90 be discharged from his deblA,
creditors oppose H. and wish IN e>snnasa OF peroa
and paper. The proper course Tor tne pcuioner a nrs
% com, in .sSng 20 show why be cannot be pressr
nersonaliy 20 be examined and SECONDLY. whether he
Court vii direct Commissioner 70 take the des,rrd es
lmony Al New Orleans. M0ton denied. With cost
In Admiralty.
Sherar10f 4 B0Nsrn5a ~ ST.. CorHsif-ln ms case
The Court remarked that Il not yet prepared 70 &C.
eide but probably would be saturday. The Cc1a
sci Tor compliments observed thar there was some pro-
pcc ~ the parties agreeing upon settle infni SCI
there were nice points they would BE- glad % have IN
o3iR on ~ the Court Il might AID IA the s,irsmsr
ana be OF permanent service The Corrt remarked ,ks
II The parties about "a settle would not ~ wo-s
while o. DO any thing more about ~ am p'rhaf, : "out
b., best tor them settle perhaps sui n tlancsg
would rrow out o t ci The Court decide ener one ~
or the other and 20 dec ding merely ior me sake
i.i.l information that would hardy De- necs..ary pa
,i.',.,,y during such DO, weather The parties "a
a r.tsnd Afterwards settled as watch = 4 gave Cag
$50 f,f bis half ihc schooner thus tskns h,r enirss
10 themselves. each party paying then own costa
The Court few days since. gave decisions IN the q
lowing Gases
"a r,.,over damages tr The running down nni 'ins,,
III !. outside the hsrbor n schooner oeonsit 20 con
pisnant ~ which. IN addition 10 me ios. . pa'ssk
.fl !. ID. q ffk flea
I'd ,hat,h brig should pay the Toe. and decrced dsmss~
"a plaintiff NJ - 2l4 ~ cts.
III. R,ryf. 8aaef or s'ocp Wu. Waiiace ", >os-As
Hashiag.0H irrms-lhe sioop "Ns run in,o sna 'a't
near pier No North River. having on hoard careo1
er.n SC. Action ws- brought against the sieamhoio
recover damages The -u, defended on he sros,i
hs, the collision caused by negligence on so"fdae
.loop The Court ordered that the Aoelsns be rs'rn
ed their loss the amount Of such 10 be ssceTisnedg
the Clerk.
N,Rt>r CorRr-Hnry Rgdn. lawns Cobb 81
ifffafu Cochran -tciion Tor Assault and Battery eis
seaman Of the bark Carissa Perkins. against ihe CapAa
and Mate damages laid az 500 The ploinf' bed hees
nsd o4 and DISCHARGED while the vessel lay NJ Nsass
hu, came on board one morning nio>lea.,d went INTO
the cabin and accused the Captain OF not having pad
him enough The Captain threw hs boot AZ planu-
ami The Mate followed han on deck and logged him i
was conendci thar plaintiff bad been PAID % snd dr.
charged and the relative situations Of seaman snd 81
Ger having ceased this Court had not jurisdiction over
the case The p.sinuf. 10 appears came home IN ne
bark The Court decided that under the words Il the
.,atu,e which gives jurisdiction to the Marine Court
cases Of seamcn. other persons on board lansde
non of the case rested IA the Court nonsut ~as or
isrcd In the case OF the Captain snd owing 10 the
foNicaiion OF plaintiff the time Jud sment gwen
s,sinsi the Mate sut for -.
John Lambert " John DsmmiHs. Olirr 4. N0Riso~.
sv and prsid D,fgardRriif Action Tor assault and bat
teiy by seaman against the Captain and tu- and sec
ond Mates OF the ship Mexican. One morning during
the voyage Of the ship from Valparaiso Lambert W.
alo having prepared the topgalanr sail TO be lowered
Becoming impatient he cried 20 the second Mate.
who was ON deck he did not mean 10 lower the sal TO
day When Lambert on deck the second Mate
asked HIM II in singing he did he had directed ms
word. 10 him The seaman replied that he had The
second Mate then said q" viii learn you 10 sing on from
aof and struck AT him cnch took place and ho'hieA
The Captain then toward told the parties 10 stop
that he would have no lighting and took hold OF Ism
bert The mate then struck Lambert eo or three blows
in the face Ancr they had risen from the dcch II said
the l., mate came up struck The seaman on the side Of
the head and knocked him down. but this i denied
Lambert told the 2d mate he would make nm pay ior
when he got 20 New York The Captain then remarked
Ia that he gave insolcncc To officer 80 AS 10 make
him strike him that he might the officer and get mo
ncy out Of him when they got into port The 2d mate
told ambert he did Il he did sue him he would
have satisfaction out of him Joint action Is brought
against the Captain and mate for the assault Decision
reserved.