New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1845-12-01
The ueresle. Of rhe TrIbune.

The Express quotes portion OF our observations
addressed TO the New burgh Gazette on the subject
OF differences among Wing Editors, and secs fit to
dissent entirely from our views. AS it's dissent is
accompanied by new ringing Of the changes on
The Trbunes general enormities, we trust our read
ers will excuse our copying it, viz
"What the Tribune means in his second proposition
on obsolete doctrines we do not exactly comprehend.
when its practice il taken into the account The
Tribune has abandoned every Wing doctrine except that
of the Tariff 1t holds that subject nothing but what
is held by almost every Loco-foco in Pennsylvania.
We should like know for instance. in what respect
the Tribune differs from the radical Charles j. lngersol
As what the Tribune says it's third proposition
relation 10 allowing Wing paper 10 express rs opa
convictions, whether referring TO Legislation Religion
Phiauthropic effort whatever, dissent entirely
We admit matter OF strict legal right every editors
columns are his butt he processes TO be n Wing
be with immunity think by virtue of the power
which Wing patronage gives him. and the shield which
the WING dag throws him. undertake to sop the
fouufaD. OF morality and good order. Under this plan
of Legislation have the Tribune calling
the Legislature to adop, modes OF destroying the title OF
property totally destructive of the ounda-
lions OF society Under THE plan Of religion we have
his columns with the blasphemies of Fourier
lem Under this plan of Phisnhropic effort" we have
seen him urging parcel OF madmen aud fools to
"vote themselves farm" Ts show the folly OF allow
Ing ouch tbngs in paper calling itself Wing viii only
be necessary to ask. where would have been the Tr
bune any other Wing press had such doctrines been
published its columns at the start The complaint
which bring against the Tribune is that il avais itself
Of position incucae ali the nsuileroble
which have charged upon it, by the furnished
II by the Whce and them when ii is eXposed turns
around and whnes pleously, in the above quotation
because IL cannot with IMMUNITY continue in this
OF mischief The Tribune has learned good many i'm
portant truths within the last few months bat it yet has
more TO learn.
If the argument Of The Tribune be good as to an Ed
tors opinions. he might publish Tom Painc's Age of
Reason in his columns day after day and yet il would
be for the Wing -ebuke him. because liz
Office 1t by such course that The Tribune has en-
de'vored to introduce into the Wing creed Ambient
Anti Hanging. AID ntBibe doctrines for oil these
Questions he called for legislation"
B The Express is TOO mercTul by half in its
catalogue of enormes 1t has omitted the Anti.
Slavery, AntiWar. Anti Rum, Anti Tobacco Anti.
Seduction, Anti Grogshops, Brothels Gambling
Houses. and several other of our heresies True
we have never attempted 10 introduce" these
Unto the Wig creed but neither have we those
Of which the Express accuses US, while we hare
advocated those by enumerated, and never
did advocate anti Bible doctrines as we are
charged with doing by the Express What the
Express means by its Mrs. Caudle babbliug about
our calling for anti Bible legislation. &c &c. we
cannot imagine, and presume the writer had no de.
finite idea He was in n railing humor as he gen.
talked as it happened.
Tom Paine's Age of Reason we never read but
understand that i, discusses Theological questions,
and with n coarse acrimony much resembling the
EXPRESSES Ediiorials-of course il would be utterly
unsui,ed 10 columns. here Theoosic con,rover-
sy, even If decent would be entirely out Of place
We do not know, however. that the Wing party, as
SUCH has any thing 10 do with such discussions one
way or the other.
The Tribune differs from Mr.. C. j. Ingersoll
with regard to Slavery, Texas, Oregon, California
War generally. the Public Lands, the Currency
National Finance, the Tariff, las will be seen this
Winterl and variety of other matters, We do
not know that we agree with that gentleman on any
question, as the Express docs with regard TO their
future course on Annexation.
AS 10 the other matters in difference between US,
so courteously treated by the Editors, no oc
casion for our n;erposing denial its loose, ran
dom SANDERS. We have never called on the Legis-
iaiure TO adopt any modes of destroying the title
Property and as TO 'blasphemies it were well for
aauseaied public il the EXPRESSES columns were as
Tree from Stiffness as ours are from blasphemy. We
nave never urged any body whatever TO Vote him,
sel' Farm though we have allowed the National
heiormers hearing through our columns and asked
tnose )onrnals which continually abuse them 10 set
forth IN rational. lucid manner the reasons for op
posing their Free Land project, If the Express
will in good faith undertake TO do this we will trans
fer its article TO our columns and lie, our readers sse
how bad scheme tina, of Young America is
Just 50 OF Foarersm o. any thing else the Exprsss
regards in our columns with holy horror We ,rus,
,ha, journal will for once, however s,,emp, 10 catch
some sembance Of an idea OF the matter it discusse,
and no, con,en, itself with mere empty scoldng and
calling names.
AS to the position of The Tribune, its pat,
ronage." &c. &c. we wish the Express would speci-
fy What position occupy, other than that OF an
Independent. plain spoken journal. The Tribune
never cos, the Wing party any thing and we never
asked any favor of it but pay for its Advertisements
in our columns-and even that We have in part
failed TO obtain We have enjoyed none of its OIL
esal patronage, and never begged Bank Director