New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1845-09-02
~ To the Public in sn.wer TO Day and New.

.
pubic newspaper TIL. ! orderng goods through
you control ihr Card Of H. c Jones al spring sna a.
Tie 'im- ref thc o' your columns for
I'd shAi be- forced % conclude Ia ne word w draw
IN inference. unfsvorah- 90 the sp s dria-G yor- de-
ign IN publishing ihai uoie
II Of the rf patterns OF orr Parautopc dii 81
ont 81 order. he holders Of hem Knew i well where
they could End nh Indemnify
Answer it have interest whatever lhe sale Of H.
~ Tis iocs which Won ro- rsu "fss ordinary nssib-
loci YOUR price for which 80, lut iur IRE nntnrety
IA hssr, i on INV vaui door v51 consented 10 iase -
suspected. bow ever Thai "a ordinary Tumble 'ocS
fad been scrrrer Oh iu ne.
Sd never spilled to Jones'. through the newspaper. or
one 10 b. iocAs Ny order o. him was published without
III Having been deceived by your Paraafegte. which
row urn- 90 he " an ordinary Tumble iocs dd not
wish my paper to be the medium Of recommending Ia The
public.
% put & .n order which deemed sufficient notice and
-uea.y urged YOUR agent The 'ck back order o
get nd Of possible Offered u 70 mm Tor - ana NE
.ocs : now NJ your disposal a. that price.
sept l. l54t fs25l THOMPSON, o. Wal =
rPHC. Jones. OF Ne0ars. y. J.. having been for
past publishing. through tie public prints series
Of articles. apparently with the intention OF njsring The
BANK LOCK which manufacturing We ieei our
selves compelled by considerations 70 give him and
n. proceedings more ihan passing nouc We depie'sr
newspaper warfare. and have stated 10 former 'ficir
that would Not indulge in one but believing ina, lhe
shove named AiFieAA p, Sc hil- 20 cover ~ ulNA
ue.. In fair ard open 'r. % Test he .ecliy OF
h, Lock. by recurring 20 CERTAIN Old issues % becomes ne
that statement Of the events io which he slces
should sced before the word IN heir true and proper
W. are by no means certain bur thai bv 80 doing we give
% i. ind vidua more uoorev han the suhec. occt>
demands Vet a. fc story mgi reach pisces
were We are not personally known prudence would
t1 dictate ihr necessity Of an explanation
In October 1914 received. through a rewspaprr,
,e..ono ci,aii.roe fron, lone. Hal Newark v J. oaer
fr IN ,rf aff their Look
topic Bank Locs with $50 stakes tile oney 90 Pc pad %
order guard ile o both parties committee IF
two was 10 be chosen Who were 10 have Tie power o 80
w accepted the proposition and selected {. member
he Committee part Mr. Geo. y. Mnei. lsuce de-
ceasedl long and avoratiy known A. ore 90 DE best ma
Chui.s the country Mr. Jones choosing fs brother
in-aw who believe. was bookseller in this city. Aer
the preliminary examination jones iooA our lock 10 some
We removed his not 10 oar -.op he states but
room ile private dwelling OF one of oar nnn Il- Wa
disposition Of the gentleman who was To test the security of
his Lock of II. c Jones.
II remained nearly week untouched by him lhalf hr
allotted umel he illness being severe a. io pr~ude the
possibility OF Operalng Conta.escing shgity, be- made
lie attempt and opened M Loos frig. and according 10 The
terms OF he challenge. some rHKtE OK iotR on, bttoRl
rHE EXPIRATION 90 me TINE ALLOWED
These the facts OBJ the case Notwithstanding the opinion
o Cashier \ T. ha'ey ihAt violence was used VI th Sli
iusey could not form unerus opinion ~ regard in hs
point inasmuch A. he never saw the Chest until a'i ui
opeHed 4
lts amaiier ct singular moment his affair ha, Inc
hruiherinaw above, ". A. Wheeler, caej several times
4r had access 20 tit tnl0I gffht chest. and newer di,
covered suspected aughi OF violence unu ana
showed hn the key whereby We gained an entrance
THIS con. Iteration alone. would seem o stamp DE charge
preferred against violence operations
al events extremely weaS one, and NOT supported hy
candid at all the circumstances.
hal very good reasons ior not sooner arpr-ing h
Committee of our success Mr. Miner being out az town
.fhsn confined bv ms la, nur.s and expected en-, .uc
t the time and Therefore delayed uutl almost DEE
ilf pora,t m hone. of arrival Meanwhile, te lock wa.
tiI. ned fs Ian off, de- adj u
ireut combinations. and ten successfully operated upon
show ing concB.vey. thai with ihe means we possessed
enirri, insecure. All this While neither Jones nor
Wheeler thing 10 complain Of The lock. being NJ
nNed the inside oihe door could only be- approal i oi
he purpoe Of remova after The chest ua' opod and the
screws tbut two of which properly mood sc.il were
probably. somewhat oo-ened by frequent turning and
out Hence he foundation tor The charge against us.a
charge IN Mr. Miners opinion totally At variance win
one which we Then pronounced untrue snd which We do
nON most emplafcaly.
We however forced 10 bow the decision Of the
prr, dee against which Ne did Then. ami ever shall
he eiesniy of our proer'ins- tai waving AL claim ="
me 500 would gafstoesg, open the iock oi ms h
c. Jones, in the prs'snce of aH pa't'c',
Ia urlhefance OF hs oaer, Mr. Miner addressed note
10 his colleague Mr. Wheeler Of which the following
copy
u. L. Hhe,ler. Esg- NEv-YoRK Dec p. Ig44
DtAR SIR From desire to bring TO speedy close The
OF Mr. Jones Lock M far manner by Me-,r- Day New
20. Of tie Commute propose that fhr money te
no.J heretofore b. gwen up by each psrv ON sondro,
that Messr- Day 4 Newell be- allowed opportunity a.
opening again. without fee or reward ueiug locked on
safe combinaiien a. u rpube o yourself and NJ
Hasy heng pre- and 10 situation "a p" satisfied
hat n0 unfair means are usid, thereby convincing Fuu
ryes OF The correctness of the position have ak 10 A. wei
clearing Mrssfs Day Newell of zee unjust mpufi
would Otherwise to attach TO them of having used
unfair means 10 opening bel,re
obige Your ohed', .ervl GEO y. MINER
will Dee At Mcssrs D. N's store a. A. VI. THURSDAY
next
Justice 10 Mr. Haisey. We Will say that he appeared a.
favor IN proposition. but for unknown U.s.
were never allowed the opportunity. Mr. Wheeler sealed
uo the chest which Wa barrier 10 our opening il before
tie public, and finally ordering % removed. A. this j.
at communication on this subject W. now ak, Why w.
demonstration before the IF me Committee claiming
neither Tee reward for the privilege.
Oar Piraulopuc came home unapproached, and unap-
pruachabr H. C. Jones not being able Two entire week.
10 NUKE ne least impression upon rs 'ecriiy Or ,eice ncy
Tins last act Mr. Jones seems entirely 10 forget, and boo
all bis Published communications enieavor- by shielding
himself under the award OF the umpire iu That particular n
stance, 10 avoid another trial We do not consider -uen
believing that, VIII these facts before them, the public
will come 20 the same conclusion
We claim operate his lock a secr,t place
will our challenge states lake the rooms ~ the Amer
him meet But he VIII not lie fears tue result much
be- DID eight months since and hence, alter be- had
our pledge that would not alter The Of our challenge,
10 feels very saie IA ofering all manner Of substitutes
We offered public challenge 10 the world and
which for fairness and calculation Ia test the security Of
Lock has not been questioned ny any person save H.
Jones This individual determined 20 avoid he trpS
lssus BY endeavOrng 10 draw the attention Of the public
aOgether iofeigntO our pfoposuona proposition
which he dlye not pieet
He that BE- has Opeged Formulation Lock of
manufacture the II Havcrhil We him why be-
should travel some three hundred miles 10 pick open
0ca which be- know DO not Manufacture for Bsus-'
n be wished he could have hal opportunity hTe no this
rfy h. immediate gtb0rhOOd trv his skill
Jur eai Bank Lock and likewise have had the Of $500
rev ard had be- been successful IN the operation,
Nov deny hat this Formulation Lock
opened any way by tle t-t< hey ac--iu- OF
ne same and, although NJ Jones states be- picked l-
L1ck IN the town of HaerhW yet We Will venture 10 of
hm that Do he viii allow u.tD put boz proper order be-
not pick 10 In Nelr- York Cfy
The Lock bon question II, however very different article
rom the Patent Par.uiOpuc Bank Lock Th.- IL n irt
vel known % N 4. Jones' a0u ID ~ culeagOfs make
fhs pubic believe hat they Identical Reasiug, be-
undoubtedly does that the Parautoptc safe and
cure ian han any Other Lock whatever h. nousy seeks
destroy reputation by statements Of H. liability be-
come dl.Ori-r,d.
We consider Ills last n-uuaion, say he least bs and
cOwariy. n some " The f patterns OfOur Psrsltopc did
get ont OF order The holders uf them fIl well where
,ley could mud tll indemnify. We have - Far improved
l, LDcz, however thai, at present j. no more Liable 10
di.ord-red than any other Bank Lock whatcye
IN carrying out this schee broker by he name of J.
Thompson j. introduced.
We would here inquire Of Dr. Thompson, # be- Is not n-
fere-ei tie ae vi the Locals VI this H. C. Jones, II
you not and did wish ~ nure U.s. Why dd you ap
oily H. C. Jones fora Lock 20 repsce il- odnary isgb
ef i0ck Which sold without lrs notifying 81 the