Mobile register and journal., 1845-12-23

We publish couple of letIers from Tuscaloosa One is several daYs older than the other, but con- tains legislative news not previously published.
 Mir Mason is elected Chancellor of the Middle Division of the Staie.
 Our correspondent incosed us, under date of inc 18th, what he supposed complete (proo) copy of the Message of Gov. Maria on the subject of the Bank debts and debtors. Unfortunately one of the leaves comprising pages End anu Srd of the message are missing, aud we are therefore obliged to defer its publication.
 We must say for the Governor, that this message has been subjected to better revision of style, than his Inaugural. The English is much better.
 The Governors recommendations in regard to the Bank dcbl are found on the 6h page of his message and have the merit of being brief aud thorough He proposes a variation from the law Of the last session for the coil, clion of Bank debts, by extending one half of the balance due by those who have paid the first nsament of one third of the debt, and giv- ing twelve months longer The first of June is the time now fixed for the payment of this debt. The Governor inlimates his willingness to allow more distant day To those who have neglected to pay the first nsta lment due last June the Governor has no indulgence. He says, mo other extension should be conceded should th, apply to any other debt ors than inc class specially referred to-
 The Washington correspondent of inc Baltimore Sun says:- "It IS now well ascerlained thai upon the Oregon question the democracy ofthe Senate is united. Had MT. McDuhie been present when Mir. Allen was chosen Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations, kadgould have voted for him. Moreover. Mir McD4 has avowed his de,erlnina. tion support the views of the Message the Ore gon question. There will not. therefore, he n single democratic vote in inc Senate against the Oregon bill of last session, unless it be Mir. Calhoun's'
 We do not know why Mr. CaIhoun's vote should be supposed doubtful. His position in lS43, upon which this doubt Is founded, we understand il, wss not adverse 10 the le of the United States, bnt adverse any active assertion under he state of circumstances at the time. He was for 'sinactiyity," until the of should throw the country inevitably into our hands. But Mir. Calhoun has since been Secretary of State, and his view of the policy of inactivity must have undergone some change, by the of the negotiations under his own eye. He must have seen that inactivity had moi been wanting our sde-that Great Britain had been the pressing party to the controversy that the activity was with her negoliators, with ours, until Mir. Calhoun himself became the Ameri. cnn plenpotentiary, and that il is perfectly plain that no delay on our part which could be honorably interposcd, would have prevented Great Britain from making issue wl,h upon the title to this country. if not by this time, least within very short time. We do not believe, in the present as. poets of the case, that Mr. Calhoun will repeat his views of the policy of doing nothing, separate from hls political friends on the measures for affirming and maintaining the right of the country, agreeing he does the validity 1.-the whole title.