The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1845-06-28
FRENCH VIEWS OF ENGLISH NEGoTIA-
TIONS.


TIoNS.
There is much talent displayed in the French pa
Der published in New York--the Courier des Efats
mis- Its bulletins" are particularly remarkable
Or their naipeis, racy pungency, and keen wit
bulletin" Of the 26th of June is not destitute of
hese qualities. We must, however, content our
)elves with an extract, since we cannot give the
Ehoe. The following is translation of the con-
fusion of the article. As to the very last statement
eerred to by the Courier" it shows its own sa-
pcity by dsbelieving it. On Thursday evening,
re had to. contradict it, when republished by the
National Intelligencer. We repeat that Mr.. Paken-
pam had given no such assurance to Mr.. Buchan-
Vii not from Texas alone that the aarmis,s have
eyed disagreesle rumors. They have to them d.
y IRON Mexico, by the ship Anahuac, from which, on
me day Of its arrival and our brothereditors have
VAN sought information Since then, journal has dis
ed from some Mexican correspondence Of the latest
e Una, the government has just contracted loan Of
nice mlhons OF dollars from commercial houses, to
the expenses OF expedition against Texas. If such
aat had been made the Mexican commerce, already
much exhausted by revolutions, and which ought TO
ave out little propensity for war the secret of this i'm
an Transaction would probably, have been kept;
o oetais would have been made known by publication.
ny nave also been frightened by some words which
captain Elliott the British minister in Texas; from
en according to u.s. they should have gathered nothing
Nv guarantees oil peace. These words, reprinted by
H. Union the official journal confirm one of our
predict ons that in which said that when English
omacy found itself powerless against annexation II
10 prevent war put more ardor and energy than
,he measures by which il has endeavored legmacly
e..eat annexation. II Is, in effect, implied avowa by
dlpomatist, who, according TO the Union, has
~ mat he regarded the annexation of Texas TO the
states as cerain but that he feared when II
pshed the camors Of the people might force the Mex
war tpith Tf,.sta
us could have but one important sgnifcation-namely
9uiescence OF England in annex alton. Asto Mr. III.
OF seeing the Mexican governmen mt driven war
people This lear simply proves that the English d.
uresos war and that the authorities Of Mexico
M not make It unless they are driven 10 IL This Is very
aurngj and there great reason for preoccunving
.seives win the clamcrs Of n people who seem much
disposed TO new revolution than 10 war n nigh,
oeen necessary that in making SO many 10
for which Mr. Elliott has no love he
=. La 'nteat as asunJeetor unessness. Such doubtless
also been the intention Of the laconc answer "a IA h
I've neen made by him TO an indirect quesoner who ask
"na England would do collision took nIace
ana The United States HUM said he sotfo ro.s =, in
shrug Of the shoulders that would depend on cir
s'ances' These few words merit post of honor In m,
pomanc vocabulary. NJ de Talleyrsnd could scarcel,
sald anything elastic less calculated 10 com
nv Mr. PakenhaIn, the English minister at Washington
nough IN rank far Mr. Eliotrs superior, would nav,
hmsei much less skul than he II he had really n,
&c me words which have been attributed TO him lie
say IN effect, that he guarantees to the American
the pacific intentions OF Mexico and even 10 in
that AT the present moment an Ambassador fron M
mtd states would be heartily welcomed in Mexico M,
.mi. Is not the man TO say such absurd things n
nst say them, even II they true becnuse he
PAID ~ the cabinet Of st. James encourage ar