Mobile register and journal., 1845-06-24

,Shich hIs mind seems to be lahorings that II was addressed to ''he feeling, passions and preJudces until he illustrates wiih BaeonIan ciearness anu power ho,p an argument De addressed fo he pas si0ns. ,,. ,L., Col
 2d Does not the Editor, by declaring 'hat 70. D. has been always opposed to annexation, ana '"aa his opinion is still unchanged, and yet mat he "'' not oppose annexation. likeH his ir'end 10 an
 (ing) bug that rolls his ball one way wh''e he looks another? If so Col. D. will ask to ue sa'eu from "such a friend" understood Col. Dunn 'o say that the honor of Nation pledged to mexico would have been violated by the Tyler treaty, whc'i he opposed; but that he honor ot inc Nal'oh oe",e now pledged 10 Texas, he should not oppose annex ation though he did not explain his apparent 'N- consistency in supporting subsequent pledge oi our honor 10 Texas, which could not absolve us from a former one to Mexico.
 The editor admitting that tame ion is consum mated" says s.we bow to he majesty of the law" There is no virtue in submitting policy on the eve of an election, universally popular as that oi | annexation sonsummated by our last Congress The arguments once urged, the passions once iostered' and the disposition once manifested against that measure by our whg friends h wing been so signally rebuked in the last Presidential election by the peo. | ple they now seek 10 avoid the popular odium by CT, ing we are m favor of annexation too But sup pose Col D. does support ion, will be supp port given 10 a measure that he loves! II he does not love it. can he conscentiousv support il. and It he cannot conscienliously support II, ought he 10 support it at all? Ought we 10 be SO cruel as to com pei him to go to Congress where he will be involved
 in casuistca quibbing, and wrIihing under 'he LOT r | ture of n laceraed conscience, while we can send one who believed in the great expedencv and abso-
 ute necessity of annexation, and supported 1t with | all his soul mind, body and strength, and who IS still desirous of giving II hearty, zealouS ana en- | cient attention '.
 As to nnliticatio resistance, rebellion, rerOiSio" | DIsUNIoN" very awkwardly and significantly ugged | m by the editor of the Advertiser, GA Democrat will s'defne his position" when necessary, proper and becoming
 | 3d. Upon the Oregon question the editor says. we | make 50 poor show that he does not deem Il | worthy of serious notice-CosvENIEET atence!- If Col D. occupies the position of MT. Calhoun up- on this question, will ask what change has been wrought in their minds by the expression of popdlar will by lhe last election The Colonel should re- member that the question of lhe occupancy of Ore gon has changed 10 one of settlement of right since the speech of Mir. CalhoUnlha Il has been an issue | in great eleciion-and ,he. correspondents of MT q. in this city have failed 10 procure from him any expression of his present views upon that question: | in my previous article stated that President Polk had asserted onr unquesiionable right to this territory, and asked whether the people would sus- tain oi censuie him for that assertion; and say, ''wa a little to pacify John Bul-hoid of or you will offend Sir Robert Peel ]" This language the Editor of the Advertiser intiinaes IS inappropriate, | and idecOruus (to whom is it indecorousD and he passes it by as ''unworihy of reply" expected he would. Answering afhrnaiively the preliminary question, "ls our tIte to Oregpn unQuesiIohaDt! :! l We are then 10 decide whether will wayer or falter m the assertion and maintenance of il. No matter what Mir. Calhoun's position upon the ques- ton is, MT. Polk has one in whose open polio, our sI congressman must concur or dissent. Upon our banners was inscribed Polk, Dallas, Texas, and Oregon. We pledged ou,s selves not only to Polk, but to Polk and Oregon, and he has perfect right to expect the support, bold, frank and free, of the people who elecled him. The expressions of his in- augur;,l were prompted by the voices which had called him into power, aud now the question is, "Does Col. Dunn any other candidate concur not with Calhoun, but with Mr. Polk. If he does not why should we send him to congress to embar rnss Mir. Folks administration by supporting the views of another who dues not himself urge then before the people. As an humble ndividuaI help ed to elect Mr. Polk with the expect ation that he would as far as was in hs power secure the annex
 ation of Texas. and and maintain title to Oregnn and now that he has done his utmost iT propriely, shall not desert my pledges bv desert
 ing him. Polk assisted in elecIing, and Polk shall sustain in lhe continuation of his well doing Polk IS for Oregon now-is Col. Dun for it noW?
 4h con the tariff q,estson," says the Editor "we are ,paiting his argument" l would be very much obliged 10 you, and have no doubt others would be equally so, ifyou would answer those al ready given. Alter you have swallowed and diges. ted those, you have many more you
 ic mode il is true, but think they wIl be found uuanswerable as if more Categorical. Don't have sc much wifnl blindness. A DEMOCRAT.