New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1845-07-30
Court Caleudar-rHis DAY.
COMMON PLEAs--Nos. 40 a.. 3. p. ~
poISGs IN OUR Law COURTS YESTERDAY

Roam or srPrrvrsoR, The Board met 10 hear tes
,imony IN relation the petitions ssAns toe dismiss,
OF Dr. Reese. County superintendent OIL SSuoU.-' ~,
Ketchum. Eco appeared 4. the Counsel OF Dr. K AMI
Mr. Henry +. Edwards on the part OF me peuuo"ei'
Dr. Reese was personally present IL.
Mr. Ke,chum denied the legality Of the proceedinS'
County Superintendent ne insisted. can only be sif'is
.d sft.r comp amt duly made upon oath. sc Mt. ~
wards in reply remarked that u proposed thst ~
petitioners .hsn be examined under oath, and N tn'
County superintendent requires Niie ~ an'"e'' " "
b, afforded him.
Mr. K-tchua denied the regularity Of the proceeding
The Board 10 assuming 70 be legs! nounsi' 70 u'
charges which affect the office and reputation Of the
County SUPERINTENDENT Regular charges should b.
made against him. If At all under oath lie moved ina
the prOce, dings be- quashed.
The Recorder. who was in the chair, in putting 81
question conceded IN the view that the complaint shou
BE- lnsde under oath specinc charges
AID Charlock considered thar the Board was not al
ing as a court but Board OF SUPERVISOR and ma
power a. such. pass upon the subject The genera
charges come from a responsible source, ana are sum
Gent 10 authorize the Board proceed and hear proc
Th, County Superintendent will have an opportunity o
EXPLANATION and fthe Board do consider the charge
proved the Superintendent viii not be removed and
better feeling may be created IN regard 10 nm
The motion to quash the proceedings was lost ~ 10 =
Mr. Ke,chum excepted. and stated that he should IS
cept during the examination 10 every piece OF tesno
nv which was not based on specific charges
Mr. Edwards stated that he was not fully prepared o.
20 into the testimony snd would prefer waiting rll NJ
Nco could take part in the proceeding The Board ad
iourned to Tuesday next a, o'clock.
T. : CrRcrrr CouRr-A seaman Of the Uavre packet
low, named iohn Turner was placed upon trial char
ed with sssaulung the cepmn and mstc OF the yesse
while az sea with "A knife 10 was shown that ne noG'
ished hs knife about which the officers succeeded, how
ever in avoiding The Jury found him guilty
The Grand Jury came into Court with true ba
against George Jones charged with larceny ~ sea r
having stolen upwards OF $40 in gold. from William
owens. fellow passenger. His trial viii probably tax,
place to-day.
Grsih charged with larceny At sea, and against Benz
Howard for an attempt to make revolt on hoard III
brig Osceoa.
Court or COMMON PLFAs-Nationiei Naris ". Isoa.
Raaus The parties in January last kept clothing stor
adjoining each other in Chatham street. The present d
an action for SANDER, charging Mr. kamus at havnf
without cause called plaintiff thei and his lady name
that ladies' do wish TO hear accompanied by grOs'
language, and saying he could prove H. Mrs. MARKS DO
consequence it SAID, became severely H. Nerdic
for plaintiff 500.
MARINE CoUw.-Heqry Fdrccu John Higham
Dr. r. entered acton IN this Court against Mr.. A. Brit
TO recover charges for medical services. Mr. p
moved for an adjournment, and the defendant became
surety for HIM adjournment Bond stipuating th'
the said Briifon would not sell otherwise dispose o
any Of his property until 40 days after the time allowed
hy law 10 serve execution should udgment Dee obtained
Judgment subsequently obtained Tor $50 and execr
ton Issued but return made of erects.' kctOn
IS brought upon the bond. It being conrended int
Mr. b. did sell or otherwise dispose, Of property belong
ing him after the adjournment bond was gwen luia
was denied The Court considered that proof 0f hi
having done 50 rested upon the painf and testimor
was heard bur the fact Of Mr. having done not b,
ing made out udgment OF nonsuit was ordered
LOAis Beiennsre J1mes Gordon BenBeu Action fdr
libel which tried once before. The plaintiff keeI
BARRIERS establishment ia Broadway. rival estao-
meni IL kept door by Mr.. Chamberlain some PEI
son threw yltri0 fancy awning belonging % latter
and injured TO- An article appeared In the paper beon
ng 10 defendant charging SIR Bellemere with hagir
destroyed the awning and defendant refused 70 core
the assertion when requested 10 do So Nerdist uI
plaintiff $40 which carries costs