The daily Madisonian. [volume] (Washington City [i.e. Washington, D.C.]) 1841-1845, 1845-01-23

whom IL came Two yesn ago, owing TO SONS 10
cal differences ON State politics, portion OF tnoso
who acted al that meeting supported uokstIor Wv
cruof and members Of Congress In oppositoato Henry
Hubbard and John r. Hale, whose whole Poiil'csi
lives until within very lew years, have been spent
contendog in the ranks oil our opponents ,y'at
al opponents TOO. We know them both. we may oil
most say egg aud bird" Hubbard was federal
isl from the tune he studied In jeremiah Mssons OIL
fee In Portsmouth, until after he delivered bis Ia
nous speech in favor Of John O. Adams IN lo11-o,
al the grand IN Concord got up BY tho grand
caucus agents lor New Hampshire" Bell, Bartlett
and Whipple. A year or two subsequent To which,
he turned a complete somerset, and with The ehceP
tioo Of few little months, has been ever since I'D
Office under the favor OF the Democratic party
Hale was always known Fedorsiist, and DO
continued until somewhat later period. lie was
actively conisDdng in the ranks OF our opponents
tsdersI opponents, la Jacksons first, II not his SO
cond term and when he turned his summcrsety nc
vas appointed Distnoi Attorney for New Hamp.hirs,
and under favor Of the Democratic parry nc mas
been in office ever since. We mention these two
only, for but for these two, the opposition ticket
would never have been gotten up. The Other
three gentlemen who on the Representative
ticket, SO lar Ms We Judge Of the general ieer
ing we've no, deemed objectionable and PROB
ably the opposition they had 70 encounter was mainly
owing TO ths company with which they were assoei-
ated and though We have personally been the SUD
rct Of much censure from two Of them Tor happening
be ticket In opposition To Hale, without even
the most renot~ agency Of our own yet We are not
disposed 10 withhold the need Of praise when fariy
won their votes 10 CongIe-. all the great leading
questions which peculiarly dentlhed with party
distinctions, have met our cordial approval WIN
the other gentleman have long been on terms OF
personal friendship, and have ever regretted that CIR
osms.apces should have placed US in seeming oppo.i-
lion. Having shown inconteslably, that the two
o.-t Two AUo " a
u s.lhe managers VI the late meeting" much cen
.urcd by the Globe, have been "Obsinaiey contend
log In the ranks of our opponents, -tsdeia opPo-
nenls too, for by far the greater portion OF ths Po
ical lives let 10 The ticket supported al that
time by portion Of ths managers OF the same meet
lng" which the Clio denounces as a " consetsa-
I've c que in opposition to IA Hubbard, J. 4. Hale
and ais; not the drral ticket, Tor the federal party
run their o~n ticket per Sc, and stuck TO H. We'll,
what was the political e0ste Of that ucketf IL COZ
sisted of John IA. White for Governor, and John
Page, James Clark, Israel Hunt, jr. and Aoner
Greenleaf for Members OF Congress. To determine
whethe by supporting that ticket, they, the mana
gers OF the late meeting" obstinaely contend
Ing in the ranks Of opponents, we VIII only APP
peal to one press 1.-THE Dover Gazette then adVoca
ting tho election Of Messrs. Hubbard, Hale, and
ais press too 10 MIR. Hale's own town, warmly at
tsched 10 his interests and which has approved hls
course in Congress out and out abolition and all 10
this pre- the friend Of Hubbard and Hale and under
the peculiar influence Of the latter, We appeal 10 de-
termne whether friends, in supporting that ticket
" obstinsely contendng in the ranks oil Federal
opponents True, the war.nole of Federalism was
set up, and like the cry of "mad dogs" was sent
through the air create alarm for political and SIM
ster purposes but what did that press say IN The We
ry heat Of that contest, These its words
4" Ir Is rxRFrcTLr USELESS TO HURL THE CHARGE
ovYkpERALIsM AT SUCH MEN AS ABsER GREEsLEAf,
JoHs PACE, JAMES CLARK, lsRAEL HUsT, JR, AND
JoHs ii. WHrE."
Now MIR. Globe, just put that in your pipe and
smoke it. We have thus far acted the defensive.
Next week shall take you on the other tack, pre-
mising that cared not a straw whether you pub
lished these proceedings not. For one, we never
would have asked you SO to do. We merely publish
ed the request of the meeting, and you might have
either complied, OF refused without an insult.