The daily union. [volume] (Washington [D.C.]) 1845-1857, 1845-07-23
EXTENSION OF PATENTS.
[cIRcuLAR.l

| PATENT OFFICE, June 81, I5i5.
TIME undersigned constituted by law board to
| i decide upon applications for the extension of
patents, have adopted the following suggestions and
| rules, for the benefit of those persons who may
! hereafter apply for extensions
The questions which arise on each application for
an extension are
] L. Is the invention n0reR
! 2 Is it useful?
| g. is it paiuable and important TO the public
| A. Has the inventor been adequately rsmunerated
for his Time and expense in originating and perfect
ing ~
| 5 Has he used due diligence in introducing his
invention into general use?
| The two first questions will be determined upon
the result of an examination in the Patent Office;
as will also the third to some extent.
| To enable the board to come TO a correct concur.
Sion IN regard TO the third point of inquiry, the APP
plicant should, if possible, procure the testimony of
persons dsinterested in the invention, which testi-
mony should be taken under onth.
In regard to the fourth and fifth points ofinquiry,
IN addition to his oath showing his receipts and
expenditures account of the invention, by which
It's value Is TO be ascertained the applicant should
show, by the testimony of disnterested witnesses
on OATH that he has taken all reasonable measures
to introduce his invention into general use, and that
without default or neglect on his part he has failed
to obtain from the and sale of the invention a
reasonable remuneration for the time, ingenuity,
and expense bestowed on the same, and the intro
ducton thereof into use.
The report Of the examiner upon the novelty and
utility of the invention, will be ready fifteen days
before the day appointed for the hearing which will
be open for inspection at the Patent Ofce copies Of
which will be furnished to all parties interested If
desired, on payment of the usual fees for copies
In case of opposition by any person to the extern
sion of patent, both parties may take testimony,
each giving reasonable notice TO the other of the
time and pluce Of taking said testimony, which shall
he taken according the rules prpacrihe0 Inv the
Commissioner of Patents in cases of interference.
| All arguments submitted to the board must be IN
writing.
In conclusion, the undersigned would remark,
generally, that monopoly Of his invention is Sc
cured by law to the inventor for the term of four
teen years. This is done with view to compen-
him for his time and expense in originating and
perfectng il. AT the end of the time for which his
patent runs his monopoly should cease, and the in
Sention become public property unless he can show
good reasons to the contrary. The presumption is
always against his applications; and if he cannot
show tina, his invention is novel, useful, valuable,
and important to the public, and that, having made
all reasonable effort TO introduce il into general use,
he has not been adequately renunerated for his
time and expenses in discovering and perfectng it.,
the board cannot grant an extension.
JAMES BUCHANAN,
Secretary of State.
EDMUND BURKE,
Commissioner of Patents.
...n S. BARTON,
Solicitor of the Treasury.
The publishers of the following papers will please
insert The above notice twice each week for two
months, and send their bills to this office for pay
ment, viz: Union, Constitution, and United States
Journal, Washington; Republican and Argus, Bal
timore; Keystone, Phadephiaj Union, Harris
burg; Morning News and Jehersonian, New York;
Herald and Gazette, Providence; Post, Boston; Adj
verser, Lowell; N. Fl, Patriot, Concord; States
man, Columbus, Ohio; Kentucky Democrat, Louis
vile; Courier, New Orleans.
June 23-2aw2m