Richmond palladium. [volume] (Richmond, IA [i.e. Ind.]) 1839-1854, 1844-01-19
INDIANA LEGISL ATURE


Mr. Holloway. the part Of tine minority OF tho con-
nittee the S,at Bank made = repps:, they
State Bank, and Why lsiscr should
appointed they believe thai t1e law Of last winter %
subject of executions will enable Bans he
ful hereafter than any period within the last i've
years They approve Of the suepeDsion Of the branch
Bank at Lawrenceburg, and only regret that II had
n'' pseh sd'pehiei t"o years ago. He !ao' ''"' |
Bank has suffered in her credit By this snspennn
an evidence Of the soinlness Of the institution
ne House no" again Pfoceeae' % ne :.
the bill, providing loan from tue BahkIae pending
question being the instructions progidng or tie feyep-
of tolls and water the "aoash ana Erie Ca
nal in good money! 10 be applied to the cnea expenses oil
Mr. Parker cn,enIed, that this s1biec,
before decided this session aud the anenaent
sequeny Of order. The House having twice refused
order tho reception Of said tolls par funds
Mr.. Foley coutended, that his amendment 10 order
Mr. Nofvo said, tina, II was precisely the same propo
sition, and told anecdota 70 illustrate his position
Mess- Chapman and SinJnson coitendei, that the in
ructions u order.
Mr.. Smonson hoped thar tta Instructions would be with
drawn in order that he nigh, present similar
amendment, which he read FOR the Information Of the
House.
Mr. Ferry said, there appeared 10 10 a disposition -
strange investigation tins important sub lie had
limited knowledge Of parliamentary proceedng+; but ne
considered the amendment nstructoas clearly order
The Speaker decided the instructions 70 he ont OF ORDER
innsnnch ns they were identical with propositions that
edy being, reconsideration Of tho bIi offered
by himself subject OF tolls in good might be
reconsdcred: which motion did not prevail.
The bill was read third time.
Mr. simonson wished gentlemen 70 examine the bin be-
propositions which we could adopt TO pay the expenses of
government One make this tolls the canal
ceivabie in good money and apply the proceeds the
OF the and the the
auditors warrants bearing interest An ssHa II treasury
notes aud loan from the bank he considered entirely out
OF the question: lie was "A friend 70 the canal tut TINS
canal Indebted ~ tho State 700 600 for money adj
vanced aud 200 900 forinterest and present
temty, should be refused this the
expenses of the government.
Mr. Bowling called the friends Of canal, who lid
wish the stop, up He
y,
that consultation night DO had.
Mr.. Bowles hoped the question would he He
considered loan tina Bank Of the question. He
then defended his original proposition for issue of treas
ury notes III a speech OF considerable length
Mr.. Parker hoped the on wosi be informally laid over
The bill raiso a for State purposes and
deem treasury notes was read third time; when
Mr. Chapman moved TO recommit with instructions TO
strike out tho section exemptng S25 worth of property
from execution.
Mr. German moved tho previous question; which
dsred and. the question shall tho bill pass. de-
cided in the affirmative, ayes 10, noes Is.
Bills, Eassed-To amend act to enable tho Bank TO
maintain specie payments, &c, compel tho Bank
to reduce notes writing, when apprasement laws are
waived; to suspend the further Of FIVE dollar
notes IN lieu of hes TO reduce the salary of clerk OF
State prison.
Tho joint resolution tho subject Of the reduction OF
the pay Of members of Congress dollars day. &c,
was read a third time and passed
Repeal Of Relief Law--The bill amend the execu-
ton law, 50 TO make property sell for thirds of its
appraised value and TO allow executions i'll
read a second time
Mr.. Roberts of Putnam moved tina, the indefinite
Iy postponed
hat ono when placed the debts of tho surplus
revenue fund on an equal footing with other debts.
Mr. Safer favored tho bill, believing gradual repeal
Of the relief laws.
Mr. Hurlbur, favoret tho BILL particularly feature
that allowed more than execution.
Mr. Roberts of Putnam said, when people in
suced him to repeal this law, he would for the
peal. but there had been petitions
present ssion, asking repeal such petitions had been
presented At the last session. and the session pre-
sous the people into this Hall, through their petit
lions. IN thunder zones, asking for relief
Mr. Mcdonald said, there little difference ia this
bill from tho present law He nid feeling i'll
the country taVoFns tho repeal Of tho relief laws Of the
country.
Mr.. Tevis said it understood in his county. during
the that there should
laws, during the presen, session.
Mr. Chapman said. he satisfied this bill could
pass and he thought il unnecessary oppose
Ills constituents were opponents IN any repeal
MI Handy said, he wished gentlemen would consider
the source from whence relief laws originated They
originated from ths hard fsted yeomany the country
lie also asked where this bill from! 1t from
the gentlemen of the BAR aud he adonishod gentlemen
that the people demanded such repeal And he would
further say that gentlemen voted for This bill would
i'll instances. their This Legs
lature so far as they concerned.
Mr. Parker favored contended thar his con-
stituenis in favor of the
Nj kead favored the bi beevng that property should
sell for thirds of its value
MIR. Chapman referred TACT der the
sent law the plaintiff had The privilege of selecting prop
sfty, when sold at its full value.
MT GoEman hoped that the gentleman from Putnam
woua h"faw ms motion, 50 that m indefinite postpone
ment ist no, pfevent the Of the clause of the
bill the subject of the collection OF The surplus
Mr.. Roberts OF Putnam thought there s1lcen, pro-
lection on this subject,
Mr.. Norveii sad under the decision of the Supreme
Court of the United States, could avail of the
vision contemplated by bill. lie ed
previous question: which ordered by the HoIse-be
eving that the said question nIedne postpone
ment OF the bill; but the main question being the
srossmen' Of the bill the question pu Shall the bill
De engrossed and decided IN the negative, 81
D. 50 this important question the peopIs is pu;
for the present session.
SENATE, Jan. 10.
The report of Mr. Chapman in relatio, to the Sv,zer
Land contested election being under consideration
Mr.. Pitcher concluded his remarks. Mr. i had nr,.
ceeded for time when the reporter in Mr.
contended tina; the commenced present ses