The Hillsborough recorder. [volume] (Hillsborough, N.C.) 1820-1879, 1844-11-14

les s.slaas Ilal ( sAe csmrerars uss
disPssea q sab.nsl - lke lyr.nny q -
who gaanhlr.l larnn ~ e lllrir fnsadlla
an = saks ga,ass Il. Polk a. : rusnpss
msse. rompsonsiss. a nhssgl uoui
Iasaes X. Pulk b he prapls's Pfrsidsnl
Lea hla hs rssr - pare and uprighl; I
lim b rEer % god > deaorEs:; agul,
d. - = - - .nsrasa "a purposes, n,
I'resiArnl II 4 knol III Cungrrssaner. ~.
M he pr0gls'si Weld lhsy 7, ~
cal his soui ms ouns Mouli lhey 49,
rule . Prrsislrn's Instead o. hias MeulJ
Il nul DC mockxry = dsanorrsey 1, ssx
ilial The Peap.e lersed him. The 80.
pir, alasl p or danlb aaaihs. no:hiav -,
lell f,r iheH .du. hpt 10 g. as hes wen
bdlea. ~ he braided - lrai,ors. I,ul
what IS t.s dar..g pssliry Of If Sc Who
eiirale.i Ire drn0c aey nnl Of lllrir ei.oies.
IA lilsl upraafluns assembly. (sse Exl !
;l.bs. n, ! the Baliimore Con, ension.
where nons BAL Cangrrssios Il Stea,ors.
standing On tables d benches. rou.d H.
heard II Al u l. lhe I'D Federal Poi.
e. Of :. dependen G on England f.,r our
Inariels-' dep ndencr on Ensland E,r
our snralirs.' What doesthsir sre., Iea.
der. Gt.sgr MeDufie. say. (see pages 0
anI Z, II las spr. rlies on he TsriI, Jan.
nary 10, 1891 . Mutual dependence
between nations sil.e highest state II ~.
laical in.sepesdencr." .Our natural mar
lie > derived. not from human rharts !.
bli lram he Provide re Of God. are Man
chester. Barmi Z am, aud Leeds .OVr
agricultural producers II The S0ulll and lhe
sa'Hh. u eel. stand ii precisely lie same
rcla bon 10 the mannfarl0 les af Msnc -.
ter. Leeds. snd Birmingham. as Ihe
tanners nf Massachusetts,, Connecticut
AMI New York, do. 10 the manufacturing
establishments 10 ih,ir vicinity distance
makes no difference" Ii Ibis Be true.
we ought to he RIiiisa Colonies again
The seed Of di.uRinn lie concealed IN This
doctrine Of Mr.. McDoiIie. Il is The Sc.
cond ea.iinn Of the Old Federal doc rine.
Only less ai!cgorirally expressed. ihn,
&" England e lie h,.l = .rk OF oar religion !"
Dependence an Engl nd, Dependence
under the Providence OF God! lfCsod in.
icn,!sd Us 10 be dependent, why did he
1iye us Washington 10 make Us indepen.
deaf. W. never had q President who
taught such doctrine. and ey,ry demo.
Cratic paisio should be up and doing, lesl
we may have President under the thumb
d sn;h nen rs do teach il. What does
] thomas jefferson say! "iIc, therefore,,
ahn j. nnR against domestic manulac.
uies mast be for reducing Us 10 dcpen.
icnce upon foreign Lalions. am moi
'ne Of these" Holding fast IN the JEFF |
Irrsonian doctrine, and proclaiming his
ind. pendence 10 the last, Van
3urea was sh 'v,d OF the political stage. |
Nay the democracy not hope 10 see him
m that stage again in 1913!
Leiilnp, be said that hostility 10 ZONES
ic manufactures under discriminating du.
los and dependence on England Tor gur
markets and supplies, are confined to Mr..
d'Duiiis and few politicians of South
'arolma. The democratic press in the
south is infected with Il, and many lead.
~ Of the democratic party, as at rresea.
are drawing the people of the
south into it as fast as they can. If any
ne doubts the facilet him turn TO M'Kay's
ill. lie will there find very good ex-
POSITION Of the democratic dacirine on the
alcct Ut the tariff, steering the evca ten
4 Ui its way between prohibition on the
ne hand. aud horizontalism on the other.
.et him then turn to the practical part of
he bill, which contains in the first col.
nm, the iaridof 1912, and in the second
Olamn, the alterations that the committee
roposcd to make. Let h,m run his fin
or down these columns until he comes to
lc various domestic fabrics of our great
iaple - cotton. An ominous word is
lcrc substituted for the minimum valua- |
ons on the fabrics made of cotton. II is
he word "aboIished," five times occur I
ing in that bill, opposite 10 cotton fabrics.
AN any one want better proof that an cne- ,
y had his finger in the practical part
I the bill! Let him read the bill atten.
vely over again, and he viii find small I
Iause introduced into the body Of the bill, {
.hich nalliiies the whole argument of the
M, IN favor of a discriminating tariff. s
he clause makes protection depend upon I
ie lowest possible duty which will bring q
re required revenue. This is horizon I
llism, and lets 60 the protective principle g
the old Republican party altogether. I
uch duty would be no benefit 10 the
'l'on planter and sugar grower. Our c
otion factories could not flourish under it. S
lTcaIy those factories work up some {
lree or four hundred thousand bales of &
nr cotton. Alrcady.thc English begin to ''
nd that unless they give better prices for d
lr staple, the americans win cut them Il
ut OF the foreign market, provided our ex- n
'r!s Of cotton goods should increase for Il
W years to come as they have increased II
II few years past. Il
u we exported o'e or two hundred v
H.