New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1844-02-05
sk, MONDAY MoHNEsG, FEBRUARY S. 1875.

'NEsG, FEBRUARY S. 1875.
f n h5 Of II; sseey bus that bounty charged TO the Coq
100 up iqt sueFd % de ba induced postpone rs
mean tne . d. s' b 81 yq NJ M 5sis2a N H.
II, r[ sseis 7nd properties gong 70 HIN
regard to the Hresnfifs cb i ND
,hea commenced with Mr. IYLEg would ssy before
y I5ai III. Wy 6ei5sys hat ,t1a could
.of collar which f= had sunk te Conrler aad that II
aai Tie sun canisd against Hsl-nS portion Of ne
Other half helng. carried Mrs Sfii'agI On
.Lnjinsd 70 wind uprhe Iapr mis- speculation, rhsH ali
sas CEASED aud whs there clear, free aEG
ne good vii The Courier 10 M to make we could oa
~ Al ms do Dir fYLEE and he "a made
La.h 81 nv statement and thai iIr. STEWART then told HIN
az aga 9rferss the concern TO De wound up on ih st Of
claims against Il harirs iteraidsd 10 DocS The losv
h consequence Of tbs Statement Tylte At the fIe OF the
assignment claimed to be placed r the list OF creditors
ana threatened TO file b effect, bar PERSUADED
9y ne rot 10 dose He has made the threats within
Gay ~ Two; AID have urged hm NOT and succeeded IN
tire then IS honest statement of the nature of tai,
oao' 10 the truth OF which wiling bear witness
fy f9nr ct Law or Equity do not question IT.
fsEatg as against me- because have sce made tegsl
.S which onahi 10 mike him the mosi itt
asls'd o. th most har.heartsd and unrel-ntms my cd
u
okttimen would he ever have placed the CoU er AMI
" o iact VINO tos ne money an that coucern-hs or T.
he letter. II must be borne in mind, has date near
~ nIne years ago. Now connect this with the fol-
lowing certificate from Col. TY1EE
Col Tyiee's TeSiuJnv
oso some nms Iy he later pat OF Ar or early IN May
sT Enqn!s o or The purpose OF uniting i with the
represented 10 prove highly profitable After eensrs
ton 4ssnted 10 tn prpositon and waited MIR Alex
anler l. Stewart. the lather-taw % Mr. Webb 10 learn
whether Mr.. W. had right 10 make such disposition of the
Morning Courier as was proposed aud also whether Mr.
partnership was proposed Nj Stewart informed me that NE
Mr.. Sewat had large Of money IN the Courier,
but had ordered De wound he had determined to
pocket the loss and the risk of sinking more
n He SAID hat he had told MS sor4-aw that ne t do
what he pleased with the skeleton that the coed cH
Of the paper but that all its properties must be sold and debts
collected paid over him: aud thar he tMr w was
In The whole Of hi, conersation Nj Stewart Impressed
red in conducting the Courier and that Mr. eb5 toGS en-
hgsS q de6 70 an o. course e WAS ss
Stewart had claimed from him len upo his bali oihe tou-
Enquirer the money sunk by Mr. Stewart
g With M sst and his asynrGnet fa r
Febb tree from deb and he less on NE Courier mas
Enquirer made that my DEBT should aae preference Of
aud thus equitable Claim would i, g9t ha'f
"a 'S'as 'ny's ai'''a'eo 0-S u 'F 81 & TYLEE
So much for this part of Nh. Stewards puhlica-
tiou the only part indeed which merits reply
Now, Tor specimen of the SYSTEM OF mystiicaton
rcsored TO for the purpose OF confusing the reader
j, ". Webb erts THAI, after the 25l, Of M 1922 he
received borrowed solitary dollar from the es-
" and also, that Mr.. Stewart constantly made per
all ms oned with him. by discouutnE
I'd MONEY at SIX per cent" II by one soy dollar is
dollar b. itself alone, uncc )mpaued BY Others,
show hat within the year after May 1893 he received uu-
DEED, and thousands Of dollars 70 company with one aaqthef
but clsh his due bill daily entered with name aud dale
lb,lr Ia no a. tH
i.e lines, addressed L. Robert stewart, on Oct. 23d
go FIVE months after the above dae Ia etsct cogtfadics al
to the above assertions. Il begins and ends abruptly
Tomorrow being Saturday zoe viii require $500 this
Costs is prepared TO let you have $40 eco on tho 10Th
r,rsz,, - do 80 yours ~. Webb
RI have placed the we IN italic y
Let us examine what did say. TWAS rs fol-
lows
or,he inTcton of tie Courier y the Enquirer haze
r. recspgd or borrowed ane solitary dollar from the eSto
am + lH %oare that h are ca4es assnss me o. he
So2k ia h 5.enh, bnt boSE viii show Geis Rs
er !i testify thar these charges are Tor money used III a
ing up notes 'e by GD, .TS a. and r 9r
nv weekly salary Ill October 1929 settling up the affairs
trl,s against t yvEBs TYLEE but all such are TO
discounted IL cent on "a!ch one per cent was
made Iecauss Sf STEWART could always ooro" what mo-
new e required al per csat."
There certainly is no discrepancy between this
statement and my note. | admit that WEBB " "
LEE borrowed money OF A. l.. STEWART, which
thew regularly repaid with interest at per cent;
and might add, from time TO time ut our seuii-an-
nual collection, loaned him large sums 10 deposit
temporarily to his credit in the Phoenix Rauk, II be-
INC always matter OF pride and policy with HIM TO
keep what he called good bank account. The
brief letter here quoted, distinctly shows that the
$500 required, was tor the use OF WEBB IYLEE
and not j. w VERB, az il evidently alludes TO the
payment OF the hands on SATURDAY, and says,
!. we will require $500 this morning." Most prob
ably at that very time the firm were in adr0nce 10
Mr.. A. l.. STEWART.
have heretofore shown, that my affectonate
brother-in-law, however much he may pretend TO be
devoted to his sisters, has but little regard for the
truth: very probably he is quite as much attached
to one as the other He says, 1.-THE testimony OF
my fathers books however, is rejected by HIM incl"
When, where and how So far from rejecting that |
testimony have always tearlessl appealed 10 II.
| shall do so on TINS OCCASION IN a manner winch
will afford him but very little satisfaction.
Nr. Bennett, The special organ OF Mr. STEWART |
throughout this affair, says III the same paper which
contains Nr. Stewards statement:
We have also in possession COPY OF The brochure
Mir Webb's own letters establishing the truth Of ir
Stewards rerypa of which we may publish called Tor
do not know what Mr.. STEWART and his coun-
sci promised themselves Tor thus deposlting WIKI |
the Herald Editor, copies my letters, &C. &c
Ii shey sHppose could be operated upon by Inc
threat of publications it was very ridiculous. Again
/ challenge them 10 commence the publication OF
every thing | ever wrote. The sooner they pub
lish all, the better for me; though might NOT be
held excusable for making the publication | have |
already relieved them from all moral or legal obi
cations TO me for such procedure, and iearlessly
court the publication yauntingly threatened
through the Herald. remble not at anything
which the Editor and his two friends may publish, |
nor can Mr. STEWART drive me from my deternl
nation 10 oppose his retaining possession OF the m
heritance Of his sisters, even with The powerful AID
of his friend Bennett and the lNeto York Herald.
have said that this publication OF Dir. STEWART