The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1844-08-10


sure denounced by the denounced by the abest
statesmen in the land without distinction of paryn
and Mr.. Van Burens In drawn an opponept of
annexation lrhese what John Randolph would
term - category Of unmain!ainsbie propositions"
The question Of annexation one which struck
home to the heart OF every American citizen the very
moment IT became topic for public discussion. Andrew
Jackson was the very he al and front Of this no,abe
plot and from his quiet Hermitage forth TO his
conntrymen words Of advice and warning He told them
be ours, or she must be a dependence of Britain Who
will dare charge that that noble souled man was at the
head Of plot to cheat Mr. Van Buren, Of the nomina.
tionf Denounced by the press ~ Bnt not by the De-
mocratic press. I he question OF annexation rs wi h
every other question involving our national interest,
trsdistingushed from British interests, YVES DE-.
nounced and Is denounced all by the Federal
lists and their organs The denuncation comes with
grace IRON ,hat party Nothing else did we
OF our onclusions In favor of annexation were we
sustained by the Federal party and their organs.-
denounced" says this sapent journalist by tn. ablet
statesmen in the land and put wn in the Senate by an
overwhelming MAORI ~ The only distinguished states
VINO has denounced IT, has becn Col Ben
ton and he sustained by the
IN his opposition Buchanan, Woodbury., Walker Breese
Atkinson McDuis, and others If the distinguish.
cd aud able men IN that body made powerful speeches
favor OF immediate annexation. And the lmng
msjorty" by which put down the Senate came
from the unanimous vote OF Wing in opposition
The Cask Recorder may joy this result os peaes
but strikes that II has strange mpathies for De
nocraic paper .The letter OF Mr. Van buren, against it .
Now we have yet to see that letter II the Recorder al.
ludes to the one written the cell of the Hon Mr. Ham.
met oil Mississippi places Mr. Van Buren, in false po-
siiion That letter was not opposed to annexation
.ablished the possibility Of csv the great cons
tiona question as to the power Of this government
annex Texas to the Union It was an argument which
set Mr. Websers contrary argument and opinion ut
rest entirely and removed from the public mind that
great obstacle which was presented when the great
stu ional lawyer Mr. Webster violation
Of constitutional authority was annexation letter
throughout doubling only the immediate proprey OF the
measure This ives our understanding oft letter when
hrst male Its appearance and have
repeatedly to our readers We have no objection TO The
Rec ,de selection Of company but protest and the
democracy protest against associang the name of MIR
Van buren, wih the Federal opponents OF gre
rcan question Of ann. xacn Snch association has no
founda ion IN fact. =
These gross aspersons the motives and acts Of the
Democratic TaTty ns represented in the Baltimore Con
venticnas sustained by the united Democratic
responded TO BY almost primary assent agc OF III.
pecpe-hs wanton stack on ,s most ches and pub
a. ly declared PRINCIPLES suppose are d. signed
oppos ion to Gov Bouck Is. to promote the harmon,
and success OF the psriy" There harmony in this mai
ter, but IL not Democratic harmony n Il the barmo
ny Of concord with The reck ess and vuperniiy,
FEDERAL organ Ia the State Let him that has nm ear for
musc listen and he will discover they chime in har
mony
from the Albany Evening JournaLl
Wsput record this declaration Of the Argus that the