New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1844-11-20
Decisiops

Decisions.
John Newca'tle VS. William lie Rov.-sIotion in
relation to relaxation Of costs; The Court said it he'd been in
% hso 0 o s on motions TO, commissions, dHcoye
dome hereafter he lie taxed according to the fee Bills
Inc a1es to stand eIcep. a. to the item of s which be
John Wood, assignee Of the Sheriff, vs. Michael
set aside proceedings on bail bond
on the ground that special bail having been required by
NE sheriff TS1d not RisEn the bail bond The Court does
'ninKso Inc shei hnd night to STANDARDIZATION denied.
George w. Piait vs.. Maria Biakely and others
In action Of ecment where tenants refuse to allow them
selves 10 be considered parties the landlord has right come
in and deiend IN their naInes-ioton in this denied
Reynolds Mcmillan W.. Thomas G.. WINTHROP
Appeal brought the 18th and 18th Ward
an hour after the time he defendant no, appearing The jus
tee proceeded took proofs, aud gave Judgment for plaintiff
ney appeared he had BEEN detained on The road By
ndsposon and asked TO have the cause opened The JUS
were still present refused to have such done Appeal is
the cause ougS, to haYe been opened pacuny there
regulation in the Jus,6es Courts half hour from the
time uppoin,ed.-New trial granted, without either
John H. Robinson vs.. Abraham B. Conger.-Ap-
Pea-Ae;lon in the Marine Court e recover COMMISSIONS
DRe 1p sa ss Ia h s % cad e 2
where he might The money aud was agreed that il the
money was g5SScSsd ksbn;9 was to have
who had the amount to oa9 hn, after negotiation did
Sroug the e Count bes% Considered the se sfo
Appeal made This Court considers that the broker per-
formed whit he had agreed to do and that the fault in the
security ofered.-Judgment affirmed
>. Martin vs.. h. V. Buter-Appeal in relation TO
purchase oflumber.-Judgmen affirmed.
John b. Parksvs Abel Wheaton -Appeal.-The
defendant hired premises, the cellar Of which inundated
without paying the rent and action was brought
The jury the Court below deducted $40 for the damage he
supposed to have sustained. Appeal is made This
Court thinks the jury erred The landlord made
the water and the tenant bound for the time
he occupied udgmen,reverse
Horace Belden Mark Cornell and Anna Ma
ria Wng-Acon for rent and on lcase.-The
defence offered that the cellar had been overlooked By
in August, lH3 The Justice allowed the defence md
judgment for the tenant This Court thinks he erred as
the defence could not be received against leae-JudGment
reversed
John Gee VS.. John Shepard-Appeal.-Acti
ofrrover in the Marine Court damages for loss
tools levied upon shop Dvisonstreet being contend
however that they uctured articles kept for sale
and also that the form OF lease of those much
whereby tenant agrees 10 mortgage every thing the
premises TO the landlord security for his rent without refer
10 exemption law verdict given IN the Court be-
low against the landlord and appeal made The Court
sdcr from the evidence that the tools had been kept for SALE
and therefore liable distress. Also, that the mortgage was
ment reversed.
Elizabeth Werdner vs. George Ketchum.-Judg-
men affirmed
John Hutchings vs. Henry Acknowledgment,
for plaintiff reversed.
Joel Bertrand, plaintiff in error, vs.. William l..
Clark, defendant in acknowledgement for plaintiff