The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1844-03-27

him 10 see when he would descend. i asked him
when he came down, to tell me It he had any rea-
sons for quitting me-, as ne would not ten my mo
child was not his, that he would not marry me
II was true he had promised to do SO, bull that he
never should. Upon this he went away On En-
day, 9th May, 1913, received second letter with
out signature, and Mr.. Remy Lareux also received
one the same day. My mother was at home when
received the letter, and she wanted to know its
contents. From that moment was unable any lon
had read IT went to Madame Guetal to show It
TO her, telling her that 1t was letter OF the same
description as the former that l had had IN the
month of February preceding. Madame Gueta
commenced to make use of abusive language 70
me, telling me it not true; she even told me
that myself had written that letter, to make VA
poleon Lareux marry me. told her she was ms ms
taken, that was as Innocent of that as was OF 'ne
first. Madame Guetal replied that was = nai ne
had given to her the rsI letter to take care OF as
well as that which Madame ions1! naa ieGeNeG,
them before her also the little bottle OF medicine
that Napoleon Lareux had brought to her 18th jan
nary 1873 and took ns V s1s
TO me TO bring to Madame Costello. Madame Cue
tai then gave the letters, the little bottle and the
So in presence OF my sister, and told me- that she
knew was innocent IN the whole business, and
that all that had taken place and that had been
said had been done and SAID by her and Napoleon
Lareux; but that if ever 1t went into court, she
would make false oath against me- and that she
All this she said In presence OF my sister My sls-
ter and then went down stairs. ! afterwards went
to Madame Costello's TO give her the 30 that Ma
poleOn Lareux owed her, and at the same time took
the letter that had just received TO show It to her.
On arriving at Madame Costeo's | told her that
had brought her the SIS that Napoleon Lareux
owed her, and at the same time that | came to
show her letter that ! had just received.
Madame Costello took the letter and read 1t, and
told me, as the first occasion, that that letter
would amount kto nothing; but IT 1t went any
further must say that IT was not true, because It
would bring her into trouble. After that she asked
me if Lareux continued to come to see me.
end of February last, 1S43. Since that was the
case, she told me that she did not wish to take the
IS, but wished me to keep them, which did.
then went away from Madame CostelO's to Mons.
Remy Lareux's, and asked him if he had receiv-
ed letter as had been mentioned in that which
came to me. He informed me that he really had
received one also but that soon as he had seen
what 1t was he had burned it, and after that
had sent his brother Napoleon Lareux into the
country for some time, until he should how the
matter would turn. lie remained in the country
about three weeks AS soon as heard that NapO-
eonlLareux had returned.rom the country, Invent
TO his brothers. store to speak to him. asked him
the child had; he said not but told him he
must have done so, otherwise should not have
received letters such as that He denied It on
oath, but lold him that did not believe him on
his oaths, because he had not held to his word, in
what he had promised me.
Afterwards, / asked Napoleon Lareux if it was
true that he bad buried the child in the cellar, as
he had assured me but he then answered that he
had not been SO stupid as to do So lest subsequent
searches might be made; and that ii the child
knew how to travel, he had given it oh aIce
throwing it into the river