Vermont watchman and State journal. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1836-1883, 1844-08-30
I'oLh against the Iy.oos-Gro~ers.

I'OTE against the Ey'OOS-GroTerS.
Thc woogowors consider the duty upon foreign wool as i'm
pp epo TO Voy @ %o6 Of the d: aay suck as
mecun WOOL costing cents and under the pound or the no
S%yGTy Yet SGipT @Tq Han dollar the pound
NV own oninion il that JyooL SHOULD BE DUTY FREE
but think otherwise, we have retained duty of
fifteen per upon the imported artico-L n Pok Cong
jan H. 1917 Mr. Msary of Vermont reported bill
better protection of wool and wooons md made an elaborate
mediatoy rose and ayowcd FREE.TRADE DOCTRINES md
commenced upon the bill Mr. Polk voted AGAINST thu
bill throughout D vol 3, pages 9S 906, lO97, 1923
jan ST. 898 Mr. Malay of VT reported the famous Tariff
hill of 1928 giving increased protection WOOL wooleus, and
other branches of domestic industry Mr. Polk with the
April Is, 1880 Mr. Mallary reported bill to prevent frauds
in the importation of foreign products and enforce tho Tariff
1898. Nj Polk voted AGAINST the BILL Same vol G, part p
Dec a. $780, Mr.. Borngor introduced resolution TO RE-
DUCE the duty coarse WOOL wooens, &C., and
the question of considerations Mr. Polk voted in the AFFR
clay for and T'oM against she 9o,iH Of Isia.
CLAY. POLK.
have every where maintain had steadily during tho peri
s tnSs % Ssi been
OUGHT TO BE MADE FORPROTECTtVE POLICY *+|t
PROJECTIONS that the Tar In the present contest for Gov
81 a S that d aESTf% uH
IT'S REPEAL- C;ags letter tohighy PRoTE6Ti1E in its
Mr.. Cope, June 10, sff character and not designed by its
my opinion upon every item of had avowcd public spec
this Tariff would ches that the Of the
think provisions in the country, und especially of tho
e "sI b any s%a m
it, (Of which have not the restoration Of the principles
Judging of tho compromise Of 1888.
THEY OUGHT TO BE COR J. h. Poiks address to the peo-
RECTED.- Cas letter to M PIE Of TennesSe dated May 30,
Bronson, Sept 10, si3 1913.
Poll susfaining the SL.EV'E-TR.gDE!
March3 1884, Mr.. Mercer introduced the following resolution:
Resoced That the President OF The United States be request
ed and to prosecute from time mo such negotiations
he
o T aifT H fsfSa sAvE TnAhE and Ultimate
citation PiR4Cl under the law of nations by the consent Of
the civilized world -
POLK VOTED IN THE NEGATIVE-COng. Deb vol. y
page $50.
Polk for smmcdiafc .a"ner0iiom.
bavc hesitation declaring that am in favor of the IN
MEDIATE REMUNERATION OF Texas to the territory and
government of the United siates.-J a. Polk.
Polk against tho old Sofdiers!
March 10, 1929 the passage of the bill for the relief Of
viyng officers the revolutionary Mr. Polk voted IN THE
NEGATIVE.-Cong. DEB. VOL 4, part ,, page 267O.
Feb 49, 1929 Mr. Polk voted for the third reading of bill ior
the relief of sund officers and soldiers. This bill provided sim
ply for the addition of undLy 10 the rolls but nea
sage Of the JH March 49, MI Polk voted NOournai 457
Mach 49, 1920 the bill no. 2i5 being
Mr. MeDuno moved amendment TO deduct dollars annually
noes 1874. Mr. Polk voted AYE.-JOuraal, p. AIS.
The amendment being rejected, the question put
deng the bill to be engossed ayes l29' noes 49, Mr. Polk
Mr. Williams moved include in this bill the officers and SOL
dier of tho militia motion by of the bill to embnr
rass it. Ayes "A, lO7. MI Polk voted AYEJouna,
On the PASSAGE OF THE BILL. the ayes were 1872
So Mr. Polk voted NO, along with Ms. Wiiams.JOurnai
March 49, $780, he voted AGAINST the revolutionary pension
0i ;,o q Pr vol g. part l. page Gs9 M I'm md
Feb II, 1891 he AGAINST the bill for tho relief of
i,s he voted phs pension
oi'-SaNe vol 6, part p page 27l3