The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1844-01-22


| and looked as though they could eat him up.
wnrHRor-sir,1 renew the call for the ayes and
on my motion (They were ordered1
CAVE JoHSsoN-Before that question is put
scHEscK- suppose, sir, that the gentleman from Ten
| CAVE JoHssos-No, sir tLaughter]
PARMrsrrn-sir, is any debate at allsin order now
PARMsNrrR-Then, sir, how can the gentleman be al
lowed
spnAxEn-Hs not in order for the gentleman from
| Massachusetts 10 debate. [Roars of langhter]
The ayes and noes were then called on granting Mr.
stewart leave to speak Ayes, l52-Noes. Is.
So leave was granted for him to explain
Mr. STEWART then said that he had no personal feeling
towards any member and that he he'd not made nor in
intended to make any personal illusions merely went
parties in the country and for doing this have been re-
peatedy charged with alsehood and course has been
stage of the business it's little use to explain and the
House will give me another opportunity III Withdraw
| my excuse to voting.
General consent was then given.
Mr. VANcE withdrew his call for ayes and noes on the
| main question.
The question was then taken the main question and
carred-a reconsideration moved and negstved and
therefore, the whole subjects of the Presidents message
have been referred the appropriate Committees
Mr. BARNARD then moved that Mr.. Stewart have leave
to explain.
srElxrR-Can only be done by general consent
McCoNrELL--Weli SIR object, if nobody else does
(loars of aught.r) Finally leave was granted by sus-
Mr.. s1nw.nT~sir, the member from Indiana in this
member from ssour spoke Of the coon party,
made up of the fragments aud the ag end Of all parties IN
reply contrasted the policy of the tive partesthe Clay
and Van Buren, and for doing this was assaled next
morning by the gentleman from Ohio although used
personal remarks) with gross abuse he said he'd prove
all that said about Mr. Van Buren, to be false that he'd
take the brand of fasehood on his forehead and
that If he did prove it, he asked this House TO put that
brand of falsehood on my brow. Thus he first began
these personalities cannot characterize his conduct
or language without violating alike the rules of this
House and of propriey He came here, and charged
with falsehoods, Nos l. O. a. So T. and O-tCSreat
aughter) Sir re.affrm all then said and when the
proper time comes, will prove every statement made
about Mr. Van Buren, and his policy to be tr,ic--with
documentary testimony sufficient to satisfy all He finds
Of date and Mr. Van Buren, voted to
the west after denying the power If he proves Mr. Van
Buren, guilty of inconsistency that's his look out,
not mine. could show where Van Buren, voted
| to put turnpike gates the Cumberland Road. and
where he voted for high tariff in 1928 and against low
ering the duties afterwards Bn sir have established
all my charges Sir, ] learn this capitol cost near
$4,000 Don instead Of 81 000 0Oo Now sir reahirm all
said will prove ALL and wipe off the brand But, sir II
in the discharge Of high duties we are to be met by
the cry of lies, lies. lies, vil,in vlainy,r why the
minority had better retire from this House at once when
their iigh not respected II this House 10 70 be De-