New-York daily tribune., 1844-04-13

sury saws the Democrat. All but don't find a
Sub Treasury here. (Cheers.) Now the true in
terpretation is that Congress shall have power to
make all laws which are indispensably necessary
saws the voter.
fMr Bolts here alluded briefly TO the opinions OF
| Col. NJ. Johnson, John {. Calhoun and Others
He would not undertake 10 discuss the question:
of the cxpediency OF the Tariff with any of the De-
mocratc Party, because he considered a prac-
teal fact worth pound OF theory and spe
cuiaiion. Let any man contrast the condition
/ of this country when have had low du-
ties with the High Tariff times, and he VII
see the advantage. Let him 20 back 10 1889, and
he will find that the second Law passed by Con-
gresS, commences with Il preamble III THESE words,
.Whereas il is necessary Tor the support of Govern
nlent and Tor the prote ction of Domestic Aianuac
lures that duty should be levied. be II enacted &c.
! [Deaiening applause. You will find that no man
| has filed the Presidential Chair the United States
vho has not recognized The eXpediency OF Tafiii.
| When the principle ofPrOection was fought in Con-
gresS 10 1924 ard Henry Clay stood there the
/ Champion o! The policy, who woreihey WHO follow
cdin the ioolst ps OF their illustriouS predec
| Who were they who looked up to Henry Clay Tor
! information, oed - he d.and sustained him in all
! his measures !ell itnoiin Gall-pGhliSh ii not
in the OF Ashalon, ior II Will not be beevedby
| the Democrats oi the present day Cheers Who
voted with him for Protective Tariff! Andrew
Jackson Martin Van Buren. Thomas Hart Ben
| ton. 4 laugh.l
! AIR. Bolts here made few remarks in relation
70 the Distribution O; the Proceeds of the sales
OF Public Lands and two or three other topics,
winch we are compelled 10 pass over. he
| proceeded 10 speak OF the annexation OF Texas
10 the United States. He opposed ii in the
! strongest ierrs IL was secret and candes,ine
treaty. and one which strikes deep the foundation
Of our Government Ii was rather for the anneXa-
non ofthe United States 10 Texas. Itwas ques-
ton of the greatest magnitude the consequences
! OF which no one can ioroSee; and that ii
Will lead il consummalej, 10 an iin,ned-
ate or ultimate dissolution OF THIS non lie
could not for one moment doubt. lie was
| a Union man. He was rot a Southern
man with Northern feelings, but Southern man
with National feelings. BY the annexation OF Tex
as 10 identity policy with hers, and not
her policy with ours. We 10 assume the debs
of Texas in this age of retrenchment and reform; VT
are 10 engage in her brawls. Suppose Great Britain
desires 10 occupy Texa>-doeS ttolow, because we
do nj want GIea Britain occupy ii that must
lake IL, By no means. We have recognized The
independence Of Texas. We have done ii because
she proclaimed herself independent. We have ter
ntory enough already. The Annexation Of Texas!
I'm aganstt out and out, be popular or unpopular
tCheers.l This Government must take Texas or
England. England has no more rightlo Texas than
we have. She don't wSnt il. Size can want it for
10 purpose but for the cultivation OF Cotton Cot
ton in this country only be cultivated by Slave
labor, and England don't tolerate Slavery.