The Woodstock age. [volume] (Woodstock, Vt.) 1844-1845, 1844-11-07

~ one tnat Is 10 be cared tor or protected
1t looks little like ungcnerous monopo-
ly and an attempt to foster the interest Of
the ftic at the expense Of the many. Our
wool-growers are the Lords of the state
We care nothing about that, so long as
they remain satisfied with fair profits, and
gains proportionato to those Of the other
classes, and do not seek to make every
body else bow to their interest and tame
ly submit to pour money into their pock-
cts and drain their own.
These sheep Lords, constantly cry out
for more protection, when their business
is by far the most profitable in the state.
Raise the price of their wool one mill on
the pound and no matter to them if the
state is drained of all its surplus funds for
bread stutls-no matter what becomes OF
the other interests in the state.
They cry out against democratic men
and measures, and endeayor to induce
those who do mot raise wool to join them
in their cry Why is this: 1t is not for
your good, you who do not raise wool, it
is for their otn Interestingly care nothing
for you only as they can make you their
tools. And look you, with what reason
do they raise this cry! They shall be
ruined they say if Gov, Polk is elected!
Did they not raise the same cry when
Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, jackson
and Van Buren, were candidates for cleo
ton? And when we're they so prosper
Gus as under the administration of these
mcn-Jackson especially? Since this
century commenced they have had four
years and thirty days of federal or their
own rule. They have lived forty years
under democratic misunderstanding
haze grown rich and lordly under demo-
cratic administrations. Allthat they arc,
democratic administrations, democratic
men and democratic measures have made
them; and now with the basest ingrati-
tudc they smte the hand that has foster
ed and sustained them ana by whose
strength they have grown prosperous and
happy. What would they have? Are
they not content with all the wealth and
prosperity they have accumulated under
a system Of wise and fair prolection?-
Have their inordinatc gains made them
greedy and must they, now, have unfair
and unjust advantages that their gains
may be further increased?
They say the democrats are opposed
to the present Tariff. Read and see for
yourself es.
WHO PASSED THE TARIFF OF
1912;
"Thc tariff bill came to its third reading
on the o2nd ofAugust, l842-and tie vote
Oh llS lllldl pasSagC StOOu'-
For the bill, l0l
Against it, l0l
There being tie, Mr. CIay's Kentucky
wing speaker, White roted against it.
and kiHcd The bill for Tie Time bling.
There were fifty fire wings present who
refused - vote for the BILL Sixteen shot
the pit, and lodged the question. Thir-
ty-ninc other wings, with moro moral
courage than these, stood up to the rack
and voted NO. The names of the thirty
nine, arc:--
John Quincy Adams, of Mass.
Mcssrs Foster and Linn, of N. Y.
Mcssrs Andrews, Green, Thompson,
Owsley, Trplett, Underwood and Speak
or White, Of Kentucky.
Messrs Arnold, Brown, w. b. Camp
bell, II. j. Campbell, Caruthcrs, Gentry
and Williams, of Tennessee.
Mcssrs Bots, Goggin, Mallory, sam
mers and Wise, of Virginia.
Mr. Casey of Illinois.
Mcssrs Cravcns, Lane and Thompson,
Of Indiana.
Messrs. Debcrry, Graham, Mitchell,
Rayner, Shepherd and Washington, of
North Carolina.
Mr. Foster, of South Carolina.
Messrs Gamble, Hubcrsham, King and
Warren of Georgia.
Mr. VIM. Cost johnson, of Maryland.
Mr. Mathot, of Ohio.
| On the second trial the vote stood thus:
For the hill, 1903
Against it, lO2
Here it was that Mr. CIay's Kentucky
wing Speaker, again voted NO, and a.
gan kiiIcd The ill., But at this iuncturc,
Two nimblc wing dodgers "came to the
rescue" and saved the bill-aganst the
negative votes of Iorty whigs, including