Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1844-09-24

Mr. T. Daniel, the notorious gentleman
.., ~tos not often stop 10 correct The statements
III, mess, the author Of the Disunion Plot,
I'd by "Mr. Disunionist," John H. Plea
r.,. the Elector for this district the general
inner in for the Wing Party, comes out IN
.,,eiavs Wing with "A Card" from which The
wing IS an extract Il did rot say that the
n.gpcral>' claimed Harper's election as Demo-
'.s.,, triumph. | commented in terms winch
N:.i, NJ severe hui which were no less just upon
i',, al which stated, and here repeat that the
- i, and other affiliated Presses claimed liar
w. ,,ecron by the ''Na,ivc Americans" as a
..,,.,rh OF their party. when IL occurred, and now
,., seeking to create the impression, Tor political
that Native Americani>m was, and Is n
N,,r organization. For the proof oil what SAID
~. 10 the Globe Of November lOth, 1913. -
N. u. following the rule OF The Wing Parry,
.',rauy 10 disregard dates. would create the
,',, impression, that Mr. harper, the Naive
'.,r;,,n candidate, was elected in November
-" ami lha, the Globe claimed ii as a Demo
'-. 20 yirtory. Now Tor the FACT In November.
% ,,sy, was no election for Mayor, and MIR.
,,r,er could not have been voted Tor as such.
r. ,nlv proof that Mr. ID. offers 10 sustain
location is. that the Globe and other aiiilia-
n,r,scS claimed Harper'S election as tri-
,,.nb or their party" Now, the extract that MIR.
- t,n,Lcs from the Globe is taken from that pa
49, NJ 10th November, 1915; the election Tor
,,,,.or NJ which time Mr.. Harper was elected.
,"as in April. 1911 We would advise the Wings
a.r,, 10 look more 10 figures, dates and facts.
rGe extracts which we gave on Saturday from
-, Why papers, il appears 10 US, ought 10 salts
-. 80. cry one that the Wings claimed Harper'S
E.-',1n as a Wing triumph; but if they are not
Gal with The statements OF their own presses
mo that we could say would have weight
fr,rn
Nj NIr .r T Danier also asks, HAS the Enqni-
-,r Groo,,en how. last Spring, when certain To-
,s,rners born. residing in Chesterfield, came TO
49,. musings Court oi Richmond, TO perfect their
r,ah 10 vote. i; denounced the movement, ana
cy,n went so far as 10 hold up distinguished
Wing ofthat county as having hnSer IN the
net
We answer that our voice always has been
an; always will be raised against any attempt at
,claiulen, voting 1t is very easy TO see what
,.-ac Mr.. D. and a correspondent of the Times
a., Compiler are PLAYING; they wish TO deceive;
nov wish 10 create the impression that we were
oon,sel 10 foreigners entitled 10 vote. exercising
mr. privilege. They must know this is not so
Ir Rhodes the distinguished Wing" who had
:, finger in the pie" said himself, after the
article appeared in the Enquirer, that they had
Il, right to vote. The effort was made 10 natu-
ra!z. some foreigners but recently arrived IN The
country, Tor The purpose OF using their votes al
III, Sprins Election. 1--WE kaop such was the
,aci-ani SO knows Mr.. Al orney Mayo)-anc
We resisted this attempt, because they had mo-
ben. and couli not be, naturalized under The laws
O; the United States 1.-The Wings are desirous o
ai,;ing illegal votes upon US, whether Native
americans" OF foreigners, we shall oppose it
;acy may play at that Improper game; they ma.
reap what laurels they can derive from such al
s,iempt, but we will have nothing 10 DO with IL
We are now AMI have always been opposed {
Alien laws, whether emanating from Old
lohn Adams, or virtually intefpolated IN sonit
ot;..r form by MIR. VIM. 5. Archer; We go Tor The
present naturalization laws, but we 90 not g
in smuggling votes.
Mr. d says that il this con.es, is to desenc
rate into a mere scuiion warfare, eur lhis) mate
rails are ample TO carry il on We did no
doubt that Mr. ID. had materials sufficient 10 car
~ on a "scuilion warfare" he would have beer
the very man that We would have selected as tn
mos! proper person for such a war; nc has al
the requisites, not onlt by private circulars, bu
hy bold and reckless assertions