The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1844-06-23

never give me any more pain and distress have suffer
ed beyond expression already Don't add any thing to
tell your father that consider him bound to let any
mortal know that he has spoken to me
word the subject for shall never let be known
that have him. any person should ever ask him
whether he did not suspect his oath binds him to clear
He must never tell what my business 49, or
where live tell him to say nothing about money II
you and ne VIII thus fulfill Your promise you may DC
God never to violate your oath and promise,
After you have read this letter your father you must
We further learn that such the agitation Of the sub
ec here and in Exeter that Mr. Farchiid Boston
matter next Monday observed the position of things and
returned Tuesday TO Exeter Tuesday night he called
church meeting reiterated the circumstances detailed
above with much feeling and with evident disress-re
marking that the evidence was strong against him.
Guiding his appeal by declaring he was innocent. He
then asked for dismisson. and It was granted.
that s aT1Is he in
this worlds troubles by committing suicide Dr. Perry OF
Exeter called in ser and extended all the elie
in his power The last account received yesterday, men,
toned that ne would probably recover.
Such is the unhappy tale We have sketched 1t, we
believe, with entire mpartiaiy and would close by say
ing that whatever may be the of this melancholy
affair to the immediate ectors the circumstances cannot
but inaic deadly stab on individual character, on do
nestle peace and the cause OF pure and und. filed religion
VERY IMPORTANT FROM TExAs-By the Nep-
tune, Capt. Rollins, We have dates from Galveston
The United States brig somers arrived of Galveston on
the 9Th instant.
The trial OF CON- Moore was still progressing at Wash
The u steamer ponsett since arrived at Mobile,
rived at Galveston on the It'll Col Thompson
board In relation the mission Of this gentleman the
Galveston News OF the 9Th instant has the following -
Mr. Thompson has been successful in accomplishing the
object for which he sent and bears to his Govern
ment information calculated to obviate the technical OBJ
jectons which have been urged by of the leading
politicians OF the United States against the annexation Of
Texas We ot course have learned the nature
of the business effected between the United States and
Mexican Governments but learn from Mr.. Thompson
that il is Of such nature TO leave but little for
doubts upon the question Of annexation.
In speaking OF the same the Galveston Civilian OF the
Sth says:
Mexco rejects the propositions for obtaining her COM
sent to the annexation Of Texas and portion Of the Me
lean territory to the United States, and the Mexc41
Government reerates the notice that the cOnsummav&
of the treaty Of annexation will be regarded her part
act of host lily from the United States"
Here there is decided discrepancy, and OF OPT
MON that the latter statement is correct We take the
above from the New Orleans Pcayune of the
The following is from the Bulletin Of the same date:
very curious correspondence has taken place, and
has been published by authority of the Texan Govern.
ment between Capt ELLIOTT the British Charge DE- flares
Texas and Hon ANsoN JONES' the Texan Secretary Of
state; The concluding letter Of this correspondence
which is all that necessary to understanding OF the
whole, is inserted in another column.
This letter shows =
lst The extreme anxiety Of the British Government
with regard the negotiations pending between the nj
ted States and Texas and its desire to thwar them
ID That the influence Tor authority Of the British
Government is exercised in Mexico to prevent settle
Of difficulties between Mexico and Texas except on
condition that the latter will give not
consent to be annexed TO the United States.
3d. That every possible nducement will be held out to
Texas and every obstacle thrown in her way to
the Incorporation of Texas into the Federal Unon
and tally that reconciliation will speedily he pro-
duced between Mexico and Texas, on basis conormhble
British policy il Texas be persuaded to renqush
the project Of annexa,ion -
entirely question between the United States and Great
Britain whether American English politics shall
prevail on this continent.
We said above that the concluding letter. which we
publish is all that is necessary for full understanding OF
whole correspondence There however one point
betrayed in the first letter Of Captain Elliott which we
before acquainted with and which is remarka-
BILE The reader will recOec that the United States on
the solicitation Of Texas, proposed to the Engsh and
French Governments that the three powers shonld later
of independence between Mexico and Texas, and that
England had declined the proposition, but Immediately
put herself forpad' to procure settlement on her own
terms 1t appears now from Captain Eotts letter to MI
Jones' that this refusal to unte with France and the
United States England made her proposals to the bel
igeren states between which she interpreting, put
plans, was supposed, III proper TRAM una then
effected junction with and the cooperation OF France,
without reference to the United States
We nothing OF the discouresy implied IN this ex
raonary procedure More serious considerations grow
out of it. Hindicates foregone determination the part
| Of Britain
lst 10 supplant the influence Of the American Gov.
eminent in the States OF Mexico and Texas.
I'd. To effect settlement OF the difficulties between
those basis that it was known the United States
could not concur ia.
3D. To stop if possible, by combination of European
powers further progress of American institutions and
influence.
rment tls Government and contrary to its true policy
| and position