The Ohio Democrat. [volume] (Canal Dover, Ohio) 1840-1900, 1844-02-22
oRANnnHY I9oTTun.

asNis%Is suCssisnd Ad%T q the estate Common Pleas
Of Samuel shull vs.. In CAANcERT,
Thomas slmonton AMI Nancy his wife aud
Others. .r
TSNHoMAs smonlOn and Nancy his wife, John HemlnEer
n George iIeminger, David Melsgah John Mezsar,
David Burnet, Charles Whitman, David Barns Samuel
Romig Martin Kel er, John H. Allen and John Riley,
arc hereby notified that on the 25,h day of September A. D.
l843 the complainant filed his bill Of complaint In the said
the ehaucery side thereof setting ferth that the SAID
Nancy the widow Of Samuel shu deceased, that said
Shul shoIt time before his death sold off quantity Of per
soua property amounting 2O dollars credit OF months
that about weeks ae the death Of said Shu the SAID
Nancy then his widow made sale Of the reUaains personal
property belongng TO the estate OF the said samuel Shu
amounting to lis dollars that said Nancy received pay
for the whole of both OF said sales excepting few dol
lars that the whole Into her keeping and CONTROL and
that ths whole well secured that she loaned to the said
John Hemnge 4S dollars Of said proceeds that with part o.
said money she took up note 25 dollars signed BY John ana
George Hemnger originally due 10 Henry Cline for wagon
aud retand said her indemnity for said 25 dollars
that about September 842 said Nancy ntermnried with tile
Bald Thomas SnontOn, and thai Immediately after said marS
age said SOnlon took possession OF all said proceeds Of
sale us well cash and Of all property belonging to
the estate Of said Shu that notes were were LEFT with said
John Riley TO collect agent of said Simonon that said 81
monitor and wife reside somewhere In tile State OF Indiana;
hat said Nancy shortly before hpr htermarTage with said
simonon recovered Judgments in her name claims
arising OF said sales before Samuel Romg ESQ Justice
of the Peace Of said county viz against said said David Metz
gar John Metzgar for S3S and also for 1918 and after
her ntearage aforesaid bal in her Of Nancy
shu against said David Bunet and Charles Whitman for
$685. all of which unpaid and should be paid to com
anant administrator. That Samuel Romg has In his hands
agent Of said Nancy employed before her mternaruge
aforesaid the following described notes viz one nganst said
David Burnet said Samuel Romg for $363 one against
Martin Keller and John H. Allen for $l2l4 all being of the
proceeds of said sas that neither said SimonOn the said
Nancy accounted complainant for any part said
saes but carried away the same 10 tile auunt Of $50
dollars that said Riley and said ROmg have scverally in
hands large of and money the proceeds OF
said sales which should be accounted for and paid and delv
cred to complainant but that such payment and delivery
prevented by said smonton and Nancy his wife, The bill
pays that defendants each do account for all Of said notes.
money in their respective hands and for all property of said
esate and that they be each required and compelled to pay
over to complainant all sums of money due from either o
them sud simonon said Nancy and enioned from pay
ing the any part thereof 10 said smonton his wife
and such other relief &c. .l0 ,ir-.g.-..tfr.
The above named defendants notified that unless they
shall severay appear within sixty days next aer the rising
OF said the next term thereof and plead
demur Lereto the will to them be taken and held
true and confessed and decree rendered accordingly
ATHERToN & CHAPMAN,
| 't ." Compl's soiS.
nov Ra 1919 X6w d '-aa