New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1844-12-12
court OK common Plear.
Before Jud-e ULsHoEFFrr.

People OF State of New York vs.. Martin Roth and
Sebastian RossActon to recover the amount OF bond gwen
child whom It was SAID, he had abandoned. TINS case was
continued The cecHce appeared To be natae we hA con-
Cernany which was or his not Receiving hes nd
farther that he offered aiiet giving the bond 10 pto'ue Io
A witness testified that Roth refused to receive ms VIE ana
child and the witness obliged TO take eE 70 ms S% pu
To the boarding house where her trunk was She WIS su'e
usn s an ss that b ZEE would hS her,
fused to do any thing for her The witness had never seen e
witness no, 10 assist his WIFE OF to that effect Roth wished
witness TO send Mrs r. away 10 Rochester, and he would pay
the expense he had relative there. Roth SAID 10 witness
NJ one tune that he wished get cen of his wife, The wit
ness at request of his WIFE, but much against his WILL
Roth offered to take the child refused mother
s6y OF f bssr Ti b@ pea 10 his Sns
about months after her arrival she .nid 10 in IN 20
her in light unieeng manner that If they compelled hum to
take her. he would feed her IN such way that she wod Dc
To quit crying Some time alter that passed his place N
Grandstreet and he called to me- lie SAID he wished 10 SPEAK
to me very much saw the woman that had been 50 inuch
talked about IN his ut the time. told him mat ne had
better take ms wife ana MAINTAIN he n1 e sa N f bs
When went home told her. aud henppeaIed to be gsd and
much She SAID she wished bad not made fool OF her She
said she down. and Just rs she got To the oop he came
out his place with that his ann They passed
her light way, and went icong along the walk she
ad she went hehd hem for some distance pt got so wfas
and FAINT that sc did not know what 10 do The woman mat
spoken OF lives now a! Newark She WIS frequently al ms
place
has been stated TO her misconduct III Germany i was
not 10 be expected that Roth woHd receive her his wife, but
he had Offered provide tor her, which would be shown.
a witness who resided IN August tie time oil giving the
bond No. l52 Boonestreet testified that M Roth spoke
him boarding MS wife aud child, and witness went To
her. aud she called his house She promised 10 come next
day She afterwards refused TO do however and DID R9t
lcok the she TO have Witness Kept boa'f
ing house, but had no boae nj the time He occupied four
lie afterwards removed TO udowsteet. Was taken
up and imprisoned seventeen days for selling Liquors without
license.
with letter. in which her husband Offered to provide room
for her. She refused accept saying she could hire room
for herself The room be in the house where his place
was She said she was afraid he would so away AID leave
her she began codHg about her husband, to his neglect
in her. told her she had done woEg III Germany referred
10 what was SAID about her having two leGtlnaie
children: did not exactly understand her repy she aid
her husbund had stayed Germany with her she would not
hive had she did sc. lThe answer beng IN Germun
difficult render in EuGsh and an Interpreter was swo
but without better SUGGEST She only coGpoined iiat hei
husband had not sent her any money. 49, =.
young who assists III the bnrber establishment OF
Roth testified to frequently beng Of the shop Vine
Their or not she frequently remained there through the
night the witness could not say cunnot recoiect he
said, ANY thing about that. at all. :"
The Counsel io Plaintiff wished 10 place Ms Roth on Tue
stand (Th0 with he. husband Md little boy. were court
Digestion made to H. however, nad tie Court dSaowed
the request. ..
The respective Counsel summed p and after the charge Of
the Jury retired but returned short time with verdict Tor
Plaintiff amount. OF bond, 500.