New-York daily tribune., 1844-11-29
Court OF Common Pleas.
Befure Judge DAILY.

Deioio SuuSe DALi'
William Lynch vs. Ebenezer Welsh.-The plain
a keep. store in Pearl street. near Centre i,I IN
noduuv DN and n ReaJe eet Which h, sold out tn Mt WS
pr "a M ce;~nr @ IN neynent s5O ,n csb md ran noiss
at2 and 6mop,hs. for balance The ls. note for s'
WIZ PM, ~ nyt & Tc @ az % an, waS ee,sa @ wo ~,
ms sion e ] m hSng s & eqs a. h le eSe
WI Wt III u ponsnU - or rn ,be, M r,. nj, ~ NJ @ @ y, - so
, , a u m nd ,%n ,ooJ snid h';; "a hn, 81 81
M Lyush himself benS the pncp pfhar and srs
the pr present action is Brought ' -'''' "-'''D-
For The defence, 1t conende tha the return OF the soP
giving up notes. was in full ind in close Of the transaction
that Mr. Lynch had previously declared that ne believed De
notes. and he offered take assignment OF them in sa
tom but at the suggestion OF the counsel for defendant who
mani was changed To the Judgment having the clause en
lon to the particular goods ~ te ,to.e NJ Bdwe iof fd
situation OF Mr. Welsh would have been likely To give upa
stock OF goods for notes TINT were not DUE and the usual
dnte sacrificed. and lie lett abe TO suit Tor the baanc
The Judgment stated expressly that The execution was 70 %
tenon ts give the stock of goods de and tho
notes on The other and the tfansacton 10 be settled
Mr.. Bonney conende or the reverse that the JIdgnent
was legal nnd Dnus 12d hat hc intenon was TO allow e
III! from bringing SUIT for balance, 49,
The Court charged TINT y Il well settieh principle OF law
Wen at men ae Supposed az 10 bors Ss
what they are about TO sn and having signed they bound
bintns against The defendant A. 70 ,hs point about he levy
Geg PEN cosI ~ I .Se t b "a % a 3a,Ser m S sofe ne ans
.o you as ' w on;S Iia hi o oiuile ano NE
y rorrr bnve decided thst Inc cl.ns No. my u.aLi
bht ibc nirn,,tT frnm sniny for The hsnce Eo, @ plo
~ is ,t s,d The Indye vii cha ,.n I'm, The I
sc ri%ht and tha he IL entitled 10 his brianrc hem. ,
s IN Ia 81 In tbs evso, ~ - ,ho he pe.ns WIN
,n,S,,e1 ,, the st he Is M jey @ 70 bem ,h no. osns
Mi cIf oT cnTrv vhnt hrs ihys a., hcon ~ e,os ,
higher Cont ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ''eu' 'IA p
Ihe iry retired brt hnd not nrn,cd nm, ve,d.. 10 IN,
time OF ndournmen md wiil bnnr in sealed ya,., ,hs
forenoon ~ $50
. -, 81 ,J ~ ,s -. ~. - = VI r. = ns .
an 70, snee.i pu,y siownE our OF tne ary heges
cac ~ s z. ialte amount Mr. Biady,m
opens e Sase loI pIent sre9 nat he wis man of prop
cry anu isb he deleodant man engasea
Dusiness ~ New ana VINO aso claims TO be respect
sy Ihe present acton instituted under circumstances
which VIII show 10 the jury that something Necessary
Dc done Dy t7 plaintiff IN istifcaon o. his character You
ny recolec gentleman OF the jury that about the ? July,
loi glil named Mary Rogers, dsppeareerom her hon
and sometime subsequently WAS found ded ut Hob1ke aud
iopy vionfe', and ten lnhGmsnly murdered. Mr. Cromme
I'm at that time b9aded at the house the mother OF the uD
fortunate g and was terms Of paeci friendship with her,
inducing him TO act US her friend a;hcr than do u1y
he was the person who identified the girl and furnished tie
testimony which sased the Coroners Jury nj Hoboken.
denvor detect her nuIderers.
Ii necessary c can show this and also the prea, want o
diligence and attention on the pan of The pubic orer HAD
they properly sustained the e1ertiops of Mr. romsln
he was acting as friend and gave valuable information Be-
was through umor implicated as BENG hls yery mursref
effect The Publisher no doubt ncieI ltb rood ntea,iog
and view 10 ferret out the real mureers and Ue1t day
made full ample apology as In Forge, ihe defend