New-York daily tribune., 1844-06-01
~ i. Justly regarded as an l.Onor and Or,smen. to

Carroll t1RiI. ne shNs III MS TtpcI VI ''dNuiuhH
that "this speech is WORD FoR WORD The sane
AZ that published in the FreemnmS Journal and
drawing his conclusion from this assertion OF his
own, he charges upon that AIN guilty OF "false
hood
This is impossible FOR n, the conclusion OF my
letter, stated that in pennng II had not s'ne.
document tetore he. aud consc'nu- =, judgment
and reilo,, were ali ! hai 10 Gepend upon. A'a
KNOWN that the Two latter oi these might betr
Il into mistake, took the precautinn which
ow ei 10 Christian feeling and common cuudor 70
state that II in any matter oi fact | was mistake,
reiructcd my words by anticipation. Alter SUI h
u declaration, 10 except Bennett, even | hai
been mistaken on some point, would accuse me o
ulseho0d This is The only Instance in which
even Bennett; question. nv accuracy or my -
raciIv. Ii what he says were true, with such
precauiion On my part i; could be Of but little
vice to hIn.
But il Is not truc. The rpori in the ReraN ard
the report in the Freemoas Journal are not word
tor Nn.J the same. This Is a Tact. Aad "Ita fact,
even Bennett ought 10 know at this tine, that Te
souing much le-s assertion, is perfectly Useless
Il therefore convict BaGnett OF attempting 10 d..
ceive on this point viii surprise nobody. Sill,
have Appealed 10 the justice oi pubic opilion,
shall no, presume TO stand before That tribunal w!h
evea thus nIpuyGiioa. lie PVT HAS matter night, 1t =
sufficient 10 say lheI the qGotstion AZ the head oi
this letter is ioun! in tie report oi my speech a
Carroll Hall, in the FrsemnaS journal, ana Is fit
ound in Benuc;t's repot, oi the same. Therefor,
when Bennett saws trat the ,so reports are "word
or word the same il only ?raves that he was az
compi-hing a fdsehood, and knew H.
Tnis flseh1d he ,epeats SIX ilmes-sliil, Is tie
i.i vii! be sufficiently long, we shall count II hnts
one. 10 shat extent il j. l.sehOpj may he Ill
erred IRON tue io,.OH ng extracts OF iay s2-ch a.
Carrjii Hall. reported IN tie freeman 8 JouTnGI.
quote ;hem not merely for tilIs purpose, hu; al-0
70 refute, in so rmch, the whole body ot s!andf.-
Il. .-aLi nil aim
ana c.erym-n who taking Bennett for their ieader,
nave almost exceeded tin in their pervcrsions o!
tne Irui!,. The whole speech may be read III TIE
Freeman z Journal extra. 1t Oct 3DGI. And the Pc
rnsa oi ii viii convince any man VINO can read, MT
that there Is not o0rd oi appeal 10 religious or
ec,arirn preiudices; second, that there Is not
word u reference politics, except IN SC lar a. ca'i-
d,aies hat. arrayed Themselves IN opposition o the
equal rights o The people; ;ilrd-that the purpose
oi that speech not tc organize u party, but 10
lay do" and develop pdacl?le. These propose
tinns wi te established hy the following passac,-
Of that speech:
Ia this country all things ae affected decided BY pubic
op aa puIic opmlon itself suS;uncd IS two opposite
-, bsp iies @ "' exeep truth nase @ rh enemies % Of r
gnogtt o tins and thcI"f'e they have cIow-
- eyers s.eiiue T. public o'''" "'h misrepresentation III
Therefore necessary or Us have r"cour.e the ;
Sc5Go IN no: Gs ;tai s1pgo-"H " tie pvoi'c m0HF
ho1ta t5 eeta,d 10 ~ o e 2arR ~ o ,,aefS = @ar
and soou'd RICHLY MERIT THE RIBuSE WIGHT COULD
Int Fntlc Schools ,>hich established acc9r'rs
To the System IN 'oTce PuT cGrsn Ind II sirdr ooN;
which a4l Mt recasnze. md or children Yee compete.
;orpkc pqrt ;'e linen we Withdrew irn from the sc'oo!s
md tau g theu wt means. ~ dg MT rant h6Ht|
from Schop EuHdssA Gcsjr s t"t Ge casin;S r-T
Fnc iSi r@S aS Socy s q 1 a1anc M I 50 - much Of
and sectaflnn ,cnclns rs eosei he;. IN ie etnde''
eute cl=i1n nud Vel they introduced - much m quantity
'iey i''oHg' c IND ci such qu4:y II. yoll;cd gu. re!
littu. rr
nanr cr religious lqtn and feelings ioadeei by The iu1c
OF that Institution; onG II for those the, capao fecel'e
from that institution, II yrnnny to taN them Tor - sup
Public School but cuniegd iHt ~ Saoa rec'oUS
faeees Be brought 10 bear on Ne 5s'ess u eaaeGtqn =.
shat BE- far e@idreH ere roeerd an ace9rGd"oe
rsia i.e religious 6cfe Of Their 2drerS Gad ja'gtes
"Rm, call upon you to resist tn, Public School system
whether you sustained by public mca OF not.
Mey ieass son no ALrrRSAr1vr N ro.ing I; may ap.
ptn uncoaon-t may Inconsistent with character
not. subject of extraordinary import Bat thee
been u religious right, and Us The spirit
II zen ta7sd DGa, mast be protected Wee w.
50 imposed. that euch denonn'loa might ecevc tie
uenet OF lis quota, the would be in: Ecdrt irt
IA" & ~ @ans ,H aSf >, ',sr @ r Ih and AN
pro,atnn OF the sc"a iuud suck manner that we may
not pesttlcI1a,e IN n' ene'''.'
Expsrencc tells tim; all questions arlnred in
@ %s a2 se ss % f' G s ss, do @ not i S s,y & % as s
egus p,i,e, men. only speak ul and advocate ie
enr ns the irend ui Inn who woud give JUSTICE TO AL
CLASSES"
cad, been said that IT not until after the mis-
representation and bgoiry OF portion Ci iie press
ad bona the representatives. OF tile people, To &C.
ny even consideration Of Meir ciaims TO the
'.ends oI general eGucu;ion. that they took up the
only alternative consistent with hUTor uud SENSE
oi right. But in all this, there Is no appeal 10 see
taranism-there is appeal 10 nstionaIir! !--thcre
+ nn expression OF GenunciGtion or bhleiness-n
word there "a nothing bur the calm, rational, devel-
opment oi great constitutional! right, happily Sc
cured cquaiiy 10 all the people il You make pub
lic issue win any other denomination OF Chrlsiana
-or instance the MeIhodstS or Presby terans for
the purpose OF depiivIng them, as such, OF consu
Iutunai iighi, they will naturally and necessarily
oppose the etiorth by constitutional means
Il YOU attempt 10 hem them H. IN such nnnnt
that they cannot have chance for voting, except by
voting .ur persons pledged 10 nhlct upon them Tie
very mjary they complain OF, their right 10 complain
will cease, ii they cooperate with you tor that pur-
pose. This The principle which developed
Amy speech at Carroll Hall. as may be seen by
another extract stl!
They say that portion OF the school fund irT
>ectnru purpqss-to npp!y 10 the support ard advance
OF religion Tins deny have hereto
We have denied o!hclry ad under heI own oscf
yallnn And werr they careful for the truth o
he.r statements. they would no, mvc mn'e the nsse!nn N
o. e9I'4. t i.e =, no N 5e .oroe cyo,ct:,1n
not Ror'iy Gt :te common cI
pcn.e e f6at minority and ,tSaj. 10 ncS against that Ee
eoRtcuGed
These extracts are all found in the repor, Of my
speech nj Carroll Hall, contained in the Free
mans Journal. They not found III lhc same re-
pott us contained in The Herald And yet Bennett i'll
his paper OF the 2ls says thai the ,So reports are
VERBATIM II LITERArIM" the same, with the ex'
ceptou OF Two words in the description o the entlu-
sa-m with which the Bishops speech was received
IN the Herald OF the 2iln he says ave shall Sho"
N the most conclusive manner, HAT the report which
appeared in our columns, Was IDENTICAL 10 the
very letter with that winch received his own sane
s;oa, aud WAS published 10 the world IN his own
journal" In the same paper 0i the 25:h las; Ss-
mmiay-" We give inis report from tie f're,maaS
J0urnal--;i!e bishops own paper-a report Mhic!'
was subjected In hiS rerision and was published
w:,h hi, tail appreciation and that Of hs l.ieHs
AID again " These reports "eTe made by the same
gentleman as have already sta;ed, and We
now present The incosrovefrn!r prooi ihut They are
rord for irOrd de s0me-t:'at tiie repor; which The
BiS,op has distinctly and vthemenGly denounced
IA, Inn, tbe