The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1844-07-31

Before Vice Chancellor McCoun.

Before Vice Chancellor McCoun.
Ann to be allowed and that said report
respect to the allowance of the first exception to the
be overruled That the second exception to the
report respect the allowance OF the 9th exception to
the be overruied and that the report IN that par
teular stands confirmed. That the complaina to have
and that each party their cost the reference;
| and also OF the exception to the Masters Report
Charles Tyler Edsoard and Charles Pope Ordered
that Compliments file security for costs OF the Defendant
III the sum Of $3.50
Cyuger vs. Douglas. q als-This case was resumed on
argument when MIR Anthem was heard for complainant
in continuation from Friday He stated that the matter
was family quarrel between Mr. Cruger and his
wife all about imaginary grievances existing between
parties who possessed every earthly means Of hsppi
MIR O'CosoR was heard in reply.-Ths articles, the
plans laid down by the compai lant marry rich wife
would afford ample grounds for him to rest his case upon
There was degree Of deep xit6ce and design in the
manner In which the bill had bee fled against Mrs.
Cruger and while he defed the complainant to lay his
finger upon single spot against the character and rep
uding to the charge OF friendship which alleged,
existed between Mrs Cruger and Mr. Pepper who hap
Re could bring against the lady was that she pou.
and in his thirst Independence he had dragged he
lady into court Of justice, :nd with degree OF per-
his that Of the lays brother an idiot and there
fore unfit to act trusteethat very brotAer whom he
himself had appointed under his own hand He came in.
court osensiby to restore his conuga rights but 1t
not for his conjuga rights he came in for filthy
ucre His bill goes the length to charge his wife with
and the language Of abuse in the whole
he has pursued during tn progress Of the suit
or .1a BUBBLE rS.r ss s
she made advances to him. He woulc be able to show
ths documentary evidence in the that from 1926
he had pursued her. her fortune and by able ingenuity
worked himself into her good graces The evidence
would fully show that previous to the departure for Eu
rope in 1896 engagement had existed between them
is charged in the bill When Mrs Cruger left for
Europe he followed he went to Italy France. Spain
Scotland England and by letter Of his dated Edinburgh
1872 it would appear beyond shadow Of doubt that
there existed no promise of marimony up 10 this time,
for this letter relates courtship then Existing between
the then Miss Douglas-the wealthy Miss Douglas and
Mr.. Smith. Mr. OConor read this letter, WHICH went
at length into the merits Of the be-
tween Mr. Smith and the then Miss Douglas (now Mrs.
Cruger and finally the separation took place when Mr.
Cruger commenced his courtshp. Mr. OT next CON-
menied on the fact of letters being received by the
panan from female to whom he occasionally extended
relief which letters opened by Mrs Cruger, who in
controversy the subject took occasion to ask her
husband if the woman married. Mr. Crugeri reply
and explanations also read the Of hieh he
demonstrates with Mrs for opening the letters Mr.
O'Conor will resume his argument this merning.