Hawk-eye. [volume] (Burlington, Iowa) 1843-1845, 1844-02-29

was well known to most Of them. Hail.,
at present, invested more than t,pen,. ~
sand dollars in she1p, and farms ds,..
and which be meant no devote, to TIN, -
ness. lie felt all proper concern q.
oun interest, and would, Of COURSE III
fully unite in ALL suitable mean, a.
advantage" This likeness Of him,elf !.
true TO nature, as IL it were sketched h, y
most perfect daguerreotyp,. But again !,
voted for the tariff of 1923, bill "a n.'
protective, that it was called the "h;u..
denominations" Yes. THOMAS H. Brx,.'
r. NJ. JOHNSON and MARTIN VAN Bu,,, =
voted for the very tariff, which CAV. S,s
to the multiplying doctrines of South Canal
ma. Mr. CLAY did not approve Of thai M
he was opposed to it in detail, and he broo,,
forward the Compromise Act, in 1870 !
quiet tho very rebellion against the law.
the Union, which Martin Van Buren, l.,
by his vote of 1928, assisted in exci,iu,-
what think ye now, gentlemen locoio,s
Of the Tariff opinions Of your champion.
Is he to be trusted where he feels al N.
per concern for his own interest
Here we will remark that Mr. CLAY i M,
in favor of high protective Tariffs, mn
"st cam Tariffs" nor "high pressure IN
ifs" as tho loco foco presses elegantly a.
press themselves. He goes for revs,u
tariff, with discriminating duties, in i,,r
of American commerce, in opposition
British commerce American manuiactu,,
in opposition to British manufacture, nj
American mechanics and American l,br
ers. in opposition to European mechanic
and European luborers. In this, he stand
lust where the old democratic party noa
whilst MARTIN VAN buren,, and the mod
crn democracy, occupy the very rroundd
the old fcderalists, In their opposition
MIR JEFFERSON, when he "inculcated the On
| couragement OF manufactures. See Jeft
son IetteI III low " fut AHVtuus Leps
OF Philadelphia, Miles, Register.
As to Mr. Clay's denying the RICH. q
Territory, to adopt State Constituted
before the matter has been acted on BY Gu
gress. every man Of information knows that
such was invariably the practice, prior to
the admission Of Michigan into the UniG.
Admit however that he 10 for keeping q
the old established ussgc, and what does
provel Does it prove that he is hOslilsh
the Territor: es, and OPPOSED to theft beeoa
ing members Of the Confederacy Does
show any disposition on his parti I'd with.
hold from them, as States. any privileges
that have been granted to othersi Nota
all. Why then all this clamor I Slmp!
to effect the ends Of demasogtcs and ,rist
sters, who seek by this means, poltia
prefermen,. But In what has Mr. Van b.
rem shown such distinguished favor to b,
Territories Was il as member Of The
New York Legislature in 1870, voting N
structions 10 Rufas King, an ultra federal
list, and the champion Of the Mlssounfs
striction ? Was it, in attempting tou
cluda Missouri from the Union, unless ss
| would, contrary to her wishes and her 10
tercst, abolish slavery, as the piIce OIL DO
admission !? Was it, as Senator OIL w
| United States, in 1922 voting dgdinsts' SIM
| ing out the restriction on slavery 10 I'd
Territory of Florida VIII tho Gass'a
ever Boosting its defence OF Southern
stitutions, and denounciDg the abolilionst
explain the conduct Of its party leader,
these particulars.
Mr. JEFFERsos, said the Missouri question
"like FIRE bell in the night. awaasna
and filed him with terror, and spoke OH
as "thc kncil of the Union" II thu'Y
pears that MARTIN Van buren, and Rufa
KING, concerted together to ring the aM
of the Union, and they would have been Wv
cessful, had not the wisdom and 'assog
Of one man, thwartcd them in Their ma
design. And who, was that man Nv"
other than HENRY CLAY, the author o. !"
Missouri Compromise,-then, ~ now "
pride and boast Of his country.
AS our article is already longer 'han
wished or intended in the outset, we sa''
close it here, with the determinst'on
push investigation further in our next n'''
her