New-York daily tribune., 1844-04-29
COURT CALENDAR. THIS Day.
COMMON PLEAs.-Nos. !, 5, 9, 10, 80, So, g., SO.
CITY INTE l. l. | G E n e L.
SATURDAY.

COURTOF COMMON PLEAS. Before Judges ULsnoErER.
lSGLls and lSGRAliAM.
DEcIsloys.-Louis Leo Wolf vs. Peter II. Cam
mannActon of Trovcr to three Indiana bonds of
SlnO each. which asserted defendant Improperly
ed, &c. plea Of bankruptcy is nterposed To this de-
urged that the Bankrupt Law only referred TO cpims
growing of contracts and those growing of tres
pass. penalty, &c Judge lnels, the Of his opinion
sad " think that the fair construction. of the 9TH
ton of the Bankrupt Act is that applies only to
ira cts" The English courts seem
resouie IN excluding from the discharge OF the Bankrupt
all actions deeto. tor offences.l
Judge nsrahum said nm of the opinion that the plea in
this defective in not setting forth the nature the claim
and ,ewng that such claim nigh, be proved under
the Bankrupt act
Judgment Tor plaintiff on demurrer.
NJ Bride VS.. Harker.-Judgmcn, for plaintiff.
ScoGcld vs. Hart, Sheri,-Judgment for defend
Hastings W. Belknap.-Verdict changed into YER
diet for defendant.
Hough vs. Marley.-JuJsmcnt for plaintiff on de-
murrer.
Green vs. Merritt.-Judsment Tor plaintiff, with
costs
SUPERIOR COURT. Before Judge OAKLEY.
MARIA l.. f. De LA HAVE vs.. ANTOINE EERnES.
The Jury after beng consultation from l2 clock
Friday evening" reurnela sealed verdict favor OF plaintiff
for 8 cents damages and Scents costs.
SUPERIOR COURT; -. Before Chef Justice JoSEs and
DEcIsIoNs.-Thcophilu Peck VS.. II. p. Hastings.
Tue Cour, decided that Attorney acts officer of the
Court, and entitled his Axcd costs whether engaged for
himself or oihers. Appeal dismissed.
LIS Comstock Il Co. vs.. Joseph w TruSt-Thc
Court decided ,ha; where coparneTs ased in bust
ness Joint action could lie. The Court has been usual
custom liberty require special bull for appearance on
charge beng made Notice 10 discharge ba dismissed
The Mayor, &c. vs. Swan Lakc.-The defendant
prosecuted for violating the Corporation ordinance forbid
dg any person 10 cart coal from yard unless accom-.
panied by certificate OF weight from welgher
memorandum IN writing from the purchase that tire latter dis.
pcnscd Win The sworn wegher lie appealed. The Court
stated that the Legislature the Common Council special
to the ordinance and the City Charter also gave
10 the Common Council the right. Judgment affirmed.
The Mayor, &c.vs Timothy Crawley.-This was
also an action 70, violating the Coa ordnance Dctndan, had
;icac from the weigher. but generally signed with
the wcsbcTs initials r. r. Judgment gwen against him
m one the Justices courts from which he appealed The
considers that out OF all for the Corporation
this individual TO, violation OF the ordinance. Judgnen,
| yerscd.
John S. Fraser VS.. The Manhattan Co-Nlotion
to sc aside the report reierechc plaintiff sued
the amount of certaa handed by him. 1887 John W
TAYLOR * Co which they deposited among Others. IN the Man
haitian Bank general security for advances Report
rned provided 81 3 % bc allowed to ME FFaeI. otherwise
set aside.
Geo Nichols vs. WIN. c. Dusenbery.- was
nn action of Rcplevn-he Courr said that landlord III HI,
eas i only bound say that rent due without exprs
nr any names-t nigh, have been due by tho previous occu
pan If the landlord has fulfilled his contract should be
the subject OF cross action. judgment, for defendant on de-
murrer
Lorn Ingcrscll vs.. Monmouth B. Hart Sheriff
Repieyn to the right o levy mocage furniture at
the boarding OF Mrs Mann uner execution at the suit OF
Sllnue Parker against Lawson = Iioyt The Sheriff took o
goods the ground that iloyi was the husband
of Mrs Mann. loyt protesting 10 BE- the huSband OF MIS-
Manu. confessed judgment Parker. On the ta the Cour,
Sd tina, there evidence Ia shew coveiIc or mar
rage between lioyt and Ar Manu. except what was dnw
from himself which sufficient The jury ionnd
diet for plaintiff The question Of coveure. sad the Court.
with Hoy, alone There proof Of coab;aon be
tween him and Mrs Mann of their hye and
evidence make appear that She his wife Judgment
against him. therefore affect her property. New trial
denied.
Daniel Ferguson VS.. Charles i. Pcarson.-Judg-
| men, fo' p!nntii
James Billings and - Evans vs. Alex. Camp
bel-Acion limit bond given Tor Barnabas Mue,t
for S5lS which he arrested The defend claim
that Mr. NJ discharged by the Sheriff
order from Judge Ushoeie Judgmen, for defendant
demurrer
Davis Il Brooks vs. Samuel Coddngton.-Judg dg-
| men for plaintiffs.