Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1841-1853, 1844-08-29

VT. TTTTtTTfT, UTTTTTT TTfTTTTTI Ut OF I'D. TIT YOU TNIW
b;eugh, youiselses to lho COZ oiusion hat, even aimti'n. .
,cssit &c sau>e Of The Veto "a er. II wa< ,rt per 10 ease from
the Constitution that great taiicr an oh,oA T. urcuusi u
iioiai AM hi-hly mex odicut l,gslsii d, the.chy nakn- thc
VIII 81 ton-Itss supreme ad In-tsiilug the ma uIil Of tn I
to'y ia The full POSSESSION f al the taNc.stf G1v,mmrnt;
o. eli Sou. OF 60 YOU Tow Eth elm 10 The etinisn ia " aich
ohcoA ard aaiaEc,s l., the wot>t fIur of q -ssoh, aud Thar
too mary guase.. IN oidor :, secure M. lie lbe,tv cauuot be
thrown o'cI il dlii,ent d. Ia.tMeuts
Il indeed, You are aiv.caies Of a change 50 II al A. That
pto, oscd. then my not only the Cams u, aul Tap ans {
our own county IJ Ice. bur a shout should a-ocid fion The
Atotilm [ ntoniio" 81 the whole w"tit a tn fact hat
oui Federal :, stem had gwen way bf re The power # a
carsohd tel goYc.naent, whose vii, u:csel fam ~ : C.
iioiai M fitie>, wa absolute, admitting VI ~ check "a re-
sI>laICc ig0m a y quarter WlaieN'T. II. indeed. tHt>c te
your opitios>. ihcn have | nDst glicvou.ly disappointed the
hsle> in which YOU II dulsei in couuecI n n tn ~ cleo ION
and my AdmirrIau,n. 1 mu Z. NJ vcft hclc<. mo>f SUiemn-
~ ave- hit had ! teen aHa.e hat sueh would have been
exec ted and r.cni,. cd Of m,-if | could have believe, nat
you. whose c,rciiate / wa peculiarly considered, and 10 con
ciliate whom was nominated foI Tie Presidency, would
have rcGulr'd of ne IN tie on fusetcy, which unhapfiy
occuIIcd, that | should comutnce nay aimmI,tTIiion wth an
act Ct geiJuiy, and SANCTIONED me sues abho rent to every
principle f my past life AID At var with the prosperity OF
the coui ty and the continuance OF III eriy, | would rot have
suleiel lay name, humble As II was, 10 nave been biea'Aei
in III c'nvass. M, ci.in the p.oui privilege # an Amer
Icn ciiIz,n 10 hhk IN ny sell Oh all sui els. and 10 scl ~
puisu nee of my own convict ns-ani wou a rcaune a
TO al chsrgr Of NV ra'uEe in oder To- ooave.t me IN O a mere
instrument of par y, or II patty dictatI
would appeal MT only TO yourselves but q all my
count, ,nen TO say what CT. I'm The matters aIpcrtairi' = t,
cur ioi,ign atfaiS. ttcy artcipais d more success ia The
adju>i II, nj Of d'nicuiiie- aud ia the formation Of hi h
in ro,tiit Tcaies than il has been my = voirco I, cause
Ia te reg tianod. Long >tanain. d.ni,ultics have teen
adju>f ed-diihrutc> ~hich threatened most seriously the
peace Of he country. MOI has any opportunity teen !o>t
ior enlaig n the e. mm,loe f The cDuniry, and sivi 2 new
ma kes IL our agiicultu al and ~uanuf.ciu ed n ducts. Ii
the county has not 'eaped full hufion # tearhi ON all
the tcatie~ ihH> negotiated, it SURE y has not been the fault
OF he Administration. The loss Of two Of tn - tie tie,
through the action Of TIE senate. oarno, but be 'epior,d by
ne a : great c.iani'rs. By the treaty with the &c m IN
States. we hid o. ered the way TO a mo G cxtcai DAD c mmerce
with -, 100000 OF people il our cotton. { bacco, lice and
laId. at duties on u acco, ice and lad gcafiy reduced. and
with a tip ala ti'n for The free aini>-i u OF cotton VIII lc
we hal asIeed 20 receive At somewhat reduced duties arlrlc,
fom those States Which entered into the mot limited
ccmp' t'ti"n, if at all, with a few similar articles Of Am,IicAn
picfuct.
The tcaty " as partrulaIly into eSting from the fut that
fr The fr-t time, after repeated struggles Is the pant If my
predecessors 10 accomplish a reiucison of duty on tobacco
the Cove nmert had >ucc' ctcd in doi,g -. 1t was cso'i ted
tfer ro>ontio $ oIi.'nt ting with Tie tobacco states, and
" 18th The presumed sanction Of Congress. Who hal raised. as
it l. believed. the mi>si "a 10 Nitnra fion a sec, I'd T. a fl :
mission, with crect reference T. The tu3iccp Inicr 81, and
had also a prrpii ted a sum If m d ey. some years p-o. e.
enable She Executive 10 employ an agent IN Gem. ny T.
acquire informant II as tc the tob.,cp taie. he selvicc> Of
which agent had only ceased a >h IT Tine prior 10 the neg
rialion of The Treaty. My hope still. however, is that the
bel tft If Tie ticaiy and The te4iy it>elf. may mi be los
I, the county | ihink IT pr per Ia add that there was n
design 10 4, viivc The House Of Rel re>er tsii,e> Of an,
rght(ul and cor>tiutional acton over he >ulj c., Which Il
might properly ox'roi-e. TWAS m, intention to have sub.
miiiei the treaty. aud al the papers caicnlit"d t. slncii ,c
il, to The Ilou c of Rope entatives. If il had been Iaife,
10y the Senate, for such ac'i II as they might have tccrci II
proper 10 adOpt-a cuni>c pursued in all cases in which IL,
action of the House is ,cqui cd 10 vote supple, # money
OF fulfil any other o'Ject falling With" The sc'pe f thou
JCwci.
which was rejected by The Scna'e, motives have beer
ascIii,d To the AdniniSir ton which has no place il II,
mud OF heait. One g,ntl, m n, occui yitg = prominent plao.
IN ia" Dem cratic patty, whether ior -ooi {" evil 1t does mo-
r become ne 10 say, has a>>ig I'd IN an adlIc>s, recent,
delivered IN Mis- onii, TWO prominent motives frn,g,iiati u
1f. Pcisunal amt III n. and 2iy. a pm pose To dI~sol,c Tho
Union. Nj. Clay. also, IN q recent letter. wrltte en- 10 IT.
editor Of a newspaper IN Ala! ANA. has called the ircsi,
iefrmou,. and asciilcd to il, in its oiisr, sinister ojeris
| Ierpll both fh IA assaults m pp III a. a md II no pnf tf.r :
What object of TcIe personal ambition IN any way corncctc'
with office could have irnncncei the Adniui>trati n il
nesofiaiing The ticay' The public archives fnrni>h,d th
strongest reasons To telieve that he caiy would have me
the unqualified approval Of both Mr. Clay AMI M. Van iuicn
=. While the ore was Secretary Of SIT 10 Nj. Adams. am
the ether 10 Geue'al Jackson each m hs inin attempted T.
obfsin the am oxation of TcXs. MIR Gays neg ,ti,iio
was oaiied on wnh Mex co in the ihtid wear Of her icvulu
'i"rar, struggle while Spain r'gaId.d her - a revolie
province. and her armies were in secession of many c th
sr. ny holds Of the ooui try. What reason, then. could
have had TO- >uf posing for an instant that a Treaty. will
Texas, af e. eight wears Of actual Independence, VITA ~
Ne Xtan soldier within her tci.foiv. and subject only 4
o,ca>ional ioricr irrciiul tons. couii or would have re
with crTo>iii n f. m hm al his fioni> -ud meeting VIII
no such opp sii n On the "a t - hct Of Mir. Van Bu,cn 81
Nj CLAW. a 4 heir ici d.. i, would puzzle a sounlcr ca>ui>
than rrofe>> To ic 10 60 ccive N what possible way /
could have menu ted the loiatlnns Of those is gentlemen
who toad al Tie II" u'E' 1t he head f Their %ic>pcr,it,
pniIe>. al wee looked NJ n ~ all rs rom, eiiiof> 20 ~,
Pc ratucv. 1t well III. VII ih -. When the . e., iiatipu +,
the acquisition of T,xas Wa con fari ed. ard up q a pcsioi
sror,c ig N sisHi OF he rcity. l. wa nv c)nli at
c.t,n lion. ,xa,c.>,d :, ~ ANY. fh.t II would. f. m the cr
cum~i noes have stared. receive the >up. or hofh Of Nj
Cay aud NJ. Van Buren,, - that neither woaid be ai,ctc,
~ lis rcsniaii u.
lit LAD htcn thar-ri bat tho n.ni-fr,ta n was prompt
81 ~ he ariit on f seeming tie slcfc,t 10 u e. H.
county,. and Tie Whole G ual.y IN the cin-i.un - a Ter
l iitofy - important III ii.rf atd - in~rpfnllv csIr'c &.
WITH the int ,>fs OF tveIv sac ia lie Inion, aui cVcfy ia
tcre,t Of TIE Uni n. ! would ave plead suitv. without
Ia meet &c is-t4ii q | cot fc> | i.lt amhiiaus - al
an ilcf trshf star 20 the Nmriic II 90 >fcii,filn. II Wuu'
have tccn a sou &C e irilc 10 me. # hat measure haltrc'
!, carIird. I, have witfc >>ci fon the ictp,mcri Tat swail
me. he y, nna1 cxtar.ion Of cur ,oa> twi>c and folci.n tad
and he iuciea>ct yosi city Of ~ az icu'turc and m'uuf.c
tnrcs, III. oush lhc rapl n " h ri IcXi~. which y tuld hiv
followed The rltifca non { the Treaty. Yes frey con
f.>~ IN Z this would have furnished me arr unfi'if = : u q
e -,a'lic, ii II 10 the cud # my lie. .houll h ve >ue
al.o tie Union Of The states iccn ming str niger AMI y onsc
N. oush their sec procai II rii u-foril iesl u les ~HPp.e~-
+, ID. AID fanaiical ,chcmc. a Z -cherc:> alike pio>'laic.
should h .vc witt c>scl tkc b's>.ei ie>l' : of uuf Feiciaiv
system a. i embraced the finest CONT ' ia the World. an
brought under its u1 re- c. 4 People d v3ici ike onisolse
20 the mlintcuarce an pr'-ciyaioa # free COVE nn'ni.
This was the kini of aWhi' ION whirh fIonstcl TIE neto
cia'i u of T." treaty Its ''ilio'i n was The sole h'n'
, winch ! coveted. and all that | row desire What siafsfc
: mOircS could have oii.inaf ci the uc- c alton at this time
IN { did not ext in 1871 Whit " : ihere noW TO lav
, rrdcrcd a Feat, iafsm9uS which 81 mt exist them
it be >al hat we hal 4 ric,iy of Limits vii u, Xco.
ak if. IN 1927. We had not ais, = Treaty OF Iunis WI
spain We had oc'rni~'d tine indie 'ialcncc OF MeAico. az
p ihciol re. virtually Caimel Ia We h,la perfect IiIAi :
treat WI h her tn the annex in of Te~eS. AMI IL fact,
we had So p'ca.ci. fi Ncxico ,niiic. Ei'ht years ~, "
F.. reto-ni al Texas =, i'~depetd'n MT ant surely our Ii.ht T. ne
4 goci,'c with her. Implied 10 woise fai "a than in 1877 to ne
= ciafc " ilh Mexico IN hcr.
+ The idea hat because of tie ox-fcncc O. a TREATY ,
Liri's viii any nation We NUT f. ever thereafter De Y t
!, al parts OF tho territory e >uth natl n tie li-ht + ctoll
! ION OF Oh NE. IA o Is excite, with an Amc ican c,z Z
!, a smile. Was IL deemed ueco>>tIy. in 1897. 10 consult 4
- Is. 10 consult the Senate or t. consult he ilen.c q
!. Representatives,. or the Pc pie VA il c,uSiicIct nccc-si
. ~ t. obtain he a>>cn; Of ercry State. n would Gem row
be N posed tefoie foimifga Tr:ty e AnreXaiou'
!, he assent &C every State i, uccossaiv, then we my ~
! a'ien to he p osicct Of annexation roD OF h~e'eafei- Ih
-. mi - H. D. ~ lsL NO ON 80 ~ fl