Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1844-08-05
vel. AxsFF.-.sO. 2.

dfiml' lis sugsestlpns hah mol 'na'a aecep'ancf.
ava mere ne uhsl ia.e ''eas'en ~ cafftc' ,"ss"
nfhs'n l''e "heh 'he f''s''i '"'' WV.
TON had 'alle, lie had tNpless, he mp'essin 'nss
INA Fkecnhvr ippar'Wee,"' me 'sethneh, haa ue.e
anxious In The s' 'nsnne, iar delay as respected the
aenoh o. Tue senate q" Tue Heay -Naa supp we" '"n
- ,,'e '".' = n,,s
w. Inv was h'seh's me ''sefntte 'aa m, ~"
contrary ohh"n as 10 lne ofusloh '' I'VE ASST Vi
,o~-nap ues'to 'e 'nned'"e pruo' " " ,"t -
.9a5 as t'y enP 7'a t'at IN aeaa'e ao'PSau'n """a
" Wv Wv W '',,'s''e 'en''i y WIS t ".
~ d ~" W c',s 'F'H"''' ~" ~ 49, =" 49,
10 i'''ef u inc ehna'h'e u fresfn' anheSh''n W."
Wv ''"'''" W '''s' VIM "e'''p'" NV '','uu'.,e"
" ''A"p'a " =, '@lS,paAF enufsels W ooa'n ''as
op,'"t'e"'' '"" ''e aelea. vi u"Se rhaF'se's
wy ~ consequence ~ hls cah'gFW 'P"i'' .s'' We
F, 10 sse oes1s.n 70 com Aan'''nps WIN 'eA,o':
a9 ',f us@t''a. h,"'s ''n vs. a'e nes''se' "e.s
zee" es""nru ~ 'i,Ne,' =" WIS., Nv, ''s'''' - n'"o's
p ''eH Sl!'' 'e W. ~ M" N''iuea i' '"''iu r'"
roft,hee 10 me despatch OF ihls msen5ef, no' "ee'y
70, I've ''Scnage " Inc ''HPpSao'o ueo, W oeo ,"ns
WIZ" ofnenueo 'ne rnnahnnieaoon W "es'c' y. 'ae
aH our :" venmeni had taken IN Inc SIGNATURE I'll 'nr
treaty. nn, 'pt 'ha purpose aso "' Summing '''c ss"sl
eh's III 'e "eA'ca" "iVrfnneh' Oh ne sn,Jfc' W Nv
neN'on' " fe'fg oPe" me ur ',fNl''"a''"n' :" ~"
'ua'nn' "l annrNamt lie (Mt, a } naa no. mace INN
pf4h'se "heh me 0enaof 'fon s'so".' na, supH~s..
w" W1'," on e'fea'y slo"'' w MP. o'e. ny WY.
uNS nc "h' ~" Nv we p'ae'''' :" P''nns''g '"'.
wan We "ie" ne 'onlh inaHe e"". '.s p''",su ""
'''' ''' us ''''N''7 S'n''' wv ''"P"'ru " ''1
hao 70 postpone ia noh io INC ief"a ~ we ptpnao"
'"n ~ ''t m'ssph4f w 'n's pN'r, 'S.'',ea ~ s"'us
ty "Fe JAYS ne III" a''H !" gnu ''' ~ "'so"a'R
~ 'N W"nise-hau 'a'lNfu W "n'i'o ,ne oe'ay rr's
Gu h"i "en success Tue Nthaie haVha "Sei"'eu "'s
"u's'sll"oe 'ne suaef'' .
bu' 'FSe were matters Pfrhm'natN Only M ~. wens
IN 10 shy winch had kept MN too lung from lhe tupcs
(gav' as They wefr) appropriate To I dlscussun. Ina
value o Texas, The dsaleness ol lls acquisition, h"
had already had occasn Ia observe dd n' present ~"
pfhepa nor hleed any iorlf al all app"prnie !" Inn
discussion The value o Texas as territorial rssses.
sion was nnqnostonay very pffnt Tue desab'euess of
us acquisition, 10 many ws-Pli'lral. commercial.
social might he as great ~ had been epres. sed Het
ha Nnlto and d sliaerss ae 10 more !" do with the
appfomat' ISSUES IN ms dseisspn than INC value 1T
ieR'nn or ihe deslrahleness :" the acquisition ~ uba
MIRO nght exist circumstances l'h'y were 81 perpetu-
NJ occurrence ~ rn1le rs IN tVae auHfs) whsch re-
qnlfed The value Of oircls presented To our arcepaucd
~ he dlsegafdcd, ana afqaa IN our reach 10 DC re-
unnnced lhat ihs pr'sNt ca"n ~ texas was nns
winch bell under the apffin al thesn principles ~ pub
lie and social nufaty. he was pafsna1ed would be ouni
nh an unbiased examination.
The debate had presented several 'inesims. The lea
dlag ono rca'ed not 10 the eSpdeney but validity II thu
transfer OF Texas male by The treaty -was question,
~. " advantages bu aolhnf'iy' Hasthe u'vefnmen8s
81 texas enp 'werrd tn makef -inrs 10 resevei Could
the Territory be tho Law li sjec Of this orm OF trans
irrR The affirmative Of thtse prp s'us had been sta
ted AID sustained with technical nIeespl' Dir rsrog-
ntin Vt Texas and that of ntie Powers Invested Tex
as II was sail, with the character Il sovereignty Gnu
pele, This character Of soveieanly involved the full
eat authority Of disposal Of The erriory. and our cnsti.
tuition permitted full aulhnry and discretion in rec~v-
o u. 1heae were the Propositions nanlaned IN afir-
mancc of the validity of the treaty Nav. what he Mt
A. undertook t.nninain that neither Of these prs
positions was well hhdal. and that II each Ut them had
been True, The inference " ilvof n the treaty would nut
be warranted The reeogpllnn "' me ,ndependencc of
Texas by onrnwn aud other towers h'd n the elect;
IN The view ol public law, o' determining ,he rght of
supremacy and sovereignty over lesis, N issue between
tue Two Governments oI Mexico and lexas, This re-