Staunton spectator, and general advertiser. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 183?-1849, 1844-01-18

gladly approve II, "a Professionalism, the Bin did
pass as moa,fed cy ar. IyhrS and that instead of
signing ana approving il as he had promised--he
objected to and vetoed it," pretend not to yer.
bal precision, but the above is IN substance charr.
ed against Mr.Tyler in thousand and one news
paper ph'lipics; and ten thousand and two stump
and street speeohes,--upon the authority Of Mr.
Stuart. The point in which Mr.. Stuart is con-
ceTned is, did he in substance make this CHARGE Z
And that in which MIR. Tyler is concerned is, no
matter by whom made, is it true Ii MIR. Stuart
did not make the above charge against the Prcsi-
ueht' ne has been grossly misIepresented by hun
dreds oil his political friends-and il he did, it
deyoives on him to establish it.
In my letter Of the Both Of September, / in
formed MIR. Tyler of che char9e--that the Whiy
party IN this quarter regard him as Democrat
'hat 'hey charge him with having eaten of the re-
padiatcd fruit OF Locofocoism, and fallen from
the grace o: Whggcry--ihat his sins in this be-
hall are imputed to the whole race Of Democracy
and that Mr.. Stuart had spoken of his conduc,
In reference to his modification and promise and
subsequent veto of the Fiscal Bank charter,
greatly to his disadvantage-rcquesied him to ex-
pam the matter TO Inc, that might use it, &c.
10 which MIR. Tyler replied as follows:
WAsnISoroS, October 3rd, iSa3.
aay thanks to you. my dear sir, for your letter of
the SUN September, by Col Johnson and for aiordin.
me an opportunity of explaining sou the circun,'
stances, which you inform me, Mr. A. IL. III. Stuart has
used to my disadvantage Mr. Stuart has done less
IMAM many others did, about the period of the extra
SION They approached me under the garb of friendship
anu then attempted to pcrvcrt every word and syllable
uttered by me- tony dis,v antagc That he has over
looked the principle involved the paper hich he has
IN ms Posscssion perfectly certain whether intcn
siton TO the Bank of the United States ai,cr
inc manner or upon the principles any pre-
National Bank, was thoroughly understood. The public
man VINO undertakes to otherwise, voluntarily sul-
shimsci Considering the long period during which
represented the State Virginia in the public com,
CHS requires the utmost stretch of charity to be
any man OF standing iii the State who prctcnd that h,
@' a0' know what my opinion was .
Whatever OF ignorance others may pretend u,o, -,
subject OF nay anti Bank opinions, MIR. Clay who bo,
from the rs directed tho assault upon me- has no suc
apology.
To him fully and freely made known NV opinions
II indeed the man who heard my speech against tn,
Bank in 1872 who had after and no distant period
eard @hose sentiments reiterated divers occasions
inc Scnatc-who was thoroughly cognzant of nv vote
IN the Senate against The renewal of the charter and a
forwards III favor oil Gcn'l Jacksons veto-coud pre-
end 10 be ignorant upon the subject To him. repeat
uily disclosed my opinions, shortly after the openn.
o, inc extra session His intention press forward
Bank OF the old stamp, had been made kaowa TO me
ana appealed to him in the strongest terms could en-
Poy TO abandon the idea Asked him il he could drsir,
me TO commit an act Of perjury by sanctioning Bill
wnch verify believed would violate the Constitution
winch men had taken solemn oath to support
lhc sequel proves with what success the appeal wa
made. The Bank bill to me and was vetoed =
Now Tor Mr. Stuart for it after that was done tina
he asked private audience He presented 10 me nro
position offered, in the Senate by Mr. Bayard of Della
ware oy way oil amendment TO Mr.. Cay's Bill. IL pro
posed TO authorizes the Board of Directors which was
DC located IN this District TO establish agencies in III
aU1ent States, TO deal in Exchanges. Mr.. Bayard and
myself had often convcrsed about his proposition III,
"u eNerted himself TO that nc
constitutional objection but he had done in vain
mad always insisted upon the incorporation of the prin
Ran settled by the Supreme Court, in the oil the
i'ank OF Augusta vs. Earle and several other cases
VIZ that the agency should cease, he csta
biishcd, If prohibited By tie State within whose Limits
u was proposed to establish it. The Bank of Augusta
had established agency, us had also the u S. Bank
oil pennsylvana, at Mobile and the Court decided that
ON the principle of comfy the Bank of anv State Eng.
land Tor example, might establish agency in any State
oil The w or of the world, deal IN cxchanyes,n-
less prohibited 6y such STATE or coufry So the RANK Of
me metropolis might now do this and had no objection
10 saying so IN regard to Bank to be created fo,
NE District Of Columbia. Mark you! l say for Mc
D,snact and 6y Congress as The local Legislature,
MIR. Stuart asked me if l would approve that amend,
mcni' and not how it could be altered my APP
CATION on the margin Of the proposition, which in
p mo with my rSae and did to him. tina, should
greed to; and said nothing then, that do not now re.
eratc lie returned TO with the declaration that il
toed was without my proposed modification, and used
INC veto against it, as would continue do to the ay
OF my death,
common fairness, in my poor Judgment should have
induced Mr. Stuart have exhibited to the public INV
GO mn under my own hand instead of reporting
as ne mas DONE why not exhibit the paper itself? And
II the paper said TO be in the possession of Mr. Stuart
does not conform with the statement now make Won
will agree to be branded with the offence of 6ay inc
Prac'seu d"pcity He cannot say that il would be q
preach OF confidence TO do he has spoken of
learn most freely.
deny that ever did to any person. at any time, in
writing or verbally admit recognise the right of this
government 10 create Bank for the Union with power
TO establish branches agencies in the States without
heir fuii assent, either express or implied. = = =
4
DC assured, dear sir, of my constant regard,
Col. d. w. FArT.soN."
This communication is too long already to add
to 1t by publishing the copy OF the paper which
Mr.. ). has, it that were properly Mr.. Tyer's, or
my duty, which | do not conceive il to be. |
VIII only add for the present, that any paper
which may have copied Mr.. Stuart's card, &C.
VIII also publish this reply, if they please, and
oblige, respectfully yr. obi. svt.
ID. w. PATERSON.
January 9Th, 1871.