Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1841-1853, 1844-12-12

be 0ler ted on the Fuopean continent why should it be
an tbs war Il fe.ola sach i now ieaie"ed by
MfNica. cannot Be way without affecting peace and
utrIIy. Il = Tile l. believe that such eoui he
j. ID uon h Indifference - CT ns, iunabit-
M doulfs >i.te; AMI cur Neutrality would BE violated
- dc' te "a al ort' Oh The part e the gose!mtt T. pc
teai T. IAe Is stci 20 ei grant, fom the j.
Tel aos. under iavi'aln hed ont T. h' ~ Spain auI
"4eAf' Use emi-fa1s have itii tcihHl ihe'n iett,
asa fea VITO sVoul Mt fi - ympaA'e wIih them
IA ueii diltne. all VIII w0aii D. ci ~ those stmra-
iHr, participate 20 ihelg stBs- however 1nci gtc tie
90 isna5ie banas e Indians. the waiikc
found "a any In which occupy tic excessive regions
con T. The state Of AIkan~as and Missouri aad Who
secession II tracts OF county within the limits
Il feX BE- likely 10 Ienaia ta-,ive The incnauous q
those numerous ifbes lead hen nvai-by y war wheaey
pretexi, exist,
Mexico bal no jus, ground Il dseasurc against this Gov
emmett o. PEOPLE Iof nes iiang the treaty What ntees,
Of hers 3ii,c;cd BY the treaty She eespoilci
nothing suec Texas forever lost 10 ber ade,cn-
denee Of Texas was rcogn zcd By several Of TIE leading
powers e cath fee TO t.cat-f,ee t. adopt
her wn line of poiicyfce 10 take the which
believed wa best calculated .ccue her happiness
'"Vetnn'ni aud ole decided annexation 10 the United
states; AMI he Executive saw, tie acquisition of such
le"t,ry '9s mems Of adsanci'g he permanent hap.-
mes ana cry. Whit principle OF good faith then VIZ
'aed WIT rue q lolii-a morals ttampcd under ot
30 " a. AeN co herself was c9nce!ntd e measure shouii
nave tcea aIlcd hy her highly beneficial Hex inab
~ 10 Tcc'rqaer Texas had been oxibiei Icieai, by
e-t-aow Iiacyea> of flriess AMI Iuuous contest. In
vurces Eris.a'i1n has wed mo her ieoiy i!om all
as, OF the world hich continues increase
young Republic herself TcX's at 10 distant day
If she continues separate AMI detlchei hom The United
Saes, viii iles a. seek u consolidate her s.on-h ly
al M L her domain the contiguous lr''.e' 81 Mexico
The Split II revolt iiom the ceno Of the Central G9vcin
nent ha, here oloe, manifested itself IN some OF those
q0tiuces and Is i % fer tht they would tc inclined
II take he t avorac oppor,gniy proclaim ;helf nie-
pendence aud 10 f ia close alliances with Texas. The
would thus he eftess if cestions i hos'iies should
they would only endure icr The interests
o! Mexico, th'tioc, could IN nothing lie better consulted
iln N ea'e with her neish5erS, which would result IN
TIE establishment 81 lefmrn. ~ boundary pm the Ia
hcaten ct he treaty, the Executive was prepared - treat
with her on the mo-, liberal basis Hence the bouales Of
Texas eft uutetnci ~ the treaty. The Executive
foiS 70 sc'le these ~ on terms int al the WOl Should
have Pronounced just AID reasonable. N tatn upon
hat iai could have seen uaietkea betNecn the United
states and NJ xco. aucc Of The ic ton Ct the
II have conducted such alton and to have
dritaktn A, would have been assumption equally revolving
- the qde OF Mexico and Texas, and sutecn. us 10 HE
charge OF arrogance: wlc proposed advance of
satisfy II, any contingent interest she
might have IN Tex would have been 10 have teaicl Texas
nj a an nde, etdent po"e nj as mere dependency OF
Mexico ItIs ton could not haze been acted on by
lie Executive, wihoui setting at defiance solemn
decla'ion That that Republic was an independent Stale
Mexico had Il tue, Threatened astsnt sac United
Sia'es IN the ef.nt tie Treaty Of Annexation ratified
The Executive ul pc.m it.elf 10 tie Influenced BY
thS threat. represented in tins, the Split OF Pee
PIE who ready 10 sacrifice much fer pesoe, tut nothing
to t,t,uil.tion war I'm Ter any is geaily
t. lie deploed and tic United states last nation
c~iTe Il; hut A. the condition OF peace 1t te required o.
"a 10 REQ the unqGe,onabe sht of e4ns with an in
interesting to both ad tat npoa baked and un>usia'f e.
otcn~Ion OF cam - hind power control The &C. will
81 the power with whom tca-lcyO'el a. my De
to eacr aud ANXIOUS 10 cultivate ieudy ions with he
whole wot, the Executive does hesitate at, the
People OF ihr United State, would be ready brave al
>tqtcfCcs than submit such cOalf But
picaeis9n of ontctsinel by lie Executive; ard
mus ky opinion had the treaty
s,i,d ty the Seralr 1t would have Teen followed by
NIT settlement u the enc ,ti>fc ION OF NJ Xico, Of
,vey maitcI Difference between couutlic Sec
ns ten That new cia aiians Tor the hostile invasion Of
Texas were alb ut 10 Toe adopted y Mexico AMI that these
welr brought about because Texas had adopted he nSes-
in> 4 The Executive upon the subject ii Annex on
could n pas.yey have folded its aud permitted
wa Threatened 10 oc accompanied by every act ihit cou
max OareasoIs age II be waed against her, because she
had dlnc
Clhcr sieia;ans II controlling character Influenced
the cause of The Executive. The uoay which had thus
been negotiated lad filed receive the ratification the
the chef oil Guns which " - urged a,in,t
II, founi TO fot, that The question Of
anne iion nd been submitted t. the ordeal o pulc opin
loa IN the United states However untena5c such OBJ
Je ton esteemed to be- ia II the souahle
power 81 The Executive 4 negotiate the treaty, ani he
gfea' ana hs'iis Interests involved IN The question: e 1t
10 Be duty 10 The whole subject Congoss
ne best eN9ounle's OF POPULAR sentiment ~ definite
acton havns been taken the subject hy Congress
question fcic red elf Directly TO The dccsia Of the states
'n "e f'oie i"e get popular election which his Just
ierniate ado dd the bet iuuy a,cctlirng The
viii Of The States and lie People upon il. Pes s.t
issue, a tccm the Imperative dats ol Tie Executive
nj Mexico taat III question OF annex s,ll be 1ic
the Aleicln People, ant until d,ci.I.n pro-
ueunccd any sen Us Invasion Il rcxl won be lc,aed
10 Sei uian with DaI, renee. most ps iui
yon That NJ such invasion has taken places and tu hat
Whatever yoGs a ton may b. upon II, Mexico Will see the
.npo.aaee Of deciding the matter 'y icst - peaceful
eXpedcas, IN pe.c to those Of arns The decision OF
tie eoi.c and Tie axes, iii. AMI Interesting sub
Ject has been decsively manifested Tao question q AZ
ncNa has been pCcucd a. kedy . ihe. cons Ir4ien.
~ The toay i,,ef, all collateral AMI incidental issues
which Wtic calculated Il di,tact and dNilc the pubic
Councils weic calenlly avoll. Ihese were loii 70 the
vision OF tie future 10 det II presented repeat,
tic isolated cuc>t, n of spa,xin an n nat ln II has
been su5mitte! t. tie ODD, Al OF pubic sentiment y con-
N'li~ IN ltiItN II ne s- -, aha large MAJ mtg OF the
s.acs have Geea oi IN favor Of iamclnc anucNai 3D.
instruct have come up t. both ba. ccs
phatic. tie viii # both the Pc pie to states That
icNaS should D. annexed = ihc tn.n pmiy ard inine-
t'"t,f. II nay te pei thtt IN cafAng into cXccGNpa
ne iusic w thus declared, all ooicIai issue, may be
aVood Future Legislatures can let dcc.c 10 ac NUM-
Der OF states which sh1ul be formed the Territory.
s.h the time has assed FOR deciding that question.
with all others BY III treaty, the Cnci states a,.url .
tie pay meut OF the debts f fcx an amount
ccctis slo0ONV0 10 he pad, with tie exception o.. a
sun falling hot o: sia00oo. cxclu.iyeS ont a the pro-
cecGS ct The sales Of The pgblc llnG.. We coll not with
uof take the lands without assuming the fun payment
. B all Iacum5rinccS
Nothing has occurred sIuce last session induce DOUBT
tha the dSfsi rs Fl Texas remain unatoted NJ init
nation Il an acied determinations The pat Il her Cow
eronent aud People, has been furnished The Executive.
She slil dc.ueS 10 throw herself under the protection ii
Laws AMI Y1Gtac blessings f,acraii,c
n "hile eVciy American nfcIc,t would seem % tclpc
It, The extension Of our and foreign uaic. 10 an
amount almost inoacua5le-;hc enarsem 1T e the mlkot
9r oui miuulactee,a constantly growing market r our
a-tlcultua pT1duc0u>-aiety 90 ous iOucIS, ani ai-
ton1l strength and stability the DnioH.-ihcsc the
results which would Iaply dcvcope ihcmcives, upon the
SUNNI lion Of The measure of annexation IT. such event
viii not ut hut thst Mexico would hn hc tue aieies
b meet TIC advances OF tai, Government ~ 4it oi apte.
M ID appIc end any scliou. comp nl On any otc
qnascr sufficient sound exists fr such iat. We
N 'nl interfere in respect with the Iishis OF Other
IA 4 a. nm act f les