New-York daily tribune., 1844-06-07

Bishop IEpDtSG said he had a lew feln.,ks {

E GEO. PEc5, Chairman.
b Bishop 1EpDING said he had tew remarks To-
ae res gec;ne relation TIE Church Some bad
.;ajed yeerday il; would possible for CoI
fei-e Epscosacy d-tc ae ntnlef oi Bishops
boe now the office would te ectlre Le four
,e.r,. He would 81 old. h,i been
LsNeyy Confidence l.Jl. i.suIc appointment
nu he ha, iore.l >ucce.syry IA N.w- YrA Vermont
New lr ma hfe and uGada Hs e!ecunis Il j, y ucru
kfe ls-i lie ad Gwi~ etJpyed s1cG hcsn previous 10
els3 al which lime 10 consequence severe labor. va,
po.trd by severe Hines, winch cnl,ebis or
fe ad never teen entirely Wei nee mat ueiod On Us
account - ome OF m, bc,hen Nie ne accepted the Office
so Bishop with great reuctance uaa or M same reason IL '
awa burden in. Ia is The Genefs tvnl.fe
request et him free /" perform no more w0fh in ~
teaih yOuin mt and the renewed by tie
Elections he had taken ;l u The work Superm
Eeiden On account ui the teebc Of IN, health had
oihe present ohe Church he did feel at liberty 10
aAc such step lie f- 70 be ni' duty howeveT - state
e should not. al probability. be able l. do III. work He
t H. ns:h visioy decreasing. and ne Ss aesd' par
hs GemGy was tsiIing ana SOW fr s judgment VA, m
sei other. could lei bette Ell ayn aly ,i,
aenent would leayethe matter ~ the hands u the Con
y sincerely that he felt deeper and stronger devotion 10 e
qElse OF Chrst than when ne i3 teheved lis only
ce TO lye and die IN Ch ard tn; oie ''is tom day
n The Conference on motion OF Nr. REED, took
knp the Report OF the Commits Sunday schools, lat the
Efle on on tie suhec; not OF general interest
Ia Mr. EARLY stated 10 the Conference that the
outhern D.ega;a had prepared their Protest esus; the ec
tsjanysd that D, Bascom hla:-y reed wicn
81 Dr. BAscoM then came forward and read tue Pro-
k.s |, was an able document pcentnc the Arguments
s,an'i the aeio OF the loneenfe IN iaelI ,iTohse s'
Sc .ia publish tn, I'1o.cs, al an early ,iay.
The lc,es; lei several mo- op-. on which !heTe vs. oie
4;e, bur the Char deciding that would oi eht 20 upon
fsa1 Hurn1e Committee to prepare statement q: the fac,
cs-e Of shop Andrew. giving them ieaNe 10 eNenine
e The Conference then iook up the Report of the
omu;;ce ttnerancy. relative 10 the duties Of Prcd
g Elders which occupe ;ae rxmcIndei OF ;Ge sessi2n hG:
Es sction taken OF resei5 rte!et. Adjourned!
81 AFTERNOON SESSION.
t Bishop Morris in the Char.
~ LEVI Scorr offered the following resolution, viz:
E sercos. the COMMITTEE on Epcor2cy do not find II prac
tbc 10 report the uuber oi Bishop necessary 10 e elected
GENITAL the action OF the Conference IN The pre-
"a kS.issI TIat tbs Conference elect ;mo additional B,h
@ aud that tomorrow FRIDAY at lO o'clock oe liked a> tie
"a r eecuc sad GshoQs aud the other genera. Offices Of
81 Dr.. SIiru opposed the resolution. and Nr. CART
H.' Sir. ElRLY also opposed the resolation on the
r. With Bishop AadfeVv-yyae;bcr he s;. u
hcp srd be sa;ansd . such OF iemeia At nome ad be
4 While the subject was under discussion, Bishop
SoyLs stated that The Snperaenden'N had commrn'ca,
E. the table aad ;se following paper read
Ere .5e Gerera' Con- f.rsRes
EEy. AN0 DEAR BEE1HRgS:As The c. e oi L bop Ac-
Eea odaUy uyolyc ie future OF the SUcsri
which IN Their Judgment IN the pfca, position OF
r. Bishops ney have no discretion "a decide, hey -ciuy
Ee't ol the General Conference c7cci instruction IN an
Eysl 20 the following cue tons.
t'si shall Bishop A6dfe"s remain = now stands
ae Aaues iynp Book and Discipline. o; be struck OF; c
second How Shall Tie Bishop Obtain his .uppo.,as pew
- ia ioi IN -. he Discipline, or IN soa'e oae way
~" shal he be appointed TO tie work
| fF45Hgf HEINZ Gs65.xc. T2gFE.
+ B. WAUGH
Seye'a motion, made wj,h 10 dispose OF tn,
IN Gr cation. and The Lone:euce thrown state Of
sHat confusion aud dsOrieG Finally,
\ ~ MITCHELL offered the following resolutions
! is: 20 the several inquiries Of the Superate1dent,
es nsie stand IN tie Minutes. LYNN book ant Dcp!ae
Resere4 TIM, ie ru;e IN relation to the ,,lopo, or
oshol aud iis family applies 70 Bishop Andrew.
= Rcsoired. That whether any and what @o:S Bishop
~ acton 10 relation 10 e pfeyiots acton o,l Conference
| IL The midst Of gIea, excitement, the Yeas and
y were ordered the t resolution and was adop;sI-
| HE Yeas and Nays were then ordered on the
'%9;-i resolution. and was edop,ed-Yea Ij2 Nay, lj
Inc ihlfd resolution coming up .Or considerations
ef- substitutes offered and lad upon the and II
| Na,2i ri ength adoDed-Yeas lc3. NaJs b.
he Southern memtefs generally voted for the
No resolutions and against tie thigd Sever,l Of he
en members asked "a be excused from voting. b th,y
" n" excused. These resolution. iavn. beea disposed o.
hf. SCOTT moved that je Conference luke up
-. luton fixing TO the or elecnc Bishops
ssi' Conefenee othecfs ms agfee TO, and the
,'ous question moved, bat failed tof of two
4 ~.ss .t,ss v"ie. The Conference thea adjourned.
I've have deemed necessary to report the iescho5
gi = te= afternoon 'es,,on iha.nuch a nothing
l "Ge wss cosfuScd.I
| ? 5. An ilnrortan, error occurred in The rrport
i o'ns remarks. published ye cfday lie W.. represent
saying thai he DID DOT egafd the action Of the Conference
~ s ea.e OF Bishop Andrew, either Judicial pr,m
1 w -ios primitive read punitive
Il