Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1841-1853, 1844-12-19
Thur. .;ay. nccc..hcr Il. 1911.


The rrc>lcn, 'aid before the Senate communication
from the Treasurer ct safe embracing report from, ,ic
Superintendent Of Tic Aew A1ban, aud sncenucs road
which referred - committee o Senators represent
ing districts hins "n ihc road
Also, communication frn George II Darn late
Treasurer 81 State. reiiise t. his settlement vh tue
State which relrrred a. tie committee claims
Reports from Committees
Dir Akin, from select committee. reported h. To
change county ROAD 10 STATE Road N Sullivan county
which passed Ia second reading.
MIR Paris from select cuuiniiiec reported back bin
o. con6ne The VOTERS of Ono aud Beal.asa counties 10
Their respective i'"n~hif- wi,n an ainstdn, at TO
make The law aetal.
On motion u. eaiur. Gibson. Pike and Dubois counl.,
exempted from tie pro, i-ian- % ia. l.l
MIR Chapman OF l., moved u refer the bill with the
pending amendments the committee judiciary. with
instructions oninsc iuio tie cvnsiIigonelfy at re-
qniring ten days rcsid,nrc.
Mr. Pennington said that lis constituents might
find fault with hm If be voted Tor tbs bill. But be-
Though that snci, law WIS passed u would prevent
many frauds AMI would mo. be opposed T. ANY sleai cx.
tent There great necessity for uni manly aud tie
hoped scniioman would withdraw their objections, and
Let the h pass
ilr Miller lad hoped that gentlemen would pres
tins matter upon counties where people strongly o
posed To 4. lie did not the pfoprely Of adopting
such until could learn - the wishes II
the people of the whole state he well rccoiccicd tai
IN lc'1, the laws changed without consulting the
people, and but lew Of the gentlemen acted con-
spicuousy IN making these changes reelected the
succeeding lis constituents posed and
lac hoped no such general law would he enacted
Mr. Dole opposed the measure II was matter that
the people cdn,aS~ing their mind. and
he was not prepared 10 say that hs constituents were in
favor Of
Mr. Farmer said that the people OF h.s district were
situated that at OF th Kind would be greatly To iheir
inconvenience. and If II made n general law he
could not consent Ia have ii,~ counties InciuI,l
Mr. Davis SAID that II would be- recescied that there
petition presented iru Eioyd county al the la,
session making complaints abou; gal voting, lie had
come IL the conclusion Introduce bill present
session ce".inc voters 10 Their respective townships II,
believed law q" the kind needed IN hi conniv and
IA case ths bill llIicd he would Introduce bill for that
purpose so iar - hi- own county concerned.
Mr. Chapmln 81 had no ecton to gentlemen Lav.
ing special laws Tor combining their townships
bu, there counties that were situated Thai
tsw Of ,h> Kind would subject aeis citizens to crc
Inconvenience.
Motions then made except from The provision.
of the hill. the counties Of Bartholomew Oransr Crav.
fwd, Monroe, Blown, Switzerland. Clark Hendricks
Delewas. Warren. Benton. White. Jasper Pulaski Perry
Spencer, W su.s%, Owen, Green. Lake and. ve,niEon
Mr. Orb Vas opposed special legislation II. had No
desire IN the se,esal tse have =,
many different equations w,uid hnd in ravrin.
osssths kingdoms 81 Europe. Sarpose h. .r O. w..l.
make nosnn 10 exempt TlPpecsnoe comply from Inc
provisions at The relief hs cosStsfra :s wer,
Opposed 10 Il (sni he well knew the, wsre) whs, vop
be Thought 9th Did the Senate see fla II,
operation would he unequal. aud that !, would Be uriu.,
Now lawyer could r,.el hi- csr~n and at,pe
- bUsDess of his cheats without ,oory into ire svisee