The Ripley advertiser. [volume] (Ripley, Miss.) 1843-1897, 1843-09-16

M concerning the doctrines nj n
"o'Sogc and affirming the liability If :,
I,"'o ~ INC most uncquiyocal terms Tb..
,s. ''eSo'"ions were debated AZ cons;dc,o III
&c, 'cng,h--not because there wa. 800
re- an'l'oonder in the house; bu, because som
of PERSONS present were fearful of roJcos;n
Or Wy stockholders They were finally paasc
'h WIN "nIy one dissenting voice, MI. Rr,dror
IL so,'ng 10 The affirmative; and copies ordere
: % DC forwarded to our RepresenIo,;ys. - :
< a. jackson. Mr.. Bradford took an oc,;v'
y P',' ~ Tue discussion Of these Resolutions
:, making more than one set speech, and uro
! ing their adoption with bis usual ab;Inv ms Is
o. once 'nt'mafing that the "horrorsy ba c.,
'or ne "od'ous" doctrines Of The message
] we're merely Editorial. Hence we Ind :
'ts0'' AZ least, 10 regard him as being sin.
.o'e - me opinions advanced by him. /
"'Ve Deen thus particular in relation 10 M.
meeting and the part Mr.. Bradford took II
''lof INC purpose Of showing that at The fine
ra'elred 70 ne did Identify himself with The
D'"u'Payers. And now in order 10 show
nat nc dld run for the Office Of D;str;c, !,
'"'"ey as Bond. payer, it will ONLY be nso
essarv to refer 10 his speech a. Ho,s,o 49, !.
reply 10 Mr.. Acker. '''o" :"
wiz DC recolectcd that Mr.. Acker wa :
a.. a. opposing Candidate for District ATTORNEY
,hes met al Houston 10 Chickasaw Conn,v
WI. Acker made an Anlibond speech ma
was replied 70 by Charles a. Byodford 10
:. D""a-p yer Am free to confess ,hoi
"o pot hear his speech, no, being there
on nave conversed with several persons
VINO o'o II u be denied The proof j, =,
oand, But This is moi all The nansrs !,
'h'7 case viii show, that Mr.. Bradford &C
rewards had contest with Mr.. Acker ~
oe Same question in Itawamba, and for rho .
~ pose q fastening Inconsistency upon him =
to confront him with his Hono,on !
Peech "''h this view he wrote to Col W
Or statement ofwhat Mr.. Acker d;d 80 8
= !, Houston !. Unfortunately for Mr.. B. Coi y
Y, NED h's letter which is now in nv hands 9
nd Y copy VI which lHill introduce here q 3
~. poNroToc sep'.S 1910. e
DEAR SIR II have just returned from y
!" "a'"oa and I'm much gralified with nv !,
there. Ackcr has been making i,
Foa's'''s excriions 70 get up IN excitement );
,'a' county also upon Tho Bond question m
10 no represented his opinions there vory sh H.
hercn''y from these he expressed in his 81
ecch a, Chicsasaw. - 90,
NY oiJec' IN writing you is to ask q state. IN,
'n' Under Jour hand, giving brief syn> los
SIS Of his remarks upon that question arIhae
'islon. And that you may Judge whe,h A.
! have understood him CORRECTLY. stated one
l'awamba that he expressed himself sub n aau
n''aI'y N The following manner. eJ,,
Mr. Acker said he was opposed to tax. s1u,
the people for the purpose Of paving Tho eve
Bank Bonds, and that he would freely viii
ID his blood in resistance Of toxstion +, ;,
at no was infavor Of putting The Bank in !, :
immediate liquidation and having its at. som
rs economically wound up; its assets col alw,
ted and applied to The paymen, Of the Tho
crest upon the Bonds. and the PRINCIPAL nj,
en- us lnsialnen's respectively shall fall with
!. lie was also in favor oftrying the we'll
esf ION Of The liability Of the Stock holders. temt
II decided 10 be liable, he was in favor nroe,
strictly lnio:clng the liability and entire Of H.
opposed 10 releasing them When all yo;d,
80 means for the payment Of the princi Loou
and interest upon the Bonds should bo |,ho
austcd, and any balance remained IN. limo
!. ,ha,ha. ~. -, % '''"o onougn 70 de'er- any |
'nce. lie said the agitation Of this ques. NOW
!, at thus time, was entirely premature. finn ,
Y 1t had nothing at all to do with the Of r.
he was seeking at tho bands Of The ,eIa,;,
pie, but that ho gave his opinions mere cbase
ecauso he thought the people might Rem,
ably want TO know them. F,an,
lease write by my Son. shall return +. 90,
A"oa : " present a. PuD'ic NEE purch'
= fu''''' VI rr'oay, ~here Jacob and sc
p'PS'n = " speak. wlsn your letter that, d
Ike with me. ~ :,
cker has failed in effecting any thing to s,reno
aim materially in his Election, by The ninion
: ioes''on' lounu on. Two families, and th
nc'n Connexions VINO mink Of voting orally
i'm. and they are not determined upon Mr.. r
lis failure there is almost rs signal as tied Al,
Is in Chickasaw. for j, :
Very truly and respectfully yours Jackso
,.,,. =. a. Bradford. coming
H. mos. q. "''''ams' The tr
W what are we 10 understand from all to be {;
If Mr.. Bradford was running as a Gov.