Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1843-05-25

mud THIS do know. that Il rs oa ,,cipg c..-, II.
winch I,t ltirs,' interest II counsel and uifiaff
pui ino the hisiufy OF Ia. al must t, aI
had lsfsihal t. lug Gtefall,. W hatr,,r lid hun
sly. 81 Which have H. teGlleeIeit.) t,, TIA Htit
duty f.glr,d al. auI Hal tie LIZ ud circumstance
susiaihrd IL tins | nlay have lntn mistaken as Nc
all liable iohe Bula lecture sal. tad not then have
aud never had any p.lir lrijugs To Crafty:
aaj # IN tae hrlt # dtiatc noun, Your e., itigs II
mol intended IN m, Iart. My ob,o,l was do IN,
duty. nv whsle duty. aud nothing hn nv duty. my
sient. have been thus ~ prit. because i
my heart 10 in!ure, ~ tttng cafarlet. living sui
aud # hay. an uhh;pd telling, 10 living mortal. ain
not aware al II. Your o5t. II. :. GARLAND.
ask ynn. Is the foregoing letter apology.
letter Of Justification had surely better never have
askd apology than To have received this: hut YOU
RAIDER. will have To pass upon II. Here thou ht the
rutrespondcnoe must end Not with my irond.-
Never happy as IN the character Of peace maker. b.
sad To me. you have enacted promise tina, would
ot'Iosp III any may think 1t necessary
sdJpt. If Mr.. g. should refuse sign the note have
carried him; ] Of course say nothing. ! saw be
desired make another effort. and enqued Of him what
he would have u dol lie replied Mr. Garland
10 have iorgoen what he did say, and at tho
tim, showed a willingness, as think, II he could
be made sensible tI,t he had used any particular Ian
70 ot an offensive character 10 ralrart II. My reply
E.,. ,our account will write and specify the
" offensive language complained oil and then gave him
= tho following letter;
IYNeubrnG, 5.h May. 1873.
Samuel Ga,lond, Esq
S,a-N,mr letter It this date has been banded b,
Mr. -. Your answer, although cuuched IA uost
respectful terms Is by satisfactory; and you
s,ln have orgCtttn what YOU did say, and nj the
same time To have >guifcd 10 make suitable
apology. Will here few Of The offensive expires
slons; for really cannot rec-lltc all of them.
You said: you, anehofse gave Burton the priv.
loge Of purchasing the tobacco rnlrovrrsy kept que,
sill until II was 'vldtt that LARGE pr lit would In,
realized from the adv cnnrr anl then claim an interest IN
H. In relation To the evidence prove that Maj Brnaaa
greatly rntctLIed IN mud aud body ,ou and that
was tr pntilng every man down who d,d not suit NV
purposes that. such the MAJ cujty uluy hcar thai
would even take the bread iron his iienah',) children
by showing him incapable ii irastctiua business aud
thereby deprive hun at Iii aud nu SIR does he Prove
uhy2 prr brick LAYER You used many other n.
marks equally offensive, and lhnk without ANY eyl
.lencn sustain you. Nnn will therefore excuse me
when call nrn yuu To produce the evidence upon which
You hottoncd thre" remarks. 10 uncond
'onslly. WA due respect. VI. Obj. srryt.
II. y. lANGiORNE.
81 fat As reference is made in ,hc above to the
privilege gwen Mr. Burton. by mr.. OF ,aLns a separate
interest III tins adventure upon his individual scruunt
here most empha,cally deny aud also deny that there Is
atom ri evidence upon the record such AT
alegaton but tn" contrary. the record shows there
was studied cpnctanent Ut this fact from As
the grasums reflections which he has been pleased To
make IN the ALT ganOs amended bill against
Maj Benagh. aud the attempt he made inpcach the
voracy and standing OF The gentleman. (styd the po
Brcklayer. BY whom established the fact in part
here would observe that Mr.. l.. Was fully convinced
himself of the inability of Maj B 10 settle complicated
accounts and has hrcn accused. without contradictions
ot ben. pvy To his dismissal AID cnncurred in II
Tins must rerol upon himself and r stands no other
attitude than hav,up hH"~ina, aud wlliny caIunnialcd
The poor brick LAYER II other than one tar
whom Mr. IT, recorded his vote tr IN our n.Xl
Legislature. That should surely establish Mr. G's es
tm,'e Of his sandug aud resp,ciai'ny. And besides
this there another witncss OF hgh standing who
fully. as the R"ror 81 iNs. u a1rh here rrlcf.)
inonstrai,s the aiSrnr al c,at - nId, bv Nj q
against no.aud whps :,Sll.irnA would ". here llsr
ted but far relI"a.l-, 1a3 thr fc.Iu., az
suns not immediately c,nn.cfl al til rorIpverSV=
Where nov stands MIR Gulana', l"a>i ct heinz, -
.rn"d by desire alone u dun. h. would he dne
il will hc ia the follow ing liacr Mh,.brr ~ nj
he srallv acuatcd hy surI
- a'rGe. Ny sd. 1872
VI II. s. Ldr@h"rrr NiH=A 54r I,trr # Tie '5fj.
inst. ha, Ia~t l,ru h.Ittd Ia or ul'ual lrenG
Mr. --. >'yng ttai YIN ~.lo not >ol'~i.'i VIII
Ia, answer 10 your r,r iy NJ r,rtiin norS
Which y"a say used III the debate last August. Your
sui against Burton, AMI r,4aras lha proof support
those words. Sc.
was. .ir. full and explicit in my letter Of the 9Th
inst. NJ could re-, IN Truth and justice, beth 10 vou
and .eit an had we'll hDpel HAT You would have
been sisl. 1t was written In lhat spirit. Which
hope will ever character my c5lacr IA il. of dnng
rs would be d"Gc Ivy and here, hope. and lusisf.
that this matter resi-. III hn,w. Sr, that what
ever old say ct which, as stated in my former letter
! have now II, distinct recollec,lon, not having kept
mites Ut my argument seen the papers for than
eight nonlhs,) was said court, The heat uf debate OF
exciting cause. for which accountable oniy 10
The july who presided at the trial 1t his duty.
1t would have been his pleasure, alike prevent
proprieties OF conduct aud ex;eai his protection
suilors, witnesses, and counse and that was, empha
cally the time and place for correcting any evils c
might have arisen, rea or imaginary, plainly because
he altuc could determine the Ia point Of fact
WAS interrupted III arguni. ni and the court deter
mlne that the arIuMrut legitimate and proper;
and YOU had two distinguished LAWYERS Ia
reply. as well iu nv argument as thai Of my assucal,
Three lawyers argued Your pari having the upoulnQ
and conclusion. CASUALLY deemed advantage have
named these thugs To show thai ynn Lad the al
vantage OF the defendant, whom toIr, scented. and
that you have cause 10 con, laG al hing
which ,raGsplrrd at thc fial.
As before said this matter must end hcrc. II is
INDUSTRIOUS proposition To suppose that counsel shall he
called upon 10 answer Tor Words used IN debate, and
that eight months Afterwards. | am acruunlai lie Ia
n all. and might WEI hay, sad in the tsl in
s'a"re, tut the l,nl,"ea Which prompted the u
swer. have no cause 81 quarrel with yol, can
he urged into aGd II may he we'll la refer your lie
gal advsersto know how ,r YOU NAY hiring Yourself with
in contempt Of tie who .r,sdrd at tie trial. Ii
Rave injured you IN any wise. the G, of the culIn
Try open 10 yuu; aud know 81 Other TIL ural u
redress injuries. real or supposed
With lie same feelings winch prompted IN, former
Ietter make thus reply.