Richmond daily Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1842-1861, 1843-06-28

Well NJ there be inconsistency in all this, MIR. Tyle
| and his friends welcome make the most OF IL.
This "dtgne. IN speaking OF the e'eenon ee,wesn WI
Mr.. Tyler by his political associates, says-"Even adj
emitting that Mr. Tyler acted improperly perfdiossty on
he occasion alluded to-Mr John Minor Bots Is equal
'in guilt and pcrdy with Mr.. Tyler lie sustained Mr.
"ryler that occasion he because he was in
situation reap the benefit OF MIR. Tyer's perhdy."
presume this unitgated fasehood that either sustain
ed him, in situation reap the benchtoi tit Is
sufficient say that this election took place six be-
fore entered public life. may some where have said
that the party opposition Gen. Jackson OF which
stood in the relation tn Mr. 1ylers teaehc
~ them that the Democratic party did 20 his rcachery 10
the Wings in Sil-but that be found in
the speech from which he Processes . quote.
This is followed up with cttcrirom Mr.. John Voolfolk,
the necessity Tor which able clearly perceive
But Ae feels his duty relate the facts connected h
thar election because he Mr w has recently learned that
il my aSssil Mr.. Tyler for accepting
the nomination at his hands, and in presenting this letter,
the "deeRes states that sanctioned the charge Of perdy
made against Mr. Tyler tor his acceptance OF that nomi
nation.
Mr. Voolfolk is not precisely in his
o what occurred that occasonbut he substantially
80, ateas sufficiently arrive the truth far IL is
material Now, when did asssil Mr. Tylertot his accept
anee OF that nomination. When had sanctioned the
charge-and wherefore did this duty" devolNe on Mr.
Voolfolk make himsclr ready witness Tor the Man OF
Power TO charge, for which, far from ssailing him,
had. even in that very speech, defended him.
What language that drew forth this letter OF MIR
Voolfolk which is used II designed To be used, TO my
prejudice. Here my speech, and the only
one that relates 10 the subject;
In the winter of ls3s Mr.. Tyler again candidate
for the Senate, in opposition Mr. Ryes. supported
him warmly but he could not the entire vote OF his
own party, and he defeated. During that contest,
which lasted several weeks, he frequently Withdrawn
and re.nOminaed On one occasion he was nominated
by member Of the then Administration party; and, on
his retiring nom the House, he asked If he would ae
cept nomination from that quarter-to which, II was
sand, he replied That he before The Legislature,
and loOHid take The appointment from quarter he
could get ". Nom, SIR, let be understood: do
not that his charge ieeH founded. defend
ed him at The time. hare detended hiHa SINCE.
though hare been almost the only IN the State
that dad defend HIN; If Others did hape not heard Of
a. do not charge aim tcifk if. beIiered at the
time he altogether Incapable gpiRg uteTanes 10
such sentiment: though confess has recent course
has greatly shaken confidence former opinions Of
hfn'. mention the Circumstance only matter Of
history for the Of shoring thai the charge Of
feIfdy has nothing Of nOpeg ,ohen connected NTH
has The Consequences horepsr iohether true
false most disastrous hiH AZ not ORg rerped
e recollection Of the Of 1877, bat IL utterly
=" and entirely Frustrated him IN The State"
So much for Mr.. wooIfok's letter.
The next thing that appears this pamphlet, worthy OF
notice, Is letter from Mr. Duff Green: for do deem
incumbent me, have any inclination interfere
with the Cabinet squabble which the intermediate por-
ton Of the defence" relates.
What could have possessed the OF this letter
such facts upon record and what natuaon could Mr. w.
Ter have abored under when he published ii the object
was, as presume II must have BEEN first the part OF the
writer TO offset Mr. Ewing's opinion the insincerw
and hypocrcy OF Mr. Tyler in expressing desire 10 his
Cabinet To insert in his message dsncnaon be-
come candidate and secondly the part Of
Mr. Tyler To dprove my charge that IA the month Of JuRe
he did hold hi1Self bound ~ the principle
and dad deSTe reelection; if in making that charge had
been search OF testimony sustain should have desired
nothing than this letter had been
tence, and could have laid INV hands upon IT, Why what
Is lit What does it prove Nothing less than
this: That Mr.. Green Annapolis when he heard OF
Gen. Harson'S death, and then heard that effort would
be made to induce Mr.. Tyler himself in his
augual address lin April be candidate in 1874.
and being his personal and political friend, he fastened
Washington prevent his doing lac told Mr. Tyler his
business who showed him paragraph that effect which
he had Just written, by the advice OF OF his friends;
he used much persuasion and what intended for
arguments accomplish the purpose his VISIT and
deHook To satisfy him that might be indispensable that he
should become candidate for reelection in 1914. lie,
sNlr Green, urged that the principle did apply
10 hlm-to all OF which Mr.. Tyler reped-not that he had
resolved ON inserting the paragraph before exhibited on,
no! but that he had the subject under consideration;
that he Of the iactious tendency existing party
arrangements" &c. &c. Mr. Tyler said there ioas much
force in the suggestions Mr. Green had made and he toOud
reflect on them, and asked him call again. Oh what
gentle yielding ain If had only had the prayer book in
hand standing between clergymen how admirably the
scene would have been played oil between MY Cousin OF
Buckingham and that hypocre and arch william Richard
BY 'hnhP~AEe in the presence of the Lord Mayor
OF London IL could not have been OcterC
rehearsed under the direction Of the great American Tage-
dian, Mr. COopcT-hough do know whether Nv COu-
SIN OF Buckingham demanded received promise of the
Eardom OF Hereford and all the mOyabes for his pains.
But TO proceed with the letter: Mr.. Green asked 10
call again. he did call the day, and found Mr. TyeL
transcrbing the inaugural He pointed 10 The pararaPE
IA question. aud Mr. Green that he had NTH
his penn How like Glosier when enfreaed by his para
sites to accept the crown, when he says
xviii you enforce a world Of cares
"Wel, call them again; am not made OF stone,
but penetrabe 10 your kind enircaucs,
"Aibeit against my conscience and my soul
"Cousin OF Buckingham, aud sage grave men
"Snce you will buckle fortune on my back
"TO bear her burden whe'er ! will or no,
II must nave patience Ia endure the load;
"l3ut II black scandal, Oufaced reproach
ATTEND the sequel Of your imposition,
your mere enforcement shall acquittance me
Prom all the impure blots and stains thereof;
"For God he knows, and you may partly see,
"liow far ] am from the desire OF this"
Here, them have the testimony Of Mr. Green and
tue admission Of Mr. Tyler that although he had early in
April the subject OF declining reelection under eonsi
siderafion at the suggestion q Of hs friends; yet the
reasoning Of Mr. Green upon the folly OF such step was
Il not convincing, least captivating that II had oper
ated like cham and under influence he had determn
ed to hold himself position which, this day, has never
been abandOned-ese why Is he candidate II his
administration had been popular, and he had been called
10y the people, there might have been show OF
and prOPney IN his present aude-but for man who
universally detesed aud denounced who has no chance
against any competitor get single electoral district I'm
tue broad limits Of the Union, be still candidate and
never TO have changed his determination that point from
the time of Mr. Green's persuasion IN April Ito pub.
sh ihai letter to dspoye that he contemplated such thing
IN June ISL pliakcs Of something than all.
sence OF Judgment and good sense; nothing short Of
lunacY itself!
With Mr.. Whauons letters, which next follow I shall
not inierere-ihe inst marked confidential fs pubica.
hon ana the matters to which the refer leave 10 be
settled between the parties Mr. Wharton was no witness
oi mne although he testified a very important fact In
/ speaking Of the conversation at Browns Hotel where
many persons were present, said any impression is ha
Mr.. wharton, Of the Wheeling Times, was one Of
Them, though will not say with certainty that he wal
there NJ ihe Time OF The conversation ~ they were con
sany passing in and out OF the roohe can speak for
himself, this should meet hs eye" did mol cali up
on hun witness aud he might have announced that c
was not present at the tmc without involving inc In the
slightest dihegy but the truth Is Mr.. Wharton declined
to testify for me- although 10 could confirm a that had
SAID, and II was not untl be- called Iy one or more
cizens ct wheeling, through his psper that he snted
"hhi hnd uansPfcd IN his presence, which shall prcson
y contrast with Mr. Thompsons leer-bnt II is both rd
cnlous and contemplate 10 speak Of Mr. Wharton a ready
1901 OF NINE We are strangers 10 each oter-1 never
saw him but wico-once in 1889, when passing through
Wheeling in company with Mr. Tyler and again on the 30
{" March, a. IN Mr. Tyofs room, and there only for
lew moHents--and shouldnoi know Mr. Wharton, If !
l 10 mrff inn nj Cd