The daily Madisonian. [volume] (Washington City [i.e. Washington, D.C.]) 1841-1845, 1843-07-03

eXpTesslon, we say "Hy Odch M'. '"''
Ia The seventh place, Mr.. John Minor bo''s
assets "Mat Nr. Wharton wds no teitneSS o.
hisn
The fact is he call. ID upon Mr.. Wharton, on
the 10Th of May last, TO testify 10 his statement
about the Presidents remarks at Browns Hotel
ia relation TO a Bank Of The United States, anu
in reply 10 this call, Mr.. Wharton gives his 'es-
timony. But the very instant that Mr. " mar
ION appears, by his letters to the President 10
be a poor devil, who would sell his soul Tor a
mess of poltage, as Mr.. Bots admits himself 10
have be- n in The Randolph aud Tyler controversy
for the Senate, Mr. Bolts declares him no long
er his witness, and attempts to kick hlm out oil
the same political bed with himself.
In this respect, then, Mr.. Bots denies what Is
true.
In the eighth place, Mr.. John Minor Bots as
serts that General Thompson states whdt
certainty did not occur"
The fact is that General Thompson distinct
" declares, that Mr.. Bots did accompany HIM,
and was with him, at an interview with the Pre-"
| sident, when the last was President oi The Sc
nate, and staying at Browns Hotel, at wheh
interview Mr. Tyler did assure himself and Mr..
Bolts that if the Cd ting vote in the Senate on
the Bank question should come to him, he would
vote against ii.
The public are al liberty to draw their ow n in
ferences in this respect, but we have no hesila-
lion in saying that General Thompson's declara-
ton is true and that Mr.. Botts's is untrue.
! In the ninth place, Mr.. Bolts asserts that 1t
makes no material difference whether he ceased
to break bread with the President on the "hrd
DAY. or he fourth day, or Meftlh, or The sirth,
of the Extra session"
| The factis that he swore, on May 10Th, upon
the Holy Evangelist, that it was The third ddy
| of The Extra session." and DR.. John Semple
and Colonel John Armistead, of Virgil de-
clare that they dined with the President, in com
pany with Mr. Bolts after The third day of the
Extra session, and that MIR. Bolts then said to
the President that she kneU has Constitutional
scrupies as 10 a Bank and 1conid mol be The man
to Mpart or embdrrass him"
In this respect Mr.. Bolts depravity can be
distinctly seen without comment from us. But
as he desires TO know upon what authority we
quoted DIR. Semple and Colonel Armstead, we
w II say to him from letter in our possession OF
the most unqualified nature and in the strong
est terms One OF the gentlemen Mr.: Bolts
knows, and he dare not deny his statement.
In the tenth place, MIR. Bots again attempts
| to quibb.e out of a scrape He desires to know
"when and where did he ASSERT or SWEAR that
! Mr.. Webster HAD committed Mr.. Tyler on. this
subject ?n-the subject of Bank
| The fact is, that we never sad that he did
make such an assertions but he did assert that
the President was committed 10 the second
Bank bill and we gave Mr. Webster's notSNo
prove this assertion false, which il ehectuahSS
does, for he says TO the President that he stands
wholly uncommilted'! lis the word in his l.
ter, instead of untrdmmeIed," as reported)
to that bill.
Here ends &" Bolts laSt'-but, before conclu-
ding, we feel il our duty 10 give additional
evidence of this "unhappy mans" regard for
veracity.
In his sneerh nf Senta",i"- in.L, ,ott, 90
| published in the lntelilgencer, he declares that
Z" he admitted in lis broddest sense that from
| Mr.. Iyier's first. entrance into public life, up
TO The date Of his appointment 10 Tie Harris
burg Contention, erery sentiment Of his mind
had been hostile TO a Bank Of the United
States'-and yet, in his K'ntucky barbecue
letter Of October 9th, 1871, he states, that
when travelling with the President through
Kentucky, " he on all occasions Prtdched The
true Wig doctrines, Bank, Distribution, Ia
! rit, and dH-bm The Bank chiefly and par
ticuidriy." Now every body knows that The
Presidents trip 10 Kentucky, in company with
Mr.. Bott., taken sometime before his nom
iaation 10 the Harrisburg Contention. How,
theu, could the President have preached Bank
so Justify, if, as Mr.. Bolts declared on Septem
Der 10 h, "erery sentiment Of his mind irds
hostile 10 a Bank up 10 his appointment TO The
Harrisburg ConrenHon?" Mr.. Bolts, perhaps
can tell us hch Of these two contradictory de-
! claraiions 10 believe or perhaps the Richmond
Wing can answer for him, since il has assumed
the province of backing him in his fabrications
No doubt the redoublable editor Of that paper
has forgotten that, as late as April Both, Al, he
declared that "Virgina was OPPOSED to a
Bank" and that " it was not certain That the
Administration would sustain Bank :" and
that " Mr.. Tyler had always been true TO the
principles Of Virginia." which were opposed TO
a Bank, &c. &c. If Mr.. Moseley has forgotten
these things, he can turn to his number Of
April Both, 1s41, from which we have quoted.
John Minor Bots and Alexander Moseley-par
Mobile Jrdirum -well met at any hour-conri-
butor and publisher-fabrcator and calculator Of
fabricatIonS.
But we must do Mr.. Bolts one act Of justice
just here. He styles the President "he man
Of Pouer." Here at last he has hit upon the
uuth-for armed as the President is with Jus.
tce and truth, heis man of pouer-ofpower