The daily Madisonian. [volume] (Washington City [i.e. Washington, D.C.]) 1841-1845, 1843-11-22

joetons TO the bill as contained in the Veto
Message, are worthy Of credit, II was vetoed
because he considered il both unconstitutional
,nd inexpedienL Whenever the President
hall sign a Back bill introduced by any body
elsr, thea the Globe may make the assertion
with the expectation of being believed, that the
President vetoed the bill Of 1871, "because IL
was the bill of Henry Clay" and not before.
On the same day thai the President sent in
his Veto, the editor of the Globe wrote as fol-
ows:
ave make our Acknowledgements to Mr. TrLER for
this act of DELlN ERANCE II he maintains his
position firmly, land has he not done il; Ask Mr.
Clay.-Ed. Mad he will ever be acknowledged as
public BENEFACTOR."
The President pefoea the Distribution BILL
and consequently no $4,000 900 per ann, IN"
have been given out OF the public treasury
This the Globe knows well enough, but il is
its vocation now to misrepresent Mr.. Tyler
The SIP, 900, coo borrowed, or one half that sum-
was applied to liquidale the debt created and
left unpaid by Mr.. Van Buren's administration.
He did sign The bill repeating the " ndepen-
dent Sub-lreasury;n it is uue-and General
Jackson, if he must be referred 10 as infallib e
authority, justified the act. We have before
US Gen. Jackson's letter, dated lllh September,
lS4l, in which he says;
Doubtless the President believes that the Sub
treasury has been condemned by the People, and so
believing he ought not 10 be eensured for girng his
sanction TO It's repeal"
What has the Globe TO say to this? WIZ
the genuineness of the letter be questioned?
If we have misquo,ed the Generals letter, he
will doubtless put US right himself, as he read,
the Madisonian
He did sign the odious and atominable
black tariff bill; J" but he was compelled to do it
or see the wheels of Government stand STILL
Had he not signed ii the Globe would not have
received its $4,000 per annum profits for punt
ing The famous Documentary History, fine
job, which may continue for hundred years
But if he did sign the bill, who passed il ?
Twenty Democrats voted for it in the House.
and lhrty-hve Ciay-whes against it-and it
passed that body by majority Of one. In the
Senate II likewise passed by majority of one
Messrs. Wright, Buchanan, aud other dislin-
guished Democratic Senators voting for it.
What was the President to do2 If he vetoed
the Bank "because it was the bill Of Henry
Clay" did The Globe, for that reason, expect
him to veto the tariff because it was the bill
of" Messrs Wright, Buchanan, Williams,
Sturgeon, lngersol, &C., &c. &C., &C., the
main pillars of the Democratic party? What
an idle supposition The President did not
like the bill-does not now-but it was better 10
swallow bitter pill than to suffer The Govern
ment to perish. But the most "odious," the
most b" abominable," The "6laokes" tariff, BY
all Odds was that of 1928, which Messrs Van
Buren, and Benton voted for, and which the Globe
supported. Mr. Tyler could not be made 10
support that bill, by any possible compusion
which the ingenuity Of man could devise.
| As the appointment of the rankest Fede-
raj Coons in the land 10 Office" we can only say
" we don't believe IT," Certainly the L. S. Dis
lrlct Attorney for Missouri (Mr. Blair's SOM is
not rank coon. Yet, Messrs. Porter, Hen
shaw, and Nelson, are the rankest coous," in
the estimation Of the Globe. But coons or no
! coons, we are happy to know that the President
-" sa" 'HmselI IN the selection of officers,
without first seeking the permission of the
Globe.
! If the evidences of President Tylers pure
and unadulterated Democracy" be not sufficient
ior the satisfaction Of the Globe, why let it seek
satisfaction IN abusing him. He does not re.
greet the Globes abuse il can do him no harm
the great and the good are sure TO be abused.