Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1843-08-11

he nominated, 1t would have he appearance oil con-
cesson of principles the part OF those who voted for
MIR. Van Buren, in 1910; hence it it, that MA ory
o the Democratic party prefer him, that there may be
tar race between the two great parties which divide
The country and that there may permanency and stab
lity IN lis administration.
The second preext is hardly worth noticing, far
Their than to call the attention of the people to the chi
canery which 10 being pracsed upon them, under The
gnrb OF Democracy. ie Mr.. Van Buren, is impntent
as this correspondent represents him, why should his
nomination the letter writer much concern? l.
1t his bread and tuer that he is labnrng to preserve
or, Is he faithfully complying with the Circular which
Mr. Tyler published forbddng tie office holders from
interfering IN elections: One would suppose, iron
the array OF his rsas0Hs, that he oycan OF rathe
small caiibre he would have been more cautious III
drawing them np-for, instead of proving that Mr.
Van buren, ought not TO be the nominee OF The DE.
mocFac party they prove, conclusvely that he is the
strongest man, and that he should be the candidate
Although this correspondent eylnces very great re
gard for the Democratic party, and for those States
winch nave never had President yet he says, "it is
sheer arrogance to prstend even that Democratic
principles cannot be carried out while have before
the people such men as Tyler &c. Now, l would
respectfully ask this intelligent office holding CORES
pendent, how many Presidents has Virginia had -
Would not the nomination of Mr.. Tyler equally de
prve South Carolina, North Carolina, Pennsylvanja,
and Kentucky, of their claims, as the nomination
Mr.. Van buren: Yet, this dslnteresed lover vi tt
p"iy, VIM nave not tIIs iSdSt uoul
Wing IN 1910, would only apply these specification.
to Mr. Vsn Buren,, though the result would equals
apply 10 MIR. Tyler In place, he says, "if thsIe
The administration of Mr. Van Buren, i, 10 be marke >
by the policy laid down by such advocates" meaning
of course the Democratic party because they are "p
treeAsncs," his (Mr Van Burens) peculiar friends,
he should not be eeced-because, 'nny man who ,ake
Office under MIR. Tyler, will certainly be marked, anc
turned out This is direct insult TO the Democratic
party-because this correspondent would fan make i
appear, that ii is the toaces and fishes for which they
are contendng, and for the principles which
should govern Democratic administration To prove
that this is his Of the fact and that his only OBJ
ject IS TO preserve his Office, a sacrifice OF
principle, he says at was not much dislike 10
his principles, as 10 the man, that Mr.. Van Buren,
was defeated in 1870 This is dlrec. acknowledr
ment that II is not for principles, which those who arr
opposing MIR. Van Buren, con,ending for, but i
is the they wish to defeat a sacrifice q
Republican principles-and it is high time that tn
Democratic party should know its true friends Tn,
Globe is fighting manuIly, and it should be cherishe
and admired by every genuine Democrat Of 1910, wh'
fell, battling shoulder shoulder with it, in deferco
of those principles which Democrats cherish and alss
mire ALGERNON SYDNEY