New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1843-11-29
ris n...s. ar.ese 81 wasa.sas,en.

w ssHfSGToS; NOT-'[oi ioit
S,s-No little conversation has been 6ccasloried
here. within the last week or two, by the antics
of that " Ajax of the Administration" Mr. Rob
ert TYLER, who has declared his inveterate hostill
ty to the Secretary of the Treasury.
The cause of this hostility is stated to be, on
authority which think may be relied on, thai
Mr.. Spencer did not make the Loco-F ocos OF
Wesern Newyor the Wing ticket a: the recent cleo
on added the refusal of the Secretary 10 transfer III;
Governments, deposits Philadelphia from the Philadelphia
the Moyamensng Bank.
The Presden, Of the Moyamensng Bank, al the lime TIT
reques; was made was learn Nj Graham, one OF the
crones Of Rober, er and familiar acquaintance OF MI
TYSON recently appointed Assistant Post Alaste! General
The object be attained By the removs! OF the deposits
as requested by Robert expected 10 be the reelection OF
the Board of Directors which Mr. Graham presided
III, election which took place Monday la week The
dros,s however were Obtained and the directors
superseded at the election referred to- By overwhelming
ma orty of the stockholders
AS the report Of the intended Change Of the deposits from
the Philadelphia to the Moyamensng Bank. originated IL
your paper it may be proper give YOU the facts which led
to the runoI and which have excited their OF Master Rob
ert 10 such degree They are Informed, substantial
| y ;l4ese:
A Mr.. Stokes Of Philadelphia, Presdem; Of Repeal As
ISOLATION p that city engaged by the President oil hs
Noyamensing Bank to visit Washington, and thIongh The
Influence Of Robert effect the oh which the Bank had
in view This in the early part Of the present month
Mr.. Stokes called Mr. Spencer with letter from non
e in which the latte. expressed his wish for change
there were no objections OF apublc character ana sau
that i, would be agreeable to the friends OF tbs Aos"a
| ton.
Mr. Spencer il seems who is understood 10 DC ei! ~
tive on the subject told Mr. Stokes in substance ha ne
been repeatedly applied to by poscai i,ieuus II.
and elsewhere for similar changes, and had uniformly met
hs, viii, most decided refusal He is said to have ex
ss.sd himself will, considerable warmth Mr. Stokes sa'd
h he appreciated and approved the grounds taken by the
Secre,arv.a he made application on poiticai g!ouho
bn mny because thought that the deposits would De
cafe in the Moyomensing Bank the Philadelphia, and ad
ed ts, ,ay were perfectly safe there He remarked ina
bo did not know what Mr.. R. Tyler had written Mr.. spen
Ger told him. and repeated his Ee determination not to make
| the change
/, seems that Master Robert, being either msnormea b.
Mr. Stokes feeling his consequence diminished by soci
psrempory refusal, subsequently, wrote Nh Spencer
note complaining that his aud Language had beer
5ir.sn.c,fl TO him in TIE interview with MI Stokes AM
dashed himself into quite rage Nh Spencer replied ina
he had not time write statement OF the inerVr" pu'
Robert would call on him he would give HIN personal re
a,ion and show him what slight grounds ne had Tor 81
much excitement, He replied tina, he had net time 10 call
and in very suhdued Tone asked all explanation. t
Spencer then wrote Mr. Pn.ose who was present al th
il, 10 state what his aad language had beer
in reference 10 Mr.. TYLER He replied that there had beer
nothing dsrespscul offensive to him Mr. Spencer en-
closed this 10 MI r. Tyler aud he returned all answer e1
pressing hi. entire satisfaction.
This may be relied ppon true version oil an affa
yc have before remarked has been the topic Of much
gossip here and has finally found its way into the newspa
pcrs 1t has undoubtedly been Of little mortfca
ton to Robert that he should have placed himself in posi-
ton TO have MS consequence ssened in the estimation o;
Mr. Stokes, by interfering with the business OF thu Irea'
suy Department On these subjects the President has al
ways peremptory refused 10 say word aud did SO In tins
Instance II. has TIE sagacy foresee the evils which
would necessarily result from making the public dposes
the spert of political revolutions aud caprice
Yours, Alan, JUNIOR.
II We give the above as it has reached us,
without at all vouching for its correctness, though
we believe il substantially true. AS chapter in
the history Of the upper and lower Cabinets, it is
certainly worth reading. Ed.