Vermont telegraph. [volume] (Brandon [Vt.]) 1828-1843, 1843-03-29
V Oh. X V. NO. %

= V~o enuorsed' This note had bee
que between two and three months 81 8
as | recollec1. TWAS abundantIy secursl
by an endorser who is good for sevaj
times thesamount. | had seen the bo,5
OF the note several times since it BEGAN
due, and conversed with him on thu suI
Jec', making known to. him my niaGfI
ness otthe matter and my disposition
40 all IN my power in regard to it. Iba
always understood from him that 7 n.
not to be crowded or distressed. He h.,
told me that if | wouldfpay $50, The !,
ance might rest for while. had -.
$50 OF the $50. and assured him the oL
or should be forthcoming as soon as oo.
slble. AT this he expressed no dissai
faction. | expected to pay it to him j
my return. saw him the day before
lett home and spoke with him of sam
means had in prospec: that I expected
reach in the course of two weeks, p
did not give me the least hint or iplim,
lion that he had the most distant THOUGH !
OF suing me. Furthermore, my endorse
lives between his house and mine, and :.
did not even notify him of his intentions
The writ filed No. 2 is in favor CT ba|
town of Brandon, for $50 of surplus mon
ey. The note was dated January l.
1912, and payable either on demand or
on the lst of January I843. Be that a.
1t may, had never BEN asked for the
money Not far from the LIST of JanuarJ
lS45, | called on the individual intrpstp1|
with the business, paid the interes, and
asked him what was to be done abou,tbe
pal-asked him if ii was 10 be eel.
lected. He did not know. The trustees
he said. would be together and Jeci1.
One single word was not said to me- an
the subject afterwards! The indivil1,
who manages the business, on my couyprS.
ing with HIM since my arrival at home
and the transaction Of the violence, SAYS
that a written notice had been posted u3
calling for renewal IF notes. This 10.
tee had not seen. The very day BE-
fore | left home, | had conversation with
this individual on other business, and f, |
knew was about TO leave home, aud yet
SAID not a word to me Of the note! Nal
syllable had ever been said to me- by
him or any other individual, indicajiag
any uneasness about the note, OF evsa
asking mesto pay it And hat is more
the trustees did not order or authorize The
SUIT! la view of the fact that 0,r note
was o. but one years standing. aud Me
interest," paid up, the course pursued tow.
ards me shows itselfto be the offspring OF
oaseness and mahgnity, on tie par cf The
mover, or movers, when con:rasttd with
the lenIty shown others. A large amoua!
OF Interest was AT that time due from OH,
ers, In addition TO principal And The
individuals from whom il was due bad
transacted business with the manager Of
the concern, and paid much less promnt,
~ than | had. YET suits were not con.
mehced or thought of. When | cone
how TO lock the manager ia the ksce end
ask Tor all explanation, he preteLds to say
that he had heard il talked, for a rohi4
that was going to fail. On nv asbn:
MIN when, where and BY whom, be ketr
dark and vague. If there had been a
mueh talk about the matter as he pretends |
why had it not got to the ears of The lrus.
ees' through him or some ether chanae,
50 mat my particular attention could have
been directly called to the subject! But
above all, if he had been knowing 10 such
'oiA 'ol month, Why had he neglected 70
eau my attention personally to The note
Ills office and mine are on one floor, and
separated only BY common partition Of
studs lath' mortar, aud panel doors H'
was IN the Telegraph office, and had con-
Vefsa'lon with me on other business, as
already alluded TO, on the day previouso
my leaving home, and knew that | was
golng-and yet was silent about the noIs
was he SO neglected. of the towns bust
ness all This time he says the talk Of ny
failure was going on, that he forget 70
look up the matter or mention the mattel
TO mel Or did be bear it in mind aD5
lay his plan to get lawyers fees out oil