Louisville messenger. (Louisville, Miss.) 1842-1843, 1843-04-29
Printers F,c, S?i.
LOUISVILLE, April 10Th.

Mn. EpIroR: A letter purpoTt'IS
to have been written fromthls county
recently made its appearance IN the
columns Of the Mssissipplan over the
signature OF .'B." ltbcing the initial
Of nv name, and having prcvlousiy,
written communications signed Is,
the impression, has gone abroad 'ha'
| am the author of the aforesaid le..
Ter. | feel it duty, ! owe TO myself
% wen as the citizens otthis county,
to state that, never wrote ", ano
never heard Of il, un il my attention.
was called to it, in the Ml,sissipplan;
| do not know the author OF II nor 90
want to know him. But as his ic'-
Ter i calculated 10 make q wrong I'M
preston on the minds OF the people,
/ IN otl.er parts Of the State; WIN re-
gard to the sentiments entertained oy
the Democracy of this county, wi
remark, that there is but one short
sentence OF truth contained ~ ms
whole letter, that is where he says
Sol. HowardS scheme won't lake.
This is true; ] have never heard Tue
4 FIRST individual, wing or Democrat,
:. bondman or anti bond, who spoke Ia
yorably Of Col. Towards preientlons
tfor United States Senator, or, OF ms
r scheme TO pay the bends, but onstle
contrary, both these are locked uron
, as vi,iona Y projects that can never DC
ACCOMPLISHED. Every other assertion
: il said letter is incorrect, and otis
:. | am sure the people of this county
/, viii testify. The people of this coun'
: |ty highly esteem the Hon. 4. Y.
Brown; but they do not rejoice at
g lie rejection Of Gov. Tucker; they
r regret that he was not renominated,
v and there is much dissatisfaction ex-
& pressed at ms rejection. ] donot pre-
J, tend to say that the party in this coun-
!; ty will not support the nominate rs
y made by the convention; ! believe
o they will. but those nominations were
}. not hailed with that satisfaction winch
k lB. represents in his letter. have
thought proper 10 say this much IN
: regard to this letter of BIS. not that
,f am anxious to engage in newspa-
d pcr controversy with any one; but
e IN order to exculpate myself from tie
!. accusation ofhaving been the author
u Of the letter, as we'll as to dlsabuse
III the public mind in regard TO the op'n'
: ion of the Democracy of this coun'y'
4 IN reference to Gov. Tucker.
4 AS an individual Ihaye been the
{. personal and political friend Of Gov
% Tucker, since our first acquaintance
9 and lave always found him an homes
A. and an upright gentleman. during
8 the time he has acted as Executive 9
/. this state, have been Al observer y
his administration, and must ac'
Re knowledge am unable to see Inalhl'
IS elfici, ncy Of which some are SO oo'S'
ID rously complaining. ,,
" Since the above waswrl1telrl ,'av'
" been furnished with a.fcply 70 d. II
,e he Messenger, over the signature o
IN sC.' and Il ! am not greatly mistaken
J. / :, recognise an old Apolitical fflen!
,hoin 1911, s.jumpcd the chasms,
: and wen, over 10 the allied pa,ties 0
~ which he says, "Gov. Tucker was tn
~ o,ly man in all the ranks of Democra
10 ~ sufficiently bold and daring to en-
81. leS9tlc contest onthc side cfthe Peo
u ~. and oppose Il "A am happy Z
VI llindmv old friend has returned to w
~ N