The Ripley advertiser. [volume] (Ripley, Miss.) 1843-1897, 1843-09-30

~. r~~s~sssss~ssss~~~-uss sllAss
der discussion, Mr.. Road offered % emcnd-
nes providing thar nothing in should
ae,teod or be construed 10 srteHds TO any
lcon,ros, made before The passage and pro-
INDICATION Of Mis ac.." Those who votes LOT
ibis amendment, were
Messrs. Barton, Bell, Branch, Cobb.
Chaod,cr, Fiudlsy, Hendricks, Macon,
Marks, Noble, Randolph Reed. Smith Of ..
|C. TszwsIl, White and Wiley 10
Against h-Mcssss. Batenan, bENrox,
Berrien, Boul;gny, Chambers, Chase, Clay"
ton. DrcxERsoN Eaton, Edwards, Harrison,
Hayne, Holmes, JOHNSON Of Ky, Johnson
of La, Kane, Mckinley, KlNe, Knight,
Mills, R,dgely, Robbins, Rowan, Rugsles,
Sanford, Seymour, SilAbee, Smith Of Md,
Thomas, vAr BuREs, Williams and Woos-
nyay 80 ICING. debates vol III. PIP
tA-l4O.
! Thus the vote was l~o TO one in favor d
extending tho operation Of the bill to Pre-:
viousiy existing contracts. On tho 3Is' o.
January, The question on engrcssirg the
Bill for ts passage was tnAcn Tho results
was as iollows:
For it--Messrs. Bateman, BENTON, Bog>
,1eNy, Berr,en. Edwards, Harrison, Havne,
JouNsoN If Ky, Kane, Knight, Mills, Mob
bias, Siisbee, Smith IND, and Thomas.
lis
Against il cssrs. Barton, Bell, Chsn>
dlef. Cbasn. Clayton, Cobb, Dicketson,
Eaton, iIendricks. King, Macon, Marks,
Randolph, Res.i, k,dgeIy, Rugg'e., San'~
tcrd, Seymour, Smith Of s. C, 1nzsws.l,
Van Buren,, White Wiley, W'''a,rs and
Woodbury.. ---25 Gong deba'es =, sON)
Tho usin objection urged by Mr.. Van
isurca and others Ia tho bill, was 'fhs Tina
'93rd sec,iop extended tho bsnet Of II all
iclasses as we'll ~ traders. During she de-.
Ita,e, Coz. johnson repvd to that otjsalon
las follows:
! nMr johnson, Of Kentucky, sad that no
wae sorry the discussion had taken Il torn
so unexpected aud 50 unhappy, as TO bring
Ithe mercantile aud agricultural 'h'eres's
into collision, aud make u party matter
between them. He did not suppose ,hht
/ he committee were disposed TO deprive Tho
-. IL h,tl hosn
, llhey were Obliged TO bear share Of all tho
steqte il uas TO remedy. Mr. J. observed,
! ,nAt he should vote for Inc bill! It Inc sec~
> ,on under consideration were retained; bu.
no cef,ainIy could not, if it were struck Out.
: The gentleman last nn the floor {Nlr. VGn
$ Bat.n wa. one Of the committee; uni it was
, the first li.se he had heard bA, yen,;eman's
1. 0piaian was adverse 10 ih's section: and
he fen As much regrs, as surprise at dts
Towering he was against il He Thought
} rha, il THE bill wore oYpl,sd 10 QUO class, il
a .hculd b ano:her. " hey pnssed this I,..
10 aiisvists tho suffering Of merchants only,
it would be partial lsw ss regards '6s
Q other classes. The vlvifyng oriscipto
(, oush, not 10 be confined 10 any privileged
;, order: bu. The relief aud advantages held
forth III the bill oush. 10 DO general aad un>
y confined, and their good effects b. dispen-
70 sed to tho cottage as we'll as 10 The palace;
- and unless such was the nature Of The bill,
\ he could not vote for H."
a Tho Senat. refused {Cung deb. p. lS2)
= 10 strike GU, the 93rd section. The vote
!, upon the motion 10 strike cut is hus lcoor-
det:
YEAS essrs, Boil, Branch, tls,ton,
Cobb, Dckesson, johnson Of La, King,
Maco", Randolph, Reed, Ridgely, Sanford,
!, Smith Of y. c., Tazsweil, Van Buren,
a white, Wiley, Williams ana Woodbury. 10
NAYS essrs Barton, Ba,eman, Benton,
i'errien, Bouiisny, Chambers, Chandler,
Y Eaton, Edwards, t'indIey, Harrison, nayne.
Hendricks, Holmes. Johnson Of Ky, Kane,
. knight, Marks, Mckinley, Robbios, Rowan,
J Rugglos, Seymour, SiIsbee, Smith Of Md,
and Thomas-26.
'f The opponents Of tho bill aftsrwards oh,
n tanned reconsideration Of this vote p 227)
' Before the vote on tho motion to reconsider,
}. MIR Van Buren, thus expressed himself:
" "He had, during the lato discussion, di.
!. rectcd bis efforts against the ninety-third
fSectIOE. q nd the vote given yeatArdav had