New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1843-06-20
THE TRIBUNE.
Lnter from Europe.

Sunday morning, WIN LlVcrpOoi odles " WV "a
INST, her day of sailing The only news OF de-
eded interest is that concerning the progress OF
Repeal in Ireland The condition ofthe country
1 daily becoming more critical. O'Connell has
-:ai.cd Cork and other parts OF Ireland address
M hundreds of thousands at each meeting, and
HING every where received with the utmost en-
fasasm.
Sir Edward Sugdcn, tho Lord Chancellor of
Inland, with the entire concurrence of the MIN
itry, displaced from the rnagistracy several gen.
1smen, because they had either attended at or
p,esided over Repeal meetings. The first person
inns dismissed was Lord J7lrcnch, and among the
Isl Mr.. O'Conncll himself. A fiery and angry
DISCUSSION in the House Of Lords did but elicit
from the Lord Chancellor that his learned col
hague was justified in the expulsion he had risked.
Several others have voluntarily resigned their
atSces in consequence Of these measures. O'Con-
he'll in his reply to the letter of the Lord Chan
esllOr's private Secretary, (who was his son. de-
clares that, Gas the restoration Of the Irish Par
lament is an event, in my judgement, rot re-
EBts | will avail myself of the opportunity
,sorded BY seat in the Irish House of Commons
omovc for the Impeachment Of the present Lord
Chancellor for presuming 10 interfere with the
subjects dearest and most precious nght-the
ight Of petitioning Parliament"
Mr. O'Connell made g long speech at the Re
pe, Association at Dublin, in which he denied
that he had ever said he would rest contented
With the Catholic Emancipation, and aVowed that
lie would never cease his efforts till the Union
Act was repealed and an Irish Parliament re-
established. With reference TO Sir Robert Pecls
declaration of Her Majesty's intention to sup
press the Repeal movements by force if necessary,
Mr.. oConnell used the following language
Vas said that Sir Robert Feel most rraguarlY aud
most indecenty had dragged into parliamentary discussion
be name of the Queen who he declared had expressed her
determination resist the Repeal Sir Robert Peel, ever
crafty and designing, had made this declaration, not IN tie
shape Of formal message from the sovereign to the house,
Tor which he well knew that, minister he would have
Teen accountable: but he lad the sukng audacity 10 hide
behind the drapees OF the throne, and from that he altered
sentiment, sentiment of her Majesty, which his royal
mistress uttered and would utter ear hear
But Sir Robert Peel had been coerced TO admit the Queen
though he was well Of this recantaton reiterated
Peel declaration III his letter Lord French. He (Alr
0COnnel) woad not harsh word-he would not cha
Pecis assertion IN word OF one lie
would say that it fasity" and Peel knew 1t to be
such ,hcar hear) But as he (Mr OConne upon this
Subject he solicited the attention of every who
pesen. that assembly the announcement he was
about 10 make Cloud cnes of hear, hear lie was GO
Ing inform them of fact to the certainty oil which he
pledged himself solemny and most emphacay hear,
har He had derived his information from source which
alike incapable Of deceving being deceived and the
fact which he hadlearned from such inconesbe authority
this thGt The Queen The aert time that she sd'c Rect
upon ec business after has extraordinary dectarGfton
lEFRoAcHEp HIN for herring made such use Of her name
Ia manner too unconstitutional and not upon his own
ministers for although Feel might no"
cone forward and say he reponstle he had not made
lie declaration in responsible form, and he had incurred the
deaure Of the Queen who made any such deciara-
ton he attributed her hear hear and loud cheers
Leterey leave that with the perfect certainty that
this occurred Oear hear Oh long life TO the Queen
May Heaven bless her. three cheers for her tremendous
cheeng) He glad that they received this i'm
pftan intelligence in such spirit, that he assured them
that hey might rely upon its authenticity He could not be
deiyed himself was he deceiying them; and he again
emphatcay assured them that the Queen made such de-
ca,ion Peel had pu; into her mouth; the contrary
she regarded Pees conduct in making such of her name
with high dpeasurs and when next he went 10 the palace
she did request him for dinner usually the
custom when the minister waited the sovereign upon oi
eial business hear and cheers) Who the; loyal man
now %
The Freeman's Journal thus sums up the Incl
dents which indicate the triumphant progress Of
Repeal:
The triumphant progress of Repeal during the past week
has exceeded even the aacipGtons OF the most sangune
ineads OF nationality.
Peel called for further coercion and Lord Chancellor
Sugdsn dismissed Repeal The first TO
these Indications the par, OF the Government was the
A nf of
prudent determined Longford In defiance OF the
unconstitutional threat and with voice soemnly pledged
themselves TO obtain legislative Independence The Mail
Called for the suppression of public opinion and attempted
70 bully the Government into prosecution OF the Repeal
ade The this audacious attempt was the juno
aon Of fifteen barrser headed by the son OF the great and
good o'LoghenSir Charles OLoghlen, BaSt--a of whom
declared their determination To support The constitutional
sh OF the Irish psoplc Harry Broucham and the Stan.
aa proclaim that civil must be enacted for the sup
Pessoa Of Repeal. Tpperary-chiralrous but canmni'
ea Ipperarsent in eight hundred leaders and eighteen
Sand associates pledged to preserve the peace oil Ireland
he iron Dnke has ordered troops and bayones Tor Ireland
Steamships have been prepared marine artillery embarked
anu ortS manned for the sub ugation OF the national spll
he English funds have fallen four per and two thou
Two hundred pounds voluntarily poured INTO the
insh exchequer.'
Charles Winners News Letter quotes r,lmor
that many of the regiments located in Ireland are
IN favor Of Repeal; tic regiment of which
Lord Charles Wellesley, the Dukes son, is Lieu
tenant Colonel, are said to be pledged TO support
Repeal.
riot occurred on the oath Of May at Man
Chester, between the soldiers and police. The
matter Is undergoing rigid investigation.
IN the debate on the second reading of the
AIMS Bill, Lord Eliot, the Secretary for Ireland,
who moved it, thus explained its provisions:
The only deviation the present measure from the bill OF
e late Government 10 substitute for the affidavit
sred recommendation by two respectable persons that
e appcan, ii. person to possess arms, and place
ee Roman Catholic this respect tho footing
Inc Protestant; have the of all persons, rich poor,
branded and registered and their owners eensed to allow
TO the Court discretion not present as 10
Porting imprsoniug persons whose possession were
eaad anlas pixies dagers or other destruc
u'e Implements eyidenty intended Tor unlawful purposes
. allow Justice OF the Peace power to grant search
warrant in which The Of the officer to whom ITS exc
a.