The Madisonian. [volume] (Washington City [i.e. Washington, D.C.]) 1837-1845, 1843-11-09


We Inadvertently omitted the letter Of Mr. Ewing,
which we promised Yesterday and we publish It to,
day and aak those who have RAJ Cd The cry Of tgeaeh
cry against M Tyler 70 peruse Mr.. Ewings letter
carefully, ana Then answer The question" Was the
Bank IN issue in i640w Mr. Ewing says il was not,
and that Il was mpudent and absurd 10 say that il
was. Mr. Badger, another retiring Secretary says
that the charge that General Harrison was in favor
Of United States Bank IS Jaise sy % ass ~ Do
you hear that Messrs. New Era and Republican3
Deaf as adders They can't hear word Blind as
bats They can't see word Of IL Let il not be
forgotten that the question touching Mr. Badgers
statements arose in debate Ia the Senate (see yes
terdays Old School Democrat on which occasion
Mr. Buchanan said he had been informed that Mr.
Badger had pronounced the assertion that General
Harrison was IN favor of a United States Bank a
falsehoodn Mr. Graham, Senator from North Ca
rolina admitted that Mr.. Badger had SO declared.
Mr. Calhoun said he held 10 his hand the speech of
Mr. Badger and read from it as follows " Aist il
Is said that General Harrison Jarors Bank Of The Uni
ted States. The charge is false. HIS opinions on The
contrary are against a Bank These are Mr.. Secre-
tary Badgers words
Was a Bank the issue in 1902 Such an idea e
"impudent and absurd p sa, MIR Retiring Secreta-
ry Ewing Was Gen. Harrison in favor of a Bank
OF the United States IL is Jalsehood SAYS Mr. Re-
firing Secretary Badger Well, now, here Is BRET
" kettle Of fish, Both these worthy gentlemen as
sured the country, pon honor, when advocating
Harrison and Tyler's election, in 1910, that Bank
was not IN issue, and 1t was impudent VERY" ap-
dent to say that Bank was in issue {; and n was
moreover, fasehood" to assert that Harrison IA
yored Bank; and yet they and their friends have
the efronery to President Tyler Of treache,u
because he vetoed Mr.. Clays Bank bill!! Can it be
possible there IS sensible man in this nation who
believes Mr. Tyler ever favored National Bank?
An but say the Clayes, he ought n II TO have per-
mitted his name to be used by the Wings unless he
could carry out their measures Nor did he !! " hat
were their measures' Was National Bank ONE
Answer il Mr.. Ewing! Answer it MIR Badger
Mo-" says Ewing, accompanied with the indignant
remark, that il was impudent and absurd" 10 Say it
was. " No. says Mr.. Badger, and adds, lie Who
says Harrison was for Bank, uttcrs ga fasehood!p
But Mr. Clay comes forward and AYERS that Ma
tonal Bank was what he supposed was in issue.
Oh, remember CALCULATES Messrs Ewing and
Badger simultaneously, {" a Bank was the issue and
II Mr.. Tyler dares TO veto your bill, we'll retire in
disgust and swear that he is traitor.n And the
deed was done. The veto came, and then came the
oi NAL retirement per orders, because the President
would not carry out the fought for IN 1910
And then came the formal denunciation of John ~
Ter, as traitor by those self same treachelous men
who, IN 1910, had souty insisted and resolutely
swore that Bank was not the issue !! Such are The
witnesses who swear that John Tyler is traitor
ay and they would swear than he is an Indian, il it
would promote Mr.. Clay's elevations