The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1843-08-14

house. in Roxbury and took out to ride, and then
made The proposition. objected at first to hold large
sum $4,000 He returned In three weeks from his
journey and then used $1,000 o. bis Dill: and they
time on my checks-memorandum checks There was
an understanding between had received loan Of
Wyman; at time got the loan of his check at his
house / did net obtain loans at the Phoenix Bank in
banking hours part Of his loan to was effected by
his taking up my note in the Phoenix Bank for 5000 He
also lent $1,000 my check; also S400n the same
way my note He still holds my Individual note Tor
$1,000 Wyman has discounted my notes, which were
In the summer of is40, received from VIM Skinner.
check Of Stanley Reed Co.. on the Bunker Hill Bank
Mr. wyman said he would be responsible for the check
and received Phoenix Bills for some weeks afterwards
II for $4,000 He requested me to keep entirely 10
myself that had loaned him money on Pb@nix bis-ne
enoined secrecy several times. had interviews with
him at Roxbury Charesown and Boston, IN the day time
andi in the evening. charged interest on the standing
him much as $4,000 at time, prior to examination
days His standing loan about $4,000 The S26 600
wsud include this permanent loan let him have his
bills back for day or So, on his check
Mr. Odiorne also testified that he had known of arrange
with other banks to allow balances to lay over and
interest to to the holder of the balance Such be-
ances would range from $4,000 10000 between our city
| banks.
Mr.. Bank Commissioner Shove one Of the gentlemen
who paid ten thousand dollars year for watching
the banks and preventing them from acting improperly
and illegally appears had some very queer trans
actions with the Phoenix Bank. DR. George Bates of
the old directors stated on Tuesday in reply to Mr. Web
ster-
soner Shove, in March, 1912 to the amount Of 900
$4,000. And we told MIR. Wyman that there was too
had not had time to take up his notes but would in day
or two substitute business paper iorit.
DR.. Bates was very cautious in his evilence and
marked IN reply to question by Mr. Huntington, if he
in relation to the contents OF package Of notes
examined by him in March, Dr. Bates said 80" not
Of anything. have been SO much deceived that will
not undertake TO be sure"
This 10 certainly the age OF fnanciering.
| III
On Friday, the fifth day of this trial. witnesses
examined for the prisoner mainly prove that the writ
ing the stolen Treasury Notes not the writing of
Dowden. Mr.. Jesse E. Dow, magistrate gave the fo
lowing testimony -
Ihave seen the prisoner write often, and nothing
that looks like his writing, either in the shape Of the let
tiers general style of writing either of the be.
fore the court Since the arrest of Mr.. Dowden have
had suspicious Of another persoL and as magistrate
Smith and told him that II he would back me believed
could find the real thief Iconversed with Major Smith
he Register for hour, and during the conversation
Smith exclaimed, Great God you prove to me that
story is good until another is told" WAS anxious
find the thief BELIEVING that Mr. Broom guilty and it
my intention if an affidavit could be procured to
rest him. had nothing but suspicious against Mr..
Broom but those suspicious very strongstopger in
teys that would ike to see cleared up or Explained by
Mr. Broom before can satisfy my mind that Broom is
innocent.
Mr. Broom it will be recollected was voluntarily and
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS in the with Mr. Barrett who
had charge the Treasury Notes. and In the letter writ
ten by B. c. Campbell to Mrs. Dorsey he spoken of
as friend of the writer and to him Mrs Dorseys reply
was sent under to the Hon Dixon H. Lewis whose
letters Mr. Broom authorized to receive and open
There 49, however, testimony in the connecting
Dowden with the negro by whom they sent to Bal
timore and such evidence haf been shown to exist
against Mr.. Broom. Mr. williamson another witness
gave the following evidence -
am acquainted with Mr. Dowdens hand writing; from
the conviction of my mind, the Benjamin Camp.
bell r" and &C. James Cox the two notes. do be-
ieve they are in the hand writing the accused any
part of either
Cross examined Il cannot say that any part of ei,her
name is in Mr.. Dowdens hand writing Taxing the word
Benjamin" separately, do not believe it is Mr.. Dow
marked that could find birds without going to
Dowden" am lawyer by profession (at present
corder in the land oftice)
In the Of the proceedings of this day Mr. Hoban
got up little episode his hook" In notice OF
the commencement of this trial. made passing re
mark on the course pursued by this Mr. Hoban in whose
judgment and we formed our opinion from what
we read Of his opening, we could place conf.
dence, and we said as much we might possibly
have intimated that he exceedingly gaseous end
would explode in open court, unless his wiser
sociate took charge Of him-at least ought to
have said So if did not. And have not additional
ground for the opinion expressed Why he furnhed
Friday by bringing his private griefs and exhibiting
his wounded vanity before the court and jury with whom
remarks Of ours could have possible connection
But he's all froth and blubber and unfit to be
entrusted with the trial Of Of the that
in which he is now engaged and except when the
Jury are to be humbugged and the court bamboozled.