Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1841-1853, 1843-07-11

would suppose that the Wing Editors had never been
guilty Of publishing private letter even dishonesty OBJ
tanned They have quite forgotten. the famous
Cro,ring Litter" which published no, only by
every Wing paper in this State bu throughout the conn
try They have forgotten. too, how that letter was OBJ
tanned but we havnt II was fresh in our memory
when We received that Of the Treasurer If State and hc
remembrance quoted any scruplcs might otherwise
have been influenced by in deciding upon the proPreiy
Of publishing that Of the Treasurer copy Of that
"crowin- letter Was (as has been 'nsinHafed by the
Journal in relation TO Dunnl stolen from Post Once
II was not only stolen Post Office, bot meanness
greater than theft perpeiraied by GfeTofon 81 Tie feT
to suit the purposes the Hard Cider PoliIc'ans-nn act
equivalent TO forgery Where was the indignation,
moral and religious, of the Rus'vilIe Wing. and the
whole tribe of Wing politicians when those acts OF real
taseness were perpe,raied II slept The act was ap-
proved nv them; The letter exuied over from one enc os
the country to the other and the perPeraior &C.
,,ardcd with the highest official honors &c the State.
But the letter Of the State Treasurer. SAYS the Wing
was written in resard 10 pirate r0rSs-matiers with
which the public had business hGtorer or thus the
public will nudge We differ entirely with the Wing
II as intended be PIRATE certain extent no doubt
1t intended only FOR the pirate eye q" the eerfe-
men" OF the Wing party; and II "was oogtdsHfiaHy
shown to tho editor of the Wing But related alto
eeher to the public business to party political aciion
There wo;d relation To private personal
matters If there had been. should have erased IT.
rIs being case conceive ourselves fully justified
in the publication admitting. for the sake Of agu-
,nent fha, our letter and The Wings letter are and
the same George II Dunn. before he became office
holder himself expressed great horror, all the Wings
did abou, official interference He Praofoes after he
became ono were matter Of interest 10 the people and
Of which they had right TO know This interference,
to be dangerous be silly Praotsed; and we have
right TO find it and publish the best way we can,
pro, ided we DO il honoraby- We have done nothing
improper in the prcmscs-noihng that We SHALL not do
again to expose the corruption of the officials here ano
put the people their guard against ieir "ashisaions
The false impualions of The Wings in consequence, we
shall scorn a. we have scornod their principles
The editor of the Wing thinks II makes no PARTICLE
of difference whether the letter was puroIned fon
ITS fcloniousy. picked up IN the street We
think does make very essential dIerenceJust the
difference between the of the person furnishing
m the letter of Dunn. and that Of the puToner OF The
Growing letter Upon the principles of moralify and
religion avowcd by the Wing, If one should accidentally
discover pirate letter the street. from Mr. Dunn, or
any BODY else unSeaied and containing violence :hat
himself and coaduors intended 10 rob the Treasury and
run off with all the which distributed
the laws he would be guilty OF monsrous crime by ex
posing the pirate scheme 10 The public Who own the
Treasury, WHY. Mr.. Dunn viii not himself, rabid as
he may be- and anxious TO cling 10 his oilce-he Will not
avo,v himself of such doctrine that He
thought was right in 1889 90 the expense Of pr
vaie Investigation of officers under oath discover f
they had guilty official corruption and interference
In elections and certainly he would not have objected
the evidence obtained either that way
or accidentally tending throw light upon their extra
official conduct
We might extend these comments upon the article of
the Wing. but we conceive IL 10 be unnecessary. The
letter of Mr. Dunn itself - the matter OF chief interest
to the public, deyeopes extent the strenuous
efforts being made by the Juno maintain their ascend
ancy in this State. Our consccnces are quite easy on
the subject of the by which obtained it. aud
the public responsible for any sin involved in The
transaction.
The letter Of the Treasurer rCpnbsh below.
that may be compared with the of the Wing
The pubic can II 1t relates pirate with
hch they have business, asserted by that paper
ISDrAsAFoLis, APRIL :, ls43
Fsiend- We omit the name
cur committee publ hing 10 WhiicOmb's
& Facts FOR the People with HIGH l. deuged
the state Iepafed by O. II. Smith and sah TO be
able. TIE SUBSCRIPTIONS HERE WILL FURNISH
ABOUT ONE HUNDRED FOR EACH COUNTY, but
yours should here or 300 al least They sell for :lper
100 and osip viii hc taken Beng in neat pamphlet form
they II be nuch handler o reference and perhaps be
useful Suggest his matter to some OF our i'snds ~
ORDERED SOON WE CAN SEND THEM BY THE
TEAMS THAT DISTRIBUTE THE LAWS
Have you noticed the Journal II i well conducted
and must have effect in the campaign.
My respects 10 cd friends. hope they viii not let
themselves be caught mapping IN 1888
Yours tsuly. q. H. DUNN.
Will have FIVE Of the Split Of 40 IL spare
through the campaign. and III send them persons
you viii designate III your county who viii use then most
prt1tiy Are there not five suggest L.
who viii rot feel themselves able documents,
rho 'r0ui 10 dc'ire an using then, sent 10 them.
The Difference.
The Cleveland Plain Dealer says.-Two wears ago,