Vermont telegraph. [volume] (Brandon [Vt.]) 1828-1843, 1843-04-05

.Dullon was a short time subsequent 10
WGght's lecture. at Carle,on's house,
when the latter peremplorily demanded
what he thought of virgins charge of
,urakshness. Brother. Duuon rather
eyaded an answer But Carleton author |
itatively demanded, What do yOn hink of
Il! "Why," said brother Duuon. IF |
must answer you, will say, Mat Ilhink
YOU care occasion for the remark for
had you been there the remark would not
have been made" This constitutes the
entire foundation forthe first charge A
man is privaiely pressed Tor his indiridu.
al OpiaiOn. and for giving il, is publicly
prosecuted before religious jadcatory-|
aud is religiously decapitated. But then
il was his private opinion Of priest
Here's the rub. He was bound 10 have
q cool opinion OF his priest, or else to have
no opinion Of hin. Verify, il must be as
a certain clergyman has lately said.
THE san against The Holy Giost whieh
hath torgireaess neither in this rortd, nor
"a that Which is 10 come, is To SPEAK
AGAINST Tue MINISTER" Again.. a
man must no., even when asked by
PRIEST himself, sly that he so much as
L.
times
(b) When the Article above referred TO,
was shown to brother Dduon. he remark.
I'd that be thought il was not far from the
ruth; but that he did no: like Il. G.
Wright's harsh pronunciation Of Garlic
ton. The article was an exposure OF
Culelon's dupIicly. aud malicious mis-.
conduct. But 10 expose a clergyman is
to sc0adqLize him. Ii is Of course, it the
exposure is made by layman; bu, |
did not know b. FIRE us il was scandal
br one ordaintd head, 10 expose the
sins Of another. Bfot Cr D. ton sould
Tot be responsible, for the exposure Of
bis Pastor. HIS sin lay 10 admitting
that III c. Wrighl had spoken the tru,h.
Bot this charge MS the other, hinges on
the fact that the pastors in(aiiibiLity is
impeacheJ. Verify foI bis delivery from
tae Clutches Of a Pastor, a man may we'll
sing, with The thinks giving OF D. borah,
and The inspiration of Ovid, for triumph
over their enemies.
(c) He has accused he Editor Of the
ChrOaicls Of falsehoOd. II is unnecessary
10 MENTION, that il is The VermonI Chroa-
wle which * here referred TO. Horrible
@ral The man has spoken the truth
~ respect TO another Ordaiael diciac.
his the greatest crime OF which a man
can be guilty. III The estimation OF the
DIeiss Brotherhood for nan 10 tell the
Truth about the priests. What occasion
bal friend Duion 10 speak thus Of the
Editor Of the Chronice2 AT The time
brother Wright was IN Stowe, copies OF
that PAPER had been Induslriorsy circu.
lated, containing n most libsllous article
fom Boston paper, concerning ne prin-
cpes Of Non Resistance The Chroni-
Gle endorsed and subscribed the article.
Those who heard II. 6. Wright. and
who had seen the article in the Chronicle,
began 10 irqnire the meaning Of the
Chronicle. A copy Of the paper, was
handed to brother Wright, who exposed
he fllsehood, s2iEual kuovery and scan
d., which characterize the Chronicle.
But friend Dulton was ioSeige1 to say
what be did. An efiod was rmade to
draw him to say that the Editor Of the
Chronicle had told a tci!fuL ialsehood
Aad coud he not nave said il wilhc VI
nuch risk A paper that for the las
leo years had thrown lis influence agains
he progress oflruth--which has not seru
pied to employ falsehood when irutf
would serve better - which has poured
Tie bile OF its malice through its sectariar
taannels. sallowing and blasting all with
hhs inAuencc-it really seems that Iiul
could be risked in point of veracily, ha
rieud Dullon said The falsehood had bee
'Aered wilfu w.
(d) Is there any great difficulty 10 PEI
Giving that the mountain is here labor
loo 10 hr;ro f,r,h n monse2 T'ha othe