The Charlotte journal. [volume] (Charlotte, N.C.) 1835-1851, 1843-01-19

tDcft.
Mr.. Moore said, the amendment TO the
amendment would destroy the ratio IN the
9Th District, but he chiefly rose upon
question of order, VIZ. whether an amend.
men, which had been offered IN The second
reading Of the Bill, could be Uttered IN pre-
cisely the same form, upon The third read
ING OF the Bill. The Speaker decided, Inc
amendment could be offered. The amend
men, was further debated " Messrs. Coop
er. Howard, Muye, and Spruhi; aud the
question being on striking out, VAS by Ayes
! IL Noes %, decided in the negative.
Mr.. D,ckerv moved TO strike out all The
arrangement, Of the Districts as proposed ~
the bill, with the exception Of the FIRST and
Ninth, aud insert the following
% DisrpIcr-s,okes, Surry, Ashe, Wilkes,
/ lrcdeil, Davidson -I3,b2l.
81 DIsrRicr-L Lincoln, Meckicnburg, Rowan
Davie. Arson and Cabarrs-750i9,
!th DisrRIcr- Cumberland, Chatham, Moore
Robson, Richmond, Montgomery, Randolph and
Sunly-73,3l3
5th DsrRlcr- Orange, Person, Caswoll, Rock.
Etnrham and Gulltotd-7l,236.
9Th DIsrRicr-Na sh, Halifax, Warren, Frank.
In. Granville and Wake-I2,ll6.
III Columbus, Bladcn, Brunswick
New Hanover, Sampson, Dupin. Lcnolr, Ons'
low, Wayne and johnston 1881.
sth DisrRICr-Carieret, Craven, Hyde, Tyr.
reli. Washington, Beantori, Greene, PIT, Edge'
comb aud Joncs-12 500
llr. Moore opposed the plan, and eshlb
tied two diagrams, showing, 10 ais opInion,
conclusyely, tie iucongrulty Of the DIS
tlicts as proposed BY the amendment, which
by AYES II, Noes SO, was rejected
sir. Walker moved to emcnd the bill by
striking out Cabarrus from The Second, aud
; adding It to Tie Fourth. Rejected, BY cas-
10, Nays SO.
M M1reheai moved to amend the Dbl!
by striking oct all after the enaciiug clause
aud inserting the iolloaIne;
lstnlsreirr-C urli,uc&, Camden P4squoiank
/ Peroaimons, Gates. Chowan, HEREFORD Bertle
, TerrsiI. Washington and Norihsmpton-Io 1881
2I usrEicr-flyde, Beaufort fiu, Greene
I.enoir, Jones, Cayteret, Craven, onssow' DUP
lin-I3 .G7.
3dDsrucr-M Martin u *, Warren, Frank
lin. Nash Edgecomb and uyne-ol,55I
i,h DisrEicr -GranyNe, Person, Orange
{ Chatham and Woke-l6,ysi.
Il 5,h DtsrElcr-lohnston, Cumberland, Moore
o Robson, Baden. Columbus, Brunswick New
!. Hanover and sampson 1902.
=, 9th DisrgICr-C asWcll, Rocklngham, Stokes
Gulllord and Randolph 69.llb
IS 7th Disrstcr- Richmond. Montgomery An
;, son. stanly, CabaFrus, Mecklenoasg aud Ian
. eolu-74,sI0.
. s,h DisrEicr-Surry. Ashc, Wilkes, l'cdel
: n,vts Dayitsnu and RowaN- =, Oii
~ 9Th Disrucr Caldwell, lancy, Burke, Boz
= oombe Haywood Macon, Cherokee, Henderson
: Rutherford and Cleselaud-6 .3o9,
ie Which amendment, by Ayes 81, Noe
n %, was rejected.
e Mr.. Lafklus moved TO strike out " SJot
a Washington" AID lnser; Wilmington,
g which Odd not prevail.
.. Mr. Moore moved TO amend by tnserlIn
al clause providing for the Bill no, to 90 III
effect until after the ith day Of March mex
o which was agreed 10.
c The bill then passed its final reading
Ayes 80, Noes II.
- HOUSE or COMMONS.
A message from HIS Escelleoey, Cover
q or Mofehead. transmitting notice from
= <oiariaI Officer, to Charles l.. ilnio
Public Treasurer informing hun ihat Il
bond or The payment Of en- Insialment
the loan 10 said company, $4,000 b
been protested FOR non payment winch "
read, and on no.l-u Of Mr. Bower, lad
- the iable.
"a This question pending yesterday, cns
- the adoption Of the amendment. Of hlr. b.
- roger. 10 The Resolutions Of Mr.. Jouts,
;. Orange.
- Mr.. Avery being entitled to the floor, n
dressed the House at great length, 10 tay
: Of the original Resolutions.
i Nj. CaIdael, ot Burke, replied 10 N
-" Avery, ard Sir. Avery trjnined.
The debate was continued Uutil half p
two o'clock, by Alessrs. Leach. Jackst
Scales, aud Caldwell. OF Iredell. Before \
I" Caldwell had concluded be gave way 10 y
'u' nebdenhail, who moved for an udJau'
menl; and on hrs motion the House a'louI
~ cd until O'Clock.
-. EVENING SESSION.
ma Tho House met al O'Clock, aud rcsu
~. "a the discussion.
her Mr Caldwell Of Ireicll, took the Go
Law and concluded his remarks.
as Mr.. Bartinger followed IN an abIe exp'
for Of the provisions OF the Resolutions ollel
ner by 'Ir. Jones, md N support Of tho amc'
a. mcnt offered by hunseiL
ce Mr.. Jones, Of Orange, replied ut so
and length, and vas followed by Hf Bigss
no .Hr. Mills aud Mr.. Nash rose abou,
aid same time to reply to Mr.. Biggs, aud
on Speaker gave the noor 10 Dir. nls
Ter fore Mr.. Nils had proceeded far, be q
end way to Mr.. Pope, who moved hr an
nix, laurnmcn,; aud the Ayes and Noes be-
,nt called for, the motion did not prevail
Mr. WcRac thea renewed the motion
inc adjournment, stating that he was anx,oJ'
i, TO vote 90 he question, but # the debate =
tie continued, and the question taken TO ,ng
rom he must necessarily be absent, AS his hea
the would not permit him 10 remain longer