Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1841-1853, 1843-11-07
ID cIo.lnnl ~. M lnIll

gain of sc,cntccn iheu-aud ia ac.c four STATE.
o. change of S 500 votes would Lave reelected lim Pr
sidcu: 50 that Mr. Van Hufcn was aetuaiy defeated hy
an If, ,iiec arty oil les than enc haI efoac PER- csat
aul vt with the ulaoul,,d proofs aoutd us Of the I'M
crease the popularity those dorncs with VIII en- and
Tor which d. Wa defeated tie auisan- Of his rivals iah
w.h nazus confidence OF lis wait II oaaiabill1 from
these Ic.aiis.
Look at De results ia ihcsc same States ,ace. Maine
a. since given the Duotfafi- tickets steady naoriies
exceeding lOoa0 New ORR has given $1,000. Penn.
s,lvau.a - eco. New Jersey Us adoultfu STATE and
may as safely be counted the side Tie other =
showing that ~ flur States Whig mai,div # 1000
has iecn converted nioa democratic m,i ry 81 at le,
55Da0-ei,irs cain If s-Oa9 VOTES vhcie oaiy ninc
lousnud rcd,d - reverse The result 81 Iei0, The
Ike gains have token 53ee every where showing that not
ony an effective glia las tocn nadc states which
would clc, Mr. Van Nprn. bat dat the groWh at the
same political cause has !ccn steady over tie country
How en- any honestly s.y that iu Name New TX
and P,umss aua. there arenoi suisict acccss!oas 10 III
dcmocra strength 60 give Mr. Van Burrn the vie, Of
those states 1t nominated ao Democratic candidate
VI HON else could L. benefit moe Evctp' IN Penrs, l.
,ania, where Mr. buchanan Is first. Nr. van Duren is
neariv the sole choice o tie party IA al the other States
+ II Cahe IN. Cass Johnson ai is more popular
Which Of ihen has there any parry conllrale ia
numbers to tia. which pnpa,os Nir Naa Busc.l Not
ore.
Ava. then with this rrcpos'erous attempt 10 ST ~ an
rated account % Toe popular mtI my IN $40 as
an argument against the availability ol hl Van Buren
AID the SIN prcposrod- claim that respect for that
demonstration demands The audience democrats The
withdrawal 81 Nr Van Bur,n. Tie same call vop,I
aadanruent If opposition The loair ant party
the Fedora Government; 81 unTGsis;ing concession Of
the tariff the bank and distribution and ali the Nbi.
measures which passed by whig Congress elect
"a tT the caasiu ucy which in 1910 voted aratu>,
Van Durcn. Is W.! m ght Mr.. Calhoun be called rnon
abandon al opposition 70 the whg supremac fty ana
forever be-ause the principles Of democracy were over
thrown in 40. and Wing Legislature and WIZ Ky
ocuiIsc e=al shed ct Washington. We ackaoN edge
no obligation - cease concuduc faT tie rst, to an.
don tie struggle for principles AID duty because they nav
have suffered popular revcrses and The experience #
tie coupfry has shown hat such second apro.s coin
after OF di-ast, have been followed by The ~ ~
powerful reactions aai The largest aud iaos, enduring
tginmyhs.
Wh left rson ated. 1896. the people railie,
around him. and rrcstab>hed the constitution through
him. IN the erca, poicai revolution OF $500 When
cener Jackson defeated So hv The coalition Of
Clay with Adams, the rally a beaten CANDIDATE was
great enthusiastic, and Triumphant. And if one might
examine The credentials Of those who ts argument
against Mr. Van Buren, auh not that we shou' find
tia; they bad themselves in 1910 assisted by votes if not
wi'h oratery. IN the Of Gen H4rris5q
who had been beaten by Mr. Van Buren, in 1880 In
their furious zeal 10 apply tLer orcahin arguments
against Mr. Van Beren they have not the aeeorm to cav
any respct 10 their own practice They took up beaten
Nhig detea Nr. Van Buren, and having found IL ex-
peeut change sides full OF horror 1t the enormty
Of resisting Tie popular decisions whenever aud however
made
Now tho democratic PARTY. which polel for Nr. "a.
Buren, in lsi0 more than mi lion one hundred ihsn
sand (hsinr nesry four bundled thousand more
votes than he received when elected IN 1867 c,p M,
easily be persuaded that lie IA unpopular viii those who
them protesting desire the triumph Of the prin
cipics which M Van Buren, dtfes'ed for main,aiu
ing. Aad when hey hear the arguments. tie