The Ripley advertiser. [volume] (Ripley, Miss.) 1843-1897, 1843-09-16
SEPTEMBER, IG, lsAa.

hc ,.,. " question! II he had not tal
- . .sus y, WIN MIR. Ackor upon that quest,
70 why did he charge Mr.. Ackcr wink hnv'
y represented his opinions there warn %;~
y : envy from those no expressed in his enc,
- :. pSnicKasawf 1.-The was not running
= Do"o'Payer, why did he ask u state n,
sIo' wnat Mr.. Ackcr did say in b;s mi; ~
! speech at Houston, 10 be used araios, \ +
|" puol'c meeting in Fulton? fine +
no' discussed the question in Itawam
now could he detail TO Col. w. what no =.
"a i'awnmba, charged Mr.. Acker with ho
: ing said 10 his Houston speech? If !,
on'e'i had no, been pretty warm, wbv 4
ne return 10 haste from Itawamba a nd ser
nus son TO Col. W. for statement "und.
~" !, nana," to be used at Fulton son n,
10y. II ne did not think ho had demo
l.sned Mr.. Acker in the discussion as far !
'aa gone, why did he say, @Acker bn
'a'eo 70 eiiec''ng any thing to aid him ma
'er'a,,y N his Election by the Bond cues
''on!" II no was no, proud of his victory
why d'd no say "liis failure there IS almos
IS s'enai as i was at Chickasaw?, AM
las!iy' 1t he did not ink he had laid !, on
10 Mr.. Acker in his Houston speech WV
a'd ne compare Mr.. Ackers s.;;cno1 f,;,,r.;,
10 l,awamba with his more "signal failure,
10 Chlckasaw? But Mr.. Bradford relies
upon the recollection of 1000 witnesses
w'nln The "ninth Judicial district - to proye
'"a' ne d!d no. run as Bond payer. !
"nsn'' and DO rely Upon the recollection If
40 equa! number 10 prove tina, he did. We,
am Wiling to conccdc for once there may
% some truth in his statement. |, will be
'ecollected that al the commencement, of|
ne Canvass, in tho spring Of 1871, The
'oc'r'ne OF Reputation NIGH. be likenod 10
','''e iearea, and that before the close, i,
ao wen nigh leavened Tho whole l.mp. /,
no. strange, therefore, that he should run
Bond>Paycr at tho outset. Ii il ONLY
uprising that he should continue 70 nress
y ,a' question up to the 9Th of Sept, the date
nls letter to Col ". Il is proper lha,
hould mention here, that Col W. did fur.
'sil the statement asked for by Mr.. Brad
'ro, retaining copy which is also now Ia
y nands' But have not learned whether
was Or was not used against Mr.. Ackerl /
fulton or elsewhere. As a matter or !. !,
mon should say it was not. have ILL
on the authority Of Col Williams thar i,
''"y "Her The statement was given, he 70
Mr. Bradford and took occasion to ad. J,
n'sn nun, that he was running the Bond al
es''on too hard; that he would certainly h.
9 votes BY it, and that in asrnuch as j, s;,
nothing to do with the duties Of Distric, 60
ornoy' u was not necessary to press the an
's,'on. This hint should say was G. "a
ga. Though it may have been ..run,or be,
'hal Mr.. 3. is wanting in common The
80, yet all will admit that when he is nm,
put upon the Iight trail, he follows it the
me Keen sent Of a Blood Hound. | for
g no doubt, therefore, but that he began nro
nee 70 haul off, and even to whisper TO wi!
e.oi his anlibcnd friends that he had n
lys ielt some misgivings in relation TO B.
Charter. l will also nd mo,
rs Oeing very probable. that his 1000 som
esses, chiefly anii-bonders, however. sun
remember that after the Sth Of Sen, vii
'cr 10 was never heard 10 discuss. Or VIII
mo Bond question before the public, Cor
ast during the canvass. and tina, he \. And
ID u IN every way, as was his .ac> ,her
'ledged duy" But he had pressed to d
question little too hard before that his .
and If"Rumor" may DO trusted for upor
hing ne lost many votes in Tippah, in gain
'quence Of the fact being too well Brad
2 there, that he had pressed the qucs lie c;
little too hard in other places. be a
ASS now to Mr.. Bradfords reoinder. in inc /
=" ~ Jus journey 10 Jackson, to pur- ants
and conduct paper in support Of The Col.
iahng administration Of Gov. Tucker Of III,
The whole context Of his letter, i. will dare
IN that he acknowledges tho effort 10 and /
ase and conduct the repudiating paper, thai
'eks to justify himself upon the ground da,o
Turing the canvass, he hadheard mn. knew
peeches upon the question, which lean
''nehed MS previously conceived O. unpal
against the liability Of the State, belle,
AZ inc Bond question was then gen genuo
regarded as settled. Is it true iha, he va
!, Or any body else, regarded tia sol the Of
mat time--or at any time sincei- for it.
WI DC seen that ne made his trip To- mong
n wniie the Election returns s',0ere who y
M dia,or.
uin 49, every body knew battle had may
ought through The legislative Halls was a
ucKcI Rau mol been installed The expect