Indiana State sentinel. [volume] (Indianapolis) 1841-1853, 1843-10-03

Of the state its choice of candidates and
era management of such proceedings that while states
% and will forever differ such suie eis such convea-
ton must be the only competent arteT oi such II rem
ce land selEcompeent each necessarily b. Ia
decide all such for ,seif that II each send-
the number OF delegates that has If electoral
land that conceded to be the proper nuube)
not be supposed that the convention will adopt any
form of that viii defrat evade the will Of a ma
ouiy of the delegates because the question whether
they will by states by individual
be decided by Individual votes: ssd as whether
they will per capita by slates-snd II BY states
whether by each by many a. 1t has
Of electoral votes-and If 10y many has eco-
raj votes then whether they shalt BE- given by each dele
gate for himself 10y majority of the delegation
for The whole delegson-afe. with all other questions of
organlz on such be settled by HI entire BODY
of delegates votes gwen. per oatG each for HIM
sef-we imagine that any majority Of delegates
will consent to Yield their power such convrn-
a minority . take o. mode of action which
will produce a different result from that # direct Der
capita We satisfied with the mode aud prnci-
pie OF voting per capita, aud approve II tina any
other hut ~ natter there may b. cir-umsian-
he which make II convenfen and sft L. Ia
adopt another mode leave that subj the ,cre-
ton OF our deegiies-confdeut that they will never sur
render the right and power AID puncpe that maj riy
should control the action of The cou,cui,n
Res0iyed That having expressed our aprrol alton Of
the holding National Convention appointed our dele
gates TO the and thereby assumed the obligation of
fidelity aud support 30 the candidate If IL, a'ion We
would, ~ the name AID behalf Of the d-rioc-
rcy # The state If New York fe ow cit
zen MARTIN VAN buren, II tie consideration Of
that Convention lie Is first choice for President.
aud ha heen made les hy his long a. ued and
approved services m public lite aud his adAtcd qua
tous Than ~ tie of that defeat which he suffer
ell Ia the overhr Of our party IN 1910 That our
defeat party not his failure a ndilaie; and
breve that his conduct IN that memorable druson, the
elevated frmness which he evnced in the hour Of trial
aud bis calm uucOuJed confidence ia the ultimate recil-
ude Of the people he retired from Office, have gained
for him higher place in the popular of the
country than any success could have done We know
that lie Is now more popular his native State than he
ever wss before aud We think th.t the must
have operated IN other States for the result That
Us there seems c'ar and open that If the de-
mocTacy of the Union do but do their duty 1874. tev
Will gam glorious victory, aud ei that that victory
Viii be % every democrat m the double triumph
If the AMI the candidate which were put
down IN 1910 by delusion and mposture should by he
Der second thought Of intelligent aud sotc peo
pie. be made trlumf han, in 1914
ResolreA That We d. hereby direct ana instruct the
delegates whom we appoint 10 the National Democratic
Convention, to present MARTIN VAN BUREN. of
New York a candidate for nomination for the Presi-
dency at the United states by that Convent aud e
further do direct and instruct the said delegates udvidu-
a' and uulelly, advocate aud support h, no nation
and to use all honorable and proper accomplish
that result aud thus TO fulfil her.auy To- aud the wish
- Of, heir cons'tuenis-the democracy of New York.