Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1843-07-11

d
Washington, upon Mr.. Tylers prospects. tits in
ply 10 the remarks which we made upon tine ls land
which we are surprised to see have received 90 much
notice and circulation IN the newspapers, but without
any republication of the Washington piece, which call
ed forth remarks) Their author now subscribes
himself "a Creole Of Louisiana We must decline
it's publication, and will consequently return i, to its
author. We will no, be drawn into any further discrs
sion upon THE subject, under existing circumstances.
We should not indeed, have gone at al into the subject
at this time If We had not been induced to notice 1t by
the publication Of the first article. We have
kind feelings for Mr.. Tyler, and we will not unne.
cessarily wound the feelings of man who "has done
the State some service" We have defined our own
position. We have spoken TO him in the language
of truth. We have disposition to repeat our sug
can the efforts Of "The Creole of Louisiana avail
DIR. Tyler: Is it necessary for a Creole 10 come
all the way from Louisiana 10 give Virginiuns-
.through the length and breadth Of Old Vrgna"-in.
formation about MIR. Tyler But exclusive of these
considerations, object to the tone of 'sThe Creole
OF Louisiana" Is it very polite in correspondent
TO hint that shave not yet arrived at that point of
madness in which you have undertaken to read MIR.
Tyler out OF the Democratic party, as the Globe has
done Was II necessary for him, because we pointed
out the of his letter. (Washn gon) and because
we remarked that it alone excItes suspicious of
It's purity to reproach with course which (our) own
conscience will tell (us) is not flair, just, and right ~
Must we necessarily conclude, that because The writer
ID "hot employed IN the public service, IN any way
whatever, and is only "soournIng for ehort period
in Washington. on private business, that therefore,
be is only impelled 10 his literary efforts by ex
elusive zeal for the public service !;
Could he seriously have thought, that we should
have acceded to his proposition to allow him e use
of one column in every No of the Richmond Enquirer,
from until May, 1874, 10 be devoted to the advoca
cy of Mr. Tyler for the next Presidency politely al
lowing US, indeed, 'he liberty of descantng upon (hs)
articles IN any manner (we) please and if we "de-
waste rIatter-why this Jealous advocate offers 10
sguaranee to (us) increase of subscribers sufficient
u, meet that increased burden, provided we) will in
rm (hm) what the amount will be2-one Of the most
% raordnary, and we might add, exceptonabe propo.
10 qns which has ever been made TO us 2 We re- |
II i his proposition We must decline, therefore,
/ Pfhlng tins article Ne further decline max
; npVer 10 him in fee simple one column in
eS Number of the Richmond Enquirer, I" from
nPii May, le44." We would much rather incur
e 'npenaty, with which the Creole threatens u.s.
o,s taking it for granted that (we) fear John
100 much to allow him 10 be heard through.
cehns OF our Journal through the trumpet, too,
Of,"Creole of louisiana" We would even rather
r'sne Vefihcation of has prediction which he "begs
lnso note down in four memory viz that if Mr..
yAls not the nominee of the Democratic Conven.
Tonne democratic Party will be defeated in 1914 -
Weeke tnese remarks, because we take it for granted
,nole author will publish his communication and we
90 n INTEND TO notice it in any further form.
"consoer 1t az an act Of sheer Justice TO Mr.. Ty-
teate our decided IMPRESSION that he has not the
."gHsI agency In these communications and that he
Us enfey gnorarant of the strange proposition which
nas ben maze 10 us-But Yale Vale