The Madisonian. [volume] (Washington City [i.e. Washington, D.C.]) 1837-1845, 1843-11-23

JectIons to the bill. as contained in the Veto
Message, are worthy Of credit, il was vetoed
because he considered il both uncousiitulona
and inexpedient. Whenever the President
shall sign Bank bill introduced by any body
else. Thea the Globe may make the assertion.
with the expectation Of being believed, that the
President vetoed the bill of lS4l, "because it
was the bill of Henry Clay" and not before.
On the same day that the President sent in
his Veto the editor of the Globe wrote as fol-
lows:
sWe make our acknowledgement to MIR. Tyler for
this act of DELIVERANCE. Ii he maintains his
position firmly, land has he not done il! Ask MIR.
Ciay-Ed. Mad.] he will ever be acknow lodged as
public BENEFACTOR."
The President retoed the Distribution bill,
and consequently no $4,000, 900 per ann, m"
have been given out Of the public treasury
This the Globe knows well enough, but i, is
It's vocation now TO misrepresent Mr.. Tyler
The SIP, 100000 borrowed, or one half that sum,
was applied to iquidate the debt created and
left unpaid by Mr.. Van Buren's administration.
He did sign the bill repeating the I" indepen-
dent Sub-lreasury;" it is lrue-and General
Jackson, if he NUT be referred TO as inf.llib e
authority, justified the act. We have before
US Gen. Jackson's letter, dated 18th September,
lS4l, in which he says: q
Doubtless the President belie8ps that the Sub.
treasury has been condemned by u People, and so
believing :; 4; he ought not 70 be ee"'dpx'r"g his
What has the Globe to sayA this? VIII
the genuneness of the letter be questioned
If we have misquoled the Generals letter, he
will doubtless pun US right himself. as he reads
the Madisonian
He did sign the " odious and atominable
black tariff bill;" but he was compelled to do it
or see the wheels of Government stand STILL
Had he not signed it the Globe would not have
received lis $4,000 per annum profits for print
ing The famous Documentary History, fine
job, which may continue for a hundred years
But if he did sign the bill, who passed il
Twenty Democrats voted for it in the House,
and lhirty-f Clay-whigs against it-and it
passed that body by majority of one In the
Senate 1t likewise passed by majority of one
Messrs. Wright Buchanan, and other distin-
guished Democratic Senators voting for it
What was the President 10 do? If he vetoed
the Bank "because it was the bill of Henry
Clay" did the Globe, for that reason, expect
him TO veto the tariff 81 because it was the bill
of" Messrs. Wright, Buchanan, Williams,
Sturgeon, lngersoll, &C., &C., &C., &C., the
main pillars Of the Democratic party? What
an idle supposition The President did not
like the bill-does not now--bul il was better TO
swallow bitter pill than to suffer the Govern
ment to perish. But the most "odious," the
most /" abominabie," the "blackest'' tariff, BY
all odds, was that of 1923, which Messrs. Van
Buren, and Benton voted for, and which the Globe
supported. Mr.. Tyler could not be made TO
support that bill, by any possible compulsion
which the ingenuity of man could devise
Asto the appointment of the "rankest Fede-
raj Coons in the land to Office" we can only say
" we don't believe it'' Certainly the U. S. Dis
rlct Attorney for Missouri (Mr. Blair's SOM is
not rank coon. Yet, Messrs. Porter, Hen
shaw, and Nelson, are the I" rankest coons,n in
the estimation Of the Globe But coons or no
coons, we are happy to know that the President
can suit himself in the selection Of officers,
without first seeking the permission Of the
Globe
II the evidences of President Tyler's "pure
and unadulterated Democracy" be not sufficient
for the satisfaction of the Globe, why let it seek
satisfaction in abusing him. He does not re.
greet the Globes abuse; it can do him no harm
the great and the good are sure TO be abused.