Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1843-06-20

TN acknowledgements Circuit Superior cour .,
Law and ssS a or 1s county, the
John II. Tlevllan and Mary Ann his wife, who was Mary
ann argyle. Frederick Argyle and Archibald H. Argyle
william Miller Isaac Curd, Executor Frederick Ar.yie
aoa Of William A.s K
beeca w. John r, Audrey X Edward H. and Joseph W.
Anderson their guardian ad Item, and Thomas r. Argyle
Decree of the Court Of Appeals Mi, cause on bo
day APRIL 1873, this day sented IN Court which
M N the sg e5G. sd al m in se civ ~
mond, Saturday,, April eth, 1919 WInm Miller, Appellant,
= Ann Argyle, Frederick Arsyr Archibald Arsyie sa
curd Executor Of Frederick Argyle Benjamin Ander
Admnisrasris I'll William Ag,lc deceased aud kebecca w.
sShn F. Andrew X Edward H. and Joseph w. Argyle, iOisn
GUARDIAN al itrm and Thomas Argyle, App-iees Upon an
Law and cesrsp S @ BY s e"n a % cia
eenih day o. coe 1889, in suit in which The said John 81
rviia and Others plaintiffs; and appellant and o,.r
and the Court having mauleiy considered transcript Of r
opinoa, that the sad ;,cnn supecr Court erred In fes
that ie appellant Miller was entitled to ered.. for
Of Frederick Argyle Geceastd aud ta t.e:e error IN de-
stances of this the debtor entitled ap( The raw
mrnt evidenced hy The receipts GATED The lah day OCTOBER
Of The debt! Therefore, decreed and ordered III, .aa
decree he reversed and annued and that the appere Isaac
nsntrir of William Argyle, deceased Out Of the o M
test1or aud ntesae, in Their hands respectively, be admins
The appellant his COSTS by him expended
appeal aforesaid here's that the cause be r.
minded 10 tie said Circuit Superior Court
rccnmnt the report 70 Commissioners andi setie
the accounts The following principle: Commissioner
10 car the said appellant with bond de-
Quoting ihersirom price II the acre. ,f
Land oil The date Of the bond and al>o allowing o
credits allowed IN the Commissioners second
der the order The nineteenth October,
The former rpor: and afro, further lv.
tyh day OF September, 1875 for the due thu. time IN
the Judgments assigned the Thousand hun
dcd and twenty-five dollars and ninety The ao,
claimed by the said appellant, having overjad
assignments of judgments evidence exec,
by tie appellant Cu.d consij the
asenmen and that the appellant he alsu allowed
dit Tor the Cf thousand and eighty dollars
the satisfactory
this has leen paid Curd the Frederick A.
gye but NOT o:crwise stating The all payments
received under the two receipts before mentioned The
assumed have been paid by aptsi.r the
TO-
in September 1885, should be applied t. lie principal deli
according In The al the receipts Of the The
when the paid, crednc the 3rincp ME
paid - Of the date fell due priarao
the debt and where bur Of the paid ced,na
payments. and the supposed ~ i've made
Of the the settlement in Sa5 against the iur
pal Of the dates Of such payments, ara aud
that the be directed the
with special deemed by himself whrh
be required by the stated, in order
decree winch ordered 10 he certified TIC said Ccn' Sup;,
Court Appellants in the Court Of Appeals $50 II
CopyTese, J. Allen, :" Hb-rcupon, THE Cont.
with the said Decree dci adudge order and
the decree heretofore entered In this be aside,
made
Commissioners this Court with anir,
settle between The plaintiffs and the defendant WI
liam Miller, upon The principles stated The foregoing
the Court Of Appeals make thereof this
ge,her with any special deemed By himself
which may required by parties to be so stated
4 Copy-1esr,