Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1843-05-01
Fur tie House If D.le@a'e..
TIE 'SUBTREASt.RN AND TIE DI Nd
CRATIC PARTY

The SUI Treasury il nov c,liria Republican mra-
sure by tho Democratic party and AID who "rp'sr are
Denounced as Fedcrals,s Whrn, hu' few years ago,
tho Sub Treasury dtnounccd ty that party Fed
eral ms assure. Thus showing that whatever measure
they advocate hovcver Federal it ma, tc, is purely
Republican And whatever measure lhe Wing, advo
cate, however Republican ii may be. Is denounced by
thai party az Federal ueas'r.
Wheu Gen GORDON Of thi. STATE, frst introduced the
Sub TrasIry.mto Congress, il WAS opposed by the
whole. i.oo foce party--and only supported by few
Whigs But it WAS only oppos by the whole l.o-
20 Foco psrv but was denounced by al the presses ot
,hs, party a, tia, Time and by large number aicr
vas recommended by MI N;n Buren,. In .s3i the
the washington Gluhe which decides thu orDId " ur
hc,rroduxy Of every ni'as0r, lr the LOCO Ioco panty
spike Of tho Sub Treasury In the tpaw ne aupuiq,:
The proposition The Suh'I rasnry is DiSGI.
GANIZlNG and REtOkGTtON AHf. SUBMISSIVE ui
the Fundamental pTlucipls Of ur government and
tr. practice from 1889 M Ia this day. Il is palIa
bic an the. sun. that the et,cl dim 'ul r.asilf,
SCHEME would be Ia bring tn pghc IL much
-r the actual 'rsod, aud cohirol II the Psiont' tlau
il is nav and crpGsr ii IL be pindtred bY hut3rcd
hands. where one cannol nan reach IL
Al the time the above written the Gloe could
mmrh better form ur'ui than nuw far that TINE II
Was not Il parry measure Eoi toN tic opinion ii the
t:obe must be biased by 'hc comnirla OF NJ Van Blu
rem aud part, d WINCH it the head. tr th.ln,s
sure Thus showing 'hqf What the Globe considered
the rankss, Federalism in s31. NOW considers the
purrst Rppuoieanisin. Wha did Thomas Richie say
~ lien il vas first recuna.e mled Ly Mr. Van Buren, ?
lie denounced in the unlcasnreJ terms 1t is
fresh in the minds of almost OF .ltfs his salo-
MIR Richie said
awe have objected 10 the sub treasury 6 STEM 50
called, that in h,si acc it viii ENLARGE the
Erccniirc potrcr, ALHE,uY TOO GREAI Tor a Re
public; 2ny that II contributes "ndanger The security
~ the public tosds--and 2niiy. that ii calculated 10
produce two cnrrencrs; bos,r i,r The p"," and
better for the Government. THE We reflect Oh
the matter the read the speeches pi the oraurs
both sides, the frnd satisfied oi the
STRENGTH otthese objections THERE Is no sacu-
nIrr IN r. aud il rid uirolre HEAVY and uineces
sry erpense
And what did Mr. V al Bnren's craan at Albany the
Albany Argus, say wen it wa. introduced l., Gen.
Gordon} 1t denounced il as the deepest kind ot Fede
r-sm Thai paper "i al others spike nearest the Gen
iimens of Mr.. Ian Buren,. The Argus said
The germ Of the Sub Treasury system is founded in
a rrIor, Of .Hrandcr Hnniton Ina great Fsderalist
10 Cong ress IN 1890. 1t moi Republican measure
then; the CONTRARY 1t denounced By the friends Of
the Administrations the Irni ssrd followers Of Jclrrsnn,
aulhy those too, who voclirrus in lis ia
yur."
At this lime, every onrof these papers call the Sub
Treasury Republican measure. And call the Wings
Fcdrrass beesuse they oppose it. According to the
opinion Of the Argus ii must he Federal than Ma
tonal Bank, being recommended by The raukesi Fed
cr,ls, alexander iIamllton) the Gnied States ever
produced. Now. what ri ahcc can \ rcrs,n pat in a
party which changes lis tests OF lrpubllcanism almost
every year Making snne men WHO have never
changed at one time II pubcans ami at another time
Federaliss