Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1842-10-24

Mr. Calhoun has authorized his friends to say that he
goes Tor the one term principle that it he has
adopted one good Wing doctrine.
n Laughable Backing Out,-Some weeks aco. an
article appeared in the .Ne,c York Union edited BY
President lyers stlpcndary in that city, NJ NJ. No
all which, on account of its oacuar well as its
amb'g"ons revelations, attracted good deal of aen-
ton 1t was signed llaon," Ohe letters of Mr. Noah
name, reserocd,) and from that circumstance was sup
posed to have been written by the editor though pur-
porting TO be letter from Waiingtou-O,hers a,,rb-
u'ed 1t to Mr. Wise. The following was one of it,
most significant paragraphs:
But the President never in any manner whatever
asSrn'ed to the Fiscal Corporation bil'' Indeed we
understand that there exists in Washington the mos,
positive proof OF the fact that he no, in the slight
est degree committed to it. 1t is well known thno
lia when MI Stuart, of Virginia, brought this bill 10
hum or hls inspection, before its passage, he he Pes
deni) said to him. Preserve sir, in the bill the prnci
pie oil the Bank OF Augusta against Earle; and ihon
may approve the bill, and them with his own barI In
'encd the paper before him in its proper oare w;,h
me tNpresson unless the establish nent of soch agency
shal be prohon". py the States in which il is snuai,
to be n'".;e1.',
vas this not so, Mr. Stuart? We desire to know
OF you II this was not the Speak out, sir Did
not the President make that or similar insertion with
his own hand?"
The following correspondence will explain the de-
movement:
House OF REPRESENTATIVES,, Aug. %, 1912
SiR:-A friend has placed in my hands newspaper
containing an article purportng be copy of an eo-
rial, published in the Union of the Sll instant in which
you refer to an Interview between the President and
self in relation to the Fiscal Corporation bill passed
at the extra session of Congress in Sil and after adj
vertng TO an nerlineation made by the President in
paper which had before us, and protesting 10 Give
what occurred between us, you say, WAS this 50
AIr S'narti We desire TO know OF you if this
the case9 Speak out sir Did not the President make
that a similar insertion with his own bandr, have
no disposition conceal any thing in relation to the sub
Jec but desire to know whether you have the auhori
~ oi the President any OF his responsible friends for
making the call above referred to.
Respectfully, yours sc.
ALEX. II. H. STUART.
\. B-Address your reply to Staunton, Virginia.
IL NJ. Moan, Esq. Editor of the .Union," New
York.
New YORK, August so, 1912.
SIR III reply to your favor Of the 10Th instant, des
ring 10 know whether II had the authority of the Pres
ent any of his responsible friends for making the
call upon you contained in the letter from Washington
published IN the 81 nlon," in reference the Fisca
COOPERATION. answer that had such authority, d
rect or implied.
The letter referred to was written and transmitted Il
me from Washington for publication by a New Yorl
Trend in whose integrity aud means Of intor, alton
had every confidence.
Respectfully, yours, &c.
NJ. NJ. NOAH.
ALEXANDER ii. ii. STUART, Esq
The question now arises, if lIaon or Noah or Wise,
or whoever this fasehood did not get his au-
thory from the President whence was it derived? lie
proessed to give conversation between Mr. Stuart and
VII Tyler and in the very words used by the latter
How did such story originate not with the President
himself! But we forbear To push this enquiry TO it: hu
initiating conclusion.
WIN. S. ARCHER, Esq.-This gentleman ha.