Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1842-02-10
NEW YORK AND VIRGINIA.


Mr. l.,lrr moved q r,4,luun r,iorrinC 50 murh OF tb
Covrrn, Nr,sarc as nla,s the controversy bctwoc
New yoA aa,l Anrinia n select committee, with ~
src,ions 10 inu,e whether the inspection In" passed
the last s..ip, ,he GENERAL Assembly. requires ro'isio
en- ths a pln o additional enarlinens, more 'ilcciual
" To- scrulnp 81 lis pbjeris
Mr. 1oef referring Ia delay In psyn proper aicn
tin 10 tho suggestions Of the Governor, urged that II wa
important the subject should receive the consldcra
tan Of the House The natural allies oi the Snut'
were upw IN power in New York, and there was roas'r
10 l,p that IT the pcrainn ri the inspection Law were
dr,.rel tir longer time. the Legislature o that Siait
mlp hi take action thai "on render the Law unno
onss.rv.
Mn llarly opposed the resolution lie commended that
il wou ~ unbocoming and mpbiie III irsnla 10 give
mn, such ntinata al what she thought might ha the
arnn Of New lork :hereh, the impression might b.,
made thai she decided IN her position and did not
c, tia, it was Just that Il would be time enough when
IN, rrsla,ure oi New urk should take the nncipa
a action frour Legislature In posiPonoo repeal the law
he law had bren prepared With great clrc, and was
IN s,d after the lengthy and earnest discussion. and
he holnd that the suicos odcae ngh no, be opened
NJ again upin the measure. Mr. Is stated that South
Cartlna had adopted the law passed exactly by this
I4aisia,yr and he ar.ned that tia Laglslaiarn d
t,at Ss>r hal adjourned II would hn lmanper IN rs.
and unn5 II South Carolina who ha, sisiained us. IN
abandon our position. Mr. u. ayct1ed that upon tins
question the Democrats Of the Nrih the friends oil
the SDui,-e law f the TRIAL Of slaves by jury passed
thc NeN iork Legislature b, party yote-the Was no
ro,,, and upon the New Nark and Nrgnlan question
tae coVTse Of Governor Seward Was SUSTAINED 10y the
Wings AMI hc had assuanecs that ic dominant party in
the Legislature were aetdaed t} desie 10 settle the
controversy n manner satisfactory 10 Virginia But
h' asked what epid would any aeon Oh then part do
when It would 70 veted by Governor Senardl
Nr. Islfr rsp,nie when he sp'ke OF the natural
lies Of the Sab h. did with reference To thc
ron clu@Aah, nal the Democrats, illsi the " hlgs
~ .ia5lff he li
n fpa j. q lha S4e' lie canicadci that under
this assertion had the right 10 anticipate something
tfHa N Nm era legislature favorable 10 our nc'eSl
aud right Inc aa,tr-lie1 kaa now the opportunity
u prove lie e'aess o. te stion ASSUMED by thor
: uhcu p1ltc7l hfet.fsn IL was not satisfied that
GJy,rnJr Seward would seo any step Of theirs rcract
iag The ocis # winch complaned-and alluded to
TIC case, e DAYS since, where the Governor signed
tie a, fcGe1lns The registration law.a law which he
Eshly apPoyel.-upon 10 ground Of his opposition to
tn cserc3se 81 The veto Gk.epi werr II could be utter
posed prevca nlpa5 inra,,1ns Of the Constitution.
Nh T. voted IL lie H. lion Inv and WAS n3t tir
is rpc1 its ps'p nemeni mig remove any bar 10 the
sciiun II supposed tie New Yorh Legislature might
h dspsrl to take lie thought II oust 10 he postron
~.
Air Blyly rc?el stating ,hathc hada correspondence
with pr5uuncnt cltircn of New York, in which he
(Mr u suggested the proprley Of the passage by the
Now Nork Legislature, Of such resolution with regard
- the clntuat al Governor Seward the irgIna lie
gentlemen assured him IN reply, that Governor Seward
would Mt shrink from his position, and that he would
no, regard such act of the Legislature -bas'nl his
course IN constitutional grounds Mr. Bo,ly pursued
his views aesyrc stated adding fa.et Arguments IN then
support. Il was time enough for Nlrsina When
New iorA eTincod eoneillatory disposition II she
han onci her position now 1t would dscrtd hen turde
sion and confidence in the nopHc,Y oihon conduct
fierc.raried ilt <ssage ihthe Acting Governors Mes
s-e upon %hch this motion WAS based. as Ill advscc
lit had bosH used argument against the position
Virginia t,y Abobtonsts.
After fcw further remarks from Mcssrs. Tolor ant
I'ayly, Mr. Daniel spike favor OF the resolution aud
against the Inspection Law which he declared deecy,
IA many respects and violatiye III the Constitution.
Nh. Bayly replied and the debate further contn
ued by Messrs. Bayly and Daniel
ar Durmsn called the previous question: which being
SUSTAINED The resolution releccd-75 Ia 3d.
Bills were considered in their early stagcs.
bill on its second reading providing for an incrs-.
IN the bonds Of the LIST and I'd Auditors. excited much
debate. \ motion for its indefinite p,s,poncmen, WAS
ye,'dlng. when
t'n motion of Mr.. Doman the House adjourned.