Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1842-07-12
je7 cwsv' WILLIAM uIrrr. cferk


| ViNGfNtAi-ht Circuit surcrior Court Of law snl
Eond on The Chaueery sde held At the Capitol M The sal
City, on Thursday, NoVcu Der lith 1871:
Mary College, " '''''''''' VI "''i i,1t anu
Robctt Mecanlsh administrator dc bons non ,,i,b h
VIII ANNEXED Of Thomas Coleman, deceased, Who was
Cand'ish Sergeant Of the City Of VIII amshufs ami
such sTn,ststor de bonis with tho viii Gcd OF
sna Mary his wifi. and George 7 leman, Charles ".
SolSnian, melSn Coleman aud Rachel Wilson, infant
~ he sad hohcit Candu H. their guardian leIp Mar
1n, lanes wilson, Preston rIocr and Eliza wile
harpearins that the death Of Thomas Coleman. s
% OF his estate was granted TO Frances Cole.
nln gnadmnislcrcd by the sal Thomas 60 emsn Win
Ine WIZ OF INC slii William Coleman annexed ,as then
e9mmi,ieio George w McCandsh, Sergeant OF ihc chs,
OF Williamsburg; aud that subsequently thereto the CONF
%, rooa revosed ,he oIer committing the said to
c sau serge Ut ani granted letters of administration de
p9hs non ON the estate Of the sai William Coleman with
hssi annexed 10 Rotcrt MeCandsh: by conrcnt OF Tho
nldtr1ncc'C Coleman aud Robert McCandish by their
counsel IL ordered, (any thing In any former order I'M
shall heneeorih tee in against the sad Frances
coleman as nistratiN of tie estate of thu said Tho.
anh as tnc prc..n administrator de bons with
we VII ann, aGd OF william Coleman, deceased well
late administrator as aforesaid: whcreupon ths cause
caire on THIS iayo Ice asau heard narcrs formerly
read. the supplemental tl bll Of TcyvSr aud ansyse
thereto and was argued 10y counsel: On Consideration
whereof appearing frorl account n TIA Commis.ionrr
Bakers report made pursuant orders of the mini
daY OF February. ihou aud eight HUNDRED and
h, anu lhe twentieth day oI Jun" one thousand eight
hnniied aud iwcutY.seven that William Coleman exec,.
su 70 inc pins certain bonds amounting To
~, T. a' soNshN seven dollar and hhy-htec cents
and appearing ioin account 4, la the same report Thai
t5 $1,000 sum OF SIX thousand and seventy
uu MY th.ec cents - the money which the
gage 81 the Sis day OF Julv 1919 made To secure
t,resi the bonds above spec fed which aectusi m
let DAY of January, 1919 amounted sum OF sara IS
cents, leaving balance Si352 IS cents due Tor inetcs
TO the day OF January, 1912 That subsequently nay
coleman on account Of what he owed and in account a"
Us each talmert Is placed first the uicrrs ine
ftfN NIlffHN
aud b, auce sTcpoed uc count II the 81 bon
OF soso oil cents, with interest s;gs7 ~ rcnis rs,t
thereof from the 81 Gay OF Juiy 1876 Tho Count cnnEIi
erns mat q fleet o. approving ani conf ming the sa
aceont'C viii not tc to declare ihit amount she va
secured by the mortgage but merely Io ne,r
that Nhem Coleman Is indebted the piartifr. ina:
amount as well as the amount shcwu by the arcoun A
and ID doth now prove ard confirm said account C.
snh 1sotc sad accounts andD aud doth declare that
the sad accounts e. 4 ani d. the plainnT' may pro.
coed To- subject the cfttc 81 the ssid William Coleman
wneIe'etc' INC Court doth refer II IL Cmmi si0ntT
Of his Cour 80 tlkc an account first. Of the csta
has been made thereof, aud II tie plaintiffs have moi
already received tue proceeds Of the whole OF to NOR
pi.ed Tor h.iy hSn, ~ Us pSs'us remain to DC AZ
reTsonsl esist,of t'. ,,1 NJ on S'eount OF ne
same has htor administered aud what amount tie plain
,n @ 10 Io,e'e ' 81 Ne SID pe,sonal estate
SAID Wan coleman 'icd, sliced, an which accounts the
SAID Comm 10 report 4, The cow, Win INV ,,
ters specially stated deemed pertinent by hns.lc OF
"hi' may be required 10y the parties to be go stated
,,,-,, SATURDAY, January 92d. 1912.
OF the plaintiffs, aud Of George W asscft EtecuioT Of
said Burwel b, counsel The eonii do,b aTie5
that his suit stand revived and be- proceeded mo a 6na
decree egiinst the said George Btssc in his eharac
ter aforesaid.
SATURDAY, February 18Th, 1872
I'm the motion "i the pluuuds by counsel leave is
gwen them ~ MI supplemental b'i now proIuccd hy
uem "a court, aud the sama being icd Robert McCan.
dh u conhnued as guardian at lte the defendants
charles w toemau AMI Helen " Coleman, and Ia also
assigned guardian Of tc defendant Rachel Mary Mison
Nnoteupon by consent Of the defendants Edward Car
Ineon aud Mary his wife. by their couns el
defendants Charles w Coleman and Helen VI Coleman
10y lheir said GUARDIAN Is ordered, that this sand
rtN'cd AMI be proceeded IN against them hens OF IN,
Sad Geo Coleman decd aud 10y the further consent Of
iane5 wilson aud Elizabeth Wilson by their counsel
AMI oil TIE sli Rachel Mary wilson 10y her sid .uarCsn
IS ordered that This cause stand revived end pro
ceeed IN against thcn heirs the tal Mary Wilscn
uee o. and thai Il be considered has"F been revived
against them as such heirs, When heretofore ty
mistake revived against Mary Wilson, Rachel wilson and
James Wilson, heirs OF the said Mary Wilson, decd
lsignedl WIN q SANDS. &C.