Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1842-01-01
ITINGINIA. Al Kuts heij IN H. ,Ic,,I- 7,,i,..a--

VIRGINIA. Al Rules held IN the tIcrk's OIi,cc al
the Cttcuit superior Court OF Law and Chanrrry Ia,
the County OF Iicnrieo AMI Guy Richmond on the
Chaneey side, the aT nay Of November. ISL The Pre-
| Thomas Tyre, Isabella Keith Alexander Brown John
iicnj'min Belt, aud Loin Ellr executor of t,rTcr
Mi,nams plaintiffs against Knapp and knapp
Gushing aud Gushing doins business under the siy Ie
~ .r rn' 0,, nr"isr AmsirHns and George
Berry piaskeu AMI John cuglc, nons business under
Maslrre doing business under the style orc 4 " il Ma.
EaIse kersnsn and .kersuian, doing business
w sl and Ward doing business under tho style Of
Ma.d' siii 4 Ward " sr.s and John spies doing bl.
- iall doing cuisines under The firm 81 Firth hall
hrm of swords, Stanford q Co. Jonathan seymour and ID
seymour, doing business under the style Of Jonathan sew
!boIn partners doing business under the STYLE OF de-
silver, Ih"nas A Co. Joseph T Iboln Cowpcrth
wait aud Joseph Thomas partners doing business under
the style Of Tho,nas COMPREHENSIVE Go, Turner and
style OF Turner & WheelIshi. Wam Jaek under ne
Rowcti, AMI other defendants. ~
Ihe defendants above named not having entered their
appearance aud given security, according To the Act of
Assembly aust the Rules u Court and il appearing by
Commonwealth - ordered That tho aid Defendant do
answer uc bi OF c plaintiffs; ani that copy OF this
DER hn lohwh inserted la come newspaper published in
posed a, the front door ofihe Capitol the sad cay
nov 3-wow %m. C. SANDS, &C.
VIRGINIA. A. Rules held in the Clerks Office Of the
superior Court Of Law aud Chanccry for the County
OF fehilco anu City OF Richmond the ChancCry side
me lst day of November, lSil:-Wm. G. smith, MN H.
settle, AMI sally Maria bis George Goblin and liar.
Iict his wife, GctTsc W Smith Eliza Ann Smith, and I'm
HTchet and Suau u. his wife, plaintiffs, against WIn
Browne admir- with the will annexed Of WIN Ge,Idy decd
aud other dcits.
The defendant above named having entered his an.
pearince nndgvet security according the Of assem-.
bly, and the rules ~ this court appearing by salts.
dc;ory evidence it hc i inhablnt OF This Com.
"hwcai; u IL oTtcrcd that tho said defendant do an.
pear here on inc ih day of the ianuaIy term and
answer the bill of the plaintiffs that COPY this or.
uer c@ ior,hM IN inscrie IN some newspaper pubshcdn
hcciiy OF Richmond for two months sicccssively and
lostc AZ INC front door Of the Capitol in the said cy
no u nwyw WIN. q. SANDS. elk.
N N"Hhumneti and CIuny Court Iith OciobcT Isii.-
spencer Thomas complainant; against Juiin, Hanev
aud Gfacy James, icsy, sally, Jntihy flames Maria and
judith Thomas, Hiram, Charlotte. Suckcy Margaret
william James aud Walter Wool Hillary sprd,llc May
sally, Mary Ann aud Nendors sophia, Joseph and Polly
Thomas, dciis In q auc,ry.
his dny came The complainant 10y his attorney, tnd
appearing 10 the sdiaciiun Of the COur that the cfcn-
dants Nancy, Jane, Busy, Saly, Josiby Francis
Ihomls, littam Wool, Mary Ann and MEMOIRS Thomas
arc not infabianls OF This Commonwcah On motion
Oi the Ianin u IL ordered, That said defendants m
appear here on the - Monday ~ January and
The bill of the planiU; AMI that order loo
forthwith inscr eel for months casycy I'm the
Richmond Wing, and another copy thereof posed at the
font door of tia" COuit House IT this County.
Copy. Tcstc.
l0-W9w ~ CRAIIE