Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1842-10-19
A Ccpy-resse,

VIRolNIAi-At Rules he'll in the CLERKS Of
the Superior Court OF Chancery for the Riel
Caleb Redd.
Samuel 7. Williamson, admir- OF James MesuI.
The defendant above named no, having entered
ser,b and Rules OF this conrt and /, spprafinr by
aSSwsss I. Sress n H., an 40, insAs s 81 ,
appear az the Rnles to be held on the fist Monday
cory q ais order DC forthwith ted ia .s%s news s
nS4lsh s, to The cry o. Riehmond, for mouth
ssti ciiy. A Copy. Tcsir, 1850 >~''''
ViRGiNiA'--At InIcs held in the CierEis once
samuol ID. DuTk. Paint
William Ru,d. and Aiansou A Ellington. ,udi,i lu,l,
administrator OF John Rudd, deed,
IN c,,,,,.,y Defenda
Inc defendant, William RudS, not havirx entere
,,nee and s,,en security according TO the
s.iaelo, evidence, that hc Is not inhabiiant Of
Sc1rs H. 1s SI1eied ,ha, the said Defendant do
gu the hrs; THURSDAY In December next, and answs
serted some Newspaper pSbahe in ,h ee tv -,
hoad, ,o Two ,no1,hs suceessvsly and posted at the
ACopy-Teste
Sc % Wv +. F1TzGERALD, Gle
VIHGINIA-At Rules held In the Cierk,s on
the Superior Court of Chancery for lie I,ieht
CIRCUIT, nc Sth lay OF September. 1912:
Mace Fitzgerald, PI
Robert 4 Bailey, and another DE,
The defendant above named not having enterc
kssembIy aad The Rules OF iii. Court and 4, spps
x sssslas,oIy evidence that he Is not inlabt.
Ant do appear here on the FIRST day OF the next Jan
Term, and answer the Iill OF the plsnild aud that
OF tlis order 10 forthwith inserted in potno nrwsn
puoshnd in the city OF Richmond, Tor two months
eessyey' aud posted At the front door OF the CarIol
AcOpy-Tcac,
Sc IL Wv wM. q. SANDS c.
NinCiNiA-At RIcs, ned IN tiia UirTS'- of5c. az
Superior Cour Of Chanecry Tor the RichmonS
cut. the Isl day Of August, iSi2:
snia who sues as The relation and 10. the bsn"r, Of
ehael Greiier. samuel E. Ade, aa John Dove Owe
ofthe Poor ior the city Of Richmond, III
William, NJ Harris, Gnd another men
The defendant above named not having entered hs
sesnby aud the Rules OF this Court aud IL epSesr,n.
commonwealth II isoIdercd, that tue said ieientan
appear at the Rules to be held on tho G,st Monday
that cory OF is order be Forthwith inseitss in =,
newspaper published in the CiIy Of Richmond, Tor
5non;hs excessively and posted at the front door Of
Capitol In the said city.
sci, w9w AcoPy- re''' ,.rs
VlHGiNiA-At Rules held in the Clerks once
superior Court OF Chanoery Tor tho Richmond
william Courtney VS. PHI
James Fisher Edward Warren and Mary ID. hs wife,
The defendants above named no, having their Dppe
of Aaaa
ani tho Rules OF this Court and Il appearing Nv ss,is
tory evidence, that they are not nhabanis OF this a.
pear here on the 6rst day OF the next January Term
answer the blu OF the p'ainiiT; aud that cory OF
IN the city OF Richmond. for months suec essiyeIy
posted nj the front door OF Tho Capitol in the said CIV
s.I7 WOW Copy Tes'e' wa, ,
NlkGINlA.-A Rules held In the Clerks once of
superior Court OF ChaneoIy for the Richmond
benjamin Lummis, William " Lummis, anil p,vt
Lunmis partners in trade, doing business under the 81
VI 49,, ne,''nS TO- PITTS
Gsorge Mohr and other, dehr.
Pearanee aud gwen security according Act OF
-emhy and the Rules OF this Court aud IL appearing
Commonwealth II is red, that the said ,cfcndan.
appear here on the fret day othc IanaAry Term al
shsGer TIE o vi the piunilis, and thaa copy OF this
Der be forthwith inserted in newspaper puhish,
"a Tie c,y OF Richmond iortwo months successfully,
POS'ed tue roni oor at the Capitol In the said city.
oe6 ~9w WIN C sANDs, c C!
UiRGtNiA.-M Rules held in tho Clerks oihce i
cult. the 3rd lay Of October, 1872:
RiehMdO Hiskns lni i.uiher Libby, merchants AZ
LIBBY. PITTS.
against S'
James Dali and William Beacham, partners doing bus,
ness under the name of Duu& BeachAm and other
The defendants above named not having entered fhei
appearance and g en- security according tho act Of A.
isflctory evidence, hatthey OF this Con
nonweath 1t ordered That The said Dc fsndants do ar
and the bill Of Inc piaiatifs; and Thai cop
of disorder he forthwith serted in some ncwspapc
published in the city OF Richmond for two months sue
eessSny posted at the front othc Capitol in tn
&C 6-wew WING SANDS, &C.
UIHGraIA.-At Hules held In the Clerks office o
the Superior Court Chsncery for the Richmond Cir
cult, the Jrd day Of October, 1912:
Charles Stow and Joseph STOW, partners doing
under the name aud style OF 4 Jsiow, Pills.
Ucnr, ~ ,rrii,or ,,t.,h.. ~
The defendant above named not having entered 10
appearance and given security according act Of Al
isfactory evidence, that he is not nhabant Of hi
Commonwealth II is ordered. That the said defendant d
airy next and answer the Till Of the plaintiffs and ina
copy oiths order be forthwith inserted some newspa
cessvcy and posted the font door ofthe Capitol in tn
'' oc Guy sgg1sw e0Py- wM. q. sANps.c.c.
VIkCINIA-Ia ChanceTy:--At rules held In N,
v Clerks Once Of Goochllnd County Court, on ihc
5ih day of september 1912:
Joseph II Turner, Plaintiff.
PrcsciIla smith, widow Of Daniel Smith, deed Rober
Hughes ani Martha his WIFE, who Martha Smith, Mar,
smith, James Smith aud Robert Smith, heirs at Law
and distributes Of Daniel smith, deed. Defts
Tho plaintiff filed his bin and the defendant Roberi
smith, not having entered his appearance and given
rules Of this court and il satisfactorily appearing that RS
is not nhabsnt of this Commonwealth: II H. ordered
Court Of Gooehand, at tho CsnItboSse on The rbiry
Montay IN Decent or next AMI answer the plaintiffs BIZ
aud that OF this order be forthwith
some newspaper pubhshcd in the city OF Richmond for
Two mouths sneeessye and be posted AT the fronooI
copy. Teste,
" CHANCEKY- TfrgiHid.-Ai Rule held in the Clerk
"co Of tho Circuit superior Cotitt OF Law and Chan
Gerry ior tho county of James City sud the City OF VIII
Hamburg. at tho Courthouse In the said CITY. from tho
sixth 70 the eleventh day Of Juns Inclusive In the year
one thousand eight hundred and foIty-txo
- Beniamn Weies, assignee Of Samuel Weilcs John
Green, Hollis Hurmovc, trading under tho hrm AM
style Of Weles Co. Pitt
Roscow Cole and William Hamilton, BENJAMIN Hans
ford, Lulciou Waller, Michael WARREN John Mack
indcr individually aud az agent Of the said Cole ana Ham
iiion, Of tho said Cole, William Eslvo. Dokio al Ben
of john BPcacy, and John Peacby Josoph \ wa Eins
Henry Jones, George w Souhar attorney indiv
Aug asiino RohiLe, attorney or Individually; Johr
Edloc, Hcnann Alien IemuelJ Bowdon, attorney, c-
Richardson Hubbard, Richard Buekrrou, Cary wikin
eSn, Ia@es DAVE John J9Hss, Robert Richardson
vidualy, and the said Roseow Cole, William r Hamilton
aud John Mackndor aud Elizabeth Cole wife OF ibe
liam FIfamilton and samuel welles John Green and
" Hollis Hurnevilc. merchants and partners tTadlng I'm
der tho firm Of wclles q Go. and Robert Hamilton,
The defendant, Robert Hamilton not having en,eIed
MS appearance and given security according tie act
satisfactory evidence that no s an inbabitan Of NH
Commonwealth the motion Of tho plaptn by counsel
do appear here the 6rst day o November Term neTt
and answer The original and amended bills Of the pantn
newspaper published In the city Of Redmond Tor f~o
months suceessvey' and that another copy be posted
INC ifont door OF tho Courthouse In tho said CITY of vii
hamburg on two successive court days
80 6 WOW THO. coaput q
VtRGINIA-At Ruics held In The CIcfE's O6ioo o
" INC Superior Court Of Ch1ncory for The Rlchmon,
Ciftoui, me 5ih diy Of september, 1872.
william ,. 1rkSdalc, Pun
Pierce Hamilton and Margaret IT, his wife, who was Mar