Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1842-04-12

EARMrILIr. Anil 6. 1912.

HAVE just seen Gard from Mr. Thomas W. Street. in the
Richmond Enquirer Of the t inst and duty to eorrec,
ducc have dea that either Mr. Street OF Mr. Jesse, who
sa that !" s LIE he s 10
that they ARE both under mak" about what said about Dr.
him. which used Them, there
would have heen for Dr. McCae TO be offended for
either Mr. myself being brought before the public in the
enviabe position which his carelesness has placed both
The follow correct statement Of all said about Dr. Nc
Cabe, at Elder W. Streets, in Middlesex:
Some remarks made by some Of the company ut Mr. So
about Dr. MeCabe and, was asked "Do you know Dr. Nc,
Cabe " answered. g" lave known him. his bro her sister, and
mother for several years. WIS asked again. do You knew
unit, now Tia, he Dentist. believe that both Mr..
acCabcs worthy hut cannot think that hr meaning
ting upon the teeth for know he has been merchant in Rich
mond for have his sign mp n; his Shoe store-how long
what proficiency lie has made knowledge of
ftsson, bur should think not in so short time Some
marks then made by Of the present. Dr.
McCabes practice in Mddeex, and about another Dentist who
had been the county former period about which OF
knew nothing These remarks made by them induced
make general remarks upon ie comparative claims
of experienced stationary Dentists and young and travelling Den
tss and my preference for The former the Inter After
what told about Dr. McCales charges said, 81 believe
he charges much more Than Dr. Itihiridge",
trh0ER relation what 10 about
Dentists who had travelled through Tie country, aud such Dr.
S" n's au be 70 IN us y a did say that s
reference Dr. McCabe, for neither knew nor pretended 10
with respect him Dentist was that Mt,rcd hen
recently The practice and therefore Inferred
other would have done, that he was rot well informed
Older practitioner This the whole of what Mr. Street cas
my "tissme Of falsChoohs against Or. mcCabc."
very unknd being asked If knew thing Of
Dr. MrCahe Dentist and after canddy answering that ques
ton that should be ported mp newspaper liar Can
any any justify the belief that could have
any motive telling lie about against whom never
heard n word against whom had dislike Whethrr
Mr. Jesse will be willing do the
in public they have attempted 10 expose
me- readers the Enquirer, that they have
statements, do know. lfhey do not shall
be the first that has suffered BY the mprudence and care
lessness Of Others.
wish distinctly understood that do not mpeacb the
fires either Mr s. Mr. j. They gentlemen far as
know of good standing in their ncehbooods; but dn
that exhibited much careHess in their statement of
said about Dr. McC have noticed many mans
statements on any occasion.
will he provoked render evil for evil but may not
always feel duty lie under the charge Of having told "a
tissue of faschcods'
There n tribunal which s:ch charges he tried |
trust ms character for vraciy is well established 10 b.
ty the wind of malice As prDdnfe IN speaking q
others acquan'anoes will hear me witness heir'e
public since assigned proper position among
honest and honorable men, ELI BALL