The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1842-04-05
Court OF Common Pleas.
Before Judge Inelis.

APRIL Grim. Con.-Eisha 7ailmadse Us. Jshn NJ
case was continued. 1t may be proper to
Friday, he particularly described the manner in which
he discovered Mr.. Lowerre and Mrs. Tallmadge in the
BACK oioe at No 10 Peck slip their exposed condition
&c. IN opening this morning, Mr.. Holmes desrous
themselves and see the little probability which existed
cit act The whole front of the Office he said was glass
from about four feet up and they were as little likely to
the sidewalk in front Of St Pauls Church Mr.. Magic
counsel for plantf said the jury were their own mas
tiers, and he was perfectly willing they should
that he had other Witnesses wished 10 rest for the
present. as one Of them sick This was opposed by
MI Holiness who contended that was in Opposition to
tne RUE For good reason shown by Mr.. n, the
the whole to be conspiracy between Tall
madge and his wife to extort money the defendant
that Mr. Lowerse 60 from beur IN ,ba ssS o
rambling at night was most exemplary and regular in
ms naons gong to bed early, and rising at particular
testimony of Tyler he declared his to have
been totally uniounde respect what he asserted as
Of the and every thing done in Il liable to be
seen from the street. After further remark he
the glass front Of the oce-also having the
store after Lowerre Weeks moved out, and Of Mrs.
Iamadge coming there to enquire for after he
had gone. 1t was in October or November II was be.
fore she was confined which, he understood took place
|
Pearl street. The furniture of Tallmsdre was soH in
two or three different lots. w" ''-N 49,
ELsAa c. DoDDmThis witness also testified as to the
glass front OF the office, and the with which what
was going on inside could be SEEN He also stated that
here were heaps Of straw in the second story which
persons might comfortably lie down and 20 to sleep
Several Witnesses were brought up 10 impeach the
character of Tyler but the they said of him
that they had heard he SO good on count OF
some one else sayiag that he drank as he was
months ego. None ofthe witnesses ever saw him the
worse TS for liquor but once and then very slightly
| p0f Mr.
years his next door neighsor
Mr.. IHLoR sworn-Kept adjoining Mr.. Tylers in
some folks said before he away that he drank
mnch never saw any thing like il; never heard any
tnng against him a: to truth except that he promised
not DO il; reccecs Mr. Holmes the Counsel calling on
me Friday evening; told him could dc him no goo;
peheve yler 10 De an industrious man. and pt his
being called little incorporate never heard an hin
against him There was little difficulty one time; Mrs
smith wanted my wife to come in enc night and sleep
with her. Mr.. Tyler and Mrs TYLER. s6s said hal =
quarrel; this was all ever heard about him. | would
most unquestonabiy believe Tyler under oath.
GEORGE A MAcoMBER sworn-This is respectable
young man; clerk in store. He testified to having
boarded with Mr. Lowerre q. the house Of Mrs Muck.
age NO feck Slip in the spring Of ls4O when tn
both went with her to Chamber street and defendant
and himself roemed together. They had breakfast be-
tween na and :, previous to which Mr. l. never wen,
OUT ana ne was always home by o'clock in the eve
ming He broke his leg and on crutches after leay
ing AIS room From Chamber street they went togeth,r
to the house OF Mrs Scudder in Gold street where MIR
LIS habits rgidly continued. He could saw pos;;veiv
except when at the Theatre opera with witness Nh Al
never was out alter 10 o'clock in the evening
rms tesumony was confirmed by Mrs. Muckridge who
stated mat Mr. L. while at her house. had the nisortune
preak one Of his arms by slip the ice and lec
py ianing IN his store. She knew he never went ou
before breakfast, and was home by 10 o'clock in tn,
evening as he had ngh,-Sey although every othe,
gentleman IN the house had his early habits OF
ing one. had he been out she must have known it, al
me aoor was last and she would have been called
MIN IN will be recollected that on Friday two lodie
sWore 10 having seen Mr. Lowerre with Mrs Talmadge
ns one al In the morning and the other at half past II
we add the testimony of a young lady who boa,de,
IN the same house with Mrs. Talinadge. It serves 4
contradict IN some measure the statement given by
witness on Friday Of Mr. L. being locked up In Mrs IT,
Miss OAKLty sworn-ls dress maker, residing a,
Fourth street Resided ut 470 Grand street. with Mrs
Williams. Went there the last of August 1910, ant
left there i'll December Mrs Tsllmadge came there in
about fortnight or three weeks after did do no,
know where Mrs. Tallmadge lived previous | never
| do not know how often he She was not sick
She generally told when he going to call that
che had invited him. Do not know that any gentleman
was ever locked up in her with her She had said
two or three times that Mr. Lowerre going 10 call
and spoke Of him as a particular friend. When she
went down to see Mr.. LowerIe which frequent we
would he was prevented by business He had never
coled previous to leaving and have called since ID
ask Il he had called, and was told he had not. w,
Josed her apo1t the doctor equally with Mr. Lowerre
The doctor called, but Mr. L. did my know ledge
The Doctors name is M'Ewen, living in East Broad
| way. never was in Mrs Tallmadges room She sad
she would bring Mr. Lowerre up to carry Miss Mitchell
10 the theatre knew Mr.. Lowerre before, but no
partial to him. do not rccollect saying he was liber
une but we frequently spoke of him. and if said any
,hing, 1t was probably against him. was not partia
| tal, or otherwise
The Court then adjourned to half past three this afer
When directions were given that the whole Of thu
Witnesses Tor the prosecution must be brought up.