Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1842-02-24

/
asleep or IN trance when he was recording my vote
| wee on Friday before for James Nc Dowell This IS
s:'1nly contradiction, lame place IN his remarks;
I'd think he has battered himself The Editor ought
ihnk ~ ice before he writes speaks once; and the
t'or GOES farther, and says, 'when he, Mr. Grimes,
"aisuddenly seized with violent affection for Mr. Ste
'iaion, !; II be not intrusion, would ask MIR. G
Fiat produced his sudden conversion Why did he
-iindon Judge Summers, and all at once become so
as'm Tor Mr.. Stevenson = | pause again, and say
al am truly as,onished at these remarks. Can he
~: c'scesn The difference between the name OF Judge
summers and James McDowe For it was James
AaDowe!! was voting for, and not Judge Summers,
hich tie papers OF Friday will show. | should like
KNOW what authority the Editor has to call upon me
account to Inn for my voting on this ail-imPortant
'9ec cafae here authorized By the free, high, and
,'emndsd people Of one Of the free counties OF the
ss' named a'ler The noble queen Pocahontas. am
:" no. 10 De interrogated by the Wing, or any man,
81 Of men, Tor carrying the views of the people
iocahonas. would advise the Editor of the Wing
'Vo6 ont his way better before he commences again
"a -. In my concluding remarks, would just
~ 'aa' through the of the winter the ques
. 80 Leen asked in inv room, If | knew who would
IN iof Governor ! have answered, / did not
-" want candidates would be brought out. The
"s OF Judge Summers was mentioned, and asked
" moaSht he would run. | have answered, II
- more 'han knew, but he might run very WE'LL
-. aush' make good Governor. But no gentleman
- an e!i'it for me TO pledge myself ! have n
i 1'F opinion Of every gentleman OF the House OF
I s"es rs the Wing has asked me for an expla'
haze gwen It 20 him now in full; and as for
.a'n' OF the Enquirer having any hand in the mat
~ would say for that gentleman, did not
4 ,sa whether he was friend to Stevenson or not,
r ~ near tie close of voting. He never said any
: &c NE on lie subject JOHN CRIMES.
s., TO TIE EDITOR of THE ENQUIRER.
- 'ustas was about to drop the above into your
gb, .r'',,unately for me, put my hand on the
s,s VI Inc 18Th Of February, and looking over its
T., ,a., hho he has made Of my name again,
10 ' s IN friendly way. He believes me 10 be
H., sp"es Conscientious gentleman; that have been
In! IRA IN my votes through the winter and dis.
8sr,bs no 10 what was right l am very glad TO see
8sa,s, !, a'o' OF the Wing has come somewhat to his
81 c,,ls - an conscientious, honest man. Of course
.sps. De the man he first spoke Of. II is argu.
5s..,s ne hrs, niade-a false charge, has been
q md !, however, he leaves little poison still be-
/ sa nc SAYS that have been overreached by a
..,,.Ss his is not the case. No man ever in.
Ira. ",e IN my vote. lie says, he hopes it will
'4eauj ~, fsson for me in time TO come, and that
Isy, Tia, anh nm for opening my eyes would just
81 viii. considering the course that this little thing
1frs viii leave it to your readers TO say, which
los -, best qualified for opening eyes. From
~, a. now!edgments, am willing that the
a, anad die, and, if he repents will forgive him
WI 90 better for the future.
#8is JOHN GRIMES.
Fl nm 40 ne hrst commenced upon me, hope he
Han, 70 me the justice to publish the above in his