Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1842-06-14


\IRGlSIAi-At Circuit Superior Court OF Law and
Chaneey for the County ct llcurico and City OF Rich
Cay, Ca Thursday, November Ilth, ISL:
Tie President aud Masters OF Professors ofWlan and
Mary college, Pltis.
kobets MeCandlsh administrator lie bonis non with thc
wil annexed II Thomas Coleman, deceased. who was
cNccuor Of William Coleman. deceased, George w Me
Caudiish Sergeant OF the City OF Williamsburg as
thc said William Coleman, deceased Edward Carrincou
AMI Mary Z his wife, AMI george Policeman Charles w.
Coleman Helen Coleman aud Rachel Wilson. Infants
b. tho said Robctt Candsh their guardian AL tr Mar,
wilson James Wilson, Preston Trouer aud Eliza hswiic
appearing that on the death Of Thomas Coloman al
mns;ftion of his estate was rranri To- Frances & colo
msn; that minstraton the estate Of William Cole.
man, unsdmnistercd by the said Thomas Go eman will
the will Of the said William Coleman annexed Vas then
coniniJfcd George McCands. Sergeant OF The civ
oi williamsburg aud that subsequently thereto, Tic Couu
OF Prohat revosc c order committing thc s rstae 10
honis non thc estate OF The said William Goldman with
h vii annexed Ia Rotcrt McCandsh. By consent Of thc
said Fran Coleman and Robert McCandsh, by their
counsel o. IL orderoo (auy thing in any oImcr order In
cause the contrary ding HAT ~ cause
shall hcuccoTh be proceeded u against the aid Frances
Ctolcnau as aimriirai.lN OF lie estate tg said Tho
Coleman, deceased against the said Robert sc.
tandi Do, as thc Vr,s SEN aniusiraor tc bonis with
the viii anucNco t william Coleman, deceased well az
late administrator aorcssd. whereupon, cause
cane 90 this ito ~ 3s.n heard % pagers formerly
thereto, aud was argued by ~ounsoi consideration
Whereof u appearing from account B IA Commissioner
Bakers renort. made pursuant orders Of the ninth
day OF February, one thousand c9t hundred and ~
hundred aud igcutysoycn, that William Coleman eScc.
ted TO tho plaintiffs cenaln bonds amounting tosotherto sx
aud appearing from account &, IN the report that
Ls aggregate sum OF six thousand and seventy en-
Of the 3si day Of July, 1919 WAS made Ia secue
And further appearing nom the said report, that tie 10.
tcrcs on Tie bonds above specified which accrued To the
ls iay 81 January 1879 amounted io the s2174 -
cents while the payments 70 hat time only sii2l -
cents eaVing balance Of s32 IS due Tor ntcfs 81
10 the 1t day OF January, 1872 That scuucny pa,
mems hav" been made 10y the representative William
NNN.Nn q amt
q each paymert Is placed first ainst the interest due
aud balance IS reported tue for count the aail bon
thereof from the 3i ay OF Jniy s.6. The CouII con
erng that the effect Of approving aud confirming the said
aeeou1tC will not DC TO declare that tho scwn
thereby IL secured by the orgsgc, butuerciy 10 cc,rc
that William Coleman indebted 10 thc PLAINTIFF tbat
amount, as well as tho amount shcwn by the nrcoun
and D. doth now approve and confirm the said C.
aud also the sad and d. and doth declare thai
The said accounts & {, and d. the painfis may prc.
coed 10 subject the Of the said William Coleman
Wherefore, the Couu doth refer io a Commi sion,
Of this Couri, 10 take account, first Of The csla
conveyed 10y the mortgage. showing what dirposition
las been made thereof, aud II the plaintiffs have not
already received tho proceeds Of whole Of the or-
gagged prop nv, then showing what part II thr saii
mprgnsed pIopcTty, Us proceeds remain to be ap.
personal the said WIN olenin Showing how ,e
same has been administered AMI what tho plain
s are cnuucito receive u the said personal estate
ant iTdly account of the real estate Of which the
said WIN Coleman ocd siezci; a which accounts lhc
ters specially stated. deemed pertinent by him-eL or
whica may L. required 10y the parties 10 bc stated
SArURDAy. January 22I, 1912.
Tho 'cfcudlnf, Burwe BleFctf bfing dead by cent
oi INC piaiuuns and of George W B'scu Executor nj
said Burwol Bisacii by Tho couri doth order
thiihs auit st1nd revived sGd tc proceeded nio final
decree against the al George w Bactt in his charlc.
ter aforesaid
SATURDAY, February l9thIei2
on tho motion Of me piuuuGs ~ counsel leave IS
gwen them u hil supplemental b1l now rtoiu-cd hy
thcin n count, and the Lrrg fled Robert MrCan.
80 DO Us cnnhuel as guardian al Item 90 the defendants
Charles w coleman iui Helen Coicmln. nrd b. 1fp
ns itn"d guardian "i te defendant Rach. Mary Wilson;
"hercupon ~ con cni at the dofendlufs Edward Car
Tngnn nnd Merry lif wife, by their counsel audofhc
dcicndtnt1 thailcs " Coleman aud Helen n Coleman
by leir end guardian, ordered that This rtusc slant
rrNvcd anI c procccdci loo against Them. hcua Ufte
ad Geo Coleman. cc ~ aud by the further consent of
James w WH.on and Elizabeth Wilson. hy their counsel
in ~ Tue ftd Va icl Mary Wnu, hy icr esii atuln
" o. ordered that tlir .aud revived ami hr rrl.
cce'cd boz against thc,t. Lorf ofthc fat Mnty T. wilson
decd, aud that n o0nlid'rcd having been revived
against tbcr ae fuch heirs whcu heretofore n was hy
mistake revived against mary Wilson Rachel WIson, und
Jam"n wilson, ashoirs of the a1iI Mary wilson drc'
l-lgucd WM q SANDS, & &.