Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1842-06-30
io7 ewsw. A'Or'' r''' WILLIAM uurr. Clerk
ITInCINiAi-Ne Circui sinrcrior ,o,,ri OF Law nm.


NINGINtAt-Ate Circuit Superior Count OF Law aud
Chanccry Tor tho County ofIicnuoo amt oiiy ofR.cl.
CITY. On Thursday, November Iith, isiI:
The P,ssiieniand Masters or Professors OF William and
Mail to.csc, fals.
Robert McCanlSl administrator dc bonis non with tho
viii annexed 81 Thomas Coleman, deceased, who was
executor Of William Coleman deceased, George " Me
sSeS Z, S eS 1 nSn S M S @ AMI as
the said William Coleman deceased Edward Darlington
Coleman icSn cosmSS All RsehSi wona ' S,,n W.
by the idRoett candsh their guardian al hten Mary
Wilson, James Wilson, PIeson TIoucT and Eliza hs Wife
Iaprcarng that ON tho death Of Thomas Coleman. adj,
nustr"on OF his estate was granted To Frances Cole
min; that administration OF the estate OF William Cole.
man, Snadm,nslrred " the sai Thomas 90 cuau with
tue VIII 81 The SAID Miliain Coleman annexed then
communication George McCandlsh gcant OF the CITY
o Williamsburg, aud that subsequent thereto tho CouI
icNuN.utle "ihct committing the sud estate Ia
the said sergeant and granted letters OF administration de
hs~iii annexed To Roeon NcCanis by consent of he
saiiFr1nccs Coleman aud Robert McCaudsh, by their
ibis causeto the contrary notwithstanding that this cause
shall hcnociurh hc proceeded ia against the sSd frances
mas Coleman deceased and sns' the said Robert
h, as nc lt,y.nt alwnisiraior lie honis non With
against the said George W McCaudls!, the sergeant and
late aiuin.traiur as aforcraR whercupon his cause
cane this ,ay, hc heard on tie papers formerly
read the supplemental bill bu of Tovivor and
thereto" and was argued 10y counsel On consideration
whereof appearing from account u IN Commissioner
Bakers reno made pursuant To the orders of the ninth
daYoi February one thousand eight huudrcl and twenty
six aud tho twentieth lay Of June thousand eght
hundred and wcntY.aeycn that william Coleman, e1cc.
ted 10 tho plaintiffs certain bonds amounting together to sA
thousand aud rcyentyseven dollars and hy-hTcc cents
indi appearing from accountU in the same report that
WE asslIsaIc sum OF SIX ulousani aud seyeniyseVen
dollars and hy three cents Is the money which the mort.
gage of the 3lst Day OF July, 1919 was To secure
AMI riher appearing nom The SAIL report that the IN.
ierest on the bonds above specified which accrued to the
lat LAY ot January, 1912, amounted 10 the ofs7i .
een leaving haisnceo Of slj52 - ccnf duc or Interest
mems have boon made 10y the representative Of William
Coleman account of what ne owed ant in account
at the time Of the payment amt then against the principal
aud btanec Is reported iuc for account Of The said bonds
OF s5j6l u cents, with Interest sgS7 II cents pant
thereof from the ~ ay of July, 1876 Tho Count consid
account will not be TO declare that tho amount shcyn
Thai William Uolcnin Is indebted TO The piantifrs tha,
amount as we'll as the amount shcwn by the accoun a
and d. doth noy approve andcoulrm the said account g.
aud also the said accounts and D. aud doth declare thar
for the whole principal and interest appearing duc on All
the said accounts e 4, A aud D. the planuAs may pro:
Wherefore the Court doth refer 1t Comui .s.oner
Of hi, Court, 70 take an account hrs Of the ostae
conveyed 10y the mortgage, showing what disposition
has been made thereof aud II the planiiaa have not
e'Hcd properly then showing what part Of the said
monsased properly or ts proceeds remain, TO be AZ.
personal The said VIM Coleman shelving how the
same las been administered aud what amount TIA plain.
anI an account 81 inc real estate, OF which the
said VIM Coleman died, sliced; all which accounts, the
ters specially stated deemed pertinent by himself OF
~hieh may be required 10y the parties TO be so slated
sArrapAy, January 22I, 1872.
The defendant Burwcl Bassef. being dead, by consent
Of the plaintiffs AMI OF George w B5sset, Executor Of
said Burwcl H4ss'i, 10y counsel The court doth order,
that this suit stand revived aud be proceeded INTO Gual
decree against the said George Blssett in his chaac
ter aforesaid.
SATURDAY February 10Th 1872.
On the motion 81 tie plaintiffs 10y counsel, leave Is
given them 10 al asuppicmeuial bl now produced 10y
them IN court, and ihc samo beng lc Rgbou MctaI.
di'h s continued guardian al Item 10 the defendants,
Charles w coleman AMI Helen Coetna 4 aud s also
assigned guardian Il the defendant Rachel MlSy Wilson;
wNcrcupon, by cunscu Of the defendants Edward Car
rnston and Mary Z his wife. by their counsel andoftho
defendants Charles w Coleman and Helen NJ Coleman
by Their said guardian Is ordered, at this cauSc stand
revived aud be proceeded la against them Of the
sad ico Coleman dec ID and 10y the urt consent of
James w Wilson and Elizabeth wilson 10y .cir counsel
r 6rSrsi liaelei Mary WILSON 10y her said guardian
faau fs- slrgsI anil L.,
III against men, A. heirs oftho fai MARY Win
ucc a. anu tattt be considered having been '';'
s'nst ,nein as such heirs, when heretofore il was SS
reNived against Mary Nson, Rachel wilson ana
James wilson, az heirs Of he said Mary Wilson decd
Isignedl WIN @ SANDS &C