New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1842-09-23

time kept he letter. secret until gave them Nr Bar
ihe!emy Mr. Vesren made witness an otter OF money TO
give up the publication OF the booh did no; demand
money him. He offered money The last OF May or
beginning OF jane, 1883 Nj verren did offer
ey prevent The publication of the letters but Le VIII
ness supposed purchase bis friendship was educated
in France Popsh Pries-nsver became Protestant
Though ves,ryman in Protestant Church joined Mr..
Verrcn's church obge Mr.. Verren- believe cath
upon Protestant bible binding ii tha altered
Ii has been altered, do not believe it binding do not
remember havag said Catholic that an oath taken
Protestant bible binding. may have said The
Court then took recess OF hour until Il O'clock
The trial OF Rev Mr.. Nerren resumed al II O'clock.
Cro,, examinations Of DE- Boail!on resuu.ed-Wsen
sick Mr. Feren gave food clothlas and medicine when
he came He was security Tor my reIt, but did
not pay my renl have anmosty against Ar. De La
Forest, have never expire any in the employ OF
NJ De La Forest parts OF 1888 and ISL and dScearg
ed from his service. He well paid NE ior MY service Ne
yer sud Mr.. De la Forestowed me $500, SEQ,
had wToGgeG tor NOUNS service Ia 1857 NJ YER
rem secury Tor my renl. furnished the house-cad
SAC IN the hands MIR. Care, which took purchase
furniture. Had quarrel with Madame De La Haye-
never tire pitcher ul al her bead, threatened
TO do il. may nave boosted OF having done H. Thsre
was some iriculty between Mrs d.. La Haye and rly
wife know NJ. BrrIe he sang III the Church, and
respectable MVerren recommended nle 20 speak very
.ressectu!y OF madame De La Haye, which told Mr..
tie tha, Ys. De La Hsye cid bag, gipsey. did
not believe myself however. told by NJ. Colon
that if would give Mr. Bartbelemy all the Information
possessed relative Mr. Verrea he would give nae $780,
which refused with indignation De said might make
$500 by threatening expose Mr. Ferrcn Mr. Barhole-
nv was there said he would have any
Mr. vcrren must be exposed l used TO so every day TO
Ch2bcrts and taught there. Chdbert was witness on ay
trial never applied TO any friend to apply 10 Verren
GET OF him $500 for Or. Formal told that NJ
Vcrren had sednced my wife had perec. right 10 do or
sny any thing against him. He told that he bad $500
would take his house and give it 10 NE 10 take me
difficulty. Did answer fully the question
he had said that he thought right 10 swear false
ly against Protestant Il vas necessary TO MS Interest
but he said held The Office OF sub Deacon in the Cath
clio Church; but was ordained Don't recelect ever
saving that Mrs De La Haye had IN ored him IN his school,
and thai he would destroy her. was offered $1,000 10 sup
press my manuscript against Nh Verren and go France.
Direct resca- regard the obligation of the oath have
being morally, reSiously and civiy as sacred
was offered the SOO0to go FaBce that the public should
no, become acquainted With the memoranda had written
concerning him and containing the letters he had given me-
Tac offer OF the $1,000 made after witness hat read his
memoranda concerning Mr. Veren 10 several persons one
of whom told him. Tread the manuscript TO Mr. Colon, Mr.
Swords and Mr.. Chabert Jr. within week after was in.
lroduced 10 Barholemy gave him copies OF the letters
received from Mr. Verrcn, retaining the originals myself.
Sworn copies of these dated 81 December 1889 About
Cor weeks before the offer OF $1,000 made NE he
came suspicious there ssmelhas wrong between Mr.
Verren and my wife Don't doubt that Mr. Nerren became
appraised my suspicious by persons 10 whsm read
my manuscript Knew Mr.. Verren and my wife were op-
posed Mrs De La Haye and therefore told hin was
the point OF throwing pitcher OF water at her head
don't know whether my wife in the city About
the first OF May 1885, told that Mr. Verren init
mate with my wife.
Sebastian Heas sworn-I was born in France at Greno.
be and have been here l6 years. here when s or s
reside at 4l2 roadway; have known Mr. Verren since
1885, became acquainted with him through his brother who
partner fmnc was very intimate with ar. Yer.
1885 and 1854 The Attorney General here offered
to prove by this witness that Mr. Verren 1884 had request,
ed him to become his amanuen, in wiring certain anony
nous letters him person. and that the witness
expressing doubts of the prople,y OF so doing Mr. Yer
rem replied he clergyman, that it important be
should have enemies and that when persons injured hin
he had his revenge by weapons peculiarly his own by
writing them anonymous letter. This objected 10
by Messrs Hoffman and Maxwell in long and able argu-
aen and supported by the Attorney General with equal
ability Mr. Maxwell, OF his objections stated tie
hostility OF the witness Mr.. Verren, because Mr. Yer.
had said he could that hs brother should be
lougert The partner Who had manufactured
felt money France fraudulent purposes;
lie also commended it violation OF The rules OF evidence
10 receive such testimony for reasons he advanced II
Court refused admit the evidence and the counsel for tue
People excepted TO the decision or the Court
testimony roundabout know any thing Of the feel
ings OF Mr.. Verren French Consul in 1885, The
letters shown witness, and the Attorney General Of
ered show that there particular words or express
slons those letters which Mr. Verren claimed vi bis
coinage and peculiarly his own This the Counselor
defence objected to- and after hearing Mr. Maxwell the
Court decided that such proof admissible The witness
said the French word assnans which used in one OF
the letters very often used by Mr Verren in con7ersa
cd
in Bsadway. 1 say million OF times, perhaps
eYaggerale; 1t might be about 100000 times
Alexander Core, eramintd-Knows the French Consul,
Mr. De La Forest Knows als- the sosn.law OF the Con-
sui D. Haulerene. Knew De Bouilion when in the
ploy Of the French Consul and when De Boutlion was
there DIlau,erene Vice Consul and De Boulion saw
his name writteH every day.
Crosseramned-De Bouillion left the French Consul IN
1884 or 1885, when witness there ana De B. was no.
always there.
Dr. james Rearney Rodgers ,ned-Knows Mrs De
La fiaye goveness in his family II 1856 and be-
ginning of 1887 Knows Mr. Verren. The latter stated IL
bidnous remarks said have been made by Mrs. De La
tiaye, which he said Mrs. De Bouion had told him she
used and he endorsed the declarations OF Mrs Beuion as
those OF woman o. yeracty. He spoke we'll of Mrs De B.
and OF Mrs De La Haye whose virtue ne mpeached
This was in 1888 or 1889.
Cros,-eraninea Mrs De La Haye had left my family
I9 before and wished 10 know what opinion
Mrs. De La Haye entertained oil my family. Inc CONVEX
saton was in Mr.. Verrens house.
The Court O'Clock adjourned 70 II O'Clock On FTiaay
morning.
L. S. DISTRICT CoURT.-IE BANKRUPrcY.-
Before Judge BsTTs.-Dechions-Henry A. aud Edward
p IIeyer-The petitioners have slcck Ut hardware GOOD
10 P-ar-.feet Motion was made for the appointment
Mr. James Suydam special assignee and tina! the pro
perry Of Tie firm be sold at private tor cash or good snort
paper. Motion allow ed.
V!!!ium H. Hiliyer.-This ordered TO the Circuit
Court on tie point whelhera Bankrupt could he denied
discharge on the his debts randulenty trans
rred or concealed anterior to the passage OF the ac aee
being no proof he possessed or ordered any properly
al the ,Ar his petition in bankruptcy was presented
Samuel 4. Jesre-Thls case had been oroeieu Oe'o'
W. c,rhr,.pg a commissioner who complains that the
biL ron,S