Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1842-06-08


nAs9i.sss A. ss ,sssss
ss q NE ss :. a.; ssssss NJ s's I. Sc
s rss,asa psse.o,s sns ceSsaa o. ne ns.k %
lohn Purcell 4dnln.stIstor of Ro~and Reynolds
executor sfosrsa wiSssHs Deed, - '' fi iiit'''
Richard l. ssnsay, John shore, william Allison. and
nssh Wan. partners under The aru OF Allison a Wet,
Richards Massle, James Allen and Davenport part.
ser aSS Soha p saeS ua hs sS 81 ssa s
seer = SOM lyen. Peyion Johnston aud
john sSss sssi ef oas pssta.s. ls
an, sSs ' CT seoA' IS%Ss", srSSst sSs
James ss surviving Of GS0S a GarSsi
nfm Of CUSHING Brother; xss,rers AMI o,o ,nS
u Berry, pa,,nes. undo. a! Of Armstrong cSry;
drm of Piaske a cusle Charles Msgrsre and H. w Ma.
."rss partners under The hrm orc 8 w. H. Msgarre; p
Of Klesman & nro,hcr; wsrd issrs i sn n ans
w s1ss aas John S"sfs ps ss ss :, ws 5
firm Of A. w Spics 4 Coz John Flrb and nau.
psrtnets undor the ntm OF Fnth Hail T. Stanford
sndiames swords, partners under tue arm Of swords,
stanford a Co.; Jsna'hsn Seymour and d seymour,
De syver lanes Thomas aud IoscrhT iborn, partners
under the hsm of DE syver. Thomas Co Joseph y.
ners under the dr,n OF ThOmas, cowpcrhwait a Co..
under tho rS az Ta nn MhSs~,s, Rtnera
son. John Rowct,, MiehaelB PoaHx; jacob Ezekiel aud
Thscause 10 which the paoiiff. appear to have pro
seeded against the defendants =. W Knapp aud
G.ner nns Ssrs ,S under the hrS q knapp Go
Arm olcushns a Broihor; Armstrong aud Georsc
Berry, partners under the Grm Of Armstrong a berry
-, Piasket and Iohn cuxlc. partnors under TIC
firm OF Plaskcu a Cugle: Charles Massrse and W. ii
MasGrge, partners under the frm OF c. a Masarrc
srAof Sss ana Brother h''nn' S@s;S '
s s1,s War;, wSTd, partners Snies the firm Of Ward
the firm III A w Spies A Co.: John Filth and IIall
partners under the firm Of Firth Hall Stanford ane
yames swOrds partners under the nrm OF swords stan
under the drn OLD. Seymour son. Thonss De sylyer
James Thomas and 1ofcph lhorn partners under m,
nrm OF DE ~ lver Thomas d Co. Joseph II IIilhorn
Cowpcrhwat aud Jose PHI Thomas paitners untlsr IN,
hrn OF Thomas, Cowpertiwah a Co: Tune,
,9d =, ,x,,, wheelTrsh partners under tho 6rmEo
lett who are out OF this Country in the mode
by law agatst absent defendants, they still failing 10 an
pear aG answer, this day be hear, ON the bil
taken oreontcsScd the said abscn ana a,
10 an the othor defendants, except John shore William
son Watt, aud Michael Poifianx answers on Tho -
john shore, viii an Allison and Hugh Watt and Mic
foiuauh ropheations and eShbls, and argued b,
totlnscis On consideration whereof the Court doh AZ
Judge, order and decree the the defendant John shore
trustee IN the Deed Of rrustn the proceedings none.i
10 render az account Of histransacons trustee a,
Aforesaid, and OF te fund which came TO hs bans
before one OF the Commissioners Of this Court That
nrd i, yr The receiver appointed 10y the order made
uhS cause ON the seventh day Of July thousand
hundred and oyonc, do render before the same Conm.
sioneri an account Of the must fund which his
hsnns ny virtue OF said appointment. Aud the said
missioner Is directed e. sk &C coun-tF of the debt
conraeted after the exeeuono Of tho said trust deed am
during the cuninuancc Of the therein provided for
the amounts the said debts; the persons TO WHOM
hey are due respectively and secondly, the debts IN,
20 the Creditors rs and second class as arrsngs
and provided for 10y the said Decd the amount OF each del
as II existed the time tho said deed was executed. m,
persons whom due; and the dividends II any, receive,
missioner Is rectedto examine and settle and
INC same 10 the Court with any specially atstc,
the parties to be so stated.
hCoIy-Tcsie,