The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1842-12-02
Price Two Cents.
Court OF Common Pleas.
Rafnra IudUs lnglis


DAG. John r. Hasenan vs. Henry Sefke.-Ihs was
an action brought against the defendant the
value OF pipe OF gin. The value Of the gin is down
at s94 90 The liquor sold the goth Feb last On
the 10th OF month Doris Hoef obtsned verdict
this suit for $500, action for breach OF promise of
marriage About the 26ih March last, the defendant
Tins SUIT issued an execution on Judgment confessed by
tedecS 10 the defendants and Frederick was sold out
der this execution and the store by MIR Hbbard
The plaintiff brings this suit the value of the
pipes OF gn Sea So alleging that the sold to tho
defendant in this suit and not Frederick. The efen-
dan insists that he has paid the whole amount 10 within
S2l, which he is willing pay. In the his
marks the Judge observed that the only point in this case
is TO which of tho Siekers this pipe OF gin was sold
may promise as often as he peases and as solemnlv
as he peases to pay debt of another but unless there
was some consideration unless the contract redu
ced to writing 1t can have effect in court of law
whatever the promise might be good for in the form of
conscience He may at any time repudiate such debt
In this case very much depends upon the crediby Of
The witnesses OF which you must be the Judge The ques
ton respecting dormant partnership does appear
be much pressed nor very much relief upon. The
generally turns the point to whom the credit
given. After briefly recapitulatng the testimony, the
Judge submitted the TO the jury who retired and in
ten minutes brought in verdict for the defendant
Peter Wilson plaintiff; c. T.. Bnhler for defendant
John Graner Josiah s. Pian-In continuation The
jury appeared except absent by and rendered
verdict for the plaintiff six cents damages and six cents
costs, and assess the value of the property at SlsO0
Before Judge Ulshotfer
Junius B. Booth vs. W. w Snowden.-This case was
monds referee. 1t will be heard tomorrow, friday
at p. NJ. at the Box Office Of the Bowe,y Theatre.
John Fisher and Clinton G Bird u.s. David Heuriques.
This was action OF assumpst, to recover from de-
PENDANT the amount of bill of marble msnels and
rest amounting to S3034, delivered to the farm belong
ing to defendant at Philipsburgh, Orange county The
value and receipt Of the goods fully proved by
fendants foreman Mr. Beehan, the defendant having
cognized him as such 1t moreover appeared that Mr.
Beehan employ by Mr.. Peixotto who represented
himself to be the agent OF defendants that the articles for
which this suit the subject OF controversy, direct
ed to d. H. aud his farm the place before stated
that other goods and farming utensils the said
directed DenrlQuee;
that the produce from said farm sold for and
count OF ID. Hem that the farm before referred to
conveyed to defendant by deed bearing date sometime
in November, l940 and continued to in him until
April 1882 and after the marble manels had been there
delivered. The defendants counsel contended that al
though the deed OF conveyance made defendant it
conveyed to him only and for the purpose
OF deiraudng the creditors OF PuXoo ince desd) and
who was in failing circumstances But to rebuff this the
deed produced, which contained such clause to
warrant such conclusion. 1t appeared, that
by deed Of from defendant to the assgnees
Of Peixoo, that consideration of $500 secured
defendant to indemnify him against all monies laid by
him, or for which he might be liable from the time that
he held said farm. The jury, under the charge Of the
Court found verdict for plaintiffs for the full amount
claimed.
For plaintiffs, E. w. Bishop-Tor defendant, E. Van
Wrinkle.