The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1842-06-17
Price Two Cents.
Superior Court.


William S. Hoy ard Others, vs.. Berg. III. Lahe--The
defendant going to Mississippi in 1899, entrusted
subsequently wrote from New Orleans that he had
and had in hand Ss76 7ic belong ng plaintiffs
crue. lie returned 20 new York in Ala, 1879, and
here FOR months whhcu. rendering IN arcount OF
ohoIn & 10 sy the ~oaey suitwss brought. Nh CLARK
or dc'eida.t, Ia opening the case, cot'ndci that MIR.
LILLE iaI not been pst money M. IN Mississippi bills,
and that nonsuit should be allowed the ground Is
ma no demand bad been made for the money aud, ally
iat The defendant liable at all only in Grand
Gulf Bank bills, which in court should lie SO
decided, ready to be rendered. The counsel for plaintiff
objected on the ground that alluson had been to
dcprecaed paper in defendants letter from New Orleans
but on the contrary he declared himself having the
si76 in hand The nonsuit allowed Verdict for
plaintiff, $3.50 being principal and interest with leave
Messrs. Edwards Mann. For defendant. Messrs NJ
Cour Clark.
Iyiiiiam Bowker vs. Charles Lent and Geo. c. Peters,
The plaintiff wife was run about o'clock in the
forenoon Of It'll March last by omnibus Of the Knick
erbocker line belonging TO defendants and r,uch in
ured that Of her legs had to be pu,ated on the sac
day and she was sick fol or months uferward The
present action to recover damages, the laid at
$1,000.
parties had been married but about two months
Mis-. Bowkcr on the morning in question, had " -
IN order to get out when opposite The Aston House At
the same time defendants omnibus, which going
contrary diiecoL had just takenn passenger ond The
driver (Tayor was looking round to il he had got in
Ills horses in tie meantime started Just Mrs. D.
got out of the stage she had been in defendants omnibus
came up; she screamed but was Immediately Knocked
down, struck by ofhe horses, aud ty one Of
the wheels The passesby lifted her Up and placed Yer
wished T. be carried to. She replied that he. leg
broke and she cared not where she Word
to the hospital and Mr. Starr the superintendent repaired
scene Of accident and had her conveyed to that cs
adjustment Her leg had received compound fracture,
and was found necessary to amputae Immediately
during the day. She lay sick for several weeks com
planning also of her back and did not leave the hospital
ill the 9TH June As regards the driver he did every
thing that humanity and good feeling could dictate inn
mediacy gave his horses charge other person.
sent to hi. employers telling them of the accident; and
exerted himself TO the ucrmost in procuring relief for
he wounded ndy dual Ike defendants themselves also
repaired the hospital directed that every thing possible
sou be done for the invalid. and said they would pay
the bill which they did On being applied to in relation
70 reI p ,ney eSpresseu .ne utmost sympathy ior
poor that subscription be set on foot in her behalf
which they offered to icad and exert II elves every
way to further. The Court, in its charge alluded to the
apparent gooo conduct Of The driver and the coepdante
yet he Jury thought The oimer exercised caieltsness
10 looking round to see his passenger bad got into the
coach While the hosf,s motion, IL could not be
considered where that proper attention which the
law required he'd been exercised, but the Ju pro-
perly weigh the testimony before them and rive such
anna es. II any, as they considered pIoperMrs Bowker
IN Court having orutchec y ing by her side thereby
aording evidence Of the calamity she had experienced
sealed verdict is TO be rendered this forenoon.
For plaintiff, Mr. r. ~ Morrison. For defendant, Mr.
d. +. Wheeler and MIR. j. w. Gerard.
CoRREcrIos-CAsE OF RoBissoN US. CARPrvDER.-Ths
bargain for the purchase and sale OF the stock made
between Vanpell and Grahsn, Rollins and Graham. Mr.
Carpenter OF that firm-he the party with
eral security On the day the stock due according
to the contract the buyer unable to receive it, but
was ready in three four days aerw ards, when MIR
Hamilton rendered the money and demanded the stock in
behalf of Mr. Robinson which the sellers then refused 10
deliver, they having in the meanwhile sold the stock at
the Board of Brokers' and charged Robinson with
Of over $3.50. twss until nfer refusal deliver the
stock pay back the amount received account Of
IL that any action was brought The opposite counsel
did not say that Mr. Hamilton was the only Daniel Ro
bnson that existed, that such Daniel Robin
son existed at ALL"