New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1842-09-27
Trial Of Rev. MIR. vcrren.
MONDAY, September h.

TE1.t OF REV ANTOINE VERsEN FOE PEKJrEY-I Con- |
unned The CccTt resumed the trial al II O'clock
Peter D. Fsrrars eons;Hued-in answer
10 heterogeneous witness said came 10 this city OF RI
dsv was first examined that evening, and again On sax
urday after which with friends to Brookiyn from
the Court Dr.. Granger on Saturday evening went 10
MI Verren's With him; went 20 M 'errens again last
evening but did speak hiIs nor ne TO me- aoot' e
trial No other person there Saw Dr. Granger al
his own house yesterday short me did not speak oil his
case to hm talked OF homeopathic Was IN Court here
trial Didnot % one that Nh NeEren
VA, very great rascal did not then say that did not
know any thing ahou. the Have taught school for
Mrs G. Weod Barrow.s,rec in my rooms IN Nsssaus'
for r Nelson IN Hyde Park, and others Frttausht al
Mr. Walters w.stchesteraiso Al Nh Lyons al larry o"a
and at Mr. Young's, IN BTooAyn was al .is iuo"i' "
poushherlse year pracCciGs Homeopathy. lhe Gay
before the trial com.uen Mr.. Verrea cemmuni'
.aidroNr V in writing what could testify went
n Mr. Ve-ren otte. wthu toar weeks. Was subponaed
WI an at Mr.. Verrens by young gentleman 10 attend
made ont written statement OF facts mat could swear
to- when in my Brooklyn and gave II 10 Mr. et-
rem believing should be suop9naei have not 'es'
fed 10 all contained the paper not having been asked 20
testify To some things contained therein To Use Atsiney
General witness said, would rather light Cossack than
hight YOU, interpreter Tor French sorse-docor
IN hi; practice al one tine.
James K Whiting, Esq sworn for defence.-Am District
Attorney ON the former trial Mr. Fo-aPs was gwen
me as a witness by Mr. Verren Formal made c"mninn'
cation 10 me first think what he kHer on the night
The testimony closed the former trial IL was proposed
bv Mr. Maxwell 10 ask Mr.. Whiting whether MIR. Formal
had made him detailing the facts he has no"
sworn 10 pending the ,rao the ether case two years ago.
and /. detail that statement &c. THIS was objected 10 by
The Attorney General Illegal unless Formal Had been
irpeached by other witnesses. Mr.. Maxwell conended
that Attorney General had beer engaged IN trying 70
igpeach Mr. Formal in his crosse1anllnatlon. Mr. DOH
man stated authority point The OF Jehovtch nthe
United States Court which Captain Hazards testimony
was permitted by Judge Thompson 10 be sustained by that
OF his wife, bo deposed lha. be. husband had long before
that trial made similar statement OF facts 10 herl Inc
Court would permit the wiueSs 10 90 into detailed
statement OF what Formal had told him OF what he would
testify on the former trial Mr.. Whiting was, however,
permitted the that Formal was not called IS
witness on the former trial. He said that the why
Mr. Formal called then was that Mr. Ferren '" as
but little acquainted Mr.. Formal and the latter was
an intimate acquaintance OF the other party it was thought
by witness ana the other counsel and Mr. Verren II might
be unsafe to ,rus, Mr. Formal IS witness.
Cro.s-eraninsd-The affidavit OF Mr. Verren which
this indictment found wa. then read. Mt Whiting
said drew up this affidavit myself in open Court on the
last OF the trial. in the presence OF the opposing cou
sell read in motion to put OF the case for
one day. the purpose showing that the evidence that
had been given by Dr. Granger untrue This motion
made the affidavit OF De Bouiion, and was consld
eIed by the be nadIissibe, as the testimony had
closed When Mr.. Formal told me his story, told him II
was all very we'll but testimony had closed and II was
issue of this trial that have introduced know OF az
other affidavit, made by Mr.. Bartheemy that shosld like
To saw something about, but answered that Mr. Bar
telemy was not witness il this There were some
Vaccinations and erssures in those letters which were the
subject OF conversation and comment AT the former nal
4.semo BERT s.por,-I have known De Beuiion or
years; have in Bro-klyn he spoke OF Madame De
ia Have az being OF bad disposition and bad character
having disposition SANDER; TO persuade me OF her
bad characters took Of his pocket an anonymous let
ter and read from top TO bottom; 1t was very apu
sive OF Mrs Iaye Intending TO have her expelled IRON
all the houses where She teaching Dc Bullion wished
to persuade me that Mrs. De la Haye had slandered sy
| family.
Cro,,exanned-I have belonged TO Mr. Verreas Church
ever since he came here De Boulon's abuse OF Mrs De
la Haye was, Think previous to the sprnS OF 1919 ne
did not say that Mr. Verren also thought badly OF r De
la Have De Bouion wished me TO believe mat ne was
The author and myself believed that he was tie auther,
and left him with that Conviction he greatly abused
Mrs De Ia Have Anonymous letter I" Mrs. De la iaye
,bowp1-It was not this u regular letter, and think
in language like the addressed 10 Madame Brune
R,y Martin Enstbur,. ,,rorn.-I Minister OF the
Episcopal Church, and meeting OF the several Mus
trs ordered by the Bishop OF the Diocese Mrs De Ia aye
vas present and examined witness before tie Eccesi-
acal Court the trial Of Rev. Mr. Verren touching hs
clerical conduct this matter Examination objected TO
by the Attorney General, and waived until Tuesday.
Dr. John Grange, sworn-I have resided nne years IN
New-York became acquainted with Mr. Verren in the
alter part 1888 beginning Of 1889 knew De Boui-
lion lang before knew Mr. Verren, VIZ; irem 1859 In
1856 De Boulon brought his wife Tin The urnmerl TO my
Office She complained OF hemorrhase OF The iuns, Tor
which then prescribed For my medical services to beth
OF them never any charge In The tall OF 1888 De
Bouilon lied and me- and during the conversation
he ask ed me what church belonged to; told bim an
American family had offered in their pc in ST
JONAS Church lie said do you know thai Secretary
of the French Protestant Church in Church and Frank
streets; asked HIM who his colleagues lie said ey
were OF old from first to last and he could do
with them he pleased asked him Mr. Verren would
allow him do he pleased With them. He asked me
knew Mr.. yerren said he said, Mr. Feren Is lii
afraid of me- for he knows ought know, Ihave il in
my power do him harm. asked how that could be; LIZ
replied will tell you, between us-one, night, said he,
Mr. Verren gel him 10 look over bnnd!e OF
letters because you knew said he Frenchmans gram
icaldiction very difficulty Mr. Verren was in stndy
and person with him, and Mr. " said, leave tho bum
die on my table left them and went away; went again
for his letters rung the bel said he up stairs in MIR
yerr MS study there found his letters and copies of them
made by SIR. Veren. He thought he said why has Mr.
VerreD copied my letters and he sa took my letters and
the copies them made by Mr. Verren and said that 200
persons could 10 Mr. Verrens hand writing asked
him ho letters for; he aid for that rascal De
Id Forest, Mr. De Behr, and Mis- Brunei, and Mrs.
Davis; and said ii this don't satisfy you will relate
cprou story went TO see Mr. yeren and asked him the
news &C. met Mr. Yerren again in January, 1885, never
,nke single word what De Boullon bad told me unli
the book appeared when l went 10 Mr. Verrcn and De
informed nIe of all De Boulen had said never heard LIE
Boullion speak of Madame De La Haye
CroIs.eromned BY Mr. Hestern--l am native 81 o"H
zerlaud where studied medicine woi ked at nieciaa
ica vocation for my pleasure Unless cGD s't us
tory my life, SHAH perempcrily decline any
future question: except the case Tor "hcA sn aun
ppued Came physician, anu havs pursued 1t
know of no other caDg in this country. decline an
swerjng whether was regularly learned Payscian
a., sican here bu, of The Medical society OF the
Stat. af Nrw York made application for admis ioa twice
nv their request NJ De Bouon aud myself hau become
nuua,e az trends made that communication 10
He VISITED u.s. his wife, and Mrs Granger visited