Vermont watchman and State journal. [volume] (Montpelier, Vt.) 1836-1883, 1842-04-04

Gus question was moved, no other member has
right to speak until the previous question is deci
ded. The Speaker decided that the previous q,les-
ton could not now be entertained, for this reason,
that the gentleman arraigned here asked posi-
ponemenl Of his trial, and were the previous qhes-
ton entertained by the Chair and demanded by
the House, 1t would deny the member that privi-
lege. From which decision Mr.. Fillmore hud APP
pealed. On that appeal the previous question had
been moved and seconded, and the ina in question
had been ordered-pending which the House had
adjourned. And the question now being on the
appeal, Mr.. Fillmore asked the yeas and nays,
which were ordered. A tier some conversation, in
which Messrs Black, Winthrop, Fillmore, Fes'
sender, Pendleton and Bolts participated and the
Speaker having stated the grounds Of his decision,
the question, "Sha the decision Of the Chair
stand as the Judgment OF the House?' was taken
and decided in the negative: yeas Ga, nays ile.
So the decision of the Chair was reversed aud
the House decided that the previous question
should he entertained, Mr.. Weller moved that
the rules of the House I've suspended, for the pur-
pose of enabling his colleague (Mr. GiIdings) to
be heard in his defence notc, if he desired il. The
Speaker sad that the House having decided that
the 10Th rule was imperative aud should he rig
orousy executed, no motion, III the opnou Of the
Chair, would now be IN order except motion TO
adjourn, or to lay the whole subject on the table.
Mr.. Charles Brown desired 10 be informed by
the Speaker, whether the gentleman from Ohio
AIR. Giddingsl could not be heard by general con-
sent? The Speaker replied in the affirmative
Mr. Brown hoped thcn the gentleman would rise.
The Speaker said that the gentleman from Ohio
Mr.. Weller) had moved Il certain preamble aud
resolution, aud had called the previous question
on them. The demand for the previous question
had been seconded, and the main question had
been ordered now, under the 45th rule, TO I've put
Uu,il that rule hud been executed, nothing could
intervene. The rule was imperative; and the
that conHicted with IT, Ii was PROPOSED, IN def
ance Of that rule, aud OF tie order OF the House.
TO make motion conflicting entirely with BOTH
The Chair had overru'ed tho moou to suspend
the rules because it could not intervene between
the ordering of the main question and the taking
OF that question: And the question Shall the de-
cison Of the Chair stand rs the judgment at the
llouses" was then taken and decided in the afiir-
native ayes III, noes not counted. SO the de
cison of the ChaW was affirmed, and The motion OF
Mr.. Weller to suspend the rules was declared to
he out Of order. Mr.. Adams moved that the whole
subject lie laid on the table. Mr.. Staniy asked
the yeas and nays on the motion to lay the reso
luton on the fable; which were ordered, and he
ing taken, resulted in the negative yeas 20, nays
i2j. Mr.. Bots desired to he informed by the
Speaker whether, by unanimous consent, he could
he allowed to modify the resolution? The Speak
or replied IN the affirmative. Mr.. Wise objected.
His votes had beeu recorded Oh the proposition
it now stood. Mr.. Giddiugs then ose and said |
stand before the House IN II peculiar situation -
Mr. Cooper Of Georgia objected to Mr.. G.. pro-
ceeding; but at The request of his colleagues Mr..
G. withdrew his objections. But Mr.. Giddings
did not resume the floor. And the question re-
curing first on the adoption of the following res.
| oution:
Resoived That this House hold the said
Der altogether unwaanted and and deserving
this body in particular.
The question on the said resolution was then
taken, and decided in the nf1irmative-yeas 125,
nays 50.
The following was the vote, as classified by the
Tribune:
MAINE Clifford, Litle,on, a. .Marshalt-3.
New observation-disclosures Burke Eastman, Redng, saa~
Nav YoSkBre~sr, Clinton C. 4. Floyd, Horck R.Neclel
Ian, oiuer, Riggs, Yards,
PrsssvLvas.~Bes,Ou, Bdak, c. Brorn, Forrancs Gerry
c. j. gssi R. Ipyersoll Isek Kem, pareaaad NsUhard
MARrLArD-J, p Kennedy, j. T. Mason, A. Rsndn sollor
MANIFESTATION, Bolts, Carey, Coles gunner, Goggn, "
O. GSOdc Harris, Hays Hopkins, huner Hasard MALLonr
NonrH cARoLsA-srrington O. w cald,Osu Daniei, Deber
ry Graham, Mckay Rnyne Rencher, Shepped, Stany Wash
soUra CAroL,SA-S. H. Butler VIM. Butler, j. Campbell,
GrORe,.~BaeE, M a. Cooper, corqm, T. F. Foster, Hab
i ALAsAMA-cAspman, Houston, LeWs, shisid'--i'
/ CSptH, jacob Th0mpsOn-2.
i LouIsANA-Dapsoa, Moore, E. d. Whites
oHroDcan D0an, John Hastings, Mathews redu, SYsncy
\ iSprASA-ya. Kennedy Lane! r. w. Thompson! Wallace
+ Green, owsley, sprgg, J. B: Thompson, TriPle-!9
bell camp6e casis Se" Gaze S,G% os c
i ILLrNori-Ca.ey! Reynolds, ]. r. stuar!-3
M'''ou'r-1 C. Ed~aTd' N hysg-a Total 1885,
Mnsr-Alon, Bronson, Fes.ondcu, B. Randall.
i New DETERMINATIONS tof course
Baker. Borden, csIhqSq Gv:nlsG
rockway Osborne Truman Smith
RHODE IsLASp-Cranston-l.
VERMosr-Eyeret,, Hall, Ma,tocks, A. Young:
New YoRK-Bdseye, Blair, Childs Chenden, c. Clarl
Granger Linn, Maynard Morgan, Roosspe Tomn'o'
Srw JlH.It-AyGriss Ma1ws at.s e ss:sn' W ,,
oSos Andrews co%e" r G. Good s. Ma.on Mo,i
IspIASA-Cravens, Joseph L. Whe-2
/, KrSruexr-Pope UndctwOod-a.
ILNOr with NEw HAMPSHIRE and all the other slave State
ABsENT-Lo~ek of Me- Briggs, Burnell, Mass. Tillinl
hast, R. sladS VT yan Bsri" hsn Bernard Sa,rd
4, Babcoek, Young, N Y: Ha'ed, Randolph, Yorke, N
T TSs"sy bs csofS g.
Ma = r. cJ sss, w va sas"%s'' %Sm; dop S.,
UeGp Ca eal Pss q Of A Ra;e Gliding Gnf s0'
vote of courss,l Ohio. G. II. PEorrrrI, Ia T. Ma
Total absent or not voting, as
Loco Focos in haes Tyler men in SMALL CAPITALS, the rel
lin Roman) Wings.
: Voted Censure. Not to Censure. Absent. Tota
| Free State Wings, SO 30 IS
D Loco Focos, 90
\ Slave State Wings, 80 10 so
" Loco Focos 40 0 AZ
Tyler mon g
Total, 1876 90 10 243
q, We have thus given clear analysis OF this re
markable proceeding. We have chosen to pre-
sent il Invested of all save explanatory comment.
And the question recurring on The preamble
was taken aud decided in the affirmative, yeas |!
nays Co.
Mr.. Giidings Immediately took leave of hi
4 friends and left the hall.
The motion Of Mr. Fillmore then recurring, an
i beng agreed TO, the House resolved itself int
i Committee of the Whole, on the state Of the I
a MON, Mr.. Ward OF New York in the chair, an
resnued The Inrntion of Ihn hll g lnr lie