Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1842-06-18
io, e,.sr. Ae0~' res;WS u1,Av uurr c,.,s
XTInGiNIA.-Ats Circut superior count ofIaw ami


NImGiNIAi-Ats Circuit superior Court ofraw and
ShanScry TOR the County OF leurco and ~ Of Rich.
CIV, On Thursday, November iiih, IsiI:
The e,tlen' and Masters o. Professors ofwsn and
MARY 'oUcSc, Pitts.
Rouc,t McCanish administrator ,c bou. non with ,,
Viii annexed ~ Thomas Culcmrn, deceased, who vas
Csndsh scrscsot Of ,1e CIV 81 Wi sn'inSS %
such slut1aor lie 5onis non viii M" Mil S a. s
the sad William Coleman dcccasc p, Edward Carrinsinn
Coleman, Helen Coleman anj Rachel Wilson. inian's
wilson James Wilson, Preston roUer and Eliza ms wife
IIopac ldus that On the death IT Thomas Coleman adj
81 ne estate IVES sranici 90 France Cole
man. t't a'n,n str,tpn of tho ctisle cf william Cole
man. unaduiuisered by the said Thomas o cmsu with
the will ot the said William Coleman annexed was then
committed 40 George McCsuduah. Sergeant OF lie I,tv
t,r al scrx,.. me- ami w" ~ estate to
hiss cxcdto Rotcu MeCaudush rs conseni OF ill.,
counsel Is ordered, (aDy thing la any iotmer ORDER in
THIS cauHcin the contrary notwithstanding this causr
shall hcnceor'h hc ia against tad Frances
CColcmae adam .tra to estate II tn said rho,
mas tucin'u, deccafed sud nerns said Robert Nc.
,o"u,h, a. TIC prcsrn administrator de honis with
tne VII sn"eAydH william o,eman, deceased a. we'll as
st~S ne ss.l "c"tsr " Me- a.Ish the sergeant and
cae 90 thus day To he again Ice m apcrs formerly
49,, -, .-' a., 90 ~ ''NiNlt "nl answers
neI.o' a"n Mes atri,i ~ counsel. On consideration
Whereof appealing fr.l account In Comm sslonrr
aY OF February, thousand Giant hundred AMI twenty.
sN anu the twentieth NV oi JON" Que thousand eight
L.
thousand anI seventy s,vcn ,o,r ANU, 20 ,A
and App"aiinr iom account a. the same report thai
ts aSsfc2ur sum oi ia thousand aud seventy. seven
gssc ot tho 3ist day Iuls, 1919 was made 20 secure
Ana iuuher aVpc rng uou the saii report, thai the In.
rest ontne bonds above specified. which accrued TO the
ls day of January, 1872 amounted the sum sara =
cents while the Payments TO lla time only sii9l s.
Genie ns abasnceoi slS% - ccnts Que Tot
To- the tday otlanuary, 1870. That subsequently, ray.
menis nave been alc 10y the representative OF VIII, IN
c,'h'u On a''"u ~ What he owed ant in account 81
&C, each paNmcrt Us placed the interest,"
aud reported due Tor count of The sill hon =
Of s53o 81 ocuts, With interest s3aS5 a cents rant
erns mat the eject approving ami confirming the said
aecount'C VIII NOT be Co declare that the shown
that William Co,cmin indebted 10 The plaintA. ina;
@ :, ss W. 80 lr amount shc~n bN the accom-
shd ESQ the sad accounts and a. aud doth declare that
the sad accounts {, ani u. tho piatnud. may pro.
Seed To subject The estate 81 Tie said William Coleman
Whsrei,ie the Cour' 10th refer b. io Comm s'ou,
OF his tonri, 20 take uu account fret. the csia
conveyed 10y the mortgage, shelving what d,rosiiion
already received the proceeds OF the hoie of tie NOR
gagged prop NY, then showing what TsT of tho said
MYrshseh ptoprry cr ~ proceeds rculin, 10 hc az.
Piled Tor their heuehr secondly. account Of the
same LAS been administered aud what amount TIA plain
ms are emf ueio receive ONT of tho said personal estate;
said Commissioner is q, rs,1rt T., Ii ,,,, Nil, W.
tors speedily stated, deemed pertinent hy btn..tC on
which may be required 10y the parties TO be so stated
sAruspAy, January l2,i, 1872.
]
OF the piaiutl aud ot Gc1rsc W Hsssctt Eiccufor Of
SAID hurwc HA1s't los counsel Tho court doin order
tiaiths suit stand revived aud be proceeded INTO final
decree against tc said George w Bassc his charac
I ter Aforesaid.
SATURDAY, February 18th. 1912.
! On the motion of Tie piinuns 10y counsel leave Is
gwen them To al supplemental BIN uroauccd by
them IN cou.t, and the same bong fled Robert Nee an
dih u continued as guardian al itc the defn ants
Charles w 'olemlu aui Helen Coleman. aud is also
ssign' guardian 90 Tho defendant Rachel Mary WILSON,
Nhtreuon, ~ con cnt Of fhe defendants ward Car
Ins'u aud Mary l. is wife, 10y their e. aud oftc
defendants [ hsfl's w Coleman and Helen VI Co,man
10y i'c sad guardian. it - ordered,
revived suI be Proceeded u aEar them a. heirs of M,
san Geo Ptolcuau, dec rs aud 10y the further consent of
James wilson amt ELEahcih " ils5u by their counsel
Sn OF the ssd Rachel Mary Wison 10y he's s.l suar,an
PEI ordered tat this cause stand revived and pro
cet,d IA against hem, heirs the saI Mary l. Whom
ucc % ant that Doe considered having been revived
'taiet Them as such heirs. when heretofore
Aisiakc revived against Mary wilson RAJ hcI Wilson
James Wilson, a. heirs OF tie Mary Wilson deed
Copies. Iesie,
lsigncd WIN q SANDS & e.