New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1842-05-13

MFuNt>ptfi Nav ID.
L. :. CiRcui1 CorRr-Beiorc Judge Hour
.ox and BErfs -DfclsioNs.--Rsnnes g fodg0.-Tt'
sls an action for Infringement ol machine for dressing
Gathers TIE defendant pat 10 pea GA Oh" ta iAai the
ease had been lea before Wlch Le aycTel dat TIE n-
,cro1 did brous plaintiff, but hat the micine hal
been used at ion coffee rooster AMI lne Jlfy i'lt
n b. favor IT, dcmurrng to the plea dice facts are not
ied and the Court nut therefore consider Ltm % De-
-arrCcf Plea allowed.
Csrlac, ss Taypau.-Tircc Il,a, were entered 100 tbs
case, a,erfin. sI TIE pliutn bal assigned, given away
itc u.ht 81 tnc patent 'o makn- iock ian's &C wien
nrinr tn, mat III ed. Pies oyeru.cd.
Bostalc, as. Cuts iglt-Itr p.a1ul savc ohigsn'r
iu transfer pfopH WHICH had .. u W. i ..l' ..
A. tle bands OF mao HaIcd arctic. Judgement iof
Hog4a d Win y, H.rsiIg-The action va, to ob.a.n
an been received 10 iartrai. potat0n o goods shipped
an, the sr,rk Of, vessel ON which boti1mry bond bad
been :. en- hv he master Motion allowed, policy OF III
,urduce that bad been gwen Ia br transferred
John Pf-mfr 'culboni Ctir'eon.- IL, va an ac'
tom to recover zoe Owl e'gi tie steamboat tAS sic
.anares caused by running eo the brig Lancet "heh'
auh her 90. wa. much injured Tie brig wa rdnniae
lp lie Delaware 10 ti~ DOL -t, with in" 800 i''- ne
81 siui,oa soing down. haVng Tue wind aAeal seer
he steamboat sarce ~, an' sufpoNn-, 10 ACCORD
.nce ih the rule OF aoa tha tr vessel hI'ns uir
'nd must make way iof NE "'htf she 'l'i'" hi 'D.'
the steamboat did not see her tai very near anu i@ @
.cr The Conn heh Int the od custom rcai'c 10 "a
vessels dd not apply 10 Seanloas which "cit tiabir'
icer 10 any direction, and "n Them mus resi- ne I',lT
Hftv When vessel D, run foul oi boy ii'm no matter h'"
bc the WDd Ihr Lancet Was honh" 10 Keep Hei i,'
tout reference Ia The steamboat, aud UT ied'" w
-anfc tie of the accident Tie 'uIcI '"u1'
1d 3D. entertained these views dni pund lpi tr t'''"
,uf DccIcc affirmed. ,,.
TimottJ D.eight and ohors. .s D4a''! 4ppfion.-ih'
d, an acton for invading the 1opyrgloi D"-ht "orA
rheolo.. Explained and Defended" &c. n vol, Toe
court Led that where he iluc Of avon j. placed 30
hr SecrcnN's office, and tie various VOLUMES deposited
they published d i suiicc' 20 secure he ''li
Judy mrnl ior pldnth
Motion TOR new trial denied.
DsoRErs ~ BANKRrprcy -RoBEkr CHAFM,S-B,ioft
ecidng in H.. case Judge Thompson remarked that eases
not come before the Circuit Cont Appeal. A. tie
ave does not provide Tor ,uc. bat that the District Judge
haa power To sub' any plrcl'"r PtAl' .of d'' ~
ChlIuan placed among the ~ ms in ~ 'chriur tc sun
$50 in money, bot hr am -aie> tlih' l No
1p.ned Il in counsel and iAs MA ne lance ~ ~
iniiy, anI squ'nly canaot make u oven he count
ieid Li. tie gn"e va, entitled lo every ul"- I'D i"
.chcdue aud hat be must pa Over the MONEY. iH'
creditors xiut not be- ale To pay counsel lee ana Il
rso,> 90 baul rupcy. fnr assignee bat % 900 MS power o
ct OF Ire $50 lur Dc uc col petitioners fanny In!el 'ir
at. neu.iDd in ihc $40.
Geoqcr nRowx-TLt, Wa q case in which objection
was URGED 0 having decree Iu bankruptcy 90 account
Of hi, on ~ hducary rIst oi debt l- Corn "ril
tal person OWING tu', G,b' only excluded m u"n iir
.cDef tie act - FAR ~ related 10 th"r dtb, ana ud
he could receive discharge q, u al ohcr. lhr i't
.rttor could make hrs choice 10 come 10 wh H. either,
retain his clam 40 n,t ihr dthior h"iing pan '"i
c>lobslle for the amount. The decree OF DAM nr'N
NrssRs Beo0As objection va, made in Nj, case
the ground factor beng agrGt. iiou' d'cdins
tbs point tie Cont considered ue pa'ilt' el'" To
= decree.
nE>RY kNEEL,No.--O Objection bad been made on the
ground that thu petitioner hai not 81 forth trusts held rom
The VIII, ct h. father and his brotisrand also belong
ing u his wife. The Court h' III thai III" latter bad brs>
eed aud the petitioner lad claim 10 a. A. Ia Tie trusts,
All the r.h Of DE petitioner vested tie WHEELER
the schedule nj, aai hr question, could be- presented
i-rca ter in regular io'iu 90 law. Decree allowed
LfoS.RD PAtf.sEN This WIS an application cd tie gem
.ra gnee 10 ms power OVER partnership properly
where only OF tIe parte, was pei o"rf ~ hthA
rup'cy The Court held that TIE mt. only me pr'r
oner IN the partner'hp property could be CLAIMED by "'
assignee.