Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1842-05-06

n fl.,vs Tn,
oT henrieo county. Mach 2ist 1890 sNR.bscr'a
ss1i Joseph MlchauE. II Richard mcbsoI /, Csi
ehanI, and Macon MichsuE tbs three Iss, ppety NJ
i,n,s " nshaiH her father and frienJ aooei
icc. rast IhoalaS S~ann and sally his wise sppei
y, pcn an appeal from decree OF Inc ronnv Ca',
F.brnarv -Sn 10 'naneery pronouneei the al day 81
nus and Alien wilson and Daniel keo 1,s pam,
a., %; zee a. Jefferson wpolson ami slily his ,xtc
~. =, .heI ani Betsy his 2i'e Amanda Kad1 a.,
RI Marha Esi ,o;-se Eedd Jane Reid, Ros enn
Ctump re father snd hsir Al lave Of Gen. n eorse
w. 40, '"hn " Nash, nis sinin sratnr and iho ~
Iona Uoodson atmnistrator ofRebeees Reda dee
sally hiehiuI Hugh Raine Ricb.ri Rai1c ~, sii e ate
~, ~, Iiy h'llosih NehAuI, AID Macon Mlehaux an
phi' ssain-t George C1nun H. he S a.n hem friend
Mn = a,or OF his wife. Anu Crump, decd John ~
Dlnei Aim errors Of sally Rrown. e 'J I wsIn and
pi pan Wilson. JOS w Mchan1 Richard VMeh.rS
-1lnn and Sally his wife defts NV ''' '"''naS L
hse causes came on this DAY to be heard together Tho
liie Transcript Of The record 9th. county con-, =
emse rant and the second unnn The bin OF M. psn S
Sns,scr ., az, ~ ne Court a bin: The
a.. =" .s ueienilni Nash this day FLED on he nro
Ivlss l,ed ~ The rules and argued by
cross h., UPON Sc run, TO ne Court, that the said
a., Sn llI eoniessei against all the ,iefcndans fsy
Miehaur, who absent from mis- n N,e !. "a
against wfom the plaintiffs have dolly proceeded bv nb,
according 10 the act Of Assembly and the y,IIc
thls Court and the said defendants still falling n,
ai answer the plaintiff bill and The Court being OF on
II N NU
apparent on the record Of the court OF CumhsTlsn
1loresal the plaintiffs cross hi are snti,is
Wiieh they seek doth Their fore adiudse III
et AMI Gecree, that the decree Of the couny ronr,
- ~ Iiau pronounced IN the first Of these cause on
~ Gay OF February, In the year thousand eis hi
anu tSlIty, be reversed and annulled; thai Inc
,ts OF part OF the matters in controversy I'm
ths' SUIT which ~ mentioned the cross bu he ors ~
81 am the subsequent decree Of the county Conr- ,n
g ceeds executed 10 pursuance Of that comproris ~
~ ii anu binding between the parties; and Inc CONF
iurer adutse. order and decree thai the sIsyas
Aopy, " az Iutn Ben, Daniel. Frederick and 1bcir -
II any there be- such % them as NAV he nov
~ Sf surrendered 10 the plaintiffs by the de(endan,S
OF tetI as have Possession ut the said slaves o. ~
Ay OF them 70 be divided between thein
ysPeeuye rights, that IS to say Giving TO ThoSss
oOaoh' ADMINISTRATOR Of Rebecea Reid .hafthetao
NNSue-io george Swami, the assignee Of Cseorgs "
SSnalh, onetWeluh In value-to George GaliowaS an
say ms wife, one other twelfth in value-to Hugh Rsnes
- me assgness OF Richard w Michan1 ami Ps,er U,S1
pli t"ot~eiHhs IN vaue-to Richard Relns ana Fli..
ZEN ms VIE one twelfth 10 vaue-and 10 Macon Nj
ne other twelfth And the Court doth further
A one OF the commissioners OF the court 10 stafe AZ,
report an account Of the hires profits OF The So
shce me deaih OF George Crump the bill m entonsJ
seuns orth by whom such hires aud profits hsye 49,
Iecssed-and ihat he also report whether any and bc,
the SAID slaves have died the death OF Tho 49,
George Crump, under what circumstance snrh So,
IN whose POSSESSION and under whose rerfo,
sue Save was al the time Of his death and wha va III
value Win such matters specially, the CommisSso,a
may neem pertinent, or as either party may reouiTe
| Copy-Teste.