Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1842-05-16

'i''lNs W We" thalrgrN h,LI
1i'i w ',@ sa,h ,ly, IN Wednesday, March q isiS
yi,,i, I rI,cI',s and Company oT tho n,nk ~
John tnrc"l adminlsiraior ct Rowand Reyno, n.own'
cS.,,,nr S ,iy v lcli tnd Lonin Eilcm
A.,vSr ''' ''' PUBS
Rich,rID Sany,y, John Shore. william, Am.
ush Wal p'tinors under the firm OF AIsnn g ~,
NchariS M'sslc James Allen lniIsase nsVrnn, wall
ncrs under The firm OF Davcnpor. Allen A 90 part
Lrr AMI john S'zcr partners under Tho firm of 80
vi , r,n, iycl Pcyion Johnson AMI
john souiha George u TSmyy Nm 1'nns,n lyel'
me hrn "i Souhall a Tonpkns; FT"Ier,~k ~ Knei
Co Henry Clarke surviving PSrneT S H Goon kHHpp
49,, ~, ,.,..''- a. cushing. partners under he
u Berry. partners unicr u firm Of Atmsif,nr n
irm OF PaskcttN Cuee Charles Miesrsc ami M ~ ~"
az, FARMERS under he h'm &c a W. H. sIagarr,:
Kcsman & Brother; "''''" ysTnGT , 1odS he drn
ward W'I partner under The Grm 81 Wall, I S
hrm oi A w soica d @ John Firth AMI "' i, ,hS
,a, I, "nier ih' nm of F''i a Han: T s,anS'
stanford 4 Co.: Jonathan seymour and ID ", ss S~oi,s
partners under the firm Of jonathan seymour a TIuI'
DE syvcs, James Thomas. AMI JoseI # m Vn mos
unieI The h'n Of DE syvcr, Thomas q Go; Josncb r
neTs under the firm OF rhculs, CSwpcrtb%"t a 'S sd'
under ihc nrn"i Turner whcclwrehr: wn,n Jsct
I Lao lin m"w.c Me4aeh PntauN; Jacob Tzekici snd
rms cause IA which the plaintiffs app-ar 10 have nr
Sr,hei against the defendants +. " Knapp AMI P''
Inp ,,a'iners under the firm Of + vs. ktarpN G.,
drm of CTshins a T,,,,, cushing partners under the
= Cd 4 Ilnura
C. -, iiasScu ani John Cu.lc. parfuer- ,,.. 10 -
nun oi Fask"u A Cugic Charles M,r.t'r ,I a. ~ -,
~ LEr' partner under tAc FIRM ct G. & W N N,r,,.s
ftmof Klcs.aa,S n-,,, h'sman' partners under Ito
an u. wa.d, partners under M firm OF W.,
~ "AtI w Spies ami john SprS partrc,s nm cI
princfs under the firm Of rth y nan + ss,,r,,,, @
S "'ris' partners under tic hrm oi Swords SIN,
,,,tN '"ht nan seymour aud -. Seymour. ts rtp,,s
nhlcr 10" hru OF u. Seymour & Son. Ttc,r,. H. $50
James Thomas and Joseph 4 IiiIorn p,rfn.r. n
h'ih ol De - liver, Thomas & 90 J0scpb Il IInhor, ~
Co. i,'Hh" 1t aus jose pa Thomss partners un,i'r tc
.uu' "' i"oihiS 4 lwpcuhwat . 90: Turrrr
T,,-ncr 4 "a, ,cciMIg,i, partners under the firm OF
80, w., ~ " Ne''wrcr: william Jack son auI Iilu R,v,.
~ W." ~ cut 81 this Country, Ia the tnnir prcsc rii~,
uN ~ aKaihN' absent dccudauis they stul f,ip~ t M
taken inr confessed asin nc sand ,u, W. %
i ,'' ",-.i ieicI iluts, except John Shotc Wl,y,
~, . "liI N'ii, p1rrer. under the rm 1T All
,'n ~ a"' iui Micba' u PoitttN answers of 40 80,
NJ >I"it' william Allison auIlrsh A Wait ana Nri-i
qua ~ ''liciinus md exhibits aud VS. ar-u,,l 80
'S'- ~" con. liberation whereof, the COM ,'ctf ~
trustee IN ihc Decd no Trustin the mo. ,
u1 I'nl,I al account e hs cions al. trtts,..
''' 1I OF ' trust fund which came fu h- l,,,.i.
one q" the Commits ilucr~ Of O. Cpurf. la, ~ 81
ari til il The receiver appointed Ly the n,,l,r - w.
t' cause on th" scNeuthds Of Itls one ih,us,n - a.,
sue 'oriy one. o rcni before the same COMMITS
~ VI ne "l Sli appointment. Aud o." said Com
"e>ln"t vs. 'Tcrt 1T take account FIST ot no lf
'n alIrft hc 'h'cuouot The said trust decd, AMI
uhtuc the coninua the -scurv There n pr,y,i, -
inc amounts the said debts: and tho psT.6us a. 49,,
lcf ar Tue respectively: and sccon 81, of lie a. l," -
u" ,i' 'lntS ~ o." sud er.nd r,-s as ,r,orro
a., 10, me ,lid 'c the linount of each crit
'N.l " me mr Co.,, siid lcrd was eNrcfife, mn.
er."ts io whom 4 .- an the dividends N any ,,.
f ''IN respectively AT WiIc trruuufr, The etr I'm
i~ itl cNluiue, stat. au 5. o. . nj r,
me-, ''.'n'nt 10y himself, or which may bc r,quiIciby
$50 l''"' - .'Nl'n-