The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1842-08-27
Case OF Madame RestelI.


Te the Public and the Press:
Il viii be recoleced that about fifteen months since the un
aou,e every variety Of opprobous the
atroe;ous oIonst INTO by which 10 stgmaine the
VII 20 express the holy horror by the truly
Had o Ss %c oa
"eon stronger Of more bitter than those sssdy
being in this particular, bankrupt
a' naturally hs .s
red and convicted legal testimony of some
IsT Of arson some other 9enous felony
ws iva. 5sSrgeS a he o
pIeme Ccurt decsre BY particle Of legal testimony which
e@bslshed with the hord, revolving. and disgusting. This
and (Which. be il remempered wa. all there was 70 sus
% "a
to supposed M % % Ss s
est hypoeriies Chistendom. Long before trial
ei e
gain af6s.py sappo ias doubles, that Re who sad
After public opinion thus effeciuaIly poisoned it ne
individuals composing the Count before whom
s6Sss
an ee%on snen1p eis
hs with minds not the tro"se. or most
ss
M s s SGsS
lido OF wish that the Court IF Sessions
sa s5
I'D ey act
nc with the panes simplest and best established and most
but on he Instance donSss.
'ea But ss
tnsles intend merely srsest gross roprety and
ss Ssss
s1eseh should aSe %s sns od
nswsr i2 How can THIS be stIane IT, on The first blush Of
ecaHs or
ssounds public The matter seized held o.
% osnes ted mssnsa the tine
whose Is he s
i not s Th sn might, perhaps be tolerated. it, ON
is Ssssa nm
fact % 8hs i a iSsS
s eus ass "s =, %
sl9 4 LIP 1
nnaath0Tz.d and inadmssbie. No expect ], not. fTe
ss,y SfS ssGss s ss
take this opportun'ty public rish, relation
the matter preferred against by presenting their notice
fT s %ad sad
ss in Ss s 40 ,ak;n in March,
1911 ,as states that he called upon and hayesrs
ticket consisting ARTICLES But the trial
s
that she had sesame ticket consisting OF the same
s ss orb
Tn . ss lid o n ok as Es
i ne me
IN which b. :h, .s having
ESaS have been suscsd to she would
would indeed Supreme Goat @Ssd
| a9piet, bat severe and wellmented rebuke.
silly easily in i"1 iae Ts
srs 81 Ssr be ToaSs5d that
S e s qpGp sy in The
the public bear iii. W. W. Pardy her husband
testified under oath that he made to me ehe
then one of the Grand Jurors, forward and testified
Huron Bets sworn for the defence eposed that he knew
20 Mae X sSa witness s two es
DID .n To his from
om hs Bows Chatham
sn n @ rhs Ssas
%,sinf to meet him BARRIERS shop the
and s saw went into the house Of Madam,
ra: :. Iii . rss s s%
e1ary and ATTEMPT to eat9r Such was the
decision Of The Supreme Court shield protection
have, conclusion but one ether point to breach upou.
u aas v oss W % M Of literary
Sdsd TO- contained among other things intended ak,
less very demon-was that special
Inc composition as production intended TO artinsly
ridiculous and absurd The only drawback upon
being that false from beginning end only add
that IN no case do engage man" physician simple
and aabundant reason that whatever undertake feel my
carry through propery and r.om requiring physician
practice Is unusual for be called for In pre-
ference to doctor IN conhnemens where proper dscacy
which hitting and proper s and more snf
Ss snd n sy
'
Will be perceived that of the exceptions taken by
Mr. Jordan Of llegality sustained by the Su
eme Court sufficient commentary upon that gentleman
legal requirements to whom return my thanks the
faithful able and fearless which he conducted him
sell throughout alike Of the owns and
ALL MADAME RESTELL, Female Physician,
H8 Greenwich street, N. Y.
Supreme Court-The PeOpIe va. Resteu