New-York daily tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1842-1866, 1842-05-16

indicted Tor Hoei 'n A''. ! -''' 80
'eeh Drought n'1'''
I'''d On Do'h ''''' 0' - -.
coupled III yer! i-ie "'-' ~ "'-'' :,
-umeut- OF counsel. d. GRAHAM. Jr ana II
Lrrrgrv 20 y,r. vcrv eloquent ;Ir the defence
-, ,..-.-. "a, f,rribI.
'.''' '''' t.-t
rgi. argument Ihe D''tr'' -N'''''''
- bitter sni airoit a. eyer-wa, more des-.t't.
I'D f r.,., ,t., 90 have often known hin
- .,r D., l..
"i'it- NJ chif-r 90 "-N-
i.ered ihi. morning after which the case VI u
.l...,.ol g.. 90. IT. II l. scarcely possible that
" L----,,.
hey WI convict IL ti' ''- " -
CNs mastery closing argument IT, i"'!'''''"
.--. e-i.r-fv. paper. going % show iEa, -imp.,
- r-.. ,,.... ID, 3. ,-r rho r. iereI li..I
'''.'' ID. - '' r
Ra- founded, or oli ri WAlti il "A- Ial''"' ''
....5 ,f Comment - of all cNtraue0u. matter.
......,, ,-,...-
N'l'l Hii@' u ii'." '.''" 'i
ue authors col tll, prosecutor IMAM ti' HAl-'
.;... ,. ,l... fact. DID tie publication of which
- L-..t..--
o- >'cne hl' heeH pi''e'1''1' vi -
-. 49,, ...,,,,,.-i,,,, tia. E,
lrtc.r. and read ~. hpnn iiie ,-t lY>iD"" D+'' "
...,, ~ - r,.e-,i-
7li-Ii nave oeeA i''''',- - 90 '''
ti l.... i.... --....r.a,-fl u the ftct, con-
-.,
aimed iu il have been pr owed IN course o te u''
,t.. hos, mary Of the wh. p case Ne can
;. ,,,, .,,,, /. entire:
srxTrXcr FACTS FoR TUF
pf0pfF-J,v,r. G5apoy Brx>trr. 70. EInor OF -.
I.l ue-,t ,r,s fo1 nd glrv 90 two indictments for
,a m the Cour, ~ Se,,ious-lbe, calculated 70 hrn,
0o OF the Ju-e. of that Court !n Their ofcaI cspaciy
MO contempt with III People IT, decing upon TIE FAR
,r.efi Of Bennett the two Associate Ju-ge,. Aldermen
10 Iufirs. and they
posed fne oi only $780, tie Crcai Jidse 'housL ue
o4ence 8e.e wed imprisonment We -, say the result
be. Surprised Vs.
W have ascersired h- =, the september term oi tN'
Court tie counsel lr Bennett. John MorrN, E'1- on
an he client had good ani Substantial "
r the merits and ila, he W. aot really for trial. .o
-, ~ H.. ,-.,l. anon The two Indictment. TIN
'f'''' H.- 'i. '' .''' "''.' -f"' 81
Che present December term Al ne ~ei'"''' ,''" '
f., .,,r.r Rerre,. counsel VIII, is a thorough Tan
...,.,,,,. ,-,,,. n ~, ,ole ,-oseouie.
80. -, ,l ir .e,r.er,. AMI TIM. have his client
cape trial H. pursuance Of The design, hr made r'on@'
Indication to judge, Noah snd Lynch Of the Court nj So
. al warmly solicited them "a Jet Beune u OF. He
~ - ~ H., a, W,.sirrt,, a letr.- Or which
E '- D.. .,,r. ,,,, ~ F.i 1912
,t-.. ,, - - o., iNi.',l, and I am
80 10 Won tom j. & B.snet,-hc
Nv .4 b. ,i1, fo do all he cIa ~ y9u-mahc such
- - S.- ,. h. ,i.,et ..,ry-and ove-y tf-n.
30 '.' a. 'll ~ 80, - ~. ,is,,...I a. a vi.
80 m p ,s.iri, ,od therefore cannot 90 in,odeiaIl-
" d yos Nrfe letter % Beunstf. 30 Lynch AMI VIII
, al n, f,r mol r-o. q &. 200 kcnt. disposition, and
t, . ' t, =. -, 80 y,.l Won would let me-
.now when YOU are coming iu town. hoa-,, 49,
j. \ MpiN'iLt-
HoN NoEDheH VI. No', "''''- '."N d., .
"hrn 'D' cfu'e' wee o"'''' 'N' 'u'- va" ''
o ihr CONT h'"iineh''' U ha'r i'''' I'''i'
bu' the w.. ed NJ defence whatever wa "'"'
~ le'eu ants counsel. who w. present very '"'I'
tme wa, occupied by the District Attorney and Court "e
or, the causes went % tie jury, who found verot' 90
,gltv
Il farther appear that there was something quite ont
fte u.,, ro1rse In the formation OF tbs Court. VIII
,pnesr by the following correspondence between william
r. Iallei. Clerk OF the supreme Court and Mr.. WANDER