The New York herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1840-1920, 1842-09-25
Price Two Ceats

related to tbs hostiIity hstsseen Wines and Mn
Verren.
Qwha transpired relative to the i'll feeling between
Verren snd yourseln
A.-Cannot say, unless speak of others.
Q-Was there any thing that occurred that evening,
that caused any lfeelng between them and YOURSELF
Here fifteen minutes occupied in consultation
between the prosecution and the counsel Of defence the
Jury retired and the reporters had general converse
Q--Iiow hostile, and what extent did Mr.. VerTen
become hostile towards for thing TINT occurred
| A-ltwas only tacit GOODNESS NJ that supper Mr.
Veren proposed to pay the debts OF person who
ped rooms IN the same house with me.
Q-7To what extent did Dir. Verren exhibit snmity for
what occurred that day
Al cannot tell without giving il in my way
heated. 49,
A.-Cannot say how far told Mr. Verrens she wanted
oil her money as She wanted TO take house in Nav
Q'-When did this i'll feeling iaPpeari
A.--When the witness established school under the
Verren. NV '''' W WI
| Q-How long before the anony NOUS letters1
Add dot see them till after she them in court at
the former trial.
Q-Iow long before gu heard of letters preiuca, to
your charactori
Ain the month OF july than six months after
wards
es awhsn did 20" first see any letters Of that 'h'r'e
A-saw but one and Mira. Brunei showed me an anony-
nous letter, in which she said she the hand writing
OF Mr.. De Bullion.
Al ohectedto read the letter the first line this
Q.-Aner you saw that letter when did you call upon
Mr.. Weren't
told him some time afterwards that the family of Mr. De
Bullion was giving me great deal of trouble but did not
speak OF the anony mous letter.
plant
Ale said know you have an uniavorable opinion OF
mel said that had every respect for his ecclesiastical
ORDER but thought nothing of him that could not frank
ly avow.
q Where did you next see him
Al wrote him note and requested him to call
Odd he comet
| Ayes and when he came told him that had
Tor him protector for self that the intimate
| quaintanee between Madame De Bullion and himself
might have prevented the letters he said he
did not know thing about them and that DE Bullion
would not have dared him (Mr Verren) with
the knowledge of such letters; observed that much
talent was write such vulgar letters such
understood they were he then said q, no. they were
not written by man. he had seen one of the
letters he concluded by saying that he would do nothing
about it. t
Q-what kind of a man did he say had written these
letters
Ale appeared TO think that believed that
avulgar man wrote those letters think this in
August four years ago and in speaking of the French
Consul he made use OF the same language that in the
letter sent to the French Consul,
Q.-Was this the last that you had with
Q-Yes
Q.-What else did he say OF the French Consult
Ale spoke OF his ntemperance, and used other Ian
guage that is in the letter.
Q-Had you an interview with MIR. verren two month";
before the trial for libel 2
Alb an interview with Mr.. verren little before
the book was published.
Did MIR. " make any kind professions or feelings
towards you
Al have had two interviews with Mr.. verren at
this time the conduct of Mr. verren changed me
his church burned at this timel his house
to enquire relative to his family there &C
knowl cdgel disagreement between us I met him in
Broadwayj Mr. Verren spoke first he spoke with great
respect this two months before the publication of
told him had lived during the winter in the family
Of James Campbell in BROOKLYN consequence
sage understood had been left for me went to see
Mr.. Verren afterwards this a few Days after
him in Broadway went to him and he told me that
a family Broadway wished an insructress he said
the Zmmermen a rendof the Dutch Consult ha
declined giving me notebut went to the family i;
hod no other interview with him wrote to him and his
CA paper here shown witness in the handwriting
of Mad Verren proved by winess.)
Counsel defence asked to it, which was re-
fused first but the Attorney General finally acccded to
| the request
Cross.eramnsd by defenceI called a witness on
the former trial was prevented giving all answers
not Knowing anything about the anonymous leer~ths
only one that knew any thing about was the sent to
ttersI have since these letters ecclesiastical
courthis about three weeks before the publication
tho book- then that wrote the letter to Mr.
verren and told Mr. Bartelemy that had written It'll
wrote to him because trembled for his position to the
publication De Bullion the Grand Juryhave
had with him since-have had converse
ton with Barelemy since his house for the purpose Of
difficulty growing out of the politeness ofDe Bullion while
was with him, but more particularly with his wife-De
planned of De Bulions interference with my school,
Of my interference with his, had sohool-he
yer complained to my whenever endeavor
ed make peace between De Bullion and his wife
meaed mel have complained to Mr. Verren Of their
duct and said that not fit house for to be mat
time had intention to leave the house. but fearing
il would not be pleasant to Mr. Verren, remained did
not visit the house after left it, but had profound con-
tempt for the wife OF De Bullion-but not for him.
Court took recess.
THK Couar irs srssror--At the opening of
the court Mr. MArwrL stated that they did not wish to
proceed with the cross-examination of Madame De lie
iiaye who the stand witness, at this time.
(r~ hu,. k..l In.
inquire more particularly MS to the why she did
not state her former examination all she has told
ths7 " -
A.Iwasvery much troubled and excited the time.
QWhy did you not detail the different conversations
you had with Mr. verren And did you not attempt to
go on and state and not checked by your inter
not saw that 1onts repeat X ''' sum-
QEHow do you mean be understood by the jury by
pursue ~
Any object was to know whether the trial was to
not had some intentions to to France
MADAME BRyNEL called by prosecution, to prove
that she had received copy the four letters which she
said she showed to Madame De La aye who tore up.
She could not tell positively whether il was the same
the copy before her or not twas SO long ago.
CUBAN MERLE called TO testify TO the mannerin
which the interpretations previous trial.
but the question -was overruled
The ArroRS1r GnssRAL called De Bullion again when
Mr. Maxwell stated that counsel absent
also his client who he understood had been sent for to
protect his wife, who had been insulted by who
had TO tho house do so in matters relative TO this
trial he hoped the Attorney General would therefore
wait few momcnts-ss he was concluding they came
Into court.
DE- ButLios ers,ained BY prosecufon-Q,-H you
ever these papers before (handng him the copy
written by Mr. Verren's wife)
A,-They IN the hand writing OF Mr. verrens wife
this letter in his study three four weeks after Mr.
vcrren had given me the annony letters this
time met him the stoop, and he said TO
preparing letters against Miss De La Hay and
you call tomorrow He took the letters and laid them on
the table, and entrusted his wife make copies OF them
when she had fnshed the copies he kept the originals
he then gave the copies he then charged make
copies Of them he then told to put the first
headed Fellow citizens" the door Of Miss De La
Haye during The night, so that the public might
post Office did not send II in the winter time he told
me to put up another on her door did not put up;