Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1841-09-21

WA. All for the eoun,ry-all for The Cons,'ta.
ton Nothing for party-noh,ng LOT sen. hus Nv"
nv colleague comes forth with the pa'fo''c "'o''o
,.iIead him or die" taught
, tho r;d;culous Yesterday none was louder than my
llaague IN Numbering out his war cry oil moe CAKE
hu, to-day because the President has acted OUT Tue
vowed principles of his whole life, principles winch he
has done ms much To illustrate any other individual
among u.s. we hear new war cry from Virginia, "neaa
him or die :" 1t reminds very much OF the peei
story that Patrick Henry used to tell.
rlr Bolts have heard it a dozen tnes.I
No doubt occurred at the close oil the hevo"'"'''
when amlds, all the congratulations OF patriots tor tue
REDEMPTION OF their country, man who had suffered
in the struggle came with demand for indemnify ,'r
a certain quantity Of beef furnished TO the Army. Inc
the cry "Rsef, i~of' beef! And here andst, lIbs
as second Salvation Tf near
nc cry If ...cad him de "iieao mn ,,a n &
,h's cry H. TyIer, Head the President OF the " D.
Wr., u,s nv colleague changed, or mas s sne ,nr,e
W., W., .h,ngedl mighty change, nueeo, n"s nus, 49,,
dent ,Le somebody's dream but i IS no, 'I he
os Iohn TylcrS We hear great oen sa'a ,,,;n was
" .a. NJ the last election. Every INNS w.
issues 'la ',n,,, noint Every thing was an ultima
~ No., Ererv thing was the great fundamental 'ssue
Sir there vas issue maze 'ei"le ~, - f,ror
-, bet Of ten or fifteen thousano ao'ia's - NV
If The election Of John lyler, unu' q" a, non,;nt
:, ,,as made by gentleman Of my PERSONA acqaa'
" wa' 49, member of the House Of Representatives,
a" 10 \ gentleman who was himself very aIt''.
snent in eitciing that election lhat ISSUE a.
was decided ,h., hot. md
rNr B,,ts ! was the man who made mat pe'' anu
oy call on you TO explain your lneahih9J
| You have explained It yourself - ,o;, ,,o,r
| M Bo,ts. | insist that you will explain your
Mr Gllmcr. / repeat INA, -" have given the ex-
,l,na,on Well Mr. Speaker, and does my colleague
hlome Captain Tyler for winning HIM his bet: e"w'
when the bet is won, and the money in his pocket.
now he turns round and raises the cry, "head MN
..hc,d him Sir this will not do-thls will never 10
e. Tho American People II smells too much OF the
Jockey My colleague says, "head HIM or die' '"'
| he may die but he will not head h'm. c,,;,h
Nv colleague has referred to charge OF perhuy wo"
was made against Mr. Tyler IN 1877 ana "n'c" !, NY
coIleaspe saws was proved upon hun. Wen, or, u Is
,rne ,La, John Tyler and John Randolph were lneh
h,h or tho same political party, and Mr. jyler was
elected in preference TO MIR. Randoiph ana 10 ,"'s "
seems he was guilty Of perhdy Does not my coi''a"e
consider that making this charge ne - nos ony
der;nr the Presiden, of the T. States, but scnnda'zg
~: IN ,,ive State-scandalizing its Legislature, by
whom that election made But where was ,he
ner6dv. Mr. Randolph presume, had not an eAclu-
siye right TO the seat in Congress. lie was not per
no,n,l tenant, whom no man could eject Was he mol
ha creature OF the Legislature; and II the Legislature
chose 10 elect John Tyler in his room, where Is 'he
ground Of complaint Unless my colleague can SNOW
wherein the perfdy lies, at loss to understand
in what it lie tells yo however, that ne was
i
fore did not complain No, Sir he does not complain
Of per6dy and treachery when he can make any gam
out of il; lie cries out 1t seems only when Nc Is 'e
loser The was the same IN ooll cases. Wv
difference lies in this, that he was gamer then ana Is
n loser now. Dad il never occur TO my colleague ,ha'
this act of treason which he says was committed 'hr
teen wears ago ought 10 have been remembered "Ne"
John TYLER proposed as candidate Tor the SENATE
of the IT, s.; Sir, remember very well tha'' on Una
OCCASION NV colleague stood by my slce, among n III
lie band of mpractcables, consisting Of fourteen, ana
his cry then was that man was so III 70 represent
us a. John TYLER Yes, SIR, there he stood, unlerr
fed unmcvcd amid gums, trnmpets, blnndernusS anG
thunder lie stood fire well; but 1t john yer hau
been guilty of treason then why such zeal on his par
TO send HIM the Senate: Was that an Office Tor WHICH
| peridy qualification:
Ru, the President of the United States has, il seems
committed the objectionable offence III quoting Lain
i Now Sir will not undertake TO say winch u tise oe,
ter scholar the President my colleague All wi
saw is that hope the President Will not utter the sent
nent for which nv colleague contends, VIZ That aite
the Supreme Court has spoken, he has no longer an!
right to think for himself My colleague told us Una
he had son of fifteen, and that if he could not wr
be,,er message than that which the President had sen
~ this House he would take him from school, and pu
4 him to The plough.
MIR Bolts | did not say that. ! said that II m.
bow should write letter containing as much tom
foolery that message, would take MN ifom schoo
and pm, him 10 the plough, aud SO would
i, Well SIR, do exactly know what my coiisagu
: ..- !, ,"''''~',. J., reoie-r and do not know
, how his son NAV write hope he writes well. But
profess 10 know something of the father in this case
"A burst Of laughter have seen certain pubiishe
MS, and believe it is ascerlained that my col
league IS The only regularly installed NJ c. who is re
coguscd the correspondent of the Richmond Coffee
= house "a laugh
Blu, my colleague al The first undertook 10 argue
but he intent heading John Tyler, that h.
soon left the argument. lie made discrimination be
tween notes and bills, the effect of which TO shny
In.
bank but ii it discounted only bills, it bank
Now, will appeal TO every lawyer in out of thi
Hail. to say whether there any distinction in law be
tween bill and a note they in substance In
same. promissory note IS only an accepted bill
The distinction is the difference between slweededun
r and tweededee.'
My colleague tells that Mr.. Tyler went to Harris
burg for the purpose of nominating Mr. Clay for Ill
I Presidency | have very often heard this said, and
will not undertake to conradictit II. lfmy colleague vii
state upon his own authority that such was the fact
must OF believe 1t but confess myself 10 b
rather lncreduous on that point. SupposIng IL how
ever, to be fact, il would to rather poo
return to be denouncng the President for adhcrln
to opnions which ell his Virginia friends knew him
hold. But John Tyler went TO Harrisburg in repre-
sentative capacity and 1t is 10 be presume carried on
the sentiments of his constituents; but did my coeagu
never ask himself this question: If Mr. Tyler did pre-
fer Mr. c. for the Presidency, and all Vrgina agree
with him, why not MIR. Clay nominated Surel
there must have been powerful objection 10 hin
WAT was it, If the opinions Of both nddates
thoroughly known, there must have been princpl
involved IN the matter for that the Convento
turned deaf ear 10 the voice of Virginia. there spok
by john Tyler, and did decline TO nominate MIR. Clay
Mr. Clay afterwards voted for Mr. Tyler Wee Pres
D dent But why he is he now denounced Nv coeagu
tells that change has the spir, of hi
dream since this Congress commenced lis sitting.
change IN what? Because he would not con bank
Why if that good ground Tor the charge Of pcridy
have more grounds for charging the President wit
raj bills which the President afterwards approved
The President has disappointed Inc twice, while be lin
dsapp"nted-no, not d'sappoined-w he has fail
all ,hs charge of peridy, there !. ,,Ie more tha,
meets ,ircye. Yes, SIR Mr.. Tyler might have vetoed
The Land bill, and vetoed the Bank bill, and all tina
would not nave unwhigged him. He might have re
ecea both, aud half bills more and s,,ll have
remained Wing, every inch Whig-if he woul'
base "'4! hs a5heson to sour rood caiNt
been amongst the best of Wings. Ard what has Pres