Virginia free press. (Charlestown, Va. [W. Va.]) 1832-1916, 1841-09-16

ed; but before The middle % July Q doubt
arose. and Just about that Psriod The Rich
mond Ehguiter began 10 discover that
President Tyler Nss . marvellous proper
nan that be was paltio,ic. high mind
ed siatssman. sad national 5sneiactor.
Mr. Richie began 10 tickle hisA with
"soft corn. and Sir Tyler fAItsned on il
like house pig. And what proposition
. vas then brought foFwSrdi
/ AR. B. here quoted an article from the
( Richmond EnqUireT. 10 the form Of let.
tee TO Mr.. Tyler. suggesting certain cal
eulHlions as 10 his political pTospsets
Here IL 70 said Nc. D.. open snd direct.
Did IL takes Did President Tyler aeesde
80 e.. Mr. b. insisted that from that hour
the whole policy Of the ADMINISTRATION
Wss changed. tie did not say there had
been aoy bargain and sale. Those Wbo
put facts together would draw their own
inference. Whai had since ihen been the
course pursued % 10 Temovalss Dir. B.
would refer 10 but one case. A member
from Kentucky. from the Louisville die.
iriet. lMT. CrlVes) had openly 10 the
House Pointed 10 the Reporters desk Of
the Globe, aud bad relSTfed TO an indIyi-
dual Who, - he said. received a salary Of
81 200 as q clerk 10 one Of the Depart
msnis. and who. 0svertheless. eoniinusd
To report for the Globe. When the Whigs
came inio poWer. il rumor spoke the
truth, that man RSs turned out OF office
IN company with a number Of Others. BY
the Head Of the DsParIu.eni. They im
meeiSiely appealed TO President Tyler
declaring themselves. though hostile TO
The principles Of the Wing patty and the
elee,ioa Of Gen. Harrison. TO be good Ty-
Ter men. What was the consequence p
They were reinsiSied before sundoEn
and Il the individual in question. being
too proud 10 hold Office under such cir.
eUmsiaoees had since resigned. IL did not
affect the question. While this a. going
on al Washington. what was The case 10
other paris u The country Was any re-
monsiTance. any admonition from Wings
heeded ~ ell by PIssidsnt Tyleri
Now. did any body talk OF John TYLER
Tor the Pfesiden'al sueceysion? Yes: sad
whoi Did he whig.? No Did the 10.
coiOcosS Yes. Now, U0s IL credible that
that party would take John TYLER az their
candidate without any change Of opinion!
They formerly opposed and rIdiculed him
There must then have been = change
SomeW here but the Locoiocos bal not
changed. What was the natural infer
enee the plain. the obvious, the paIpa.
bic Inference That Nr. Tyler had chang
|. ed.
i But this was no belrsyal-no .rssehe-
fy-not al all. And Whyl Because ii
vas difference OF opinion on only one
point. On one point' Why Arnold and
Hull differed from their brother oficers
only on one point. and that WAS. Wbetaer
they should eight for or sgaiasl their coun.
J try. And vas there any Less difsrenc-
here The question there IVES shall /
eight for America. or go over TO the Bn.
tsh. The question here, shsll remain
with the Whig party. OF 20 over TO the
} Loeolocos' MIR B here. abiding TO the
short remnant OF The hour which Wss LETT
} BIN, said he must omit much that be had
prepared He would say bot word 90
the one-term system aud on that point
be would quote toast given by Mr. Tyler
in 1899 al . public dinner in Soutbamp
ton. Here Mr. B quoted The toast. com
meneing with the Wofds "PligHm Presi
dents aud travelling Cabinets" and de-
: nouncing 10 The strongest terms the mis-.
ehievoos effects Of . second ierm.l After
briefly referring 10 some 20 yTestions ia the
PTesidents Inaugural Address, Mr.. n. said
be wished TO correct some misspprehen
; SONS % 10 bis letter, which had been sent
no, 10 grOggery as bad been asserted.
but to one Of the most respectable reading
! rooms 10 The country II had been said
that, al the same time Mr. g. had written
that letter be had addressed another 10 the
President IN Of the warmesl affection
! ADD hienGthip. Il was due TO himself 10
ssy that this assertion, come from uhenee
u might. vas an sbsoluts falsehood Il
grew out Of q misapprehsnsion. He would
} say q Was q istske. Six DAYS be fore the
veto was received. be bed written letter
TO the PRECEDENT, land be did not know by
what right the Locoioeos had seen that
.etier. and be would nov read q copy OF
II openly 10 The HoCse ADD 10 the couniry.
. Mr.. B here read the letter a. length. and
bad just concluded u When hiI hour ex.
|, pred
Mr. GILMER nsIi Obtained The floor, snd
went into reply 60 his colleague, and . de-
fence Il The eouTse u he Pfesidenf.
10 he course 81 The speech some personal al
lusions uefe made t. . bet made bV Mr Btdts
% ne 'eso'i q The slee'ion and when Mr q
A1 Bolts msds an eHplhHation in he oonrss
81 which BE- applied Some rather strong ierass 70
he ihainuauona ~ BIZ colleague
BE- Chair called him 81 order; and
Mr. Profii. uho bad yielded ne door fof e.
piana'ion, protested against its being occupied
f"F ne purpose q any Sueh rematkri Wheru-
uFnu--
Nc p Trtums1 his speech. IN vhich be lsud-
- me President io ihe skies
~. siuari. q Virginia. read statement 10
ihe House IN rfiatinn ia he unfoitunair cratic
Versy whirh red iasi occlrfrd hetureu Nes.fs.
s"Us and Gi'mef. Sc stated dai be h8k fsii
called 90 % iniFfrer his ulrdision bstseea
hem, ard ihai 30 vas happy 20 ssT thsi media
zion bad hem arcfpfrd n me SPIRIT boz uh.ch BE-
bed befn odrfed Maiuai ftpi8HaHohs urfs
mliT, uhirh proved enireig a1fisfsciufy. The
b flrntif- fupfeftirsl 20 bfih unhdfaa and
itP psinfui iifiruiiv hiss hfuuFhl it 81 ED
NJ aaran. 81 Ohlo. her adtfel.sf thr Hra.r
on ihe subicc' n The Yrto-aad shea BE- bed
fCrrrflfrf--
30 LANE. ~ isdiaaa remarked ihai BE- had
$40 laIh.uz oH itr I1firti III bssE 81 49, pre-
asHi trasiaa. Bet ueu .as itme hsd c.us she's d.