Mobile daily commercial register and patriot., 1841-07-26

fnrei t- t-stfr.lt. iHFy d4e i a4a.h tnittEt la t.& iu .Ar c.'t cirei.ons a.s l.a.sf .sUida t.oa reu= reeiaA. Mho "aoes u l=iNHs aJI Hiais mz olns e'efY day. tAir. Lag iun .u4, i hara tae gauiis,an 'i"es n't call ine a wiue drmEer-l fs 0l f.-as-the gentleman pi1lei' hatdet blaaf# tGaHtja-r)
 A- ff'n.e sad. loppassd tia isanue ei tae hue iet Il tie h.ne ,hui Il N,,s ea r s a1 avelaielu- Ing Icunu0, aud have never head rHt ore uaa 5b ltcsne to h in the ciy. hat ig5l has tais es, .a- tuie t. t1rce aa hiobit u,easa,r tas to mt eauta dd n"I ihlsk the n.aiof,l w1u.u Bo .i from llf- ty teehngs
 The Nole was ,'en taken on be iniednits rost= ponemeat of the htil, ana l9stieas @5--5l.
 Iuo-e who vol affirm ltirr. to a4sI t4a ht Me .is Aslu f RATES Belt los en, ktpd ], ioo Ifn Campbell Dav# son. Dnstfr q, .sii gr s Nu ItitN- HEk, t,mher, iage, Jemisoa Jones, kfdI, IA 'eh'Ai l. te, AianRali, hapn. A, Coy A crn,fp Nuchel spo of Mari n hu re- Murphy. Pe4uas- tefaus. letef, Pc te, son, fRlNtE, sqrul, " Nem eH and u9s--,.5
 Those who vel d n thu negHtus Bic Saeayer Alms, Adrian AieNand"r, hoa Ci mras, Colt, Crru- shaw, naNis. 4 Davis ot R. Dty- If L. Dts9. D ug ss fiemng, tns Ter Grlilit "i s ia Hill :. us Hutchinson hefg Kin Iai ard, A,Ureh0alfs NeApIH, Me nv, McClanHahn, hlrt ,0ongh. Mctj lfc ihru pf B. McMiiion ofJ oreuf alnd. dnrr,a. Noss Narnood. Pyne Randolph, Reyno ds, Riet Ruher, B, Ra it. <.ub- ders, Sitnks, SinmOne, stith Of smt pf |. < one, St0de, Walker ofB Walk of L.. Wann, Vii isirs. Wt= sop, Winston ofDok. Winston ofs a Wmn--i..
 Mr. langdon moved that the h be postponed un- til Monday next; which WAS carried.
 ncNDAY. April 2G. l8ll.
 The bill from the Senate to repeal portion of ihe city charter of the city of Mobile, was read second time, and referred to d select committee. Whercup- on, Messrs. Langdun, Winston oi < and Smith we're apponied.
 TursnAY, April 27, lsll.
 RW to em0idM Chtgfer Of the Cay af i56iic.
 This bill was taken up yesierday and aticr some discussion, Mr. Langdon moved 10 rs.or It 10 a select committee, which prevailed, and tae bill refer red tn a special committee, conSistgg of hessrS. Laugdon Winston oi Sumtter aud Smith et l..
 Alter tile House had mel this morning, (Iueaday) officer of the House delivered the bill fa A.r. Laugdon, chairman, iJr the ot the ceruittee.
 In short time therea, ter, Mr Clemens introduces resolution, instretlns the special coninitte to Nhnm the bill to amend the city charter uf Mobile, had been referred, to report ihe same forthwith t1 tbe House.
 The Speaker said flat the bill was referred on the motion of the gentleman from GiobilA, (Mr. Lang don) to a special committee. and he had made that gentleman chairman, associated with the gentleman irom Sunptcr Cdr. " instonl and a9oihcr. Was the gentleman io.u Madison. Mr. Clemens, one 'of the committee which made him desire to put the bill he possession of the House!
 Mir. Clemens repcd that he was not on the com- mttee; that he had been requested b, one of it's members to present the resolutlOn.]
 NJ. LangdOn said he should make a report whcE- ever he ready and not before.
 Mir. Saunders reminded the House that it bad tle power to compel a repot, when inc object nt with holding ii was 10 smother biil. 1t was asreSpectGl
 
 committee, for the purpose of denying all actian la it,
 Mir. Langdon desired to know why certain party the floor insisted getting the bill before them.
 Sir, until the last half hour, said Mir l.. l never touched the bIll. It was then delivered tn me by an officer of the House, while the House was in session, and while had other business to engage my atcn- ton in my place. II is downright oliicousness on the part of the majority for whom the gentleman from Madison, (Mr. Clemens) IS the organ on thls occa- sion. The House can take what measures it plcases l could not have examined the bill in committee so as to make mp ths time.
 Mir. Hutchinson inquired if the House would force the gentleman from Mobile, (Langdon) to retire from his scat while the House was m session, and that gentleman capied with important business? lie asked for hln, as well for every other member at times, fair chance. The adoption of the res ,ln,n would violate every principle of justice-it would e an arbtary exercise ot power under the most humil- Hating circumstances. To withdraw by force from the hands oi committee, referred bill which they had had no tune to investigate, and thit within e s than an hour after they had received ll, was sttp which he trusted the house, even divided aa t.was, was not prepared to take.
 Mir. Moore moved to lay the resolution on the ta be. Yeas 36-Nays 39. The motion was lost.
 Yeas--Mess,s. Barron, BATES, Bell, blount, Bowen, Brady, Broughton, Campbell, Crenshae, Davis of B. Doster, Fleming, Griffin of is. Hall, HOLLlNGER, Hunter, tutchoson, Inge, Kidd. Little, Mangunl, Mann, Mccoy, McLemore, Moore of NJ. Nloores, Norris, Norwood, Pegnese, Perkins Peters, PRINCE. Simmons, Srru Womack and Young-36.
 Nays-Messrs. Adams, Adrian, Ale. ,nder, Rlacl; shear, Clemenf Colb, Davis of A. Days of L. Dixon Douglass, Griffin of AI tiale, Hill, hvdston Lei,. Kidd. Madrd, Marclbanks, McCay, McClaunahao, Mccullough, McMillioa of B. McMillion of j. Moore of NJ. Pynes, Randolph, Reynolds, Roberts, Russell, Saunders, Smith of J. smith If L. Stone, Stfode, Walker of E. Walker of |. Wilson, Winston of Dek and Wynn---39.
 MT. SAUNDERS knew the position of the commit tee it well ascertained that the chairman was violently opposed the bill and failing 10 dispose of it to suithmsef otherwise, he had resored to the eN raordnary art of getting into his own pocket an there retaining il in defiance of the House He houed the gentleman from Madison would not withdraw hs resolution; il fot To cast any inpntation OH the chairman of the committee that lis urged the resolu- tlon-he had higher object in vew-he wished to get the bill passed if he could.
 MT. PERKINS offered on amendment to fhe reso- uton, follows, (which said bill came into the hands of the committee nearly one h)ur past.o Mir. P said the amendment he prcl oscd asseited nothing but the truth, and certainly no Il,nibor would ol ect to the truth.
 Mr. Stone said, this was q question ofpower, with the rich one side and the pOnf on the other; and although am from the backwooUs county of Talla- poosa, low down east, still must say to the eene- man from Mobile, Mr. Bates that he has not done his constituents that justice to which they were enti- tied at his hand. am opposed, strongly opposed to property qualihcaton-[Hcr the Speaker informed Mir s. that the question before the House was the resolution 10 instruct the committee to repnrt.l ST, this matter here at the last session "a similar hi Il passed the Senate and lost here for want of time Shall it be permitted in this free country that re- pubcans from the age of twenty one, and foreigners naturalIzed, shall not vote for officers to administer the laws to which they subject, unless they own certain amount of taxable property? He hoped he should never see such principle established and that too by democrats.
 Mir Clemens objected to the amendment, because if implied the fact that the resolution called for a report from the committee, which did not; the bill was lone required which could be forthcoming in moment The action of the not looked to-lhe bill is the object, and he trusted it would be taken out of the hands of the committee. The gentleman from Mobile MT. Langdon, says he heard of the bill until r made It's appearance from the other end n the Capitol and he complains that tle delegation from Mobile on this floor was not previously consulted. Does that gentleman pretend that his county has not repre- sentative elsewhere than in this body. who is well acquainted with the wishes his constituents and as ready to carry them out, his colieaguesl The gentleman says the subject has never been stirred by the people, and that he has heard no expression of opinion for the repeal of the property qualification. ask him this question: said MT c. Were not inter- rogatories propounded through the papers to each candidate during the canvas last summer, 10 know whether they in favor of or opposed to the restriction? Did not the gentleman reply in true democratic language, that if the people desired the restriction to be removed, he would use his efforts to procure 1t to be done! But he says he heard no complaints from the people of Mobile on this subject has heard and what he has not; but some of the people of Mobile have complained tD me and have