Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1841-12-14

-
az Marshall snd a. fence his wc tnrtns,y oyr,to
si M MaIsls md Lucinda n. vile iarery Ossiioo,
sn hard lones and sally hs wife, Mary yenninSs
The delcndans RieharI Jones sni sally hi, wife, AMI
s ys"nlnss no, having entered their spPsSrSaec and
Shpt ,sc So%5 sGa appearing by salseio!y evidence
s,hs ucicudauts, Gn appear here ou the Ht a ,i,y
ngh February term, anu the biu ofths p.9
"a ,os .cseSPei published n The sy of Richmond or
posted al the TN. TO-, 10, Two months -uecgssciy, aud
poq7 suas Copy. reS'e, '''' '0''''
- U. FirLGERAID. e.. e.
NIRGINIh:-AtaCo Court of ,rn.,,. ,.,,.'
I 70 me NY o, Rlrhneud On Frisy october e,S,
ihomssii 1,rrc aniwm kmi.o, Ian ana nc ,imc
10 'SS sI "S" SIT TpG, S;,Ss! Gs'qc pandgo
1%@ SS5p S; Spp1sS "Eom appeal de 1
county. and the CRY Il Wrams6Srs '0o'' OF James CITY
The WITS ct supersctcas heretofore awarded q, ,ht.
hoS1e and appearing In the slii-iaeuon 81 The Co",;
ha he Is not anuha6usut "i I'll Commc nw,ahh 01itS
motion OF the appellants by their counsel: Il H. or,Ic,.
a The said appellee do appear here on the L., Mond IN
the decree afnrcs nc; aid tba, r III s"r tn
TSt pS 'rhSh inserted In some newspaper printed in
% @ sh alec that another copy thereof be pSste az
,o svo, Copy, Tcs,c,
o1 g. ,i Rgl, noulCu IN The CeTE's Odce
y o. We 'l'Lu superior Court of Law and Chanrrry
for the County o buck rrha,u The I'm ,IsS of oSy'
against wiron rHce WIN Moscisy, add ' k No. FIX
The defendant, Wilson Price not having er,cr., nj.
a. ana ycn security gccos the Act Of As.
sCG,, ana me Rules Of this Count, appearing Sy
isici'IN evidence, that be b. not an tt, RianI ~ ~,
County 1t Is ordered THAT the sail sbsen, Su us
answer c TN Of Tho ri, rr AMI ta copy of TI nv. anu
me- re i1N N inset IN souc ncwsrNrcr puhHshcdin
posted Mtc iGUut oor II the Count house OF tI rn,
&C n2-wsm korFE EEiunrncr. c. .scc
NlH"iNiN ~ CnANCERS IA Vul,s, LcIIirI6o
amt g, 3 n's" "l 10" ,out Suuvrrr Court & Law
IA 1911: Mary Duke. admin.tr,tIy Of ncr,S, ~
ps' ,SI,atri sgnh a;rn1 Geo Duke aud Lewis
The sad defendants, George W. AMI Lewis ppL, No,
eordug law the rules Of thus CSI, SSi%mr se
mI,h ~ ',,,y,"y rvlcarc that they inhahtanis
* ordered, the said George W Dngc ,n cvs D,k
I"ns"' on the first day ufhc urNi Term oi Inc s, 80,
answer Ne pai"ii.s "l; and that cngy oi ils or
NE e,y OF Nchm,ud 81 two months FucccsatveIy; and
c at The trout "o'r" the Count House oI this county
.o. ~ ACopy. Tcs:c,
o. % JOHN HUNTER. G C.
y G .pc,tlnI ouuly IouT- Il Ia N7ycI,,-, -
Johnson In his Own riZat and administrator dc L,n'
and Nancy Z. lbs wife win, was Nap"y y Ro ure o.
= ggt,,c of Ssnu"l towutrcc deed, prf, uss,nsIwm
Thomas Josiah, James and Lucy Ems. uhc last Two
g"l others also lrCnt'cs ot samuel Ruwntrec de- de-
icl,innts In Char,cry w VIZ ~ "e'
The puul " - ban h.ue FLED ami The Defendant. ob,v.
named, MOI hrvinc rucrc iheir srrcar,rcc an, -iy so
cgr' according Co. the ~, VI Ns5 rnby and the Rules
o. inns T"m', ann aprrarne 20 The Satisfaction OF tho
S%nTI nat tGy ,,r Tot n,hn,p,s Of this Common.
neat sni answer INC plaintiffs biI. and that copy Of
he'd in the Cy Of Richmond Tor ci.h, weeks s,cr"u
am posted the front door Of the Courthouse Of
no % arow A'Op E.F Fe; W, MILLER. rooo
n Superior Cour 1T Law aud Chtucrry Tr The county
of lI'n.ScI. on tn Bod of February ISl l. Prci,.ri
anL style ct rarn~. Nrir. q tt" u ."r nc hrG
FIanru Nelson. drfrs-IN CUASCErgY
III" defendants, Thomas L'lg John u Andrews and
sySn s,egr oceors Ast 81 Asscny "nI T IhS
'irmcr ,II nI,. nmd arr".rns 10y .asncr"ry c,i.
Is ordered that the ia c, ,n appear cr, 1 10
n" plaintiffs said bill that copy Of his "rer %
Ei,'~%p %sr',gd ~ S,mc nrw.apcr published In the
I i oM w' posted a. is r"m door Of the Courthouse
&C p WV pnirrP D. WINSTON. &C
s ! Ru."s, holden tho uIcrls Omce of the Ii,n,,
Superior I"nrt ct Law ana ChauceD Gr the county
Turner and George William " hcclwri.i merchants and
Win r,irfy n@ mr9 ITh S,,." Of TurnGr& Wheel
dr"Ns aud Peter Nruu, late hauts an, rattnrTs nm
mgw,c ini Franct. nelson. 'cfs Is CMsSeeRY' II" L.
me defendants Inonns League, John u. Ardrcws aud
refer Wilson, not having entered their appearance ami
given security. according 10 the 81 AzsrmIy and lie
icmr, that ,, S' EG,Sn9 10y satisfactory cyi.
u t. ordered that the g1l d"ini arIclr here ON
swCr ~ ponrhF soi lt ami that cory of tiis oder
cv 10. 81 EN- mr ns%sINrcr rub,sledn The
another copy Ice ru-cd AZ the front .ur oTtc Courthouse
o222-H2& rntrIP II WINSTON, c c.
a Rug. holdru IN 'hc CIrrss Office ofinc q Gun ru.
:, pcnor Court o Law ant Ehanccry TT TIE county Of
Ia"vrr on The 5d y Ut February, 1871 Gertgr lar
nest aud Wesley Co.'S nlu's an partners trading
against Tuomi, League, John u Andrews AMI Peter Wi
s@T tate mcreanl- ad naIor,s mn"r the firm aui STYLE
son, iciis-IN thAScERY
Peer Wilson, not hav entered their appearance and
gwen security, according 10 The 81 Assembly and Inc
tcuoc rhcy inhabitants Of his Common~salfh
u Is ordered that the sa, defendants do appear on
the LTst dIy ct the Term the said Cont and an
swcrhc plaintiffs bi AID that copy OF Ills order h.,
forhwth inserted newspaper rHish~ri m iIe civ
Ut richmond tor two months ,rrrssycIy, nn that AM,
hcr copy toe posted At %" front door Of the courthouse
oe2! w5%' FilrIF d. WINSTON, &C.
UIRGINIA.-IN CnkNCERY-At Rules hcldtnfhe
V Clerks Once uf the Cucuu superior Cuurr of Law
iii- 80 James '" U.s. Iiiii against Geo w Duke aud
The s'ir defendants, Geo W. ard evils Duke, not hav
ng ilc,r spreManc" and gwen security according
satisfactorily evidence, that they inhlianrs Of mis-
cTc Tn m%"n % ls "vn 10y n'3 counsel, lisor
9pr"ar before tho Jude of the stiI Court Court
andausUcrIns plaintiffs but aud rbl acopy OF this order
-. rgwill nsrrc IN som" newspaper phi shed tho
AZ me ron, oor " the Court House Of this County
Copy. Tcsrc,
oc 60 waw JOHN HUNTER, G. G.
VIRGIN IN CHA CEEN ut Rules, held in
" n" ti"rh'. uHcc 81 the Circuit ~ugcuur Court of
wau. tiarccry Tor Louisa EuuuY, Monday. October
irh -il-rc", GucTnnr. PM; against Geo. " Duke and
Lewis Duke, aud other drrE
Tho HBii defendants, Goo W. and Lewis Duke not hav.
ing irtr rpprrluc", nod given socuuy according
Ia Law nud tIr EuI"s Of ibis tuurt, aud appearing. by
satisfactory evidence, slgt They irIablus us
SLATE. bu mn.u ui tho VluuT by hfs counsel: truT.
dcr'd, THAT Hu EiI Geo v. Duke aud Lewis Duke, 10
3Ircai before hc Judge Of the said Court, the Court
House, wu flee lat Gay 81 the Term Count
and answer tir plaintiffs hI u"d that COPY order
Ice nrlhwuh iusr ted uFumo paper published
'y NJ Richmond iur w" "ut- surrcE.ytlg, aud posted
ai the r OF IDur of the Court House Of this County on
some Cuuuday.
Copy. TcTr,
oe ~ W9w IOHN HUNTER c &.
WILLIAM 4 JAMIE. -. CIIRISTIAN,
CRGJEHS AND COMMISSION MERCHANTS
MARRTT BEIDGE.
WE offer iur sale on the must reasonable terms, for
w CASH or spgToTcd paper, tICluIowing Goods
. Ihda % tf,fy
~ ,0 Porto Rico