New-York tribune., 1841-10-07
Y He T RIB U N f.
THURSDAY MORNING, ocToBER7, I84
LATER FROM EUROPE.

hsd terrible weather the whole voyage and brings
100 passengers with dates from Liverpool to the
lerh ult., her day of sailing.
The intelligence is of good degree of interest.
In England however nothing decisive as to the
Intentions Of the now Ministry can be inferred
from the debates in Parliament
On the 10th Sir Robert Peel stated that the to-
sl sum Immediately necessary for the public SER
wee was about two-and-a halt millions. He stated
sso MS intention 10 provide for the renewal OF
those acts which would expire at the present 7es-
SION including the Poor Law which he proposes
70 renaw until the end of next July. The Chan
cellor of the Exchequer promised to state on the
FIRST day Of Ways and Means his plan for It TEN
porarv provision for the deficiency Of the revenue
Sir Robert will not now what measures he
regards a. necessary to eqaulise the expenditure
and the revenue though that be done. N-ithor
will he state what the ministers will do 10 meet
the commercial difficulties of the country postpou-
Ing these subjects till next session. Lord j. Rus
.s said that he disapproyed of Sir Roberts
course, and the next day, the l7th, very long de-
bate took place upon this question.
The latest Bank OF England statement shcws
Increase in the circulation Of 1888 600; in de
posites, of f9G,9O0; in secsrites, of f555, 900;
and decrease in bullion of el3l 900, as com
pared with the last statement.
The Banking House of Barclay & CO., Of Not
tingham. aud Hobhouse & Co, Of Bath, have
stopped payment.
The state of the Markets may be gathered from
our quotations below. In Liverpool cotton and
bread stufs have slightly declined.
The following is Il complete and correct list of
the important Cabinet appointments. 1t will be
seen that the future management of the relations
between Great Britain aud the L. States, on their
part, has deyolved upon the Earl Of Aberdeen:
CApiNGr.--Duke of Wellington First Lord Of
the Treasury, Sir Il. Peel; Lord Chancellor, Lord
Lyndhurst; Chancellor Of the EXchequer, Right
Hon. H. Goulburn; President OF the Council,
Lord Wharnciife Privy Seal, Duie of Bucking
ham; Homo Secretary Sir James Graham; For
eign Secretary, Earl of Aberdeen; Colonial Secre-
iary, Lord Stanley First Lord of the Admiralty
Earl of Haddington President of the Beard of
Control, Lord Ellenborough; President of the
Board of Trade, Earl of Ripon; Secretary OF War,
Sir H. Hnrdingc; Treasurer OF the Navy aud Pay
master of the Forces, Sir L. knntchbull Post
master General, Lord Low,her; Master General
of the Ordnance, Sir G. Murray; Vice President
Of the Board of Trade, Wm. Z. Gladstone; Sc
cretary Of the Admiralty, Hon. Sidney Herbert;
Attorney General, Sir f. Pollock Solicitor GEN
eral, Sir w Folett; Judge Advocate, Dr.. Ncholl;
Gov. General Of Canada, Sir c. Bagot; Lord Adj
yocale OF Scotland, Sir w. Rae: Solicitor Gener-
al for Scotland Duncan Al'Neil, Esq.
IReLAXp.-Lord Lieutenant, Earl De Grey;
Lord Chancellor Sir L. Sugden; Chief Secretary,
Lord Elliott Attorney General. - Blaclburne.
C.; Solicitor General, Mr.. Pcnneiather
QurFN's HousEHoLD.-Lord Chamberlain
Earl Delawarr; Lord Steward, Earl of Liver
pool Master of the Horse. Earl of Jersey; Lords
in Wairng. Lord Aboyne, Lord Rivers. Lord
Hardwicke, Lord Byron, Earl of Warwick, Wis
count Sydney Earl of Morton, Marquis of Or
monde: Mistress of the Robes Duchess OF Buc-
clcuch: Ladies of the Bedchamber, Lady Little
ION, Lady Poriman, Lady Barham, Countess OF
Charemont.
THE MCLEOD CAsE.-Col. Napier-the author,
We presume of the great history of the Pcninsular
War -lias been engaged in controversy with the
Times. on the Mcleod case We have only one
Of his articles, bur 1t seems 10 afford sufficient
understanding of the whole discussion.
Times" The republican sympathiscrs were
tie first aggressors.
Answer.-That gave England no right to invade
America.
Times The destruction of the Caroline was
amater of self-defence.
Answer-That is 10 be proved If she had been
DESTROYED out OF the American waters It would
have been so. IL she had been pursued INTO the
American waters when hying from an attack it
would have been so. But she was deliberately
attacked in the American waters without any pre-
yOus demand for redress, without any proof offered
any declaration made, that she was piratica YES
sci. Her destruction was therefore. an attack on
the American nation.
Times" The State of New iork was hound
10 enforce the neutrality OF lis citizens
Answer-Uudoub,cdlv it could An American
general was sent with troops TO enforce H. But
lhe frontier Is immense, and covered with forests
The neutrality could not be enforced. Was bad
si,h the part of the American Government
suspected If so, an energetic remonstrance and
Hsucc OF reprsas, If redress not granted,
would have been the mode OF proceeding accord
.ns 10 the international law. Was no deceit sus-
pected Then demand for the surrender OF the
Caroline and her crew q pratisal vessel, or the
Punishment OF the pirates, according tie laws
Of America wosld have been the proper mode Of
Proceeding. In either case the right OF the Ame-
dcan nation 20 have It's sovereignty in It's own wa
'ers respected would have been conceded, but the
deliberate destruction OF the Caroline in these wa
ieEs being complete act in itself, and not the con-
anua,ion OF an attack commenced before she took
refuge in the American waters was quite unauthor.
ned by international law Was ii mater OF
aecesaity2 That necessity should have been
shown; and an apology founded on il offered for
iae attack upon American sovereignty. Had this
b=en done on the instant, no weakness or dishonor
could have been imputed to England and though
iJweqld be less graceful now it is never late