Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1841-02-05
G. W. GOODE.
Copy OF a statement furnished Mr.. Philip NJ. Tabh, sr.
agreeably IN his request

Copy Of a statement furnished Mr. Philip NJ. Tabh. sr.
a~greeably IN his request.
Having been requested by Mr.. Philip NJ. Tabb,
ST. TO specify what particulars in Mr.. Goodies re-
ceN publication were confirmed by my recollectios,
L would say, those occurrences which are stated To
have taken place in MIR Goodies office and in Court.
To my knowledge, Mr.. Goode has fallen into hui
one inaccuracy, and that trivial, and of no material
import de states, that "soon after | got TO Court
Mr.. Tabb came in, &c" MIR. Goode is entirely
correct in saying that, 10 obedience to a message
from the Judge, he left his Office, while MIR. Tnhb
and myself remained but owing, probably, TO
some detention in the street., he did not las he sup
poSedl reach the Court room before MIR. Tabb and
myself, but a few moments after our arrival. I
would add ihst, while in Court, my attention al
the moment being otherwise engaged, I did no, hear
the waiver of notice by Mr.. Goode but the re-
cords OF the Court will, | believe, shew such waiver
to have been made. | did not understand from Mr.
Goodies publication, that the remark, i'm regard TO
the course which he mir. Goode) should feel bound
TO pursue, was addressed TO any other than MIR.
Iabb himself, or that II had been made in my hear
Ing. The substance Of 1t was certainly conveyed
to MIR. Iabb, IN the message subsequently, deliver
ed by myself at MIR. Goodies request.
At the like instance Of MIR Tabb. | would state
what further conversation besides that stated in Mr.
Goodies publication, according to my recollection.
occurred IN the interview between Mr Tabb and
MIR Goode ot his office. After Mir Goode had ex-
pressed TO Mr. Tabb the opinion, that if he had made
' - wa NNiAAlilAasloWh Ut interests OF any
sort 9nce the judgment and execution in this case,
That II would be a question OF law between the as
sisnee and the Judgment creditor, MIR Tabb remark
ed thatthe transfer had been made to his son, in an
tclpntIon OF this thing, some time ago, before the
judgment was obtained, and that, why could lie not
make a transfer Of his business as well as a mer-
chant, or any other person1 To this Mir Goode re,
piled, that the records did not show any such trans
Ter, nor haS npy notice thereof been given; and be-
sides, that a part Of the work must have heen done,
and q portion Of the commissions earned, before the
transfer HAD been made, and hat such portion could
not h. transferred to the prejudice of CREDITOR
MrTaOb answered, that perhaps Mr Goode did not
understand his (Mr Tabbis) business; that he did
not consider any portion Of the commissions FOR
having taken bonds, and such ike services, due
until the money was collected. Mr. Goode replied,
that was a question of law, which the Court must
decide, and that he did not think The authorities
would sustain MIR Tabb's views. The suggestion
about giving up a memorandum, sc. &c, was then
made by Mr. GoOde, as stated by himself The
conversation as hereln detailed, together with that
stated by Mr. Goode, was, so far as | recollect, all
'hai took place al the interview referred to.
teS " p. b. JONES.
EOft HIRE, u able bodied neapo Men. Just trom The
II countIy-amongt them, iwo hapds for tie Pits, and one
also, ? Women. aud ! boy for Factory.
LEWIS NH,
ef-d Collector and Agent.
n u n VI - nUnn-anG