Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1841-12-03
NLImGINIA.-kl RnIcs Lcld I'M ~ CIcrE,. nrlcn o

ATIhGiNIA.-kt Rulcs held iu the Clerks Once q
the Circuit superior Court ui Law aud Chanccry for
the County Of Hcnrieo and Cry OF Richmond, oniho Chan
chants Bank OF Baltimore, ptf ug INST the President,
Directors and Company 81 tho hank " the United aics,
Joseph CowpcThw ate, late Cashier 81 the BiuE L
Taylor, present Cashier Of TIC sad D,uE, Thomas Dun.
der SJninston, homRs Robins, and oner cers
The defendants above named, having entered their
appearance and given security according TO The
scinbly aud the Rules Of this Court and appearing by
satisfactory evidence they inhabitants OF this
Communicable It's ordered TLa the said defendants do
appear here the 9th day 81 the January Term
answer The bill Of the phinhs aud haiH copy Of this
deI DO ionhwih Inserted IN some newspaper published
nol-dwgw wM SANDS, Cpk
XJIRGINIA-At Rules held in the Clerks omce Of the
Circuit superior Court II Law anl Chanccry for the
Couny.of HcnTco City Of Richmond the CnanccTy
side, ih day October, 1871: James Mayo plaintiff
agansi benjamin :. Knapp aud rrederok W Knapp
wing partners 81 Knapp, Preston Co. aud another
The defendants above nancd having entered fhcir
scmbly the Rules Of thus Court, and sPpearng, by
satisfactory evidence that they are not inhabitants "i THIS
Commonwealth l. u ordered that the Fai defendants do
appear here the sixth day Of the January Term,
and answer the Till ut the plaintiff aud that cory this
order he "HhMi inserted 10 some newspaper published
In the City Of Richmond, for mouths cssycy and
'I no dw9~ ''''' ''''' " '' wv q. SANDS. OK
VIRGINIA: At Rules hoI Ia the Clcrk'8 once Of the
Circuit Superior Court Of Law and ChIncCry for the
side The day Of Nuyrmbcr lsl: PotauG lobinsoG,
paiuih against Charles Essmoon and another dsIts.
The defendant above named not having entered his APP
pcancc and given security according 20 tho Act of As
r.,
sisiacoTy ,y1ence That he ~ not az iuhabani ni tbs
Commonwealth: IL Is ordcTe That the said Defendant
ami answer Tie bin Ofthc pain, aud that copy Tile
order bo forthwith inserted M newspaper published
the city Richmond, for months sycly and
now nov = W. Wv S''''' ~ " Wv WIN. a SANDS Crk
VIRGINIA. At Rules held In tho Clerks once Of
V Tie Circuit superior Court Of Law and Chancery for
Chancery side, the first Jay of November 1871 the Pre-
Thomas Tyror, Isabca Kcth, Alexander Brown, John
Purcell alm,"r Rowland keynoids Joseph KeninEam'
Williams. plaintiff, against w Knapp and Knapp,
doing business unicrthc style OFF Knapp Co. James
Cushing aud Cushing doins business under The style
Of Cushing & Brother. Armstrong and George u
berry, PIiskcu and john Cugic doing business under
The style Of Plaskor Cuse, Charles Magsrge apd w u
unicf The style Of KorSruan 4 BROTHER, Ward Henry
Ward siil & ward " spes and john Jspies, doing
sInes, under the 6rn Of A e" Spes Co. ghu Firth and
Hall, doing CUISINE miduT the firm of Frth a iIal,
stanford and James Swords doug business under the
Grm u swords, stanford a Co Jonathan seymour and
seymour doing busing under h" style of Jonathan Soy
m9Ir SON Ihoa5 Dcs'ytr, jams itnas snI Joseph
silver. Thomas 3 Go, Joseph HiibDin, CJwprrih.
bs s, IT, oSTlamss. Cowpcrthw1fS Co. Tuner nnd
whcolwrignt partners doing business under The
Ts cTnndsn,s above named moi having entered their
appearance and given security, according Ia the Acf NJ
hIserbiy and inc Rules u This Court and appearing by
tsfetfy evidence hat lhcy not inhabitants of ths
r 6crc ON the Gh day the next January Term ana
a1rrr the IInT the plaintiffs Hnl that copy NJ tis
dc, be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published In
the CITY Of Richmond, fpr two months, successfully, end
I'll Al the front door Of tho Capitol bon the Fad CITY
o,vs-wos '''' WI. O. SANDS, q. C.
XTKGiNiA:-Af Rules, held tu the CLERKS Once ~ the
sruerior Court of law srd thanccry fur the County
Of UcnTico and cry of Richmond on the thlucCry SIDE
fba 1 q day Of November, t-i.-Wm. q Smith, WIN. 10.
souo AMI sally Maria DIE wife George uudtn and IIsr.
riet hin vile George Smith Ehz1 Ann Smith and John
Brrhctt and SusBn Y. his wife, pln.nus against WIN.
Browne admir- with the will annexed Of WIN Geiy Decd
the de- fendant above named having entered his APP
pearInce and avCn security according m tho act NJ 1FEc
XIV and the rules 81 this court and appearing bY satF
c,ory evidence that he is not iuhahn ~ THE Com
popwcstis d h ordered that the said defendant 30 ny.
near here 9th day 81 tho next January term, aud
answer The bin NJ tho planuas anil tnata cory q ibis Or
te CIV OF Hirhm1nd. for months succcgsvcy, and
posted n INC front door Of the Capitol ihc .2tI
no dv9w WV u HNNbT, 'lH--
IN Northumberland County Court, 18th Octobor lsil-
l spencer Thomas complainant, against J1hny NaIey
and racy, Janca, Betsy, sally, Josiby Ffancsf az. W.
judith Thomas Hiram, Charlotte. Sueseyl ~ 49,
William. Iimcs aud Walter Wood, Hlary Tpfinl..L ~,
SALLY, Mary Ann and MEMOIRS, sophia '"s'lH a'' wy
Thomas, dclis In = 1HcffV. a. IT, .Y,r,rv. sr, 10
HE day csmo the complainant ~ me at,o.',,J' ,r
fn aafiaftrfiun of the Court la l' '-
isnts Nancy, James. Betsy sally i9,,nl W. ~ ~ y
Thomas, Hiram Wool, Mary Ann anl ~ ~, ~ r,,,
sre NOT tpbahianta 81 This tommnnwealh w ' unl.h
~ ~, ,inUT. n is ordered That tho e1ld deicndiuta IN
% kre on tho ~ Monday In January nati, and answer
ky Kin III tbo plsintm; and chat copy oi THIS order be
GrhwHh inserted fof Two moninA slC. s.Neyi ln We
Richmond Whiq, snd anoiher CODY lneIenl poNeo ~ INC
f,ont doot Of thr Court fiouse ~ this County
no io--vow ''"' N, n. CRALLE, c. c.