Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1841-08-19

~ .s4,s4es itself Il ns xsls40n, "a iadsse delay
n, assent il 10 bs implied. lhis iron tae Z give
.x "a nj, eir-rsr, s,arces--it is uabesiag and Ia
aasibls Ii is tie language Of the master e tbs
vassal. An unconditional answer y riafned tstta
Nth; ana delay, rosiponeuicns, 81 ineaRaesY y
ans wer prodeces IN laisisd asscni. Nhiep = ever
as,er irrssocsbie Macy az tho State elecsians
A.y. uifeas1y taken uloce Without any knowledge
on lie parl of the People, that such qaest'on
was 10 come ap The Representatives may desire
suh.sisston 81 The question 70 their constituents
ntepsraoyv to taal astioa upon IL; bat iii's rish
ariyfere i arnied Nhaiever may he The motives
ard views cherished by the Representatives OF
the Peopie to induce delay, Their assent L 70 De
presumed and Is ever afterwards bin,'ing, unless
their dsseni shall be Internationally expressed al
heif rs session after tie passage ii this bill int
a law. They may By Formal resolution declare tie
laestian Of assent OF dissent to be un'eciaed aue
postponed, AMI yet, 10 opposition to their express
declaration 70 the contrary. theie Is 70 he
implied. Cases iaaamefable might be cited 10
manifest The irratunssity of such inference.
Les one TIVE IN addition snHice.
The popular branch Of the Legislature may ex-
press its dissent b. an unaaiuans vote, and rs rs-
solution may DC defeated by tie vote OF the Sem
ate, ard vet the assent is TO DO implied. Both
b anches &C the Legislature may concur in
solution Of decided dissent, and yet the Cover
nor may exert the vefo power coaieueu on him
by the State Constitution, aad their legislative ac-
lion be defeated and yet the assent q INC veg
i've aeshufiig IS imputed, ara t'e aaessois % t"as
contemplated institution, euthofi1ed % es'as-
sh branch or branches ID such State, whenever
they may End il CONDUCIVE TO The iatesvst OF he
stockoltiers TO do 40 and having once established
H. they can under no circumstances withdraw u,
except by act CT Congress me state may aiser'
wards protest agaifst sueh unJhst Inference ult ~
authority Is gene. It's assent Is implied ny .es
failure inatiiy 10 ACT at ITS Inst session ana ne
roice can reveI afterwards be henid. 10 inier-
onces go si"enf, and as tey seem 70 me ifsaphai'
! cannot yield NY consent no court o. lnst'ee
~cnlh OF eoeu fheetloh thstu, "i"'"s '.'eis'"a
althat is established IN Judicial proceeding, 10y
introducing presamp,ieas AZ va'ianee with let.
and inferta rs at the expens~o Of reason. S1ite
in coadaion OF eufess would be PresH'ac@ u
speak as on indishihali inanacicd snd IN pils9h,
mig be rresnme to bc IN the etJay Heht - tree.
dom. Fsf better to say to The States boldly ana
frankly Congress wills, ard submission Is de-
mand,d.
1t may be said that the directors may not es-
tnb.h branches under such circumstances Bhi
this is question Of rpwer and Ibis bill invests
them with full autheiity TO do so III TIE Lsgisla
fure Of New York. OF fenns1 tvenls, or any othei
STATE. should be ioufi to be N such condition as
have suppost d. could there be any security iurnish
cd against such q ster on the part Ct thsr dirfci
tors Nay, is it not fairy to tie presumed, that
this iroyso was introduced Tor tie sele purpose OF
meeting the contingency referred TOT why else
should il have been iuttndnrcdl And submit to
the Senate. whetl ~ j, be believed that any
State would BE- likely 10 sit quietly down. under
| such a state Of thingsi In a great measure OF
public interest. Their patriotism may be sueeessfn-
iy appealed 10 bur to infer their from Gil
cumstance. a, war with such Inference; canno,
but regard rs calculated 10 excite ieeing at faa