New-York tribune. [volume] (New-York [N.Y.]) 1841-1842, 1841-04-21


cases of conscience TINT the Mraans. IS neither
- "a, less than system OF Casulst Like al caSulSut'
= oeeds with the show of didaotic method ana ''
ANALYSIS. For example, complete case Oh oon7oies
divided into five members Il The point 10 Dc cleared up
, The doubt raised that point; g. ne soiuton VI @
doubt which naturally presents Iself hsl 20 iae NM
l. The true orthodox soutloni D. An aPFehoA' - So
how the solution harrlonzes with the so!uuol o,
c,sos and thns TO compose regular code MS schoo
rest.-frst on the authority of the 'edas whose "o'
law secondly tradition. and even on the WORDS VI '
ne-sons who are supposed ENJOY peculiar illumination "
even admits SORT Of probablesm All usage IN err
,-esr,es some lost tradition and this probability su
and becomes authority. provided It does not foFiHa, ~
,-adc massage in the Vedas The author OF the hlinsa
!, Daipin: its aphonsns very ancient Dut they ha
been revised at different times and enriched with coI
,aries The school OF Daimin has ever been the
Of Hindoo hecrodo1y; and hournariia' Eer ieui 'l
distinguished commentator of Thu school has been M
author least OF the instruments Oh tii' i
and violent persecution of Boodhism
Thus we see one step taken of the Nedas though II
r.es not beyond the circle of theology sut Tue human
mind could not pause there. After the Mmansa OF Dammit
- no,bcr Mrnansa another school of Interpretation,
which still retains something OF theology but which without
ever renoncing the authority OF Revelation Is Tar oouer
than It's predecessor and goes into the metaphysics Oh th
nrcept, contained in tho Vedas Therefore II IS called
both Nimansa Theology and Yedanta Philosophy II rests
on the Vedas but forms system OF metaphysics ana
real school philosophy The author OF this school, or at
least he whose attached the fullest exposition OF
its principles is Vyasa.
the Niava Philosophy and the Vahesika Philosophy Maya
reasoning Vashe.ika distinction knowledge o distinct
parts that say, of the elements OF the world Inc
Niava Philosophy system of diaectics the 'ahesiSa
Philosophy of natural science In SAYING these
two systems come after the Vedanta Philosophy rely on
the following rule of criticism Other things beng equai
among different systems those which embrace the most
objects are most metaphysical, ard have more synthetic
-, rnfpHf Driy al "A
single point or of kind Of questions whose subject, are
less elevated, and which more analytic Inc MAYA
Philosophy. whose authors name Is GoaIna Is SIMPLY
svs,em of daeccs is the nature OF dalcccs to be
inpara i, is indeed difficult say whether system
of logic is orthodox heterodox For this reason the
school of Goaua has been pardone and even accepted b
Indian orthodoxy 1t has been otherwise with the al9lcSha
Philosophy and is this the effect OF lis nature or o peculiar
circumstances! This syseni-whose author name Is ha
nada-s in such bad rcpute that has always passed Tor
hc,erodoxy; and am at loss for the reason OF THIS IL
system of Natural Philosophy which preiends to explain
the wo i'd v of single atoms that Is L" say III modern
,oare hy means of simple and ndccomposabc molecules
which by virtue of their peculiar nature and OF certain
inherent laws were motsn consresatcd and formed
into this universe This philosophy like that OF Ecur'
is an atomsc and corpuscular system OF physics
In the train please, by the SIDE oil these Two
svs,cns appcars another, which is system OF
physics psychology dalcccs and METAPHYSICS IN word
u universal and complete System OF Philosophy Inns Is
the Sankhya Philosophy, which could not have appeared
Tor II Is cntlrcy 'i"
least appearance of theology Sankhya Sisnies ra'o rca
SON reasoning; it rational theology: Is the account
which the soul gives itself of its by the process OF
reI,r ANALYSIS or in the words OF Colcbrook the dis
coyery Of the soul BY of right discrimination The
author of this philosophy kapila 1t pushes independence
10 beteodoxv and only hctcrodox but a. things IN
India are called by their it is avowedy system
of Atheism Its appcaiion is Nrlswhara Sanklya that
Is Sankva sine Dec This the first fruit OF philosophical
ndcpcndcncc in India But The Sankya Philosophy not
all contained in the kapa School; It comprises several
other systems Of which the important; Is the Sankya
Paandia that is the school o. which Paiandall Is the
author This philosophy also cnti oy independent 1t
admits something of the Sankhya physics and !iacctic' but
separates itself entirely from the Sakya metaphysics rs
the former is Nir-Iswhara without God-his Is Leswara,
with God the former only independent but mpouS
the latter independent but religious One Is atheism the
other is lhcistical, TO extravaganza
Various other connected with the Sankhya ih
losophy-among them the Dainas and BoodhiSts-who
c.nno be separated from the history of Philosophy since
bv the side of mythology which seems placed there by
design they have regular system OF metaphysics Bood-
hsm preserves the division and Is therefore
incontcsabv Indian II is heerodox. and rejects the
vcdas in manner hostile, that only argument but
the sword also has been used against IT. and the Afmasa
School, cmncntv Brahminical orthodox, has employed
fire and sword DESTROY The persecution has been
arocous that Boodhism has quilted India crossed the
Gauges, entered the Indo-Chncse peninsula and China
itself where the religion and philosophy OF To- 1t has
become system of philosophy. and for the people an
travaganl superstition.
Such are the which the labor OF Coebrook
directed After taking General view OF them TO give us
idea of the great whole of Indian Philosophy he enables
search these for the elements of all Philosophy
namely Sensualism. Idcalsm, Scepicism and Mysticism
Scientific Items
IRoS SrE,NsHlr.AThe great iron steamship being
li,i will,