Mobile daily commercial register and patriot., 1841-11-05
In Caaneats State ai A.s,.amt--,iob.i ', nnl,.=
 df hUes--ttf. i7ah. ld4i. Joseph Fowler, j.. omiIainanl,


 In cd@ae1s -state ol aa#a'na-=hieb.ie l :, my. df hAe-0st. i7h. la4i.
 Joseph Fowler, J.. complainant,
 The Aississrei iaisn Lark, The Planters aal slcr-
 chants Bank of Il sbi!e, fbanas Cara" ood, Abner trcNcn, ei al, Deienaants.
 TIRE ilhl in tiis oise ses talh thai nn and befr re the iih a. al Aptil. A. D. la10, ihc Mississippi Union Bank was l1aelged t4 fte complainant n a very large stun q IaeneA iaat en the said das, t3e C0mpanaH procured attachment ta he issued, re- lu1able to the Guams Count of Nahile county, at its June Term, lst0, agaln,t said Ntssisslprl Union Bank; tlal upun satd aflaclunent summons oi ganish mrnt issued and lex led an the anteIs anu Mer- chants Baak of Mobile, on baaie A. Riges, Cash fer of said Bank, and others, that said Daniel A Rigs admitted on the part oi the Planters and Ner- chants Bank of Mahie, that the said bank mas in passession among other things, ot hiils drawn, en- doised and accepedb bs defendants hefeinatet named that judgment Was afterwards recovered hy campai- n1ut, itr very ktfge amount aBain' the Faid Ms sis,ippi Union Bank in lhe connly court aforesaid; that the said Mississippi Dnion banl. has proper " within tie state oi Alabama 10 satisis aige a. nowi still ue on the judgment H sresaid eScert the said bills and notes in possession al tue sad Planters and Merchants Balk that the sa,id balls and nales are ohoses n action and cannot be esied under execution; and that the sail fattIes, drienants, drawers, endotsers and aceeptors, ate ideHls of Alabama and cannot he reached hg frneess oi sai- nshmenl And the bull pfiAs that the bhs and nates aforesaid in possession o the PlaaerS and Me chants Bank of Mobile aforesaid. may be sold by the alaster in tiaocery li satisfaction of inc conp iuadis indg ment and lar other relief.
 And now inc complainant comes h, Lis solicitors and applies for or al aref of pubeaiian aai II ii,- peatng inc satisfaction ofthe Register of the Gou o Chancety for te first district Of Southern Chaacery Division olIbe State of Alabama al Aohda, that he defendants, The Mississippi Union Bank, Thomas Copew0od, Ahner Prewetf, Nm. E. NilkeN Samuel t,gareV, Mark Pfeweti, Smith Hogan, 6enrge N ain- han, John FiYat, 4. Ii. Ralmond, M. Q. Cook, ,Iumps Gasse~ay, John l.. Indail, Moses B. Collins, bn Eclol>. Jacul Louehhriaee, iohn Fisher, D. II. Cummings, JohnN Battle, q Burritt, J ahn Goodwin, kthen Davis, stephen Adaiis. lohn N ilson, John Wilson, Jrs, Charles B1ram, Aneustn Willis P AieXauier, B. |. Burnett r. M. Rogers, I :. B. Richards, ?. <. Parknan, ]. M Anderson, in mas W. Eski0, ". ?. Carter, Iames Owen, James Rnt- ledge, William Sniln, Isaac Casey, Benjamm Spen- cer, A. R. Hunter. Gand ]. N i.hlnau, George B. Sandersou, B. NJ. fetrill, Joseph Fowlkes Augustin Willis, J. <. Gholson, John M Cook, N illiain 4. Cunn, Danel Burnett and Joho Wghitnan L ing the name and style ot John N Nighman X Go. are non-res- idents uf e State of Alabama, they are ordered to
 appear the next ter, ol tle court of clncery afote said and answer or deur tue ball If conn laint and
 further ordered, that this order be published once
 week Tor six weeks i1 new spaner printed and published iu he ctv of Mobile, aud that a copy of the same be poste the door ol the court house of Mo- bile county, within fifteen days from his date
 Witness, Malcolm l. Mcitae, Register of the said
 court of chancery, al kue4 ths eighteenth day
 ofOctober, lS4l. M. J. McRAE,
 oc20 6lto Register.
 In CmHceiy--state ol Alabaua-Mehle County.
 Al Ralss, Oct. 1Sh, 1Sll.
 Dudley Hubbard, conn planlait
 S27 Pressly C. Lane, John W. Lane, Can W. Iane Edwin s. Lane, Daniel Russell anl Lucy his wife
 James Burlington and Eleanor his wife, delts.
 The Bills in this case sets orh that the camrlan- ant purchased piece of property nj a gale maIe h, the Register of the 1i cncely nj Mobile. un- der decree m certain ealse in said court wherein Thompson l1ttell was complainant and Joseph Bales Jt. was defendant and thnt in consequence fl errors committed in previous deeas of convey ance of the same property the deed given by the Register at the sale was erroneous in this that did correctly sclibe the properly intended ip he tafeclosed snd sold and the bili prays that the may be correct ed to make perfect the chain of title 10 premi ses on the north of St. Joachim and St. Louis steels and for other relief. And now the complainant comes by his solicitors and shows To the satisfaction of the Register o the court of chan cery for the first district of the southern chaucery di vision of said State at Mobile from an ailia,it on file in the cause, that the following named defendants in the above suit are all non-resldenls oi the Slate If Alabama, to wIt:-i'fessly C. Lane and John w. Lane, whoresde i'll Cal,ell coulty, Va; Daniel Russell and Lucy his wife and Carr N Lane, who res tide il tafralltpn III the Snte at Missouri James BuIlmeton and Eleano. hs wife who reside m the State uf Ohio, and Edwin . Lane, nho resides in the city of New Oileans, Stale of Louisiana, and applies for an orter of publication t2 them. Now Incl eiure the said dei.ndni, otdefed n appear at tle next term of the said uf chanceiy he held at Mobile on the secohd Monday ui No1emhei next, and answer demur to the bfil oi mplaiut; and il is further ordered, that this orde, he published once a week for six weeks m some newspaper print ed and published in the city of N,bile, lAat copy of the same be posted the door of the court house afM nal tllf n he fad It mai to each of the said defendants Daniel Russell anl Lucy his wife, Carr W. Lane, ant Edwin <. Lone al their respective places of residence above stated all within flteen days from this date
 Witness, Malcoln J. Mc6ae, Register nf the said
 court pf chtncery, at Rules, this the 18th day of
 October, A. b. 18Il. Attest,
 oc2O 6l+c NJ. I. McRAE. Register.
 In Chancery--Slale ct Ai4bama-sloble Cnnuly.
 Al Rules Oci. 25th, l }il The Planters and Merchants Bank of Mobile, s2S ,s.
 Isaac H. Erwin, admr, Anne Hitchcock and her chiliren Caroline, Henry, Andrew and Etban A.
 Hitchcock, defendants.
 TENIE BILL in this case sets forth that Henry N Hitchcock being naebted the coml4t. in large sum ai money, did the 7lh day of October, 1858, execute his certain deed of mortgage to ihe compt fer several lots of land; that said Henry Hitchcock has since departed this life, leaving the defendants his representatives; and that default has been made by sad Henry m his life fine aud by the defendants his representatives since his death in the payment of several of the nules, for securing which, sai mortgage was given; and the bill pays for fore closure of said mortgage.
 And nov the complainant comes by his solicitors an applies for order publication, ani it appear ing to the satisfaction ofhe Register of the court of iccry for the first district ot the southern chance " division of said state at Mobile, from an affidavit on file that .li. defendant Anne Hitchcock resid.