Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1841-10-11
49, ron THE NiRuiNIAN.
THE LYING IlHIIRE EEptiuI irAN


professions. aud by the yehemence with which hr
dsceurses Of the Inconsistencies OF Others he would
De taken Tor paragon al conssleic,. Yet II Is
somewhat marvellous, that he scarcely ever writes
an editorial IN which every subs qurnl paragraph a
not IN distinct coutra.iety Ia the preceding one
The last Mondays Republican contains u lengthy
cdllotal sln1ic,tins the course of Nj. Tyler, aud
Offending him from tie ''abuse oi his friends -
which i"r several reasons, deserves 10 be patio
ly noticed. The editor thinks it very incons,s,en,
10 the Wings TO denounce Mr.. Tyler Tor brtta,inp
the confidence winch they rrposed IN In H. and pro
leeds say I'VE Insist them under all the ciro un-
stances then treatment of tie President IL unustIf.
able aud ungenerous and dictated by other
atoms, than d,sre 10 promote the public good. E"
| rus Is really Il most extraordinary atIcle. The
editor knows that rs far a. his observation extends
tie conduct Of NJ. Tyler is almost r,aly cons
demned by tie Wig patty I he denounces the
notices of 50 large and Respectable abody fins own
coun,i, men, an gravel, assc,;~ lat they a,r act =
dled hy selfish considerations. Does I'D really b :
rve that al the phiiotism OF the country min
I'd to the II rs ni the pseudo drmoc,alic patty nd
that The rger portion oil hIs daily associates are
traitors. ready Ike Esau 10 sell Iheir brin, IA, (o, a
mess Of potlagt! lie certainly says So, whether h,
means it or no,-llps language wall admit of no a.
ther inference. had always supposed that the mass
OF both parties were honest IN the intentions. aud
anxious Tor the welfare OF lher country But IT te-
NAMED for the editor nl The Republican 10 nsccf.
tam thai the Whole Wig parry are aetuated b, 40.
/ he
public good." " hat wonderful discovcn!-
Doubtless. he was A. much agiiatcd when It buis,
upon him, as Newton was WHEN he Discovered the
principle o; gtavlaIion.
But the editor thinks The Wings very itconsis.
tent because they condemn Mr.. T,lefs course ~
vctoing the Bank Bills, alter having supported INN
their "a ddale Tor The Wee Presidency, and
having defended hun during the canvass ~ ,in,t the
assaults oil his enemies, -n0io, pretended tftends-
D'es he not perceive ihel he '"volses htmseV also
in inconsistency The Wings notp condrinn MI
Tyler; tormeriy they supported him. The Fed.
erasts io,meily denounctd hun; no" they ate slug
ing eins 10 his praise. II Mr.. Tyler has MOI
changed, VIII, have the editor and his parry all At
once fallen In love with him II va they taken
him with all his slns-wllhout his IN ,nesung the
least rel enhance 1t must be The litor says
that Mr.. ! vl,r has not changrd--ha, lie has been
'rlectly consistent. The oily inference tbcn, ot
course, is, HAT thc editor aud ms par. have chang
ed, aud have accepted Nh Tyler INTO the Loco Fo-
church. with all the odlous OF fede,ai,sn etc
su resting upon hn. The editors argument,
/ them Is tai the Wings have changed wait Nj.
! Tyler las remained IA sdfu guo-tank old dtial
! Wing, as lis new alles once dubbed nm,-and he
| Locos have rallied a,oand him. lie mus, admit
that Nh. " has changed, aud as Il necessary IN
! ference thai The Wings have been Consistent, OF
/ that his own party have changed aud rallied to the
support OF Nj. Tyler, who has been stationary. lie
may accept e,lher horn oi the dilemma he chooses
One ol the Two lie IS Obliged TO take. lie cannot
prove the Wings to have changed without neccs
,a,, adodltln4 that Mr. Tyler has not changed
and If Mr. Tyler has been consistent. why Is lie 50
acceptable noir. 10 I'll, no loIm lIy held hun IN
abhorrentel lie must either admit that his owo
I party have cidnSsd are eulogIsIng MI Tyler
without cause.
But let us peep into another snare which the edi-
tor has sci lJt himself. Let US see how pref iy he
again entwlnes the a,ounl his neck. lie
says that Mr.. r. Ter had formerly voted and spoken
against national bank, upon the ground oi us ua-
constIt ulo nay -lha lie had token an oath To sup
n the constitution, and NOV says he-"we
submit II to every Impartial reader, whether MIR.
Tyle with his views OF the uncUnsill ntlonaiy and
danger OF IA nat onal banh, could Lave sgucd either
OF the bills lately presented TO him without commit
ung pc. jarg J" Tue editors aigumeni, then, Is
that as Nj. T. Ter had taken otlh support the
constitution, # he had sanctioned chel vi the bark
bi~ believing them 10 be uncunsiItuos al, lie would
have con nntlrd an aci OF the udest mordl tr
pivde-peyUy. In subsequent paragraph he
ys,-"But admitting II 10 be uue that the Pres,-
dent did al lime agree sisn Ewing bill, under
the strange CONVICTION that The ohj eoilons which lie
had long entertained, and sIll entertained az anst
Bank, did not apply to that particular scheme,
his subsequent course shows that lie changed his
piniuns. rs other Presidents ociure hm had done. -
Gen. Washington. II Is SAID decided IN favor OF We
tong the charte VI the first bank IN 90, and did not
conclude TO sign it, until his scruples were removed,
near The iast hour" How the editor can make this
paragraph harmouize with The one quoted above, II
is impossible TO conceive. He Contends, that as
Mr.. lyler had at one Time voted aud spoken AZ INST
bank, ds being unconstitutional, If he had Alter
wards sanctioned one, as Nh. Madison did, lie
would have committed perjury Immediately alter
waids lie says that alinough the President had AT
ouce lime agreed TO SANCTION E"iug's bill, h.. liter
wards "ctdngcd ms opinions, other President be
fore ham haa dOne.' How does he reconcile these
int ,sstencies In one case 1t would have been
PERJURY IN The Pres dent 10 change his opniou aud
SANCTION q bank, other Presidents hid done
while II was most glorious act to ''change his o.
pInon as other Pre- sdenls Def re had done" and
reto IA bank bill. The Of his argument,
tn II, Is that il the President changes his opinion
aud retoes bunk bill, is GLORIOUS, honorable act,
6u II lie change iiIs opinion, the Father OF his
couoiry did, and sanction bank bill, II Is Derjury.
Ana yet ms IS the consistent editor Of Lynch
burg Republican; wno IS continually delivering
lonies 10 other people ab III then Inconsistencies.
But what iu,t hermore saith Tins deponent lie
SAYS H. not how Jno. Tyler may have tatk.
ed about the Bank he has acted we'll ms fA.u
on that subject" All now lie speaks out like a
man. Why did he noe I'll us that AT first II
lakes no DIFF renee how Jno. yIer may have "iaik.
ed''-lt makes no difference wha fine professions be
may have made to the " lis ,,-:y "ho raised h N
from The ''jesoldte abyss" OF "dreary nothing" II
he has dced 50 AS to play into the hands Of li,ose
who once did all they could to cham him down
IN that humble sphere from winch he has I'M
fortunately isen,-ii lie la, blasted the hopes Ut As
irends aud substrVed the purposes OF his Loco Fo-
CO allies, lie Is fine fellow, and shd be borne hi
umphantly TN ugh upon the btawny shoulders OF
the "lllusflous Pred cessor, ana tho bald pate oi
the "Lrule Mag can." Truly has lie acted ''well
h., Ian, Il 1,