, 1841-09-25
WHOLE NUMBER asa.

We turn to the speech of 1919 alluded to
above, and there we find the following:
'Sir, in as much as ! beliere the creation
Of this Corporation RECONSTRUCTION
AL, 1 cannot, uithout a violation of my oath;
THE CONSTITUTION WHEN AN OPPORTU-
NIFTY PRESENTS ITSELF Of doing 50
Dithout uiolatidg the public faith: But be.
leiping, also. that it is EXPEDIENT TO
PUTT DOWN, and other gentlemen feel
ing themselves al liberty to follow up that in
JURY, / propose TO express to you my views
on that subject"
as il expeiieni to direct a scire fdcias, or
in other words. TO PUT DOWN THIS
CORPORATION! | contend THAT 1T
is"
81 protest against the idea that the Govern.
ment cannot do without this Bank. W.
are not dependent on this corporation.-
Wretched indeed would be our situation if
such was the case"
Look at his vote in the United States SEN
ate in 1882 against the re-charter of "the
mother Of monsters" and then asked how
has Mr.. Tyler been guilty of TREACHE-
RY? How could he have done less than
he has, without--to use his w emphatic
and beautiful anduage, "without surrendering
all claim to the respect Of honorable men,
all confidence on the part of the people-all
self respect-al regard for moral and reli-
gious obligations"
But Mr.. Tyler stands not alone in his
enviable pre-eminance with respect to feder-
al abuse. DR.. Francis Mallory, our immedi-
ota RanraSant.t.ua in Hn~~.e, ! ol,> l.
nounced by the federal faction, inasmuch as.
he will not abandon his long known and
fondly cherished political principles. He
stands up boldly for truth and right, which is
an all-suficient reason why certain cliques
should be disposed to plot his condemnation.
Were not the opinions of DR.. Mallory,
with respect 10 a National Monster, well
known TO the public years ago? Did he not,
in the most open and positive manner, re-
avow his unyielding opposition to any such
Institution, during the last Session Of Con-
gress7 Did he not, also, express most fully
and positively his opposition to the Extra
Session, Distribution bill, &c. &C., at the
same time? Was not all this done previous
to his reelected he would oppose all these
measures? Who then has any reason to find
What has he done for which he should
be called upon TO resign by a MINORITY Of the
whig party-a mere corporals guard! "You
can't come it, gentlemen"
We subioin a paragraph from the Rich
mond Enquirer. asking particular attention
TO the closing lines:
"These wings Of Norfolk have met and
denounced DIR. Mallory for his intrepid de-
votion to the Constitution. They may play
the same game on Messrs. elmer, Wise and
Hunter. But these able and distinguished
gentlemen will find in their souls one drop
of patience against the vituperation of the
federal wings, and Bank devotees. Thanks
be TO these men who thus stands up for the
right, and for principle-for the country and
her Constituencies federalist murmur as
they please. Every thing is working for tho
good cause. The authorizations ofthe wings
in Congress-their humbugs and their devil
esther madness in giving away the pub
lie money, which is wanted to save us from
loans, from a violation Of the Compromise
Act, and a Protective Tarif-their infatua-
ton and their tricks in relation to a Nation
al Bank. their gag laws, and their precipitation
and their thousand active tricks, and their
mischieveous measures. ore opening the eyes
of the wings, and ~arousing the indignation
of an enlightened people. Let US stand by
those ,rho stand by their country. Let US not
abandon those whom The uhiss prescribe"