Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1841-12-22

NInsINIAi Al Rules hell m the IicTs's Office III
the Cucm superior Couu OF Law and Chancery foI
ChanccIy side the first say of November lsi the Pre-.
3sen pTer,nr- sud ton@ny of tie BANK OF Virginia,
Purcell admnro l Rowland Reynolds Joseph Kciuns
| wiiHms plaintiffs, against W Knapp aud Knapp.
Ions business u"acri Tie s,lc Of kuaPn Co, James
Of Gushing & Brother, Armstrong and t:c"rrc' N
Berry dong bu.ness under The siyIe Of Armstrong I"
he style Of Paskcrt Cusr, Charles Masarge anu " ii
M.eirge doing business under the style a a " Ma.
under the styie III Kcrsnan & brother Ward Henry
Want. sill & ward v Spies ami John spies doing br.
sine's nader tho nrm Of \ spcs q Co. iohn Frih ana
stanford aud Jines swords dol business uneT The
firm Of swords, sA.rtd 10. Jonathan seymour aud ID
monr & eon Thomas Deslycr James Thomas Joseph
Hnb9In partners doing bushes. uudc the Style lie.
silver, 'i"uas \ Co. Joseph I iiibnin, Cuwpcrth.
the style ofThon,s Co~pcthwair% o. TvSSsT
wScewright, partners dons business unaeI IS SS
style Of Turner a Wheclrisht. William Jackson, John
| RnwIcif, AMI other dcfcnuauts.
The defendants above named having entered their
appearance ond gwen security, according the Act NJ
assembly Hni me Rules II his Court and appearing, bY
satisfactory evidence that hcy not inhabitants this
onmmon~cauh ne ordered That the said elendant do
appear mere on IN" MN aS 81 t' neat January Term
answer the bIof the pinr; sui that copy ofihs or.
der he forthwith nseIiei in some puhshcd in
the City Of Richmond for mrn'ls, SUCCESSFULLY and
posed at the front door Of the Capiol the said CIV
nov a-w9w 'Op' ' wM. a. SANDS. &C.
ViEGINA:.A Rules, held il The Clerks Once " the
superior Court ~ Law aud Chanccry Tor the County
OF HcnncO and City Of Richmond the Chaurcry sid.
the LIST day OF November, ISil:-wm & Smith " m m
settle, and sally Maria his wife George Gpdhn aud lila
Iet lis wife, George " smith EUZa Ann smith, andJ I'M
Brchett and susan r. his wife, plaintiffs against WIN.
Browne, anr with he Will anne Ked OF VIM. Geddy decd
| and other dris.
The defendant above named having entered his
peardncC aud sNcn security according To the
by and the rules Of ts court, appearing 10y salts
factory evidence, that ne inhablnt This Com.
nonWcal: ~ ordered, that the saii defendant an.
pear here the nun day Of the January term, aud
answer the bill of The plaintiffs that a copy Il This
der hc forthwith inserted ~ newspaper pubiishcd in
the City oi Richmond. for months successively and
posted At the front door Of the Capitol IN the said city
no > d~gw WM. q. SANDS, OK
IN Northumberland County Cour, IIth Ociohcr 1911
/ Spencer Thomas complainant; against John, Nancy
aud Crazy, lanes BETSY, sally Josiby Ftanes Maria
Judith Thomas, Hiram, Charlotte. Surkry, Mirgare T.
William, James aud Waller wuOi Hillary Syid,Hc, May
sally, Mary Ann aud Nendoris sophia, Joseph and Polly
| lhOuas, dcits In q IHcsTy
Tbs day Gene the complainant by his attorney, AMI Ii
appearing 10 the satisfaction 81 the COur that the defen-
dtnis Nancy, James busy sally Jpsihy and Francis
Thomas, Hiram Wool, Mary Ann and Memoirs Thomas.
not uhifiIus Of ti- Commons esh On the motion
nf the plaintiff: II IA ordered That the raid defendants
appear here the - Monday January aud answer
The hill Of the riainu; and that 81 this order bc
forthwith ell for muuhs surrCssiyely In the
kchmond his, and another cory thereof posted the
itOnt door Of IN" Court House II this County.
Copy. Tesic.
no lg-Wgw NJ. H. CRAILF G. e.