Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1841-12-21
NTIRwtaIa, ~ Rules held IN tue ,7cTs's ,,Ii,cc

NIRGtaiai At Rules held IN tue ,icrg's Ufcc II
he 'ncui superior Court OF law and Chanc-ry for
Ih~"eoy side tie .s lay Of November. 1871 the Pre-.
siieE;, Directors anu Company II the Bank Virginia
rnTccl, aiu'ol oi Rowland Reynolds Joseph KciuinsI.n
~ INN ,n 4 sen; -'u ton liLr executor ~ prrcn
doirs business u"1.rt.c tr,o Off " Kuapn s Co. James
of Gushing & EroIher. Amsirons aud t:coTr. n
berry, doing business under the style Of Armstrong
BE ~ III Plaskcit Uuslc Charles NasarEc and IS n
Mlslrrc dVing business under The style ct 4 " II Ma.
m,ncr the eiyio q, krr-,uan & RratncI, ward Henry
" St' an W., M",I; .,rI oi.n,ss under ;hc Style Of
S'ne's under the irmo y spss Go, ioEn Fab aud
Il y So ,,t 80, Il, "a IN! OF Ihu y Hail.
arm of swords sIaniIId Co, jonathan seymour aud
mor son. Thomas Dcs,vor, James Thomas and IosoGh
iiboi Partners DOING business undo. the sty. OF de-
wait aud Joseph lhorns, Ta'uers doing bgncss under
The s;y.e Thomas, Cowp"rthwa' a -, Turner and
Nhr"iwTgit partners l1iI- business under titc
SiSIe 81 IGTncr q NHrc..isiii. William Jackson, John
TIE defendants above uaInci not having entered ,hclr
.ltIra, &c ahI gwen security according 10 the Act Of
satisfactory evidence, that ihcv inahirr of his
Commonwealth: IS orlsTsd That the sid defendant 80
appear here on hc hu daI Of the neat January Term, and
answer the hin OF the Plintns; aui thai copy OF this or
der be forthwith iuseIeI in some ncws pei published in
the City Of Richmond, for months succtssiv,ly and
posed al the front door ofihc Capitol said Cry.
nova-w9w WI. G. SANDS. Z. e.
UIkGINIh:AI Rules, held IN the CLERKS oGice Of the
Superior Court OF Law aud Chlncery Tor tue County
OF HcnIico and City Of Richmond The 'aauc-ry sif
the lst day Of November lSIl:--Wu. e. smith, Vim IT,
settle, and sally Maria his WIFE George G, IN aud ai
ret his wife, George Smith. EhZa Smith, and lhu
BiTcheit ani susan u. his wife, plaintiffs against VIM
Browne aiuIT will tie will annexed OF W Gediy, dec
and other de:ts.
TITO defendant above named not having entered his APP
pearhnce and 2vcn security according the
by and the rules OF mia court and appearing salts
factory evidence, that ho ID nhlbtnt Of this Com
Iu"nwcat: II u ordered, that the sad defendant 30
pear here on te hh day Cf the January tcrr
answer the bu tue plaintiff and that copy 81 this
der hc !OrhN ih inserted newspaper pubshcdi
the Cry Of Richmond, for months srcc esziycly and
Ios"u 81 lie front door of the Capitol IN the sail ciy.
no dS9w NM. e.. SANDS ok.
IN Northumberland CounN CouTi, llti October, ISL
j. spencer Thomas complainant; against John, Nancy
and Crazy JiHca, re 81, sally, Jo-y Ffluc.s Maria aud
Judith Thomas, Hiram, Charlotte. SucFcy, Margaret
William James and Waller Wood, Hillary SpIiIle, Nay
sally Mary Ann and McndOIs sophia, Joseph aud Polly
Thomas, dcfts in e aEcsTy.
hts day came the complainant by his Attorney and IL
appearing Ia tc satisfaction Of the CouT that the Gcicn-
lauts Nancy, James, B0isY sally Insihy and Francis
Thomas, Hiram Wood, Mary Ann and MCud0Ts Thomas,
arc not inhabitants Of this Commonwealth On the motion
Of the plaintiff: II Is ordered That the sad defendants 3"
appear here the % Monday In January
The bill Oi the plaintiff; and that cory this order be
iOr'lWih ed for months ssiyCiy Ia the
Richmond Wing, and another coy thereof posed the
font door Of the Court House OF this County.
no lO-w9w NJ. n. CRALLE G g