The Ohio Democrat. [volume] (Canal Dover, Ohio) 1840-1900, 1841-08-12

Mr. C. OfAlabuma. appealed to him to withhold his
motion.
Mr. C. ofKentuclSy said ha would not withdraw bic
motion. He enssed on its bein9 put Oy the cha'T,w
out further 1eay. j
Mr. Benton said he would only have 10 mOvO to take
il M agsn the moment il was laid OH the table,
Mr. C. ofKentucky said very, well, so he Mr. Benten
might. and get majority too, The could.
Fhe question was then aken by yeas and nays on the
motion TO lay the table, and decided IN lie anrma-
tive-yeas 81, nays 20
Mr. Benton then ross, and moved to take up the me'
mortal. lie gave notice that he would make the same
motion every morning, until full and ample oPPOrtu-
nifty was given foT-- -.
ri to order.
Mr. B. was proceeding to explain that he was inor>
der when
Mr. Clay again rose and said, call the Senator to orr
der, sir,
Mr. Benton requested the words might he taken down
Mr. Clay called the Senator to order, and insisted on
his sitting down when the question of order was cai-
led.
Mr. Benton again requested the words would be Ia-
ken down.
Mr. Clay insisted that the Senator had right to
move to take up what had been ordered to lie on the
table. lie insisted the chair entertaining the ques
tiUn of ordors
MrB, repeated his wish that the words would bo
taken down. lie insisted that he was in order when
he moved to take up the memorial.
The Chair explained that the motion decided was that
on laying the proposition TO print on the table, which
carried with it the subject matter of debate:
GAfer considerable debate on the point of ordbrI
Mr. Cuhbert said that even ftle Senator from Mis-
souri, out Of order in moving to take up The memo"
rial after the question Of printing had been negaiIVed,
he conceived there really TO Orcaslon for the ex'
ces,ive warmth Orthe Senator from Kentucky, and
said he made question of order in regard to his con-
duct
TIIere Mr. Benton said he would not proceed, unless
the chair pronounced il in order.
The chair explained the decision.
Mr. Benton appealed from the decision.
Mr. Tappan contended that the motion 10 take up
was in ORDER the motion print having been decided
The char said the morning holr had expired.
Mr. Clay said he had not risen to debate the subject
ofthis memorial. His object was to move to lay this
appeal on the table, for the purpose of getting rid oftho
memorial and all its consequences.
Mr. Buchanan said he would vote against the motion
to lay the appeal on the table.
Mr. Calhoun rose to explain why the motion to lay
The appeal on the table should not prevail, when
| Mr. Clay ofKentucky called Mr. Calhoun to o:der.
MIR Calhoun said he would meet the Senator on the
| point oforder.
Mr. Clay insisted on his question Of ORDER no called
! the Senator to order.
Mr. Calhoun insisted on discussing and testing the
point Of order.
Mr. Clay insisted on the chair calling the Senator 10
order.
Mr. Cuthbert appealed against those ebuions Of pas.
sion which had prompted such unscemy calls to order
in body heetooIce distinguished for great decorum.
Mr. Calhoun appealed to the Chair on tho point Of
der.
Calhoun understood it.
Mr. Calhoun said he knew the chair would 20 decide
He quoted analogous with regard to amendment
to bill motion to lay the amendment on the abl'
does not carr, with the b;so in the present case,
motion to lay the motion to print the table, does no
| al a Al ....nl itaatf