Wheeling times and advertiser. [volume] (Wheeling, Va. [W. Va.]) 1839-1849, 1841-05-01

NIRGlNlA-iN cnANcrRY-At rules held in the
Clerks Office of the Circuit Superior Court Of
Law aud Chancery for Marshall county ON the
LIST day OF March 1871.
Samuel Thompson, Compt
rN
John Gray and Jacob Wharton, Defendants.
The dcrIs Jacob Whartonu not having entered his
appearance aud given security according TO the act of
assembly nnd the rules of this Court, and il appear
ing ny Satisfactory evidence that he Is not an in.
habitant of his commonwealth. II Is ordered that
the said defendant. Jacob Wharton. DO appear here
un the first day of the next term OF this Court. and
anEwet the ball and amended hill of The complain
nnI and that n copy of this order be insc- "
some newspaper published in the CITY or, "evt"s
ior two months successfully and |" =, H.
door OF the Courthouse Of p souS! F" " INV
m,To-o0 r,,ffS u. MORRIS. Clerk.
CHArcERY-At Rules held m the
,Cleyt. Office Of the Circuit Superior Court of
IsT and Chanccy Tor MARSHALL County, on the
ist day March 1871.
William Re-eborough' Plaintiff,
John Kyle. James Roseborough. ID. Roseborough.
Henry Taylor and Abraham Fry, Defendants.
The Defendants, John Kyle, James Roseborough
ID. Roseborough and Henry Taylor, not having en-
tered their appearance. and given security. accord
Tug w we Ati OF Assembly ana the hulCS Ut THIS
Court;-and it appearing by satisfactory evidence
that they are not inhabitants Of this commonwealth
II is ordered that the said defendants do appear
here on the first day Of the next term. and answer
the bill Of the plaintiffs and tbata copy Of this orc or
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
in the City Of Wheeling for two months successive
ly, and posted at the front door OF the Courthouse
OF this County. A Copy Teste
JAMES D.. MORRIS, Clerk. March 2-2m
NlRGlNIA-IN cHANCERY-At rules held in the
Clerks Office of the Circuit Superior Court OF
Law and Chancery for the county Of Ohio, in the
month Of March lsil.
George w Johnson, Complainant
against
Benjamin Baly and James Coats, and Samuel on
and Jacob X Greer, partners in business under
the firm name, and style Of on q Greer.
Defendants.
The defendants Baly & Coats not having enter.
ed their appearance and given security according
TO the act Of assembly and the rules of this court
and 1t appearing by satisfactory proof that they are
not inhabitants of This cnm~monwealihyon notion OF
the complainant by counsel il is ordered that the
said defendants do appear here on the first day OF
the next term Of this court, and answe or the com
plainants bill and that a copy of tins order be forth
with inserted in some newspaper printed IN the
city Of Wheeling for two months successsvely and
posted al the front door Of the Court house Of Ohio
county. a copy tcsie.
ALEX + LAIDLEY, Clerk.
NAhFbfi.Lt ii lump i' ~
yIRGINIA-rv cHAxcERY-At rules held in the
Clerks odi,e Of the Circuit Superior Court Of
Law and Chnncery for The county Of Ohio, IN the
month ofMarch 1871.
Samuel Low;her. Complainant.
james Goats, Benjamin Baly, John MLure, and Jon
athan Simpson, Defendants
The defendants Goats, Baly, aud Simpson. not
having entered their appearance and given security
according 10 the oct of assembly, and the rules of
This Court. and II appearing 10y satisfactory proof,
that they are not inhabitants Of Tins Commonwealth
on motion Of the complaInant's by counsel II is or
dered that the said defendants DO appear here on the
first day OF the next term OF This court, and answer
the cOnnplai tant's bIll,& that n copy of this order he
forthwith ins5red IN some newspaper printed IN the
city Of Wheeling for two months successfully and
posted at The front door OF the Court house Of
Ohio county. a copy teste,
ALEX T LAIDLEY, Clerk.
EDGINGToN, for Cnmpt. mar %
EIRGlNIA-IN cHANcERy-At rules held in the
Clerks Office OF the Circuit Superior Court Of
Law aud Chancey for the county Of Ohio, in thc
month OF March 1871.
Henry Young, William II Smith and James r.
Taylor. who wero partners in business under the
firm, name and style Of Young. Smith q co. Com
plainants.
against
Ebenczer Zane and MARY NJ s his wife, Henry
Moore, and James & Johnston, Defendants.
The defendant, Johnston not having entered his
appearance and given security according 10 the act
Of assembly aud the rules OF this court, ard II up
pearIng BY satisfactory proof, that he is not an in
habitant OF this Commonwealth On motion Of the
compliments, by Counsel. II is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here on the first day Of tho
next sp!ing term Of this court, and answer The said
cOmplainanis' bill, aud that a copy Of This order be
forthwith inserted IN some newspaper printed IA the
City Of Wheeling, for two months successfully aud
posted II lhc front door Of The Court house Of Ohio
County. a COY tesle,
ALEX. Il. LAIDLEY, ClerE.
DAN. PECK, Counsel for Comp'ts. mar IL
VIRGINIA-rS cuAvcERY-At rules held in the
CLERKS office ofthe Circuit Superior Court Of Law
and Chancery for the county Of Ohio. in the
month Of March 1871,
Robert Motif, Complainant.
Bouldin Biddle and Others, Defendants.
The defendants Story d PARIS, Of the city Of.
Louisville, not hayinp entered their appearance and
given security according to The act Of assembly and
the rules OF this Court, and % appearing by salts
factory proof. that they are not inhabitants Of this
Commonwealth. On motion Of the Complainant by
counsel, q j. ordered that the said defendants do mp
pear here On the first day Of Ihc next SpriLg term
Of this Court. aud answer the said compliments bill
and that a copy OF lhis order be forth with inserted
ia some newspaper printed IN the city Of Wheeling
for two months. successfully, and posted at the front
door Of tle court house Of Ohio county.
a copy leslie,
ALEX. L. LAIDLEY. CLerk
CARTER, Tor Compt mar IL
NlRDINlA-GN CHANCEEY--At rules held 10 the
Clerks office Of The Circuit Superior Court Of Law
and Chanccry Cor the county OfOhIO, IN The month
Of March l5il.
George Horton, Complainant
against
Siurcy CCthbert and Charles Eusell, Defendants.
The defendant, CuihbcH, not having entered his
appearance and given security according 10 the act
Of assembly and The rules OF Tins court, and 10 appear F.
ing by satisfactory proof, that be - not an Inhabi
tant Of This Commonwealth. on mOHOn Of The com.
plainuHt by Counsel, 81 IS ordered that The said de-
ienllnI aL -u-.-L h-rn on mn .r.L Lau Of lLn nnrl |