Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1841-01-23
no THE PIRIIC

My attention having been called 10 a statenen, in
me wing OF YESTERDAY, signed Philip NJ. Tabb, ir.
ahu whlch purports TO be correct account of The
facts attending the taking of the cath of insolvency
oy MS father on the 3lst December last and also Of
the attack made upon me bS himself on the Ith in
sian and II having been suggested to me- that while
my siehee as 10 TINS statement would readily be
UNDERSTOOD IN THIS community IL might at a disianee
oe misconstrued into admission of the trn,b az
what has been thus stated, | would submit TO the
fuOlic the following fully inclusive of everv ma
tera circumstance connected with the case up 10 the
Time oil tho attack meniioned-so that al who otb.r
wise being ignorant Of the facts and who. knowinv
nothing OF the parties, might consequently be nm
Justly influenced by said statement may have il in
Iner poweFio form conclusions which the facts ius-
! tiy. ''''' JUS
On the 3Isi Deee mber 1870 Mr. Phlip VI Tsbb sr and
Mr. Philip Jones, Sheriff of Henrico eonniy rs,Dc 81,
ofee-my psrneI, Mr. seldom was absent from he ciy
lions that he hoped did not int nd 10 compel him 30 %
10 JaI, Certainly not" was the repy-'we hope how.
menI.n NO: have no means OF payi ng H. and snail be
SomPemed To- AXE the GATH was Mf. Tabs answer
tleh Ienarkedto MI Tahe, that supposed he Soud
ee VA Tue receipt Of aige for Inc
% SS, o. nesrsss this year us40 and that he took
he ea! We should expect him give up these cems,s.
them i" ns me soua! o. ne JUDGMENT for waseh he
pated his thing and had me business ~
son expressed TO Mr.. Tsbh. that II he mad made an v
anser OF his commissions or Interests any sort since
the judgment ana execution In thisease thar ,yonj h"
question OF law between the assignee and The insmept
sISIaoI and susSesiedtia u he would ave VA @cmor.
shdun o. the negroes hired by hun ana he names Of
we persons Tor whom hire'i We woD waive nocs N the
eise ana thus remove all obstacle taking the oa,b
9tce Mr. T. did not object this Arrangement huf SIT
Would have 20 p s 1 About hn and that he
long ne the Court wou De adjourned and he oIG
very much thai he should be compelled 10 go 10 III g,
that ie TO be my duty, counsel to insist on he Sivns
Judge came a. and informed that the juge was wait,
mSna y .SS me a SSsi1sfS osyed the
ONCE senn amer Got 10 Court, Mr.. Tabb same IN snI
sn1Sa 70 ne Court BY his COUNSEL his intention TO
4 in 4 ar ~.
We. Tabb The schedule was ussde out and handeo me-
lie sshs would ave mn VT bs9e Tor tn
quIedu, ihsn 9ssedthe Court II might propousd en-
CURES 70 Mr. IAbb the object Of which was - shos tst
MT fahb had right 10 ceTain commissiSns fr srrg o,
hesI9es,a meaorandum Of the nsalbeI and Tor whom
CURED 10 give W the usmoranIum Mr. Tabb's connsel
DIRECTED 70 the gietrosAores and surrender OF he
ntInotsn1Sa then stated to the Couu what Aad s.d
10 Nc IsDb as the counsel In the case asL thai unless
shS ne ne snd9m was gwen mp could consent to
HI'e nouSe Ater stew moments rejection. however
di Sonsent 70 wave notice, aud Nj Tabb was psrmteJ
axe me oath re.Arked TO Mr. Tabb, in Court At thS
moment that az counsel for the plaintiff 1 s ,ayseIf
bound % nouy throuEthe public papers All persons rr
ny 1s ne 'I m,ed out negroes i1r the year Dsi0N
other than the sheriG. seeing ihat NJ, toy ono
missrprchendsd @s sail to Mr Jopes e Shs s, s,ys
We lyl ne Court ogeiher, that wished be wouiI
solnse, ldeemcdu my duty, under the pecuDar si5c,
sSnees Of he case TO nofy through the public TapeTs
sop not % pay sch commissions any other Than ,hs
~ n, ne, nSm iSsused the n,tice complained Of 10
I s'srqsy n1h, following, when boz esheJ at my Of
AZ SAL VIZ Iabb wanted knsw who pui thar notice
~ NC wing presenting to me the orgna Ns notice Nv
IeIy 400 only remark T. him wss"t didH snd Mr. r,bb
@ .hsi before ,hoogh' nothing Of the matter
unH hondsV, WsfB We assault was made upon m.-the
slIcuNsanSes attending which assault, having been
nSoueh 20 TIE notice of The Mayor forthe city nv The ppb
ho suthortes, AMI the Mayor aaer 40 etsnson Oh Inc
scs on evidence, having adopted legal measures with re-
ference 70 an elimination hehaJe higher tribunal Idee
par Of the slslemepk
woaa add lest the contrary might otherwise bs infer
ed gon We statement referi 81 to- mo anly eouncc
lien have had With the case, has becs cunt counsel
Aesde rcoul prusec uiips oaigp put into our hands
a. Az ober c.ns are o. be enforce every means me
law allows We kg0s sOthnE of the consider a,Sn Sivcn
January AEh, 1911. o. W cooDp
the toreEoing setensnt having beea snhnit,ea IN ma
~ VT 19ode for The purpose 81 ascsraonr whetbst a.
eooecon othe fseis theFein given &C cords win hi
no sesevcs N is,ss 10 him stating ,ssi nv re-
coceon Of hose ACTS, far they carse sosrr a. -
ssrvs,ios S0e. uy accord with the fsessinT sisscni
Nouo $50 addthd the lnesssEe delivered ~ me , "A,
fSb. 81 the request % NJ Goese was nresgss,v s,,k .
ne W spooc) has stated and that in the NOT, q he A.
Nery were vas esftsnly nothing Of sh.rs
ter. THIS sine@est = given voIsassrtx '"A'Ae
"a - Pa JoNrs
poMARs sHERRv wINns.-Tpe ..e.c,,-
~ US ustreceved and offers for sale Pofp.ri. n.le
sau Drown sherry Wine Of hesf