Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1841-04-06

| yIRGINrA AT rules held In tho CLERKS once Of
the DAY Of January Isii William a. rsyios Plaintiff
asaaS Moore y, n,oeksaeroush and Thompson Marrss,
deed u o. rsyloe. who L one OF the executors Of Col
The defendant q. rayoe not having entered hs ap.
saranse aud security Aeeordns To The act OF Assem-
factory evidence he an inhaban OF this STATE
On the mS.ion Of the pl.iad by counsel Is ordered thai
April next aud answer the original and smended and
bs n sps y. s, os.
city Richmond for eEh wsek1 succcssively, ani that
JAMES ROY MicoG' IT, ciStk f. @ s.cL&c
a 4 RULES he'd In The once The CcIk Use IiTc az
"a Superior Court OF Law apd Chanecry for the county
Newcoub claimant. against A.ou ALEU- auj samuel
Bacon, partners carving on business under the name
samuel BACON individually, and Joel cilly berjanin
The defendants, Allsioh Alien aud samuel w. Bacon
above named not having entered their appearance aud
rules OF this Court aud Il appearing 10y satisfactory ev
denee that they no, Inhabitants Of this Ccmmonw, ah
ne hIsi day ei,hc nemtcrm cfthc Circuit superior cau,
descs the first Tues lay aner the third Monday In
April ISL and cutter their appearance suit give
order be forbw inserted in SOME se@sparef pGbshed
Ia the Guy OF Richmond Tor months suecessycl, and
~'o... GEO, Il neAiY,fSy NJ ; Ss, C.
VIRGINIA. Lancaster C0Eniy Court Mon day
lsh January, isil-wlliam H. XIX aud Euzlbein
Miranda Myers; Pleasant Myers and William aycTs, de.
This day came the complaints by their counsel and
Filed their bill against the dcfen ants and the said defen
", according OF Assembly aud The rules OF this
Court an arpearins by satisfactory evidence that they
said defendants appear here on tho third Monday in
April next and answer tho bill OF the plaintiffs; aud tht
per publshcdin the City ofRichmond for two mouths snc
eessvcy. aud poste a, font door the Court House
Tge
fe5-w9w' RIO. 7. puNAwAY. G. c
UtnGINIAi AT Rules, held In the CLERKS Once OF
hs nlIem, superior Court OF Law and Chaneery, for
Heritage H. Cauhorn a Walker Hart, Merchants and
is against Nancy Taylor, ai1 OF Caleb Taylor
deceased Vincent Taylor, George Taylor, Lewis Taylor
els Taylor defendanis-IS CnAScKaY.
The defendant, Vincent Taylor, having entered his
Assembly and the Rules OF lh court, appearing by
9esoty evidence ihsi he Is no, an inhabtant Of this
here the frs, DAY OF the May term and answer
S,Si tS raanu'i anu ,ha, copy OF nus order he
city Of Richmond for months sivcIy, and post
ed the ont door OF the Courthouse OF this county
fc l6-wox ROBERT POLLARD. Jr. G c
VIRGINIA, Sc.-At Rules, hel.i in i6e IicTkTs OT
ice OF tile Circuit Superior Court OF Law and Chan
ecry for the Couay OF Accomack the 9th day OF Feb
ruary .ii; Levin Ioynes ir sheui OF Aeoonack ans
un against Gideon pearce, Michael Mhealou Sally Pull
I and Oliver Logan, dcfcndanis-Ia ChdHcsrv
The dccn tsni Gideon Pierce, not having entered his
appearance and given security according the
Genera Assembly aud the Rules this Court aud II APP
pcaring 10 the satisfaction of the Court, that he an
inhahiant of this State On motion OF the plaintiff by
council IL ordered, that the defendant Gideon Prarec
appear here the Rules I" DC held CLERKS
tlc said County, on the t Monday tn May next, an
forthwith ns . ed some one of the public newspap,,
pnntedn the CITY OF Richmond, for twn months sucec%
syey and also posted At The r"ni door OF Court House
ATrue Copy. Tcstc
IJAIl.woRTH, Deputy for
NH 9-w9w Thonhs JoVnes, CI'k