Vermont telegraph. [volume] (Brandon [Vt.]) 1828-1843, 1841-12-22

mend their arrival here at any period be-
twiyt the first of Dec and the first of Nav :
and | think it would be more advisable |
Tor them TO return all together, than in
small companies.
81, Windsor Nov. 90, l84l.
To the Editor of the Vt. Telegraph,
Slr,-The intimation in your last that |
have represented Mr. Garrison to be an
:nidel, pronounce false and groundless. |
and call on YOU to prove or 10 retract it,
The Editor of the Vt. Chronicle.
REMARKS.
Instead Of hindering the mail with so
toeighty an affair as the foregoing COM
munication. and taxing me with the post
age on it, why did not the Editor OF the
Chronicle, Ikea man. bring his charge
in his. own paper, so that his readers
should see It as well as mine2 What if
| |, and others, as often as We should have
just occasion 10 bring such charge against
the Editor Of the Chronicle as he has now
undertaken to bring against ME, should
tax him with so lengthya communication,
and ten cents. postage? There would not
be room in his paper for the coInnunica-
tions-and his postage bills would reduce
him 10 bankruptcy in less than three
months But | do not admit or allow
that he had the leas, occasion or warrant
for taxing my purse and my paper, in
making this vile attempt at show of a
disclaimer of this sort. He knew better.
1t is one of his skuIking, intriguing, iesu.
itical movements. If be had come out
honesty and ingenuousIy in his own
paper, and acknowledged that he did mol
beliere Wm. Lloyd Garrison TO be an in
/ fidel, he would have been entitled 10 credit
for honesty and fair dealing. For have
no idea he ever 6elisred any such thing
as that w. l.. Garrison is an in6del. Blu,
that he has in various ways represented
him as such-that the Chronicle has from
time TO lime, for eight or ten years past
labored 10 throw upon the Liberator the
odium Of in6delity, there is he cIeares
and fullest evidence. And l can conceive
of no other reason now why the pretend
, ed disclaimer he has here imposed upon
me should not, and would not have found
place in bis own paper, only that he ha:
the conviction that he has given his read
, ers occasion to think be views the Edito
of the Liberator to be an iufde!, and hs
p rather they would continue in that view
!. than to disabuse them and show them biz
; dishont sly in the matter. | shall be con
e strained TO hold this opinion until he give
u me reason for his nnmanly and jesuitica
: course. >.., s.. ..
a Now for the proof that the Chronici
has labored to throw the odum Of in6de
n Ivy upon the Lberator aud its Editor
The first attempt Of the kind, so far as
now recollect, was made while Josep
Tracy, brother 10 The present Editor Of tn
i, Chronicle, was editing that paper. H
: undertook to identity the doctrines pro
mulgated by the Libarator, with ,Frenc
: Jacobinism. Although, mig ht have bee
the political more than the religious cha
III acter ofthe Jacebins, that might have bee
q in the mind Of the E litor of the Chrol
., icle, still the impression made on Ii
readers Of that paper, 50 far as | cou
learn was, the at,qchment Of a species
: French >iu6delity to the Lbefator and i
= Editor. Ever since that time, but espe
i iallv since the Formation of the Nun- r
III sstance Sociev, the Chronicle has bee
IS. laboring to show that the L;berator is
- war with what the Chronicle holds to
"A among the fundamental principles and i
e. slilutions of Christianity. do not sd
nor for moment allow, that the Editor
a. the Chronicle has succeeded in provir
81 any thing OF the kind 10 be true. 1 S;
an he has thus represented things, accor
% ing to the best Of his abilities aud oppo
Ne tunities. When Harvey Curtis fed fro
h. the Telegraph, in his war upon The Chi
av tim doctrine which teaches "tha: We r
pm sist not evil" he at once took his place
a THE ranks, under the banner of the Giro
~ icle; and from that position he held for
Non. Resistan,s in general as followers
~