Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1841-12-18

TIHGtSIAt Al Rules hell la the C,eTt's ,Iihce ii
the County OF Ecnuco ana Guy OF Richmond on the
Chancery SIDE the fret saw of November 1871 the Pre-
Thomas Tyre, Isahela hehh, Alexander Brown. Jnhr
purce stnoL OF Rowland Reynolds Joseph Kcrlnrhaw
| wilians plaintiffs, against W Knapp aud Knspp
doing business uCerth" style oi + " knapp Co. James
Cushing aud Cushing, doing business under the rIyle
OF Gushing & Brother. Armstrong and George ~
berry, plsskctt and Join C"sc nom: business acr
ne style Of PiasEctt Curr. Charles Nsg,rse II
under the style OF Kersnan & rsro,hci. Ward. Henry
Wa.C, sili Ward Az -pc- and John spies dom. bu.
sness under the nan OF a d" sprs Co. John Firth sni
Hail. dors CUISINES uui'r tie 6rDI Of Firth = iIa
I stanford and mcs Swords dol business under thc
hrln Of r"ord- rian.pfd a Co Ioaahan seymour and
s-ymouT doug husIn"-s under The style OF jonathan
T3nT ron, 1honss pes'v,r James Thomas ami Joseph
h9Ih partners 'uhs rn'imrs. urd'T the sly OF De
silver Thomas a Co Joseph 4 iiilboIn, CuwpcIth
ile style oITha,nas Cowpr 1thwa.t& Co, Tuner and
Waecwrish', Farmers doing business under tie
Rowlctf. and other defendants.
Toe defendants sbnv named having entered their
importance aud given sscUIity, HccUTtiug Act of
Assembly anh the kuCs 4 th.s CcuTi and lpcarfg by
COMMENSURATE: g ordered I6sS thc sai eisnani '. S
appear here ihu Lh aS ~ the January Tern,
answer the hiIol The plaintiffs ani that copy oftEs
der he forthwith iusce u some newspaper published
e Cry Of Redmond, for two on,Ir, sieecssyeiy, aud
posted III me front drnI "i tho capitol va The sau Guy.
nov 3-v9w WI. C. SANDS, 4. C.
NihGINih:A Rules, held In the CLERKS oGice Il the
V Superior Court II Law ava ChaEecry for County
OF lIennco and CITY OF Richmond on the EhEnccTy DO
the Let day Of November, ltIi.-wm q Smith, Nm A.
Scit - AMI rov Maria ls wife George II Cod Iai-
ret his wife, George Smith Eiz1 Ann Snnh. audJ hu
h'rchett AMI susan r. his wife. p4 uiffs against Win
browne, aim'T whthe will annexed OF WA Ge'y, decd
amt other dctis
The defendant above having entered his APP
pcarance aud sivcn security ding OF
bly, and the rules Of isis cour, and pcafing by ss
Ory evidence, that he inhabt4nt Of his cou
on~cnlt tie ordered, that the -rli defendant 80
pear hrIe on the rh day Of the neat January tcr and
answer the It'll Of the plaintiffs au that copy 'f this
der be forihNhh inserted IN some newspaper puhshcdn
the CITY OF Richmond for two months successfully, and
IOstefatt nc front door Of the Capitol The SAT- CITY.
no dw9w WIN. q. SANDS, elk.
n Northumberland County Court lih October, lSil:
Il SPENCER ThUmsB complainant; Esaiu,t John, Nancy
and Sracy JIHc Besv Ssty, Jusiby, FTsUcs Maria aud
Jud'h Thomas, Hiram, Charlotte. Suckcy. MarEstc. &,
WIiini, James snd Waller Wool, Hillary SpI.Lllc, Ma
sally. Mary and Meutoris Sophia, Joscgh and Polly
Thomas. drts IN q GHcrTy.
ms day came the complainant by his attorney, and IL
dants FANCY, James. Batsy rally, Inity and Francis
Thomas iIaui Wood, Mary Ann and Vendors Thomas,
ar" not inhabitants Of this Comm"nwcalih On the motion
Of the piiinn: u s ordered That tho reid defendants so
appear here the ~ Monday January ut sud
IN" hin 81 the plaintiff and tlit copy Of tins order be
forthwith nser ed for two months sncccssvely In the
Rchn0nI Whit aud another c"ry thereof posed the
font door Of tli- Cnuit House NJ this County.
Copy. Teste.
no lJ-wow VI. y. CRALLE &.