Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1841-01-14
DEFERRED DEBATE.
HOUSE OF DELEGATES.
FRrpAI, January 3.
VIRGINIA BANK.
debate ooniinusS.l

49,, ,e ' =. .S.,.L IL, IN rsI,t;,, IN thai
oesgeu ,es'e W 'eu", r.. =, IT. .,,,,,.n,
banetul influence, wh'en, accorung W .ne sui'e"'
o' the genuem,n ron yieI, "au, ~" 'ne So,"
meneemeh' OF "es1 .s 49,; IIp -,
sway over uhe ~ wv ' a.ia ~ r., -;
not having oeen "'nu e'o 'aso, .'N y, I ~"
huenee-no' n'''us en n' ~, $500 "a 49,
mol pre'eno 20 say nov '' wa. r. ""u oes.
eSerteu, OF wns' nsu ooe" u' e"oI' !. 90" - ~
question nc 'eN en'"cy 'o"e se".ee" "'.
ier But this nc wouu say, ~ lusuo1 " ''.e
OF Nlchmono' tna 50 'a' u ",s S"I "
no improper lhnuence hau oeen el'"o' eNyL'eu VI
attempted relnon 70 tpe suoeGI unuoi VI. con,
SHERATON Oh the tiouse; Du. ~nnS' t"e s't -.
deprecates, III suen emphauc 'eths, ''o eu""u. w.
Jiuenee ceiore anuueu ", NC ousu' W 49,, ~ -
there IS another influence wnlen pom ne kcoNs, anu
winch Know WIN nav an u"eq va, an' r.
ieet on tue u'ssusson y, ''s ~. =. 80, 20 t, ~
tsT 81 oetng hough' 10 oe under .Ha' 'n'ae"eu, ro'
h'msei ne was unue' n.i1"., 49,. -, h 4.
meant 10 oiscnarge nis uu'y aeeo'o"s W ""a' "o
oeneVeu que n''nse'i aug W VI, No , -
haVng disposed VI uIs p'e,li'i ,y "Ias'., ~
necessarily, as NC e'neeNeu, , INV "o 10
cusson oil TINS quesuon' NC "Ta.u " 80 .He
resolutions oeiore 'ie ttous.. ~ '"e az, u -.
ON seetio" % -. "a -
u" es'Ate, ouS'esS' r. A.. u -; -, -
eonos.ns VI 'hv sNu 49, l;.".;o
Tvs enans, sn"u oe 10, S 80 -, =, r.
anu eonNDl u DoIu VI M DL ID - g
rtnclpe. Damn, anu ~ ,.on =, ,hs I.,sr n,
WHOM 'ou' q, .hJ E.:n, Las.IsoS,bs Ca,,'
DC aPpointeo ny 'ne HAe''u'e0 v" oe"'''' 'i'S O'"'
""cs" sam ' p,.,,; oe ,Lo ,,,,I.,,,, e,o,,
~ W" " ''e 80, a, H. $500, : -;
Iyle', P''Po'ou, . va 80. -, -
DC IT, - az VIA,
Nry eW, 40 Di.e.pS VI ~ - IT
WIN Eo'e az nns. ue ~ III III 80
80 " -; I-',; - !, :. 80 have ans, .,f.c,
VIC. 'I' -, on.,a,chr,.n, mnon tbs FL
- s lbs C;oysrnmer, az well ,s an
49, ~ ~ H. II. aC IT, S,n.LLoldor j.;
$50 20 -
,,I:ni - 49,. ,s,i;,;s;y ,.,n,f = ,Lao :; 80;
.St " w. pi -, - "A ~ ~; -. 80!
80 IT. !, E ',ho ,r;nc;oio or ,bs e.
.: IS a. - D.or,w,on,s ~ ,ho f,o..rn
Pa.aA0'' " Wv
~, H. r,,,.,s oe o,,r Stat. Cons,;,,
VIC ""a ma I Mn &c D;L,. - ,,Licb ,ro cd -,
uTn auoP S 'ne 81 Ill. r;n,.inl W. snd IT,
- IL, - H. -. conceded in tho, ;,s,,ur,en, a.,
o.s .o.;n ,bo, The s,les;sat;ve The eyecu,;ye
80 Py'.;T I.n.r,n,sy,s sLonld h T.. :,
a"e S;,;n. so ,b,t nei,her sbouIJ exercise Tho
,ae ,arl,, IsIon;ne 70 e,bsr oT the others "
"" III Of ,besc eynress nrovis;ons The
- -" - H.. gentleman from TYLER nronnse
% d;rect The Executive of this Commonwealth IN
the eyecn,ion Of duty expressly conferred on him
Lv the I,w-,hat;s tbsappontnient of the Directors
an the n,,t oC the state Now. if il be proper for
he 90 ,,,ure either to direct or 10 interfere in INV
n,nr. viii m. DISCHARGE of the duties of the Eye
cutive will gentlemen be pleased TO inform me W h
what du,v whether conferred by the Constitution
or bv The law. upon The Governor of this Common.
,y.,h ina, NAV not be interfered with and con,rol
ed bv ibe legislative department. Let il be sun.
pose1 that an individual. who. for some cause may
Ne ohnoxious IN the LEGISLATURE, should be recon-.
rnrnded to the Executive OF the State as a proper
and fl nerson for the Sherfflity Of the county |
submit whether a resolution introduced into this
House. even for the purpose Of advising the Execu-
tive 10 the appointmen or rejection of the nomi-
nee. would be entertained for one moment by this
House, Would not such resolution be regarded
hs an insulting and contemptuous intermeddling
with the duties Of the Executive Would not every
member ofhs House hold 1t TO be an attempt TO as
sumo the control OF powers no: conferred by the
Constitution or the laws OF the land ? Again take
the case Of claim of citizen against the Common
wealth. the decision of which is by the law devolv-
ed on the Executive, land there are many su n
Jawsl what would be thought Of proposition 10 adj
wise direct or request the Executive either to allow
or disalIow the caiml Take another instance
not under our State Constitution, but under the
Constitution Of the United Staes.-By that Consti-
tuition. the President has the power TO appoint all
publi. ministers and ambassadors, and let us sup
% )se a resolution brought before the House of Repre-
,ntatves IN Congress- requesting the President of the
u ). to appoint individuals holding particular opIn.
Mons TO Office humbly app ehend that there would
be little reason to believe that such resolution could
at any time or under any circumstances, receive the
support of any member OF that body. He would
ask whether the appointment OF the four Directors
on the part OF the State not clearly vested in
the Executive Of this Commonwealth by the char
Ter of The Bank, as the appointment Of public Min
tiers and Ambassadors is by the Constitution vest
ed in the President of the u. SheS2 One more IL
lustration on this branch Of the subject: The House
will perceive that by the clause OF our State Con-
ctiton before cited the iudica. department of ,bs
Government is expressly protected from the control
OF eithsr of the other departments. ask OF gem
tlemen whether resolution rCqutsiiag the judge of
the Circuit Court Of Richmond TO proceed instantly
TO the trial and condemnation o. Beri. w. Green.
the individual who is supposed chiefly 70 have pro-
flied by the defacation which has given rise 10 this
proceeding would not be equally as proper rs the
solution under consideration? A resolution of mi,
character would be considered as Improper and alb
surd. Whvl because il gould be an interference
with the udtciaI DUTIES Of the Judos oc his C;c,
ask will not the resolution on vour t,b,e be sn,I
ly nt interference with the Er,c,iirs dii,s n t5>
GorernOr2 Do thew not direct him as 10 the Ssode
in which he should executs a lnvv which be b,s
worn TO see faithfully executed Do NOT tbex. -.
solutions seek TO take from him that resnonsL;I;,
which should attach TO eac Department Of Cavern.
ment for the due execution of her reanective rnc
TORS and IN ihYovv the responsb;litv on ,bis ons7
Is there ground to doubt either the willingness or
the ability oftbe Eyeentive IN discharge coec,,y.
and faithfully this trus, conferred upo9 him bv aw2
But It is said by the advocates of the resolutions
they simply contain request TO the Governor not IN
appoint individuals favourable IN tbe ,ec,cstior 81
Or. John Broken brourh. and that the C;oyer,n,
will not be CONTROLLED Gy them. Surely the reso.
luton is designed 10 esHiroul him, and OF course Is
i,ewayer. tbsv are no, dss;,,.J 80 co,,y' -
then submit whether il IS no, Le oes,l, liz ,,''
Of this body even 10 entertain tbcr, I, ;...sI ,y
the Governo, bae called on, s,,s,,ia, -, ,i. .''"'
iect and invited our a.tion denv .bc Ia,
ins invited our action, proposed by this resolution