Liberty advocate. [volume] (Liberty, Miss.) 1835-1866, 1841-09-16

can only reler 10 Inc puo'iC 'Iieet'nSs Sot
ten up in consequence of tho veto OF Mr.
Clay's bank bill. These meetings hav
never expressed any opinions showing
conclusively 10 any rational mind, tina
the people are yet willing TO trust in Mr.
Tyler, to approve of some measure, tina
will answer the end of National Bank
That Mr. Tyler has disappointed the PEG
pie in his veto Of the bank is unquestioned
The wings during the last canvass con-
sidered him bank man, and did not once
anticipate, however, that he was for new
experimental bank. They supposed from
his letters upon the subject, that he oc
cuped the same ground Mr.. Madison die
in 1916, and would approve of a similar
charter Of bank, that Mr. Madison did i.
Yet does this disappointment or deception
as they term it justify the wing jou rnals
in persecutngiMr, Tyler, who on all other
great measures is with the wings Such
course can only SOW division among the
whig ranks, and cause dIsunion where
there should be union for the sake Of the
union" Let them initiate Mr. Clay's great
example, who when his great measure for
the prosperity Of the country was delca-
ted, stated that he would throw no obsta-
Gle in the way Of some measure being
passed for the benefit Of the country
By unnecessary and severe prescription
and abuse Of Mr.. Tyler a division will
take place among the wings, and the pres
ent Wing cabinet UiH be compelled TO re-
sign or be discharged For it is not rea-
sonabe that Mr. Tyler, should keep as
constitutional advisers, men belonging TO
party, whose journals, are constantly
and numerically abusing him. The loss
Of the pre- sent cabinet would be deplored
by every lover Of his country. We ac-
knowledge that we were and are for
bank similar in feature to Mr.. Clay's bill
yet should the plan now under discussion
in Congress pass that body and be supper.
ted by Mr.. Tyler, it will probably answer
some Of the purposes of a National Bank.
That II can answer all Of the purposes
that the plan Of Mr.. CIay,s would, had
it become a law Of the land is not eslab-
lished. This plan being limited in its
operations TO matters universally &C
knowledued to be within the authority of
Congress, and sheering clear of the OBJ
lectlons of the veto message will no doubt
receive the sanction Of tho executive
Should the executive however not sane
ton the bill but again thwart the wings
in this measure, he would deserve to be
censured and cast aside by every genuine
whig. The passage and approval Of this
measure, would again restore harmony
among the wings, and revive confidence
in Mr.. Tyler. We cannot conclude this
article without making few remarks
upon the message itself. We must &C.
knowledge that we were astonished at the
feebleness Of the objections to Mr., Clay:
bill, assigned in the veto. We will, how
ever notice the commencement paragraph
of his message before we enter into 1
discuss ION Of his objections. The Pres,
ident states that the constiutonalty
Of National Bank has been matter
Of dispute from the formation of our gov
eminent, and that in regard to it Con
crosses hare alfred. He says that this
question is yet unsettled. Now, the Pres
ident must have known, that this was q
settled question with the wings. 1t was
so declared to be, and he as their candi,
date should have so understood them
In regard TO the differences Of Congress,
he is not correct. Not one solitary Con.
gresS has erer decided United State
Bank 10 be unconstitutional The abortve
attempt TO re'charrer United States
Bank in 1911 is the only instance cited to
show that any Congress ever objected to g
U. States Bank "Conremporaneous au
thority states r political writer proves
the failure to recharter the bank ut thai
time, was TO be ascribed to circumstances
extrensic Of its consttuionality, and a
mons these circumstances showing its
inexpediency and impolicy al that time
was the threatened Eruption with Great
Britain, and the fact that seven tenths
of the stock was owned by Engishman.--
The vote on this cteStion oc raphar