Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1841-11-29

the Circuit superior Court Ut Law and CIan.rTy GI
Gerry sic the Ist day OF November, IsIl.-Th, wcT
chants Bank Of baltimore, ulIf az INST Tic President
Incorporated 10y the General assembly nf wanna,
I"sSph Co~peIIhNai!e late asher Of thc said I
layuT present CashtcT Or the 1id BNuk. Thomas Dun
lap Herman Cope. James crl.,n John HIcon Slr,aT
Ter ~ mnston, hnma, Robins, ard other deus
- ~ usleiiaI'- above named, not having entered their
appearance aud given ,ceuTiy according The Actoi Az
satisfactory evidence, that they are not nhabanfs OF mn,
Comm nweah: It ordered, Tha the said defendants do
answer the oil " the psd, anL hat copy OF ms or
IN i6s C o , mssagu "a some mSwsrsrer published
no i-d~ow wM q SANDS Crk.
Circuit Superior Couu ~ law AMI Charcrry flr the
Couny"i Ilenrco und Guy Of Rchmoui the ChancrTy
against benlainn Knapp and E ieicrick W Knapp sur.
Nnnf parners IT Knapp, Preston Cuaud another offs
The defendants above named not having c.tcrcd their
sr1nhy and he RnIcs of fhiS C"u, .rd ~
commonwealth u b. ordered, That the .aii dururu s do
appear here the SIKH fay ui thr nrSt January Icr
aud answer the bin uf the plaintiff that cupy Of li.
order be forthwith inserted 90 Newspaper published
Ia the tuy Of Kichmnui, ior months and
post - AZ ne itoni d'ot Of the Capitol u he said city
noe d~'w wN g. sANp-, ok
UlRIINAs A. Rules hclitu Tho Clerks Once of the
trcuIl superior Cuuft OF Law aud Crsnccry for the
county Hcnuco and Guy u Richmond the ChanrcTy
plaintiff a-anst Charles rs ,Inuau and another derts
The defendant above named not having entered his au
pearanoe aud sccuy, according To- the Act of A.
sem1y and the Rules OF This Court aud b. appearing by
satisfactory evidence that he IT, not uhabau Of III.
Commonwealth u IA ordcrc THAT ,ho said dcfsn,ant
do appear mere on inc hh Icy Of the January Term
and answer r hilI fthc pain ~ aud that copy this
IN the city Richmond ,r fgyn months
Ioscd"tihs front door Of the Capa" N The SAID city
nov i-w9w Wh. SANDS, CTk.
NTIHGINIAt A. Rules held In the CI.,E,. neirc -,
the Circuit superior Court Of Law and Chancery Tor
the County Of iIcnrico and CITY oi Richmond on the
GhanccTy side, the rst Say oi NpvCnbcr 1911 the Pre-
sideni Directors and Company u the Bank Virginia
Rowland ntt
BcnJ'min Belt, aud ofu Eri', executor OF OrTcn
wiiams, plsiuutIs, against " Knapp and Knspn
doing business undcrth style OF wKnapu Co. James
cushing and Gushing, doing business under the style
Berry doing business under he style Of Armstrong .
Berry, PisEclt and John Cugc, iong busincss under
Mag,rge doing husines1 9ndcr Che style Of 9 a ~ Ma
gmsg ~ ksra st, snd hstsm'n' doing 3pncss
w ~ snd ward DOING business under the style 6f
siness under the firm Of " spies CO. iohn FiTiI ami
lIhli doing CUISINE under The Grm OF futh s Hall
frm Of sworIs stanford 60 Jonathan seymour and -
seymour, doing husn, nnd"t the style or Jonathan scy
mour Son, Thomas DesIlyCr, James Thomas and Ioseph
Hlhnrn patiners doing busucs under the style lie
silver, Th"mas = Co. Joseph q Illborn Uuwpcrih.
the style ofTnnmes, Cowpcrihwir& Go, Turner and
wheowright partners doing busincra under iIo
style ri Turner q Whcclrshi, William Jackson, John
RgwIcu. and other d'ienlants
appearance and given security, according To- Tho Aci Of
Assembly tho Rules ~ ihis Count audit appcnfnr y
Commonwesfb NJ, ordsr,d That tho sSi'i sion1pI1' s
here the hlh daY NJ The January
auswcT the bin of the plaintiff; anI that copy this or
der be forthwith nsHtoI iu newspaper bsbcd In
the CITY Of Richmond, Tor months sirc .vrv and
posed M front door uf the Capitol bon the aaid Iity
nova-wow WI q. SANDS, CO.
XTIRGiNiA.-A Rules held In the clerks ONCE Of the
superior Court NJ law aud Chanccry for tho Comfy
Of Ucndco and CITY Of Richmond the Chsnc cry stIg
the lst day Of November, l-fi.#Wm q smith, VIM a.
Settle and sally Maria DIS wife, George Godn snd Ma.
Trthis wife, George w Smith Eliza Ann smith, and hu
Brchcu aud Susan r. his wife, plaintiffs against WIN.
Browne admir- with The will annexed OWN Geddy deed
aud other deita.
The defendant above named not having entered bls ,p
peartnce and aven security according m the act OF sase
e'ory evidence, that he is moi inhaan III This Com.
mnnwcas " d. ordered, that tho said frudnnf
poar here the nth day Of the January term and
answer the bill n the plaintiffs that cory ~ fha
the cry Of Richmond, for nonihs succeesivoly and
posted he front door Of the Capitol IN tho sad CITY
/ no dwgw WIN sANDH. OK
IN Northumberland County Couu, lith Octobcr III
/ 1 spencer Thomas complainant; against John Nancy
and Gracy, James Bcsy sally, JDsiby Fraucis ara anl
Judith Tlomas Hiram, Charlotte Snckcy' mart.Ie y
stly, Mary and Moni1riu, Sopha, Joseph and Folly
| Thomas, dcfH ~ = qHcrry
his t,y came the complainant by hin attorney, and IL
appealing the satisfaction u The tonr inal me decn-
/ ants Nancy lanes. ntsY, raly, lobby and Fran,s
Thomas IIifsm Wood, May Ann and Mcndors Thomas,
sre moi this Commonwealth on the motion
N Tho u,ioUT n IL ordered Ths tho faid cndanfs d.
sopear here on ~ Monday IN January and
~ bin on tho plaintiff; ana that copy 81 this order be-
E,rthvtfh nser ed fof months sire csslvcly In the
Rchmond whis, snd anoher c6py thereof posed At the
i Gont door Of a.. Cont House ~ tia County.
| Copy. Teue,
] no io--w'w NJ. p. CRALLE, G. G