Mobile daily commercial register and patriot., 1841-07-02


 says, this is to be tbc modes onefmdi in "ryEEr etsf ei ut.iary ag-iesssati.
 -3. sit Is lIe aHiN ni $ahetls t1 suppose 'hc OR rEHs pr THE suNf fREIeN last and w.se. And fhe' are nei "to fc4.n the igu.tes "hNl they aa1e done, mol If tleir aNp "il- 7fai as instruments iN 4aH HANH. or rHtlG '.oA Dht#i iNe4i#4Ns' lhcsc are quotation, iaa istffi, and We ae atilefg tn aiit his aah.fi,, tar in fnf tenaths Ia-i cnea be sa1s nathne thal VI ace uHsiitns tl re"eeae'- When Alr. RYrs pruYrs tht NrSal nad lus soleleis WeIe Hetps uuder "oHnfbs itam ther rpN fk- ftFN. tifn Hs Wiil aHmI, neu ta te ioEal iins'fa- luerts m he tauss uG ideit ssaNeieisn.# lheh Nh it.aasu.re llip eumi iaNian ol d ualala wtons aad call uf 6aton.a WtrbHipn-hut VI hNe vel |, cara ta7t ''a'1els' ta eaaat an are s}noe> m"aS whh approval airt il is done. Agilu, 'NNern- meut would be mpavueahe fl every Gne ol Us lh- strnmcats werf to Nelgh lts commands s' SaA We--hai w,il 3lC. RiHes pfuee to us that "0o,eih uent" issael is "agmD5a,afs ,.
 3i. M Ei,es i~ disiu9caueus in appi3 ng the ease of Floaee against DD2 Aisai, b ac present qecs- ti5n For, according 10 his own admission, the blsfhfiey dt f}4H1f dt8 af c#rtgGH-e, mll 'faa'Hg to otoa re9arat,9aa for the Portuguese agg esslons ''hy NEoprINrIoN,i ''2ts G'BANGE, IIiL "3f- ERNMENT) resoiicd la feprislls-aihrs a ths, .'shc des7af nd saaa3na under adarR Hs'2.'a' &5." "The required concessions were speedily yielded &c.' Ramatks-NeW is il mt dishonest and equivacatiag Tor Mr. Bnes to ask if ''thc sail- or5 under dmiIal Ron-sin would have been retsoa- ally ansHerable 6c, when il Is self e'lent truth that the sGoyerumenl' was here throughout the p'e- aef, aider aad qbea Can Col. McAab plo luce hs .'erlsrs from his Government or can Mr. khes torture any subsequent satisfaction into one
 4ti. The authority of Rutherford is iuconseqnen- tal as far Us cited by Mr. Ri,es, and inapposue to the point ssue, and might well have been om't- ted ii for no other feason than this; il would have saved hiul from teo dc se; for in uis last extract when he would draw support for the docnme oi m- puuy for soldiers, ~c. Rutherford distinctly speaks of "Nhat members do whn act under the particular direction and authority of their Nnti1n' 9th. The importance to be attached 10 the 1ith and 10th sections of Book the 2l, Ch. 9th of FoHd depends not much upon the eafPlessness with winch Mir. Buchanan stands charged in passing il over--but rather in the disguise with winch Mr. RVes enshrouS both the let CT and the spnlt oi the contest. Let us In sec. "A, orer cltai, these are the wofds-''Bu fl nation or s cbiei approves and "a flies the act of He nliyidnal t then becomes
 public concern, and the niuted party IS to consider the Nation as tbe real author of the injury, Q Uhsh the eitzta w7s PERH APs 5Btg ae iaStTNmaH" Re marks-Now, we are perfectly satisfied that not only ''the inditiluali' not ''peIhapso the 'mstfu- ment' of the nalion, but that he certainly was npt (hat s as far as proofs have yet gone )-henee the qualification" or "approyal' of hls deeds are only worth so much as they are the sign manual uf his agency for that specific work, for which his "naton made him the instrument for he time being. But to throw the shield ofapprohation around the murderer uhCq h IS caUgh in act andh5rSed at the tune o is commission, merely with view to sustain a na- tional pride has moi been nor ever will he recog- use3 as a rational rule of action by any writer on in taruatona aWs.
 In Sec. 75-''lf the offended State has in lerpow- CT the indyidua &c,-She may letaout scraPie bring him to justice and punish him If he has escaped ,Slc, She ought to apply to his sovereign, &c.
 Remarks s:-Section 74th gives the rule of action, no other resource being at hand. But if the evil deer is at hand, then ,ery the remedy is suggested at once redress the wrong, and saves (which Is al- ways preftrable) the utiu,s rotio Rrgum, seeking naonaI redress by indemnity or the sword
 Glh.-Mr. Rives, objects to ie proposition made by Mir. Buchanan, as to the validity of Ilea of ..ordeis 1u ease McNab had robbed thc mail oi the United States by order of the Canadian authorities. The parallel is iair-lor MoNah, his supcfiurs in Canata, might dream of lutlers of msurrectonaY spirit, oyertures offebeon, &e. and to assume tp himself to solve those dreams bl high handed mra- sures. Could he with any show Of jpstIce, whe1 awoke to the reality of lis sober senses by the arm ut the law, say he acts under orders and endeayois tp transfer the consequences from his shoulders! l deem not.
 But says Mr. Ri,es, 'such proceeding would he common leony.' ''Ihe duty ol a military man can never place him under the obligation of bdenmiag a highway rohbcr," and then singular To say. Mr. Ryes draws his distinction between the dee Is and asserts, that the attack on the Caroline governed by all the rules and discipline of military service and sub ordlnatioo!"
 Fhcu, Eheu-g,,eo, Repptlcom haJcnug pqpai,s ,i- dt iScaaug9Qe nteiigh. Let Us drop this portion by merely asking, whether the ''duty of military ma" >(concernng which Mir. Rives is i,stidious) can .'lav him under the obligaton'' become iteen- diary and ajdaieh nltrdua
 7h and lastly.-Alr. Rives thinks il ''remarkable' that the language used by Mir. Fox to Mr. Forsyth, should not rereye the same construction from Mir. Buchanan, as he gave to the language of Mir. FoX to Mir. Webster. Nothing remarkable" in il. Let Us examine the cases.-
 Ist to MT. Webster: "Har Maiesty's Government entreas the President of the United States, to take into his most deliberate consideration the Sa-os a- lure of the 6enscquences which ensue from re- lection of this demand" (the release of McLeod.)
 2l to AIr. Forsyth: "l (Mr. Fox) cannot but fore see the very grave and serious consequences that must ensue, &c.
 And these Mir. Rives thinks are almost identical. But ''idencal'' and ''almost" so, mol exactly the same thing. There is to my plain comprehension a vast difference between ministers ''fVre seeing serious consequences, and Her Majesty's Govern lnent entreating the President deliberate on the serious consequences which must ensue. In the first place "I''I IAlr. Fox) give .you (Mr. Webstc0 this as my apprehension In the other, 'ler Majesty s Government the final arbitor, calls upon the highest authorities of our government, Co pendG on he guences Qf noa-coapiiance and to count inc costs- The one fear the other decided Gauntlet.
 haye Mir. Editor, thrown together these points of difference, because doubtless Mir. Ryes answers to Mir. Buchanan will be unpublished, and the reader who Is unaccustomed to follow up these subtletes of political oratory is apt be conionnded before he threads thro' the of four columns of small print. HAMPDEN.