Vermont telegraph. [volume] (Brandon [Vt.]) 1828-1843, 1841-11-24
VERMONT TELEGRAPH.
BRANDON. WEDNESDAY,. NOV. "a, 1871.
NEW CHANNELS,
the Price Of Blood.
EMore on this subject next week.
For rhe r legrep h.
.mnnf c,hranfcle..E. C. rra.

For the T ehegreph.
Vermont Chronicle..E. C. Tracy.
Dear Brother Murray - A few weeks
since, appeared IN the Chronicle, an extract
from report Of the recent anniversary of
the Non Resistance Society in Boston, made
| BY reporter of the Boston Post, and pub.
lished in that paper. The Reporter Is as
bitterly opposed to Anti Slavery and Nom
Resistance, as E. G. Tracy; and the Post
is as hostile TO these holy enterprises as is
the Chronicle. The extract is from the
speech of man-not a member of the So
ciety- who moved to. strike out the word
christian" from resolution, and in his
remarks on his motion took the ground that
he did not wish to be regardedas a follo,cer
of Christ, since be had got before him-
stating that for the last 200 years Shaks
peare had probably been Of as much service
to the world as Chrise" This the ChFoLi-
Gle quotes, and, in an editorial comment,
endeavors TO held up the views expressed
by that speaker as The views of the Non
Resistance Society, leaving out that part Of
the report which gives the action Of the
Society on the amendment. The next sem
tenee but one to that which he quoted would
have given the action of the Society. The
sentiments quoted BY the Chronicle, and
which he puts forth as the sentiments of the
Society, were not sustained by the vote of
single member.
In my lectufng IN this State on Non.
Resistance, the Chronicle on this point has
been frequently presented as an objection
| have shown TO people the true state OF the
case. After hearing, several have stopped
the Chronicle, and letters have been written
to, the Editor asking him to publish the
whole report of the Boston Post. In the /!
last Chronicle (Nov. ~ the Editor states
his reasons for refusing to publish the report
Of the Post. He then quotes from speeches
made In a Convention with which the Non |
Resistance Society has nothing TO do, and
tries to make his readers believe that what
ne quotes contains the sentiments of the
Society and Non Resistants generally.
! wish to ask E. C. Tracy a few cues
tIons; and would gladly ask them in his |
own paper il he would allow it-bue that is
forbidden.
4The CORRECTNESS" says 4. G. Tracy, "of
what we copied has not been questioned by |
the friends Of the Society there" Gin Bos. |
ton.) Does he mean 10 say that the 8: friends
OF the Society in Boston, admit that what
he quotes from the Post are the sentiments /
of the Society, or of Non Resistants gen
erally| He knows they are, not.
This was the ground taken by Mr.. |
Garrison and others who agree with a. C..
Wright respecting the authority of oarSav- |
Tor and the Apostles" Does Mr.. Tracy
mean to insinuate by this that Mr.. Garrison
or myself deny the divine authority of Chris,
and the Bible? ~
AT another meeting the same difference
was manifested among members of the So
ciety." Does MIR. Tracy mean that that
other meeting" was a meeting of the
Non Resistance Society, or that it had any
thing more to do with Non Resistance than
with Temperance
"He (H. c. W:(repudiateso our marriage
laws" Does Mr.. Tracy approve the "mar-
riage laws" Of VERMONT These laws as
sumo the right TO abolish marriage al pleas
ure. They state several things for which
the marriage contract may be dissolved. II
God mentions but one in His code. and says.
those are guilty of adultery who dissolve it
for any other cause. Whose laws does E.
G. Tracy adopr-God's or Vermont,s2
The Vermont Chronicle is the malignant
foe of God and man, doing what il can 10
sustain nadaa-Steaiing and maa-kia ine.-
Ought not its lying spirit to be exposed and
rebuked.? Can a spirit SO full Of all subj
Lefty be the spirit Of our Divine Lord and
Mas'erK BE G. WRIGaI.
Brandon, Nov. %, 1s41.
An exposition OF this matter shall be given 40
soonas can lay my hands on The necessary n.
pers.-ED. TEL,
WIN fI,.