Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1840-1842, 1841-06-15
yyIRaINtA,A,n ,,..,o,,,,

VtnehNA; Al rules holden la the Clerks ONCE Of
the Oifcun supctor Court OF Law and CHANGER, for
ne County OF HsnIicc aud the City Rchmon on The
a%s Wsa sS T Sss isA E &aD .s' 'Gsn La
Robert hnler executor OF Julia &. Avery dee and lhn
and other defendants. ~ '"'"'
The defendant, above named not having their
Oily aud the rules OF this Court and II appearing Sy
Cny ss.d.nee e, that they arc NJ inhabitants
appear here etthc rules be holden the sI MondaS
copy a, this oricr be Gothshh Inserted in sone ms,,,
pc, GnSshsd IN The city Of Richmond, mouths
& 80 anu at the front door OF the Capitol n the
ar ls-w9w wM q SANDS. C. q.
OlNGlNiA At rulcs holden In tue ,icIk's one, OF
the Circuit Superior Court OF Law aud CSancrTx no., ~
the County Of nenlieo and City oT hmond ON Tho
wing psrnsr Of Dsaa@n beS eesa.r pS sur
s pem, ate merchants aud partners, trading under
me hrn, and ny the style OF Beu lin samuel nrmit
RUE AGAINST Joseph kirkland his wife James
= C"sswcu, Douglas sloan and Maria his wife Mao, a.
Fitch Charlcs rIeh Ezekiel Folsom and Lucy his mir
eurion H. hacchus Maria nacchus Nathaniel Ra,rIsnan
ani fhil"mcl his wife, Elijah kcnyon aud Maiy a. his
wife, Eiam Che, sebToush and Bcisey his vile, ncnIs
E, aIn enn Nancy hls WIFE, William Fitch, Gutdon u
p pGsn, Edmund Fitch Thomas H. DAeehus. and other
The defendants above named, not having cn,erc,
act Of Assembly and tho Rucs Of this Cont an" n
not inhabitants OF this ComuCnwcaith n is "rJ,r"J
,e sIl d,irnIsn's do appear hcrc, at The rules be
b OF the plaintiff and that a cory uf this order he Iorth
Soi', o ~ sonr newspaper published In the Guy
nom ,or oiihc capiol In the said City. Copy-Tcstc
az 70 WV wM. q. SANDS, 4. q
In ~ VA. AT rules holden in the Clerks office
OF lhc circuit Superior Court OF Law and Chan, cry
,e EQUITY OF licnrico aud City OF Richmond on the
Chancery side, the nh day ApIiI ISL DaTuc wirR
sI, panuu against Elisha Baker and William D. Mai,S
The defendant, Elisha Baker, not having hi.
aud given security according To the act Assem-,
by ann The Rucs OF this count, and IL appearing law
satisfactory evidence that lac Is not an inhah,sn, "1 ny
commonwealth Ii ia ordered that the said defendant, a.,
appear here the tucsto be holden the first Monny in
Juy next aud answer tho bill of the plaintiff ami maj n
y, ot1er DC forthwith inserted in some
pSognsd IA ihe city Of Richmond for months sue
vcssNeS, anu posted at the front door OF the Capitn in
me ssii Guy. ACoPy-reste, "
ep lo-wgw wM G SANDS, c. c.
ViRGlNiA, At Rules, holden tic Clerks Office OF
the County oflienTco Cay OF Richmond on t6c t,
Cs SIDE Tie hlh day OF APri ISL John barr and John
partners, trading under the htn OF John art a
40 plsiniS against Henry Goodins and William Wallace
The defendant, Henry Cooling not having entered h,
pe1tance and given security according TO the Ac OF A.
factory evidence that hc not aninhab,nt of
wealth s ordercd that the said 10 appear here
and answer the bin Of tie plain f an, Inn, COW
Tsr nc in some newspaper putsheJin
posted athe front door of the Capitol i'm thn saty anu
mn ~ STSIS-ies'e, WIN. q. SANDS, &. Z.
VIRGINIA, AZ Inics holden in tho ,.lcr.,s ,,,,, =,
Tue Circuit Superior Court OF Law and Ch.ncsry far
INC 'ouniy iienfico aud CITY Of Richmond on The Chan
nus .csyi', Charles Mygstt, jr aud William w iurib"T,
bits SsansI as,a IhS: the firm Of w and H. Lcar
Watkins, and William VI Watkins cTchan;s ana
m D under the firm Of J. Watkins aud BothcIs, aud
The defendants, above named n u having cp,cr.i ,h
Nv ~ 'i gwen security according To- the Act OF As
s,aactory evidence that they iuhabans OF ms
20 appear here, the rules TO be holden ON tic S
monday III July ne Vt and answer the hill of the piant
newspaper published IN the City Richmond for tW,
months successfully and posted at the front %,I Of he
az l5-wlw wM G. skSps q r.