New-York tribune., 1841-12-17
Gin Fntelllaenc.
Reported for III, Now-York Tribune
r,tT,f rnt-D1,s

$1,000 Mr. Henry, vho Is no" DON to-,
Merchants Bank vas in 1884 Cashier VI ."e 49,.
Bank Connecticut MIR Ketchum beng MS 'u,' ' -,
turning his enemy efterEards. 1t was saio ~ a..
he could TO iniure him In the year s'acu
s,.-c RANT AT Albany RENTED 20 Morga0 he'e"u"
~ ~ In, ,mouo.lpg to S20.t0O, and being
e,noo ~. han they intended renttisg Inc DIRK o'o
h,ve the error I'LL they got ipumsuon Of ~ IN eau
e,s,,, sf erwards WHOM hey called upon m' he'cua~
sagi,g bcen dissolved and the ether partner TO-
.o,v.,,) 10 refund Mr.. n wrote back, accusing the
of wing received and puroined the amount and
otherwise speaking Ill of hin. The pre.snt acton for
Incl therefor. brought 1t was shown in evidence that
Mr. Morean oae Of the other partners of the
bousud dollars being received and limited the BaRk
but was not of ITS being obtained fro1 them The
money vas p ced what the brokers call the OF
Over Mr.. Ketchum refuaded the money the Bank
verdict will be rendered tonoryow friday forenoon
COURT OF SESSIONS.
TauRsoAY Dec. l6.
Before the Recorder Judge Lynch and Aldermen Purdy
ard Bredhurs,.
TRiAi FOR EmaEzzLEMEST REsUMED.-Tho Ccu:t met
ct O'clock aud resumed the cf Edward Shaw on
On ind ctmcut for embezzemen the cross-exanInaton
Of Mr. Schenck vas resumed. He aed that entry IN
the day book the 30th OF January last of sl04 49, a
cash received from Edward Shaw in wiinrsss hano-
writrg. shaw in The summer or au ann Oh lo7'
to Hudson Troy and Albany witness Account 10 sell
oil on commission thinking he could make money oy H.
Witness As unncquanIed VIh book Keeping OF win
mercantile business general he was eoucaea al "e'
Point was subsequently employed as an engineer for
considerable time but getting out OF employment turned
his attention TO his present business leaving his oneyed
affairs in the hands OF Mr. Siurges in whom ne had the
utmost confidence. Witness had commenced a suit
against Shaw and he brought up under the Sul~el
scino, with view OF recovering the money, but TO fer
ret our plans being concoced III order effect
the escape Of the accused Witness within
$4,000 or s20.0t0 what amount in his books
Direct resnmed.-The entry made by witness in the
day book was merely memorandum taken OF the money
received during the temporary absence of the
er 20 whom his return, banded and then
passed TO the credit OF those of whom Shaw said he had
received it. AZ entry in the cashbook the
.audun would be resumed
Ast was proposes 10 examine Josiah B. Sturges
witness for the prosecution, Mr. Edward H. Hudson
Counsellor a, Law called prove that stu,es did
not bcAeve in the existence of God and not there.
fore competent witness.
Mr.. Hudson depoed That at trial 10 The Marine Court
in which witness COUNSEL for w. E. Shaw a
against Edwin Schenck lie (witness) asked Surge,
whether he believed in tbs existence of God and
Of punshmeuts hereafter He then stated he did be-
eye in the existence God The other branch of the
question answered. owing to the interference Of
opposing counsel. The objection however was with
drawn and Sturges then sworn in the Marine Court
David Simpson then examined. who deposed that
he had repeated conversations with Joseph b. Sturgcs, IN
Siurges said he did believe in the existence of
God it is generally understood by Jews and Chris
tsns.
amiaed Winners and sturges agreed mainly
in their opinions Witness at frs, declined 10 answer
whelher he believed In the existence Of God but after
wards said he believed in Supreme Intelligence, who
had the power and purpose to punish ga but hot in a
future state.
Theodore J. Martin deposed for defence that Sturges
mad told him that he did believe In God a
rewards and punshmeuts hereafer-tha he did not be-
leve in any thing Sturges told witness that he did
believe in God mighty Jesus Christ, the Bible
thai no was Just good Jesus Christ God Almighty,
or any oue-that he could write ja,t good book the
Billie aud did believe IN any punishment for any
crime murder, either here or hereafter Witness
said he u Trinitnran-believed in God the Father,
Son and Holy Ghost and in a state of rewards and pun
shments hereafter.
Dr. stephen HaSbrouck broher-in-law OF Mr. Schenck,
deposed the prosecution that he had repeated cosver
sations with Surges in all OF which he hsd admitted The
existence ola Supreme Being ana gave witness his views
which witness believed similar 10 those OF the so
cniaps The thought that Sturges was not be-
lever in the vinty OF Christ, in the plenary nsp'
ration of the Scriptures. lie believed thew were good
moral guido but not Inspired word Of God He be-
lieyed that there is God who created and governs all
things aud nods his creatures accountable expressed
hi. belief in uture rewards aud puBshments but did not
saw whether il ths life that which is 10 come WIT
pcs was In The Marine Court at the trial spoken OF r
Ma, last. and to questions propoundcd aus"ered that
ne believed in the OF God, and in tho Bible and
IN future Of rewards and punshments ami the o.
iec,ion being withdrawn, he admitted witness Oh
thai trial
Charles schenck deposed for prosecution that he
had with Stnrges ~hich he expreesed his
belief in the existence of God Supreme Being, IN th
Bible as spiritual work, and is future state ofrewird
and uunshmcnts according 10 Bib which he eonsd
work of inspiration
Josiah Sturges Sen. dcposcd that his son, JOSIAH b
Sturges had been in bad health for years Heard
HIM saw he believed in Supreme Being also IN the
Punishment for by that Being. lie "as brought up
in the Cnr,lan faith was sent when young TO Nazareth
and e,uc ted IN the ienets Of the Moraylans, of VITO
church he became d member. lie believed IL the BGl
which he read ZACH aud, in consequence OF his intense
gudy the Scripurs and OF his thoughts on reigion
he became partially insane, aud for zine inmate
of the Luna,ic Asylum lie ofteu reads the Bioie.
Charles Schenck was then recalled. DID hear Stur
yes IN the Marine Court testify that he believed IN ood
liz the Bible
Ei,s Alnsoy, John C. Ritter and Edwin schcpck al
deposed 10 having hoard S,urgus express his belief IN
Supreme Being, The Bble, and III future punishment
Richard Sutton, called for defence dep1sed that n
woulc Not bclicve Aiasley uncer oath.
William A. Snaw, for defence, derosed that he heard
Stuccs IA, he believed in God, but not such God
others did he (Starges) was God ,hst the wne
SHAW wac God aud that every q ID "a mu,
any other cd ihat Jesus Christ was the lleg IL
mate son of Roman soldier and th,i he Stuses ssic
he no Ella s*earing either one way or another
Alter hearing the arguments of the respective course
the Court stated that they would decide whether the test
nony Of Slurges was TO be received ASt TO moro"
(Frisay mOraiGg at II o'clock which hour the Court
adjourned.
KINGS COUNTY OYER AND TERMIvER.
BsooKLyS, THURSDAY, Dec. le.