New-York tribune., 1841-04-12

though; ina; ofla~s defining rnu'et! &c a
,,e citizens Eothns the discretion Oh W
best evidence OF a free people 0--;
, [ law A.. v.rue and uucea. AID sEs more vague taAa
;he feoart- ahoee members ars e5ahsns
lave right. aaa duties prescribed by Inc
- sue. prin.5l. kso-n to law 1t thc
;7e o ruro: RIO OF ard ahes' r.ea Il Eag
s a o asr5eld and ci Chatham declare nc eaaper
i. - ,se WORT .osree Of % adea:ou. mach a
il rend afca by degrees tas whole !lN o' ae ~
In our law the judge 5 sacred oath 20 dster1a
.eeora- kaova a~s sad ancient customs oi Inc
1o,1 . ude Of learned VIE sad up
r -s u7en variety particular facts and ea Tiea Vnea
t9ey .ass ose E % ~ I Sc letter on be
papers &c By Camden aa1 panains
Zse--1tyS;ate nec---r hs protection o. 'ne Pogs. @ -
the a-y- n. plea assumption Of power every 1soa
private vhich aas vexed and oppressed inA1 ~ F
Tao aa- England pesahed - TIE 'ioa-e Com
asserting TIL. very doet7la- V-iea the y T
reign Cna+ Of -hiP noHer deeiei mai ta'e
necessity ja,ps -;aoai the eoa'aI 9
4o-t identical Win The proposition 'i The a' |
eety ne public Will justify tie >eaieaiae nia
papers without e.re-S aaGeTii, oi .i
and tnat the magistrate = the Judge OF maj n, -' " L
and h, u-irious aoe,tcs thought oiser'i>e ana t'F
peaeices fo7 the lra-e' vho ,Te
i,ain-5er l- attempt 10 establish Paes
utterly scbTer.,r> Of tae rights @! IA eti%ea
The nrono,toa no; beon re-orted 70 before TO
MA; -eh 10 and zurc paper. And Lord
al.a m - . - - -. - ON. So,i r.sr,lI. expect tha;
lax horls be clear popoaon a tae power
n: a., Ice. i. .yi &c rnd m our scols i BE faaad
per- Of to .ssc. u7oa tac & h' should
h.re exs:ee o The ane vsrcof the memory
20 contr .t ss,e- vet A.,e f5uzd place ofa~
Incredible.
Acu judge. .aia: a7oa -s-oaon 'aid
o7 tv-c jrise Of England IN h- tine Of
Ch.f a; III PeF-ons ih'o Vrie or
sei ph- "a, ea-r 'aaaon- TO Paals Or pr
ls- ih- .-ir- al;- llae.r make thing
laste bat AS S'.don ~ d-0'if.oa Ia" 'Iel -
1t -RcceesD-s; 10. sry Judge 10 a"fra IT,
Ba; cou:-oir- pfscpie Of se eoHor Ia" eA'' "nsa
,a-a ae rzhi 90 "ast iay as ne-e,' 10 me poe
pase ;hs7 ee-asis shr- s H. aad X ner
day TO dse-f. o' fsoi.G' ~ ''- 4 aHea
government. 4a the esrAh'nn-Hi OF law" he
the ,a 5ibe 'rIur. 10 The rgai'
e. ss aa..e4-Iss .s, p,,a, NC Legislature
soar-f:on tn, caaei~s"t 2}ses'e s'Ha-s'reto'
TIE Extraordinary OF tee der hat some portions OF
A- eonroa law ka1. never writing, and
equally and unenabe Lord Camden
Th- and right. of public Their power and
T.a M sss i 70 be sqsd % II book @ @ @ - Of .-ren
private papers, and declared h intention to continue
bound to show precedent or authority IN law for
70 dong and ihis he has attempted to DO =, , o,- ,y
40 l37 Robn.on for murder OF Helen Je"
To.usent of manning with s;F'ol Lazarus ea's oI
und on tho persons
been u,e their a A. evidence AGAINST heh
lfobeston hei been made tina authority Of 'h
But Why has 10; objection been
made Eoi because no body ever ied rs saen - anu
private paper but because rs body 'eI aouoaa a ~.
pertinent; aHd legal the court would not ard could not
form collateral sse 10 ascertain now a. ooia'nsa Iaa even
the Illegal manner OF obtaining ere admitted |ouu ~ no ~
cal objection ia testimony and the court could no on INA,
iGiN rccoGui|eI ~ cues q"
Jordan - Io's - f-as 5', lhote 'a' 1-rSEe " &
rapcr- ouly Illegally htcad out against the express
cu % ~ | & nm ,.iIs p-sr;.ery rho an,n sin5 Of pr.ce-
adccac of arbitrary IN their
but Camden and Dunnns epy the
qaoderi debet nc;r4 sGan unlaSf manner
coming papers prevent being evidence when
dure letter concerning iel warrants the -e@ars o pa
pors BY Camden and DuHnIns IL IN edit p i9
A.ain Cnnr;on And # should be added that
papers ought 10 acquire some strength oy
the silence Of those which have heard them read 80 oen upon
annadvcon am able To oofro~ nv
from the Court OF ns BeHe "heh aey
declared WIKI great una'Hy III tne el-o o' -tA''
objection taken them upenih returns na iao matter
a5 Hio ;he prcceden oi no "eshi h class of
ca.os therefore, Recorder directly or ati
reciiy. involve tho principle. and proves Hotting 49,
wcnd $50 Foster, 800: Hale 80 Hawk eh II =; wh'c
felony committed icoH be pursued
private mouse and the do may be broken open to ne The
ahat anaog appe;on have iacy the
Of prcote papers The arrest Of cons "'h or without
expressly Authorized BY and by siaie a" but
required similar a"'ofiiy derived
authorizing the OF paper None -A been pro-
Ii he ha searched the records h' ,;arehaFibs he has ouHd prGee
dens OF warrants Tor .ear'hns tor pepGrs IN case o os @
originated and "efe supposed to have dec with tha Illegal aad IN
order convict the forc.r TIE
bor tho re-o"1 II wolid
o: the Of h.s kind jn'ti-
mn oca and thew are therefore, .ub set 10 ,lure 50
S reasonable itself
The fatal the murderer forfeited
private therefore. proper
" ezod 50 N large
part eorpu. deic body OF the
heh .e forth the or a'en are IN
e1ate necessarily connected with the offence charged have
supposed by eatc by the officers for tna reason
But tar of convenience or necessity obe aoSedet
restricted the question the case ci sei@ars oil
paper, carefully provided and prerbed the mar
papcr vcuc. civil or criminal
ea-e.
II party papers the OF
party produce them and rot
taced. he n1ayr paro evidence OF their contents.
The Of Rex Watson and al = T. K i9 Application
for criminal libel certain resolution
and order entered IN corporation books
Iuilrr >-d II ha been soemGiy determined haun criminal
prosecution you defendant produce paper N
other evidence oi H.
Tie hnhtoush ri De'ereaus No Cor Rep
and the prisoner % pro-
paper and refusal ro esuence OF their contents
But the r.t Of search and seizure ui pa
per- counsel or the
Enormously objected the admission of evidence OF the
conteGi-.
The >ay as secondary evidence properly received
of The prosecution
Possession the papcr- BY the accuer
primary ridence actually destrogeG The pnnc OF
a that shall be compelled TO give evidence
by the bill Of right. protects the defendant
Of the primary evidence The object o the notice
iygfr