New-York tribune., 1841-12-04
E The trial of William NJ. Price, it will b
seen, has again gone over.

. Edifor ~ shf iri0hHc
In accordance recent Ofsr made by the Evening
Post open pages for the discussion OF the School
Question, OF the of the Catholics was
therein Published This followed by rrele-
want reply from VT ter signsg himself "A Witness,
~hck quick met @ith sharp but suitable reJonder
At this he -1t iurions may be in his vulgar
Of the 2d Though against rule have led
down FOR myself il As controversy yet for the
mentioned below, sent tho .uhJoined brief note TO the
Evening Post. Contrary, ;hins the duty OF Ell
or aad certainly justice he refused il admis
slOn. rthe adyoc. Of the Catholics the worsted
party. there would bsen objection. 1t well for
the Catholics to know and remember the .pir, towards
them in that question Their protect against the supre
macy Of Tsmm'ny Hall will not be forgiven by the
Post or its party.
have experienced Sir, your libcrali,y and love o
fair play" ard no pc you will place the
To the Editor efthe Er .ning Post.
SIR-Sone observation OF the style OF certain ad
Of tie p. : Society suggested resolution
which minated in my mrs, letter, OF noticing only
argumentauve and gentlemanly replies. am tot
conscious that now infringe It's rule-it IS not A
Witness thai notice. Il assertion were evidence
the Judicial condition | limited at would in his
case be superdous. But having the fear ofthis
condition before his eyes he reaSScrts with sashng
and original confidence, that fear il may pass ior
proof on the careless the indisposed On this &C
coun; l did not fee! at liberty compromise the
cause in any contempt for the antagonist.
He calls my article extraordinary :" and have
doubt il startled him. for he seemed in doze.
Then, quoting my stat ement and assuming that
there Is word OF truth in it, and also that my
structures based upon II. he cavalierly
cudes that these do not deserve notice, wiihoU,
degning even to profess himself ready verify -
ms denial.
Now the fac; is, these structures ,as Wit
ness terms them mad merrl y suggestive connex
ion with the statement. But IN his conclusion he has
shown some prudence If not much logic. As to the
statement, have perused his letter for passage 10
justify my c0hJectHre respecting ior conjecture
was all tlst could be done ana all that, with great
stretch OF candor, though he complains that | have
none, expressed this his object seems 10 be-
DO. But find MS aruce SO loose in language and
deficient not merely OF common sense, THAT
before, but of any seizabe ALL that tor
my purpose would have to inilict the whole on the
reader or incur caril by condensation. must
therefore only beg any who think worth while, tc
compare the FIRST communication OF Witness,
with the reply OF Cato and for the result Ito put
myself on the country X.
Seriously, the seicomplacency of this BomJas
teS Fuy30SO" is quite udicrous. He seems 10 think
he has monopoly of the common sense. well as
his Society have Of the Common Schools of the City
After .emorselessly CONSUMING half column OF youI
valuable journal with the "hearsays" Of Catholics
and the minutes of A Witness" he assures YOU
in his former et,er that you had the worth OF your
penny" In this he informs Us that lie believes he
can state a fact or ciothe idcd ntelligby az
honest reader As 10 his Geliet, the information was
supcrtiuous. But with respect the fact he should
rather have condescended sh0'r that he posses
ses the simpler-,he schoolboy-acconp npshment of
writing ersmlmaticGHy But am forgetting myself
into STYLE, which. however suitable to the subject
should not be permitted sully my pen or your
paper | can estimate the difficulty there s " man
born Of woman d" keep his temper while losing
his cause And so, congratulating the Catholics and
the public that the hired advocates of injustice
and monopoly are betraying the secre, symptoms of
deisat. dismiss, for ever, this very su.ky, though
a volunteer Witness. CATO