Wheeling times and advertiser. [volume] (Wheeling, Va. [W. Va.]) 1839-1849, 1840-02-15

CH.aNCERr NOTICES.
,,ylRGlNlA-,s ,cnASernv--At rules held N the
CLERKS once Of the Circuit Superior Court OF Law 4
ana Chancery for the county OF Ohio. IN the month
Ut January, 1870.
The General Insurance. Company Of Maryland, |
Complainant.
tRalnet
Thomas :. q. f.n,yney, Pls,cff Zane. Ely Dorsey, I
Mary L. Dorsey his wife, late guatdi OF the /
sand Pisioa Zane, Samuel Sptigg and Charles ID |
Knox, Trustees. Under a certain deed OF trust,
the creditors of the said Platv q for other purpo-
ses. Moses w. Chapline and Ebon. zer Zane ad.
illustrators with the will ann. xed of Ms Zane,
deceased, the said kbenozer Zane, in his own
right. and Henry Moore and james G.. Johnston.
Trustees under certain deed Of mus, executed BY
the sald Ehenezer Zane, for The en At of the cred
ses, Descendants.
The Conn. lainant having filed is bill in this cause
and the Defendant James &. Johnson, not haviI (
entered lis appearance and given security according
TO the of Assembly and the rules of ,aIs Court
and il appearing by satisfactory proof that he /. moi
an lnhabItsnt OF this Commonw, atl-on motion
OF Accomplishment by counsel .: ordered that the said
Defendant do apr ear here on the Srst day of the
next Spring Term of this Court, aud answer the
said bill, or otherwise defend this suit. and that
cory of this ord,r be forthwith inserted ~ some
ewspapcr printed ~ the city Of Wheeling. for
months successfully. and posted outer door sf
A COPY Sy' ,es, c,' ALEX. +. IAIDLEY. Clerk.
ANs 81 EpoiS0T>S. January T. Itio.
NIRGINIA--Is cHANcsLY-At Tuics hela in the
Clerks office of the CIRCUIT Superior Court 81 Law
aud Chancery, tor the county vi oi,l" IN the month
Jacob +. Bier and Lloyd G.. Hughes. partners in
business under tbs firm Of Bier & Hughes, Com
plainants,
lanes Waters and David Myerlr, Defendants
! The Defendants not having entcrc. their appear
sembly and the rules of this Court and IL appeaiin,
by satisfactory proof that they not inhsbtans OF
. this Commonweslth-on motIon of Comp. annnis
by couns,lt Is ordered that the sand u, r. nnnrs d.
apPSar here on the first day of the Spring Term
Of thu, Court, and answer the Complansnts' bIll &
that copy OF this order be forth th inserted IN -nn,
newspaper prntsd in the city Of Wheeling ~, two
msaths succ,sIvely and posted the front door OF
the Court house Of ONO county.
\ cspy teste. ALEX. T. LAlDLEY, Clerk.
WHEAT. January ., lsio.
Clerk office OF the Circuit SuTenor Court of Law
and Chsncery for the county ofOhio, in the monih
David Lee, Complainant,
against
David Myerle Defendant.
The Defendant not having tered his appearance
and gwen security according to the OF Assembly
and the rules OF this Court and II appearing by sat
lsactory proof That hs ~ not inhabtant Of this
co nmonweath-on motion of Complainant by
counsel II is ordered that the said Defendant do np-
pear hare on the hrst day { the next Spring Tcrm
ofthis Court, aud answer the Corsplainants bill.
and that n copy Of this ord be forthwith inserted
IN come ewspaper printed in the cry Of Wheeling
Tor two months snccessvey and posted a, the frsn
: door OF the Court house Of Ohio county.
copy iests- LEX. T. LAIDLEY, Clerk.
WHEAT. JaHuary :, le4o.
vlRGl NlA-Is cHAscrsr-At rules held in til.
Clerk office oI tue GREAT superior Court Of La
aud Chancery for the county OF Ohio, in the mo.tl
If January, ls4o.
John Gilchrist Complainant,
} agaast
, John Lick; John GerSc Doelker, Henry Anerback
Charles Brrl il, Andrew Sch vartz, John Wshlen
msysr. Jacob Smith and Peter Anshutz. Defend
ants.
The Defendants Decker, Auerback. Berlt
: Schwsr.z, Wahlenmayer, Lick and Anshutz no
entered
according TO the aci Of Assembly aud the rules u
his Court. and II appearing by satisfactory proc
that they are not NH btants Of this Common
i on motion CT the Complainant 10y counsel, IL is OF
Tered that said Dcfendaats do appear here tn
{ hrsi dsy OF the next Spnng Term Of this Court
answer the said Comp bill, and thar cop
81 this order be forthwith inserted IN ncwsps
paper prinied IN the city of Wheeling. Tor two mo nth
successSely, and posted at the front door OF tn
Court house of Ohio county.
4 copy tes.e. ALEX T. LAIOLEY. Clerk
! NILSSON January 7, 1870.
ElRGlNiA-IS orAScFRv-At rules held in ih
Clerks office oi the Circsi superior Court vi La,
and Chancery for the county OF OHIO in the mon II
Of January, 40.
John ". Bush and James VI. Jusrus late partner
IN business under the firm nsme and style O
BIsh q Jusius, Complainsnts',
. agaInSt
An.tin ?eay and Henry Moore John r. Clarke a
Mark Douglass, merchants aud partners in bus
ness, uAder the hrm, name and style of Moore
Clarke & Co. Defendants.
The Defendant Austin Peay, not having enier,t
hrs appearance and given security according To tt,
OF ASSetHblY ana The rules Of this Court and
.ppesnng by satisfactory proof that he not in
. haorant OF this Common ealih-sh motion If ia
Compliments by counsel, il ordered that the 81
Defendant do appear here on the first day If ia
/ next Spring Term OF this Court and answer the
Compartments bill, and that copy OF ihs order b
; forthwith insert IN some newspaper printed Il
the city OF Wheeling. f. two months successiyel,
and posted at the front door of the Court house q
= OHIO county.
hcspy tes'e. ALEX. T. LAIDLEY. Clerk
WA. ,. HrSLtr. January Z, 1910
SleTks Office Of the Circuit Superior Court OF Law
md Chancery, for the county Of Ohio, in the mont
, Harman I.avedock Complainant,
a against
= Daniel Nichols, and alicha,l Sweeney and Rober
u Sweeney, par ers under the firm Of NJ d X
~. Sweeney, Defendants.
. The Defendant Nichols not having enierrd hi
h appearance and gwen securtg according TO the &C
ii Assembly and the rules uf this Court nj II 40
= 2carnS by satisfactory proof that he is not an in
haniani OF ms Commonwealth; on motion OF tn
onpisinHni by counsel, IL is ordered that the sal
I Defendant do appeai here ON the first day OF th
. aext Spring Term Of this Court, aud answer Nh
I'd { ompannnfs Till, and that a copy of this or
der be forthwith inserted IN some newspaper prin
d IN the city { Wheeling for two months sncces
slvely' az posted at The frsnt door Of the Cour
4 copy tesfc. ALEX. T. LAIDLEY. Clerk.
rAVL * hUsshLL January 7, 1870.
, NiRGINIA-IS ouAScEHY-At rules held IN IN.
Clerks Office Of the CIrcu Superior Cont Of "A
s9G Chancery for the county Of Ohio, in the monil
George Atkinson, Complainant,
against
George McCollcueh. Thomas MUMMY snd Andrew
Mitchell. Defendants.
The Defendant Mccullough not having entered
h's appearance and given security according To- the
act Of Assembly and the rules Of this Court and n
appearing by satisfactory proof thai he is not IN.
nabItant OF this Commonwealth; on motion OF the
lainant o. counsel u u oTdeTef that the said
Deicndant do appear here the first day If al,
n.N' Sp'ihg Term Of this Court aad answer ti,
Compliments bi and that a copy Of this order b,
Tor hwiih inserted IN some rs vi paper printed m
the city Of wheeling for two morris successvelv
Snl posted at the 'front.' do OF the Court house 0i
OHIO county. "
/ copy test. ALEX. r. LAIDLEY. Clerk.
'AooS WILSON January 7, 1870.
J ~NI.blNiA-iS cHANCERY- At rules held in The
CLERK Office Of the Circuit Superior Couri Of az,
arg Chantety Tor the cosnty Of Ohio in the month
OF January, 1870 '"
Robert Barlow Complainant