Wheeling times and advertiser. [volume] (Wheeling, Va. [W. Va.]) 1839-1849, 1840-02-04
NOTICES.

.li : once Ci tfC Circuit Superior Court of Law I
nc Uaaneery ior the county OF Ohio IN the month a
The General Insurance Company Of Maryland. :
Complainant,
asainst
Thomas J. y. Prntuney, PlatoH Zane. Fly Dorsey.
mary l.. Dorsey, his wife, late guardian of the
sand Pla,oh Zane, samuel Sprigc and Charles
Knox, Trustees, under a certain deed ct trust
executed by the said PletolI Zane, for the benefit OF
the creditors .; the said Plai,h q for other purpo-
scs Moses w. Chapine aud E5,nezer Zane. All.
inlnistrators with the will annexed Of Noah Zane.
right. and Henry Moore spG JsmeS G. Johnston.
Trustees uncer a certain deed al Iust executed by
the SAID Ebenezer Zane, TOR the len, III uf the cred
ses, Defendants. ~
The Compiairant having hled its bill in this caus.
aud me Defendant JCmes &. Johnson. not having
rnfe'cd lis appearance aud given security according
to Tie act OF Assembly and the rules of'AIs Court, /.
ana u appearing By satisfactory proof that hc - not
an lnhabIt9nt OF thus -aith-on motion
% Com claimant oy counsel, IT'S ordered that the said
Defendant DO apI ear here IN the sgst day Of the /
uCNt Spring Term OF this Cont, ana answer the
sad bil. or otherwise defend this sait. and that a
copy OF this order be forthwith inserted IN SOM
new spapcr punted N the city cf N.iseling. COR two
months sGccessIve.y, and posted az an ou;cT door OF
the Court house of Ohio County.
Aco9y ,e.,c. Alex. T. LAIDLEY. Clerk.
! Aln G FDoiNGrCS. January : $50
NRGINIA-rw cuAScExy-At rules h.lo in IN,
Jerks Office OF the & lr,u!t SUI error COurt -. LAW
ana Chancery, Tor the county VI Oh In thc month
Jacob F. Ei,r and Lloyd G. Hughes. r,r,n,rs in
business under 'hs hIsn Of Bier & Hughes, Com.
pselnants,
against
lanes Waters ard David Nycrlc, DefcnI.n,s
The DEFENDANTS not having tnt,Tea their sppcar-
SnSe and pivCn security according TO the act of As
sembly and the rt'ss rfthis Court, AMI II nrpearirp
10y "a lsia'toy proof that they Are not inhabiianfs OF
tins ComW ealth-uu motion of E,rvp},,ra,ts'
by cOunsC,u - ordered that the said DE- ndants' III,
appsar here on the trst day off, next SurIrg T.rn,
of has Court. and answer The Conui,;rgn,s Ill q
that ccopy .! THIS order be iuT'au in ipssrt.d m s'rrr
newspaper printed in The city ct Nhe,Ip. io, Two
m9ntfs suSccs'N'i. and po.ted re the front door VI
4 copy teste. AK. 4. LilDLEY, C'crk.
WHEAT Jan'ary $40.
NlRGiNlA-Iv cHANCTBY AT rr'.s held m the
Cirrk's once O. he Circu.i Suruior Court OF Law
sad thane.Fy for the county ofCAiu, in the month
David Lee, Complainant,
ESGlnSt
David Mlerle. Defendant.
. The Defendant not having entcfcd Es ar.enraree
on5 gwen security according 70 lhe act ofAssrmb!y
si''to'y 9io"i ihat n = not an inhahiiaut II tins
20 ninouNeaIth-o Iactian of Complainant by
eoGns'i uls cTdcr.d that me said Defendant do ap-
pear htre on ;ho first cay e the next Spring FERN
oithIs Court, and answer thu ComplsinanIs bill.
aud that a COPY Of this ord I be forthulth irs-rfet
q some new ap,r lrntcd IN tar ely OF Whee'in..
door of the Court house ofthio county.
acoPN ieste. LEX. I. l.AIDLEY, Clerk.
Wheat. January : IgsO
~ lRG,y Mas euaSeEkr 1t rules held in tn,
CIcrE sotic" of tue ClrcJIt superior Court of Law
ara Chancery Tor the county o. Ohio, in the month
John Glchrs;, Complainant.
against
John lack John George Decker, Henry Auerhack
'haries. BERT, Andrew Sch .ariz, John Mahl.n.
ants.
TIE Defendants Decker. su,rb,ck Pol,
Schwar'z, Hah'enmsyGr. Lick aud Anshutz. no,
having entered their appearance and given securty
ACCORDING 10 tae act Of Assembly and the rules OF
nus CUT ana II appearing by satisfactory proof
tiatth they ale UotInhabItants OF this Cnmmonwe,Ih
gn motion { the omploInant by counsel, It Is or.
tered tAdt The said Defendants do appear here on the
answer the said COMPLAINANT bull, RGd that a COW
pSpet prnicd n The CRY Of Nheelng, Tor months
succcsssciY, and posted al tho foni door OF In
Co'it mouse OF OHIO county.
q COPY tese. ALEX. 7. LsIOLEY, Clerk.
Nf+'0N' January :, 1870.
,NlRGlNIA-Ix cHasosnT-At rules held in the
Clerks o!Gce Of The CIfcsi; >uperior Conf OF az
r CManeeiy isr tHe county Of Shio, IN the mon h
J.hn ". Bush and James u. Jus.r. late Bsr,,ers
~ business under tie arm name GEd style Of
BIS" u JCs'us, ComPlsiuants',
hus;in ?say, and Hear, Moore. Jlhn +. Clark, &
Hiai" - C-lass, merchants and partners In bus
ETissS eh.e5 t"e nm, name AM sly &c Of Moore
lhr Defendant Ausun Psay, not having en,e-fd
as a. petfanrc and gwen security according l., n .
aeto' AAs'm'lf ana the rules OF this Court, end il
spl "h'lpE by satisfactory pToof lat he l. 40, an in
~. ~ =. '.'H CohhnoG "ealih-on motion Of the
ComP.a!nants hy counsel. tits ordered taat the IL
NeI.ndatI CO a'petr here on the first day of th,
ext Srlh2 iSim OF lE 5 Io0It, aud answer the "a q
lo'np'ailanis blI', and that n copy Of this urd,r 30
.%"rthWrh ln.eTt d in some nav paper punfc. a.
the. city OF, wheeling for two months sncccssly.Iy
ana posted al ihe .rOEt door Of the Court house Of
OhlJ county.
Mc,py tes,c. ALEX. T. LAIDLEY. Clerk.
Wa. :. HES.EY. yauu.ry :. 40
YIRGlEli-Ix ontSesRy 4 niles hold in a.
.'gtS 'lltc o. the Circuit Superior Count OF Law
oi January, 1910
H-rman Laysdosk. Complainant,
Daniel Nichols, AMI hicHa5i Sweeney and Doh.-,
G"ttu'y' par cT En. e. tIc firm Of VI. & r..
The Dei-ndaat Nichols ns' hoyin- cater 4 nj.
"tbe"I'h- % anu gwen seCUutr Gr.or ding 10 the Get
81 Assembly, and the rules oft.is Court. snc N an. /
p,1Ihi 10y, satisfactory proof that lie IS not a. H..
ha'iGni g THIS Commonwealth ON moirn nf ,c
Ionpiaiuaut By counsel, IL Is ordered That lie s.I(
HeNt spuns Term OF tils Court, and sIsy.St A.,
10 4 uWpaitGuts uhl, ard that "A COW Of fbiI 49,
q be forthwith inserted i'm some now - .
! 5h ie SKY u wheeling Tor Two months success
l'e'y, and posted 81 he front door of Inc C,,T,
4 copy tests. ALEX. I. LArDLEY. CLERK.
PAU & RUssILt. Janua,v : $50
IRHiNlA-IN oaANrEEy-At rules held i7 n,
once o. me Circu 0 Superior Court II Law
aud Chaucey, fr the county ofOn:5. in lie ronr,I
Oi January, 1870. ~
George Atkinson Complainant,
against
1eorse McCcIlou3h, Thomas Muuhy, and Andrew
- Mitchell, DEFENDANTS.
The Defendant HrNOll0uah no, having entered
ms appear lncc and .ivrn srcurfv accor1i,g h., 49,,
aetoi Assembly sad the mlrs Of this Court. and 4
ptaTihg D. saitsiactory proof that hc Is not an fp.
%ia5tant o. this Commonwealth; on motion II Nh.
- mi ainant by counsel, % D. ordoTef that the said
do appear here on the first da. If fTs /,
Sp.ls Term Of this Csurt. aad snsysr H.
tumpIairants bI, and that a copy Of ths order be- l
.of'hWiih inserted m some Newspaper printed rp !
l' ~ oi "IceI'g, Tor two mon'Bs sUcccssryCr.
posted al the font do r OF the Court hon.
JEf0 county.
4 copy tcs'a. IT II. I1fDT ry C1.-t ID
'AloB WILSON. January u, I-sl. n
NILGINIA-fy CHAScERy- 81 rules held ID, ,h,
-lerk 2 Office OF the Circuit Superior Conn az -
nd 'hantery fog iIc county OfOhio, in Inc r,g1fb
Ji January, Tao.
Robert Barlow. C0mp,a mart. ,
AGAINST II
Iohn J. Morgan ana john W. Brarstrup, DcEn4 a
ants. u
Inc btlcE 0nt Moran not having cnfrffd haI
appearance aHG given security according to H. art
u Asssm.I5 and The rules Of this Court. and ia AL.
caring ~ say sfaci0ry proof th-f be is not on inbab. p