The Ohio Democrat and Dover advertiser. [volume] (Canal Dover, Ohio) 1839-1840, 1840-09-25

Of hun, We1tusl the eS ldeuco hereto
fore adduesd, will not be dlsesedited
now, backed as iI9s by the letter Of.
Judge AyEea, TO Mr. Sloody Of this covn
". The original letter we have seen
and know the following 10 be atrue
copy. Aeregards Mr. Sioody's charac-
ter for uprghtness and verac,,y. We put
him against aoy osher inaa in.he county.
Fotths Ohio Democrat
Messrs Hill aod Mt,ehenef;-
Sirs:--Y our paper oflhsl7th ofJu.
lyIasl, came to- this office containing
-s'soae OF the sayiugs and doiugs Of The
Federal Wing candidate at his own
lhome,' in which he As charged by sun-
dry persons with using the following laa
Ruags: -..Buchansn Ia a d--d scoan-
Sdrel, G-d'd--n him, and any per-
aon who takes his part, and the whole
party are a set Of d--d Seoundrels."
al shah receive 240 electoral VOtes out
Of the two hundreds and ninety odd | By
the Eternsl God shall
NotwithstandIag'a portion of the fore
going words we're a,tesied by the s'G-
nature ofa worthy citizen Of CIncm-
ati, Charles Hale. and the bsisnes
sworn to by one OF the Comm,s'oRets
, Of Hamilton Co., (P. KemPer) before
Judge Ayes Of SAID County, whose Of
fetal character vac certified BY J, Say
der, Hsuison's own deputy CLERK, ! say
Notwithstanding Names, Dates, TSmcs,
Places end Offices. were all mentioned
and oil in thSVIcynity Of Gen. Ha'ri>
sons own Residence, Which Il fsse,
would has0 afforded the Ge0erSl very
-xooS chance to have refSled the charge
as il vas fret Published Ia the -JCIHclO>
ati Advertiser, ia hafrlson's o~n eOun-
-ts.sad every iaipg 10 regular order,ye,.
When your psper Was shown to The
Wings Of Mes CosshsNsnd, and The
charges agaiost Gsnessl Harrison, rsso
,othem, it was sIl pronounced falee BY
4le,s truth louiag WhigS
Well, said Ito one o the Wings pres
en,, what kind Of proof would you Wsnls
It wee q, length sgreed, that ! should
clip the whole article from your paper,
acd dseaclese,tti in "A ieirsr directed to
Judge Ayre., and if the Judge should
st,,e letter and send It back, with hle
avn signature endorsed, then the ssid
Wing woold believe the report, and vote
for Martin Van Buren for Precedent.
Well the letter was accordingly wrote
end zen, with the slip from the Ohio
Democrat enclosed inanswer TO which
the following is,e correc, copy:
. Cincinnati July 26,h, 1870.
sSIl. Daniel stoody Esp.
Dear Sir I have just Receiv.
p cd yours dated the 24th, inst, enquiring wheth.
sr nv signatursis rig,nfully placed to the Affida
Wit Of Mr. Kcmper as published IN The Ohio
Democrat or MOTTO which enquiry | answer
that TIS,-when male that Certificate, did
not intend to be drawn into an Eleciopeering
.scrape, not being in the habit Of taking A very
rctye part in the contest.--But it seems that our
regard Tor truth ,thathe community generally will
not believe item lave therefore been obliged
10 answer seyeIale nilar requests. In doing 20
do moi wish to be considered as taking any part
betwesn the General ard Kemper Gas to verac>
,ityE the character Of the General is public prop
~ <. ia generally known. Kemper Is respect-
able man and Commissioner ofths county, he
mado the affidavit voluntarily and il is sor the
public to determine between them.
remain yours to serve,
R. AYRES, A. j. H. c.
Daniel S,oody Esq.
The original letter I have, and csr
show il to any person, whenever called
upon at my sestdence,in New Cmber.
land, Tuscarawas County, OHIO. II
any further evidence should be Uecessa.
'ry to show that General Harrison ia a
protane and vulgar old man, the follow
ing, which is copied from a letter writ
ten by Charles SIuts Formerly Of this
place, but for some time past a resident
Of Cincinnati, to friend Of his 10 this
town, and may serve by way Of soma
further testimony 10 show that The Gem
eral il not only profane but vulgar.
The Letter 10 dated Cincinnati, June
'14ih, 1910, and after writing upon pri-
'va,e matter, Mr.. SluIs says,-'i must
hsTe state q circumstance that took
place in tins city, concerning General
Harrison. He was in this city a lev
weeks past, and was congeEsing with
some Of his party, and on being asked
Tbv . democrat whether he bad voted
for a Law to sell white man. He said
be HAD and WOULD again. The
Democrat then replied that he did not
think that soch principles were in favor
,ofequal rights, and liberty, to which
'Geberal HaRison answered that the
democrat was d---d rascal. and that
che whole Vaniis party were all d---d
Tascals, and making use of other IAN
Husge too VoigartO place Upon paper"
Yours, respectfully,
nAMiET. ST000Y p M