Wheeling times and advertiser. [volume] (Wheeling, Va. [W. Va.]) 1839-1849, 1840-02-27


Complainant.
-, against
lhomas ). " Prn;yney, Plsiof Zare, Ely Dorsey, /
May l. Dcrsev. his wife, late qua aian of lie l
ssld fiaioh Zane, samuel Spsigg and Charles - /
hhoS, Trustees. under a -ctfiein decd Al irlst. |
executed ei The - ID PlaiolI Zane. for TN. benefit OF
inc Creditors 81 the ssid flatf & '0r other purpo-
see Moses W. Cheplne and Eb, zer Zane "a.
minlstrotors with the will anut 1ed Uf y, an Zane
deceased, the said 4 benz ger Zahc In his owp
nshi. ead henry Moore aud James G. Johnston.
rust - nnUer certain deed oi iust executed hy
the said kbcnozer Zane Tor TIC hcnt r., 81 th cred
nors 81 ,he ssid Ehenozsr, ard for othor purpo
The Complaineh, having IL. bill in this cause
ana u. Defendant Jones q. Johnson. not having
n,SIsd h.s sppearanee aud given security according
20 me oct OF Assembly aud the rules of 'Ais Court
and y appearing by satisfactory proof that ne ~ not
an inhS6itSnt OF this Common ", alth--on motion
~ oy counsel l:is ordered that the said
Del.naant 90 apI car here n the first day Of the
next Spting Tenn OF ih,s Court, ara answer the
said blil' or otherwise defend this suit, aud that
cory % lhis order be forthwith inserted an some
Newspaper printed "a abe city Of Nhe,ling for two
months snScessNely nnd posted al ouIer door or
\ COP icstc ALEX. T. LAIDLEY. Clerk.
ANR ~ trcISdEN =. January : lSt1
NIRGtNIA--rS cHsNcERy-At rules held in IN.
Clerks Office OF the Circuit superior Court Of i,~
ana Chaacery, Tor The county oi OLiU IN the month
Jacob r Pier aaa lloyd c. Hughes. partner, in
tss ness under the firm of Bier 81 Hughes, Con-
plalnantF,
against
lanes Waters srd David My,rle, Defendants
ancc ard given ,ouTt. according to the act 81 As.
semeiy and the rules q ibis Court. and il appearing
Ly "a lsiactoTy ptoc that they not inh an's of
tnis Commonw ealih--On motion of Compla,na
oy counseili IS ordered that he sais d. Iant-' de
abps' here on the hrsi Gay 1i the next Spring Term
81 mt Court, and answer the CuuJairaEts' bill &
thai copy OF thus ord be orthw b inserted m s"me
newspaper prnttd IN the city Of Wheeling To, two
the Couit house vi Ohio CoGntv
4 copy tesie. ALEX. I. LAlDLFY, Clerk.
WHEAT January p, $50.
ViRGINlA-IS cHIvcrRy vt rules hold in tho
Clerk Office OF 'ht Circuit SuTtnor Court of Law
ana Chancery Tor the county OF Ohio, in Jhe mon
OF January lSin.
David Lee, Complainant,
against
David Nycrle, Defendant
The Defendant not having en- IefeJ HE nrr.,racc.
ond the rules of this Court and il arpt.ring h,
S,aciory proyi That he IS not nhsLi,snt If tins
= hh"n~ea't4a-o9 mction q Complainant by
pear htre The rvs. "uy e. 80 neat Spring T.rn
ithis Court, and answer The / ol,s ...-"t's BIZ
and that a COPY Of this ord DE forthwith iu.r't@
ior two months suecessvely and posted Al Tia from
DOOR OF the Court house cfnhio county.
NHrAg. January iSso
,vlRGiNIA-is e,nAScERy a, rules held in the
CIetk soficr 81 tue CiTcJrt sup, nor Cou-i of LaS
"a Chancery i4r the county Of OHIO, in The month
John Gilchfis,. Complainant,
0gaIEst
/ John ack; John &c rye D,elker, Uonry Auerback
/ charles Be'!ir Andrew Sch vartL John Wahl,n.
mayer Jacob smith and Peter Anshu,z, Defend
ants. '-
/ The DEFENDANTS Doe,,e-. Ap,rb,,L ps,l,
/ Nchwirz, ahsenmayer, Lick AMI Rrshutz moi
having entered tnelr appearance aud given srr,rity
accorsiaE TO the act Of Assembly and tue rules of
Us curt and II appearing by saiisfsctorv proof
mat they are not mhab tants OF this tomtnopws,th.
2n motion 4 the omp'sInnni by counsel, itis ar.
ltfe snHt the seld Dcenddh do al pear here on The
ursI CAY Of ne LeXt Spring Term "f this Court and
'9swct me SAID Compliments bill and that "a cJpy
- tn.s ofecf Se forthwith inserted IN some newspa-
l'pri ptlht 10 me cliy 81 hceling, Tor monihs
sgcc,ssively, and poslcd al the front door OF th.
/ C"Ntt house of Ohio county.
/ ccpy tes.e. ALEX. T.'LAIOLEY, Clerk.
! 'lS'N' January 7, 1870.
l,NlRGiNIA-IS eHAScEEY-st rules held in the
Clerks office Of the Great superior Cont OF az
20 hanee,y i1f 'he county q Ono, IA the nth
John ". Bush aud james NJ. Jrs,us late partners
! ~ oOs mess uUc.I he firm name md syle of
! Bush & Jusius, Complainants',
Austin ?eay. and Henri sl Moore J,b, r CHI, &
Mars - ug!ass' merchants aud partners in bus !.
"a onSeI .he hr'n,, nome ana style Of Moore
ia Re - 70 -efcndsnis.
:, n defendant Austin Ptay, not having en,ered
rs a IcaTancS aud gwen security ACCORDING 10 lie
act OF Assembly and the rules of tins Corrt and IL
sppeann3 hy satisfactory Trocf hat he i not az o.
nAol =: o. tals ;orumOG WcaiIh-on motion ~ IN,
Gohp'ahsHt - d. counsel II Is ord, red that the i
Defendant d. appear here on the frst day II ,bs
next Spline Term OF hrs Court aud unswcf the 81
Nowpianants bili, aud that copy Of this ord,r be
the city Of Wheeling, for Two months successyrIy
ana posted al the front door OF the Coul. house II
copy teste. ALEX. T. LAIoLEY. Clerk
WM. ;. HESLtY JanusryT la
-,FIfPlNlA-Is eHASc .EY--A, Jules hgld in Il
CItIk once OF the Circuit Superior Court Of Law
agd ChanceTy for the county OF Ohio, in the month
Harman Lavedock, Complginau,.
=, against
Daniel Nichols, and Michael Sweeney and Rober,
1 4. SWgenag. p fierf ha Of
~ Sweeney, Deieucants - ~
he Defendant Nichols not having enter, d nj
appearance and given securlt, according 10 The set
81 Assembly and the rules Of his Court and n 40.
Z, anns by satisfactory proof that he is not a. In.
o.o,,r;,Uai ~ eaIih on motion OF The
omp.huant by counsel, 70 n ordered that tie said
DeIenJant DO appc7i here on the first day of the
heNt Spnng Term OF tins Court, aud ansver thc
lh ompainants hit, and that a copy of this rr.
be forthwith inserted IN some newspaper prin.
ID N he Siiy f Wheeling for two m3nths succes.
iNe,y' and posted at The front door OF the Court
a copy tests ALEX. T. LAIDLEY. Clerk.
[AVl " hrssliL- January T. 1870.
NlRGlNlA-IN cHAScERv-At rules held IN the !
,IeFhs Office Of the Circuit nor Corr II Law
~ mans'iy tsr me county Of Ohio, in the month
George Atkinson. Complainant,
George NcColIcueh. Thomas MUMMY and ,,d,.,.
49, Mitchell De'cndanis'
he Defendant Mccullough no, having entered .
= appearance and gwen security according I'D the
act u assembly and the rules Of this Court ard n
ilpeanng D. satisfactory proof that Ia is not an IN
iahiipnt Of this Comm nwcalih; on motion Of the
s"npl sln5nt b. counsel 10 l. ordCre n ": the said
Defendant do appear here he first DAY # tn d
leN' Sp.ilg Term Of this Court. add answer a..
-"InPanauts bi 7, and that a copy OF th,s order A.
OF hWiih Inserted ~ some nst. paper Or MED m
ne cry Of Wheeling. for two mnu'h5 o ccess.yeIy
~ posted al the iEont 90 OF the Court h.use 81
)hlO county.
4 copy test" ALEX. T. LAfnLEY. Clerk
'N-O0 ~ '4LsOS' January 7, $40.
NlLSlNIA-fS cHAScEEY- At rules held IN IA.
,ierk Office Of the CIR az Suporilr Conn Of az
20 Chan,ery FOR inc county Of Ohn, in The p,tn,T
4 January $40. ~
Robert Barlow Complainant, ,
, - 90. against
Ohm u Moran and join ~. Branstrup D,C.,J 2
ants. J
The DcfcR lsnt Norgqn NOT having s,,.,,I
Ipearance a1n liven sCcunty according o. n. act
Assem- u ard the rules Of this Court and a. a.
caring ~ slaroy proof Ih1t Ne D. not an i4na1.
snt ~ ihlf common ,I.th; on motion Of Com
Iainan by ccrusoi. ~ is order q thai n SD De.
hn ahi % u're1r Isfe the first day Of the hex
% 'g I'Tm Of tbs g MT aud a-syver ibe All /