Wheeling times and advertiser. [volume] (Wheeling, Va. [W. Va.]) 1839-1849, 1840-01-14
CEg.aNCERY


CK.9.NrCERr NOTICES.
NlRGlNlA-iS cuASehRv-At rules he j m he
once OF tte Circuit Superior Court OF Law
Cnhhe'ry ior The county OF Chic, in the month
The General Insurance, Company of Maryland,
Complainant,
against
THOMAS ). y. Pent,ney, Plaiaff Zane, Ely Dorsey,
haryt T.. Dorssy, has wife. late guai dian OF the
said Platot Zane, samuel SpIigE and Charles ID /.
Knox, Trustees, under a certain deed ~ Trust.
executed by the said pla,oir Zane for tho benefit of
ihe creditors OF the said Plat II d 'or other purpo-
ses, Moses w. CEophnc aud Ebcn,zcr Zane. adj.
illustrators with the wall an xed of n, all Zane
deceased, the said Ebenezer Zane. in his Swn
Ilghi, and HcnGy Moore and Jane, G.. Johnston.
LiustcsS under a certain deed OF 'nus, executed by
tne sald tncntkcr Zane, Tor the hent ht of the cred
ltors of the SAID Ebenezer, and fer other rurpo
ses. Defendants. 1922
and Tue defendant James, <. Johnson. not having
.n!e-,d las appearance and given security accordinT
20 the oct OF Assembly and the rules of,Iis Coart,
aaa 1, appears by satisfactory nrcoe .L-. l IA noi
~ an OF this Svrnmrnwealth-on motto, I
-"uiFialnantb y counsel, III ordered that the said
De.endani 90 app ear here on the first day of the
SAIL oil, or otherwise defend this snit, aud that a !
cory Of this order be forthwith inserted IN some
months snecessively, and posted at an outer door of
me SoGIt house OF 0hla County.
LAND N fp1lNSrNS January Z, as 40.
NANhlNlA-tN CNANCELY-At rules hFld IN tba
Clerks Office of the tircuit Superior Court of Law
a9d Chanccry, tor The county of Ohiu In the month
Jacob 4. Pier and Lloyd G.. Hughes. mariner, in
Ins ness under Ihs finn of Bier & Hughes, Conf.
pIaInants,
against
lanes Waters and David Myerle, Defendants
The Deitndants not having enterec their opp,,,-
ance and given security according to The A. ~ a..
senbly and the rules Of This Court, and il annc,,in,
ny satisfactory proof that they are not inhab,anis Of
tnis CommonwcAlth- motion of Compliments
% counsel,i III rs ordered that the said Def, ndont.i do
appear here on the fl. st day of THE next Sprinr Term
OF his Court, and answe the Compartments bill, &
newspaper printed IN the city of Wheeling To-. two
months succesivsly, and posted at the front door of
the Court house Of ONO county.
copy tcsic. ALEX. 4. LAIDLEY, Clerk.
WnEAr. Janrarv !. Is,o
Clerks Office ofth. Circuit Superior Court of law
and Chaneery tor the county ofOhio, in the month
David Lee, Complainant,
against
David Mycrle, Defendant.
The Defendant not having en- tered his appearance
aug gwen security. according 10 the act vi A-senbl,
lsfacioTy proof that hs Is not an inha6iianI If t5is
20 hmonwealth-on motion Of Complainant by
counsel, rs ordered that The said Defendant do an
pear mere on the hfsi day q tho next Sprins Term
OF thIs Court, and answer the Complainnni's hi
aud that a copy Of this ord : DC forthwith inserted
loF two months successfully. and posted n The FROM
door OF the Court house nfUhio county.
WHEAT. yaUu,ry tS,o
yIRGINIi,Ix caAScrRv-a rules h,ld in the
ClerS somcr Of the CrcIlt sup nor Courr of Law
ana Chancery Tor the county OF Ohio. in the month
John Gilchris,, Complainant.
g.. against
'V @E. 1teti b John G., IsS 2,slker. Henry Aqcr5qck,
mayer jacob smith and Peter .Anshuiz, Defend.
The Defendants Doeiker, suerb,,L R,rl,
D SCnNdTZ =, w ahtgnI!aguF. Lick mud Apsbuty ~,
having entered their appearance and rivcn srcurlty
according 10 The at OF Assembly and the rules of
ms Court. and II appearing ~ satisfactory proof
ihat they are notlnhab tanjs IL th!s Cummonwealfh.
on notion & the I omplainnnt by counsel, itis or.
leTed mar the sad Defendants do appear here on the
hrsi day OF the next Spring Term Of tins Court and
answer the SAID Complalnants b:il, and that a copy
paper pnnied IN the lily of Nneeiing, Ior Two monIbs
snccessveiy, aud, posted at the from, door of IN,
! cosy ties c. ALEX. r. LAIDLEY, Clerk.
WILSON January :, 1910.
ElKGlNtA-IN cmAsCERy-At rules h,il in the
Clerks office of The Great superior Conri of Law
ana Sn1ncery Tor the county of OHIO, IN the month
JnhD W. Bush and James W. Jus;us late partners
~ business nndrr Tie firm 'sms and style Of
Bush x Juslus, Compliments,
Austin ?eay, and Henry Moore, John +. Clarke &
MARX Douglass merchants aud partners in bus.
ness, under the firm, name aud Style of Moore
CLARKE e Co. Defendants.
! he Defendant AUSTIN Pcay, not having entered
~ ~ oHh ENGlS security dGGOlfllR 10 NJ q
act OF Assembly and the rules of this Corrt. and i
! appearing by satisfactory proof that he Is not an in
hGOiant OF this Common wealth-on motion Of IN,
Complainants By counsel, il Is ord red maj the sd
Defendant dp an ar here on the first dav of he
Hext spring Term OF his Court, and answer the sad
CDmplaInants1 Ii, and that a copy of his ord.r n.
'OrlhwIh INSERTED IN some new paper printed In
the, oiiy Of Wheeling, for Two months succesSiyely.
ana posted at the 'front.' door Of the Court house or
OHIO county.
Acepy ,este. ALEX. T. LAIDLEY. Clerk.
"A' . HENLEY. January z, $40.
FIRGINIA-Iy cHAscvRY-At rules held in u o
CItES,s Office Of The Circuit Superior Court Of Law
aug Chdhcefy, Tor the county OF Ohio, in the month
u January, 1870
Hartman Lavcdock, Complainant,
against
Dqpiel Nichols, and siichacl Sweeney and Rober,
SNscn2y' par . ers under the firm Of VI. d II.
The Defendant Nichols nos having entered hi. /
appearance and given security according 10 Inc act
OF A.seInb!y and the rules Of this Court. and II APP
peannS ~ satisfactory proof that he is not an in
hab'iant Of this Commonwealth on motion of ~
comp. aIhant by counsel, II Is ordered that the said
DeIenIant 90 appear here ON the first day Of the
HeKt SpnnR Term Of this Court, and answer the
ID ompiinants bill, and that a copy OF this az.
DR. be forthwith inherited in come new spaper prin.
I TT 10 the yi'y e Wheeling FOR two months sneees.
! lively. aEj posted AZ The front door of Inc Cont
4 copy tesie. ALEX. T. LAIDLEY. CLERK.
PAUL " RUSSELL. January 7, 1910.
.NlRGlNIA-IN CHANcEHy-At rules held IN ,ha
CIerk.s Office Of ths Circu { superior Cont Of Law
agd Chaneefy Tor the county Of Ohio, IN the monih
u JhuuarY, 1880. |
George Atkinson, Complainant,
agaUnst !
george MsCollcugh, Thomas Murphy, and Andrew
Mitchell. Defendants.
The Defendant Mccullough not having entered
he appearance and given security according 10 Ibe
uctof Assembly and the rules Of this Court, and n
2ppednhg BY satisfactory proof thathe is not an IN.
habiI 49, this Commonwealth; on motion OF The
ON by counsel, V Is Ordcref tia; the said
DcicnrF no appear here on The 6rst day Il the
next Spang Term Of this Cont. aod answer H.
C"mplainants bill and that a copy Of this order b.
IoT' h"ith inserted 90 some s~spapGr printed In .
the cry OF wheeling. for two uOu'hs succcsqyelv /
and posted az the front DOR Of The Couu h0use ~
Ohio county.
4 COPY test. ALEX. T. LAfDLEY, Clerk.