Vermont telegraph. [volume] (Brandon [Vt.]) 1828-1843, 1840-04-08

the church, and therefore are not gospel /
churches.
1t is also we'll known that, while the regular
way OF building these $50 called) churches
is by sprinkling unconscious babes, yet
they sometimes bap,ize believers and by
that receive them into their number.
Now Task brother A. A. if such individ-
uals are baptized rightly? and if they are
not, would ask whether he would, win
Tertullian, say they are doubtless not oap-
tized al all ? or whether he would say the
fault is not in the individuals so baptized,
and therefore treat them, in his practice, as
properly baptized persons2 ). w.
| Irashurgh, March 81. 1910.
For the Telegraph. !
Brother Murray AS it is matter oil
doubt in the view of some of our breth- |
rem, as to the propriety of inviting to our
communion baptized christians who be-
long to, and partake with, Psychologists
at their communion, have written few
questions for them to answer, belleTlng
their doubts will be removed, by the an
swers they must of necessity give.
j. II.
: Dear Sister, or Brother:
RI Do you know of any scripture which
; teaches, either directly or by implication
= that anything but immersion is baptism2
Do YOU believe that immersion is the
n only baptism2
. Do you believe it to be right to com
n mune with unbapiized persons2
= Should number of unbaptized per
=. sons meet together and commune, doe
80 this act make them church,
N Can such thing be. as an unbaptize
he church, sH
ID. If YOU and l belonged 10 Bapt
if church, and should commune with
re unbaptized people, should you not :
nd tried with me?
en- If Baptist church should sit down
Of the Lords table with sprinkled peopl
not do they not acknowledge their baptls
ir- good by their conduct 2
Dut Then if we should invite baptlz'
on member to our communion who belon;
zen TO an unbaptized people and partakes WI
be- them.-are we not inconsistent and do
The not thus saw sprinkling is as good as al
If thing else ?
OBJ Does a sprinkIed church allow chr
you Itians to their communion, which they
ave lieve unbaptized?"
Which is the most likely way to !
Ian them out of the mud, 10 jump in W
!, in them, or stand on good ground ourselV
one and try to help them out2
r. Who is to be blamed, or on VIII
from does the fault lie, that we do not all &C
diff. mune together +?
from Is it not the Lords table and not Q
sake then what right have we to dishonc
sites with Inconsistencies
verb Ii we should countenance @"y MS"s
K The baptism, should we not say to the we
s,ori- ang thing IS baptism?
pro- Is it not right to build churches
, see the manner in which the apostles
erses them. and maintain that manner
, sub Some say they believe, in their
nd science, that sprinkling will dds
does science sure guide2 or the wrliin
fifth, the apostles? for there Is sure {
ne of somewhere.
stand Would Naaman, Inc Assyrlan'
marks been cleansed from his leprosy, if ht
what dipt in the waters of ALBANIA and Pha
This rivers of Damascus, and not in Jord
mind though the waters were both alike
Would the blind man have receive
!. ]. sight, if he had washed in pool
O might have been more convenient al
-. have gone 20 the pool of Siloam2
! Te,e- Would the Tabernacle have bee
of Acts copied II Moses had maue IL Vi map
Suffer birch-when the Lord said to hi
broth thou make all things according
nauern showed thee in the mount
EN-, APP tMosas had made a wooden S
3 Of the -, -, baco,se !, i
mmuni-
respect Haoe anu s'iu'
lion. the people have been benefited :