Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1840-02-06

Saturday, the 9Th day Of April 1889 use On
r, John I. Brown, Mary Brown. admini,,,a,,;,
= \ homss X. Brown. deceased, Andrew H., OF
Mary 3 his Wiz, formerly Mary s. Pow ri ana
D'o'- '"' 'ia''ha brown Piautifs
Maurice IL. Garland, admin sfrator Of A,,bit,
Robertson, deed, Nathaniel |. Manson and Sa'''a
Garland, the said Roberson's securities St%e'
Robertson, formerly Sarah F. Brown. James NJ :,
Robertson. infant son OF the said Archibald p. ID
son, by Robeu Tinsley his guardian, spee,ll,
signed 10 defend Inn in this suit, Rhoda Bow
James NJ. Brown executor Of James VI. B,o suu
decd. #z=F ID .(ooi Dt.o"n,
In CHAScERy.
The defendant, Maurace H. Garland adj ,,i;
tor Of Archibald Robertson, deed, by counsel ~
ing first Obtained leave Of the Court filed his -,
TO the Plaintiffs amended BILL to which the pl,i,e'
by counsel reply generally. And the suhnnnas
warded herein on The 9TH day OF May, l53S, hsin.
returned executed upon Defendants. Nalhani.,
Mason Samuel Garland. Sarah f. Robe,,..
James NJ. Brown, executor Of james NJ g,os"'
decd, and Rhoda Brown, and the said Defendln,.'
still failing 10 file their answer, although fon,
months have elapsed well since The return daS.
OF the said subpGnas, as the fIlug The Plainn6.,
amended Bill On motion Of Plaintiffs by cour,.I
the Court doth ake the said bill FOR confessed =, =,
the said Defendants, and thereupon this eau.e
came on to be heard upon the papers formerly ,e,J
the amended Bill, the answers thereto of Tho D
PENDANT, Maurice Ii. Garland, administrators N
Archibald Robertson decd and of the infant IA
PENDANT, James NJ Rob rtson. and the examination NJ
a wltness,and was argued by counsel On consider
atioG whereof the Court setting aside the or.Ie, of
account heretofore made, doth order that the Ds
PENDANT Maurice II. Garland. administrator of Ar
chibalJ Robertson decd. do lender before one If
the Commissioners Of this Court, account of his
lntestate administration OF the estate Of Jamr.
Nj Brown, deed, which account the sad cnmms
soner IL directed 10 examine, state, and settle. and
make report thereof 10 the Court with any matter.
specially stated, deemed pertinent by himself or re-
CURED by the parties TO be stated. In settling
the SAID account The said commissioner will take as
a basis, the various settlements in the comfy Court
including as well those that lay for exceptions as
those thai were admitted TO record. striking there.
from or disaowlng all items of debt or credit, on
account Of The house and LOT IN Lynchbure and
IN heu thereof. charging Doctor Browns estate
with the TAR rent OF the same so long 1t was oc
cuped by the widow and family, with liberty TO the
Plaintiffs. further to surcharge and lalsdy before
The commissioner, by evidence taken or here
after to be taken. said settled accounts to the extent
OF the specific exception taken in their amended
BIZ, or taken IN the county Court, ald endorsed on
the accounts which are not recorded. Aud in order
better to enable the commissioner to state the ac.
counts the Court doth further order that The De-
lend ant Maurice H. Garland administrator as alor.-
said, do deliver to the said commissioner, all books
papers and vouchers in his power or possession, re-.
Iating to the subject matter of said account
Copy-Feste,
ROBERT TINSLEY, Clerk
COMMISSIONERS Office.
Amherst Court house. December 80, 1899
The parties will take notice THAT have appointed
Monday, the 9th day of March next, TO execute tho
foregoing order, on which day at The hour Of 10
o'clock, A. NJ, they are requested 10 attend at my
dice, with their accounts vouchers and copies Of
Court papers, prepared for examination aud setls-
uent. ROBERT TINSLEY, Com'r
Jan. l6 w4w
A Il Circuit Superior Court OF Law and Chan
a Gerry, continued by adjournment, and hpld for
he county OF Amherst, al the Courthouse, on Thurs
lay, the 5rh day OF September, 1889
Peter +. Christian, Plaintiff,
against
William L.. Christian. Richard Davenport and
Mary L., his wife, Ohm Christian. Ehiah l.. Chrs-
ian, Walter l.. Christian, James q. Christian Ju-
llth +. Woodson, Drury Christian, Chslles l..
Christian, John Christian, son OF Samuel, and
Samuel Garland, Defendants.
In CHANcERY.
The Defendants. K ichard Davenport and Mary L.,
MS wife. Charles l.. Christian aud John Chrlsuss,
son OF Samuel, against whom the Plaintiff appears
% have proceeded IN the mode prescribed by law a
galnst absent Defendants, still failing 10 appt ar and
answer and the subpGnas awarded in this cause, on
he 30lh day Of Aptli, 1888, being returned .xecu-
ed upon the Defendant Dtury Christian, and the
same acknowledged by the Defendant. Samuel
Garland, and the said last named Defendants still
aillng 10 file their answers, although four months
have elapsed well since the return days OF the said
subp1nas as the filing Of The Plaintiffs bill.
lion OF the Plaintiff by counsel his bill is iaksn for
sed TO those Defendants: And therefore tbs
cause on to be heard upon the bill, the an,oen
Of the Defendants, William l.. Christian, John
Christian, Elijah Christian. Waite, l.. Christian.
James q. Christian, aud judith +. Woodson, and re
reations 10 the exhibits, and examination OF Wit
nesses, and argued by counsel; on consd ration
W ereof the Court doth order that the plaintiff DO