The pilot and transcript. [volume] (Baltimore, Md.) 1840-1841, 1840-09-07

J 10 FEDER.aLTS.M.-wE pELIaNT ~ TuE

of FEDER.aLISM,-wE DELIGHT IN TUE
Again, in 1898:
ss'ro us, the name Of Federalism is subject
of no rcproach. We rejoice to bear It, and hope
that our efforts to honor and support It, may De
such as it merits. While others are endeavormg
to hold itup to scorn, and deserving its standard
for the purpose of securing power and emolu-
ment, from other hands, 1t shall be our glory to
support its cause, and OUR FEEBLE pow
Frs SHALL. ALWAYS BE EMPLOYED
to display its beauties to others"
Again In reply to correspondent of the
Wilmington Waterman, he compliments the
Democracy thus:
seWe can inform sVerbum Sat of the Watch
man. that none of his Low BRED, HIDE-BeUND
DEMOCRATS corresponds tcith Us, as ne fnSt5tit-
dteSp
Again. federalism he calls the GOOD OLD
CAUSE.
eI3ette1 and better.-The accounts we receive
from Kent and Sussex, are more and more pleas
ing. From other places we also learn, that the
FsderaIistS are actively engaged, and evince an
anxious desire FOR THE SUCCESS OF THE
GOOD OLD CAUSE" u ise
Again. He tells us what he deemed GOOD
NEWS:
sGood .NepS-St Georges Hundred has come
out Federal. A FEDERAL CONSTABLE
has been elected in this STRONGHOLD VI
DEMOCRACY"
Again. He rallys the Federalists to the Polls,
and tells us who the Democrats are:
'sTttYn out, turn out, give in your votes for
Ger. Paynter and the Federal ticket. Then shall
we be safe-then shall we see the t1tTbttlent-
the violent, the ttflpTincipled men, who have
commended against us, pat do'UT."
Again. The election is over; the Federalists
succeeded, he raises the shout of triumph:
"The triumph of FederaliSm.-F liberalism
has again re-established itself in Delaware IL
has suffered partial eclipse, but its glor1es nave
only been concealed for season, to display tne
greater radiance and beauty on its re-appear-
ance." ep.,
Such is SAMUEL HARKER. Democrats OF bal
timore, behold the oman of your counsel;"
Democrat sein whom there is no guile"
As to his Friendship for Andrew Jackson
In 1888. He says:
stOf all the gentlemen named for the PresideH-
cy, General Jackson appears to US the nloSt 90
jectionG6le."
Again, @We have seen in the General, such
disregard for the Institutions Of the country,
such disposition to place himself Gb9ce ITS IdtcS,
and such an inclination to tranple upon the
rights of Others, when they stood in opposition
TO his own interests or feelings, should render
the citizens of the United States very cautious
about placing him in the first office within their
gift"
Again. General Jackson, like Gen. Wayne,
should be called Mad .daldretc"
Friends of General jackson, behold the con-
sistent supporter of your beloved old General.
AS to his Friendship for Mr.. Jefferson
In 1928. He says:
t(Tbo attaclr which Mr. liersOn
has been pleased to make upon the Federal par
| ty, without any kind of necessity or reason for
it. is altogether uniustifable, and can be account
| ed for on no other ground than the MENTAL
IMBECILITY or unhallowed resentment OF its
author, a most coTsttnl1ndte tntrtgtteT, who had
been opposed to the adoption of the Federal cen
stitution; invcigled himself into the favor OF the
\ people; undermined the men who had befriended
| him, and rendered him popular, when far other
wise, on account of his opposition to the consti
tuition; Hisreprcsented their motives and actions
and instigated Others to insult and abuse them
and at length seated himself in the chair of the
Chief Magistracy of the country, by course 81
the MOST SHAMEFUL DOUBLE DEAL.
ING and PERYERSION OF TRUTH AND
JUSTICE"
Democrats, behold the consistent follower Of
the Father of Democracy!
As to his Friendship for Mr.. Van Buren,
believe the party hold up Mr.. Van Buren, a:
Democrat? Well-the Democratic editor o.
the Republican, speaking through the Delaware
Gazette, in 1928, says:
GIVE SHOULD REJOICE TO SEE A
SOLID, SUBSTANTIAL FEDER.4LIS1
ELEVATED TO THE PRESIDENTIAL
CHAIR, because we believe that the advance
ment of the best interests of the country would be
thereby promoted"
Who can read these extracts, and compare
these men then with what they now are, and be
lieve that their opinions to men or principle:
should become the standard for honest men?