Vermont telegraph. [volume] (Brandon [Vt.]) 1828-1843, 1840-11-11
VOL. XIII. NO. =

all, and leave il. My former slalpn.s
were, that was satisfied be deaieaed :
honest; but | thought some of his ac,,
vOlsed practical dishonesty. The ps.
who cannot see tat there is In This n
cessary contradiction, IS TO be piled. =
pose | should say: l am satisfied H.,
designed to go to Albany, but he missed :.
way and went 10 Utica. Is there apr :
contradictions here ? Precisely as mus.
in the former case. There IS none j,
ther. Il IS one thing to desfga-it j. i
other 10 perform.
As for the challenge for an exposg,
the whole Of bis conduct, /" from bs.pin,..
TO end" shall neither trouble myself ]
the readers ofthe Telegraph viii anv j
thing. Daniel Rowley has been crov.I
TO lake this reckless step by i'll advise. n
position he occupies is that of one who D
everything 10 hope and nothing 10 fear NJ
notoriety. The Telegraph cannot be c,o.#
tuted TO such vanity add wraneIiDg. It,
be and must be better occupied. In g.
pliance with his request for exposure 7 p.
mention two or three things, which be y
not deny-and there The matter mus, o..
unless justice require some explanation. 81,
that must be shost.
When be commenced his agepcv Fl. 4
Telegraph, there was an express s,ioar,.ll
between him and me that be should h..
only a certain per eeatage Of moneys 8
iected, as pay for his services. lie was
TO have his commission aay faster thai
had the principal. This contract be r..
time 10 time violated, using my moru
his own convenience. and thus forcing i.
self into deb1to ne, TO considerable azse.z
without MY consent.
! While this was going on, l was at Nos
holly, attending lhe State Conves@ce
October, 1888, and saw a sen CT De-.
Richardson Of LondonderrY, who il.
for Daniel Rowley, stating that Re-
had horse Of his father, 10 March Pr
ing, agreeing 10 return he horse ia a 81
number Of days or weeks, or tae NO..
it;-that the time agreed oa had ali:
elapsed, and doubled or ireb!ea, and ~c'.
/ had heard nothing from Rowlev. II
only add, on this point, that this W.
Of the things which moved nae 10 cs~-
him 50 sharply, about that time, fur a sell
ment
One case more must suffice 4: present.
About The last Of July, 1910, man by i
name Of Williams. a Baptist brother f.
Mounlbolly, called on me, know;~2
Rowley was my former agent, and il, .
for his then location, stafiag, as n,ar 4
can now reeolieet. that, some two VI.
before, or more. Rowley lad boar3sd +.
him to the amount Of several dolIa,s-55
7-pronisiRg prompt payment AL
was the last Of it. WHAT rendered ;'.>s
the more aggravaline, IN my own Ejr~~. IS
brother Williams is a poor man, vii, !.
one arm 10 use in gaining sustensa" S
himself and family, having lost l5c
by The fall Of Tree, some years sire. 3
These are only three of numercus a.
that mighs- be mentioned. Bot can s
consent 10 I'll up the Telegraph with
Of them; or with any further coar>~
on the subject, except, as before sfarsl.
lice require explanation-and that ma,
lie briefest possible. If this be moi II.
factory, and there be those who viii
further Information, enough 10 seek il
other channels, they are referred to c.
Palmer, David seofeld, and RoswcHW
cock, of this place. The last lives iar
ford. His Post-ofice adlsess l heller.
be Brandon.