Wheeling times and advertiser. [volume] (Wheeling, Va. [W. Va.]) 1839-1849, 1840-01-28
CRER.YCERY NOTICES.

NOTICES.
vlRGiNlA-lS cEANesRv-At rules held m the
Clerks Office ct the Circuit Superior Crurtoi Law {
ara Chanecry iorthe county OF Chic, IN the month
OF January. 1870. II
The General Insul ance Company Of Maryland, :
Complainant,
against
Thomas }. b. PentVncy, Platofi Zane. Ely Dorsey,
Mary l.. Dorsey, his wife, late guardian OF the
sand PlatoH Zane, Samuel SprieS and Charles ID
executed by The said PIatoG Zane.fo The benefit Of
tho creditors of the said rlatOH ~ cor other purpo-
ses, Moses w. .C,hepline and fb,nczcr Zane, All
illustrators with the will annexed Of \ ,ah Zane,
deceased, the sad kbenezcr Zane, in his own
right. and Henry Moore and JameS c. Johnston,
Trustees under n certain deed of aust executed by
the sad kbenezer Zane, Tor The hen,ft Of the cred
ltors of the SAID Ebenezcr, and for other purpo
ses. Defend ants
The COMPLAINANT having flied Us bill in this cause
and the Defendant James g. Johnson, not having
entered his appearance and given security according 4
TO the act of Assembly and the rules of,Sls Court,
and II appearing 10y satisfactory proof that he II not
an lnhabitant OF this w,alth-on motion
81 Coniplainani by counsel, a: IL ordered that the said
Defendant do apI ear here IN the first day of the
next SPilng Term OF Ihls Court, aud answer the
copy OF this order be forthwith inserted IN some
newspaper printed IN the city Of wheeling, for two
months successfully, and posted at an outer door Of
the Court house of Ohio County.
copy ,este. ALIEN T. LAIDLEY, Clerk.
LAMB FpoiNorNs' January ., ls40.
.vIRGIN1A-Ix eaAseEry-At rules held in the
Clerks office OF the Circuit Superior Court of law
and Chancery, tor the county OF OniU in the month
of January 1870.
Jacob +. Bier and Lloyd C. Hughes. partner, in
business under tbs finn Of Bier & Hughes, Com
plalnsnts,
against
James Waters and David Myerle, Defendants
The Defendants not having entered their appear
ance aud gwen securty according TO the act OF As
semb!r and the rules Of this Court, and Il appearing
by satisfactory proof that they are not Inhabitants OF
tins Commonwedlth-on motion of Co mplainant.'
by counsel,lt ~ ordered that the SAM Def ndants' do
appear here Oh the ffStday ofthe next Spring Term
Of this Court, aud answer the Complairants' bill, &
newspaper printed in the city OF Wheeling ior two
msnths succoslVcly, and posted at the front door of
the Court mouse OF OHIO county.
NsEAr. January :, is<o.
VIkGlNlA-rS cHa~oERY-At rules held in the
. Clerk. once Of the Circuit Superior Court Of law
a AID Chsncery for the county OF Ohio, in the month
e David Lee, Complainant,
against
= David MycTle, Defendant.
The Defendant not having en- tered his appearance
= and gwen security according To the act o fA.sembly
T ana the rules OF this Court, and II appearing by sat
d i.iactory prsvf that he IS not an inhaIitant Of this
r 20 nnlonwealth-on motion Of Complainant BY
a counsel, II is ordered that the said Defendant do an
pear hare on the first day of the next Spring Term
oithIs Court, and answer the Complsinants bill,
and that q copy Of this cnd I be forthwith inserted
+ N some newspaper printed in the CRY of wheeling.
h ior two months suecessively. and pOsted at the front
n door of the Court house of uhio county.
= heopv teste. LEX T. LaIDLEY, Clerk.
WHAT. J.nu,ry !, is4o.
}, CierS,scfiee Of the Great superior Couri Of Law
AID Chanoery for the county OF Ohio, in he month
" John Glchrist, Complainant,
y John Lick. John GearSs Decker Henry s,.-h,c,
Charles Bcrlt, Andrew Sch ssri,, John wnhien,
j mayer Jacob Smith and Peter Anshu,r, Defend
The Defendants Decker, Auerback, Berlt,
schwartz, Nahlenmeyer, Lick aud Anshutz, moi
e according to the act Of assembly and the rule. Of
= thls Court and II appearing by satisfactory proof
d thai they are not inhabitants OF this Commonwealth ia:
h on lhouoh 81 the Complainant, by.counse, IL is or
e Tered that the said Defendants do appear here on the
e mrs, cay OF inc next Spring Term Of thls Court and
n OF tins order be forthwith inserted in some ncn-pa-
paper printed IN the city Of Wheeling tor two months
succrssVely, and posted AT the front door of the
Court house Of Ohio county.
copy tese. ALEX. 4. LAIDLEY. Clerk.
n Nhlsos' January 7, 1910.
cHAseERr-At rules held in the
!" and Chsncery for the county of Ohio, in the mon IN
Q! JaIuary Ii4O.
+ John W. Bush and James VI. Justus late partners
IN business under he firm name aud style OF
BGsh d 1usius, ComPlainanis',
Austin ?eay, and Henry Moore. John F. Clarke g.
> Marx Douglass, merchants aud partners in bus
ness, under the trm,, name and style Of Moore,
Glake d Co Defendants.
Inc Defendant Austin Peay, not having entered
ms aPPearanes and gwen security according 10 tie
acto oil Assembly and the rules o: this Court, and IL
n sppearng BY satisfactory proof that he Is nor an in
c naolant OF tins common wcalth-oh motion Of the
a. OehSNi ~ u Otu1TcO INA ~ \ lI1
Defendant do appear here on the first day Of the
next Spring Term Of his Court, and answer the SAID
Somplainants bill, and that a copy of this order be
forthwith INSERTED IN come Newspaper punIes in
tbs, city Of Wheeling, for two months successively.
D ana posted at the front door OF the Court house Of
Acspy tes,e. ALEX. T. LAIDLRY. Clerk.
"h' HENLEY January z, 1910.
VlRGlNlA-TS cHAscrRY-Atr rule, held in tie
iCIeIks ONCE Of the Circuit Superior Court Of Law
aug Chencery Tor the county OF Ohio, in the month
OF January, 1870
Hartman Lavedock, Complainant,
u Daniel Nichols, and MichaeT Sweeney and Rober,
~ sweeney partners under the firm of NJ. & II.
~ sweeney, DeienCants'.
= me Defendant Nichols not having enfercd his
D appearance and gwen securIty according To he ACT
Of Assembly and the rules Of this Cont. and n an.
Pe3tIn2 by satisfactory proof that he is not an in.
habrtani Of this Commonwealth; on motion of tic
: Complainant by counsel, IL is ordered Mn AZ the 49,
Defendant do appear here on the frst dav Of liz
heNit Spring Term Of this Court, and answer Inc
~ I ompninants bill, and that a copy of this cr.
q be iorthwIih inserted IN some newspaper prin-
I q in The city Of Wheeling for two months sucres-
kNely' and posted at the front door Of the Court
4 copy tesle. ALEX. T. LAIDLEY, Clerk.
NVsstLl' January Z, 1910.
V~IRGINIA-IS cHAxcERY-At rules held in the
CIeFks once of the Circuit Superior Court Of Law
s9J ohaneery' Tor the county Of Ohio, in tho month
George Atkinson, Complainant,
George McCoIIoueh, thomas Mummy. and .nd,ov
Mitchell, Defendants.
Inc Defendant Mccullough not having entered
hs appearance and gwen security according 20 the
acto assembly and the rules Of this Court and n
appearing by satisfactory proof that lac is not en- I'M.
hatltanf OF this Commonwealth; on motion Of the
Complainant By counsel, it - ordered that the said
defendant do appear here on the first day of the
next Sppng Term Of this Court, and answer the
toInpiainants bill, and that a copy Of this order be
forthwith inserted IN some newspaper printed in
the, city Of Wheeling. for two months succcssivcIy,
and posted az the front doJT o.. the Court house II
OHIO county.
a copy testr. ALEX. Il. LAGDLEY. Clerk.
JACOB q WILSON. January Z, 1910.
N~LGIN1A-IS cHAScERy- At rules held in tho
Clerks Office Of the Circuit Superior Court Of Law /
ana Chan,ey for The county OfOhio, in the month
Of January, 1910.
Robert Barlow. Complainant,
against ]
John T. Morgan and John w. Branstrup. Defend
ants.
The DCfcn liant Morgan not hav1np rrtoted he