Morning herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1837-1840, 1840-06-01
Supreme Court.
May Term, lS40.-DEcIsIoN

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.-Watts ct al VS. Kinney;
Acker VS. Campbell ct al; German VS. Colbey; lib
bets impd VS. Doud; Jones a. Chubb VS. Fish; Gus
TIN VS. Jackson; Mcpherson VS. Chedall; Baker VS.
McDuhey; Mil VS. Abel X Annas; Powell ct al vs.
Myers; Cannah VS. Hale; Willis ct al VS. Burt ct al;
Monnell VS. Frink; Werkmeister VS. Alderman Il
Colt; Harbeck VS. Cox Il Knock; Bamman VS. Rip
ley; The Mayer, &c. VS. Benjamin; Williamsett
Manufacturing Company VS. Hubbard ct a.; Patten
VS. Ihurston; Buckley Case.
NEW TRIAL DENIED.-Laurence ads Buckle and
al; holloway ads Terrill; Fort ct al VS. Cornell,
adm'X, Ne; Wells ad Bronx; DeGraw, survivor,
&c adj Brooklyn Bank; Hahn ad Pratt; Blessing
Davis; ellis ad Wood; kellogg ct al ad Magee;
Brooks Brainard; " ales ct al v Reynolds Van
VIE ct al ad Van Rensselaer, ct al; Woolsey ad Hal
Lock; Stockholm VS. Robbins; Shepherd VS. Craven;
The Palmyra Manufacturing Company ad Lyndes;
! Cole Thurman ad White; Fox vs. Lipe; Brown
VS. the Mohawk and Hartford Rail Road Company;
Porter ct al ad Simpson; Paze ad Davis; Hall Il
Vanetten ad Case; Hayes, jr ad Rocks; Newland
VS. French; Bates VS. Stearnes; Smith ad Helme;
ellis ad Norton; Patchin Vine; Walcott ct al
ad Cook; The People rel Norton ellis;
| Wright ct al ads Holmes; Teal ct al ads Bowman
Lake ad McFadden, ex, SC; Marvin VS. Robin
son; Evans VS. Delolme; Mitchell ad McChesney;
Wright ad Hobrook Barber ad Cooper; Scovile
ct al ad Bank Of Sandusky; Sheldon ad Sheldon
and al.
/ NEW TRIAL GRANTED, COSTS TO ABIDE EVENT.
Ross ad Downs Il SIX lingen; Potter & Whpple VS.
| Pilling; Young Il Halsted ad Mills; Saratoga and
Schenectady Rail Road Company ad Lincoln; Trull
ad Dayton; Brooklyn Bank VS. DeGraw ct al; YER
panck ct al VS. Wright; Chandler ad Standish; Sears
VS. Patrick; Hart ct al VS. Coltrain Cameron ad
Thurman; Saratoga and Schenectady Rail Read Co.
VS. Tredway; Seymour & Wood ad Ladue; God
rich Jr, VS. Pratt; Miilous ad Williams and wife;
Shoemaker ct al ad jacobson ct al; Rowland ad
| Douglass; Ehle ad Judson; Failing VS. Gage 4 Ca
| rey; Stanton VS. Thomas Bank of ST. Adams VS. Gil
leland IL Raymond; Sheldon ad Sheldon; Handy ad
Sanford; Cambell ad same; Sinclair ad same Butler
ad same; Hascy ad same; Talmadge ad same;
Greene VS. Burke; ReS nolds VS. Reynolds; Vermil-
| yea ad SANFORD.
| MORTON TO SET ASIDE REPORT OF REFEREES DE-
NIED,-Groot & Groet ads Van Ingen; jackson VS.
Rice; Houghling vs. Wyncoop & Springsted; Bates
vs. w hittlesey; Commercial Bank VS. Corning ct al;
| McDougall u McDougall VS. Penniman; Zero ads
Hogan ct al; Cudney ads Cudney; McClaughery ads
Clark & McCreedy; Smith 81 Dunnlng ads Will
iiams Sacket ct al ads Briggs; Boardman ads Hill
ct al; Blodget ct al ads Townsend; Lamb & Bost-
wick VS. Kidder ct al; Collins VS. Lake; Clark ads
Hoffman.
REPORT OF REFEREES SET ASIDE, COSTS TO
ABIDE THE EvEKT.-Sackett g. Sackett ads Col
burn & King; Van Week ct al ads Colburn d. Ruiz;
Bellinger Il Winans ads Bailey ct al; Cleavelsnd
ads HOwes; Cameron VS. Chapple ct al; Hog ads
Howard & Rykeman.
! JUDGMENT FOR DKFENDA or Demurrer, WITH
LEAVE To AMEND ON USUAL rERMs.-fhe Mayor
and Common Council of Brooklyn ads Western;
Wheaton " Doolittle VS. Fellows; Corning ads
Townsend ct al; Hubbard & Oraite ads Townsend
ct al; The Mayor, &c. of Brooklyn ads McCul-
Tough; Thomas ads De Leland ct al; Gilbert ads
Titus ct al; Bouchaud, ext, &C. ads Das; Tuck ct
al ads Glover; Bates VS. Relyea a. Wright; Linley
ct al ads Giet
JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF ON Demurrer, WITH
LEAVE TO AMEND ON USUAL TERMs.-Sherry VS.
Schuyler; Dunnng VS. Humphrey & Clark; Phelps
VS. sewall Fonda ads Garfield ct al; Robinson VS.
Cunningham; Ives VS. Reynolds; Van Nostrand ads
Leavin; Warner VS. Hathaway.
JUDGMENTS REvERsED.-Freeland VS. South
worth; Bennett VS. Ingerso
| JUDGMENTS ron PLAINTIFFs ON DEMURgR.-The
Bank OF Orleans VS. Comstock ct al; Same VS. Com
stock, Martin Il Comstock; Same VS. Coms,ock,
Martin Davis ct al; Bryan VS. Woen Il Hufty;
| Tappan ct al VS. Caldwell d. Rossiter; Wilkinson
VS. Gilbert ct al; Folsom Walker; The People
VS. Dingman; Ives VS. Reynolds; The President and
Sloan Corning impld, Sc; Lambert Living
ston; Perry ct al VS. Strngland ct al; Rogers ct al
VS. Evans ct al; Houston VS. Spruce; the President
&c. of Madison Bank VS. Wyman ct al; Smith VS.
Barhgatt;- Allen T. Paxson VS. j. Johnson ct al Dix
Beers; Sheridan VS. Smith x Smith; Terry VS. Pet
tibone; Brown VS. Stckney ct all Cook x Brother
son VS. Spading x House; Montaoth ct al VS. Boards
ley and al.
MISCELLANEOUS.
Marvin g. Goldsmith acknowledgement
versed venire de novo by N. y. Common Pleas
costs to abide the event.
Clark VS. Sexton ct ai-Judgment fer plaintiff on
demurrer on LIST, Sd, asd 4th Pleas, and for defend
ant on the I'd and 9th, with leave to amend usual
| terms.
] Brill & Brill VS. Flager-Judgment reversed, and
judgment for plaintiffs in error on tie demurrer
Seward ct al VS. Jackson ct al-Proceedings af-
frmed
The People VS. Sturdevant-The Oyer and Ter
vised to proceed and give judgment for the people
on the verdict.
The People VS. acknowledgement for the People
demurrer, leave TO amend usual terms.
Cooley ct al VS. Belts judgment reversed venire
de novo by N. Y. Common Pleas-costs TO abide the
event
| Irish e. Ream ads Szer-New trial as to defend
ant, Ream, Granted-costs to abide the event.
Benedict VS. Lathrop-Judsme Mt of Common Pleas
reversed, aud that of Justice affirmed.
The Directors and Company of the Bristol and
| Rensselaervile Turnpike ads the People-Judg
ment for the People demurrer the 9th and 9th
Replication, and for defendants the 7th, sth and
| 10th Replication, with leave to amend on usual
terms.
! The People VS. the IIlsdalc and Chatham Turn
! pike Company-Judgment for the People.
Earl VS. Wendell-Judgmcnt reversed venire de
novo by Common PIcas-costs abide the event.
Dixon VS. acknowledgement reversed venirc de mo-
/ vo by Common Pleas-costs abide the event.
Dygert VS. Schenck-Judgment reversed venirc
de novo by Common Peas-costs abide the event.
! Cutter ct alv Doughty ct al-Judgments for de-
| PENDANTS.
Barton VS. acknowledgement Of Common Pleas
reversed, and that of Justice affirmed.
| Howes VS. Foster-Judgmcnt Of Common Pleas
reversed, and that Of Justice affirmed.
The People VS. the Mayor, &c. of city Of Albany
Proceedings affirmed.
Hays VS. Hays-Judgment reversed yenire de no
vo by Common Pleas-c,sts abide the event.
| Patterson ads Doulance-yudgmcnt demurrer
for plaintiff first count and for defendant Sc
cond count, leave to amend on usual terms.
! Bank of Sslina vs. haywood ~ Johnson-Judg-
ment for plaintiff the verdict
! Curren ads the Professionalism affirmed.
| judgment reversed venire de novo by Superior
! Goa ri costs 10 abide the event