davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27
IN CHANCERY.

VIRGINIA: In the Circuit Superior Court Of
Law and Chancery for Berkeley County, August
Rules, 1910,
Edward Colson plff
against
Charles c. Starbuck and Harvey M. Foreman,
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27
~ CHANCERY


VIRGINIA s-iu the Circuit Superior Court Of
Law sud Chancery for Berkeley County, August
Roles. $40.
Franeis u. Dugar pliE
against
Chas G sisfhuek and Harvey NJ. Foreman, George
Randall, and Eduafd Coi.toa DTS.
~ CHANCERY
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27
IN CHANCERY.

The defendants, Charles c. Starbuck and Har-
vcy Nj. Foreman, not having entered their appear
ance and given security according to the act of
Assembly and the rules of this Court and it APP
pearlng by satisfactory evidence that they are oui
of this Commonwealth it is ordered, hat the said
defendants do enter their appearance to this suit
the sixth day of the next term, answer the bill Of
the plaintiff and give security for performing the
decree: and that copy of this order be forthwith
published in any newspaper within this County.
and continued for two months successfully, and
another copy thereof posted at the front door othe
Court-House of the said County.
Copy.-Testc.
JOHN STROTUER r.
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27
HARRISON WAITE, c. R. G.
Angnst - I8lO-2m


NibGlNlA;-In the Circuit Superior Court Of
Law and Chancery for Berkeley County, August
Rules, 1910,
Samuel Kcesacker, Andrew kecsackcr. Noble En-.
berson and Mary his wife, late Mary Keesacker,
children Of Conrad Keesacrer, deed, pltfs.
against
Silas Harlan, Administrator OF John French deed,
and Admir- de bonis non of Jacob French, deed,
and Sarah French, widow of said John French +,
aud Jacob, John, aud Teter, children and heirs
q SAID John French, who W as devisee OF said Ja-
cob ffcneh, deed, Cbristiana Houck, Peter Ba-
sore and Elizabeth his wife, Michael KEGS ack er
the lsi, Michael keesacker the ID, Martin Shelf
Or and Catherine his wife, Andrew Keesacker,
Rachel shook, aud Mary Pitzer, heirs Of Andrew
heesacAer' deed, dHs.
~ CHANCERY.
IHE defendants, Peter Basore and Elizabeth his
wife Michael kecsackcr the 1st, Michael Keesaek-
~ the p, Martin Shoiier and Calharinc his wife
Andfew keesucker, Rachel Shook, and Mary Pit
zer' not having entered their appearance and given
security according to the act Of Assembly and the
fulss OF Ibis court, and I, appearing by satisfactory
evidence that they are out OF this Commonwealth:
q = ordered, that the said defendants do enter
their appearance 10 this suit on the sixth day OF the
nest term and answer the bill of the plaintiff: and
hat COPY OF THE order be forthwith published ia
auy Newspaper within this county, and continued
To- two months successiyely, and another copy
ihrteoi posted At The front door Of the CourHouse
oi the said county.
Copy .-Tcstc.
JOHN SrRoTHER, c.
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27
upWtV5L
Charles c Starbuck. Harvey M Foreman, and
George Randall DTS
IN CHANCERY.

The defendants, Charles G. Starbuck and II. M.
Foreman, not having entered their appearance and
given security according To the act OF assembly and
rules of this court, and it appearing to the court
thatthey not inhabitants ofthis commonwealth:
it is ordered, that tho said defendants do appear
here on the second monday in November, and an
swer the bill ofthe Plaintiff and that this order be
published in the Maytinsburg Ga=eue for two
months successfully, and copy posted at the front
door Of the court house Of said county.
A copy-Teste.
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27
August 10, ls4o.--2m

VIRGINIA AT a court held for Berkeley county !,
at the court house, on Monday, the 10th Of Au-
gust, 1910,
John r. Crow Mfr
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27

FlhGlNlA;-In the Circuit Superior Court IL
Law and Chanccry for Berkeley County. August
Rules, 1910,
james l.. Cunningham ptF.
agGfast
Chas Z. Starhuck and Harvey M Foreman. Geo.
Randall, Henry Basore, Jacob Coontr, Daniel
Emerson, Magnus Rayner Jacob Sperow. Jo-
seph Holland James II. Kisineer, Isaac Ever.
sole, Michael Eaglebrigit, George Sperow, Sam.
uel ii. Kisinger. Edward Colston Philip vii.
hein' and Joseph Strobe, DIS.
In CfIANCERY.
The defendants, Charles c. Starbuck and Har-
yey NJ. Foreman, not having entered their appear.
ance and given security, according to the act OF AS
sembly and The rules Of this Court, and il appear
ing by satisfactory evidence, tina, they are out Of
this Commonwealth: it Is ordered, that the said
defendants do enter their appearance to this suit,
on the sixth day of the term, answer the bill
OF the plaintiff and give security for performing the
decree and that copy of this order be forthwith
published In any newspaper within this County.
and continued for two months successively and
another cory, thereof, posted at the front door Of
the Court House, Of the said County
Copy.-Teste,
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27

VIRGINIA I'm the Circuit Superior Court of
Law and Chancery for Berkeley County, August
Rules, 1910,
Newland Bycrs -, plfG
Chas. c. Slarbuck and Harvey VI. Foreman, George
Randall, aud Edward Colston, dfts.
IN CHdNCERY.
The defendants, Charles C. Starbuck and Hair
vey NJ. Foreman, no: having entered their appear.
ance and given security, according the act Of As
semby and the rules Of this Court and il appearing
by satisfactory evidence, that they are out of this
Commonwealth il is ordered, that the said delen-
dants do enter their appearance TO this suit the
sixth day Of the next term answer the bill of the
plaintiff and give security for performing the de.
cree aad that copy Of this order be forthwith pub
hsAed in any newspaper. within this county, aud
continued for two months successfully and another
cory, thereof, posted the front door Of the Court
House, of the said County
a Copy.-Teste,
$3.50 JOHN sTRoTHER, C.
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27

VIRGINIA AT rules held in the clerks Office Of
the county court Of Berkeley on Monday, the
10th Of August, is40,
Joseph Butt riff.
against
Charles c. Stsrbuck and Harvey Nj. Foreman
dts
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27
August 6. ls4o-om ~ : en- :,


NlRGINlA:-In the Circuit Superior Lsurt of
Law and Chancery for Berkeley County, August
Rules, 1910,
Joseph Burns plG.
against
Charles c. Starbuck and Harvey M. Foreman Geo
Randall, Edward Coston, and John Nichode-
mus, IN cHANcrRy DIS.
The defendants, Charles c. StaIbuck and Har-
vey Nj Foreman, not having entered their appear
ance and given security, according to the act Of AS
sembiy and the rules Of this Court, and il o2ear-
ing, by satisfactory evidence, that they are out of
this Commonwealth lis ordered, that the said de-
PENDANTS do enter their appearance to this suit on
the sixth day Of the next term answer the bill OF
the plaintiff, and give security for performing the
decree and that copy of this order be forthwith
published IN any newspaper within this County, and
continued for two months successfully and another
copy, thereof posted the front door Of the Court
House, of he said Comfy
Copy.-Teste,
JOHN STRoTHER, c.
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27

VIRGiNlA:-ln the Circuit Superior Court of
Law and Chancery for Berkeley County August
Rules, 1910,
Daniel Gehr DhE.
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27
IN ouANcERy.

VIRGINIA AT rules held in the clerks office Of
the county court Of Berkely, on Monday the
10Th OF August, 1870,
Mary Portcrfield pfiH
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27

fiRGiNiA:--At a court hela for Berkeley county
al the court house on Monday, the lush II All.
gust, 1870,
Joseph Bowers plsF.
against
Charles c. S'arbuck, Harvey NJ Foreman. and
George Randall dfs.
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27

Charles G. Starbuck and Harvey NJ. Foreman, Rob.
Ison Dugan, William Criswell, George Randall,
singer, Sam'l ii. Kisinger Jacob Sperow George
Sperow, Joseph Holland, aud Isaac Eyersole,
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27
I'M CHANCERY.
JOHN sTRoTHER, c.

NlRGINiA:-In the Circuit Superior Court Of
Law and Chancery for Berkeley County August
Rules, 1910,
Thomas Rutherford min
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27
Harvey NJ. Foreman aud Charles c. s,arbuck
IN cHANcHRy.

VIRGINIA AT a court held for Berkeley county,
at the court house, on Monday, the 10th OF Au-
gust, ls40,
John r.. Crow pIf
against
Charles G. Starbuck, Harvey Nj. Foreman, and
George Randall DTS
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27

Charles c, Starbuck and Harvey NJ. Foreman, Rob.
ison Dagan, William Criswell, George Randall,
Edward Colston, Joseph Strobe, James H. XII
singer, Sam1 IL. Kisnger, Jacob Sperow, George
SperOw, Joseph Holland, and Isaac Eversolc,
Martinsburg gazette. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1833-1855, 1840-08-27
VOLUME Al.

the Circuit Superior Court Of
Law and Chancery for Berkeley County, August
Rules, 1910,
Maumee City express. [volume] (Maumee City, Ohio) 1838-184?, 1840-05-16

San Court of Common
go ~ oh'o, Pleas, March Term,
'N'S' '' ''' A. ID. 1910.
James Wolcott, In Chancery.
VS.. IN pursuance ci
Elisha C. Sacket, an order of the Court
Alexander Sacket g. of Common Pleas, in
Edward Sacket. and for Lucas Coun-
ty, in the State of Ohio, at the March Term
thereof, 1910, the said Elisha C. Sacket,
] Alexander Sacket aud Edward Sacket are
hereby notified, that James Woicott filed in
said Court his Bill in Chancery against them,
the substance of which is--that on or about
the 24lh day Of June, 1886, the SAID VOL
| colt executed Contract in writing under
seal with Elisha g. Sncket, of Sackets Har-
Dor, in the State of New York, to sell to
him Lots No. 4 and 0, situated in the Coun-
iy of Lucas, in the State of Ohio, as laid
down on Wolcott's plat in his addition to
Miami City, for the sum of twelve hun
dred dollars to be paid in three equal annual
payments, with annual interest; but that
the said Contract having been lost or des-
| troyed by accident, he cannot state the pre-
else terms thereof that a counterpart of
said Contract was delivered to Edward
Sacket, also of Sackets Harbor, in the State
ofNew York, and is now in possession Of one
of the Defendants, that said Defendants all
have or claim to hive some interest in said
Contract, and to said two lots Of Land mem
toned in it; that the whole amount of the
purchase money, principal and interest has
become due, and is unpaid, except two
hundred and fifty dollars paid by Alexander
Sacket, and that Defendants have wholly
refused to pay the balance due on said Con-
tract. The prayer of said Bill is, that De-
PENDANTS may be compelled to appear before
this Honorable Court at the next term there
Of. then and there to answer under their
corporal oath, each and every of the char
ges contained in said Bill, and particularly
whether said Wolcott did execute Com
tract with Elisha G. Sacket, as set forth in
said Bill, and if Defendants are able to dis
close the terms and conditions of the same
whether Defendants have any, and what
rights and interests in said Contract, and to
the said two lots of Land mentioned there
in; that an account may be taken of the
amount due to said Wolcott in salt Contract,
and that on final hearing the Defendants,
or snch Of them as may be found liable may
be decreed to pay said Wolcott the amount
which shall be found due on said Contract,
or in default thereof, that the rights and
equities Of the said Defendants in said Con-
tract. and in and to said two lots of Laad
mentioned therein may be sold as on exc
cution at Law.
And the Defendants are further notified
that unless they appear and plead, answer
or demur to said Bill within sixty days af
ter the next term of said Court, the said
Complainant at the term next after the ex.
piratlon Of said sixty days will apply to
said Court to take the matters of said Bill
MS confessed, and to decree thereon accor-
dinghy. N. RATHBUN,
Sol for Complainant.
Maumee City, March 8, 1910. 6w2
Maumee City express. [volume] (Maumee City, Ohio) 1838-184?, 1840-05-16
o Court of Common
Inoas c'n,,,. "" "'o' ~, Pleas, March Term,
J' A. d. l84O.

STATE OF Quo. plea", Ga''' March "f eoT%"" Teqm,
Lucas county, S. A. D. l84o.
The State of Ohio for the ! In Chancery.
use of the County Fund IN pursuance
Commissioners Of Lucas of an order Of
County said Court, the
vs.. said Hemnn
Willard ]. Daniels, Walbridge and
Heman Wabridge and Henry Wal.
Henry WaIbriGge. bridge, non re-
sident Defendants, are hereby notified, that
Bill in Chancery has been filed against
them and said Daniels, in said Court, by
SAID State of Ohio, the object and prayer OF
which is to foreclose the equities of the SAID
Defendants in and to the following desert
bel Lands, stunteh in said County of Lucas,
to wit: one undivided half of the E. ofthc
S. w. 4of Sec. 80, IN Township 0, S. of
Rnnge Z f., containing 81 35-10O acres,
and the N, w. / of the S. E. Of section
80 in the same Township and Range, mort
gagged by said Daniels to the said State of
Ohio to secure the payment of seven hun
dred dollars, according to the condition of
certain Bond in said Mortgage Deed more
fully described, and to obtain an order for
the sale of said mortgaged premises, and
an application of the proceeds of such sale
to the payment of slid sum of money in
said Bond mentioned.
And the SAID Heman Walbrdge and Hen
ry Walbridge are further notified that, un-
less they appear and plead, answer or de-
mur to said Bill within sixty days from the
next term of said Cout, the Complainant
will make application at the term next after
the expiration of said sixty days, to have
the several matters and things in said Bill
mentioned taken for confessed, and de-
cree made thereon accordingly.
YOUNG s. WAITE,
Soils. for Compa!nants
Dated April II, 1910. 6ws
Maumee City express. [volume] (Maumee City, Ohio) 1838-184?, 1840-05-16
Dissolution.

THE copartnership heretofore existing
Il under the firm of G. g. w. Richard.
son, is this day dissolved by mutual con-
sent, and all persons having unsettled nc-
counts with us, are respectfully but ear.
ncstly requested to call and adjust The same
within thirty days from .his date, or we
shall call upon them in manner not to be
misunderstood. One or both of us, will be
found at the old stand, ready to attend the
settlement of all demands, &c.
GEORGE RICHARDSON,
WILLIAM RICHARDS
The business will be continued hereaf-
ter under the firm of
RICHARDSON 81 co.
Maumee City, May 2, 1910. 8
Maumee City express. [volume] (Maumee City, Ohio) 1838-184?, 1840-05-16
ADMINISTRATORS SALE.

THE STATE OF OHIO, Lucas County, SIS.
Samuel M. Young, and BY virtue of an
Michael Ireland, Ad- orderissuing from
mnlstrators of the the Court OF Com.
Estate of Oliver Ri mon Pleas, in said
chardson, deceased. ( County, in the
vs.. above entl' d cause,
The Heirs at Law of the Subscribers
said Estate. will expose TO pu-
bile sale at the Central House, in Maumee
City, on Wednesday the 18th of May next,
between the hours of 10 o'clock, A. M. and
4P. NJ. of SAID day, the following describ-
ed Real Estate, to wit:-The N. w. I of
the N. w. / of Section No. II, in Town
ship No 8, of the u. S. Reserve. of 12
miles square, at the Foot of the Rapids OF
the Mani of Lake Erie, containing 40 acre
more or less.
SAMUEL NJ. YOUNG, } Admi-
MICHAEL IRELAND. { nst'rs.
Dated April IL, l840. Ave
Maumee City express. [volume] (Maumee City, Ohio) 1838-184?, 1840-05-16
sr,r, or O,,o Court of Common
Lucas County, S. A. d. D. 1910.
Jnhn IT, Hunt Tn Ch,ncorv

Sr,rr or Op,o Court OF Common
Lucas County, S.. Pleas, March Term,
John E. Hunt, J In Chancery.
VS.. IN pursuance of an
Daniel NJ. Wilson. order ofsaid Court the
Defendant IN this case will take notice, that
Bill in Chancery has been flied against him
in said Court, setting forth that certain
contract was made and entered into between
the parties, on or about he lth day ofJu-
ly. 1886, in which the Defendant agreed to
purchase from tile Complainant, the follow
ing pieces Of Land situated in said County
of Lucas, and known as the N. e. Of sec.
so, in Township One, of the Twelve Mile
Square Reserve, containing 100 acres, less
40 acres before sold to John Pray,--also,
Tract SO in said Reserve containing 1856
acres-and another Lot of Land adjoining
the Town of Waterville, and commencing
a: Main Street % rods S. of the S. w. cor
ner OF Lot 40 in said Town, thence running
Easterly parallel to the line of said Lot 40,
to the Maumee River, thence s. up the Ri.
yer to the line between River Tracts 81 and
38, thence w. .on said line 20 rods 10 the pub
lie highway, thence North Eastery to the
places Of beginning, containing as is sup
posed, one acre and fifteen rods, reserving
one rod on the east side for a highway
and to pay him therefor the sum Of $40 900
according to the conditions of certain Bond
made and executed by the Complainant 70
the Defendant at the time of said contract.
But the Complainant AYERS in his said Bill
that said Defendant has not paid the said
purchase money according to the conditions
of said contract, but that large amount
thereof still remains due and unpaid, to wit:
the amount of three certain drafts in said
Bill and contract more fully described
Complainant therefore prays that the De.
fendant may be compelled specifically to
perform his part of said agreement, and to
pay to the Complainant the amount now due
upon said purchase money. and in default
thereof that all the interest of said Defen
dant in and to said premises may be sold and
the proceeds applied TO the payment of such
amount of the purchase money, as may be
| found to be due as aforesaid.
And the Defendant will further take no.
tlce that unless he appears, pleads, answers
or demurs to said Bill, within sixty days
from the next term Of this Court, the Com
planant will apply to said Court, at the
term next after theeXpiraton of SAID sixty
days, to lake all the several matters and
things in sud Bill contained fer confessed
and decree thereon accordingly.
YOUNG & WAITE,
Sol's. for Compluinans.
/ Dated April II, 1910. 6w2
Maumee City express. [volume] (Maumee City, Ohio) 1838-184?, 1840-05-16

sn.mn - ou Court of Common
Lucas County, IS. A. IJ. b. ls4o. Isa.' -''"'
Elisha Mack, In Chancery.
Robert A. Forsyth and IN pursuance of
Isaac Hull. an order of SAID
VS.. Court, the said De-
William Houser. fendant is hereby
notified, that the Com mplainants have filed
n said Court their Bill in ChaDcery against
him, the object and prayer ofwhlch is, to
foreclose u certain mortgage made by the
Defendant to the Complainants upon the
following Lands and Tencments, situated
in said County VI Lucas, and known as the
South part of the N. w. 1 offrac. sec. No.
35, in Township north, and range No. 0.
and the West } of the S. w. of same
Section, to secure the payment of two notes
also made BY the, Defendant to said Com
pIalnants, and to obtain an order for the sale
of said premises to satisfy said notes.
And the said Defendant is further mott
lied thai, unless he appears aud pleads, an
swers or demurs 10 said Bill within sixty
days after the next term Of said Court, the
Complalnants will apply to said Court, at
The term next succeeding the expiration of
said sixty days, to tnko the several matters
and things in said Bill contained for confess
sed and to decree thereon accordingly.
YOUNG g. WAITE,
Soils. for Compliments.
Dotted April IL 1910. 6w2
Maumee City express. [volume] (Maumee City, Ohio) 1838-184?, 1840-05-16
LOOK AT THIS !!

THE Subscribers would respectfully in.
Il form the citizens Of this City and vi.
cnity, that they are now receiving large
assortment of Goods, which they are dis.
posed to sell at prices to correspond with
the times, for cash or ready pay of some
kind, and thankful for the liberal share oI
patronage bestowed on the late firm, they
will endeavor to merit continuance of the
same.
AT our establishment can among other
things be found the following goods.
Dry Goods, w. /. Goods and Groceries,
(ofall kinds with the exception of lqnors)
Crockery, Glass, Stone, Hard and Hollow
Ware, Boots and Shoes. ia full assortment)
Iron, Nails, Steel &c., all Of which and the
prices, those wishing to purchase are re-
ucsted to call and exam nc.
RICHARDSON & CO.,
Successors TO G. g. w. RICHARDSON.
Nav Q, l840. S
Maumee City express. [volume] (Maumee City, Ohio) 1838-184?, 1840-05-16
A HoosIrn's TeMrIB OF HrMRN.-I

A HoosIRR's TEMPLE OF HYMRN.-The
poetic editor Of the Goshen lind. Demo-
crat, appends the following to an announce
ment in his paper Of the marriage of a cou-
pie Of lis friends, whose "wedding occur
red in the woods, in the open air. .''-BG-
.Jalo Patriot.
"Thats just the place, (says he, y where
we want to be married, on the first day Of
June, under the broad blue Heavens, with
the sun smiling down through the green
bougbs overhead, and the merry birds sing
ing their epithslamiums, and flowers of a
thousand hues blushing and hanging their
modest heads before the matchless beauty
of our dulcinea. Them's 'ump'
Maumee City express. [volume] (Maumee City, Ohio) 1838-184?, 1840-05-16

New CouNrERgBlTs.-A new batch Of
counterfeit Bank notes have made their ap.
pearance, and as usual, we suppose the
scoundres will make the West, "the gol-
den field for their circulation. So look
out for them, as they are said to be well
done. They are on the Oneida Bank, Yates
County Bank, Bank of Geneva, Commercial
Bank of Oswego, Mohawk Bank and the
Amherst Eank. Arrest the first man who
offers any one of them and in that way the
fountain head may be discovered .-Da.
.adp,
Maumee City express. [volume] (Maumee City, Ohio) 1838-184?, 1840-05-16

sr,r, or nr,o Court of Common
Lucas County, SIS. A. d. D. 1870. o.'" '"'
Archibald Mercer) In Chancery.
VS.. in pursuance of an
Henry Tyler. order of said Court. the
Defendant is hereby notified that the Com
planant has filed in sald Court his Bl in
Chancery, the Object and prayer of which
Is to forecIose certain mortgage made and
executed by the Defendant TO Noyes Bill
lings aid William w. Billings upon the
following Lands and Tenenents, situated
in said County Of Lucas, and known as In
Lot No. lO7, in Hunt and Beaugrand's ad-
Cltion to Maumee, for securing the pay
ment Of three notes made by Caleb S. Hen
derson to said N. and William w. Billings,
which said mortgage and notes have, for
valuable consideration, been assigned and
endorsed to the Complainant, ana to obtain
an orderto the sale of said premises, and
an application of the proceeds of such sale
to the payment of said notes.
And the said Defendant is further notified
that. unless he appears and pleads, answers
or demurs to said Bill, ll,within sixty days from
the next term of said Court, the Complain
ant will apply to sad Court, at the term
next after the expiration of said sixty days,
to take the several matters in SAID Bill con-
tanned for confessed, and to decree thereon
accordingly. YOUNG s. WAITE,
Sol's for Complainant.
Dated April II, 1910. 6w2