Wheeling times and advertiser. [volume] (Wheeling, Va. [W. Va.]) 1839-1849, 1840-01-11

caAScERY-At rules held in the
Clerk sofhce OF the Crcuit superior Couu of Lan
s9d CnanSery Tor the county OF OHIO, in The month
John Gilchrist,. Complainant,
John Lick, John George DSelk or. Uer,v A,,,h.oL
Charles Berlt, Andrew Sch vartz, John WnhIen.
mayer, Jacob Smith and Peter Anshulz Defend.
The Defendants Decker, Auerbaek. Berlt.
Sehwartz, Wah!enmayer, Lick and Anshutz, moi
having entered lieir appearance and siven sec,r,,r
according TO the at Of Assembly and the rnies ~
ms Court. aud Il appearing by satisfactory proof
tnatthey are notinhab'iant OF this Commonwealth
On Hoilon CT The Z Complainant by counsel, i. is or
iered thar the said Defendants do appear here ON the
hrsl DAY Of the next Spring Term Of this Court and
answer me said Compliments bill. and that a COPY
Of thIs orderbe forthwith inserted in some newsno,
paper prlnted in the city Of Wheeling, for two months
successively, and posted at the front door OF the
4 copy iese. ALEX I. LAIOLEY, Clerk.
NELSON. January :. iss0'
NIRGINlA-Is cBANcEuy-At rules held in the
Clerks office Of the Great Superior Court OF law
a9d ShanceIy Tor the county of Ohio, in the month
John, W. Bush and James VI. Justus late partners
N business under lie firm name and style of
bLsh * JuS'us, Compliments,
Austin peay, and Henry Moore, John F. Clarke &
Mars douglass, merchants and partners in bus
. ness, under the firm, name and style of Moore.
Clarke Il Co. Defendants.
ne Defendant Austin Peay, not having entered
MS appearance and gwen security according 10 NJ q
act OF Assembly and the rules OF this Court, and !,
appearing By satisfactory proof that he Is not an in
hGbIiant Of this wealth-oh Inotlon ~ ~.
Compliments by counsel, IL is orde red thai The az
Defendant do appear here on the frst dav Of ,hs
noxt Sprn2 Term OF THIS Court, and answer the sad
Compliments bill, and that a copy of This order he
forthwith inserted in come newspaper printed io
the city OF Wheeling, for Two months suceessiveIy
Ohio county.
Acepy teste. ALEX. t. LAIDLEY. Clerk.
WA. ). HENLEY. January T. $50
VIRGINIA-IS eHAScrRY-At rules held in ~
Cierks Office Of the Circuit Superior Court of Law
aed Chancery for the county Of Ohio, in the month
Harman Lavedoek, Complainant,
Daniel Nichols, and sIichasi sweenev and Roho.,
a. Sweeney, partners under the firm of M a. X
u Sweeney, Defendants.
Inc Defendant Nichols not having entered his
appearance and gwen security according TO The aci
OF Assembly and the rules of this Court. and n ap-
PeqIinS by satisfactory proof that he is not an in
1aDuah! OF ms commonwealth on motion of the
complainant by counsel, il is ordered that the said
Defendant do appear here on the first day of Inc
aext Spring Term of this Court, and answer tbe
. I'd I, ompainont's bill, and that a COW of this cr.
DC forthwith inserted in some newspaper prin-
"a IN me city Of Wheeling for two months success
house of Ohio County.
4 copy ieste. ALEX. T. LAIDLEY. Clerk.
i"'L hOsshLL' January Z, 1910.
NRGlNIA-IN cHANcEEy-At rules held ia the
CIerSs Office OF TN Circuit Superior Court Of Law
a99 ChauceTy, for the county Of Ohio, in lie month
George Atkinson. Complainant,
against
Se1rse hsCollnu2h, Thomas Murphy. and Andrew
Mitchell, DEFENDANTS.
ne Defendant Mccullough not having entered I
~. hppeafanee AID gwen security according To he /
ACTOR assembly and the rules Of this Court, and n
aFPeaIhg by Satisfactory proof thar he is not an IN. /
naOllant OF this Commonwealth on motion Of the !
SompiainantbY counsel, u - crderef tia the said
defendant do appear here on the first day Of the I
next SP,ng Term Of this Court, aad answer the
CDHnpl ainnnts b1Il, and that n copy Of this order be /
loTihwltn inserted in some DC yspaper ppnted tn |
me CITY OF Wheeling, for two mon'hs successivelv
1ng posted at the front door Of the Court house of
OHIO county.
4 copy. test. ALEX. T. LAiDLEY. Clerk.
'NOVS ~ WILSON January Z, 1910.
FLGINIA-fv cBANoEnv- At rules held in the
Jerks Office Of the Circuit Superior Court Of
20 Chantey for The county Of Ohio in the month
January 1890.
Robert Barlow, Complainant.
against
IOhn T. Morgan aad John w. BransfrIp. Defsnl
ante.
The Defendant Morgan not having entered has
appearance and gwen security according 10 Tho a~t
Assembly and the rules of this Courf and In ar
,earng BY satisfactory proof uhat ne Is not an Inbab-
iant Of this commonwealth on motion Of Com
'ialnant by counsel, it is ordered that he saHl ne /
% appear here on the frs; day on Inc nertl
prog Tenn Of this Court. and answer Inc soid
iompiolnauts bIl, uud thata copy of This order he
9rthwlth inserted m some ueyvspuper piiutrn in he
ffV Of NHr0IlWw. for two muufha r....-- 80