Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1839-11-29

=, heard you MAKE We 'ane 'h's helhoo OF oe'
% bsu,. IN order that there may be no misunder
,na'E ,,n about the matter. Phase hand them TO
| ,-.r sud obl!Ge
sE~'' Your vbedent servants,
ANDREW McCLUER.
JONATHAN BECkNER
:, ,>prRsoS, Esq.
-. certify that this day handed letter 10 Jno
S,,s,n a. the request OF Andrew McCluer, and
A"1.,op H. said Anderson became very furious and
aud among other things said that he had An
I,l,er and Jonathan Beckner's certificates and
IA keep them Given under my hand this 9Th
}; Nor, lo"'' 4no' 'i"f ooS.
BorErouRr, Nov. llth, 1880
|. CaHaghcn, E$9
\ . S,-ir John T Anderson has published Ger.
.'- uhicn my name is attached, which does you
4.,r..i,e and act ef duty 10 you, take the
- =, correcting ii, wr'hru, application from YOU on
',, | never told you when signed The letter,
j',...r heard M5. Anderson say any thing about
nm al. | SAID Oh that subject was, that knew
.h.nt wha, ne said al New Castle on the day of
non You never stated, tha, il made differ
h .lher knew any thing about his pledges, il
.,Ae others did, yon meieiy said inst I made no
49,, ahslhsr h, ard his New Castle speech, if
nm IL The other pledges 10 the le,te, the
a,. al i, in conversation. never said word TO
,tr.on about the Legislature or Senate, or where
:. ro.. and when | found that he was abou, 10
,, certificate |. in connection with Mr. Andrew
r,a, Addressed hiIn letter. Demanding II, which
.a. 4, I'VE nlc. and published II agans, my
.,.crG a !rter at your house which believe To
,Gr Substance Of the letter winch published
- H. r.rra, and II thr certificate which Mr.. Ander.
, ,un ,sneG IS The same that s,grcd, d,d not
- i. or never wou,t have s,gneG any thing of
Ind Very respectfully your "ht serv'',
JONATHAN BECkNER
BOtetouri county 10 ,rt
H.. 5ay John Burger personally appeared before me,
. - q, he peace for said county, and made osth
, - n.a;t John L. Anderson state, in conversation
= IN saur time before the last sptng election, when
(,.n. On the subject of the then pending election.
rt majority :" the people [ms aiming the people ofhs
E,g-,4! Ds,rc) were opposed to the course that he
,,..u,d IN the Senate of Va he, (Anderson) would
am h. sea, and that he ready To do al any
- TINS ct .ut father states that not many days
sad Anderson &c hun with letter signed by
.I and some II others addie sed 10 said Anderson
|, +, nm 10 redeem tie pledges he had made to he
[,rs and that such 'rl OF The letter was read TO him
,aa,rs,n rs cnnra.ned he pledges he had made TO
h. p-,or oi Newcastle. and suppressed the pledge this
|sat hard and tried 10 obtain certificate from said
[z,at the, he, Anderson had made such pledges
I, .nnlsard in said letter. Given under my hand
/ 70 cas- OF September, 1899.
JAS s ALLEN
.et reading The above, fellow citizens, leave you
cryie whether Anderson or myself, committed for.
rs u fraud, Tar these gentlemen Concerned
y represent him in the d!sgraceful attitude OF drcrv
bis honest, cnEHG'ng constituents, and under The
.a,>rG tia, they had done him inirSuce and per.
cr, them 20 sign certificates 10 convict OF far
| r. Shame shame. where is tIy blush: Whether he
alrs LED about The matter you must also Judge from
facts nov te;ure YOU. 1t is untrue that ever Mr..
/ LtAei and myself we're violent enemies. we never
]. an unpleasant word in our lives pass between Us.
b, lac riti'ul a''smp,to provoke quarrel vii not
Sc h. desired feet. Ills charge Of passing counter.
money almost TOO contemplate 10 nui.cs; but
20 ,r has introduced it, will no, shrink from ex-
nation, lest the public should think there nigh; be
aelaI.g IN th!s charge The state menls Of Messrs.
!yue Caw,hnn and Lritwilch explain the whole mat
I: and render II unnecessary for me 10 add single
ID oi comment, as they completely exonerlte Inc
n having any interest Ill the money or any know.
:" a. lie traasacion:
certify tia, the i've dollar note 10 which Mr.. Ander-
qas alus,on in his communication lately pubshe
tl.t Nessrs. Mcdowell aud Gala ghan. was sent BY
/ 10 the Store Of MessTs y LEY and Callaghaa, to be
over Mr.. LEWIS Brunh tia, said Calls gahan bad
interest IN II; that il returned 10 me counter
note, ana that SAID Calagh ian had 10 know ledge Of
TRANSACTION, to NY knowledge. Nov. ~, l-39.
THOMSON II LAYNE.
certify that in the month IF February or March last
1 was living IN the store Of Hey and Cala chan
ha bes. %; my recollec,iop) Mr.. Thompson Il lIayne
l. Mr.. Lewis Brugh. and that on the same day Mr.
ax'hon in The store and asked me TO give him
H. dollar note for small notes, winch did, giving
s7e dollar note Of the money LET, By Mir Lsyne. The
rs a,ern ards returned a counterfeit. and
!, a.n returned TO Mr. Layne as such | further Ger
T. hat Nr. Calloghan was not present when the mo
= .as left. thu, he was not present when gave said
a 10 Mr.. Cawihun and had no knowledge 81 any o!
l. above circumstances and from the best recollection
nave of The matter Mr. Ca'iaghan was ftoGi home ard
IL knn~lsdge OF the giving out said note, or It's
IN Gwen under my hand, tliIs 9lh day oil N"vem
&. l-39 WI. ". LEFTWlCH.
naying been called on by Mr.. Callaghan for state
-H; al wha, knew in regard TO ale counterfeit note
winch alr Anderson has reference IN his communi
or published in he FIncasiie Democrat, must stale
IA n the month Of February or March last, called in
Nes.1s Wsy and CalIaghan's Store, and asked Mr.
raam LeitE Itch 20 give five dollar mole for small
''s and That he gave me one, which was afterwards
Il ~g paying 1t out pronounced tn he counterfeit.
|so'red / immediately 10 Mr. Le;twich and he gave
good one !oT il further stale, that Mr. Caaghan
~ melting Of the Transaction, as he was not IN The
~ al the time got ii, when ii returned =
sen under my hand, this 9th daY nf Novamber, 1899
ROBERT CAWTuON.
H. low attempt II wound The feelings Of my wife and
ay ~ his ntiCiing ausion 10 suit lately decided
F. nst ny father law for seduction. fail to be
T uHsd 10 The proper spirit by every honorable indv
=: WHO nay il. II only goes 10 prove The extent
ns Gallgny IN carrying II 10 The remo,est branches
ny family 1t is, therefore. unnecessary for me tc
''ice farther ttan T. say that 1t is untrue that be
an" personally hostile TO him on account If his bsing
FHi jed n that suit. The three other lawyers that
"" "".":sG IN IL the sam. side with hlin, might
y say that AN personally hostile TO them io'
g. sane fratun
! 'i-i rsc7q,tuiation Of he testimony will convice
'rF Urp'J Htlcsd man q. the manner ~ which have
80. m SO Presented nrd saucert this attack.
Isl H." ua'h> and afldavlts Of Mssrs Frrrler Goode
Eh H"rL"-, Baldwin and others convct han 81 mss
i-'n1fo" IN fls denial al his ptd-cs 10 resign, and
'''.a AID hy the bridges he made IN his Allegheny
.-ct. hr h2ssrs Letcher and Ca@ihon. ~ho heard
spefcl and The same testinony mnre than sus'ains
y N IN pledges set forth The letter of IL OF bis con
H-nis. OF which h. denies and complains
20 "a" earac, given from his own letter of 2lst Feb
I'iE last, confirms the above testimony and cunric,s
n o. khoatngy msrepresenting me 10 Messrs Bur
ana Slower and Others in denying it in presence Of
pr E>kr;t.e
% ihe pledges he gave in hs Newcastle speech (and
ca he Grrrs) are fully sustained BY the aidayl,s OF
i->''s M,Carncy. Wright, Wagsener. Lennon and
-'s aoc convict him his denial oil giving SAID
"1,"s % ~
,'h The anI,tayts Of Nessrs Hsrkrpr and Nc( liner