Morning herald., 1839-06-05

rom rom which concected this article. believe it to
h;e Ssen destroyed; as also the original copy from
"n.c % the libel was set up.
Moses Y. Beach examined. l remember Mulock
SAILING aboat the Newark story. He said it would
S oar duty to publish it here in New York. because
- me influence exercised on the press at New Jsr-
~ the parties implicated,
&c imam u Kinney examined.-I am the person
os !. ea 70 In this libel have read it, and no part
ark Of M true. There are no other young men in New
te1tion was first called to it by a friend Of mine
Oross examned.-My reason for suppesing il re-
m. me was that some such report had got afoat,
Mr Day, cannot tell. think first heard it from
Ty, Si. Day, never saw Mulock till saw him in this
Ioult' sI made inquiries about the author of the
SANDER; also went to the Sun office, and took me as
WAaron B. Campbell examined 20 )nsISe. rss;Ss i
ana hrst saw the libel when the last witness called
on me in relation thereto. The libel referred 70 w
Kinney, and called twice at the office Of Mulocb,
James Miller examined II lived in the neiphbor
heod OF Newark at the time this libel was publ she'd
! understood it to refer to Mr.. Kinney, Mr. Cutting
Mr. Campfed, MIR. Earl, Mr.. Plume, and Miss He
denburg. felt more anxiety about the lady's repu-
tation than about any else.
Cross examined.-l got the impression that Miss
Hsdenburg meant because the article says 'sthe
daughter OF celebrated carriage maker"
The prosecution here rested.
Mr.. Kinney recalled by MIR. Brady.
Counsel-You knew Bartlett before this!
Wrness.-Yes, when he was employ ed in the Office
of the "Jersey Eagle"
Connsel.-Have you seen anything of him since?
vltness-ies, occasionally when ! visited New
York met him and saluted him.
Counsel Have you said at any time that il was
particularly ungrateu in him to have published that
story in the "Sunl'
Wltness.-Not as to myself; but / may have said
so as regarded one of the other young men, whose
Iainer had been great friend to Bartlett
Robert Ward examined by Mr.. Brady.
Counsel.-Where did you first hear of these
facts!
This question was objected to- and oyerruled by
the Court.
Witness.-Well sir, what did you say to Mulock
In relation to these facts!
Wltness.-(ln In low tone Of yoice) told him some
part but don't recolect what.
Dlstrict Attorney.-Open your mouth sir and don't
stand there munching pfums
Witness-Well, asked him if he knew anything
In relation to the story.
Counsel.-What was his replvq
Wltness-Why, my firm opinion is, that Muloch
did not Know anything about it.
District Attorney.-When was you a witness for
Muloch?
Witness-Never;I only knew him about note that
ne had occasion to sue me for
District Attorney.-When was the conversation
you speak Of!
Witness.-Cannot saw
District Attorney.-Well, near about!
but certainly after July; because the weather was
very warm
District Attorney.-Did you see it in the SUM-
the same day that it published?
THEORETICALLY not; il might have been
week after. know one Of my men show ed il to me-
District Attorney.-What did Mulock call ON you
for!
Witncss.-Why, to buy grindstone to take to
Newark.
District Attorney.-That will do sir-you may go
down.
1t being understood that the evidence was closed
on both sides, the Court adjourned.