Columbus Democrat. [volume] (Columbus, Miss.) 18??-18??, 1839-11-23
pENOCRArIE rRn NPHs-

Bdj-'s Ran, has aietl ben tie ''Gr-at Req
n.ar' O. Tie toicr pa-'y llrsEaiatsd % up up
-Ht d IS -egH.a'ra- HrNn down. For instance
Is NV ti1ur,HlxE=-s bare majority ia 1857
Ic maIrHJy el tI74 .n $50
Is M,ISE-i,tcrsl Governor sai legislature u
ls51-demac-o'lc ma Ho-iy o SS9o "a ls5S- -sUg-
cratic usurty IN l>S9 upwards Of 5000
II MAssAcHu>ETr>-lriers majority IN 1887 of
I7,767-rtfEssdlo 9925 N lsSS-ani about To be
reduced still more
Is VEKNONr-Gleul mapdyo. 6544 in 1855
reduced 10 259O in lsS9
Is RHoDr IsL,SD--lcjsral majority OF io1o q
lsS7--redueed 20 4So IN lSSS-rejueei again an
1889 tn about 500.
Ia CoHasctlcHf-tde-al m. ilrlty Of rising 5000
IN lSSs-reaE,fi tn 25li in 1889.
In North Clrolga-itdrral majority of lI4l 10
lSSo-rereTstd in lSS9. showing an aggregate dem
/ oCratc ms gritty OF $500
| IN .ilabama-ihe sinai democratic majority ot
4 ls2s--lncreased 20 about 5000 ia 1880
| In Seaih CsroiIsa, su overwhelming popular
+ vote for tie Independent Treasury, and a gam al
4 two members of Congress
! In IpgiHia. iac federal legislature of ls'S ueu-
trsll2rd Rves defeated, popular democratic ma
/ jorily OF I sing 1000 votes
In Maryland IA 1897 federal majority of36si,
rsrSrssd tl 23l democratic To- ISIS which maFrliy
Is this wear increased t. 1880
In Georgia, federal majority in 1850 elected a
wing governor va 1887; elected a democratic GOV
ctnor m Is39 by majority Of about 5000
In Nee Jersey, N 1857, a fedora mlnrJy ~
1912: IA ISIS rertrsti 10 democratic leverage
majority of 50 IA lS5s democratic majority n-
creased To 1906.
In Deiarare, federal majority " $50 in 1867
rerersSa to 90 democratic majority lu l-5s. Sc.
In PtRHsyipdRId, Iodtrl. majority In 1857 re-
versed 10 q dem cratic manuW Of / li23 IN 1855
increas a to at least 20 900 in 1880
In arkansas, M lS36-7 a dcmorratic majority q
1902, which IN SIS was increased to 1858, and
probably still more increased BY the late election.
In Missouri, IN ls567 democratic majority o
, 2557; in 1885 increased to $3.50
In Illinois, federal majority in 1887 N ISIS
rererse3 while democratic mai rites are RANGING
, from 900 To 1000
! In Indiana, a com Pete SummpFsst where wing
gerry relIned supreme IA ST. democracy Is sigma.
9 ~ Triumphant Ia 1899,
} In Tennessee, Oct the Albany Argus spcah)--fh
Old Hero--he who pat has hIe on llc stake al Ney
Orleans, and ms political character and success %
the great combat with tic United States Bluk-ha
lived 20 see his state redeemed from federal Hhra
dom, AMI the mooeycd Monster prostratc Ten
l. nessee. which in 1887 elected the federal canddat
= for governor BY majority OF l9s75 votes, hae
n, now carried in the intrepid and dear Headed states
=, man Polk, by majority ol 1909 and elected 81
,. democratic mcmbess Of Congress, being demc
cratic gam Of three This result is the more sc
mGcint since Col. Polk, in his addresses to III
y people of the several counties following Gov Car
y non on the othcr sldt) pace the issue distinctly NJ
+ on the question Of The Independent Treasury.
e In OHIO, N 1887 federal Governor by 5000 N,
orly; IN 1888, order reversed democratic maaut
Of 573s, Which is this year increased
Thus al birds eve glance oflhe political hist,
. ry our country AR the last two or three ycal
: may II b. seen how tho Great Regulator b.
u regulated the Feleza party downward To % erusI
II ed b, The rolling bal Of democracy, unul its cred
C is as poor with the people as Is the credit of
n 3" Great Regulator in the American money ma
y kets
a Mississippi also swels the democratic gain to Il
is tune Of about 5000 Ems DfN.