Morning herald. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1837-1840, 1839-06-05

rom which eescsctsd this article. believe L to
have been destroyed; also the original copy fron
wh nc the libel was set up.
Moses Y. Beach examined. I remember Mulock
calling aboat the Newark story. He said Il wsuld
g oar daty % publish il here in New York. because
OF the influence exercised the press NJ New Jsr-
ssy ~ tine parties implicated,
William ID. Kinney examined.--I am the psrssn
referred TO in this libel have read a. and no part
- ~ - true There are no other young il New
ark OF my name except myself and brother. MY at
tenton was first called to il by friend of mine -
cross examined.-My reason for suppssing IL re-
Ter me was that some such report had got aAoat
Mr.. Day. Never saw Mulock Till saw him IN th..
Court. ! made inquiries about the author Of The
SANDER also went TO the Sun Office, and toek meas.
WAaron Campbell nisi % rsSs n Newark
and hrst saw the libel when the last witness called
on me in relation thereto. The libel referred 90 W.
Kinney, and called twice at the Office u Nsloch,
James Miller examined Il lived in the neignber-
hood OF Newark at the time this libel was publ
understood i TO refer to Mr.. Kinney, Mr. Cuttisg,
Mr. CamPfeld, Mr.. Earl, Mr.. Plume, and Miss He
denburg felt more anxiety about the iady's rcpu-
taton than about any one else.
Cross examned.-l got the impression that Miss
Hedenburg was meant because the article saws sthe
daughter Of celebrated carriage maker"
The prosecution here rested.
MIR. Kinney recalled by Mr.. Brady.
Counsel.-You knew Bartlett before thisl
Wfness.-Yes, when he was employed IN the Office
Of the Jersey Eagle"
Counsel.-Have you seen anything Of him sincel
vHness-Yes, occasionally when ] visited New
York met him and saluted him.
Counsel,-Have you said at any time that il was
particularly ungraeful in him to have published that
story in the Sun?'
Witness.--Not as to myself; but may have said
50 as il regarded one Of the other young men, whose
father had been great friend TO Bartlett.
Robert Ward examined by Mr. Brady
facts!
This question was objected to, and ovsrruled by
the Court.
Witness Well sir, what did YOU saw 10 Mulock
in relation to these facts?
WItness.-(l In low tone Of voice) told him some
part, but don't recolect what. IA fyEe
District Attorney.-Open your mouth sir, and don't
stand there munching p1ums.
Witness. asked him il he knew ANYTHING
in relation to the story.
Counsel.-What was his replya
Witness.-Why, my firm opinion is, that MULCH
did not know anything about It.
MULCH?
Witness-Never;I only knew him about note that
he had occasion to sue me for
District Attorney-When the conversation
you speak of
District Attorney.-Well, near abouts
Witness.--Perhaps September, perhaps August
but certainly after July; because the weather was
very warm. fsf
the same day that il was publisheds ffrN
INTERNATIONALLY not; Il might have been q
week after. know one Of my men showed il to me.
District Attorney.-What did Mulock call on you
for? Ha.t r
witncss-why, to buy grindstone to take to
Newark.
District Attorney.-That will do sir-you may 90
down.
1t being understood that the evidence was closed
on both sides, the Court adjourned.