Staunton spectator, and general advertiser. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 183?-1849, 1838-09-20
Sept. ID. 1888.

In The Clerks Office ofthe Circuit Superior
Court ofLaw and Cbancery for Augusta
County, September the 18th, 1898.
Whereas in cross suits lately depending
in the late Superior Court of Chancery Gnr
the Siaunion District, the original SUI IN The
name 81 81 Villain Barort administrator Of
francis hifkiy. deceased, and ST. Clair
kukly, plaintiffs, against Michael Deck.
John Deck. RoniInus Deck, Henry Deck.
Jacob Deck, Charles Deck Christian Beck.
and John Munger and Caihariae his wife.
defendan's- And The cross sui; in the pan.a
oIthe said Michael Deck, plaintiff, against
the said W iIliam fort, ad:ainis,ralo. Of
! Francis kirkiy deceased, defendant. 1t Vas
on The 18Th day Of July, 1880 among Other
things, adjudged, ordered and decreed, that
the defendant Michael Deck pay unto the
said 81. Clair Kiikiy forty dollars, with in
tcresf thereon al the rate OF five per cen,um
per annun, from the Tin day of January.
l1SS, until paid, and the costs expended in
The prosecution o' this suit, as we'll in The
County Court Of Rocking ham, as in the
said Chdncery Court: AID that the cross h,lr
o! il!o said y, ichac! Deck be dismissed and
that lie pay unto The said defendant w ilIism
bufiori, Administration of Francis EirkIy.
deceased, the costs expended by him in the
defence, as well in the said County Court. az
in the said Chancc,y Couti-rrrom WHICH
] decree the said Michael Deck appealed 10
the Couf, OF Appeals. And whereas a!
Court oi 1prea!s, beid at The Capitol, in the
City Of Richmond, on The ]Iih day.of .Jsnu-
airy, 1887, i. seemed toihe said Court of a;,-
lea's that there was error in Ike SAID de-
cree, and by HE SAID Court il rTas considered
that The said decree be affirmed and that th,
SAID Dichac! Deck pay be arpelses dana.
| ges according 10 law, cor reipiGing the eye.
cuiou lhetsol, snd gu SIS cents, their costs.
! hy them, about their defence expende6. in
! the FIRST or original csuse, prd SIS So cen;a
/ in the cross cause-and whereas al Circuit
Superior Court Of Law and Chancerv held
! iof Augusta County, at the C0art. house
! thereof, on the 18th ddv of June. 1897. il
vas considered by The said C;rcui, ;uperiar
| Court, IL pursuance Of The decree Of The said
| Court of Ar;;eals. ti,a. the said decree nc az
| tlFnch, and that iie snid Michael Deck, M v
the amount dectetd, damages and costs n
ioFesad, ard iwo dollars ard ta,iy eigg,
cents, a5 edjI'ohoi costs expended in each.
case, in the said Circuit Superior Court.
Nevertheless, execution CT the said decree
still remain: 10 hc made, rs by the iDsioua.
! lion of she said 81. C.siF kirlily, and syas
! IIain Durtofi standardization 1T Francis Kirk
! ~, we are iniormed--and because those
! lhings when IN our said Circuit Superior
| Couit afo rightly done. rse woold have du.
! y rut iii execution: II Is therefore orders
cal, that tie said Michael Deck epi,aar bo>
iore The Judge Of our said Ciicui; So, erior
Court OF Law a9d Ci7ncary for Augusta
County, On the first day of Tho nexi Term
E(lOth Of November ersuing.) etd show N
any thing for himself he haih or can cav ,why
the saidS; Clair Kirk Try andyT lillian Bui iort
sdfn'r OF Francis knkly, deceased exccuiioa
ong!h not 10 have, sccordiog 10 lie force sr6
effect OF The decree aforesaid, il 20 i!..p il
shall seem e1pedent
NiCiiS. G.. KINNEY, c. &C..
Sept l3, 1928