Rutland herald. [volume] (Rutland, Vt.) 1823-1847, 1838-12-18

rts,sss fss tAs tsstrrr, ~ seftsr ciarat ~ Sc rcs
ipss ~ lie ro uar iteesst.n, ~,h aassa Sc fs.i.
receive rstcf rcsaiitc dif~tsa thr tut.vri u lhs
dau 'apsssa ea ns Paesss' Geurfa' by ihai aw 'rss
~ rrsfao ~ nirssi leloneinr fas ,f
fre hfsnch II ic Fsrra Hr thea shstons tlat She
cposiutessi cnwpicrry 81 ihe ludicsat Sc direct sHd
cnufo lai ~ tiscAsee nsrearit dfawa ia gnrf
ii"n Aud = ~ faf rnF1sFsi On ~ Postmaster "'n-
erri - estnsarfea efvy mnisfefa and not
erusr y ~ fsps'rte ie tr ho~e that We etenh coaT
~ ths dsisst bod auftafif 81 tpetiete by nandRHs-
sueh power slsN teca ssaeftes ~ eatme By tai
court.
wnh drew TO tie fsiilrre-i AZ llsrr opa'isr, eurs.
iars Ne judgement ~ tfc citcut count earned 10y
~ ta &c .rp.cur crur nt tic & ; ln the
opisioa o tist tfiuna3 imposed hu ro,trrts
Groers ~ae r.tal rltcotto duty bot ouc 81
sereis 'oiai~efsi ostasr Fe gave constitutional ogrs-
tops vt cb sd heea disrcHea. we're, er'ioe ehcieei
SO dee a. ite Tho iadssd cfprrsls
admitting ihsi it fov trd ducs properly BELONGING
a. tie rtcatisc. fiHr dtsvimsHi cote crc by tic
wit K uau4,tus, sod e tHesuon therefore rfascs it
ssG Htu tis hss enuffcia c'nicftoa vpnn Tie ottout
court of thls dst0a, r rracf sspc such writ
officer oi hc general eovtrrncat commanding Nu 60 rcf
Form sef4 aci nrlrf''v ~ The court ia'c ccr
dsd that hos tot haze founded their derFon upon p'o
cess Of tcsouire oeh Iodemcai, fcnlet isr,het
legislative provision nopspssbr I" tic pabc late css
and the equal adn. iaisirata'@r ri tnsttce
IL has long hson ctcftcd Wy the Surtem~ Court.
bot oc thor nat trua ~ mr. Ne circuit cours OF TIC a
tod Snte bod within tie respective states, prssess The
power 0oosoni bot q s oid hat thus power de med
10 both these high ruunais to TIE tuer b, the oonstu-
ton aHd to &c stor hs corgc,s tas hccn hy us csa-
ton. vested ga She ufcut court "i TINS durc No such
direct grant tf power Go t'c ct tits district b.
cation. from several scctnHs Of the Law establishing the
court a. these declares that the laws
Maryland they existed a. TIE ic 90 tic ceon, should
be ~ force that part ." TIC district coded N that state
aud hy this provision, The common law. CiNh and cni-
na cases prevailed MARY land n 1901 We establs -
/ 81 30 That part of tue distinct.
In England, the Court Of King Bench because the
sovereign who, according 10 the theory Il the Cou>
tuition tine iounoIn ot justice, originally sat there M
person, and is still deemed 10 be present. construction
of hw-alour possesses the high power at ISSUING the
{ ttaif ii
corporations bot also t. magistrates aud others, com
mandIng them 10 the King name e. DO what their duty
requires, IN cascs where there is vested right aud no
other spec Hc remedy 1t has been held ~ the case fc
ttrcd 10. that the Supreme Court OF the L. States,
10 by the Constitution rendered incompetent 10 exercise
this power. and as the circuit court of th district
and b, IA c.., riurt OF original iursdcuu the DIS
,cc r rgli to issue tie writ Of uandautus - incident
To- us common Lass powers. Another ground relied
upon TO mnin'an the power IN question, Is, that was
included by fan construction, IN The power 1t guul'd
~ the circuit courts of the United States by the act 40
| provide for the convenient organization of tbs
courts of the United States passed 18Th OF Feb leol
that the act establishing the circuit court Of this dis
irict passed the 27h day OF Feb l-ol, conferred
upon That court and the Judges thereof the powers
BY law vested 10 the circuit courts IN the United
States and the judges OF the said coursthat the
peal OF the first mentioned act, which took place ~ tie
year did dvcst the court OF this dslric
of the authority dispute, but left II still clothed Will
the powers over the SUBJECT which, ~ Conceded, were
taken away from the circuit courts OF the United Statei
| by the repeal OF the act of 18Th Feb. 1901.
Admitting that the adopt on OF the laws OF Mary lant
for portion Of this district conies the circuit couF
thereof ~ that portion, the fanscendln extra judlcu
prrtogaive powers OF the Court OF king Bench, II
England, that either OF the OF Congress by ne
ceesary implication, Buthnise the former court Go issu
writ of ,nnndaulus an officer of United States
to cumpe HIM 10 perform ministerial duty, the canse
quenccs are, IN one respect, tht same. The result II
either that the officers of the United states, sta
toned different parts of the United states, IN re
spcc the performance OF heir Official duiles splIec
to different laws aud different supervision; those d
tho states 10 role, and those The Distinct u Co
lumb1 10 another and very different one. Ia the d,s
t!ct their o.ic.s conduct is sui ret To judicial control
from wh.ch ~ tie states they are exempt.
Whatever difference 81 opinion may exist as 10 Oh
expydiency Of vestng such power ~ the IudIca5yr
4 system ct Government constituted like ibai Of iHe
States all must agfee that taesr dsplraEtng dlscrcpat
cirs 10 the law aud IN the administration Of lusuc
ought not IL be permitted 10 continue; and as Congcs
alone provide the remedy, the sGa unayoIdabl
, presented 10 your cons Iteration.