Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1838-11-15

4
one oi his little OF Sanford lcli the plan
/ ialion six OF eight weeks age. aud having been
] brought from Hampshire county, Va may have
attempted To get back Ia that county. The ,bovc
reward will be gwen lot ms apprehension and con
| fnemcut WALTER COLES
| fntsysania county, Va. Nov. Is iw
The Staunon Spectator will please insert this
Tor four weeks and forward his account this Once.
a 1 n Circuit Superior Count of Law and Chan
4 n eef, continued by adjournment, aud held ior
the county ct Amherst al the courthouse. ON Satur-
day the Sih day OF September. lsis,
Frederick II. Mu,tell and Elizabeth NJ. his Wifi.
late Elizabeth VI. Ncnablc Plaintiffs
against
Peter 7. Thornton. administrator of Josiah Vcna-
Bile, decd Benjamin ralalcrro. aud " William Shell
ton has securities, Jane &. enable, widow, Joseph
Nenablc, RIchatd Nenablc, Samuel raNor aud
Mary his wife and Thomas n. Enbank. sheriff Of
Amherst, and as such administrator OF Ahtam Ncna-
bic, deed. Defendants.
Is CuANcERf.
The defendant. Richard Ncnahlc being dcad and
administration of his estate having been committed
10 Henry Duuninglon, Sergeant OF the corporation
OF Lynchburg, and thetcuppn the defendants. 10
seph Ncnablc, and the said Henry Huntington, ser
geant Of the corporation OF Lynrhhue. aud II such
administrator aforesaid, by thcm counsel flied
their answers 10 tho plaintiffs bill and the SUBJ onas
awarded IN this cause the lst day Of May, 1877.
beng returned executed upon the dc ipndants Ben
Jamn Taialcrro, William Shelton, Jane {. Ncna-
Bile, Samuel TAYLOR and Mary his wife. and Thorn
as n. Eubank. Sheriff OF Amherst county, and as
such, administrator OF Abtam Nen,bc, anl the,
still falling 10 appear aud file their answer although
four months have elapsed. as well since the return
day thereof, as the fling Of the amended bill Ga
motion Of the plaintiffs, their SAID bill is taken Tor
confessed rs to the said defendants And this cause
came on this day To be heard upon the papers for
mcrv read, the amended bill, and answer aforesaid
which the plaintiffs make replication, and the
answ or of the defendant Peter p Thornton, admin
istrator OF Josiah Ncnnbc. decd aud replication
thereto. and was argued by counsel Ca considcra-
tion whereof the court doth order, that the dcien
dant, Peter i. Thornton, administrator Of JOSIAH
Nenabc, decd render before one OF ITS Commls
sionct account oi his administration ol the es.
tate of his interstate. which nceoun, the said Com
missioner is directed To examine, state aud settle aud
make report thereof 10 the count with any matters
specially stated, deemed pertinent by himself, or
required by the parties 10 be 50 stated. And the
said Commissioner is directed 10 take the first
count settled by d,slntercsted Commissioners, tof
the period II embraces, the basis of hs, rescrlng
10 the plaintiffs the liberty To sufchurec and talsily
for errors apparent It's face, or IN its i,anc OF
structure, OF by evidence at,unde. As,hc end ae-
count. which settled by Commissioners, int
rested, supposed TO be Interested Tor the period
embraced, by thai, the defendant must settle de novo.
But ,hs liberty To surcharge and ialsliy the FIST ar
count Is limited 10 the FIST second. thiid, aud Sc
venth specifications OF tie amended bill. the fourth,
fifth and sixth being too general ndtinne and m
sufficient, 10 authorize surcharge OF ialshcaon
and leave is gwen to the paftirs 10 examine each
tom upon intcrrogaons touching The subject mat
ter OF SAID accounts
Copy-Testc,
ROBERT TINSLEY, CHI
CoMMIssioNERs OrrIcr, October 29th, 1893
The parties Interested IN the foregoing order of
ron nv UpI fhotI I,.vp ed
18th day of December next 10 carry SAID order, into
effect, on which day At the hour OF 10 o'clock III
the morning, they required 10 allcnted nj my
Office, At Amherst Courthouse, with their accounts,
cnples OF office papers their evidences, &c pfepir-
ed 10y examination aud settlement.
JAMES p. GARLAND, Com'r
Novem5rr 10 WI"
A II a t,,cnl, Superior Court of Law and Chan
n ccry continne,l Ivy adjournment. and held for
the county Of Amherst i, The courthouse, on Satur-
day the Sth day OF Septembtr, 1885
William Davidson and Henry l.. w Camden
plaintiffs,
against
William H. Camden, Wesley l.. Duncan. N his
right, and administrator de bonls non with Inc
will annexed OF Sarah Bnrrus, decd Defendants.
il CuANcERY.
The subpanas issued in this cause, on the 20tl
day of March, 1890 being returned executed upon
the defendant Wesley L. Duncan. aud he stu failing
file his answer, although four months have elapsed
well since the return day thereof the hing oil
the plaintiffs bli, and the deter daut, William IL.
Camden, who Is ont Of the country, and against
whom the plaintiffs appear have proceeded in the
mode prescribed by law against absent defendants
still failing appear and answer: On motion OF the
plaintiffs, by counsel the court doth take their bill
for confessed, and ih'reupon this cause came on 10
he heard upon the bill and exhibit, and argued
by the plaintiffs counsel. On consideration where
n, .f.. I,ts