Staunton spectator, and general advertiser. [volume] (Staunton, Va.) 183?-1849, 1838-09-27

In The Clerks Office oftho Circui. Superior
Colit Of Law and Chancery for Augusta
County, September the 18Th, 1888.
w hereas IN cross suits lately depending
10 The late Superior Court of Chancery for
The S'aun!on District, the original SUIT IN the
name OF William Burfort, administrator of
Francis kirkly, deceased, and St. Clair
hlrkly, plaintiffs, against Michael Deck,
John Deck, Ronimus Deck, Henry Deck,
Jacob Deck, Charles Deck, Christian Deck
and John Munger and Catharine his wife.
Northumberland the cross suit in the name
OF the said Michael Deck, plaintiff, against,
the said William Burfurt, administrator of
Francis kirkly deceased, defendant. TWAS
ON The 18Th day of July, 1880 among other
things, adludged, ordered and decresd. thai
the defendant Michael Deck pay unto The
SAID 81. Clair kIrkiy forty dollars, with in
ierest thereon al the rate oil five per cenium
per annum, from the 7ih day Of January.
1888, until paid, and the costs expended ia
me prosecution Of this suit, as well in the
County Court of Rocking ham, as in the
said Chancery Court: and that the cross hull
OF the said Michael Deck be dismissed. and
that he pay unto the said defendant William
/ burtor', Administrator of Francis Kirkly.
! deceased, the costs expended by him in Tie
defence, as well in the said County Court, as
in the said Cbancery Court.-From which
decree the said Michael Deck appealed To-
the Cosrt OF Appeals. And whereas at a
Court OF Appeals, held at The Capitol, in the
! Clty oi kohmcsd, on the II III day of Janu.
airy, 1897, II seemed 10 the said Court of Ap-
! peals that there was no error in the said de-
cree, and by The said Court it was considered
that the said decree be affirmed and that the
said Michael Deck pay the appellees DANA,
geS according 10 law, for reiarting the exc.
cution thereof, and 81 Sc cents, their costs
By them, about their defence expended. in
The !irs, or original cause, and G4S Sc cents
IN The cross cGuse-and whereas at a Circuit
Superior Court Of Law and Chancery held
for Augusta County, al the Court. house
thereof, on The 10Th dav OF June, 1887 d,
was considered by the said Circuit Superior
Court, in pursuance Of The decree o! the said
Court Of Appeals, that the said decree be az
tifmcd, and that the said Michael Deck, pay
The amount decfeed, damages and costs a.
ioTesaid, and two dollars ant. forty eight
cents, as additional costs extended in each
case, IN the said Circuit Superior Court.
Nevertheless, execution of the said decree
stili remains 20 he made, as by The nsinua-
lion OF the said ST. Clair kirkiv, and wills
iiam Buri0ri administration of Francis Kirk
ly, we are inf0rmed-snd because those
things which in our said Circui, Superior
Court ere rightly done, we would have du.
ly put in execution 1t is therefore order.
ed, that The said Michael Deck ap,,ear be-
fore The Judge Of our said Circuit 5urer;or
Court Of Law and Cbancery for Augusta
Co"tIy, on the first day of the next Term
(I0'h OF November ensuing,) aud show II
any thing for himself he bath or can say why
The saidSi CLAN Kirkley and w illiamBurfort
adm r Of Francis Kirkly, deceased execution
ought not 10 have, according TO tie force and
effect OF the decree aforesaid, if 10 them i;
shall seem eXpedicnt
NiCHS. G. KiNNEY,'c c. c. c,
Sept. l3, iS3S.-4t