Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1838-11-29
ROBERT TINSTEN, Crk.


COMMISSIONERS OfttcF, Oct. 29H 1853.
Inc paIiies Interested IL the foregoing order of
court are hereby notified, that have appointed the
9lst LAY Of December 10 cary SAID orders INTO
ceei, ON winch day, the hour ol 10 O'Clock IN the
morning. they arc required 10 attend at my Office
at Amherst courthouse. with their accounts COMES
OF oibee papers. then evidences, &c prepared for
examination aud settlement.
JAMES L. GARLAND, Com'r,
November - WV
\ T Circuit Sppenef Court OF Law aud Chan
n oeft. continued by adjournment, aud held Tor
the county 81 Amherst. al the courthouse on Sa,ur-
day the sih day Of Sepember. 1893;
Frederick II. MpfeI aud Elizabeth NJ his wife
'a'e ha'@4oe'h ~ enable, Plaintiffs
dgaiHSl
Peter 7. Thornton. administrator Of josiah Vena-
bic, decd Benlamin ralrsicrto. aud William Shell
ton ms securities, Jane G Ncnablc, widow. Joseob
Venable Richard Venahlc. Samuel Taylor, and
Mary his wife aud Thomas n Eubanl, Sheriff of
Amherst, aud as such administrator OF Abram vena-
bic decd. Defendants
la CnANosnY
The defendant, liiohdrd Venable, being dead, and
administration Of his estate having been committed
to Henry burlington. Sergeant Of the corporation
ct l'snchbntg, and ihereupon the defendants, 10.
seph senablc, and the sad Henry Huntington ser.
gean' ol the corporation OF Lynohburg, and rs such
administrator ns aforesaid. by their counsel flied
their answers TO the plaintiff, bill aud The subpmnas
awarded IN this cause on the lst dav Of MAY, 1897
beng returned executed upon the defendants, Ben
Jahh 1aiatrro, William Shelton, Jane {. Vena-
Bile, Samuel Iaylur aud Mmy his wife, and Thorn.
as II. Enbank, Sheriff oil Amherst county, and as
such, adnnnstrIto, Of Abfam Ncuohlc anl they
stu tahng TO appear and file their answer, although
tour months have elapsed ~ well since the return
DAY lheieoi a. the fling oil the amended bill On
motion hi the plaintiffs, their said bin is taken for
confessed as 10 the said deiendants. And this cause
came On this day 10 be heard upon he papers for
mefls read, the amended bill and answer aforesaid
to winch Tie plaintiffs make ma rcrlcalion and the
answer OF the defendant Peter i. Thornton, admin
mrhtor OF Josiah Ncnable deed. and replication
thereto, and was argued by counsel On considera-
uon whereof the court doth otdcr, that the defcn-
dant, fttcf l.. Ihuuton rs administrator Of Josiah
enable, hec d. tender before one OF its Commis.
Nlnnct an account OF hls administration Of the eg-
tate OF his ihlcsatc, which account the said Com
missioner Is directed to examine state aud SETTLE and
make report thereof 10 the couft, wih any matters
specially stated, deemed pertinent by himself. OF
itqnhtd by the parties 10 be stated And inc
SAID Commissioner is directed 10 take the first ac-
count settled BY disiuteteslcd Commissioners for
Inc pellod II embraces the basis OF hrs tesetvIng
10 the plaintiffs the liberty 10 surcharuc aud lasify
Tor errors appdicHt on It's face, 10 its frame Oh
structure, OF by evidence aitmde. Asthe ond ac-
count, which was settled by a Commissioner, inte-
rested OF supposed TO he interested tor the period
embraced. by that, the defendant must settle de noyo
But TINS liberty 10 suteharge and talsy the fitsi ac-
count Is limited TO The first, second third and Sc.
'enth specifications OF tie amended bill the fourth
MIN aud SIKH beng too general, indefinite and in.
sufficient To authorize surclIltrc or C,lu6cation
andleate IL gwen TO the Iattirs to examine each
other, btiolc the SAID Commissioners in solemn
'om upon inlertoSations touching the subject mat
ter oil SAID accounts.