Liberty advocate. [volume] (Liberty, Miss.) 1835-1866, 1838-03-24
OUR COUNTRY'S CArcp

W. oN III . CAUSE
we have taken occasion, once hos
remark upon The probability of \ JnI',
IN the Wing ranks. We canoo, e. 'N
menI believe that it will, in reoli,, ~
pace. II such detection should N '' 'r''
the Wings of this State, it canno, i, '''''
me members of the Legislature wo,a ~
unanimous, with perhaps one or two as. wv
ans, in the resolution to clipu ,o oaY'P
hey had completely relsens ar'' ,S
Whjs mom From our knowledge Of u,
there IS " M, one we y can confidently a,s ~'
is, in the slightest de- I NUMBER who
his opposition to a Na,iohy ' , toilet 4
him to fly from Wing cani2'G an'' Induce
he is in favor Of such an ins,itulioSSec aun
fear that +. B. J. HadIey will do This ~
an observation made by him when ri,
name was called in the election orauSI
Senator. He rose and remarked ,b,, III.
vote he intended to give, was not his ov,
vote, but the vote Of his constituents. W,
were sincerely mortified at this declor
ton. And we believe that he was the d.
~ Wing member in the Legislature 0,
posed to National Bank Amonr II.
Democrats there were several in ayo,d
such an institution, enough to give tA
Bank Party adecidcd preponderance inh
Legislature. We could easily recl;e ma
names of Democratic members who w.,
IN favor of National Bank bat we dam
1t unnecessary for our purpose. From r.
cent indications in another qua rter, to wit
the Sentinel and Exposilor, we are Ieajs
aPprehend dele tion in that see,m
However highly we prize and admire, III,
talent, energy, and independence DISPLAYED
oy The conductor of that Journal, we cam
not think with him on this subject. Wecop
not rally into the ranks orthe "Democracya
Ior The reason that we mi 5ht concur with
mem on one point out of hundred. Wa
la'e abused the Administration land cor.
rectly too) for numberless usurpations and
'ouses OF power. The National Bank
question was not the paramount leading
est OF Repubicanism, when we were ali
acKson men, and approved of the veto,in
'hich he expressly declared that a Ma.
lonal Bank was constitutional. We claim.
d TO be Republicans at that time, and why
annot those who still approve Of the We.
D. be considered Republicans. Our OBJ.
'ct' however, in these remarks, is, to ad.
lonlsh those vino are disposed TO fly off
this question, that they cannot receive
Ir humble assistance. We have been
llt'lhg Tor thorough reformation, in tho
ADMINISTRATION of public affairs, and not
llll that purpose be consummated, can
sheath our sword. The conflict has
zen long and arduous, and Just as the light
victory is about to illumine our banner;
ter we have merely dispersed one wing
the grand army, and the other parts
and IN battle array; how should the pro,
'slilon to enlist beneath the standard Of
e enemy be treated? To the State
ghts men of Amitc we say nothing, for
know that no such disposition pervades
bosom of one Of them. True as steel
~ know that but small part Of their
y is yet accomplished, and their cry is,
'oard, onward, TO the RESCUE. Their
rlts arc flushed with recent triumphs,
they would spurn dosertion, at this
lcture, as degrading and damning.
we entertain no serious apprehensions
It In our State, opposition to National
nix will amman many ofthe State Rights
n In other parts of the Union, this
flt is more strongly displayed. There
n evident effort made at various points,
tlcularly at Washington, by Paper
we have heretofore admired, to force
he Nullifers into an adoption Of The
Treasury Scheme. This attempt will
and we caution those who are strug-
to effect this purpose to use milder
pons than abuse and denunciations.
IN you attempt to force freemen, you
axe the course Of wisdom, and defeat
inevitably attend your efforts. Our