Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1838-07-05


bilny that lac Ind eoneer with any nte al
thonrh II was quite runSonant with hs feelings, as a
sincere and ardent l,iend ei the Adminsttai1nn-
He had been auxious TINT the SHb Treasury BHt
should pass; Yet because 1t has not passed, aihi
cannot pass J9r firo or difoc gfdy' tlefc WAS u"
reason ON that account that congress should do
nothing.
Mr BrcusN,S was followed by Mr. SrRaNaf,
Who avowed himself against any commitment Ia Nj.
#BucuANsN's proposition ~ any nihff oil shiiai
character b, the friends Of the Administration, aud
thcteupon speech entirely eon-eo@o5ii".-
Were the field open he would sly that Mr.. Bren
,>.N's measure, was Inefficient aud caleniatedlo do
little good lie had no idea thai 1t would Dave
been offered rs substitute ior the measure oi The
Massachusetts Senator. lie wanted time iof Re
Election and therefore moved to lay tie whole sub
sttnie ON the table. lie declared, moreover, with
great vehemencc, he would not wIlhdfa" his motion
NJ the instance al my man.
Mr. Brcu.N,x replied 10 this rather sharply
lie did not wish the Senator 10 withdraw ms motion,
but would he call up The bill 10 morrow !
Nj. SrR.N6r did not know whether he would call
il up to- morrow, OF next DAY
Mr. WtnSrta cried ont across the desks 10
i BueuANA>--" SLY youwill call II up to morrow, II
lac does not"
Ard Mr.. BucnANAa, acting on the suggestion, said
he would.
The whole subject was rhen lad on the table
NoflIne else Of Importance occurred.
The House was occupied during The greater p1ii
/, n - IL - : -. -, , ,,,,,,,,,t,. al
- W, ~ '''i''.''' -. l''''' '''''' ~
nv y ''''' - '''''
h""lNoIeN' jun - 10.
! no sfn'ie h''Pef' 'o-"'S' was 'he See'c %
one al INC most interesting 'h' 'hlln9''e as rs
SONS thu have ever taken place. within lis walls
The suhlcctsWcse the ncr financial measures offer
E ed ~ Mr.. WfrsrfR. and Mr.. Br,nANAN.
1hc question beng on tie adoption OF Mr. BrtH-
NNnN ''' ~ S"os",a'e 'o' NJ IN >
I''eL'i'iN 'oS'' al" aec'Ho" us ue''''''p",'on
!" WV 's''s. o''u '''' nv" "S
' -" NV 49, "
1'"'' ''''' ~, l',i'''' ""''S o'''''"7 y,
Al, 49,,
W "' '"'' l'' INV ~. '
- - ~ y " ~ ~ -
49, y - ~ W. - @ ) I
E - - ~ ,''' 2''usp, :, - >, -
''3,N nv ""'', '',' '''','. ~, -, ~,
'' ~ 49, '.1 .i
" u" ''' y" 49, W '.'
e - Ii''' ''' ' - ,,
81, ''3 We " "'9 '''' II ''''"'
3 49,
J ','le"-'9' o,' INV" IL '''' ~ o" AMY O''''i
, ~ '1l "H' iui u, ,@"9,i2
s. ms c"htihuel VIZ I ei'tsf' Inc fesP"sbIl5y'
-, wiz le "tai"Ie ~ 'liSI, nut no" lfslonsoiily
!n'""9 on lue oPo>l''oh' hh'' the 'liIIsh SyNf"
s Womb 'ilUcI produce adIssolulnh OF iAfilahehi,
ana 'h ateal to the People; oratcsSnaiI"n OF their
"oa'0 ps 'los' 10 "hoh lllf administration ol pnhc
'Iia'S hl'Ghi be entrusted, bn' under oui system,
. 'e c'ss y inherent lie minority mere Is as ic-
'penS'1le IS tie majority, &c. &c.
, III ~ HAN " Ua9' aA''S Ildoeip' lfiH'n 10
lhs "nafl from lls ne" ally. lie defended hls Inea-
SHle lsf'Gnl'lca To imii Executive discretion, m
stead oi rni4eh@ It. lie expressed his astohieh-
neot lhal Nj aholln should pieltf Nj. Webster =
proposition Ia lIfs; wlcu his proposed topreYenl the
use OF any banks as general dfPoNhottes OF the Ito
vcfnmeni; whereas MI Webster would bring back
the state Bank Opposite Scheme. lie more than
nslnuhcd that Calhoun was i hule Inconsistent IN
ms milfrt.