Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1838-03-01
The .h,at;yrli E1!4rgsacer- a: .faaiti


The last National Intelligence hes DEVOTED three
ana half OF lis lradrd cva;i:is TO "EeFaw OF
Political letter a5cribed 20 Mr.. Grancy. Tie All.
Gle IS !cnr and abcred-ard "i!es is al" IT is
so,a= what dipomatic-a little adsoi,-b:t Il is destitute
of x.uch Of lle ingenuity and force, which sometimes
distinguishes lie elaborate exposes Of tie integeu
eer II has nuc, more csthe character Off defense tina
attack. II is ratef 7inGtcaton and az e:iogy of Mr..
Cay The QUESTIONS Of hboiitionisn.-t'ie Iari!-n
tcrnai Improvements land National Bank, than Review
Of Mr. GrurGys Eciie- We haze no time at present
10 terch its positions. We lay them ove- for more
leisurs day. and for vacant columns content
Ourselves with saying Tor hc present. that the champion
Of The Wings aud their candidate for the PRESIDENCY, viii
reGr!ie stronger Arguments 10 ADVANCE his Ne!ensony
thar !aG article nOw before 10.
We might Indeed ha ge rassedt.ic matter ever withou:
notice the Inelligencer had not thought proper to
nssys;a.e our cwn rsurse with. NJ. G.undys. seems
tho. .e Senator 7om Feanessee had letter
10 friend in Tennessee, rPon tie course Of he wings,
and the politics Of ennessee GS - The rrTt Election
which was published in tie Ca!atin un:on-and That
be had probably seHt copy Of the same letter to the
Editor Of the CoiuGiS;a Democrat who hac used GER
tain sa.saye, from it il; an Editofa! article Nothing IS
more common Than this scnting ola duplicate et!e7 to
frieEd-Bat apon this the nicgencer IS pleased 10 sup
pose ta. nIr Grunty llao pathIs letter IA i.tograph,
and addressed copies 20 his friends IN Icncessee.
Even j! lie had done this sucS tEecscn or Ia
rgee iE the matter, as the inseschcs' !s pleased t''
suppose.
Blu. lie Tael,iscncsr goes farther! Il - pleased To-
say that ithas alrcady e counsrpas0t The pr!n
cipai .eal,ire3 OF t!s !ter il ner quarters o! The
South. We have il in pua;nalions IN Inc Charles
ton Isrcu7y, and in the well considered editorials q
the Eohr:ond En,,e. IN the former Of whi:a, as III
Mr.. GIuudy's letter, !fb"i!tions, and I'D Gay are
anaths.atZed IN The breath, Wills! IL lie latter
the present Administration 10 1ced and nphslj as be-
ing ursiaCon;sca4 10 both. We feel Justified in con-
siderinm talettpf therefore, manifestation OF the
designs Of the Administration party. and OF lae arsu-
menls By which a.! attempt ct reform OF tie crying
abuses in the Go2errmc nj is 20 he resisted 1t is fur
Their creased 10 saw, that The c0iGcGc7ltc indeed,
between tie EDITORIAL of the Richmond Enquirer and
The SeaatDr:a} Lettar are speaking aIs more than
merely remarkable" Sc. CHAD the Editor Of the En-
ouirer tco received of TIE lithograPh letters 1T
is pleased further TO add that Coming now 10 tie poa:
which is mos, prominent n this letter, and most aonsp
ia the contemporary demonstration oil the agsn
OF the party at Richmond, we canD3. but cini:c the
courage OF M. Grrndy N con turing Up, to alarm his
fellow. citizens the ghost of ie Ben: whichae himself
was so mainly Instruments! in sen:iay to :ts cng
count."-.fhe subject Of the Bank however, IS Intro
duced IN Mr. Grundys letter, presume, just II is
in tie Rchmond Engu-er for two:old purpose the
one TO revive fading rGsy prejudice against the late
Banl.-tne other to the Jealousy Of State feeling
agans. shese 10 whom Dir. g. npDtea tie design 10 es
tabsb another Bank Of the u. States,
We seq leave 10 meet these several allegations at once,
and By one wordt to ute. the 'thc. coming arcies
of the imaginative Reviewer. In wor<i then, have
received no thosruph letter from Nj SFund y-aor any
other copy CT aay lelteTEcr any lstsr at ALL from the
Senator OF Feaneseee-aor any scch hint OF augges-
ton from any member Of either Eouse, Of tho Admit
nstraioa-aor free, any other person, at Washington
or esew here-Wha we said upon the sub &C. IN nues-
ton spou an issue between Mr. z. Buren, and Nj Clay,
was eur own-wthont consultation, suggestion, OF ain:
from amp person whatsoever Mr.. Grundy did not bor
row sroin u.s. from Ms. Grundy -h there be any
analogy between statements twas because thc same
truth had struck both Of because The uth lay upon
the eurlace.