Vermont telegraph. [volume] (Brandon [Vt.]) 1828-1843, 1838-04-04

Revelator spake as if things were then pass
'ng before him. think feel willing, nay
aestrous to take back every wrong state
ment, and leave nothing but the naked truth
remaining in all my articles. Perhaps some
may inquire if my opponent has not shown
great many errors into which have fall
en- In my articles. NY answer is, just take
one Of my articles and read it-then read his
answer" and so go through: and if you
lind, on careful perusal, that either my Ian
g"0ge or arguments are fairly met-if Ga
lew instances excepted) you do not find my
opponent going around, and Grading the
point, then l will acknowledge that preju-
dice has blinded my eyes. His second ar
ticle on the 70 weeks is, by far, the most
like an drsaoer of any have yet seen; and
yet, in this, there are many instances where
my arguments are not met
The "Cherubims," still think, "both
looked one aeay," aid will, with permission
of the Editor, hereafter present short arti-
Gle on this subject. l wish also to say, that
if have not forfeited all claim 10 the atten-
ton of my readers, l will, with leave, pre-
sent an article or two font the 70 weeks-23OO
days-daily sacrifice -abomination Of DESC
lation, &c.-also the claiming of the Drag
on, (Rev. 20. &c. )-none of these, however
as ANSWERS to my present opponent-but as
common newspaper articles, in which will
venture TO give some opinion Of my oa0n.
Such positive declarations of my oppo-
nent, relative to my real character as a
christian, as the following, coming from
whatever source, with whatever spirit in,
dited, l consider worthy of my serious
thought. See his article on the two wit
nesses-"But one thing is certain, you
cannot be one of the witnesses for Christ
And again: "You was never slain by the
law" &c. My prayer is, that, if never
was "slaiu by the law" l may be, and bt
made alive in Christ too, and prepared 70
MS second coming. AARON Angler.
Waterbury, March %, 1888.
P. S. Since writing the above, hav,
seen my opponents "answer" to my 4tl
objection. Had he argued from my Ian.
gudge, much of that article might hay,
been saved. For instance, say-Tele
graph, Jan. "a, l column-A "vision" gen
orally is something seen and times is nc
} seem" Just compare it with his quotation
see Telegraph, March 81, column,-a1s
Sd column,-You say, ga vision is some
thing seen and time is not SEEN" Here m
qualifying word generality" is left ou
and he goes on arguing from it, as an an
qualified declaration, until he finally get
me into an awful "dilemma," and rattle
exultingIy says, (which side of you
dilemma do you choose l care not whic
you take, either one, as a school boy ma
see, sweeps your objection Daniel aoa
n not satisfied about the TIME OF THE END
away at once" My opponent has charge
Q me number of times, with having ed
il sign" in some things which wrote. T
: this charge l plead guilty. And to increa.
e my guilt, I would say, had design in a
it wrote, and especially in inserting tt
r, qualifying word generally" in the Sc
+ tence he pretends to quote, had desie
O TO keep out Of just such dilemma" as
is thinks l am in. 1t was inserted with speci
reference to the 70 weeks. A. A.