Southern Argus. [volume] (Columbus, Miss.) 1834-1842, 1837-08-29

3 opinion is the only doctrine that
ver prevent the consolidation Of
wers IN the Federal Government,
ringing about the kind of Govern
the Columbus Democrat lately |
,as''possessing some advantages"
having more energy and dects-
md less delay in its operations
RepuBHc." 1t may be said that
\ Carolina went too far in illustra-
he doctrine Of Mr.. Jefferson, and
resume our neighbors will so say,
eavoring to get clear ofthe charge
ing in cre,y respect as much Of a
Flyer as ourselves : We can
ou still faster. Mr.. Richie, editor
Richmond Enquirer, a paper en-
3 the countenance and support Of
bon, Van Buren,, and all the mod
Democrats, the doctrines Of which
columbus Democrat vie US as true
oly Writ, says in his paper of
eh 10, 1882, as follows:
IFICATION-AN ERROR CORRECTED.
We have come before the public to
ect an error into which we have
ycd them. Some of the politi-
of South Carolina had maintain
be opinion that Mr.. Jefferson was
only the friend, but the father Of
doctrine of Northumberland their
cipal argument was, that he was
author Of the Kentucky Resolutions
%, as well as those Of '9S-and that
bose Of 80 is to be found the me-
a1.e passage that The several
ties who formed that instrument, be-
sovereign and independent, have
unquestionable right to Judge of its
action; and that a Notification, by
Sc sovereIgntics, of all unauthorized
done under color of that instru-
pit, is the rightuI remedy"
Ee had a great curiosity TO ascer-
the truth Of this opinion. We
ted up all the facts that were within
reach; weighed them as impartial
we could; and we arrived at a
erent conclusion from that Of the
le Rights Politicians Of South Car
a. We expressed our opinions in
Enquirer of the 18th of September
Nc have now to state our cOnviC.
j THAT WE WERE WRONG
ID THE SOUTH CAROLINI-
s WERE RIGHT, AS TO MR.
PERSONS OPINIONS. A
N Ms. book has been found among
apers, which, with other articles
ins two copies in his own hanC
be, that appear to have been the
bal of the Kentucky Resolutions
first Of these is blurred, and mucl
ctcd, with passages struck out
bthers interlmed. The other is {
and later copy, Judging from tn
Of the paper and Of the ink, O
Us draught. We are indebted t.
randson for the permission to eX
be these MSS. and compare then
the printed copies Of the Kentuc
resolutions"
hat impartial mind, scorning sui
&c and not warped by party pre-
e, can refuse to admit that the CO
JUS Democrat is as good a nullifye
lrsclves? Ii believes, it says in MI
erson's doctrine of State Right
essence Of which is Modification
believe no more,-,rgo the Demo
and the Argus are brother Null
.--GiUc as your hand brOtherl
y a schooner arrived yesterday, W
b that the vessel alluded to in OF
as having proceeded with a nun
of prisoners under the care Of CO
arton from ValaSco to Matamora
been lost off that port, and that II
or with his command and prisone
into the hands of the Mexicans.
I'D that the crew of the schoon,
her, on finding that they could n
rwise avoid capture, in hopes Their
o escape being considered in Il
} Of prisoners on landing; but Il
llt proved they had reckoned wit
their host. We confess the latt
ofthe story appears rather impro
IN. D. Com. Bulletin.