Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1837-11-13

r.t-.
OF the Experiment, and not because they bebo,.1'
to be in itself worthy fsnpport,) would b,,o 4,
dled,own 10 corporaI's squad. Indeed. ,o a.''
whether Gen. Gordon himself would no, haze. s'a''
ed his own bantling. il some ..harl. money
crat' OF that day had succeeded in at,,cb;,a
odious feature. Gen. Gordon thercfo,e
'a'her oil the SUB Treasury scheme, in II, NJ.
form. as he is alleged to have asserted in III. A.
marie meeting; and although his "yani,v n..'
tickled' by the contrary assumption we bona
not so far blinded by the intoxicating fumes =, :,
passion not TO the essential dierene. ,. .'"
the two projects.
One more remark. We are told that NJ; -
land defended himself against the charge of h...
Fedcrditsf, brought against him. Mr.. Ryes AID :,
Conservative portion Of the administration n,,,.
the Globe, in consequence of their epposo, ;. :,
ub-Trcasury project. Why, Major. have va, =.
| TO learn that Federalism does not now d.n.., -
the character Of the opinions entertained, ~,
same Gfo6e winch now, rs the organ of Mr. Va,p,
rtn's administration, denounccs gou as a fede.r.
because you will not support the Sub Proc
scheme, applied precisely the same cpi,he,,o e..
Gordon in 1884, because h. did support IT., .
that YOU may console YOURSELF Major, with III. ;.
Election that although your political appe,o, ;.
changed your creed is not. The truth is i,c o.,.
test of federalism with Gen. jackson and his a.,
! luStrious'' successor for the last eight wears h..
BEEN support otor opposition 10 their mea,u,,-
| Were they against l.. s Bank An who sn,n,
it were tederasiS. Had the Bank displaced H..
miah Mason from the Presidency ofthe New H..
shire branch of that institution, agreeably to Gan
Jackson's orders TO Nicholas Bldlc, he never uou,
have vetoed the Bank, and of course all the o,,o
ncnts Of that institution, Instead OF its friend, wo,A
have been lcdeasts, When Gen. IlayDe an all,
indicated the doctrine of Modification in the :
Senate. Jackson himself WIS NulliGcr. and of
course all who opposed it were trderaiss. After
wards, when he quarre'lcd with Mr.. Calhoun. aul
on account of that personal difficulty. changed HI,
political creed, and issued Proclamatioa ,mb,
cling doctrines as federal as any ever a,ya "a Nv
IIamillon Pickering or Jay. why forthwith tie Null
litlels became lcderaliss, aud were accordingly
mathematical and accommodated By the Glol,.
as enemies Of the Republican faith Presently
| the State Bank Deposte system became the test
and its opponents all placed under the ban,
and the old cry Of :" tcdcrdStS," was rung in their
ears, especially they advocated the Sub Treasury
scheme, which denouncedb y the Globe because
it gave the Execntiyc Too much potroaaee and
brought the public money too directly nnder his con-
| trot! Now. the friends Of the state Bank sys,m
even under a more efficient organization, meta.
morphosrd into frdcraSts. and the advocates oi the
Sub-Treasury are your ouly dcmocrafs--tlr lra
Simon Pures With these facts staring Maur
Garland in the face, he should be terrified h, AN
! DO, -,
1t should rather be regarded Of honor than
Of reproach. since it uniformly made To mrau
an enemy otifre>p'"Sibe poprtr'
MIR. WEBSTER AND MIR. CALHOUN.
We conclude Mr.. WebStcr> able speech this
ing. aud shall follow it up"iih Mr.. Calhonn's second
speech. 1t will BE- seen that Mr.. Webster brought
into notice Mr. Caihouns celebrated arsnnentinia.
vor of the Tilted States Bank in 1916. and made him
| feel the awkwarursS of his present position. sn
vain Tor Mr.. Calhoun to say that he then yielded
his convictions of the nnconstiuona'iiy and nexpr-
diency of National Bank the urgent necessl'yol
the casc-ior that very necessity shows the nili, Of
such an institution, and, in our opinion. its consAH
tionuliY also. II it tcSsdrY to charter BanA
| in 1916 for the purpose Of enabling The coyrrnnrHt
| to exercise lis functions aud 10 perform It's duties. The
poArfr TO charter it follows inevitable con'e
| quencc.--as the i"gma'c means To effect the great
eR of It's institution. And its necessity is not no" hes
apparent ,han it was then. The federal government
has not only the exercise granted powers hui
also all otlerpowcrs not enumerated. which ARE me
crSsary and proper carry into effect It's achnor
| lodged obligations.
But Mr.. Calhoun contends that the .nized CON
nrction then existing between the Government anu
the Banks, which alone justified the establishment
consequently the ground of justification is removed
| But could not the "connccuu' have been cui then
! by law, it has since been By necessity! "hat
would have been ea>iei, in 1916, than for MI 'a''
houn to have brought forward i proposition Tor n
yorcc between the Government and the Banks. ami 10
have proposed the Sub-'rrcasury scheme as a sub
stitute There nothing 10 prevent II. The oh''
cation to continue the connection not more bind
ing then than it is now & might just easily hare
been dissolved. But the fact is Nh. Calhoun did moi
thoue hit entirely. Col. Benton first broached II anu
Mr. Calhoun, who adverted to it in his speech oil
$751; as an alternative to be deprecated rather than"
be adopted OF choice, now struting forth IN '"e
borrowed plun,are of the Missouri Senator. Let any
one read Mr.. Webstcr's remarks upon the poslfiono
Mr.. Calhoun in lS16-and they will see with ecu"
regret and surprise the unfortunate prcdicament mo
which Mr. Calhouu's 'i-weaved ambition Has
thrown him