Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1836-03-12
Hurra for TYLER! Hurru for Leighy

Leigh letter. able and eloquent production tho
nest poitican--"sincerey regret (though) he did not
resign - always commended for the right of instruc
uoh - aoie and Ingenious Argument still belle We
(howeve) the only alternative is obedience or rsigno
ton -ExPunging Resolution all "farce"-yet hoped
Leigh would have done Tyler did-must force other
Issues Than Leigh or no Leigh Instructions or no In
sirucuons that viii do--and so on. as DIR Co
Phagus 'ooud say--or as the Petersburg Intelligence
deoeoPement! must go for Tyler or for Leighyet nei
Their against Tyler Leigh!--as the Wing in Rich.
mond said the other day 10 bis fellow, urra Tyler!
Hurra for Leigh and on as DR.. Cophagus again
would say
Find no fault of Mr.. Tyler for rcsignng''-"vcner.
ate The right OF instruction could have excused him
lthongh) in such case if he had disobeyed'-Mr.
or the Norfolk Herald does say"IIurSaG for Le;rI
H"rr@A for Tyler" las the Dialogue says)
Asthe signs CO. Mr. Tyler will find little the
wings OF the other States The N. Commercial calls
s course disheartenog and vexaoussays he has
fered himself 30 be no or wick
ca feeling against him. but he has acted upon principle
OF error, and "has sacrificed hia duty the IT, s. to his
Difference for the wishes of few political partizans in
virg:na-not for MS constituents the people of the
Union Gor the snswer TO that doctrine see Mr.
Aeigh own Report in 1922 and on, DR.. Copha-
gus would say.
The Raleigh Register of the 9Th takes the thing more
highy IN dudgeon-This friend of Citizen Mangum thus
brings Mr. Tylers eloquent production home 10
his own business and bosom"we mean, the Editor of
the Register: -
:" The resignation of Mr. Tyler suggests the ooes,on
to our minds whether the Wings of North Carolina can
win due regard TO their principles to say nothing Of
their honor support him for the Vice Presidency Our
own opinion u.s. (and speak for ourselves alone TINT
TO continue him Ticket under existing circi,m.
stances, is TO leopard the vote Of the State Az . ,n,o
OF ms nomination he was taken up, in preference to
Others SIMPLY because lie had accepted the MARYLAND
nomination, and from wish avoid collision with our
he VIII now decline the Maryland nomination In ustce
10 tnose who brought his forward he certainly
Dugnt 70 40 So But should he hold on, have very
G.,e doubt that Maryland will revoke her nomination Of
hin;--We do not sec how those who approve Mr. MAs
GUN scourse can consistently support for the Vice Pres
uency, one VINO, by hts own example, has given the
strongest rebuke TO Wing principles. North carolina
IN our opinion should meet the Virginia heresy on her
own borders, and fight il back"
80 says Mangums friend on the great RfoLf of r..
strneion But IL is hard dilemma this upon Mr. nv.
xLto please his own State to dsPease others If
mangum friends strike off Mr.. Tyler from their list
Leigh in his place. W.
=, Curious Dlcmma-Mr. Tyler tells "tbe FaitlfnIp
Inat ne cannoLretatn his seat with "honorMr Leigh
oecares mat ne cannot reitaqnish il with 'honor We
ask with The Petersburg Constellation which 81 ,te
oracular leaders is in the tight? y '"S's
fasst was no, only ,oy HIMSELF bat the cause of
aott !" ohers-Just so-the Senator of Virginia. He "a
moi only ~ qnaHdary HIMSELF but he is tie cause Of il
10 gu MS friends Ifthey generally go 10Th him they
are gone because the people would not 90 with them
Al they 90 against him. there is schsm In The ranks
ana he party falls between the stoolswe mean the
two Senators ~
me correspondent Of the N. York Journal Of Com
merce writes from Washingon ION the OOH Feb ON
l@eign has determined not to resign Al n,escnt ss
say, that y is bis intention 10 submit the question ~ h
people az the April eleclion and consider the esut If
.a1 election rs proper test Of the wishes Of The STATE
1lo acs Mr. Leigh does not make lest
'and ms letter points otherwise lie People ,oia
The Washington Correspondent of the PHILADELPHIA
inquirer writes on the 18th February In the fooeng
w - On The subject of the right of instruction.
WI, leigh stands painfully committed die then refers
70 tne report Of 1912, and adds )"If then MIR Iegb
WIS ~ favour of the right Of instruction In 1916 ean he
refuse 20 apply the rule to himself in 1886 n were
wi, beeiigh, would not resign would hold my seat
ano on inc ga Dominion Mat ohat aoas lao and oosoc
r"s tHeH ~ 1916 oqs rank and skeer heresy a. 1sG
dS makes wonderful change in all things: and III
Old Virginia was silly enough In 1916 10 mast tbs 80
representative was but tool an antomaion tvyenty
years agone, IS that she should perst in ~
folly ~ this enlightened age" ~ '''
49, i s,. mas changed, Old Virginia has not But
s ys, wo OS.1 Dc silly enough were she submit to it
49, p',. ~ ssc uof Wby-her Representatives and
n e TcoPe can DO one thngDO the very thing ,oiel
MT. Leigh dd in 1879, when he bore down opon 1ess
es anu brent Then his celebrated Report carried oof
LDe course winch she Pursuedand has i spoke of the
s g'o uey were bound TO discharge As he did
do BY him in 1896 ~ ~ s'''''"'e
Least o. all can i ever be devoid Of seerespect