Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1836-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS.
NT., >

DDMEES AAC.
COURT OF APPEALS.
MARCH 2.
Gibson vs. Gordon-Heard.
D0nneNvs. Kings rep;--is HE,
Jones vs. .lndcrson-Heard.
MARCH 4.
Clopton vs. Clark-Heard.
Mahcn vs. Joknson-Heard
Burk vs. Atartin-Heard.
MARCH 5.
FoNeio vs. Dryee, &.e-Error confessed ana 'e8e''eo
Garland vs. 3gec--Heard.
MARCH ~.
Jones rs. .4nderson-Affirmed,
Branch vs.. Webb-Purtly heard.
MARCH 5.
Inuhon vs. Johnson-Afirmed.
Burk vs. Martin-Affrmcd.
CLuiborne vs.. GroSS-Rcversed
JyI1nJish vs. Gross-Dismissed irnprov. emuue
Clopton VS.. Clark-Afirmed.
Braneh vs. We6b-Farthcr heard
MARCH 9.
Lardley vs. .Nerrifeld-Afirmed.
Brandt vs. HetJ-Concludcd.
Guerran, vs.. Hoeker-Hcard.
MARCH 10.
Randolph vs. HH-Heard.
Houston vs.. CantrAt-Partly heard
MARCH H.
Houston vs. CantriH-Concluded.
Jones vs.. Couch-Party heard:
MARCH IL.
Garland vs. .2gce-Affirmed.
Gucrrant VS.. Hoekcr-Reyersed.
Jones vs. Couch-Farther heard.
MARCH ID.
Branch vs. HcBL--Atfirmed.
Jones VS.. Coueh-Concuded.
Thompson vs. .Ncek-Partly heard.
Panerson vs. Fcugls-Appeal allowed.
Sorrs vs. Winston--Appeal allowed
MARCH IL.
Thomson vs. .Meck-Concluded.
Foreman VS.. Murray.-Partly heard
March IL.
Randolph vs. Hin-Afhrned.
DonneH VS.. Kings rep.-Afhrmed
Foreman vs. Marray-Farther heard.
MARCH Is.
Commonwealth vs. Waller-Appeal allowed.
Foreman vs. .Murray-Concluded.
Tucker VS.. Ross-Party heard
Tucker vs.. Ross-Concluded
MARCH 81.
Basse. vs. acknowledgement and bill dismissed
Gibson VS.. Gordon-Athrmed.
Sseptoe' ad. VS.. Harrcy-Partly heard.
Simmons od. VS.. Weeler-Appeal allowed
Septos's ad vs.. Harrey-Farlher heard.
MARCH %.
Sssptos's ad. vs.. Haroey-Farther heard
MARCH "a.
Robins vs.. .,ohnson-Appeal allowed
Same VS.. Samc-Appea allowed
Septoc's ad. VS.. HaTrey-Concluded
MARCH %.
Trottsr vs.. Broun-Heard.
Nichols vs.. AyIer-Partly heard.
MARCH 26.
Nichols VS.. .4yler-Concludeaao
Scann VS.. Sclden-Argued in part BY Mr. swunh for
appellants.
Houston vs.. CdntriU-Affirmed.
S,oann vs.. Sctden-Argument continued by Dir.
,wann.
Trotts- vs. Broun-Reversed.
L. M Do1ceH-Ap meal denied
Dc Laey vs.. .7ntonio-Supersedeas awarded
S,oann vs.. Seldsn-Argument continued by Mr..
Swami.
APRIL l.
Hath,cale VS.. Kablc-Appeal allowed.
S,oann vs.. Scldsn-Argument continued by Mr.
'wann.
Suann va Seldcn--Argued by Mr.. SssaaHd sr appel
.es.
APRIL 4.
Hack vs. Sxsih-Appeal allowed.
KecJle vs. ChurchiN-D Dismissed.
S,oann vs.. Selden-Farlher argued by Dir. Stanafd
APRIL S. ~
Bdsset vs.. nninghom-OEder to certify
Jones Coueh-Afhrmed.
Ssounn vs.. Ssldsn-Farther argued BY Ms. shnasd.
APRIL 8.
Forsman Mrruu-Reversed.
S,cann VS. Sclden-Farher argued by Mr. johnson for
he aPpellees.
ArRlL 7.
Scam vs. Seldek-Argu'nen. by Mr.. Johnson for ap.
,ellees continued.
APRIL 8.
Thomsons vs.. Mcek,-Reversed.
S,oann vs. Selden-Farther argued By Mr. johnson.
APRIL 8.
s,,ann Vs. Selden-Farther argued by Mr.. johnson.
49, APRIL Ii.
S,runn vs. SeldeR-Farther argued ny Mr.. johnson.
-" April Il.
S,rann Vs. Sslden-Farther argued By MIR. Johnson.
-. APRtL IL.
s,ecan vs.. Ssdcn-Argued by Gen. Jones for the ap-
,ellants in reply,
suuans vs. Selden-Argument in reply BY Gen. Jones
or appellants continued.
APaiL Is.
Suann vs. SclGen--Fasther argued BY Gen. Jones in
eply.
Wpna Vs. Wyam-Supersedeas awarded.
Simpson VS.. Simpson, ed.-Appeal denied.
APRtL 49,
S,camn Vs. Seldes-Farther argued BY Gen. 5eses in
eply. 49,. 20
Meade vs. Brynn-In the matter Of Mr.. John Ran.
olph's will The case was opened by Mr.. Robertson
e the appellants, -
.Mea9evs Bryan- Argument continued BY Mr.. Robert
N.
Dc Leey VS.. .aRsonio, &e-AfiEuied
APRIL 90.
JHssds Vs. BryGn-Arguedby John r. Cooke, EGG, TOT
o sppellsht.