Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1836-03-26

TO re-coInm tho whole of tho Resolutions The object
as his speech upon tsst satert will CLEARLY shrw,
her the Bank Resolution i'm the Committee: Hence the
reason OF the vote in the negative of Banks (Speaker
wilson of b. Watkins, Garland Of NJ, Holeman, and
o'ne the same reason against the motion to reconsi
der the vote To reject the motion % recommit
Dut Is charged, that Banks * Co. voted for the
luton called Marshalls Resolution" Now il is well
known atmany ofthc Administration party voted that
resolution, az that time, compromise for the purpose
of rctoIiug the resolution upon III, subject Of The Bank
and not doubtng that those who bad for pre-
ceding resolutions, voted precisely aud exactly their own
sentiments. But the gentleman forgot to enlph,en the
public mini, 10y telling them that resolutions as
modified by the Senate, upon final passage was voted
against 10y Banks " Co. The Resolution in these
words:
RcsOiod That Assembly do not ntou by tho de-
SL of e's opinion IN rsgard to The Of tho
iosS Of their Misrepresentation Of the Withholding
Gilner ~ Co. voted for this resolution and Banks 81
20 against it, But, AN amendment offered by Mr..
watkins, 10 strike out assumption of power, and to
"abuse and the Administration party voted for this
ainendment-the Wings, of course, against il But if
mat amendment had been adopted, the gentleman has
forgotten 10 tell the country that there would have been
an after vote of agreeing 10 it, amended That would
not have suited his purpose The first resolution which
the the gentleman substitute declares that
the President had been guilty Off dangerous and alarm
my assumption of power, which could be strongly
con.cnDed GilineT " Co. voted for it, and Banks aud
others voted against H. see Journal oe H. Of Dcieq0teS
1855 and a. page 1917 The Cd resolution, passed
the H. oil ~ was voted upon division of the question:
Young upon the first member of the Resoution and the
latter part charging the union of the sword purse
@ he
third Resolution, which instrncts Senators in Con
gress TO vote restoration of the Dcposites Banks
tSpeaker0 and others, voted against the third Resou
ton; the second Resolutions il from the Senate
was voted for by several of the friends of Admins
tration, as an alternative proposition
III VIII he perceived by this hasty expose, that there
was nothing inconsistent, according the stcicst rules
OF parliamentary proceedings in the pursued by
Banks and others, whom Mr. G. has thought proper TO
designate. The Wings then had majority in the Lee
gisature They could force the minority TO vote be-
tween competing propositions and afterwards present
eff from
1T was true, which could deny as the state
ment goes; but is not the whole truth and The facts
and motives are not known TO the public Hence the
perpetual efforts, which have been made by of
Wings To gull and deceive the people, and 10 induce them
TO distrust those who have uniformly been their fast
friends.
1t is not necessary To go into statement of all the
various little amendments and amendments amend
mens; The people look TO results upon The main ques
TONS
Is il not most strange that Messrs Tyler and Leigh
should have taken up the idea that by the adoption of
these Resolutions, they vote for the
Resolution of 2Sth March, 1894 trying and condemnng
the President for violation of the laws the Consti,
futon. These gentlemen know full well, that these
Resolutions were considered and adopted scratint and
that there was but Resolution of instruction. which
was the third Resolution, which directed Senators
10 use 'e pest excrtons TO procure restoration Of The
Public DepoSes to the Bank If tie H. States How they
could have ever imagined, for moment, that this
tnru Resolution ever designed intended instruct
them 10 attain the object contemplated by charging
President with an impeachable offence, if true, pass
ing strange. The other Resolutions condemning the
President Tor the removal of the Secretary of the Trea
sury, and The subsequent removal of the Depeses,
the individual opinions of the members voting them
and which they had legitimate and perfect right
press.
The Senate of the u States is coordinate branch of
the Govcrnment and they exercise, under particu ar
circumstances, three distinct
Executive and Judicial; but the Resolution of the 2Sti
March, 1924 was certainly neither Legislative Ex-
ecuive If it Judicial, then the case was not pro-
perry before them according the Constitution of the
U. States 1t must them have been gross assumption
OF power which has been delegated by the Constitution
to the House Of Representatives But all of this parade
about their being instructed to this unconsu
tional Resolution of the 2Sth March, 1884, is designed
for political effect, 10 deceive and sleaG the public iud
ment. ARlSTIDES