Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1836-09-23
n, JI,;-,.'S E,:g{.ti0yls.

la~' IT, -,
icE Br'e" :, ; ;,--7--;---
=. TIer does us nothing bLs justice. we were
M MI OF the existence OF h's second and 50 re-
isao'"" Hu we d. him the justice 10 .cpub!sn them
s'.h'' 49,, attached 10 the article from the Lynchburg
rs Nv, which t;'!lcws these remarks. Mr. Tyler
:, his Is, 7ssnu;ion. hat u is IN rtoaiioa gt IKE
i ,,,a to abolish the rights ut property I'm slaves
.ef , -i. District ,rtaout ;itc cgascat Of Tic otca.
,,,rrsr that Congress may abolish slavery in the
Is -, viii :hr consent of the owncrs-Mr. V. Buren,
l',", ,. there are objections to the exercise of this
'.S' ,,o., The wishes Of the slave holding States
~ ~ ;&tsr na:are and obligations. in reguut
. .,ndu,' -" public men, as The H'ost pa!padlc oaHt
- ,;cqci poiccr ,coutd be. Mr.. Tyler maintains
,o6 Sd resolutions, that even with such conSe nt
,r, with slaves in tic District, mot only without
''I"ns, the consent OF the people Of Maryland and
would bc III diagram: ri0inion Of The pHtlic taiM
IN, Constitution, mark Vthat it would sap the
,;,, If our conventional system, and disturb the
i'''', e cpsaprGnSc out of which the GovetnmcG,
"''s.,t Mr. Van Bnren goes iuT!her than this
-.,raunces. that The abolition OF !avsry III the Dis
'.' the wishes (not of MARYLAND and Eirr;nia
t E,,, Of alb =. ' slavciIoiding States, (assu.Ang
Ho.risss las Tie power 10 effect t] would riuiatc
.iat compromise OF interests which lies al the
-. -; ca. social compact; and AN thoroughly con
-. ,Da; i; could not b. so done, without imminent
: rot certain destruction, TO the Union of The
v;.wing Tie Iual,e! in this light, il is my clear
,,iat orlnnn that the Federal Government OF ght
.,ip iron, doing and that II is the sacred duty of
- ny:a :le people ol the Uned States enlrusl with
.,,,t,i 81 It's action, 10 use Tie constitutional
" u;,n winch they invested as to prevent it,
- rss thu: Il he the President, he would r,to
...a alSATl. 50.
wnid 70 The 'cunnng little Isaac. who is calling
.,. en- lr,ti!y 10 d. Justice TO Mr.. t. We call upon
N, T. Eh;gj do justice the South, whose inte-
l.. 30 has aba ni"ned on his very question When he
, u, ina, Mf. Tyler went farther than 20 require
sca, Of t.r in the District before Congress
E; act. why he c;ned IN with the sentiment and
ti,,,u 49, 60
ss a!:r. lie: had obtained such consent But hat
49,. n. nos saw now T. al lie finds not only MIR Pirck.
~ aad MIR Van Buren, requiring also the consent OF all
g., nv: holding Slates but Mr.. Tyler himself in his %
81 % resolutions. requiring IN 0Gdsiton, The consent O.!
r.-,.~:a end Man stnnd-oherw;Se, it would be fla.
.5, violation OF The public tath' The Wing only asks
a. cou.en, OF the owners, and wonders that any
,.,,i ask more. Yet M7 Van Buren, does ask more
,ri iIf rincknsy did ask mere II his 'ecak resolutions
IS The Whlr silly enough to call then-aud Alr
Y.a- DEMANDS more in KS Resoluiions-And il tu.us
ma, The VIM the Only ,reGk defender Of HE faith
~! tia! lie has abandoned the rights and interests Of
81. : nth:
iirOrr tic '.yuch5urg Dcmrcrat}
The Richmond ing calls upoa Coy. Tyler's COM
-cnl:u.. correct their representations OF his opn
,.n "A relation the power of Congress abolish s!a
,r, n the DiS,!ic, It Columbia AS one OF those
,, aenllc., SO shall clleeruly obey The CALL when
,..r We a.. conr:@ccd that we have done injustice to
=. T. ". have pi:,i'si!.d the resolutions offered in
-, Srna,e ~ Mr. Tyler as Chairlna Ola committee
e.. uroa his Individual responsibility, aud therefore
.a.-y - Ge presumed ruJudy his sentiments These
.,soa rs d. deny thai Congress has the power TO
,s- cnang. or abo!!sl! the rights OF property in the
i;s.-c, OF Columb!a with The consent u the owners
7a do not tha! interference w that body w,h
-. sgrct Of slavery in The District. (w the consent Of
- ag ,,sl would he unconstitutional but at such
n xrcs" c power. without or against the consent Of
ar "roplr OF Maryland and Virginia., would be 81 fla
e-n VOCATION Of the public faith. abuse Of trust Nc
v.-I ,hnut tIp,;al,iv We hl
: that taS exactly l!s rew taken o the subject
!; > = Buren,. who v!.:'d for lalnin! the
= sentiments uttered Gy Mr.. Tyler. the Wing candidate
= iYs Wee Presidency, is Senator from Virginia. 1t
sd !l the Wing 10 refer TO repnr. which
7r'--and besides it is not very reasonable TO suppose
IA! SoulierI SenatoT, upon question o vita! upper
.1c- II his constituents would concede IN the rrsoiu
''as that which he d.'ncd in report. But Mr.. Tyler.
I'D the resolutions individual Senator ami not
a. Chairman Of ComnIlttee. They contain his
.len,S and not those Of other persons He comedies
c:-. certain restriction the constitutional part OF HE
rls.lIoH and MS resolutions prove the fact.
We have before remarked that would freely lrnst
:: r,er upoI tbs question. II matters not 10 US w!!e
rs7 rnan considers certain exercise "a, power
sr9ona or as grant violation Of the public faith
oi trust, &c. II he would violate such faith,
snc! trust he would not be very apt 10 regard the
r:st.u.:Ja The lDluuctions OF the iInpera
I've as those OF thc OLDER Mr.. Van Buren, and Mr. y
x: .ot Substantially the same opinions relation 10
power referred 10, and both entitled TO confidence
~ that question Wemereiy advertct to the sentiments
M after expressed in his resolutions, TO show The
Inconsistency OF the Wings in supporting hl!a after his
'.al OF the identical views which tGry abused ilr.
':g Br:en :c7 entertaining.
We 'epab<h Mr.. Tyers resolutions and call upon
b.: ;re"ds 10 point out wherein he has been nisrepE=-
."H,-G--
"EcsyreA That alter, change, abolish the rights
4 property in the District Of Columbia. without Tic
SEA; OF the owners would be unjust and despolic and in
Violation D! tie Constitution OF tn. L. !
"tcSo.eed. iaricr, That with such consent, 70
i~!~eT- w the suhjcc. ri slavery not only without
-: a43ias: ID" cOrsrH. Of the people Of Maryland and
l'g'ua. would Dc in tiagrant violation OF the public
:r abuse OF: the trust conferred Congress by The
e~s aal hazaru9us - lie peace and security Of those
80 States.
"!:=1ired, fartcr, That such proceeding would sap
l5e ;1uada,on Of our conventional system, which is
tSsi on The condition Of things they existed at the
time ot the adoption oi the Constitution, and which
caaH"! >" altered in material point without disturb
ing re principle OF compromise out of which The Co.
Te'2DsH! originated.