Rutland herald. [volume] (Rutland, Vt.) 1823-1847, 1836-02-23


allowed by 70" tr 'he holding oflhc coarl anr
taf jury afqmled hiu' h4l lsPpepcd 10 irnam ~
'Ne "a WHee' s1'en lAai They 90 not bring 'n iholf
''''',t ~" |''F - "'"e4' be all tn 90 h'id ~
n'"S'.' up" 'Ne mao :" d. ifioa over sg-in r.
az. '' '''"F'a' la s'mshL', ah4 orders at ceeiu,
u'' a'l '''a' +" oaee ai'vr wieaiehi, oa tile dat
""N' ,N' ia" pe-e''"'s 80 lae ia"l Gag II
"".'' "' ''sF O. Hh'" oY An'aoFiy' % r"ihony
o'1'd ~ "'a'e' io' 'a'4 ''o reason u Which
g. 80 '''af 'oa, INC gag iasls "hue ''e daily ses-
a'." "'''' '"' iue court ot TAG 'rs'tiall'' h"ay
"'J'ufH5 log 'hn' cA!. i'f Gay s over cad tai be-
1''''
nm ''.d, indeed sir' twl. De irgc laaton th's
saU" "a "'S % ""f," 'A7'' MOI only ""'" other
''"-s '''."e' IT, '' '''' voc 'i" ''' We H'PaI "t
''e C'"u'f'a"' 'o'', "9 Important and 'aoch "h-
s'''' 'ssu'c' "''-a'.} i,,c'.'' '"' Fsnli"ie OF
"'' P',.'ulls '"'''' A''f " t'''A was lhcn sent
~ ''t 'o''''"'' @N' .t"'0 W h'''' 90 not a'-
"'"'' '-'' 3ucabse i"1h 40 ho'',e sd me iinc or
GO "'' 'eHehne' ~ u ! "'"i Dor ha'e heard We
. matter 50 slatad.
sceno reason, sir, far the introduction of this
new p.actice: 80 principle 90 which It can bee jns,-
tGod 30 necessity for u no prupricty Ia 1t, As.
yet, il has been applied only to the Presidents ia-
tercourse with the Senate. Cer,uuly it i. equally
applicable to his intercourse With boih Houses iu
legislative matters and if it is TO prevail hereafter
The President Of the L. States, sir, has allud-
cd TO this loss Of the Fertilization bil! IN his mes
sage al tao opening Of the session. aud he has al
luded also, IN he same message, 10 the rejection &C
the vote olthc three millions. 90 the Grs, point,
that, is the loss of the whole bill and tho causes
Of that loss, this is his language;
"lIuch loss aud Inconvenience have been exper-
fenced in consequence oithe failure ofhe bin con
tanning HE ordinary appropriations for ioriGcatious
which passed one branch Of the National Legs
( 'lature at the last session bot was lost in tie
other
If tie President intended to say that the bin,
having originated in the House Of Representatives,
passed the Senate, and was yet aflcrw ards LOST in
the House of Representatives be was entirely
rect. But he has been altogether wrongly IN
formed, if he intended to state. that the bill, lave
ing pas ed the House, was lost in the Senate, -
AZ have already stated, the bill was lost in the
House Of Repre- on aises II drew its la,t breath
there That House never let 90 It's hold on II
sl"r 81" '~r"'' ct the e''''''''ee of conference
hut 1t hcu It 1t retained II, ana Of course, II die1
:" ,'s l'"S7ess''h "h'n inc mouse toJ"ofoed' II IL
W '4a' '"c '-'oslleHt shon!d nave pee"
"''''i'0 'on ~ "i'''e' VI '"i' h'nd ""en me
''s 20 we jo"'Ha's 81 the Two Houses
"o"' u"'c eA"''H'u '"e correct history "i tne
=,
80 lam vi ''S'ucn'' " 'ue P'p"scu
E''"' % inc lH'e' "Iohs' ior me purpose o' si"'
1 'ng so'nc""p, more u'S'Inc'y 'ho true GROUNDS OF
oUjecuoh 10 ''at grant
lheSe gFoubds Of "uJoc''oh were Two; the hrS'
vas 'hot no such appropriation had been recon
mendeo oy Inc President or any Of the Depart
ueU's, ana "Hat MADE ms ground INC stronger
was '"u' ,'c PIop'seu Grant was deienueu 20 lar
Us was ue'o"oe" AZ an upon ana a.egel poceS-
styi growing out ol opr iorelsh relations. Inc