Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1836-08-30

BA -FiHGlSIA--At court OF Quarter
& y Session, continued aud held for oE!s'i county. at
the cou.. house thereof tic 4h day Of June Ic;'G:
CIrviars Baker, Ha.:itH,
ararst
Hardin Dake, Thomas Swift. jr. Thomas Swit, and
Harriet. his wife; Thonas Swift and Peggy, his wife;
iiuul 81 Psius GABRIEL FUntry,er and Mar, his wife.
the heirs or d, riccs o James Duke dcccusrd- William
Baker alary Br:ioE Lucy Elicit, John NJ. Nir,ody and
Cathurie. i:s VIII; George Baker. Frederick Jude and
Eliza, his wife; Henry Rc!aTds Hni Amanda his wife;
DruTy Fox and Evcllrn his we; haria Bu tc-r "idnw
Of Marlin Baker dec d. john NJ. Ben anin j.. asafon,
C!emcntina Martin and tnne Maria Baker. r1 irea Of
said Martin Baker. decd; John G. Duke, AI.ne Duke.
Betsy Duke, Mary Duke" Pa,s"Y Duke, burnley Duke;
CHARLES Archibald, Thomas, William aud John Swift,
SONS OF CIrrias; Thomas Keeran and Mary his wife:
Elisha Jackson md Sally his wife, Nimrnd 4. Chi sholn
and Nancy his wife; Cornelius Chisaon and BE y. lis
wife; and Maria Baker. liz her right da tighter
Of Cltyia-s wlti dee d. Edmund John. David Mary
Swift, children Of Rebeccu Swift tcc; jnli: &. tlaw
Eins aid Rebccra his wife, james Johnson AZ" fancy
his wifi; 1arIlon Cities and Amy. his wife: - Hall
and Amy his wife; -- Hall and Elizabeth, his wife;
- Hail and Louisa hts wife: and lla!vev Baker, o:
such of them be living by their PR pr names,
together with 'le unknown gran! children {" Ce"Iars
Duke, the elder. d"cd 10 whom ne devised aIa land On
Lutte river, in Louisa county, after lie death Of his Nj
do%; aud the unknown de@ccncan;S atIenrs', or oeT
sees OF the said grand Children Eetcndnnts
On the motion Of the piainii:f anal By consent OF the
defendants who nave answered. leave :, wen him 10 file
his amended and supplements! bill, which rs ed acc0TG
nGiy win It's cSllOlS ana l!rn on Inc HDt!Clt T.!
plaintiff, John Hunter is appointed GUARDIAN, nd Item,
10 the infant defendants who known and named in
the amended bill, who filed their thereto: H,os
of the adult known home defendants, III: EnoDas
Swift IT, and Others also filed their Joint ard several
answers; to both of which answers tie pa Iiti replies
generally: Whercupun, th: cause came on to he heard
by consent upon the orig ina bill ana other ers former
y read, the supplemental and amended bill, with It's cx
hibs the said answers aud the repications 1ereo and
argued by counsel Upon consideration whereof It
appearing thr satisfaction %! tie court. hat the de-
rndants Thomus Swift and Peggy. his wife, Hug! NJ.
Pct,us Gabriel Poindrxter and Mary, his lie; ascli
bald Swift Cornelius Chisholm and Betsy, h is wife; and
John Swift besides others of the dcendantt unknown,
inhabitants cf This State, that others of the de-
PENDANTS whose names and residence also uDkrn"n,
may perhaps be residents Of the State is orcecd.
that the said nonresident and unknown defendants aP
pear here the September term of this Court and
shew W any they CAM why the relief shooid not
be granted prayed by the plaintiffs supplemental and
amended bill that is to say, why tract OF 1I Hcr ct
land Little river, in this county, devised by CcF;ara
Duke 10 his widow, Mary. afterwards Mary Egglls!on
for lif the remainder to nineteen of his grand Children,
should be Sold in order 10 division. and hc Isett
proceeds thereof distributed among the said grad ci
dren their heirs devisees according 10 their
respective rights And it is further ordered that copy
Of h. order hp for months successfully nscr m IN
the Richmond Enquirer and another copy be posted fer
the same period, at the door of this courthouse.
copy-Tcste, JOHN HUNTER. {. L. g.
July ~ 2l-"Sw