The Arkansas advocate., 1836-10-28
THE DIFFERENeE

fth DlfFERENGE
 Beifceen Jacksoatsm and Ean BHfenisai.
 The difference between these two isms Is dailv more manifest Every hour accunaIaes proof that Gen Jackson cannot tranSer his popularity 10 his fvorite Eet q few facts be stated in evidenee
 Tennessee, which was nearly unanimous for Gen Jackson himself declines to be transferred To his favor ne.
 North Carolina four years ago contained Jackson majority of fully 20,000. She has just renounced tn fagorile by majority of 4,000.
 Alabama was even more unanimous for Gen. Jack son than Tennessee. So was Mississippi. So wa indiana. All three are opposed to Mr. Van Buren,
 The Jackson majority in Pennsylvania was 50 GOO IS believed that Gen. Harrison will carry that State The majority If not annihilaed, IS reduced 10 a mer handful.
 In Ohio the Jackson majority was about 10, ,0o0- Harrsons majority, at he lowest computation, will b, lo,0o0-a difference of 10000. ln Kentucky, Mir. Clay himself was unable 10 car " the Slate for Mir Adams in l82s and carried fl fo himself in 1882, by meagre majority. Harrison' majority will be from 0 10 2o.ooo.
 In Missouri the change Is undoubtedly very great in Georgia, Gen. Jack on's majority was fully so, Io0o. His feporite pM lose his stats?
 In the single county of Clarke Indiana there ha been change against Van Buren of GOO votes in on year. His friends last year were elected by 400, ant defeated this, by 200 majority.
 These facts afe moi less ascertained than powerful significant. They show the direction popular opiDio ls taking and how easy thing Is 10 beat the favor lto Were inc election of President without the inter veniion of Electors the Wings to run only one candidate. say Gen. Harrison and the collective polls ot the U. States to decide the event, verify believe Gen. Harrison would be chosen by one hunded iho,t sand najo1ty at the least. IL may. he reader knows be so, and yet Mr. Van Buren night be chosen by the electoral colleges Richmond Whig.
 'The father of Gen. Harrison was rich aristocra of Virginia
 Thus said a tory paper the Indiana Signal. On, ot the immortal sgners of the Declaration of American Independence is slandered in his grave for party pur poses by the base ninlons of party The slander need no other answer than the following quotation from Col k. M. Johnsons speech in Congress in 1881 Gen Harrison Is fhe of one of the sieners Of the Deck. ton oi Independence, who spent the gredter part 0 his large fortune in redeemng inc pledge he then gave of his fortune lie and sacred honor secure the ber ties of his country Lon. Jour.
 Battle ot JGppecanoe.-I In looking over table of ;h number of he Presidential electors, and the times o choosing them in the different States, some crcunr stances struck attention.
 The first IS that thirteen States precisely inc origra number of States and precisely half of the presen number of States, choose their electors on the 7fh November, fine anniversary ofthe battle of rippecanoe
 The second circumstance is, that thai day on, hundred and forty nine electors will be chosen being precisely one more tham majority of the whole nnm ber
 On that day, also, screen of the old Thirteen statc. chooses their electors being precisely majority of thu original States.-Seven also of the free States beir, precisely majority of the free States, choose the electors on that day.-T Pills. Gag.
 Denocrdcq.-Nh hat constitutes Il democrat Of h, modern school l--.Nask. Baa.
 .fastcer-fo be worth million and half of none httu and il, some land specuating company-tn ride in m Enplisl carriage, with whIie coacbfnan and faonan dresse, in livery aer the fashion Of British lord-o ride pom pously over the poor, and refuse 10 answer auestiou tpropounded by workingmen. This is what constitutes democrat of the modern school ;-at least such is Mr. Van Buren's practice -and he is said 10 be inc greatest democrat of the present day 1eiegreph.
 4 Van Buren paper, speaking Of the strong testimo ny of Col. Davless in favor of Gen. Harrison, makes he objection, that s.it was given before the battle Tippecanoe." True enough. Col. D. was kiiled ii that battle. How vesy much his testimony must b, weakened by the extraordinary fact ta. ii givel lfe.-- J;e n,,.v,ifa fo,rnsf