Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1836-08-02

! EN Observation-Disclosures Il court OF Quarter
! Il " Session, continued and held for Louisa COUNT
the court house thereof, on the lair day Oh JnN" ~
Clrviars Baker, f!a"''H,
against .
Hardin Duke Thomas Swift. jr., Thomas Svi!laa
Harriet. his wifi: Thomas Swift aud Peggy his WIZ
llarh W. Prttus Gabriel PonGcX tcr and Mary. hs Ne'
the heirs or deviscrs OF James Duke, deceased "iHm
Baker, Mary Britton, Lucy Elicit John NJ. Monty a"i
Calharine his wife; George Baker Frederick JHIr 81!
Eliza, his wife; Henry Richards and Amanda h'S "ae'
Drury Fox and Ev"lIna his wife Maria b"hrr wee"
Of Martin Baker Grc'd; John NJ. Ben lnn f.. Marc
Cleu!cnuiua Martin and Annc Maria Baker ch!drr"
said Martin Baker. deed; John & Duhr. Annc i'sh'.
Betsy Duke, Mary Duke, Patsey Duk", brrn@? Dn@,'
CHARLES. Archibald, Thomas William aud John >'..'
SONS of Ceviurs; Thomas kccran and Mary, I'N "'
Elisha jackson and Sally. his wife; Nmr"d T. Eh''n'@
and Nancy. bis wife; Cornelius Chisholm and B':% Is
wife: and Maria Baker, in her own rgh'. ~ dan5.'
Of Cevlars Swift, dec d. EtInnnL, JOHN DAVID ana gag
Swift children Of Rcjccca Swift, dec d. John l1""
kns aud Rcbecca, his wife; James johnson and Nancy
his wife: Tarlton Chcs and Amy: his WIFI - i!''
and ANS, his wife; - Hall and Elizabeth, ms ""''
| - Hail aud Louisa, his wife; and Harvey I'1h:f"
such Of them be- living, by their proper na"''
together with 'he unknown gland children q! tr'.4;'
Duke the cider, dec d to whom he devised h!S AKA -
Little river in Louisa county, after the death {" III; y"
dow; aud the unknown descendants. acnccs, q Ge''
! secs Of the said grand Children Defendants
On the motion Of the plaintiff, and BY consent u ~
defendants vino have answered. leave Is given !H %
his amended and supplemented BILL which Is MED a'ss'
inry with lis exhibits; and them on the motion &" "'
plaintiff John Hunter is appointed GUARDIAN: ad ''
To the inla ut defendants who are known ana name" "
the amended bill, who filed their thereto; H0''
of the adult, known home defendants, vM: l"o"iI
Swift IT,, and Others also filed their Joint ANA srFrfi1
answers: to both Of which answers the plaintiff frsI
generally: Whc!eupon, this on t. lac "ea'
by consent upon the original bill and other papers I'
" read the supplemcn ul and amended bill. wan !"
hibts, the said answers, and the rcpiicat!oEs
was argued by counsel: Upon consideration "N>;c"'}
appearing the satisfaction Of the court tha ''e ~
PENDANTS Thomas Swift and Peggy, ms vile: ii"!" w.
Pctlus Gabriel Pundrxicr and Mary. ms VIE :'''"
bald Swift Cornelius Chisholm and Betsy, h's ":' ."'
John Swift besides others Of The defendants ui'"t'"
are not inhabitants Of this State, that others Oh '"e
PENDANTS whose and residence are as" a''""
may perhaps not be residents Of the STATE IL IS o'~e
that the said non. resident aud unknown de:en,a'.
pear here at the next September term OF ths C"u, ~
sew ( any they cam why tie re"! s'1I aud
be granted prayed by the pllnN suppctHr..,". -
amended bill; that is 10 say, why tract oi 80" ,,,.
land on Little river, in tins county, devised D.; ,
Duke to his widow Mary. a!terwardS May
for life the remainder to nineteen Of his g'di @ ,,
should not be sold in order 10 dIVsoH i" - oLl.
proceeds thereof distributed among the sad 4'' ,,
dren or their heirs devisces assigns, acco'!a
respective rights And it is iu:thr! ordered "' -
of this order be for two months succcss!"ey !'''l ,r
the Richmond Enquirer, and another copy "
the same period, at the door OF th,s c!nL!i W : E.
A copy-T.ste, JOHN HUNTEk; T. l..
r July - -.
UN CHANCERY-VIn Louisa count! '''''
Richard G. B!bb, Executor of Benjamin G1o rT -
james BIB and John Ellis, De'r" t.'t HI.
The defendant, lanes Bib, not having en'trs" n