Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1836-08-09

Hardin Duke, Thomas Swift, jr, Thomas Swift ana
Harriet his wife: Thomas Swift and Peggy, his VILE;
Uuch NJ prtlus, Gabriel PondrXier and Mary, ms wlc,
the heirs or cvsces Of james Duke deceased; William
Baker, Mary Brten, Lucy Elicit, John NJ. Moody ana
Caliarinc his wife; George Baker, Frederick Juue ana
Eiiza his wife, Henry Richards and Amanda, his wife:
Drury Fox aud Evcina his wife; Maria Baker. widow
,f Martin Baker deed: John NJ, Benjamin f. Marion:
Clrmrnlna, Martin and Anne hlara bIker ch'!drrn oil
SAID har,n Baker. dec Il; John q DUKE, Anne D"ke,
Betsy Duke Mary Duke. la;sry Duke, Burnley Duke;
ChaiIes Archiba!d Thomas. William and John Swift,
SONS Of Clrviars; Thomas Krcran and Mary his wife;
Elisha Jackson and Sally, his wife; N"nr"d Chisholm
and Nancy his wife, Cornelius Chisholm and bctly his
WIFI. and Maria Baker, in her right, - daughter
Of Ccyars Swift decd Edmund, John. David and Mary
Swift children Of Rcbccca Swift. dec d; John = itaw-
kins and Re5ccca. his wife; James Johnson and Nancy
his wife; Turion ChiIcs and Amy, his wife; - Hail
and ANY his wife; - Hail and Elizabelh his wife;
- Hall and Louisa, his wife; and Harvey Baker, or
such Of them as be living, BY their own proper names
together with lhc unknown grand children Of Ci"vars
Duke the elder, decd, 10 whom he devised ms Ia'n on
Little river in Louisa county after the death at his WI
dow aud the unknown descendants, aicncrS or dew
sees Of the said grand Children De'chG'hts:
On the motion Of the plaintiff and by consent Of the
defendants who have answered. leave Is g"en h: TO i'e
his amended and supplemental BILL which! is filed accord
iney with its exhibits; and then. on the motion OF the
plaintiff John Hunter is appointed GUARDIAN al MEN,
TO the infa defendants who are known ana name" I'D
the amended BILL who fled their answer thereto most
swift IT, and others. also filed their Joint and several
answers: TO both Of which answers the plaintiff replies
generally: Whcreupon this cause came on to he heard
bY consent upon the original bill and other papers former
~ read The supplemental and amended bI!l with lis eX
hits the said answers, and The rplcalnns thereto, and
vas argued by counsel: Upon consideration Whereof It
appearing to the satisfaction OF the court that the de-
i;ndants Thomas Swift and Peggy, his wife; Hugh NJ
Pctlus Gabriel Ppndexter and Mary, his wife; Arch
bald Swift Cornelius Chisholm and Betsy his wife, and
John Swift besides others Of the defendants unknown,
are not inhabitants of this State, that others OF the de-
PENDANTS whose and residence also unknown,
may perhaps not be residents Of the State: II is ordered
that the said nonresident and unknown defendants ap
pear here at the September term Of this Court and
shcw cause If any they CAM why the relief should not
he granted prayed by the plaintiff supplemental and
amended BILL that is 10 say, why tract oi 80 acres OF
land on Little river in this county, devised by CevIars
Duke 10 his widow, Mary, afterwards Mary E@gllsion
for life the remainder to nineteen OF his grand children,
should not be Sold in order to division, and Tie nett
proceeds thereof distributed among the said grand chill
rc nr their sirs devisces gns, according to their
respective rights And il is further ordered that copy
of this order br for months successfully inserted III
the Richmond Enquirer and another copy be posted for
the same period, at the door of this cnurt-house.
A copy-Testc, JOHN HUNTER, {. l.. c.
July 10 2l-"0w