Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1835-02-26

rl,oud not multiply the Banking capita without the
greatest caution and discretion. We must beware how
act over the which succeeded tho dssou-
ton of the old Bank Of the u. Show throw the
circulation into fresh disorders, by reckless multiplied
ton of State Banks lest political quacks should up
and prescribe another National Bank "a desperate
medy for the desperate disease. With these views of
the matter, we pleased that the General Assembly
have for the present given the goby TO the subject At
the next session, they approach the winding-up Of
the Bank of the L. S. they will be better able
how much banking captl may be wanting-H herc
rhen aud hoc it to located About Ia years ago we
did all in power oppose great batch of 20
new Banks that were embraced in mammoth Bill
and We never have repcn:cd coursc-from that day
to this The Legislature most wisely rejected the whole
scheme Otherwise, our whole monetary system in
Virginia would have been thrown into the dsor
DIR that unfortunately embarrassed the States
OF Kentucky and Pennsylvania.
MIR Polk has noby discharged his duty in relation To
the State Banks Bill. He has slept tired, in
his efforts to Mroc the Public Dcposcs into those Ins
tutons, under such restrictions may secure their
safety, well limit the power of the Executive: If
he should fail in this mastery effort, shall whose
fault il is. We shall whether it be the Wings who
have hitherto raised loud cry against the Executive
control over the public monies who will defeat this
sautary measure.
The Washington Correspondent of the New York Star
may twit Mr. Polk with the opposition he has met with
from Mr.. Bnney What could Mr. Polk expect other
wise from that quarter Nlr. Binney who has been
the warmest advocate of the IT, s. Bank of the
strongest opponent to the use of the State Institutions
he will be supported by the Wings
The New York American has been guilty of gross in.
justice TO the author of 'the East Room Letter, well
as to ourselves i'll saying that neither he his abet
tor of the Richmond Enquirer, has made any
therefor to the insultcd county, The American ought
to have known better. More than seven and half
years ago. explanation made both by the Author
and Editor The former assured us, that it merely
" a mistake Of one room for another, made by another
member who not much acquainted with the interior
of the Presidents House and who naturally concluded
that the finest which he the in which
the $4,000 had been expended" In fact charge the
writer with intention to deceive, absurdty lie
INNS have fo.l IN ,ba,,
there many to expose the lie such story would
have gone uncontradctcd As he says himself in his
explanatory Letter published in 1927 such an attempt
would SAVIOR more of insanity than of intention
docetrc."
Mr.. Grymes-The New Orleans Bee of the 18th inst
states that 'the proceedings against Jno. r. Grymes
were terminated yesterday. Mr.. G.. conducted his own
defence, with the assistance of Mr.. r. Soulc Messrs
Lewis, Lawson, Augustin, Ogden Brashea and Sparks
sustained the privilege of the house. and argued length
against the positions taken by the accused The iudg-
ment of the House was, that Mr. Gryines should be re-
prmanded by the Speaker pro tenn, which duty was
discharged by MIR. Penn in happy and fecitous
ner."