Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1835-01-20

''". 70 Washington, alter due IL was dc.
tefea is services would be more ciectua here than
tnere.tha, as councillor of Virginia hc ,nrlt betpr
serve Andrew Jackson, than the Office which had t.r
cndcrcd to him. The President had tcsiorat,d HE sue
cessor new and important contss At mus, a,;s, Ie,
The expiration OF his should he l m
c t,'uc, wineh ne should occupy in the Executive
council o. the State, would give him am influence
That might be advantapeously improved in al,ng tL
election OF The man the President desires 10 be- is sue
eessor Am wrong in this Who has been a more ac-
tive aud devoted paltizun of the Adninstra,o and ,h
appointed succession, than MIR Daniel lie has us. d his
s'auoh ana inc patronage Of the State, through the CO.
mns oil public journal Of this city To support tho Al
nnstration and destroy the principles wh:ch virginia
has held sacred will ,,, ill :, .,.;.,. " So.
station and patronage. ~
If am IN error in the differences have drawn bcs
tate not to believe il devotion To Virginia or l
principles, that induced him TO deelne-nor was \, an m
o'ierencc TO oihce We find him. upon the expaticn o
every term of Office, for series Of years coming hero
AGAIN Tor re-ceetonand that, in dircct conflict with
ms iavortc principle CT rotation in Office In The (sn
@ when met here to consider the adoption of the
FEDERAL Constitution, il said that election TO ofcr
rotation, Slapped the fundamental principle of re
sIonsibihty IN rcpubcanism. And we bave Tho b;,,h
authority OF 1.-THE greatest and best Of President Incl
SON. IN recommendation Of rotation in Office AS Ills
prncplc in regard to the officer now TO he cc,cd Las
not been adopted by the Constitution of y;ron; L., i;
iavorc theory with Mr. Daniel let us rive 4, nrc,ca
eiSIt o.aay III ms own case He should complain
and his friends should their wanys about nr,scrn
ton. What are his high prctensions his miyh,v onaf
hieations that he must be FOREVER continued in this ocrp
Rave we no citizen in the Commonwealth as comprtent
y his equal ~
III Young against nr Daniel maintain my own prn
elpes NO personal attachments shall influence me 10
vote for man, whom believe to be in active and nn
hosuniy to principles which hold dear believe ,I.c
principles OF Mr.. Daniel are al war with Loso 80, w -
ma and Of majority oftc Legislature but irhc sosld
nave the good fortune again TO succeed in DESPITE of
,nose eiIe unsiances shall not complains but shall la
mont over the result with sickcncd heart
MT Sherrard would not copy either the manner or Tho
mater oil the gentleman from Northampton He hud
asked numerous questions, of which MIR Shcrrad
could not answer but many Of tber, I,nd lno, ,n,,
ca ny the gentleman himself, Mr.. S. presumed much
wond Irns s sarsaclon One question, however, lie
opinions MIR > understood iIiat Mr. Daniel was n Re-
publican OF the 70 and 80 School, as Understood by the
republicans of that day. but not as understood nv ,,l
branch of the several parties which now con,, ,h
great Wing family in this House '
MIR. Iiooe said-Mr Speaker, the gentleman over Inc
way Mr. rarkcr) IS greatly mistaken if he thinks ann
INC advocate oil Mr. Daniels political views have said
nothing- have done nothing that jusiifes such aeon
cinsion probably differ with him in his politicai on
mons us widely The gentleman oyer the wov ,,i,t
occasion IN very recent with that cne
man 10 say 10 HIM, that questioned very much If he
were Candidate in my county for Congress or for any
Office that strictly POLITICAL whether he could Obtain
nve votes, and that should be with the maority-Mr
Speaker, information having been asked for v the oen
ueman from Northampton us regards MIR D,s on;55an
upon The subject of President Jacksons Proclamation of
I'm justice to MIR d. it may be my duty to say that
ne informed me At the time held the inst
auded To- that he agreed with the Proclamation SO far
as 1t embraced Nnlhcaon but that he DISAGREED with
sets forth. N
Mr.. Parker said, | ann told only, in reply TO all nv
enquiries tat Mr. Daniel Is IN favor of The Resolutions
and lcport OF S, 80, understood and incrprcted h.
the Republicans Of that time and that he approv.s ,
part oil The Proclamation concerning Nullncaton The
professions of regard for the resolutions and report Of
-, 90, hare Lcen often known 10 me 10 Weld 10 cir
cunstances, That am always disguised with that
cal and cautious recognition of tcn fas -
The Republicans at that time" When those who inns
recognize them told of the construction given M h
time, they fatty deny it, and seize upon an intcrprcta
ton made thirty years afterwards. The first doubt that
was creteu as TO iheir true meaning the offspring
OF Mr. Madisons letter MIR. Everett No one ever
questioned before the publication of that letter the cor
rectess oil the great principle de-
drcibie from them. The letter completely ovcthoyys the
whole doctrine OF the report the powers of the SUI
pfcme Court and by consequence the right of State TO
Judge III the last resort of infections of The
When this celebrated letter made lis appcarocc i,l
journal in this city took the alarm aud stote, !; a., i've y
subject of deep regret Mr. Madison friends tlat he
should have suffered himself TO be drawn out by Web
ser, Everett u CO., in direct conflict with his own mo-
nlorabc report and in support of the resolutions of
New Hampshire and other States against that report II
would surprise any one, who knew the sentiments Of
siat journal at thus day, to read the entire article
10 whcn refer Upon a not long past memorable oc-
casionl mean rlae celebration tie Birthday of Tho
mas Jefferson; the author of the doctrine of Nulliico
honMr Bibb of Kentucky stated that the Resolutions
OF Kentucky, in which the doctrine of NulIi6caou 10
expressly asserted, drawn by Mr. jefferson and an
lie understood were drawn and transmitted to Ken
lucky upon consultations and communications be,
Mr. Jefferson, Mr.. Madison John TAYLOR of Caroline
MT Spencer Roane, and others of Virginia; and Mr.
George Nicholas MIR John Breckenridge. Mr. Hubbard
Taylor ana others OF Kentucky. The same principles
were asserted by the Legislature of Virginia in I5s
ana again at the ensuing session were rc-asserted and
V'ucaied III very lucid report penned by Mr. Nadi
son his statement was made in the presence Of PR.
sdeni Jackson-John &. Calhoun then Vice President
-narun Van Buren,, then Secretary of State-P p
Barbour liaync Wayne and host of others collc,ed
10 commemorate the birth day of him. whose princlcs
tey then recognized to their fullest extent And this
statement so far MS am informed has never Lecn con
tfadcicd And what does it prove that MIR AIadson
approved the principles of the Kentucky Rcsoluti,n
that the principles OF those Resolutions and Of Ills own
resolutions and report, dcnticslly the same Hero
then, VIC have tie evidence of the ruc inpo of The Viz
gna Resolutions and Report. But Mr. Daniel will ot
abide by this evidence. He takes the letter 10 Everetf
ana adopts the Interpretation contained in that ForN
the gentleman from King George tells MS Mr. Daniels
approves the denunciaton of Modification contained IN
the Proclamation. "
might adduee other circumstances 10 shcv how tho
report OF ~ was understood prior To the appearance o
the letter to Everett. but do wish to iafpne The
Rouse with detail Of historical facts that might con
sumo inc remainder OF the day Let it supposed
.a mean TO connect this election with the subject Of
Nuilihcation. that intending TO Introduce II for
discussion. | intend no such thing While mon !,
suitable occasion and proper time, should winely
meet lis opponents IN 6scusson do net now seek or
WISH To provoke il. have alluded 10 the subiect Il,
slew that Mr. Daniels professions of respect Tor lilo
principles OF the Resolutions and Report of S. 81 do
iioI prove MN TO be supporter of State Rights but that
ihosc professions Of that easy flexible character
winch can be adapted to circumstances WIN sir An
drew Jackson makes the same professions and what
man has done more within the last two years 10 deg
troy the sovereignty Of the States and to stru fc,n
OF ah remedy, short of revolutions for their violated
rights None--no not But Mr. Daniel is on.
posed TO Nulihcation-Oh yes it is an unpopular
doctrine. But it is not more so now tlan when
first asserted by Mr. Jefferson And as then il con-
tinucd to grow into favor. until under ts Influence
ne was chosen President; SO Dersns fle ov NAV mt