Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1835-01-20

n easd j5r dses f ~ 'Ij ns sn
il the ai'ssssd and the Rspscssas
,S, sss n The House Of Rop'oen,sivc
s s sSa % Tonnage
r was vs ,ns FIRST s;,p g Eighteen amer
Z @ s iss s saS Ts sSss SSss h;,
'esssh IL the Senate Of he United states, May 10
io mat mS (issi to the worry .ny no
steps have been taken BY tho
From unofs;sl and informal spIsns,os Sas thu,
M Van Srea a Is s sI Ss s ISS no, be
saue'os had recently ben given uiao to dc
entrance ise he had understood same from ohcr tousI u
pie OF the State oi New York, naturally be L
raaste and 10 , sa@ rs every WY sm
,aiecst As however, there might mistake on the subject
making those which, the ease be as
would that in behalf The state he cou,s"ded ,ha,
@ which Il s sss TO embrace waters Of The der
oy rs terms TO appl, tito them would
That u in h> mistaken the t. unouosed y the Con
s, which osg and on% ress 10 @ Is 81 g n' oil tho
Thus 1t appears that this gentleman, whose followers
others, has himself b, the advocate of State
uon--o the right of State to Judge, in her sovcrcicn
character, Of the inffactions OF the Constitution bv Tho
Federal government, and of the application the roht
III remedy IN sach casesn short, the doctrine of
Notification But, popularity in this threatened in
OF new lork IS that It is made in anti
Constitution IS pcrpctracd. In all other cases the
States have not acted until the Federal has
aS'uaiiy .ioiHtcu TIE compact Perhaps. Mr.. Van
buren, ike other great men, has changed his opinions:
or. IT may be- New York has RIGHTS which no o,Lcr
aate possesses ut all events let the paragraphs which
have read, teach gentlemen upon this floor yrca,
or moderation in their Pronunciation of others
Dir; liooe said: Mr. Speaker dislike very much to be
troublesome TO the Housc BE not alarmed, however
SIR DO not rise To follow the example of the gentleman
over the way who has suffered himself 10 be
INTO the wide field sf Notification No. sir do not
rise to discuss that subject for with my little persp;cutv
cannot Tor my life, see the connection which it has
with the appointment under considerations NV
oniy onJcct IN rising, SIR is to supply omission of
winch was guilty when last up An objection
has been raised to Mr. Daniel for this Office hy the rem
teman from James City, and supported by the oe5lc
man rom northampton on account of his long services
III at oihcc. Sir, with great Difference to the opinion
OF those gentlemen must say that this seems
to me to be worth but ttlet is as unstable as air
touch 1t and 1t wastes into nothing The people in their
primary action have never acted upon this principle
had they done SO, should now be deprived of the VA
uabc--yes, sir, the very valuable services of your
fancey, your Garland your Booker your Wilson vour
Crnp nor, sir would you be now seated i'm that chnr
nor should in my humble character be now oddress
ngyou AGAIN, SIR, why do we keep Clerk from year
10 year IN that situation; is il not i'm consideration of his
very efficient and able services WHY do we keen onr
Serseans-at Arms in that situation until they are gather
ed to their athersis it for like considerations
why did we yesterday elect three of the old officers
upon the basement floor of this Capol-was il not in
consideration OF their ample qualifications for the dis
charge oil the duties of the respective offices 10 which
.ey arc attached: Yes sir, these the considcra
tons, and none other Why, then put a mark of cen
sure upon Z. V. Daniel? WHY then make nm oxco,,
ton of him, when upon all sides of this Uobso
IN every part of this Commonwealth he is acknoyvedg
ca TO possess all the requisite qualifications of Council
Tor OF Staewhen it is admitted that as am officer he
INFERIOR TO none-no, not one in her service Mr.
speaker he who runs read-the cause is To be as
criDed TO inc sad political times in which live
o We arc high on the waves of error iossi,
,,d Gu. ship half ioo1dsr'd and compas. io.t;p
yer make haven of happiness and rest
Mr. Sherrard asked the gentleman from Northampton
whether he presented Mr.. Pcndeton to the House as
Nullifer? ~ 40
MIR. Parker No Sir. advocate his election MS an op
Poneht OF the usurpations of the General Government
Mt Sherrard That is not an to the question
Mr. Parker said, he supported Mr. Pendeton because
ne understood him to be opposed to the present ncum
bent and to the Administration
The debate here closed.