Litchfield enquirer., 1835-01-15


 Nine doys later from EngEond.-By the packet ship South America. which sailed from 1 Liverpool on the nth Dec, in the reInarka. bIe short passage Of 24 days, we have received c0piOns flies of Liverpool papers to the l7th, l and London to the 18th Dec. inclusive. Al though the Court Gazette has not officially announced the Ministry, all the Journals of the 16th agree with the Herald oE Ethe 18th, which says, !
 The new Administration is at length form ed. We anticipated that the proceedings Of yesterday would put an end to all speculation on the subject, and have not been disappoint- ed. The following list of the Cabinet Mem bers appeared in the StaDdard-a similar one appeared in the AlbiOn:-
 Sir R. Peel, First Lord of the Treasury and Chancellor of the Exchpquer.
 Lord LVndhurst, Lord Chancellor.
 Duke of Wellington. Foreign Secretary.
 Lord Wharnclffe, Privy Seal.
 Earl of Aberdeen, First Lord of the Admi ralty.
 Sir E. KnatchbuII, Paymaster of the For. ces. ..
 Lord Rosslyo, President ofthe Council
 Mr. A. Barring, President of the Board of Trade.
 Mr. Goulburn, Secretary for the Home De partment.
 Sir c. Murray, Master General of the Ord nance. Lord Peterborough, President ofthe Board 1 of Control. { MT. Herries, Secretary of War. Sir Henry Hardinge, Secretary for Ireland
 Besides the above mentioned Cabinet Mem bers, the following names have been given "t individuals included in the Ministerla! ar | rangements-viz:
 ! r..l T..,o,, r o.d Hha nohar1ain 1 Sir Edward Sugden, Lord Chancellor of 1 Ireland.
 Sir James Scarlett, Lord Chic! Baron of l the ExcheqUer.
 Although the fact does not appear to have been announced by authority, it was fully un- 1 derstood that the new ministry, in it's essen- tial departments, had been filed up. To our surprise, Sir Robert Peel, and not the Duke of Wellington is at the head oft, heinz Cham cellor of the Exchequer and First Lord of the Treasury. The necessity Ofthis arrangement, undoubtedly caused the delay in making out the list of Ministers until Sir Roberts return There are many speculations in the London papers on the subject. The Morning Chr"n' icle, an ultra reform paper, has no confdence in the stability of tory cabinet; while the Morning Herald, more moderate resormer' takes a different view of the case. and reasons
  By the general complexion of the newspapers we are led to coaclude, that the question o , the dissolution of Parliament was not settled , A propagation had taken place till the 10th o , January, probably for the purpose of deter mining this great question. It was suggested s that the new prime minister was opposed tt an election. if this be true, it furnishes, we P think, strong presumptive evidence that he 'n { tends to take mOderate course, with the ex pectation of carrying with him all the mem hers of both parties who are determined t' , preserve the important institutions Of the na l collected, both the Duke Of Welhngt6k aft E Sir Robert Peel yielded to the necessity O , that measure, and it was supported by them Another circumstance seems |" rOuntenancs the idea that the premier intends to take such a course as we have suggested. 1t will be re- collected, that one Of the ablest members u } the Grey Ministry in the House of Commons was Mir. Stanley. After that nohlrman retr- } cd, MT. Stanley resigned his place. 1, has been understood that he left the government on the ground that he could not g0 to SO great lengths as some of the high toned reforners wished. By the death of the Earl of Derby, he takes the title of Lord Stanley. Applica- ton is said tO have been made to him. and Sir James Graham another wh'g, to take offices
 in the new ministry. Lord Stanley is stated to have declined but the fact that he was applied t", seems to warrant the conclusion that we have come to, as it must have been known that these gentlemen would not con. meet themselves with ministry, wh"se object was {" und" all that their predecessors had done towards reform.
 ! Should the Parliament be dissolved, an e.. lection will necessarily take place, ,and we shall he disappointed if it does not agtate the king dom more seriously, than was ever before known On similar occasion.
 We see nothing of any importance from France. respecting our concerns with that government. Nothing conclu appears to have been done in the Chambers respe citing our claim.
 The marriage ofthc Princess Victoria, ore. sumntive heir "f the throne of Great Britain, is said to be fully determined on.
 ReV. Joel P0rker.-A large meeting of the citizens of New Orleans, of all classes and ereeds. was held on the Sth nlt. for the pur- pose of taking into consideration the charges against the Rev. Joel Parker, that ne had, in some addresses made during his recent tour tn the Northern States, slandered the citizens ot that place, by stating l" that of the CathO. hcs, the men are almost without an exception Atheists, regarding religion as intended only for women and servants, and the Protestant can hardly be said to he tn a much better state." Mir. P. was called unOn tO adflress