Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1835-04-20

8 nf5g
1hefSrS' EditorS-In Won, an. .'pt u 10 1883.
~ GIVING the result of the eectinns Wy 2'h INST
nave oeeh ciassed with the Whio ne'''e un'
P'opef mat this statement sbonld t!' 'h'hk
o as II conveys 40 erroneous ;,.,,...-:' NJ
'"y WI" regard to my own sen,i,a,,. NV
0. 'he county also Il is tr,o ~, ,.iT
~" ,'e 'a'e representative with ,c,a,5 - IL
next + esidency but came hafo,o - e'u ~ TIC
.,e-.'',, - " VIC administration. pnd no s,oh ~.
e'ec'ea ny them Yours, Respectfully S''' was
o.. JOHN lNGLEs.
''''s'"cution had reference less n ,.o.o.,
- "s'ocie''ohs than TO the inpyi,abp ;nn,,e.sa
''o contest Tor the next Presidency nina, 90
80 :" 'ne 'otufe combinations of the nol;,ioal :,
omehs. Hence, by reference 10 ours,,t,l n 81
9ih INST It will he seen thai ws vno,,d r. o'.he
g.es' not as the Wtg, but as the Ul;Ie n,'l,', III
we were aware that he was ga friend ~ .i'V,
"','s'ra'ion, and we therefore in coss;,. NV,
u'u "o' app'y 10 him the title by which Tho on ,'
"1 VI 'he administration ave gcnorellv doc ;rra
w. D"' hnow'hg, too ihat, although friend of tho
w m aioh' he preferred Judge White n Mr.
.a..,I '' 'o' 'he next Presidency, albeit the latter
.'0.' .o''o before the people with The mnosno
,'. VI me Baltimore Convention WE desig
we think, the Doctor himself sps,,;ns ~ ~ 'e'e"
gang lelc,. 1t is true. We smoke If !, Wv '.'e
me w hig cause; and so we must co,,,,,o
~ FOR II IS lmposs bic not to see ,ba,nev, ,;,,a
WIN o'lhS about complete disruution of n,,r,;o.
Is ",ey now exist, and that in their new forn,,io
o'""s exclusively upon the next Presidential . ;
e.''o"' many, VINO are now e friends oI tho nd
''n's''a"oh, and who will continue to bc co
Us i'' as P'mctPle is involved will be thrown in
lfo'noh ~ us efecHeneering schemes and wi be
formally accommodated and denounced h., H.
oaeSS0't party proPcr. Such, we venture 10 ,,o-
NV WIZ the position of ve.sxths OF the nconle NJ
western Virginia and their delegates in tho To-
sslasurc, who'will, by the force of circums,,,ces
De d'sSoe'a'ed from the supporters of the Baltimore
nominee, and thrown mo alliance with the friends
Of Judge White "''"''
i"rse remarks are applicable 10 the Wyrhc cleo
''p "Iso' '',uFnS from hl'h we subjoin, copied
nun 'hs argus eEfrap Of the llth inst
WfIt]E-l delegate
Wyhc Is herself again. The White c,,fr
due is elected md the fl of freedom still wayos
over u.s. The following is the result.
Fer Congress.
John II. Full on (Whte) 800.
Geo w. Hopkins ". BUREN, oG7-26 mai
Fer House Of Delegates
John A. Sanders (Whe) 3lS
w. 'oon Stranger ". BUREN, 2lG-72 moi
In no county IN the Safe, Wa believe was the
eec'ion looked tor with more interest than in Chcs
'e'heio--because 1t was the county in which the
system of bnsh inStruclions originated, and be-
cause of the confidence with which it was asserted
and reiterated that VIM. R. johnson had disobeved
the will of his constituents in treating the attcmpt
of minority of them 70 control his course with the
contempt it mcrited We'll The election has been
held; and what is The result Wm. r. Johnson
is reelected in despite Of the most violent and long
continued eltoris 10 defeat him. Where were the
o00 slSners 10 the Instruction papers Mr.. John
son S own vote bing little more than 500 it is
evident that If the names signed to those paper,
had been genuine, or If, being genuine the; had
been honestly procured he must have lost his cleo.
lion. But when the spirits were called from the
''vasy DEEP" they 1rould not comc The COO
instructors dwindled away to less than 500 rotcrs
Surely this single fact is sufficient to overwhelm
with ridloulc all the rhapsodcal nonsense with
which the country has been flooded, in the way Of
harangucs and essays, the pretended violation of
lnstructions-a principle, which, if ii was end n
gored at ALL was brought into jeopardy by those
who degrad d and cheapcned il by resort TO the
most odlous means of bringing it TO bear aUegia
maieIy upon the action OF the members of the lie
gislatlrc, and by those jackson Senators, who in
ago an open and ayowed enemy of tn, right of in
siruction violated the will Of their constituents,
expressed at the polls and without the smallest tn
tie of evidence that their will had undergone the
slightest change We suhjom statement Of tho
polls in Chcsrcrfed
For Congress.
John w. Jones COG
William S. Archer 2lJ
IThc votes given TO Mr. Archer were OF course
thrown away that gentleman. having withdrawn
from tine canvass before the Chesterfield election
took place,
For Sine Senate
John w. Nash (adm) iGO
William Old (whie) 392-maJ 69
FOR Houseof Delegates.
VIM R. Johnson (whlg) 523
lanes Elan fadm1 497-maj 2G
1t is remarkable that 200 more votes were gwen
for Delegate than for Senator. A gentleman who
was present at the election, informs US, that THIS
singular, and we may add unfortunate crcum-
stance. was owing to the intense interest felt IN the
county election, absorbing every other feeling ana
rendering many voters forse,fl ufor indifferent TO-
every thing else BY this unfortunate Oversight,
Mr. Nash was permitted to ob'a'n majority Oh
votes in Chesterfield, although II is clearly wing
couny.
The Richmond Enquirer is exceedingly mof'i-
fled at the result of The Chester held eieeiion-"s "
has right to be. Ii complains, as usual '0ee" az
fcated, of foreign votes AS II 'ofe'g" 'o'.'
were not given to both sides-as 1t It's own parry W
not as often profit by this feature IN our system Vi
suffrage, as their antagonists-and DIS IT. ""o'ns'
this be so or not the foreign roters were not IN the
exercise of their legal rights. Probably Mr.. Rl.-
chic himself and Peter " Daniel, residents o. h'ca
- ! -, eaotola votes in UBnrtc1 did they not