Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1835-12-22

his Northern friends, in any manner favor the d;abol
schemes of the Northern aboionists Slade Of v,
whose sensibtcs are So much disturbed BY the tolers
of slavery in the District o! Columbia, certain pe,,
man. whom Mr.. Van Buren, found in possession of 49,,
and lucrative ccrkshir in thr State Departmental I.;
when he entered upon the duties of Secretary Of STAT
lie had been busy: travelling politician, and MI "a,
Burrn removed hi: 1t is needless 10 say, that c h.,
been mos. impiacahe anti-Fan Buren, "Uhig" cy.s
since. Mr. Ffancis Granger. who has twice been nm
and bealen in New York. ms the an-Van Buren, cant
date for Governor voted for printing tie r:rnor. A.
did also The whole Of bis little anti Masonic an,. .y,n
Buren, corps Depend upon it, that the friends Il! Mr.
Van Buren, In man, from principle ard Il cling
strongly opposed 10 tie schemes Of HE Northern Abel
tionsts and if you vii! look over the yeas ant IA
upon the questions decided to-day, you will IT..
those who 1utrd against layin. the Maine petition uoo
the table, or in favor Of printing, the opcu an,
ayowcd opponents Of AIR Van Buren,. The vote Of t.
day uivcs the abolition question lis qnetaS for he se,
sion, and furnishes ample pledge that the Dcmoc-ac.
Of the North heartily opposed to any lntererenc.
from 0brood with domestic relations - the South"
Tic subject vas again brought up in the House oFE.
PrcscntaIvcs Friday last. S"!ie difference o. Cpl
Mon prevailed among the Ant! Aboltioniss as t. t.
jctttng the Petition or laying it upon the !Gb!c.
"Mr. Hammond, Of South Carolina, moved that lie
petition be rrjcc:rd.
Mr.. Hcartssy moved to lay the petition on the table
GA question Of order rs 10 the precc dcncc #
the two motions, and also. whether, under The rns e.
Their motion could be entc .ancd the frs. prescmata
OF petition.
.'The Speaker eventually decided that the motion /,
lay the petition the table had Prcccd' nee ;hGl rnles,
ordered By the House TO III. contrary, neither mo,.
could be decided on this day.
g An appeal from this decision taken by II. WI
iiams Of y. C.: but after paEallon - tie Spcakc
it withdrawn, and by vote Of the House. il vi,
determined to consider the petition en- ili* day
MIR. BearG>cy then moved to lay the petition Oil In.
table.
Mr.. Thomas, If Md. moved tic rc.considcrauon Of
the vate by which the House had agreed 10 consk: tie
petition
"Mr. Hammond, Of S. c. stated that if the House
agreed 10 Reconsider tho vote, he would tina. lie
petition be rejected.
:" y debate cnsued, which turned principally point,
the petition involved denial Of the right to pc,cn
In the o. the debate, the Speaker found gs,
difficulty in restraining gentlemen from going into Tie
merits Of TIC question.
&" Great cxc!tcmen. manifested the par, OF the
Southern MEMBERS
Finally, the motion 20 lay the t0Ee the petition
lost-and then the motion to reiCct it, came II,
and adjourned till Monday yesterday -
We cannot permit ourselves 10 doubt moment 9th.
result. 1t should be forthwith disposed Of Just as tine
two other petitions were, which submitted OIL Hec
ncSday last We deprccatc all Debate such subj
jcctand hope that it was yesterday promptly ATTEST,
ed either by the good OF the House tie prec,s
question.
a letter which we have seen from Washington nIudrs
TO this suhect-satcs. that the South is determined 10
stand bravcly by her own riChs-in case o! share
to compromit lem-hut that il canno, b. conrca!cG
there is masked political enemy. who is playing ,:cc,
game, and laying snares for i certain effect