The Arkansas advocate., 1835-05-22

2 n. de Metternich has been charged to design a plan for monument to the late emperor of Austria.
 The brother of the new monarch of Aus- tria has been appointed viceroy of Italy, and the arch duke Charles takes the direc- ton of military affairs.
 The Journal du Commerce thinks the choice of M, RrogIie secures the passage ef the American indemnity bill; for the fear |bf another dissolution of the ministry, the Aedltor says, will be greater than q fear of Hwaf with America,
 M. Humann was in favor of the amnes- ty. M. Thiers, says the Constitutional, is now attached to the Doctrinaire chariot pt the new cabnet.' It Is expected Gen. zEsrai AAiiaison will refuse. iihe Fulchifon caucus or night meeting of the 15o depu- ties who organized the cabinet, is endeav- ered to be made handle of by tho Tiers Iarti, Nc. as an arrogant assumption. The Fdeo of waiting on M. Thiers to reconcile Ihim to Broglie and Guizot, is said to have been copied from the depuation of the 8Engish Commons in the case of Lord Al- Hhorp.
 In the course of the debate on the min isters, March 15, M. Mauguin complained 2shat the chief of the etat major and three sssfonels of the National Guard had assist ed at the Fulchiron meeting. Gen. Jac- fqueminot, who was the leader in this eau GUS, said they did not act as National Guards.
 Nj. Guiaot made brillian, speech in fa- vor of the amnesty. The Journal des Debates says, if the American treaty is not accepted, the Duke of Broglie and every one of his colleagues must retire.
 The Duke of Brogie in the sitting of March 10th, when the questions on the causes of the ministerial crisis were re- sumed; said virtually they had formed a ministry, which would sink or swim togeth- CT.
 After M. Odillon Barrot had replied to M. Broglie, the chamber passed to the or der of the day, which vote was considered indirectly triumph of the Ministers.
 The petition against the election of o. Connell and Ruthyen IS to be heard in parliament, March l9, and 500 witnesses are to be summoned from Dublin. It will be an amusing spectacle, and rather an.ex- pensive Counsellor Phillips IS engag- ed, among others, for the petitioners.
 The entering aeedge.--Mr. Ewart, of Liverpool, will bring before parliament law to create peers for life only. The very mention of such daring innovation i'll the feudal oligarchy of England, will cause her sepulchred barons to start from their cerements, and the living occupants of the old tirne-worn palaces of her lords to think that the world is coming 10 an end. Il blow like this would uproot the accumu- lated parchments and emblazonments of centuries, and more than any other event shake the British empire to its foundations. But unless that blow be struck she never can be free.--Eu. .Star.
 Lord Brougham, by the bold and elo- quent style with which he has again launch ed into the political arena, promises 10 prove to the dastardIy harpies that bounced upon him when they thought him down, that he is too great a giant for animals of their kidney. Neither the imputation of drunkenness, insanity, nor other vice, has disheartened him. He has marched up 10 the assault in vindication of the great liberal principles that have distinguished him, and being. thus, as Ifazlitt said Of him, in his native element of opposition, the superannuated Duke of Wellington will find him the most formidable obstacle that eyer crossed his path. 10.
 .Nisceliaaeous.- There are no less than 49 petitions before the commons house, against the return of various members. There are three against O'ConnelEs eec- ton. If the inquiry be proceeded into there will be no less than one thousand witnesses from Dabn! The expense of each witness (for his maintenance and loss of time) will average 25l. to 100I. say SOL, on the whole, for each. Thus. the bare cost of witnesses, independent of single item of legal expense, may be 250,- 900 dollars! The petitioners need only give security for the payment of 5000 dol lars expenses
 We have no such thing as cleap la1p in England. In one case (Sma!l v, Attwood) the leading barrister, Serg. Wilde. receives 4000 guneas with his briefi
 A case was tried, last week, at Salisbury, in which man named Smith claimed property to the yearly value of S5l, as heir at law to Mrs. Smith, who bequeathed it, by will, to person named Smart The defendant gained the cause, which occupied four days in trial The law expenses amounted to 4000 dollars, to recover 425 dollars a year !-- Correspondence of Epe-