Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1835-04-30

Mor'ee1, oho,ne (Syhio) 36i
Jas =, do 226
s,,hor r. Smith (odm) III
John Harper w o.
Jobn Bidde do 81
Wilson B. Scott (wh'el 10
q Tn, Van Buren, papers, with the Richmond
,,.a,e, n, their heal, will doubtless clam Col.
raaka as Gain of one TO the side OF The Magician,
"a sbo, mos, obsrepcrously in consequence there
g.. we are sorry, however, that we must put q
VI ,ao, IN their cxtacies. Col. Cooke nneqnipo7
u' ,i .r1 man fuAy declared at the hastings, that
' .y'.nh ho wa, an Administration man, he knew
u3be nolitical sentiments Of the county, and lie
.,.a,cl himself faithfully 10 represent the interests.
a;sbcs and the feelings, of his constituents, II
locsd He mnreover declared, that he preferred
urDGE WHITE TO either of the candidates tor
=, Presidency now before the people. These frank
ayowels of Col. Cooke satisfied many of his Wing
+,;cnas. enIrhey voted for him accordingly.
a W wished much for the reelection of Capt
Watts; he hai been an alle and J'l'gons represcn'
,o,iye of our local interests and with the most I'M
@;n.hi,o fle,v h al reflected the aseerancd wish
.s and sentiments of the majority of his cons ltucns
~, MI ,iors of d political character. NO: one
W" ..I = co,on,aiat was ever uttered against his
.,b,de course in the Legislature. a third Wing
c,nJidate. however, was brought forward, whose
rnooooeemert was soon followed, Of course, 10y
IA, of an Administration cand Jale and II requi-
rad no extraordinary sagacity 10 iofesee, that 1t
,his course was persisted in, there would be loss
NJ one Wh;c delegate; and the determination OF
CANAAN Watts no 10 VOC for Emmerson for Con-
eross though qlal!hcI by the avowal Of his decided
oonosition to Lowell rendered this result inevitable
a very large body Of the Wing party declared thai
they would no, vote for him unless he would vote
f,r ,he;t Congressional candila.e, while many OF
the naiy Withdrew their votes from HIM IN despair
of his election and gave them to MIR. Langhorhc,
whose success was by This slate OF things, rchccrco
probable, but who IN the end was equally uhsuc
cessfa. -N0ffo'" ''e'"'''
ELIZABETH CITY.
roaqysss LOYAL (adn) i65, Emmcrson (whlg)
~ lAisis n most Singular v6ie. Elizabeth Cny
:; oneos the few counties in Virginia in which Null
}i6cstion has thr ascen lancy-anl yet, strange TO
say the men who profess that creed, prefer Jack
so 4 man to a National Wcll-we hope they
will get their yeWard We imagine that this cx-
raordinary vote will will secure Lyalls re cleo
ton he trin, nov upv erd5 Of 250 ahead, aud
Norfolk borough only to so'c'
Delega'e-Scgrvant (ahig) III hubbard (~his)
% No administration candidate Warwick,
which, with Elijah III C;ty, fo'ms an election dis
irict, had previously ve'e], giving Hubbard a
small m jory. Servant is therefore re elected.
s0UTIAMPrON-l del.
At the close of the polls, the third day. the
rotesool thus : E Cuts (whig) 429, DR.. VIM. B.
tiooI@yn (adm) Late delegate, 800 No opposl.
lion to John Y Mason for Congress, though ma
jouy Of the votes were given against hlm.-South-
Ampoy,is one Of the instruction. counties.
CITY OF RICHMOND del.
Congress John Robertson (~hg) 36l, VIM.
II Roane l22 Robcr,sm's election certain. his
present majority being 1856, and Hanover only
10 be heard from
Delegotc-R. Der: Slnsard (whg) 4G2, Charles
II. Hyde (adm i6G.
The Wing says: There was not contest
enough to call out the strength Of the Wing vote.
Mr. stanard. personally unpopular, would have
commanded a much larger vote, had there been &C.
caslon; and NJ. Robertson, universally popular,
much larger still. The infcrorty of Mr.. Robert
sous poll 10 MIR. Stanards is owing TO the cir
cumsanc, that many voters in Richmond had pre-
vlously voted for r. in Heurico. The Jackson
men threatened much, but performed little. AT the
close Of the polls, the people were eloquently al
dressed by Messrs. Stanard and Robertson
JEFFERSON 9 delegates.
For Congress John R. Cooke (whis) 372, Ed
49, A1"S"' N"o'h'J o'"' YUM lltScHt i'oJoii'
iiy Is, and Hampshire and Morgan to VOTE Resul,
doubtful.
Delegates --Thos. G,isgs (whig) All, Henry
Berry, do 1916 Samuel Carson (adm.) 3S7, Jacob
Morgan, do. 80
LEWIS-l del
y. CongresS-Lnwis Maxwell (whig) pa, Joseph
johnson (adm) 1893, J. J. Allen (whig) 1863 BY
The division in the Wing ranks, i, is probable tina,
Mr.. Allen, the present representative will be de.
felted
MONROE-l del.
Delegate Samuel Hays (adm.) elected. Nc
Wing candidate.
For C"ngress-Wm. McComas 400, Gen. D
Smith 296. Both Wings
f"r Delegnfe- A. "A. Chapman (adm( Ale, II
Alexander (whis) and late delegate 3i4.
ALLEGHANY-l del.
congress-Crag LOG, Moore 60.
Dshgate-D. B. Layne (adm.) l66, Joseph
Damron (whig) 81.
Floyd del
Consress-R. Craig (ajm.) 374, S. MD. Moore
iwms) 70. Craig wen, to Augusta, the last coun
W. haS ahead. The Lexington Union says Au
susla Gun give 2l00 votes, and, 1t is thought by
'"uny OF Moore's friends that he will be elected.
nc De1n f (White) 2l3, Lee (V Burcn,
rot Howard 81.
RHODE ISLAND.
appears to be difficult to ascertain who is Go
'ernOr OF Rhode Island even after thn elertiou is