Litchfield enquirer., 1835-04-30

that truth shnOd dispel taeehOOds You are at hherty use the euer you may deem best for this object" 4@
 | :" Washmgton, Juiy l4th, 1884. | "Dear Sir-f owe you apology for not having aek nowledged the receipt of yonr Ohligng le ol the 26th of May. My opinion the subject of l Ihe power of Congress over Slave Property in the Southern States, are we'll understood by my friends, that am surprised lhat attempt impose upon the public respecting them should he haEarded.
 "Phe subject is in my judgment. exclusively under the control Of the State Governments, and am moi appraised, do believe, that contrary opinion to deserv consideration, is snse,fained a any part of te United Stases. The charge therefore, to which, you" have had the goodness tO call my aen- ten. ia. "ae a favor ot an ln!eriere9se hy Con pf gndaion saGa from i. dO nos Pee ca wbasNO- iEority ihe General Gosernent could interfere, witt change fihe Constitution, even a the instance of either or of all the slave -lsoldiag States.
 With respect, 6Lc. M. VAN BUREN,
 It will he remarked, that this letter hears date July l4d,, 18S4S-~Re months before'it was pHblished.- Why has t beeD kept concealed for so long time F- And why is ,, noc with so much preparation and pa rade, brought to light? Thsopinion which 1t conveys to the public. and which Mr. Richie says will "pui inc extingusher at once upon all the msrepresenia- Van Buren, this vital and delicate subject" is, c. ven a Mr. Van Buren's view, common 10 all the people of the United States. We neeer recolect i0 friend of abolition ,hat we have ever met wh Ger tainly who has real 6 understood the con. s,tuion, can entertain the opinion tba Congress can interfere in the abolition of slavery W" are no' 'n- correct in oar recollection. t is some years since letter from the Hon. Mr. Webster, lo a gentleman who once resided in Georgia, was pubshed, in which he expressed his opinion to De that Congress could not interfere, and he had never met wnb any person who held different opinion. What great discovery respecting Mir. Van Burens sentiments [" on this vital and delicate suhjeci," has beea made either in Ten 1s ass ars cefiainiy, than that like all the rest the cenmuniiA he holds al least sou0d cogstinloDal opinion nd l.ss aha
 But. says the writer Of the letter from Tennessee to the editor ofthe Enquirer, have exhibited the let- ter to several persons, and has as yet, becoEe necessary have it published ia Mississippi. hnUe held ready Co De ssediH Unted Staees, schen became mecsssayy, that trh should dspeL false. prepared ia such good season, and has been kept hand so long, is disclosed. It was be ready to a- swer all the electoneerng purposes for which t was regions. might require. This indeed. is evident from the fact .rat it was addressed to somebody at CIhon, Misssipi and in tle hands of ssme friend Gt Gana- tin Tsn.essts and by ihs latter sss 70 1zs Rse
 From the whole, j. is very appafenl that MT. Van Barren has his tools pfaDted ihros2houi the union, a prepared .o carry on the necessary Teasnres 10 ss his ease becomes necessary oF expediens he has al " intimate fsieaG' al hand ie da hidrudge.y; nnd ~hes somsihiog frors the foeuiain Atatls called sor fhat be can go work in peFe0n, ana f0 hissseU. The time has beeD when such E state ol ihngs would not have bee1 tolerated by lhe indepea dens electors of this free sepuble. V GeerEe Wash in9ton had beeH detected in uring lsfsfs and carry ing on system of intrigue aud siecf.oRfesng tor te paspose of romofing and securing has esCp an1sOns
 ecs and iaeyests sooHld hGre snnk nesT e iOsigs Of pa6sic od;gm aud reproach But times change. and mep change with them. Ncw ihe People of these United States see their chief magistrate taking upon himself the authority designate he successor m that office, aH then catering the csectoneering field 70 support the claims of his lasosiie candidate while that candaie advances step furhes aed in shame less maaner eteeiioneers for himselL ln Nese.York Daily Adrersfser 1
 Coaueef;ruf -There was recently . State caiiedby this same--one of the swestylouF sbai nolso- dy kaows what has beceme of her. TAe leei we beard ofher. Isaac Hill casryiag her aNsyAs hs breech es pockeL-BOsfOR BakLekns.
 Y M4RRIED \
 In this village, on ihe 22d insis hy thp Rev hr. Hickok, Mr. Isaac Stow to Miss EiE1aszA .Almers
 In Beihlem, on the 2ls. 5sss Dls Jsases Ssa!leiss of Leb6eId South Farms. to Mss bsary 7. illams
 In Tavting Gssd, Ss ibe 2l iRss. Mt AHeos P Gllbs Of fIas.sialop, 10 Miss Elizabeth A. Gayictd ef the EJrmer place. yst. <. $
 h NssE-lIavsn, Br. Besjamia D. Naris; el skep- eaIeiea, N Y., lo lls Mary T. C0l!Ias tir ElRba- le, Cooper, lo Alies Julia TBnei Mr. Joseph Cor ham, 10 Mias Laviaa Datie, 0G AIadisOns
 q (s- GwJn anmW afnu