Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1835-07-21
GENER.qL COURT-Jodn Randolph.s u1w

he following Judges decided against the viii viz.
judges Smith, Lomax, Scott Thompson and CIonton
The viii has, therefore, been admitted TO probat Inv :,
aJon'y OF one But an appeal has been taken to the
by the VIII of 1882 the .lJrs, sor sc NJ a..
who married niece of Mr. Randolph's is oppointeJ bs
pfncipa heir II supcrscdes the provisions of the win
OF o<2 which had cmancipated his slaves and appoint
ed Bishop Mead and Mr. p b. Key the Trustees for
their benefit. A very elaborate argument NAV he ex
before ihe Court of Appeals question: which
mas caiied forth more testimony and excited more in.
ereFt than amy other Will perhaps which was ever of
The General Court, having gone tlfrouqh tbe;, husi
ness adjourned yeserday-aer an unc xanpled session
|. OF three weeks
Yesterday Wing contains singular article upon the
subject of MIR Bandolph's Will Ii saws
1--WE presume that few doubt what the u,Ipn,cnt of t.
Court will bcAll the presunptions of law are ~, "a 10
OF the last Will until insanity established The idea
that John Randolph insane is received vii, IN
dlgnani incredibly by most people There meyer vas
clearer document than rs last Will sought TO be over
I9wh and 1t certain that at the very period when the
evidence oil most Of the witnesses "a, tie date of hi .,
Wild bore the hardest his sanity others who kneJ
him we'll and had known him long and they as CONNIE
tent as any men III the world considered him highly
inueeu' ont even more brilliant and clear in his
mental exhibitions, than usual The disposition of his
properly alleged to be exactly that which might have
occh anticipated from his peculiar opinions on that cub
Ject, and his known affection for his niece whom, he
viewed as greatly resembling his mother whose memo
ny ne ido!ized 1t is singular 10 the unntalrd publc
who have observed the trial that no evidence has b,,
examined to sustain MIR. Randolph competency To- max
VIII. Perhaps it thought 10 b., unnec,s,,rv
/ lac article IN the Wing called forth we understand
Just spirit of Indignation among the JUDGES of The
ourl ana every impartial citizen. IL looked like an
pt 10 nrowocat The Court and to turn the poisc of
1uscT 40 DOUBT Inc decisions of the Courts ought to
=" 10y investigated IKE the Proceedings of Congress
' NetS Oh inc Executive, or any other transactions OF
f otli'r uphc >ody-but Oh the very day, when the
opinion OF Court IS to be pronounced question of
sI-dt cohlpiex,y when great deal of testimony and
argument has been producrd-and when there was not
are 10 decide tcommond iscr.,; NV :" NOSE VINO
ought have dictated the forbenra NOE ~ 80 a. 'i
ton. any thing like dicta,ion on te snh;, P'''p
We shall publish as soon ns nos.;I,in s, r. a., r..
dcnce 1ro and cou on The subject IT, vi; 'e iVl-
il all, us well as The arUulnenf in non,rl, 50 r
m 49, ---- I.I '"'
nc wing makes an awkward, laundering effort TO
justly .ic numbering toast about Mr. Jefferson. The
pcndcnte'' This il mas, t'y y .s"'efIr"M tnae
does it mean, Does il mean ,bc a.. , J, rnat
Fourth Of July Declaration ne indcnond, u IN, 'lie
it is denied that iinnnrtial u;tr ~, men
tract the honor from the ~.acL 81 I'll, W Su9
sons fame The hono,|E - - W a
is hs-NcitErr inn, $ \
can ever deprive - q i
Hucon II thetcast means, that the Mecklcnburg Dec
was uc hst paper HAT put forth tho idea OF In
'lt WI. Jefferson does not deserve the
iit vi "'Vlhg hr5t originated the iden of declaring
inu'pehdencc, then we ask, why deny him the credit
winch no ono ever claimed for him? The toast is
ioST:eEcl' elniyocal--and creates doubt about Mr.
elSon preparation and his fame, which ought never
- nave eNiS'eu.
The Boston Cnzetc Boston P,rio, anil o,t -
Wings, arc comncndinp MIR ci,,l,'e - :, go ',
skies Mrs Royal Joins in the cbnr,ss al ,i ~ D. ,ne
dence Journal r. ccLocs Lcr Va, ana tie rr9v