Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1835-05-01

I'm CHANcrRY-vlnciS,A-A Court ofmcnd
= session held for the county ofIouisa, at tic Cod
David NJ. Hunter, Plal
James Bibb and John Ellis. peftsl
The defendant, James Bib, not having entcrsffis
appearance and given security, according TO the act of
Assembly and the rules Of this Court; audit appearing TO
the satisfaction ofthe Court. that he is mai an ,,l,,,;,,a, I
ofthis State: On the motion Of the plaini,i.. hy lbs conn.
sci, 1t is ordered, That the said James Bib do appear
before the Justices OF our said Court, at the Courthouse,
on the trst day OF next June Term of said Court. and \
answer the Plaintiff bill; and that a copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper. printed in the
Cty OF Richmond for two months succcssiycly and post
cd at the front door of the Courthouse of this county.
A coPy.-Tcstc, DAVE Nj. HUNTER, D.c.L.c.
March q. lU7-wsw
ny observation-disclosures an inicrmcdiatc
n term of the Circuit Superior Court of Law and
|hancery, heid Tor Henrico county, Feb. 7ih, 1895
~ SV'Ns' Plaintiff,
John Smith, Richard starkc, and sas
rah Starke, defendants;
And John Smith, :. plaintiff
against
Joseph starkc, Thomas starke, Richard starkc. Tho
younger, John Starke, Thomas j. Napier, and Sarah. his
wife, late Sarah Stirsc, and Lyddall Bowlrs. Dcns
These CAUSES came ON this day. to be heard together:
the first on the bill taken fr confessed, as TO all In. do.
PENDANTS except John Smith. the answer of th,t ,L.i.nJ-
ant, with general replication thereto, exhibits. and cx-
aminauons of witnesses; aud the second. upon the bin
taken for confessed. us to all tie defendants except 10.
seph Starkc. the answer of that defendant. with general
replication thercto-and were argued by counsel On
consideration whereof. the Court doth adindgc. order.
and decree, that the injunction awarded the plaintiff. in
the hrst SUIT, on the ninth day of January, ies9, do
stand and be perpetual. And that th. %dci;ndant. John
Snhih' do execute "a bond TO the plaintiff. Joseph
Starkc, with sufficient security, to bc approved by Com
missioner Shore, in the penalty ofS90 dollars, conditioned
to have the slave Dob forthcoming at the death Of
Richard Starkc, tlc father OF the plaintiff, in the frsi
suit, to be then delivered up t, The said Joseph S;atkc.'
for himself and such of his brothers and sisters as may
be entitled TO share with him i'm the said sl,ye. And
the CDurt doth tau thcr aditduc or,lpr and ,1acr.n tIn.
the bill in the second suit be dismissed us to the snd J,-
ssph Starke, and that the defendant. Smith, do pay umo
the said Joseph Starkc his costs by him about Ills de-
fence in this behalf expended. And if the said John
smith shall not execute the bond hereby required,
within thirty days after he shall have been served wi,la
copy OF tins decree, then the said Joseph Slalkc is au-
thorizcd to Withdraw the hond executed by the said
smith with John Goddin and Lyddall Bowl,s as his Sc
curucs, and 10 institute a suit thereon, for the recovery
of the value of the said slave, Bob.
4 Cory. Testc, CHS. WILLS, D. elk.
APnl ll3-w5w
HN CIIANCERY-vmcXm.-At a Superior Court
IL of Chancery, heldin Staunton on the lh day of Au-
gust, 1880:
Wn. Nj s~woope, Plaintiff,
John Nicholas and Alexander Garrett, Defendants.
This cause came on to be- heard this fourth day of Au-
gust, lcJO, on the bill, answers, exhibits, and cxauiina-
tons of witnesses, and was argued by counsel ON con-
sideration whereof, for reasons set forth in writing and filed
amongst the papers in this cause. the Court doth ad;udrr
order, and decree, unless the defendant, John Nicholas,
and forty one dollars. and thirty seven ccnts' with lrgol
interest thereon, from the Goth of August. 1924. till paid.
and the cost expended By the Plaintiff the prosecution
OF THIS suit; then that the Marshal of the Supc-
nor Court of Chanccry for the Richmond District,
having first duly advertised the time and place OF sal, in
some newspaper published IN the city of Richmond. and
at some public place in New Canton, for four weeks
previous thereto, proceed Ia sell. by public auction, a.
the highest bidder, for ready money, the land Snd ape
purtenances in the proceedings mentioned; and that he
pay the money INTO court, out of Which the payment of
the defendant, CARROTS costs, expended in the prosecu-
ton ofhis former suit, which remain unpaid, viii hereai:
ter be directed.
December l4th, 1880. X
Itbeing suggested to the Court that the plaintiffs dead,
the same is ordered 10 be entered of record BY consent
OF parties by their counsel, it is ordered, that this CAUSE
stand, and DC reviycdin the name ofJoscph Brown, adnr,
of William Nj. Swoop, deceased. "a
And TIA Circuit Superior G urt of Law and Chancerv
held at the Court-IlGuse, in Augusta county, the LIST da ~
of June, 1888 80
On motion of the plaintiff. by counsel. the Court sanoo
appoint George Nj. Payne a Commissioner to makes M
the land, directed TO be sold by the decree pronounccf3N3s
tins. cause on the fourth day OF August, loaO, in placs.-
the 1%iaFshaI therein gained. K~Pics-Teste; -.