Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1835-11-06

tnguished Chief MaQstrate'-and hence that qualified
u nuenn''r reso'uton, appiosng ge"1faty inc inca
tons OF Jackson policy that gentlemen do not approve,
why b4ve they not been especially enumerated Why
call on US TO vote thus in the darks Do gentlemen de-
sign 10 notify the good Federal and Nuyin friends of
Judge White that whilst they approve geeraig the po-
cy oil Jackson they do not approve has policy to those
three principles which placed out IN glazing colors
as beacon lights 10 the Opposition
But, MIR Speakcr, the author of this document has
deemed it essential TO dcnonnce the Baltimore Convcu-
ton Be that shall not defend ill., and yet will say
that much Importance has been attached 10 H. than
1t deserves believe that 1t is entitled Just much
weight and respect the ndatvn of the same
number of men, of equal spectabty assembled at
other point and That convention never at
tempted 10 usurp power dictate the people or To
decree who should be the Presdentit did Just what
this House proposes TO dot recommended can
didate for the Presidency In relation caucuses and
conventions, hold the opinion expressed in the follow.
ing paragraph 70 be correct:
"re tight or'uafase eo@peens only privilege ehoos
ed tor the office but compartments also the important pv
aud claims may &c deemed ,utesns % Ss Mso.'
i o%sn So,s these the right
and the onraons OF acqueseence by the people
or % . p OSS S %po,ng orps''a Of NSoSa
right OF Suffrage and areproenbe dersie,on the duty
But it dees not follow, that every man who supports
Mr Van Buren,, does because he has been nominated
BY the Convention. Far from this is the case with my
sell. Nor do support him, some gentlemen ha We
said they did in 1882 because Gen Jackson desired il
hope, sir shall never become servile as to support
any man whose principles denounce merely to please
great Individual supported him in 1899, because he
was genuine Republican | support him now for the
reason.
regard the last resolution Mr. Speaker as an atac<
upon our Senator, Mr. Grundy. 1 not pre- pared IL
cast any upon that gentleman He has served
us ably and faithfully, and l would sooner vote him
thanks than ccnsure.
l might urge much more against this Prcamble-bu
The Indulgence already extended to by the House
pause and survey well the ground we occupy. For my
SELL Whatever consequences may befa as an indyi
dual am resolved to sink swim with the principles
OF the Republican party.
NASHVILLE, Oct. %
Nomination Of Judge Hhite by he Sennte1It will be
perceived by reference, the
OF the Senate on Saturday. that they have IN
The Preamble and Resolutions of the House of Repre-
sentatycs, nominating Hugh L. White for the Presi.
dency The nominating resolution passed by vote
The following gentlemen were Yesterday uppoin,ed
JOINT Select Committee TO inform the Hon Hugh l.
White of his nomination for the Presidency; Messrs
Ledoeer Hynds and Cahal, the part of the Senate
and Messrs Anderson of Jefferson Churchwcll Mabry
Ready Watterson, Campbell of Smith Nj Claim Seorcy
IopP and Rogers of Carroll, on the part of the House
Republican.
HOUSE, REPRESENTATIVES,
On motion Of MIR. HARRIsoN, tic House took up the
nominating preamble and resolutions and sustained his
call for The previous question
In our last we gave an account of the whole proceed
ings this subject
The following is the protest Of Messrs Guild Ridley
and Nicholson to the I'd resolution
The undersigned protest against the adoption of the fol-
lowing resolution:
heso'eed That we approve generally the principles
and policy both foreign and domestic of the Amnisra
ton OF this Federal Government during the term OF
service OF our present distinguished Chief Magistrate
Gen Andrew Jackson aud assign the following reasons
for voting against the same:
l. We regard the said resolution when taken in con-
nechon WIZ, the original preamble, attempt to pass
an INDIRECT eensuIe upon the present administration by
the use OF the indefinite term, approve generally
= The vote on the said resolution taken by re-
sor, to The previous question, which prevented ay de-
bate amendment, and that account we were no,
allowed to move such amendment said resolution
as would have enabled to express appreciation gc-
morally ard especially of the present Administration
Such an amendment was proposed but declared out
Of order We should have heartily supported resolu-
uoh approving ia strong and decided the leading
measures and policy of The Administration of Gen. An
drew Jackson.