Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1834-02-18

auAue o qncsuons distinct from each other, and not
pe'heh 10 The question under consideration. III tolerated
Ia case like the present might be brough, no our
everyday Legislation. and produce great evil coniu.
SON. lie should therefore, oppose this moon let il be
clothed IN whatever phraseology.
Mr. Smith said iha, before he should be prepared TO act
ON This sugecihe 'houj ak that the veto message
printed lie rccollected that 1t contained some principles
which he approved but others which he di.spprovei-
Veto was Latin word. meaning, al reiee,"-anJ by the
O"h,auon haue oy HE gentleman to his amendment.
ne had done no more than translate IL into English IL,
had struck out ihe word veto aud substituted re usa TO
'n'hg more than Translation. The veto the ground
w WING" Tue refusal was placed, and the modification had
10 maui me shsh'est change in the meaning oil the
uon. IL The gentleman would allow Of selection GER
' parts OF the veto message, Mr.. ). could Gni many
poros oil IL TO which he would yield his approbaion-
Bu' he could swallow the whole Ii they were TO
approve the veto. they approve the reasons on which
II was ounded-and MIR. s. could take all of them
Mr.. Watkins Iruste tina, before the Comm tee aone
this notion they would be convnc ed that was an
amendmen,-iha 1t ADDED either beauty or strength TO The
resolution he a'ked the gentleman, If this
any 'h'Dg 10 the strength OF the Lecara ton that we
consider The Bank unconsii uoual! n il was adopted
'he impression oil the people must be- that they had rot
confidence In their own opinions, an1 therefore
,nem OUT oy reference 10 those OF the Presden,.
u' ,hs was not the only effect which might produce.
m'gh result! in ming the President om por.
ton Ut The ceOsure which the Legislature p opposed 10 pass
upon his conduc, aud which Mr. w houe h he SO rich.
" deserved The gentleman from Brunswick has told us
'h' we ought, ii We found any thing good in Gen Jack
sou ad'nisi' alton, TO put IL on the credit side But Mr.
W. thought he could it'll justice say, that Il thi.
veo was put on the credit side, something ought 10 h.
proclamation, deb sid AID
why moi on the other hand, refer the battles of New
Orleans and the Horse.sho He thought hi. nation
would have The effect to throw dos b, on their own ON
Mons as 1t would appear they were obliged 10 r.lr IN
'he opinons and acts OF the President.
Mr. Dromgoolc had hoped, that he should not be called
upon explain motion. which bore its illustration Oh lis
lace lie id not intend TO be driven into the disc
oil inc question, TO the propieiy Of the two
SUBJECTS But lit was proper express an opinion tina,
e naA was unconstitutional was it not equally SO to say
so'ne'hng OF its recharcri When i, had been cha,g,
upon Vreiuia that she had forgotten her principes La
so naa o.en lulled 10 sleep by the narcotic Influences OF
expedeDcy and ssity-ihat she had men IN
ONCE who were the known friends Of the bank aud there
by given at least indirect the crea ion and
continuance Of an U. $. Bank:-when all these charges
were made II was proper, 1t necessary for this Legi,
azure 10 say that did not calmly look on and see the
bank re'chariered This the proper course for Vir
g,ma 10 pursue ii she was really true TO her prn-
c'ple' But II had been said, that by adopting this
motion, they would be appealing to the opinions of
General Jackson to sustain their own He did moi in
TEND that any such Inference should be drawn Io ,,
"o''on but, dii not gentlemen know that il had been
argued mat Zen Jackson had right TO put his veto ON
INC charter OF the Bank, that un act
Sc Now IL Virginia approved of that act, if she saw
u, II an ehdeaVor 10 destroy an institution which she look
Ell upon as dangerous and Observation-Disclosures crea,ion
" "en she considers daring usurpa,ion power-was
NOT proper Tor her to sustain that measure? Ii was cer
a'hy So especially when the friends of this monsrous
monopoly were now making efforts obtain re. charter
by raings hue aud cry in relation TO the removal nj b
leposes. MIR. ID. believed the GLAMOUR now r,,Ia
mainly gotten up by the Bank party in order TO create
popular excitement III favor of its charter He was de-
"""s w pPposc tnc effects oil this md
his subtle scheme for creating re action in
the public mind in favor the Bank 1t was for This Tia,
ne wished the Legislature take firm stand and en-
press us interpretation in unequivocal terms of Tho ~
charter OF the Bank As 10 its proving an ogSa -, ,,
rensuic bestowed on the removal OF The denosi,ee h
thought the language OF each and every resolon 49,,
ed 10y e Legislature ought to explain itself He wish
Cd mat the voice oil Virginia should 20 forth clear and
u'uhc' upon The recharering Of the Bank and with ibis
view lie had offered his motion? ~
Mr.. Watkins did not think the gentleman, fo p
WICK had shewn that this would be any amendment III,
Was necessary that they should express their
ION oil the re-charter Of the Bank the u States had
hey not already done in declaring that institution nm
Constitutional! Where was the necessity of men,on;na
The President at all ?-Was il TO refer to The on;n;o -
Jackson 10 strengthen the opinion OF this Ieeis
azure iihat was not the object, cui 6ono-aiter having
themselves expressed the same same sentiment in Ill.,, s
e'omhon now proposed 10 be amended.
Mr. Maxwell said if he had the shar, ontics which
would be precisely such wanting 10 enable hin
10 discover any proper connection between the reson
ann ,he gen'lemans amendment Bnt his optics, unor-
unaiey' were net sharp; but, like the gentleman him
cI he had been obliged those artificial conrivan
es' commonly called specdses; AMI the only difference
between them this point w as that the penenn,n 80
Brunswick, ii seemed, used the modern pafent oues
whi- he Tor his part, was content TO wear the old |
nginS SORT winch had been always used and approved
u hiS commonwealth, and which he thought were very
900 Gun they did not enable him 10 see what cer
AMY was not 10 be seentha, intimate connec,ion yhch
he gentleman so grauey assured them there between
ne amendment and the resolution. Nor could he bv |
any means, agree with the gentleman that il was tic
1earious attempt OF the Bank 10 obtain renewal r ~;
naer hat had caused all that dire distress with e,r
u worse, under which the people were proanno ,to,t
ut all The land but il obviously the fragrant az,
he PRESIDENT IN removing the public deposi,es from
hat treasury which Congress had provided for them tha,
Tau uOne Tue mischief and that called loudly for the So
emn protest OF the General Assembly aganst tbe JaO
'0ns anu alarming assumption OF power which it nvoIv.
,d Moreover lie could moi help thinking that if the gen
ieman really thought that the Bank alone was The piI,
monster mat mad caused all sufierngs and ougbi
nc'eoIe, 10 De hunted down as public enemy; and if
III, ~
my and every thing that you'd aid the re c,rter;n, ~
IS 10 De anxious TO compliment the President for xercs
ng his veto against il on single occasion, he ought i,
u reason 10 be equally ready the other hand 10 ;o
cesufng hm Tor nIimating as he had done in the verv
message announcing that veto, and in the yerv lace of H.
General Assembly that National Bank was not so ,;rei
ihcons""noha not so mere monster but that il mip
DC ao"ea 10 exs-provded only he could be permitted
o nGR ana shape little according his own fancy
MT Cooke moved 10 amend the third resolution bv il,
erIng aiier Tie word Enclosures" in the fourth line tho
'os oher Than lie recharier OF the Bank of the I'M;
81 o'a es In making This notion MIR G. said he wa.
ware ihat he should be told that ii was super1uous
icion, because they had already declared an op,;o,
salhs' Tie consiiuonaly Of the Bank But he did moi
view III and reference 10 the proce edinps i'm the Other
rouse would explain the grounds which he acted A.
you'd DC observed, that the fifth resolution was enplan.
DRY III It's Character announcing no principle, exhibiting
osenmehi, Out merely guarding against the inference
nat e resolution relating 10 the question OF
y was INTENDED as an offset 10 the censure of the conduct
me PRESIDENT, expressed in the previous resolutions
NJ ~ couiu not perceive the necessity for this fifth reso
on' was II in any 10 be presumed ne a ,,,us. =,
curse, that the opinion OF The Legislature on te cons"
onaliy OF The Bank, should have any effect ON tIe ex
esso OF disapprobaon at the removal of the depose
nc cou see no reason Tor believing that such would have
een we inference drawn from the union Of the I,vo s
ecs. During the discussion of these ouestons in IA, II
", anoher resolution offered and rejected which do
'drcd mat Was not the intention OF the Legislature 10