Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1834-02-08
From tho Wondainck snn,inA1 1

The following letter addressed TO several individual.
IN ms place was received few days ago from the Hon
Jas NJ III Beale, the Representative in Congress from"
this district, and has been deemed advisable to Law il i've
fore his constituents at large as the best method nj eI;ci,
ing IN" Information which he is DESTROYS OF obtaining
Inc democrats OF 'hs county, and OF Page are opposed
TO tie u 3 Bank upon constitutional grounds and there
are very lew among US who condemn the course the
President has pursued in relation 10 the Deuostes. and
the views OF Representative seem 10 acco, .;,t
those OF majority OF his constituents at least in ,lis
qHarler upon HAT subject, presume particular in
sNucIiOhs TO MIN VIII not be considered necessary
WAsHINeToN CRY, Jan Is, 1884
Dear SiTs: On the subject OF the removal of the DEM
sites from The Bank OF the United States do not know
the opinions OF my constituents in Shenandoah VIII CON
please write me on tina, subject! Give me vonr own
views ana those OF our acquaintances generaIly shou
oe slan my course should correspond with the opinions
O majority oil hose represent. 10 the absence of no.
shve Instructions, shall take that course which nv con
cePliOn' OF The public good shall dictate.
The subject is not without its difficulties II has bes
charged by our opponents, that when this subject was re-
fered by The President TO The last Congress il was tct
acknowledgement that he considered The matter as proper
ly belonging 10 them; and That by assuming The
he had then been willing TO shift the
10 another body tlnk twas impoRic ON uc scor. 81
popuiary,lh NE Presdent,' be instrumental in the re
movd, because brought the charge of the derangemeo,
oil The currency and the pressure in the money GarLc
whether toe or false, upon himself and his lisnds a.
me ffesIe" mas as heretofore done what lac concev.
ed 10 he MS dny leaving lie consequences 10 be fell
and his motives TO be Judged by his country and nos
leny In uis important matter, viii sustain The adj.
mh's,fa'on Tor TIE following reasons: Thai although ,he
lorSer course, yet was an act stcy delensbIe by The
Constitution, the laws, and he practice Of the
and moreover, II was necessary TO the ftf discharge
Of is duty in seeing that the laws were doly executed.
and also from The general e0nsergace pooer Of lie cbe
magistrate OF The people, TO preserve The tranquility and
happiness OF The country aud the purity and perpetGy OF
cur institutions.
There are but two questions that present themselves IN
my Mao 80 deciding this maeT-at least ito Iesalitv
H. ,o We president the appointing snd removing power
W e''o' 70 a' executive oicefs' To say that he has
ne PoweF o. removal, which all admit bot that he must
"'. u"'' so'e "'ong act ~ committed and thst I've has
not e power 10 prevent the con,pission Of a az, 10 rs
Tecuon or removal is irrational aud a mere bubble 2
Are the reasons OF be Secretary for the removal good and
tuei That hey arc, have no hesitation In r,Sio,, a.
though he may have clsned, iO bis COMMUNICATIVE eon
general powers uat do not properly belong ia hin, W.,
the Bank Of The Unied States has violated lie con,r1 ~
innumersbe instances: she has set III law In rei,Goo =,
herself al oren defiance II This is true 1t inconirovert
Wy proves not Only the proprey, but the necessity Of Tho
act o. me president In causing the removal Of the mo-
mes OF The public from her direction aud USE and also an
>" ere the hfs question, by showing that the President