Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1834-02-08
IN SENATE.
We,fnesdoU E.h.,n,,

REPORT ON THE REMOVAL OF THE pEpos1r.s
hi, "eos'er' from the Committee Finance, to
wch were referred the Report OF the Secretary of the
Treasury on the removal of the deposites and , s
cond oil the resolutions offered by the Senator from
for- " = $3.50 "6 S"''eu
Mr.. Webster read the report, which occupied abou,
on "our anu quarter, aud concluded wi ndng
e adoption OF the second resolution introduced bv M
Clay. ' ~ "ir'
MIR: Webster moved that the report of the Committee
pn.eo ana ,hat The report of the Secretary OF the
'easuty anu the resolution which had been before The
Committee with the other resolution Of the Senator from
Aern,ueSy, be made the special order Tor to-day.
ne motion was agreed TO.
Mr. Chambers moved that 900 adJtiona co,;ss Of II, .
report be printed. oP'''' " "'
Mr. Forsyth said. he did well understand the obiec,
OF printing more than the usual number OF copies of the
report 1t bad been suggested by an honorable Senso
me DINER day. that the printing Of additional number
OF copies OF any document, gave 10 il sort of ofG c;.,
sanction, which he by no means Willing n .ccd o.
the document then under consideration If dis vie no
anu he report was to be The foundation Of the ac-
uon OF he Senate, he objected printing an sdiIiona
number oil copies Of the document because n. H.; ,o,
think II contained sound political arguments and hs All
no. k IL stated ialry the views Of the Secretary Of tho
sssury certainly great credit due 10 the Commit.
tee on Finance for the ZEAL ability and inn.,rw ,Yi,,
"n I1h ,he report had been brought out.
ne nought 'e reference made yesterday al four
o'clock; and the Committee could hardly have III to-
!" agree on and write out long port in the shor,
,Paee o. nne intervening since then 1t was pos.ibl.
a we suOec might have been discussed and ell nm.
~ The Comni Tee BEFORE and that the Chairman
nsu hDe 10 embody the sentiments OF the ys,io,,s
80 W "e COMMITTEE previous TO the reference. If such
was the case, II reminded him OF what had once
~ one Of The Courts Of Justice OF the State of Georgia
grave question Of Constitutional law was presented be-
Iofe mat Court, argued for days with great ability
anu when the argument concluded the Judge drew
rom bis coat pocket written opinion which I,e read
Shu ordered TO be recorded the opinion of the Court
appeared, therefore, That unless the Senator from Mas
sachuseits carried the opinion OF the Committee In hi.
Goa, pocket he could not have presented his report wifi
we anexampce dispatch hat bad been witnessed. To
ms however was not his purpose raise any obec.
uon-bs objection wss TO the report seli in which lie
did not ihnk the true question fairly met He wjsh.
Ell the report 10 be printed (he usual nuer Of copes)
shu Wben that DONE e would take occa,on 10 set the
subject IN proper light, aud bring the true issue fairly
bso the public II seemed 10 him that IL would not be
lar to go on With The discussion, until the report Of the
COMMITTEE, so vastly imporsna Committee peculiarly
constituted and rom s nature giving such weight 10 lie
opnIons should be printed and in the hsDds Of every
senator. How could his friend from Penosylv snis Tor
instance do justice 10 his argument without an opportu.
mly Of giving TO tina. repor, thorough investigation 10
his closer "
Mr. Tyler rose aud said. that the gentleman from Ceor.
gaheed not 10 have gone quite far for precedent.
Tie might have proceeded no farther than the Executive
himself The Committee Finance had held their csbi.
net meeting, and had compared their views on IN. sub