The Arkansas advocate., 1834-01-17

say s, to suggest them. II B.a
 that the President ressiddeenTtt i,ad ;ss,,s5 ,.a eea
 fafSs f;i iy iiad read t iis
 Ms easliigt' winch had bee, = '.,,1siils
 to the public as his, and s wb;st Iql1iaIss possession 2 of tho country as bisa sas n
 senate }, had had no official ,ia.I, hs Sa4 the President, nor any oiiieisI is' fIssla'as sa
 ion to them of this eaeec- ', =. selansa ..ll any form, from him, whieh s' KY a''f lhRg that paper was his. If the Prssa s,.'l5s'
 merely n read a paper to tie slle rI,er,'Ssa. ssasal
 Cabinet. without prorasall prorasallzaiii..a ags1s ..s. 2
 the world, it would have pfsss''. 2 '''''' PaPH
 tally different question. Gentls,.a Gsa
 have reasonably doubted if ii,s,''sa tbsy ss.,
 q right to call for the proaaesj,,,: x g'ss's
 which was confidential betwesa z z. 2
 d dent and the members of his N sh. x
 Dat thls paper had been pro,nblqa,sa sslasl
 world; and therefore the senats s4'sa
 the production of the Presidea, bas
 to cali for an official copy, that ,i ,iss t5sg
 thus be assured, from the highsss ~ z p!
 that It vas genuine. He had bii,.ssg ss' doubt that the paper was genuine ,''ssa pa ],
 tact only rested, at present, en the,s,s.
 of a newspaper, and 1t was not eys,. WI
 es..t, sssuss;;ss; .,;, . 's
 entitled 10 credit. The only tssti@ss,a ss
 was tho assertion of the Editor oI s'' s
 paper, and t was only respectful 7
 President to ask him for copy. sa1
 copy was communicated, there <, eosla ll1
 right 10 presume that it was m, a as.
 He was influenced by another pata' ss
 Ihis was a proceeding altogether s'' ,'s.'
 dented ia the annals of our ea,n,a 'sls''
 was the first first instance of the pubIiss.;,,
 paper read by tue President to tbe I HssI' the Executive Departments. Thsqs'a N tution authorized the President h csl N members Of the Cabinet for tbeir ss in writing, on all subjects under dg..,I ton; but this document vas re,s,s that constitutional rule; for, instead d .l ing to the Heads of Department ar 51 opinions, the President had, by tbs as..I communicated the reasons 5p6jcb o.,e,s influence their judgment. lie aoaIa } go into the subject to show lat dat i ay sts|
 5oiionsef this inquiry, sahs. saIhlss.. .s,,Itjis, for what reasons, the public depostes M removed from the Bank Nhere feas..l designed that they should be put, and pau| in Banks where Congress designed N they should not be put. That was a5s|
 of the subject which would hereafter oy1 np for discussion. He had mesee!g esee!!g fissass answer the inquiry of the gentlenlan isl Georgia; and to say that he NishedtlJ certain the genulneness Of this paper, vil now only rested on newspaper aathah| and, because if 1t was an official act of N President, he was desirous to have atesl the Senate in an official character. | Al gentleman objected to the word agenaat| nessn in his resolution, he had no desre retain 1t. It was merely his object o d| tain possession of the paper. and he Epa then be willing to assume it's genlaaesA
 Mr. Eeasu4H said, if he andefssosaa] honorable Senator from kentnekg aolnal ly, he admitted that with the inleIeorx between the President and his Secrsals whether oral or written, the Senate had h| thing to do. This view of the subIsc M X. did not conceive to be affected ty ya publicity which, whether with or wind the consent ot the President had ha given to the paper referred to in the res1' ton. This paper was one sad o sF been addressed by the President oI Y United States to his confidential adFsts Mr. k. said he could not see way the m orable gentleman from Kentucky shh entertain any particular desireto get ls paper. What official use could he Idas'8 it, when he had got it Why depaIl TO ll usage by calling for such paper $ q { unless 1t was intended to make soma oila use of isl Mir. K. said he could Iaa9a' that one branch of the Leglslatlrs nsp \ under certain circumstances have 7 'ss to call for it, and, if 1t were refused sa. NY. called for, to obtain ii by the use ol ', means within it's power. But tAss Tlls ' 7 7 thai branch of the LegisiattiaTss. ! v F '. per in question was to be made 'ae a. s'sAs ''Is of criminal charge against the f'f''a !, of the United States, 1t must esil's lps s another body. and must be a Pafl 2 Y 7, evidence on which the President ol lf 'r ]. ted States is to be brought to the ~ s s this body, under charge of hlsa c''ss ..,' ls misdemeanor. The honorable senal0laa ,''a that the paper referred 'e = ~s, < be of vast use in ascertainmg Dy sDv'a " M < deposites have been removed. Asl0 x < MT. F. said, there was no question l'a' a.,, 7 deposites have been removed: wlflnslrg, ss clIy or not, would, he presumed, Ots'i. 0'aa aSs subject ofipauiry. HepresuTea a'r .s,Ss. as to that act. the Senate had alreaei I,'rs, 'ns c;ant ;n nf,rm,t,on to enable the geI'Fh'',,