Vandalia Whig and Illinois intelligencer. [volume] (Vandalia, Ill.) 1832-183?, 1834-03-13


eee...s ii. .. .le o..5i-.t.. l.-
+. .ru t.nt -. .f-t.. ..
.-.t'- 'Hl. iisH. { ]. ..,. ....1
- ....4> 1-....-...y .a.e4..
ed to fill the important station of CDie
Magistrate Of this state"
The addressers tell US that they have
been appointed to present to the voters
the reasons that have actuated them IT,
recommending their distinguished fel
low citizen, --, asa candidate for
thai high and responsible off, e. &c.
SO it seems that both parties to this
nomination, are distinguished" and
the office is distinguished" also.
Again. the addressers tell us tina,
heir candidate 'has risen TO competency
and influence, TO command the favorable
hotice of all acquainted with him.
Again they tell us, she has acquired
wealth and influence in that pursuit"
The addresse 5, Furthermore. urge his
cLAIMs-yes. gentle reader, that is the
very word-''his CLAIMS upo the serious
consideration of our fellow citizens
Throughout the state" "Therc may be
individuals better qualified for the high
trust for which he is candidate, hut"
-6m!-''among those who are or
perhaps will he, aspirants. he is not only
pre-ensinent IN fitness, but possesses para
mount CLAIMS on account of his long
residence with US, and former public
services These aristocratic claims
ha-rbrs Urged up,>a IL P - h"fr-@,
and rejected by the distinguished" ma
jority of 1887 votes
These remarks are made without any
hostile feeling towards the addressers.
or their candidate. My sole object is =
check, if possible. that strong propensl-
ty which is generally evinced by polite
al writer's. TO make use Of words ard
phrases OF which neither they them
selves, nor one half Of their readers.
knows the correct definition. Il.
Who voied 70, the Bank Bill? The
Alton Spectator answers as follows: the
answer corresponds with the Journals.
The question being taken in the
House OF Representatives ON the final
passage of the bill, after lis return from
the Council OF Revision, on the 18th
January, 82l. it resulted as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative,
are-MessrS. VIM. M. Alexander, OF
Alexander comfy; DAVID Blackwell, 81.
Clair; Nathaniel Buckmasler and Joseph
Borough, Madison; Al, xander Camp
bell. Wayne; Thomas M. Dorr,ss, Frank
lin; George r. Logan, White; Vim.
Nj Partridge, johnson; Charles r. Ma
theny, ST. Clair; Enoch Moore, Mon
roe; S. Omelvany, Pope; Alexandes
Philips. White; Cha's. Slade. Washing.
ton; Richard nj. Young, Union-l4.
Those who voted in the negative, are
-Messrs. Abraham Cairns, of Law
renee; VIM. NJ. Crisp, Bond; Henry
Eddy, Gallatin; Wirkliff K,tchell, Craw
ford; Thomas Mather. Randolph; Nose,
Michaels, Edwards; William B. M'Lean
White; Samuel McClintoc, Gallatin
R,sdon Moore, Sen. ST. Clair; William
Orwell, Madison; Edward Robinson
Pope; Raphael Widen. Randolph,-l2
The objections OF the Council Of Re
vision having been read in the Senate
on the Sd of February, 1921, the bill
/. was passed as follows:
Those who voted for the bill. are
, Messrs. Lewis Barker, of Pope; Rober
I Frazer, Edwards; Alexander Jamisor
Monroe; Edmund B. w. Jones, Union
i Martin Jones, Bond; Michael Jone!
GalIatin; Milton Ladd. Johnson al
Franklin; Leonard White, White ~
!, Those who opposed the bill, are-
. Messrs. William Boon of jackson; c
, Caldwell, Madison; S. Crusier, Ra,
dolph; Joseph kitchell, Crawford; ia
Lemen, ST. Clair--5. Mr.. Maddux,
Washing ton, was absent.