Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1834-12-25

! tend such election IN TIC same manner n II my
| had brcn duly swo.n, aud shall make return on
oath OF fma,,on, that they had faithfully aud TN.
n,r.islly performed the duties OF thcif appoint.
/ meni.
81 Ta7tany Sheriff, Deputy sheriff Justice o.
the Peace, or Snpcrnen lent, who sh have ia.
ken, OF conmsnecd lasinr, any poll, aud 10 sh'ii
fail or refuse to complete cnd return tho sann &c
eofng to lsw, shall, for his or thelr offence ihe'e
m be nmefead IL sum not less than oo"ats
mr. more thai dollars. !.
81 That thc fine provided against the shefh
anil p puts sacuf n the lSlir section oil sad Hc'
l,s Increased 10 sun not more than dollars
nor less than d1llats.
On motion II Nir. Voolfolk, tbs resolution was
laid on the Table.
rteuaa.=D tNp raeDgniCgsaoHG RAILROAD.
Tho z II 10 authorize tho B1aei Of Pube Woke
10 sniecrbs 70 tho Stock Of tha Richmond, FREEZER
! rkshur, an1 Po'omae R'I-foal Company was
fa.a ,he fir limc, and The question Lctns on the
! ste1n. reading.
Mr. Pace said that lie had st4tad 70 the friends
oflbe bill when in committee. that whenever II
was btolehi into the House, he should Il no 9th
Fl member deemed It bia duy 81 10 d') move thai
i, be laid on the table, with Tho understanding NAT
It vas not % bo taken mp unll inter the Oh OF Jan
nary. lis objection to actns Mt present on VIC
bill was that Il proposed 10 give TO one improve
ment the Ysry large amount 81 $3.50 0Do, when
the ,cojsl 4afc could have M knpwledga OF the
other schemes =, hieh met be LAID before them dn-
ripy the prsaent session, and - which II might he
lhoueh ut expeIlcul 70 extend the All OF the Common
wealth.
II was sail by tho friends oftbs bill, that unless
il was pa.se1by The 27.h of this month, us pro.
visions would be npsatery boi tho company hnd
! placed themselves il tbs prelleamfn', aud II was
IN 10 way the fault Of the Legislature. ! III
LEGISLATURE nashi not to be considered bound
on this aeeoun', 10 violate an equitable poi
! icy. Which hal always been observed to.
wards every par. Of the Soio, in regard to
Internal improvements nor ought They 10 ex
haugl the funds of the Safe IN hehnlf Of ono com
parry, without KNOWING what o.her PROJECTS would
! ne BROUGHT before them nmoos which there might
be some equally mefltotious, and possessing t1nd
claims 10 contributions from the funds OF THIS Com.
monwealla.
Mr. Johnson Of r said he hal NJ objection To
laying the bill the Table ut present as II was his
wish and laat Of The fflen IS OF ls bill generally
that members should have fua OPP ortunny of cx-
aiming IL merits Bat he wished Il To be und'r-
stood thai he sh ul1 eonsIrr II hrs duty TO coll up
the subject nj an c1ller day tlnn that whlch the
gentleman from Fayete had named Tho situa-
ton Of he Company required that thl' bill should
b. acted upon at IA eally day The Engineers
-, +. ,.l,a, -, o,tLe. lqt.
-, f,45..,l. /, 90, ,6,r,f,,e essen,i1
f....,, .ll h. ahIs IN calenla,c their
.'.'' ~ c5,,,,r,s ,,cb, 10
w. " M ,l.,,,,,,,, ,.,o,ll
induce him 10 call up Tie b, al an carly day-pre.
viau, 10 which, ho trusted every member would
make himself acquainted with lis merits.
Mr. Wnftibs4nil II called on now to vote, he
80, " '='... H. L,,lna ohi,c,,,.
sno''' ''9 ~ "'' IN Wv.
- nv Us =, g.. II,
Dc nh'' On "nl," No''c' ~ ~,
- Wv ~ - .,I ,',.a soo
''ls"'N VI INT o" '''' my "'''''
ee,i,e' wy =. al, L. ,,o,11 o;,o dino
80 n ,lsl,,, M, which hs intended To call IN
,li5u 80 d., ,,,,,t,,,., n,i,ht nat he tnhcn bv
.,,rr,isc
M ,,,,o, T., l,,, ,lo nil, ON tn, tohle was then
ao,o,1 ,,1-.., h.,nq, 6xc1 on for IT'S consldcra
INN.
N, Iohn.on Of r f.om the Committee of Courts
= 1,,,, I'D - ,,,,.,,t unf,vor,llc IN tho nnul,-
ol a,, Drake for d,ymco from her Lus.
l.,nJ pots,, p,,kc
A. C,,.,,ar., n,ovel I'm, The Rrno,, he reversed
-sns,oioi,, l n,o,ian hv nn nlIos,on Ia the facts
contained ~ Tho ,I,c,mpts before the l,nse. md
winch cxb,bilea nm aggravated case Of rdutcry
neelec, md cnsl treatment ON The pa,t of tho hus
had U,nlsourccl the G,t that Ihc I,agjslmre
h,1 hcretof,ro rrcansnllv dissolved the merri,ao
contract noas, aimiI ar circumstances
MIR johnson of Richmond city, sustained the
Report of The committee at considerable length
eonen.hng that the law had established sufficient
redress for the injured party, in the divorce men
"a II thorn, which the Count of CInnccry Is cmpow-
cred to gron. and that to establish permanently
m ,,,,:,.l.,t th,, -, all ,,sas of n,l1li,ry tho