Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1833-10-22

public. wsay to Governor Hamilton (,oho riu rea
dy perceive tcho is that gires the infornaon) that
1t was Mr. Randolphs intention to renew his permission
| TO publish that letter
2. AS to Mr. Rsndolpls alleged duplicity in being
pnvy To the publication, signed "a friend Andre
JACKSON Esq, as to the Infatuated eaiment o. that
tact aud Us 10 the Presidents the discovery
a"u MS consequent refusal receive MIR Randolphs visit,
ca" upon The aforesaid Andrew Jackson E-qure, to ex-
anime MS papers aud say, whether he does find let
e. rom The writer OF that article bearing date February
90 100" enclosing the article from the Telegraph
~ mar morning, and Informing him Of the name OF the
"irr anal oi Mr. kandoiphs concurrence in his views,
a'u ms approval oil the publication call him say
whether this letter was not received the same morning
cy ne hands If M. Randoiphs servant, and ,ch Nh
Rnndoiph's compliments. l wish him to remember
whether il aner-but ON The same dan tina,
Mr. X called on him for the first time. I wish him to
publish that letter, aud call upon you, gentlemen,
puosh me article III question, that the public may
whether Mr. Randolph had not taken eif.cual means TO
prevent that courtesy which is due every gentleman in
ms own mouse, from being misunderstood by the Presi-
oen "msey' however II might appear TO others.
hope, too, that the President viii be allowed TO saw
ooS'i on hs own behalf 81 much acqu;t him OF he
charge OF bare ingra,tude 10 man to when mo-, IN :,
=" ~ o'her, Inc ow eel his Ell. vator, hai when Mir r.
caid was lett with him, has been mentioned he knew
MT ~ was not in the rri ge; llat reeeiv. are.
wen message from in; 'hat he only Il, clirel admit
"ng Tie bearer, because he ia aci busy TO see
any body, ard returned u kind a.sw er 10 Mr. !,
.uirus beg that he may be allow ed instances The
call oil one OF his best friends who was refused aIriso
on me sam" day. aud would have lett The ci milhou.
asing leave had no Iii. intimacy him 10 &c
his way 10 the President
s. AS I" Mr. Ranlolph'S imputed reserve on the sub
Ject oil the Proclamation, call upon The same Andrew
Jackson Equire. 10 examine among his papers for letter
bearing date March 1888, setting forth tie Jews of tho
winter concerning the Force Bill and Poclama,ion 40.
prising hia Of Mr.. RSndolps approb of those vic
anu Informing him that the aforesaid letter WAS write,
WIN his concurrence call for tho pubca alton OF that
'e"er' onoing only name, which neither the PreNden
nor The friends oil Mr. Randolph have any light TO use
mean ,ne name OF that iend OF the President, who
charged himself with the delivery Of that letter. and in so
doing expressly gave il his saucton.
"nen these things are seen and heard make doubt
mat Mr. Hamilton will be acquitted of fasehood Mr.
Randolph OF dupciiy and the President OF insoIence in
gratitude and basencss The court may then adiourn In
hold It's next citing at the close the regular court of
oyer and frminer, where according Esop, the Wolf
against Sheep.
In reply to the above, we subioin the following
unquahed contradiction from the Globe. And here,
TOR the present, we leave the facts of the case:
" An anonymous correspondent OF the Editor of the
Richmond Whig endcavors make the impression that
me PRESIDENT was aware OF the fact, that Mr. John RAN
nopn was accessory to the violent invecve which was
published III The Telegraph against him, tile anony-
nous signature Of N Friend 10 andre,c Jackson Esq
when he invited Mr.. r. TO the Inequalities of his
10 the statement which find copied i'm Yesterday. le
iesaph We give direct and fiat contradiction. The let
ter alluded to by the Wings correspondents was
heard oil by The President until alter the dinner given by
nm 10 Mr. Randolph. The President would, doubtless
have given both Mr. Randolph and his escort a very dit
ieren reception from the hospabe and kind one which
was obtained by Mr. X. long. cherished friend, if he
had supposed him capable of the hypocrisy of writing the
shdesi ana most lalerng letters TO him privately, while
ne gave his concurrence and opprouar 10 the ma
hgnant publications against him in the Sspapers."
we beg leave to add single remark of our own.
Governor Hamilton is here called upon by one who
declares himself to have been i'm the confidence of
Mr. H. during his lifetime, to come out with Mr. r.
letter. We again beg him to pause before he follows
the advice MIR. Hamilton will probably be disposed
10 receive any suggestion, which may come from us
on Tins subject, with many grains of allowance
10 listen TO the invitation of Mr. RS avowed friend
WIN much more readiness than any warning we
may give him. But cannot forbear rcpeating
what we uttered in our paper of the Goth ult: L" As
for Governor Hanton's threatened publication of
MIR. KS ercoiating Letter, it is hoped and believed
that he has forever abandoned all such intention
Let him take care y,ceU aduised he toU nerer make
Me publication. Too much has been already pub
lished from Mr.. RS pen, by friends or enemies
ana 1t Is trusted that this letter least will never see
The light a war OF retaliation may be carried on
winch none OF the friends to Mr.. RS memory nol
any OF his enemies would wish to see waged against
the dead.-ReQuescat an pacen'