Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1833-01-21
laws will be adjusted so AZ to DO satisfactory Il

was distinctly we'd IN tn resolution, but II Ia
been inferred from the passage IN wnch the pfhei
pie IA oombaucd, thaln citizen ola seeded stat
WA guilty of trrnson IN rendering auogiance 10 nj
SUITE Government. This, 1t was thought, NIGH
| seem Ia invite South Carolina to persist IA her de
sign of secession. lie thought this aWendmen
would obv,afc tho Objection
On motion Of Mr. Wallace. the ayes and noe
were ordered OH the question: which beng put th'
vote was
AgesLMcasrs. Banks lspeaher,) Riley, Cole
burn G,lmor, Randolph, pefirger, bool'er, camnf
Stunt. M'Cuc Mayse, Pate. Fausucr ilrn5h,w
Miller, Wilson of Bot. campbell, Gholson, PA;
teson of Buck, Yancey, M'Comtt, ncaiinr
Chenham D,ckcrson Roane of G.. CiY n
" Kent, ,ichprdaon, palleson al Chest, Pendia
ton, Thornton, IS isou Of cumb, Brolnnsl Int
chic Daniel, Marshall, Wallace, Stephenson of +
and Mob Payne, Helms. Hale Wooda, smith 81
Fred, Barton, Euilc, Emmons, Smdh OF oileu,
Watkins of Oooch, MCamant, AIdcrson SLOW
ard. Vance Sloane, Roane 81 lian Mullen, ton
klnchcoc, Williams, Gtayelyt GalInher beay
Fry, uhrwood, liooe, Gmterof Law. and Rteh
ilciskll, Hays, Lawson, Beaid lInriso Inf lof
polndexter, Roy, Smith of NJ, aud Jack hn1N
Henry, Wiley, Alexander, Charlton, Shcisaf3,
Webb, caboll, Murdnugh Collins, Harvey, An
derson, PARROT, Lcilor Da9e, Robe'ttnn, Adams
Hinet, Witohcr, wanson, Cneklcy, Nash, Bto"o
of Pres, Wn,lus, Of Prince Edward, Lows,
shends, Garter, OF =. Wm., Boothc,, M'powelil
Moore, Thompson, Griffin, Stevenson OF stott
Conway, Crump, Pegram, George MCoy, VI GU
Loeb, stnmsn, Maybety, stangor KING, Blown o.
Pet, aud IsuIherioold
Aots-Mossrs shell. Jones, Hricc, Sins, llolie-
,nan, Gregory, Dabney, sueci, Goode ana Dun
len#-4l0
Tn motion of M, Dadc the illh resolution wa
stricken out, providing lpf sending COMMISSION
to Soo h Carolina Mr. u Observed, 'hnt the ton
vcn,ion and Legislature nf ,hn' State both having
Adjourned, ,he ptovlIioa was unnecessary
Ar Canipboll moved To amend The - rcselo'ioni
by striking out from the following p"aSafe, 1hf
words IN tal,ea THAT they Il c, the atties u
our political eseedl were originally asserted, alie'
great elaboration, al an Interesting and memorable
epoch III our political history --ttot Meg h0oe az.
Nqae Aiig, on oaytnas ottasioas, 1cea fRbRafalg
1850 aLsa by ou General Assel5'y a. the sei.ie'
docl,ines mud opinions Of E1smi1," &c.
MI = SAID that az the resolution now STOOL, II
no, only made the House fe-naifm the resolutions
Of 9s, but all the subsequent rese iohs OF the a.
scmby Of Virginia. II would he rccollcc'Qd that
when this report wits first Introduced INTO the
Ifonso, II was followed by motion to print the fn-
pos, and resolutions OF '95 and 80 they being 10.
ic,red IN III this report, and assumed a. The doe
trnes ofVngiuia. But II was moi supposed That
oil the resolutions on this subject OF State Rishs
wete be included IN this GO assertion lie on'
nol supposed, for ina'nnee, 'hat iho'o VI ''s'
known nsthe G}'S rfsniaiions, were 10 DC aooi',eo
by tbia f,por, He presumed thcic We're eenoe'
insn & sent who had ~ knowledge OF those reso1
lnlions aud no would III voting to te-atfm them
DO heling in the dark. Mr t.read ono OF The .eisa
feso'uiions, winch declares the buion coh'eaa-
,aiion OF States, wlih 40 common arehcr' ana WIN
the power ofJudgine for Themselves oi INV 'ci'ona
&c. There were mahy gentlemen ho thought
who would be nnw'atg 10 f=ht'fn' '0h 'oDoip'ioh
although they would entirely agree ~ inc "o9i"les
Of -.
MI Aei'owol asked ~heihor, " "nohp N
othef resolutions adopted s'nee 70 WIS ''e,ae'
10 heiade those passed IN leo', "nfn ue0'',e' '''
supreme Court ol the y. - 10 DC lnH J'pEc" ~ gRe'
tons between the states ana Tic @I"erA' oo'e'h
ment
Mr. Watkins oil J.. T.. sad ne seh"oinun INN
brooke was nnas' ihishlpffhehS'On 10 W 'ie nv
meaning ofthc passage. II did not 'rier 10 any
resolutions but those OF '9s nc gentleman "pa
mol Justified by The language, IN Tie Interpretation
he lad pa, upon H. No resolutions bot those oil "a
were spoh>n of and II was deeiafeo ina. they hau
been automatically reltaaie9' INC I'in'l''.ee
say fhlY have carefully revised y t4eSe fe@ei"
aons = what resolutions those o. 70 ~ "a. ~
gunents HeH ndduced 10 sustain u''o " na'
arguments Why The repono W. because Inc
epoch IT cur history IS INDICATED w me "otaa
then Had the resolutions or nay SuD'e4uen
period been alluded to, Distinction "ou," n''
been made, and all the different pe"oa' at "h'e'
such resolutions had passed wou'. no. n'.e p's'
thus conioundod. II "he clear 70 mr, W. 'i"' '"'
resolutions OF '9S were atone feis1reo w.
Mr.. Campbell sad II Inc sen'icneh eo'S''us
ton was correct, he wondered d, ms opj'o''on -
strike out the passage re aah'''s 'nr' ''',' WIN
are mere s"rPtnS"ge, II nc coHienoS VI"' '"o 'eso
Iations oil 10 atone arc feietfch 70, ""' "'''' W "
re affirmed hediiiefed nom we se"1'o'"''' ~" IN
L. E IN the construction Oh ug ''"o""sg "a
any gentleman couin suppose ,'s ,USV, - -