Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1833-10-25

eiees 10 his country should they Be caiedor by distinct
seiee irons me country Mr.. Clay has yielded much to
the opinions OF those he valued to friends deserving his
confidence The enthusiasm Of these. there is
apprehend has pressed him Pyemdtuely into the edncass
for me PRESIDENCY. to which, in due season, he most,
probably would have attained without effort They ought
to be exceedingly crcumspect how they urge him into
another canvass-is fame be increased BY sue
tempt"
The Italics are our own--the expressions are Mr.
Hammond's. We are here distinctly informed, that
Mr. Clay's visit is not much To brother in
law i'm Philadelphia or son i'm Boston, but TO con-
fer with the manufacturers, and ascertain ,chaf Is
best for their great aerest the present moment"
He will derofe himself at the the pro-
motion Of this interest to the great question of the
public lands, and last hut not least to the support of
the Bank interest Hereafter he will hot refuse his
services to- his country, at the call o. those persons
to whose interests lac has dedicated his exertions-
This is the plot of the drama-und its catastrophe is
left to the people,
GARRISON Home!
This miserable Fanatic, who has disguised every
enlightened American by the abuse which he la
vished ut London, upon large portion of his coun-
irynen, has been again defeated. In a meeting
called at Boston for the purpose ef organizing an
AnSlavery Society, he could ntfster only five re-
craits. Thanks to the discretion of her citizens.
The reader will recOect another project of these
ianaticaI agitatOrs-the proposition to emancipate
the slaves of the District, through the agency of
Congress One OF the great authors Of this scheme
-
become still more distinguished by the pk,n he is
said TO bave preached up of ntermarriages with the
Blacks. The fact was denied by of his friends;
but letter of his addressed to the Editor of the
Brooklyn Advertiser, hus leaked out which shows
him to he an equivOeater, we'll n Fanatic. The
letter was in reply to- certain interrOgatories that
were propomacd Ivy the Editor-and it wus written
me day before the refined and reverend gentleman
delivered his address in Providence. We make the
following extract--aRd then leave the Public to
Judge of the taste and principles and the Enancipa-
ton Projet of its author:
bot to answer your question enpIieiiy T,coud say
tchife man sincerely I0Ues a c0iOred on a
rhife coman sincerely ores coiored man. and me
tachmem is recprocated, although should not aduse
them TO DC married ,che the public sentiment is such
hdt they might De rendered gerry uncomfortable they
,oere to md'ry-yet am sure Ikno,r Of nothing-and
challenge yoa and the friends ,cho suggested the ques
0n, TO sh0tc me any thing in the revealed ciH of our
Heavenly Fdfher-or TO gue any better than
prejudice against compierion uhy ii ,Doud be mpro.
per Jor such persons to be married, II they chose"
"A 3d Branch of this concern, is female-Miss
Crandall of Connecticut
Her defence crested OIL the ground the statute ~ az
IN cohraveniion OF that portion Of the Constitutions of the
United States, which gives citizens of each State all
the privileges and nmuntes Of citizens in the several
Sta In the Brooklyn Advertiser OF the lOih Gays the
N. Y. Commercially find sketch Of the charge de-
Ivered by Chief Justice Dagget to the Jury, in which
declares, that it, slaves free blacks Indians were c
zens, he is not that the law would be
al; but expresses his opinion with the emphasis
that they not citizens, and of course entitled
TO the benefit OF this provision In the frs,
pace he quotes the description OF citizen OF the United
Staes, given by Dr. Webster, person,
turazed, who has the privilege Of exercising the elective
franchise aud OF purchasing and holding real He
proceeds shew that Indians and slaves citizens
and then to the conclusion in regard to free
blacks The argument appears rest upon the authority
oil Chancellor Kent who declares that there brood
junction in most OF the Sates in respect political prv
leges, between tree white and free colored persons and
the fact that when the Constitution of the United
was adopted, every State, except Massachusetts, tolerated
slavery We perceive eference any legislation Of
Connecticut on the subject Of these persons"
we pass over for the present the work Of Mrs.
Ch'tds, who must excuse for saying, she is med
ding with subjects she does not Understandable,
the last No. of the Boston "Coonizationist' which
seems to approve her work-and also, the abours of
Arthur Tappan, who is contriving, as rapidly as any
man can, TO render himself ridiculous in the North
MS he is odious in the South. We wish him Joy of
the ianatica associates lie has selected his com
panions.