Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1833-07-25
T. w GllaiIE Esq

= w hitfshi IA 'fa1
Cb4ita1irsr,He 3G1h JRne, 1888.
Ny DeR SIN | have just received yours OF
the 9Th am clad thai YOU have been thus ifonh
II disclosing he grounds on Which II seems your
suspicious with roEntl 10 mo have been nnd ioi
ausht which appears IN your letter. sli'l ,nay be
toundcd--l supposed thai bad afisht 10 expect II
dlercn, answer from yon and ilia, niior YOU were
satisfied Of The injustice done me III relation TO ihe
communication ior tho Enquirer, You would have
made some ntoncmcut fot the pam ! 50 naturally
felt under sub ,mpaiatlon y ua are content
however 10 say, lint you arc glad TO ieatl'
that am moi so base as the lmpntation n true,
would have mac me IL addition 10 tins you al
ude to other circumstances winch you seem 10
think justify yout suspicious OF me. You mistake
our POS o very much, fYou suppose TINT am
eadeayoring 10 acquit mY scliofth unworthy Il DIS
ho b, eours hlch la cen ts1i c Tome. T. =
fnnc1 on IN slucntoa, that his wa a tnsN which
could not eondcsccnd 10 undertake You hpse al
edgcd the suspic tou that wrote the cumnlnlcp.
ton for the Enquirer, as calculated to create your
dstrust Of me, and though you have ample proof
that another person wrote that commune alton,
without my knowledge, you do not oef any apoi-
osy Ia my feelings for The injustice You Ind done
Sir you carrot be unaware, tint lie itfs sus.
peon OF This sort, after he prominent and oesided
part which had taken before the public N htr
election to the Senate, was an Insult Must hase
been the yefieat hypeeale and disscmoie', # /
could have written snch cumn.nn ealiuu IA you
describe tins to have been, aud lheh ollor oui sub
sequen. correspondence hayo nominated u even
voted fo, yo1 10 the 'scntlc What then, Vas the
course which friendship 81 Caudour dictated, @ieu
the suspicion was first bIeathtd 70 you prno~,
when you are satisfied that 1t was utterly ground
& l., u Al
you and yonr secret uielln.ul had dune me mus
tier, and making some rsPuIaion for II. by admit
ting IT, you, labou, lu long ieter to yndieaic
Yourself AM your susf4sious and TO eliminate INT.
| will not repeat IT, for the ihitd time H. yoa--
wall not DEGRADE myself by answering 10 IN az
cusaticnNs iieh implies 50 much tarPAuau. WISH
YOU however, # you lhinh that nothing t. eue 10
on unccut friendship, to do ne die justice as "a
nun which haven tishl to ekPtet | would IL
you how il was possible, iJr you 10 feel the aent
ments Of warns and apparently enthusiastic ltlehd-
ship for me, which Your letters ul subsequent
date sn,ak, If you really entertained the suspicion,
Of winch yo1 now complain. have turned 10 out
correspondence a.d traced this continued assurance
Of your entire aud con-. iiieud,hip down almost
to the period when yoa iirsl minated that utisvor
nble imp ess ions had beea long making on lonr
mind towards me. leave you to reconcile the cx-
preston OIL 3Nth lctllngS3 WIN SUCH sgNi,ClpHb
You remember thai during our inlcrvlew ~
Stanton, after you declined TO give Int the ndn>r
of the busy bodies whose letters ana conmuniea
tons you referred to, or the facts communicated,
inquired whether the evidences ofniy un'flendy
spiri, were discovered before after your Vote of
wha, has been famiIiarly termed the q Force Bill
You have now quoted from the letter 81 some
one who you say was ii member OF the last Lego
ture, an expression, putting You on your gna1d
ainst me as being " acttUeig 0PPosc@ u Poh bb IN
oifcct u.ea1ls.p | should have been gra'hedit you
had been more communicative with regard .oih's
letter, ard the wiiler--I si.Qpd like to Know @he~
thcr it was written before OF after you, unexpected
course on the rnrce Bill AID Proclamation. i.si
some curiosity too. Though certainly that Is no
concern of mine) to k,?e TO whose good Offices we
are indebted for its having been wrl,ten--teflatn-
w. you have not to learn for TIC hrst time, that !
have always both as constituent sud mend con
lctnned your recent course IA the Senatc OF the U
niiod States. have made no secret OF this Tn
the contrary, believe have spoken with mofr
freed IN On this subject 10 yoI than | have ever
done TO others. Eat regarded his as political,
certainly not az II yer.ana2 difference. | Lutte
thought tina, beca1se coai ..c conse.eaI.oasiy OF