Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1833-01-17

The vote Mr.. Roane's amendment was as follows:
.4yss-Sic.srs Banks (Speaker) Riley, Coeburn Gil
nor, tandoph, Booker, Camm, Ghoson. She'll Pattcson
oil Is, fancey bearing, Cheatham DickerSon Roane of
Charles City and New Kent Richardson, Patteson of C.
tendeton, Thornton Wilson ofC., Brodnax, Jones' Rit-
ehe, Daniel Payne, Hale, Smith of F. Earle Smith of
Gloucester, Stewart of GreenSvillc Bruce Sims Roane
oil H., Williams, Gravely, Holleman Gregory HARDWOOD
tiooc, Dabney, PoindeXtcr, Street Row Goojc Knox
Charlton, Webb, Murdaugh, Collins Dunton. Harvey
Anderson, Dadc, Hincr, Witchcr, Swanson Nash wat.
kins OF p E. Lewis Shands, Carter of r. Cline Bare
Newman, Thompson, Griffin, Stevenson of s. Conway
Crump, Pegrani, Brown of Petbg and Ruthcrfoord-73
Noes-Messrs Persinger, Stuart of Augusta M'Cue
Mayse Pate, Faulkner, Hen~haw Miller Wilson of Bot,
Campbell, NJ Comas Marshall WALLACE Stephenson OF
F. and = Helms, Woods, Barton, Emnons Watkins of
Gooch, MCamant, Anderson, Vance, Sloane, Mullen,
Coll hincheoe Gallaher. Berry, Fry Carter of L. aud
r., lIeskill. Hays, Lawson, Beard, Harrison TAYLOR
Smith OF NJ. and j., Henry Wiley Alexander SherTard
Cabell, Parriott, LETTER Robertson Adams C,ckIev
Brown OF Pres. Boothe, M'Dowol Moore, NJ Mahon
lacarlane NrMullen, George, M'Culloch. Mayberv
Stanger and king-59
The vote Mr.. Marslals substitute NJ amcr,eJ
as follows;
.ayes-AIessr:. Randolph, Richie, WALLACE, Watkins
otG., Roane OF H. LETTER, and Bare-7
N0eS-Messrs. Banks, (Speaker) Riley Coeburn Gil
mer, Per>inger, Booker, Camm, Stuart of A. M'Cup
Mayse Pate Faulkner, Henshaw Miller Wilson of b.
Campbell, Gholson Shell, Patcson of b. Yanccv N,ro
mas, Dearing, Cheaham, Dickerson Roane of Charles
City and New Kent, Richardson Pa,teson Of
Pendeton, Thornton, Wilson OF c., Brodnax Jones' Da-
MEL Marshall, Stephenson of Faysue aud Nicholas
Payne. Helms, Hale Woods Smith of Frederick Bar
tom Earle, Emrnons, Smith of Gloucester, M'Camant
ANDERSON, Stewart OF Grcensville Bruce, sims
sloane, Mullen, Kincheloe, Williams, Gravely HOLE.
man, Gregory, Gallahcr, Berry, Fry. Harwood, Hooe
DAbney, Carter of l.. & r., Hciskin, Hays Lawson
Beard, HARRISON Taylor Poindcx,er Street Row Goo IT,
Knox, Henry, Wiley, Alexander, Charlton, SherrarI
Webb Cabell, Murldugh, Collins Dmon Harvey An
derson, Parriot, Dade, Robertson adams Uin.r WI,
cher swanson, Cackey, Nash, Brown of Preston Wat.
kins OF p f., Lewis, Stands, Carter of r. W Boo,Ie
MDowcll, Moore, M'Mahon, Cline, Macarlane M'Mul.
len Newman, Thompson Griffin, Stevenson of s. Con-
way, Crump' Pegram, George, MCulloch, Sturrnan.
Mayhery, Ssnger, King Brown of Petersburg and Ru,
thertooTd-l23.
The amendment to the 9TH resolution adopted ON motion
OF MIR Gmer was the following, come in at the close
OF the resolutions: '''
That would be understood hereby as alvi.i,g
or inmating to our countrymen of South Carolina that
any just cause has occurred which can or ought TO in
duce them to adopt any measures watevor, which may
ehdanger the peace or permaneucy OF our happy Union:
hut on the contrary, we feel bound express our conf
ueht 1hucpanon' oil an entire and speedy adjustment of
all sub.lStlng controversies between the Stiies and tho
reuerIl Government, aud the restoration OF harmony
throughout our country and confidence in its institutions
DEBATE CONTINUED.
On mr. Campbes motion TO strike out of the 81 reso.
'iuuon these words that they hare subseq,,enfIy ON ra
TiouS occasions, been substantially reterdted''
MIR Goode concurred in the remark OF the gentleman
from T. Edward, that these words not in themselves
ol great importance hat gentleman had also correctly
stated that theypny affirmed what was historically trc
and that they referred to the resolutions of gs alone
but Mr. u would ask If the gentlemen from Brooke
would have moved TO strike them out had they alluded to
subsequent resolutions onlyi 1t was Mr.. G's opinion
that had the House proposed rn IN nj
1902 the gentleman from Brooke would NOT haze roIn
the motion. Mr. c. believed that gentleman referred N
the resolutions in which the Tariff laws were declared 10
be oppressive and unconstitutional, and that was IN Oh
obtain an indirect vote against those resolutions that This
motion was made. He would ask whether gentlemen
VINO were opposed to the Tariff policy prepared to
give vote contradictory OF the principles which had
heretofore been afrmed' 1t could not nationally he sun
posed that the language Of the resolution referred to all
the resolutions passed by the General Assembly since 9
II was plain it alluded to those and those ony He ask
cd The ayes and noes on the question.
Mr. Campbell said he perceived that the gentleman
M I'm
recily, and by deceptive obtain vote of the
House which should contradict the former declarations of
me General Assembly that the Tariff is Unconstitutional
But MIR. c. would tell the gentleman that when he en-
deavored TO carry object il was by fair and direct
means-opehy ana IN day light The accusation was not
sustained because te very next resolution in the report
OF the select committee declares the Tariff laws 10 he nm
conshutionai-and MIR. &. had not moved 10 amend IT,
Ills motion had been made from the best moiives-to pre
vent the Legislature from acting inconssenv He had
made 1t because, if the resolutions Of 80 were re-afrn
ed, they would Justify South Carolina in a she Ioi |
tie d not wish to affirm those resolutions and at the
same time denounce notification, which was justified by
them: lie believed that Virginia had to answer for the
doctrine al NuIihcation. Let then have the magma.
nimity TO say that she has been wrong Sucb VIE h,
views in making his motion.
Mr. Goo'e said that the gentleman would have another
opportunity TO the resolution which declares tb
Tariff UNCONSTITUTIONAL that his present forbearancc was
no proof OF his real Intentions He presumed the gentle
man dd not Hienl to vote for any OF the resolutions and
therefore, that he would be willing TO strike out all hose
parts which sustain the tulionaiv of the T,rn
Tie had stated his o cct to be cause Virginia TO refuse
"l'Ioh o hef Ioincr principles in regard the
arm he gentleman seemed very anxiously TO desire
That virginia should contradict herself on that subject
VS. not do this question like the present Let il como
ldily before us, and he thoroughly discussed MIR q
conceived That the object OF the gentleman from Brooke
was INDUCE me House TO repudatc the principles of our
ioreiahers Mr. q. prepared TO do this and he
was ready to sustain the opinions expressed in the reso
lions of 20 " ~ "
Mr. Bronax said that this motion was founded on , mis-
apprehension. lie would give an answer TO The question
proposed by The gentleman from Rockbrdge. II The re-
solutions OF 1909 do affirm the PRINCIPLES of 9S tbe
ihey are included IN the scope OF the language The
he proposed TO be stricken not exactly construed
Oy me gentleman from p. Edw ard. II was moi intended
10 uorse all the opinions OF the Legislature; but TO state
naked Tact oil the affirmation OF those very princi
plies OF IS, ard no other Mr. b. presumed the geilnn,a
from brooke had too much frankness saw TO the House
mat the resolution amended he would vote for II
ne words were not OF very themselves
out IeiaVely, they were important. They were there
ana IL they were stricken ont would shew that we were
whg 10 contradict the acts and principles of VIRGINIA
LOT nan century lie did not intend TO discuss the
subject OF State tght 1t was evident they were in had
odour The order had gone forth from bg authotv Co..
thelr extinction The time when different feclno
existed The Proclamation was hailed a few weeks 40
as inc commencement of the mileniun-and This motion
was Dut one 5teP IN carrying Quits principles The zen
uea nom BROOKE had frankly told the House his obiect
III making the notonand this debate would 90 firth
10 ue world those who friendly to the doctrines of
virginia ought TO sustain the reference i'm the resolution
TO The periods at which they had been affirmed
Mr. Moore should not for himself have made the mo-
uon; but the remarks which had been made ,vouId IN
"ce MN TO vote for it. lie presumed that those who votc
Or tnese resolutions were expected speak the TRUTH:
nc resolution says " have carefully revised tbesc
several resolutions Now, he had not carefully revised
all the resolutions alluded to- and therefore if he voted
N lie nlf, a