Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1833-04-09

all classes la Ireland. OleOr. heor) The Learned Gen.
eah says that all will be weifwe give them agitation
ian ne say that There has been none already! Can
ne lay ms hand his heart aud truly say that he has
gwen no advice which has led ignorant people be yond the
limits OF the law? And are 10 suffer them still to be
misled into the commission OF these ourapes when il
on those who are thus deceived, and NOT on ,hose
who deceive them, that the heaviest consequences Of
these disorders always fall When Magistrates were
heu up as objects ot dislike, and the police of every
annoyance, provided il legal. "a laugh When
resistance TO hthes encouraged, provided il did
not violate the letter OF the law, and ten or twenty
thousand men directed TO assemble TO protect ti,h
SdIe-that the sale might be no sale-(A lauplO-was
II surprising That the Hon. Genteman's eNhorlaIions
sometimes failed OF effect and that his victims some,;
ApH'ed with their blood the consequences OF his advice.
II was no, extraordinary that they should
he limits OF the law, when distinguished lawyers were
found TO have been mistaken in their views of IT, "A
m"Sii) The Hon. Gentlemen opposite under his on -
nahd aud Signature pedgng also his proie ssiona epna
uon 10 'he soundness oi ms opinonhad declared that
euer 'ehulhg TO excite n combination against law was
NOT a reasonable violation vi any law. Within ,h,ce
weeks, gentleman, himself member of the Bar unter
very statute rejected as quite inapplicabe in those
"hieh received some praise from the Learned Gentle
man last session, because had introduced an amendment
lo'it-'he WmebOy Act. The Gentleman had The adj
Ndh"ge OF the Honorable Members talents and what
was the advice he got from him To plead guilty 10
every count OF the indicment.-w ould he deny il T!
VauShter and hear, hear, from Mr. OC dom deny il
i admit ~ THE Hon. Gent here combatted Mr. orc "a
statement relative TO the Jury system to the charge
"gainst government, OF not appointing liberal Catholics
10 ohce by reference lacis which disproyed his as
SERMONS iullyJ That great law authority was leceved
anu MS letter aud conduct utterly variance
" Conne denied the statement TO the letter rhe
honorable Gentleman denies the letter; but believe
could produce 1t at this moment. CA laugh1 The Hon
uen'leman had charged the English Government with
systematic misconduct towards Ireland For this burmese
he had gone very far, indeed; he had ascende, "a, bs
uihes OF Elizabeth; and endeavorcd TO show ,ha, ,o
saxon government OF those days the a. the pre-
sent. lie had gone back, not only needessIv but ns
vousy, and had length alluded to America a If Il
vou,u oe parallel case to that OF Ireland. OF what let
me ask hn' did America complain: Does he understand
Tue question he has alluded TO: The Americans compoin
ed oil being taxed without having a voice in The Irrisl,
uie mat imposed the taxoi beng thus deprived Of tho
distinctive right and privilege Englishmen: and il
IN such this that they made the las, apne,I g.,
physical power. (Hear, hear) Will the Hon. Gentle.
man say mat this parallel the condition OF Irelandi
grant might have been before 1TS2-t might have
bSeh so when the Pvy Council of England Centralized ne
IL chose the bills OF the Irish Parliamen-it nigb
"eeh 20 "hen tho Crown assumed the right of dis
posing oil INC surplus revenue without rendering any
a''o'nt to the Representatives of the people; bui say
that there exists no parallel whatever bciween ,Lo
"o cases, when Ireland possesses her fair share in tho
Imperial Legislature, aud is heard with as much ia
.or as Y yorkshire or Scotland. CHEERS chcersN-
rs "e non. uentIeman has not touched Repeal,
VIII not go into that question row. NV object j. r., TO-
IY'e ms charges against the Government; though the
Kings Speech had already reuted the most NJ
he or how could 1t, in the face of that Speech be as
serted That Ministers really intended nothing ON the sub
Ject OF the Irish Church The amount of Iithes in The
lace OF the House, the Hon Gentleman had asserIoJ
"u 'enured 10 assert-wds one-tenth of the total pro-
uuce' NOW, every person who examined the evidence
brought forward the subject knew that so far rom
peinS what the Hon. Gentleman had asserted il was moi
even one-tenh OF the The fairness of Ministers
Intentions and their anxiety TO deal in due time with so
Important question, might have been concluded from
We motion (oI which nouce had been given) upon the
STATE OF ne irish Church, its revenues and their dstrbu
uon Clear, hear.) Upon the motion with which ,I
Hon Gentleman concluded shall touch as little as he
hnseli did, 1t was, presume, merely intended as We
hcie or certain Charges which have sought TO answer
and will conclude by declaring that we must ,Lo 100
respected and Government feared, before is beloved in
Ireland; and that Parliament is bound to invest oyern
hen' WIN nose means OF coercion which absolutely