Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1833-05-03

nc oe' and land west OF the Mississippi for To-
eeuon. In Georgia we apprsed Of the motives which
nave led the Cherokee chiefs TO work on the minds Of the
tribe aud induce them to withhold until the nressn, d.;
her consent Tor aremoval from the territory thew nov o
anu IN Georgia we should just as well the
motives oil the same chiefs which lead them IN ge, Ton
tue governments round for the territory: for IN
sion Is made under such terms, the disbursement of M.
shaded H., @ on we ehieis who no doubt, per-
uaueu mat no better speculation could he b
hem than the management OF a few millions Of o,,,'
ana Tor which they would spulae be accountable only
With regard to the supposed agency of NJ, VII, +,
ang part OF The enforcing bill, il is nothing les, than
a e coinage Of some malignant brain Mr. Webster was
OF 'he committee which reported the Judiciary bill and 40
was Mr. Frelnghuysen, the notorious advocate of he
onerokees and recently their earnest adviser 10 m,L
erns immediately with the general government az he
oeheved their continuance where they now are ,,nJ -
Injurious TO them and TO the United States No ono
oug' OF the Cherokee question when the bill was he
oe congress- and II not in any of its provisions in anv
way more important regards the Cherokees than ny
provisions existing laws The passage of the bill had
CO., III s enec. upon The Cherokee chiefs. the prn-
after that bill passed. ~ "e'e heiu
Snee writing the above we received the Georgian from
winch we extract the following remarks Tbey s,nn,
the statements we have made il additional @
needed to establish their correctness We Womb mo-,
no, 70 speak manner positive, if were
no' warranted oy the sources OF information from which
we have derived the particulars stated above. ''"
N, From the Savannah Georgian1
"c arc al loss 10 conceive how some Editors from,
whom better things expected can persis, in ,h %
cuous story that Mr.. Writ drafted any part of ,h d.
venue Collection Bill The Georgia Journal has twice
uttered me charge, on authority which the Editors saw
cy implicitly rely Ii is in itself so utterly absuJ
una, an opponent OF the administration should have been
cared upon TO aid in an administration measure bv he
s consulted In relation TO the bill, that in order 10 be-
M II; we must hrst believe that General jackson and
Lis s oao,het nave lost their senses. We have before
Ma from the decision the Supreme Court itself
e f section is not nor cannot be applicable to anv con-
Woversy with the Indians. We now wish TO nail 10 m.
counter me ridiculous report Mr. Wr,s acsn
cy IN me bi as sheer fabrication! NE ossr,f o ~.
n'ost induotdoie authority that Mr. w1nr had n.;th,r
art mar part in the measure IL was an aa;; .ea.e'
measure entirely IL is moreover entirely untrue. that
any part oil was designed with view to future con,o
versy with The Indians Every Georgian knows that ,ha
best Efforts OF Andrew Jackson and his Cabinet he
1eVoedto an early and ancable settlement of the Indian
Suesuon tiow ridiculous 10 suppose that the aLminis
uaion would deliberately undo hat had been accom-
pushed al Tue expense OF much time and trouble ON
her part The contingency OF any controv ersy win the
Indians was well weighed aud was clearly foeseen h,
IN no possible way could the bill affect that question.