The Arkansas advocate., 1833-07-24

gau .aar Judge fuiton aIliYeu 'h1,o o. =.
 aYs c ali'' eevier tells the public that all this But Opl. . s .be city, and was before the Pre- grlFea a' j 'l. senate. before the 12th Decem. sideIl 'la 'ld date of the commission, and hae bsf' us uSs.'nined mi by those branches of the been es.s ,sani before the nomination passed s0Velll,,Ds. ,. st;te flourish on this subject tle alaaog .'er.tes the fact in various forms, aad s 5sl'sag Senate had the subjeetfully before ssal sss before a the reappointnaent was concur fsia U' sad very wittily taunts me with the sd l' 'Snrefering @n charges against the whole ; : sasate Iaea ', II so happens that have now ' sel.s.s sss me testimony on this point, which i ssgls 7 lsssared that no man, not blinded by tel sao aso feeling, or laboring under mental PlIu4s n.il;,g will or can dispute or doubt. itis llDsss sonrce entirely removed from all the ion aoaal a feelings and local settlements, slsgr yow disturb our community. It the 'aI aarty aS of all individual, alike distinguish '14a Gr tbe high offices he has filled, and b;gh integrity and moral worth; 1t Is the ,tar;tv 'a of member of the Senate of the
 as .oa States last winter. It IS letter sss,' ~, tbe Hon. GABRIEL MooRE, late Gov l,"a, lg, ' of Alabama, to friend in this place, l.tsJ as Washington City, December 18th, ,5,Se ssa9 [ will submit the following extract:
 ats relates to the charges exhibited a. ,..;ast Judge Johnson, l have to inform .,saa @ fine nomination of that gentleman was 1oat;rned BEFORE THE CHARGES MERE RECEIVED: whether the no- mnation or the confirmation, or both, |vsrs precipitated in anticipation of the Iebarces, 1 know not; but 1t is now con l.dered that the subject Is removed entire- slg from the reach of the Senate"
 ] Iftbis is not, by an intelligent and impar- kapublic, thought sufficient to convict A..
 seyier of gross misrepresentation and E,lsehood, pledge myself to produce re- (pectable witnesses, in this town, by whom, hi the records or files at Washington, to Ebow the falsity of his statements. This after was written shortly after the renomi- IaiOp was made, and before there was any Er0otfoyersy in relation to the facts t con- zans. The letter will be shown to those Eao may wish to see 1t at this office. 1t 6llY sustains my statements in relation to |[le testimony against Judge Johnson, that was not forwarded until the fifth or tenth E December, and goes further, and states Enteven the charges had not been received the Senate, when the nomination passed. Il is remarkable, that although l made the atements in relation to Johnson's renomi- kahon in March last, Sevier should have kated to give his denial of them until last Saturday. Did he think that his word was [topotent as to be able to gain credit against tnh testimony as the above, or did he ! fink to get his handbiils in fuil circulation, sith all the falsehoods they contain, just be- *ffe the election, so that no explanation or Contradiction could be given to the public. Did he think to gratify his spleen and ma- kyolence towards me, by this puerile and 2egraded effort to injure my election in this Bounty! He must think strangely of the ReoPle of the county, if he supposes they ZzEould vote simply to gratify his wishes, or Dis hatred. He will find them independent hen, doing as they please on the day of the Election, and entirely regardless of the Clustering and threats of himself or friends. hey are feemen, know right and pursue TT.
 As MT. Sevier has brought his veracity 2. n question by assailing me, and contra plcted what have stated to the public, l pust beg his pardon for referring to the fol- : sowng statement, containedi in his speech pl l4tf January last, in defence of John sOn, which, with an abstract from the re- Pords Of Pulaski Circuit Court, may afford some additional illustration of his true fnafacter for veracity. He says in his Peech-"l Twas Dunlop's lawyer, and moy- F0 10 quash one of the counts in the indiet- plen' on the ground, &c. Ny motion WAS fVsTAlNEp, and the prosecuting attorney falered aOlle prosequ," &c.
 Here IS an abstract from the record of Has same case as follows:
 Abstract Of the Dill oi r, ss Indictment found by the To@ ss Dunlop. } Grand Jury, al the June .;a s'Ia oi the Pulaski Circuit Court, i630. se Dill of indictment contains two Yaals-one ;aasone charging said Dunlop with E,,snarsins Essans loaded pistol at John t'. apl' arP' wl'h intent then and there to feloni m, wilfally, and of his malice afore- sasn'' toklIi and murder-and the other mn1 saa' Hilh assaultiog, beating, bruising, ,ll ssulhg' and lll-treating the sad Sapp, aaa Wnlch 1gne took place on the I4th day oi g.s ,,t,.I Term, 1880, June l7th.
 sy. Indictment for shooting V'se Dunlop. with intent to kill.
 sioras.i.o aa nov oh this day came the plaintiff Baid dsa, dsse,1 oy their attorney, as well as the aad ,b. ,Ibs'enaant a in his.own proper person }hs r+e eoa.. uefendant by his attorney, moves bress;a a'. 10 quash the first count in the a. kearia, iauictment, and the Court after Dot hsss, s"e argument of the counsel and nl..