Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1833-09-17

F""VS uHy s0Tt OF 1HtcTtSt. tbs p0pcr DrO-
iesses to quote half a dozen lines of the above text
holy horror:
Nov, fellow, citizens, you who love the Union. you
" !" nu'ihcsuon with horror, what will YOU cav
to the declarations Of the Richmond Enon;rerI 1h,s Ia,
'eau'ng Jackson paper, his Is the confederate Of the Albany
Argus, aud a convert to the surpassinp cIo;u. of Al.
Van Buren, to the Presidency! Can n he no.s;hi. ,h.,
any one can be longer deceived, by the proie ssions Of such
position Of the Richmond Enquirer looks like an Items,
quite as ar'ful and %perfidious, ~perfdious to the North, and
be - v" " 49, ne 49," +. por'en,Sss signs OF the times not
oil independence, our universal educ a,icn. our name. our
lame our laws and our constitution, If all can be made TO
y'e'd TO the expositions OF selfish politicians, who would
move heaven and earth to get office, and live by politics =.
ny a trader viii the people see through this ireschery to
their cause! Will they not kick down these little men
from me pedes'als, where they have crawled and planted
themselves, to the exclusion Of ADLER. better aud honester
"ens ~ they TO not. they are unfit TO be free"
IL ~ now our turn to appeal to the People
FRIENDS OF Truth! what think you of this ardul at
tempt to garble our sentiments, and thus grossly to
deceive you? What think you of this "suppressio
Ueri," Tor suppression of the truth,) which is held bv
most writer's to be as Infamous as the "suggestio 6alsiT,
Tor the suggestion Of a .Ealsehood.J "T6ese are the
strongest charges (says an author) which can be
made against u public orator or writer" The former
charge we now make against this .albanv DaiIv .ad-
oeH,ser. And Friends Of The Union! what think Won
OF Ibis base attempt to veil over the most dnnUerons
rock on which the Union might percl,ance be split
ano nolo up Inc humble Pilot, who would point it
out sincerely to You, as your most p~erfidious and
treacherous foe? That "false glozinng parasiten ;s
not your friend, nor Gun he be a true friend of this
blessed Union. But enough of this brace of ca
lumniators!
II is with some regret that we have TO ploce tho
Nationai Intelligencer in company with this misera-
bic brace of New York Editors. We do il from no
feelings OF political resentment or of personal dis
respect. with all the wars we have ever winged
with the Intelligencer, we have scarcely ever LOST s;ob,
OF that social good will, which we formerly cherish
ed SO cordially towards its Editors. None of the liz
We hns, which they have given us in this very at
tuck, OH which we RS n Nfpr IN 20. l.:.c - ~
tary, can sting us into l-humor with tbem-nt lens,
to-day. why then do we groupe the Intelligencer
VI the same article with the two New Workers.? Be
oause, we wish TO expose the misrepresentation
measurements will they call them?-which thew Lnve
put forth in their paper of the IIth. We excuse
them from the PiAory, but not from animadyers;on
and correction.
The !ntelligenccr touches up our articles ON tho
Bank of the u. States-witlo,It no,icing bowavn
ne structures we have made on a secret service
fund, expenditures, vouchers, &c. To this day
an ~ nahk presses, without exception, have slurred
over these charges. But what then does the Intel
lgencer say ? We shall touch each no;pt mi -
few words MS possible. """
AL. > 1 Gen'es 1t to be a matter of public record
R .n"t ~ rrcsldsnt had avowed his opposition to the
Bank before the N. Ham oslire scenes had occurred y
Inc ~. lnteligencer answers in the old law longnage
wa tet record. ("Learned Lingon indeed! every
word OF ~ And it calls for the record-It saws
," ,ne N; hampshire scenes had occurred before
NE PRESIDENTS pronunciation of the Bank. Very
diherent indeed is our own recollection-Does the
Intel'g,encer mean to say, they occurred before the
December Message of 1890 I?
"a. Ii thanks us for our "secyein obou, tho D.:
dents first declaration against the Bank heinz No,
nVored ny a single individual near him. but Mr.
van Buren"-and then silly attempts IN occonn, ,nor
nns 'act' Tor Inc vigorous war which the ALBANY
nesehcy have undertaken against that Institutionn
Nov, we point 20 the record of MIR. Van Rur.n,.
speech, IN the Senate, in the days of Mr.. Adams. to
SHOW mat ne was then against the Bank-nnd of
;s nm uouGraing 10 me logic of the Intelligencer, it
10 III SURPRISING his trtpndcn y An,,-
3D. The lntelligencer thinks, that we hive let o,t
the secret OF The nefarious plot"-in calling for the
repenhon OF the veto. Indeed! We claim no merit
Tor The honesty of our avowal or the corroc,no-a.r
our information. We only state whot w. hsTa"o ~
DC me lact, that the President will veto the Rank a
second tme-and what any man oftolerabJc discern
mem would have the wit to see, and the frankness
10 huhllt. The Constitution of the IT. G rem.;n. :,
1908, tie same, ms il was in IS32-the Pres;den, :.
ei""'y pohhd TO respect its provisions. If he could
v eonscientiousIy sign it in one year, how could il
ne expected, he would sign il i'm the next
f,h. But the lnfelligencer contends. thar General
JACKSON docs not deny that q Bank mav he con
st'uiionally established" But do not onr ,vor,hv
friends see, they entirely shift Tie question ? Tim,
are are' , "n mot use the right article in grammar? We
"e h'KihS not OF a Bank, but of the Bank-the
pa,ucuiar institution constituted as this is. The Pre-
s'oent III ms very first Message to Congress- does Ger
"'nIy deny It's constitntionality.
braca ~ ne ~ in.ehIgencer does not, it is true, en-
nrace IN It's long, ponderous article of the lI,b' nno.
.her thins that is worthy of notice-bui il throws :,
w a s,l'au seVeh-iine paragraph i'm the same paper
ms calls the attention of its readers n n 80.
n'cation of Jefferson" i'm the PbiladeInb;a ~"
uohhi banner"-ohds, in all probability the modern
oa.o Oh " the mercenary Swiss" politics. The In
'1H"gcncer p'ifs III ms a wonderful exhibition of econ.
elusive facts and unnnswerable argumentsn aoo;ns,
1ne exercise of the Teto Pouer in the case of ,hn
nahk. Now, we will offer only one snec;men nr H.
modern JeffersOn's facts and arguments. Ue 10 nv
c'screet enough we might call him iuD,,aentj m -
ier 10 Mr. Jefferson's opinions upon ,he Rat .na
especially to his Report to General Wosh;notnm
When he was Secretary of State.-He perver,s th;,
.ePor. ~ Inc TWO respects, which we noted in mr.
ieP,y 10 Caio some days ago-Bm the PhiIadelnb;a
writer, WINE he quotes one passag of the renor,
- "nlcn ne puts II into the readers power to see how
glossy ne mas n1Isrepresented that part of il. does
not Iite me other passage of the Report. CONCERN
."s 'e general use of the Veto power-but ,bis de
Ingenious writer 1.-THE modern Jefferson) makes Mr.
'elerson himself say, ain the sequel of the same n n
pei mat 'he negative of the President would onIv
Iu'"y pe applied to measures of Congress induced
ny pa'P"Die corruption for evil purposes Now
VIII u be believed, that Mr.. Jefferson expressly d.'
clares that " "e-
ne negative Of The Presihcn N; is The shield prov;J.s
NV u constitution, 10 protect against the inyasons m a..
]. The rights of the Executive: 2 of H..
1nnIcIary; a. OF The States and State legislatures Tbe
Qhe Bsnk) is the case Of n yjobt eno
,oifh me States, and is. eonssorenrt, n
der his protection u" P'aeed u-
d. we shan not say that the Intellieencer knew or
MS ,nlsrepresen tation-but he ought TO bave known
general inspection. WV o'"er u"y, i%