Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1833-05-28
SIGNS.-BANK OF rur u. SrArrs.

Inc advocates OF the Bank are beginning to hope
for its re-chartering. The remarks of Reprcsen-
tative OF Congress, who was lately in this city, and
has since sunk into the silent tomb, have been cir
culatcd with great avidity i'm the Bank papers-and
similar note has been sounded to the South-as
we learn from the following article in the last
"Charleston COURIER"
"a Sign.-The Columbia Times contains commune
cation ON "Banks, signed &C.. and probably from the
pen oil Er Cooper in which the re-charter OF the u S.
Bank is advocated, AS Infinitely TO he preferred monied
monopoly in ~ York, excep,ionabe national in.
s'ituon under the auspices OF Jackson aud Van Buren,
both which would certainly arise on the ruins OF
the present tcec0nductcd establishments The author
avows himself still OF the opinion, that the u s. Bank
in direct opposition to the Federal Constitution,
any thing preferable "o organized moned aristocracy
under the controlo OF Van Burens mammoth the federal
head" When Gen Jackson retoed the Bank Bill las,
summer, we were told by the Mercury that it
which would ''cover a multitude of sins" We now saw
that ii the Nufers will put their shoulders the wheel
IN good earnest, aud rccharer the o. s. Bank in spite OF
Cen jackson, we may possibly be induced almost to
grant them absoluon The following is the concluding
paragraph OF the article above alluded TO:
As things are therefore, il is better bear the ills
we nave, than fly TO others that know Otto
satisfied with an institution honestly and prudently con-
ducfed than TO PROSTATE il for substitute originating in
despousm and fraud, and which will be managed in the
same spirit in which il originated. There never was
question in which the permanent liberties of the country
were more decidedly more manifesty involved; or one
which Il behoves the people TO examine with sau
tary suspicion 10 talk oil opposing combination Of mo-
ney corporations which controu the loans of 900 mil
lions OF dollars, is downright folly You shall hear from
me again by-and-by, on this alI-important subject"
We differ toto cGlo with the Charleston Courier
on this whole subject We are aware, that NIessrs
McDuffe, and Calhoun, and some OF the other null
liners are prepared to put their shoulders to the
wheel-and with all their professions of attachment
to the Rights of the States, and the specified prov
sohs OIL limited Constitution will seek to char
ter the u. >. Bank. But shall give them no alb
solution" for this transgression. On the contrary il
VIII only Increase the aninosty of every true State
Rights man for the politics of those, who thus at
tempt to reconcile the grossest encroachments OF
the Constitution, with protested devotion to its let
ter and its principles.
But let the nullifiers and the federalists combine
their efforts, as they may the true friends of the
Constitution will stand fast their principles The,
VIII resist m Congress and out of Congress, the re-
newal of the Charter of the Bank They will Oh.
pose it, as contrary to the Constitution of their coun
ry--as direct departure from the old creed of the
Republican party-as injurious to our liberties from
the encroachment it involves, and the power it ex
erts. we know, that violent effort is to he mad,
at the next Congress to revive this expiring nstitu
ton. We are satisfied, from the Signs of the Times
that Clay and Calhoun the Tariffites and the Null
tlers, Webster and McDufiie, the Telegraph and tn,
lntegencer and the partiZans and subalterns of va
rious classes and denominations, will club their ya
rious efforts for its ressciation But the good me,
and the true in Congress will stand fast TO their al
and even If a majority of both Houses should b,
found faultering in the line of duty, we shall agar
rely upon the energy of Andrew Jackson for on,
rescue from the fangs of the monster.
| we know what sophistica arguments nre about tc
De employed on this occasion. We have seen it al
ready alluded to, in the South and i'm the NORTH
we shall he told again, have already beer
told, that we are to choose between gigantic New
York Van Buren, Bank, and the present Bank of ,h,
u: ,. But the reply is tls-we will choose neithe
oil them. They are both opposed to the Constitu
ton--both nimical TO the rights of the States ant
the liberties of the PeopIc--and we will not he dra
gooned into support of the one, by any panic re
presentations of the of the other Does
Martin Van Buren, advocate any such Bank?s 1t
incrcdibic that he should do So But if he does
he signs at once the deatli-warrant of his politica