Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1832-12-04

NHANr""t- I>. %ts:--.N I-i., held :. e
IN clerks Office of the circuit superior court III
law and chanccry Tor Louisa county, on the 5 !,
u'y oi october. 1882 Philip Smith, plaintiff against
'ohn White AMI William White, defendants.
i""deinndant, William White, not having cnie r
ca his appearance, and given security according to
INC act oi assembly and the rules of this court, and
" appearing by satisfactory evidence, that he is
no' an 'nhahitant OF this commonwc 9th, on mo-
oh OF the plaintiff, it is ordered, that the said de.
v"uah' w VILLAIN White, do appear before the judge
VI our SAID court, ut tho courthouse of our said
county on the tenth dav of April next (that beiu..
inc hrst day OF the next term OF said court and
answer The plaintiffs bill; and that copy of thi
"'He' DO forthwith inserted In newspaper pub
"sned IN the city of Richmond for two months sue
IeSsVey and posted at the front door of the court
mouse oi this county. A Copy. 'icste,
ID JOHN HUNTER, c. l.. C. $. L.. & c.
q ChANcsRY-ViRG,NiA:---A rules held in the
n clerks office of the circuit superior court of law
ana chancery for Louisa County, on the 5th day ui
october, 1882; Philip Smith, p,f., against john
White, and William White dts.
Inc answer OF the defendant John White ha.
Vmg been adjudged Insufficient, and he having
oeeh ordered To answer the plaintiffs bill more fully
ana sufficiently, by rule of the said court, enter
ed ON the llth day of April, 1892, in this cause,
an" he still failing to file full and sufficient
answer. although five months have elapsed, as well
SINCE the plaintiff filed his BILL as since the making
the RUE aforesaid, requiring mere full and sufii-
cieht answer: On motion of the plaintiff, his bill
Is taken Tor confessed. as to tho sa;d defendan IT.
Iohn White, and the court W i'll proceed ut u future
a'y TO decree tho matter thereof, unless tho said
defendant, at or before tho next term after he shall
have been served with copy of this order, shew
cause to the contrary =
A Copy Tcste, JOHN HUNTER.
30 G.. L. &. =. G.. l.. u G..
81 mlddlescx county court October Y2d, 1880:
"A William Burke and Sarah II. his wife, who was
oarah IL. Stepioe conpl'ts, against George Healy
and Martha q. his wife. who was Martha g. Stem
Toe, Richard A. Christian and Elizabeth a. his wife
who was Elizabeth A. Steptoc, George N. Steptoe
and William IT, Redwood, administrator of james
y. S'eptoe, decd, dcfts.-iN CmANcEay
on motion of the compliments by their attor
ney' leave Is given them To amend ll,cir bill here
'otore hled IN this cause which said bill so umeud
ed' is by i:;ihcT leave of the court fled And il
appearing to the s:sfnction of the court that the
deienda'' George N. Stcree. is not resident Of
this commonwealth and that process oanno, he
served upon him: The court doth, therefore order
ana decree, that The said defendant appear here on
the FORTH Monday in February next, and en.er his
appearance, and give security, according 10 the acts
oil Assembly and the rules of this court; and that
copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city of Richmond
Tor two months successfully, and another cory
posted at the door Of the Court House of this coun
~, Tor two successive court days.
Copy. Teste, GEO. HEALY, C. NC
oc 3l-cSw