Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1832-03-17

CHSANcERy-IaJ James oaty county court, Ian.
William Hanln,, administrator Of Allen Richardson.
decd, t.s Pltf
Norborne Ratclihe, Thomas RatciTe, Caroline Rat
Chile, heirs OF James RatcliAe, decd DTS.
This cause in which the order of publication appears
to have been duly published, on this day heard
on the bill and exhibits filed, and was argued by conse
on consideration Whereof the doth adiudge order aud
Decree that account be taken before the master com
missioner OF this of the Zee simple and nroabe annual
value Of the lands Of James Ratce deceased-and also
that the plaintiff render before the same Commissioned an
account showing the amoun OF the deb, % ~ % ,;
tiff, and demanded by his bill, together with anv nav
ments which have been made TO him on that account
anime, state and settle, and make report thereof IN tho
court with any specially stated, deemed nerncnt
oy himself or which be required to be stated by
the parties. copy. Teste ~-0'i
Feb. 81 [sz-w4w] iii. o. CoGBiLL, c.
The parties interested in the foregoing Order are IN
formed, that have appointed the 24th day of April 1882
for its execution, at which time they will attend at INV
o'clock A. NJ and clock p. H. with COPY Of the
court papers, and all things necessary taking the ac-
counts. EDWARD RICHARDSON Tnn,,~ =
March -. 1o2-2awlm
In CIiANCERY. -yIRGINIA--A rules taken in tI,.
Clerks Office of the Circuit Superior Court of Law
and Chanccry of Prince Edward county, Oh the 9Th day on
December, 1881:
Peter l. Gregg, cx'or. of Edward Jones' MIN
against
Edward Redtord, admir-. of Augustus Watson, Mary
lnrn-
thy his wife, Joseph Price and Elizabeth his wife, Samu-
ell Johns and Frances his wife, Sarah l.. b. Watson Ro
bert Strange and Elizabeth his wife, deits
The defendant Thomas w atson not having enterc, bs
appearance and given security according of the
General Assembly and the rules OF this Court and il APP
pearing that he is inhabiant of this State ON o
of the plaintiff by his ney it is entered at rules aorc
said, and accordingly ordered, the said defendant
Thomas Watson do appear here on the first av of A;i
Term next and answer the plaintiffs BILL and that COW
Of this order be forthwith inserted in some one of The n,
lie newspapers printed in the city of Richmond for two
mn tynlv nHal-,
the Courthouse Of this county.
copy. Tesie. BJ. woRsHAM, &C.
rep. IL. SS-wSM =
Nm CHANCERY-vIReINI Circuit Superb
or Court OF Law and Chancery, holden at the Cap.
the City OF Richmond, Tuesday the eighth day Of
November 1881 -
Peterson and Mckinley, Thomas Cookscy III. l.. Philip
Robert Ewing, Thomas De Sylver Moriecai Lewis and
Read and Gray, Pitts
Against tta.
John Hendrec William ID. Wren, Sergeant of the CITY
of Richmond and Administrators of William W. Heninc
dec, Elijah Brown, George Hcndrec, Hamilton Potts
William w. Smith and Albert W., Sarah Ann and vii,
liam Smith, infants, John s. Myers and Robert G. Scott
Dets
On motion of the plaintiffs by Counsel John Robinson.
the Clerk of this Court is assigned guardian al e,n to
the infant defendants, Albert W. Smith, Sarah Ann Smith
and William Smith, to defend them this suit And tho
Court doth ORDER that the defendants, Robert G. Scott
and John 8 Myers, render before OF the Commission
OF this Court of their transactions under tho
deed in trust, copy whereof is filed exhibit in the
cause, bearing date the twenty first day of june one
thousand eight hundred and twenty made between
John Hcndree OF the first part, the said John s. Myers
and Robert G. Scott OF the second part and s. and NJ
Allen and Company, C.. and g: Clarke, Henry Watkins
Baldwin and Ives, Anthony r. Thornton Benjamin f.
billiard, Charles Abrahams, Edward Hallam, Cullen
and Briggs, john winston, Hefernan, Cook and Ryan,
George Hendrce VIM W. Smith for his three wards Albert
w Smith, Sarah Ann Smith, and VIM. Smith and George
endree, for Hamilton Potts, of the third part and of the
amount received by them trustees under said de ed;
and that they deposit whatever shall appear to be
due from them such settlement in the Bank of Virginia
TO the credit OF this subject 10 the future
Court; and the said Commissioner is directed examine
state and settle the said account and report the same
the Court with any matters specially stated, deemed per-
nent by HIMSELF which may be required by the par
ties 10 be stated And the Court doth further that
the said Robert g. Scott and John S. Myers report to
the Court their proceedings under the entered in
this cause on the eleventh day Of February one thou
sand eight hundred and twentysx stating specially the
sums OF money loaned out by them under the said order
to whom loaned and the security taken by them for the
repayment of the and that they deposit secu-
ry with the Clerk Of this Court.
Copy.-Teste, WILLIAM G. SANDS, ID. Cs
Feb, IL, 1892.