Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1832-11-13

ther: In the latter case. their minds with all ,ha d
enees OF umePiace, accidental Sc which
exist between them. ~
(SS2 Would have BEEN Sc. See Mr.. TelC,r's speech.
| lS9') Would have raised, SC. Look at the sere, of
extracts, for the opposition " hirh II did raise
(i0) The evidence shows, that both its exnediencv anal
ITS Justice cere as strongly questioned they possibiv
could be; that moreover, Mr. Telair spoke OF the mel
sure as an assumption at the right OF judging aud ica,
ing, Sc; and that Mr.. Randolph opposed the whole ,ys-
ZEN, oecouse Of IT'S bearings upon State rights. sim
uere does not appear be ANY direct evidence on rrco
una, TIE constitutional point was expressly made. Adj
'hs the Tact be, that the point not made il 10.
".n W oes'ow moments consideration upon the
eoh'chg iuerences from that fact. 10 not think that
any one WHO has given his to tho evidence and
consdercdhe decided opposition which the easure EN-.
Souere"' can hesitate Tor an Instant, which TO choose
On the ONE hand, all Mr.. Cahous differences ,re n,e
to be ialse,not false differences but false asseytions
assertions, not merely untrue, but directly al uoin with
recorded truth On the other hand, had the constitution
aly been deemed debsteabe,-in other words had tho
distinction on which the constitutional point rests oc
Cured To any oil the numerous oppone MS of The
Is possible that n should have been once stated or
alluded TO! No: the honest truth OF the matter is. nust
De, that MIR. Clay Is this point right Nor i, M an
surprising, when the nature oi the distinction consider
cd that should not have occur. ed IL rests al.
together upon dif ence between m0tires The potcer
10 lay duties l. coude 10 Congress, without Limitation IA
10 Their extent: III the mOtipe which determines the ex
erce oil that power be its is consti
uosl IL the motive be protection, il is the reverse.
(4l.) The system has not "since crown up'' IL was
as system made peJect aud complete ia all its parts
when ITS adoption was zealousy and successfully urg-
ed by Mr. e. The only difference is, that his
beyond those with reference which the system was dc.
v,'ed Every Tariff since adopted, has been but work
oil detail upon the supers,rucure There is nothing In,
Them which does not hn1,there could have been no.
thing la them which would find, the fullest usiifca-
ton ia the views and principles of Mr. c. in 1916.
i2) lts continuance after the payment of the debit
alter the government should want cent OF re.
venue from mposts,- would siiind ample Justification
n,-woud still be vigorously required by Mr. IS views,
and principles IN lSl6. 1T any dUbs it, let him give
another perusai TO the evidence.
The reader will now clearly see into Mr. Calhoun: SEQ.
what he was IN 1916 with regard 10 the Tariff aud what
ne nov IS hregard principles and what
he should be told, that long after lSl6,hat up to pc
Rod comparatively very recent. Mr. g. continued to 10
IN conversation with from ''ldt portion VI coun
try supposed TO be peculiarly interested, most decided
aud jealous advocate of the protective sysema most
honest believer III all its virtues, and oil its efficacy and
In It's absolute undergraduates this country? That
ihis Is act have earthly doubt satisfied that
evidence IN relation TO tnght be obtained Just as con-
elusive as that now laid before the public. But 10 what
purpose' What would be the end Tor which we are
any trouble in obtaining III slight that trouble might be;
Tor the word OF single Of ordinarily fair character
must unavoidably outweigh all the assertions which he
could heap together this any other subject la the
esumauon oil those whose minds totally closed
against conviction, the character of Mr. allo must be-
greatly shaken IL there be any, in Whose minds this Ell
ect Is not already Produced il beyond The po, or of
facts 10 doit. A FRIEND TO TRiTru