Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1832-04-10

ordcr-thc beds being all new, and made in the hes,
manner.
Also, the entire stock of Wines and LIQUORS,
being of the choicest kind.
At the same time, all the NEGROES attached
Ia the establishment will be hired out for the ba.
lance of the year.
The Tavern will lie rented at the same time and
place tor the balance Of tire lease. The stand is
extensively known one of the best in the city,
Terms at sale. 5. Il c. Aucts.
NiRGINIA-At a superior court of chan
c"rv. holden at the former capitol IN the
city at w I'amsburg, the l4th July, 1927: Is
rael IL Jno Z. Pleasanis ptf against Jpo. ii.
Blair, admor with the wall annexed Of Nat.
Burw' Il. decd. Jas. X Mar, hall and Clnud,5
Ii. his wife, Matt. w. Kemp, sheriff OF Glou
cester county, and Commit ce of the estate of
Wm. Hale, scu dec, Richard q. Morris
adIn'or with the viii annexed t Smith Hal,
dec Il, who was adm'or of WIN. Hall The elder,
dec u, John Hall. adm'or of Frames Hall, dec d,
Henry l.. Nu'taii adm'or of Francis Thornton,
deco, Ben. w. Clruvcritss, eXor OF Joseph
Cienverius, decd, Thomas Whiting, ex'or OF
Skalfe Whiting, decd, JOHN s. Stubs, lr, a'mr.
OF Jn". 5. Srubbs, senr VINO was adm'or Of
FRANCIS y S'ubbs, WIN. q. hughes, IN his
right, and as ndin'or OF his late wife Jane, ard
R"b"r, r., Randolph s., Albert C. and Edwd.
"A. S!ubbs. and Edward Garrett and Sarah his
wife, dt
The d a,h of the plaintiff Israel Peasants, is
ed, and the cause came on this day to he
heard on the bill, answers of the defendants
Jn". III. Blair, admor with the will ann xed OF
Nat. BurwelI, deed, Edwd, A. Stu BIS, Ran
doph >. Stubs, Robert +. aud Albert q.
S'nbbs, Edward Garrett. WIN B Hughes Jas
IL. Marshall and Claudia II. his wtt., B,n.
w. Ci"pv"r'us. ex'or of Joseph Cl.uveris,
dec q, Mat. w Kemp sher fl and ,lnlnttee of
the estate of WIN HAP, the elder, decd exhi-
bits, aud examinations of witnesses, and as TO
the dcf' ndant John Hall, who is out of tn
co 'n'ry, and against whom the lanl IFS appear
10 have proceeded III the mode prescribed bv
la" against absent defendants, and to the
other defendants or the dccre.al order akinC
The bill for confessed, which appears TO have
oeen duly executed, aud was argued b. council:
On cnnsiu, ration whereof the court doth adj
lrdH', order and decree, that the defendant Jnu.
III. BAR, adm'or with the will annexed of Nat
Burwel!, deed, render before one of the com.
rnlsSI"neis OF this court. account of his trans
| actions III the estate If the said Nat. Burw ell,
that the defendants Jas. Marshall and Clau-
dla IL his wife, who was Claudia II. Burwell,
child OF Nat. Burwe!l, d, cd, render before
the same commissioner an account of all the
real estate which either by descent or wise
care tn the sad Claudia, mediaiely or immc-
| d'aleiy from her sand father, wi ere the same is
situated, the present ice supple and ANIMAL va
lue thereof, Distinguishing what has come to
her by immediate descent or devi.e, and what
| remotely, and the value of such portion of the
real estate as may have been ailened, sold, or
made ov r, and that he also take an account f
the personal cs,a Of the SAID Nat. Burwrll.
winch may have been received by the SAID
| Claudia, or by her HUSBAND; that the defendant
John ) Stubs, Jr., adm'or of John S. Srubbs,
SEN. renler before the commissioner All
account If his Intcstate's transactions on the
| estate OF Francis >. StHbbS also his own
| account OF adm nistrati"n If the ate of Jno
Stubs, sen; that the defendants Edward
Garrett and Sarah his wife who was Sarah
STUDIOS, VIM. B. llughcs, adm'or of hi, late
wife jane, who was Jane S'ubbs, Robert f.
| Siubb, Randolph S. Stubs, Albert @. Siubbr
and Edward A. Stubs, do scveray render be
| lore the same Commissioner account of all
the real estate which either by descent or de Wis
came TO them, mediatelv or immediately from
the SAID Francis 5. Stubs, where the same u
sItua; ed, the present fee sinpl. and annual
value thereof, distinguish ing what has come t.
th"m bv immeu ate descent or devise, and what
remotely. and the value."f such portions Of the
! real estate as may have been acncd, sold o.!
made over; and that he also take account of thu,
personal estate of the SAID Francis :. Stuhhs,
which may have been received nv the SAID EGwd.
| Garrett and Sarah his wife, William B. Hughes.
adm'or Of his late wife Jane, Robert + S:rbns
Randolph S. Subbs, Albert e.. Stubs. and
| Edward A. Stubs, which was of the e>tatr nf
| the SAID FTancIS s. Stubs. Gee d: that lie same
C. mmIssIoner state an account Of the plaintiff s
demand on account of their judgm ut obtained
IN the county court of Gloucester III the ro-
ceedlngs mentioned against mes Bavtnp, J, I'm
Baytop, and Jno b. WhiInc; in taking which
account the surviving plaintiff Is TO suomit to
be eXa3 med IN soI,mn form before the SAID
cnmmi~ slUncr. touching any payments which
have been made to HIM account of the said
judgment: which said several accounts the com
missioner is directed 10 ,xaInlne, state and settle
and to the court report, with any matters spe.
cially stated. deemed pertinent by III nself or
which may be required by the parties to be so
/ stated.
| FIRST FEBRUARY, 1898
| For reasons appearing 10 the court The order
entered IN this cause on the twcnty-nnt. day
of January last, is set aside-And Oh motion Of
Israel P'easants, by counsel, and it appearing
| by the ufidavm Of james CabaD>s the deyu Y
clerk, who made the entry on The rec RI on the
| fourteenth day OF July, one thousand cirhr
| hundred and twenty scvcn-the dca,b of the
above named pitt. was suggested, inst, ad Of
John +. PlcasaD's, the court doth orGcr and Nv
consent OF the dts. Robert + RanGulpI :
Albert q and Edwd. a. S, uO,s, ard Jas X.
| Marshall and Claudia Ii. bis wife. by den,
| counsel, that the record he so amended rs To
ubStltute the name OF john Z. Plea ant. instead
| OF Israel Peasants, (who Is nr,V The surviving
! partner OF the late mercantile firm f Israel a.
Jo1n +. PicaSants) and on the her motion
OF the surviving pitt, and II appearing by Ib
affidavit Of Saul Jackson, VI d. that the SAID
piif, by reason of d'seusc, Is incapable ofatiend
ing before the commissioner, ard submit TO
examination, according 10 the provision of the
IN crl" cutory decree eulrred 10 rhs cause on the
| 18th day Of jury, IG!7 the court doth order
tn The commissioner wao may state The SAID
account, directed by the SAID decree, propound
IN writing such interrogation es tO the 80 I'd Israc,
| Peasants, as he or any of the defendants may