Martinsburg gazette and public advertiser. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1826-1833, 1832-12-06
the Circuit Superior Court
Of Ld,r aud Cl,oneery for Berkeley county,
G,Erxnpen lOfh, 1884

| VIRGINIA. the Circuit Superior Court
Of Lac aud Chmeery for Berkeley county,
SEFrEnBER 10th, 1888
The Bank OF the Valley ia Virginia, Pss
sgduIst
PbiIip Nadenbousch, Edward beeson' =
Jesse Beeson, MicaJsh Beeson, lacy
Reeson Edward ; Beeson, Robert ?
Sh,l.e and Matthew Ransom, and IA ?
ron H.bbefd. adm'r. de borsIs non With ?
the will annexed Of Edward Beeson,
decea.ed, defts
sH AIS cause came on regularly TO ne heard
4 this a0th day of September. 1881, aud
was argued by COUNSEL and the court 3avlhs
duly e0r.itiered the sage, and being OF oPin
ION that the statute OF Limitations, which Is
relied or ty the defendant Edward .. bee
son ln his answer, $50 far as II may be aPPh
cable for his protection" Is not applicabie 10
the case or good defence, ard being llr
lher Of opinion, for Tie reason set forth IN
the written opinion fled IN tins cause and
made a part of this Decree that the instru
ment of writing under seal executed by Tia"
defendant Jesse Beeson, dated Jcuo 9Th,
1871. IA copy of which /. referred to in the
bin Of the complainant as plaintiffs exhibit
No. |, / and purporting to transfer 10 the de
fendant Tacy Beeson, ah and every part OF
his The said Jesse Beeson's interest in iega
cy beqaeathed to him by his father Edward
Beeson, f,r the siledged consideration Of two
thousand five hundred dollars, TO hun in
hand pai and the two Instruments of wri.
tug under seal executed by the deteniant
facy Beeson, dated Octoher 9Th, 1891, leo
! pies ei which are referred to IN the bill, as
| plaintiff exhibit No. ., and piaInilii s eshb
| 1t No 81 by which she the SAID lacy Bee
son promised to pay 20 the defendant Edward
| ) Beeson and Robert Shiles respectively, the
| sum of Que thousand dJlla,s ia Consideration
! Of the transfer above mentioned made 10y
! Jesse Beeson TO her the said Tacy Beeson;
| were made and executed with intent to de
! lay. hinder and delrpud the plaintiff, Gre
dlior OF said Jesse BeesUn, aud were iraudu
lent aud void TO the said plaintiif5 do Y adj
| Judge, order and decree, that the SAID IN
struments of writing be crnuied so far as
t,ey interfere with the claIIfs and pfeten
sions of the plaintiff IN tins cause: and the
court doth farther adindge, order and decree
| hat COMMISSIONER oi this court do take an
| Bccount OF he funds Of any description sur
rendered by the defendants jesse Beeson aud
Pulp Nadeuhousch respectively. when they
| .ook the benefit of the act for the relief OF
,nsolveHt debtors, and report TO thus court
whether the plaintiff hiatt! received any thing
from ether Of these sources 10 part payment
II the judgment obtained by it, against The
SAID defendant IN the county court OF Berke
,ey in 1921. and, If not, whether SAID fund,
are available, aud TO what extent, towards
the satisfaction OF the Judgment: and also
ti,at the SAID Comm sioner do call before
him the defendant Aaron HebbeId, admins
traitor dc nonis non with the will annexed OF
Edward Beeson the elder, deceased. and
lake an account OF the fund attached IN his
halds belonging TO the absent debtor Jesse
Beeson, and report to this court in order to d
final decree.
Copy-Tes'e,
JOHS 4STROTHER. @.