Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1832-12-18
Plaintiff.

IN CHANCERY-VIRG Rules holden in
u in the Clerks Office OF the icuit Superior Court OF
Law and Chancery for the County OF Buckingham, the
fifth day of November, 1892
John Morgan, PltG.
Against
James r. Morris, William Morris James p Richardson,
Morgan, and Jones, and William Crane Def.
The defendants, James r. Morris and William Morris,
having their Appearance aud given security
according to the Act of Assembly and Rules of tis Court,
and appearing by satisfactory evidence, they are
not Inhabitants ts Country; is ordered, That the said
defendants ito appear here the first day of the prl
Term and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and that
py of this Order be forthwith inserted in newspaper
published in the City of Richmond, for months
cessvely, and posted at the front door OF the Courthouse
of Ibis County a Copy.-reste,
Dec. Is. [6t-wswl r. ELDRIDGE, C. c. c.
YEyHE absent defendants, James r. Morris and William
IA Morris will please take notice. that shall w cd
neslay the I1i day of March 1888 at the Tavern OF
Thomas May, in the OF MaysviIlc and county oil
Buckingham, proceed 10 take the dispositions of Samuel
Ford others be read evidence in suit depend
ing In the Circuit Superior Court Of Law and Chancery
for the county OF Buckingham, in which plaintiff and
you and others defendants at which lime aud place
you may attend il you please. Yours,
I'm HANCERY-Y1 RG1NIA-In Luenburg Cir
"a cult Superior Court of Law and Cbancers, continued
and held for Lunenburg County, the 10Th day Of October,
1892
Joel Neal and Henrietta his wife, Pitts.
james Bsgey, Thomas Keeon, Robert Davis, PasckiiI
Davis Sarah Anderson, lillian Davis, Sterling Davis,
Martha Davis, Dcits.
The absent defendants Robert Davis Sarah, Anderson,
and James Gee, against whom the plaintiffs appear to
have proceeded in the prescribed by the of
Assembly and tho rules of this Court having appear
and answered the bill of the plaintiffs, the Court doth
take the said bill for confessed, them; and this
this day to be heard The subpoena there
in, the BILL answers of the defendants, Thomas Kceton,
James Bagley, Sterling Davis, William Davis, and Bax-
ter Davis, aud exhibits and argued by counseon
consideration whereof it appearing the satisfaction of
the Court that the subpoena awarded against the defend
ants, Jeremiah Burnett and DIANA his wife, and Thomas
Adams administrator of Daniel Williams, deceased, has
been executed them for than four months. The
doth take the bill Tor confessed as tein and doth
adiudgc, order and decree hat the defendants Thomas
Kecon and James Bagley do render account Of their
administration OF the estate OF their tesutor /acharah Da
WIS., deceased, before the Commissioner of the Court who
directed TO exanine and state the same, and make
port thereof TO this Court with any matter specially
ed, deemed pertinent by himself required be
ed by either OF the paftiesand the Court doth further
ORDER that the said Commissioner do ascertain the
Der and description Of the slaves conveyed by the deed
OF the 18th February, 1884, in the proceedings mentioned,
including the increase of Tie females since The date OF the
deed, how the have been disposed Of the value
thereof and in whose possession they are; and also
That the said Commissioner do ascertain the value OF the
ether personal propery conveyed by tie said deed Of The
1911 February, 1791 the date OF the said deed md
what has become OF them; and ALSO that lac ascertain the
value OF the slave, advanced by the tesatOr 10 the plain
Gf aud the value Of the slaves bequcaihcd by him in
trust for the female plsinln and he paid hy tho
defendants Thomas Keeion, and James Bagby, 70 the
plant and make report thereof this Court, with any
matters specially stated, deemed pertinent by himself, or
required TO be stated by either party,
opy. Tese, WIN. II. TAYLOR, elk.