Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1832-02-24
CoMMIssIoNER's OrricE,

COMMISSIONING OFFICE, Z
RIcHMoND, IN February, 1892. :
= the case of Thomas NJ. Burloot an infant who sues
IL by Thomas f. Buriooi, his next friend, Pltir
Lawson Burioot, administrator Of Matthew Burfoo
deed and in his right; Peter NJ Cary late admins
traitor of William Trabue iec'd John Stanford Son al.
mnisIra:or de bonis non of the said William Trabue
decd, aud in his right John SSnforc Jr Sarah f.
Stanford; Abncr Trabue; George 1inslcy, and Martha
William Elliott, deed, and in his own right; Matthew
Mnree; john Burton; Julia Lavnia Buroo,; and Rosa
assigned her guardian TO defend her in this suit. Dcids
=, Pending in the Circuit Superior Court of Law and
Chancery, Cor Henrco county
In this case, the said Court did on the 9th dav of Jam
uary last among other things odudgc order and decree
mat the Defendant, Lawson Buroot do render am ac-
count OF the administration of his n,cstatc Matthew
Durioot, on the estate OF Dauie TIabuc, decd also an
account OF the said Matthew Burioo guardian of the
Pianiiii also an account of his the said Lawson Bur-
iootS, own administration the of the said Mat
thew Burioot, decd and account of all the assets
real and personal, belonging the estate Of the said
a',hew b1rloo' deed, at the time of his DEATH before
: one OF the Commissioners of this Court'':-
" That tho defendants, Peter NJ Cary, John Burton
h'lion Cary, and Matthew Wnirec, render account
oil the administration of the said Peter NJ Cary on the
- estate OF the said William Trabue decd before the
" same ConmS-ioncr'':-
That the Defendant, John Sanford Sen render an
account OF his administration the of the said
William rabuc, deed, before the same Commissioner;
that the same Defendant render account of all the
personal estate oil the said William Tabuc, Decd which
mas come 10 ms hands or TO the hands of any other
person for him. since his qualification as administrator of
me said William Irabuc, before the Commission
That the Defendant, John Sanford Sen, and
=" the defendants, Abner Trabuc, George Tnsley and
90 Martha Ann his wife, and Gus,avus Street render m
account OF all the real and personal estate of the said
William Trabue, deed, which left by him at the
. time of his death before the COMMISSIONER
And that the Defendant Milton Cary re nder an &C.
count OF his administration the his incstatc
" William Ellio and of all the personal as
&c his DEATH "
Which said several the said Commissioners is
" directed to examine state, and settle, Gas far the
Pfd'nfD shdH require them to be stated and settled
and TO the Court report with any matters specially stated
" deemed pertinent by HIMSELF which may be required
'' by the parties TO be so statcd."
Such OF the foregoing accounts have been settled,
reported 10, and confirmed 10y the County Court of Chcs-
lerheld the said Commi'ionoG is directed 10 take
Prirnd dce correct liable hcsurcharged and falsifed
by the parties by the production of legal and sufficient
proof Tor that purpose. And the said Commissioner is
also directed TO reform and state all the said accounts
conormaby 10 the principles laid down in the case OF
Cranberry VS.. Cranberry, explained by the Court
p" OF Appeals in the Of DuTtceNs executors VS..
| % StiH's erecutOr.''
The parties concerned, in the execution of which said
Order, are hereby notified that have appointed the 2S,
day of April next for their attendance ber me on the
matters thereby referred and for proceeding of the
Commissioners of the said Court perform the duties
thereby required; at which time the said parties are re-
CURED to attend, at my Office the Capitol the City
Richmond with their proofs and the accounts they are
WM. G. PENDLEroN, Com'mr.
feb.o [S7-w4wl
IN CHAN CERY.-In the Circuit Superior Court Of
u Law and Chanccry for Henrico county, tho 20h
January, 1892
John Sncllngs, George Snellings Alexander Snelngs
William SnellnGs, Josiah Sringer and his wife Polly
John Lapradc Sally his wife, Elias Cruinp and Eliza
beth his wife, and Martin Brooks, right OF his late wife
Nanny, PINS
against
William G. EIam adn'or with the will annexed of Eli
zaboth Keen, decd and John Bankenship Dcfs.
This cause in which the plaintiffs appear TO have pro-
ceoded against the defendant, John Bankcnship, who
ont OF this country in the mode prescrbedby law against
he
came on tins day to be heard the BILL of the
other defendant, exhibits and examinations of Witnesses
and was argued by counsel On consideration whereof
the dom adudgc order and Decree that the eten
dan William q. Elan, render account of his transac-
ions as administrator with the will annexed of Elizabeth
heen, deceased, before of the Commissioners of this
court who Is directed TO examine state and settle The same
ana to The court report with any matters specially stated
deemed pertinent by himself, which may he required
by the parties to be so stated Copy Tesc,
j. ROBINSON, CPk
COMMISSIONERS OFFICE,
Richmond, 18TH FEB. 1892.
The parties interested, hereby notified that | have
appointed the 10Th day OF April next, TO take the account
directed by the above order of court, which time thew
are hereby required TO attend before me- at my Office at
the Capitol in the city of Richmond with the necessary
accounts, vouchers, &C. enable perform the duty
required by said order.
wM G. PENDLEToN, Com'r.
feD' Is. 0I-wSw@
IN. CHANCERY.- Mecklenburg County-Novcmber
IL Court 1881.
Thomas b. WALL Phn
against
Hiram II. ROlc, Def
The defendant not having entered his appearance ac-
con'iog 10 the Act Of Assembly and the rules of this Court
and it appearing 70 the satisfaction OF the Court that he is
not an nhabitant of this Commonwealth On motion Of
the Plaintiff by his Attorney il is ordered that the said De
endant do appear here the third Monday in March
next and enter his appearance and answer the Plaintiffs
b and that copy OF this order be inserted IN the
newspapers printed in the of Petersburg or CITY of
Richmond, for eight weeks successvey and posted at
the front door of the Court House of said county