Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1832-02-16
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS.
MONDAY. Fer. 9th, 1892.

|
I0nnetcr, dc. vs. The Governor, arho sHcs M
fae rcl"f'on 81 NcNcirS adm'or.-Applcaton for
a supcrscdeas to Judgment of tho Circuit Superior
COURT OF Law and Chanccry, of Hardy county
awarded.
Tayior vs. decentralization an appeal from a
decree Oh the Superior Court of Chuuccry held in
"mchcs'cr-Dockccd by consent, and revived.
Frdtt vs.. TaiiGfcrr0.-Upon an appeal from Il
decree pronounced by the Superior Ccurt of
Chancery held i'll Frcdcricksburg.-Arg ;aicnls
| continued.
Adjourned till tomorrow, - o'clock.
| TuEsDAy, Fer. 7th, 1892
De'h VS.. hirfeys adn,'or--Cr"u an appeal
from d"crcS pronounced by ,h,, Superior Court
/ oil .hanccry, held in Staunton-Hulc against the
| appellant for security for costs
P,a't against acknowledgements CONT
nucd.
Adjourned till tomorrow. II oclack.
| WEnvEsD>v, Feb. 8, 1882.
Uor$hdm's ddat0r VS.. WorshaHi's er'or.-Appl
cation Tor supcrscdeas to an order of The Suuc
r'or Court Of Law of Chesterfield county
Awarded.
AHe"'S cr'or Carr .Sc.-upon an appeal
from decree pronounce! by the Superior Court OF
Chancery, held in StauutoIr-D Decree reversed, and
| cause sent back with directions.
Prah against Tutiatc?o.-Argumcnts CONT
| nucd.
Adjourned till tomorrow II ocl"cll.
THURSDAY, Feb. 9th, 1892.
i''"g vs.. Orick.-iIpon an appeal from Il iudr
ment o.! the Superior Court of Law OF Berkeley
oounty-On the appellants motion, this appeal
was put upon The docket
FRA" VS., T"iinjc:To-Argumcnts courTetlcd by
H. Stanard Esq. for appellant, and T. Harrison,
Esq. for appellee
Dudicy, ,yc. VS.. Dadlcy, ,fc--upon am apponI
from a Judgment of the Superior Cour, of Law of
rtH"ki'n c"un,v,--Partly argued by &. Johnson
Esq. for appellant.
Adjourned 'Iii tomorrow II O'Clock.
FEIDAY, FEE. 10, 1882.
- he'''S """FT ". Po'i0rd, %Urtjcjnr TGr!Hcr, Sc.
| Upon an appeal from Judgment of the Superior
| Court of La" Of Campbcn countv-- Dismissed
under the rule requiring security for costs
| D""l"y, &c. vs.. D"dicY, Jc.-Argumcnts CON
cmdcd, by IL. w. Leigh, Esq. for appellee
I"hHg'd, Sc. vs.. Coe"'cja, and HenmcHy, dc
VS. Good~in.--Upon appeals from decree nro.
nounced by the superior Court Of Chanecry, held held
IN williamsburg argued by c. johnson,
Esq. for the appellant.
Adjourned Till tomorrow, II o'clock
SATURDAY, Fer. llth, 1922
H"hbGrd, SC. Goodicin and RcHncJy Sc
VS.. CooGirin.-- Arguments continued
Adjourned till Monday next, II o'clock
- 80 y :! Hr-e s-s-vsrezf
'rmg C~XsrTurIoN>L WIuG IS unfinished twice wcek
(Tresdays and frd"ysD at RI T. dollars per auum,
PAYABLE i'll advance.
For advertising 10 square (or les for the irs
Insertion, and 5J cents for each Continuance - The u,a
Der oi insertions must he noted the MS o,i. t
the advertisements will he continued ,nd changed accord
mely.
Previous iisoomtinuance OF the papcr al aIrear
ages must He pad ~. And those vito may ;i,h l., dis
continue will notify the Eduors 90 hat effect a, ,,,s.
twenty days beIcfc tie period expires Tor WHICH they
Notes Of chartered specie paying Banks o! any Of t..
states VIII ne received III rayu,rut for subscription to
ne ptcrFt'"; and remit, he through the
Post Office at the RISK of tine idwg
All i'crs to The Editors must he past paid they viii
f"ct We no attention
ses1-', .,s--..sz-.
4 GKAWING of the Union Canal Lottery,
ny No. 3: