Southern planter., 1832-06-02

The new Tariff Bill proposed BY tho Treasury
Department, It Is said, presents a conpromioe 10
which no reasonable objection can be offered. II
the Union party are satisfied with scheme 80 radi-
caiy unconstitutional and unjust, what's there that
Congress could do 10 oppTess tho South that would
nol satisfy themf But We cdnnol belieEe that this
y the opipion Of .hatpafiy generally; and suro we
are shdsitis not the opinien Of tho state Rights
party,or Of The people Of the South. SO far rom
there being no reasonable objection against Il, Il is
little less than wonderful 10 Us how any one can i'm
agine that il embucesa sinRle imporlant feature h
which the Southern Siatea Gao aeqnegce without a
total ubandonment Of their rights, their interests,
and their principles What right does Il restored
What grievance does Il redfessi What security
!. for the future does Il furnisht None--hieEally
none This alone tBtrikes Us, is sufficient 70 con
femu Il but that the State Rights paIgy may not
6eem capliousy to donounco . scheme with which,
Il 4 conlonded, all parties should be content, wo
wiIlbnay state tho grounds upon which they sIc
opposed to IT,
Because Il is evidently dscheme dictated by the
Manufacturers themselves, who weror exc|usvaly
consulted BY the Secretary Of the Treasury.
Because Il only proposes to reduce ne Tafifto
y6miiliond Eve millions more than will Be requir.
cd foF the legitimate expenses Of the 0ovesnment
Because i proposes to create surplus fevsnue
cfat least FIVE millions 70 BE- expended on rods.
and canals, and pensions, IA the North sad West.
Because although 4 viii reduce lhe whole a.
mount ofsederal taxation, Il will Be 1such moro un-
equal, and therefore unjust u ~ operation, that
even tne present uysism
Because whilst & will totally abolish the duties
On vast yefieiT ofA1iieleys consumed by ,he Tariff
states, ana otno laporance TO the South il viii
lhloR hY Is ilnpoaili5ns 1pon articles essential 10
me sousn, almofs Tho entire support Of The
Rosefnlhenl upon ths Southern States
P.ecadse tins would be as Unjust and inadmissa-
nIA undW sho proposed as under The existing, Tar
under TaFii Of seven millions, as under ono
ogiwenty.
peoause ?. Proposes, unnecessarily and lyranni-
Sal,y % abolish ne eIedu system, and TO require
tesh ppymenls a. the Cuslon. House, and 10 luy
heaty faxes on Bales al auction. bv which inuori.
ing merchpnls will b substantially deprived even
oflhe little benefit With might otherwise accrue
Com fhe roducton recommended.
Becaase although CongIess has night 10 levy
m3ea lorfevepuss tits bound TO legislate impair
tally aud has no right whatever oimpose them for
sAe enIclnment OF agerandizement Of particular
o. favored claSs.
Because the Iolection ofmanuhcluros, OF in o.
sher words, The en1chlhent Of Inonopols,s, s the
plain and undisgniaed object and intention Of she
Bill
Because if,hat Bill be submitted 10, the proiec
live policy involving the ruin. and degradation Of
fhe Southern States, will indeed become the settled
a1d iregpcable policy Of tho country
Because the Southern States are ernphahcally
fhe depseaaed and suffering portion Of the Union,
dion &C iusllee 10 relieve, and aoi % aegravaie