Martinsburg gazette and public advertiser. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va. [W. Va.]) 1826-1833, 1832-12-13
vfRGINTA:-h he Circuit Superior Court
of Lao and Chdneey for Berkeley county
0nfh 1897

II Il
nf I,uo and Chdneeyg for Berkeley county
SEPreNBER Goth, 1882.
The Bank Of the Valley 10 Virginia, PH.
against 2
pbiEo MAIDEN bouscb, Edward Beeson'
| Jesse Beeson, Nlieajab Beeson, lacy
| Reesoo. Edward 5 Beeson, Robert ? Z
sbiles, and Matthew Ransom, and "A =
ron HebbeId, admir-. de bonIs non with :
the will annexed Of Edward Beeson,
deceased. deCB
va mai Sscanse came on regularly to he heard
a this 2eth day Of September, 1881, aud
was argued by COUNSEL aud the court having
duty considered the sane, aud beng OF oPtn
ion that the statute Of limitations, which is
relied on by the defendant Edward D bee
son in his answer, $50 far az il uiay be appii-
cable for his protection" is not applicable to
the case or good defence, and being fur
Their Of opinion, for the reason Bet iorih IN
the written opinion filed 10 this cause and
made part OF this decree, that the lnstfu-
meat OF writing under seal executed by the
defendant Jesse Beeson, dated June oth,
1891, ia copy Of which is referred to IN the
bill Of the complainant as pialntltfs exhibit
No. ), and purpor,ng TO transfer to me de-
PENDANT lacy Beeson, all and every part oil
bis the sad Jesse Blossoms interest III a iega
cy bequeathed TO hun by his father Edward
Beeson, for the aledged consideration oil two
thousand five hundred dollars, - hun IN
hand pal Ian the two instruments oil wri
ting under seal executed by the deter
lacy Beeson, dated October 9th, 1881, leo
pies oil which are referred To ia the bill, as
plaintiff exhibit No 2, and plaintiffs exhib
It No. s., by which she the SAID lacy Bee
son promised TO pay TO the defendant Edward
- .aafly s4iU hR
sum of one thousand dollars in consideration
of the transfer above mentioned made by
Jesse Beeson to her the said Tacy Beeson,
were made aud executed with intent to de
lay, hinder and defra,rd the plaintiff ere
riitor of said Jesse Beeson, and were iraudu
lent and VOID AS TO the said plaintiff; doth sd
Judge, order and decree, that the SAID III
struments of writing be annuled so far as
| they Interfere with the claims and preten
sions of the plaintiff in this Cause: and the
court doth further adjudge, order and decree,
that Commissioners Of this court do take an
| account Of the funds of any description sur
rendered by the defendants Jesse Beeson and
Philip Nadenbousch respectively, when they
took the benefit Of the act for the relief OF
insoiyett debtors, and report to this court
whether the plaintiff hath received any thing
FROM either of these sources IN part payment
of the judgment obtained by 1t, against the
said defendant in the county court OF berke-
ley in 1871, and, if not, whether said funds
are available, aud to what extent, towards
the satisfaction of the Judgment: and also
that the said Comm sioner do call before
him the defendant Aaron Hebberd, admins
traitor de bonis non with the will annexed oil
Edward Beeson the elder, deceased, aud
take an account of the fund attached In his
hands belonging to the absent debtor Jesse
Beeson, and report to this court IN order to a
final decree.
A Copy-Teste, -