Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1831-03-22

proposed g-u rDa l. Sc" There WAS M, s,.h 49,, n;
, u'h Noae MAS intended. The company would b.
E'u 70 receive Subscriptions fro any quarer-frou
'hc State ut Virginia, from James River xicbnanJ ~
amy where eise-but no subscription was reoured :,
pe'made by The State &C Virginia; aud if there had
peen then sir, said MIR. T. we should have had thu,
advanced against the passage OF the blu If ". a,
Tempt to shun Sylla, agans; Charybdi, Steer
70 me right or TO the left, and arc equally exposed
,I., ~ r. me gentleman from Montgomery. says
nat We OF the valley urge poverty, as an argument
lor the passage of this bill Sir the gen,lemsnis mis-
taken--no valley member in this House, ever urged
any such argument The valley delegation in rot r,,,n
mere 10 ask an aims, to clim your sympathy for IN,
poverty The people Of the Valley are the most inde
pendent portion of Virginia, and am SUR, tb,v will
ne.er ca'm any thing from your sympathy, for their
POVERTY; and they would spurn any OF their req
teseh'atFes, who would condescend TO do IT, we do
not Come here begging is to demand tina, i>-tice b
.; 70 rs all we ask That gentleman too, has
sa'u IN the heat into which he worked up his feeInp,
It, ,'e ,he alley was ~ miserable par, of the State
P'N OI 'Ae state avn happy to find that Virginia is so
much more respectable, and wealthy u STATE. than
had ever supposed her.
Mr. Williams of Shen now modified his npendoer.
lh the mode which we shall morrow and some
IphEer stuon ensded among Messrs Williams, Garlsnd
ot Nelson, Preston and Lewis
hr Garland Of Amherst, differing generally from
nose VINO repres the James River country feel;
necessary 10 explain has reasons for summarizing tn.
privilege asked. lie die upon the ground of ;rs
ice to the applicants IF the propose d road ini,rsL
t"e James River improvement. he should regret l..
4 cDt,~a
ih8 10 every part OF the State the pryileg. oF mo-
N'"S 'heir own improvements. with their own money
ana IN Their own way. lie preferred indeed that ,h.
luc "i the west should concentrate at the can,l of
tue SKATE but this desire should not induce rfn TO de-
ny 10 the west choice of markets or force ,Lau r.,
seek particular market.
Mr Anderson of Bot. a. ain spoke in EXPLANATION
ana IN farther opposition to the extension Of the priv.
iiege beyond Statn;on. '
Alter some observations from Mesrs pres,np and
Wilson, the question put and the amendmen,
heE"tiVed by the following vote.
=, HlessTs Banks, Speaker ) NJ Garland Kenncy
s4cIue Mayse Davis, OF Ber Heusha,v Canpue SL y,
h"Ioot BrodnaX, Jones, Chichester James Mar
snal, Powell Nj Mason, Caseman w Wood Er.L Cai
Gnre Green, Easey, Damn kadom Seymour Luca, Cad.
!ahcr summers, Lawson, W L I Mason Caldwell S,,as,
,'e"'nin, Eonle, Nawier OFeIalI, Cuhoon, MrLaugh,
M liner "reher. Swanson Baxter, Neuahle Moore
HoH''hon Lewis Williams, Harris. Ga,eyyood Erp.s Ac
NoAs-Messrs Gilmcr Booker r Campbell LeG,vicb J 7,
NuaeFs"n Miller, Christian Yancey ~ N RNeg Cl,v
tdyne, Holland King, Hail Morris, Leigh Dye Atkinson
emhe, Is Pollard, Pollard, Leland Ewing uays po.
S"'rr i!ulSns, Knox Preson Hehus Garland Upshur
!acN VEIL IL Il Anderson Davis OF Orange Adams T Miller
o"el hyes, Hart. AL sander, Klg0re Gogawn Mon
&c 'v'mp Gillespie, Mccoy, MCCu!och Keller Crockett.
HihN"eU, kutheTfooId-5S '
The amendment of the Senate striking out the 2etb
section extending the privilege to continue the rail
cd, ayes SO F'
On motion OF Mr. Leigh, leave was given to bring in
a olii prescribing the mode of dividing estates held
IN certain cases referred to Messrs Leigh Brodnax
Moore, Summers, Burfoot, Shell, Watkins Preston
CHRISTIAN, Garland of Nelson, Wright, Harris and
Morris. ~ ~
on mott IN of Mr. Claiborne,
The House adjourned