Alabama state intelligencer., 1831-12-03

Mir PERRY'S exposition of the which led to breach of the peaceabe relation which formerly existed between himself and William King, should have appeared sooner but for beyond control It carly last month"; by gentleman from Dallas county the office the Inqurer with written the ostensbe editor that paper, desiring its publication through the chan mel that Col King had thought proper As the edit spoke like having authority translate Col Kings language, it but fair conclude that he would ect another defending himself at the tribunal But the justice e pcaee thought differently, and decided that he had gathered enough from side of question his purpose Hence the necessity of applying another press Mir Perry has been compelled do to Pe the foul and unfounded mpuaion that he seeking office, and the life of Col King, graty ep root- cd bOtcat hostHy." Those who have known him. either in public private e and calmly look back upon the turmoil of the past will be loss account why such gross charges have been made aast him. Seeking no flee whatever and enlistng himself under facon the whole tenor of his life conadct the aecusaon and proves that he has endeavored do justice a with readiness equal to the rmness with which he would require justice from them But may be said that he has taken advantage of Col Kings absence publish any thing all upon the subject of their difference. This complaint however will not last long, we intend send ,h gentleman this very article, to the City of Washington, where he at his leasure.
 TO THE PUBLIC.
 With the publication which appeared in the Tuscaloosa Inquirer of the Sd inst (which paper borrowed from friend yesterday or with the publicity in any shape which has been given to the difference between Col. William R. King and myself, either before since the termination that affair, have had agency Col. King has himself published part of the correspondence growing of that difference. To this neither complain object The Col King has given of the conversation which pro duced the betwt makes it rather of regret that the publication has been long ed, and imposes upon me the necessity of reply Tins shall be short be made, place the controversy between us on it's true footing
 the subject of the Sealed Noe" is only necessary to say, in justice to Maj Kenan, that he explained it Col King the 22d May last the correspondence between them will show. After Col King had partiy if entirely broken the waer observed him, that it related to the unortuna difference between him and Maj Kenan contens2 The that did the prc language He asked me if had read it. To which pled that had He asked if it sealed when received it. informed him, He then unolded the to do the same. did He then asked considered it challenge? To which made other reply, that it was very strong.
 This took place the bank of the river, Cahawba and as turned to walk back, and had proceeded but short distance, he asked if considered myself the agent of Major Kenan, and acting for hna in that business. swered far as fo deliver that and if he chose to make one by Col King then spoke and notwithstanding the questions he asked did dream of his intention to bring into the contest until we had reached the sidewalk before the of Joseph Deury He then requested word with and stepping asdt replied, pecetiy; and then sea rated, he promising return an answer by me immediately er dinner, which then bringing
 It is proper here to state, that the question: you acting pih your eyes oen! induced extend my agency be- yond the delivery of the first note, of which informed Col King shorty after the delivery of the sealed note.
 Dinner being oyer Col. King turned and proposed walk Wesepped out oSew of those at the tost, (Deu