Alabama state intelligencer., 1831-07-09
From the Globe of June I6.

1 1elegTaPh's Attack or the PrssideRt.-1'he Pres
 dent Is assaied by the Editor of the Telegraph, q having ''PUT HIS OWN FAME, THE INTERESTS o
 THE COUNTRY AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY UPON l | DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO CONTROL THE PRIVATE IN TERcoURsE or SOCIETY,"" He says: SHALL NEW CABINET BE ORGANIZED EXPRESSLY FOR I'll | PURPOSE OF CONTROLLING SOCIETY THIS PARTICG LARF And he answers his own interrogatories b | declaring that if he were TO REMAIN SILENT, Il | WOULD CONFIRM THE INFLUENCE WHICH IT IS ouS l HIS DUTY COMBAT. AN INFLUENCE wHIc} | SEEKS TO UNDERMINE OUR FREE INSTITUTIONS, AM BY USING THE POWER AND PATRONAGE OF THE Cd vERNMENT, CORRUPT OUR PUBLIC AS WELL AS oUt | PRIVATE MORALS" l We have here given, in his own language, tls ground assumed by the Editor of the Telegraph a his attack on the President. But upon what fal does he base the charge, that the President has o
 ganized a new Cabinet for the purpose of controlling society in particular" which is to E. corrupt o1 public as ,ocH IS our priUate mordts?" Is it to s found in the circumstance of the dissolution of tie late Cabinet? Did the Secretary of War, in IT. | signing his stution, evince wish to exert Cabnf influence to sustain him in society," We think nd By the declarations of member of the late Cabne, it is now apparent that there was deep rooted pe+ sonal hostility existing among some of its member. Was not the knowledge of the existence of this di- ference, and that 1t was irrecOnceable, sutficiet to render it's reorganization necessary. The peopk had seen the public service suffer during the admns tration of MT Monroe, by the rivalry and dissentio of Messrs Adams, Crawford and Calhoun. The, had seen jealousy and difference of opinion operatn upon the Secretary of State and Secretary of Wan under Mir Madison, paralizing the power of the Ga vermnent during war, and surrendering the seat d Government itself to the enemy, almost without struggle; the Cabinet concurring in nothing, eve wrn the enemy was at the door. If, as Mir Brancl ha, asserted and has been often repeated by tic Telegraph, the ''infuences" were 'malign," which operated upon the Cabinet, IS not that riomsslon r ..tnnf fnnf ft,aa adopted by himl Had MT Branch, or any other member Of the Cabinet, right to call on the Presi- dent enter into the dissension and by parting with one division of his Cabinet and retaining the other, thus to put mark of reproduction on those that left i
 Notwithstanding the difficulty of his course, the conduct of the President has been from the frst to the last, towards every member of his Cabinet, kind and conciIiatory He exerted no other influence than that of mutual and afectonate friend to sooth the feelings of the members of his Cabinet and re- concile them to each other. Being unable to accom- plsh his benevolent wishes he felt himself called on by his duty to the country, to bring together new Cabinet, which consulting in perfect harmony, would be enabled to direct all its energies to the pubic ser vice. and to command his own and the public confi- dence. We believe there is no impartial man who does not approve the course which he adopted
 But the Editor 1.-the Telegraph imputes the wise course which the President has adopted, and which we believe the whole republican party approves to Il ueSlSn 10 corrupt puDHC us Wch oo oui pr vate morals" and insists that the "NEw CABINET V is "oRGANIzED" by the President for that purpose !! It is but few days since this man pronounced the highest eulogum on the purity of Hugh L. White whom the President has invited to fill the place o Major Eaton. Will he say that the President has sought the cooperation of this pure and upright man to corrupt society," What is there in the life ano character of the venerable and enlightened Living ston to lead to such conclusion to him Has the | name of Louis M1.ane ever been coupled with dis honor! What we demand has MT Woodbury evel done to fit him for such conspiracy against the prl vate and public morals of the Nation? Our sensitive our scrupulous, our overweanngy fastidious Duf Greene, is alarmed lest some "matign intlueace' will overcome all these honorable men, and induce them to make common effort to compel society "to associate soith particular imdiuiduar'-an indi vidua too in the retreats of private life, and going into remote State-iar from the scene of the ma
 gn influence! Is it not astonishing that this "Jea
 lousy the green-eyed monster," did. not seize upor our Editor, whilst in the midst of the terrible "cr cum stances of 1S29?" Where was his scrupulosity then and since: how could he have sanctioned tn,
 intercourse his own wife and daughter have helt
 with this ''particuiar indiridmaI7" How could ht
 have invited the whole city and half of Congress tc
 his house and brought it into association with ths
 individual to countenance whom we arc now toll
 is sufficient "to corrupt pNJlic ,cc as priuae nOrdtsn