Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1831-03-31

| The New York Courier Is mistaken when II charges
upon Messrs. Tazcwell and Tyler that they were ior-
merly Federalists. This IL an act Of great Injustice.
No such imputaton lays at either Of their doors.
The Courier rcnews the attack upon these Senator's;
for voting against the appointment Of Editors-and it
c%riteises with much asperi,y, their Speeches on the
Turkish Mission.
Tut their votes upon the former, find an echo in the
hearts of most Of the citizens OF Virginia, and Of many
OF the Republicans of the land. There is no measure
OF this administration which so little deserves our
support, as the appointment. Of so many Editors to of
fee. IL trenches upon the liberty of the Press-and in
the hands OF a vicious President, such a practice would
become a dangerous source OF gross abuse. We found
fault with il in the last administraion-and why should
we respect il in the administration of Andrew Jack
son! The appointment OF M&Stambaugh as Sub-Agent
OF the Indians, after he was rejected as Agent by the
Senate, is a tribute Of respect for his services and quail
tcatlons, great as they may be, which, we think, tho
Presidents better judgment ought TO have withheld.
The Speeches on the Turkish Mission present differ
ent considerations. We think them right in pr inciple,
but unfortunate in manner. Some of our Republican
friends approve both. The N. York Courier approves
OF neither But the manner of the N. Y. Courier is it,
self liable to great exceptions, and leads to great mis-
constructions.
% Representatives Of Virginia, Who have seeded
from u Q Administrators! two only firm, and fheu false
ly said TO be acira'ed bv self IA con .id.ra ioa. The
whole story l. stuff NE kno,c, that this account of
our f-pres n'S'ives is grossly ialse-and let the s,rug-
gle ccms when It may. that our fellow citizen will
show their mistaken and warm attachment, 10 the in.
teres's OF A. JACK on.
The Louisville Advertiser dsposes Of Mr.. We b,,er,s
So ~ mn tutb1 ~ uaF-
Clay as Its g loding star :"
AT the very moment that the present administra alton.
through intrigue, bribery end cunning, came into 20 W.
e, the eyes Of he people were turned upon Henry
Clay az the man to sueee ID the present incumbent, aud
root out the cancerous NEGOTIATIONS, which non. who
looked with unprejrdiced. eyes could but ioresee would
DO the consequence. There has not been the sliehte.t
waverirg in public opinion. Tha ftiends OF order and
the Union, have all spoken as with enc voice. The
very inference which the Jack 'ouites would have
drawn from " A .econd DANIEL has come to judg-
ment,' is refu'ed in every m Q, ment OF the distipe , ish-
ed parsonage to whom they allude. The Sta,e OF MAJ.
sscsuse'ts and the trends OF this individual there have
Pledged themselves 10 support Mr.. Clay for the next
Presidency, and their pledges will be rede, med as such
pledges, from such a quarter, are always receem a.
New.Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island. Vermont, ard
Connecticut bavs all spoken in the same voice, and in
he year 1888, the noxious roots OF Jacksonim will find
no place io' existence IN the soil OF New. England"
There can be no doubt about he mater. Clay is The
champion OF the opposition. The Menifesto issued On
tie adjournment If Congress proves il. The Bani-
more Convention Of December uex,, vii sound II O, n a
highest note upon the gamut. And in The mean time,
VIII his opponents suffer themselves to be guile d-to
be juggled by false hopes, or insidious oyertures,--
Will they suffer thenselves to be rent in twain bv dis
pu,es about the succession. which will no, take place
before lo3I-(six years henee!)-This conduct would
oe unworthy oil PARROTS and o. pc III .ians.-Th -r being
laughed at as fence-men, temporizers, 81 &c. is a
"ick wor ny OF The %wbiPsiers OF the opposi, or-5ut to
which no man, with ten grains Of sen,e, will listen.
without contemp'.
A HAIR.BREADTH DISTINCTION!
yahe richmond Enquirer OF Tue.day Iast says:-
fr - - pm Pr" Sou't mas orcioed so
lar IN favor oil Georgia" The Courl has d. cided no.
hing IN favor OF Geo gait has acknowledged no
tish' In mat State as 20 the Cherokees; it has merely
determined that 1t cannot grant the Injunction which
was demanded, because it cannot View the Indians as
within The description Of parties entitled 10 is interfer-
ence" No. g..
This is indeed a nice distinctioD!-Mr Walsh as
serts that the Court has decided nothing in fapor of
Georgid-al houyh 1t ha+ refused the Injunction
when the Cberokees expected TO obtain against G .or.
gla.-Ibat is Is to say-A sues out an injunction TO s,sv
a very Important -prr ceeding on the part of R-the
Court refuses he injunction-and YET the Cour, de.
cides nothing IN favor OF B.-Par les in Chsncerv
would not think 80 lightly Of this advantage, as Mr.. w.
seems TO do.