Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1831-09-09
@WGNHIGAMa
From The Georgia Journal, a5lh Aug.

OF THE y. STATES.
Inc sfp'aranee 81 the address OF the V.te Pre,iI,
oil The Un ed States renders il tce.sary TO eff =,
any apology for the icl owing address. The II view
OF TIE c9'Ie'pondsnee signed 4 b. orig lay PUT i.h.
ed he Geo'g'" journal OF The 2lj OF Ap. last and
several srislrs In the Glebe aui other he Sspaoers
have Ia my judgment Eutfieisnl y explained my SIN.
uue' al impartial aud Gnprsjudiced cd,; and tbosA
Of dlHsTeh desert ton, il il improbable that apv
tba con urge sci convince. BssideS II is not yrJy
Important to he people OF he Usi.ed Sac, before
"hom mere Is 30 probability l shall az ain be
placed TO form any definite oIDion Of my motives or
'""uuft IN 'hs Hansasion7 developed in the corre--
pondenee, between the p esdeut and Ves Presi,en,
i'ay ~ Is moi very important, 10 he sitzeLs Of the
onited SlAef; hut u Is important individuality 10
have my sordust correctly understood; for 10 man
however retired he may live, ought 10 be indifferent TO
FuOLc opioien Ii also appears from the n.wsrap.r,
thh an explanation ttom ma /, expected, and s.ired
therefore submit 10 she apparent 'cesy of apns,,
i=g before the public
undSr,ood from l:ttets received during the las
s.s'on oil congress, That The Vice PRECEDENT aud his
friends were endeavorinS make ths ina,
me dleuliy between him and the Pfeslen, had besn
produced by me, from d,slre on nv sa, M n.,stiaa
inyssh "i!h the PFesiicn'. II this impres.i;n had
been maids by their Sin efforts The Vic. President bas
usPeied 1 iu5Cr; for by his publication il eleariy
eSSoihsd bat tie MEASURE did DOT originate with nr:
but that IN the hola eniir have hsen o,s.iva :
iac', assert wihsu Tho fear of contradictions that no
iaisreoufse ether verbal written, bas taken pl,c.
oe'ween The President aud myself Since a fe lava az
Ter 'he Prssd nd' eCcon in The House OF Re cresar
iaoYe5 ~ FibruiFy, 1925. Dsirg The call G inesaI
'hsh mace UpJn ne, no reference whatever was made
u. "a
considered TIE celt ss evidence OF better siaie Of
iesHng oA hs par, then had been understood 10 We
p'erious!y exi5,fd AMI az had eheriihed auy
ieehHgs 81 bos'lly towards him, was petis ely vii.
ling HAT the past should he buried ia cblvioo IN,
The publication of The csrraspoud has relieved me
suhlsr,.
Two other charges bavs been made against me: L.,
not The co1h Sn'iai Iei;er OF nsIa ckson whi:h
say vas produced ard read 10 tue cabinet W.s nnl
Iroiutsd and read. Aad 81 tta, have, i'm property
LiaclOssd sabne secret
Upon the IT, objection mega i've testimony is relied
Upon NJ. NJ ,urOe, Mr.. A '3,ns and MI wiz, do mn,
recOlleci 'ha' il produced and read: or rather Nj
'ama and Mr.. Wit, do not rec0ee, IL for il il mani
let that h MoafOe, has no recollection upon the SUBJ
lrc', having reii.d wholly upon Me-. Wit. But Mr.
Caho"u has distinct recollection that wao not po-
dneed andreai. Whnou rel;ing upon at rule OF le-
81 evidence, Wbich declares, that one :. hi native
Wines ccuLtetvaiis many gegaiiVs ones there ia
b'h've abuGdfEi evidence in tue correspondence sell
TO iup?ott any staisment. Here beg leave 10 tran
scribe an afusie on the Globe OF tbs 20h Feb last
vtic1 hal mush force aud eogenty, and proves a.
leas' pre- 'umpVs'y |at my siaienert ;erning the
COS ien'ia letter Is corfsel Tho Globe We "Auer
~ he amrpi' dId fstas ions, about tho ptoducio,
OF Gen JacksonP Letter lore 'he cabnst il JuIy 1878
MI Monroe letter Pub hedbI Mr.. CAhoun go,s FAR
~ covhrm NJ Cfa.torI's statement. In ,he scBelu-
sOn Vi NJ. MsurOs Let ers to GeneTai Jackson, dated
December 'he 2it 1913, (Pduled 1880, by msisk, in
the pamFhleO Mo Monroe 'buS sPeskS OF Inc eoufieD.
tai letter your letter OF the h Of January, re-
'eived whilst wa' ssnsusy indiSpose': Observing
hai was from you hshied IL to Mr. Ca houn 10 read;
after reading two lines mysel-Ths Ter to take
command ia ihsi quarter had before then be en Issued.
He remarked after r'a ling The letter hat il was con.
6deniia one relating 10 Florida, which I must answer
asked him, il he had GoIwSrded 10 you tho orders
thai h,d been given 20 GpneB Chimes On hat subject
lie replied lha' he hsd-YoUr lister 10 Lns with mani
0lheTs rom ferGs 6ss put aside ia c0nseqnenee of nv
DdsPosiion, ard The great pressure rpon me al tho
time and never required to- vail after nv return frsm
Louioun, the receipt Of yours bv Nj H.,ohIv and
then on The suggestion Of mr. Calhoun New rhen
ct M. MoOtoe, return fsoG LoudouD, asd when va,
The iei7r by Mr. H'mely recsivs6l M. Calhoun
has given ns IN, evdanee to sho1. In cf his nole,
he tells US ihsi The inst cabinet msetvg that subsci
nok pacs on the 10Th or 18Th OF July, 1878 Mr. Men.
roe having rs'uInss on ihs I4h from his rssids 10
Loudsun Mr.. MsBross letter TO Gen j. d,tsd 10Th H.
~ 1878 hes ms Ibus: 81 received a,.y vour I.I.r n
June 2iS by Mr.. Handy, at my farm ~ Loutouo &c ,
Thus the time when the confidential letter was looked
up, on the suggestion Of Mr. Calhoun, is identified with
In few days. IL was aer Mr. Monroe's return from
Loudoun the I4'h, and before the lOth Julv is1s
the very period at which the cabinet were de6eraino
about the Seminole War; and at the very time MIR
Crawford says IL was produced before them There 4.
remarkable coincidence, between the details of MIR
Cra"lordS recent statement and Mr.. Monroe's account
o this ahhir, made In 1878, which proves the identity
OF the incidents alluded TO: Mr. Crawford saws NJ r
Calhoun made some alusiou to letter the General had
written 10 the ITesden who had forgotten that he had
received such err bu said it he had received
one, he could find It., and went directly ioto Li ca5
net and brought the letter out Mr.. Monroe in bis 10
ter Of the 2ist December, 1915 says your ieI,er
put aside &C. and required 10 until sC,c, ~
return from Loudoun, sc and then on the sugges,io =,
MI Calhoun Here Is conclusive proof Of Two things.
gesuon OF Mr. Calhoun after Mr.. Monroe's return from
oudon, On The l4h and before the writing OF his let
t5t 70 General Jackson on the 10Th Of July, 1878 ID
Mr. Cfaw ford present when the sn,Des,ion ,ga
made aud ,he letter produced. The Cabinet II seems
were several days ia elaboration Mr. Writ fnigbf M
have been present when The letter wa ,ro,t,,ca5 !.
any rae, the proof IS conclusive hat the letter vas ~
duced TO Mr.. Crawford on Mr.. Calhoun's snggesiion
Mr. Calhouns own account Of that letter IL 6eorrec,
He Gays, my recollection In relation 10 n scca ~ -,
Mr. Monroes statement ! csue into tliq roo,o uLan
he had apparently just received the letter He U"s ~
disposed at the time. .biDk he opened the le,s, -