Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1831-06-27
Rag1aaesOsgU gga1sSW~
.sEOettay Ecen&ns, Fame "a.


tho following paragraphs
'I.ottcrs have passed between Major Eaton and Mr.
Bcrrien, which represented % bo of the Eioniaa
stamp. We have heard ii mtcj that suppression OF
'hcn is on foot in high quarter"
- The Satnc papcf at Saturday evening SayS:-
"l'hc kc, II and cutting CORES punleuce b.twccLi
MIR Gerrirn and Major Eaten has not as vet come
to hight. a. Mr.. Is. caused the cnrsrspo dcnCe b.
tween hnsc!f and ,nrral jackson he puhssrc
To prevent MISREPRESENTATION" perhaps for :;e
Cause, it would be eli f,r hun pub!ish this also
il dcincd by Major Eaton, who, If report speak,
truly, has Mr. Bcrrcns ready consent to dc So"
IL The Philadelphia Sentinel, original jackson
paper of the unqualified complexion, thus express
es itself in reference the late disgracc incidents
Washington
s'As citizens of the United States as republicans az
friends to lac, morals, order, and dec0ru deeply
regret that mpcous truth calls upon us to record such
facts III public Journal. Anxious as VIC arc sub
NIT tho correspondence between the two secretaries
without comment; would do violence o all honora-
bic feeling if did not express our deep adherence
of the horrible nsinuation contained i'll Major Eaton's
Inst letter to Mr.. Inghan. An American matron more
pure, more exalted, more exemplary in all the re-
lations of life does not in this country deservcdy
celebrated is for female excellence than amiabc
and excellent lady of Mr. lngham. In making Is
sault utterly uuustiable, General Eaton has
med most III responsibility; responsibility not to
be referred To the umpragc of the pistol any other
Of the various means by which fashionable murdcrcrs
endcayor TO make the appear the better cause;
but 10 he fixed by the wise the vrtuou and the good
i prOVlGCnCc,
not IN high places, still the safe guardians, OF
public.
u The L. States Telegraph Of Friday evening,
in the following strain upon controversy
between Mcssrs. Inglam and Eaton
We will postpone for he present further No, zee
ofthe letter addressed by the President the pcsos
implicated III Mr.. inghams letter TO him, under date
of the 2lst inst. When MIR. / shall have been re-
quescd by the President la iuFni h the proofs upon
which he made the statement, contained IN his letter
they will be satisfactorily gvcr 1t is not for us to
anticipate him. we again say. that Mr.. Ingham has
not gone far as TO affect N any wi-c the proceed
los in'this
feared III the Globe This rug, which Mr.. Et-
says that The l9in, [SunIay.J he notified Mr.
Ingh,m th,t II he ell he had made upon HIM was
not promptly answered, he might expect suLh treat
InGit Mr.. Ealon Thought his conduct deserved =
mad thatefJrc, he dissolved all cunucxicn with the
Gove!Lit.ent Is II tn be presumed that so much
tho conid"ncc OF tie Executive, and holding such
office, ga st his dc ire! he srcctul re-
:cst OF e Pro SjGent would resign without giving
10 the ir1s!5en; the reason for doiGe? Was II
proper III m.jo! Eaton 10 id his JToih-i-in lIw, The
acting Secretary Oh such an crrLnd, with such n
threat, on Sunday Was not such IiiG1t CuUt ,tcG
and ihtcrdcd prevent Mr.. lnghams acceptance e
the challenger And lit Improper t,r MIR. Eaor:
while ) crclary OF War, to challenge Mr.. Ing!on.
wac 1t net equally Improper III MI his br, thcr 10
law and "c'mg success. o, Ia make the call on Mir.
lng!,:: Blu, III Ia; now saws, thi his rOtc wa>
written under indignant feelings, and that hence his
r"trrrmCc was made to icmalei!, tia. he now re-
'nts it =! that 1t never designed by him to meet
tic pubic eye. True, doubt and that, ard that
alone, i, hy supposed TO be the cause c such an
rni"undcd charge against lady, whose ciar.c or
was fec from lmPutati"n. The SANDER was, no
doubt, thrown into the last letter! similar SANDER
against another lady was introduced into another
correspondent &C, to prevent It's publication! ii Mr..
Eaton Is GeTanged, lie has method in Ills madness ;
nnI he Is now, 10 doubt compelled 10 this retreat by
ali
cited by R.s rude and untceling SANDER. siauG.
whc! ha net even lie shadow OF shade rest upon
What is the true state Of this question b fore
NJ. Eaton appointed Secretary of War c,ruin
Ia ;s6s Lad refused to associate with his WIFE, Ate.
u understood that he was sci, Cted and before.
bis name was announced, he informed tI,t hi,
'lcva':ol would work change III her favor; ! nd
advised not to provoke he consequences He
ih' rr tested that r, !sai to associate with In,
fIry wuui n"i be- The cause OF personal din: reno"
wiih any r. degrees ! Z found i. power III
creased. He obtained control OF the President.
will, and made aCqucscencc with his demand the
condition upon which his collcag CUES were to remain
IN Office. They rcfused--thc cabinet was dissolved;
ard he Philadelphia Inquirer, devoted to Mr.. Eaton
and the favored press IF Mai. Lewis, charged as
Justification for the removal of hCr husband, that
Mrs lngham had refused to associate with Mrs
EatoI. Many weeks thcreaft The sumo fact is sta
ted in the Telegraph Maj. Eaton then demands of
Mr.. IDgbom to di5avow the fact, under pain of beng
Id personally responsible, aud BY way # proyoca-
ton. sandcrs AIR. Inghums W.T.. Thus in The same
hr,a alb, and III fact in the note, declaring that
Mrs ingbnm unfit TO a<@o,iatc win vItunus
woman, and challenging her husbaLd b cause she
had refused associate with Mrs Eaton!
But he Globe asserts that the wisdom ofrhe Pres
idcnt more clearly exhibited than in rcnc-
wing every discontcuted Selling from his councils
Had the President acted .th the krnncss and pro-
per regard tor his charattcr winch his own
fame and the interests If bis CCurtrv required hc
woull have s,lcncrd the 'malign influence" ut once
II was IN his cover TO have hused The rising tnn by
rstrcting it tho d0mrs c fire, ide of his ,vofii"s
BUt he has adopted all their f., lmg~ aud passions
and by yle iirg IT, their cOnlro, become, We fear.
rrctrIcvab!y ih'ir vitlim. What had Mr. Inrbam
Nj. anrh. Mr.. Bcrricr, done 10 provoke the (
vuyatc anmo,:ty Of Mr. Eafor, Nothing We |
eiy the ingcnu ~ and The jnccnfiJn of Tie Globe 10
pint to single act with he single exception that
hey refused to compel ir lnui's 10 VISIT Mrs. |
Eaton. They bad MT slaudrrcd Mrs T. They had /
not lnstl'cd Mr.. Eaton. They had no private ami. |
mostly against Mr.. Eaton. On the contrary. they /
sympa hlscd FOR his misfortune. Why then i It no,y
pretended that Mr. Eatons private an nIpsi'i IS wcr,
good cause for dissolution of the cybincn; Is u2
,ll6 gn admission that Mrs Eaon's prya almost
ties "'rc good cause for dissolution o he cnbnots