Litchfield enquirer., 1831-03-03

purporing to be excupatory and explanatory OF his
interference in the affair between the principals
in the matter.
The Jackson editors appear take different sides
in this matter according their feelings preponderate
in favor or against Mr.. Calhoun. From the New-Ha-
ven Register we copy the annexed article upon the
subject:
| Since the publication Of the correspondence be-
! tween Mr. Calhoun and Gen. Jaskson, relative TO the
| Seminole war, the papers at Neutrality-suspicious. OF
the two parties-give us decided expression Of their
drferen, views Of the subject. The Globe, the new
ly established Van Buren, print expresses great sur
prise that Mr.. Calhoun should have brought subject
OF private controversy before the pnblic'hat he has
unnecessarily prolonged correspondence that ought
have been closed by single answer to Gen. Jack
son, that he did did not move speak against him
in Mr.. Monroe's cabinet. The editor that Gen.
J. deceived by the duplicy of Mr.. Calhoun, IN
his professions Of friendship and avowed approbaiio"
OF his c0nduci-tha he, Calhoun, substantially admits
the truth Of Gen. Jacksons suspicious and Of the al
legation Of Mr.. Crawfords letter, and that the pub
cation is neither less than arrangement OF
Gen. Jackson at the bar Of public opinion fire.
brand wanonIy thrown into the republican party, and
Mr.. Calhoun will he held responsible for the mischief
which may follow"
The Telegraph the Calhoun paper, replies at some
IengtI and says, that Mr.. Calhoun forced to the
course he took in seIf-decnce-hat the intrgues Of
the grea, Magician Wan Buren, could not be develop
ed without full detail Of the whole affair, and that "
WAS due to Mr.. Calhoun and the country at large to
place the matter in its proper light. Mr.. Calhoun,
in The Cabinet did disapprove Of Gen Ja-ksons con-
duct in a military point of view, not warranted by
his orders; hut for reasons Of general nature the
whole cabinet, including Mr.. Calhoun. approved his
conduct and sustained him through the subsequent at
tack before Congress
The Telegraph asks, " can the Globe he ignorant
that the present ersy is in which the Pres
ident has n,eresti adding, in substance. that Is
Impossible doubt that this affair was deliberately ar
ranged during Messrs. Van Buren, and Cambrellng's
visit the south, in the spring Of 1877 TO excite the
dspeasure Of Geh. jackson against Mr. Calhoun, by
telling him that he Calhoun moved and urged his ar
rest and punishment, in Mr.. MonrOes cabinet, with
view of being called into action ut proper time to
destroy Mr. Calhoun, by bringing the weight Of Presi-
dent Jacksons popularity bear upon him. and to ell
eva,e Mr.. Van Buren,.
For ourselves, think Mr.. Calhoun has complete
~ removed the charge Of dupcity and fixed that Of
malice, intrigue and misrepresentation upon the mo-
! yers Of this plot. Still apprehend il 10 The last
struggle Of Mr. Cahouns political life. He 10 deter
mined 10 die lighting bravey but the arch magician
il 100 much for himhs struggles will be Intellectual.
| TBy the last mail we received in the Washington
papers another address the public by Mr. Calhoun,
recommended by several letters from Mr.. Forsyth, Mr..
Hamilton, and Mr.. Monroe. In publishing the state
men, Of Mr.. Calhoun. the United States Telegraph
ACCOMPANIES it with some pointed remarks against
| Mr.. Van Buren,. The following is an extract:-
"Tbe statement clearly shows, that the arrange
menta Tor the accomplishment Of she plot If not con.
eeyed were at least cOTSummaed IN thIs city, ~ It
and 1923 The agent the district attorney Tor the
sOnIIDern district Of NeW-YOrk. The public may lie
eurioua IN know who he H.. and what his political
assocations He 10 James A. HamiI'On, Of New York.