Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1831-02-17

Iendss 'hef servcss In the profession desirable.
wsuld accept and retain the commission us. 90 oux %
might sufics TO OK the Judicial eosuom.n
II the interrogatosy were repeated in references 10
escn OF me imputed ivsn'sEss Of the plan which had
oeen 80 much extoed, and the matter were eaudidIv
soo s.av''y considered. II would be found TO furnish
no 10 IL, again" any one OF the mischiets which were
ch,rseaoie uPoo the existing institutions. For calm.
piuent, and undisurbed alton OF the papers, and
ms principles sppertaniug TO the cause aud for the
az ana assistance afforded by the exsrons Of COUNSEL
"heh were important TO tbs most eui ne
'he proposed syss1 would be found 10 be- iue oi civ
rss calculated than that which now existed.
" had been stated. aud much tsi I'd on In arrument
IN" the expense OF Chancery litigation would be
Erea ~ diminished. II that would be the certain cor
sequence o. The new arrangement it was, for tina, rsa.
son, entitled TO be tsvoraby considered But wa, /,
likely to be rea'ZeH Would IL no, seem that slIov
ancss wh'cL were now considered only reasonable
wnen enjoyed 6y tho Marshai., Clerks. and Connie,
~ OF nine Chanccry Cou'ts. would be only rea.
"nablo when they come 10 be distribu. I'D mon ,h
omeets OF one hundred ami seven courts. Thar "a.
vu' certain amount OF litigation, and In proportion A,
- persons who subsstsd on it's fruits.
IN tue same ratio would exist the necessity
" ,as'ng' rather than Of reducing the scale of fees
@ e"arges' II was certain that very seriou, charge
,s 90 Incurred in the 6r.t io'soeo. put the syi-
w :" operauon; charge that was tbs subject OF Jus,
P'an,' when the experiment. tor the sake Of which
jsctioue. ~ W.
The expenss Of removing tho cause, on IN. Dock.,
anu AZ tho Rules. with all the attending charges he
haa heard es.im ued at half million Of dollars That
9""s'o night ne erroneous; but when II was consid
ered mat there were other Lawyers to be employe
snu allowances to DO made to a OF officers whose
"uy should be to superintend the removal IL would
seen tnat the amount must uanavoidably be larger
anu would be farther scan, when the removal IA.
.empte', mat the convenience Of mali part onlv of
me parue to suit would be promoted, while al IF
'hc residue would be subjected 10 additional
.nees. Whatever was the rule Of dist ibu,on among
-. INC courts which might be adopted wheiher thai Al
,ue uost named defendant tho defendant h,viny h
interest at stake, the party In whose favor thr
RUE was applied, would have the cause carried to the
Cut. OF ms own county and the other parties must Of
naees'ty follow II. They would rather their suits
"s r 10 the court. where they were instituted
ne objection which existed against tho remova, Of
% causes now In court, afforded a practical illus.
Ta'a OF inc inconveniences Of tho system, when IL
an De carried into operation. IL the district svs,,m
wsie preserved, the business iu court-ai Of il
"u'on the parties preferred to be rstaned-eouId he
enuea IN the courts 10 which IL was Commenced And
regulating tho number Of districts BY the ,ub,,an,i,
convenience OF the people, the courts would be a, mn
e'o"s as there was any just occasion for unless. in
'hey were to be made for show AZ we'll a, M.
reserve tue district system, add valuable and n.ces
y reforms could be introduced, " hich were uus,
a'naoe under the proposed plan.
He concluded by observing that hs hal ,,,,
submit but a few views. e""'u 70
DEBATE to be Continued.