Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1831-05-13

" AN'''N' pa
STIRGiNIh:-At rules, holden in the clerks office
~ of the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 4h day of April, 1881: James
Harrison and Sally his wife, and other pitts. against
Thomas ID. Fisher, Thomas Blackwell and Mary his
wife, Robert ii. Warren and Harriet S. his wife,
Dabney p. Philips and Jane his wife, WIN. Fisher,
Elisha Smart and Martha hio wife, and other dfts.
The defendants above named, not having entered
their appearance and given security according to the
act of assembly and the rules of this court, and it APP
pearing, by satisfactory evidence, that they are not
inhabitants of this country; it is ordered, that the
said defendants do appear here on the first day Of
the next June term, and answer the bill of the plain
lifts; and that q copy OF this order be forthwith in
serted in some newspaper published in the city of
Richmond. for two months successfully, and p"sted
at she front door of he capitol, IN the said city.
~ A copy. Teste, WIN. q. PENOLEToS, &C.
SS~FTRGiNIA:-At rules, holden in the clerks office
" of the superior court of charcery for the RICH
mond district, the 18th day of April, 1881: J. McCaw,
and VIM. II. McCaw, pits, against Walter Jones, in
his own right, and rs executor OF Catherine Mccall,
decd, James Robertson, and William Swami. defts.
The defendant Walter Jones, not having entered
his appearance and given security according to the
act of Assembly and the rules of this court, and 1t
appearing.by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an
inhabiiant Of this country: 1t is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here on the first day ofthe next
June term, and answer the bill OF the plaintiffs; and
that a copy of this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city OF Richmond,
for two months successiyely, and posted at the front
door Of the capitol, in the sad city.
~ ~ NbDN' to'N - - - -
NVFIRGINTA: 4 IrGTes, holden ~ the clerks Office
" &C the superior court OF chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 4tb day Of April, 1851: Bacon
TAFT, pitt. against James p. Wilkinson and Henry Dc
Eude, dts.
The defcndan, Henry Dc Erde not having entered
hs appearance and given security according to the
act OF assembly and the rules OF this court, and it
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he IS not an
inhabitant of this cuurtry: ii is ordered, that the saiG
defendant do appear hero on the first day Of The
next June tcrm. and answer the bin OF tho plaintiff
and that a copy Of this order be forthwith inserted
IN some newspaper published in the city of Eich-
moHd. for two months successfully and posted 81.
thc front door Of the capitol, in the said city.
81 4 copy. Tcstc, W. G. ftvnryros, O c..
%g4IRGiNIA:-N rules, holden $40 the clerks Office
" of the superior court OF chanccry for the Rich.
mord district, the ith day Of April, 1891: Clement
- Weston. pitt. against Joel Nlckcrs, Charles
Gwynn, and John J.. Moore, dts.
The defendant John T.. Gucrc not having entered
his appearance arl given security according 70 the
act OF assembly and the rules Of this court, and e
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he IS not an
inlabitant of this country: it is ordered, that the SAID
defendant do appear here on the first day OF the next
June term, and answer the bill OF the plainuiii and
that a copy of this order be forthwith inserted IN
some Newspaper published in the city OF hIchmond,
Tor two months successfully, aud posted az the 'front.'
door of the capitol, in the said city
81 4 COPY. CeSte, WV. q. PENDAron, &C