Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1831-04-12
FRANCIS BEnlvELL M u
Just received and for sale by
ian - Iawtf II. G. McNEMARA

A quarterly court heId for the County of Lancas
ter, at the courthouse thereof, on Monday the
list day of March, 1881 John Thompson Diff against
William Thompson. and Anna, his wife. who was An.
Ma Huett Samuel Treakle, and John X. TreakIe dts
Nv CHANCERY.
This day came the plaintiff by his attorney and the
defendants not having entered their appearance and
gwen security according 10 law and the rules of this
court and appearing, to the satisfaction of the court
that the defendants William Thompson and Anna his
wife, arc not inhabitants of the commonwealth of Vir
gnIa on the motion Of the complainant by his coun-
sell II IS ordered, that the said defendants William
thompson and wife, appear here, the third Monday
III June next, to answer the bill of the complainant
and that copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in
the Richmond Wing, for two months successfully,
and another posted AT the front door of the court.
house of this county.
SO Copy. Attest, RoBT r. DUNAwAY, ID. CT. C..
IN Powhaan county court February the 10th, 1851
A. s. Woodbridge, Seth Cook, &c xecutor of joseph
Bondurant, decd and Benjamin Bondurant, complts.,
against Joseph Is Davis, Samuel Davis, and william
blackburn, defts.--IH CmANcEnY.
MS day came the compliments by A. s. Wool
dfdgc, esq., their attorney, and filed heir BILL and
me defendant William Blackburn, not having entered
hs appearance and given security according to the
act of assembly and the rules Of this court and it m.
pearng To the satisfaction Of the court that he is not
an 'nhabi'ant of this commonwealth: Therefore, on
the motion of the compls by their said attorney: 1t
10 ordered, that the said William blackburn do appear
here on the third "Wednesday in May next and answer
the ball OF the compliments, and give security
Tor performing such decree as the court NAV
make herein and that copy of :his order be forth.
WIN inserted IN some newspaper published in the city
of Richmond for two months w. and that an
o'her copy be posted at the front door Of the court
house OF this county for two successive court days
~ Copy. Tcste. n. 7. GRAVES, ID. G.
\VlRGiNlA:-At rules holden in the clerks Office
~ of the superior court of chancery for the Rich
m0nd district, the 10th day of March, 1881: James
Hamilton, PlN., against J Fitzgerald & Co, and
James S. Foley, dfts.
re defendant Fitzgerald, not having entered
MS p carance and given security according to tho
act OF assembly and the rules of this court and il ap
peaP ng, by satisfactory evidence that he not an in
habtn OF this country: II is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the FIRST day of the next
June term, and answer the bill Of the plaintiff and
at copy ct this order he forthwith inserted H. some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months excessively, and posted ~ the front door of
the capitol, in the said city, Copy. Tcs;e,
<6 WV. e.. PESrLEToE, e. e.
NRiHiINfA AZ rules, holden ~ the clerks Office
nf the superior court Of chanCcry, for the Rich.
mond district. the ith day of April 1881 James
smith, pitt against NcVtou T. Smith and other dts
The defendant shove named, not having entered
Ms appearance and given security according 4 the
act of Assembly and the rules Of this court and IL
appearing by satisfactory evidence shat he is not an
nhabiaut Of this county. it is ordered that the
sad defendant do appear here on the first day of
'e next June term aud answer tho bin of the plain
iIl and That copy Of this order be forthwith in
serted ~ some newspaper published in the CITY Of
hichInoni, for two months succesrvey, aud posted AZ
| the front door Of tie capitol, in the said CITY
81 COPY. Tcsie' WV. G. pgSnLEroS, c. C.
J o. JOB PRINTING! executed ~ the Why oae.