Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1831-04-09


The defendant John l.. Moore not having entered
ms appearance and given security according to the
act OF assembly and the rules of this court, and it
appearing by satisfactory evidence that he is not an
inhabitan of this country: il is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the next
June term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff: and
'hat copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city of Richmond,
Tor two mouths successfully and posted the front
door OF the capitol, in the said city.
d copy. Testc, WV. G. PESpLErop, &. C.
l\VlRHlNiA:-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
" ct the superior court of chanccry for the Rich
mond district, the 9Th day of April 1851: Mary Boil
!ing' and Thomas Shore and Maria H:-ric, his wife,
pitts aginsi Edw ,rd Watkins, Alexander T. Boiling
John Boiling, JTn., and other dts.
Inc defendants Alexander T.. Boiling and John
"o"'"g'J r not having entered their appearance and
gwen security according to the act of assembly and
the rules OF this court. and it appearing by sasfac-
tory evidence, that they are not inhabitants of this
country is ordered, that the said do ap
pear mere ON the first day of the next June term
ana answer the bill OF the plaintiffs; and that copy
ct this order be forthwith inserted in some uewspa
per puo'shedin the city of Richmond, for two morhs
success'veiy. and posted at the front door of the
capitol, in the said city
| 81 copy. Tes,e, WIN. G.. PrxnLErox, &C.
| \TlRGiNlA:-N rules, holden I'm the clerks office
! " OF the superior court OF chancery for the Rich
Ioond district, the 4th day of April. l8Si John h.
Ciopton and Maria C. his wife, and Joseph Jackson
and Jane T.. his wife, pitts against John III Foster in
ms own right and rs ex'or of John Foster, decd
and John ST. John, and other dts
The defendant John ST. John 10, havinc entered
ms appearance and given security according to the
act of assembly and the rules of this court, and il
pPGarmE by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an
H"ioi'aht OF tins country: IT is ordered, that the
ssu defendant do appear here the first ay of the
next June term. and answer the bill of the plaintiffs
ana That copy of this order be forthwith inserted
IN some sewsPaper published in the city of Rich
onu tor two months successvely, and posted al the
front door OF the capitol, IN the said CITY
81 a copy Teste, VIM c. PENpLErox, &C.
\V'kHiNlA:-At rules, holden in the clerks office
"' uie superior court OF chancery for the Rich .
mond district, the 4,h day of April. 1851. R,cn,
att PIN against James Il. Wilkinson and Henry De
Eude, dts. '' NS
The defendan, Henry De Erdc not having entered
ms appearance and given security according 20 the
act OF assembly and the rules of this court and Il
appearing, by satisfactory evidence that he is NOT =,
nhaotant OF this country il is ordered that the sail
defendant do appear here the frs, day of the
next June term, and answer the bill of the plap,;
ana that copy ct this order be forthwith inserted
IN some newspaper published in the city of Rich
'!one Tor two months successfully, and posted AZ
the front door of the capitol, in the said CITY
81 copy. Teste, WIN. G. PENDLErox, O.
SVlRGlNIA:-At rules, holden in the clerks office
~ OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 4th day of April, 1881: Jobn
Davis pi'I against David Jiggets and Susanna his
wiie, and John Bullock, ex'or of VIM. Bullock who
was eXor OF VIM. Simpson Davis, decd dts
The defendant John Bullock not having entereI
his appearance and given security according to the
act OF assembly and the rules of this cour; and Il
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is moi an
inhabItant of this country it is ordered that the
said defendant do appear here the first cay of tho
next June term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff.
and that copy of this order be forthwith inserted
IN some newspaper published in the city of Rich
m"nd' tor two months successfully, and posted NJ
the front door of the capitol, II the said city
81 a copy Teste, WIN. G.. PENnLEroN C. C
NWIRGlNIA: At rules holden in the clerks Office
~ OF the superior court of chancery for tn. Rich
mond district, the 18th day of April, 1851; John
tieid ana John H. DAVIS pitts against William Cut
Ter ard Richard 7. Boiling, dts.
The defendant Richard r. Boiling not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according
to the act OF assembly and the rules of this court
and 1t appearing by satisfactory evidence that Inc ia
not inhabtent Of this country: IL is or,.rcd III,
the said defendant do appear here on the first dav Of
the next June term, and answer the bill of the plan
'h'; and that copy of this order he forthwith in
serted IN some newspaper published in the CITY of
Richmond, tor two months successivcly, and posted
at the front door of the capitol, in the said CITY
81 copy. Ieste, WIN G.. FESDLEToS, c. c.
\VlRGlNtA-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
~ of the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 4h day of April 1881: Josbua r,
Garrison, adm'or Of Ed. b. Garrison, decd. nnr
against William Wynn and Richard r. Boiling, and
other dts. o. ~
The defendant Richard p Boiling no. b,v;n,, ~
tered his appearance and given security ACCORDING IN
the &C. of assembly and the rules of this cour, orJ
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is rot
an nhabtaIt OF this country: it is ordered that the
SAID defendant do appear here the first day of the
next June term, and answer the bill of the PLAINTIFF
and that copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city of RichmorJ
for two months successfully and posted a, the front
door of the capitol, in the said city
81 copy. Tcs,e, WM. 6. PaxpLEroN, c. c.
NWiRGlNlA:-At rules, holden in the clerks ofirc
~ OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 9TH day Of April, 1881: William
Gilliat, adm'or of John Gilliat decd Milf apa;ns,
Joel Wolfe, Samuel Wolfe, James VI. Wolfe, Michael
Wolfe, Nathaniel Wolfe, Udolpho Wolfe, Josenb
Carter and other defis.
The defendants above named, II OF having entered
their appearance and given security accortliI To the
act ot assembly and the rules of this court and II
appearing by satisfactory evidence that they are not
inhabitants OF this country IL rs ordered that the
sIId defendants 20 appear here the first day of
the next June term, and answer the bill of the plain
TIL and that copy OF this order be forthwith in
serted IN some newspaper published in the CITY of
Richmond, for two months SUCCESSFULLY, and posted
at the front door Of the capitol, in the said CITY
81 Copy. Tcste. WM. &. PEvpLEroN, C. G.
NViWGlNlA:-At rules, holden IN the clerks office
" of the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
mond district the 9TH day Of April, 1881: James
Harrison and Sally his wife, and other pitts against
chpr 4 hnr, a