Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1831-01-18

e
commentator, and IS equivalents not cxccedng tn,
ordinary cei-in f5es' Few If any OK the clai,n,n,
wonld have given thing cortar,
Several claims offered m. T. would .,r-
less han one h ~. tn. owners c,u-i. ..,,.. ts
much declined, and - hers hnv h..,, su.-cs.,.....
Judgments obtained fnr very arrr sums & ,ybica d
per cont, # ever paid, VIII be rrl.,-t annie. r.r..,
toil--hut could not frrosoC this arr r--u .,I,.
nothing less han tlri Notwithstanding. ti,. A..
G t tr.hhS '-5o'hrn-t 9 'hHt erm would e9aaa
nave effected tio ohiec' Tho ,~:,t', b. 5is a
were considered almost absolutely do r-.--. ,4
scarcely any of'ho pqr'ios would have be-, ,,I,c-
,iich' any e',n"n-e whatever /" pr .-rrr H. M
Legislature had however been r-ova'' ON =. -nss
som" oI TN n giving commutrt re- - prt ur ,orn
promis,. aud If tho claims could hav a~r broroht
'''I'r;' !" or ihrec az crch sNs~i n t1or ,,-,-rd
prohRjlv have hoeu patd auf bet t.,r ,!,is oboh;;
OF Inc l'2s,is!a,uTns doing som iur I do nor bc'
';'.T' any person would Dave uu AXE 20. rr,,,
the SUITS fC~ enc half do NOT -;v h,e IN u r.,o.,
anG apn's';i'n o. any oHo-I 'ossn to ak no fvor
i'H S" AR os my own interest is concerned I~v.onli
rather the Legislature and the Cou-,s Should -eicct
10" claims than allow them if arv ircy,-o. sion =, ~,
ter case Is 70 exist arajusf ;ba r.;.yEec g 49, e
duet. Eth" claims he rejected i Will h., co,c, 10
- ''i'. n'!"l'' y promised, was less
'i'' l''H most ordinary fec. But ! do NOT moan -
me cao'', believing hem inst N prinrinle
WI do all can to asah!i-h l,rn
1t rs Suggested that le adrui-trac Bon az ,o i,
matte necessarily ofany Consequence Is not known Thar
~ ne PENALTIES of hond reference had not onlv
70 'e Fne @; the tate On the c7Ils auc. Of tho
'o beng "s'ru'e' In looking Report Of the AMI
~, see h" ''fr' cases %! thee -ad,lrae bonds o. i
sui, f., the r, , ,'! 's' . O." wears nriofc tins
and In lhs, ca, arc. i; , '. ~ "'iV "o sirhu'ees-
coyssa a. an, ~ 10 me Hn'.'' nothing be re
large sum. - "' commonwealth a
In ano1sr the PENALTY Of the bond is sian or, IT..
olv chit. .c Ii, 7ff-.r and mao mar
the claim add mo- d.f Iy NOV" emitted to every
been oopH',son in he Court have required bond in he
$500. sud in ar administrator il, oG i0f
her sister twin, belize. Win ,, ~ ~ | ~; Oh ms vile, d.
no aSa aalaYed :" rS'-' Why therefore should laeer
An2'hr' remark "i the Nucjnr, tone of complaint, s
dencc aiken p, ,.s j),s ,n, tfo 'nered upon EVIL
dence can of rig be addn~as in % snow. tha no evil
viui!s,y been >ubnite,,r lir r.. 49,, In lau nor pre-
IS 20 revise ms judgment IMAM m Nv a.pea TO the '"rrt
clairr winch had been ,,razarfsf ~ L.: |0lianVnS the
claims auv kfn- against the -o,r.', ~ presenting
dpnca aE,7,,, ~ r,,s-s ~, -, a'Il Is not the evi
controversy exisffus If, , a,l ,I ,o,'e he gye" no
eye TO 'is rernar A.e,n.,I f., % ~ y.a IS an'Nher an
did apply 10 the Auditor Il. know, II Is I ralhaH's
and place of tax M ev i,,-a lie ,., - "a mo
told him been r,,ren-t, ON a s; sg m'rfa ~.
communicates hi, views ir answer He sad ~ i " WI |"
pcst 40 unnecessary touh'e difficulty and that the tar,
should ' ac,ari'v ni~rl vas all he ren"I E
o"' Inference 90 On" ne.,' la fn :,nl he AS rioi,,
70 now that here eror IN recev;as e. pn|i ey
derce iii" lau belongs neither to ae Co!,t Nor co,r, ~
"n 'A' Intend 10 make commentary on the >udi,or,
= eioFt-@Xcen - shnHs he ;aci and If f..e,rn -
intend even advert singular posi1ns talen m 10,
o'1cer Yet cannot refrain FROM observing his References 10
the example Of Congress giving c0n,nn,aI,on sc 10
verv nn!ar,nnas as fn ,g 'o' creditors to accent il is
the officers. hut their ojo, 20 accord, w. 80;
The Legislature last bv resolution infnrn,SSd ,,c
mauds hev might hqy, on The ,.tr Of ,e |ang any De
The invitation OF the assembly ac,en,cdand The ii.
for supposed ju demands h,ce fsen I
The Auditor thinks - would he Just in The eo,aIawra
no" to 'eeede and to he caiman's we viii
give 70" three or iour times the Courts have All
ua 10 be voif Just res. and we viii give YOU
''eisH't q" your - MS
','lo 'HnSs iia those who have rccevad the commr-
".lo' " h,se judgments be najd-Indeed had thought
c" could vary any contract BY the the Acts the
rIe , ND +or' y, cas-. e.. ,-,...,
Of Ir .,,'.o saws , %l'sr must have regarded the pledge