Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-12-04

the superior court Ot chanctrS for the Richmond
district the Sub day at August 1885, Claiborne Grad
dock and Mary his wife. James Craddock and Juiith
his wife, plfs. against Richard Dolby, ahm'or ot
Lloyd Robertson decd. Samuel ID. Burke and Peter +.
Sreggi-and Nancy Robertson, and Matthew, Martha,
Cstharne, Mary, William, Sarah, Eliza and Lucy Ro
bcrtson children of W ill,am Robertson, dec'd;-Dan.
! 'ei s., Lemuel. Madison and Martha Ann Robertson,
Children OF John Robertson, dec'I;-Ailen Freeman.
who survived his wife Caroline, late Robertson, and
J"hn and Grace Freeman their children. and John
Poke and Sarah his wife. late Robertson, dts.
/ Inc defendants except the three first namely
not having entered their appearance and given secu.
rty according To the of assembly and The rules of
TINS court and appearing, by satisfactory evidence.
that they are not inhabitants of this country; it is
dered that the said efe ndans do appear here on the
first day OF the next January term and the bill
OF the plaintiffs; and that a copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the city OF Richmond, for months successfully,
and posted at the front door of the capitol the said
ci'y. " copy. Testc,
20 WIN. G PrNpLEToN. c. C.
" iRGiNiA. Al rules holden in the clerks office of
" the superior court of chaneery for the Richmond
district, the I'd day of August 1880 Stewart Jackson
pitt against John &. Bosseau. James Perry, VIM Per-
ry, John Perry and other dfts. 49,
The defendants James Perry, VIM. Perry, and John
Perry not having entered Their app- arancc and gwen
security according to the act otassemby and the rules
OF this court. srd IL appearing, by satisfactory evi.
dence, thai they not inhabitants of this country; it
is ordered, that the said efesdanis do appear here
on the first day of the January term and answer
the bill of the plaintiff; and that copy OF this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
",
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the
said city. 4 copy. Teste,
40 WM. G. PENpLEroN. C. C.
NlRGlNiA. AT rules holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the Cd lay of August 1850; Rober, King Ro-
bert Temple and John Skyrer, pitts against Richard
Patterson, James Cooke, Thomas Floyd and James
Fox, dfts.
The defendan, Richard Patterson not having enter
ed his appearance and given security according to the
act OF assembly and the rules OF this court and ap
pearing ~ satisfactory evidence he is not an in
habiant OF tins country; II is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiffs and
that copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months successfully, and posted at the front door of
the capitol, in the said city. copy. Teste,
10 WM Il PENDLsToN. c. C.
w EGiNIA AT rules, holden in the clerks Office Of
" the superior court Of chsncery for the richmond
district, the 9th day of Sept. 1850: James Andrew,
pl'f: against John Bell, ex'or of Reuben Howard,
decd and trust under his will, Bowling Starke
and William l.. Howard, dts.
The defendant William l.. Howard not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according TO
The act ct assembly aud the rules of this court and It
appearing, by satisfactory evidence that he not an
iabsnt OF this country il is ordered, that the said
de- nant do appear he re on the frs, dav of The
January term, and the bill the paini i and
that copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published i'll the city of chmont, for two
months successfully and posted q, the front dor of
the capitol, in the said city copy. Tes,r,
~ WV &. PEsnLEroS, c. C.
w RGiNA. Al rules holden in the clerk IS office of
" The superior court of chancery for the Richmond
h's,r.ct' the 4th day OF October 1890 Mary Boiling
and Thomas Shore and Maria Harriet his wife, pitts
against Edmund Watkins, shift, &c. Alexander Gun
bingham. Richard p. Boiling and other dts
The defendants Alexander Cunningham and f. p
10 lg not having entered their appearance and fiy.
en- So cury according to the of assembly and the
rules OF this court, and it appearing, by
evidence mat they are not inhabitants of this country
ordered, that the said defendants do appcar
on the first day of the January term aud answer
the bill of The plaintiffs and that copy of this order
De iortn"lth inserted IN some newspaper published
in the city of Richmond, for two months successiyeiv
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
city. A COPY. Teste
~ WIN. C. PENDLEToN, c. c.
NIRGiNIA. At rules. holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chancery tor the Richmond
district, the 9TH day of October 1885, the President
Directors and COMPANY OF the tarmers, Bank of Viz