Phenix gazette. [volume] (Alexandria [D.C.]) 1825-1833, 1830-02-25

,fys: Malyiahu,
r ~, IN ;he negative. North Carolina was
'5'' As the consent OF nine States was
f':. 81, the sSrds could not sand and were
>nn .ccSIdingly. Mr.. Jefferson voted
9;A -. US. but was overruled by his col
:gy.:, os the next year, 1888, Mr., King,
iA NJ seconded by Mr.. Elicry, OF
N'' ,T,nJ nroposed the formerly rejected
y. with this addition:
-" a., regulation shall be an article Of COM
~ 80, mn fundamental principle ofihe Consti
=, %s tBStIuteen original States, and each 81
. ~, ~ ,Ss,er!5sd in the Resolve" Se'
=. hi, clause, which provided the adequate
.S,rough security, the eight Northern
~ >, ina! time votrd afirma'irrlg, and The
''V s,n,b.,n S, les negatively. The votes OF
20 80, were not yet obtained, and thus the
@, ;,;cn WAS again rejected by the Southern
Tn. perseverance OF the North held
'' "a ,wo years afterwards the object was
- l. i, no derogalion from thu credit,
re, tho, HAY be, Of drawing me ordi-
,b,, is principles had before been pre-
IA discussed in he form ef Resolutions
.. ,hopid reason in Iha; way, what would
" If the distinguished honor of the An
e ,Es Declaration of lndepehdence!-
'r.,,. !, 40, sentiment in that paper which
"a M, besn yoed and resolved IN he Assem-
..ss and o,her popular bodies IN the country,
,y,f and over again
r. honorable member has now found
-, hi. gentleman Mr.. Dane, was mem
aG1,e H,T ford Convection. However un-
.',,,,.d III, honorable member may be OF cha
aud occurrence, a. The North, it would
',a, TIA, br has i, MS elbow on this occasion
,,,. bisb minded and lofty spirit, some mag
,,,imous and true hearled monitor, possess
Irr The means of local knowledge, aud ready
a ,ynply the honorable member with every
,,;ng down even 10 forgotten aud moth-sa;en
,v, pepuv nsmphIers, whi'h may be used 10
-. iiSsdvar,age of his own country. But, as
,a ,he Hartford Convention, sir, allow me TO
,,v ,hs, The proceedings OF that body seem
Nv n be less read ADD studied in New Eng
land han farther South. They appear 20 be
IooksJ to, not in New EugisnG. bu elsewhere
for me purpose Of seeing how lar they NAV
,,rys as precedent. Bat they will not an
,ser the Eurpose--;hey are qoir-roo 'ame
The lariude in which they or,gIua I'd wa 100
odd Other Conventions, oE more recent ex
yepce Oaye gone wr-le bars leug'h oeyGnd
fine learned Doctors of Cc.leon and
,lbeville have pushed heir commentaries
m tie Hartford collect so fAr, that the orr
in4 ext writer's are Ihrown enurely into be
h,de haze nothing TO d., sir, w'h the
Hartford Convention Is Journal, wrIch she
,n,tmln has qUoteC, neNer read. So lar as
ne honorable nember may discover IN It's pro
,,dings 1 spirit ~ any drsrve rese mbliIg 'ha,
hich wss avowsd and jusi6eI 10 hose other
onyen ions 70 which have alluded, or SO tar
those proceedings Can "e shown to he dts
wal TO the Constitution, or ending 10 disu'
loo. 30 far snall be "a ready - anv one 10
e,,Dw on hem repre- hension anh crn u'e.
Having dwrlt long on this Convention, and
n,r. occ urrences Of that dsy, IN he hope,
rohably, (Which VIII not be gfa'i6rd) that ]
1ould leave n, course Of this debate to follow
I'M. a, ienc h, in hose excursions, the honni-
Bile g,ntlsm n returned and attempted anolh-
r object. He referred to spsech OF mine IN
he o,ner House, the same which ad occasion
0 alude TO myself the other day; and has
,uo ed passage or ,wo from i, With bold,
haugr uneasy and l4boriag air Of confidence,
Is # M mad detected in me an Inconsistency -
Judging from tae geutleman's manner, ran
ger W thr course Of The debate, and 10 the
oont IN discussion, would nave imagined,
from 70 triumphant tone, lhst The honorable
memlr vas about to over" helm me- WIN
a manifest CONTRADICTION. Any one VINO heard
rim, and who had not heard what ] had, IN
h.l previously said. must have thought me
routed and Discounted, as the gentleman had
pro uI,cd. Sir, d breath blows all tins iriumph
,w,y There is not the slght,s difference IN
he sentiments OF nv remarks IN The Two oc'
,sons Wha' said herr on "Wednesday, Is
n exact accordance with tn. opinions expres
ed ~ me in the o her House IN 1925 -
Though The gen'lemam had The metaphysics
i Hudlbras though ne were able
To sever and divide
a hair 'tsixt North and Northwest side"
e vet could not ,ns,rt his metaphysical seis'
or, h,tween rhr fair reading OF NV remarks
u 1925. and what said here las week lh'rt
5 -, only no conlradic ion, no difference bu'
D truth, too exact a similari y, bo h IN thought
nd language, ID ne entirely in just taste
ad my,ea quoted the same 'prech; had re
urred 70 II. aud spoke with i, oven brtore me-
nd much Of what | said was lit'Ie more than
'petltipn Grsm il, In order 20 make tnlshlne
FORK WITH this alleged eonrad'cuo", permit
'e TO recur 10 the origin Of this debate, and
tuew ITS course. This srrm, rxp~dient, ant
lay be done Us well now as a. anv time.