Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-01-01

NWlRGlNiA-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 5th day of October 1929: James
Molly, pl'i against VIM. Moody, Daniel S. Middsgh,
and James S. Moss, dfs.
The defendant William Moody not having entered
bis appearance and given security according 10 the
act ct assembly and the rules OF this court and il an
pearing by satisfactory evidence that he is nat an in
habltant of this country it is ordered that the sail
defendant do appear here on the tenth day of the
nci January term, and answer the bill OF the plaintiff
aud chat coPy c: this order he forthwith inserted in
some "eWspaEef puhIishs i in the city of Richmond
nr tw" months successfully, ami posted the front
door OF the capitol, IN the said city.
copy. restc, Wv. G. rrNuLEToN. {. G..
VETERINARIAN rules, holden ir the clerks office
oi the superior cOuF; OF chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9Th day Of October, 1892: John
Sneings George Snellings, and others, pitts. against
VIM &. Elan, atlm'or with the will annexed of Eliza
beth Keen, decd. and John Blankenship, df,s.
The dcicnl liant JOHN BiI"kensiip having enter
ca hrs appearance and given security according the
act OF assembly and the rifles of this court, and APP
pearing by satisfactory evidence that he is not an m
ahtant of this country, is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear hers IN the tenth day of the next
january tcrTo aud answer The bill of the plaintiffs; and
that copy ct this order be forthwith inserted ia some
newspaper published in the city OF Richmond, for two
months suceessvel,, and posted the front door of
the capitol in the said city. \ copy.
Teste, Wm 6. PsNpLRroN, e. G.
NlRGiNIA~--At rules, holden in tho clerks Office
Of The superior court of oharcery for tile Rich
nOud district, tile 5ih dy Of Octo~er 1892 Carter
Braxon and Mary g. lbs wife, pitts. against Robert
Iicaly, ahn,or Gle bons Of Peter Kemp, aud admir-
of Sam. win. Sayre. and also adm'or of ihus Trice
and Ovcrton Seawcll aud hs wife, and othcrs dts
The defendants Ovetton Srawcll and his wife no,
laeing offered their appearance and given security
according to thc act assembly aud the rules of tins
court, and it appearing by satisfactory evidence that
that tlcy inhabitants of this country IL - tr
dcrtd that tue said defendants do appear here on the
tenth day OF tile next JsOuHy tern, and answer the
bill OF the plaintiffs aud that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted IN some spapcT published i'm the
city qf Richmond, for two months sueccssiyrly and
posted the front doc: of the capitol, IN the said CITY
1 \ copy Tcstc, WV. &. PENpLgroS, c. e.
XTIRGtNlA:At rules holden IN the clerks office of
the superior court ut chanccry fur the Richmond
district, the 5th dsV OF October 1922 Robert bah
ncy p against Walter Shelton surviving partner of
himself and q. y shelton deed. late partners under
the firm of =. u. shelton { Co. Biunford Perks Rob't
Nelson, aud other delts.
The defendants MuhfOrd Perks and Rubt Nelson
not having entered their appearance and given sccur.
y according To the act Uf Assembly aud the rules Of
this court, aud 1t appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they not inhabitants Of this country; IL IS order
cd. that the said defendants DO appear here OF tho
tent, day Ot tue next January term, and answer the
bill vt the plaintiff; and that a copy OF this order be
forthwith inserted ~ newspaper published ia the
city ct Richmond, Tor two months successfully, and
posted at the front door ct the capitol the said city
copy. Tesic, WV. &. PESULELoS, c. c.