Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-15

ElVcn-
The act Of assembly and the rules Of this and
appearing. By satisfactory evidence that he IS not
inhaoAnt ofthis counry tits ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the first day Of
January term, and answer the hill Of the plant and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, fort~o
months successfully and posted the font door OF
the capitol, in the said city. A copy. Testc,
| 20 WN..G PKNpLEroN. c< c.
| VIRGINIA.; AT rules, holden n, the clerks Office
OF thesnpcrior court OF chsncsry for the Rich.
mond district, the 9th day ef September $50: VIM.
Jones Harksaalc. sdur Of Frances Tsbb, decd, pitt
against rheodrc Blair Bsnns,er and Seigniora his
wife. John Bann.ster ard other dts.
/ The defendant John Bannister not having entered
his appearance and given security according to the
ofassembly and the rules Of this court, and it APP
prarin. by satisfactory evidence, that be not al,
habi,st of this country itis ordered that the said
defendants appear here the first day of the
that copy of this order be forth Sitl inserted II, same
newspaper published in city of :chuons Tor two
months successvely and posted at ths front door of
/ the capitol, in the said city. Acopy. fes,e,
40 WAr.' G. PkkoIsroS, g. G.
SVSIRGiNiA.-At rules. holden in the clerks office
" If the superior court OF chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9Th day of july 1890: Carter
adn'or of Samuel W. Sayre adm or de bonis non of
Peter Kent, and adm'or Of Ihos. rrice, doc' Over
ton Scaweil and his wise repre- senaii,es az Sterling
Seawell, decd, and other Offs
The defendants Overton Scawc and his Wife not
having entered their appearance and given security
according To the act of Assembly and The rules of this
court and ap pearing BY satisfactory evidence that
they not inhabitants at this country it is ordered
hatthe said Pendants do appear here on the rst a
ct the next January term, and the bill the
plaintiffs: and that copy Of this order be orhwilh
inserted 10 some newspaper published in the city of
Richmond, for two months successfully, end posted
at the front door of the capitol, in the said city
: 20 Acopy Ic-'-, WIN G. Pr tEros.c.o.
lSy2iRGINiA. AT ralcs, holden in the clerks Office
4 " of the superior court of chancery for the Rich
n Sci p,er
Scott and Caroline NJ bis sife, and John Robertson
and EIiz sDs his wife, pits. against Dabney Miller
the will annexed Of Elizabeth Rocker dec d, John L
Townes,Josepi Smith aud Judith Lis wife, and other
fdfts.
! The defendants John l.. Townes. and Joseph
appearance aud given security ACCORDING 10 the act
OF Assembly aud the rules of this count, and appear
ng by satisfactory evidence that they are not nhab
itans Of ,hs country. it is oriered that the said de-
PENDANTS do appear here the first day of the next
January term and answer the bill of the plaintiffs; and
that copy of this order be Gortx ID in SONG
newspaper pu5lishediuihe city of Richmond for two
tnonths successfully posted at the front door of
lthe capitol, in the said city. copy. Teste,
! 20 wa. g. PksPLETov, C. O..
\VfiR6IN Ai-At rules. holden IL the clerks office
" OF the superior court of cAancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9th dsy of September 1880 Jacque
line r. Taylor adm'orof James Halliday, pltf against
james Dick and Nathapiel Dick. in their own rights
and as surviving partners of Dicks, Moore & Co. and
others, dfts.
The defendants James Dick and Nathaniel Dick,
not having entered thei Appearance and given secu-
riiy according 10 the act of Assembly and the rules of
this court, and il appearing, BY satisfactory evidence
that they not inhabitants of this sountry il is or.
dered that the said defendants do appear here on the
frst day of the next January term, and answer the
bill of the plaintiff; and that a copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the city Of Richmond, for two months successiyey
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
city; copy Teste,
SV7IRGiNlA.At rules, holden in the CLERKS office
" of the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the ID day OF August 1850 JOHN Dun.
Top, and David Brydon and Janett his wife. plts
against Griffin Organ, David ID. Brydon, and David
Dnuop, ex'ors Of James Dunlop deed and Robert
Dunlop and James Patterson, dts.
The defendants Robert Dunlop and James Pate rsop,
not having entered their appearance and given secu
riy according to the act of Assembly and the rules Of
tins court and II appearing by satisfactory evidence
That they are moi inhabitants of this confry IL is or
dercd that the said defendants do appear hear on the
rst day Of the next January term, and Dill
OF the plaintiffs and tlat copy OF this order be
forthwith inserted in soirc newspaper pubshed in
the city Of Richmond, for two months successiyeiv
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
city; Acopy. .Iesre.
10 W.. 6. PEsntSrox g c.
J WiRGlNiAs--At rules holden in the clerks flee
Of the superior court Of cIancery for the Rich-
mood district The 5t' day Of july 1880 Henry Clarke
and VIM. J. Clarke, exors of Jnn. Clarke dec d. pIt
against John 5. stdbbs. in his own right and adm'or
Of John s. Stubs, sew, decd, Herbert Stubs Ran
doph Stubbs and other dts
/ The defendants Herbert Stubs and Randolph
stubb@ not having entered their appearance and Civ
en- security according TO the act Of Assembly and The
rules OF ths court, and It appearing, by satisfactory
evidence that they inhabitants of this coun-
try Il is ordered. thai The sad defendants do appear
mere on the first day Of the next JsDuary term, and
answer the bill of the plaintiffs and that copy Of
D,s order be iorthwith inserted in some newspaper
published in the city OF Richmond. for two months
succe ssvey, and poscdat the front door Of the capt.
! 70, IN The said city copy Teste,
~ WN.o. PESnLrroS, 6. &.
NfflhGlNiA AT rules. holdeh IN the clerks Office
~ OF The superior court of chancery for the Rich
mono district, The 9th day Of September 1880: Fran
cls ~ royai, plt against Hlwar johnson and Caroline
NJ " Johnson his wife, ThOs. Drake. WIN. &. POvail,
kosna Johnaon' Philip Johnson, and Edward Johnson,
infant children OF said Edward and Caroline, defts
ilfe defendants Edward Johnson and Rosna, Phil
~ and Edward Johnson not having entered their b.
peafance and gwen security according 20 the act Of
Assembly and the rules If This court, and il appear
ing by satisfactory evidence, that they are not nhab-