Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1830-01-29


VoL. VlI.-No. Il
cn%mi0s Of the Whole Finally they were laid tbs
, Wno WEBS s"s a5s JA ySj9 y.
n cpmmnniea'ion from the Senate stated they had
Passe1 ''e onis--l, Adding part of Kanawha np,:
Cabell to hogan g. Authorship separate elect Tor
IN Aibemarle; 8, Authorizing separate election IN
scott; Ihey have rejected the bill in favor of Plea,
SAINT and agreed the resolution for tha
election of Bngadier General OF the irb Rr,naJa
4 On motion of MIR. Goodc, leave was given! 10
P Pr,nE IN nai "a to ISL abosniOg the BOARD Of
!snd OF Nelson A1iier, Stands, Watts, Newman Of
Mason, e!avely, Gilmer, Payne, and Wooifo.k: = ,
On motion OF Mr.. Goode. The order Of the day for
Was postponed to "Wednesday next. Sslssss
HsPofts wore made from various Committees bv
Hessrs Mason OF Erred, White of RockbIidse, and
On motion of Mr. Rutherford the report of tie
solect COMMITTEES on the Bank Charters, was ta%ea
| Gp for consideration. KIT
! pr. Guue,. took the floor in reply 10 tho arou
nents of the Yank NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. with seyc
rty upon the combination of the three Banks in their
application for renewal of their charters-showi 10
inst no evl would result In the postponenent, eth
lfo1p the tall OF stock Cnrtnilng, or any otsr
cause to individuals, the public large or the Stsfa
-reprobatiDg the evils Of banking, exhibiting Tbs
superior fitness aud expedency of the LegisIa-
ture to decide upon matter affecting the permanent
poicy OF the gorernment-apd expressing the balicP
that therc uus be some PARTICULAR reason etbinrj
aul U1et ING the officers
pressing their applications at unpropitious tirn
Htr. .tason OF Fred, replied, explained some mis-
conceptions OF bis former argument bv the gentlemun
from Albcuare, (Mr t1ilmer] and enforced his for
Mr RuthsJoord next addressed the House in on.
position to the motion presenting variety of viorn
In show the expediency both It regarded the pub.
io and the State in lis corporate capacity of recha
tering the Banks. = *: ..tr'~f-
Mr.. Rercherai suc1ceded on The same eide. ard
warmly advocated rechartering the Banks Ia thg
nnfh cpho ot.n,o
mnnlcation WHICH appeared this paper of vest
signed an Observer, and disputed the accuracy of h
Statement that the application for the renewal of The
Cbarter OF the Bank of the Valley was uuknccvn ~
the great body of the Stockholders. - -
AIR -hctltuney avowed himself tie author of tb1t
coInmunIcaion and declared the reason for lis
statement that be for one, ard others represeot;3T
that section OF country, had heard of the appl
cation untlI 1t was made here, which afforded ho
thought fair matter of inference. that was unknown
TO the great body of the Stockholders 7'I.':.I
Mr. .N1son of Frederick read the resolution ABORT.
ca at the general OF the stockholders of the
hai'K OF the nR6l ester, in July last, 5g
"n.cn tney nag FeterrDined to apply for
ueral Assembly. 4lde' their pe.ton WINS mt ne
sented sponer, was owing the fact of his trashl
ton TO another body (the late Convention. He had
not mentioned The existence of such petition to the
Delegation from that part of the country becausc,
De presumed they ere conusant off, and because il
had not struck him necessary. y
AiF. Boyd expressed his astonishrncnt at bayno
seen the statement alluded to- knowing as well gs he
did, that It was uniTne--aud TINT the meeting OF
sqckhoiaers had not only passed The resolution fnr
peaslonng TOR renewal, bnt that no,ice haa -heer
given TO The stockholders, that the cxpediencV of
Application would be considered al their nenere1
Inscting. -
Me- Carskd7oD said-Inas1nuch as the Iarnnsb;r,
delegation Ia referred to in tine publication alluded ~
~ the observations of several gentlemen On fb;,
floor, feel it duty incumbent on me to stne "a IKE
house what know relative to the application of tl.s
StocAholders of the Bank of the Valley for the re-
neVa OF their Charter. Sometime last Summer
was told by certain individual or perhapa ;n5ivi
duisf, that an application would be mnde durinr the
present sess'on-but never bad any other knowledge
OF OF, the application tf the petition was presented
Xhht LIVING al some distance from q branch of theef
Bank aad not beng stakeholder or extensive daaIer
I'm tho Bank Though inatteution mipht not bars
Hnae myself acquainted with the busine,ss-tbat In
conversation with the Loudotru delegation this morn
lng stated to them that had heard of no eenerof
appfcation for renewal of the charter and tins
though the Banks we're not faVorite Children WITH
me- yet If The evil is to exist would 90 for VireSnia
receiving the benefits, ard would therefore vote
against the Indefinite postponemcnt and for the re
newa of the churter " '"S %
Mr.. EPYeS took tue foor and SPOKE with orr,t
onidness and energy IL support OF the motion to most
pore. P'5:'
! When TO had concluded tie vote yvas taI,ap t,x
ayes and noes, and resulted as follows.--Ayes -
Noes III. a-1t2.F SO
phe House thus refusing to postpone. the resoI,,.
tions were then adopted, 1a on motion of Mr. CyooJe
The Bouse adjourned. '