Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-06

WIRGINfA: At rules holden in the clerks of7ic'
" OF the superior court of Chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5h day of July 1850 William Dun
ford and Edward unford who sue by Philip DunforJ
their guardian and next friend. pitts against Johr
England and VIM. England in their own rights. II as
exors OF Wm England decd, Thomas England and
other dts
The defendant Thomas England not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according
to the act of assembly and the rules of this court
and appearing, by satisfactory evidence that he il
not an nhabant OF this country: u is ordered, that
the said defendant do appear here the first day o
the next Jany term, and the bill the plain
uHs; and that a copy OF this order be forthwith in
serted in some newspaper published i'm the city OF
at the fr,nt door OF the capitol, in the said city.
90 Acopy. Teste, WM. e PEsDLKro>, C. C.
NlRGlNIA:-At rules holden in the clerks office OF
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the LIST day of May, 1880: James Bream pitt
against Thomas II. Mitchell, James Inns, Benjamin
Dawson and Matthew Wallace and other dts
The defendants Benjamin Dawson and Matthew Wal
lace not having entered their appearance and given
cury according to the of assembly and the rules
OF this court, and it appearing, by satisfactory evi
dence that they are not inhabitants of this country:
ordered that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the next January term and answer
the bill of the plaintiff and that copy of this or
ger De forthwith inserted in some newspaper pub
l'shed in the city of Richmond for months sue
tot. in the said city copy. Teste,
o9 WIN. G. PESpLEroS, C. C.
NlKGiNIA Al rules, holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the I'd day of August 1850 Manuel Judah,
pitt against Abraham Block & Fanny his wife, and
Hayes J. lsascs, dts.
The defendants not having entered their appear.
ancc and given security according to the act af assem-
bly, and rules of this court, and it appearing, by
factory evidence that they are inhabitants of this
country: is ordered, that the said defendants do ap
pear here on the first day OF the January ERIN,
and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and that copy of
this order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published in the city of Richmond, for two months
cessivcy and posted at the front door of the capitol
IN the said city. copy. reste,
50 WIN q. PENpLEroS, c. c.
VIRGINIA: Al rules holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Rich nond
district the 9th day of September 1885, James cal,
pitt against David Street adn'or of Mereweather
Hurt, dec'G JosePhus Hurt, and Champion &. NJ. Mar
able, dts.
The defendant Champion C. NJ. Marable not having
entered his appearance and given security according
to the act OF assembly the rules of this court II
appearing, by satisfactory evidence. that he is not an
nhabhant of this country; is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the
January term, and the bill of the plaintiff and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for tive
months successvey, and posted al the front door of
tie capitol, in the said city. copy. Teste,
90 WIN q. PENpLET"N. C c.
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the ID day of August 1850 Langley b. Jen
nngs rltf. agains, Wm Flournoy, and Anne his wife
and Robert L. Oliver and other dts.
The defendants above named not having entered
their appearance and given security according to the
act Of assembly and the rules OF this court, and il
appearing BY satisfactory evidence that they are no
inhabitants n this country; il is ordered that the said
defendants do appear here the first day of the next
January term, and the bill Of the plaintiff and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted i'm some
wspaper published IN the city OF Richmond, for two
months SUCCESSFULLY and posted the front door of
the capitol, in the said city. copy. Tcs,c,
60 WM. G. PEnDLEToN, c c
NiKIINlA.-h, rules holden IN the clerks Office OF
the superior court OF chanccry for the Richmond
district the 4th day of October 1880: Henry wat
kns pltf. against Francis S. o. Kelley and Peter V
Daniel, dts
The defendant P.ancs 8. o. Eclley not having en-.
tered his appearance and given security accordin to
the act of bly, the rules Of this COURT and it APP
pearng, by satisfactory evidence, that he not an in
habant of this country: it is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the next
January term and the bill of the plaintiff and
tina, copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published III the city of Richmond, for tvs
months successi vely, and posted the front door of
the capitol, in the said city copy. Teste,
50 WIN O. PENDLEroN, C. c.
TNSlRGINIA:-At rules, holden in the clerks office
~ of the superior court Of chancery for the Itch-
mond district, the 5th day Of July 1885, Mary Car
ter plt'f. against Joseph Tate, Edmund w. Rootes
VIM. A. Elason aud Mary his wife, and other dts
The defendants William A. Eason and Mary his
wife, not having entered their appearance and given
security according the 10 act of assembly and the
rules of ibis court and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence, that they not inhabitants OF this country:
it is ordered that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day the Of January term and
the bill OF the plaintiff and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
the city of Richmond, for two months successfully,
and posted at the front door Of the capitol in said city
81 copy. teste, WV. 6. PESDLEToR, C. &.
NWlRGiNIA:-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
" of the superior court of cbancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9th day of September 1890 Will
liam Smith, plf. against Austin Watkins, Peter ri.
and other dts.
The defendant Peter Rison not having entered his
appearance and given security according to the act Of
assembly and the rules Of this court, and appearing
by satisfactory evidence, that he is an inha bitant
OF this country it is ordered that tue said defendant