Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-12-25

WSlso,saA:-At rules. holden in The e,ers's osioe
W OF the sups rior court OF chRncery for the Rich
mond district the Cd day at August, 1850: samuel
lNia, assignee of John w. Smith, ana. oth.r pitts
>cc'd Thomas Z. Webb and la,ric, his wife, Samuel
Sheppard and Maria his wife. E'l~ in lavs and Charles
y. Davis and Matilda his wife, dis
The defendants Thomas +. Webb, Edwin Davis,
Gad Charles 7. Eavis and Matilda his wife. not
having entered their appearance and given seeu-
Ivy according to the act of Assembly and the
rulcs Of this court and it appearing by satisfactory
csdcncc that they inhabitants of this country:
is ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
the LIST day Of tho next jsny term, and answer the
bill Of tho plaintiffs; and that copy of this order be
the city Of Richmond, for two months successivey.
AMI posted the from, door of tho capitol in the said
CITY; copy; wm re Ct; pxx,,rxo, i. G.
N1iRtiINYA:-At Rules holden in the clerks Office
" q. the superior Court of chancery for the Rich
mond dis, rct. the 9th day Of September $780, Sam
uel Vinfree, pitt. against Alexander Cushman surv
wing partner of Cushnan & Andrew, YIN. Cis, John
Lee. Isaac Reynolds, Charles Hoffman, George w.
Hoffman, Peter Pahnestook Henry Lerering g. CO.. J
+. L. Berry, Francis y Kennedy, john Krause, Jofa
1ruil, Jonathan Rogers, and others, dts
fhe defendants above named, Except Alexander
cushman) having entered their appearance given
SECURITY according tho Of Assembly and the rules
nf this court andt appearing by satisfactory evidence,
tht they inhabitants of this country II Is
ercd, that the defendants appear tie
first day Of tho January term, and answer the
bill of the plaintiffs; and that copy Of this order be
forthwith inserted in newspaper published in the
city of Richmond, for two months successfully, and
IS copy. Testc, WM. G. PEynLBToS. e. C.
WiRGiNiA: At rules, holden in The clerks Office
" of the superior court Of chanccry for the Rich.
mond district, the 5t day of Iuly 1850: Armsire al
Bruce, ex'Ur Of James Bray decd, plf. against Susan
Archer. Peter Archer, Thomas W atkins Leigh and
other dts,
n
tered his appearance and. given security according
the act of Assembly and rules of this court and i;
appearing by satisfactory evidence, that he is not
inhabitant Of this country, il is ordered, TIA;
the said defendant do appear here the Grst day
Of the mex, january term. and answer tie bin Of the
pitt; and that copy az this order be forthwith in
serted IN some newspaper published in the city al
Richmond, fer two ncn,hs successfully, and posted
at the front door of the Capitol in the said city.
60 Copy. Teste, WM. &. PENnLEroH, C. c.
VTIRG,MiA:-At rules, ho!ecn in tho clerks Office
v Of the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 9TH day Of October 1850: James
Lyle, adn'or de bonis With the will annexed oI
James Lyle, SEN, decd, p,f. against Pauus a. Z.
Irving, CAtharinc Gamble and other dts
tie defendant Catharne Gamble no, having enter
ed her appearance and given security according TO
the Of mbly and the rules of this court and
II appearing, by satisfactory evidence, That she IS
inhabitan Of this country it is ordered, that the
said def ndant do appear here the first day Of TIC
tiG and that copy Of this order be forthwith insert.
Ell in some newspaper published in the City oi Rich
Inond for two months snccessivcy, and posted TIE
fTorrt door of the capitol in tlie said city.
rs copy. Tcs,e. WM. G.. rEsDLEEuS, 9. C.
NTiRGiNIG. AT rules, holIIcn in tIe clerks o(cc
" of the superior court of chancery fer the itch
mond district, the 9Th day of Jolly 1880: Carter
Braxon and Mary c. his WIFE rls against Rnl tIcaly
adm'or of Samuel W. Sayrc, adnl'o de bonis non Of
Peter Kent and adm'or Of Thcs. Tricc, decd, Over
ION seaweli and his WIFE representative Of Sterling
Scavcll, deed, and other dts.
The defendants Overton Seawe and his Wiz, no,
'aving entered their appearance and given security
according TO the act of Assembly ana the rules of this
cnurt, and i, appearing by satisfactory evidence ha;
they not inhabitants uf this county Il is ordered
that the said defendants do appear here the first day
of the January term, and answer the bill Of tic
plaintiffs; and that copy Of this order be forthwith
inserted in some newspaper published in the city Of
8ct'mond, for two months saccessiTe!y, end posted
6 the from. door Of the capitol, in tle said city.
~ COPY. V"-'c. Wm. &. p Lrrov. q.
VIRGISIA: 4, rules, holden in the clerks ut1ce of
Y the superior court of chanccry for the Richmond
district, the Cd day Of August 1880; Manuel J"dsh
Diif against Abraham Block IL Fanny his wife, ard
Hayes J. Isnacs, dts.
Phe defendants having entered their appear.
and given security according the act af assem-
bly, and rules of this court, and appearing, by
factory evidence that they not inhabitants OF this
Country it is ordered, that the said defendants do ap
pear here the first day of the January term,
and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and that copy of
ts order be forthwith inscrtcd,in some newspaper
published in the city Of Rchmond for months sue
cfssvey, and posted ut the front dnor q tie capitol!
!" 90 sse said CITY, COW w. G. re- Ps.D,,,ros g.
NIRGINIA: At rules holden in the clerks Office Of
the superior court of cfanceiy for the Richmond
District, the 9Th day of September 1880: James Neal
plf against David Street adm'or Of Msrcweather
nop,. deed, Joscphus Hurt. and Champion c. NJ WIT
able, dts.
The defendant Champion G. n. Nara5e rot having
offered his appearance and given security according
TO the act of assembly the rules of this court, and
appearing by satisfactory evidence, that be is
inhabtan Of this country; 1t is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the tfrst day Of the next
january term and the bill of the plaintiff, and
Uat copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city Of Richmond, for
months successfully, and posted at the front dour Of
Tie capitol, in the said city. copy. Tesie,
60 WIZ G. PESDTETnN. @ r.
~IRGINIh:-At rules, holden In Ulr clerks Office
% Of the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
nnTh district, the OH day of September 1880: Jacqre
line p. Taylor adn'or ri d,r,es Halliday, pitt against
james Dick and Rathanie Dick, in their own rghta,
and as surviving partners OF Dicks, Moore & Co. and
oilers, dts.
The defendants James Dick and Sathaniel Dick,