davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

VWINOINIA' NJ TuIcs, HOIlrn III INc ClCrk's Office
" of the superior court Of chanccry for the Rich
mond district, the 5tl dss Of IuIy 1890: Arms,reat
Bruce eK'or Of james BrsY, decd plU against Susan
Archer, Peter Archer, Thomas watkins Leigh and
other dts.
The defendant Thomas w. Leigh, not having en-.
tered his Appearance aud given security according
TO the act of Assembly AID rules of this court and L
appearing by satisfactory evidence, that he is not
az inhsbitant 1t this country, it is ordered, that
the said defendant do appear here on the FIRST da,
Of the next JANUARY term and answer the bill of the
pf, and that a copy sof This order be forthwith in
serted in some newspaper published in the city OF
Richmond, fnr two months successfully, and posted
At the front door Of the Capitol in the said city
50 Copy Tcste, WE. G. PrSDLEroS, c. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20
a. raIes. AoI.cn In .hs esrh o!Iiee ,

NVlkG!NlA. At rules, holden in the clerks Office of
~ he superior court of chanf,ry Tor the Richmond
district, The 5th day of July 1880; Edward Cunning
ham, plif against Thomas A. Ntchrli and Garland
Thompson, exor of WIN. Mtcheu, who was ex'or of
Thomas Mitchell DTS.
The defendant Thomas II. Mitchell not having
tered ms appearance and given security according to
the act OF assembly and the rules uf this court, gnl
appearing by satisfactory evidence, that he is
'nhaoitant OF this country; order a. that the SAID
defendant do appear here the first day uf the
JANUARY term, and answer the hill of the plaintiff; aud
that copy o thus order be forthwith inserted IN some
newspaper published in the CITY of Richmond for tw O
months successfully, and posted the door OF
the capitol, in the sad city. copy. T,s;e,
20 MM. t. PENpLEvoN. c. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

RichmDnd. HWgHd SLIT 1880
The parties interested will please taxi notice. ii =,
have appointed the 2nd day If November next, to
commence the accounts directed by the roreyo,,g
order OF the court: on which day, at O'clock H. Vi
they are requn ed to attend my Office IS doors above
the Va. Banks with the necessary proofs and docu
ments ready for examination and settlement
62-law2m AMOS LADD, Commissioner
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

9IRGINIA:-At Rules holden in the clerks Office
" OF the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
nond dis; r;c the 9th day Of September 1885, Sam
nri Wnftce ptf. against Alexander Cushnlau, survI-
wing partner OF CmShman & Andrew, Wm Gist, JOHN
Lee, Isaac Reynolds, Charles Hoffman, George w.
iiofnsn, Peter Fahnest"ck, Henry lowering & COS J
& T. L. Berry, Francis Kennedy, John Kruuse, John
Truu, Jona han Rogers, and others dts
The defendants above named, except Alexander
clshman) not having entered their appearance given
SECURITY according the of Assembly and the rules
Of this court audit appearing by satisfactory evidence
that they net inhabitants Of this country it is or
dere' that the said defendants do appear here the
first day OF the next January term, and the
e'i of tie plaintiffs and that copy Of this order be
forthwith inserted in newspaper published IN the
CITY OF R'cb"ond, for two mouths successfully, and
posted at the front door Of the capitol the said city
oJ cODY. TrSte, WV. g. PENpLETDN. G. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

NVI""lNA. ~ rules, holden IN the clerk. oGic, al
~ We superior court OF chancery tor the edmond
oisF''i ihe ~ day e October 1880 Andrew aiccuic
MrQuie dts. WV '"''
me defendant not having entered their appearance
ana gwen security according 10 the act ~ assen,bIy
enc me rules OF this court, and Il appearn, by salts
counlryi 1t is ordered, that the s,id defnJ,r,e do m
Po9rneFe OF The llst day Of The next January term
and answer the bill OF the plaintiff add that COW a
tU's oracr be forthwith Inserted in some newspspcf
published IN tie city Of EichmonJ fr ," ,p,p,,
successfully, and posted at the from, door Of the can
l'ol, IN the said city. A copy. Tege,
- WY. 9. PEvpLProa, r, r..
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

NWlRINlA. At rules holden in the clerks Office of
~ the superior court 81 chanccry Tor the Richmond
district, the "a day OF August 1850; James Neal Dlf
against Samuel Morgan, David -treet, admir- oil
Mere~ Gather Hurt, decd and Chan pion e.. w. Mara
bic, dts.
ne defendant Champion e. W. MARBLE not having
entered bis appearance and gwen security .reor 80
TO The act OF assembly ~ the rules Of this court II
rappcarinR, by satisfactory evidence that he is not
AZ, inhabnsn Of his cOuntryi IL is ordered that tb.
L" Gticndant DO appear here the first day a. t,.
n,M January term, AID the bBl of the rIsin.
'n and that copy Of this order BIZ forthwith insert.
ed 10 come newspaper published in the cit, ri Rich.
mOhn Tor wv" months SuccesslyeIy, and pogcd It the
front door Of the capitol ~ the sad civ.
~ copy. Testc, WIZ. 6 PENDLErox, e. r..
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

H7IRGiNIA:-At rules holden in the clerks Office
" OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district the I'd day OF August, 1850: Samuel L
Pullam, assignee of John w Smith, and other pitts
against Edmund w. Foote's ex'or of Augustine Davis
decd: Thomas 4. Webb and Harriet his wife, Samue
Sheppard and Maria his wife, Edwin Davis and Charlie
e. Davis and Matilda his wife, dts.
The defendants Thomas I. Webb, Edwin Davis
and Charles I. Davis and Matilda his wife, no,
having entered their appearance and given sccu.
i,y according to the act of Assembly and the
iies of this court and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence, that they not Inhabitants of this
1t is ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
the 1s day of the next Jany term, snd the
bill of the plaintiffs and that copy of this order be
Forthwith inherited IN some newspaper published Ia
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the su
city. Il copy 1eSie
81 Wrn. q. PENrLFTo~. e Z.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

q IRGINIA.-At ru'es holden III Tie clerks Office oi
the superior court Of chapcery for the Richmond
district, the 18th day Of October 1880: Henry Wat
Eins, P'tt against Francis ). o. ReilIey and Peter V
Daniel, dts.
The defendant Toncs < O. rci'ley no, having en-.
tered his appearance and given sccug..y accordn TO
the act OF assembly the cs Of this court, ard il an.
Fearing b. satisfactory evidence, That he is not an In
habi'aut of this country: il ordered hat The SAID
defendant do appear here the first day IL the next
January term, and the bill OF the plaintiff: adj
that copy OF t!s order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published the city OF Richmond, r.r two
months succrssi veiy and posted the front door q
The capitol, IN the said ciiy. y copy. Tcsic,
90 WIN q. PE>ULETox, r.. G.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

the superior court Ot chancery for the Richmo.d
district, tive ID day of August 1880 I4ngiu, b. lem
mugs, gt. against Wu'. fo"rnoS, and Anne lis Wife
and robert Oliver a"d u'htr DIS.
The det,ndsuts above named not ing entered
their Appearance and gwen security according to the
act ii assembly and the rules o. tbs court and il
appearing oy satisfactory evidence that they are no
inhabitants It Ibis country It is ordered. that the said
defendants % appear h,ie the first day Of , ne,
January term, and answer ihe bill OF tie plaintiff ard
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted IN son
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for TWO
months successy ely, and posted at the front doc, @,
the capitol, ~ The said city. \ copy Tcs,c,
50 " ". q EENnI-Ern,
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

i(GiNiA: At rules holden IN The CT, rks Office OF
tine superior court of chauccry for tUr Richmond
district, the 9th day Of September 1890; james Neal
pltf. against DAVID Street adn'or of Msr,weat. cr
Hurt. ed, josephus Hurt, aud Champion e. NJ Mar.
able, dts.
The defendant Champion c. NJ. Mar. BILE not having
entered his appearance ard given security according
to the act of assembly & the u this court and (
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, That h. is not an
lnhabant of this country; is ordered mat the said
defendant do appear here the first day uf the next
January term, and the bill OF the p1inti; ai,l
that copy oi this order be forthwith inserted an .uc
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months successfully, aud posted the front door of
tic capitol, IN The said city. A copy. Tcste
GO ETu G. p.>p, rms -
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

81 TuicSJ modem the clerk
~ OF the superior court Of chanccry for tic Rich.
mond district the 5th day Of July 1880: Mary b Car
ter pltf against Joseph Tt, Ed muHd w Roo,es.
VIM. a EliasOn aud Mary his wife, and other dfs
The defendants William A. Eliason and Mary ms
Wife, not having entered their appearance and given
security according the 10 act OF assembly and the
rules OF This court, and it appearing by satisfactory
evidence that they not inhabitants of this country.
IS ordered, that the said defendants do appear he
on The first day the Of next january tc.mand an,, ar
the bill of the plaintiff and that copy Of this order
be forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published IN
the city of Richmond, for Two months successiyeI,
and posted at the front door Of the capitol IN said ,
o9 copy. tesie, WV. 6. PENDLETov, e. e.
NWlR'ilNiA:-At rules, holden IN the CLERKS Office
" OF The superior court Of chauccry for the Rich
mond district, The 9th day Of September 1870: wi.
Ham Smith, pitt against Austin Watkins, Peter ri.
son and other dts.
The defendant Peter Eison not having entered his
appearance and given security according TO The act Of
assembly and the rules of this court, and Il appcafi
by satisfactory evidence, that he is not al i'm, bi,t
OF tins country. it IS ordered tat te SCI! defendant
do appear here on the first day Of the next January
term and answer the bill of the plaintiff and tat a
copy Of this order be forthwith inserted IN sumo news
pspef published in the city Of Richmond, for two
months snccessveIy, and posted al the from, door Of
the capitol IN the said city. 4 copy Teste.
60 Wf g. pgspttro,, - .
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

W IKpNiA; At rules, hOiden IN the CLERKS Ohct OF
tine superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the I'd day at August 1850. Manuel Judah
PHI. against Abrshsni Block n Fanny his wife, AID
HAYES !. lsaacs, dts.
The defendants not having entered their appear.
ance and given security according the af
ply anu rules of this court, and appearing, by
factory evidence, that they not inhabitants OF tbs
country: IL is ordered that the said defendants do ap
pear here on the fist day of the January term
and answer the bill of the plaintiff and that copy OF
THIS order be forthwith inserted in sapl r
published in the city Of Rch'aond, for months sue
cessvely and posted the trent door Of ,e capitol,
in the said city. \ copy. Tesic,
co WI. G.. PENnrFroN G. e.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

VIRGINIA. A. rules. holden ~ the clerks office
OF the sutorior c"uri %; cliAroery for the Rich
mond district the Ir day al Oc:"bcr, 1880: Richard
IL. Harwood, HdmQr dc evnIs non OF Warner
Uarwood, decd, asd James Montague admur of
Vim Norwood. pitts, against Christopher HARDWOOD
Godfrey Gilmore aud other dls.
Pho defendant Cooley Gilmore no, having enter
cd hts apphaance ard gwen security according TO the
net OF assembly and the rules Of this conrt and II op
prnrrg, by satisfactory evidence that he Is not an
inhabian ofthis counry IL ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the
January term. and answer the bill of the plaintiffs; and
that COPY of this order DO forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the City of Richmond, for two
months successfully and posted at the front door OF
tho Capitol, in tho seid city. a Copy. Testc,
75 WIN. G. PENDLETON. G. G.
VIRGINIA: At rules, holden IN the clerks office
of the superior court of chanccry for the Rich
inond district, the 5th day Of July, 1880: Branch
Chcatham; and WIN. Winfrcc r!is against Thomas
Edwards, VIM Edwards Ben amin Edwards, and
Susanna Edwards. d.ts.
The defendant WIN. Edwards not having entered
his appearance aud givca security according to the
act of Assembly ard the rules of this court, and
appearing by satisfactory evidence, that Inc
nhabtan Of this country Ii is orde cd that the said
defendant do appear here the first day OF
January term, and answer the bill Of the pisns;
and that copy &C this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published IN the city of Richmond,
fi'r two months SUCCESSFULLY and posted ut the Gont
door of the capitol itthe said city. Copy. Tesrc,
rs WIN Il. P&NDLEioN, C c.
XTIRGlNlA-At rules, hoGen in the cie IS flee
of the superior court OF chaDcery for the Rich
mond district, the 9Th day of September 1880: JOHN
i. Tirscy, George W. pinslcy and other pits. A.
gains, Susanna Iinsiey and Fleming =. Grant:and
Susan Grantland, Ann Granlland aud other dts.
The defendant Fleming r, Susan and Ann Grant
Land no. having entered their appearance and gwen
srcurity according tie of assembly aud the rules
"f this court. and it appearing, by satisfactory eyi
depce that they not inhabitants OF this country:
II ordered that the SAID defendants do appear here
ON tho first day Of tive January term. and
the bill ut the plaintiffs; and that copy of tins
order be forthwith inserted III some newspaper pub
ilshed IN the city of Richmond, for two months sue
ccyivrly, and posted the front door Of the Capitol
III the said city. a copy. Tes,c,
10 Wa. q. PENpIrToN, c. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-20

\HSttiNlA: at rules, holden in the clerks ofhc
~ OF the superior court Of Chancery for tue l;ch
mond district the 5th day of July 1880: William Dun
tord and Edward punord who SIC bv Phihp Duuicrd
,he'r guardian and next friend, pitts. against John
England and VIM. England in their own rights. 81 as
ehors OF "m. England deed, Thomas England aud
other dts.
The defendant Thomas England no, having
teted his appearance and given security according
10 the act ct assembly and the rules OF this count,
and It appearing by satisfactory evidence, that he Is
not an inhabtant OF this counry IL is ordered, that
The said defendant do appear here the first day OF
the next Sapry term, and the bill of the p!air
uils; and that copy uf this order be forthwith in
serted in some spap-r published in the city OF
liichmOnd, Tor two months successfully, and posted
at the ffant door OF the capitol, IN the said city.
90 Ac1pv. Testc, WIN. g PENpLEToN, c. C.
NTiR,iINlA:-At rules holden in the clcrk S Office o.
the superior court Of chsncery for the Richmond
district, the lst day of Nav 1880: James RTesm, plif
against Thomas h. Mitchell, James linus, BENJAMIN
Dawson and Matthew Wallace and other dts.
The defendants Den amin Dawson and Matthew W al.
lace, not having entered their appearance and gwen
security according To the of assembly and the rules
of this court, and 1t appearing, by satisfactory evi
dence, that they are rot inhabitants OF this Country
1t ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day OF the next January term. and
the bill OF the PLAINTIFF and that copy OF this or.
der be forthwith inserted in some newsI aper pub.
l's'ed IN the city of Richmond, for months sue.
cessively and posted the front door of tn Capt.
to' IN the SAID city. copy. Teste,
Virginia advocate. [volume] (Charlottesville, Va.) 1827-1860, 1830-02-19

and conscience of each member to make out his
account for compensation both for travelling
and attendance aud that there Is no officer or
tribunal, whose duty it is to scrutinise and cor
rect these accounts.
Whether this matter is to remain as hereto.
fore, to the injury and scandal of the admins.
'ration of our public affairs, OF be corrected for
the future, will DO seen from the fate of Mr.
Wicklif>s bill upon which it will be well worthy
OF the patriotism Of the vigilent Editors of our
newspapers to keep an attentive eye, and Let
their readers know the result X. L.
Virginia advocate. [volume] (Charlottesville, Va.) 1827-1860, 1830-02-19

pira,ions OF youth, and experience has
taught me to trust viper that s,inps the
bosom which warmed him, sooner than
place confidence in ,nan any further
than his interest IS concerned. Irurmer-
ly resided in Boston, afIluent and happy.
My family was small, consisting of 4 wiiie
and one lovely daughter. The latter was
ruined by fiend in human shane
British lieutenant There the officer hid
his burning brow and appeared los, in alb
straction bu, the old man appeared not
to notice his confusion, and proceeded. I
the former died of a. broken heart INV
property was reit from me by the ueache-
~ OF false friend and became free
dinizGn Of the wilderness.
Retribution has in part done its work.
The villain who graspcd my property
has ended his career on the galows:
though the reptile who blasted one of the
fairest flowers that ever bloomei on, OF
| Eden, still walks forth in the open l:ght OF
day. Soon-very soon-however, will he
receive the need of vengeance. But the
sands in my glass are few-lime will soon
be changed for the dial plate Of eternity.
The melancholy voice of the old man
ceased, and they proceeded to search. the
apartment while he threw open adoo,
no, before discovered by them, ON that side
OF the cabin facing the lake. 1t was a
Dizzy distance from tnis door 10 the blue
water beneath-but the old mar looked
down with unquivering limbs aud stead,
eye. After unsuccessfully rumaging ever,
part oil the hut, with the expectation find
ing secret papers or money, he was or
dered to accompany the soldiers to hea,
quarters. Making feint to move towards
the opposite door, he suddenly grappled tn,
the lieutenant and exclaiming, (" Wretcl
my daughter shall now be avenged
with powerful effort precpita,ed bimseI
and his opponent into the lake. A dealt
shrIeck-a heavy splash and few bub
b'es rose above their watery grave.
Virginia advocate. [volume] (Charlottesville, Va.) 1827-1860, 1830-02-19
From the American Manufacturer.
MIND YOUR BUSINESS


There" said my Grandfather. ssare
three words worth more than volume Of
SUCH trash as young people in general
read nowadays. | assure you, Dunson,
mat they have been of more service to me
than all your Philosophy, Chemistry,
hhetorIc, or star-gaziBg notions could
have been. You may wonder. if Won
please, but what tell you is true. and
| much mo'e !; for | tell you, if had never
seen nor heard of them, you never would
nave known Philosophy from Rhetoric.
or how to fill bladders with air that would
burn brighter than rushlIghts.
Should you like TO know lion, il was
OF so mnch service to me q Listen and I
WIZ tel! you. When Twas thirteen wears
Old, my father sent nue. to one OF. his bro.
Tiers to learn the Blacksmith's Trade. I
| worked with him about week steadily
but not liking TO be burned by the Gin
ders, or have my naturally white face and
hands made black by the GOAL took
French leave" of my master. travel
led as fast as well coold;for two DAYS and
nights, fearing should be followed and
when within ten miles of Boston AT which
place l intended to engage on board some
vessel as cabin boy, | stopped to gather
nuts to eat. | found among the fallen
leaves an old copper of the stamp frs, is
sued by the United States mint. WAS
quite pleased with my treasure and rub-
biDg off the dit discovered those wordo
- MIND YOUR BUSINESS" took the
ADVICE so kindly given, with thankful
heart, and wheeling about, commenced
my march for the BlaCksmith's DWELLING
IN quick time. | attended strictly tn nv
business until became of age. when I in
tehoed according to custom to give a free
dom treat TO my friends In pursuance
oil my design, journeyed to grocery to
procure lew articles for a repast.-'Tbe
thinS ordered were put up, and 1 took ont
my purse to pay for them. As the cbaboe
slid out, the copper before mentioned
seemed to struggle to keep top, and AT
tract my notice, Its efforts were NOT in
vain. ordered the clerk to put the arti-
cles into the respective boxes from which
'hey were taken, and pour the "fourth
proof" into the. hogshead. AS soon as 7
saw it done turned upon mp heels and
set OH Tor village near by, where was a
D'acksmith's shop to be sold at Auction
that day.
One hundred and fifty dolIars-haye
you all done f'' burst from inc hrazan
lungs otthe -auctioaeer, jsst as 4 arrived
Within hearing distance "One hundred
and fiity-five" said |. The sound ne INV
voice reached HIM and returned as if in
echo, although much louder, and with The
addition Of "Once swice y three ,inesq7,
the buyer |" Peter SIedce.
Hammer, answered, throwing the one
hundred and fifty-hve dollars npon the
counter
had little left except the old conner
and the clothes had on. As soDn as The
crowd dispersed l went 10 work, and be-
lore sunset had earned money enough TO
procure supper and lodging for the night.
from that day to this have minded mv
business. and you, Dunson, can see and
appreciate, the results.
PENDENNIS.
Virginia advocate. [volume] (Charlottesville, Va.) 1827-1860, 1830-02-19
PENDENNIS.

From the Southern Religious Telegraph.
When, and 'cltom is ii safe In Hurry A.?
Mr.. Converse Il am sure there are
many who feel anxious about The matter
involved III the above inquiry. The ladies
are particularly interested-and pDor
ih'ngs they are so often deceived in marry
ing, that feel mind to lend them a
helping han".-I fear TOO, Mr. Converse
that my labor will be lost but as 4 am N,
the habit OF working for little reward. /
VIII proceed TO gay when young ladies'
ought not TO marry, aud whom they 1orbt
not To marry.
|. They ought not to marry a, Is oy
Virginia advocate. [volume] (Charlottesville, Va.) 1827-1860, 1830-02-19

You ask me for observations on the mo-.
moraDdum you transcribe, relating TO a
map OF The States, a miDeralogical survey
and statistical tables. The field is broad
and new TO me. have never turned INV
mind to this combination of objects. nor
am at all prepared to give an opinion ON
1t. On what principles the association Of
objects may go that far and rot farther.
whether we could find character who
would undertake the mineralopical survey
and who is qualified for it, whether there
would be room for its designations ON a
well hlied geographical map, and also for
the statistical details, cannot say. The
best neurological charts have seen, have
mad nothing geographical but the water
courses, ranges Of hills, and most remark
able places, and have been colored so as TO
present to the eye at once the mineralooi.
cal ranges.
For the materials Of statistical table I
think the last census Of Congress present.
ed what was proper as far as it went. but
Did not GO far enough. IT required detail.
cd accounts If our manufactures. and an