Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1830-04-20

q Ntr.R frf.YY
..,ian because the rejection of the bill had boon
claimed as victory by those who resisted the power
ofhe General Government to appropriate money for
Internal improvements ana because II was SAID that
-.nnld bemade to lay the viii on the table,
-. n, ~ na c,a,, us dsaip at this session.
nut Az Po1x saidhe was slaa OF ec ectioh OF the
hill because it showed that every measure presefre
here under the name of Internal Improvement could
not be got through: After SO full House mad aec,
flo ho if theyete was to be RECONSTRUCTED, direct
vote would be taken.
M M Do, X deuIanded q call of the House. |
Mr. Gon1rAMIasked tor the ayes aud noes, winch
were ordered. ,,:,,: ~, &c t
| The question was tneh put ana oeS.uc0 ~ 'uP :"
81, noes 60
| So call of the House was ordered.
The House was then called over, and the call was
suspcnded i.
of Yesterday victory for the South They had har-
pooned the monster. IL was great and glorious
victory. He wished 10 meet the question fairly. lie
wished to see who would be the dserers. He hoped
the bill would be laid the table to let the wound
heal.
4 Mr.. A. SPENCER said he had opposed the bill Tor
reasons peculiarly his own. He had not changed -
opinion, but he held himselfat liberty to do so If he
should be Convinced that he was wrong. He must
submit any which gentlemen might IN their
magnanimty cast him for having made Inc motion
he had now made from courtesy.
Aitcr some remarks from Messrs MERCER, LUCK
ER, CRocKErT, WILDE ANGEL, MAGEE, burgess,
i CARSON. and j. S. BARBoUR--
Mr.. MARrrS moved that the House do now ad-
lonrn.
: The molten was neg atived. \
Messrs. Ellsworth, p. 2. BARBOUR, BUcHASkN,
/ MERCER, a. FL. SHEPHERD STERIGERE, and HEMp-
RI NIL severaly addressed the House, after which the
question reconsideration was put and decided IN
1 the affirmative:
YEAs-Messrs. Armstrong, Bailey, Barber, J. S.
Barbour, Baylor, Blair of Tenn, Boon, Brown,
Buchanan, Burgess Butman, Cohoon, Clark, Cole
man, Cooper, Coulter, Craig of Va. Crane, Craw-
ford, Crockett, Creighton, Crownnshield, Davis of
Mass, Denny, Doddridgs, Duncan, Evans OF Me-,
= Evans of Penn. Everett of Mass. Everett OF Va,
y Finch, Ford, Forward, Gilmore Green, Grennell.
- Hawkins, Hemphia Hodges. Howard, Hughes, Hunt
. Huntington, ibrf, lngersol IRWIN, Irwin, lsaacks
i jennings Johns, Johnson of Kentucky Kendall, Kin
= caid King of Penn, Leiper, Letcher, Lyon, Magee
- Mallary, Martinlale, Maxwell of n. Y, Maxwell Of
: Va, McCreery, Mercer, Miller, Mitchell, Mullen
. berg, Norton, Pearce, Pierson, Ramsey, Randolph
= Reed, Richardson, Rose Russell, Scott. Shields
n Semmes, Smith, A. Spencer. Sprigg, Stanberry
; Standifer, Sterigere. Stephens Storrs OF Conn
d Strong Sutherland, Swami. Swift, Thompson of O.
= Tracy, Vlpfou, Washington, Whttlesey, White o
i Lou, Wilson, Young-99.
- NAYs-hIessrs. Alexander, Allen, Aston, Ander
. son, Angel, Archer, Arnold F. P. barbour, Barn
Il we'll Bafringer, Beekman, Bell, Blair of s. c., Boo
: kee, Borst, Bouldn, Broadhead, Cambreieng' Camp
= bell, Carson, Chandler, Clifton, Claiborne, Clay
! Coke Conner, Cowles, Craig OF ~: " Crocheror
!, Daniel, Davenport Davis of s. e., Deberry, Desna
De Witt, l.fivton, Dudley, Dwight, iari Ellsworth
Einday, Foster Gai.her, Gordon esns ma,
Hubbard, johnson of ean., King of n. Y, Lamar
; Lea, Lecompte, Lent, Logan, Lewis, Lumpkin, MAI
, tin, Mccoy, Nc Dufie, Mcintyre, Mcneil NTckol's
j Shepard, Shepherd, Speight Spencer OF Md, Taiia
!, fers, Taylor, Thompson of Geo, TreEvant Tucker
q Yerplanck, Wayne, Weeks. White of y. Z Wick
; liffe Wide, Williams, Yancey--91.
, So the House agreed to reconsider the vote
~ Mr.. 9HUBBARD moved the previous question.
|, Mr.. STEVENS moved that the House do now ad-
; iourn.
!, On this question the ayes and noes ordered.
The question then taken and decided in the
; negutive-ayes Do, noes 1914.
The House then refused the previous question
SO, noes 90.
ayes ~yrnERLANp moved to lay the bill on the
| Mr.. -
table. - ,;tion the ayes and noes we're or
Tie question then o.
firmative.
From The LsnchJrs Virginia,i. 4f.- ON Tel
Tile .NashriUe Communicative Washing. itch
crraph has undertaken to reply to the queries Va.
we I'd to the editor OF the Nashville Reprb-
Iican few da ago, concerning the deaicaIon OF
Joel Parish. CASHIER 1T the Nashville Bank; the
manner in which the nobev, abstracted by his con
nvance, from the vaults Of the Bank faa DeeI us
bursed; and the source to which rcsort mas o;h mao
to obtain the repayment of large 'ioh VI tiS
falcation. Tho Telegraph aifirms, oy d~thoTaf3'l
that 'the statement that either of the ersons iof,
mery of Tennessee, in this city, wv ni's'oui
were III any measure connected with the defa, Ut ~
fcrred TO- or that they had transmitted funds n. Oh
vile on that account, is utterly untrue" The Tee
egraph need not have coDtradcted ''Statcmenr'
which was never made. We should have been cgrc-
gious fools, indeed had charged set of men with
being guilty of act, tie proof of winch could only
be obtained from themselves. We certainly howe
ever, did insinuate that which the Telegraph has con-
yered into ''strtenent' but VIC do not intend now
to show the strong probability that such is the fact
the authorised denial of the Telegraph to the con-
trary Notwithstanding. We shall at least wait to
hear from Nashville.
In the mean time, however, VIC copy the denial Of
the Telegraph, well for future reference, as TO
point out the art of the cunning chiel The Tce
graph says "nether of the persons formerly Of Ten
Desse in Office connected with the deal-
cution We did not say that either of those persons
was so connected; for, so far we know believe,