Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1830-03-23

been long time since have prac,sed n'e,,oy II has
Soushps never did excel never had nd those
ocSichng sunless graceful attitudes, and enchanting yo,s
which SO much characterize distinguish some eersi.mc
my acquaintance how fortunate should be- Gould Oh
borrow from that gentleman he could easily ,r
anu nave great abundance left, while dcourse with Mr.;
upon the subject which has presented to our view MIN
however whou, assistance endeavor to state hou Will,
mas pecn now IS, and is TO be hcaraer Some FIVE nv
dresses to the West, and were his inpo,,pi;ss s;
hoe OF ms trends that they did from her hesi,atn,
dubious and reluctant She was not satisfied
and when the old people talked her, and she had
y upon inc SUBJECT She determined against the
nnon OF the East and West and in of the ad
her best friends she married individual of whom @ OF
some accoun, to the gentleman from Maine ie was hs m
SCUM carolina in what is called the Waxhaw Seemen, -
for the production of men, both of boJ
,b ,mee an instance Of one Ponng Mr. BLAIR
,h n ana a, an early period removed the West and
ieahe4 INC rui'nents Of under General James Re
ne iounoer OF Nashville and father of West Tennes
see He distinguished himself the bar as an adxoc,,
where h % was caieo 10 The supreme bench State
VIII ne eid inc scales OF justice between contentns
WIN an even and steady hand He was hs fn H.
Tne a he a. ana treated vany of Sort with
aye as good old seasoned hickory, With INN tbs W.
dOub, entertained that next Mov 20 %pm
years. as an evidence of her attachment she will in
emony usual in such should be disapnoned # M
Sae OF Name were found aiding assisting a, the ce,s,
o anu S,e gentleman himself would unite, am sure were
no tor his uncomfortable attachment political
Inc senate wh excuse me for saying words in eia,;o
last war and now alluded by the gentleman from Hans
winch , makes to consis, of James Madison Felix trmd
|
se Mr. oLMEs rose and remarked, that he had enly said
at mad the Parson thought him. he would have ad3eJ hi
n 1RuNDv proceeded We will supply the elipss Of IN.
and make him what gentleman suppos.s he
my duty compes me to do and therefore as 70 him I
e .a ~, mink ms zeal was mlsdected; but to the
gentleman from Maine, have something more tn cav 80
honored too much when my was inserted in ne ,; as
bsne.s c mad nor nave now capital capacity for
therefore, in the about be made nv
T no" ". De M either in the e of the firm upon the
\ Md
uohest ana well earned fame politicians wealth. he has re-
and business WILL hereafter be conducted ude ,S s piace
sye OF Andrew jackson and Company this firm r;ii
be an humble and partner The gentleman f m,
Name will not conducting the business of ,b fro
ana e third person named, has violent antipaty to H.,
partnership, and let the last named es,sh
new m under the name and style of-(meanipp the Dar;
and John olmes In making this DIVISION great reliance IL
placed in tbs many excellent qualities superative v;re
OF the genleman from Maine, which will enable hin, ~ I
the senior member of his firm ORDER should he prove
tory 10 tins dissolution of the old firm and the eshii
ment OF the two ones, call all these Senators ~
testimony. ''S !" oeaf
MT faEsDfNr wish TO address the Senate serousv ma,
another subject introduced this discussion Lpreend n
prescbe rules TO others each Senator must Judge of his
late President of the United States and of his s
sate nave spoken no evil will do If that is TO- he
DONE let those do it who WITH and oononee5 h
insIIs De the honos of the triumph, the spois
usng and eusna ,fshas 10 be
e country the beneficial effects of achievement This
Icing inc Cource intend TO pursue, gentlemen will excuse ms
Tor not feeling the influence the remarks thew have
To h e pIesen, secretary OF State Although willing
ohers and indulge myself in freedom of rema,t
wnen the conduct of public officer fairly before the San.
tes,ed h 10 near Their names introduced and bashIy
ect under discussion When recoect that ,bi, nd;v;d.
terney General great State of New Yo a,e Inc A.
senator of the United States Chief Magistrate of his S,s
now the first Constitutional of the Prsdent Of h
United States, must be for thinking hin, &c
Another high officer has alluded to in shs debs,e o.
manner wnch may De calculated to do injustice to mis- sen
read extracts from the speech of the presiding Officer of
nody delivered the tariff of 1876 and from his renor, aG
unceI ca from that body with the Justify the svs,en
wc mas SINCE oeen adopted reference these imporan
justice compe M to that consider such proofs as
~ iaiacous NO proof of sentiment more unfair us
any, man partial extracts without reference to subject
cumstances And such. have doubt is the &C. IN III;
ne arm oil 1915, was in its different from,
hoe since adopted IL for revenue and moi nro,sco
1t was reported from the Committee of WAYS and Means @
h a. en- manufactures; and the of duties as fixed
~ IL, were not higher than the the eou;ysJ
IL was IN TACT reduction increase Of the then eY
duties 1t tina, many of lis provision. ware .a eSng
as to afford protection as was practicable m 80
revenue TO the manufactures which had sprung I'm d.
forced into existence by policy of the ode
JUST Isnt 10 us protection far was consistent with lie
constitutional powers just regard TO oI,.r Us
No ONE the rigid in the construction of the Con,,
pu That protection might be afforded in that
dental mode; and would as little doub,ed thn, '
measure which proposed thus TO protect them was he, &
House. the general benefit 70 heme manufacturer voud ,o
ste legitimate topic of debate order to ensure The
sage OF the bill But would doing great injustice n a
from general remarks made circumstance oons IN %
mat manufactures at home would us more
no reo9G IN time Of war that he who delivered Them was in
favour Oh te protective system The mos. that can he ai,i
inferred u.s. that he in of protection as nc;dsn y
ne character OF the under consideration
wv, 'c remarks referred throughout the discussions shows
that II was regarded in that light only. ' ~
surely Tie Senator from Massachusetts, when he reac, ~
ms own case VIII not insist diferea view He onnos.J
the tariff of 1924 and supported the sill, tang iSSe
6e ground OF change Of circumstances the interval
between te and yet Iepeiled the charge OF
when applied to himself With defence in b
de- Gamnd' but see nov unjust would be rely on
uenVeteo on tariff for revenue only, as Justification of
system based on the principle protecting one banoh of in
anus o5 al s expense Of others without revenue
giang injustice which may produced by quoting partial
eXac is sun more strknsly exemphed in the case Of that
VINO" tne senator from Massachusetts from the
on Internal improvements. lie read the ntroducton f
tue report some Introductory observations ON Internal
Wehls no doubt with view prove that the author was in ia
yoT OF the constuonay of the system in its broades
Easing what the geBeman read separately the inference
which he wished to draw nigh: f,Ioy, a.