Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-12

lNVfIRGINIA; At rules. holden in the clerks Office
~ of the superior court of Chancery Cor the Rich
moiul district, the Sth day a. July 1850: William Dun
ford and Edward Ounforl who sue by Philip Duniorl
their guardian and next friend, pitts. against John
England and VIM. England in their own rights 4 as
ex'"rs o. Wn. England deed, Thomas England and
other dts.
The defendant Thomas England not having en-.
'efed ms appearance and given security according
10 the act OF assembly and the rules of this court,
and It appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is
not an inhabitant of this country: 1t is ordered, that
the SAID defendant do appear here on the first day OF
the next Jan'ry term, and answ er the bill of the plain
Jus; and that a copy ut this order be forthwith in
serted IN some new published in the city of
Hichmund, Tor two months SUCCESSFULLY, and posted
at the f mt door of the capitol, in the said city.
90 Ac,py. Teste, WN. q PENpLkroN, c. C.
NlkGiNlA:-At rules holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the ist day OF May, 1885,. James Dream, pltf
against Thomas a.. Mitchell, James innis, BENJAMIN
Dawson and Matthew Wallace and other dts.
The defendants benjamin Dawson and MATTHEW Wal.
lace, not having entered their appearance and given
$, curi'y according 10 the act OF assembly and the rules
OF this court, and it appearing, by satisfactory evi
dence, that they are not inhabitants Of this country:
1t IS ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day OF the next January term. and answer
the bill of the plaintiff; and that a copy of this or.
der be forthwith inserted in some newspaper pub.
Iished in the city Of Richmond, for two months sue.
"Ns HOSaNa 81 ttC dOO VI IL SSlll-
tot, IN the SAID city, A copy. Teste,
o9 WIN. C. PENpLEroN. C. c.
NiRGINIA: Al rules, holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the Cd day of August 1850: Manuel Judah,
plf. against Abraham Block * Fanny ] his wife, and
Hayes j.. lsaacs, dts.
The defendants not having entered their appear.
ancc and given security according to the act af assem-
bly, and rules Of this court. and il appearing, by saiIs-
factory evidence, that they are not inhabitants of this
country: it is ordered, that the said defendants do APP.
pear hereso the first day of the next January term,
and answer the bill of ,hcplaintif; and that q copy of
this order be forthwith inserted in sume newspaper
published in the city of Richmond, for two months sue
cessivcly, and posted at the front door of the capitol,
IN the said city. a copy. Teste,
90 WIN. G. PE>pLEroS, c. c.
NiRGlN;A: At rules holden in the clerks Office of
y the superior court of chancery for the l,chmord
district, the 6'l' day OF September 1890: James Neal,
pitt. against David Street adu',r of Merrweather
Hurt. deed, ~Josephus Hurt, and Champion c. NJ. Mar.
able, dts.
The defendant Champion C. ". Marble not having
entered his appearance aud given security accnrd;nl
to the act of assembly & the rules of this court, and il
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is not ana
%iuhabitant oi This country; It's ordered, that the siid
defendant do appear here on The first d., Of the next
January torn, and answer the bill of the plaintiff; aud
that 4 copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted at the front door OF
the capitol, in the said CITY. A copy. Testc.
60 WM G PENpiEroN. c C..
N|tRGINIA: Atruies, holden in the clerks oRice Of
Y the superior court of chaucery for the Richmond
district, the 2d day of August 1850: Langley B. Jen.
nings. pllf. against VIM. FIournov, and Anne his vic.
and Robert Il Oliver and nther dts.
The defendants above named not having entered
their appearance and gwen security according TO the
act Of assembly and the rules OF tbs court. aud il
appearing by satisfactory evidence. that they are no.
inhabitants # this country; II is ordered, that the s,d
defendants do appear here on the frs, day of the mex,
January term, and answer the bill of TIE plaintiff; and
that 4 copy of this order be forthwith inserted I'M some
newspaper published in the city OF Richmond, for ,v.o
rtseths successfully, and posted at. the front door of
the capitol in the said cry. 4 copy. Tes'e,
90 WV. e PENntrroN, c c
I~KGINIA.-AI ruies holden IN the clerks of;ce Al
' the superior court OF chancery for the Richmond
district, the 9Th day OF October 1850: Henry Wat.
k'nsr pl'f. against Francis S. o. Kelley and Peter v.
Daniel, dts.
The defendant F.ancis s. % Kelley not having en-.
tered his appearance and given security according to
the act Of assembly & the rules o: this court, and tan
Pesring, by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an i'm.
habitant of his country 1t is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here on the first day Of the ueyt
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and
that q copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond. for two
months succ-ssi vely, and posted at the from, door of
the capitol, in the said city. Acopy. Teste,
60 WM Ct. PENDLEroN, c. c.
WIRGINiA:-At rules, holden in the clerks office
of the superior court of chancery for The Rich
mond district, the 5ll day of July 1880: Mary II Car
ter pltf. against Joseph Tat, Edmund w. Rootes.
Wm. a Eliason aud Mary his wife, aad other dts.
The defendants William a. EIiason and Mary his
"Iie' not having entered their appearance and given
security according the to act of assembly and tho
rules Of ibis court, and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence, that they are not inhabitants of this country:
IT is ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
ON the first day the of next January term, and answer
Tie bill of the plaintiff; and that a copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the city OF Richmond, for two months successivelv.
and posted at the front door of the capitol in said CITY.
% A copy. teste, WV. 6. PENpLrroy. c. c..
= ~ Al .rul.e L,Ilo, 20, -. -tt, ~
~ of the superior court of chancery for the Hich.
mond district, the 9th day of September 1870: vii
liam smith, plf. against Austin Watkins, Peter RI
son and other dts.
The defendant Peter Rison not having entered his
appearance and given security according 10 the act of
assembly and the rules of this court, aud II aDnearinp.
by satisfactory evidence, that he is not All nina bil.nt
of this country: it is ordered, that / c said defendant
do amman L.Ea nn LL. G-.. Ia- - .L.---. -