Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-02-08

can he used iorsicha purp ise. he would nat
wihdta. II.
Tine public debt was in ihe progress ata
rapid discharge bui thure seemed 10 he a
morbid irryar IN sumr paris of The country
io have ~ disc hargrd= lie WISHED TO have II
di charged but u lad been one efeoI III The
debts hold together The country which pad
the lniefes IN 4 IL could nut but snslrcf
ihai sunr If fhe tpryot upoa the snhiert
had been rieteisetl. Mt brcause il wa pnerous
To the country. bui he an,c u VAS a link winch
held the conntr, together.
was SAID The dl-t,b lion ola large fund
corrupted the people lie did not see how
II they sold the land Ia tTeehptdrrs. they did
not soirnpt There was ploposnian 10 dis
pose OF them for edUe9tlun. , hool- aud mas-
tiers did not corrupt. Spelling hooks aud tbr
bIhlo did mol corrupt. II they were gwen tot
rohds and canals. lhet did OF c"rrult. The
Government had no patronage ~ II lie be- D..
ged Ia kauw where Was the corruption
II was sad the UniIed States rrsei vrd them
keeping ihem Tor the taxation aud ,he sover-
eigniy al The States IL they were lras,
aol rendering u reg lar rent, there won d b.
,o'nelhog IN argument Blu IT was ~ 80.
| ne unhrd states had ihem TO sell they own
81 pare Of barren lands II the StaIcs
held them, they would not tax them until theN
VIZ ,etIed.
The nnnnHo,s the rebuked. the reproached
Eat The East was charged with d,spo
I"n Ia SUI ies. emigr Il VAS ,hr Tntin !!
fnrih ialIli! Every lh,ng begaa With II AM
ended Wit IL he believed. II here were any
sota ia r.4yn ann II, n ihr,r sonusis wouid
b" ~ he same subject As lor III" policy of
n, ENGLAND hr Tar n WINS none 1of hnrs u
a, ( reed uron her How stood III. Weston
vles IN 1916 II spnd the West and
= al ali Ia.
Western States, h8t Virginia htrsel', gave me-.
vuies tan Mass tcbuseus. II vas reproach
apon lhem IN 1924, that tlnss .adories could
A I nlung ~itnout tsnfl, Il thai therefore
thes were opppsed "a tailn The MrH ~
pow NV gland mansui d,i not n,-
| glnate with them. Bot when the CO." inmeni
| hid tnken up, i having u densa popolauo ,
| AMI ,nlc space they invested III Ir motey.
| IN tre spppusnion that the Guyrrnmsni weulu
support ~. FROM The fits the peopI' 81
! \ " England hal showu III much zehl III hvoi
II the Wrs, IA, may p ri,oo ol the people wha,
ever l. was no, hue that they has oppobrd
| emigrai ion.
Al this place we los, aporion Al Mr. Wa r"
! maIks.
Nom 81 the " shingl ing ms II was called
tho Wes was 10 br found where ,hf Unilrd
| oiatas granted lands.
| There were no lands covered by titles 80
| deep, aud hr had seen them ~ deep III M
| Supreme Court wnie III thu pa,I OF hf Wesi
| where The oihor ysifm was pursued no man
could Ray that he had clear iIls 10 any
| land
la allusion to Tho act OF 1877. h. snid he
should like 10 see any sirougc. mdc,fpn o
long lighted wisdom then was 10 be ditossfed
| III The difference betwecn the rlghl hHd ten
bank oil The OHIO Il was The gIort Of the
4 Il, "A ~.
born 10 II baud ,nca ole OF producing slaves
a That ordinance oil ~ was from NJ pen OF
Nat an Dam, Of Mnssaehus ITS, Vas Iher'
ny 'bing ~ that ,,,oN ing 3osthi,y q ne aesR
LIT GU temrn iudge for lhems lvtt. whctart
such ordinances showed want Of iisdom for
the go,crnmeni 81 The peouls. II Vas netes
snfy a FIRST haisoinelhing should've done iur
ih' ""st II WAS pndouhtndly hard That
50 mn rhould bo annually drnyi from The
YVES bur II was pr1por. The mJ,ey was not
iaken alIog ihrr from them. n man IA the
Eat complained OF The "migraup The argu.
meni thaia nanuiactu'ins prple wished to
| reslrnin r.nIgrntion Nhs IA HI lpInion wholly
| fanriful lie wished tosec hD measure dc
VS. d ioT the ben fl of the Ws which had
| been opposed b, til Easi ybo had made
III Cumberland Road, was mode b, Eas
| efn votes 4 hl Sou hern iotcs Take toe
| Poftla"d Canal; he Wab9b G.nal luke
| The ayes and NOS aud srit rom the aye
| tn " W England voits. aid The SouIherns
| votes al bent dann the Wei. II IN the
rrptoached N England hat has supported
| these measures
| Much hid ben said % y report OF the lae
| Secretary OF the Treasury He bad iDfgoiitn
| Tue report, bu, he belmv,i much injustice hal
| been done 10 That secIcllry. The substance
| If his argument wns, THU III projecting unnn'
lactuirs, the ag icnturr'of the country was
receiR lug constant hOunt,
Nj w did not speakol the wisdom of thai
measure now ms oljed was % show tina, tho
Easl had MOI been gully Of i"ai narrow poll
cy. lie believed tba If The Secretary had
bori owed his notion AIRY where, was not from
u New Englnnd sourci MIR read from
~, rcb of Nh. M'Dunln IN extr9'. in which
NJ Duff sad Il any thug was hi the benefit
ot southern states, ! was 10 Sup the sale Ol
! the Public Lands. Mr.. w. wasnndsr TODD TO
aIlude 10 this. "a the source 0fDe oecretary's
vieNs, ifBek we're borrowed bi all. Mr.. w
read from the same debate ~ extract from IN
o"n speech, IN which he c0gepded, ~ opposl.
ton 10 NJ MD that the lads should be sold
Ms low as possibly an1 seltyd and IN addition
TO his argument, that the settlement oil hr Wesl
| had been as isled by The tasl instead vi the
s 9TH.
II" ndu HfNeI ntHiu ll"sBfsPh my WHfifI
as "A matter al policy, tha emigfaion SHOULD
j bs res Iained S,ime psple might BIZ some
VIVA ayerSs 10 he dl,Dyui'on OF comparative
IN porianre. but there ~ no hostility. Were
not the people of the " st Tho descendants oil
the East were lheynoi bone OF her boue
and flesh OF her flesh Ia WIS not his DISPOSE.
ion AT hrsi TO have yered one word on this
subJt c. but when he bard So many hints su
mises, and SO man tcal alIps'ons, for one. lac
c nd not hold his peer any longer. During
The whole fifteen yest THAI he lad been inrm
bfr lie had never nile 80 man rema'ts oil
sectional characletis he had dd'iug lhr pre-
sent debate --Bm Ehie he stood there asa
representative o Nv England, b, the blessing
Of God he woudbe her true representative,
and oppose sybnisrepresenslion as,o he
policy OF any ,Rutation apon her uonor
| Nj. w. con1hded by mpslfg the indefinite
pos ponemeni the resolution aud the amend