Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11

|NVfiR6lNlAs 81 rules. holden IN 0e clerks Office
Of theSnpericr court of Chaucery for the Rich
mond district, the 9Th day of July 1885, William Dun-
lord and Edward nunford who sue by Philip Dontorj
their guardian and next friend, pitts. against John
England and VIM. England in their own rights. q as
ex'ors OF VIM England deed. Thomas England und
The defendant Thomas England not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according
10 the act ct assembly and the rules of this court,
and It appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is
not an inhabitant of this country: II is ordered, that
the said defendant do appear here on the first day OF
the next Jan'ry term. aud answer the bin OF the PLAIN
uus; and that a copy OF this order be forthwith in
serted in some newspaper published in the city of
Richmond, for two months SUCCESSFULLY, aud posted
at the front door Of the capunl, in the said city.
90 Ac,py. Testc, Was PErnLEroS, c. C.
V~IRGiNIA:-At rules hoiden in the elerk'sofice OF
the superior court of ~chcncery for the Ricsnond
district, the ist day of May, 1880: James Dream pitf.
against Thomas II. Mitchell, James s.pis, Benjamin
Dawson and Matthew Wallace and other dts.
The defendants Benjamin Dawson and Matthew Wal
lace, not having entered their appearance and given
security according TO the act of sssembly aud the rules
of this court, aud il appearing, by satisfactory eyi
dence, that they are not inhabiSants Of this country:
1t IS ordered, that the said defendants do ape AR here
on the hrs, day of the next January term. and answer
tue Slli OF tue plaintiff; and that a copy of this or
der be forthwith inserted in some newspaper pub
lished in the city of Richmond, for two months sue
cessively, and posted at the front door of Ia Capri
tol, in the said city. A copy. Teste.
69 WV. G.. PEsDLsroS, c. C.
XiRGlRtA: At rules, holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chapcery for the Richmond
district. the I'd day of August 1880. Manuel Judah,
plf. against Abraham Block & Fanny J his wife, and
Hayes J.. isaacs, dts.
The defendants not having entered their appear.
ance and given security according to the act af assem-
bly, and rules of this court, and il appearing, by salts
factory evidence, that they are not inhabitants Of this
country: il is ordered, that the said defendants do ap-
pear here on the first day of the next January term.
and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and that . copy of
this op1er IVA frrthv-ifh t,oor.~l -" 800
published in the city of Richmond, for two months sue
cessively, and posted at the front door of the capitol,
in s the said city. A cOPy, res,e,
NTIRGlSiA: At rules holden in The clerks Office of
' the superior court of ~charcery for the RICHMOND
district, the 9th day of September 1890: James Neal,
pitt. against David Street adn'cr of Mereweather
uuri. deed, ~Josephus Hurt. and Champion c. N. Mar
able, dts.
The defendant Champion C. NJ. MarabIe not having
entered his appearance aud given security according
to the act of assembly & the rules Of this court, and Il
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is not aA
inhsbitant of this country; Il is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here on tue first day of the next
january term, aud answer the bill Of the plaintiff: and
that a copy OF this order be forthwith inserted IN some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months succe ssiveiy, and posted at tie front door Of
tie capitol, in the said city. copy. Tes,e,
69 WA O. PENDLEreN, c C..
NiRGIN1A: AT rules, holden in the clerks office Of
the superior court of chsncery for the Richmond
district, the Cd day of August 1850: langley b. Jen-
nngs, pltf against WIN. Fiournoy, aud Anne his wife.
and Robert B. Oliver and other dts.
The defendants above named not having entered
their appearance and given security according to the
act Of assembly and the rules OF this court. and Il
appearing by satisfactory evidence. that they are MOI
Inhabitants Of this country; IT IS ordered, that the said
defendants do appear here on the FIRST day of the nrxt
January term, and answer the bill OF the plaintiff; and
that a copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
ne wspaper published IN the city of Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted at the front door of
the capitol, IN the said city. A copy. Teste,
SO WV. G PESDLEroN, c c
NIEGiNIA.-At rules holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 18th day of October 1890: Henry Wat.
kins, pitt. against Francis S. o. Kelley and Peter v.
Daniel, dts.
The defendant F-ancis s. O. Reilley not having en-.
tered his appearance and given security according 10
the act of assembly & the rules of this court, and tan
pearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an in.
habitant of this country it is ordered, that the said.
defendant do appear here on the FIRST day of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff: and
that a copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper Published in the city of Richmond, for two
months Successiyeiy, and posted at the trout door of
the capitol, in the said city. copy. Teste,
90 WIN q. PENDLEToN. c. C.
NYIRGtNIA:-At rules, holden in the clerks office
" of the superior court of chancery for the Rich-
mond district, the 5th day of July 1880: Mary b Car
ter pltf. against Joseph Tate, Edmund W.. Rootes-
VIM. A. Eliason aud Mary his wife, ahd other dts.
The defendants William A. Eliason and Mary his
wife, not having entered their appearance and Given
security according the to act Of assembly and the
rules of this court, and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence, that oIey are not inhabitants of this country:
1t IS ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the hPst day the of next January tern, and answer
the bill of the PLAINTIFF and that a copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the city OF Richmond, for Two months successiyely,
and posted at the front door of the capitol in said city.
60 a copy. teste, WIN. G. PRNDLETox, C. c..
NWiRGINlA:-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
~ of the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9th day of September 1880: Will
Ham Smith, pitt. against Austin Watkins, Peter ri.
son and other dts.
The defendant Peter Rison not having entered his
appearance and given security according to The act Of
assembly and the rules Of this court, and it appearing,
by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an inha bitant
vt this country: it is ordered, that tue said defendant
do appear here ON The first day of Lhe next Lannarv