Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-30

Ty7fRGIN1As At rules. holden In the clerks oEics
" OF the superior court Of Chancery tor the Rich
mod district. the ssh day of July 1850: William Dun
ford and Edward unlord who by philip Danlord
their Guardian aud next friend pitts. against John
England and WmeEngland in their avn rights a as
esors .. Nm. England deed, Thomas England and
The defendant Thomas England not having en-.
tered his appearance aud given security according
70 me act OF assembly and the rules ct this court,
ana X appearing by satisfactory evidences that he IS
not an nhabant of this country: II is ordered that
the said defendant do appear here the FIRST day Of
the next anry term, and answer the bin of the plain
uis and that copy OF this order be forthwith in
serted IN some newspaper published in the city of
Richmond, for two months successfully, and posted
az the ff7nt door Of the canitol in the said city.
% Ac7py. Teste, wsf. 6 PKsDIEToS,c. c.
XtRGINIA:--At rules holden in the clerks office Of
the superior court az chancery for the Richmond
district, the LIST day of May, 1890: James Bream, plu
against Thomas IT, Mitchell, James inpis, benjamin
Dawson and Matthew Wallace and other dts.
The defendants Beijamin Dawson and Matthew Wal
lace. not having entered their appearance and given
s. curiy according TO the act of assembly and the rules
ot tins court and It appearing, by satisfactory evi
dence, that they are not Inhabitants of this country
il is ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the irst day OF the next january term and
the hi'i OF the plaintiff; and that copy of this
der be forthwith inserted in some newspaper pub.
i'shed IN the c;ty OF Richmond, for two months
cesslvely, and posted at the front door OF tn Capt.
'ol. in tho said city. copy. Teste,
% Wn. G. PEsDLKroS. c.
VikIiNlA: AT rules, holden in theclerk,s Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, tue I'd day OF August 1880 Manuel Judah,
pitt. against Abraham Block & Fanny his wife, and
HAYES j. Isaacs, dts
The defendants having entered their appear.
ance and given security according 10 the act az
bly, and rules at this court and IL appearing, by salts
Factory evidence. that they inhabitants OF this
country is ordered that the said defendants do APP
pear here on the first day of the January term
and answef the bin of the plaintiff aud that copy of
this order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published in the city of Richmond for two months
cessive, and posted at the front door of the capitol
IN the said city. A copy. reste,
90 WV. G. PkNDLeroN, 6. c.
VIRGINIA: Al rules holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court ot chancery for the Richmond
district, the 9th hay of September 1880: James Neal,
pitf. against David Street aduor of Mereweather
Hurt. deed, Josephus Hurt, and Champion c. NJ. Mar
able. olfts
The defendant Champion C. NJ. Marble not having
entered his appearance and given security according
to the act of assembly & the OF this court and II
appearing by satisfactory evidence that he is not an
nhabltan OF this counryi is ordered, that the said
defendant DO appear here the FIRST day of the next
January term and answer The bill the plaintiff, and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months successfully, and posted at the front door Of
tie capitol in the said city. copy. Teste,
60 WI G, PENr1rToN. {. c.
XTlRGINIA At rules holden in the clerks Office Of
Y the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the Cd day Of August 1885, Langley b len
nngs, pltf against VIM Fournoy, and Anne his wife (
and Robert Il. Oliver and other dts.
The defendants above named not having entered
their appearance and given security according to the
act of assembly and the rules OF this court, and il
appearing oy satisfactory evidence that they are NOT
inhabitants of this counyi 1t is ordered that the said
defendants do appear here on the first day the next
January term and answer the bill the plaintiff and
that copy of this order DC forthwith inserted IN some
newspaper published in the city ct Richaons for two
months successfully and posted at the front door of
the capitol, IN the said city. copy Tesie,
SO VIM. PENDLEroN,
NilcGlNIA-At rules holden the CLERKS office Of
the superior eaurt Ut UhauCery for the Ricbmond
district, the 4th day of October 1865 Henry Wat
kins, pitt against Francis S. o. Kelley and Peter v
Daniel, cfts.
The defendant Francis s. o. Reiliey not having en-.
tered his appearance sRd gwen security ACCORDING 10
the act 81 assembly & tie rules of ths court and an
pearing, BY satisfactory evidence that he is not an
habitant Of this country it is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff and
that copy OF this order be forth with inserted in some
newspaper pubished in the city of Richmond for two
months success yely, and post the front door of
80 WIZ G. P FNp1IEros. s' 6. 9.
EVSIRGlNiA:-At rules, holden in the clerks office
" of tie superior court Of chancery for The Rich.
mOnd district, the 5th day of July 1890: Mary Car
ter ter PIT. against Joseph Tat, Edm, W. Rootes,
VIM a Eliason aud Mary his wife, anC .ther dts
The defendants William A. EIIaso. md Mary his
Wife not having entered their appearance and given
security according the to act of assembly and the
rules OF this court, and appearing by satisfactory
evidence, that they inhabitants of this country;
It rs ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day the of January term and answer
the oii ct the PLAINTIFF and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the.cty of Richmond, for months successveIy
and posted at the front door ofthe capitol in said CITY
69 copy. teste, WV. C. PENDLEToS, C. c.
rules, holden in the clerks Office
- OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9th day Of September 1870: vii.
lam Smith, plif against Austin Watkins, Peter Ri
son and other dts.
the defendant Peter Rison not having entered his
appearance aud given security according to the act Of
assembly and the rules Of this court and it appearing
ny satisfactory evidence, that he is an inha biant
OF tins country: is ordered, that tie said defendant
do appear here on the first day Of the next January
term. and anaMer The hllI Of lla r.I.inaM -. -.