Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-30

some newspaper published in the city of KichmonJ'
TOR Two months successfully and posted the front
door "i the capitol, IN the SAID city.
~ copy. Teste. WM. q. PKNpLxrn>. e.
VIRGINIA. At rules holden m the clerks lnt. "i
the superior court of CHANGER, for the Richmond
dsirict the 5th day at August 1850; Claiborne Grad.
dock and Mary his wife, James Craidock and Judith
ms w,fe. ni'ts against Richard Dolby, adm or OF
Lloyd Robertson, decd, Samuel d. Burke aud Peter +.
orcgSi-and Nancy Robertson, and Matthew, Martha,
katharine, Mary, William, Sarah, Eliza and Lucy TO
orttson' children of William Robertson, dec'd;-Dan.
vi 3, LemueI, Madison and Martha Ann Robertson,
children OF John Robertson. de ti;-AIlen Ere, man.
wh" survived his wife Caroline, late Robertson and
Jonn ana Grace Freeman their children. and John
'oKe and Sarah his wife, late Robertson, dns.
The defendants Except the three first namely
NOT having entered their appearance and given secu.
ry according to the act of assembly and The rules of
ts court and IT appearing by satisfactory evidence
that they are not inhabitants of this country; it or
dered that the said def, nan,s appear here on the
hrst day o the next January term, and answer the bill
OF the Plaintiffs and that a copy of this order he
forthwith inserted IN newspaper published in
the city OF Richmond for two mouths successfully
anu posted at The front door of the capitol in the said
CITY, \. copy. Testr,
40 WIN. q PENDLEruN. C. G.
" 'REiNiA At rules holden in the clerks Office of
" the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
ostrct, the I'd day of August 1880 Stewart Jackson
put against John &. Bosseau, James Ferry, VIM. Per.
~, John Perry and other dts
ihe defendants James Perry, VIM. Perry, and John
Ferry not having entered Their app and gwen
security according to the act OF assembly and the rules
oi TINS court and it appearing, by satisfactory evil
aence' ihaiihey are not inhabitants of this country ii
IS orHered, MAT the said defendants do appear here
On me hFs Gay at the next January term, aud answer
the oi OF the plaintiff. and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published
IN the city ct Richmond, for months successfully,
and pnsted at the front door of the capitol in the
SAID city. copy Teste,
10 Wv. G. PENpLrro>, c. C.
NIRGINiA At rules, holden in the clerks Office of
" me superior court OF chaneery for the Richmond
siIg grtgt ti,.C Lin ,,f - ~
bert Temple and John Skyrer, pitts against Richard
Patterson james Cooke, Thomas Floyd and james
Fox, dfis.
The defendant Richard Patterson no, hav;n,. enter
ed has appearance and gwen security according TO the
act ot assembly and the rules this court and it
peafE y satisfactory evidence that he is not an in
nab"an OF tins country; it is ordered that the said
defendant DO appear here the first day of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiffs and
that copy at this der be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months successve'y, and posted the front door OF
the capitol in the said city. copy. Tes,e,
~ WIN G PENDLEToN. c. c.
" GINA. Al rules holden IN the clerks Office OF
The superior court of chsncery for the Richmond
uistfic', the 9th day of Sept. 1850: James Andrew
pl't against John Bell, eN'or of Reuben Uowa,d,
dee'd, and trust, under his WILL Bowling Starke,
and William L. How ard dts
The dtfe ndant William l.. Howard not bay;n, on,
tered his appearance and given security accordink I'm
the oct OF assembly aud the rules of this court, and II
appearing by satisfactory evidence, that he is no, an
, j
Del ndant do appear here the frs, day of the nex
January term, and answer the bill Of the plaintiff and
mat copy ofth order be forthwith inserted IN some
ht "spaper published in the city of richmond for two
months successfully, and posted the front door of
'hr capitol, IN the SAID CITY \ copy reste
- WV q. PENnLEroS. c. G.
\Wih1iNiA. AT rules holden The clerk office Of
~ the superior cour, of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 18th day Of October 1880 Mary Boiling
ana ihomas Shore and Maria Harriet his wife plfs
against Edmun Watkins. sh'if, &c. Alexander Gun
ningham, Richard p. Boiling and other dts
me defendants Alexander CunuInpb. and f. -
10 rs not having entered their Appearance and civ
en- cuity according TO the Of assembly and the
rues OF inns Court, and 1t appearing, by satisfactory
evidence mat they not inhabitants of this count re-,
IL IS ordered, that the SAID defendants do appcar bere
on the first day of the January term and
the OIL OF The plaintiffs and that cop, OF this order
ne forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
III the city of Richmond, for months successiyeI
ana posted at the front door OF the capitol in the SAL,
cry n copy. Teste,
WM. 6. PENDLEToS, C..
IihGINlA. At rules holden in the clerks Office nj
~ me superior court of chancery for the Ricbmn,d
ustrict' The ith day of October 1870; she Presden,
nfeciois ana Company OF the Farmers Bank Of Viz
gina, pitts against the Richmond Dock Comnanv and
John Gamble ana Robert Gamble dts
Inc defendants John Gamble and Robert CambIe
no having entered their appear aud given sccu
ray according 10 the act Of assembly and the rules Of
Ia,