davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

NTIRGINiA.-At a superior court of chancerv, held
at the capitol IN the city of Richmond, Satur-
day, March 9th, 1890: Betsey McCredr, Kdder Bell
and Adelaide hs wife, formerly McCredie, and Robert
Spri6gs, and Polly his wife, formerly McCrede, pitts.
against James Penn, executor of George McCredie
decd, George NJ Credie, and John McCree, devisees
of said George McCretie, decd, Walter Dunn, ex'or
of John Graham, decd, Berley Randolph, ex'or OF
Harry Heth, who was exor of Samuel Clarke lee,
and William Long, dts.
On motion of the plaintiffs, by counsel, this is
dismissed TO all the defendants, except John &c
Crede and George McCredie without costs, .nd
theTeupOn the to be heard, on he
original and supplemental bills of the plaintiffs ia IN
for confessed, exhibits and the records and proce 4
ings lately pending in this court by the style of Nc
Credie vs.. Penn & al, and Graham vs. McCredie g.
al, and argued by counsel. On consideration,
whereof, 1t appearing that the whole personal
of the said George McCredie, decd, hath been ex
hausted in the payment of debts the court doth order
that Of the commissioners do state and report 10
the court account of the real estate of George Nc
CTede the elder, dec, q Of the manner in which the
hath been disposed of, and what parts thereof
aud what rents and profits thereof have been received
10y the said JOHN and George McCredie the Younger,
either OF them, any other person persons for
them either Of them, and the value Of the said real
estate and its several parts that the commission.
or do state an account of the legaces to the plaintiffs
IA this sni', shelving the amount Of principal money
aud interests due each respectively that If required
by either Of tho parties he also take account of
debts, 1t any, outstanding and due from the estate of
the SAID George McCredie the elder, decd which NAV
be entitled to satisfaction of the real estate of the
said George Met redle the elder, Decd in
10 the plaintiff l'gscies, with other matters sne
'.ially stated, deemed pertinent by himself or which
may he required by the parties TO be stated and the
G4d commissioner is authorized &C. examine any of ihe
parties IN solemn form touching the premises
\ copy. Ieste, VIZ. q. PESDLEToH, C. G.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

NWiRGiNiA At rules, holden in the clerks Office OF
" the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the 5,h day OF July 1850, Ann Davidson,
sdm'rN with the will annexed, OF Robert Davidson.
decd, pl,t against Samuel s. Saunders and David Da-
wilson. dfs,
The defendant David Davidson not having entered
his appearance and given security according to the act
OF assembly and the rules of this court and appear
ing by satisfactory evidence, that he ,nhabi
tant ct this contry is ordered, that the said dcen.
dsnt do appear here the first day of the next Jan.
uary term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and
that copy ot this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city OF Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted the front door OF
the capitol. in the said city. 4 copy Teste,
10 HN, @ pr>nrrro> r. g
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

NX7IRGINIA: At rules, holden in the clerks Office
" Of the superior court Of chancery for the Rich.
rnond district, the 5th day Of July 1880. Armsireat
Bruce, ex'or Of James Bray, decd pH against Susan
Archer, Peter Archer, Thomas Watkins Leigh and
other dts.
The defendant Thomas w. Leigh, not IVA wing en-
tered his appearance and given security according
60 the act OF Assembly and rules of this court and Il
appearing by satisfactory evidence, that be is not
an inhabttant OF this country, it is ordered that
the said defendant do appear here on the first dav
nj the next January term. and answer the bill Of the
pits and that copy Of this order be forthwith in.
serted in some newspaper published in the city of
Richmond, fer two months succe ssiyely, and posteJ
At the front door Of the Capitol in the said city.
~ Copy. TcSte, Wa, q. PgSbLIroS, c, O.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

NVIRGlNIA:-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
ct the superior court Of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 9th day Of September 1880: Fran.
CTS IL Povall, plf against Edward johnson and Caroline
W H. Johnson his wife, Thos. Drake, VIM. g. POvsll,
tosna Johnson, Philip Johnson. and Edward Johnson,
infant children OF said Edward and Caroline, dcfis
INC defendants Edward Johnson and Rosina, Phil.
p and Edward Johnson not having entered their an.
pearahce and gwen security according to the act Of
Assembly and the rules Of this court and it appear.
ing by satisfactory evidence, that they not nhab.
tans OF this country it is ordered, that the said de-
PENDANTS do appear here the first day Of the next
January term, and answer the bill Of the pantG and
that copy ri this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city Of Richmond
TOR two months succcssively, and posted at the front
door OF the capitol, in the said city.
~ copy. Tcstc, WIZ. g.. PESDLgToE, e. e..
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

SWIRulNIA. At rules holden in the clerks Office of
- the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the "a day OF August 1880; James Neal ptf
agalns, Samuel Morgan, David Street, admir- of
Mereweather Hurt, decd and Champion e. ". Mara
BILE, dts.
entered his appearance and given security aceor;nS
~ the act of assembly and the rules of this court and
tappcaring, by satisfactory evidence, that he is not
an nhabtant Of this country; II IS ordered, that the
sad defendant do appear here the first day of the
next January tern, aud answer the bill Of the plain.
uil, and that copy Of this order be forthwith insert
cd IN some newspaper published in the city Of Rich
nond Tor two months successvey, and posted at the
front door OF the capitol in the said city.
~ copy. Teste, WM. G PENDLxToN, c. G..
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

NlRGlNlA:-ht rules, holden in the clerks Office
of the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5th day of July 1880 Henry Clarke
and WIN. j. Clarke, exors Of Jnu Clarke dec d. pItrs
against John s. Stubbs in bis own right and adm 'or
OF John S. Stubs, SEM decd, Herbert Stubbs Ran.
doph Stubs and other dts
The defendants Herbert Stubs and Randopb
stubbs not having entered their appearance and Civ.
en- security according to the act Of Assembly and The
rules ct ns court and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence, that they not inhabitants Of this coun-
try IT IS ordered, that the said defendants do appear
here on the first day of the next January term and
answer the bill Of the plaintiffs; and that a copy of
this order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published IN The city Of Richmond, for two months
successvey and posted the front door Of the cap-
To-, ~ TIC SAID city. copy TeSe,
~ WV. q. PENDLErON, e. G.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29
NYEGINlA. Atrules, boIden ~ the eIerk,. olI,ce Of

NNIhGlNIh. Al rules holden in the clerks office of
~ We superior court Of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 9TH day e October $50; Andrew Mcouie
P,ti against walter MoQuie, Jane McQuie and Mary
Mcluie, dts.
me defendants not having entered their appearance
ana gwen security according to the act Of assembly
snn the rules OF this court, and it appearing by salts.
factory evidence, That they not Inhabitants of this
eouniy is ordered that the said defendants do an
pearbe on the FIRST day Of the next January term.
and answer the bill OF the plaintiff and that COPY Of
Ih'5 ofder be iofthwi'b inserted IN some newspaper
successfully and posted at the front door of the cap
h"l, IN ihe said city copy. Teste,
II Wn. g. PESDrETsy, C. =.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29
XyIRGINIA: Al rules holden in the cLerk,s Office o

VyIRGINIA Al rules holden in the clerks Office of
' tho superior court of chsncery for the Richmond
district, the I'd day of August 1880 Langley b. Jen
mngs plf. against VIM. FIournov. and Anne his wife
and Robert b Oliver aud other dts.
The defendants above named not having entered
their appearance and given security according to the
act of assembly and the rules tins court and it
appearing by satisfactory evidence that they are no
inhabitants Of this countyi IS ordered, the said
defendants do appear here the first day the next
January term and answer the bill OF the plaintiff and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
xspaper published IN the city OF Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted at the front door of
the capitol, in the said city copy. Tes,e,
80 MN. G. prSntr ToN r r
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

VIRGINIA. At rules. holden in the clerks Office OF
the superior court of chancery tor the Richmond
district, the 18th day of October 1885, the President
Directors and Company of the Farmers Bank of Viz
gina pitts against the Richmond Dock Company and
John Gamble and Robert Gamble, dts
The defendants John Gamble and Robert Gamble
not having entered their appearance and given secu
ry according to the act of assembly and the rules Of
this court and II appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they are not inhabitants of this country; or
dered that the said defendants do appear here on the
hrst day OF the next January term, and answer the
bill OF the plaintiffs and that COPY of this order be
forthwith inserted in some paper published in the
city of Richmond for two months successfully, and
posted at the front door of the capitol, the said
city. COPY Teste,
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

.NWiRGlNlA:-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
" OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 9th day of September 1870: Will
liam Smith, pitt against Austin Watkins, Peter Ri
and other dts.
The defendant Peter Rison not having entered his
appearance and given security according to the act of
assembly and the rules of this court, and it appcariny
by Satisfactory evidence, that he is not inha bit,n
ct this country it is ordered that the said defendant
do appear here the first day of the next January
term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff and tnat
copy of this order be forthwith inserted ~ some news.
paper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted the front door of
the capitol in the said city. copy. Teste.
60 WIN C. PEsutrrov - r.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

RYIRGINlA:-At Rules holden in the clerks office
" of the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9th day Of September 1850: Sam
ue Winfree, pltf against Alexander Cushnan survi-
wing partner of Cushman & Andrew, Wm. Gist, John
Lee, Isaac Reynolds Charles Hoffman, George w.
Hoffman, Peter Fahnestock, Henry Levering & CO.. J
& 7. l.. Berry, Francis Y Kennedy John Krause, John
Trull Jonathan Rogers, and others, dis
The defendants sboys r Rs9sd ifbTpesPt Alexander
to the act of Assembly and the rules
of this court and appearing by satisfactory evidence
that they not inhabitants OF this country: ii is
dered that the said defendants do appear here the
first day of the next January term and answer the
bill of the plaintiffs; and that copy OF this order be
forthwith inserted in newspaper published in the
city Of Richmond, for two months SUCCESSFULLY, and
posted the front door of the capitol. in the said city
IS A COPY. Trste, VH. G.. PESDLETOS, c. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29
ComMIssfoNER's OrrIcy.

RitIiDIOnd, HUguSt Jlst 1870
The parties interested will please take notice tina,
have appointed the 2nd day Of November next 10
commence the accounts directed by the foregoing
order Of the court: on which day, IT o'clock H. ~
'hey are requh ed to attend my Office IS doors above
the Va. Banks with the necessary proofs aud docu.
gpents, ready for examination and settlement
62-iaw2m AMOS LADD, Commissioner
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

G"arGGr fof fs fs IfnGe ot
district, the fth day NJ October 1890: Henry Wat.
kins, pf against Francis s. o. Kelley and Peter v
Daniel, dts.
The defendant F-ancs :. o. Peilley not having en-
tered his appearance and given security accordn = to
the of ubly & the rules of tins court and il
pearing, BY satisfactory evidence, that he is not an in
habitsn of this country is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff: and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for tive
months successvey, and posted the front door of
the capitol, in the said city copy. Teste,
60 VM O.. PENDLEroN c. C.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

XTIRGINlA. At rules holden in the clerks Office O
the superior court of chancery for the RichmonC
district. the 9TH day of October $780, John Jones' plf
against John Hinton and samuel }rame, merchants b,
the style o. Hinton and Brame, and other dts.
The defendant Samuel Brame not having entered
his appearance and given security according to the
act of assembly and the rules Of this court and it ap
pearng, by satisfactory evidence, that he in
habiant OF this country 1t is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the f st day of the nex
January term and the bill of the pIuntH and
that copy ofths order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted the front door oil
the capitol, in the said city. copy. Teste.
u WIN PESnLrToy, e.
NIhGlNlh. At rules, holden ia the clerks office o
the superior court Of chanccry for the Richmond
district the 9TH day Of October 1850 Edward H. Nose
ley and Archibald l.. Woodbridge, ex'ors of VIM PIem
ing decd pitts against Price Perkins and Tandey Key
surviving exors OF Hardin erkins, decd, and James
Dunlop and David Buchanan, surviving partners of
Dunlop, Pollock, and Go, and other dts
HE defendants James Dunlop and David Buchanan
not having entered iheir appearance and given secu
rty according to the of assembly and the rules of
this court, and appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they are not inhabitants Of this couniry IL is or.
dered, that the SAID defendants do appcar here ON the
hrsi day ct the next January ERIN, and the bin
of the Plaintiffs and that copy Of this order be forth
with inserted IN some newspaper published in the CITY
OF Richmond, for two months successfully, and oosed
at the front door Of the capitol, in the said city.
- copy. Teste, WM. G.. PENDLEroN, G. e.
VIRGINIA. Al rules, holden in the clerks Office Of
me superior court of chaucery for the Richmond
district, the 9th day of September 1880; Edward Pal
mer and lhos. F.. Palm-r merchants and part ners,
trading under the firm Of Il. & T. r.. Palmer pltfs A.
gaInst MilIar and Finley, merchants and partners,
Mler Myers, l.. u. Mister, II. b. Simpson and John
VIM, dts.
The defendants Millar and Finley, Il. Il. simpso1,
l. H. Mister and John VIM not having entered their
appearance and given security according the of
assembly and the rules of this court and IL appearing
by satisfactory evidence, that they are rot inbabi
tans OF this country; it is ordered, that the SAID dc
PENDANTS do appear here the FIR 4 day Of the next
January term, and the bill Of the plaintiffs;
and that copy Of this ord en- be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city Of Richmond,
Tor two months success vcly and posted at the front
door OF the capitol, IN the said city,
~ copy. Tcste, WI. G.. PENDLEroN. o. 9.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29
VIRGINIA: At rules holden in the clerks Office

NlRGlNiA At rules, holden in the clerks Office
OF the superior court OF chancery for the Rich
mond district the 9th day of Sept mber 1880: VIM.
Jones Bar ksdae, adur Of Frances Tsbb, deed, pnf.
against Theodric Blair Banns,er aud Seigniora his
wife, John Bannister and other dts.
The defendant John Bannister not having catered
his appearance and given security according TO the
act of assembly and the rules of his COURT and
pcarng, by satisfactory evidence that he not in
habtaut of this country; or red, that the said
defe sdant do appear here the first day of the
January term and the bill of the plaintiff; and
;ha, copy of this order be forthwith inserted in
newspaper published IN the CITY of Richmond for two
months successvely, and posted the front door OF
the capitol, in the said city. copy. rcste,
20 WV. G.. PK>DiFToN. G. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

" of the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 5th day of July 1880: Mary Car
ter pli'f. against Joseph Tat, Edmund w. Rootes
Wm A. Eliason aud Mary lis wife, and other dfts.
The defendants William A ElIasop and Mary his
wife, not having entered their appearance and given
security according the to act OF assembly and the
rules OF this court, and 1t appearing by satisfactory
evidence, that they inhabitants of this country
It rs ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day the of January term answer
the bill of the plaintiff and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in newspaper published IN
the city of Richmond, for months successvely,
and posted at the front door of the capitol in said
90 COPY. teste, WV. q. PENDLEroS e. T.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29
The Turf.

The Turf
I'VE copy complete IN 10 vols) Of the Annals OF
- Sporting and Fancy Gazottc Magazine On.
lreIy appropriated TO sporting subjects and fancy
pursuits; containing every thing worthy of remark
on hunting shooting, coursIng, rncrng, fishing cock
Ing puglhms, wrestling, single stick pedestranisrp
cricket billiards, rowing, sni.ng, accompanied with
striking representatives. of the voriOus subects CO.
Toured and plain For sale by J. n. NASH
AMP WICKS.-An assortment received az
~ NASH'S Ger 90
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

NylRGlNIA: At rules holden in the clerks office of
the superior court OF chancery for the Richmond
pl,f against David Street adn'ur of Merr weather
Hurt. decd Josephus Hurt, and Champion &. NJ Mar
able, dts
The defendant Champion C. NJ. Mar,hle not having
entered his appearance and given security according
TO the act Of assembly & the rules of this court, and L
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is not
nhabitant o this country II is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the
January term and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and
that copy OF this order be forthwith inserted IN
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months successivey, and posted at the front door of
tie capitol in the SAID city. copy 1este,
So WV G. PENDIETuN. G.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the Cd day of Angus, 1880: Manuel Judah,
piif. against Abraham Block & Fanny his wife, and
Hayes j. lsaacs, dts.
The defendants not having entered their appear.
ancc and given security according to the act af
bly, and rules of this court and il appearing, by salts
factory evidence, that they not inhabitants of this
country is ordered that the said defendants do ap.
pear here the first day of the next January term
and snswer the bill of the plaintiff; and that copy
this order DO forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published in the city of Richmond for two months sue
cessivey, and posted the front door OF the capitol,
IN the said city. copy. res,e,
G9 WV. G.. PENDIFToN. C c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

l%1SIR6iNiA At rules holden in the clerks office
" of the superior court at Chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5,h day Of July 1880: william Dun
ford and Edward nunford who sue by philip Dunsorj
their guardian and next friend. plus against John
England and VIM. England in their own rights. n
exors o. VIM. England deed, Thomas England and
other dts.
The defendant Thomas England not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according
TO the act of assembly and the rules of this court
and appearing, by satisfactory evidence that he is
not an inhabitant ct this country; II is ordered, that
the said defendant do appear here the first day OF
the next Janry term and the bill of the plain
uiis and that copy of this order be forthwith in
serted in some newspaper published in the city OF
Richmond for two months successfully, and posted
at the fr.nt door of the capitol in the said city.
90 Ac'py. Testc, VIZ. q PENpLETo~, C. C.
NiRGlSlA:-At rules holden in the clerks Office Of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the LIST day of May, 1880: James Bream pitt
against Thomas h. Mitchell, James lnnis, Benjamin
Dawson and Matthew Wallace and other dfts.
The defendants benjamin Dawson and Matthew Wal
lace. not having entered their appearance and given
cury according the act of assembly and the rules
OF this court, and it appearing, by satisfactory ev
dence that they are ut inhabitants of this counry
1t is ordered that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the January term and
the bill OF the plaintiff; and that a copy of this
der be forthwith inserted in newspaper pub
lished in the city of Richmond, for months
ccssvcly, and posted at the front door of tn Capt.
tol, in the said city. A copy. Teste,
90 WIN. G. PENpLEroN, C. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

NWlRGINlA:-A rules, holden in the clerks office
~ OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9th day OF September 1880 Jacque
line =. Taylor adm'or of James Halliday pltf against
James Dick and Nathaniel Dick, in their own rights
and as surviving partners of Dicks Moore & Co. and
others, dts.
The defendants JAMES Dick and Nathaniel Dick,
not having entered the appearance and given secu.
ry according 10 the act of Assembly and the rules of
this court, and appearing, BY satisfactory evidence
that they are not inhabitants of this country it
dered that the said defendants do appear here on the
hTst day of the next January term, and answer the
bill OF the plaintiff; and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the city OF Richmond for two months successfully,
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
CITY. copy Teste,
~ WIN. g. PESnLEToN, e. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-29

SWIRGiN,A--At rules, holden in the clerks office
" f the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5th day ot July 1890: Carter
Braxton and Mary G. s wife, pits against Robt. Hesy
admor of Samuel w. Sa,re, adm'or de honis non of
Peter Kent, and admor of Thos. Trice, decd, Over
ton Seswell and his wife, representa- Of Sterling
Seswell, decd and other dts.
The defendants Orerton Seawell and his wife, not
having entered their appearance and given security
according to the act ct Assembly and the rules of this
court, and appearing by satisfactory evidence, that
they not inhabitants of this country il is ordered
that the said defendants do appear here the first day
OF the next January term, and answer the bill of the
plaintiffs; and that copy of this order be forthwith
inserted in some newspaper published in the city of
Richmond, for two months successfully, end posed
at the front door of the capitol, in the said city.
~ COPY. T"r'e. WM. C. Pr LEToS, CO.