Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-09-29

'TTiRGiSiA;-At rules. holden in the clerks office
~ 1t the superior court &C chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 9th da> OF September 1850: Fran.
CTS II. Povall pf DIV ri johnson aud C.ron.
a. johnson his wife. 1'hos Drake, VIM. c. Puvnn
Rnsna Johnson, Philip johnson, AVID Edward Johnson
infant children of said Ed~s and Ca oiuc, deGts
The defendants Edward Johnson and Rnsina, Phil
~ and Edward Johnson not having entered their APP
pcarance and given ecurity according To the act of
Assembly and the rules uf this court and it appear
ing by satisfactory evidence. that they not inhabi.
ants of this country: II is ordered that the said de-
PENDANTS do appear here the first day of the
January term anh answer the bill uf the plaintiff; and
that copy of this order he forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city of Richmond,
for two months succ"ssvcy, and posted 4 the front
door of the capitol, in the said city.
20 copy. Teste, Wa. 6. PENDLgToS, c. c.
NIRGiNlA-At rules, holden in the clerks ,,ifice
V of the superior court OF chsncery for IA, Rich.
mond district, the 5rh day of July 1880 Henry Clarke
and Wm !. Clark exors of Jno. Clarke, dec d. pitts.
against John 5. Stubs, in his own right and adm'or
of John s. Stubs, SEN, decd Herbert Stubbs Ran
dolph Slubbs and other dts.
The defendants Herbert Stubs and Randolph
Subbs not having entered tn er and Civ
en- security according the of Assembly and The
rules ct 'hIs court, and It appearing by satisfactory
evidence that they are not inhabitants OF this
try: is ordered, that the said defendants do appear
here on the first day of the next January term, and
answer the bill of the plaintiffs; and that copy of
this order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published in the cit, of Richmond, for two months
successvr and posted the front door of the CAPT
d
~ WM. G. PENnLEroS, c. c.
\VlRGlNlAA At rules, holden ia the clerks office
" of the superior court of chsncery for the Rich
mond district the I'd day OF August 1850: John Dun
lop, and David DRYDEN and Janeu his wife, pits.
against Griffin Organ, David ID. Brydon, and David
Dunlop, exors of James Dunlop, decd and Rob ert
Dunlop and James Patterson, dts
The defendants Robert Dunlop and James Pate rson,
not having entered their appearance and given
ry according 10 the OF Assembly and tho rules
tins court, and II appearing, by satisfactory evidence,
that they inhabitants of this country il is or
dered that the said def uants do appear hear the
hrst day of the next January term and the bill
OF the plaintiffs; and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in soue newspaper published in
the city of Richmond for two months successivcly,
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
city. \ copy Tcste,
70 WM. &. PESDLEToN, c. C.
.NWIRGINlA:-At rules, holden H. the clerks uE;ce
" OF the superior court of chaucery for the Rich
mond district, the OH day of September 1890 acque-
line u. Taylor adm'or of James Halliday, plH against
james Dick and Nathaniel Dick in their own rights,
and as surviving partners of Dick, Moore & Co. and
others, dts.
The defendants James Dick and Nathaniel Dick
not having en cred thei appearance and given
rIiy according 10 the of Assembly and the rules of
tins court, and it appearing by satisfactory evidence
tha they are not inhabitants of this country: it is
dered, that the said defendants do appear here the
hfst day OF the next January term and answer the
bill OF the plaintiff and that a copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the city of Richmond, for two months successvely
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
city. copy Testc
70 wM. &. PESDLEToN, 4. c.