Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-01-04

NVIRGiNIA:-At rules, holden in the clerk 5 Office
" of the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 5th day OF October 1929: James
Molly, pitt. against VIM. Moody, Daniel s. Middagh,
and James :. Moss, dts.
The defendant william MOODY no, having entered
his appearance and given security according to the
act of assembly and the rules of this court and it ap
Pearng, by satisfactory evidence, that he is an in
habiant of this country: is ordered. that the SAID
defendant do appear here on the tenth dav ~ Tive
January term and answer tho bill OF the csintir
and that copy Of this order be forthwith inserted IN
some newspaper published in the city of Richmond,
for two months successfully and posted At the front
door OF the capitol in thc said city.
copy. TeSte, WV. &. ptNnLEroN. c. c.
NIRGlNiA:-At rules, holden in the clerks office
OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 5th day of October, 1929: John
Snclngs, George Sncngs, and others pitts. against
VIM. g. Elan, adm'or with the viii annexed OF Eliza
beth Keen, deed. and John BIankcnship. DIS
The defendant John Blankcnship not having enter
cd his appearance and given security according the
act of assembly and the rules of tins court, and APP
pearing by satsactor, evidence that he 10 not IN
habtant of this country: ii is ordered that tie said
defendant do appear here the tenth day of the next
January term aud ansu cr the bill of the plaintiffs and
that copy Of this order bc forthwith Inserted in some
newspaper published in the city Rohn ond, for I've
months success'Vely aud posted at The front door OF
the capitol j" TIE 1s. sald city w., re copy
NIRGINIA.-Nt rules, holden IN the clerks Office
of the superior court Of chanccry for the Eich-
mond district the 9Th day OF October, 1929. Garter
BrNNttN ana MARY ~ S Nltc, pittS. Robert
Ilesy, adm'Or dc bOus OF Peter Kemp, and admir-
OF sam. VIII. Sayrc, and also adm'ur Of 1bos. Trice
and OvertOn Seawall and his wife. and others, dfts
The defendants Ovcrton Seawcll and bis wife, not
having entered their appearance and given security
according the assembly and the rules OF this
court, and appearing toy satisfactory evidence, that
that they not inhabitants of this CounN u is or
dercd, that te said defendants do appear here ON ;lc
tenth day OF the next January term and answer the
bill at the plaintiffs aud that a copy this order be
forthwith iuScrtcd IN new spspcr published i'm the
city of Richmond for two months successfully. and
posted at the front door Of hc capitol in the said city
copy Tcstc, Nv. g, PENDLEroN, G. C.
NlRGlNIN..At rules. holden IN the clerks office ct
the superior court ct chuccry for the Richmond
district, the 5th dav OF October 1922: Robert Dab
ney, pltf, against Walter shelton, surviving partner OF
himself and T.. =. Suction deed. late partners under
the firm of z. Z. shelton { Co Muuiord Perks ROb't
Nelson, and other dcfis.
The defendants Munfurd Perks and Rubt Nelson
not having entered their appearance AMI given sCcur.
ny according 10 the act at Assembly and The rules OF
THIS court, aud appearing, b, satisfactory evidence,
that they are not inhabitants u this cOuntry % IS order.
ed, that the said defendants do appear here on the
tenlh day ct the next January term and suswcr the
bill ct the plaintiff. aud that copy OF this order bc
forthwith inserted ~ newspaper published iu the
CITY "i Richmond, Tor two months sucecSs,vcly, aud
posted at the front door ut the capitol the I'd city
cory. IGste, VIZ. 81. PEygLTcS, n 6.