Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-23

the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the 5h day of August 1850; Claiborne Grad.
lock and Mary his wife. James Crsdtock and Judta
ms wife, pitfs. against Richard A Dolby, a,m'or of
Lloyd Robertson, decd, Samuel u. Burke and Peter F.
Grcgg;-and Name, Robertson, and Matthew Martha
Cathar'ne, Mary William, Sarah, Eliza and Lucy Ro
oertson, children of William Robertson, decd;-Dsn.
'ei s, Lemucl, Madison and ~ r:ha Ann Rob-
cn'hren ct John Robertson, dec'd;-Acn Freem
who survived his wife Caroline, late Robertson. and
John and Grace Freeman their children, and John
Yoke and Sarah his wife, late Robertson, dhs.
me defendants except the three first namely
not having entered their appearance aud given
rty according To the act of assembly and the rules of
TINS court, and it appearing, bv satisfactory evidence
that they are not inhabitants of this country; it is
dercd that the SAID drfe ndans do appear here on
hrS day ofthe next January term and the hill
OF the plaintiffs; and that a copy of this order be
forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published in
the city ct R'cbmond tor two months ssivcly,
and posted thu front door the capitol in the said
city. \. CODY. Testc,
20 WM. G PFNpLrrnN. C. C.
NiRGiNiA. At rules holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chanoery for the Richmond
district the 2d day of August 1880 Stewart Jackson
plti against John c. Boisseau James Perry, VIM Per.
~, John Perry and other dts.
The defendants James Perry, VIM Perry, and John
Perry not having entered the app and gwen
security according To the act of assembly aud the rules
ct tins court, and it appearing, by satisfactory
dence that they are not inhabitants of this counry it
is ordered, tina, the said defe sants do appear here
an the first day of the January term and answer
the bill of the plaintiff; and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published
IN the city of Richmond for months succcssivcly
and posted at the front door Of the capitol i'm the
said city. copy. Tcstc,
an WV. G. PtNpLEroN, c. C.
NiRGINiA. Al rules, holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district. the Cd lay of August 1850; Rober King Ro
bert Temple and John Skyrer pitts. against Richard
Patterson, James Cooke. Thomas Floyd and James
Fox, dts.
The defendant Richard Patterson not having enter.
c his appearance and gwen security according to the
act OF assembly and the rules at this court and it ap
pearing, satisfactory evidence that he is not an in
hab,ant of this ooun,ry i, ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of next
January term, and the bill of the plaintiffs and
tina, copy at this der he forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city OF Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted al the front door of
The captoi, IN the SAID city. copy. Tcste,
10 WM q PENpLrTo>, c. c.
W fGNiA. Al rules, holden IN the clerks office OF
~ the superior court IF chsnccry for the Richmond
district, the 9th day of Sept. 1889: James Andrew
plIf. against John Bell, ex'or of Reuben Howa. d,
deed, and trust e under has will, Bowling Starke,
and William l.. Howard, dts.
The defendant William l.. Howard not having en-
tered his apr and given security according to
the @ct g" assembly and the rules Of this court and II
appearing, ny satisfactory evidence that he is not an
'nhaban' ct this country it is ordered, the SAID
def ntant do appear here the first day of the ne
January term, and answer the bill OF the plant M and
that copy of this orderbe forthwith inserted i'm some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months cess'vey, and posted the front door of
the capitol, IN the said CITY copy. Tes,e,
~ WV G. PESnLrroS. c. C.
NWiRGNiA. At rules holden The clerks office OF
" the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the lth day of October 1890: MARY Boiling
and Thomas Shore and Maria Harriet his wife, pitts