Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-12-08


Thomas Mitchell, dts.
The defendant Thomas II. Mitchell not having N
tered his appearance and given security according
the act OF assembly and the rules Of this court and
appearing, by satisfactory evidence. that he is
nhabitsnt OF this country; rs ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the next
January term, and the bill of the plaintiff and
that copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in
newspaper published in the city of Richmond. for
months successfully. and posted at the front door OF
the capitol, in the said city. copy. Tesie,
20 WM. & PENpLrroN. C. C.
\WikGINiA. At rules, holden the clerks Office Of
" the superior court OF chanrery for the aichmond
district, the 18th day &c October 1880; Andrew McQue
pltf. against Walter MoQuie, Jane McQuie and Mary
McQuie, dts.
The defendants not having entered their appearance
and given security according to the of assembly
and the rules OF this court and il appearing BY
factory evidence, that they not inhabitants of this
country; it is ordered that the said defendants do a.
pear here on the first day of the January term
and answer the bill OF the plaintiff aud that copy Of
this order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published in the city of Richmond, tor two months
successfully, and posted at the fron, door OF the cap
itol, IN the said city. ACopy. Teste,
n WEN. G.. PENDLEysN, c. C..
NViRGiNlA. Al rules holden in the clerks Office of
" the superi. court of chancery for the Richmond
district the 5th day of July 1850; John Archer and
Frances Cook his wife, PITTS against william Jones
Gnrksdaie, admor of Frances abb, decd. the same
Wm Jones Barkslaie and Mariana his wife, Thomas
B. 1abb aud other dts.
The defendant Thomas L. Tahb not having catered
his appearance and given security according to the
act ct assembly and the rules of this court and 1t ap
PcarnG, by satisa, tory evidence, that he is not AN
inhabitant ct this counry 1t is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the first day or the ne Vt
January term, and answer the bill of the pI n,ffs;
and that copy OF this order be forthwith inserted
some ne spaper publish, in the city of Richmond,
tor two months successfully, and pns,e at the front
door OF the capitol, in the said city.
~ A copy Tes'e. WV. &. PE>nLEroN, C. c
NlRGtNiA. AT RI es, holden lie clerk :. Office OF
" the superior cou t Of CHANGER! for the richmond
district, the 9TH day Of October 1850; Edward o.
Friend in his own rig. and adm'or de bonis non
with the will annexed Edward Friend Sr decd
and aim'or dc bonis with the will annexed of
Edward Friend, ir dec, phf. against Thos O. Tay
lor. Thomas u Taylor Be jsmn Harrison and Nancy
his wife, Thomas Friend, John Friend and III. Flour.
noy, dts.
The defendants Thomas Friend. John Friend and
WIN Fiournoy not having entered their appearance
and given security according TO the act of assembly
and the rules of this court and it appearing by salts
factory evidence, ta, they not inhabitants Of thi
country: il is ordered, that the said defe ntas do an
pear here on the first day of the january term
and the bill Of the plaintiff. and that COPY of
this order be- forth with inserted in some newspaper
published in the city of Richmond, for two months
successvely and pos ed the door of the CAN
itol, in the said city. copy. Tcste.
II WAN. q PENDIEToN. C.
SWIRGINIA:-At rules, holden in the clerks office
" OF the superior court OF ohancery for the Kich.
mond district the 9th day of September 1880 Joseph
Scott and Caroline NJ. his ife, and John Robertson
and Elizabeth his wife, pits. against Dabney Miller
y.
the will annexed of Elizabeth Booker, decd John l.
Townes, Joseph Smith and Judith his wife, and other
dts.
The defendants John T.. Towncs and Joseph
Smith and Judith his wife, not having entered their
appearance and gwen security according TO the act
OF Assembly and the rules of this court and nDcar
ing, by satisfactory evidence, that they are not nbab
tans OF this country it is ordered, that the said de-
PENDANTS do appear here the first day of the mex,
January term and answer the bill of the plaintiffs and
that copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in Some
wspaper 'i''fshed in the city of Richmond for two
months successfully, and posted at the front door of
the capitol, in the said city. copy. Tcste,
~ WIN q. PESpLEroS, &C.
\WiRGINIA:-At rules, holden H. the cIrrk's Office
" OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 9th day of September 1880 Jacque
line r. Taylor admor of James Halliday pltf agans,
J'mes Dick and Nathaniel Dick. in their own rights
and US surviving partners of Dicks, Moore x Co and
others, dts
HE defendants james Dick and Nathaniel Dick
not having entered th-i appearance and given secu.
rty according the act of Assembly and the rules of
THIS court, and appearing BY DRY evidence
that they are not inhabitants of this country: il is or
dered that the said defendants do appear here on the
first day OF the January term and answer the
b' ct the plaintiff; and that copy Of this order be
torthwth inserted IN some newspaper published in
the city OF Richmond, for two months successivcIv
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
city A coDy Teste
70 n WIN. g. Pryn,rroyc
\VlRGiNiA:-At rules, holden in the clerks ofice
" ut the superior court of chancery for the Rich
Tnond district, the I'd day OF August 1850 John Dun
lop, and David Brydon and Janeu his wife Nils
against GFitHn Organ, David ID. Brydon, and David