Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-12-31

Y W U
~ he superior court "f chsncery for the Richmond
district, the 9th day Of Sept, 1880: James Andrew,
PnI; agsns, John Bell, ex'or of Reuben Howard,
decd and trustee under his will, bowling s,arke,
aud William L. Howard, dfls.
The defendant William l.. Howard not having en-
.sreu ms appearance and given security according TO
the sct OF assembly aud the rules OF this court and
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is mot an
'nhaoitant OF this coontry IL Is ordered that the said
aendAnt DO appear here on The Rrss day the next
Januar, term. and answer the bill or the plaintiff; and
mat copy ofths order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the, city of Richmond for two
months successfully, and posted at the front door of
me capitol, IN the said city A copy. Testr,
~ - VIZ 6. PrSpLSros, @. G.
lNVkIiNiA Al rules holden IN the clerk office OF
The superior court OF chancery for the Richmond
district, the 9TH day of October 1870. Mary Bol,ny
and Thomas Shore and Maria Harriet his wife nlfs
against Edmund Watkins, sh'f, &c. Alexander Gun
ningham, Richard p. Boiling and other dts.
NJ, ne aensnuan.s Aiexander Cunningham and K. p.
10 rs not having entered their appearance and Civ
en- security according the Of ubly and the
rules OF this COURT and appearing by satisfactorv
mat they are not inhabitants of this country,
1t ordered. that the said defendants do appear
on the FIRST day of the next january term and nnsw
the bill of the plaintiffs and that copy Of this order
De forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
IN the city OF Kchmond for two months successfully
and posted at the front door OF the capitol in the said
fciy. A copy. Teste, 49," s.
II wM. G. PrSpLrros, c. c.
ViRGiNiA. Al rules. holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chaucrry Tor the Richmond
district, the ath day of October 1850; the President
Directors and Company Of the Farm,-s' Rank of W.
gna, pnis, against the kichuiond Dock Company and
John Gamble andsRobert Gamble, dts
The defendants John Gamble and Robert Gamble
not hassg entered their appearance and given secu.
ry according 10 the &C, of assembly and the rules OF
this court andit appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they are not inhabitants of this counry II is Or
dered, that the SAID defendants do app.ar here an TN
nrSt day OF the next January tenn, and answer the
OIL OF the Plaintiffs and that cory of this order be
forthwith inser,ed.n some ancr published in the
ciy OF Richmond, Tor two months succes svely, and
posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
city. 4 copy. Teste,
~ Wm. G.sPENDLEroY, &C.
NlRGlNIA. at rules, hold in tie clerks Office of
" the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 4th day Of October 1880; Edward H. Nose
ley and Archibald l.. Woodbridge, sx'ors of WIN Plem
ing deed, pfs against Price Perkins and Tandey Kc,
surviving exors ct Hardin Perkins, decd, and James
DuhoP and David buchanan, surviving partners of
Dunlop, Pollock, and Co, and other dts
The defendants James Dunlop and David buchanan
no' having entered their appearance and given secu
ry according to the of assembly and the rules of
.hs court and appearing, by satisfactory evidence
at tey are not inhabitants of this country; il is or
dered that the SAID defendants do appear here onthe
hrst day OF the January term and answer the hill
Oh the Plaintiffs AID that copy ofths order be forth
with inserted in newspaper published in the CITY
OF Richmond, for months SUCCESSFULLY and oos,ea
at the front door of the capitol in the said city.
~ copy. feste, WIN. G. PEspLETos, C. C.
NlRGINIA. At rules, holden in the clerks office NJ
the superior court of chancery for the RichmonS
district, the 9th day of eptember 1885, Edward pal
mer and Thos. E. Palm .rperchar,s and partners
trading under the firm OF EsrSs pamer. pltfs a.
galns' Muiar and Finley, nerttasi's sld PAT ,.sr
Myer Myers, l.. r. Mister, x. d. Simpson and John
Winn, dts ~
The defendants Mar and Finley, RIB. simpso =,
L. X. Mister and John Winn not having entered their
appearance and given security according to the act of
assembly and the rules of this court and IL appearing
by satisfactory evidence, that they are rot nhabi
tants OF TINS country IT 10 ordered that the said de
PENDANTS do appear here the FIR day OF the next
he of no Mo m
aud that copy this ord be forth with inserted n
s some newspaper published in the city of Richmond
Tor two months success vely, and posted a, the front
door OF the capitol, III the said city,
III copy. Tes,e, WIN G. PENpLEroN. C. G.
VIRGINIA. AT rules holden in the clerks Office q,
the superior court of chanc, ry for the Richmond
district, the 9th day of September 1885, Mary NeaDes
Daniel Jones, Walker Leake and Susanna his ,yice
pitts. against Lucy Jones, exrx of Frederick ines
decd, Edward " Carter and Louisa his wife, Daniel
Carter, Thomas Clarke Joseph Somerell and susan.
ma his wife, john Trplett and Virginia his wife Mo
ry ii. Mcnlulen, anthony Bond, James Bonds nv -
Bond, Sally More and Judith, Susan, Mary, Thomaa
Charles, Walker, and Daniel Lacy, and other dts
The defendants above named not having entered
their appearance and given security according To t
act OF assembly and the rules of this court and il
pearinS, by satisfactory evidence, that they are not
inhabitants OF this country; it is ordered tina; the said
defendants do appear here the first day of the
next January term, and the bill of the plain
ts; and that copy of this order be forthwith insert
ed IN some newspaper published in the city of Rich
mond for two months SUCCESSFULLY and posted at the
front door of the capitol, in the said city.
III "A copy. Teste, WIN. G.PENDLEToN, C. c.
NlRGlNlA: AT rules, holden me clerks Office the su
pc or court OF chancery for the Richmond district the 5h
day OF July 1880 Johnaihan Creey pL against MIar and
Finley merchants aud partners Niger Myers, r. Simpson
and John Wnr and l. X Mister, dts.
- The defendants b Simpson, Mllar and Finley John
Wnn and l. Mister not having entered appearance
and given security according TO the act Of assembly rules
oil TINS court and II appearing by satisfactory evidence that
lhey are not inhabitants Of this counyt ordered that the
said defendants do apPer here the first day the next
uary term, and answer the bill Of the plaintiff copy
ef this order he forthwith inserted publish
ed IN the city OF Richmond, for months successvey and
posted at the 'front.' door Of the capitol in he said CITY,
~ copy. TeHe, VS.. g. pENoLrToy, G. G.
NlRGINlA:-Atru rules, holden clerks office OF the
superior court Of chancery for the Richmond district the
Isl day Of November 1890 Robert Rives pG against WIN
Iai, adm'of Of Seymour Scott, dec the said WIN Gilat
and John Gnliat in their own rights, WIN pendcon aud
Herbert a. Claiborne, dts
The defendant John Giat having entered his appear
ance and given ury according the Assembly and
the rules Of this court, aud appearing by satisfactory evi
dence, that he is not nhaban Of this COUNTY, IL is order
that toe said defendant do appear here 10th day
the next January term, and the bill Of the plaintiff and
that copy Of this order be fohw h inserted IN some news
paper published in the CRY Of Richmond Tor two months c
oesvey ard posted tho front door the capto In the
sad city copy Teste, WIS., &. PrSDLrroN G. c.
/ 80
IN CHANCENY.-In llenrcO County ouu CleTs5s