davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03

A\rOIlCE.-ThP Subscriber having delar
-A4 mined 10 discontinue business ia this
place, earnestly requests those indebted 10 him
lhy bond or otherwise.) 10 make immediate
payment to Mr.. William Digges, who is alone
authorised 10 settle The same aud those hav.
ng CLAIMS, will present them for adjustment.
All those indebted 10 the concern of $ " NJ.
Allen 4 Co. are requested 10 make Immediate
payment, as longer indulgence ca4uoi be CIV.
en-. L. w. HEH son.
Nav 3
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03

ERUR5UANf 10 a decree of the Superior
II Court OF Chancerv, for the Richmond
District. pronounced at the las, term, ia the
cause of Cooke VS. Bentev,the undersigned Mar
shall Of the said court. VIII sell, on the premises,
for cash, III the county Of HALIFAX, on tuesday
the sixth of Jgly, 1890, a tract OF land, snppo
sed 10 contain between and SuOacIes. d AT the
same time. thirteen acres adjoining The town
OF BentCyviie on Staunton rFer, IN Tie county
of la 'i(ay.
THOMAS. \. HOLCoMBE, Marshal
June 3. tds"li
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03
Bagwell, Smith and Hannah
Commission Merchants,
RICHMOND,

,FyShVlNG taken 5amnel Hannah as = part.
RI nos IN our concern in Richmond. the bu-
sinp,s in future viii be conducted under The
Grm of Bagwell, Smith and Hannah, and under
the supernlendance and manas cement oil MI.
Hannah ia person
We shall continue our business here, mud VIII
! future transact Commission Business. hna
respectfully tender our services to the pu9''c :"
that capacity. Advances VIII he made on pro
duce wber plsced IN our hands. If required.
SUfrH, RAGWELL y Co.
- 5o''H
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03

Tie Message 10 thu "a tlusion OF almost
every thing else ffop our columns this nom.
ing, we lay before tuf readers the trtraoftliu4.
" Message OF the lresilen' afcumnnpvmp
his veto upan the Ndgseille Road Til. We
call II an extraordinary au.amcnL aud wore.
fret 'ha' we hive not roon' this morning 10
show wherein 1t is so. We viii eude.,or to Do
So, however, IN our next paper
i Will be see.. that the President oi.jrms the
Constitutional jurisdiction e the general gov
ernneut over the subject of Internal improve
inen,. but WOnld restrict the exercise of the
power TO such works as HE, in his superab,in
3aR WiSdom, may consider 70 be diyested of
HcdI and to have assumed q nu'5u1i char.
acteT' What have the friends of STATE Rights
and the advocates of rigid construction gniu.
I'd by tits lucy have gained the benefit Of
Gfn. JackSon's experience and discretion IN the
exercise Of a power which he says belongs TO
the general government, and which thev say
does not We shall not gaInsay the GENE.
rails experience and discretion, but we must be
permitted 10 doubt his judgment, Ia deriving
this power NOT from The constitution itself but
| from those easily understood ai1ihorlje,, pre-.
cedeot and usage
Great excitement was produced hv Che Mes
sege, and an animated debate followed. Mr.
. anhery, Of Ohio. leading Jackson mem
ter abandoned the parry aud wa, "a IS said
/ denounced by Mr.. PoIlt, Of tennessee. in most
unmrasured terms. Tins he mieht have cx.
! Pecred. II IA the fa'o OF all who i" ,lare To- be
/ honest in these worst OF times
| We hop: that Gcn. Jnckson's course with
regard to this bill was mol affected nv The fuct
that Mr. Clay is Stakeholder and Dnrrior in
! the Company, aud that section Of eountr,
~o1ld have been beuetiaed by il which gave u
large majority against hlm. We say, We hope
| he was not actuaied by such a motive, though
it would be in perfect accordance with IN.
Tartish quot American) System OF Rewards
and Punishments.
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03
MILLINERY

Ms Gill mas on hand an assortment or
Leghorns aud other Millinery. received direct.
l., from the North, which she is prepared 4.
dispose Of a, very low prices. She is alsA
prepared 10 execute any order in her line with
elegance and Dispatch The dizens of Lynch
burg aud 't' vicinity are respectfully invited IL
call and examine her assortment.
June 3 a..
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03

MN AhkiED, on Thuf1dsy Inst. by III. Re-.
MIR. Russell. Capt LINDSEY COLEMAN,
Amherst county. 10 Mrs l5ABELLAo REAo
III Bedford comfy.
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03
WOOx. GARDTNGs'

BY Double CyInder MACHINE
7ENHE subscriber respectfully returns his
q thanks to the public for the liberal en-
ragement ae has met with, aud hcgs a con
tnuance Of their lavors for the present season.
No pains will be spared 10 give general salts
faction. HIS machine has lately undergone a
thorough repair, and is NOW in full operation
For lhe convenience oil customers, all wool can
be LETT at the Store of l.. +. Gardner from
whence it Will be taken and returned IA rolls.
One pound of clean ard is required for every
ten pounds OF WOOL.
aMASA W. HOLMES.
NIB. Superior Wool Rolls for sale az J.. f.
Gardeners Store, where cash will be wen lOr
few hundred pounds Of goodwool
4. W. H.
May y VISIT
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03
Shoe Store and Mandatory.
Je 4ILE,

YEfAS on hand, NJ his Store, next door above
Ia DR.. Howell Davies. a general assorinen,
OF shoes of bis own aud Northern manufsc.
iure which he offers nj the lowest prices. Also
Philadelphia made Boots OF unusually low
prices. lie is prepared 10 execute work; bar.
ticularly in the ladies branch Of business viii,
neatuess and Dromutnpss.
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03

! IL Mr. Noah's denomination has been con
iirmed by the Senate, by the casting vo,e u The
Wee President and thus has n man been
sR1aggled into Office, in violation Of the deca-
red vii Of the people, as expressed thro' their
representatives., by the cunning Of the Presr
dent in iakGg advantage ot the unavoidable
absence Of portion of them 10 effect his pun
pose An ACT so contemplate in its character
and so Insulting To the psopIp, is unpreceden,-
ed in the annals Of this government; and if il
do not excite feeling oil indignation and re.
sentiment. then orr couatry hes " lost the breed
OF noble boods aud we may "a well at once
make up our minds 10 be increasingly chained,
coIlared aud muzsled. like our dogs
Some gentlemen, we learn, derry thaf Noah
was re-nomiuaici by The President, and contend
that the vote Of the Sennte was re.consdeyea
This denial of course pre-supposcs, that. even
in the estimation Of those twho fy TO il, the
denomination Of Noah. by the President, under
The circumstances Of The case wonld have been
an indeiensiblc at. Well, gentlemen, we will
deprive yam of this shadow Of hope. Every
man, who knows any thing Of parliamentary
rules, knows that motion Tor reconsideration
must be made by one u! the majority aud
We Gao al see, by the state Of the vote-23 TO
23--that tbs was MOI the case. Which Of the
Senators, pray, gentlemen do you think. WAS
such fool as 10 make a motion, the nece5sa.
y cd'cc. Of which would be To defeat his own
wishps--or, i. !, did nat do lnal, would leave
the subject Just where II WIS when he made the
motion II tie Presidents acts cannot be De
isudel, Trey should not be denied Duff e4.
panatiau-or his defpnce--s wanted
4 T James Thornton OF New Hampshire.
has been appointed by the .PresIden, g. Senate
second Comptroller, in ru 6f the '' m f1R3o Us
isaac Hi. So. Isaac may 4" take his flesh in
lis teeit,' though an Indifferent substitute ,or
Treasury pay, and journey houewards.
II The Nashville Republican now admits
hat there was Private Journ a connected
with the defaIcaiion Of the Nashville Bank
but contends that it was no more than " The
Journal, Leser or Book, in which the private
accounts Of It's customers are preserved Noi
50 slippery sir, il you please . the Private
Journal to which we allude. is not tbat in
which "the private accounts OF the customers
Of the Bark are preserved" bat Tia, in Which
the private accounts of tie customers OF the
def,uldng CASHIER were kept. Gen. Dunlap.
n his a,;sr 10 ;sa Knoxville Reg ister ,coa.a no
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03
OIL 66

The committee appointed Ia audit the Urea
surer account, hav. per formed tina, duty, and
hnd Il correct. .Ahibiing n balance In favor Of
lin Treasurer ofu"o hundred aud fifty ono
Collars thfiy sil cenis-2Oih May, 1890.
c. H. WILLIAMS.
JOHN X. d. PAINE.
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03

II The Eulnirer asas ic TIE nuthot Of the
East Room lelcr ms not madc the amta3s
iruorGLis 10 rhr public = tie rss the Enqui
rcr, IN 'oro, IN. 4: dopt Grg sach thing lie
has not unless The 0mende honorable consist
IN apoog,aing for one ieIsehood by telling
another aud n greater Aud the Enquire
emil, ihat huge. mammoth lie a mistgke -
That is man describes a splendd room,
which L. never saw aud gorgeous furniture
wh,cb had no existence aud declared lhat the
SIGHT iheleof was a gent shnck to bs republi.
eau lceIiags and all, for The purpose Of min.
r'og political opponrut--and, when the cheO'
is discovered. be is reluctantly made to confess
that he WIS q" mistaken" but says tia, a friend
told him 50 which was as much ialscbood as
10 FIST Add his the Enquirer cela making
the oHtnde honorable 10 the pubic Ills IS
almfdhle logo, truly
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03

n USf received. direct from New York, nod
% opened This morning. small lot Of very
desirable goods. consisting IN part Of
A few peers pngos
DO FamyreDes--esfram sde aud vety 81
pcrior qualiiy-s,he eolors are pea green, lilac,
straw colof aud liglt blle.
HENRY ALLISON.
Also, 8 ar & dozen course PantaloUns, veiv
cheap aud lot Of Cotton Yum. H,A.
June ).
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03

have ALLUDED 10 the srsissry bosks sfihs Back
Is The Republican contends that he did, nou
that u Is oornered by tia, letter, and compelled
tn admit What II has heretofore uniformly de.
nied. lie could not have mean, them. because
| 10 all OF then, the Clerk has access. and Gen.
Dunlap says, that when tns Clerk Wssexam.
med. he seemed 10 be ignorant of .pery thing
| feta'ing TO III. Pr,vde Journal" lilo could
mol hate alluded 10 the Ordinary books of fhe
Bank. because they. according TO Gen. Duo
laps version o. he Clerks testimony. had been
posted BY himself nnd yet he knew nothing Of
this Private Journal, which 4" the Clih.sr refus.
Cd 10 g.re ~, / which contained. as he says. the
accounts oil persons whom he permitted 10
draw when they had no drposltcs" The pre-
var,calions and quibble. IT the Republican
eonhtm suspicious rhete they did e,isi, aud
eres'e them waerc hey did not.
W II secrsvery difcuit 10 make the Il ch-
inond Enquires understand ~. When we
said we tad mo Informant. with regard to
the matter embraced IN our Queries. relative 10
the dgtaoa'ion IN tho Nashville Bank, we did
not intend 1t 10 he understood, as the Enquirer
aItc's In believe, TIA, We acted upon lfh,
tm,s' We mean this thai the information
which VIZ received WAS not Intended Tor publi-
cation but, believing i, 70 he uur, we made
npubci on our own responsibility. Are We
now understood IL wa are, wv hope we shall
not be again grossly misreprescnted.
The Enquirer. FOR the twentieth time. com.
plains OF our logic, aud declares that IT.
" arguments arc thrown away upon u.s. The
reason Is obrlons we never studied III. Jtsnfs
cojc--we never learned the art OF nssimilntinY
conirares. or reconoilIng Contradictions, or
converting curses into blessings or u viola,ot oil
the constitution into its most Jealous frend--we
could never believe, to-day, that a mnn is qual.
fled to admin sler all the laws Of ihe land 3"
whom yesterday NE had declared 10 be incana-
BILE of " interpreting the PLAN provisions OF n
single law All this the Enquirer has done
and it's no, strange, therefore, tbsth ncilher
understands our logic. nor we biz.
But there - one argument rgr 10 all cnpa
cities. q The old Virginia e1Pey.msn,am crue.s',
--or in plain fogIish, Il bst--aoh tint tho Id
ifor % lie Fnpoirer addresses to Us. 10 this
we tepls, lat, that n matter of luct can be Ms
well determines without het A. With II; 2dly
ibo, We should tave very littl- confidence IN
such testimony as would be htoueht onward
IN his side Of the question aad 3diy, that We
have CIT gambling
Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-06-03

Charlotte Haywood. charged with the niur,
der 81 II negro girl IN Richmond, has beenrx
dm,ned before the Hastings Cur, OF that city
aud temanded 10 the superior Court Of Law
T.y trial
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11
In L6FTIN n. kLLETT, c H. c.

VWfRGfNiA. AZ rules holden in the clerks office Of
the superi,r court Of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 5h day Of July 1880; John r Archer and
frances Cook his vito, pitts; against William Jones
Barksdale, nd'mor Of Frances abb, deed, the same
VIM Jones Barksdsle and Marianna his wife, Thomas
u. Tsh5 aud other dts.
The defendant Thomas .. Tabb not having entered
bis appearance and Eifen security according TO the
act a assembly and lie rules Of this court, and IL APP
pearing, BY satisfactory evidence, that be is not an
iptabilsnt of THIS countfyi Ills ordered, that the said
deitnfant DO ap3earnero on he first day Of The nest
4anug5 tcrfp, and answer the bill Of the pl shifts.
and that q cppy 81 this order be forthwith inserted IN
some newspaper p~ubiohed ~ the city Of Richmond,
f two mouths auccessiyely, and p0ated at the front
Of ne capl0l, in the said city.
copy Xeste, Wa. G. Pesofrro~,q g. o..
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11

\WfRctNIA At rules, holden in the clerks Office of
y the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 5th day of July 1850; Edward Cunning
ham, pr. against Thomas -. MITCHELL; and Garland
Thompson. ex'or Of wm. Mitchell, who was ex'or of
Thomas Mitchell, dts.
The defendant Thomas III. Mitchell not having 2 n
tered his appearance and gi,e en- security according TO
the act of assembly and the rules of this court, aud il
appearing. by satisfactory evidence. That he is not an
'nhSbusnt of this countryi II is ordered u, that the said
defendant do appear here on. the First day of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and
that a copy of this order be forthwith inserted IN some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for tw o
months successfully, and posted At the front door Of
the capitol in the said city. A copy. TeSe,
20 Wm. G. PFSnIEroN. c. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11

VIRGINIA. Al rules. holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for The Richmond
district, the 4th day of October 1896 the President,
Directors and Company of the Farmers Bank of Viz
GINA, pitts. against the Richmond Dock Company and
John Gamble and Robert Gamble, dts.
The defendants John Gamble and Robert Gamble
not having entered their Appearance and given secu.
rity according to the act Of assembly and the rules Of
this court, and il appearing, by satisfactory evidence,
that they are not inhabitants of this country; II is or
dered, that The said defendants do appear here on lie
first day Of the next January term, and answer the
bill Of the plaintiffs; and that a copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in the
city of Richmond, for two months SUCCESSFULLY, and
posted at the front door of the capitol, in the said
city AcoPy. Teste.
n VIZ. G. PRxDLEroN, G. G.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11

the superior court Of chancery for the Richmond
district. the 4th day of October 1880; John Jones, pltf
against John Hinton and samuel Bramc, merchants by
the style o. Hinton and Brame, and other dts.
The defendant Samuel Brame not having entered
his appearance and given security according TO the
act of assembly and the rules of this court, and it ap-
pearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an in.
hsbitant of this country: il is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here on the first day Of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and
that a copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months successfully, aud posted at the front door of
the capitol, in the said city. a copy. Teste,
II WV. G PBNDLEroH, c c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11

NWlhGiNiA. Atrdcs, holden in the clerks office of
- TIE superior court Of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 9Th day # October 1880; Andrew Mcooie
McQGie, dts. go!
lhe defendants not having entered their appearance
an5 gwen security according to the act Of assembly
y lhe rules OF this court, and it appearing by salts.
eoml,ryi It is ordered, that the said defendant do ap-
pear here on the first day Of the next January term.
ana answer The bN Of the plaintiff and that a copy Of
published in the city Of Richmond, for two months
saccessiyeiy, and posted at the font door of the CAP.
itois ~ The said city. Aoopy. Teste.
Wn. O.. PEsBIErec, g. G.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11

SW7IRGINIA. At rules holden in the clerks Office Of
y the superior court Of chsncery for the Richmond
district, the I'd day Of August 1880; James Neal diff.
against Samuel Morgan, David Street, admir- of
Mereweather Hurt, deed and Champion G.. N. Mara.
Bile, dts.
entered his Appearance ADD given security accoraioS
TO the act of assembly and the rules Of this court. ana
II happening, by satisfactory evidence, that he f. not
an i%nhabitant Of his country; 1t il ordered, that lie
said defendant DO appear here on the first dav of fhe
next January term, aud answer the bill Of the plain.
ihl, and That a copy Of this order be forthwith insert
ed ~ some newspaper published 10 the city Of Rich.
nond' Tor two months successvely, and posted At the
front door Of the capitol in the said city.
70 copy. I ste, WH. 6 PEsDLrrov, G. g.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11
Rogers Orange Gun Powder.

Rogers Orange Gun Powder.
.EENHIS article, (for sale'by the subscribersl is now
IL made upon new and much improved princi-
pies, producing rs guaranteed by the proprietor, re-
markable superiority Of strength and q~uickness, and
great perfection IN It's combustion.
It's offered in kegs of all tho different sizes of
grains, and suitable for all kinds of shooting and of
guns-also, IN canisters Of double and the great
est possible degree Of strength.
Dealers are requested to notice, that this Pow
der muy at once be distinctly known from oil other,
by an orange OF red stain impaired OH its ignition.
also by It's peculiar hgbtncss, Us a measured charge
OF It will be found TO weigh much less than the
same measure of any other kind.
OTIS, DUNLOP & co Agents.
aug t3-2ow3m
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11

T7IRGINIA:-At Rules holden in the clerks Office
" of the superior Court of chancery for the Rich
mpnd district, The 9th day of September, 1880: Sam
uel Winfrce, pitt against Alexander Cushmsu, survi-
wing partner of Cuslman & Andrew, VIM. Gisi.- JOHN
Lee, isaac REYNOLDS, Charles BofFmans George w.
Hoffman, Peier Fahnestock, Henry lowering & co.,
KIT. l. Berry Francis X Kennedy, John Krause, John
TruIi. Jonathan Rogers, and others. dts
The defendants above named, Except Alexander
Cushman) not having entered their appearance & given
security according to the act CT Assembly and the rules
of this court, audit appearing, by satisfactory evidence,
that they are not inhabitants of this country: it is or
dered, that the said defendants do appearhere on the
FIRST day of the next January term, and answer the
bill of the plaintiffs; and that a copy OF this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in the
city Of Richmond, for two months SUCCESSFULLY, and
posted al the front door Of he capitol, in the said city
IS A copy. Teste, WIN. G. PESDLEToS, C. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11

VHiRGiNIA:-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
~ of the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9th day of September 1870: viii
Ham Smith, pitt. against Austin Watkins, Peter ri.
son and other dts.
The defendant Peter Rison not having entered his
appearance and given security according to the act of
assembly and the rules Of this court, and it appearing.
by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an in6a bitant
VI this country: it is ordered, that the said defendant
do appear here on the first day of the next January
term, and answer the bill Of the plaintiff; and tat a
copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in some news.
paper published in the city Of Richmond. for two
months successfully, and posted at the front door Of
the capitol in the said city. copy. Tese.
69 WIN. G. PENDLErog. q. r.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11

VIRGINIA. At rules, holden On lie clerks Ofhce
the superior court ofchancery for the Richmond
district, the 9TH day Of October 1890 Edward ~. Nose
ley aud Archibald l.. Woodbridge. exors of WIN Flem-
ing deed, pitts. against Price Perkins and Tandey Key.
surviving ex'ors Of Hardin Perkins, deed, and James
Dunlop and David Buchanan, surviving partners Of
Dunlop, Pollock, and Go, and other dts
The defendants James Dunlop and David Buchanan
not having entered their appearance and given secu
riy according 70 the act of assembly and the rules Of
that they are not inhabitants of this country IL is or
dered, that the said defendants do appear here on the
first day Of the next January Term, and answer the bill
OF the plaintiffs and that q copy ofthis order be forth.
with inserted in some newspaper published IN the city
Of Richmond, for two months sucoessively, and posted
az the front door Of the capitol, in The said city.
~ a copy. Tcste, WIZ. G. PESDLEToN, C.. G.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11

INWlRGINIA. at rules holden in the clerks office OF
~ the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 4th day of October 1880: Mary Boiling
and Fhomas Shore and Maria Harriet his wife, phfs.
against Edmund Watkins, shift &c. Alexander Gun
ningham, Richard p. Boiling and other dts.
The defendants Alexander Cunningham and r. P.
30 lg not having entered their appearance and Civ
en- security according to the act of assembly and the
rules OF this court, and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence, that they are mol inhabitants of this country;
it is ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the next January term, and answer
the bid ofthe plaintiffs; and that a copy OF this order,
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
in the city of Richmond, for two months successfully,
and posted at the front door Of the capitol, in the said
II WIN. g.. PENDLETON, c. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-11

NNflkGfNlAs-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
- ct the superior court Of ohaocery for the Rich.
mond district the 9th day Of September 1890. Fran
~ X Johnson his wife, Ihos. Drake, WIN. G.. POysn,
hos'na Johnson Philip Johnson, and Edward Johnson,
infant ch1drcn Of said Edward and Caroline, de1s.
Inc defendants Edward johnson aud RosiDa, Phil
n and Edwsrd Johnson not having entered tbeir APP
pcarancc and given security according TO the act Of
Assembly and the rules of This court, and Il appear.
iog by satisfactory evidence, that they are not inhabi-
PENDANTS do appear here on the FIRST day Of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and
that q copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published IN the city OF Richmond,
for two months excessively, and posted az the, front
door Of the capitol In the said city.
~ copy Tcsic, VIZ. q. Prsnrtr0ns o. G.