Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-20

w toNiCl ~ AZ rute9 uOtucn IN Nnc ctefke omcS "
v the supestof oourtof ch.ncery for,he Richmond
dis,ric,. ths sth day of Angus, 1850, Ciaiborne Grad
dock and Mary his wife. James craddoek and Judith
Lloyd Rob ertson. decd, Samuel ID. Burke aud Peter +.
Nancy Robertson, and Matthew, Martha,
Mary. william. sarah. Eliza and Lucy TO
iel s., Lemuel, Madison and Martha Ann robertson
children of John Robertson. decd;-Alle" Freeman:
who survived hs wife Caroliue. late Robertson, ana
John and Grace Freeman their children and 1o"n
Poke and Sarah his wife, late Robertson, dts.
The defendants except the three first namely
not having entered their appearance and gwen seou.
this court, and IL appearing, by satisfactory eviue"ce'
that they are not inhabitants OF this country' II rs or
dercd, that the said defendants do appear here on the
first day Of the next January term, and answer the bli
of the plaintiffs; and that n copy of this order he
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published IN
the city of Richmond. for two months successiveiy,
and posted at the front door OF the capitol, IN the SAID
city. A. copy. Teste.
10 WV. G PrSDLEroN. c. C.
UIRGiNIA. At rules holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the Cd day of August 1880; Stewart Jackson,
pitf. against John G, Boisseau. James Perry, VIM. Per-
ry, John Perry and other dts.
The defendants James Perry, VIM. Perry, and John
Perry not having entered Their appe arance and gwen
security according To the act o fassembiy and the rules
! of this court, and it appearing, by satisfactory evil
dcuce, tina; they are not inhabitants of this country; 1t
is ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the next January term, and answer
the bill of the plaintiff; and that a copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
in the city of Richmond, for two months successively,
and posted nj the front door of the capitol, IN the
10 WM. G.. PENpLEToN, C. C.
VTIRCINIA. AZ rules, holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chaucery for the Richmond
district, the I'd lay ut August 1850; Robert King, Ro-
bert Temple and John Skyrer, pitts. against Richard
Patterson, James Cooke, Thomas Floyd and James
1 Fox, dts.
The defendant Richard Patterson no, having enter.
+ ed his appearance and gwen security according to the
act Of assembly and the rules of this court. and it APP
pearing, by satisfactory evidence. that he IS not an IN
habitant of this country; IT is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here on the FIRST day of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiffs; and
that a copy at this oder be { forthwith inserted in some
3 newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months SUCCESSFULLY, and posted at the front door o
, the capitol, in the said city. copy. Tes'e,
20 WM q PENDLEToN. c c.
N4lRGiNiA. AT rules, holden in the clerks Office o
' ~ The superior court rf chancery for the Richmond
5 district, the 9th day of Sept. 1850: James Andrew
I pltf. against John Bell. cx'or of Reuben Howai d
!, decd. and trust g under his will, Bowling Starke
V and William l.. Howard, dts.
e The defendant William l.. Howard not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according u
e the pct of assembly and the rules OF this court, and .
Il appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he rs not ~
inhabitant of this country; it is ordered, tina, the salt
def ndant do appear here on the first day OF the mex
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff; ans
= that a copy of this order be forthwith inserted in som
ne wspaper published in the city of ~Ricbmond, for 20
" months succcssiveiy, and posted at the front doF o
u the capitol, in the said city copy. Testn'
,l$7l WIN G. PESpLET<S,c G. c..
STTKGINIA. At rules holden IN the eerk,s office o
district, the 4,I ,is of e5s9'fTss 1880 Mary fps oifns
and T1v"as Shore and Maria Harriet hi. wife, pitts
against Edmund Watkins. shift, &c. Alexander Gun
ningham. Richard =. Boiling and other dts.
The defendants Alexander Cunningham and r.. p
30 1g not having entered their Appearance and Civ.
en- 81 curity according to the act Of assembly and the
rules OF TINS codrt, and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence, that they are not inhabitants Of THIS country,
1t IS ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the next January term, and answ er
the ball OF The plaintiffs; and that a copy of this order
DE forthwith inserted in some newspaper publishe d
IN the city of Richmond, for two months successively.
and posted at the front door of the capitol, in the said
city. A copy. Teste,
WM. &. PENDLEroS, C.. C..
T