Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-23

NlhGlNIA. AT rules holden ia the olerk's Office OF
" 'he superior ct,'t at chaneery for the Richmond
district. the 5th day of August 1881; Iaborpe <r,d
dock and Mary his wife, James Cra.l,lock and yuth
his wife, pliis against Richard \ Dnhbv a,ln,nr nj
Lloyd obertson, decd, Samuel -. Burke and Peter T.
Gregg;-and Name, Robertson, and Matthew Martha
Catharine, Mary, William, Sarah, Eliza and Lucy lo
ne',son' children OF William Robertson. dec'dDan-
lel 81 Lemnel, Madison and Martha Ann Rob- rtson,
Children Of John Robertson. deed; Allen Freeman
who survived his wife Caroline, late Robertson, and
John and Grace Freeman their children, and John
fnke and Sarah his wife, late Robertson, dfis.
The defendants (cxccpt the three first nancd)
not having entered their appearance anil given
ry according To the act of assembly and the rules Of
uS court, and 1t appearing by satisfactory evidence,
that they not Inhabitants of tins country; il il
dered that the said defendants o appear here ON the
hst day ct the next January tern, and the hill
ot the plunus; and that a copy of this order he
forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published in
the city Of Richmond, for two months successiycly
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
city. \. copy. Testc,
10 WV. G Prrprrro~, c. c.
" iRGiNiA. At rules holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chanoery for the Richmond
district the I'd day of August 1850 Stewart Jackson,
pitt against John G.. Rousseau, James Perry VIM Per-
~, John PER-, and other dts.
The defendants James Perry, VIM. Perry, and John
Perry not having entered Their appe and gwen
security according To the act OF assembly and the rules
ct tins court, and appearing by satisfactory e,i.
dencc thai they are not inhabitants of thus country; il
is ordered, that the said defendants do apncar he
the frs, day of the next January term and answer
the bil of the plaintiff. and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
in the city of Richmond, for two months succcssiyeI
and posted at the front door of The capitol, in the
SAID city copy. TeSte,
10 WV. G. PrNnrrrov, c. c.
NlRGNiA. At rules holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court OF chancery for the Richmond
district, the Cd LAY of August 1885, Robcr, King Ro-
bert Temple and John Sklrcr pitts against Richard
Patterson, James Cooke, Thomas Floyd and James
Fox, dfs.
The defendant Richard Patterson not having enter.
cd his appearance and given security according to the
ct of assembly and the rules of this court and it a-
pearng, by satisfactory evidence tina, he is not an in.
habiian %: this country is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here IN the first ay of the n.x,
January term, and answer the bill ofihe plaintiffs and
that copy vt this oder be forthwith inserted i'm some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months success've'y, and posted at the front door
tho capitol, III the said city. copy. Teste,
20 WM G. PENDLrTon. {. c.
w "GiNiA. At rules, holden the clerks Office OF
" the superior court Of chancrry for the Richmond
district, the 9th day of Sept. 1850 James Andrew,
pltf. against John Bell, exor of Reuben Howa,d
decd and trustee under his will, Bowling Siarkc,
and William l.. Howard, dts.
The defendant VILLAIN l.. Howard not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according
the pct of assembly and the rules of this court and
appearing by satisfactory evidence that he not an
nhabitan of this country it is ordered that the said
def ndsn do appear here the first day of the next
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city Of Richmond. for two
months successfully, and posted AT the front door of
the capitol, IN the said city copy. Teste,
~ WIZ G.. PENnLEToS c. e.
w h6iNih At rules holden the clerks office of
" the superior court of chaucery for the Richmond
district the +th day of October 1850: Mary Boiling
and Thomas Shore and Maria Harriet his wife, PITTS
against Edmund Watkins, shfl, &c. Alexander Gun
nirgham, Richard p. Boiling and other dts.
ihe defendants Alexander Cunningham and r. p.
ling not having entered their Appearance and Civ
en- security according to the of assembly and the
rules OF this court and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence that they not inhabitants of this country
IS ordered that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the next January term, and answ
the bill of the plaintiffs; and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
in the city Of Richmond, for two months successfully
and posted at the front door OF the capitol in the SAID
city. A copy. Teste,
II WV. g. PESnLETov, C. G.
NIRGINlA. At rules. holden in tie clerks Office OF
v the superior court of chanccry Tor the Richmond