Lynchburg Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1829-185?, 1830-10-18

Southern states mas Rhhdrsw frsm TIE 4 -
fedsTHry. enu what 4 NAV. M .ss y enofe u
he dreaded fhpn aIors' ~ the ssnefsl 6oser1
meat 10 regulate Industry power which
cannot wiih safrfy be nhdsd 10 any Rosefn
msnt hut with TIE most guarded Limitations
| D,feni lave for thu sprpu afensnf of tnHnti=
| s,iures wonll not have been paid fof snsl'
year The five csnis yard on nuf co 'oa
barginr. lr.isd Tor The progressed purpose of
rnatiins he Western @tHtrs 10 supply the az
lieie on ihsiI own terms " ben the proceeds we're
10 maL. roads aud canals Tor The same States
v onld have ben opposed silh aspifit mol eAsi
! " nila,sd The, have bern borne only be
/ cane briug indirect, they nrr unseen, hnd
! bseaus. - nortinn of the evil may be avoided
f nv The nun consumption OF thnse articles whics
afe moi NJ huslneeessiis. There Gam 4 be
I great, faliacv than thai the Umon - 10 be-
i prsser.ed by power IN the General Govern
! menI 10 e06rcs the States II" existence oil
.os,feieniy s,einIes tie idra Of force. Ours
/ Is government af uptnian. of consent Of
vnMnlatv ns.nristion- ihe only guaranty Tor
enion :. lns,ire. Jnslire sec9ras good leenng.
j I'D Its. affection and nothing bot jpsute tan
secure item.
OF ~ha, value il that union which is formed
! ~ INV illing aud 10 luctaut nembefs Who, but
Tor the sword suspended over their heats,
| would nv on from the common centre, rs from
n fierce and CONSUMING FIRE. which burns onls
| To destroy The Construction, administer II
according Ia is letter aud spnli can dispense
nothing bn justice. and the character 81 the
American people IL fheir sufficient warranty
that no State would separate from The Uhon
whhum unsuitable cause. Regarding he O.
mon rs u family compact. the members Of
which ran only he kept together by tue prat-
tee OF strict aud lnpariIal 1stice, " ~ better
that the non-cnnienfs and mntonienis should
he Suffered To depart in peace by common
consent, than bs ommon concert. u consltain
u reluctant obedience, which II ylrlied TO day
may he forribly withdra~n tomorrow II
is the shedding Of blnod - bcb deters rs irom
constitutional resistance 10 uneons'i nfonai
laws, aud which ought 10 be pDslpuned SO
ong w H. taiotesi hope fc1ia#ns 81 n 5ststfn
ing sense 81 justicr. You well knaw how t.
same lntatusioh IS constantly pursuing an
interest infinitely more sarred III" unhallnwrd
touch of ~hlcb would be boand IN hon Ia
resltt aud with vengeance nrver 10 be appeas.
ed But pardon much on thcse distressing
topics, md accept The tender of my regard aud
esteem g. NJ 1ROrP.
IL Mesas John TAYLOR, Wutr HnoItan, Jr.
John &. Brown. Pierce NJ. Butler aud WI
liam Harper.
INC CnTfPFpon1Pnfp bflWfPn Jhu9P JOHN
con nnd Col Taylor, of South Caiolioa, recent V
published, interesting, ma,fnpch a.
hnthrf facts were expected 70 la Developed IN
the course Of the discussion. Wa shall publish
nj we see IN The subjec. The Chh6esion
Mercury contains the following rreie of Tn
Judge To the last letter Of Col faylor:
CulpLtsros, Sept, -, 1880.
nv DSnr ImlOr y our letter dated Klcr |
Creek, September H. with the columbia
Post marx oi TIE liln, did not come To baud
until the l7th, near three weeks AFTER the datr
Of mne To which II Is an answer, aud alta time
when il Was out Of the question Tor me TO br
~ Columbia 70 make my speech. What an
opportunity was hrrr lost certainly hould
have Addressed myself Ia an audicnce mho@
minds mcte IN n state for m,ukmg" and might
have enjoyed atrtnmph. such as yon aul have
fell IN common more ihan oocr. Whrrr we've
the men who uus clnim 10 he Radicals and *.
elusive Patriois. when you and stood ehout-
der TO shoulder IN the stormy days OF Ultra
Federation ! md more recently IN uat
unN rrsal homage now rendered 10 hp tai MS
aud worth of our friend Crawford bv men
who reVel ed IN the most ~anton abpse Of
hun, when you aud stood up for him almost
hlbn"
! perceive by nm editorial remark pr G,ed 10
the publication of our correspondence, thai the
suggestion is ihrnwn ont that my letter "Rs
written To Won wliha view ~ 10y olive ynn IL
u controversy. ana sure you cannot enter
tain such an idea Nothing wa, farther from
my minA but ypn court II, | certainty shal
not shun IT, Ydn would re wli,pe ing to
The bowling winds 10 attempt III the nrwspa.
pers the defence oil INV Eight punts, unlti the
election ~ over. Let that be passed aud
somrthug of n calm ensue, and am read, To
meet Won hui il mast be III tho columns oi he
Telescope for thus, and thus only. can thu
aniidole Toe administered where II may have
something 10 operete upon.
You style yourself " One o. the members of
the ConspiracY"-h hut II all the Cousprators
were as candid and disintfrrsted MS YOU are
the Republic would hive nothing To fear from,
them: YOU have openly aud csnaldlp avhwed
thal II Virginia would consent 10 he a From
tier State, yon would 20 off from HE Union The
next day. THIS Is at once appealing 10 the good
sense aud good feelings OF the People and in
that tribunal repose unlimited cnnlidencp II
is only when they are hoodwnk ed by de
magognes and hyP0clIIeS thai they can go
wrong
As to the part YOU take in this Conspira-
cy,' solemnly declare thai ii could think MS
YOU 4 o upon the facls think should feel AS
you 40 upon the measures would not Ii
ander " a government of unlimited powers"
aud II saw distinctly that nothing but re-
evolutionary movement couii impose due
restrictions | would cry out Tor Reyoiu-
lion.
As 10 afrording the States some more salts
factory security than the Intervention of the
Supreme Court u is what | have heen urg-
ing for wears -Re.tassnred tina; we are far from
coveing Jurisdiction, especially where States
are concerned Heaven save MS from IN
counterIng the irritable feelings of sovereigns
Rn,l have always been met by the question,
What can the States want more than the Sen.
ale They are all there equally represented,
and every law which passes that body m
wolves n decision nm It's couSt'intinaalty
decision made Ivy hody sworn u decide in
partially. that in which the smallest Stnre
has as much weight rs the grpat"st. 10
this have never been able to find but
ons answer, and TINT is, that as to Que class
Of cases that tribunal is not accessible. |