Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-01-05

I\ViRGiNiA-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
OF the snpe'ior court of ehancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5ih day of October 1929: James
Molly, pilf against VIM. Moody, Daniel S. Middagh,
and James s. KlOss dhs.
The defendant William Moody no, having entered
bis appearance and given security according the
act ct assembly and the rules of this court and it an.
pearng, by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an in
hnbiant of this couRtry: it is ordered. that tire said
defendant do appear here on the tenth day of the
next January term, and the bill OF the plaintiff
and that copy Of this ovler be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city of Richmond,
For two months snecessveiy and posted at the front
door OF the capitol, in the said city.
copy. Teste, WIN. q. ?ESDLEroN c. E.
NiRGiNIA:-At rules, holden IN the CLERKS Office
Of the superior COURT of cbsnceYy for the Rich.
mond district, the Sih day Of October, 1929: John
Sneings, George Sn.ings, aud Others pitts agains,
VIM &. Elan, adm'Or with the will annexed Of Eliza
beth Keen, deed, and John Dlankenship, DIS,
The defendant john B!ankenslip not having enter
ed s appearance and given security according to the
act ct assembly and the rules uf tls court, AMI il sp.
pCarng BY satisfactory evidence that lie not an m
Iattam 81 tins country: IL is ortlepcd that the said
defendant do appear here I'm the tenth day of the
January tcTm and the bill of the plaintiffs and
newspaper published in the city OF Richmond, for two
months successively and posted at the front door OF
Testc WV C. ps 1S1'i e. c.
ViEGINlA.--M rnles, holden in ihc clerks otice
81 the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
pond dnircs, the 5,h duy If Ogober, 1929. Carter
BFaXtOn aud Mary G.. his vile, pitts against knbert
Healy adn,'Or dc bois Of Peter Keuap, and admir-
Ut Sam. VIII. Sayrc and also adm'ur ur 1hos. Tricr
and Ovort0n Svaw,lI and hts vito, and otjcrs, offs
The defendants OyertOn Seawc and hs wife not
having enter sd their appeaEahce aud given security
according ~ the act assembly and the rules of this
court AID II appearing by satisfactory evidence that
that they not inhabitants Of this connS it is or.
dered, that the said defendants do appear here ON .c
tenth day OF The next January term, and answer the
bill OF the Plaintiffs and that copy OF this order be
forthwith inserted IN newspaper published ia the
city Of Richmond, for two months uccesSvely, and
posted tie from, door at the capitol, in the said city
cnpy Tcstc, WM q. PENDLErON, C.
" IRGINIA:At rules, holden in tic clerks Office of
the sup, rior court OF chancery for the Richmond
district, the 5th dsY Of October 1922 Robert X Dab
ney, plt against Whter shelton, surviving partner of
himself and y. T.. shelton deed late partners under
the firm Of y. T. Shelton & Co. Munford Perks. Rob't
Nelson, and other defts.
The defendants Munford Perks and Robt Nelson
not having entered their Appearance and given
y according to the act Ut Assembly aud the rules Of
THIS court, aud appearing, by satisfactory evidence,
that they inhabitants Of this oounryi is order
ed, that the said defendants do appear here the
tenth day Of the next January term, and answer the
bill ct the paint0 and that copy Of this order be
forthwith inserted IN newspaper publshel in the
city OF hchmond. tor two months essiVely, and
posted at the frant door Of the capitol the said city
copy. reSte, Wa. &. PESoLETOS, &C.