Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-08

Sy1RGiNIA:-At rules, holden in the clerks OFF CO
" at the superior court &C CHANGER, for the Rich.
mond ds'rlc', the 9th day of September 1885, Fran
CTS " Povsll, plf against Edward johnson and Caroline
NJ L. Johnson his wife, Thos. Drake, VIM. G.. Povall,
osns Johnson, Philip Johnson, aud Edward Johnson,
infant children of said Edward and Catohn, DIETS.
inc defendants Edward Johnson and Rosina, Phil
Up ana Edward Johnson not having entered their APP
pearance and given security according the &C, of
Assembly and the rules of this court and it appear
ing by satisfactory evidence that they not nhab-
.ahts OF TINS country IT is ordered, that the said de-
PENDANTS do appear here the first day of the next
January term, and answer the bill Of the plaintiff and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city of Richmond,
for two months SUCCESSFULLY and posted the from,
door OF the capitol. in the said city.
~ copy. Teste, WV. &. PrSnLEToS, &C.
NiRGiNlA;-A, rules, holden in the clerks office
of the superior court of chsncery for the Rich
mond district, the 5th day of July 1886: Henry Clarke
and Wm J. Clark, exors of Jno Clarke dec ID, pitts.
against John s. Stubbs, in his right and adm'or
ut John s. Stubs, SEN, deed, Herbert Stubbs, RAN
doph Stubs and other dts
The defendants Herbert Stubbs and Randolph
S'uhos, not having entered their appearance and Civ
en- security according to the act of Assembly andthe
rules OF tins court and it airing, by satisfactory
eviden that they are not inhabitants of this coun-
try: 1t ordered, that the said defendants do appear
here on the first day Of the next January term, and
answer the bill of the plaintiffs; aud that a copy of
this order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published in the city of Richmond for months
successve, and posted at the front door of the capt.
70 '''" Guy v%W ieSU,
\ViRGiNiA:-At rules, holden ia the clerks office
~ of the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the Cd day Of August 1880 John Dun
loP. and David Bry don and Janeu his wife, pits
against Griffin Organ, David ID. Brydon and David
Dunlop, ex'ors of James Dunlop, deed and Robert
Dunlop and James Patterson, dts.
The defendants Robert Dunlop and James Patterson,
not having entered their appearance and given secu
ry according TO the act of Assembly and the rules of
inns court, and IT appearing, by satisfactory evidence
mat they are not inhabitants OF this is
dercd that the said defendants do appear hear on the
hrst day at the next January term, and the bill
OF the plaintiffs; aud that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published in
the city of Richmond, for months successfully,
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
city. \ copy Tes:c
20 Wu C. prxnrrrox = r
NSSlRGINIA:-At rules, holden il the clerks office
~ OF the superior court Of chancrry for the Rich
ond district, the 9th day of September 1880 JacQue-
line T. TAYLOR admor of james Halliday, pitt. against
james Dick and Nathaniel Dick. in their own rights,
and as surviving partners of Dicks, Moore Co. and
others, dts.
The defendants Iamrs Dick and Nathaniel Dick,
not having encrcd thei appearance and given Secu-
r'y according the act of Assembly and The rules of
this court, and it appearing by satisfactory evidence
dered, that the SAID defendants do appear here on the
first day of the next JANUARY term, and answer the
bill OF the plaintiff and that a copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
tie city ut Richmond, for months surcessiveIy
and posted at the front door of the capitol said
city. 4 copy Teste
~ WM G. PFSDLETuN, c. C.