Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-12-13

-
\ViRCiNiA. At rules, holden in the clerks Office OF
~ the superior court of chsncrry for the Rchmon
district, the 9th day of Sc pt 1850: James Andrew
pitt. agains, John He'll, ex'or of Reuben Howard,
decd, and trns,.e under his will, bowling s,arke,
and William l.. Howard, dfts.
The defendant William l.. Howard not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according TO
the PCT ct assembly and the rules of this COURT and
appearing, by satisfactory evidence that he is not an
'nhabant OF this country is ordered, that the said
do appear here the first day of the mex,
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff aud
that copy of this order he forthwith inserted somc
ne wspaper published in the city of Richmond fortwo
months successfully, and posted the front door of
the capitol, IN the said city copy. Tcstc,
~ WV &. PEspLxros, c. c.
i\Vih1iNiA Al rules holden M the clerks office Of
the superior court of chsncery for the Richmond
district, the 18th day of October 1885, Mary Boiling
and Thomas Shore and Maria Harriet his wife, pitts
against Edmund Watkins. sh'h &c. Alexander Cum
ningham, Richard r. Boiling and other dts.
me defendants Alexander Cunningham and r. p.
10" 'g not having entered their appear and Civ
curity according tn the of assembly and the
rules ct tins court, and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence, that they not of this
it ordered that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the January term and answer
the bull OF the plaintiffs and that copy OF this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
in the city OF Richmond for months succe vel,
and posted at the front door of the cspo in the said
city; A'0py' r este
| W
v the superior court of chancery tor the Richmond
district the 18th day of October 1850; the President
Directors and Company of the Farmers Bank of Vir.
GINA, pitts against the Richmond Dock Company and
John Gamble and Robert Gamble, dts.
The defendants John Gamble and Robert Gamble
not having entered their appearance and given
rtty according TO the act ut assembly and the rules
this court, and appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they not inhabitants of this couniry 1t is or
dered that the said defendants do appear here the
iirs day OF the next January term, and answer the
bill OF the Plaintiffs and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some paper published in the
city of Richmond, for two months succe ssively and
posted ut the front door of the capitol, the said
city. copy. Tesc,
~ WM. G. PESDrEroS, c. C.
NIRGiNIA. At rules holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 4h day of October 1885, Edward H. Nose
ley aud Archibald L. Woodbridge ex'ors of VIM Plem.
ing decd plfs against Price Perkins and Taney Key
surviving ex'ors OF Hardin Perkins, decd and James
Dunlop and David Buchanan, surviving partners of
Dunlop, Pollock, and Co. and other dts
me defendants James Dunlop and David Buchanan
not having entered their appearance and given seci
ry according to the act ct assembly and the rules
this court, and it appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they not inhabitants of this country; it is or
dered that the sad defendants do appear here on the
hrst day OF the next January term, aud b
OF The plaintiffs and tina, copy of this order be forth
WIN inserted IN som" newspaper pubished in the cit,
OF Richmond, for months successfully and oostes
at the front door of the CAPITOL in the said city.
| II copy. Teste, WIN. G. PESDLErox c. C.
NikGiNiA. M rules, holden IN the clerks Office o
" the superior court of chancery for the Richmone
district the 9th day of Septembe 1850: Edward Pol
mer and Thos. E. Palmer merchants and partners
trading under the firm of E. & T. f. Palmer pitts
gainst Miiiar and Finley, merchants and PAL uer
Wnn, lifts.
The defendants Mar and Finley, r. n. simpso
l.. X Mister and John Winn not having entered their
appearance and given curity according to the act
assembly and the rules OF this court, and It appearing
by satisfactory evidence, that they are lot inhabi
tans of this country it is ordered that the SAID de
fp nlun tQ In hnra C..
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiffs
and that copy of this ord er be forthwith inserted il
some newspaper published in the city OF richmond
TOT two months success vely, and posted at the front
door of the capitol, in the said city,
II copy. Teste, WV. G. PENDLEroN. C. c.
| VIRGINIA. At rules holden in thc clerks Office n
the superior curt of chanc, nv for ti,e Hchmon,
district, the 9TH day OF September 1885, Mary Neancs
Daniel Jones, Walker Leake AMI Susanna his wife
pitts. against Lucy Jones, exrx of Frederick one,
| decd, Edward ". Carter and Louisa his wife Dor,c
Carter, Thomas Clarke, Joseph SomereIi and Susan
ma his wife, Johh Trplett and Virginia his wife Ma
ry IL. Mchlullen, anthony Bond, James BonGa 1i -
Bond, Sally More and Judith, Susan. Mary, Thomas
Charles, Walker. and Daniel Lacy, and other dts
The defendants above named not having entered
their appearance and given security according to IN,
act of assembly and the rules of this court and il an
pearing, by satisfactory evidence, that they arc not
inhabitants OF this country; it is ordered, that the sst
defendants do appear here the first day of IN,
next January term, and answer the bull of the plain
tits; and that cop, of this order be forthwith insert
ed IN some newspaper published in the city of Rich
mond for two months successfully, and posted at Tn,
front door of the capitol, in the said city.
! II a copy Ieste, WIN. G.. PENDLEToN C. c.
W ikGNiA: Al rules, hoIden Office of the i,
pc Tor court OF ohanceTy for the Richmond district the 5i
day Of July 1880 Johnaian Creery plL agans, Mlar anc
Finley merchants and partners Myer Myers r. f. Snmpso,
and John Winr and I. X Mister, dfis.
. The Defendants X u simpson, Miar and Finley Johr
Winn and l. Mister having entered their
and given security according the of assembly rules
OF this court and appearing y satisfactory evidence that
they are not inhabitants Of this ordered that t,
said defendants do appc here the first day next an
uay term ard answer the hill Of the plaintiff and that copy
OF this order be forthwith inserted newspaper publish
ed in the city Of Richmond, for months SUCCESSFULLY am
posted NJ the front door oi the capitol in the said city
! ~ copy. rere, vs.. &. PESoLtTov, C. c.