Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-18

SxyIRGINiA; At rules, holden in the clerks Office
" OF the superior court OF Chancery Tor the Rich
district, the 5h day OF July 1850: William Dun
ford and Edward unford who sue by Philip Dunfori
their guardian and mex, friend pitts. sgans. John
England and VIM. England in their own rights. " as
ex'ors OF VIM. England decd, Thomas England and
other dts.
The defendant Thomas England not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according
TO the OF assembly and the rules of this court
and it appearing, by satisfactory evidence that he is
nhabtant OF this country II is ordered, That
the said defendant do appear here on the first day oil
the Jan'ry term aud the bill OF the plain
ufs; and that copy ct this order be torthw'th IN
serted in some newspaper published IN the CITY OF
Richmond. for two months successfully, and posted
at the ff,nt door of the capitol, in the said city.
90 copy. Teste. WN. 6 PESpLETo>, c. C.
NIRGiNIA:-At rules holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chsncery for the Richmond
district the LIST day of May, 1880 James Bream, pitt
agains, Thomas II. Mitchell, James Inns, Benjamin
! Dawson and Matthew Wallace and other dfts.
! The defendants BENZ Dawson and Matthew Wal
lace, having entered their appearance and given
cury according to the act of assembly and the rules
of this court, and it appearing, by satisfactory evi
dencc, that they inhabitants OF this country;
is ordered that the said defendants do appear here
the first day of the next January term and answer
the bill of the plaintiff; and that n copy of this
der be forthwith inserted in newspaper pub
shed in the city of Richmond for two months sue
cessivey. and posted the front door OF the Capt.
90 WIN. G. PESpLETos. c. c.
K7IRGINIA: a; rules holden in the clerks Office OF
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the Cd day of August 1850 Manuel Judah,
pltf. against Abraham Block Il Fanny his wife, ana
HAYES J. lsuscs, dts.
The defendants not having entered their appear
and given security according the act at assem-
bly, and rules of this court and II appearing, by salts
factory evidence, that they not inhabitants OF this
country it ordered, that the said defendants do ap
pear here on the first day of the January term,
he Of he MS nd rat q
this order be forthwith inserted in newspaper
published in the city of Richmond, for two mouths sue
ccssivey, and posted the front door of the capitol,
in the said city. copy. tes,e,
60 VIM q. PG>prrroN. c. c.
NTiRGiNIA: 4, rules holden in the clerks office OF
| v the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
dist ric t+e 9th day OF September 1880: James cal,
plf. against David Street adm'or of Mereweather
Hurt deed, Josephus II urt, ard Champion Z. NJ Mar
able, dts.
| The defendant Champion C. NJ AIarsbe not having
entered his appearance aud given security according
10 the Of assembly & the OF this court, and 1t
appearing, by satisfactory evidence that he is
nhabi,an of this country; II is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the FIRST day Of the next
January term and the bin of the plaintiff; and
that copy OF this order be forthwith inserted IN some
newspaper published in the city q. Richmond for
months successivey, and posted at the front door OF
tie capitol in the SAID city. copy. Teste.
60 WM q PENnLEro'. c c.
NyIRGINIA At rules, holden in the clerks Office Of
| the superior court Of chancery for the Richmond
district, Cd day of August 1850: Langley b. Jen-
mngs, pltf against VIM Fiournoy. and Anne his wife,
and Robert Il. Oliver and other dfts.
/ The defendants above named not having entered
their ap pcarance and given security according to the
act Jf assembly and the rules OF this court, and it
appearing by satisfactory evidence. that they
inhabitants of this country; ii ordered that the said
do appear here the first day of the next
January term the bill of the plaintiff; and
that copy of this order be ortw inserted in
he aspaper published IN the city OF Richmond, two
months successfully and posted the front door OF
the capitol, in the said city. 4 copy. Teste,
50 WV. PtNnLEToN, c
K ITIGiTIA.-At Jules holden in the clerks office Of
' the superior court of chanccry for the Richmond
district, the 9Th lay OF October 1880: Henry Wat
kns, pl,t against Francis S. q. Reilicy and Peter v
/ Daniel, dts.
I The defendant F-ancis s. o. Rcey not having en-
tered his appearance and given security accordin
the of assembly * tie rules of this court and tap
pcaring by satisfactory evidence that he is not An in
habitsnt this country: it ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the first day Of the next
January TERM and answer the bill ot the paInnn.
that 4 copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in
wspsper published in the city Of Richmond for two
months SUGGEST yey and posted at the front door o.
the capitol, in the said city. : copy. Teste,
60 Vs. @. PENDLEToN, c. c.
ZVSIRGINIA:-At rules, holden IN tie clerks Office
" of the superior court OF chancery for the gch-
mond district, the 5t day OF July 1850: Mary Car
ter pltf against Joseph Tatr. Edmund W. Rootes
VIM. a ElasOn aud Mary his wife, asd other dts.
The defendants WILLIAM A. E!iason and Mary his
wife, not having entered their appearance and given
security according the to act of assembly and the
rules Of his court, and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence that they inhabitants Cf this country
it is ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day the of next January termand answer
the bill of the plaintiff; and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the city of Richmond, for Two months snccessivey,
and posted the door of the capitol in said city
60 copy. teste, WM. G. PEypLEToN, c. {.
SWiRGINlA:--At rules, holden in the clerks office
" OF the superior court of chancery for the Pich-
mond district, the 9th day Of September go: WI
liam Smith, p!if. against Austin Watkins, Peter ri.
son and other dts.
The defendant Peter Rson not having entered his
appearance and given security according the act Of
assembly and the rules n this court and il appearing
by satisfactory eyidencehat he is inha btant
Of this country is ordered that said defendant