Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-01

WiRGtNIA;-ht rules, holden in the clerks office !
~ ~ the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mnnd district, the 9th daN Of September 1880. Fran
CHS r. POvs, plf ag ,ns Nlward johnson and Caroline
NJ u. Johnson h's wife. 1hos Drake, VIM C. PovaI
Rns'ns Johnson. Philip Johnson and Edward Johnson
In'snt children OF said Edward and Ca olne, dens
The defendants Edward Johnson and Rosir~, Phil.
~ and Edward Johnson having entered their APP
pe"rance and given ccury according tn the act of
Assembly and the rules of this court and it appear
ing by satisfactory evidence. tina, they nhab
tants OF this country it is ordered that the said de-
PENDANTS do appear here the first day of the next
January term, and the bill uf the plaintiff and
that a copy of this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city of Richmond,
two months successfully and posted a the front
door of the capitol, in the said city.
40 copy. rcstc, WM. G.. pRNpLKroS, 4. G.
NTIRGiNIh:-At rules. holden IN the clerks nilice
v uf the superior court OF chtnccry for th, Rich
mund district. the 9th day of Juy 1880 Henry Clarke
and VIM. j. Clark exors OF Inu. Clarke, dec d. pitts
against John 8 stubbs, in his right, and admor
ot John :. Stubs, sen, Decd Herbert Stubs, RAN
dolph s,ubbs and other dfls
The defendants Herbert Stubhs and Randolph
Stuhbs, not having entered Ia cir appearance and Civ
en- security according to The act of Assembly and the
rules ot ms court, and II appearing, by satisfactory
e'a,hcc, that they not inhabitants of this coun
ry II - ordered, that thu SAID defendants do appear
here on the first day of the january term, and
answer the bill OF the plaintiffs and that copy Of
tins order bs forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published IN the city of Richmond. for two months
success'vrk aud posted the front door of the CAPT
to IN the said city. copy Teste,
~ WV. g. PSNDLEToN, q. c.
I\ViRGiNlA-A, rules, holden in the clerks ofice
~ of the superior OF chsncery for the Rich
mord district, the I'd day Of August 1850 John Dun
Top, and David Drydon and Janeu his wife, pits
against Griffin Organ. David -. Brydon, and David
Dunlop, cX'0rs of James Dunlop, decd and Robert
Dunlop and James Patterson, dts.
iGe defendants Robert Dunlop and James Pate rson
not having entered their appearance and given secu
Ui according to the act of Assembly and the rules OF
s court, and II appearing, by satisfactory evidence
That they arc not inhabitants Of this country: it is
dered that the said defendants do appear hear the
drSt day OF hc nest January term, aud the bill
81 the plaintiffs; and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted IN SON. newspaper published IN
The city of Richmond for two months surccssvcIy
aud post At the front door of the capitol, in the said
city. copy. rcste,
10 WV. g. PENDIEruS. {. g.
.NWiRGINlA:-At rules, holden H. thu clerks sSce
" OF the superior court Of chauccry for the Rich
"ud district, the 9th day of September 1880 Iacque
line T. Taylor "dGur of James Halliday pit. against
mes Dick and Nathaniel ID ok, in their own rights
and As surviving partners Of Dick, Moore < Co. and
others, dts.
The defendants James Dick and Nathaniel Dick,
not having en- cred thri appearance and given ScCu-
Tty according - the act OF Assembly aud the rules of
tins court, and 1t appearing, bv satisfactory evidence,
that they not inhabitants of this country:
dered, that the said defendants do appear here the
first day of the next January term, and answer the
bill of the plaintiff and that a copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the city of Richmond, for two months successvcly
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
city. A copv Tcste
20 WIN G. PgSpLETox
CAE