Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-09

VtRclNiA. AZ rules holden in the clerks Office Of
district the 5,h day of August 1850 c,s,b,rnc cd
dock and Mary his wife, James Crsl,d6ck AMI ,,,3b
his wife, pfs. against Rchard A. DOLBY, adn'or of
Lloyd Rohcrtson deed, Samuel D. Burke and Peter y
Greggs-and Nancy Robertson. and Matthew. Martha.
Cstharine. Mary william, Sarah, Eliza and fuc, f,s
bertson, children of William Robertson. dcc'd-Dan-
iei s., Lemoel. Madison and Martha Ann Robertson,
children of John Robertson, decd,--Alen Freeman
who survived his wife Caroline, late Robertson and
John and Grace Freeman their children, and John
Poke and Sarah his wife. late Robertson, dts.
The defendants (except the three first namely
not having entered their appearance and gwen secu.
rlty according TO the of assembly and the rules Of
TINS court and x appearing, by satisfactory evidences
that they not inhabitans Of this country; it in or
dercd that the said defendants do sppear here on the
first day of the next January term and answer the bin
OF the plaintiffs; and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the city of richmond, for two months successvely,
and posted the front door of the capitol in the said
city. 4. copy. Teste,
40 WM PknpLsros, G. G.
ViRGINiA. At rules holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chanoery for the Iiichmond
d,stric the I'd day of August 1880 Stewart jackson,
pitt against John c. Boisseau James Perry, VIM. Per-
ry. John Perry and other dts.
The defendants James Perry, VIM Perry, and John
Perry not having entered the appearance and gwen
security according the assembly and the rules
OF this court, and II appearing, by satisfactory
OcnCcs
IS ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
the st day of the next January term, and answer
the bill of the plaintiff; and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
in the city of hchmond for two months SUCCESSFULLY
and posted at the front door of the capitol i'm the
said city. copy. Teste,
40 WV. G. PkNonnros, G C.
ETIRGINfA. At rules holden in the clerks office of
Y the superior court OF chancery forth Richmond
district, the I'd Jay of August 1885, Robert King Ro-
bert Temple and John Skyrer, pitts. against Richard
Patterson, Jsmcs Cooke, Thomas Floyd and James
Fox, dts
The defendant Richard Patterson not having enter
ed his appearance and gwen security according to the
Of assembly and the rules of this court and il APP
pearing by satisfactory evidence that he is not an in
habant of this country; il is ordered that the said
defendant 90 appear here the first day OF the next
January term, and the bill of the plaintiffs and
that copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in some
months successfully, and posted the front door of
the capitol, in the said city. A copy. Teste,
20 WM G PENDLEroN c. c.
NJ 8GiNlA. At rules holden in the clerks Office OF
" the superior court of chsncery for the Richmond
district, the 9th day of Sept. 1880: James Andrew
pltf against John BELL, ex'or of Reuben Howard,
decd, and trust under his will bowling Starke,
aud William L. Howard, dts.
The defendant William l.. Howard not having en-
tered hrs appearance and given security according
the Get of assembly and the rules this court and
appearing, BY satisfactory evidence, that he not an
nhabaRt of this ouuntry it is ordered, that the said
90 appear mere on tue nfSt oayOf the
January term and answer the bin Of the plaintiff and
that copy ofthis order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted at the front door of
the capitol, in the said city A copy. Teste,
II WIN G. PESpLEToS C c.
w RGiNlA. AT rules holden the clerks office OF
~ the superior court of chaucery for the Richmond
district the 9TH day of October 1890 Mary Boiling
and Thomas Shore ard Maria Harriet his wife, pitts.
against Edmund Watkins, sh IT. &c Alexander Gun
bingham, Richard p. Boiling and other dfts.
The defendants Alexander Cunningham and r. p.
bong not having entered their Appearance and CIV
en- security according to the of assembly and the
rules OF this court, and it appearing by satisfactory
evidences that they not inhabitants of this country;
1t is ordered that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day OF the next January term and answer
the bill of the plaintiffs; and that copy OF this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper publish ed
in the city of Richmond, for two months successivey
city. copy. Teste,
y WIZ. G. PEsDLrrOS, c. c.
ViRGlNIA. Al rules holden in the clerks Office Of
the superior court Of chancery for the RicI mond
district, the 4th day of October 1885, the President
directors and Company of the Farmers Bank Of Vir
gnia, pitts. against the Richmond Dock Company and
John Gamble and Robert Gamble, dts
The defendants John Gamble and Robert Gamble
not having entered their appearance and given secu.
ry according TO the act of assembly and the rules OF
this court, and il appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they arc not inhabitants of this counry 1t is or
dered, S the said defendants do appear here on the
htSl uaJ u the january term, and answer the
bill Of the plaintiffs and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in the
city Of Richmond, for two months successfully, and
posted at the front door Of the capitol in the said
city. copy. Teste.
n WM. G. PHNnLEroS. c. c.
NtkGiNiA. At rules holden in the clerks Office OF
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the 4h day Of October 1890; John Jones' plt
against John Hinton and samuel Brame, merchants by
the style o Hinton and Brame, and other dts
The defendant Samuel Brame not having entered
his appearance and given security according to the
act OF assembly and the rules Of this court and il APP
pearng, by satisfactory evidences that he is not an in.
hahitant Of this country 1t is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the I'll day Of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff and
that copy ofthis order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city Of Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted at the front door Of
the capitol, in the said city. copy Teste
n VIZ. G PsSDIfToE, c.
WiRGihIA. At rules, holden 10 Tie clerks Office OF
the superior court Of chancery for the Richmond