Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-17

NHkGiNA. At rules holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court or chancery for the Richmopd
district the 5h day &C August 1850; Claiborne Grad.
dock and Mary his wife. James Cradiock and JuI;,.
ms w,fe, ni,fs. against Richard a. Dolby, adm or of
Lloyd Robertson, decd, Samuel ID. Burke and Peter r.
Sregg;-and Nsuc, Robertson, and Matthew, Martha.
Cathar'ne, Mary, William, SARAH, Eliza and Lucy 10
bertson, children of William Robertson, dec'd,-Dan.
rel 3, Lcmuei. Madison and M,r;ha Ann Robertson,
cntthren OF John Robertson, dec'd;-Allen Freeman.
VINO survived his wife Caroline, late Robertson, and
John and Grace Freeman their children, and John
eoKe and Sarah his wife, late Robertson, dts.
Tue defendants except the three first namely
NOT having entered their appearance and gwen secu.
wy according tn the act ut assembly and the rules of
uhis court, anti IT appearing, by satisfactory evidence.
that they are not inhabitants of this country; il is or.
dered. that the said defendants do appear here on the
hrSt LAY otthe next January term, and answer the bill
OF the plaintiffs; and that a copy of this order he
forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published in
the city OF Richmond, for two months successfully,
ana posted at the Front door of the capitol, in the said
city. \. copy. Testc,
20 WIN. G PrNpLrroN. C. C.
NiKGiNlA. At rules holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
District the "a day of August 1880 S,ewar, Jackson,
pNi. against John Il. Boisseau, James Perry, VIM. Per-
ry, John Perry and other dts.
Inc defendants James Perry, VIM. Perry, and John
Ferry not having entered Their app, arance and give,
security according tn the act of assembly and the rules
of this court. and it appearing, by satisfactory e,i.
dence, thai they are not inhabitants of this country; il,
IS ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the hrst day of the next January term, and answer
the bill OF the plaintiff: and that a copy of this order
De forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
IN the city of richmond for two months successiyelv.
and posted at the front door of the capitol. in the
sad city copy. Teste,
40 WV. G. PrNpLEro~, C. C.
AIRGlNiA. At rules, holden in The clerks Office of
the superior court OF chancery for the Richmond
district, the I'd lay of August 1880; Rober, King. Ro-
bert Temple and John sky rer, pitts. against Richard
Patterson, James Cooke, Thomas Floyd and James
Fox, dfts.
The defendant Richard Patterson no, having enter.
ed ms appearance and gwen security according to the
act OF assembly and the rules of this court, and it an.
pearinE, y satisfactory evidence that he is not an in.
habitant of this country; it is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here on the first day of the next
Januar! term, and answer the bill of the plaintiffs; and
that "A copy ot this oder be forthwith inserted i'm some
newspaper published in the city OF Richmond, for two
montts successfully, and posted at the front door n,
me 20 capitol !" the sand wy I"y' G 1be0py, as''c'
w GINA. Al rules, holden IN the clerks Office ot
~ the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 9th day of Sept. 1850: James Andrew,
PIN: against John Bell, eN'or of Reuben Howa, d,
decd. and trust e under his will, Bowling Starke,
and William l.. Howard, dts.
The defendant William l.. Howard not having en-.
tered his appearance and given security according &c
inc PCT ot assembly and the rules of this court. and #
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an
inhaoitant OF this country it is ordered, that the said
der ndant do appear here on the first day of the mex
January term, and answer the bill OF the plain, If; and
that a copy ofthis order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for twc
months successfully, and posted a, the front door O
'he capitol, IN the said CITY A copy. Teste,
WIN G. PENnLEros. c. c.
w N"INiA. AT rules holden IN the clerks office %
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 18th day of October 1880: Mary Boiling
and Thomas Shore and Maria Harriet his wife, pl,fs
against Edmund Watkins. shift, &c. Alexander Gun
ninEham, Richard p. Boiling and other dts.
me defendants Alexander Cunningham and Il. p
10 iG not having entered their appearance and Civ.
en- 81 curity according to the act of assembly and the
rules OF this court, and it appearing, by sa,isfactor,
evidence. that they are no, inhabitants of th,s countrv
IL Is ordered, that the SAID defendants do appear here
on Inc hrst day of the next JANUARY term, and answe,
me bll OF The plaintiffs; and that a copy of this order
De forthwith inserted in ONE newspaper published
~ me CITY OF hichmond, for two months successiveIy,
and posted at the front door of he capital. in The saI?
city. a copv. T.stc Wv '"o
l. WIN. G. PESDLEroS, c. c.
Aik1lNlA. At rules. holden in the clerks Office OF
' The superLor court of chancery tnr lie HAehna.I