Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-01

Never. indeed, Lad man Il more ilbcral possc of,
a.v'rs"r'cs TO poun' upon hun, with poisoned wcu.
pom u'pr0C hcd The gu t0;ions are mad from
NJ lHgh'- pru Cd spc .chcs; nor is thu, gu, hrp,ici
" o them In tan HuH', pretended to be. d.
MED BW ave gwen umhragc b .c,uss have
on y d teo mu Il. -orstoo hNie and have arranged
a." q o "tnn with n vi'~ - method, So tn. there
s1oud he ctrd oad argumrntativc beginning,
n,dd. and conclusion Ia the subject. | made bur
'ttlH commentary myself prJtermg that should be
done by the moro tnrcibc controversy of hi. oppo-
ncnts IN debate who were more compel ent, as well
as more r"spcus0lr for a understanding and
exposition of hIs pervcrsiOns of the most saccd no
hlc1 'ruhs-Onr OF the rcgim nj that has marshal
icdagoins mo, indirectly charges with being a ma
hgnat personal enemy OF Mr.. T.. III is due TO Mr. T.
that notice TINS Chlrgc which he might take other
wlso inr good authority After repeatedly usk,pu
"whn "a this hero of the rst 10" tins volunteer snvs
Judging from h,s work far kn9to hun nat e must
b some malignant personal enemy III Mr. l.clt
prompted by personal prQur." Now it happens tha
notw It's anding thl- Tim vel ofprstrnsc not to know
who The au hnr OF Ma haule Bacon was he h. aearv
moro thon twc" IN personal conversation denied this
charge "t host!y TO MIR Leigh " the last time IN the
presence OF several gentlemen IN the private house
oil HIM who made and rcpca the churge-wbcn
added that besides never having any personality
with NJ h'lgh whaisvcr, thy only objection TO Inn
arose from utter abhorcncc of hs political prlncI-
pes, ever since my icnCn was first drawn towards
them III convention meetings IN Richmond In 1894
After this denial. "a repca he accusation under any
disguise IN the columns of public paper. was cal
CHIat 'Wproduc" SucH an impression nv mind az
cannot We easily efnrcd. And viii axe occasion
nnN 10 add, that N my opinion. FIR. Leghs political
creed l. sufficient To give any republican an aversion
I" lis services pubic and farther rinn that
or whor necessarily grows ont OF H. | will DEFY any
man TO say have gone On the contrary, have
regretted thai Mr. L"rgh has prccludcd the public
from the full benefit Of hI- talents by prevent
ny aud rdicalng thCsn drio,zs of HJcyGy and
equabiy which every NirgInan ough to- hold
sacred. not only for liz sake and his postcrlv
bat 20 Confirm by his example the republican SEMI
mcnts of has c0untrymen. Otherwise he OUCH, nei
Their to win, nor could he deserve. the confidence of
hts fellow citizens, no matter what be the force of
his taicns-the more powerful they are under such
circums ;Guccs-thc worse for So who cntrust hin,
with tic power tn do what they do no, desire tn no
done; and therefore the more They praise his talents
the more shngld the people be to his scrriccs
Pruy Nessrs. Editors, since your press Is absolute
iy free, tell us how long II is sacc you made up
your minds 10 80 over ~ Mr.. L"gh And since
you arc vet and always have been, advocates for
REFORM would You abandon 1t a hopeless and I'm
practicahl" thing, # Mr.. Leigh w"r Ia 60 the wuys
of all the ear'h-and leave IN the middle Of the
entcrPTIsn? Who would you then call on to d. the
specia job? For my part. NJ Leigh has demon
strated such strenuous aycrtIon to any chanrc n,
ali, that would not trust tho job to HIM. lest he
might make II crGHE-Sidcf
NATHA MEL, RACON