Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-27
VIRGINIA. A, rules holden in the clerk

! the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the Sth day Of Angus, 1880; Claiborne Grad
uocS and Mary his wife. James Craddock and Judith
nus wife. pl,ts. against Richard Dolby, adm'or of
Lloyd Robertson, decd, Samuel ID. Burke and Peter f.
Srcgg;-and Nancy Robertson, and Matthew, Martha.
Catharne, Mary, William, Sarah, Eliza and Lucy Ro
oerson, children OF william Robertson, dec'd;-Dan.
'ei s., Lemue, Madison and Martha Ann Robe son,
children of John Robe rson, dcc'l;-Allcn Freeman
VINO survived his wife Caroline, late Robertson, and
J"nn and Grace Freeman their children, and John
eoke and Sarah his wife. late Robertson. dts.
The defendants Except the three first namely
NOT having entered their appearance and given
ry according to the of assembly and the rules
nus court and IT appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they inhabitants of this country. IL is or
dercd that the said de- ndans do appear here on the
hrst day the next January term and answer the bill
ct the Plaintiffs and that IA copy Of this order be
the city of Richmond, for months succcssively
and posted at the front door of the capitol said
city: a. copy. Tes.e,
NiKGiNiA. At rules holden in the clerks office Of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the I'd day of August 1880 Stewart Jackson,
pt. against John G. Bosseau. James Perry, VIM Per-
~, John Perry and other dts.
The defendants James Perry. VIM Perry, and John
Perry not having entered the appt arancc and gwen
security according TO the act of assembly and the rules
OF ths court, and 1t appearing, by satisfactory evil
dence, tina; they not inhabitants of this country;
is ordered that the said defendants do appear here
On the first day OF the next January term and answer
the bill of the plaintiff; and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in new spaper published
in the city of Richmond. for months successfully,
and posted az the front door OF the capitol in the
said city copy. Testc,
40 WM. q. PrNDLEroN, c. c.
NiRGINiA ~ rules, holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chanccry for the Richmond
district, the I'd day of August 1880; Rober King Ro-
bert Temple and John Skyrer, phfs. agains, Richard
Patterson, James Cooke, Thomas Floyd and James
Fox, dts.
| The defendant Richard Patterson not having enter
ed his appearance and gwen security according the
act Of assembly and the rules OF this court and ap
pearng. oy satisfactory evidence that he is not an in
habitant of this country; is ordered, that the said
do appear here the first day of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiffs and
that copy OF this oder be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months successfully, AID posted the front door of
the capitol in the said city. copy. Tese,
10 WM G. PENDLrros c C.
W KGINIA. At rules holden in the clerks Office OF
" the superior court If chsncery for the Richmond
district, the 9th day of Sept. 1880: James Andrew
pf. against John Bell, ex'or of Reuben Howa d,
decd, and trus, under his will, Bowling Starke,
and William L. Howard, dts.
The defendant William l.. Howard not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according 10
the act of assembly aud the rules this court and II
appearing by satisfactory evidence that he not an
OF this country is ordered that the said
rndant do appear here the first day of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff and
that copy ofths order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months successfully, and posted a, the front door of
the capitol, in the said city copy Teste,
~ WIN G. PENnLEToS, C. c.
l\VlRGINiA. At rules holden in the clerks office
~ the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 18th day of October 1890 Mary Boiling
and Thomas Shore and Maria Harriet his wife, pitts
against Edmund Watkins, sh II, &c. Alexander Gun
nngham, Richard Z. Boiling and other dts.
The defendants Alexander Cunningham and X. p.
Bo ,g not having entered their appearance and CIV
en- Sc curty according to the act of assembly and the
rules OF this court, and it appearing, by tory
evidence that they not of this
1T ordered that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the January term and answ
the bill of the plaintiffs; and that copy of this ord
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
in the city of Richmond, for two months successiveI,
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
city. A copy. Testc,
II WV. c. PENpLETos, e. c.
VIRGINIA.. At rules. holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond