Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-01-02

\NflRGiNiA:-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5,h day of October 1929: James
Molly, pl,f. against VIM. Moody, Daniel S. Middagh
I and James 6. Moss, dts.
The defendant William Moody not having entered
his appearance and given security according tn the
act of assembly and the rules OF this court, and it ap
Pearing, b, satisfactory evidence, that he not an in
habant of this cQuRtry: il is ordered. that the said
defendant do appear here the tenth day OF the
next January term and the bill of the plaintiff
and that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city of Richmond
for two months successfully, and posted AT the front
door OF the capitol IN the said city.
COPY. T.s,e. WM. 6. PEspLrroS. {. C.
NiRGiNiA-At rules, holLen in the clerks office
OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich
nond district, the 5th day of October 1929: John
VIM G. Elan, adm'or with the will annexed of Eliza
beth Keen. decd, and John Blankenship, dts.
The defendant John Blankenship not having enter
ed his appearance and given security according the
act o assembly and the rules of this court and il
prar'ng by satisfactory evidence that he an in
habtant of this country: IL is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the tenth day Of the
January term, and the bill Of the plaintiffs and
that copy OF this order be forthwith inserted some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months successfully, and posted at the front door OF
! tic capitol, in the said city. copy.
Testr, WV. G. PEspirroS, c. c.
| NIRGINIA--At rules, holden IN the clerks Office
ut the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
raond district, the 5,h day of October 1929 Carter
BraXton and Mary G.. his wife, pitts. against Robert
It ally shm'or dc bouis of Peter Kemp and admir-
of sam. VIII Sayrc, and also admur Of Thus. Trice
\ anil Overton Seawel and his wife, and Others dts
| the defendants ovcrton Seawell and his wife, not
having entered their appearance and given curty
according TO the act assembly and the rules of this
court and 1t appearing by satisfactory evidence, that
that they not inhabitants of this connrv; II is or
dercd that the said defendants do appear here on the
tenth day Of the January term, and answer tive
bill OF the plaintiffs; and that copy OF this order he
Forthwith inserted ~ some newspaper published in the
city Of Richmond, for two months succe ssivey ant
posted at the trout door of the capitol the SAID city
! copy Tes,e, WV. &. PESDLETox, c. c.
I NIRGINN:ht rules, holden in the clerks office o.
! the superior court at chAncerv for the Richmond
district, the 5h da, of October 1899: Robert X Dab
ney pH against Walter Shelton, surviving partner %
himself and r. r. Shelton decd. late partners unde
the frm oi =. 7. Shelton & Co MunIOrd Perks Rob-
Nelson. and other drfls.
The defendants Aunford Perks and IlObt Ncilsur
not having entered their appearance and given secm
~ according to the act Uf Assembly and the rules
'his court aud It appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they not inhabitants oftis oountrys is order
eel. that the SAID defendants do appear here on tn
tenth day of the next January term, and answer M
bill of the psinih and that copy Of this order b.
forthwith inserted ~ newspaper published in IN
city of Richmond, tor two months successfully, an
posted ut the front door of the capitol the SAID city
! A copy. TeUe, WV. G. PIsDLKToE, c. c.