Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-13

lSyyIgGISIA, At rules. holden in the clerks ofc-
" Of the superior court of Chancery for the Rich
mon, district, the 9Th day of July 1885, William Dnn-
! ford and Edward DuniorJ who by Philip Dunforl
fher guardian and friend. pits. against John
England and VIM. England in their rights. n as
ex'ors "a VIM. England decd, Thomas England and
other dts.
The defendant Thomas England not having en-
tered ms appearance and given security according
to the act of assembly and the rules OF this court,
and 1t appearing by satisfactory evidence. sa he is
not an inhabtant ct this counry II is ordered, that
the said defendant do appear here the first day oi
the next Jan'ry term, and tho bill of the plain
tits; and that copy OF this order be forthwith in
serted in some newspaper published in the city of
Richmond, Tor two months successfully, and posted
at the f!1nt door of the capitol, in the said city,
90 Ac,py. Tes'e. WV. e PENDLKroH, c. c.
! NIRGiNIA:-At rules holden in the clerks office of
| the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the LIST day Of May $780, James Dream, pitt
agains, Thomas a. Mitchell, James tnpis, BENJAMIN
Dawson and Matthew Wallace and other df,s.
The defendants Ben amin Dawson ard Matthew Wal.
Lace not having entered their appearance and given
ery according to the act of assembly and the rules
ot tins court, and 1t appearing, by satisfactory cvi
dence that they are not inhabitants of this country:
ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the trst day OF the next January term. and answer
the bill OF the plaintiff: and that 4 copy OF this
der be forthwith inserted in some newspaper pub.
lished in the city of Richmond, for two months sue.
cessvey, and posted at the front door of ia. Capt.
! % WIN. C. PEsDLEroN. c. c..
NiRGlNiA; At rules, holden ~ the clerks office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the I'd day of August 1850: Manuel Judah,
rltf. against Abraham Block Fanny J his wife, and
! HAYES J. Isascs. dts.
! The defendants having entered tier appear.
sncc and given security according the af
bly, and rules of this court and il appearing by sai,s-
factory evidence, that they are not inhabitants of tins
countrl it is ordered, that the said defendants DO
pear here on the first day of the January term,
and the bin of the plaintiff; and that copy of
this order he forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published in the city Of Richmond, for months sue
cessvey, and posted the front door OF the capitol
:" 81 59' said city, coy w. G. re ps,n, rro
NTiRG!NIA: ~ rules holden in the clerks Office Of
the superior cnu., at chancery for the R.chm0nd
district, the 9th day of September 1890 James Neal.
pl,f. against David Street adn'or of Mer. weather
Hurt decd IosePhus Hurt, and Champion G. NJ Mar.
able, dts.
/ The defenjan; Champion C. ". Marabls no, havin,,
entered his appearance aud given security according
the OF assembly the rIes Of this court and n;
appearing. by satisfactory evidence, that he not an
lnhabant of ts counlry II is ordered, that the said
defendsn, do appear here the frs, day Of the next
January term, and answer the bi.l of the plaintiff; am,
that copy Of this order be forthwith inserted some
newspaper published in the cay of Richmond, for two
months successfully and posted at the front door OF
tie capitol, in the SAID city. A copy Tes,e,
CO WM G PENnLFT"N. c.
NyiRGINIA: a, rules, holden in tae.srk's office of
the superior court Of chancery fT the Richmond
district, the ed day Of August 1850 LangJr, b. len.
mugs, pltf against Wn. Flournoy, and Anne his wife
and Robert q Oliver and other dts.
The defendants above named not yinr entered
their appearance and gwen security according 20 the
act Of assembly and the rules o. tbs court and i,
appearing by satisfactory evidence that they are no
Inhabitants 1T this country 1t IS ordered, that the said
defendants do appear here the first day the neg,
January and answer the BILL OF the plaintiff and
that copy of this order be forthwith IN some
newspaper published IN the city OF Richmond for two
months successfully. and posted the front door of
the capitol, in the said city. 4 copy. Tes,e
60 WV. G PfNDLEroN, c c
a IGl NiA.-At rui,s holden, the clerks Office al
the superior cour, of chancery for the Richmond
district, the lth dag % October 1880: Henry Wal.
klns pitt against Francis s. o. Kelley and Peter y
Daniel, dts
The defendant F.ancis :. o. Pcilicy not having en-
tered lis appearance and given security according to
the act Of assembly & the rules of this court and il
pearng, by satisfactory evidence, that he is an in.
habiiant u! this country: il is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the frs, day of the mex,
January term. and the bill of the plaintiff and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city Of Richmond for two
months succ~ssvely, and posted The front door o.
the capitol, in the said city. 4 copy. Testc,
69 NM IT, PENDLEToN, C. e.
NVfiRGiNlA:-At rules, holden IN the clerks Office
~ of the superior court OF chancery for the Rich
mOnd district, the 5ti 1av Of July 1850 Mar, u g.
VIM. A. Eliason aud Mary his wife, and other dts.
The defendants William y. Ejason and Mary his
wife, not having entered their appearance and given
security according the 10 act OF assembly and the
rules OF ibis court and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence that they not inhabitants of this country
is ordered that the said defendants do appear here
on the FIRST day the OF january term and answer
the bill of the plaintiff: and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published ~
the city ct Richmond for TWO months successiyeIv
and posted at th" front door of the capitol in said CITY
% copy. teste, WM. e. PENDLRroS, c. c.
NTgiRGiNlA:-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
" OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9th day of September 1880: viii
BAN Smith, PIT against Austin Watkins, Peter ri.
and other dts.
The defendant Peter Rison not having entered his
appearance and given security according to the act Of
assembly and tie rules of THIS court and II appearins
by satisfactory evidence that he is not an inia bmt
OF this country: it is ordered, that said defendant
do here frsi f1v of ,b,. NOV, f.,,,.,.