davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

NWlhGNiA. At rules, holden IN the clerks Office of
" The superior court Of chancery for the .chmond
district, the 18th day f October 1880; Andre McOne
pm. against Walter McQuc, Jane McQuie and Mar
Nj Que dts.
me defendants not having entered their appearance
an" gwen security according to the act Of assembly
shu The rules OF this court and it appearing by salts
.'oy eVinencr, That they are not inhabitants Of this
Country; it is ordered, that the said defendants o
prarhere on the first day of tho next January term
and answer the bill o the plaintiff aud that copy Of
'"'s order be forthwith Inserted IN come newspaper
published IN the CITY Cf Richmond, for two month";
successfully, and posted at the front door of the can
''oI' IN the said city. Acopy. 1estc,
- VIM. G.. pENpLgrGv r r.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06
Co.JmIssIosER's 0Facp.

-, . HrHHUnd, .HuguH 3lst, 1890
lie parties interested viii please tas. na.ice tba,
have appointed the 2ad day of Noyemhss n". " az
commence the accounts directed by the Enregoine
ORDER OF the court: on which day, at o'cInck A M
'ney are requh Ell to attend at my Office o doors above
The Va Banks with the necessary proufs and DIN.
ments ready for examination and settlement,
62-law2m AMOS Lam Cornrn;s.;
FsNo Mrs Abigail Mayo, Edward c. MAYO. and
n ali Others whom il may concern
Notice is hereby given that appIica,on viii be
MADE I" the ne@ General Assembly, to pass an ac,
authorizing the erection OF another Bridge ncross
james River, between Richmond and Uanches,pr
TO no either free or subject to oils and 20 be buiIt
oy the Commonwealth, or incorporate company, OF
individuals, IS shall DO deemed best.
SH'dTg CifzzorS IF Chesterfield Co,nuty.
sep lI-lAM8M 49,,
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06
Bonnet Rjboncls

Bonnet Ribands
EFAsHIONABLE and new UyIe fall bonnet tibands teeeiv
" ed by the Packet Hayre from France n,, onened al r
~ yhSkINS'F Fancy Dry Good AM Irish Linen Store
RROWN'S FEST CHEWING; TOBACCO.
- nov q FOR By ~. a. MCNAMARA
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

" IhGINiA At rules, holden IN the clerks ,fic. og
'he superior court of chancery Tor the lchmonL
district The 4th day of October 1890 John Jones' plf
against John Hinton and samuel Brame, me rchants bv
We sVIe Hinton and Brame, and other dts
The defendant Samuel ISrame not havirg .r,oro,
MS appearance and given security according To the
act OF assembly and the rules of this court and il an
pcarhS ny satisfactory evidence, that nc IS not an IN
habnant Of this country II ia ordered The, 49, w
defendant do appear here tile fist day of the next
January term, and answer the bill of tie plaintiff. and
mat copy ut this order be forthwith inserted I'm some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months successiVey, and posted the front door Of
II ~, a. t51,
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

H!lRIiNiA.-At "A superior court of chime =;
atthe capitol 10 the city of Richmond on S.,nr.
day, March 9th, 1880: Betsey McCredie K,dd-r ReI
and Adelaide his wife, formerly McCrede and Rohsr,
spriggs, and Polly his wife, formerly McCred,e nIfts
against James Fem, executor of George Mccred,e
decd, George NcCrede, and John McCrec!ie deyisees
ct SAID George McCrede, decd. Walter Dunn ex,or
ct john Graham, decd, Berley Randolph ex'or al
Larry ileih, who was ex'or of Samuel Clarke loo
aad William Long, df,s.
On motion of the plaintiffs bv coposeJ The , ::
dismissed as tn all the defendants, e1cept J,hn II
Crede anu George NCredie without costs and
'hcr"upoh tie cause came to be heard, on lac
Original and supplemental bills Of tue plaintiffs IA IN
tor coue exhibits, and the rceapds and nrocs
lns lately pending in thus court, BY the siYle of nc
Creole vs. Penn s al. and Graham vs. Mccretie A.
vi, and was argued by counsel. On considerations
whereof, u appearing that the whole personal estate
VI the sad George McCreG:c, deed, hath been .x
"usteG IN The payment OF debts, the court doth ore-
mat one OF the commissioners do and report TO
lhc court account ot the real estate of GEORGE uc
Credie the elder, dec, g. of the manner in which tie
same ha'h been disposed Of and what pa Is thereof
anu what rents and profits thereof have been recsved
ny the said John. and George McCredie the vounper
or eher OF theH any other person or persons for
'hen or either OF ther and the Value Of the said real
estate, and its several parts that the same commission
or do state an account of the icsnoes the plaintiffs
IN n'S SUIT, shelving the amount Of principal money
and interests due each respectively that IL reouire
ny either OF the parties he also tahe an accon,t nr
debts, any, outstanding, and due from the est,, of
the SAID George McCredie the elder, decd which -
be entitled TO satisfaction of the real estate os I
sad george McC rede the elder decd, in preference
to tue plaintiffs lie gsces With any Other matters sna
c'sly stated, deemed pertinent BY HIMSELF mr. ,Sisk
may De required by the parties TO be So stated and ,
ssd commissioner IS Authorized 10 examine anv of ,b.
parties IN solemn form touching the premises, " ''e
N0F'' hes'e' Nh' =. PEspLEIoso c. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

VIRGINIA.: AT rules holden in the clerks office o
the superior court OF chancery for the Richmond
district, the 9th day Of September 1880: James Neal
pl,f. against David Street adm'or of Merrweather
Hurt decd, Josephus Hurt, and Champion c. NJ Mar
able, dts.
Inc defendant champion c. NJ MARBLE not having
entered kis appearance and given security ACCORDING
to the act OF assembly the rules of this court and Il
appearing, by satisfactory evidence that he is not an
inabant OF this country; is ordereh that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the next
JANUARY term, ana answer the DILL of the plaintiff aud
that copy OF this order be forthw inserted in
newspaper published in The city of Richmond, for two
months essYsly, and posted the front door Of
tie capitol, in the said city. copy Tes,e,
90 WM G. PESpLEToN r r.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

E William and MarS College.
fk~HE Lectures IN this institution, will commence
usual on the last Monday in October. The sub
jects taught ave
LIST Bellies Lettres. Rhetoric, Logic, Mo IA Empie
raj Philosophy, Cr,'cism in reference to Pres Z
the tue Arts, and the Philosophy OF the Profos.
I'd Mathrmatics--P s. Campbell Stewart. Professor.
81 Lsw and Poi,ce-Jsmes Semple, Professor.
4th Political Law and niis,ofy-Thomas Il Dew,
5b Ancient Languagnasr Danncy Brown. Professor.
9th Natural Philosop nd thens'ry-wm TO
sfng washing, fuel, &c. $40
Fees to three Professors $40 each, aud meta
physical class from the 22d of February, $40, 20
Naturalization Fec, s
1875
The expenses Of a student, the second Year I8s
Law students s'ould bring with them, the Virginia
Laws scts of Congress and fuckers Blackstone they
VIII have the Of well selected Library: cessary
expenses tor the course, Sis
metc, English Grammar and Geography, make q part
cf the of instruction, begins on the l d,v or
octohe aud ends on the last day of August expenses
- S12u
The Faculty is not authorized permit student to
board out ct College, except at the written reuues, of
the parent or guardian, nor in any is be
padfor board chan the charges above mentioned one.
hsn OF winch must be paid when the student enters
College, and the other half the expiration of hal.
the term
1t believed that :ie avs and Regulations of This
institution rs recently modified, present so many i'm.
ducements TO studious and orderly habits and provide
50 many checks to Incidence and misconduct as to
the utmost diligence and propre,y of behavior,
ON the part OF scholars and students. For the in
formation OF the religious community, may be proper
IN remark that by statute of the Visitors the college
ehapel mas been opened and students (w,hout being
cnmpriied) will have an opportunity of attentlinS
prayers every morning previous the commencement
81 the daily Collegiate exercises.
hey who are DESTROYS to enter any OF the classes
''- ensuing Session, are earnestly advised to be pre
n-a' ut tue commencement of the course, as much
'jnry viii result from delay in this particular
A. EMPlE, Pres.
The National Inteigencer, S Telegraph Rich.
'"n"i Enquirer, constitutional Wing, q, e. Star Fay
e''eri'ie Observer, Newburn S.ntinel Cape Fear Re
6o'aer norfolk Herald and Petersburg Old Dominion
ae requested publish the above notice once , Co.,
nigh, until the opening of the College.
Sept4 "a a.,
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

NlNGlNlA. At rules holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the I'd lay ct August 1850; Rober kng Ro-
bert Temple and John Skyrer, pl,fs apains, Kch.rL
PATTERSON, james Cooke. Thomas Floyd and James
F"x dts.
The defendant Richard Patterson not having enter.
ell his appearance and gwen security according to the
act OF assembly and the rules of this court and il an
pearing, satisfactory evidence that he is not an in
habhant ot this country; IL is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the nex,
January term and answer the bill of the plaintiffs aud
that copy ot this oder be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months SUCCESSFULLY and posted the front door OF
the capitol, in the said city. copy. Teste
20 Wa O. pr~rI .,,
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

I\VlRGlNiA:-M rules, holden ill., the clerks office
OF the superior court Of chancery for the Rich.
no"d district the 9th day of September 1880 Jacque.
me T. Taylor adm'or of James Halliday pltr araIns,
mes DICK and Nathaniel Dick in their own rights
an" as surviving partners of Dicks, Moore & Co and
others. dts. wv $3.50
the defendants James Dick and Nathaniel Dick
not having enered thri appearance and given secu.
rty according the of Assembly and The rules
inns court, aud appearing, BY satisfactory evidence
ha' they are not inhabitants of this country it is Or
'na' the SAID defendants do appear here the
hrst day of the January term and answer the
pm OF the plaintiff; and that copy of this order be
ior'hwith inserted in some newspaper published in
inc city al Richmond, for two months successiveIy
ana posted a, the from, door of the capitol in the said
city. a conv Testn " " ~
70 W., ~ p
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

NWiRGlNiA:-At rules, holden in the clerks oaics
OF the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5th day of July 1856 Mary II Car
Yer pitt against Joseph Tat, Edmund w. Rootes
VIM a Ehason aud Mary his wife, and other DIS
The defendants William A. Elrasop and Mar he
wife, not having entered their appearance and Syen
security according the to act Of assembly AMI tLe
rules OF thrs court, and it appearing, by sasf,c,orv
evidence, That they are not inhabitants of this
Is ordered that the said defendants do appear
on the hrst day the OF next January term
the bill of the plaintiff; and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published IN
the city OF Richmond, for two months successiyeIy
and posted at the front door of the CAPITOL in sid
69 copy. teste, VIZ. g. PEHDLEroS E.
NihGlslA. At rules holden the clerks Office Of
the superior court Of cbanceTy for the Richmond
district, the 5Ih day Of August 1880; Caiborne Grad
dock and Mary his wife, James Craddock and Judith
ms vie, pitts. against Richard DOLBY adun'or NJ
Lloyd Robertson, decd Samuel ID. Burke and pete, y
Gregg;-and Nancy Robertson, and Matthew M.ribs
Cstharinc, Mary, William, Sarah, Eliza and Lucy 10
bertsoB, children Of William Robertson dec'd,ZDan.
ieI s., Lcmuel, Madison and MIriha Ann Rob- rls,,n
children OF John Robertson dec'd;-AIen Freeman
who survived Ms wife Caroline late Robertson. and
John and Grace Freeman their children, and Johp
foke and Sarah his wife, late Robertson, dts.
the defendants Except the three first named
'o having entered their appearance and gwen secu.
'y according to the act Of assembly and the rules OF
tn's court and It appearing by satisfactory evidence
a' they are not inhabitants Of this country, il is or
that the said defendants do appear here on the
, gay OF the next January term and answer the bill
OF the plaintiffs; and that a copy Of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the city OF Richmond, for twO months successiyeIy
and posted at the front door of the capitol in the said
city. \. copy. Teste,
20 WIS.,. q PrvDLETor. G. G.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

"iRG'NiA:-At rules, holden ia the clerks office
of the superior court of chsncery for the Rich.
mond district the Cd day Of August 1850: John Dun
Top, and David Brydon aud Janet his wife, pits.
against Griffin orgair, David ID. Brydpr, and David
Dunlop eX'ors of James Dunlop, decd and Robert
Dunlop and James Patterson. dts.
me defendants Rohcr, Dunlop and james Patterson,
no' having entered their appearance and given sccu.
y according to the act of Assembly and the rules of
ns court and 1t appearing, by satisfactory evidence
mat ney are not inhabitants Ot this cuunry il is
uerr that the said defendants do appear hear on the
hrsi day OF the next January term and wer the bill
OF the PLAINTIFFS and that copy of this order be
FORTHWITH inserted IN some newspaper published in
me CITY OF Richmond, for two months successive.y,
and posted a, the front door of the capitol in tie said
CNy. copy. Tesie,
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

w GINA At rules, holden in the clerks office o.
~ The superior court Of chsncery for the Richmond
district, the 9th day OF Sept. 1880 James Andrew,
pllf. against John Bell, ex'or of reuben How, a
dec and trust e under his will, Bowling Starke,
and William l.. How ard, dts
Inc defendant William L. Howard not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according to
the act OF assembly and the rules of this court and
appearing, by satisfactory evidence that he is not an
nhaoiant OF this country is ordered, that the said
de ndant do appear here the first day of the mex,
January term, and answer the bill OF the plain III and
tina, copy ofths order be forthwith inserted in
newspaper published in the city OF Richmond for two
months successively, aud posted the front door of
the capitol, IN the said city copy. Tes;c,
~ WM G. PgSnLEToS, G. G.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

NlR1iSiA: Al rules, holden IN the clerks Office oi
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the Cd day OF August 1880 Manuel Judah
pitt against Abraham Block n Fanny J his wife, and
Hayes J. lsascs, dts.
The defendants no, having entered their aprear.
ance and given security according the act sf assem-
bly, and rules of this court, and appearing by sas-
factory evidence that they are not inhabitants of this
country: it is ordered that The said defendants do nm
pear here on the FIRST day OF the next January term
and snswer the bill of the plaintiff aud that copy Of
this order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published in the city of Richmond, for two months sue.
cessiveiy and posted at the front door Of the capito
in the said city. copy. Teste,
69 WM q. PENDIrToS =
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

\NliGiNiA. At rules, holden in the clet Office Of
The superior court of chan;ery for the Richmond
u'srict, the 5th day OF Jniy 1850; Edward Cunning
ham, pitt against Thomas ~. Mitchell; and Garland
Thompson, ex'or of WIN. Mitchell, who was ex'or of
Thomas Mitchell, dts.
The defendant Thomas II. Mitchell not having g n
Tered his appearance and given security according TO
'"e act OF assembly and the rules of this court aud Il
appearing by satisfactory evidence that he is not an
aohant OF this country; II is order d. that the said
defendant DO appear here the first day of the ne
january term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff and
'n' copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city OF Richmond for two
months successfully, and posted t the from, door o
The capitol, in the SAID city. copy. Tes,e,
40 NM. G. PIHpirroS y r
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

iRGiNlA. At rules, holden in the clerks Office of
~ the superior court of CHANGER, Tor the t,chmond
ds'nc'' The 9th day at July 1880; Ann D,yidson
49, wtn Tue WI annexed, ct Robert Davidson,
deed, pl,f against Samuel 5. Saunders ami D.xJ Ma.
wilson, dts, "a
The defendant David Davidson not having entered
ms appearance and given security according to the ac
OF assembly and the rules OF thus court, aud il ann.
ing, by satisfactory evidence, that he not an nhab
'Sn o this country; ii is ordered that the said cf.n
dant 10 appear here the first day of the next jan
uary term, and answer Ia, bill OF the plaintiff: and
mat copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city OF Richmond for two
months successfully and posted the front door OF
the capitol, in the said city. 4 copy Testc
I" NM. G. pr\nttroN r. g
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

NRfRGNIA,-At rules, holden 10 tie clerks oaic<
" at the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
mond district. the 9th day of September 1850: Fran
CHS w. Povsi, pit against lward Johnson aud Caroline
NJ L. Johnson his wife, Thos Drake, VIM. G. povsiL
Rosna Johnson, Philip johnson, and Ed ward Johnson
infant children OF said Edward aud ca olne, des.
The defendants Edward johnson and Rosina, Phil.
ip anu Edward Johnson not having entered their ap.
pcarance and given security according the act OF
Assembly and the rules of this court, and il appear
ing by satisfactory evidence tina, they are not inhabi
tans OF this country il is ordered that the said de-
PENDANTS 90 appear here tho FIRST day Of the ne
January teru and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and
that copy Of this order be forthwith inserted M
some newspaper published in the city of Richmond
tor two months succrssvcly, aud posted at the front
door of the capitol, in the said city.
" copy. Teste, WM. &. PENpLEToS, c.. c.
ViRGiNiA'-At rules, holden in the clerks office
OF the superior court of chsncery for the Rich
mond district the 5th day of July 1880: Henry Clarke
and Wm. Clarke, exors OF Jnu. Clarke, dec d. pitts
against John $. Stubs, in his right, and adm'o
OF John s. Stubs, SEN, decd Herbert Stubbs, Ran
doiph Stubbs and other dts
The defendants Herbert S,ubbs and Randolph
subos not having entered their appearance and Civ
en- security according to the of Assembly and the
rules OF thus court, and it appearing, by satisfactory
eNat nee, that they are not inhabitants of this
y' IS ordered, that the SAID defendants do appear
mere on the first day of the next January term and
answer the bill of the plaintiffs; and that Il copy OF
inns order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published IN the city of Richmond, for two months
SUCCESSFULLY aud posted the front door of the capt
TO, IN the said city copy Tesc,
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

iSeTR6iStA. At rules, LsiSen 10 the clerks Office
OF the superior court at Chancery for the Rich
mo" district, the Sth day Of July 1850: William Dun
ford aud Edward runford Who by Philip DuniorJ
their guardian and friend, plifs. against John
England and YIN. England in their own rights. n as
ex'"rs ., "m. England decd, Thomas England aud
other dts.
The defendant Thomas England not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according
TO the act of assembly and the rules OF this court.
ana It appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is
not inhabtant OF this country: II is ordered, that
the said defendant do appear here the rst day Of
'ne next Janry term. aud the bill of the plain
serted IN some newspaper published in tie city of
richmond, for two months successfully, and posted
at the tt door of the CAPITOL in the said city.
% Ac,py. Teste. wN. g PEsDLKro~, c. c.
NTIRGINIA: At rules, holden in the clerks Office
" of the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5th day of Iuly 1890: Arms,reat
Bruce exor of James Bray, decd, pitt against Susan
Archer, Peter Archer, Thomas Watkins Leigh and
other dts.
The detendsn, Thomas ". Leigh, not Ina wing en-
tered his appearance and given security according
to the act OF Assembly and rules of this court and
appearing by satisfactory evidence, that he is not
an inhsbi,ant Of this country it is ordered, that
the said defendant do appear here on the 6rst day
OF The ne x January term and the bill Of the
pitt; and that copy of this order be forthwith in
serted in some newspaper published in the city Of
Richmond, fer two months successfully, and posted
at the front door of the Capitol in the said city.
o. Cory. Teste, WIN. G. PESDLEroS, c. C.
" ihSiNiN-at rules hoiuen IN the clerks office
v the superior court of chsncery for the Richmond
district, the LIST day Of May, 1860 James Dream pIf
against Thomas II. Mitchell, James lnnis, Benjamin
Dawson and Matthew Wallace and other dts.
The defendants Benjamin Dawson and Matthew Wal.
lace, not having entered their appearance and given
security according to the act of assembly and the rules
OF this court, and it appearing, by satisfactory evi
dence that they are not inhabitants OF this country
IS ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the next January and answer
the bill OF the plaintiff; and that 4 copy of this or
der be forthwith inserted in some newspaper pub
hshed IN the city of Richmond, for months sue
cess,vey, and posted at the front door OF til, Cap
'ol, IN the said city A copy. Teste.
oS Wa. G. PENpLEToS, C. C.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-06

JUy 5th, 1880. {
The parties interested are hereby required TO- A.
tend at this office, prepared with testimony to sustain
their professions on the 9TH day Of November next
at % clock, n. NJ II. u. BARTON,
% eW CUni'r q. g., Fredcricksburpr
Virginia advocate. [volume] (Charlottesville, Va.) 1827-1860, 1830-04-09

r';ged an extravaganza and fanaticism in ia
YOUR of n foreign nation in opposition to the
true interest of his own, for which no can find
% sufficient Apology except in his minority, and
IA the example and influence of others whose
nigh characters and public services gave
great weigh, nd consideration 10 their conduct
rnd opinions in public affairs, aud in whose foot.
steps hc nrdently and incautiously followed
And when he desired with all his youthful and
infatuated heart, that his country should draw
her sword in aid and alliance of what he believ-
ed To be the glorious cause of liberty aud the
lights Of men, in Franco, li,tlo did he imagine
that the tragic scenes then acting there were no
other than tho savage and disgusting Saturnaiia
Of liberty, i'm which the actors We're slaves let
hose from an iron bondage to which they must
soon return, and for which time and nveterate
habits and feelings had rendered them the fit
and incorrigib!e subjects.
But circumstances will not permit us to dwell
on this review, however useful it might be to
call our attention to n careful aud impar,iaI
consideration of the post, and Just application
at its results and consequences To the interest.
ing and important subjects which now occupy
and agtate the public attention. To these We
must hasten, with the intention Of showing
that the dc!uding mischievous spirit of fanati-
'ism was never more conspicuous and active in
our public affairs than at the present period.
JANUS