Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-22

kn"orNA. Ht rules holden ia the clerks office of
v the superior court of chanccr, for the Richmond
district. the Su' day If August 1856; Claiborne Grad.
dock and Mary his wife. James Cradtiock and JuIi,h
ms wife. pitts. against Richard \. Dolby, adm'or of
Lloyd Robertson, decd, Samuel ID. burke and Peter r.
Grcgg;- and Nancy Robertson, and Matthew, Martha.
Catharine, Mary. William, Sarah, Eliza and Lucy no
6ertson, children OF William Robertson, dec'd;-Dan.
'ei s., Lemuei, Madison and M4r:ha Ann Robertson,
chttiren oil John Robertson, dec'd;-Allcn Freeman.
who survived lis wife Caroline, late Robertson. and
Jonn and Grace Freeman their children. and John
toke and Sarah his wife, late Robertson, dts.
The defendants Except the three first namely
not having entered their appearance and given sccu.
rty according to the act of assembly and the rules of
uhis court, and II appearing, by satisfactory evidence,
that they are not inhabitants of this country; it il or.
dercd. that the said def, ndan.s do appear here on the
'rst day of the next January term, and answer the bill
of the plaintiffs; and that u copy Of this order be
forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published in
the city of Richmond, for two months SUCCESSFULLY,
aud posted at the front door OF the capitol, in the said
city. \. copy. Testc,
40 WIN. G PrNpLrroN. c. c.
RSi At rules holden in the clerks office of
v the superior court Of chanerry for the Richmond
district, the I'd day of August 1850, Stewart Jackson,
pitt. against John G. Boisseau, James Perry, WIN. Per-
ry, John Perry and other dts.
Inc defendants James Perry, VIM. Perry. and John
Ferry not having entered the + appearance and gwen
security according to the act of assembly and the rules
OF tins court. and il appearing, by satisfactory evi.
dence, thai they are not inhabitants of this country; it
10 ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the frst day OF the next January term, and answer
the bill ot the plaintiff; and that a copy of this order
De forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
in the city of Richmond, for two months successfully.
and posted at the front door of The capitol, in the
said city, A copy. Testc,
10 Vs.. G. PrNpIEro>, C. C.
NiRGINIA. At rules, holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district. the % lay of August 1880; Rober, King, Eo-
bert Temple and John Skyrer, pitts. against I,lchard
Patterson, James Cooke, Thomas Floyd and James
Fox, dits.
The defendant Richard Patterson no, having enter.
ell hs appearance and gwen security according to the
act of assembly and the rules of this court, and il an.
pearing, by satisfactory evidence. that he is not an in
habitant OF this country; il is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here on the frs, day of the next
January term. and answer the bill of the plaintiffs; and
that a copy at this oder be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city OF Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted a, the front door oi
the capitol, IN the said city. copy. T'este,
10 WV q PENpLrron. c. c.
W.kGiNiA. At rules, holden IN the clerks Office OF
~ the superior court &C chancery for the Richmond
district, the 9th day ct Sept. 1850: James Andrew,
pitt. against John Bell, cx'or of Reuben Howa, d.
deed. and trust e under his will, Bowling S,arke.
and William l.. Howard, dts.
The defendant William l.. Howard not having en-
tered ts appearance and given security according TO
the act OF assembly aud the rules of this court, aud /,
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is not sn
iniaoitaut oi this country; it is ordered, that the SAID
def ndant do appear here on the first day of the next
January term, and answer the bill Of the plaintiff; and
that a copy ofthis order be forthwith inserted in some
ne wspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted at the from, door OF
the capitol, IN the SAID city copy. Tes,e,
WIN &. PENnLEToS, c. C.
VIhHlNiA AT rules holden in The clerks office oil
~ The superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 18th day of October 1880: Mary Boiling
and Thomas Shore and Maria Harriet his wife, pl,fs'
against Edmund Watkins, shift, &c. Alexander Gun
ningham, Richard p. Boiling aud other dts.
The defendants Alexander Cunningham and X. p.
30 'g not havinc entered their appearance and Civ
en- 81 cnrity according to the act of assembly aud the
rules OF this court, and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence, that they are not inhabitants of this country,
1t is ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the next January term, and answer
the bil OF The plaintiffs and that a copy OF this order
De forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
IN the city OF Richmond, for two months successiycl,.
and posted at the front door of the capitol, in the said
city. 4 copy. Tes,e,
WIN. G. PESDLrroS, C. C.
VIRGINIA. At rules. holden in the clerks Office OF
' Nhe superior court of ciiancery tor The Richmond
district, the 4th day of October 1850; the President,
directors and Company of the Farmers Rank of Vir,