Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-13

sh ships have the trade I'll to themselves.
The Rev n, Benjamin r Oudcrdonb has boon
coc cd shop the Diocese of New York.
The Richmond Wing, in commenting u2on the
Maryland Elections, says:
"Tho Frederick county, where the Jackson tic
ket for President was elected think, by 600 ma
iorily, and Washington also have faced to the right
about, there Is SAID 20 10 no doubt
Tn" Wing should crrrec, these figures Tho ma
jorty IN Frederick above 800 against Jackson: il
: now but LILLE more than 200. and IN Washington
county, The Jackson mai rty is $50 more than at the
Presidential election -BaH. Rep
From he Charleston Mercury, Of Sept %.
Ny Dear TAYLOR y uur letter dated Rice Crerk
Sept II, with the Columbia post mark of the ith
did not come TO hand until the l7;h, near three
weeks after tie date %: which 1t is answer
ana at me when was out OF the question for me
To be az Columbia 10 make my speech What an
opportunity here lost | certainly sbould bnyc
addressed myself to audience "ichoss minds oerc
m a state for thanking aud might ha I'VE enjoyed u
triumph suoh as you and have felt in common more
than once. Where wer" the men who nov claim TO
be radicals and exclusive patriots, when vou and |
stood shoulder to shoulder in the stormy DAYS OF ultra
federalism: and more recently in that universal no
mSGe now rendered TO the talents and worth of orr
friend Crawford, by mon who revealed in the most
wan'on abuse of him, when you and stood I'D Tor
him almost alouC.
perceive b. on editorial remark prcfxed to the
uon IS thrown that my letter was writt5n 20 YOU
with view To involve you III controversy | am
sure you cannot entertain such an idea Nuhnr
"ns Idrherlro my mind; but # you court it. ] GER
fainy shall not Shun n Yet II would b. whispering
20 the hu1hng winds To attempt in the newspapors
iie defence # my eight points until the election 10
over Let that be passed, and something of calm
eusus, aud ready to meet YOU, but n must h. in
the columns Of the Telescope for thus n nd thus ouI,
can the enidote he administered where II NAV Iavc
something 20 operate upon
You style yourself One Of the members of the Con
spracy but II all the splraturs were as candid
and dlslnreros'Cd YOU are the repubhc yould bovr
nothing to fear from them: YOU have openly and can
jidy ayOw'd that # Virginia would consent TO be n
frontier state You would 90 of from Tho Union the
next day. This IS at once appealing to the good
sense and good feelings of the people, and in that
tribunal repose unlimited confidence 1t is only
when they ar hood" mixed by dcmagosucs and by
pocrItos that they 20 wrong.
A. 10 the part You take in this conspiracy So
lemnly declare that II l cEuld think as YOU do upon
The facts, think should feel as you do upon the
measures. | would not live under IA Government o.
uni mied Powers and II saw distinctly thai no,
thing but revolutionary movement could imoose
due restrictions would cry out for Revolution. As
To ahordlng The States me more satisfactory secu-
ny than the intervention of the Supreme Court it
is what hav' been urging fof years Rest assured
mat we are Tar from covcng jurisdiction. especially
where States concerned Heaven save US from
encounteung tEc irritable feelings of sovereIgny -
Bot have always been met by the question, What
can the States want more than the Senator They
are all there equal! represented and every law which
passes ,h1t body involves decision its consttu-
;IonulIty-a decision made by body sworn To decide
implrtay, and ~ which the smallest 5, ate has as
much weight as the greatest. Io this have never
been able to Ind but answer and that ls that as
to one class OF that tribunal Is not accessible.
mean cases IN which the constitutlonalty of Slate
Laws Is brought III question There ! would GER
fanny amend the Constitution so as to give an appeal
10 the Senate; and perhaps require the concur
renee Of TWO thirds to declare the law of State uu
constitutional A. present although we are emphat-
icoliy te men 81 The people, being charged exclusive
ly with the protection Of individual right against I'M
constitutional laws. yet directly compelled 10
pass upon the delicate question Of sovereign right
from which may Heaven deliver
You ask why did not come out with my
Eight Points al the lac election Tor Intendant If our
city ] answer, because had iulle To do with
the Meeting Seylc YOU had, and if I had,
no body would have listened ~ me The majority
who voted for Mr. Prnglc, are as decidedly anti
Tariff as you are. did not vote, and | doubt if
there IN South Carolina who agrees with
me IN of least seven Of my Eight Points. But THIS
DO not doub Of that Tie time is not far distant when
they wi at agree with me 10 every one Of them
You know the course OF my public bfc | have
more than once teihre been a minority, 10 all al
p'aranccs ms hopeless as ha prcsen, aye, ne
>'sijoD 81 Jqctsv1 10 ihe P,csidspcy. I only assert
t.rt freedom ot opinion which readily conceded TO
p', o.hsra.
agree with you entirely That Judge Lee and my
srJ ought not $50 hly been invited aud iur the rcu-
II you suggest Iou see la dolbted wh, Iii, 1T
ras {. hoax, ord alter The lapse ct so much tine
w,la.u an answer from you, J vas ncorly confirmed
in hot doubt. treated the invitation however res
poc,.uly. yet as TO leave Ittlc possible 10
be gained by the hoax, # 1t was one There is one
'Iug must beg you pstiicularly 20 netcC. do not
m "a D suffer mgstiitO be drawn into the question Of
Conjunction or In1stfuuonai.v 81 The TmiH Act
.cc THAT 900 Co. y first Point have written CyHsiiir
HAM, where ought 10 have SAID Codrcpiion; but tho
context wi correct 'hc hpsus. wall treat the sub
IHc bis oucaIy. aud tot otherwise, and then # find
have oven approached hc question of Conetruc ION
aii! not s1 lDdiciolIy upon a cause arising under
|G AZ 10 the point winch you press with most eur
nrs.ucss. mean no conspiracy, ! am ready now
t' dsp.s" of 81 as prob. bly, ever shall be, and have
no u' e.ou 10 a'a'. b1v. no evidence but what IS
..i.. Tic public ned probob. never snail have. IL
requires Cue powers Of on Asmodcns o. ronsock ca
UhH.a, or iohc mp 'uG ashes of '.uloeuli1 cores
GDulc DJi % thrrr has been enough published Ia
esub si tho fact 90 fl q purpose aud zcaiou- CO.
opera rnoi some Of our cil,n5 10 CT RID oftho
F.Ii A.., or 600 rcd of IKE Union. then can only
.s.v. oil Acr wJc'y from every one IN Ty references
ttph .h.Ic s Evidence show tha soIuo ~ ia RI her
ard u1lutaju hat o separation rom uIo Union. who