Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-12-15

VsGfSiA---At rules holden in the eierk's Office of
the superior eour, Of ehancery Cor the Richmond
district; the ssn day OF October 1880. Henry Wat
The defendant Fs.nes 8. o. Kelley no, having en-.
tered his and given security according to
the act OF assembly the rules Of this court and APP
pearing, by satsfactory evidence, that he is In
habitant Of this country; 10 ordered. that the said
defendant do appear here the first day Of the
January term. aud the bin Of the plaintiff, and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
nc wspaper Published in the city Of Richmond, for
months rssive, and posted at the front door of
the capitol, in the said city. copy. Teste,
50 WM C. PENpLEroN, C. C.
\VlRGlNiA:-At rules holden in the clerks office
" OF the superior court OF chancery for the Rich
mond district. the Sth day of July 1880; Mary Car
ter pl,f against Joseph Tate, Edmund w. Rootes.
WIN. A. Eliason aud Mary his wife, AND other dts.
The defendants William A. Easoa and Mary his
security according the TO act OF tssembly and the
rules OF this court. and appearing, by satisfactory
evidence, that they not inhabitants of this country
it is ordered that the said defendants do appear here
on the hrst day the OF next January and answer
the bill OF the plaintiff and that copy of this order
oe forthwith inserted IN some newspaper published i'm
the city OF Richmond for two months successfully,
and posted at the front door Of the capitol in said city
o9 copy. teste, wv. G. PENpLEroS. C. c.
l\ViRGlNiA.-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
OF the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9Th day of September 1905 Will
liam Smith, pltf. against Austin Watkins, Peter Ri
and other dts.
The defen,an, Peter Rison not having entered his
appearance and given security according to the act of
assembly and the rules of this and
by satisfactory evidence, that he is ina btant
OF this country it is ordered, that said
do appear here the first day Of the next January
term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and tnat a
copy of this order be forthwith inserted some news
paper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months successfully and posted at the front door Of
the capitol in the said city. copy. Teste.
60 wM. G. PxSpLrroS. C. c.
NNIRGiNiA At rules holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the Cd day OF August 1885, James Neal pltf
against Samuel Morgan, David Street, admir- of
Mereweather Hurt, decd and Champion C. II. Mara
bic, dts.
The defendant Champion C. NJ. Nsrable not having
enered ms appearance and gwen security according
to the act at assembly and the rules of this court and
taPpearng, by satisfactory evidence that he is not
AN nhabant at Tins country; 1t is ordered that the
SAID defendant do appear here the first day of the
next January term and answer the bill of the plain
I'M and that copy OF this order be for,hu ith insert
ed IN some newspaper pub;sht in the city of Rich
mond for two months successfully, aud posted at the
front door of the capitol in the SAID city.
70 copy. Teste, Wm. G PESnLEroS, C. e.
" IRGiNlA: At rules, holden in the clerk's Office
OF The superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 9th day of September 1880: VIM
Jones Barksdale, aduF Of Frances Tabb, decd pl,f
against Theodrc Blair Bannster and Srgniora his
wife, John Bannister and other dts
The defendant John Bannister having entered
his appearance and given security according to the
&C. of asse mbly and the rules of this court and it an
pcaring by satisfactory evidence, that he no, an in
iasant OF this country; il ordered, that the said
do appear here the first day of the ne 1t
January term, and the bill of the piaintiE and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months SUCCESSFULLY and posted the front door of
the capitol, in the said city. copy. Tes,e,
70 WV. e. Ph>DLKroN. G C.