Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-12-28


" at the supt court at chsnrcry tor the Rich |
r-ond district, the ~ day 81 August 1890: Samuel U
against E,lnurd W. foote's exor Sf Augustine Davis
decd 1homas T. webb and Harriet his wife. Samuel
Shsppad and Maria his wiz, Edwin Davis and Charles
s 4 DAVIS and Matilda HIS wie, dts.
The defendants Thomas 4. Webb, Edwin Davis.
and Charles 4. Davis anal Matilda his wife, NOT
having entered their appearance and given secu-
sait, according the act ut Assembly and the
rates * This court. and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence that they not Inhabitants at this country
is ordered that the said defendants do appear here
ON the day Of the Jan'y term, and answer the
OIL Of the plaintiffs; and that copy ct this order be-
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published IN
the city of Richmond, for two months SUCCESSFULLY
an nusted front door at the capitol in the sand
e'y1; copy; VIM ae 6. psxnrxro~. G c.
SeSa,EGiNTA:--At Rules hclden in the clerks Office
~ o' tie superior court at chanccry for the Rich
mend dis, tie Sih day Of September, 1885, Sam
el Wmircc, pitf. against Alexander Cushma", survi-
wing partner at Cuaiinan & Andrew. Wm. G'st, John
Nee Isaac REYNOLDS, Charles Hoffman, George W.
Hoffman. Peter FatncSturk Henry Ievering co...
I L. Berry, Franc's Y ken0cdy, John krausc, john
;r,'li, Jonathan Rogers, and others, dhs
7h- defendants above named, Except Alexander
Cushran having entered their apps france given
security To tie act OF Assembly nNd the rules
OF this court audit appearing by satisfactory evidence,
thst they inhabitants of th, country: 1t is Or
.erod. that the ssid defendants do appear here on the
first day Of the January term, aud answer the
hIli Of the plaintiffs; and that copy OF this order be
forthwith inserted in newspaper published ia the
city of Richmond, for two months successfully, and
NOS, at the door Of he capitol, the said
Is copy. Testc, w. G.. PESpLEroN, 6. c.
SN5IRC;NIA: At rules, holden in the CLERKS o3icc
" OF The superior court of ChanceIy for the Rich
rnond district tie 9Th day Of Iuy 1880: ArmsIreat
Srice, ex'or of .mes Sr,y decd, p against Susan
Archer, Peter Archer, Eho'"as Watkins Leigh and
other dts.
The defendant Thomas W. Leigh, not ha yirg en.
tered his appearance and given security according
80 the act of Assembly an r,!cS of this court, and it
appearing ny satisfactory evidence, that he is not
niI.bi,ant OF tits country, it is ordered, tina,
defendant D iaV
ofthe next january tern. and answer tie b Of the
PIT; and that copy uF this order he forthwith in
serted in some newspaper published in the city OF
richmond. for tw" months successfully, and posted
at the front donr OF the Capoi in the said city.
CD Copy. ?oste, NM. g. PESnLg""S, e. G.
-HT!RGiNlA:-h, rules, holden in tho clerks Office
of the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, tie 9TH day OF October 1880: James
Lyle, adnor de b"nis With the will annexed nf
James Lyle, sea-, decd, pif against Pauus =. T.
irving, CAtharine Gamble and other dts
II defendant Ca,Iarine Camille not having enter.
Cd her appearance and given security riding to
the nc, OF asse b'y and the rules OF this court, and
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that she is
nhahiiant Of this country il is ordered, that
said def ndsut do appear here on the first ay of the
next January term, and answer the bill of toe plain
ti,1; and that Gerry Of this order be forthwith; insert
et. in some newspaper published in THE city Of Fitch
r,ond, for two months sIccessivey, and posted at the
ito door Of the capitol, III The said city.
rs copy. Tes:c. vM. e. PEsDLEToS, c. c.
ZEfiRGiNiA. a, r'.!os, hoaen ia the clerks o.fcc
- &c the superior court Of cancery Cor the rich
Ersx;on ard Mary g. lis wife pits against Rebt. Hea!y
atu,'or nf Samuel w. Sa, re- adm'or de bonis non Of
Tc'er Kent, and adror of Thos. Troc. decd, Over
ION Seswe! ana bis wife. prcscnari, cs Of Sterling
Sesweil. deed. and other dfls.
The defendants NTcr:on ,;eaweii and his wife,
having entered thtir appearance and given --curi,y
ACCORDING the of Assembly ard the rlea ef ,his
court and 1t appearing, by sssss: Dry evuenc, that
they are not Inhabitants Of this county t is oru-red,
oi Tie next January tet'n, and srAwer the bin az the
plaintiffs; and that copy 81 this order be forthwith
insisted in snoe newspaper Published in the city Of
liicmord, for two months sNccessive'y, end posted
1T the rort door CT the capitol, the said city.
~ copy. T~7'e. WV. C. p LEEDx. ..
VIRGINIA: 81 roles, holden IN cIerk4 dee Of
y the Superior court OF chanccry for the Richmond
dis,,ic, the 2d day of Angus, 1850: Manuel Judah,
pit. agsins; Abraham Block & Fanny his wife, and
HAYES J. Isascs dEts.
in. defendants not haYing entered their appesr.
and given security according 10 The act AT Assem-
big and rules os This court. and il Appearing, bv sa,s-
factory evidence, chat they not inhsbants of this
country: is ordered that the said defendants do ap
rear here the first day Of tho January term,
ar, the bill Of the plaintiff; ard that copy Of
t'.,s order he forthwith inherited in sone ne~spaper
published in the city Of Richmond, for two months
ccsve!y and posted at the front door Of the capitol
60 Wn G. PsSnLHroN. c. C..
TTiRGiNiA: At rules holden in the clerks oi;sce Of
the superior court of chancery for the richmond
district, The 9th day Of September 1890 5ames Neal,
r!;f. against David Street adm'or Of Mere weather
Hurt decd, josephus II ur. and Champion c. q. TT.
The defendant Champion C. ~ Narsble no. having
entered his appearance and given security according
10 TIC act Of assembly the rules of this court and It
iprearng, by satisfactory evidence. that be is
.hsban q! this country; 1t is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the first day Of the
January term and the bill of the PLAINTIFF and
Tat copy of this order be forthwith inherited some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
-uths succcss'vey, and posted at the front door CT
TIE piiol, in the said city. copy Tes:c,
80 WIN q PENDLET"N. C. C.
RJIRGiNiA:--At rules, holden H. the clerks 0ce
- Of the superior court of chancery for the Rich
nond district, IT," 9th day Of September 1880 Jacsue.
'hc +. TsyoT adn'or of James Halliday pitt. against
jtnc5 Dick and nathaniel C,ck in their rigite
eid as surviving partners Of Dicks, Moore & Co. and
Others, dts
Z Ae defendants James Dck and Nathaniel Dick
not having en'ercd thei appearance and given secu-
~ according 10 tie net of Assembly aud The rules o.
i.''s court, and II appearing, by satisfactory evidence
shat they not inhabitants Of tits country: il is or.
Gered that the said defendants do appear here on the
t'rst day of the next January term, and answer the
tlplt, =. -. -. II.