Lancaster gazette. [volume] (Lancaster, Mass.) 1828-1830, 1830-03-23

Nj G "A L.
SECOND SPEECH.
rEn.I
rarked on the analogy Of
he conduct of European
cir own subjects settling
lint, to show, that we had
Gug, when we should have
settlers. / thought the
rfered his judgement to be
". that he was struck with
,nce, where there was no
. still. The first settlers
,erprising spirits, engaged
fleeing from tyranny at
Re, they were forgotten by
4 remembered only to be
again by the appearance
the eloquence of the pas
tmber yesterday observed
rnment towards the Wes-
resentation of it, brought
Ieech in the British Par
speech of Col. Barrie. On
tor the tea tax, ! forget
heard a member on the
at the people of the United
bnists, planted by the ma
ihe indulgence, and protec-
nd, would not grudge their
sr country from the heavy
voaned. The language of
is, was-They planted by
sion planted them in Amer
tyranny, and grew by your
b as you began to care for
care by sending persons to
represent their character,
hut their substance.
mrable gentleman mean to
Ike this is applicable to the
Int Of the United States
grants. or to any represen-
That conduct ? Were the
ben ,thither by our oppres-
he'd only by our neglect of
Hnent done nothing but 10
out their substance? Sir,
the British speaker, Just
Uttered, and fit to remain an
is not a little out of place,
ITO be applied here to the
iy towards her own citi-
England, it may be true !;
own Government it would
US leave it to be recited
i against n foreign nation
bette and declaim ourselves
tof the alleged contradic-
Wednesday, | commended
away gratuitously all the
sld them in trust ; that the
pledged itself to dispose
for the common benefit,
10 as its discretion should
tontradiction does the gen.
ent, in the speech of 1925 !?
then said, that we ought
as a very great treasure.
lpe to be accurately. report
bat is the contradiction ?
i've should hug these lands
ocular income. No such
!. What / have said, snd
tey are a common fund
common beneit-to be sold
rcommodation of settlers,
ettling the lands as much
money from them. This
hye always said. Is this
|Ite treasure ? Is there no
Ping and boarding this fund,
Peat treasure, and on the
u low prices, placing the
treasury of the Union +?
much is to be made of the
may be, selling it all
\ to give the fullest effect
pot giving it all away to the
f would propose; nor is it
Fnd tenaciously, as a favour
fmy judgement, a just and
F'ording with all the various
Government. So much
End what is it? Where is
Eemau's triumph ? What
Of doctrine, has he been
This be a sample of that
llthe honorable gentleman
Fne to the word discontinue
M the point Of the debate;
Fllleman back to that which
Fseen me and him is, where
at the South or at
|idon Of the West should
need not he fastened on
|llain off the people from the
|a,s doctrine, as has been al
n, That is the question
md anything by which he
Rusation !? l submit to the
|nely failed and as far as
lhs only person who has
sats, is a gentleman from
Trend to the honorable
favourable gentleman has
there is none which can
act, while it requires no
'aehes all argument to refute
'peeches of another South
Before, of the same general
Se effect, as that which has
mot consume the time of
gof them.
s',%land is guiltless Of the
ss'tern population. and Of
y. the growth Of the New
\ be Of that policy in the
aefs. If it has a local hab-
member. has probably seen,
\ ,Ialook for it |; and if it now
'@ himself christened it.
M,sir, to a more important
gentleman's observations.
q Y with nv views Of justice
!. aaepublick lands altogether,
", | am asked by the hon.
0't ground it is, that I con-
Y in particular instances ?
with these profess
2oFt Of measures appropria-
aads to particular roads,
alar rivers, and particular
~ the West I This leads,
difference in political opin-
a. !, gentleman and myself.
y laese objects as connected
laaly embraced in its objects
i Contrary, deems them all,
good. This is cur differ.
y which he proceeded to