Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-10-16

NV@fRGiNiA; At rules, holden in the clerks ofic,
" Of the superior court OF Chancery for the Rich
morJ district. the S,h day Of July 1885, William Dun
ford and Edward punford who sue by philip DunforL
their guardian and next friend pltfs against Johr
England and VIM. England in their own rights. & as
ex'ors OF VIM. England decd, Thomas England and
other dts,
The defendant Thomas England not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according
TO the act Of assembly and the rules of this court
and appearing, by satisfactory evidence that he is
not an inhabitant ct this country is ordered tina,
tho said defendant do appear here OH the 6rst day
the next Janry and the bill Of the plain
tiffs; and that copy of this order be forthwith in
serted M some newspaper published in the city OF
'nchmond, for two months successfully, and posted
al the Fl snt door Of the capitol, in the said city.
% Acopy. Tesie. WV. G. PESpLkroS, C. C.
ViRGlNlA:-At rules holden in the clerks office Of
| the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the LIST day of May. 1880: James Brcam pl,f
against Thomas II. Mitchell, James lnns, Benjamin
Dawson and Matthew Wallace and other dts.
The defendants Benjamin Dawson and Matthew Wal
lace not having entered their appearance and given
security according to the of assembly and the rules
OF thrs court and appearing, by satisfactory evi
dence that they are not inhabitants Of this country:
1t ordered. that the said defendants do appear
on the frst day of the January term, and
the bill Of the plaintiff; and that copy Of this or.
der be forthwith inserted in some newspaper pub.
"S"eu !" 'ne cay OF ucnmonu, Tor Two months sue
cessvey, and posted the front door OF the Capt.
tol. in the said city copy. Teste,
oS WIN. G. PESpLEruS, C. C.
NIRGIklA: At rules holden in the clerks office of
district, the I'd day of August 1850: Manuel Judah,
piif against Abraham Block Fanny J his wife, aud
Hayes J. Isascs dts.
The defendants no, having entered their appear
ancc and given security according the act af
bly, and rules of this court and it appearing by salts
factory evidence, that they not inhabitants of this
country is ordered, that the said do ap
pear here the FIRST day of the January term,
and answer the bill of the plaintiff and that copy of
this order be forthwith inserted in some new spaper
published in the city of Richmond, for months sue
cessiveiy, and posted the front door Of the capitol
in the said city. = copy. Teste,
go WM. G. PENpIEroN, c. c.
NiRGiNlA: AT rules holden in the clerks office Of
the superior court ut chancery for the Richmond
district, the 9th day of September 1880: James Neal
p'H against David Street adm'or of Merrwe ather
Hurt. decd, Josephus Hurt and Champion c. NJ. Mar
able, dts
The defendant Champion C. NJ. HIarable not having
entered his appearance and given security according
to the act of assembly & the rules of this court and II
appearing, by satisfactory evidence, tina, he not an
nhabi,an Of this country II is ordered, that the said
defendant 10 appear here the first day of The next
January term and answer the bill of the plaintiff aud
that cory of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city Of Richmond for two
months successfully, aud posted At the front door of
tic capitol, IN the said city. copy. Tes;e,
60 WM G. PENpLEToN. C C.
KJIRGINiA: At rules holden in the clerks office 81
V the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the I'd day of August 1850: Langley d. Jen-
nings, pl,f against VIM. Flournoy, and Anne his wife
and Robert Il. Oliver and other dts.
The defendants above named not having entered
their appearance and given security according TO the
act Of assembly and the rules OF tbs court, and il
appearing by satisfactory evidence. THAI they are no
inhabitants Of this country; it is ordered that the said
defendants do appear here the first day of the next
January term and answer the bill CT the plaintiff and
that copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in
newspaper published in the city Of Richmond for two
months successfully, and posted the front door Of
the capitol in the said city A copy. Tese,
90 WV. g PEHDLEroS,
NlRGINIA.-At rules holden m the CLERKS Office Of
the superior court OF chanccry for the Richmond
district. the 4th day Of October 1880: Henry Wat,
kins. pft against Francis g. o. Kelley and Peter V
Daniel dfts.
tered his Appearance and given security according to
the act of assembly & the rules of this court and tan
pearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he not an in
habant Of this country il is ordered that the soid
defendant do appear here the first day of the next
January term and the bill of the plaintiff: and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
ne wspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months succ~ssi vely, and posted the front door Of
the capitol in the said city. copy. Teste,
o0 WIN d. PEnDLEroH, c. C.
NViRGiNih:-At rules, holden IN the clerks office
" of the superior court Of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 5tl day of July 1850: N,rv Co.
ter pitt. against Joseph Tate, Edmund w. Rootes
VIM. 4. Eiason aud Mary his wife, and other dfis.
The defendants William A. ElIason and Mary his
wife, pot having entered their appearance and given
security according the TO act OF assembly and the
rules of this court. and it appearing by satisfactory
evidence, that they not inhabitants of this country
1t IS ordered that the said defendants do appear here
on the hrst day the OF next January term answer
the bill Of the plaintiff and that q copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in 11me newspaper published in
the city OF Richmond, for months successyeIy
and posted at the front door Of the capitol in said CITY
o. copy. teste, WN. q. PEsDLEToS, c. C.
NViRGlNiA:-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
" Of the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9th day Of September 1906 Will
liam Smith, pl;f: against Austin Watkins Peter ri. !
son and other dts.
Tie defendant Peter Rison not having entered his |
appearance and given security according to the act Of
assembly anil the rules Of this court, and il appearing
by satisfactory evidence, that he is AIT inha bnnt