Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-12-31

ViltGiNlA-ht rules holden in the c,euh's of;cc of
the superior court OF chaneery for the Richmond
district. the 4,h day of October 1880, uenry Wal.
Daniel, tlfls 80 -
The defendant F.ancis 5. O. pei,ley no, having e.
tered MS appearance and given security Seees<ny to
the act OF assembly the OF this court, and il an
pear'ng by satisfactory evidence that he Ia not an An
nae'ant OF this eoantrys 10 ordered. that the said
ueienusnt do appear here tue hst sy of the next
January term and answer the bill at the plaintiff. aud
that copy OF this order be Forthwith Inserted in somc
newspaper Published in the city of Richmond. ter two
months saec-ssiveG, aud posted the 'front.' door of
the capitol, IN the said city. A copy. Tes,c,
% WM q. PSNplHroN. CSC.
WiRSiNiA;-At rules. holden in the clerks office
" otthe superior court ct ehsncery for the Rich.
mond district. the 9th day OF September 1850: Viii
and other dts.
The defendsn, Peter Rison not having, entered his
appearance and given security according to the act of
assembly and the rules of this court and il airing
by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an inha bitsn
ct tins country ii is ordered that said defendant
DO appear here on the 6rst day of the next January
term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff and taat
copy OF this order be forthwith inserted IN some news.
paper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months sue eessivey, and posted front door of
the neapi'olin the said city. Acopy. Tes,e.
oy vM G. PsSnLEToN, c. O. r
\WiRSiNiA:-At rules, holden in the clerks office
~ OF the superior court Of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 5t day Of July 1856 Mary Il Car
ter Pltf against Joseph Tate, Edmund w. Rootes
Wm. a. Eliason aud Mary his Wife and other dts.
The defendants William A. El'ason and Mary his
vic. not having entered their appearance and given
security according the to act OF assembly AMI the
rules ct this court, and appearing by
that The are not inhabitants Of this coun,r,
IL IS ordered, that the said defe do here
ON the FIRST day the of January term and answer
the bill of the plaintiff and that COPY of this order
he Forthwith inserted in newspaper published in
the city OF Richmond, for two months successveIy
and posted at the front door Of the capitol in said cy
o9 copy. teste, wv. 6. PENpLEroN. c. q.
NWlRGiNiA At rules holden in the clerks Office Of
~ the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the 2d day OF August 1880; James Neal Diff
against Samuel Morgan, David Street, admir- of
Merewea,her Hurt, decd and Champion C. NJ Mara.
bic, dts.
3 The defendant Champion C. NJ. Marable not having
enered ms appearance and given security according
TO the act tassenby and the rules of this court and
disappearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is not
an nbaotant ut this counry 1t is ordered, that the
SAID defendant do appear here the first day of the
next January tern aud the bill of the plain.
h and that copy of this order be forthwith insert.
ed IN some newspaper published in the city of Rich
mond Tor two months successfully, and posted nj The
'front.' door OF the capitol in the said city.
~ copy. Teste, WING PENpLEroS, C. c.
Z lRGiNiA: st rules, holden in the clerks Office
OF The superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mono district the 9th day OF September $50: Vm.
Jones Barksdae, admir- Of frances Tabb, decd, pI,f
against Iheodric Blair Bsnnis,er and Seigniora his
wife, John Bannister and other dts.
The defendant John Bannster not having entered
MS appearance and given security according to the
act OF assembly and the rules of his court and ap
pcaring, by satisfactory evidence that he is not an in
haoant OF this counry it IS ordered, that the said
defendant 90 appear here the first day of the next
January term and the bill of the plaintiff and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months successfully, and posted the front door of
the capitol, in the said city. copy. STeste,
10 WN G. Ptsn,rro. =
\HiRGihlA Atruies, holden IN the clerks otiice of
the superior court at ohancery for the Richmond
adurx virh the will annexed, Of Robert Davidson
decd, Pi,f against Samuel S. Saunders and David pa
The defendant David Davidson not having entered
hrs appearance and given security according to the act
OF assembly and the rules Of this court and it appear
ing by satisfactory evidence that he is not AN nhabi
taU Vi this country; ii is ordered, that the said deen
dan % appear here the first day of the next Jan.
nary term, and answer the bill Of the plaintiff and
that copy of this order be forth inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
nonths snccessvely and posted at the front door of
the capitol, i'll the said city. A copy. Teste,
so WV. @. PsspLEros, c. c.
WiRGINIA AT rules, holden in the clerks office Of
" the superior court Of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 9Th day Of July 1880; Edward Cunning.
ham, pltf against Thomas n. Mitchell; and Garland
thompson, ex or Ut YIN. HtcheN, who vas exor of
Thomas Mitchell, dts.
The defendant Thomas Il. Mitchell not having g n !
tered bis appearance and given security according to
the act of assembly and the rules Of this court and
appearing BY satisfactory evidence that he is not an
% WIS Countryi III IS ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the frs, day of the next
SsnuaPy term and answer the bill Of the plaintiff and
That copy OF this order be forthwith in some
newspaper Published in the City of Richmond, for tw
months excessively aud posted at the front door of
the capitol in the said city. copy. Teste,
~ YIN. PESpLETos, C. c.
AtruIes, holden in the clerks Office of
" The superior court Of chancery for tho Richmond
district, the 4th day October $3.50; Andre Mcoue
PHI: against Walter Mcauie, dane Mcoue and Mary
McQue dts.
The defendants not hsvng eutered tn cir appearance
ana gwen security according to the act of assembly
'he rules OF this court, and it appearing by salts
factory evidence, that they inhabitants of this
country; IS ordered, that the said do ap.
pear mere on the irst day of the January term
and answer the bill OF the plaintiff and that COW of
this order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published IN the city of Richmond, for two months
successfully, and posted at the front door of the
'toI, IN the said city. Acopy. Teste,
VIZ. &. PEsDLETsN, c. C.
\WikGINiA. Al rules holden in the clerks Office of
~ the superior court Of cbancery for the Richmond
dHH'ct' the 5th day Of July 1880; John Archer and
frances Cook his wiis pltfs against William Jones
Barksdale, admor of Frances abb, deed, TIE same