davidaulloa/AmericanStories huggingface dataset:
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01
Rules holden in The clerks office

YIRGlNIA:-At Rules holden in the clerks office
" OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond dis,ric the 9th day of September 1850 Sam
uel Wnfree, pltf against Alexander Cushman, surv-
wing partner of Cushmsn & Andrew, Wm. Gst John
Lee, Isaac Reynolds, Charles Hoffman, George W.
Hoffman, Peter Fahnest"ck, Henry lowering & Coz
& T. l. Berry Prancis Kennedy, John Krause, John
Trull, Jonathan Rogers, and others dis
The defendants above named, Except Alexander
Cushman) not having entered their appearance given
securtyaccordng the act of Assembly and the rules
of this court, audit appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they not inhabitants OF this country: il is
dered that the said defendants do appear here the
bill of the plaintiffs and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in newspaper published in the
city Of Richmond, for two months successfully, and
posted the front door Of he capitol, in the said city
65 copy. Teste, YIN. G. PESDLEToX, {. C.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01
At rules, holden in the clerks Office

NYfIRGINIA! At ruIes, hoIdrn In The CLERKS Office
" of the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
moud district the 5th day Of July 1890 Armstreat
Bruce, exor Of James Bray, decd, PIG. against Susan
Archer, Peter Archer, Thomas. Watkins Leigh and
other dts.
The defendant Thomas W. Leigh, not ha wing en-.
tered his appearance and given security according
20 the act Of Assembly and rules Of this court and il
appearing by satisfactory evidence, that he is not
an nhabiant Of this country, it is ordered, that
The said defendant do appear here on the first day
o Tic next January term and answer the bill Of the
pitii and that n copy Of tds order be forthwith in
serted in snme newspaper pSblishcd in the city Of
Richmond, for two months successfully, and posted
ct the front door Of the Capitol in .he said city.
O. 4 Copy. Testc, Wv g. PEgHsIroS, C. E.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01
NTIRGINIA: At rules, holden in the clerks office

NTIRGINIA At rules holden in the clerks office of
Y the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the I'd day of August 1850: Langley b. Jen
mngs pltf against Wm. Flournoy, and Anne his wife
and Robert Il. Oliver aud other dts.
The defendants above named not having entered
their appearance and gwen security according 10 the
act of assembly and the rules this court and II
appearing BY satisfactory evidence that they are no
inhabitants of this country; is ordered that the said
defendants do appear here the first day the next
January term, and the bill of the plaintiff; and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted some
wspaper published in the city OF Richmond for two
months SUCCESSFULLY and posted at the front door of
the capitol. in the said city. copy Tcste,
SO WIN. Ct PENDLEToN c e
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01
CoMNrssrovEn's Ofr1cy.

KicTm0nd, Uugut JISt. 1880.
1he parties interested will please take notice that
ibavs appointed the 2nd day Of November ncxt TO
commence the accounts directed by the foregoing
order Of Lhe court: which day, ~ O'Clock, s. NJ,
they reun ed to attend at NY Office IS doors above
the Va. Banhs) with the necessary proofs and docu.
nents, ready foT examination and settlement.
62-Iaw9m AMOS LADD, commissioner
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

HTIE1ii>IA.-At rules holden the clerks Office Of
the superior court of chanccry for the Richmond
district, the 18th day of October 1890: Henry Wat
kins, plt against Francis s. o. Kelley and Peter V
Daniel, dts.
The defendant F.ancs $. o. EeiIIey not having en-
tered his appearance and given security accortin to
the of assembly & the rules of this court and il an.
pearing by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an in
habitant of this country it is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the next
january term. and the bill Of the plaintiff; and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city Of Richmond for
months successveIy, ard posted the front door of
the capitol,in the said city. y copy. Teste,
GO WM G.. PESDLEToN. &. G.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

" of the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5th day of July 1885, Mary Car
ter pltf against Joseph Tate, Edmund w. Rootes
Wm. A Eliason aud Mary his wife, aud other dts.
The defendants William a. Elason and Mary his
wife, not having entered their appearance and given
security according the TO act OF assembly and the
rules of lhs court and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence, that they not inhabitants Of this country
rs ordered tina, the said defendants do appear here
on the first day the of January term and answer
the bill of the plaintiff and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the city OF Richmond, for months successiveIy
and posted at the front door Of the capitol in said city
% a COPY. tesie, WV. g. PENnLEroN. G. G.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

VIRGINIA. At rules holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chancery Tor the Richmond
district, the 4th day of October 1880; the President,
Directors and Company of the Farmers Bank of vr-
gnia, pitts. against the Richmond Dock Company and
John Gamble and Robert Gamble, dts.
The defendants John Gamble and Robert Gamble
not having entered their appearance and given
ry according the act of assembly and the rules of
this court, and appearing, by satisfactory evidence,
that they not inhabitants of this country is or
dered, that the said defendants do appear here the
first day Of the next January term, and answer the
bill of the plaintiffs and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted i'm some paper published in the
ci,y of Richmond for two months successfully, and
posted at the front door of the capitol, in the sad
city. 4 COPY Ieste,
II WM. G.. PENnIErnn
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

" of the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mond district. the Cd day of August, 1885, Samue.T
Puliam, assignee Of John w. Smith, and other pitts.
agains, Edmund w. Rootes, exor of Augustine Davis
decd: Thomas 7. Webb and Harriet his wife, Samuel
Sheppard and Maria his wife, Edwin Davis and Charles
4. Davis and Matilda his wife, dts.
The defendants Thomas I. Webb, Edwin Davis
and Charles 7. Davis and Matilda his wife, not
having entered their appearance and given secu-
ity according 10 the act of Assembly and the
rules of this court and it appearing, by satisfactory
evidence, that they not inhabitants of this counry
il is ordered that the said defendants do appear here
the lst day of the next Janry term, and the
bill of the plaintiffs; and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in
the city of Richmond, for two months successfully
and posted the front door of the capitol in the sau
city. copy. Teste
81 VIM. G.. PESpLEToS, c. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

NtRGlSlA: At rules holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 9th day of September 1880: James eal
pltf. against David Street atn,'or of Mereweather
Hurt. deed, Josephus Hurt, and Champion G. II. Mar
able, dts.
The defendant Champion c. NJ Marabe not having
entered his appearance and given security according
to the act of assembly the of this court and It
appearing by satisfactory evidence, that lac not an
nhsbitant Of this country; Its ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the next
January term and the bill of the plaintiff; and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months successfully, and posted the front door of
tie CAPITOL in the said city. copy Teste,
60 WM q PESDLFToN e C.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01
The Turf.

The Turf.
hNE copy complete IN - vols.) Of the Annals OF
~ Sporting and Fancy Gazette; a Magazine en-
urcly appropriated 70 sporting subjects and fancy
pnrsuits containing every thing worthy of remori
ON hunting shooting, coursing, racing fishing cock.
ing puglllrns. wrestling, single stick pedestTIansm
cfckci' billiards. rowing, sal og, accompanied with
striking representatives. of the vorous subjects On.
Toured and plain. For sale by ]. IT, NASH.
4 AMP WICKS.-An assortment received AZ
- NASH'S nc, 90
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

NNkGiNlA. At rules holden IN the clerks Office of
" the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 18th day of October 1890: Mary Boiling
and Thomas Shore and Maria Harriet his wife, pitts.
against Edmund Watkins, shift, &c. Alexander Gun
bingham, Richard II. Boiling and other dts.
The defendants Alexander Cunningham and Il. p.
20 g not having entered their appear and CIV
curty according to the act of assembly and the
evidence that they are no, Inhabitants of this country
is ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
the first day of the next January term and answer
the bill of the plaintiffs and that copy OF this order,
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper. published
in the city of Rchmond for two months successfully
and posted AT the front door fthe CAPITOL in the said
city. A copy. Teste,
II WM. q. PENnIErnr. q.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

XIRGNlA. At rules, holden in the clerks office OF
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the ID day of August 1850; ober King, Ro-
bert Temple and John Skyrer, pitts. against Richard
Patterson, james Cooke, Thomas Floyd and James
Fox, dts.
ed his appearance and given security according the
act OF assembly and the rules OF this court and il ap
pearng, oy satisfactory evidence tina, he is an
habtant OF this country; it ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiffs and
that copy OF this oder be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted the front door or
the capitol, in the said city. copy. Teste,
TO WM G. PENDIFTo> G. &.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

w 'GlNiA. At rules holden the clerks office oi
~ the superior court &c chancery for the Richmond
district, the eth day of Sept 1880: James Andrew,
pf. against John Bell, cx'or of Reuben Howard,
decd and trust under his will, Bowling Starke,
and William L. Howard, dts.
The dctepdan William l.. Howard not having en-
tered his appearance and given security according
the get of assembly aud the rules of this court and
appearing, by satisfaction. evidence that he is an
nhabItant Of This country 1T is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the first day of the mex,
January term, and the bill of the plaintiff and
that copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted the front door Of
the capitol, i'll the said CITY copy. Teste,
II VIM G.. PENnLEToN, C. G.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

NIHGlNlA. ~ rules, holden IN the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the 9th day Of september 1880; Edward Pal
meT and Thos. r.. Palm r merchants and partners,
trading under the firm Of T. & r. T.. Palmer Dltfs a.
gsinst MIllar and Finley, merchants and partners,
MJe Myers, H. X. Mister, X. u. Simpson and John
VIM, dts.
The defendants Millar and Finley, r. g. Simpso1,
J. K. Mister and John Winn not having entered their
assembly and the rules of this court and it appearing
by satisfactory evidence, that they not inbabi
ants of this country; IL ordered that the said dc
PENDANTS do appear here on the first day ofthc next
January term, and answer the bill of tho plaintiffs;
and that copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city Of Richmond,
for two months vely, and posted at the front
door Of the capitol, in tho said city,4
~ cory. Tcs'". WN. ~. PENprrToy. r.. &.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

SSfIRtiiNiA at rules, holden in the clerks Office
" of the superior court of Chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9Th day of July 1850: William Dun
ford and Edward iuniord who by Philip Bunford
their guardian and friend Pills. against John
England and VIM. England in their own rights. n as
ex'ors oil Wm England decd, Thomas England and
other dts.
The defendant Thomas England having
tered his appearance and given security according
10 the act ct assembly and the rules of this court,
and 1t appearing, by satisfactory evidence that he is
not an inhabant of this country; II is ordered that
the said defendant do appear here the first day Of
ne next Janry term, and answer the bill of the plain
THIS; and that copy of this order be forthwith in
serted in some newspaper published in the city of
Richmond, for two months successfully, and posted
al the front door OF the capitol, in the said city.
90 Acopy. Teste. WM. g PESpLEroN, {. c.
VIRGiNIA-At rules holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the LIST day OF May, 1880: James Bream, pf
against Thomas A.. Mitchell, James Inns, Benjamin
Dawson and Matthew Wallace and other dts.
The defendants Benjamin Dawson and Matthew WAX
lace, not having entered their appearance and given
curty according to the act of assembly and the rules
OF this court and it appearing, by satisfactory ev
dence, that they inhabitants Of this country
it IS ordered that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the next January term and
the bill OF the plaintiff and that copy of this or
der be forthwith inserted in some newspaper pub
fshed in the city of Richmond, for two months sue
cessivey, and posted the front door of tho Capt.
'0' 20 in the said city "A copy Tes,e,
oS WM. G. PENpLEToN, G.
VlRGlNIA: At rules, holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the I'd day of August 1850: Manuel Judah,
pltf against Abraham Block n Fanny his wife, and
Hayes j. Isaacs dts.
The defendants not having entered their appear
and given security according the af
bly, and rules of this court. and il appearing by
factory evidence, that they not Inhabitants of this
country il is ordered, the said defendants do ap
pear here the first day of the next January term,
and the bill of the plaintiff and that copy of
this order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published in the city of Richmond, for two months
cessvely, and posted the front door of the capitol
in the said city. copy. Teste,
GO WIN. G.. PENpIETcS, c. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

VIRGINIA: At rules, holden in the clerks Office
of the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, tho 9TH day of October, 1880: Richard
". Iarwool adm'or dc bonis non of Warner
liarwood, decd. ard James Montague, adm'or of
VIM. HARDWOOD pitts against Christopher Ilarwood,
Godfrey Gilmore, and other dts.
The defendant Godfrey Gilmore no, having enter
cd his Appearance ard given security according 10 the
act Of assembly and the rules oftbs COURT and 1t ap
pearing by satisfactory evidence that he is not an
inhabaDt ofthis counry IL is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the first day Of the next
January erm and answer the bill u the plaintiffs and
that copy oftks order be forthwith inserted in
newspaper published i'll the City of Richmond. for two
months successfully and posted at the front door of
the Capitol, in the said CITY, A Copy Tcsic
- WIN. G. PENDLETON, g. c.
VIRGINIA: At rules. holden IN the clerks office
Of the superior court of chancory for the Rich
,noud district, the 9Th day of July, 1880: Branch
Cheathum, and VIM. Winfrec pl, S. against Thomas
Edwards, WIN Edwards. Bcniamin Edwards, and
Susanna Edwards dts
Tho defendant WIN. Edwards, not having entered
his appearance and given security according to the
act of Assembly and the rules of this court, and 1t
appearing by satisfactory evidence, that he is not
inabtant OF this country: 1t is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the first day % the next
January term, and answer the bill Of the plaintiffs;
aud that copy fthis order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the city of Richmond,
for two months successfully, and posted at the front
door Of the capitol, in the said city. Copy Tese,
73 WIN. G. PENDLErON, C C.
NTlRGlNlA:-At rules, holden IN the cIe' Ks tfce
of the superior court Of chancery for the Rich.
,nond district, the Oh day of September $780, John
e b. Tlnslcy, George w. Tinslcy and other pits. a.
guinst Susanna Tinsiey and Fleming II. GTaDtand.
Susan Grantland, Ann Grantand aud other dts.
The defendant, Fleming r., Susan and Ann Grant
land no. having entered their appesr rance and given
security according the Of assembly and the rules
of this court, and II appearing, by satisfactory
dencc, that they not nhabitants Of this country
i is ordered that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the next January term, and an
the bill of the plaintiffs and that copy of this
lshed in the city Of Richmond. for two months sue.
ccssvely. and posted the front door Of the CAPITOL
in the said city a copy. Teste,
70 Wal q. PENDLFToN. c. C.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

NIhGlNlA. At rules, holden in the clerks Office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the 9TH day of October 1890; John Jones' pl
against John Hinton and samuel 4rame, merchants by
the STYLE o Hinton and Brame, aid other dts
The defendant Samuel Bramc not having entered
his appearance and given security according to the
act of assembly and the rules Of this court and ap
pearng, by satisfactory evidence, that he is
habtant OF this country It is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the fist day of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and
that copy oftbis order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months successfully and posted at the front door of
the capitol, in the said city. copy. Teste
II WM. q PENpLEToS, G. e.
A/IkGiNlh. At rules, holden ~ Ne clerks Office o,
the superior court of chanccry for the Richmond
district, the 9TH day Of October 1880; Edward H.
Icy and Archibald l.. woodbridge, cx ors of WIN. Plem.
ing decd plfs against Price Perkins and Tandey Key
surviving ex'ors Of Hardin Perkins, decd and James
Dunlop and David Buchanan, surviving partners of
Dunlop, Pollock, and Go, and other dts
The defendants James Dunlop and David Buchanan
not having entered their Appearance and given sccu
ry according TO the act OF assembly aud the rules of
this court, and it appearing, BY satisfactory evidence,
that they not inhabitants Of this counjryi is
dered that the SAID defendants do appear here the
first day Of the January errn and tho bill
OF the plaintiffs; aud that copy of this order be forth
with inserted in some newspaper published IN the city
OF Richmond for two months successfully, and posted
al the front door of the capitol in the said city.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

NlkoiNlA AT rules holden in the clerks Office &C
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district the 5h day Of August 1880; Claiborne Grad
dock and Mary his wife, James Cradtlock and Judith
his ~,te, pitts. against Richard A Dolby, adm of
Lloyd Robertson, Decd Samuel d. Burke and Peter F.
Gregg;--and Nancy Robertson, and Matthew Martha
Catherine, Mary, William, Sarah Eliza and Lucy Ro
bertson, children of William Robe rtson. dec'd-Dan.
'ei s., Lemuel, Madison and Martha Ann Robertson,
children of John Robertson, dec'd;-Allen Freeman
who survived his wife Caroline, late Robertson, and
John and Grace Freeman their children, and John
Poke and Sarah his wife, late Robertson, dfts.
The defendants except the three first namely
not having entered Their appearance and given
rty according to the of assembly and the rules
tins court, and it appearing, by satisfactory evidence.
that they are not inhabitants of this country; it is
dcrcd that the said defendants do appear here the
first day OF the next January term and answer the hill
ot the plaintiffs; and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in newspaper published in
the city of Richmond, for two months successfully,
and posted at the front door of the capitol, in the said
city. \. copy. Teste,
20 WI. g PFNDLETOS. c. c
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

AikGiNth At rules holden in the clerks office OF
the superior court of chanoery for the Richmond
district the ID day of August 1880 Stewart Jackson,
pitt. against John c. oisseau, James Perry, WIN. Per.
ry, John Perry and other dtts.
The defendants James Perry, VIM. Perry, and John
Perry not having entered Their appearance and gwen
security according to the act assembly and the rules
OF this court. and it appearing, by satisfactory evil
dence, thai they not inhabitants of this counry
is ordered, that the said defendants do appear here
on the first day of the next January term, and
the bill of the plaintiff; and that copy of this order
be forthwith inserted in some newspaper published
in the city of Richmond, for two months successvely
and posted at the front door OF the capitol, the
said city copy. Tcste,
20 WIN. q. PESDGEToN, c. c.
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-11-01

Comm'sStoner's Office, Fredsricks6urg,I
Juiy 9Th. 1880.
Inc parties interested are hereby required TO at
tend az tins Office, prepared with testimony sustain
their pretensions on the 9TH day Of November next
AT clock, n. NJ. II II. BARTON,
% bW COu,'r e.. e..
Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-01-13
NEW AND sEAsoNABLE GOODS.

Z NELSON has just received and offers for sale,
Il. unusually low prices an extensive stock OF
STAPLE AND FANCY DRY GOODS,
Embracing large and general variety, suited to the
resent and approaching season, and consisting in
art of
Blue, black and fancy colorcd cloths s cassimeres
Oxford and steel MKT do do
Do do sattnetts
Blue and brown do
Valencia and swansdown vesting
Rose, dufHe and point blankets
Green booking and floor cloth baizes
Fine and superfne white fanncls
Red, green, yellow and black do
Black and blue black Italian lustring
India satin and satin levantire
Black and blue.black Gro dc Nap ;
Do do Gro de Indies
Black senchews and sarsnetts
McIino and Cashmere long shawls
DO do handkerchiefs
Thibet, Prussian and cashmere square do
Thibet and worstcd borege hdkfs
Barege, gauze and Gro de Nap do
Merino cloths and circassians, all colours
7-8 and "A Irish linens
5, and 8-4 do sheetinrs
Long lawns and linen cambrcs
Linen cambria hdkis
Cd and l0-4 damask
Russia, birds-eye and "a diapers
Black Nankn and Canton Grapes
Plaid Norwich do
Black and white Italian grapes
Black and co!oured palmyrencs
Plain black and coloured b,mbazetts
Figured do do aud rattinetts
Black English bombazines
Tartan and Crcsssian plaids and cnmblcts
Black, olive and drab bang-up cords
Plain book. null and Swiss muslins
Figured DO do do
A and o. cotton cambrics
Plain and checked jaconcts
Plaid and fancy London prints
Cotton, worsted and silk hosiery
Silk and worsted braids, assorted
Gloves of every variety
Spitalfeld and bandanna hdkfs
Imitation bandanna and Madras do
Figured, satin and Gro dc Nap bonnet ribbons
Garze, cap, do do
Common, fine and superfine belt do
Black and coloured guard do
a large supply of brown, bleached and plaid do
mestics, apron and furniture checks, bed tickings
British oznaburgs, and course woollens for II ssrc
clothing. Aud constantly hand,
Cotton oZnaburgs from the Richmond Factory