Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1830-09-03

co OF uis duty Tor him 10 perfnrn,;t w. r,,n ,.,
Tie .n, see. 70 nave been neccss ary and at
,ne same unie 40 unavail,ng But n seen. IN. Jrdro
met with MIR. Scott IN Richtpopd ~ he :; IL h .uuso
uisuhguisncd member ct the Fauou;cr R,,".,1 o..
On MS mentioning to him ,hot he had received such
letter, and advising him whether il vn. no. su.u
nave IN order made assigning a Jadce ~ 80 ~ W
~. Tor in other words, whether an ."e eouh,
POSITIVE law ofthc land should DO executed or a"o
strange subject by he bye upon which To t,Ls
vice., "hc Mr. Scott agreed with me itb. w,
that 1t was unnecessary, and that il would he 49,!
I'D nave meeting of the persons intere,tc6 a.
~ ;ssn h;s 'o, and then apply to Judge as usual
w ,ssoc MS warrant Thus 1t seems that tbi, Jndro
ana TINS distinguished eu,ber of the Fnuouier 49,
grecu ana decided that the act of Assembly should
oe n"ihiied and so far as il concerned the county
OF Fauqucr should not be executed w, d,T. r.y
the gentlemen We think il wonld b,yn La ..si
o''icr Tor the General Court to have discbar noJ -,
duty IN assignn. some Judge, who no donh, Inr
u" nnea On any day Tor the court would have con-
suited the members Of the bar. Indeed, we nndor-
stand that the Clerk mentioned in his letter 70 H.
Judge that it the gentemua who might bo nss Ont
snoud ihink proper TO communicate with him ON tho
suJect nc would make II hs business TO have Gov
sui'ation with The members of the bar mn ta IL .
of the term. " ~ 'ne"seHient
nese reasons with others of cbnrac,e,
why" may oe readily conceived, induced me IN ytb
uoiu any FORMAL application to the General Come g.,
Tue assignment OF Judge, although mentioned the
ptS ;m ION made TO me to such of the Judgcs as
uiu 10 al probability b. called upon to perform tho
H. T..
inc Judge says may be readily conceived we confas.
ourselves az loss 10 conceive unless indood 60 90
'Heh was that The Judge considered the (,J.,h :,.
VI 'ihP'rtinence and presumption IN w,;,inn -, s;y
al upon the subject In the old coun,ru ,h nun a1
saying th't cat may look at the kim 80, 20 y
presume that IN this land of liberty and ~ tha we
hearted liberty boys. clerk may be Cd =, '.e
10 Judge even ifit should be for the nnrnoso " e
gins nm IN the discharge of his dutv nar,o,I oS
Dc sucn logging seems to be sometimes an n.oay
80 We presume 1t was not expected bv the
t e,t 'nat "a" Judge was to make formal applic,o
wv, W 'le GENERAL Court for the assignment, of =
'"u.e Out u SEEMS TO US that he mug In bnvo ,ot.,
sc Som opportunity whilst the Court was m ss.si
VI PucinS me letter OF the Clerk m the hand. ~ ~
PRESIDING Judge not for the purpose of MAKING n sar
n'a. apPhca'ion Tor the assignment of a judy. I'm,
aely oy way 81 calling the attention of the com,t
:" suoJec' upon which the law had made IL ,bs do
o' Ihe court to act. Had he done so and tho c.
cral Court bad acted las IT did not neil tho rsi
SSi'y would then have rested the court bnt a. r.
did not think proper do this il seems tbs, Ut
on 'udg" Parker and "a ds,in gushed msmbor f .hs
PauQuier Bar" 'oef Vi tho
YIN reading the Judges letter. we were ,trr,L r,;,,,
hichard r. Parker, frederick COUNTY ThaMa
we 10 ourselves whar is this gentleman dono -, ES
ericK county: only visit we presume :, e -
De that he is residing there seeing that .,,ba
OF the General Cour' sha reside within tho co.s
which they have or may be allotted" and ,,s - 70
MOI heard OF this gentleman avipp VET beon n nse
10 ms circuit altho' was such an alo,ment nros
we DO not know that should make anv az;
hf'uoge having been aud still being a favorIte ,;tJ
u.s. ~'i'o VIII