Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1830-03-05

happens that all duties shall be equal all The Stacs Docs
no! this approach absurdiy
either of tho States, the whole Union roma of sand
Are we not thrown back again. precisely upon the old confed
II plain be argued Four twenty in,enn,e of
authority any body else and this eons Su
onal law ahe only bond of their Unons What is such
state of things during pleasure or use
the phrassology OF the times, during feeling? that feel
s too not the feeling of the people who established con-
In another of the South Carolina Addresses having promised
that the crisis requires "a the energy pas
an attitude OF open resistance to the laws of the Union
ADVISED Open resistance to the laws them is the constu
iona remedy the conservatives of the State which the
South Carolina doctrines teach for the redress of political evils
real or imaginary And its authors further say, that appealing
with confidence to the constitution itself to Justify their opin,
justice In sense indeed sir this is assuming attitude
W The liberty of establishing their opinions, defiance
Of the opinions of all others the liberty of Judging and of de-
as much right judge and decide hey the liberty of pa
eng their own opinions above the judgment of all Others above
and this the fair result of the proposition contendcd for by
the honorable gentleman Or may more properly said
publication find the following; previously to our Revo
hee G New Eng
patty than that which sprung from the bosom of Caonian
NC had no ertorton collision with tie Kings ministers
Eg daSa ""''s''' 's"'s 'p ~ e'''1s r'0ay Of
This extraordinary language South Carolina no coll
son with the Kings minister's 1875. no extortion no o,-
presson But sir, also significant language Docs
fail that designed to raise the readers mind
the question: whether, at this tme-hat say in 1895
South Carolina has any collision the Kings ministers apy
oppression, extor,ion fear from England. Whether il,
Snort not naturally the friend of South Carolina
as New England with her navigation interests sprngng
i envious rivalry of England.
is It not strange sir that intelligent Carroll.
ma, IN 1873 should thus labor that I775
was no hostility no cause of between South and
England! That she had no OCCASION in reference own
interest," from regard her welfare to take up arms
in the revolutionary contest Can any the
expression of such strange sentiments circulation
through the State otherwise than by supposing the object to
be- what have already mmated, to raise the question,
they had collision (mak the cxpresson) the minis
e tiers of King George the Third, in 1775 what collision have
they IN 1928 with the ministers of King George the FOURTH?
What is there in the existing Of things separate
Carolina from DID, rather, than from Ne,D England:
Resolutions sir have been recently passed by the Lega
tr. of South Carolina need refer they 90 no
farther than the honorable gentleman himself has goneand
hope not so far content myself therefore, with debating the
matter with him
And now, sir, what have first say, this subject is,
thai, at no tme and under circumstances has New Eng
land respectable body of persons New England or
any public man of standing New England put forth
doctrine as this Carolina doctrine.
| pE