Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1830-06-15

Mr. hacauey o,scived uai the Jews unlike ohcr sect
had suffered long in silence and they asked decent
y for admission to an equal right Of privilege with themselves
(hcar) They had Ike other had their
meesnss ana training; even to arms 70 upset the Christian
Tor relief lie tcrded human being should be
ton attended with danger 10 the party holdng
the hand of mecY.-Thc Jews wished be in Parliament
tes hear They all events deserving Gift, Hear
ae concluded by hoping the hill would pass
MIR Bailey said If the Jews 10 be admitted into Paa-
memi would be breach of the constitution of the country
HE should therefore oppose the measure.
sirJ nackn,o, rose his conscience from what
he Eel, pressed hardly upon it, by giving his hearty concurrence
20 inns ni M giving bis sop ' I" the completion OF that work
hca-in secondng adoption, of,,hat liberal system of
freedom which had laee contributed to raise thai House
of Commons ESTIMATION no, mereIsof this country b,
foreign powers Ce lie casS o VIZ ina, Tu.
same House of Commons S tn bad performed the measures of
e las. two hnis them by agreeing the
proposed (1ear Much had heen said prejudice of this
race at people He wcu!d say thai the higher class of Jew,
wee men OF great requirements and of Judgment
vel "eu anu iccn.ctcd, acting The upright feel
nys and would not as he had ,ha, nish been
sod require 10 be reclaimed shc NAL practices existed only
led TO better acs by the acknowledgement now soug, for
sa. Take away the brand winch Induced this conduct,
and thcy would become valuable class OF society," clear
proverb of
'Iovexhy ;s.slbonr as myself
1ve en theeiore similar privileges to themselves, and
y gn' them on a like As'ins by passing tia. bill
The chancehf the Excheaucr. said If hepld persuade
n%,ea 'ha. pponmg the proposed bill ou'
N"S gefera aovan,aSc, no wO0Ydo brit lie
us' con'ess that his oprion opposed The g,
non gent then compared the Of the present. app
cans 10 that OF the Roman Catholics TWAS latter in
Stance matter OF eSPedency o greater evil and the
result mad proved that the expectations had realized No
sach benefit was r. be anticipated this
mo dis''ncton In opposition this he did il with
considerable pai was unpleasant task thwar wish
eS OF hose honorable friends who supported the
Opposition was not iom entertaining feeling aversion
or scoIn nut was point of expeency he declared
! himself obliged 10 offer such opposition.
Ut Washington anmadver,ed fact, that nowhsiau
was universally known that this was to be broeh,
OIL not ono petition had been to that house o. aims,
the measure Tho Jews had for series of wears suffered
w.no"t nurmor He hoped the motion would he granted
VII . fefcIvai con<cien,iously opposed the motion
i'ord morpeh supported the noon and conended that all
the arguments lie had heard contrary were futile and
not to the pohit ' ~
Inc solicitor Gencra said that by the existing law Jews
were empowered 10 buy lands; then let Jaws buy
ana become country gentlemen he should be-
g 10 see them become members of that house daughter
me question now the Christian Church TO be or MOI
oe part ann parcel OF the constitution Speaking Of the
lows as body he had the highest retpec, for They
We're most respectable, most loyal body could new
CT wn :" SEQ them iu the high Offices OF the State
/ MIR w. Smith supported tie n.oon.
| MIR r Grant replied.
if'e house then divided when there appeared.-For ,r
notion li5; Agains ii, Majority the motion 10
ihe DILL was then brought frs, time adjourn
ed ~ ~ fN"jo''"