Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1830-06-22
MIR. RANDOLPH

OppOslHOn OUT, against
Minister to Russia They must backen his motives
detraet from his taents-and they go To ask in tn
dark what good can he do in RUSSIA? The bterest Of
these assailants is Saltiksf" in the Nat Journal
The following is specimen of the spirit and STYLE OF
his attack:
Blu; in Russia will have nothing do, wAa,avcr your
patch once in month Your predecessors, Mr. Middleton
about You will have to write word how many bows
70" . make to the to- to d., describe the ort D
form how the great Chlnbcrla and mails
sSi% M ,H %s as
gono tho treaty OF ArianoPc threw that all nations
Now, is it true that Mr. r. will have nothing TO do at
St PetersburgIs he certain that Black Sea open
to us! We have seen letter from Smyrna of March
10, just published in the Boston ID. Advertiser, which
says, that
short time from the Uaisd of opinion a he
must have been male viii, view to the Black Sea- and
e,uatea-io American vessels not aOOsd 80
Saltikof seems, however, to b. certain that Ms r
IL no, charged with this subj Tim will prove that
he ia mist in asserting that Mr. r. will have nohnp
10 dolt is said that he is charged with one special OBJ
ect, which makes the President anxious for him TO
depsr, az oon "a possible SaItkof hit bet wait
see MIR. r. Instructions before he hastily decides
upon his business for the Result OF hs nego'ia-
tons, before he ponounces upon hs qualifcatons-Ii
there had been such objections the Mission or to
the nan. where Saukans friends in the :. nate?
Where Messrs. Webster, and Holmes and Barton?
Why did they not oppose it? Why did Me.srs. Wrh.
ster and Johnson OF l. manifest some little ac-
uNly ~ forwarding MS cOnITmaon!It ~ the opinicn
OF many OF Mr.. RS friends, men who know him
well ard intimately that he will give iaore eclat
and credit TO our diplomatic relations in Russia han any
IN an in America Where was the God like man." al
the time this nomination came up, II Mr.. r. be go
poorly qualified as the opposition have said, why did
not MIR. Webster oppose it! Was he bouni by his
duty to his country to protest against il? But 80 fr
from OPP osng it. did he not untenance and sanction
IN Either hen he sumbered over his duty or Mr. r
ba' been most uijustly and beray carica;ured by
party papers for party effect.
Tie Oppo.i,ion prints have charged Mr.. Ingham
with running Commodore Rodgers az aims Mr.. Mercer
because The les ia opposed III AAninis,, a ION -
They have ruug all The charge upon biz accus tion-
(noi knowing ssis aid to be tn that Commodore
RCdsers was himself the lfisnl OF Mr Adams y But
ia charg" has forced out Sketch Of t,e Debate N
which the obi ions, assigned by Mr.. Inghsfn % lhe
reelection OF Nh. Msrcer, brought forward Can
b. possible, that the declarations OF Mr. Mercer are
correctly stated! Did hat gentleman really Law Claim
10 the meri' OF being the author OF The lac great revo-
luton Ia VIre'nia-and oil being the founder OF The
Charlottesville University. which had been run away
With by M JeiIerson!" CoulI Mr.. Mercer he cor
recy unier'tood flying directly in the face OF the
emphatic inscription. which Mr.. Jefferson reaue ted
1--WE believe in his viii TO be carved on the humble slab
which covered his remains, that he the draiter of
the Declaration Of Independence the author of the Act
establishing Religious Freedom and the Father of tle
University Of Virginia? And could Mr.. NJ. have meant
to lay claim 10 the honor himself and insinuate that
Mr. Jefferson mad run away with the credit of it? Mr.
VI. could not have so expressed himself-We suspect
mat there are other assumptions ascrbed in this sketch
TO Mr. Mercer, which must be founded mistake
We shall see whether Mr. NJ. will himself correct them
The Hartford american Mercury" states that "NIr
Iazewe, as party legacy to his Jackson friends at the
termination OF the late session of Congress told them
That, were lac member OF the House of Representa-
uves, he would urge an impeachment of the President
Tor his outrageous abuse OF the confidence of the ma
uon 1t is absolutely incredible that Mr. T. has ever
made any such declaration We cannot believe It'll
is impossible that MIR T. could have made so rash
and outrageous declaration 1t is the arts of our mill
uca oPponests who thus trying to abuse the public
ear and by dnt OF misrepresentation divide the par
W -Oi similar character must he the report of
speech said, (and eagerly circulded) TO he made bv
Judge w. Siaith Of s. c. in the secret session of the
Senate. Wv
We have seen the very liberal structures in the Nor
folk Free Press" of the 10TH II is sufficient answer
that one OF the conductors contributors 10 that pres
is JOHN ARCHER RoBERTsoNi-Thc article in ones.
uon abOunds IN mSTePTcseUfdtiOHs o facts 0bsurdies
OF reasoning; and the Uiest Inscriptions of the piesf
notifies. 800
The Wilmington (D) Watchinsn d nies that Mr.
Lone NJ written any private leuets going 10 "repe.
sent thst there was no posp.c Of settlement with he
brUsh GOVetnmen rel1'ive 10 ths West India Trade :
CONSTITUTIONAL POLL.
NEE are Only three Counties vet TO ne heard from