Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1830-08-10

particular synopsis
@ SSc sod body IT,
and would not Of the notes by another author
ha. been edited IN such as to make appear
that he had actually signed tho whole An examination Of tho
which ssrs lately from he eons.1nsd
win explain and expose this fraud upon the public as
The charge of Secretary was. that had
habit OF making exuavagant acquisitions drafts upon tho
here for years before nv REMOVAL and that in particular
had made ovedrasof this kind between the FIRST of May and
9th Of August 1829 amounns about 03 which
my answer wss that made any such ov erdra at
and that in fact from the
my requ,,i,on, Away. made in the usual and
regular prescribed by the Navy Department. est
Commanding Of the Navy Yard, hough sometime,
only by nyse specifying the objects for which the wac
Div signed and by h sona aSe sds
that with the exception Of those for pay only, they had
Navy and approved by them before they were
submitted to the Depamen And further expressed thy
May and he 9Th of Angus. is2s had actually
been set down by the Department. myself and Others here,
support his honorable Colleague in this charge against me-
and says the Of his acquisitions for money
.or to cast Tho r..pon.iey upon the Captain of the Yard
~ho approved them AT that time had implicit
Navy approve bin. twelve year. on his bare
after remova there repeats his reted SANDER on
ia his and approved his requisition. before
breath Of suspicion had reached him" This kind indeed
Ito the Captain of the Yardand shows how amaby
communicating Auditor abolve friend from observing those
of the service which he enforce with such
estimates in which nay r.suisons we've ioundsd we're
made as have stated or the part" by the Captain Of
the Yard himself And although have ught ito
tho responsibility that officer to have
him released from his joint responsibility with me- this way,
merely to oblige hm-and especially when it is we'll
known that there has been any particular connex
ION between the Commodore and myself whatever couspou
dence there may be between him and Audor-Bu II ia
really matter OF moment whether have the
accusation alone not for it evidently without the sh,es,
foundation in fact, as easily shew from Auditor.
own words and 6gures-wi,h few Others set them right
His statement Of the of overafts thus:
9Th May, to the II,h August, 1898, as stated in
the report Of the Secretary q the Navy, saaalss
but not received till after that date 28,572 IS
a5s, 7ea IS
Reunited to Mr. King to upon these
Reunited to Purser Fitzgerald upon re
---1as,7s s %
No, to any person 1886 70
his is sufficient reply MIR Kings assertion that
whole amount of tine acquisitions had been othersn
Now. correct the statement follows First
debit Of s. because drawn for before 9Th
OF May the hst date of the period of inquiry what
VIII 10 as WELL allow eredi, for exactly the
paid by me before the 5h of May
ei4ooo, (nclsding the $4,000 the Government
accoun, of said acquisitions of May and
the h Of August instead of the ss67s 10 which sets
down as RENTED TO me them Thirdly, give credit for
an additional emited Mr. Fitzgerald on account OF
my said requisons $se7o another additional sum re-
m,,ed to Mr. Leerand about and the corrected
The whole l amour, drawn for lyme between the
9th OF May, and the 1l,h of August 1929 S23oIa9 81
Faa oy me on account OF those requs
Reunited to MIR. Pur.er Firzgereld on
"a account 90 ns Of ,hem also. 1927 zs
RENTED to Mr. Legrand, e4,357 90
Do do aftervnrds, about 5000
I -23o 5ss So
oVerpaid on aecoun, of my requsons about 1886 27
Now where are the overdIafls' erred, indeed lite
Sec in expressing belief that the whole amount of nv
acquisitions had heen semi Others on account of
.hen for the 10000 which drew from the Bank paid
out on account of them, certainly kept from ms-to
my cost But erred in word only, Thoughts and our
e e91f ~ NV delights 9u6be has obviously attempt
only more fully established by his pains even amusing
TOO to oS.vs that he is here a, hi. old trick again.
Bank into view connection with my account to shew
s ss of .,s. d;aSs he, he s now y slipping Of
dsawer But the knave do nothing without card and
he is right no doubt, to make all the of it These
are actA all the charges any consequence which
been heretofore brought against Of any pan
condue, prior the lh of August, 1929 Now whether
they shew good for nv remo
val from Office shall leave the public decide Sure am
that all honorable men will at eas, agree with that they
furnish no proper apology for the ISLANDERS by winch have
TO be confinued.)
NORTHAMPTON CoURY House. {,
:. July 9th, $780,
Dear SiTOn my return TO this place from Weldon found
your esteemed favour accompanied by the papers
your reply the foul apsons of the Secretary and his worthy
associate from which derived great pleasure and satisfac,on
The note you aude to prepared by in the Of
bc and put upon the table where There can be no
difficulty coming conclusion as to its author sub
sequen was requested to sign and qualify before
nagstr" instead of doing made explanatory of
the cause of one Of the discrepancies appearing too "a
yoabe to your cause told that my SERVICES were no
longer reguired,' &c. ~ "
. (Signed) D. SANFORD
huEs KINo, Esq. Norfolk.
FOREIGN
From, the ~. 2. Commercial Advertiser of E,;do,,
DEATH OF GEORGE xv-