Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-12-31


SYIRGINIA:-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
W of the superior court of chaneery for the Rich.
mond district the 5th day OF October 1929: James
Molly, plif against VIM. Moody, Daniel S. sIiddagh,
and James s. Moss, dfts.
The defendant William Moody not having entered
hs appearance and given security according to the
OF assembly and the rules OF this court and il an
pearing by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an in
ha5iiant OF this couatry: is ordered that the said
defendant 90 appear here the tenth day of the
next January term, and the bill Of the plaintiff;
aud that copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published IN the city Of Richmond,
for two months successfully, and posted at the front
door Of the capitol, in the said city.
! a copy. Teste, wM. G. PrNpLrrox. c. c.
NyIRGINIA:-At rules, holden in the clerks office
OF the superior court of chanccTy for the Rich.
mond district, the 5h day OF October, 1929: John
Snelings, George Snengs, and others, pitts. against
VIM. G. Elan, adm'or with the will annexed of Eliza
beth Keen decd, and John Blankcnshp, dts.
The defendant John Blankenship not haying enter
ed his appearance and given security according TO the
act ct assembly and the rules OF this court and il ap
pearing by satisfactory evidence that Inc IS no, an in
habitan of THIS country. il is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the tenth day of the next
January term, and answer the bill of the plaintiffs and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper publccd IN the city OF Rich ond, for two
months successfully and posted at the front door of
the capitol, in the said city. a copy.
rcste, wu G. PRNpirrox, c. G..
VlRGiNiA.-At rules, holden in the clerks Office
oi the superior court Of ChauCeTy for the Rich
mond district, tic 5ih day Of october, 1899: Carter
Braxton and Mary g. his vie, pitts. against Robert
Ilealy, adnOr de bouis Of Peter Kemp and admir-
of sam. Will. Sayrc and also adn'or OF Thns. 1rce
and Overion 5cawcll and his wife, and others dts
The defendants Overton SeawCll and his wife, not
having entered their appearance and given security
according to the act assembly and the rules of this
court and it appearing by satisfactory evidence, that
tat tcy not inhabitants Of this country; it is or
derc that the said defendants do appear here on ,he
tenth day OF the next January term and answer the
bill Of the plaintiffs and that copy OF this order be
forthwith inserted ~ some newspaper published in the
city Of Richmond, for two months succcssiyey, and
posted at tie front door OF the capitol in the said city
copy Tcste, WV. G.. PESpLEroS, e. c.
NIRGiNiA:--At rules, holden in the clerks ohce of
the superior court Of chauocry tor the Richmond
district, the 5h day of October 1892: Robert Dab.
ncy, pitt against Walter shelton, surviving partner of
himself and p r. shelton deed. late partners under
the firm of T. r. Shelton s. Co. Munford Perks Robt
Nelson, and other defts.
The defendants Munford Perks and Rob't Nelson
not having entered their appearance and given
ity according to the act ct Assembly and the rules Of
this court, aud IL appearing, by satisfactory evidence,
that they not inhabitants this country; il is order
ed, that the said defendants do appear here on the
tenth day of the next January term, and answer the
bill Of the plaintiff; and that copy OF this order be
forthwith inserted in newspaper published in the
city Of Richmond, for two months succe ssveIy, and
posted at the front door Of the capitol in the said city
eopy. Tesie, Wa. G. PEsDLLreS, Q. c.