Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-12-30

NWiRGlNIAi--At rules, holden in the clerks office
~ of the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5ih day Of October 1899: James
Molly, pltf, against VIM. Moody, Daniel S. bfiddagh
and James s. Moss, dts.
The defendant William Moody not having entered
his appearance and given security according to the
act ot assembly and the rules of this court and Il an.
Pesring by satisfactory evidence that he is not an in
habiiant Of this couRry it is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here on the tenth day of the
next January term, and the bill of the plaintiff
aud that copy OF This order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published IN the city Of Richmond,
Tor two months snccessivey, and posted at the front
door OF the capitol, in the said city.
copy. Teste, WN. G. PRSpLEToN, C. C.
VIRGINIA:--At rules, holden in the clerks Office
of the superior court of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 9Th day of October, 1929 John
Sne'ngs George Snri''ngs and others, pitts against
VIM G. Eam, sdm'or with the will annexed Of Eliza
beth Keen, deed, and John Bankenship, dts
The defendant John Blankens,ip not having enter
ed hs appearance and given security according the
act of assembly and the rules Of this court and ap
pearins by satisfactory evidence, that he not an
habitan of this countrys IL is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the tenth day Of the
January term, and the bill of the plaintiffs; and
that copy of this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months successvey, and posted at the front door Of
the capitol, IN the said city. A copy.
Teste, WV. G. PESDIEroS, c. C.
VIRGlNiA.-At rules holden in the clerks office
at the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5th day Of October, 1922 Carter
Iiesly adnor de bonis Of Peter Kemp and admir-
of Sam, WIN. Sayre, aud also admor Of Thos Trice,
and Overton SesweIi and his wife, aud others dfts
The defendants oyerton Seawell and his wife, not
having entered their appearance and given security
according to the act assembly and the rules Of this
court and 1t appearing by satisfactory evidence, that
that they not inhabitants OF this country; is or
dered, that the said defendants do appear here on the
tenth day Of the next January term, and answer the
bill OF the plaintiffs; and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted 10 newspaper published in the
city of Richmond, tor two months successfully, aud
posted a, the front door Of the capitol in the said city
copy Teste, WV. 6. PESDLtroN, c. c.
NIRGNlA:--At rules holden IN tie clerk s office OF
the superior court of chanoery for the Richmond
district, the 5h day OF October 1929, Robert DAD
ney, plu against Walter shelton, surviving partner of
himself and p. r. Shelton decd. hate partners under
the firm Of T. T. Shelton Co. Munford Perks, Robt
Nelson. and other d, fits.
The defendants Munford Perks and Rubt Nelson
not having entered their appearance and given secur.
ity according to the uf Assembly and the rules n
this court, aud appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they not inhabitants ofhis coUntrys Il is order.
cd, that the said defendants do appear here on the
t'nh day ~ the next January term, end answer the
bill OF the plaintiff and that copy Of this order be
forthwith inserted in newspaper published IN the
city Of Richmond, tor months sUecessively, and
posted st the front door Of the capitol the said city
- Z eoR1 rssie, M, g, RSapfTyoz, =. :.