Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-12-25

NEPlRGiNiA:-At rules. holden in the clerks Office
~ of the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5th day OF October 1929: James
Molly, pltf, against VIM. Moody, Daniel S. ATddaeh
aud James :. Moss dts.
The defendant William Moody not having entered
his appeara and 6;Tcn security according to the
act OF assembly and the rules OF this court and APP
pearng, by satisfactory evideuc, that he is in
hsbant at this country: II Is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here on the tenth day Of the
next January tern, and the bill! of the plaintiff
aud that copy Of this order be forthwith inserted la
some newspaper published in the city Of Richmond,
for two months successfully and posted at the front
doIr Of the capitol, in the sail city.
copy. Tcstc, WV. g. PrxDLErox, c. C.
NTiRGlNf8:--At rules, holden in the clerks office
of tie superior court Of clancery for the Rich
mpnd district, the 5th day of October, 1899: John
Suelngs, George Shelings, and others, pitts. against
VIM. c. Elan, adm'Or with the will annexed OF Eliza
beth Keen, deed, and John Blaukenshp dts
The defendant John Blankenship not having enter
cd his appearance and given security according 10 the
oct Of assembly and the rules of this court and APP
pcarlng by satisfactory evidence that he is ~ in
hahant Of tins county. is orderedI that the said
defendant do appear here the tenth day % the next
January term, and the bill of the plaintiffs; and
that copy ut this order be forthwith inserted in some
newspaper published in the city OF Richmond, for two
months suecessive, and posted at the front door Of
Tic capitol M the SAID city; = copy.
/ NWGiNIA.-At rules, holden in the clerks o{ice
I of the superior court OF chanCoiy f1r the Rich
n0ud district, the 5t DAY oi October, 1899: Carter
BraAton and Mary G.. las wife, PRS. against Robert
Heay, sln,Or de bouis Of Peter Kemp, and sdm'r
Of sam VIII. Sayr,, aud also sdnOT Of Thus. Tricc,
and Ovrrtun Scawcli aUJ hs wife, and others, dts.
The defendants Overton Seawell and his wife, not
having entered their appearance AND given security
according the act assembly and the rules ~ tins
ccuri, and II appearing ~ satisfactory evidence, tia,
that they are not inhabitants Of this cOnnryi il rs
dcrcd that tle said defendants DO appear here ;he
tenth day OF tho ucXt January term, and answer TIC
bin Of the plaintiffs and that copy Of this order be
forthwith inserted ~ newspaper published in the
city of Richmond, Tor two months cessiyely, and
posted at the front door Of the capitol the said city
copy restc, WS q. PENDLtrov, c. G.
NIRGtNtA:-At rGes, holden IN tho clerks office 81
N the superior court Of ehancerv tor the Richmond
district, the 5ih dav of October 1929; Robert nab
rey, PITT, against Walter shelton surviving partner %
himself and =. Y. Shelton deed. late partners undo
the firui OF y. T. shelton & Co. MunfOrd Perks. Rob-
Nelson, and other drf,s
II The defendants MuniOrd Perks aud Robt EelsOI
having cutereJ their appearance and given secur
ty according to the act Uf Assembly and the rules o
this court, aud it appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they not Inhabitants OF tits countryi is order
cd, that the SAID defendants do appear here tn
tenth day &c the ncu January term, aud answer tlt
bill of the plaintiff and that copy Of this order HI
forthwith inserted iu newspaper published ~ tn
city Of Richmond, for months successively, an
posted the front door ofthe CAPITOL in the said city
a co?g. TeHs w. Q. REsOLtsoSs q q