Phenix gazette. [volume] (Alexandria [D.C.]) 1825-1833, 1829-06-16
From the New York Commercial Advertiser, June
VERY LATE FROM ENGLAND.

cial Advertiser have received copious files of
London papers to the 10Th day Of May, inclu>
sire, and regular flies of Lloyd's Lists to the
f.ieeuih.
Manufacturing Districts. Two or three of The
persons who were wounded at Rochdale have
died. Al Stockport serious disturbances have
taken place, and he aid Of the Military force
was called in A party Of the 67lh after nav
ing tecervCd quietly, the batteri"g OF stones &c.
for con,iderahle time, were compelled TO fiIe
in their own d fence. Sixty shots were ois-
charged and several persons were Wounded
III, magistrates had sworn in 500 special con-
stables, and at the last advices, the peace OF the
town had b. en- in a great degree restored
The Morning Hersll Of the l6tn May, says
matters are not yet se'tled between the manu-
facturers and the jeurneymen silk weayyrs in
Slitta'held,, and that 10 consequence The mas
ters have again ceased giving out work.
Three banks are mentioned in the Morning
Herald, as having stopped payment IN the
Wesi Of England, VIZ: that OF Messrs flnud
s. Co. Of Exeter, and two of Messrs. Sha,p *
Co. one at Ghard, and The other al Gre w$erne.
% These houses were connected with ma"utac-
turing operations, and their f,ilu els, no doub',
owing TO the callir g in Of the one pound notes
Thus The Small No,e Extinction Act has be,
gun 20 prUhuce us natural ,ffect-naniely, the
extinction of hose banks which rested upon
GU circulation for their existence"
SIR William Campbell, late Chief justice OF
Upper Can ida, lef' London on he 18th OF May
on his return home. He is thc bearer Of des-
patches to sir Jobn Cclbo.ne.
Canad'aa I9fairs-In The House Of Lords on
the l4'h al, Lord Goderich said, he held in his
h,nd portion from body of persons in Up
4. L., e ,no ,.A
grievances. He should not go into all the va
risty of topics introduced by the petitioners,
but there were some matters which ne thought
deserved the consideration of the House and
the Government. One of the fist allegations
rela'ed 10 he removal OF Mr.. Justice Willis,
as Puisne JUDGE of the Court of Kings B'nch
H. had been Informed that The law was against
Justice Willis in the position he had seen fit
10 AXE; hut he thought i, FL that the law should
be cIear'v known, and the principles of the
mother country followed as nearly as possible,
in the administration ofJustice The petition,
els complained also Of the constitution OF the
Legislative Couaci,, which contained several
members hol'iing office, who were hot compe
teut TO act as imparially was desirable; and
by which several laws agreeable 10 The people
had beeo rejected They complained that
tbrv had no c,nlroul owe, the acIs Of he Exec
u i've cou,c ell, and that they ough, to have the
power OF Impeachment They also desired
s,me changes respecting trials by jury. II"
Lord Goder,ch) thought ,he colonies were
best able to manage this and their other inter-
nal concerns for themselves He adveried 10
the importance Of the colonies to the mother
couotry. lie believed the people wsIe well dis
posed, and wee good subjects. Vie was, how
ever, a2prehensive thai he petition could not
be received, a. passage IN II referred 10
spec, h made IN the House of Commons last
Sc ,siou by Mr.. Huskisson. whom il named,
AMI 10 ~ hon sentiments were Attributed which
he did 40, utter. If the orders Of The house
OK lrde6 the petition in consequence Of is re-
4, RI 20 what had been said In Parliament and
CONNIE ntiug thereon, he should withdraw it.
ne Duke of Wellington conquered with the
nrb'e W. oun' in his anxiety to attend 10 the
in ere,;s IF the colonies, and the necessity Of
p,,s", ng ecod feeling between them and
thu mo- hsr country, He did mt concur
in the views of The petitioners, however,
as - carving their reconme nda;ions into eff
feet by Government or Parliament. He had
sfcn The petition for a considerable time, il be-
in, sju,l ar 10 the one presented 10 them. He
Safe tie case Of Judge Willis, which had
b.. before the Privy Council. The nature OF
the proceedings there would be explained by
Eur b. hurst. His majesly had approved Of
tie conduct Of Sir Prregrine MaItiaad, in dis
missing Justice Will, As 10 the desire of
the pe,itioners to nave individuals responsible
To the HOUSE of Assembly, for the acts of the
GoveInm.nI he did not consi Ter that The prin-
cipl, which might suit Great Britain. were
suitable TO their position in distan, colony
II thought II proper that great landed pro-
pr,e:or~ should he included in the Legislative
G. uncil; and that the Executive Council was
IN, al 4, nd
offs members also belonged to the Legislative
Council, it should not excite jealousy. In the
House az Lords there were peers who advised
the rrown, and o hers who did not.
Earl Ba hurst said that no hing could have
be- moi. proper han The dismissal Of Mr.. JUS
tict Willis. He lad thought proper to de-
clare all proceedings in the Ccur' for thirty
years, null aud void, wnen the Chief Justice
had moi been on the bench and had refused