Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-10-06
IAeiSn'-A,tOIs.,Dela en pr me eISrk,s oihse OF


Igcf.iA:-At lUiCs. Aoiucn ~ the clerks oihcc OF
Tho supcfior court of chancery for The RlchNnoad
ut Tor. tIs 81 y OF August, 1929; james Blair,
y nnh Ianc has vito, and Andrew Leslie, pitts. against
Wm. Clark, lat, sheriff OF Chesterfield, and a such
adunn'r DE- hanis non ~ John Ecicod, dccG. tr.ris-
tophcr Roberts, aud Ann as wife, Wa. Rodbird, ADD
janet hrs wife, and rhiiip Peach. and Sarah l"7 witc'
Elizabeth A,i,;t. and Wa. hylctt, joan S~potswood,
snl Mary has wife. Edward MOShy, an Sarah his
wife, aud Elizabeth tioodo, Francis Morrison, Ann
Morrison. Martha Morrison, AMI Robert Morrison,
Iansse Lyle, Coin Clarke, aud Mary his wife, and
Jchl Lylc, and Sarah Scott, dts.
THE scfcndauts. VIM. Rodbira, and E,lzabcth and
Mn Aylet'. mo- having entered heir appearance and
given security according to tho act Of assembly and
the rules offhis court, andi appearing by s~atisfacto-
~ evidence, that thcy are not inhabitants Of tins
country; It is ordered, that the said defendants do
nppsar her Nont tho Grst day ofthe next January term,
aud answer the bill of the plaintiffs; and that a copy
OF this order be forthwith inserted in some newspa-
per Published in the city ofEicbnond, for I've months
\ sicccssively, and posted atthc front door Of the cap
itol in the said city.
rs A copy. rcste, WV. G. PryprrroN, c. c..
VT8G1NiA:-A rules, hUllon IN the clerks Office q.
TIE superior couTi OEE.Oncc.y, EvSthe E.Saaio"d
district, te Sd day of August. 1929: John II. Davis,
pitc against Richard p. Boiling, john j.. Scott,
W.lGm il Pryor, Richard Pryor, John Field, SAmu-
ci Pryor, aud Thomas i. Harlaway, dts.
/. The defendants Richard r. Boiling, Richard Pryor
ana PhouGas q. HArdaw.Y not having entered their
appear anCe And given security according 10 he GSt Oi
assembly and the rules q t..s clua, auj it appearing
bS satisfactory evideace tGat they are not n.Aa1!taBts
uf this Country: Il Is ordered, that the said defendants
do appear here on the hrst day of the next January
term, and answer - bill # Lde piaintLi; aud that u
copy OF this order be furilwnh Inserted IN Sau,.
newspaper published ia ,ke city OF Richmond, Gftv.o
months suocoSsIvcy. aud posted &; tie .roAi door ..
the capitol ~ tie said City.
IS AcopT. Feste. EV. @. pENpLgro~. e c..
NiRG ,NIA.-At rules ho.leh IN Tue cicrN 5 once u
the superior court OF onUucery Tor the Richmond
district, the jrd day OF August, 1859. " u.ium W.
Mostly, pic. against John a.. Mos5y, Wade AIosbv.
r., BrockenboroVgA =. Morrison, ana Ajarv q. his.
vile, Joseph BOyan, Susan II. : Ised. L.tlcuerry "A.
Mos0y, Edward Z Mosby, yndhdm Robertson.
Roam. John Van Lew ElCo., Joshua Storrs. John
B. Penb.rton. Robert Anderson, Hail s Moore.
VIM. ID. Wron, Join Mos0y, ANA John L. Burton,
DIS,
Tie defendant L:tlebarry II. Mostly. ~. having
entered ais appearance 'uj given sccGJi,y Ascending
IN The act Oh assembly aNO the rules % Ups c1i.1j. 1aG
1t appearing by sattsiactIry evidence, that ha Is us,
ala mliabItant OF tals country; uls ordered, tia, ;Ic
SAID defendant 10 appear here on the first day o. tnu
next January term, aud answer the bui of the pain
til!And that a copy Of this ORDER be ,uhh1vith insert
ed IN some newspaper published In enc city ct .,ici-
fnond,t or Two months successiveiy, ana posted at The
front door Of the cantoi III the saiu CITY.
20 a copy. Irste, "N. u. PENuLfroN, c O..
TIRGINIA:-At rules. holden IN the clerks ofiCe
ofthc superior court Of chancery Tor The Rich
mond district, the Sd day or August. -. Rober,
Miller, and Charles Ellis, AID John Allan. lte mer-
chants and partners trading under the firm O.. Ellis n
Allan. pitts. against William Birch. aud RD-1 Lis
'' . '.''.
son, admir- with the will annexed Of Niinun johnson
decd, WIN. r. Johnson admir- dc bonis non Of Cania-
min Johnson decd, Pmlio Johnson. Susan PptI,r :
and Matt Jordan Il co, dis.
The defendants William Burch, aud Roxs his wife.
not having entered their appearance and given secu-
rlty according 70 the act OF assembly and the rules OF
tins court, and II appearing, by satisfactory evidence.
that they are not inhahttonts ofthis country: it's or
dored, that the SAID defendants &c appear here on tho
fist day Of the next january torn, aud answer Tho
brll oftke plaintiffs and that a COPY of tins order he
t,TfiV 81 IN IDsartpd in 1,r,o v..- a. . =.
the ely OF Richmond. Tor two nfo.!tns succes-ivelv.
and posted n the front door of the CAPITOL, m tie
said city. a copy. Tesie.
70 william G Pr>otrro~, q. r..
VIReiNrA:-A rules, holden IN the clerk office
oFthc superior court Of chanoe-y for TIE Rich
mond district, the 81 day.of August, 1920: Gus,avus
AdOlrhus Muir. afm'0r De boHis non with The will nm 3
neXcd of Francis Muir, deed. Diff against Bartclof,
P. Todd, a@in'or. sc. Of WilHam Yates. ir. d. cd. L.
scph W: Harper, adm'or ae bonis non Of 3 .niamin p.
Yates, decd, ef,n OF Of William
Yates. ir. doc'd, anil George " Freamaa and Ann
his wife, dts.
The defendants George W. Frcoman and An, his
10. not having entered their appearance and 6rvcn
security according 20 the act OF assembly and tl"
rules ri tln5 count, and il appearing by satisfactory
evidence that they are not inhabitants of this coun-
try: IL is ordered. that the said dcfeudants DO aopcar
here on the first Day of the next January term. and
answer the bill Of tie plaintiff; and that a COPY Of
this order be forthwith inserted in SOM newspaper
published in thr city Of Richmond, for two months
Excessively. and posted Mt The front door oftie c~ri-
t2l il? e she said city. u 4 copy. Tss.o.
NIRGTyIA:-At Eu'es bolicn in tie Clerks o4ics OF
the superior court Of cllnccIy for the Richmond
district, tho - dry ofAugis., 1899: William Moore.
ItC against Richard j. Adams, Join A.. adams.
Tio5. J. Adams, N.l. Clarke and Susanl his wife.
Roger Mallory, sergeant OF tic town Of Pctersburo.
ond a. such adn'or Of Mary Sands, decd. Thos. +.
Robertson, Mary J. Ycnccy, and Francis Taucy, and
benjamin Linton, the only cIi.d, aud Edward Wat
kins,. sdIn'or ofSeInucl linton, dis.
TIode.enidnts Tios. !. adams, VIM Clarke. and
Susan his wife, and Ihys. y. Robertson, not havino
catered thor appearance and given security o%ccofIul5
= the actof assembly and tie rules If This court. a,I
ltappeailng, by satisfactory evidence, that tloy af.
rot nlhobitluts Of his country: 10 is ordered. lln'
NE SAID dcicnJon's ap tpiccg here on Che Gis, day or
the next January tenn. and ars..ar tLc LHi .ft-
plaintiff and that a copy Of this order be forthwith
inserted III some Newspaper published in the CITY Of
IIchuloGj, Tor two months siccc siyelv. and posted
at the front door Of the capitol. in tre.a.i cty