Delaware journal. [volume] (Wilmington [Del.]) 1827-1832, 1829-02-24
from the Courier of the 9th January.1

Is
ceenys recall the slightest degree the consequence of
his letter to Dr. Curtis because it had anspired to any
person, Doctor Curtis and Murray excepted before the first
Instant eighteen hours after the letter of recall had been ia
the hands of the Lord Lieutenant word two to those
who indulge this suppositon The Marquis received letter
from Doctor Curtis ncosng in it the Duke Of Wengons
letter to him and the Doctors reply On the 23d he replies
the Doctor Would it be very unnatural proceeding that
the Marquis meaning to give opinion little in accord
with that of the Duke should think of fairness
dispatch to the Duke acopy of his the day
which he sent that to the Doctor The despatch
sent off the 3d. would reach the Duke Thursday night
Friday morning. the 26th On the 18th the papers stated
his Grace to have gone Windsor to have interview with
his Maesybefore whom, supposng him to have received
the day before copy the Naquss letter, he would ma
tay lay it, and take his Majesys commands upon it. On
Sunday, the 2sth the papers informed us that Council
held--and wer then determined recall his Exceency,
the letter recall off the afternoon of Sunday would
reach Dublin the evening of the Both Is there any impos
sibity abrdy in this Nay, it at all likely that the
Marquis with the openness that belongs him, would suffer
the Duke of Wellington to remain IN perfect ignorance OF his
having written such letter until he in the Dublin
London Papers If be said that if he had informed
the Duke he would only have acted the Duke did in
sending him copy Of his letter the Doctor reply that
the different The Dukes not, believe,
tended to be made pubcand besides the repetition OF
the sentiments he had expressed in Parliament which
known to the Lord Lieutenant But whether the recall was
or was of the letter Doctor Curtis still
o,ios that the Marquis could no longer remain Lord
Lieutenant.
Nothing has yet transprcd with respect to his Lordsips
successor But would again and again impress this truth
upon the public mind that the Catholic Question would not
have advanced by the Marquis of Angesays continuance
in Irelan nor will be impaired retarded by his recall It
is the Legislature the Maqus says truly 6 that de-
| eide this great question
[From the Times Of January 81
Lord Angcsea letter written the 23d of December
his recall reached Dublin the 10th In the interval, il had
anped person but the two Catholic Archbshops Cur
tbs and Murray 1t made public until the first inst,
eighteen hours after the letter of recall had been the hands
| of the Lord Lieutenant
The real melancholy Truth is that Lord Angcsea was found
too liberal in his poicyoo independent in his haaete-too
much penetrated with the of Irish sfernsstoo well
qualified attach the hearts of the peopcto foster their
hopes and to unfit them tor future disappontncatS, suit
the jealous spirit which has passed from Court Cabinet, and
vce within the last sixteen years. since the deceae
/ of Mr. Percevai
Lord Angesea has been recalled, because high principles
him dcmer than high prices and because amongst the
difficulties complained Of by another sort Of etter-wn,er
from Lord Anglesny surrounding the consideration OF the
Catholic Question: the paramount and only difficulty
his Grace glanced aviz that of resigniag.
We unfortunately ruled by generation, Who though
thew may not be without administrative
talent, men of Theoretically little minds All public vr-
tue sneeed by such people weakness the petence
to branded by their conscientious mpudence rank and foul
hypocrcy Nothing can be done with the Tory place Of
the time but by bringing force to bear upon thetht
OF the middle classes of the communitywhch political arti-
fee and sesness have not yet corrupted whose impressions
strong their hearts fresh heirppose grave their enusi
asn tangible, with whom virtue is not name, duIy a
scaecrow These in day saved Queen Of England
they may be wrought upon to save the empire day Also
Let the press Try them, and they will the call. Ire
land lost if Lord Angesea, and the INTEGRITY honor,
and humanity, for which woud-be chastisement is inflicted
on hm,be abandoned by the people. He has acted noby.
and therefore has judged wisely but his judgment as
erroneous with respect policy it sound principle
say support him 1t is honesty and independence which the
nation Nor his equitable beoc
his Dismissal than his conduct since has been admirable for
the highest degree OF manness temper and dignity The
enthusiasm in Dublin great, that there tribute OF
public affection which he could not command Yet does he
decline all the honors which the grateful people wonld force
upon him. for the sake of peace and from the fear exciting
animosites.