Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-03-16

men in the onion. Canton or stuff dresses not no.
cessary, as he has suitable machines to finish them il
sent TO nm IN the situation above m1ntionod.g
Gentlemen are likewise informed, that he scours
and renewsin colour Coats pantaoons and vests 10.
geter with allknds apparel and frcqucsted repairs
them IN the neatest manner. As usual all kinds OF
piece goods dyed, and hot or cod pressed; furniture
stuffs cleansed and re-dycd in the ncatcst manner
". b Tickets will be issued on leaving the Goods
with hiin, and requests they will be presented on nm
plicotion for the same.
In Gooeitand County Court, l9Gl JanuaIy, 1929:
Joseph Pollard, pit.
John . RsdiST Samuel rcahe and Mcwo Is c""Sfr''
This day plaintiff by his attorney and filed lbs hin
and appearing 10 the satisfaction OF the count, lein
uan John M Kedfod, not nhabani this State is
ordered, that the said defendant BEDFORD do apprar
here on Inc hIst day Of May court next and the m
M some public newspaper printed in the city of Richmond,
months s.ceessye and ta, another copy be posted the
court days and IL 10 further ordered thar defendants Samuel
herise dispose any money or effects in their hands be-
longing the defendant John NJ Rcdor 1 ms 10 enable hen
20 pay TO the plaintiff the debt in the plaintiff bill mentioned
9 copy. Tele, MAR. w. MILLER, nc. &C
VIRGINIA; At'oes, holden i" the clerks oflrr of tie
superior Of r,sncrry 70, the Rchn,ond district
the 2nd day of February, 1899: Isaac VancIerL MIR
against Henry Davis & Co. aud Henry w. Noncurr n nd
John binson surviving partners of Moncure, Robin
a. PleRsants, dts
The defendants Henry Davis & Co, not having entered
their appearance anil given security according 10 the e, f
assembly aud the rules of this aud appearing by
satisfactory evidence that they uha this
country; IL is ordered that the defendant do auurar
here the FIRST day of the June term d swr the
hillof the plaintiff; add that copy Of this forth
with inserted IN some newspaper published in the city Of
Richmond for two meath successfully aud posted at the
front door Of the capitol in the said city.
. : copy Iests, WEI. g. PENDrEroS G. &.
In Hanoper. County Court, Jan. 28. 1899
MILLER BROW of the and the adminis,ra tor
Of Anne b. Brown, dec. plE AGAINST Patrick Brown
David Richardson aud Mary H. his wi fe, who was Mav
II. Brown, James b. Clop,on, TYaldesrave CIopon Pa
trick Copton, Miller cop,on, Thomas Clopton, David r.
Copton, William Clopton, Anne " Thotipson who was
Anne w Clopton, Winston Harwond, aud Margaret his
wife who Margaret Clopton, nd Mary c. Yarbrrurh
an inant daughter Of Mary T. Yarbroush who was Mary
T. Clopton, children of Margaret Brown and John s n
Brown, Patrick Brown. Fanny p. Brown, Mary Brown,
Sarah Anne Brown, William T.. Brown aud Allied Brown
children of William Brown d|is-IN CHANCERY.
The defendants James r. Cioptou, WalIrrrayr Cl,,.
ion Miller Clopton, Thomas Clopton, John ;. T. Brown
Patrick Blown, Mary Brown, Sara Ammo Brown Uiliam
T. Brown, Alfred Brown and Patrick Brown uni bavin,
entered their appearance and given security according
20 the act Of assembly and the of this court aud
IL appearing the satisfaction The court that ,hpv
nha bitSns Of this country; ordered tina, the
said defendants do appear here the first d,y oil
April and answer the bill uf the paintiR and
that copy Of this order be forthwith in some
newspaper published in the city Of Richmond for two
months successfully aud posted the front door of the
court house Of this county.
copy Tcs,e PHILIP p. WINSTON. C. nc.
VIRGINIA: At superior court OF chancrry holden AZ
the Capitol in the city Of Richmond on the 2Oth dav
oil June 1870 Joshua Smithson, pit. against Edward
Cunningham, sole acting executor OF Achibald Moore
deed. John I. Robertson and Maria NJ his wife Ia s
Maria NJ. Moore, divsee Of the said Archibald Moore
decd. William Davidson aud Natha nir and James DID
surviving partners of the late mercantile firm of Dicks
Moore g. Co.
Ts in which the bill hath seen taken f,r conlcs
sed against the defendants john T. Robertson and Mari,
NJ his wife, and in which the plaintiff appears m have
proceeded ~ the mode prescribed by against tho de-
fendTpis, William Davidson aud NausnicI and James
der, who are out of the country, this day to he
I'LL, 1sn IyC., 4
eNhhits and argued by COUNSEL On cuusidcra ton
whefeo the court doth order the defendant Edward
Cunn"sham render an Of his administration of
Che estate ot his testator, before of the
court VINO rs directed to examine, and settle the
samr, and make report thereof court, with any
matters specially stated, deemed peiucnt by himself So
which may be required by the parties IN hc So stated
.2h FeJrttsrN 1899
The doth ord, that the Cnmoissioncf vino p,av
execute the order made IN this cause the twentieth dav
ct June 1870 do IN addition the
state account ~ tho real of which Archibald None
died seized and posscsed aud uf any debs binding tie
real estate, that may have been paid uf personal
assets Of said Moore, and report the court
win any matters specially stated, drcncd pertinent by
hmse or which may be required by the parties he
ttated.
Copies. Trsic, Wm. e. PeNpLEroN, &C.
Cop,mi'sioner's Office, Richmond, Fcb &c. 1929
The parties Interested will pIcase To take notice thar
have appointed the 30h day of March next m commence
the du'es directed IN the foregoing orders of court, on
vhch day ats O'Clock, NJ they arc rruifrd IN attend
~ my Office ~ this city, with their accounts vouchers and
documents ready for examination and settlement
feo. LO-W4 HILARY BAKER. Com'r.
Circulating Library.
NAgTT'S Circ,1,t,,,, 7 IL