Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-11-02

VusCiNIA:-At sppeuor court OF c,,ane.,v h,.,
OF July 1926 BSrwe I,assc eN'or Of William ian.hu"S
,ne younger aud admir- o iian. Lam BONE IN, ellie
smith; admir- James sSC AID Mary C. Msb k aS
Nv eny Webb her snarl'a assigned ieend her in ,h,
This cause this day to be heard ON H.. Hill, ,
Peuyu oi voc pnmuh Tales exhibits, and nm,
INWARD uaiel pn the eleventh day of Aunust Ias ..i 49,
John ID Watkins aud john ii Christian f,,hch , $3.50 "
~ ~ we s,'l"an' and by Consent of the tlanuf is
received as ''enoe was argued by COUNSEL ON
wLsrro the court deciding At this time thai Tho ,,
% -, ~, fy we JUG nen' tn favor OF the plaintiff in preirs.
ing ma point tor Its future consideration doth adndr. os,,
ns. ,"e %owms accounts aud statements be taken
W e pa'ues oeoe commissioners Oh this court-E,ni
an aceo" between tile plaintiff of William 49,
e the younsc and as administrator Of iliam I.,ls,c
the elder aud the defendant Richard g. Smith adn'ins,
James Webb IN which the latter cha,sed vii, ~
SUN o Two hundred and hiiyvc dollars viii, Six ne cS
interest thereon from the fifteenth day OF February fsia ~,
pu aid eleven dollars three costs of s hca
VIC oun, o, INC Judgment recovered by the plaintiff as ADM
n'>,'ar Of William Lansbouc elder sgams the said
III the November term, eighteen hundred and TWENTY
TWO, o. e"co county court, acopy which fled among
e EXHIBITS and that said defendant is 10 be cleied for ,,v,
nu"ed hy eight dollars sixty four cents with
10Y OF AuSu 1872 being the OF the judgment obtained
" the sad deendan against Francis Foster admir- with the
VIII annexed OF John tuseT ot ol,po, with Iyi;an,
tire younger, and the is also Directed
20 attach To- HAT account statement costs showing ,h.
COSTS incurred by the defendant the prcccuon or hS s
~ W sa Poster quaint to be paid ~ the said pain, as
t'u William Lang bone the elder ana the said Janrs -
he chas S S ct The defendant, in which the latter %
Interest forty dollars fy-seve en- cents from the
{" Jnnc i6-O, as nscerancd by tire of John ID lVa,k
'o IT, Christian as above monoed1hrd an account
NC administration OF the estate james r. Webb Inv ,bn
defendant Richard G. Smith, IA, taking which nccn ,'u
AUDITED account referred - IN his answer IS to c cous;a w
CORRECT as To the es received aud expended liable IN s
elseu ana aishe' and the conn ascertain the c,
:" receipts ana Payments, and distinguish between So
Claims PAM 10y the said Sml bound The heirs Of L., ~
Nroo anu what were paid of the personal estate and n
what payments were made hy said defendant of S;i
'TaG' trblS, aud AT what after his adnrisa,io ~
ucp.S Ho beng oi superior dignity the PLAINTIFFS c.i,
N'c PA" ny n', aud a hat tine-t nuuL an ,cco,n 49,
'eiI estate OF the sad Wehb either legal cquitsble which %
, ~ or devise passed 10 the infant Defendant Mar q yVcy
@ ' amount winch came 10 hcr hands, 10 the hands S
'' E'A ior her use aud the probable annual ya OF a.,
-mc ana also any balance amount arsn. FINN h. ~ ~
uc lands conveyed 10y the said James =. Webb in his ra
p i'nIy urts aud Richard G. Smith as trustees to sec,
49, '. l"m Cunningham mentioned in tie answer of dc
' e'Uldh ann by whom the has been received. a
i"'Iy t'eh tn the creditor, OF james p Webb yyIo ,,
Pedi before the SAID commissioners aud nv peton act f
% .i'"s " agree To contribute pnporiionaby IN the nav
mean Z" the costs at this prove their said claims yb;ch
s' SN cams TIE commissions is directed To examine
% ma Se''e AMI Va the court report with any na,iers s,.
olaiy stated deemed pertinent by himself or which
required by the parties h. So stated ~ ""' "p
-- = co!y- lesIe, Us CABANlSS. u. {.