Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-11-28

-, 4 -fen, Eu, S;'h
iashon, and superior qualify. ~, - 80
ViRGiNiA:-A Rules, holden in the Clerk,. oase.
of the superior Court of Chaucerv 20, The p,sb.
rnond district, the 5th Cay Of Oe,oh-- 1890 ,c,.r
Vs. iiarvie IN his right cx or of Nargarr,
Hsrvie deed pItE against VIM gr,,ckenbro,gh d.
ct Edwin g. Harvie. and others, deft's
The defendant John Hsrvie not having entered hin
appearance and gwen security according the Acf
" Assembly and the rules at this court and il apoe.
ing ny 'ory evidence, THAT he is inhabi-
a"t OF TIA" cou ty, 1t ordered, that the said defend
l 90 sP ear here o" he tenth day of the jana.
'! eF"' ana answer the bill of the piAiEIfl; and that
copy ut this order be forthwith insete,, ~ some
newspaper published inthe city uf Rchomnd Tor two
ots successfully, AND posted at tb from, door % the
capitol, IN the said city. A COPY Tes,e "
- WV. C. PtxpIKrox,c. C.
NHGINIA.At rules, holden IN the clerk : office OF
. The superior court of chancery for the R,cmnond
district the 5ill day Of October, 1899: Thomas H,w
er'on, surviving partner OF Apperson { Howeron n
against Henry 3 Jeremiah Rbede5. and Alexander 2
Richard NJ Cunningham, dts. .... -
The defendants Henry & Jeremiah ubod.s oh
richard NJ Cunningham, not having entered the;r
HGpenrapee and given security according to the se
# assembly and The rules of this cour+ and II
ing, BY satisfactory evidence thar they are not inh.b
anS of this country is ordered that the said defen
dants do appear here the tenth day of The next
January term and answer the bill of the plaintiff and
that copy % this order he forthwith inserted in snn,
newspaper punished in the city of Richmond for two
monh successyey, and posted front door of the
capitol, in the said city -' -" - -
AeoPy 1este, wn G. PESDLErox. c. C
w GINiA:-At rules holden the clerks Office of
he Rtch
district the 5,h day of October 1899: Charles Swift
Hughes. PIT. Billy sneed and Jesse sneed, dts
Inc defendant Billy Sneed not having entered his
appearance and gwen security according the act OF
Assembly and the rules of this Court and il appearpe
by satisfactory evidence that he an inhabitant of
this country; it u ordered, the said defendant a
appear here the tenth day of The ne 1t January term
and answer the bill of the plaintiff and that copy Of
this order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published III the city of Richmond fer two months sue
cess'el, and posted at the front door OF the capitol
in the said city A copy. Trste ...' l.. -
WV. C. PkNHLrroS, c.
ETIkGiNIA:-At rules, holden in the clerks ofiice
OF the superior OF chancery for the Rich.
'mond district the 9Th day of October, 1929: John
s"engs George snellings and others, pitts. against
Wn. - San adnI'or with the will annexed of Elizn-
bsF iteer deed. and John Blapsenship dts.
e Sre defendant John Bankeryh:p upt having enter
~ his appearance and given security according TO the
act of assembly and the rules OF this court and 1t aI.
pearng by satisfactory evidence, that he is moi an in.
hah tant OF this country it is ordered. that said
defendant do appear here the tenth day of the next
January term, ami the bill of the plaintiffs and
that copy Ot this order be Forthwith in SONG
newspaper published in the city of Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted the fruntrdour ,f
the capitol, in The said city. copy. e.
Teste, WIN. C. pxspirros, c. c.
court eSaao i s a ne Re9 a .%Reaa g
@! March, 1899 Edward Palmer and Thomas l. Pemlf,
Henry lowering Morris lowering
DONG business under the firm OF Henry Lowering Co Alex
trading gn"er The arm Cus!uan Andrew, anJ OILS, Dunlop
The defendants Henry lowering lowering and Robert
eves not havg entered ter appearance and given SEM,
y according to the of assembly and the this court
and appearing by satisfactory evidence that they are moi
inhabitants OF this country; ordered said defendants
90 mere on the Tsi day OF the
b az the plaintiffs aud that copy of this order forthwith
e' ~ S"e NEWSPAPER published nihe city Of Richmond,
for two weeks successfully and posted the font door
capitol, IN the SAID cty ........i-
81 copy. Tesie, NS @ PESnIrroS G e.
NVlRGlNlA:-At rules holden in the clerks Office al
" the superior of chancery for the RicImond
district, the 5th day Of October 1922 Adene AIlson
PIT against VIM. selden wm. IL. Roanc, Cary Sell
den, Charles Selden, Joseph seden and other defts
The defendant Cary Selden rot having entered bis
appearance and given security according TO the act of
Assembly and the rules Of this court, and appearing
by satisfactory evidence, that lac is inhabtant OF
THIS cOun,ry it is ordered that the said defendants do
appear here the tenth day of the January term
and answer the bill of the plaintiil; and tha copy OF
this order be forthwith inserted I'm some bewsnaner
published in the city of Richmond, for months sac
cessNey, and posted the front door of the capitol
IN the said city. copy. Tcse, '"
WV. G. PrSDtEroS c. C.
NVlRGlNlA'-At rules, holden in the Office cerk's
OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 9Th day Of October 1929 Ermion
w SHELTON, pltf. against Peter =. Archer SEN John
r Mosely, Edward Haskins, John A. Archer Peter r
Archer, Jr. and other dts.
The defendant Peter +. Archer " not having en-,
tered his appearance and given security according 10
the act of assembly and the rules Of this court and IL
appearing, by satisfactory evidence. that he is an
nhaotant OF s country; Is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the tenth day the next
January term, and answer tho bill of the plaintiff
and that copy of this be forthwith inserted IN
some newspaper published n the city of Richmond
for two months successfully, and posted al the front
door OF the capitol, in the said city.
COPY. Tcsle, WV. 6 PESnRroN s.. @
EIRGlNlA.--At rules holden in the clerks Office %
the superior court OF chancery for the Richmond
district, the 5th day of October 1929. VIM A. stone
Rob't W. Bragg Asher stone, Thos Kceton, Nm
Wood and Daniel W. Bayne, pltfs. against David
Street admr of Sterling Smith, deed Newton o. Smith
and other defs.
The defendant Newton o. Suth not having tered
his appearance aud given security according TO the
81 Assembly and tie rules Of this court aud appear
ing by satisfactory evidence, that he is not M inbab
tant OF this country; is ordered tina, the said d.
ctdsnt do appear here op The tenth DAY ct the next
January term, and answer the bill ofthc pliinshnd
that copy OF this order be forth with inserted ~ some
newspaper published in the city of RichmOnd tor two
months suecessivey, and posted at the front door ~
the capitol, in the said city. copy Trstc,
II WV G. PENDLErOS, g. G..