Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1829-09-15

tnnse who mad personal knowledge of the facts and
dld not intend to ask for any. We are NOT however,
altogether unproridei in this respect Rot 49," IL -,
anticipate mat This statement viii be denied bv .n,,
POI the parties, and presume that proof would be s,,
pe.huous. ne knowledge of the transaction was
not confined at The time. TO one two or three ner
SONS; and IT some might feel inclined to rsoue do
NAL others VIII not Should proof be REQUIRED bv
any one having right to requre lot us be placed n,
a position where compel witnesses r., COW,
forward and testify, and there shall be no defect Of
evidence $3.50 VI
We have done. The preparation of This article
has afforded US no pleasure.--Everv ,ay we hccnrn
more and more reluctant to utter and publish ,h;n
which may disturb the rcpose of individuals hnwsye-
situated But the ided that the cha rge coinno;ned -.
by .ur Illusions come 'cith an i'll grace from one sit.
ua,cd as we have shown Mr. Barry to be wns too
oo'rnsive Upon our minds to be suppressed when
commenting upon his case The appeals to us from
abroad and the 'unqualifed denial,' have made the
rest inevitable; and if this exposition shall asaist our
sountrymen in forming correct estimates of n,,h,;c
men and public affairs, we shall have no lust case
Tor regret" '
| t II was arcr this that the s,i, was ,o,,, 49,
e bond; to which, will be recoec,e,l two grounds of de-
what court the suit should brought in The Other If s aS
would obviously have the effect throwing the yhoc
era Aeigs) without any recourse or means of osn
ad"nb return for this singular confidence and kind
ness on his part w '
ihJust'ce to Mr. Barry, give the following fror,
the Frankfort Argus, published by Amos Kendall, &,
Co The reader will bear in mind thai tho o;s. IS
the last charge against MIR Barry is not the obtain
ing blank commission, but putting it up sale 70 .b
highest bidder. - >'''
The Commentator Of yesterday devotes ahout
! -FOUR columns and half to .cbarGe of defaIca,;
against Maj. Barry. We Shall in due time n,,a,,,t
To TINS Tordy production. For the present we wo,iJ
rsmark that Mr.. Danna has fuiled to prove sby the
OF .he Federal Court" that Maj. Barry is
loeiahNer TO the government. The statements and
HiSh"ntlohs relative to the blank commission the
sac OF the Lexington Post Office, the proceeds of
me- 1 n &C ARE UNTRUE. 1t was needless for
Mr. Parma after making number, of false s,.ta
ments to inform his readers that he co,Id NM 49,,
mem rms admission would render reply at,nust
tlis naked assertion, is nothin. in this COM
munity. 1.-THE pretcndedfacts detailed bv the E,,.
ofthe Commentator, use his own lan,s hnnIs
mare common ms, stare what WILDE tho,abt If !,
SHOULD appear IN the sequel that Henry Clay himself
I IKE n'n ~ho 'o1s entrusted mita blank coro,is-
strn oy Posfmd'ter General .Hegs for the Ley;,rfo
Gbffe' More hereafter" D'
We shall keep readers informed oftbe nroorasss
ofihis affair.
/ RHODE lsIAND-DufT says the 'kand of reform has
as yee' scarcely reached that State" No doubt pm
IiShhehts ana rewards will be showered very Lavish
~ 'here IN consequence of the result of the recnn,
e'ecl'ohs-H jackson men enough can be found in
lhe state to iii oil the Offices if not they will be i'm
ported.
! : iALs OF w RATH? No. Oceans of scrrriJa,s !,
VectiVe and blaekgnardism now pouring out bv
puff upon the heads of the Editors of the National
Journal In this occupation he is truly in his element
why VIII not the National Gazette, that dignifcd
'custos morum" ofthc press, take him to task
Sorgreat is our love for orr consistent neirl,hor
frnir,f
letter OF John Taylor of Caroline. Truly the torn,
consistent is most applicable to the worthy editor s
such as ne was 90 years ago. such he is now. and
VIII continue to be to the end of the chapter
From the National Journal.
| One word nose to the Richmond Ero,;o ~
nave done that print injustice, in surprising that -
had III az respects degenerated from its former char
aeter' testimony exists, for which the chara cter OF
the witness will obtain unqualified Difference indna
ting that Mr. Richie conspicuous twenty ycor
ago Tor some traits OF conduct which we had per-
ceived only IN his recent tcrgiversations. This wit
ness is the late venerable JouH TAYLOR of VIM.
1t seems that Mr. Il. had at one period of the can
vass for the Presidential election in lgO89 exnrssso
ms preference Of MIR. Monroe over Mr. Madison
put to nee Col. iaylor's words ssnGernoyys cbon
sing to oin the strongest drfy he could not toroiy
chose who stood their ground and supported the
mdn OF their choice, adheria sieadi TO their ,,inrs
''PfeS. and to The side which they had taken anos
fafes !" all ages hare been persecuio,s. Col Tavlor
was one ofthose whose firnlness Mr. RitcfIe could
not forgive At the close of series of letters m
the latter, elected by his falsc assertions "calnm
nous Inslnatons, ann clover a,tiiiees as an Editor
Col. L. draws the following portrait:
hHvng no acquaintance with you, I n,sy have mistaken
your Character but inord'Hote seconce the frinre and a
pings OF leaning without the substance ufscf igoyae
81 he principles Of ren6caaism appear among it's pIominept
features These principles founded in moral recile
10 abuse the liberty Of HePre sow discussions among re-
pibhcas to become species IF trained 6y tie boD n
Jor hunting regulations, reuorSeLess Spanish 6LoE
hotad assert ntseeod confess make amends b se
rih md TO dfIGud Subscribers bp ys,no tbe,
io" and "'thoding t'uare features neitie of good 90
cian good c'tzs'' ora good man Jeleries OF Wild
would have been startled xti,a proposal 10 q inv 10
one OF Their own Comrades upon false testimony and wiito
hearing hrs deeuce on have withheld o,n yovr reader 49,
hrst letter, the Pete 'ded your attack and sy
ques etterS necessary To- meet II; you have forced Them n co
late The maxim "oud aieran Pn,teu and n ldge no, ,