Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-12-15

P"''PS'-'ust received, from their factory hu
"hANNlSS, son 81 BROTHERS.
nov Corner of Nam and Iith streets.
Il .Ncso and Fashionable .4rf5cyc
AoiES fashionable bronze Slippers, ust resni.
dec GRAMNTSS, SON & BRorHERs
\V'hG'NiA-At rules holden in the clerks Office os
~ the superior court OF chancerv for the R;ch "
district, the 9th day of October 1899 Atl-in. aii;
pitt against VIM Seldcn, VIM. H. ROAM -. GO u,
ne, ChSrtes Sclden, Joseph Selden and other def,s
Tie defendant Gary Selen not having cr,oraJ H.
appearance and given security accor,l;ne ., III, CIV ms
Assembly and the rules of this court and il ann.;n
~ sSac.ory evidence, that he is not an nhabi,nnt OF
inns country; 1t is ordered, that the said defcrI,
sppeir here on the tenth day of the ne II J,nnar
unu answer The bill OF the psintif and that COW ;
'1r outT DC forthwith inserted in newspaprr
PuoSeu 'h the CITY ut Richmond, for two months s,,c
cesSNey and posted at the front door of the con;,i
IN the SAID CITY, copy. reste, 49, ~''''''
WIZ. c. PENDLErox. &C.
" lh"lNiA-At rules, holden in the clerk's oiTo. y
the superior court of chancerv for m. r;.i y,
uis'rlci' the 9Th daY of October 1929: Rober Dah
ney' PITT against Walter Shelton. surviving par,,er ~
n'mSeh and T. T. Shelton decd. late partners ,ndor
the tirm OF y. 7. Shelton & Co MunforI p.L nt,
Nelson, and other d, fts SNS' "oot
he defendants Munford Perks and Rob't N.;Ison
not having entered their appearance and given ssr,,
ny according to The act IF Assembly and 1h. .'I.S
ms court a"d appearing, by satisfactory evidence
' they arc not inhabitants OF this country: il is order
ed, that the said defendants do apDear here ~ IL
tenth day of the next January term and snsu, ,t c
on, OF the pa,nii and that copy of this order be
I"',, inserted IN some newspaper published in the
Guy oi richmond, tor two months successfully md
posted at he front door of the capitol in the said c
a copy. Itste, WN. c. PESnLErox, c. G.
\VlRGlNIA;-At rules, holden ia the off. cI..,,'
OF me superior cour, of clancery for the Rich.
nnnd district, the 5th day of October 1870: Ennin,
w Ske tom pltf against Peter 7. Archer Sen. LAIN
T. Mosely, Edward IIaskins John A. Archer Peter r
Archer, Jr. and other dts. -
The defendant Peter r. Archer Tr nm, hov;r, ~
tSrea ms appearance and given security ACCORDING i
e ac' "t assembly and the rules of this court and il
aPPearhf ny satisfactory evidence that he il not an
OF inns country: II is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here the tenth tiay of the nex
January TERM and answer the bill of the plaintiff.
anu 'hat copy ct this order be forthwith inserted -;
some newspaper published IN the CITY of Richmor1
"r TWO months successfully, and posted at the front
door OF the capitol in the said CITY "'
= COPY, Leste, WV. G. PENnLErox. e. G
y iHSiNIA-At rules, holden in the clerks off,,
OF the superior court of chancery for the R;ch
mono district, the 9Th day of October 1900. Go.
nraH" anu Mary u. ms wife. pitts sganst Robert
tea'y aun or de boniS non of Peter Kemp and adn,-
OF Sam WIZ Sayr", and also adm'or Of 1hos Trce
dnm , NEeL'oh 9eaweH and his wife, and others DTS
me defendants Overton Seawell and his VIC. 49,,
having entered their appearance and given sccnr,,
according TO tie act OF assembly and the rules Of Ills
court and appearing by satisfactory evidence d.
that they are not inhabitants of this conn,rv. :, ~
uered mat NE said defendants do appear here ON che
tenth day OF the next January term, and answer tic
. uI .ie p"'ht'Si and that copy of this order be
Ioranwn inserted IN some newspaper published in tie
CITY ct h'chmond, for two months uccessiveIy, and
posted al the front door of the capitol in the said %
/ copy Teste, WIN. g. PENnLrrox, C. e.
\VlKC'NlA:-At rules, holden in the clerks odic.
~ OF the superior court Of chancery for the Rich
mond district, the 5th day of October 1929. Mary Bs
ling and Thomas Shore and Maria Harriet his wife and
samuel Pryor, pitts against James mcfarland James
u. Kendall, VIM. IL. Pryor, ex'or of Richard Prvor
dec and Il. r. Boiling and other dts
The defendants WIN. ~. Pryor and Richard p not
ing not having entered their appearance and given Sc
cury according to the act Of Assembly and the rules
o. TINS court audit appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they inhabitants of this country il is or
uered' That the said defendants do appear here on the
tenth day OF the next January term, and answer the
n ct the plantfis and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in the
cry OF richmond, for two months successfully, and
posted at the from, door Of the capitol the said CITY,
copy. Teste, WIN. G.. PESnEEroY, G. e.