Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-01-03
GeTsrI AaseMnlp.
HOUSE. or DULEC4TrS,

FRrpAv. Dec. ID, 1926
|, . message announced from the Senate that that
ha' passed the bills entitled an act chanrnc- Tho
times ofhoiding certain courts-an act to chance tho
pace ~ ho!!iIT separate elections IN the county &c
Preston an act djsposing of sum Of money in tho
na''os on the examiners OF inc branch pilots on tho
haprafannock Rlvcr--ln act % amend AN ucr I'm IN
corporate the new Baltimore Inanract,Iripo con,,rv
passed February 18th, I828-an acs releasinr to Mar
garrt - Wargen'r, the commemorative r;ol,t n
certain "gacy-Gnd IN act conccrnino certaI, mo.
Prince William. "
They have also passed The bill entitled nm oc, 70
authoHse Archer Brown TO erect toll bri!o. ac-oss
MattaPony river. Mt Dnukrk with amendments i,
Delegates ~ 0 -
They agree % the amendment nronosod bv ,l,o
h"uae OF Delegates. to thor first alnendpont 10 tho
OIL emitted m act to authorize the inhabitants rs
! Tue town oi eIishurg in the county of Brooke 20
raise SUM OF money by lottery for the nnr1osc.
therein Innnt'onrd; and rccede from their sncord
amendment. 10 the said bill, to Which the house of
Delegates disagreed "
On. motion Of Mr. Ui'Fs The bill authorship Ar
chcr bro"n 70 erect toll bridge acros Matanonv,
was laid nm III, table !''-
'Rr. ct"ig moved to tr'e up tho Joint order Of. ,e
day, which had for its object the election of an audi.
or OF public accounts. This being agreed TO hv tho
mousse ne nominated James r. Heath for that otiic.
who was reelected without opp1qition
"Ir. Yo1r"" moved IN take ,ir tho bill "a, ,,,n;,,,
Thomas W. White, which was laid on the ta lie some
DAYS since. THIS being agreed to. he moved to Gn
tie blank with the sum OF $3.50 10 ana stated the
reaass which the committee had been oove-ocf H.,
IN FIXING upon that sum.
(Ins bill was TO compensate T. w. White f,r loss
allcdgcd by him TO be sustained III executinr a con-
tract with the Commonwealth, for PRINTING ;y,rr,I.
of Convention Gel
0Jr. Ruthcfoo,d entered into some EXPLANATIONS 90
show that the bauk should be filed with the sum II
500 10. '''' QUA "
Mr.. Booker of Amclio moved the indefinite p,,t.
poncment of the bl--1'hc motion wasnot Hornsd -,
"'. IIwhert"ord1nade some further explanations 20
prove the equity OF making the proposed co;npensa-
ton to Dir. White. The question was then tnkon on
lling the blank with the Of 1910 II as moved h,
MIR. Rutherford and rejected. H. vas then
moved by Mr. FVacy to I'll the blank with The sun, If
$500 - which was also rejected
Mr. Craig moved 20 Ell the blank viii. the SUN q;
So5O and used some Orclble remarks IN fhe house IN
the proprcty Of admitting the claim II was epnorcn
nc thought that there had been breach OF contraor
OF tne part OF inc executive which had resulted in
M injury to an Individual the amount coid not pe1
maps be precisely asceraned but from the host nior
nation that could DO obtained it was about tLo
amount with w.icII h7 proposed 20 I'll tic blans.-
could u bc question with This house in doubtful
case Ike this, whether they would rive dollar Too
much, Ur dollar too littlcS
Mr. Pnrccy moved 10 f fhc blank yilh Tie sign, NJ
$3.50 ~, and made explanations of the
upon which the claim was founded. Mr. DUoyyosk-
ca TOT me reading OF tie contract brorc he could be
s1,igfcd W give his Dote. ~
Mr.. R'fhcrtoOrd moved 20 I'll the blank viii, tho
SUM Of 500 10, this appearing 10 be the araonnt due
by the rule of calculation.
This amendment accepted by Mr. Y1pcey.
mr.. Roofcr moved the Indefinite postponouent RI
the whole subject IN he ground that il was q CON
tract Tor so much paper and Mr.. White had b.cn
PAD Tor al the printing hc had really executed Sc
Ncgatiycd. .air. R"therfoord entered INTO Some fur
ther explanations TO shcw The propriety Of nanq the
proposed allowance to Mr. White. Tie qaos.ibn ,gas
III taken on GiLup fhc bat ,,,4b a. -. : r se N
- lost. " WV
.I. cgig iaovcd TO gu 10 blank with ,hc sum oC
$50 lie thought hst hlg IS iiie was entitled o COM
pInsatioh for The loss ha had sustained He susiajn
Cd w't9 great force the justice OF the application
ne INDIVIDUAL had certainly sustained an injury from
the iai'nre On the part of the Executive.
.r HrdTio" NO ed to G he blank with he sum OF
- 3-lhis wa III The couniQn principle o. cCnpro.
missing by splitting the difference, &c. &c.
&c. Hr Crog replied that he would be no party 10 this
i'NslOn 81 iJss between al Individual and % com
''" "'f"h ~ 'nc pats rc'asi0ing tle LOSE ouaji