Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-03-17

N States the district Of Virginia in
the month Of FEB 1929 james Thompson and Richard Nn
and JouC Hem don, of Epa phrodIs Tmerake
deceased, pits noisf Peter Murdoch and John Hamilton SIR
viving partners Of William Cunningham g. Co. defsS CHas-
rbe defendants having their appearance and
E eSuty 70 RUE o. The court and sppea
State of Vrgniaon the motion of the plaintiffs w their
sell IS ordered that the said defendants appear before
cy Richmond day of the next term
and answer the plaintiffs bill that copy he forth
rnon for two months succcssivc aud posted a. the int or
OF the capitol in the said CITY,
a copy Teste I'D. JEFPRIFS, GU.
superior court of chancery for tire Richmoud district
the End day Of February, 1922 Isaac Vancieef, PHI
against Henry Davis ~ Co. and Henry w. Noncrre. an6
John Robinson, surviving partners of Eoncure, Robin
en- IL PleaSants, dts.
The defendants Henry Davis & Co. mt la wing entered
their appearance and given security according the of
assembly and the rules of this aud appearing by
satisfactory evidence that they this
county; It Is ordered that the said defendants do appear
hefe The 6fs day OF the June answer
bi OF the PLAINTIFF aod that copy Of this order be forth
with nseded IN some newspaper published in q city OF
Richmond for two month successfully and posted the
front door OF the pitol in tine said city.
copy. Teste, wv. G. PEEDLETov c. c.
VIRGINIA: AT superior OF chsnceIy hDIden III
the Capitol in the city Of Richmond, the ooh day
&C June 1896 Joshua Stsithson, pit. against Edward
Cunninrhanr sole acting executor of Arehb4d Moote
iced. John T. Robertsou and Maria NJ his WIFE late
Maria ~. Moore, divsre of the Archibald Moore
decd. iliiari Davidson. aud Nathan sI and Dick
surviving partners of the late mercantile firm Of Dicks
Moore " Co.
This n which The hill hath been taken Tor couGes.
se against The defendants, john - Robertson aud Maria
Nj his wife, and in which tJe plaintiff appear 10 hive
proceeded in tie mode presoTIoed By law against
fndaois, William Davidson aad Nathaniel and James
Dick, WHO arc out Of the county Ibis ia to be
lizard the hill, the answer Of the Other defendant and
Grhbiis, AMI argprd by cnuise On oonsfc afion
ehsreo me c"rt doth ordrr that tie defrndan Edward
Cunni"sham render of his administration of
the estate ot his ieeaiof, before Commissioner ~ the
topH' who directed TO Examine, state aud settle the
snd msk" rcpnst irrcof the court. with any
uaiiers specially staeh decmrd pertinent v hitnssG s
"aIch may be required by the parties 10 o stated
I'D February, 1920.
The cobd dufn order thar the Counis,,oneI who nav
eNecOts the made caGss the w enticIh dgv
tfJune iBs6, do addition s therein
slate Etcuu1f The fealrsate of which Archibald hIon,s
fd seized and possessed ard any debts binding the
faa estate, fat aay have been paid Of he personal
bes ~ snid Moore, aud fepnft the the eOur,
riihauy DatTrs specially stated decmed pertinent rs
imsef which may BE- required ny the parties be
GsieL
Copies. Tesie, wu. g. PENDLEToN. G. q.
Co.amiss,on,rs ONE, Ricamond, Ftb. 10, 1929.
The parties Interested win please notce net
appointed tie son day March next To commence
ps dass drecten in the nrrgoing orders of oomf, on
Vhieh Day ats oiock. NJ. they required To attend
- my alice a tbs city, with eir accounts vouchers and
oocUa,eDts ready Tor examination and seiiement.
Leo. 49--W4, HILARY BAKER, Conn.
a TRUNK was put nio tho possession Of pas
"a srngrf on board the steamboat Potomac on the
IN lsn,msy. NJ City Point, BY mistake for his lie
has since recovered his aud wishes the owner Of the
one IN bis possession to obtain his own, il is small
rcd hair tfuBk, FoSfurthcr Information enquire at
tae nlsg Df'cg fcb 25