Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-10-13

1
I mora district, the I'D d1v OF August. 1922: Saral
Williamson. cx'ix of George Williamson dec d, Dit,
against Garland Thompson, lr. ex'or OF William
Mitchell, VINO exor OF Thomas Mitchell ,lrcI,
james lnnis, Thomas Ii. Mitchell, Franris ]. Mitch
ell, Francis Johnson md Barbara his wife, Alexand,,
W.. George &. aud Anna Maria Mitchell am Tho
mus Lambert, dts.
| The defendants james Inns and Thomas H. Mitch
ell not having entered their appearances and given
curity according TO the assembly ana the, rulu
OF this court, and appea ring by satisfactory evenc.
That they arc moi inhabitants OF this couutrv Il is or
dered that the said defendants do appear here the
hrst day OF the next and answer the bill of the
Plaintiff and that copy of this order be forthwith in
serted III some newspaper published III the City OF
Richmond, for two months succcssvelv aud posted
at the front door ofthe capitol in the said city.
~ copy Teste. WM. &. PEnDLEroN, &C.
NIRG rnIA;-At rules. holden IN the clerks Office
of The superior court Of chancery for the Rich
Carter pltf against William Gait, William Bryde.
commonly called William Brydie Napier Robert
Sharpe and Elizabeth his wife, formerly Brydie. and
William II. Dyer and Nancy his wife, formerly Bry-
die, Elizabeth Randolph, Ann " Lee, Mary BraXton,
William Carter, Bernard ~. Carter, VIM. =. Carter
John Hill Carter, Baden Duancy and Mary his vito
formerly Carter, Hill Cortcr, Thomas Carter. VIM
F Wickham, and Ann his wife, Edmund f. Wick
ham. ard Lucy his wife, Joseph G. Cabell, and Mary
his wife, Plrke Farley Carter. infant daughter Of
Charles Carter ir. Eliz1bnth Taylor, Edmund Berke-
ley, Ann Berkeley, Nathaniel Bnrwell, and Nancy
Burwe Pntsy Burwel,, and Nathaniel Buryvcll, in.
Ns1f
Elizabeth Carter, ard Nancy Carter, dfts
The defendants WIN. 8rydic, commonly called
WIN. Brydie Napier VIM II. DYER, aud Nancy his
wife, formerly Brydie, nna Bernard VI. Carter, not
having entered their appearance and given security
according the act OF assembly g. the rules of his court
and II appearing by satisfactory evidence that .hcv
are not inhabitants Of this coutry is ordered that
tho ead defendants do appear here on the first DIV
ofthe next january term and answer the hill of ,b
pialntih; and that copy of this order be forthwith
inserted IN come newspaper published in the CITY of
Richmond tor two mouths successiveiy, and posted
at the front door ofthe capitol, in the said City
20 a copy. Teste, WM. q. PENpLETuS &C
ViReiNIAAt rules, held clerks office of the
ccu OF chancery for the Richmond district the 5t day of
lam Rowic John Seabrook Survivors Of ,bens " ~
Alexander Fulton, decd William Armstrong David Burr
Wight Thomas Covles, John u Esrace William y Mcom
benjamin Brande, Leva Webb Fleming James teo T
sanis, dts. W i"a
Inc defendant tohn pkh moi having on,ce his appcar
hce ard gwen security according act of assembly and
'S VI nis court and u appearing, nv satisfactory evil
ence mat ne rs not an nhaban of country; il is ordered
next January and bill of te planuff ana ha
SCpS OF inns order be forthwith inserted newspaper
ana posted at the font door OF the capitol IN said ci,y
- copy Iese, WIN. g. PIxDLfroa, &C
VIEGINAAt rules, holden lexis office Of the s.
t oi ehamceTy los the Richmond district sd ay Of
suSG los Alos Emanuel, pit agains, j. J. o,enh snd
eo.y MS y, we William vi, Dandrse late sheriff Of cnrco
Iomnneh ior administration, Robert g. Marks aud awrence
The Defendants j. Joseph and Sarah vi. r;s ,,, Dbl
MARKS not having entered their appearance and oiver
;on 70 he act OF assembly and the rules this court,
u appearing by satisfactory evidence they re moi mia
@ 81 ,hs c1uniry IS ofdareh that the defendants co
M @ nie on he othe next January ern aud answer
inserted IN some newspaper published in the city of Richnog
iG i'gns excessively and posted at the font door ote
IS copy. Te,,r, W. C PrxD1rrov.o &C
HenTco county court Aug. 18th, 1870 John 81 S,1,T
Pr against Georgia Catherine Jones an infant, NV Jo
Aios sheriff Of tie county I!enr.co her guarS,n J
'el assigned b the defend b, ia tis Sun Samuel
The Defendant john Estep not having entered III, s,.,,
snee ana gwen security according the 4 u assembly sd
ha he insfsui Of ihs county, 4, o,' ey,'see
e sad Defendant do appear here the fra fsy of the
ierr aud answer tie bill Of tie plaintiff and a
copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in come -
she1 ~ ihe eY Of Richmond, r months and
% copy Tere, CHA'S WILLS, Dvy. Ok.
Y sopefof eonr ~ cbsn1erv holden =,
1sle I W ,s cIy % sichnond the 1ath day June
Oic w. '""n Fefkmson, decd, kcard Boruin AID A.
Ihs day came the parties ny their counsel aud ,b. ,
NssI"s a'Hfey considered the pfeHses AID lie -
e9msel hereupou had, doth oder rhsi tie e 90, IT,, o.
Miller. DO render account Of his ~ ~,
o. us 'ss'alm john feTkuFon. decd sle1ving ,l,e s,s W.
us hands Aforesaid bp,,e,te, n, III, ' y.
w1 To sarah Norris, the late wife On the dclsi 80
NOIss ana that the defendant Oliver do rense, i 80
o VIC commissioners, account IL the p,o(ees ~ 49,,
property conveyed to him ne rsise Nv n ne , ~ ,Iu
100 M 'ne same Dabney NORRIS, and referred 10 IN ,l main,
ihs b and ofhc disbursements tIereoC aaI a. 49, i pau
payment oi which charged upon ie sa.d trn, ,,ons M
'h't he ZANE commissioner do an accom-, of nm. 49,
C''uhed ny the defendant Richard Borun aud ri ,te
20 VIZ anne swell for tie board said jOru d. 49,
wv une nc ved with the defendant Dabnoy Alorts =, H. ~
lle paywonts actually 10 the said lo,, 49, ,I ~
we ehl1 uoDt "heh several tine coniini,,te, H.
u.oc,el 10 eNamine and report court with a,y ,o.o
specially stated deemed pertinent Inv himself or ,,,i ,s
ISlcg Ny I've Pdnes 10 he slated eavo 10 g,veu a.,
Pdmu 10 amend his bill aud make Nirno Aiors ne s,
traitor Of sarah aonss, decd defendant i his c %
seat go te rules Tor 'hat puuora ~ ''0' WHICH
copy. Teste WM O.. PENDLETON
- CsNtii@ONlRs OyTEE,
~ ,.. . Richmond, August 23h, 1873
Inc parties interested u please notice tat Ebavs
appointed he 10th day Of nctober 10 commence , a.
counts directed m the foregoing order Of court ON which dsO
1ocock ~ they are required attend INV Office IN ,b
cHy' wan heH accOTnts vouchers aud documents reodo a.
anaon aud settlement anl with office copies Of the neccs