Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-10-16

,i,Fj,uh,shsss proposed TOOL will open on 1T "
n ahdhe viii continue receiveshs offer Of
hr /, ms :, rs ior,ser ivrrrmcu, may have
-r b. wi, 'rsa tina, they $50 o the scholastic yea
months One vsca,u only wall be given from Tue Isl o.
August the 1T rf ccioaer, during which The hoard viii p,
"a nr osn ~'o clause to remain a yearly ssos,
al,scl. mcng. books and saonary The two ias VIII
h., "rrured elsewhere; while the mendns can done
very sn< cost nv seurs,rescs IN tie VINO VIII
branches taught, pursued, viii hc such
give .hs Boys all The requisite psraTson 70, entering any o.
mural education viii bcmade the primary aud paramount object
H. Direct letters tpos pa) to the yubsc,iber at Rich
mand, ur,l the Convention rises; afterwards ElawoIi
Essex county. Virginia The distances this place from the
fnh,v;nc known points IS of Richmond
Ia of Bowne 81 south Fredericksburg The
steamboat fatuxeul passes within 81 miles of IT, Thurs
day from Baltimore and returns i% I'd SrTSy
The Editors of the National u,clgeuccr and Fredericksburg
llrrald will please insert the above.
Eiu'-wood Essex county, Va. oct. 10 ,9-wat
VINt;LNIA:-Ai superior court OF cnanrey, holden at
the former capitol ia the ey OF ',msburs the list DAY
the Younger and admir- of William Lansbome the cider aud
Gcoe has 3d Of SSSss ssr"f Spy aS Ws a
Nv ficy Webb her guardian, assigned defend her IN this
sui diss IN. .b,
pcon ut the plaintiff ales, and exhibits, aud l
award dated the eleventh day of August 1920, sgied by
ruhn ID Watkins and John II CHRISTIAN. (Which ofucd
the o the deeuan aud 10y consent OF the laut IS
ice'ved eVideuce argued by COUNSEL: on consolidation
liable to pay The Judgment IN favor she plaintiff prefer
10 the defendants own simple contract claims but tesefv
any that point of future consideration doth adudc, order
rnd decree that the following aud statements he taken
btwsen the parties, before commissioner OF this couri:
account between the paintii as executor OF William Lang
inne tive younger, and administrator of w ium Laugbois
the elder, and the defendant Richard Sruh,
james r. Webb in which the latter is he charged with the
OF two hundred and ihy-hVe dollars with per
interest thereon, from the fifteenth day OF February, 1914, I'll
paid, deeyen dollars niueiyih al st being
c of the Judgment recovered by ,le plaintiff,
ns,Taiof Of William Ianghone the ecr, against the said
dciendan AT the November en eighteen hunacd H,wcuty
the exhibits, and that said defendant he credited IOr
hundred and fy eight dollars and sixty fouI cents, MI eres
the of six per pea aunu fO'n tie
of August 1922 being tho Judgment ohisueo
~ hc said defendant against Francis Foster, s with tho
M annexed of john Foster, who joint uhgor h William
Ian.bou the younger and the commissioned also objected
lalanre il the should he opinion hereafter
costs incurred by the defendant in tie prosecution OF hts sal,
sgns, ,he said Foster ought bo paid ~ the said plaintiff,
ex'or of William Langbone, jr-Second.
Chg sad William iagbome the elder the said james T.
ebb, the nestate OF the defendant, whcl the latter
be charged with fy-two dollars and fifty seven cents witt
Interest forty dollars and fyseven from the fft
ofJune 1920 ascertahed by the award at John y Watkins
an 1ohn n Chrsan as ABOVE mentioned IhT, Az accom-
Of tho administration of the estate of James Weh Ivy tia
oeienodnt Richard G smith, Ia taking winch account u
audited account referred in his bu considered
correct as 10 the items received and expended liable he
charged and fafed am the comm is ascertain 'he date
OF receipts aud payments and TO distinguish between suci
ciuis paid 10y the said Smith bound the heirs of james l.
Webb and what werc paid out OF the personal estate aud @
vat payments were made by The SAID defendant OF sinph
conac debts and at what time after his administration,
paid ny him, what tme-Fourl an accountof the
real OF The said Webb either legal equitable
descent devise passed TO tie infant defendant Ma.y e. u
md the amount which her hands, hands
her Guardian for her and the probable anuoal value
same and also balance
The hnds conveyed By the said James T. Webb lifetime
10 Henry Curtis ana Richard G Smith, as trustees
neb 90 William Cunningham, in answer OF tine
infant defendant and by whom the received: ard
liberty given the creditors Of James p Webb
aprear before the SAID commissioner and petition forth
Their claims and agree to contribute pOporouaay e
heh' on the cossoi TINS SUIT to roFe their said claims, when
si2e and settle, aud 10 the
cay stated deemed pertinent by himself which may be
r'!loued by The parties to he 81 stalled
A copy. Tcsie, Us CARANlSS. %.
VHeINIAi-A superior of cianccry holden at the
orneT capitol in the cny OF Wiians5urE the twenty
ond day Of July, thousand eight bundled twenty
e5ht Buweil Basni, executor of William Ian sorne tie
younger, deceased, and administrator of William LangLOyne
I've ecsf, deceased, and John Haes administrator George
Satage. pits Richard g. Smith, administrator James
Neb deceased, and Mary {. Webb an infant by Henry
HNe4o, her guardian assigned, dts
on1nonn Of the plaintiff Hales TX counsel the court do,b
order mat the order entered his twenty FIRST esv
81 July one thousand eight hundred w eny SIX he 30
aheucd as TO cause 10 read JOhn aes admir- Georrc
savage, and "Joseph Fosef instead of ''Johu Foster
a copy Teste, Ed. CHRISTIAN C. c.
CoNnms1oxrR A-ner-o~'s Ogrrcr
williamsburg Isl SEPT 1879 {
nave appointed the November next 10
execute the foregoing ORDER Of day by niue
ONCE WIN Their books, and testimony with COPIES Of the
court papers, and with this original order.
11.w5tc RO ANDERSON, Co,n'r.
VIhGlNIA:-Ata superior cfancerv held AZ the
eaP,o IN the city of Richmond, Thursday, July 3D.
1899 Robert o. Scott and other pits Gg.Ist Nathaniel I,r
ffson, exor OF Edmund Harrison, decd, aud other dts
rof reasons appearing the court much of e orlcr
Hsoc W , cause on The oh Of February 1923 direct, the