Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-10-08


aud answer the bill OF the plaintiff, n copy of this
Richmond SUCCESSFULLY and posted at the iun,
door OF the capitol, III the said city.
/ 40 Acopy. Tcste, WV. G. PrNpttroN,
Vmer1NAt rules, holden clerks of tie superior
court o ehdnccry for the Richmond district, the Sd day
SsIsi 10y; Morris Emanuel pit against j. Joseph and
county, whom the of Marks decd, was
committed Tor administration, Robot o. Marks, and Lawrence
The defendants J. Joseph and Sarah his Wife, and Robert
o. Marks not having entered their appearance and given
ray according To The ac oi assembly aud the rules of this
an' naPrears, by satisfactory evidence that they iuhs
"nt oil this country ofdored that the said defendants o
appear here the anuay crn and answer
The bill OF the plaintiff and that copy this order he forthwith
inserted ~ spapcr published the Richmond
Tor successvey aud posted at the Iur, door OF the
capitol, in the SAID city.
. copy Tesrc, WV 6. rHr,rrov.oo
VTIRGtHIA:-AL rules holden IN tue clerk Office
OF the superior court Of chauccyy for the Rich
mond district, the Sd day of August, 1922 Agnes p.
NJ. j. Brown aud Aaron ]. Brown, isfant children of
Richardson Brown decd, who sue BY Frederick
Lucy, their guardian and mex; friend, against Mary
Brown, widow OF Richardson Brown, decd Edward
! NJ Brown. John Brown. Lewis H Brown. Jabcz n.
Brown, and Thomas X. Brown, and John Brown
son. cY'rS Of said Richardson Brown, dacd, Thomas
/ lirCbos. and l.ucy bis N-i2, aud Willis PotTcSs, and
RchcCoa bis wife, DIS
The defendants willis Fortress and Rcbacca his
vile. not having entered ,hCIr appearance and ~iven
security according to the act of assembly and the
rules Of this colrt, and 1t appearing. by satisfactory
evidence, that thcy not nh Ihtuns OF this
try 1t is ordered that the said defendants do appear
here on the first day Of the January term. and
answer the bill Of n" Plaintiffs and th1t "a COW ~
this order he forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published in the city OF Richmond, for two months
successfully. and posted at tie front door OF tie cap
itol. IN the said city.
IS a copy. Testc, WV. G. Pr>n,trox, @ C.
ETIEGiNIA:--.lt rules. holden IN the CLERKS Office
of the superior court of chauccry for the Rich
mond district, the 3D. day of August, 1929: Philip
Nylctt, Sherfof King William county, and commit
tee Of the estate of fancey Lipscomb decd PITT.
against James Fox, and Thos III. Fox, admo'rs with
ihe will annexed, of John Fox, decd. Hudson p.
Lpscomb, William Stone, adrnor Of John Lord,
deco, Mordecai Abraham, personal representative
of r. Mitchell. decd, David Dqtcntine. Abraham
Archer, COrbn Braxton, and James Edwards DIS
The defendant Hudson =. Lipscomb, not having
entered h's appearance and given security ACCORDING
TO the act of assembly, and he rules vf this court
and appearing, by satisfactory evidence, that he
not M habant ot this couary il is ordered that the
SAID defendant do appear here, Tie first day of tho
next January term, and answer Sc bill of the plain
tIif and thai copy of this order be forthwith inser-
ted IN some spaper published in the city of Rch-
oEd, iOI two honiha successfully, and posted at the
I front door Of :hc capitol IN The SAID city.
20 A copy. Trste, WV. q. PsNpLrro~ G. c.
! UmGINrA:-it rule holden in The clerk office Of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the Bird day OF August, 1899 Beverley Ran
dolPh e% OF the last will and testament Of Harry
Iieth, dec, who was eX Or Of Samuel Clarke. dec
ptf' ogan-t John T. Ciopon, admor with tire will an
neXed of David Clopton dec, SIoeby Pulliam, and
Samuel y. Pularn, trust for Ann e. Pulliam and
her family. Nathaniel Ciop,on, Alfred Clopton, Ro.
4 bert NJ. PuaGa, and Ann G.. his wife, late Ann g.
Clopton, David CloPton, Albert G.. Clcp,on. and Ed
/ ward Curt, rnd Sarah LIS wife, late Sarah Copton.
dts.
! The defendants Alfred Clopton David CIoD,on. AL
bert g. Clopton, and Edward Curd, and Sarah his
VILE not having entered their appearance and piyen
security according to the act Of Assembly aud The
rules OF tins court, and 1t appearing, by satisfactory
evidence that they not inhabitants of this cou-
try II Is ordered, that the said defendants DO appcar
here on the first day of the next January term and
answer the bill of the Plaintiff and that copy this
order be forthwith inserted IN some newspaper pub
llsIed in the city Of Richmond, for two months sue
cessivcly and posted IT the ifoHt door Of the capitol
/ III the said city.
"a \ copy. Testc. WM. g. PEvprErov. r.
/ NiRG INIA:--At rules, holden the ci,rk office o.
! the superior court Of chancery for the r ;chnond
district, the Sd day of August 1890: Mary Fuouo
/ admnx with The viii annexed Of VIM Fugun, decd
PIT: against Richard J. Faulkner and Elizabeth A.
Ire wile, samuel &. Faulkner, Edward Powell. adm r
/ Of Cole Powell, decd and Fitzhugh Powell, dts.
The defendant Samuel &. Faulkner not having on
tered hs appearance and given security according 10
tie act Of assembly ant the rules Of this court ard if
appearing by satisfactory evidence that he is not an
nhaban' OF tu country: IL is ordered, that the said
defendant do appear here the ilTst day of the next
January term, and answer the bill Of The plaintiff
and that copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in
some newspaper published in the City Of Richmond
iOrtwO months excessively, md posted AT the front
door of the capitol, IN the said city.
7G a COPY I'cnc WI. G. 'PEvDLrrox, G C.
V,UeiNiA--ht rules, holden ~ the clerks Office Of
I the superior court Of chanccry for the Richmond
district, the Sd day Of August. 1899: lanes blair
and Jane bis wife, and Andrew Leslie pltis against
WIN. Clarke late sheriff Of Chesterfield and az s.,ch
adTor de bOnis non OF John Mcleod decd Chris
tophcr Roberts, mad Am his wife, WIN. Rodbird, and
Jane his wife and Philip Peach and Sarah hia wife.
| Elizabeth Aylelt, and WIN. Aylcu John Spotswood
4 and Mary hIs WIFE Edward Mosby, nm Sarah bis
we, aud Elizabeth Gopde, FroncIs Morrison, Ann
7 Morrison, Martha Morrison, and Robert Morrison
James Lyle, Colin Clarke, aud Mary lis wife, and
John Lyle, and Sarah Scott. dGs.
The defendants. VIM Rodbird, and Elizabeth and
\ WIN Ayictt not having entered their appearance md
given security according TO the act OF assembly md
the rules OF THIS court and appearing by saslacto-
~ eSdence, that they not Inhabitants Of flds
country: u IS ordered, that the said defendants do
appear horc the first day the next January rn,
AID answer the h'ii Of the plaintiffs and that e,py
II this order be forthwith inserted in SOME ne,yspn
per pobshodin the city Of Rchm 81, for two months
nd rocfaI Al Il. NJ