Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-09-04
RtrDttr0ttU cen 11t0
FnIpAY MORNING., sErr. =. isoa
Gea Jaeksoa eiH ysu.,,i N, Gy1,Jy 49,, ..-;-s -

|
reasoned without his host. lie was mistaken in SIM,
p0es '''e people would support such course upon
s"cn an avowcd motive. There wen, tbos, NOV
cunning who found that Daft wns ,oo hold a.,
ana although we firmly believe that the ntnin;s,,.
non Is ac,ing upon the pracipc avow.] bv D,e, 80,
1t must DC done with some show of dcccncv. us,oo
The moan dcsicablc u,tcn,o; to pros,,o,. ,Lo -
'ers OF those removed. Not whisper now or ro,,,-
lung and punishiug in the Jackson miners
Our nechhor the Enquirer, will not ,ir,c,,, a,
prove Or condemn, but stands aloof for evidence. n,
'"e same h"c repnbishing all the ISLANDERS i, ran
rake from those fi,ul.noutbed ,s r,
'"'"K 10 deceive any into belief Tint there j.
possibility gifts conlenin- am act or Tho n
"'n's'raif"n' no matter what the evidence NAV no
"'esS II DC IN manner similar TO its notice md nm
parent u'S"pprova OF the appointment, of Editors IN
oce' which was no ccnsurc of the course pursued nv
Inv present administration bu, only ex PRESSING an an
prchcnSon that might and would in f,,p,c h.
oy others cr evil purposes, and instacinr Mr. t,,,v
Wirt' was this but negatively saypu i, w,s al
IN "rn' Jackson 70 dp Mat which it would BE- wro,
in others 10 follow "a precedent Ana ,h,,
cause 81 the untrcnnded confidence Of the worth,
editor In the Integrity of GEN. Jackson
The Enquirer said on the 18th DIV oe An.
a rrpt
al NorfhA, Miles King, aipi the appointment of Sas
LeStand IN Ills s,chl, that eve are unnconuip, al ;,h
'he reasons which indh,c the administration 20 s,,-
P,''e"e HiF' plies King as Navy agent al Nor.
iok. Until they arc explicitly developed. il s on,
'"' our power 10 approve or condemn his ,e,,.l -,
JUS, one week ago Jes,ingly offered a reward FIR
this information for tho benefit of the Editor r H.
enquirer. mother week has clanscd. and No, ono
Nvo volt finn 8 ~
tiication. How is this: Has there not vc, hoo,
time enough Tor the officials at Washington to r:yc
The cue? Is the scent cold, Or are thew ,vsi,in,, -
De possessed of Miles Kings books and papers, to en-
bic them 10 hunt up some seeming Caw in h;s oe;;,
conduct We have heard this shrewdly surmised.
THIS removal shall not sleep in silence. We shall
fing the changes Oh It. 1t Is which come, so
near home to us. in which the facts can be so o.,
SLY "Scer'a'neu' that before we quit il, we expect 10
satisfy every candid jackson man. that in this rms.
at least there has been prescription for opinions
sake; tina, Gen. Jackson has punished an enemy and
rewarded friend
we IRE pat in possession Of sundry facts in rela
u ron 70 inns matter, winch we shall probably make
Puhc ~ the proper time. OF one thing however our
readers may rest assured, Chat Mr.. King is not
ueiar!ier' KS part of the underplot, we rcpuhisi
Inc following affidavits from the Norfolk Herald:
fHos. g. BRorGmroY. ESQ.
Sir,By publishing yn will ollrp vo,
oitrdrnt servant, HAKS ARn ce%t'iI f
Having heard of a ePor, circulation INJURIOUS to INV cha
racer, TIA! oath taken contrary 10 Known fac ~, mo
to do the Stone Work for the Navy Yard Wall for "a when %
ms explanation to tine public. D.
The fc's simply hese-Upw of two wears avo IN.
was contracts" 90 be done Tor less my pro,osaIs As
believed aud thought oft The coni,ac, "a, 900,
evef annulIed or not carried into execuiou-he ovs,nr
nd's h,ugn more land the plan Of the Wall was under
Stood to he altered very uuci increasing the amount of the &
intended To oeI ior !! again, whe told It had BEEN
sn Vo. o' 81 per Nj Tor the brck work. (IoW much for
o.ne SNOW 'Ll wished to precisely what had
.r p' ai1 went TO Washington for that purpose but the
osd CouG not be found; had copy and applied 10 the
Notary VINO Grew up my proposals lie said that aie lavo,
~, Siy % hem by him. Tor upwards ola year. deemed
" W, Importance and they were destroyed with other
papers We endeayored then bring to our ecolci,ou be
.m I've eehes nnde[ his zeal to have about 81
i heen falsely asserted but best of nav knoviee 81
wall was Sl-ihe impression Notary and ny"it h ~"
snhe ana We ahdavits, (Which are my and
Of all WHO may desire iom) wle, re6r,c, g, ,', @
arm 'h' statement IwGuld lie unreasonable 60 nppoe t
could or would swear PoyiGUeyas the ar,cuar no ,.,
The stone work, as had no interest ia that the offer iu
made by another, Capt PaTks,) inserted in pv
But as to the principal object the brick work nv i
was more coTcet N having stalled between aud no
have lately understood that NY proposals. aov, ALLUDED -
have been found have seen item The price ~ ,i
ooe woIk may possibly oe So b. said; II so il proves
we nsFecOrcthn ~ tie Notary well myself on small
oCee, III hs proposals ~ which Immediately com.
price more ke doilass stone work as can m &
Tor that price. ~ - " ''' w "oNo
may he asked what the object certificates, h.
We're they gwen for! They prove delivered In r,n
sails in due form, although they could not h. found in
ion nor do NON know they ever acted on " "'s
Portsmouth, 2bth August, 1929.
10 Enron o. ruy Hrpur
Sir,-Relative 10 communication which a,,,...1 -. ,
N0rlOk papers Of this day, dated Portsmouth Aug, 90,
1879 aud signed "Baruard ONcIr have no beei NV; =;
saying that the statement IN said communicated, ' c,, Wv
respects myself aud whefe my name has been n,,od o.
cnTroborains evidence Is, almost entirely incorrect W
In the first place. necessarily be insrcd fo,o ,,
statement Of MIR ONeil that when drew ot,t n 80 po
Io nm dId ~ my official capacity Notary Public lnd M
@ ought 10 have put said prorosas on rec srdS Now
we tcl v, MAT ~ MARCH, 1877 did not hold any n0ciaI
HpPuhuenh bI was engaged ~ mercantile pursu aud rev
proposals at 'be request aud solely To- obice Mr. ONe
sceoI ni's aiencn and Of great nportance is that
u WI ONe called al my Office the latter cnd o July last,
M .nc purpose OF making his deposition and obtaining my
as p the hols d'shHehT stpfed n HIM, n Impression
.rP,,g "'"d Vh'n ~ hsprgosa, fort Sfo,e Work,
va 1'r "2NqTs or uPgoris pcr perch ~ reply, Mr. ONel
% Wht my Impression n,fs, certainly be erroneous
n nave becn utterly ou of,hc question have named slct
! MI H. Ill 4 a