Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-10-31

k.is,t
smith ednr of James f. ui,b. aud May e. Wea, am S
y ,.y Webb hs guardian assigned to defend IL. in M;
nus cause came this day bc heard ON the bills ,.
pv"% Q, he plaintiff iiales answers aud exhibits sni uIn
'"nn ID Watkins and john ~ Christian. (Which, was u0,,s
received as .yieucc argued by counsel. on co,sr,.o
whereof the oour, deciding this tin,e that the efus,
ac' 20 pay the Judgment IN favor OF the plaintiff n preir
enre to the dceda"s simple .aiu,s but e,y
point or IT. future consideration adludgc order
ana dectce that the following sste,en,s S al
Oroen the parties, etne commissioner of this
~ H nmesn .e p,ann as executor of William Lang
"us we Younger aud us administrators Of William, Ian,bou
the elder, AID the dcendan, Richard Smith a,mn,s ~,
James T. "eob' IN which tire latter is be Charged % nh hc
sam of two hundred and thirty dollars with SIX me- ,
Interest thereon from the fifteenth day Of Febr,Tv Sa,s IN
PAID and eleven dollars ninety three of sun, b.,
the amount OF the judgment by plani "a ADM,
n's,'",of of William iansbonp elder agans, nm. sal
the e<h,s aud ,ha, said defendant H ~ nv eu among
hundred aud nifty eight dollars cents with in,.a,
az the rate o SIX per oentu'n per from twenty niu
gay o Hus"s 49, being the amount Of the Judgment obaA
VIII annexed of John Foster was ort obiror w,,h Iy,
tas,rue tue younger, the conssoncs is also d;
10 attach 10 tlu statement of costs s,-v;s ~,
aMee' the coo should he opinion, hereafter thai ,b
orS iucur' by the defendant the proseeuon OF h;s SIR
against tao sad Foster ought b. pad y the sail l,i,0 ~
rN"r OF William LangboIne, il Second al accom-, beincr
e sdu " IMAM ansOonie the elder, aid James T.
Neh tho hnc>'a,e of the defendant in which, the latter 90
DC c".S'' wa" hiytwo dnllass and fy.seven cents with
"''s' ga y dollars and hhyseven cents from the frst dav
G." June, 1870 asceltaHeu nd of ,l,, ID Watt
90" c% ~ m.l.lan as above menoned- 1hrd.s account
1 e administration ot the estate of James p Webb by an,
"Sith'2nt Richard O. smith, III taking which account the
O he
correct a. To tine es received vA,rnled Liable 10 e s
sl2ed and talshed, and the u 10 ascertain the d.
OF receipts aud payments and To distinguish between sucb
siS pad by the sand Soii,1 bound tie hers of James T.
Webb aud what paid of the personal estate and ais,
cn"ac' debts, aud at what time after ination ami
wha debts "oi hans of superior N PLAINTIFFS claim
were pad hy han, art al hat t an accon of IN,
zeal estate ul The SAID Webb legal a. equitable xh,cb G
decent or DEVISE passed 10 the infant defendant Mary C. Weh5
and the amount which hands or In the hand, ri
her M her Use, and the probable annual vain, Of ,l
,i,nr also auy balance or anou arisinr S % o
Wclhi
To r"rv u's and Richard Smith, as Trustees TO secure
debt to William Cunningham mentioned in ,re a,s,,o ~ H.,
h defendant, and 10y whom ZEN received. ard
'ir'y gwen 10 the creditors James Webb who shall
appear before the sand sroner, aud Uy p,-on set f
heir claims and agree contribute propooabiy in the nav
iheI oi the casts OF this suit prove their claims which
'd several oHnns hr connis Toner directed exaunr
state and seattle and the report wrh any ,ra,.rS s,.
c"ly stated deemed pertinent 10y himself OF winch may in
copy. Tv.te, Us CABANlss, d. t.
V'EoINm-M superior clancery holden a, ,l,
former capitol M u.c city of Williamsburg, the twe,y-
srcond day OF July, thousand cr hundred and twenty
eight; Brwr Bassru, OF William Lag borne the
you"gcr drca'ri and "om!"sa'or of William Langborn.
a-.asr 's Richard g. Smith. administering of jams
y, ".io d,ceasei and Mary C. Webb infant, by Heuy
On motion of Tie plaintiff Hacs by counsri the cou do1
order that the order entered IN this twenty first dav
OF July one hnnsand crght hundred and twry six be- 50
amended as John las admir- of (;eo,
Savasc," aud Joseph ostcr" Instead OF John Poster
; cory Tes'e, ED. CHRISTIAN, c C.
COMMISSIONER AYofRsovs OFFrcl,)
HUi,ansd,pg, IaS sat 1923
have appointed tic seventeenth day of November next t.,
execute tie foregoing order Vt dsv by ,ua
O'Clock parties required to attend at ny
, @ ' po,Ns lsPer and ies''muny, vain copies oi tho
77---v'''o = 70 ANDERSON com'r
T court OF monthly sessions for the county of Pow
FAY of August, Tth ownn tate judith Mo. se ' u
Hs"l' James tke, ae sheriff Of iowhatam and as sue
nnr Of Robert W Niosy decd who guardian of -
saa JG'h ii9"Sld amdJesse Owe" aud Henry Anderson rs
% E'sr ana Mn, iooIer exor Of Iteberry Nlo,
% r,"N'' 'i"rr's it'r lesur"r admir- Of Lucy his wr
lucy M"F and the said Jesse Owen Nancy g. h.,
" lIanr ~. deed dhs-Iy CnAN,hny ' - " " ''
. ms ~ came the plaintiff Dy his attorney and line de C,
eeo ~ according 10 the act IF assembly aid the rules of II
C" - ana appearing to iie satisfaction court tia, ne
'id defendant Francis r. Harris do ae,r her, ~, ,h, 6
y OF Nov,ntI court next being the Third Wednesday, ami
answer the b' OF the plaintiff and give security Tor pc,fyn
uth decree as e court mae hern and that cnov II
ms order he forthwith inserted IN newspaper published IN
c city of Richmond, month, .urcessyeIy and ,b
H'"'her copy he posted the u the court houe f
i 20 copy Tcstc, HM. 6 DANCE, Clk
court heii oE rrlncc El,yad coiniy July I6c I'm
I Ia ~, ~, 1",m buchanan, it against Hays & Luonici
The defendants having Il or appear,rr. ,rd
gwen security according of the General asse, @
de role of this cou and appearing To The sasCaco f %
'"' Mat they e not Inhabitants of this state on ,is n,otn,
~ ne an ny ms attorney, is ordered that said dofr.
n"n "' appeal here on the FIRST day Of October court next an
answer the pam''s h' aud that copy This order he o
~, W some one oi the public newspapers printed
VIC cay 81 Richmond for two months suecesslycly aud a.
f ~ d" TIE 'on o'o' o. Inc c""'' house Of ms county
- y cIpy. Itsic. u. J. WOBSIlAN1, =. G.,
4 rules holm" TIE clerks oil the county court r.
Fowhaian from the 9Th O 18th 81 81 ,,enter Intl,
and Ezanch wife Cornery fllbo,h tos adm, vi' 1
wni %nneSfd o. fn@ = Cox Decd and Kendrick bag,
aud Matilda NJ Cos, infant daughter the said PtgI
Cos, decd, uudc the age Of - years I Cgavc,ny
lhs dav came hc plaintiff by his attorney aud the dofpdat
he"drcS NJ Bashy not having his appearance and
vcn security according the o assembly ard tle mic
ms court and Appearing ly satisfactory evidence that be- =
uoi an habiant 81 this commonwealth ordered thai
said defendant do appear here tho hhd Wednesday IN No
Vrnh'r nest aud answer Tire bill Of tive plaintiff and ,ay
COW ~ ms ordf1 he forthwith inserted in newspaper tr
lished IN the city Of Richmond vo norbs
and that smother cory be posted door Of td cOi
! house ~ this county.
! ~ Acr7y Toto. r. - GRAVES, - O..
/ A 7 court held for Buckingham county tue l2iL
n day Of October, 1929: Christian Silrack pft
against, William g. Linlicun, and Edward Limit,
cum. ext ors Of Edward O. Linhcun deed DIR.
! il Cn,NcERY.
! The defendant Wlllianm G.. Lintlcum not Iay
inc entered his appearance aud given sccuritv nc
cordng 10 h" sc OF assembly, aud the rules Of tins
court. and It appearing ny satisfactory cyidenc tp