Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-12-22

LINE OF PACNHTS.
SlIIag from this Port IN Regular Succession, rt<.
Schr. TANTivY, Walter Thorn; Master.
Do. EXIT, Daniel Howell DO.
Do EFroRr, John Bell, 10.
DO. PLANTER, Eliada Baldwin, no.
Do, FAnrrELp, Timothy Coffin, DO.
Do. EIcHMoNp PAcNEr, Burr Knapp, DO.
For freight or passage, apply to
DAVENPORT, ALLEN 81 Co.
Richmond June nth Rutierfoords Buildings, Cary,
VlRGINIA.--At superior Ut chancery
held in the town of Fredericksburg, on the 2Stll
day of September, 1929: Lewis How erton, admins
traitor of Charles lowerton deed, pitt. against Tho
mas Newbiil in his own right and executor OF
William Nv,--'dl. deceased Thomas Pitts, sheriff of
Essex, committee administrators of George New
bill. deceased. John Newbi James Newbin, Rich
/ ard Ncwbill, William Newbl, Orvle jeff les and
Polly his wife, Travers Gatcwood and Ann his wife
William Robinson, sheriff of King & Queen, commit
tee administrator Of the estate of William Garrett,
deceased, Rcbecca Ncwbl, widow and rect of Will
ham NCwblll decd, & Henry w. Latany, Il Warner
Lewis, surviving administrator with the will annexed
OF Lewis Dix, deceased, III, nry G. Howerton, Tho
mas Dix, Jr and Robert Garrett, ddmlnist de bo
mis- non OF John Gresham ir. deceased dts
This cause on this day to be heard, Thy con
sent 10 the defendant Robert Garrett, adminisra-
Tor de bons non of John Gresham, il deceased, who
this day filed his answer upon the bill answers oil
the defendants Travcrs Gatewood and wife. Henry
w. Latany and Warner Lewis, administrators with
the Will annexed OF Lewis Dix, deceased and Robert
upou t'rv ur Tunsail Graham, deceased lite
executor of John Greshlm deceased-thr bill cr the
plInti being taken for confessed as 10 all Tho ,b,r
defendants upon whom the subpGnas awarded in this
cause have been duly executed, and mon than four
months having eapscd since the return G1ys thereof
and was argued BY co.si-ri: On consideration where
Of the court doth adJudgc. order aud decree that the
de'cnuants Thomas NewbIll. and Thomas Pitts. She
rih Or ESSeX, committee administrator of The esa 70
80 George Newb, deceased, do settle before one of
the commissioners Of this court an account OF The &c.
tmgs of the said Thomas and George Newbiy on the
estate of William Newb, deceased. up to the tine
or the revocation of the letters testamcutarv % i
said George Newbill and III account of the actinos
~ Thoules N"wbll on said estate subsequent thereto
showing the value othe slaves and other estate de
hvered over by the said executors or either of them
10 the defendant Rrbecca Newb and the other lev
aiees OF the said William NeVb. licensed in which
settlement, the executorial account of Thomas Navv
bill on the said estate, made pursuant 20 an order of
the county court Of Essex, bearing date the 2Ist dav
OF August, 1921, and admitted to record on the 2Oth
day OF August 1922 60 form the basis subject TO b.
SurchaTged and faislhcd by the plainIf;-and il is
further ordered that the SAID Thomas Pitts do render
also an account of his administration on the estate of
George NewbIiI, deceased, which SAID accounts the
SAID commissioner hereby directed 10 state settle
ana to The court report, together with any SPECIAL
matter deemed pertinent by himself, or which NAV
DC required by either of Inc parties to be So stated
copy; Teste, a. w. MORTON, C. c.
COMMANDMENTS OFFICE, TAPPAH NSNocK)
November 25th, 1870.
The parties interested will take notice tina have
appointed wednesday, the goth day of January next
TO settle the accounts directed by the foregoing order
u
are required 10 attend at this office, with all the
vouchers, record copies, and other TESTIMONY neccs
sary TO enable me to comply with the said order of
court. LAWRENCE MUSE,
.lO7-w4w bias Com. Oh. CT. Fred.
YlRGINlA-At rules, holden in the clerks office o
the superior court of chaucery for the Richmond
district the 9Th day Of October 1929: WIN. NJ Harris
pit against DAVID Parkhurst, and James King late
dts. ''
The defendant Davh Parkhurs, not bavnp entered
cnritN
Of assembly and the rnles of this court and il apnear
ing, by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an nhab
tani OF this countr s ordered, that the said defen.
dant do appear here on the tenth day Of the next
January term and a~cr the bill of the plaintiff; and
that coN o. tnIS order be forthwith inserted some
newspaper published in the city of Richmond for two
months excessively and posted al the front door of the
capitol in the said city.
| i copy. Teste. WIN. c. PExpIzrox, &C.
I VIRGINIA:-At Rules, holden in the Clerks Office
| of me Superior Court of Chancery for the Rirh
mond dItrct the 5th day of October 1879: Jacoweln
49, nae " ms his own right and as e1or of Margaret
HarVIe' deed pltt against VIM. Brockenbroupb adn,r
OF Edwin g. uarvie and others, deft's
The defendant John Harvie not having entered HE
aPpearance ana gwen security according the Act
OF Assembly and the rules of this court and il anpear
rg, by satisfactory evidence, that he il moi IN beSi
ant OF this country is ordered that the said dcd
ant do appear here on the tenth day of the NJ, -
airy term, and answer the bill Of the plaintiff aud ,h
copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in 60
newspaper published in the city of Richomnd for Too
months successfully, and posted at the front door r E
capitol in the said city. A conv Tee,e " ''e
- WM. G. PESDLEroy,c. c.
Vih0lNlA'--ht rules holden in the clerk 3 office of
v the superior court of chancery for the RichmonJ
district the 9TH day of October 1929: John c. CooJe
PIT against Ihos Burnet, Chss. l.. Jerics and Mr.
w. Berry, deft's. '"N wary
The defendant Cbas. l.. JefTries not having erteoI
ms appearance and given security according TO the c
o' assembly and the rules Of this court and il
B, y satisfactory evidence that he is not an inhabi
YAM OF ths country 1t is ordered that the said def
AM 90 appear here the teyth day of the next lam,
oy .erm; ana answer the bill Of the plaintiff and thai
paper published in the city ofRichmond for Two o,b
Soee,S'yey, and posted at the front door of the GO
'ob W the SAID city. copy. Tes,e
---- WIN g. PEvpLErov, &C.
rules holden in the cl.,L,.a,-
OF the superior court Of chancery for the R;cb-
mono district the 5th day Of October 1920 Mar nj
"6 Hnu ihomas shore and Maria Harriet his wife and
,amneI Pryor, pitts against James mcfarland James
D. hendsn, W% b. Pryor, eHor of Richard pryor.