Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-10-27


and Christopher Bate, late merchants and partners by
tnc style and under the firm of Lee, Savage & Bate
pits. against Seth ii. Noycs, and Charles w Noycs,
partners, by the style OF Seth III. Moves g. Co. and
IN their individual capacities, George Charter and
Ann w iilams, partners, by the stylc of Charter g.
WliIiams and in their individual capacities, dis.
:. nc defendants Seth III. Moves, Cha,los w.
Noycs ond George Charter, not having entered their
appearance and given security according to the act OF
assembly and tho rules of this court and it appearing
by satisfactory evidence, that thcv are not uhahi-
tas OF tns country: 1t is ordered, that tho said de-
PENDANTS do appear here the first dav of the next
January term and answer the bill OF the paintiils;
ana that copy of this ordor be forthwith inserted in
somc newspaper published in the city of Richmond
lot wv" h"'ns Fncccss'voiy and posted at tile front
door of the capitol IN the said city.
rs a copy. Tcsc, WM. q. PENNINGTON, C C.
W mGiNiA:-At rules, holden nj the clerks Office
OF the superior court of chnncery for the Rich
nnnd district, the Sd day of AuguSi 1899: George
Carter pitt. against William Gait William Bryd,c
commonly called William Brydie Napier Robert
sharpe and Elizabeth his wife. formerly Bryde and
William IL. Dyer and Nancy his wife, formerly Bry-
die, Elizabeth Randolph, Ann III. Lee, Mary Braxton
William Carter, Bernard NJ. Carter, VIM. +. Garter
John Hill Carter, Baden Dulancy and Mary his wifi,
formerly Carter Hill Carter, Thomas Carter VIM
+. WlckhOm and Ann his wife, Edmund f. Wick
ham, and Lucy lis wife, Joseph c. Cabel, and Mary
his wife, Parke Farley Carter, infant daughter OF
Charles Carter jr. Elizabeth Taylor Edmund Bcrkc-
ley, Ann Berkeley, Nathaniel Burwell, and Nancy
l}urwell, Patsy Burwell, and Nathaniel Burwcn in
!nts, and Hill Carter, lizard Carter, Susan Curter.
Elizabeth Carter, and Nancy Carter dts.
Phe defendants VIM. Brvdie, commonly called
VIM. Bryde Napier, VIM H. Dyer ond Nancy his
wife, formerly Erydic, Bernard NJ. Carter, not
having entered th"ir appearance and given security
acco ding the act of assembly & tc rules ofths court
and appearing by satisfactory evidence, that .hey
IRE not inhabitants of this country: is order cd that
the SAID defendants do appear here on the first div
OF the next January term, and answer the bill cf the
plaintiff and that copy of this order be forthwith
inserted IN some newspaper published in the city of
itlchmond To- two Ia uths successfully, and posted
at the front door oftlre capitol, in the said City
10 a copy. Teste, WM. g. Pr>pLrToT c c.
VIEGINIA-At rules, holden n the clerks Office 0r
the superior court of chanccry for the Richmond
district, the 3D. cay Uf August, 1870: James Blair
and Jane his wife, and Andrew Leslie pltfs AGAINST
Wm Clarke late sheriff Of Chesterfield and as such
admO'r dc bOnIs non at john AicLrud decd Chri.
tophor Roberts, and Ann his wife WIN. Rodbird aud
Jane his wife, and Philip Peach and Sarah his wife
Elizabeth Aylett, and VIM. Aylctt John Spotswood'
and Mary his wife, Edward aiosby. an Sarah his
wife, aud Elizabeth Goodc, ETancs Morrison Ann
Morrison, haItha Morrison, and Robert Morrison
James Lyle, Colin Clarke, ana Mary hts wife and
John Lyle, and Sarah Scott, dts.
The defendants, VIM ROdbird, and Elizabeth and
WIN. ayictt not having entered their appearance and
gwen security according TO the act Of assembly and
The rules OF this court, and il appearing by saistncio
ry evidence, that they not inhabitants of this
country: 1t Il ordered that the said tlelinlaus do
appear her" on the first day of the next January term
OF tins order be forthwith inserted in some nowsnn
per published in the city OF Richinond for two months
succ ssveiy, aud posted the front door of the CAP
o in he said city.
10 copy. 1estc, WV G.. PENpLEroy. r r
W IRG ISIA:At rules holden in the clerks office of
the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, tho 3rd day OF August 1929: BEVERLEY Ram
olph, cxor of the last will and testament of Harry
heth, dec, who was eX'or of Samuel Clarke dec
pltf against John b. Ciopon, adnor with the will an
nexed OF David clopton, dec. Mosby Puliam and
Samuel L. Puam, trustees for Ann G. PnlliaIn and
her family, Nathaniel Clopton. Alfred Clopion Ro-
bert NJ. Pull'am, and Ann G his wife, late Ann G.
Clopton, David Copton, Albert G. CIopton, and Ed
ward Curd ind Sarah his vito, lato Sarah Clopton.
DTS.
phe defendants Alfred Clopton David CIopton, AL
bert u. Clopton, and Edward Curd, md Sarah his
WIG not having entered their appearance and rivcn
security according TO the act Of Assembly and The
rules nj tins court, and it appearing by satisfactory
eVuence That they are not inhabitants Of this cotn-
Try " Is ordered thnt the said defendants do appear
here on the irs day of tie next January term and
answer the bill Of the plaintiff and tint CORY oftb
order be forthwith inserted ip some neyso,ror ,nh
llshed in the city Of Richmond for two months sue
in the said city. paw
~ COPY Tcstc, WV. G. Pr~prETox. r g.
" IRG NIA-At rules holden IN the clerks off,,
OF the superior court of chancery for the Rich
rnond district the Sd day of August, 1920 Rgncs p
NJ j. Brown, and Aaron J. Brown. iufaut c,I1ra, -,
II t.fIrU
tnelr GUARDIAN and next friend, dts against Mar
DTo%h' widow OF Richardson Brown decd Eduord
NJ n brown, John Brown, Lewis II. Brown, Iabez ~
bro"n' and Thomas r. Brown. and John RE-,
sen OK OF said Richardson Brown. decd Tbon,as
GrGoos' and Lucy his wife, and Willis Potncse ard
Rebecca his wife, DIS ''"''S' ana
The dciendauts Willis Potness, and Robccc, IT,
wi'e not having entered their appearance and ,r
security according 10 the act OF assembly md ,Ln
rules OF tins court, and it appearing by satifat,,
eylucnce' mat they are not nhabitant OF this coun
try 1t IL ordered That the said defendants do annc
mere on the first day Of tho January term and
answer the bill If The plaintiffs; and that y COM, 80
thus order be forthwith inserted in como no,vsn ~,
published in the city of Richmond, for two months
suGceSsyey, and posted at the front door Of the CAP
itol, III the said city.
VRGT'-A rules holden ~ Ire clerk office Of The s,e,;o
court 81 chancey ior the Richmond district the d do 81
august lbgt James Denton pit against James tp,cr,y1,d
ainT OF John Denton, decd, Susanna Denton widow az,
John Denton Allen Denton, Jnsepi Perkins and S,ss h
vic, formerly Donton, Richard johnson and Ma,y HE ,
rmery Denton, and Fanny Dcnion children of said Ir,
Thomas Denton decd, DIS ''"'' a''
Inc defendants Richard johnson and Mary bs ,;G. m
having entered their appearance and piyrt srcuyi,v &
I q bly al H.