Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-12-11

~ ,-ru'Ot W wi. y. ilIAhhE.
RR0WN's BEST CHEWING: TOBACCO,
NJ nov ) For sale by IL & McNEMARA.
4 AIDES White Satin, and medallion dancing slip.
nA Pers, trimmed IN new and very superior style.
.ALSO,
G"ntlemcns worry superior Goat skin full dress
Pamps.-Iu,t received, from their iacory. by
GRANNISS, son e. BROTHERS,
nov Corner of Nam and l4th streets.
II NeD and Fashionable .4rticle
/ 4 AIDES fashionable bronze Slippers, lust roce
"a we'd by
dec GR.4.V.yTSS. SOW g. BROTHERS.
TVFlKGINA:-At rules holden the clerks office of
" the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district, the 9Th day at October 1929, AdeIinc Allison
pitt against VIM. Selden, WIN. II. Roanr, Cary Sci.
den, Charles seden, Joseph SeIdcn and other defs
The defendant Cary Selden not having entered his
appearance and given security according the OF
Assembly and the rules of tins court and il appearing
by satisfactory evidence, that he is an nhabant OF
this country IT is ordered. that the said defendants do
appear here the tenth day of the next January term
and answer the bill of the plaintiff and that copy of
this order be forthwith inserted in some newspaper
published in the city of Richmond, for sue
ely, and posted the front door of the capitol
IN the said city. copy. Teste.
WV. &. PESDLEroS. &C
! NIRGINA:-At rules, holden the clerk office OF
! the superior court of chancery for the Richmond
district. the 9Th dav OF October 1929: Robert Dab.
ney, pf against Walter Shelton, surviving partner of
himself and p. T. Shelton decd. late partners under
The firm OF u. l. Shelton & Co. huuford Perks Rob't
]
The defendants Muuford Perks and Rob't Nelson
not having entered their appearance and given Scout
ity according to the act of Assembly and the rules of
TINS court, aud appearing, by satisfactory evidence
that they not inhabitants Of this couniry il is order
ed, that the said defendants do appear here on the
tenth day of the next January term, and answer the
bill of the plaintiff; and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted ia some wspaper published i'm ,,,.
city of Richmond, for two months s,lccessively and
posted at the front door OF the capitol the said city
copy. Trste, WM. C. PENnLEroN, c. O.
. a A ~ ,,T.. I,It -
" Of the superior court Of chancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 5th day of October 1870: EnnioD
W SHELTON. Pllf against Peter I. Archer, Sen. John
T. Hosely, Edward Haskins. John A. Archer Peter ,
Archer Jr. and other dts.
The defendant Peter T. Archer, Jr not having en-.
tered las appearance and given security according to
the act of assembly and the rules of this court and il
appearing, by satisfactory evidence that he is an
inabuant OF tins country; it is ordered that The SAD
defendant do appear here the tenth day of the next
January term, and answer the bill OF the naip,id
and that copy Of this order be forthwith inserted, in
some newspaper published in the city of Richmond
Tor two months sueeessively and posted the front
door Of the capitol in the said city
copy. lestc. wH. 6 PESnLErox. e. r
| VmGiNtA.-At rules holden in the clerks ofBce
"i ihe superior court Of ohancery for the Rich.
mond district, the 5h day Of October 1920. Garter
braHt"n and Mary g. his wife, pitts against Robert
Heay' admo de bonis non of Peter Kemp and adn'r
o sam WIZ. SaJre, and also adm'or or Thns Tricc
and Ovtr"n Seawell and his wife, and others dts
! The defendants overton Scawell and his wife NOT
having entered their appearance and given s,cvriv
according To the act OF assembly aud the rules of this
court, and appealing by satisfactory evidence that
that they not inhabitants of this country; il ia or
dered that the said defendants 30 appear here on the
tenth day OF the next January term, and answer the
bill of the plaintiffs and that a copy of this order be
forthwith inserted ~ some newspaper published in the
| city ct Hchmond, for two months successiyrly and
posted at the front door of the capitol in the said city
| COPY Irste, WM G.. PtNDLKToN, c. c.
/ NVlhGNIA:-ht rules, holden IN the clerks Office
| " ct the superior court of chancery for the Ricl.
m"nd strict, the 9Th day Of October 1929; Mary Boil
""g and Thomas Shore aud Mara Harriet his wife and
amucl Pryor, plis. against James mcfarland James
u. kendaI' VIZ. u. Pryor, cX'or Of Richard Pryor.
/ decd aud u. =. Boiling and other dts
/ The defendants VIM u. Pryor and Richard r. Boil
ling not having entered their appearance and given Sc
cury according To the act of Assembly and the rules
OF this court, and appearing by satisfactory evidence
that they are not inhabitants of ts country il is or
dercd that the said defendants do appear here ON the
tenth day OF the January term, and or tho
hhi OF the plaintiffs and that copy of this order be
forthwith inserted IN newspaper published in the
CITY OF Richmond, for two months successfully, and
posted at The front door of the capitol III the said CITY,
copy Tesie, WIN. G.. PENnLEToN G.. e..