Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1829-10-13

pressed desire for dissolution and WOW agreed 70
leave ITO Siessrs Henshs% & Hamilton 70 say how
agreed that this decision should be had in February
or sooner 1t practicable. II was then objected, by
you, that having advanced five thousand dollars, it
not fair to expect you to reliuqusb your interest
without first receiving back the sum advanced. !
DESTROYS to bring this business to close on terms
which shall save the feelings and protect the interests
OF both partics, have resolved to make YOU this pro-
posi- viii pay you five thousand dollars in
September and we viii submit the question of how
much you should receive, both as to tho nr,ouot
anu time OF payment to the referees named with pow
er TO them to choose an umpire incase of Disagree
ment. And IN case they either Of them should
frorl any not act before the 18th Of Fehruayv
the matter shall be referred to others, and with
view to avoid difficulty in selection sugpest Julue
White and Mr.. Woodbury. of the Snnaic 'rhese
gentlemen all the mutual friends of bot, of us
and am induced to believe do Justice vii bind
a yse TO Pay you, porn Us to amount and time the
sum which they under all the circumstances taking
INTO view the legal and equitable rights ofthe parties
may awaId. f
TINS proposition is accepted you will receive ycur
HVc thou4nd dollars and your notes for three thou
sand the sum Ill dispute will be left to he adjusted in
leofuary.d the payment made in continuity with the
award OF honorable men mutual friends in whose
,p 70 ao Iish you must have more confidence
'hah you can nave III the uncertain verdict of Jury
winch you must know, from experience is often de-
pendent upon the caprice und prejudice of Ignorant
inaiViduas-and we will thus avoid an expensive and
ruihous litlguos, and feelings be spared an nm
pleasant and uhprofitable controversy win of
course expect the dissolution be announced upon
the payment of the five thousand dollars have
made Tins proposition which trust will be recpro-
Gated and II SO am sure the dissolution now dcs;
raOc to both, iii be effected much more 10 our mu
tuui satisfaction Yours ~ CREEns ,
My answer to this, which closed our corrcspon-
dencc, was as follows:
WASHING rom Aug T. fsn8.
SiR: agree with YOU i'm saving that we are mn
'ual'v interested in TN amicalc adjustment of orr
pa con'erns aud that we have both express
II mat tins wish proceeds not, my part from any
ammunition IN my estimation Of the rights which re-
inquisr ny fhe dissolution, fl, what they wcr. con
suelea wiieh formed the connection; but from Inv
cohNctiou t'int after what has occurred much ion
ger continuance OF 1t would be agreeable to neither
party You say tive agreed to leave tn alessrs Ham
ii'on and hensiaw, 10 say how much should he maid
10 me Tor my Interest," that their decision should hn
naain eoruary next, ifpraccable and that
lheh objected, because having advanced five thou
c"i'u hoiinrs IN purchasing my rights, deem il
an ta' should receive back that sum before re-
anguish sich rights. have mist aiken The ground
OF my oGJcciIou 10 conversation ON the snb;ec,
"hacrstond you to say TINT should leave the d..
cs"h oi the point mentioned to Tine gentlemen u,nnd
=" DC MADE IN Ecn'lary next; and that. in the
iaean tinic the partnership should continue till such
dccision. 10 this asenLed. But on the neyI
DAY, you presented 10: my signature paper. nv
which was to renqnsh Immediately all rights in
RI IN YOU while the ofthe firm should be retained
~hercoyy II would hive the use of nv name till Fob
ruary Iobjeced to this, because it made me nart
he' without an interest, subject liabilities withon,
p'onto. security. respected, mntter of course
:" receive, on relnquishine my rights in the firm INV
I'VE tho'sand doiars, my two notes, and SO much
more as the referees should award
| aio..S s' Proposltion Is to pay me five thousand
uiiafS dno give up my notes in September NEXT and
as much more anu at such time as NIessrs IInsbeu,
anu 1aniiton shallsay am entitled to; they having
p 'S 10 choose an umpire in OF disagreement
ana making their decision by the 18th of Februa ~,
next ana IN case either OF both of them shoud no,
act before that day, the case shall be referred f Id
r eS w " h .b;s and Woodbury. Of the Senate
lHls proposition, with slight notifications
nave not the least objection One is TO posnone tl
payment OF the five thousand dollars and the
ing of the two notes, and the CONSEQUENT annuncia
tion or the dissolution to some later pe,od thar Son
TENDER My object is to continue the rarnorsh
LAG ecStion VI electors be passed, and the retras
re- eived IN sufficient number to demonstrates The
t .-,et OF Zen. Jackson. can then saw with
truth and propriety that LEADING object os NV CO.
hecting myself with the press is atto;ned and oa,
fetire without the mputation of abandopino tho noe,
ass'S1led to me by the party This cannot be to n
'ei PERIOD than the first ofNovem6er. PERHAPS
sooner Another rnodiica ton is to postpone tho DE-
h olsn OF the arbrators few days saw Febrnnrv o.
or march l. tor the PURPOSE of enabling Mr. Ucnshaw
onS scs ne VIII probably attend the inauguration
than Match LIST. ] shall ascertain bowenr a',sn
aeiy' ana am willing to have the decision made CO
~ IN as ne can attend to it. if he can attend
~ rms snort postponement affect the riphta
cd
some months before that period Sunnos;no IT,. 60
tsssc would be made to your proposition with
.nese nodifcations, I'VE close this part OF tho hn
s'ness by signing the enclosed bond. '''V o"-
i Yours, p. JARVIS
! nave now given to the public the whole of tb,
correspondence between Duff Green and mvsolt:
about dissolution of orr partnership The bonj
mentioned in my last letter, was mutual bond
whereby we agreed that he should pay me s5ooo ~,
the 18th OF October, 1929 cancel NV t,yo ,ot on
.ne debts and receive the property of the firm. ans
pay me as much for my rights in the coneorn. %
s So sl oe awarded by Messrs White and Woodbury.
OF tne senate and Hamilton of the House who ,,or
10 decide by the first of January, 1929 We alec
agreed that, If they should be prevented from dnc;
Jung; other referees should be chosen, one by him.
ano'gr oy myself, and third by the two thus cho
ID my next, will give some history of what trans.
PRED during the reminder of our Connection. and
aHerWards history of the reference. ND'
RUSSELL JARVIS