Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-10-29


iKGiNlA:-A'a superior coal OF ohe"eS,y, holden
The former capitol IN tire city Of Williamsburg the DIST day
the younger and admir- of William Langbon.o the elder and
George aes admir- OF George Savage pits agans, RehardG
sun, dts.
This on this day To be heard OH the bills the
petition OF the plaintiff Hales aud exhibits, and the
dated on the eleventh day of August 1920, signed by
John Watkins and John II Christian (Which was oie1y1
on the part of the defendant by consent of the tant
received as evdence argued by confederation
whereof the court not deciding this time, deendan MT
dole 10 pay the Judgment IN favor Of the plaintiff peter
ehee To The defendants simple claims but iesery
log that point for us future considerations adudse ortc.
Una, the following accounts and statements be taken
between the parties before commissioner Inst
an account between the plaintiff OF William Laus.
bourne the younger and administrator Of angbone
The elder aud the defendant Richard Smi,h amim1Ior Of
sum OF two bundled and hiryve dollars with SIX rer cent
interest thereon fon the fifteenth day February I8I4 in
me amount Of The judgment recovered by the plaintiff as adpi
nistraiof OF William Langborne elder against the said
t~o OF ienFco county court, copy which is filed among
e tNDs and Thai said defendant be credited for two
hundred and fifty eight dollars sixty four cents with n,er
day Of August 49, bcing The auo, ~ o ,e .%e'y nn,
ny thc sdd defendant against Francis Foster anr ,, M
WI annexed Of John Foster who o.t nh,yor with JVlin
W 'dcn 10 iha account statement Of costs slcy;ng t
naace the cou' should be of opinion hereafter that bc
sts incurred 9y lire defendant in the prosecution his suit
asi le sad Foster ought to lie paid y said plaintiff ns
eor OF William Iangbomc jr-Second an account, between
az Sa william LanSbomc tho elder, the said James r.
eVD inc ineae Of the defendant in which the latter v 10
be charged with hhy.two dollars and 6y.seycn cents NAL,
interest on forty dollars and 60yseven ccnS c. ' WIN
Of June 100 as asccnaiRed by the of John d
and John H. Christian above northumberland an nccnr
OF lhe administration Of the of Jumes T. Web by The
ueISnodnt Richard O. Sm, In taking which account the
audited account referred to in lis to be considered
correct AS to te items received and expended liable 10 be sun
charged aud albed and the conm'r 60 m date
o. receipts and payments, and Distinguish between such
CLAIMS paid BY the said Smith bound heirs Of James
No ahd what were paid Of tic personal estate and
what payments made by the said defendant, Of sIc
contract debts and at wha, his COMMUNICATION and
dfnutfy
were pad by him, and NJ what ourh an aeco,, of &
edI es'e OF the said Webb either legal equitable which v
ueSe OF devise passed 10 the infant defendant Mary yebb
and the amoun which bands or IN tie bo5s -,
her guardian Tor her use aud the robabc annual value Of the
the lands conveyed by TIC s,id james r. Webb in his f,
70 Henry Curtis and Richard Smith, ~ trustees To- seo,Io
dCDt 70 William Cunningham mentioned the answer Of tho
ndn defendant and by whom the same las been ercivc a
liberty given to the creditors James Webb who si
Pcsi ooro the sad commissioner, and by petition set forth
ieir claims and a,fee contribute proportion Div II, the
nHn Of the costs Of this su, prove r,rr s1 claims yyb
tate and settle, and tho court report with any rnncrs %
caIy stated deemed peruen, 10y himself or which nav no
Acdpy. Tcste, Us cABANfss. n G.
Vih6nfA-A suPcror court If ohancory, holden At tho
ioI"er capitol IN the city Of Williamsburg the twenty
eight f6rwel Basset, executor Of William Isnojo,c C
yonnger deceased ard administrators Of William Lanrbot"e
Savage, pits against Richard G. Smith ndminsatgroc Jas
~ webb deccaied, and Mary g. Webb an infant by IIeorv
/ "eop her guardian assigned, DIS
On motion Of the plaintiff flacs 10y counri the court doth
oIde That the order entered ~ This the twenty 6r s
~ Juy orc ibopsand. cigld hundred and twenty SIX be 20
sncndc so cause il 10 read "Ion iIacs admir- Of Ccorpc
savage instead Of "Ccoge IIacs administrator Of Ceo,se
Savage" aud "Joscpi Foster" instead of John Fos,erv
! 4 c9py Tcte, ED. CllRTSTfANcc
CoH,nisIpSfH ASnEHsoS's Ogyrt)
! H.. williamsburg, ldSepL 1893
execute the foregoing order Of court on which dsy nv ,c
ocs 81 ~ W, es concerned required 10 attend AZ NY
! "~-pS'o no. ANDERSON, Conf