The Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1822-1829, 1829-01-01

|
ben preserved. Bot u cannot be doubted iha
lhe sentiment there expressed VAS common Il
the other Stairs ~ that quarter. mere especial,
TO toanee,icD, aud Iihpde Island the mo-
thifkiy pe"pled of all the States, Hnd having :"
course. their iiionghi biost turned ,o.the tuiges
OF nisnniHctnrrs like Inference may be con
hdenily applied TO rev Jersey, whose deoa.i
IA easentoa nave not been preserved IL
The populoHs and manufacturing State OF Penn
syisnnia, a partial account only OF the debates
having been published, nothing cettnin Is kno"f
1T what passed IN her Convention on Ithls point
But ample evidence NAV he found elsewhere
thai regulations OF trade for the encouragement
Of manufactures, were Considered ms within the
power 10 he granted 10 the new Congress, al
well rs within the scope Of the national policy
u the States Ssuih of Pennsy lvania. the oniy
two IN whose Conventions the debates have been
preserved are Virginia and North Carolina. and
from these no adverse iniersnces Gao be drawn
Nor Is there the slightest indication that either
oi the Two siaies faflhest South. whose debates
IN Convention, II preserved have nos been made
public viewed the encouragement u manuiac-
lures as noi within general power over trade
TO be transferred to the Government OF the Uni-
ted States.
6. II Congress have not the power, il is anai-
haied for the nation policy without exam
pile IN any other nation, aud NOT within the rea-
son Of the solitary one 10 our owe. The exam
pie alluded %. Is the prohibition ola Tar on cz-
ports, which resulted from the appareni iinpos-
sbhy OF raising, in that mode u revenue from
The States, proporlloned tp tie ability 10 pay II
the ability ofsome being derived, IN great
measure not om their exports, brt from their
fisheries. fon Then freights, and from conf
usrce At large IN some outs branches altogether
external 10 the United States the profits from
alwhich beng Invisible 4, intangible, would es-
cape tai, on exports iux on imports On
the her hand. being a tax on consumption
vim IL in proportion 10 the ability of ths con
ssimefs. whatsoever derived, vas free from that
ineaash,.
!. Il revenue be the sole object ola legii-
male Impesf AID the encours cement OF dones
nc atiiclss be not within the power'of regul la
tin Iade II would follsw iharnO monop ol,sing
OF UNEQUAL resu ATOMS of iOrPlgn nat,o0s could
he cnnnieraeira that neither Che staple articles
of subsi=trnre. nor the essential implements Tor
the public sIirty could under any cu cunIsiances
br INSURED 81 ioserrd ut nome, by regulations
OF commerce, the usual aud most convenient
mode OF providing for both, and THAI lie Amer
can narisaian. though the scarce OF naval de-
ieneh, Of ehrapenng competition Ia carrying
our valuable aud bulky artrclrs 70 market, aud
oi an independent cut'Hge OF ihctn dufing for
.,., -. u. . Ct; ..,,.,; - q -
,v,,h,l,,=., -, A., =, 49,. ~ II, -
div d,..,,,,rd !, h.,,,,, v,le,,,h,., ,noo,o..
JnIv u, E,r.io 49,, .,,ins, ,,,- .,c,s,l .,,l a.,
e,.,,,,;,,., ,,.,,, :. d,,, 49,. :, =.
vor Of forsisu vessels. must nave the inevitable
eleci OF banls'ling omrS from the ocean.
10 assume power 10 protect our navigation
ard the cultivation aud fabrication oraIl artl-
Giles requisite for the public ssirty, rs incident
.,,,,s,,,., - 49,, r,,,.. r. ,:''','
10 cons,1.r .,,,,r,c.i I,v = -
:, ., -.
r.. = In ,,.,,, t ,,,,,,,,''s -
..l;.h -, - > "'''
f.a,,,.. ~. -.
~. So. ~, t, 49,, -,
.,nd L., -. 'ts'',,,',,.,',,,. ,h ,,''
49,. .f,l.,aL II. ..,I
- =. II. =. ',.,',...,.., 10y - :,
-, c,,.#;.I - H. -. 49,. 80, ,.,aI =
- ~
:. lhai the encouragement o. manufactures
Was MI ei9'e' Oh 'he power 10 'eG""'e hade, Is
p'"''" ny ''t NV ""uV w W P""e' 'oF 'l'''
ooje'i, III 'hf III" session " the "h congress
nha'r me CONSTITUTION ""'h h"""s i"e mem
he's p,ese" we're 40 many wa" ""n oCfn mem,
befs OF The fedef"I t"nVen''"" "n'oh trained
winch ratified II each OF 'hrs' classes consist
ing also of mtn"'i' woo hnd opposed and VINO
had ffpo"sfd 'h' .o"sf'ln'o" !" 't' actual i"rm,
II dies moi appeal from 'he printed proceedings
oi ongress on that occasion, that the pn~er
wa denttd ny any OF 'hcn' hud u may D" ie-
tn KIDD, ina members rom irgmd ~ par
neWar. hs wei oi h1' ahl-,e"''' ~ 'h' T. drf"'
PCT tne names then Distinguishing th"'e =" HI
Id opposed and those "h" had approved he
oo' s1tn,lon dad not hesitate I" propose duties
aud 10 suggest even prohibitions IN idvor 81
several articles OF her pr@''o"'" by ON"
datY was proposed On mineral coal, IN ihsor OF
The Virginia coal puts; by another, duty IN
hemp WIS PROPOSED to ""ro"lag" the g'o"th
Of thai a'erie; aud ny th"d' Prohibition
even OF foreign beef was suggested as n
measure 81 sound policy. lSee Lloyd's De.
bates
\ further evidence IN S'pP"t, ct the 'onst-
tutIona, power to protect a"a roster manuiae-
lures ~ regulations uf trade. an evidence that