Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1829-04-21

- SASANH HAANNSs
-a2rnl
Boxes family loaf sugar, Tor sale low 10
close u consignment, by
april II 81 d. TTMBERLAKE.
VIRGINIA. Ats superior court OF Ihaucery holden
al the former Capitol in the city Of " lille mshurr the
lith July, 1877; Israel 4 Jno. p. Peasants. pits. agair,,
t!no. n. Blair, administrator with the will annexed of Nath
Burvsii, dec. James X. Marshall, and Claudia n. his wife
"a'tne" ". hcmp, sheriff ct Gloucester County, and
committee VI The estate OF WIN Hall, sru. dec. Richard g.
Morris, adm'r with the will annexed of Saith Hal! dec. who
was tue admir- ut VIM Hall shr elder dec. John Hall adm,
o, Frs han dec. Henry L. Nuttall, administer Of Franois
lho'ntnn dec, BENIN ". Cleuvrrius. sxre'or of Jescph
Cle"ve'ius dec. ThomaSN Whiting, executor OF Skaife Wal
ting dee. JDo. =. Siuhhs IT, ndm't of john 8. Stnbhs sen.
who was a7m'r Of Francis $. Stubs, wm b.. Hughes in
ns own 'Sht and as admT Of his late wife Jane. aud
Robert T.. Randolph S., ALDER, G. and Edward A. Siuhbs,
and Edward Garrett and Sarah his wife, dts.
The death Of the pit Israel Peasants is sncrest.d: and
1e cause came on this day to he head ou the oil, answers
OF the defendant John II. Blair adm'r. with the will an,
nrSed OF Naihf Burwel dec. Edward A. Stubbs, RAN
do!ph - Stubbs, Rnbi. +: aud Alh-rt g. Stubbs, Edward
Garrett VIM y It Hughes, James X Marshall and Claudia
IL. his wife, Beujn ". Cieuvcrius, excc'nr of Jcsenb RI,
vcri'L' dec. Matthew ". Kemn. sAa,;T aud rc,,,;,,..
of the estate OF Wm RaH the elder dee. EXHIBITS amh h III sSe
amina,ions OF witnesses, and as to- the defendant John
Hall, VINO is out of thtS county, ~ against whom the plain
tiff aprearsto he proceeded in the mode prescribed by
law against absent defendants, and AS 90 the other de-
PENDANTS or the decrstal order taking the bill for con-
ieSed, which appears 10 hafe been duly executed, aud
was argued by counsel; On consideration whereof the
court doih adJudGc, oder and decree that the defendant
john ~. bldir. Gdm'r With the viii annexed of Nathaniel
burNCn dec. reader before one of the commissioners Of
this court an account Of his transactions ON the estate of
the said Nathaniel BurweiI, that the defendants James X.
Na'shaP. aud Claudia II. his wife, who was Claudia H..
Bur .elis a child OF Iathn BuTwel dec. rendrr he fore the
same c Smissioner, an account OF all the real estate
Which either by descent OF devise came to thu sal Clau.
d.a, mediaieiy or Immediately from her said fa,her, where
mo same is situated, the present fre simple and annual va
hue thereof, distinguishing what hes come To he. by imme-
H'dte descent or devise, ADD what remotely, and the value
OF such portion OF the real estate as may Ia we been alien
ed, sold or made over; and that he aIn take an areoun,
OF ing nC!Suual estate Ol The said Nnsh'l Eurr.I .s:.L
may nave been received by the said CIardia, u her
Northumberland the eitUdant John s.. SIubhs, il. admir-
ot Jno. ;. Stubbs, sen. render brfoIe the same commission
fr an account OF his irtestates transactions on the estate
~ Francis ;. Stubbs. as also MS own account Of ad,Ji-
nisirauom of the estate Of John :, Stnbbs sen tina,
ms defendants Ewd Garrett and Sarah his wife, who
was Sarah S"ubbs, Uin y. Hughes, admir- Of his late
Nife Jane VIM was Jane Stubbs, Robt F. Stubs, Randolph
= Snbbs, Albert e. StubbS and Ewd A Stubbs, do Sc
verally render before the same commissioner, nm accoun,
OF all the real estate, which either by descent or devise
same to them indefinitely or Immediately from the SAID
Ffenc's >. StnhhS, where the same is situsted, the pre-
sent fee simple aud annual value thereof, DISTINGUISHING
and what remotely, and the value of such portions Of
'"e real estate as may have been alieued, sold or made
over; and ;hat he also take an account uf the personal
estate 1T the said Ffs. :. Stubbs, which NAV have been
received 10y the SAID Edw Garrett and Sarah his wife.
I'm Is. Hughes, adu''r of hs late wife Jane. Ro. +. Siubbs,
Eand"iph -. oiuObS, Albert q. Stub6s and Ed A Stubbs.
which was Of tine estate Of the said Francis ). S;ubbs
dio:-tn"t the same COMMISSIONS state an account of the
! '''h'ih> denand' on account Of their judgment obtained
N|FJ ''"'N VI hfF vi ne DTOcee0SnnS mn n
toned dgainStJ Jas. Baytop John Bdytop AID Jno. Il Uni.
ting, in taking winch account the surviving plaintiff is tn
submit to be examined in sol"an form before the said COM
m'sHn"cI' touching any payments whirh may have been
made To- him on account Of the SAID Judgment. which SAID
several accounts the commissioner is directed TO exa mine
s'a'a ana Seti'e' and to the court report, with any mat
'"fs specially state e, deemed pcuirent BY himself ar
"itrh may he required by the parties To be so stated.
Ifjruuy l.I828.
For reasons appearing to the court, the order entered in
;"!s Cause rn 'le -9t' dry Ut IAN. lat, is sci a>id, AMI un
" o'ior of the p!ain:in ISRAEL Peasants, by counsel, and II,
"II gazing 10y the AFFIDAVIT, Of James Cabaniss the deputy
c'rfk, VINO madr the entry on The '. cord, on the 14,h day
90 July 1927, che death Of the abuvc named plaiUtd was
suggested, Instead Of John p. Pieasaut>, the court doth or
ser and by consent Of the defendant Rubt F., Randolph
=, Aiheit 6 and Ed A Stubs and J'S X. Marshall and
CIhndia u. ms whe' ~ their counsel, that the record be so
amended, AS to substitute the name Of Juo p. Plrasanis iu-
,irsd OF Israel Peasants (Sh0 is nov the surviving partner
OF Tie late mercantile firm Of lsrael < John Il, Plea@nis)
"nh on the Iur'her motion Of the Surviving plaintiff, and
Il; appearing BY the affidavit of Samuel Jackson, NJ. -
that the siid plaintiff by reason OF disease, is incnpa.
ole ut attending bef"fc the commissioned, aud submit TO
examination according T." the provision Of tlc iuteI!ocuio-
~ decree entered in this cause, 90 the Ii,n day Of July,
1877, ihe court doth order that she comris'. who NAV
State the said account directed BY the said decree, PRO.
pound IN whiting such nfernga trriFs To the said israel
P.ratiuts' as be or aus 81 the defendants may require,
touching Tie claim Of the Q~lni"tift, and that the same
may be answered ~ the said Israel Pleasan'e, he beng
hi'' duly s"om before a n"DAy pueIic nj, Justice. Of the
pefcs duly g'ani"d IA Pennsylvanin.
Copies. Tr,tc. JAMES CABANJSs, u e..
C"na;siioaer .qndersou's offer. UiHIqmsburg, l2H
.NTrcb, 1929.
Iha,c appointed the twenty eighth day of April next w.
execute tho foregoing rdcrs Of court. On which day by
n'ne O'Clock q. W. the parties are required to attend at
my ofit., with i'rt houis, pape,s and testimony, with co..
pie0 ~ TIE court Parrrs and with this original order.
- R0BT. ANDERSON. com'r.
yiHGiNIA: At Ulel, holden it, tue clerks olire fine
superior ooutt of chauccIy Co.., the Richmond district.
tive @ud day at February, 1899: Isaac VauclctL plC.
against Henry Davis s. Go. and Henry W. Nioururc. aud
jon" H.h'ns'", surviving partners OF Moncure, Robin.
son & peasants. DIS.
Trr defendants Hrn,y Davi, ( Co, not having entered
their appearance and give" security according to the act u
assembly and tho rules NJ this Govt, and It appearing bv
satisfactory evidence that they arc mot inhabitants OF this
country; Il is ordered that the saij defendan ts do appear
here on the first day ftht nest June term, aud answer the
bill Of The plaintiff; and that = copy of this order he forth
with iu5tued ~ some neW spapet published in the city oi
Richmond for two month ssuccessively and posted Al tie
font door Of The capitol IN the said city.
. 4 rnru. InaIr. W. O. Prrntrrnr