Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1828-11-26

ihoco on the first halot, and in opposition to the OK
pcctations ofo' Not clccting Speaker the first
ballot, the House Sht have continucdto ballot US Il
often does, ior whole day or even 6ays for the rule
Of dropping the candidate having fawest votes, does
NOT prevail there. Suppose i, had happened as al
expected 'hat there hud been protractcd alioin--
Nix Sloane night have communicated the ;cdre to ;ll
TIN fourth reason Of .Vr Stevenson i, ;',at ryy.
Sl"sn> did notcomnlmicat2 this charge at the cleo
ti"h f'r Speaker when AZ. Stevenson was chos,n.
Why he dill not, we are sure We cruaoi toll nv.
hops ;i"sarar reason prevented lin, tha. restrained
Cen Jackson from charging Tr. Clay with corruption,
whcn a. Senator Of IL Z. s. he vas ,o,, ,,,, IN
vote Upon INSTRUMENTATION Secretary OF State. Tho
cases ere parallel on this point Mr. sloane hcs mi; nj
'"' nave lsilcd 20 prefer tlIiS Gcc,,suian lie ,nit
interchangeable not worth while To- tloit But ., arc,
hS'Is that t1lng sno true because. not .,I =. = r
c;'i2T time, wien there was 10 coercion in ~ i :
Aad onc \ thousand reasons NAV h, in,oo;,,l
glitch wor! render it needless. or i,,nron.r ~ M
"cHcatH, or painful .Ur. Stevenson a. ~. Mr. sIo,,,
tlsn did not" dared not Til. i :, mn, c,..-.
Mir Sloane has since both done ard dared, IND
WHY net then, ii he hud ehosv! i, We ;oI;c,, e..
our paris, that r. Sloane rcyer ,.oiiiI la,
the charge, had Mr.. Stevenson regulated Iz co,,e
towards the Administrations hv the dictates oc irs,o
ma hheralty Vixen 10 found TINT Mr.. Ste,,,,,=7,
whom nc once knaw 10 leiona Nr. CLAW ao-;e, 4,
NH"rga'n' had from the a;jvuac;no- nom ..r,fv oc
Jaohson' become without lyme or reason. r I,o-
'SFcTin itNhcn he heard OF his suvi.l in pic,,,,o.a
~ way OF proving the corruption Of the Adn,i,,f.,
tion' tia: ii had offered kim Ssv oficc in is oi,l
fden, ana rot before EIr Sloan, Lro;,. ,;lo,., e.,
/ INC purpose J,- tins
FcnSon of That weight of cicrpctcr which r,ir,4 rive
''' 70 Ills uli''st and Injurious accusations mr.
''io'hes conduct was consistent and horc,,-o%,
nc Would hot expose NJ Stevenson for the simple
''''S' Oh iHjnFiS "i"'--hc cnly di1 it, hen if be-
UNI necessary TO protect others from urpcr.io,
instead % bcl;'g deionrccd for GcI1ir t'c ,,aos
"F'' 'iT' Souic dcSSrcCG credit fer his frba,rn,.n
III not huY!ng made at time when j. ,vcu5 :, 81,
lpoohnlty, sustained as is by Mr. WluIssn, har,
eeifatod the election Of AR. Stevenson Us Sneaker
MI SteVeisons evidence, consists Of letter fy,-,
iii. Brent of Louisiana to The a,no,,t tl,r4 ~
stevenson told him on the day Speaker WIS .,,o.,,
III Dec. 1928, (the Gay when Mr. S,o.n. s..,s a.,
overture ~ae made 20 hir that he would ornoxa -,
communications or support it, according to lis neoe-
ui's' his declaration to Brent, be thinks ncor,-
Pdli'!a Vlth tho ol!edged to Sloane INT p.b,-a
"le' ne was on intimate terms with Brent. TT,
mo "R0''"' s!nco tbe preceding .7rct, that Dr,1,
! Word Tot" ,or lin. lie knew that sr,cT, . so,r.
'oh' SO right III itself, you'd not iri;re, but you'll
probably, benefit him with Brent. q. 40 3D..
ilahd' ne might have known or coniartur,i H..
nothing o"' distinct and Substantial premise o'g,r
porting The administration. poul3 ers,,cr Wy, H.
zeaioUs tfiea3s Of FIR. Adams aud Er Clay. Wa,
@!N =; o-1r,