The Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1822-1829, 1828-01-14

r.o,,td be NJ convention aud L was
'As' .,,r.,,.ne that tbeY spoke the sentnfuts
lah - r',.=,.rfurnfs. but ifihere was q he 4
81 81 .,,,.n when wolid = AXE place Aii- I
-. roll hy hJst N1o could ten wat
linz opponents otihe measure hgm
1'.' -, il, tie way EHt We wsrr 10 lave
f'i''' ..tf,,,., IN a T., sSouaair Time, It could
ton into offtHt'"n " 'a'' t"ie' a'"'s' ~
Do' -. sreoffIle 10 the plan contemplated
''s' .,Jgnltitd Tor the rritic ,'ton 81 rel {
- f,.a.ronlr Under these cn cnmNtances
i'' " es,.. under winch the country Ia" Ia
W. a., be- p,oyiied Tor, Were they 10
h'a' ,.-..,r4.. anl ,ve.gh down the people
"r =" ...,,,,atiug weight Inc Legislature
" ,,,.y,f# fl,su - apply the remedy aud he
I'll II W, their duty Ia cHeteiNeh' lie
....olld nave ben well II Mr.. Soision h'd
Lt,t.aying expense. anu opposed me IN
i''.- ',,,r,4fr oil instead Of waiting mtiI 50
,,5,,. nal been spent upon II aud al the
III. had en- nearly gone through.
- fr,,ta. considering thattha merus OF me
-,.o, d 4 been uuly opened 10 discu>''o" "
q,,te,n. rose aud delivered ms sentiments "a
IN, bill lie 49, aware OF the a lay "d
',.-,.sion, ofaur present judicial SYST m an" II
.pP''o.,I ,,airtethatt4e bill VAS consistent 9th
Ill. f,e ,pirlt or thelettcrof the constitution,
I'd -, for if. He commented on ithe G
a.. AT
,.,.n.,nnt almost 10 Il denial OF justice
so 7,,ay ~,.,s. h. drterrug men from asserting
- ;,st r,.snt of consuming tho amount ~ cor
-, In their prosecution. Although he 1T
II -, tfe fl.np lad arrived "h II a radical
&c ~, the judiciary system was called i'r,
90, he ,,tId not support the present hili, ne
III VA. Unconstitutional lie went Ia" Il
=, ef the Circumstances under winch me
....,,rti,t uas-f0rncd and Of the pr"bihf
-. ,ta.-.,,ioo TINT Induced its trainers so nearly
-, ts aur Institutions to those II the moth
:. ..,,f, : especially tine Judicial system. Ia
r.I.,1 there was tutd separation between
me courts al law and equity arising lfom INC
dpIercnce ot proceedings 10 eaeh' ne 'iS'a
a,,li.alIna q the principles y Jules "i "a" 81.
'llar.o,,,rd to be n,iagared b, the more lDneral
.oaf,c Of proceed ings in the courts OF thancfry.
1t the necessity of their cnfIrc separation.
- .rnerahon, he thought was ooptcmpIa.
,.lhy tl,r frainrrs of out constitution. his, he
proyca Nv the terms dsci both ~ reia-
,, "a me appointment aud Impeachment OF
tL. f,dars. Add he contended that such an an-
,o,,uatiun as the bill proposed vas III violation
II .l.o. a.,i rcd 10 the bill because II propo,
cal ,,,,..5fe judges by idic, aud nuth by Jo1"t
b,flot a, me constitution prescribed. ne
r.,s,As ,I tn, bill aware Of tins o1lecuon haa
Inserted clause rtqnrib" t'Ltt the Judges
snoniA DC o'"'l''1 i''. f.I. ,,,,,,I he
ldehc' NV %" i'''>' .3,l.#....,,s
ereit' .''|' 3"' ..,I, -, ,.,,,,.,-
@'aio oe a. 'a'' ..,,,.,,., ,,,., ,,,s,,ho,
4ushc"o o. an "ho, s'"'' I,5. an. s,.,,le
Diht' il'a''. taH a'Pl - -. ,of,s.d "a
5is la'"Sh' 'l' gn,,,l moi
ACT III Tue ne" en"' '''1' 90 49, -, and
df Bh7" sem " - ~ mont
u P1ona'''' oi "'"'' s..I ,,,.i.
not nnhh' ih't 50 i'cPn'N NJ" - a.
fei 'iii' ne WIS 80 ,''' - -, ,,,,,, -,
9u3gf' would reuse ,a' We ia" ,,',.,,,,
tar ahIe,' ON 'h' oe"'n wa W., I,,;t,o,i ~,
strut 'na'. "'s 1 ,,,,, ,,.,,cr n
all aagd' lat me JUDICIARY ia" .'s i.,.'.s
po''p",' ~ - 80 ,,or,,o If tac, had
,s,..,.s. ,r.5,,, ;uds,,,dcnre was pros-
wv '', '..,.,f.r,,,,e ,,s,,,nation.
Al, a...g,d..9 hy ,em,,.,no that the
u,',', al,,-,'.s ,.'a.'oa o,th .ytrrmo jealousy
,,f,..,.,;,,, ,ftne Constitution If tht
rl,,,I 'f,,t',,r,,., mr. Siote Constitution
,,,,,..,;,, IN that jealousy was river t.
rh.e.ni,. An.t. he asked, vas the cause al tai,
inconsistency
Al. c...,l,,,, ro,rc,t,d that the motion TO post
-, n,ao Ito had Aonrd thaf the
Fue '',' ''.'.I .,,r,,,,,t,,,a +, r., mr.,
g,tsS "a az would nave deferred thc,r attack up
snia lte longer that they wood haYe Snt
s..rdi,. IN II, amended tonn 10 be printed M
-.i,nA AMI f,irlv presented FOR tons'dera
non Hchad not expected it 20 PISS without
Il sweat and a bloody agony. Bu' me SENSE q
tie country had been passed npon il and in IT,
Ggar. Mr.. g. spoke of any fareat, Or opinions
"-an In Judiciary as Improper ana not outitlcC
tl influence the decision Of the House. Mr.. j.
4 argument, he said was not ne0-wnen that