Daily Richmond Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1828-1831, 1828-12-30

~
not even by the moral and f,stidious MIR. Walsh
whose sensitive dslicacy so often offended by tho
abuse tue "IIero" nor It's the deliberate lie fpro
we'd 10 DC srh by tho proceedings of Congress- propa
gated by the same infamous association that Mr..
Adams spoke and voted against the treaty Of cesson
OF lousiaua, and against appropriations Cor carving
It Into effect. been cnnraieted o. cenaIfe,i in onv
Jackson paper.
Tho Richmond Committee say in thrss Address
'And fox whom vas this man (Gca J) thus To be an.
critNsR For men who, devrisinr each o,h., md
Until then h~aT;ng each others purposes came to-
geihcr By so:ue on,.Dus co,uuc;io. 10 aspuish ,hc,
cacnisy nndgratiy their o siabiiic." Is,is t,ue
statement oFiae relation III which Nests a. So C..
stood to each other darag the Presidential cnp,cs,
nc letter OF Mr. Clay respecting Nr. Adainss pob-
!cion III as controversy With Russell related Soye,
10 some diHaTccc ofopinor Of facts In reference to
the negotiations u. Client. The letter Of Mr. Cla;
I'll me reply to 1t of Mr. Adams, both bcore the
pubic, and we're the s9bjcct OF ceulu,ent by some
en'ofs dspnsed 10 produce alna;io fgood fcl;,
o"'heir part. They did not succeed, for the publici
ton neither caused any feeling OF r,sentut ;oSurds
or respect for, each otrcr. The ,nIuo,cd GOODNESS OF
each ioE the other, if il indeed existed arising from
sner letters or from tho circumstances OF their beine
Fa candidates. did not interrupt their social inter
course ut Washington. lsiurthcr proof we're rcoui
stein vndicaton Of I'. Clay on this suhie1, i, nay
DC found IL his letters published by Jonathan Russell
ihcsf, although vfittp i'll coniiicaac and 10 t!.c
most bitter eneCy Of Nr. ADAMS, contain no exors
SION dsrcspecthto Mr. Adauus. On t,ccuntrarv. h.,
plainly writes - Nr. Russell that satisfactory ex
PLANTATION of tic duplicate lcttgr" i narcssarv f,p
his rcputatiop
W hat vas the "onirois corjrrcticO' Of tho ecve-
rai devoted pariizhns Of Mr.. Cravrord Mr. CaIhorn
and OF Gen jackson, attert,c election of Mr. Adams,
Did trey not hate cnc othlr and the bends OF the
parties also, With an Intensity of sni,nas!,y unrxn,
pied IN the history Of political parties in this cuuntrys
We're not their INITIAL rrsentmcnts almost inextn
goiShabie In their nature sofcncd and suothed over
Tor the purpose OF combining in deadly and uuutio,
tc' hatred Of the administration Just formed, yyoz
there not determination the part Of many OF TIN
combination men to oppose tire Iuessnres Of Mr..
ADAMS 6ciore thrse Duasurrs we're fully de,-st,-
.PcP. In illustration If .b,s truth land VT, cmr.I
cite otigr evidences Of h) We state fact.
communicated 70 IFS By q fiieni, that mrrp.
ber OF congress from s. Carolina said. a, tho
'evee held at the Presidents bouyp on the nigh,
OF TIE day OF election, that the election ofr adams
WIS Tor Jlpsr q1DS oViY Is il uncharitable to STIR,
pose tha' IN uttfng this opinion, he expressed elso
the opinions Of his colengues' We sincerely believe
that no party in this couury Sas ever more bitter in
Their icehls against the men in power or formed Of
materials discDrdant and VIC trust and believe ,ba.
the cement which united this inconrruous mass will
ere long, begin to lcse its quality of odhcgiveues
and present to the world nouldcriur ruin never
gain to be reunited.
We tiink that GIr. Stevenson has SIGNED His ,or,,
to She Address without iGvii,n read il verv cnrs,,
and must have trusted entirely 10 bis assnr,,,,u
their selection Of the articles which form the anpen
nx. That from tie american Sentinel" which Is
IN hc form question ind answer contains &C drsc
an attack on Mr. Stevenson endhis colleagues in con-
Sress, for voting in ayor of Mr. Crawford. as r. !,
haa Ueen specially applied to them. Yle main Object
o. TIE article u 10 ccsnre every member Of ougrc
WHO a'd noe vote for Gen. j., for, Notwithstanding
that the constitution gave TIC full power 20 ,hg r.
OF - To elect any Of three Persons before Tho
House, its spirit it is said, violated by not elect
Nc Jackson who had the largest number Of electoral
votes we giVo, to onr rrud.rs, ciyu sample q tho
logic Jf this article:
t1"cShad.-Thcn if understand the matter, Nr.
Adai1s' by foul practices, got minority Of one in
DO House of RGprcseratiycs, voting by Ss,tesoi
though he got hut ai out 2sI electoral yotosoI,l,
but II out OF 2l2 members Of congrcs voted for him
And although majority Of the people had voted
geographically ST. ira members of conpreys
VINO violated the will OF their states .Tssovri and
rtu',s; and for which they afterwards rot Offices
ron NJ. Adams, bad rs much influence in electing
President tho Gi1iy members from pcnnsvIvan;s
aud New York. "'''"
In regardto tire STATE Of Illinois, ia, Adams %,
taihed najorty oftho votes of the Teopi, and Cen
JacIarJu majority 81 erats from tlre crcptrgioncp
oft"o Adams electors being voted for in ono dis
t'c:. The same result crcnrrel in MARYLAND
Which shows that by the want Of uniformity in
TonnS in all the states, candidate may net ma
JoIity Of etectoToI votes another maionty Of the
votes of thcPcp'e. This occurred in the last cleo
'ion a. has bern proved by IN accurate estimate.
Bt in what stoation ire the rrepcctnble members
OF The state Of y. Carolina placed by tho arguments
~ this 0rticc' Ibry viol0teJ tls ,yill of ,bo -,.