Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1828-03-12
From tie Nia..onai journal. or.H,,e, -

twas a saurceof deeprcgrct 20 us, that re ro,r,
~ , cenpohed ny circumstances TO publish a CO.
~ VI me au'oS'eps'c communication made 10 US by
yen. Jackson Tftr note had been IN our posses.;on
'or s"re'a! months; bi, n feeling ct nation pride. for
winch no patriotic and rejecting citizen will cond.,on
- 'esp"'hea ns from making q public disclosure of A
aJchricnt 50 iitt'e calculated to do honor To- g.. attn.
mons " enc who ills at This rnorncn, so laroe a enace
III nc public eye. Bot whcr we saw nrolic,;nn.nv
ucnt'S h'' MS ""H; pa'ned of bpop the world IS the
c,'tn'ahe'"S ch'iS'ons nfi.is MAD, au1 used to sus-
'anl us rt'ensicnst "a the Presidency. a re-, rl 10 tr,ti,
ard u dcsire 10 ctrch the career ef dccrrtton. couno,
itd Us ~ s'cri!ice every other confederation and vra
published The copy of tic uutc il eur paper of the ctst
OF
On tho d. &c is pub!i-a,i1n. <, vo members IF e.,
gross from Tennessee. Judge Waite, Of tie Se,,.n
and Col Polk, oftAa Hnuen Of Ecp.etnlat:vcs c,nct
as 'hr 'rie''S OF Gen jackson, to cxama.c the origis.
al. These gentlemen have chr consent to u aI,c . ef,n
statement oFail that took ?'acn du-io- Tho ir,o,r;or
Al'cr = long and close exacn;na 'ior. Col. Poll, caoi:,.
y e'a'ec '"n' he conid not tel! w!cii.er il Was zen
ta"Sf"ns hani writing or not" Judge White fsr
some t~'c declined vTress;-r any rninio,. ar u; l. -
mot until after ne had been repeatedly nsssrl - ,r
anG. after we lad told i.im, more than once. ina, e,
c"StHe'cd It Que 10 US 'ha, lie Should express i :
o3's''", and that loo hef're be lt the room tl.a.
he v"nflred to say, II will say this. Si~. 10
not thi''k would Tel, the trnih, # we're to saw
knew y IL be his saSlh-wriiinc;' al upcu orr iroIoc.
d'afe'y asking him If he would sly tlis, ~ .ti.k !
would tell the truth it | were to say believe il Is No,
has handwriting, :" he declined giyirr n diler, AN r.
and said, che Inference mg, be DRAWN We II. -,
vi IL
prepos<' to him, and we now renev.the oropos,tior f :.
Tue purpose OF removing all double upor The srJ'c..
10 compare the ori1ina! with arv T. tnrs If CIR. = nj
son ~ bis poSses2:cn, when we wonii cuny acn i'm u 4,
only that the handwriting Of tie noe vas The sar,e
but 'ha; ~ hcrevcr the same wor'. ere FOUR in ho;I,
me "TthoGrap'y was uniformly lhc same. lie I'D All
acnode tn his proportion.
Tire first un''cc taken Of TIE "irrrrsstarc: hc.c, " he,
s'here are abundant mraua nf as,et:aiY!rc r H. ,,c -,
gS'ume, by reference ITO rrrsons and papors.' vas IN ,u
ed t"rlal article in the Tclsgrarh Of > tur4nv Last. tho
fh 'hs,a,', six'est' days"iIer the FIST publication 4 ,.c
nate. We refer 10 tins article. fnI the ;lcecmi rurpts, 81;
merely marking the TINE "F its appearance. The sis-
sta 'enIen,s and admissions II cnntains wills bc Noticed herr
aiirr- We cannot see tGat me Authenticity OF tbe not.
can or proved I" the satisfaction Of ihc pcspjr, by entsiiro
ini" a %ar"i words with hn eGjtnr wl.o has had no n..n.
o. jansing "i iAe i'ci, a+i coase qu"u;ly has no Materials
iT]nI "Aicn 20 form 4 corIcCt opinion. We aIp. ir>,ou, al
'ns7rtirs- n ine first place, IN he bast means oIi.,;iry Nh.
di'h o. cur Statements; am ii TIE friends of Ugna,.I J,.k-
SON chinese ~ meet us on the ground we have slated. W.
"iii not shrink from ;he investigation. We will not un,y
nret theh; S"t WI a' them III ne inquiry, by ?rodIein,
o'h-r sp"ri"ens Of his baud -v,iiinc. the autB:r.ic;,. ~
Which they themselves viii NOT dispute.