Delaware journal., 1828-03-04

,rine would be deeply responsible to the community
if were possible TO suppose they could DC dece''-
ed by such doctrines. :,
According to your reasoning, Mr.. Editor, there IS
privileged class now existing in this country o
some ten or twelve years standing. aude 70 the
manufacturers ofcoarse cottons The tariff OF 1910
protected the manufacture ofcoarse cottons py hgh
lduties, which were extended IN 1894 10 coorea COL
lions. These are fully protected, and the coarse
cotton manufacturers, according to your logic, are
' privileged class and the country is now suherng'
and has been for many years, all the evils OF = mo-
|nopolv' priviieges'' exclusion and so forth,
J Iu cotton shirtings, sheetings and cacoes. Where
Twas your warning voice when these " monopoiites
lwere created, and why not now demand the repeal
of this PARTIAL and :" exclusive" law? This law
has, indeed, given to the American cotton manniac.
turer I" exclusive privileges" but it is only the
pr,uiege of srcudng British coarse coons IRON our
market, and of substituting American oottons at nall
the price and Of vastly superior quality. ihese,
:, Sir, are the effects of the exclusive privileges
which you SO much deprecate and the same DIRE
ful effects, and much more will result, whenever the
woollen manufacturer is, in like manner, endowed
, with " exclusive privileges"
= II may be deemed left handed compliment from
me, to say that you appear perfectly to understand
the tactics of the new school of friends of manu-
: Gctures At one time, you fight the wool grower
, against the woolen manufacturer, and, again. you
pitch battle between the d" individual establish
ments" and the incorporated companies OF New-Eng
. land.' The whole plan of the campaign may be
found in the edifying story of the mutiny OF the bel
:. |ly, and the members. The scheme you have sug-
gested by which the incorporated vultures OF New
England were to swallow all the foreign wool which
: = shall come into the country during two years, while
: the farmer. would shut up all the domestic wool IN
- their barns, "un they ehectually closed the doors
of every mandatory in the country, based on ind'-
- vdua capital'--is discovery which would do you
= credit if il were not utterly deficient in probability
" " possibility and even plausbility. You may as we'll
" tell me that water will not find its level, OF deny
" :. any other known law Of our nature. 10 suppose
- on the one hand, that the farmer would keep ms
- wool shut up for years, to be devoured by the
RI worm, while violent competition was going on IN
the market, for foreign wool, between the vutures
y and the small fry-the monoposts out-blddlng the
:" individual establishments, and giving exravagant
- prices for foreign wool or, on the other, that the
- incorporated monsters themselves would invest an
49, Immense capital in this article at an extravagant
:, price, permit it to lie dead for years, exposed TO
the injury and destruction to which wool peculiar
G " liable from the moth and worm, in the hope, the
vain and baseless hope, of crushing down competl-
hon in country like this to suppose all TINS and Sc
rously to urge it. presumng, think, very largely
' upon the folly and credulity of your patrons and
. readers. I have heard OF an honest iiibernlan,
who for some particular offence, undertook to break
,nL la country Dank Dv up us ho'es,
49,, burning them as fast he could find them, bu
he depend upon it, my good Sir, you will meyer catcf
~, yunkee burning his fingers in this way have salt
before that al the woollen manufacturers the Bran
:" dywne were in favour Of the wooens bill of las
winter and no need require more unerrin
oi test of its usefulness than ths-They are the par
ties interested they ought to know better than 9th
ers, its operation, and they had no dread OF the re
'fe suit if these individual establishments had no ap
ear prehensons for themselves, why should you be
mo anxious on their account
w. But seems that the wool growers, too after ha,
os lng assisted in crushing the "indivlual establish
are mens were to become the victims Of these nsati
va BILE vultures. 1.-THE individual companies woul
have it in their power to keep the price OF wool u
on. at that rate. that ooud pay the gro,0er nothin&
tell while it would be high enough to ruin the small cal
OF italist "-Again, "The agriculturlst would
the worse off, because he would have on hand two
OF three crops of WOOL for which he could get no pr
the dtable market, oich ,vod lead 10 the destrctid
ON ofMe Rccks Of sheep at once, and then the who
to country would suffer-" Admirable logic powe
full reasoning which demonstrates beyond contr
bill icton, that the manufacturer is interested in Il
lass destruction of the "Aocks of sheep" What ne
hat shall we hearl The Brandywine Millers comb
ex ing against the Farmers to prevent the growth
S." wheat, or you, Mr.. Editor, kicking your paro
kind out of doors and telling them that the Patriot
last flourish very well without them.
the At length, however, we have bill with win
Iel Won nrofes, to be satisfed-.Th. bill now befo
n, 10 Congress provides as well for the farmers as t
this manufacturer, and places the individual establis
ments and these Overgrown vultures of the Eas
ork, un the same foo,ing &c'' This bill meets your
and tire appreciation it approaches to the war
that of the nation taken whole, and is reer from
more :. contracted and beaparly' policy than the bill
hese last year-Such is your language and let it be
upon membered-The time may come when you will wi
G OIL III unsa,u