Literary cadet and Rhode-Island statesman. [volume] (Providence, R.I.) 1827-1829, 1828-03-12
where they will hc prepared any vosr.e eonjunet"o' TO
for Nj Elha r. Potter 10 promote any ohsr jackson

for Mr.. Elisha r. Potter TO promote any ohe jackson
which may be thought tsped'ni.
1t i tAi iarme, Of Rloials4nd which induces those who
have o,a sought 70 beoy .on, 10 'ue the pamphlet h
question. They know yoCT d,!le of the "msn Of blood
who a,i up csnIi late in OPP ''on to John Quincy
hl'm The have not iogo the l'.'on which You 'ao,L
item Ia iCe, whom you h led from the kcpgeeniaise bench
many yo secret enemies, aud elected A'lur Robbins
in spite sf al then naenatons They are, now, more esu'
,us h ls hen were; bat they have rlnlu,hed then
object. To e,ain s,'cn the Senate, they must elect
Nathan Brown Milan Whipple aud E'hon SANFORD yes,
E,on Stafford, who ia ia2i suffered himself 10 he named on
the irdeal kH for Lieu enan Governor. To sustain these
men hcy must d"t your attention hom the real question:
al they ;e YOU that til. fnmcs arc in danger Of con-
riacy, fomrd 10 he formed among the other classes in the
aud ,hey endeaspu to excite your srooisl dstrui
az ,n.l hanl dnec'ors
II the fact that bank director, must di'qnafy him
for ocr then d,p1oe Lieutenant Governor Collins
and Senator, Whea:.n Eidge Smith, Watson, aud the two
Wppc, and YOU ought to purge the house OF Repre.cta
y oi three quarters Of ' present members There have
always been mao Of bons director, in both houses of the
General Assembly. The present Senate has such majority
yet nohns h besn done propo'ed in that body against the
landed Interests. or in favor Of the banss The ineonenry
of the pamphlet this point is Obvious; II recommends
Hlian hi,ple bank director while object. Thomas
Nhan,e BECAUSE h. one. II it had been sincere,
woul have reL the eoton agini both, and far
would have been cop.tent v h ,eI. But Thomas Whip
e an honc,t open hearted Adam. man, while HWiam
give, ont. ,l,, h. oHAS NOT COMMITTED HIMSELF
ON THE PRESIDENTIAL QUESTION" This fellow
riis,n, constitute, the real difference in the pamphetee
between Thoma, and Wii!nm, II is, with this consistent
writer no objection to Mr. Sanford that II is b,nk director
II true that H,n Whippe i, excused because his great
e Interest in land. This would apply with A. much
powcy, all the candLno There is no man among them
nav there is hardly in the directions of the seaport
bink, who doe, gea;e amount in real estate than
in hsfk .ock. The oppeon the Tax, even in those towns
principally confined TO certain great stockholders, lew ~
number who have little in the active bnncs, OF
hc community. AZ these capitalists have ,he command Of The
bnk aud elect dpaoc directors at their pea'ue, the
bank directions acqs,ce in their wish To haye the constitution
atty Of he tax decided in The only legal way II Is nai"-
al plmph!,eer well Observes that these few men should
wi avoid the legally ty may, and no one should
blame ,lcm lo ing TO that Law which settles the rule q"
property and OF night, according to the 'ca'on ot the "a'r.
But IN, PAM heecr la. gene into compar'on "' the men
who ere now in opposition each other, the two
pox,s. No ficnl Of Mc,,es. Whascr Cooke ani Smith,
will shrink ON compai,on of gentlemen with Mosrs
brown, Nllam w nipple anu J''"" w y ="
man. whom III who know him. respect. The author Of his
runc. the foundation Of which he laid by the hbonr' oi his
hand.-th uperucture which has been raised by konors
bic and pceverng industry which gave bread and employ
ment to nunbes-by intelligent enlcprzc-by the intro !u'
ton and establishment OF new branches of industry which have
called numbers of mechanics from other places and added
them popuoon. Liberal to the eiyparioLic in his
senmen-repulican to the heart-he i, firm supporter Of
=. il.,a a.. h,,,n of
public school. aud the new Judiciary law. lie will he faith
f Representative Of the interests and sentiments of the
ch,nc, and manufacturers of Providence. 1t objected to
him that he bank director. To this olection If il were
sound one against any man, might be replied, that his bank
stock is SMALL compared with his interest in the soil Even N
Providence his real estate greatly exceeds the of his
money stocks and trading capital lie is large proprietor OF
land. in the country. His interest," therefore, would no be
promoted 10y repeating the bank tax.
Who is Nathan Brown Z We all know him well enoush-a
large landho c therefore, good farmer Let his
neighbours OF what avail HIS countless uncui
vaed What employment do they Afford to the labour-
e! What example, of improvement TO his brother farmers
II would puzzle his advocates to point out single
benefit or advantage which has been yielded by lis business
or hi, polite, or in the whole of his conduct, whether his
lands the general assembly eewhere single dispose
duced any thing beneficial in the business of the farmer
single implement of hu,tandy-any crop which was be-
fore unknown? Has he done any thing public to promote
huslany-contihted 10 the premiums which every
awarded for the hest butter, cheese cider; for p'ousins
Matches working cattle, horses, sheep, swine &c Scr Has
he joined his example those who for the last eight years,
have been persycngy employ ed the promotion Of Ag-
ricuc? Has he in hi. legislative seat, done any thing of
th. kind, wished endca,oed to do ii! IT. during
twfe years occupancy Of at the Senaeboad, he has
done nothing and attempted nothing Of this kind, where, in the
of reason, h disposition his ability promote the
farming Interests! Yet this man. who has in twelve years
done nothing for he farmers must be by them sustained in the
Senate that he may continue TO do nothing for twelve years to
come
But objections to Mr. Brown not all told. 1t is to
him, rtincpay be remembered that must impue all The
opposition which has been thrown in the way of improvement
in State ahihs. Who opposed the reform Of the Supreme
Court /, Nathan Brown. Who opposed and endeavoued by
secret measures taken in concert with John r. Waterman ia
defeat the act for establishing PUBLIo SCHOOLS and creating
! permanent School FtSD! Nathan Brown Who has al
way. thrown himself in the way Of every proposed improve
ment? Nathan Brown Who, lastly, let ask, la, obstinate
adhered TO the exploded party Distinction Of former years
and system Of nomination in party Convention, by which
the representatives of many excluded from giving III,
voice Of the majority of their constituents! Nathan Brown
Yet Nathan Brown mode'y put forward the champion
Of the farmers by this pamPhlecer, who calls hine farm
er, in opposition JOSIAH Whitaker who and cultivate
nd, who has been Of the active member. Of th'
State Agricultural Society, since il, establishments
who literally expend, his Time aud money promote the inter
Of the ha,bandnan. If Mr.. Brown friend, satisfied
to have these two compared certainly have obec
| ton
rhe want Of room compo defer further remarks hi
subject to our next.