Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1828-05-02

To- lor ,as o'Foi tie city Of Williamsburg, The Il
Benz f. Dabnry, adm'or Of u eni Dahney dec and t,,
~ lho' and Mary 10 Dstuty, niHu by the said Benz =
Dabneyi their guardian aud neat friend, Phf,
VS. IT, Macon and strshbis wife, and er'ri, Of
The, g. Smith Tho s Dalney Assne T. pssS. :.
" an nIafihs Il. his ts;fs and May 4
o% an infant ~ 'hn a. Smith, her guardian pss,s IS
Tins this LAY to be heard on the bin. sb
"t, eAbDi and examination of wtntsses, was
BY counsel; On consideration whereof The cent IS of
e atsson o. 'hf land called Eim'ndon, brwee
ba defendant Ssiah mieon and en-, proper
me aud that was proper the dyi.on OF tle is,, "a
W m oui'dhss on tue lsimingun tract YET. 81 b
'iat the persons appointed by tie Of The saia
made he yesr1sl3s beesuse by the calculation then nsgs
The sons did not shtau, each Of Them tire times as much a.
10 the division Of The share which Jfmesnue of die s
%o ded would have been entitled. Tsse errors are cor
Ben Dsbbey tins sec". No 20 cue ey ueoig.
en!ai,o" Of the division OF the mossy Arising IRON the al.
intended 10 divide the whole amount Of sbs sa
ct That Tract Of lsnd The statement Is aso
N charging TO George snd Benz Dabney the amour; Of b
paid 10 Ross aud due by the sst4tor The se,t,smen me-
~ Jalnes Dah-sy and John A. smith Of the 9th day 81 A
su' ne court eon7dtrs, under the Circumstances Of
csc render u mPfopeC tqis account Of the profit.
i 9s from tue cuaivoon Of the called hIninsten 4 m
seet at ' 1873 bsosuse il - bsssI ON Inc -
Oa e ist division Of the ianj, sud contains snargtn
iustet contrary 20 the former statements auJ ado IN fls
y'n Of oJ0ib part Of The sales rhyard and sarrs Tor
Decree shat the defending Wu1. II Macon AM, Sarah bi. ~
e. sd eNtfN " Be0 Dabney render before one Of the
comm sones ~ tins fouit Of the transa
7aiah before her marriages. ofthe said Sarah
H. Hdoou since their the eni pafne
hnt 90 such account notice hesksn Of the nresfs
iS.se ~ the cultivation Of The land osiifh Eoneon or
ohef, hof % advances TO The chdi festsor for
Hpput sui education. The ih f1rthrr sdi.dr
an1 decree, that tle defendant John A. Smith fraf.
r-pfe me sst3 COmirsgoneT an account Of his 49,
ior ihrtnas o. Smlths acfines 10 the csfae of h
sa'd BfnJam'n pabueyj bat IN account 20 notice d. ~
iake1 % the pronts 10 The cultivation Of fe d
."td hmWFion shy othfrf Of advances % tie a.
u'e = te tesayr for tuer rapport and fdnrs1n and n 4
id h9mis q smith shall he found 10 be inIebftd on sue
,etouni ifn e deeadsnt John a. Smith ~ ft-
ger nn account OF his aetings the ese Of the aid Thans
- 'n ufesS be admit o6-e 4. pag he baiser
1Vt"tn4 doc by Dc estsf0rs estate court fh Grfhrr
a3ufE's 'faef aud decree, that the SAID commission a-
ne va'ns Fsi.le menis made q pfs # tvlchsre fld IN
@ cf) according % the 1f eeoing opinion ard hsvins o.
td 'any evidence cxpisn8ii0n which may lie tfsd.
winei ,ft several acco7nf The Commissioner if-
iect-d 9 tr1une, state aud settle aHd 10 make rero fa
OF ip te court m any matters specisly stated decnei nr-
infui Wy himself which may required hy ne psrf 10
be - sisted. cory. Te'tA ED CHRISTIAN &c.
Con7l't9ney hndeoons CDies, Hansbrg, 2fs, 0Jores,
IbX8i
hve srPouisJ ih 9TH dsy Of nay nest execute Che
'ofeEous order II coufi which day by o'cIofk H.
t P9e' concerned are required oaGend niy o e,sesa
rr b9nk, pfrefs End trnupny, With copies 81 the oa
'bpefs, snd vsiih tbs original oidir.
no. ANDERSON, ooa'-~.
ni w Uq-ss5t