Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1828-04-26

given and forgotten Ousht you not ,hen in You, rnl
"'s 20 enghten the good people of Virginia To have adj
Ve''ed to these facts and let them what thew
" I" mus perhaps you will answer that people OF
"'"ky han not then heard the evidence OF Cen Jack
s'' '@i N"j"T Ettn and Judge Issac. .7ncs Keda
"n' God k"'ws ."ho saout "the bacgain" rne gen,lc
m'" 'y had act ttu heard OF itLu sse not how nm
ls" amce "i ''t!' bagain between MI. adams and NJ
S!hy c"aid ieven, them from knowing what had b.e,
'her own wishes; and the question here is whether Nh.
woes vi tne Kentucky been TONED
~ e' constituents as evidenced by subseque elections
gu" no' whether their votes had been honestly given
mat IS quite another which shall in snu Time
be considered ~
:" much for the evidence of public scn,nsp, in Ken
lucky at the tine when that as sor..s, n,,
are quite TAI in stating the of what ,ha
"o" IS IL IS true that there eight Of eu
jackson ou of the twelve in Csngess Eu, in both the
houses of the last State Lesisla tu,e who's.
c"nser as furnishing the best OF the sense of The
slate THESE critics in OF the ion
mere rs evidence against evidence [, is not however
quite so strong side you suppose il, In IN, con
test between the late DIR. Young and Nr Calhoun (bot,
ADMINISTRATION menu there had been much Of tb,, bcr
personality which often mirgies in political contests.
'" ''s h"'i nv ELECT oil making of Young sun
roe's IN the subsequent u,wecn MIR Chii,on and
i Calhoun either for Mir Chiffon the ,es,,t u. !,
oeros not vote at all They did we see don. every
uay' tney sunk the politician in the friend w III, ,hs aid
MI C'"n was elected by vey small majority but his
district is decidedly for the ADMINISTRATIONS B az did
you not Aa"w that the general law WIS passed by
we concurrent perhars unanimous vns og boil, ma ties
ms nci, surprising bt aen,bers nf the csatu,e Ia he
good nises OF tin, taii constituents as v,u
are furnishes evidence that the ad,,,us,ra,i, !; 49,
strong ~ that at Gen jackson. Nav same may think il
n"c"'es yet greater strength, the Jackson party
h"dna that their opponents could aud wood pass the
~ 'h'''e oi necessity ard effected wis, the Y
could ""' prevent for the sake mai IN. im essio, an
WI" '"ie ana o dcprVins their ativersaIieS tenpo,a-
ry triumph
But gam, gentlemen political caIculatos or ccss,ry
YOU please say tat Gen Me,calfe one nf the members
WHO voted los ai Adams, wi! bt choen the next Govern.
"f. The 'ackso" patty, of his hsh staining
ms c""fy"rn insist that the probability Of his
lion furnishes the sense %: the S,a ~, ,.
r'esidentia question BE il 1t however quite as
s""ng as trait IN wh RELY it would have ST., a
s"od example OF hat fairness which sale to,
praise tnan convenient ooerve to have stated these
hrs' y"" Knew them, ard extenied your inqui
.'es il you did not.
"A word % two now the State OF illinois Both par.
"e> 'i"'" L" have The majority tina, State;
pF"naDiy no great difference them Mr. Ada ,y
received the GREATEST the votes of The rcon
AVID Gen jackson Of the electoral votes. M. Cock who
ma" give" qualified pledge TO The people Tor Cen
'"Shs"n, always maintained that h, not. under the
circumstances of the election, thar pieg in
ting lar nv Adams. Besides, his preference iot that
teman kunwn avowed the ,ine Of his n,ci;n,
IA 1874 and how little such pledges avail IL ur.su ,, n +,
votes "f the opposite party. al know lie y hn "
eveF LETT OUT aa you correctly the Succeeding
ERECTION But nave always uudersooa that cnusi-
ocratons thsn h!S vote foI Nr. Adams gos.
IN favor of his opponent. This seems po,ta from The
oncumstauce of his father IN Sir N!ra.,is havru NJ:
the san'e time los; bis election nor. This ge,c.
Di
Mr.. Adams and Gen Jarkson, and than IN.
'Icc-fresident disposed be the betvee, rn
OF nay, had declared himself in iavur General
se'as you may think iat the such man
Hs EDWARDS, the invIdous and crue prosecutor Mr..
CRAWFORD showed which the n,aIoriy laid: but
yo" shu' remember that THO Il" instinct
sure AS vel as strong. and Ia his election Upo,
ne whole here convincing evidence the public
81 toe present se,n'"nts Of the people Illinois but die e
was snaii prSponderanca in iRvoT II M Adams Al The
time OF his escffssssas
e II ;s
me representative who voted for Mr.. Adams fi
""t b5 ms constituents, tu, il cuay iruc ev
nave elected .n administration succeed him IL
can scarcely be su;pOScd that, question
ma" been The governing primcip, yuu would
the people would not have selected person had
'e sentiments ri t!ie rhJoryor thai ii, furnishing
member for Violating then rights, aud disc sar,!ug
wishes they would nave selected another avnerIlv of Ia,
sin'e sentiments Nh Bales, Indeed, h! dsca.e that h-
would obey mis- Constituents, as an,o,
every candidate declares when wishes concliate in
dVnuai is OF rival parties, Ike lHu
submission Z" the popular w there who
do not prefer hav. tine ury afforded by Il
concurrence 0f sentiment! aud &c majority of
ut Missouri ia rvUr IF (rn. Jackson happened il
'a' n" ore was found willing and ready profit by this
natural a"d veil founded principle? Let being the
case home 10 yourselves. Suppose that 81 Stevenson
should rsgu aud that Mr.. Chapman Jchuson whose ord
VIII 90 taI any mans should be a Candidate would
you with nedec fur Geo Jackson vote
In" h'n, nat 'shSaudg has talep.s, his pfnhity, his
assurances that he would on"r your ns uctions? Itert
Is part of y"o who would Ill venture TO say that a
majority would and it would he ''ia," q tina va,
SOUR have the feelings Of party sympa iythe same
natural prudence yourselves. At all events, you shnulc
have stated the fact Of Mr. Bates political sentiments
aud let the people HAYS judged of it.
A FREEMAN
',S -C.Ir1r rn<.Ir