Delaware journal. [volume] (Wilmington [Del.]) 1827-1832, 1828-07-04

itesisuaou---,t nle.cd al least 30 SAYS tue Norung
lChroncle of23d,) of Mr.. lHuskisson. Lord Pal
merson, Mr.. Charles Grant, and, possibly, the
Lord Chancellor, would follow him. The cause OF
this step is to be found in the disagreement Of the
Cabinet as to the disposition OF two seats IN Parlla-
ment iorn,erely owned by the borough OF East
! Retford For corrupt conduct this borough was
DISTINGUISHED and the question was to the dis
position of the two seats-whether they should be
given to some populous and unrepresented town,
such as Manchester OF Birmingham, or to the small
hundred, containing only few inhabitants, IN
which East Reford is situated On this question,
the aristocracy and landed interests were against
the large town, and so the cabinet determined to
20. Mr. Huskinson and Lord Palnerston voted IN
the house against this disposition OF the seats
and thence misunderstanding, and want OF coni-
dence.
ROMAN CATHOLIC CLAIMS.
In the British House of Commons, on the 10th
! Nav Sir f. Burdett moved the order OF the day
for taking into consideration the report of the COM
mee ulon the Roman Catholic Claims. lie after
wards moved that the resolution agreed by the
House be communicated TO the House of Lords in
a conference and their consent desired. Mr.. Sec
rotary Peel concurred with Sir Francis lnthe course
he proposed. resolutionto the above effect was
then offered by Sir Francis Burdett, which was
agreed to-.
The conference was held on Monday night, the
10th Nav. between the two houses of Parliament
The resolution adopted by the Commons was pre-
Il scented to the Deputation from the Lords. The
propriety of such conference their Lordships de-
termined to take into consideration on the 9th
June As soon as the affair had been disposed OF.
Earl Grew presented petition from the English Ca
tholics, distinguishing their cause from that OF the
Irish Catholics.
; The Courier, of May 22d, SAYS. The issue Of
tie Debate upon the East Retford Question has Civ
en- rise to rumours of intended changes. Some Of
1.-THE Cabinet Ministers we're opposed to each other
in the Division. The question whether the fran
9 chise should be removed to great City, or to
! Hundred in the County of Nottingham might seem
i yrma face not of its elf to be OF such vast inpor
lance But the issue of the debate and the di
vision have given rise to strong rumours OF re
n slgnation or designations.
% Deeply indeed should we lament their con
j Grmation because we trusted the greatest cordial
!, " existed and because the country would thcreb,
!, be deprived Of the services Of men OF talent, at
D. time when snch services were so necessary
(Trom the Globe, of May %
Runours have been very prevalent IN the CIT,
this morning. Of the retirement from office OF Mr.
a iInskuson and Lord Palnlerston. The story seem
s. to have obtained very general belief, and has bee
Z strengthened by reflections the fact that thes
at minister's voted in opposition to Mr.. Peel an
at Nr Goulburn on the East Retford dsfranchlsemer
Il, BILL"
v (Fromthc Star, Of May 22.)
of I'VE have much regret in stating, that the di
a. ferences which have for some time existed among
some Members of the Cabinet have at last led to a
unfortunate result. Mr.. IInskisson has rendered hi
resignation. The grounds which he has take
e this step not yet made public, but we are led
IN believe that various causes have produced this dc
termination on the part Of Mr. FIuskisson and,
nat ntpf
y. It will be followed by that Of other Members of ii
TX Cabinet whose opinions coincide with those of tn
lse minister Indeed, we have heard It rumoured (h
by we mention this only as report,) that MIR. Char
Pc Grant and Lord Pamcrston have already tender'
,s- their resignation also"
ov From the Morning Chronicle of May 23.]
~ Mr.. Iuskisson did not occupy his usual seat |;
~. night beside Mr. Peel, but one on the extremity
,I the Treasury Bench, next the Speaker.
III 1t currently reported yesterday that Mr.. HI
IL kisson. Mr.. Charles Grant, and Lord Pamersto
~ had resigned.
Lord palmerston we understand denies the tru
"" otthe report as far as relates TO himself. But
believe, we can take upon us to say that MIR. III
:, ! kisson has rendered his resignation. We kn'
zen, nothing beyond this that it is possible his res
N nation may not be accepted. 1t is possible that
ling Ghdrlos S'i.''' WI 'esu'a.o n''sen ~ t..
any decided step.
The osteusibe cause of Mr.. TIuskisson's resigr
ton is the vote with Lord Panerstcn, in that W
- affair Of East RetTord.
From the Gazette de France, 21st May.]
ich- BUCHAREST, May A Its understood that
pa the It'll of this month the Russian troops will be
to occupy the Prncipaes, and the Hospoda
i'm who have received orders from the Porte, on
the approach of the Russian armies, to retire into
gem Turkish domnions and not into those of Austria
her they are said to have wished, will probably go
ased Constantinnpe. Count Pahlen, who is appoin
Civil Governor of the Prncipalities, will reside
. Of first at Jassy, and in the sequel go to Buchar
been The Russian Emperors expected at Jassy on