The Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1822-1829, 1828-10-27


Mr.. BrreurR administration i. reported 10
have losi bis election. 10y what majority /, not
known.
From the other FIVE disiriei.. we have no re-.
iurns. II 5 known, however. that The Districts
represented by Mr.. WHirrLEsEy, Mr.. M'LRts.
Nc ViaroS. aud Mr. BARLEY, Will give great
najof,tes 10 The Admintsn niion.
The State Vi Onip j. safe, therefore, by an uu.
doubled and considerable majority. for the cause
otCiyil Liberty.
From tia Wing.
Mr. yeferfon. Mr. J. Q .4dams and lfr.
Cies.-A slp r. onf1lic oiiicc of the stanton
Spectat~, has put us 90 possession of tho mnst
interesting Dounment bfonghi to lieht by The
collision of ihe political eiemenh--namrlv, n
letter irom ihb Jefferson 10 Mr.. Giles, dated
Dec. 25th. 1925, disclosing his opinians OF Mr..
Adams coniuct IN ioining the Republican
ranks In 1907, a neytr brf r published How
'hs letter eau. 10 ne published, will appear
from the correspondence between Judge Stuar
aud Nj. Tho J Randolph, Executor oil hlr.
tefre.on. Voucled MS the copy is. by Mr..
l~sii"tson Randolph, the depository of MIR.
jthrlson'e papers, no donhf can he felt OF the
Fenuineness OF the lcttc, aud the sole ground
i'r regret Is. that n Document OF ~ much mate.
#iall, IN enabling me people To form a just Is
i'nnle OF Mr.. Adams conduct and character
should mol soouor have been made public. We
pfocred Al once, 10 Jay II bafnfe the reader.
From tho Stauplon Spaetafor Extra Of Oct. u.
~~forreap1Hfcgcs bfipfcn he Hen. / stuart Of
Staunton. ord fAomas jefferson Randi pi.
Lrecaior Of Thomas Jebersoa deed
SuAaLorrE3glLLr, October II, 1879
Dear an,- an advised l1lat among the pa.
persin sanr possession, there IS a letter wntten
Ia Y,H44 n..4.d i.t.a. .t.I4aas.x. ~. AI.---
%ft0lifn nj course ~ thu support which he gave IN
Its decentralization. and the reasons which emit
uiled him 10 50 large a stare III his confidence.
It's important that their connoxion should be
explained thai the history OF This inlerestinr
pprtad should be known "a The People. l. Il I'm.
portani II should vow be known. Ionr gradd4
fathHr, !! liVlag, would not viii hold ms teSlima.
Bv IN iiSor oiany moritpripus puhlle servant.
.'glrttcnlhrly one WIN has been So Distinguished
nm aud, and : bright an ornament to his admin.
,%Sjration. Candid men OF all parties viii be
granhed 10 receive t%eslanan, from 20 pure a
source, May thrn ask the iav0r of YOU 10 W.
ne, NJ WITH a copy OF The lcller referred to, thar
"a NAV be laid betere the people. II am dear
lir, very alectionstely yours. &c.
ARCHIBALD STUART.
III J EANpotrn,
EnGEHuL, October, II, l82S.
Dear Sir. In coup iauor with your request.
? send YOU a copy Of the letter, | presume ,llu.
drd To IN your uote Of this mnrnng Conscious
that 10 suffer any 81 tire VIKINGS uf my Grand.
fnther "a nay possesglon TO be made su,srrvient
20 the use OF any p%rrtonal nr p0liiical purpose
would he an unworihs aud improper ahuSc Of
the trust teposedin me, ! hateue s~lttheless deem
med il entirety consistent willfits faithful dts.
charge, TO allow them to be used as vindiruiary
testimony OF the character or conduct of anF
individual, whnre thrY would fairly admit o.
that construction. Thist believe ~ he one OF
those cases. The facts contained IN this lrtct
have long been familiar To me-, having often
heard them with great interest from my Grand.
father in Conversation with others ON different
occasions from the date OF their occurrence To
bis death. | am awaie ihat This pi"oe.meal publ.
tption OF his correspondence. mnnyofh his letters
ZOO, seeing The light, mutilated aud detached
from their contents, would bear the anpearauce
of inconsistent snd contradictory opinions /:
get the evil has no corrective Tut in the full pub.
iicaIl1u oe his manuscripts, which will ere
long appear, when the public being in possess.
sion OF The whole viii ., enabled 10 form a i,,t
Judgment Very a1eciinnatcly you're.
Til JEFFERSON RANDOLPH.
JuDGE A. STUART.
MONTICELLO, Dec. ., lS26.
Mr.. Ours,
iNhi hi' " illi j fiH NaN Iftfl
vel four days ago. Il found me engaged II
wha, | could not lay aside I'll this day.
Far advanced IN my SD year, worn dowr
with lnfrmties which have confined me almos
ientifeiy te the house for : or ) months past, !
nS'cts me- much % receive appeals 10 my mem
CRY tor Transactions SO far far back rs that whcl
is he subject OF your letter. My memory is IN
deed become almost a blank, OF which no bette
proof can probably be gwen you than b
WY solemn prhtestatIou that have not III
beast recollection of our intervention betwee
Mr. j. @. Adams and myself ~ what passed .
the subject OF the embargo. Not The slightes
f'ace OF il remains in my mind, Yet | nave n
d ,ubt Of he exactifude OF 'te Statement IN yor
letter. Aud the less, rs I recullect the inte
feryiew with Mr.. Adams, 10 winch tie previot
communications which had passed between hi
and yourself we've probably aud naturally n
preliminary. That interview remember wei
mol tfN'"d IN the very words which passed b
tween us. but ~ their substance which w
ola character too awful, to- deeply engravt
an MY mind. and influencing too materially II
eouise ] had 10 pursue, ever Co Toe forgotten. III
Adams called GA me pending the embargo, m
while endtavnrs were making to obtain IFS /
ieak lie made sonIe apologies for the call, {
the ground OF our not being then in the hat
Of confidential commune ations, but that viii,
interest of our country not to override all 9th
considerations v ith him, and make il his du'
tareycal il TO myself particularly, ! assu!l