The Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1822-1829, 1828-07-31

=, ,,ten contract Tor The purchase OF rs e'oos
.annnn,ias 10 Slo.u50, which negroes were
bgurfi solcly for ihc purpose al beng 500 ass''
for the sake 81 profit II surely thfn h.ho' ne
re.sary to argue further on tins shiHee', "p' "
s'.s,rb .,ntnp old f,lliish for private papers TO
prove the charge. You have yourself pnp'e'y
s,lnu,ed IL AN no, about 10 inquire into TIE
decree Of ,rimnaliiy or hnpropue,s. II any ~,
attendant ON such A Transaction. The iaei Is an
Inv. NOW 10 do With Whether il he risht or
,yr,,e, 4, deal in human flesh with n view to gam,
/, ID, buy M aud transport " distant he"h''
like ~ many cattle, unfortuna fellow oi.'-
tirrs who happen 10 be of di1ri.n' o"o'
from ourselves IS question which '''' i"'
every man 10 settle Tor himself But 'hai YOU
Andrew Jack son, were once Partarr 10 a spec
u'ntion 81 that kind, canno, NOW he uenH" a. '"i
IL has ben aauted by seWsrii and proven
h. the written contract deposited by YOU IA me
hands II your printers. .,.z
Rui II 10 ell said. y3u weTr not ptncpai W
tie snereI,tioo-lou iecrt oBlg q security l
will presently eS8nine the shchcth 81 'his anu
eng and III ,nw apology. IN, must ~ ihe.itst
piac. ,xpress NV admif.tianof the conclusive
and abe srpnmrnt by wi5rb Il Is attempted 70
establish tn fact your security snip he" me
contact .,selG Tue following 10 an "''fae' nom
,onr defence.
tn. way fse ~ Tho ar,crmeH' iad,ed wn'li be F't.
rcrrf d. ealts1re Wit nl hH.th7..ei ms 30 =,
Jackson ~ a. kapqn - hr tHau al property ma 'ihii
',fc-a NHs eo4np uiau Iisl commencing "anz - aI1
artuue. aHd alaaiis 'iHeuinsiancra aus N'"F t
Alar.hns. lIthen had horH the HnGf 'AHllhF ~ ns
iar'ies thti Gen J1rksan ~ rrihr'fa' "a as u.
seiioa. noulf not hl- na.lr hpf i'rH put zinc 60
'r4rt oa3 II not hu9s hsrn Jackson. t'Ita'1 1na
Grcca instead Of Carnan Gfraa and ia ha"h' l"s
asdoratono Itself - srrifHt - ffhh 'a' 'ofI"'f
ton, HAT To WA principal ~ Tie iflnsa'ne'
Whether his argmneni were original With
80 some Il your council If pr, cannot say
hotifisa specimen of log,e worthy III" braun al
a p,ofnand auorue, Al LAW Judge Of the va
n,c,nr oouff. senator ~ congress, and asrn'ai
10 th. rra,taaney Tho man, whose nam" A.
placra last n the style of firm, = he mrrcof
~ possrss more capital or credit than hr others,
!. IN Il, REGARDED as security aud not rs pan.
net,t Il would he difficult. ma ~, aero d
,np To this rule, 10 Determine whether thr la-
Nor ednor," so cdti'a, in yeot printing c''aei"7z
ment IS really n partner pr only "'ol'Rs
which of the osi tibl' members oi TINT hrln
h,sfee l.rse,, amount, either Of capital 81 cred
~ NJ least ~ uuahle 10 de''dr. but "bo
d,es,,ttcrlthe fuIl 6sfcs attbe argument contain.
ri IN the asovr cxt,s,t4 E" Grn. Jackson was
known 10 IL a mao uf property aud c'edn,
'ireet was Young IAN iusi commencing bust
ness ,yithnu, fortDIr and CalcmanS circum-
.tances any thing but 1oth shing HtTffore
/, most cunclosivnly aud l.ctiStbly follow, that
're two last, eithnnt money AMI without credit
Sr,e the y-n 7pdis "a the TRANSACTION, anil lhai
tir former - q, Involving hrmsc'f-- assuming le=
tpous tu.s. aud running iisks. u9hoU he
s'igl't.i rionre or hopf Of profit merely as a Sc
-arii "a The irifnlg amount OF Sloooo, tor n
Young man Just commencing business, with
oui f1itane," aud loi man whose q" eirchmsian-
res arfe any thing but lpufiNling ~ ! he
A Al. - inn "A Ii ,tftfE -
Is hc drni~d hv any JAclisuuilc ~ the land.
RI sir. taking pom y"nr own ground and
sd,riuug, contrary 10 Ill the probabilities OF
thr case aud contrary 10 he wciPht at evidence
I. Tar as Il has We, been exposed. thnt YOU were
originally concerned IN his sprcalaliou, only as
"A grciir.fy Tor others. aud hid not dcslrC nor
intend to participate uhe prohS;' what thcn
Is the aspect Of thu affair materially changed
Iftherc were any improperly IN the transac-
fion Is II any better or you, Ia this vie" OF #,
'aan upon The suppasItipn Of your having been
beneicia I, interested /. it worse 10 do
prong 81 fnr yoar own profit. than 10 ald and
-btf othr,s IN dung sroug ior htH hen'h TT
Wat would sou hiuk Of "A man accused Of lie
~ an rrcompNGe ia an ACT 81 hung hiy or hiSb'
uaT robbery. ~ no should set up asa deftnec
thaf he was only concrroed A. security, 10
stand at distance md watch for the ,aieiy of
- companions, audtuat It was expressly under.
& God aud agreed that hc was TO have no share
81 tar booty Would you say that tins gcner-
ops robbrr. who showed huuscIt thus reckless
u'tltr property and even ofthe lives OF othas.
ass auY the less guilty. because hr robbed onlv
f.rihe benefit and profit II MS friends, and did
not expect nin,sell II pariake Of The spoil A.
= an say. / dn not uow meu II discuss the
prnpririy OF utGrD tyulWK Ihls mdltrt
l,aYc ~ the Judgment - he public But do
~ hesitate to say, thai IT YOU We're as You al
nj. q partner TO a contract Tor tbc purchase aht
sic ofslaNes nv ueRto Traders far p1ulif-ii YOU
gave your sauct on TO sucha #pernlanon, 10y
senu.r your aunr t. a written 40 e,meuf IN o.
del 10 carry L on Ii YOU 4 ouccd yuur money
or ri>lod soa credit, as q ueaus of aiding, pro
N ius ~ ~ cfng II, YOU ate, 10 nj lnients ard
purposes responsible tnl II. II therr WrTe
A. .ra.ropioty or criminallly Won acrr ips,
=, much griir5ys rrimiHs ~ case ~ were On
!, 4 ca,iIg Tor the h'ncGt OF prhrrs, as
,oa ,,,,t4a a.,ye bp.u # yoit WIRE ,alnsalf -