Delaware journal., 1828-01-04
DALATWsA ARE 90 JAZZ 4 J.,
W-l-.A..- N sa.SNs
Friday, JANUARY 4, 1928.
MIX. CLAY'S ADDRESS.

MIN. 1IA1 . ADDhEnoS.
We have seen nulning, within few davs past ;,
that we thought would interest our rcadels more
than Mr.. Ciay's Address to the publication ot
which, in part, we have this day devoted SO man,
Of our columns.
DIR. Watkins, at the instance of Mr. CLAY, ad
dressed circular to the Secretarys friends who yo-
ted Tor Mr.. Adams--on the subject Of the Beverly
or rather Jackson accusation. In reply It sseen
that twenty members Of Congress declare ,hair TO-
tai ignorance of any condition on winch tapir votes
depended-and thus prove the charge ut ry is.
unless we suppose one and all do moi tell The
truth. Mr.. McDuilie testies to tn. honorab. char
acter OF these men generally, and .lfr i}ncoanat.
another friend of the General expressly dtctarea
that he SCALED on him. not as the agent OF M .
Clay or any person"-thereby refnting the charge,
and rendering totally unnecessary the present adj
.lrrss, had Gen. Jackson only confessed MS error.
We're the gentlemen from Ohio, Kentucky Illinois
Missouri, and Louisiana, who voted with M. Cay.
less entitled 10 credence than Mr.. NcDnllle's cnur-
acer OF them would Indicate; still the complete re-
fltauon OF the charge, given by Mr. Buch man
leaves US III no doubt as to the OF tneit
statements.
1t appears from the testimony Of j. j. Crittendan
James Davidson, Judge Frinba, d ,wd Triuiha
IL. 5. Johnson, ID, Bog5ny, James Barbour. IN
La Fayette, that from early in October 1872 l. ana
extending to nearly the ena Of The year. Mr.. Civ
was unwa}e erng MS decision or to vote for Gen
Jackson.
1t appears that Gen. Call, the Aid of Gen. Jack
son, according to the testimony Of John brddlock
declared that Gen. JaclisonS friends did not eXper
] Hr. Clay to vote for the Generals AMI il so, wonl.
be an act OF duplicny on his part, knowing that wiz
Mr.. Cay'> sentiments, he could not vote for ho.
These things appear IN to-days paper: by wha
VIC snail publish IN our next, it appears by th, ties
timony of D;tnu.l l. rge, Wan. Crowsdl, Riaar
Simms, and Alden Il. Howe, that the urlgin-h
beginning Of this matter,' was not at the house an
A tireade of Gen. Jackson, in .Mtrch, 1827-as til
General states in his address ofthe Sh of July last
: but at st two years before, in public places III
9 highway. at taverns, and board of steamboat
+ The conduct of Gen. Jacksons friends toward
II Mr.. Clay and his frends--in lG24-25-some ev
l. dence that Mr.. Eaton--the 1900 dollar nan-wa
Il the author Of the kremer letter--,,nd an accour
r. of the acquaintance and intercourse between M
al Clay and Gen. Jackson-&c. SC. conclude the az
10 ldress.
lie The Appendix, from which the extracts in til
Address taken. contain the letters certificate
lr Sc in extent, and form one half of the pamphlet
as lftruth has not lost its force, reason lis swa
h, and the fountains Justice their purity" in the la
IS guage Of Mr.. Clay the decision of the Amerc;
ne people, this subject. must be auspcions TO bin
on : He makes no appeal to their sympathy-but i
st vokes only stern justice.
en- On Monday, there was an important motion mac
ne in the House of Representatives. That the Col
on aiee on .Manntacurcs be vested ith poser oad
e thority TO send for persons and papers--which W
St amcn,led by the following o,th d vietv to usce
an tain and report 10 h,s House such facts as may
in useful to guide the judgment Of the House il relau
m to the revision Of te tar0 ofdues imported good
y, Mr.. Aallary, chairman oftho Committee Of ma
ng ufactures, olfered the resolution in obedience
md the wishes of a majority Of the Committee b
on opposed it both in Committee and in the House
le Mr.. Strong considered the resolution of an exit
er ordinary character, and requesedthe reasons viii
ho operated on the majority to ask such power.
| Mr.. Wright Of Ohio concurred with Mr. Stro
ties as to its character, and asked for statement
be those considerations which had induced the Co
lot mtee to offer the resolution
e, Mr. Stevenson, Of Penn. answered that the men
rals on the subject Of manufactures were contrad