Delaware journal., 1828-02-12
BoAyoKE vs. DUFF GREEN.

The United States Telegraph so freely and extensively
anked by Senator dsey, according to the testmonyof
oar correspondent is very highly estimated BY
John Randolph OF Roanoke. MIR Randolph would certain
not give testimony, in Congress, against the Tele-
graph il he could possibly ayodtseelng that they both
ar laborng in opposition to the present Atlninist aon
D Green represented, in his Congressona! report and
toral article, Mr. Randolph to have stated IN debate
that Mr.. Clay had eectonecred with him MIR Randolphl
&C. &C. and other matters about bargain and corruption
Mr. Randolph wrote to Duff Green stating that in
in these Articles there unMarrtned and unwarrant
able of his not ony n msrepresentlg wlat ne
had i'd but wlal he hat not said No notice having been
taken Of the letter. Mr. et due to himself and to the
House. say srarEMENT WHICH THAT PAPER con-
statement c auhat he said out 9 1ehat nc
dii not sag.
TIere Mr H. read an extract from the article complain
ed OIL
"rhe whole tenor and air OF this report to make
impression on the public mind abroad, that he came Tor
ward with knowing air. to tell the House what othef per-
did not know; that he came here rendering himself as
witness 1t such thing lfauy thing was calc.
lated to do mischief It was sch reports, and suc etofls,
comments as these Ii, sad Mr.. r.. were to put my hand
this statement (tlrowng the U. s. Telegraph ON the
Aoo) put my hand to that which IS not true Every one
knows ii is not true. With single exceptlon-n which
he had not been misunderstanding meant as to Irish and
Aricans-he had not any repnrt IN that paper winch
did not excite his disgust and even m the report winch
contained the correct expression winch ne aa hamed' ~
every his remarks were wretchedy nanpled
The National Journal remarks that Dull Green, the Ed
or Of said Telegraph reiterates the correctness OF ms M
terpre,aon of Mr. Randolph'b semimens-decares that
tive heard him distinctly and his remarks were, IN SUD-
stance, did not pretend to give them literally 7Vha' we
saiL"
Not content with this rcorting upon Mr. andoph the
accusation of msstatemen without any disclaimer as 10
molvesor this indeed is not the practice OF the iee-
graph he throws down the gauntlet and challenges le
Hon. alenber to single combat Eated, we presume WIN
his late Official appointment as printer 10 inc oehae' ne
likes not this mpachnent of his veacty or correctness
and reminds the Hon. Member that ne IS more lnueptc
the Telegraph than any individual Tor disiheresteu
yinlcation OF that reputation upon wch nc places so
high estimate At the same time, however tlS Ms,e.
ard generous advocate declares, that MI. toi
has been defended account OF any personal
tlon for hnselfand his character 1--WE knew lha W.T.
Randolph had many eccentriclties and some peeu 81
cts and principles, which calculated to preJuoce any
party !" This snteesed editor atrms that ne o"y ue-
Tended Mr. in requital "f the services he mad ehder,
ed" sand because believed that the coun'eance ana
the press were necessary to sustain any Puoc man
Andtus this mirror of fdsnterestedness boldly aVows tas
he defended Mr. r. from unmerited accusations because
he mr. r. had been useful to the party by whom ts Ed
hor was employed. A., D.
But now however, the is to be changed MT ltan-
doph like Governor Clinton IS to be informed al HIS ser
vices can now be dispensed WITH The worthy organ Oh
the dynasty his former dsnterested abors TO res
the drowning character OF Mr. consulted, seems
hs'' of justice and proprlety more than the
wishes of some among his political trends or the dictates
@ cautious bohcy;" and therefore Mr. T. is distinctly IN
1rrned that but for the Telegraph he would nave been
,ed the eart and that it generosity and forpearance
e not the distinguishing traits OF the Editor me Wonlo
fe him TO his fate.''
The Baltimore Patriot Of Thursday says; "We observe