Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1828-04-09


mile of'sj junction with S,aunton River; abou: two
acres are cleared, 30 Of which land,
" .. '""' q"ar'y iscscoeI; tobacco land and uf In.
,'"' r'e n"' less 'ha" two hundred acres OF
t"e tobacco landthe last amcd tract consider on. rf
Wv eS' ,'oaccn plantations in Bedford he made
" eA ''ent Stock farm, being better adapted TO grass than
any plantation in that section or country or on this side #
'c mountains, with extensive ou,iets-This tract III he
Shewn by hr Orv Loving, lives on the PREMISES and
ne TWO hist tracts by the Subscriber The terms will he
made very accommodating suit most of purchasers
: JESSE LEFTWICH.
| rItGiNhi: al rules, holden at the clerks Office
Oh the superior court OF cancerv for the Richmond
'ne 81 DAY o! March, 1928: Philip Harrison,
ni against Robert Randolph AMI Elizabeth his wife
and Bernard NJ. Carter W lliarns Carter and Will
am ti'z ugh Carter, and Hill Carter Susan Carter
nary carter and Elizabeth Garter, Children of Charles
carter The younger, dec who was Il son of Charles
: ''ar'er q! Shirley dec. Ann II. Lee and Mary w
1faXton, Walker Taylor & f! zaSell W. e. his wife
formerly Ee'ke!ey, Edmund Berkeley Ann H. Herke-
icy, Robert &. berkeley aud ParI, Farley Berkelcv
children and hrira Of Ca,har.ne c. EcrLr,ny wHo
was daughter Of the SAID Chalcs Garter OF Shirley
iec. ii'!i taiter, Thomas Carter. William T. Wick
lam and Ann hs wife Eimuu " ickhan and Lucy
AIS we winch said iii.i, Th0mac Ann and Lucy \,
the q 'Is!rsn ana heirs % Robert Cafter dec WHO
also sou o' The SAID Charles Garter % Shirley Zee
smiley I arte, John IL Garter aud Mary ". Carter
heHs OF Edward Carter, dec another son of tie 81
Cha'iea laIicr H Shirley, Charles Carter and Joseph
L. 'hei! aud Mary W. his WIFE ,y.ic. SAID lbaIie.
! ana May W. are The children and heirs Of Gcorge
carter, ""o also was son o! tie said Charles Carter
y
tiahiei Ddrweii, infant children of Lucy I,urwnlI
VINO was daughter of the said Charles Garter of
Sh'riey, Davidson Bradfue aud Hiarla T. his wife.
| Evelyn Byrd, Abby Jackson and An, q ,vr;nh,
winch SAID Maria t., EVELYN, Abby and Avn n e,re
churen and heirs of Oiway Byrd dec ST. o WIS = son
| oi W lillian Byrd o! MISSIONER dec. MARY w Uar,i-
son anu Ann NJ. Harrison, infant ch!.e en- Of Lucy
harrison, who was Lucy Nelson the DAUGHTER OF bbv
Nelson, Il daughter OF tho said W ,am l5yrL OF West
oyer dec Charles w. Byrd, son OF the said William
ny'd. dec Mary ". Nelson, abby Nelson and Ann
af,o N.lg.,
rusAne Neis1n' children and heirs of Abby Nelson
who was libby Byrd, daughter OF tie I'D William
Dy'd' dec Ffancis Otwsy Byrd, Charles Cater Byrd
hichard Evelyn Eytd, Thomas Ta,Ice Bird rs5.5.
"e'h I'LL Byrd and Philip Norbo.ne Nicholas and Ma
ria Iarer his VIE, who Maria Garter Byrd heirs
n nos l. Byrd, who also son Of the said =. al,
i''"n Byrd, dec Mary Byrd, fam Byrd, George Byrd
ana Charles Byrd infant children and heirs ii TI,s
I. b re, who also son o! tie said lillian, r, ~
ii ~ cstorer dec. Elizabeth &. Skipwitb IZard Skin.
'Fnh a"d Maria C. {. Skpwh Lens :or FL zabeb
~ SK'p"lth, who was daughter Of the ssad William
BYRD dec. John Seahronk, tlc p. es:dcDt all Dice
Tors OF the James River COMPANY, aid Yr1 II
rzhugh, DTS.
The defendant. Charles Garter Byrd, 10, i.a, ng en-.
tered his appearance and gwen scCuIIty accoLr r.
f .hc act OF assembly and tie rules OF this court and
u appearing by satisfactory !cence thai be is not
an inhahant OF t:Is county; IL ordered, that tie
sad defendant do appear here lie ts dav o. the
p'X' term, ard answer ;he ILL al tho plaintiff aud
Mat copy cf i'ls CIDER be forthwith Inserted IN some
newspaper pab!ished IN Tie newspaper Published
IN The ci;J OF Richmond for months suoccss;vely
and posted al the lro:i door tie ca,!to in ibg said
cry. 4 copy. Tese,
81 WIN WIDENING c. c.
fIhGhNI5: ~ rules, holden 10 lie clerks once
I" 'e superior court o! chancey for the Richmond DIS
tnci, tue daj of March 1923: Moucurc, Robinson
q r'oasan's merchants aud partnera pits. against
Richard adams. Richard a. CarrngiOn I,i,tIebutv
darlington and vie, George VI. Carrinstop John 4
! arlington William -. ia, Tor and wife, Wrn. d
W rcn, sergeant OF the city of Richmond and as such
admir-. OF " lillian Marshall Thomas Marshall, John
a Smith, Thomas 4. Smith, John Minge and wife
Charles Picket add Margaret his wife, Eliza j. Ada,ns
Paisey W. Adams Louisa Adams John J. Adams EIc't
u Adams, E!vIra Adams George Pollard and yyr ure
C. Adams, Samuel G Adams, Geo. w. Adams, tt ona
Adams, IaihaIIDc Adams DaoItha Adams, Eliza G
Adams, George ~. Darlington. admir-. of Ann Car
rinGon, sally T. Adams John adams, John 6. Smith
Andrew Stevenson, John Robinson the Bank of The
United Sistes, William j.. Wren, sergeant of the cit,
. OF Richmond, and az such, admir-. of Samuel G.
Adans, I1chaiiah Brooks and vie, WIN. d. Wren
sergeant Of The CITY Of Richmond and such, admir-
Of James Brooks, alexander Brooks Richard Booker
Hiram Harms, john Jones. james Robertson IT, Cor
o SlCRae Martha Brooks, Victoria Brooks SonIerYit
} Brooks and Ocfavia Brooks, Horentia Brooks Gale
u dona Brooks, II6erna Brooks, alexander hlcEae an,
e John Campbell, admir- Of George w. Smith, deed
G def's.
The defendant, Thomas n. Smith rot having en,eret
his appearance and given security according to the
act of Assembly and the rules Of this court and il ap-
pearng by satisfactory evidence, that lie IS not an
nlabtaDt Of this it is ordered that the said
defendant do appear here The first dav OF the next
term, and answer the bill Of the plaintiffs, and that
copy Of this order be forthwith inserted IN some
paper published in the city Of Richmond, for two
months suchessvely, and posted at the front door Of
the capitol, in the said city.
> 20 q copy. Tes'e !. 3 ,1BBOTT, 4. e. e.
81 PIR(IINj.4: At rules, boIdeO inc clerks office
. Of the superior court Of chancerv for the Richmond
district, the 80 day of March, 1929: George Mason
and Elizabeth his wife, Augustine Jones and Mar,
. Whers pills against Philip J. ClsIbor ne John n.
Claiborne, ---~-------, admir- of Butler Clsi-
borne, dec. and Thomas BroaJnan, dts.
The defendant Thomas Brosdm5n not having en-.
tered his appearance and given security according
the act ofasse1by and the rules Of The court AMI u
r. appearing by satisfactory evidence, thath he IS NOT an
nbabant Of tbs cuunrJ; 1t - ordered that inc SAID