Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1828-05-09

NciR0INjA: Alta superior court of chance, v hoiien
q. former Capitol !" the city Of Williamsburg, the 2d
bis Dss1,y .dS'G, Of Dsn Dass.y dee. aud Sarah
a'nsy, ,hsr guardian and next FREUD, PhG..
W. H. Macon and Sarah hi, wifi, .,or and .x, Of Rem;
Dabney, dee Jobu A. NTH, adu'or 9Th III, viii annexed IF
~ y; s%h, dee. rho' s. p.sney Augustine l. Dabney,
saan. an infant by John Smith, her guardian special,
Thu ih, DAY to be heard on the bill an.
swe', exn'h aud examination Of and
% On consideration whereo the of opinion,
.na' n' a.von Of the land Jailed Einaton, between
ieh>!. defendant Saah Macon the children wa, proper
BE Dahn.y amongst his ei,ldreu to take into the estimate
the value a" thu buildings the Em,nston tract yet il Is
Dso Daboey, their IN the nj
mne " ne because, by the ulat,ou then
ea Of the daughters and the error existed IN relation
th' division OF I'll. shsr. TO weh Que Of the son.
unued m the second at-ren aud increased by an
OF 'oere on the supposed balance due by George
calculate" OF the division of tn. money arising from the sale
o, Tue 'h'p-,sd, a' appears by that sstsien,en was
OF hs tact Ut land The second Is also
charging to George s"a Denj DsbUey the
PAM Z" ho and due by the testavr The settlement
by n. Dabn-y and John A. Smith, the 2sh day sf An.
case .nde mPfopes Of III, profit.
risn from the cultivation Of the aID called rImnston. Tn,
seuemrnt IA 1879 erroneous on the or
the i.t division OF III. lands contain. charge OF
t- ct cona'y 20 the former saemen and also an the d
v;n oil ioooih pant OF the sales of yard aud for
sail 1T slaves. The doth, e. adxe ord.r ana
dee' ee, 'ha the defendant, WIN. aud Sarah hi, W
ext asd extx 81 Beau Dabnry render before one of the
omn'' 'oues Ut this douit of the al
,ne s.o oai al before her MARRIAGES. ofthe Sarah VIM
IL hoa since their arrisge,Ur the Ben Dasne
o' " sueh seeouni no notice be taken pt
.s"s IN the cultivation ut the land az
o'h- nor Of advances 10 the chdi for
"pp"t .n' -'ucation The tn further adiud.
and d'ci'c, that the defendant John A. Smith tend.r
before the SAIL Commissioner account hi.
Tor Thomas g. Snnihs selinxs in III, estate of the
:aiu Dtnanin Dahn', but such no notice Is 10
81 the pioii OF losses III the cultivation the land
aed ElmnSton any other, Of advance, TO the hi
dre q the tsor Tor their support and the
SAID fb"mas Smith shall be found he ON such
account then the defendant John Smith r.au,r ell to rem.
der an account OF has s'tns the Thoma,
u Smith, unless he admit t. psy the baianr
due by his es,ator The ccutt doth
aJndge order and leerer that the cor.
rse The saii"n' made (opie OF filed
ms esuse) according 10 the foregoing opinion
Ssrd TO any evidence explanation may he
winch SAID several accounts the said is iii.
eeed u examine slate aud settle and rel o there
Of 10 Tue couii with any matters specially
nen' by himself or whsh he required by parties "a
| o"s stated cory Tess, ED. CHRISTIAN, C. c.
Co"'mis'oner Anderson Office Wihiaas6nrr 2Ist March
| 1899:
have spPoin,es the 21 day of Nav It, 10 execute III,
Sttgoms order OF count ON which day, by o'clock A. M
ht parties concerned my Off e. with
their books, parers and tmrny with cupie, of the eouy
papers, and with this original vider.
Ro. ANDERSON, conner.