Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1828-04-18

SrlRGIAiA at ,apt.;or eods, q shsnssty Aoilens
the tot s Capitol az the city Of williamsburg the ID
Bsnj f. Dabney. sdm'or Of Benz pabpey dec aud Sarah
D. Ino snd Mary H. Daeney infants by the said Benz
Wa. II Macon Sarah hi, wife, esor aud exrs BENZ
Dahney dee John A Smith, adn'or with will
rhos g. Smith, Zee. Thos S. Dshney, Augustine L. Dabnty
Lew" w. Chsmbersyne AMI Martha D. h wifc, and Mary C.
SMITH, an infant by John Smh, her guardian ,pecia,
TIN. cause came on th,, IA, 10 b. heard q, me hII an
aver exhibis, aud suese. and wa, argued
by counsel: On SOnsdefagb whet court opnon
l.nale defendant Saah Macon and the ebilren was
made ana thai was pfopsi the dvos ef the of
D' Dabnty amongst has children to take the
the value Of the buildings the En,nson yet
iaai tue persons aPpointed ny the will OF the
msde IN the year is4 because by the cscuson then made
the sons did not -btan, each OF them, three
can 81 the dauyhters; and the same relation
To the divon OF the share TO which of suns
wh. died, would have been entitled TTese
nued IN e second sateen aud increased by
harS, interest on hs Supposed balancs 10y Geois.
ntn pAhhey this second seillemen also
v uie usnion OF the money Arisin> IEcm the sal
-, 'ne Al (as 1t appears ny that set,lsmeno
I" nivde The whole amsunio th. purchase
"aet OF land The second statement also
charging to Gyoise aud nj Dabney the Ola i.b
I 70 hG,s' anu Hue ~ the ',,tAvr The sccmtn.
a,nes pShhtl an" Johu a Smith, Of the 9Th day
GU. 49, tn. court oons'drs, Under h, ale
"npopef tot profits
'on' .ne eu'a'on oi ihe aiD called Elminstn he
utmtn IA 1928 erroneous b.Cau.e based on the e,
- 'ht is dr'iiou OF the lands aud charge
'tee contrary to the former sns: AMI ala in The h
vo" iOcsb. part OF the sAles and hare m
Iige. Ter ami
e+'hai the defendants WIN. IL Macon and Sarah HI vic
exc aud exx ot Beoj Dabney, before one Of IN.
q" this court account OF the ansaeti.n, az
M ssu Sd an before her msiage ofthe Sarah m
It, Macon since then saFrase,o, the OF Brr Da,ns
"' IA sueh account no notice be the
es IN the cultivation OF the land called lmns,on OF am
~ nor OF advances TO the children of the ,.tsto for hrr
pP' aud esueaiion The court dpt further adudr
a4S oeeIte, that the defendant John A. Smith tepde
tue said Commissioner account of his te.,a
'' a homas u Smith's aeiines in the estate Of IN.
W DeiJtmn Dabney; bat such account no motto, !. a.
81 ihs profits losses IN the cultivation OF the land
Iihingon " any other, Of advances 10 the chi
~ r. 'ne testaIor Tor their support -aIr the
in'ulAs O Smith shall he found inlrbt,d ON seh
men the defendant John Smith IS reou, e.. TO r,n-
- an account OF las asngs the OF the ad rh,m,.
Sui',h nnie he admit ofle, sufic 10 pa, the hsanr.
aus que bJ his testator estate. The doth futile,
Juuge 'Tner and secret, that the co,
ret he 'aI"ns settlements made (c.pes Which are f in
III ese) aeodng 10 the gong opinion and having re.
s"d u any evidence explanation which NAV he ae3r,.
winch said several accounts the said couimoner i. ,
-ted u exam'ne state aud settle, TO make rerort
Of 20 tue court, with matters Tally deemed ~
nrht ny himself, ar VINE. be required by this par. Ia
b. - stated a COPY Tt'is, ED. CHRISTIAN c.
ConnissioreT AR6erSoi,g Office HiLiicasb.re 2fn MIR
is2e:
base appointed the 9Th day Nav ne H. 10 exet. Tho
tor goug order Of court which day by o'olotk Nj
the parties concerned require attend al my OF with
their books, Parers aud -imsny, op, of The cont
paPe's, and with this original order.
R0. ANDERSON, confer.
y "a ~ --tT5