Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1827-09-19

Office
court OF cancey for tie Richmond district the end
day of July, 1897:
John Hunics, ,z,
against
George FomerfeIt and Daniel Molonr ard David r,o.
u,criclt, arr.
The defendants 70, having entered their appearance
and gwen security according TO the of assembly
ami The rules of this court and appearing by sastac-
tory evidence, that they are inhabitants this couu
try 1t Is ordered that the said defendants do appear
here ON the first day of the and answer the
OH! OF The PLAINTIFF and that copy of this order be
ot'"with inserted in some newspaper published the
CITY OF Richmond, for two months SUCCESSFULLY and
posted at the front door Of the capitol, in the said CITY,
63 copy. Tes,e WIN. w. HENING C. c.
plIRGLSL4.
at rules holden in the clerks office of the superor
court Of chanccry for the Richmond district the sd
day OF July 1897:
John S. Atkinson, ,,y,
against
Frances Elicit, widow and deyisce of Robert Elicit
deco, " iliam Cunningham, ex'or of Robert Elicit
decd, James Is. CioPton surviving trustee of Fran
ces IIiiet and Others and Nelson Elicit, dts
The defendant James 3. CIopton, not having enter
ed his appearance and given security ACCORDING 10 lie
ACT oil assembly aud the rules OF this court and il ar
Peaihs by satisfactory evidence, that he is an in
aoant OF this country: is ordered that the said de-
ehdant 90 appear here on the fist day of the next
Term and ans"er the bill of the plaintiff and that
copy OF tbs order lie forthwith inserted in some news
paper published IN the city of Richmond, for two
months successfully, and posted at the front door of
the capitol, in the said city.
% n copy IeSte, VIM w. HENING, C. C.
PLRGLNI.4:
al rules holden in the clerks Office of the sunerfor
court OF chancey for the Richmond district. the 9Th
day OF August, 1927:
George S,ovaIl, ,,
against
Francis s. .OIleilly, me-
The defendant not having entered lis appea,ance ant
gwen security according 10 the of assembly and
ihe rules oil this court ana if appearing by satisfactory
EVIDENCE that he is not an iniabant of tbis conntr
u oTaered that the said defendant do annear bere ~
he FIRST day of the next term and answer the bill of The,
P'ah,ii' and That copy of this order be forthwith in
IN some newspaper published in the city of
,'ch!hohd TOR two months successfully and posted ar
The front door Of the capitol in the said civ
% "a corr. Teste, w NJ W. HENlNG, c. c.
PLRGINI4:
at rules holden in The Clerks ofice e,, -.
court OF chancerl for the Richmond district the Gin
day of August 1927: "
Austin is, Smith admor with the VIII annexed of Henry
Wright, Tt
against
Lewis Madison and John Eheppard ex'or of Benia,o,
Coleman decd, liz
The defendant Le,vis ladson not having e gs
MS appearance and given security according 10 The
ACT OF assembly and the rules this court and il
peaTing by satisfactory evidence that lie is moi an in
napan' OF IBIS country it ordered tina, The said de-
ehdaht DO appear here tie first day of The NEXT
term aud answer lie bill oftLe plaintiff and thai , CO
Ply oil t order be forthwith inserted IN some newsna
per rhbsticdin The city OF Richmond for two months
Succsssiyeiy and posted tie front door of the can
toi, IN the said city,
g COPY. Teise, WIN. W. HENING. c. G.
PIRGLNT.4:
At rules, holden in the clerks Office of tie suner;or
court OF cbancery for the Richmond district The %
day of July, 1877:
William Lowrdcs -,
against
feter fownaIeite, Richard Wallace, and Joseph Pet,
gPo',' yts.
The defendants Peter Townaetie not having onto
ed bis appearance and given security ACCORDING to tic
c OF assembly the rules Of this court and il appear
ing by satifactGry evidence that he is NOT an nI,sb
aht o. ts Country: is ordered, that the said efen
oan 90 appear here The first day of tho next tcr,,
ana answer te bril- Of tbe plaintiff aud that conv or
'hIs orGcr be forthwith inserted in some ney snspor
PUNISHED III the city Of Richmond for two months s,c
ces3Ve'y ard posted at the front door of the capitol
IN the said city. F'
90 4 cory. Teste, WIN. w. HGNIYG. C. c.
piRGiAI.4: -------
AZ superior court Of chanccry holden al the ca,;,o1 IN
IN, INC cry OF Eichmond the 9TH day of June, 1897:
nathaniel Dick and James Dick, pf,
against E
Edward Cunningham, ez'or Of Archibald Moore deed,
On motion Of John r Robertson and Maria his vic Inv
'e' counsel ic court doth order, that unless the plaintiffs
wife parties defendants thereto within sxtv dave Ccr ,i
~ nave Uccn served with copy Of this order that the
y"Cn awnrhed the plaintiffs in this cause, the fourth
10y =" NoVenber' 1924 stand dissolved act of this
""y' copy. Tcste,
I'M. ". HENING, c. C..
49,. :, Peers61g, Tirginia, .August 2ONt, 1897.
MEssRs n. & J. DICK,
Genticmcn-As you re not Inhabitants ,f ,h;s Goo.
wealth aud the above order in no other wa be o,G
co 10 YOU have caused II be published herewith ana
request You 10 take notice Of the same in order that w
may have the bill therein named, amended i, ,bo 80,
directed, II you slial! choose IN do so 80 or,, 100
your obcdieUt sc,vuDf, JOHN T. CdREPTsOW ~
tcy