Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1827-12-06

ssrsi coS', f uls 1ss: is L. EssIssd pri
the 9Th day OF Nov. iseI-
David q. Williams, ia.
wn. Wren Serse,n, Of the city Of Richmond, and q,
SUCH sdm'o kdmuad Will, d,e adn'or OF sat
Gresnh, dee Nah IT, Jones, exon of Francis Jones, dee
Mary r John soDs s ' c. iIsi" and sG csSs
ne u ity'n his wife, Alb sham Hall and fsn,' hswis,
deus JOn', Php q. JSne, Dor,ha C. jones, irss,1
sh'ldie and heirs OF the said Catherine Jee' dee Wm.
the SAID tobrhps Wo.lsm aud Sarah Ia. wife, Philip
Jones and Mary his wife, and David, SAIL aud PhiIp W
Greenhi aud Richsad Mohoin Elizabeth his wife, Ben;
Johnson Catherine hi. wife, Tho, G,bbon sJm'or Rich.
ard Hail. AMI adm'Or de bOns non of Wan codis, dee;
The senefaeia, awarded cause h,ng returned nos
executed ON the defendants Abraham Hall and Francis his
security according the Act of Assembly AMI the Rule,
,nhaS,n,' 81 thu, conniry oylsrsd That The
said Defendants do appear hen III. day ii
sought by the said process and that aeopy Of this Order he
ss % ms. ssSasa q
door OF osP'0l IN The aid e,,y; cory ;T.:is,
Nov. .. 5s-wew
~ cHANCEkY. Al account acid IO Prince Edward ~.
Il Sept the 18th, 1897:
Peter il.ie' conpls
GeS'ge Martin & Frauei, a. M,rtin peft.
The defendant Gsorg. Mlrtiu not having entered hi,
ptsfanee and gwen security according Genea
Assembly tue rules ~ this
salistaeon Of the curt tina, he hAhan, OF III,
State; Ga the mopn of tue complainant by uD,sl, II is
here on the st day Ct Dec. next answer tn. eo.
Piainans b and that copy ofth Order forthwith ineI
q Richmond two ~onh. @s, l su po ss s5
n n. rn, door OF The courthouse Of this county And
6 sSy esusa Gd apy T0' .,
i. L WoiRsHAm, &C.
Oe.. -, 4s-wsw
N
john Redlod, IN right OF lis wife Esabsh. fsrme5iv
iiwt Peter Grgs, right Of hi. wife Chmny formefiy
ssnna Hurt JOIN Hurt, aud WIN. Hurt who sue ,y Peter S.
Sss; he ns, sod aud guardian i'd s which said e
are child en- Of John Hurt also the children John Hum
stout, whose names are not known, conpiainan,
Lloyd Hurt, Eliza Hurt charity Hurt and H am Hurt, ,na
Rshard A. Daily admor Lloyd Robertson dec Defdt. '"a
This day came the complainan,s by their COUNSEL aud on
Their notion sud appearing the that defendants
Lloyd Hurt, Elizabeth HUT, Charity Hurt, Hiram Hurt,
are not inhabitants af this commonwealth aud hsy not hs
the Act sa sss me aud syeI e.ny ,eeodo
that the said absent deienan appear here before the
50 mat copy OF this decree be inserted forthwith some
public newspaper printed in the city Of Richmond Borough
front door The courthouse county on two sue ,e.,ire
'0 os, days ay Ae.Py Ts.e FRANCIS FITzGERALD,
INWIRGtNIA Az Kule,, holden IN the KIeTk's oace -.
hs superior Court Of chaneey for the Richmond Dis
Thomas Shelton aud Phobe hi, wife, and Frances NJ and
Wh,'', Richard aud Peter Cousins, aud Layton Yancey
''h' s .. o. feer cousins, dec. APPlis.
Aranead Hardy La.lweIl Evans, adn'or of Edmund
hardy Armistesd Hardy, Ludwe Evars Jane his wife,
Wilmington Beehes and Keturah Stokes, Appte,
The sersiaeias ,warded thi. having return
Gu not executed ON the appeees Artead Hardy and Lud-
well Evans admoIs of Edmund Hardy and they not
to The Act Of Assembly and the Rule. Of this Court and !,
appearing by satisfactory evidence, they are not nhab
dosPPesr here the 10Th day Of the next term, snd show
esSs II sny e ean asai; She revival sought by iie .ad
some newspaper Pubiishsd the city of iehmOnd Tor two
months ;ueeessve aud posted at the Of the a.
WIN. W. HENING, &C.
oet. So 5o-wev
NNriRGiNIA AT Rules, holden in the CieIPs Office
District the 9Th day of Nov. s26- '""s""
Thomas Shelton and Phube his wife, and
Francis NJ. and Willis, Richard and peter Upon writ Of
Pssr o and Layton Yancey dos of apersede
fe'ea oonsin dec APPlts decree OF the
Edmund Hardy, Armistead Hardy Iud bStr In Ch,%.
well Evans Jane has wife,Washington eery "'
Belehes keiurah Stokes, App'ees.
sn {" stop The execution Of the said decree not her re-
!nTned executed on the APPelees, Arnlead Hardy Wash.
4t'9y evidence that they not inhsbani, CONT
Wy Wy edsrfa That The said Appellee do appear
whole maier IN the decree aforesaid contained; and hs
copy OF thus order be forthwith some
published IL the City Rehmsnd two month. iele,.
:.yey aud posted at the front door Capitol IN the sI
City o. Copy. Te tie, WA w. HENiNG, c. c. .'N
oeH 80 sO-wsw-
NNsiRGINIA. AT 9urerior Court OF Law held Tor iIca
rico eosnty, al the Capitol, in the City Of Richmond,
Nancy cIsig one Of the heirs Of Alexander Craig, dee1
and one Of The heirs Of Mary Craig, dec and of
Ctag, dec who heirs OF the Cr,,s
dec & Alexander j. Gait, VIM &. Gait Judith r. Gall .
W ~ ovhe aud Sarah his wife; which Alexander
ID. VIM e. Judith r., and Sarah, children & heir,
Of Judith Gait, dee wAo also The keh. Of the
s1d Alex Craig, dec aud also the heirs Of he
said Mary CIag, dec. aud Of the Lueetia crsir dec
srain,t
Talon Weba and Harriet his wife, SamT Shepherd ?
and Aldrd hs wife, Wn Davis, Edwin DAVIS and NlatiI
da Davis; the said Harriet Maria, William Edwin and y
Mauidai being heirs devsce VI Augustine Davis dec
49,, Tenants.
Th' day the demsnIaRis by their Attorney aud IL
appearing ny the return the writ Of Soifefacias issued Nv
be S 80 vacation oil the court against said Tarlon
aud Harriet hiss wife, Sam She pheId Maria his wife and
The SAID VIM Davis Edwin DAVIS, and Matilda Davis tbs the
SAID wr has been duly executed the said a. ion ~ .bb
and Harriet his wife, Sam Shepherd Maria his wife and
matilda DavI-they soenny called ams not; and
ri eupo 4, o. deTed, That the SAID TdrIton Harriet
ms wi'f, semi Shepherd AID Maria his wife, Matilda
av he made parties defendants to this the saii
aida Davis being au infant Sain Shepherd assigned her
guardian 10 defend her the said sut;and ret,n min,
made upon The said wit Of Seireacias Sheriff
RICO enny that the said William Davis Edwin Davi, are
not inhabitants Of this basiek it appearing also 10 e
susaeiiou OF the court that they do reside within mi,
CONFERENCE.-The, OIL The motion If the demsndants ~,
ordered, That the said W1n. Edwin Davis do spper
here on the J day OF the term, 10 he holden for die
VIZ OF e''i causes aud sbe cause, It they can why this
aeuOh should MT be proceeded in final ndymen; ami
That copy OF this order be published in some u,,sn..
printed IA this CommUnye ah once week for fanr ys -
and Il after such publication, the said WIN t-
VS. add Eiwin Davis do no; appear and shew cau.e 10 a
contrary, then that the said VIM Davis and Edwin Davis he
" - VII" '''''" j. ho iSIRS int &C..
NV '' 59-wfw