Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1827-06-26

serted the subject, becau=e there were rumours
! OF numei creations. Mi. Coming said they
were Of Tie widest and most Uniformed character
circulated, he knew, from the mosl mischiev Gus
motives" The great Struggle, however. between
the Parties eXpec' Ell 10 on early in June
And lhese details likely pro, interes iing
we shall continue tn lay cop,ogs extracts from
them before readers.
We pass over with the scorn " hich i, deserves
The long ard ridiculous sirrde in the Nauonai
Ionrnai-whch cts out with denying the En-
uuiTer any - pTe;ension those great qualities
which Pr whence sni then bss' o,vs on some
fsvored individual appointed TO guide his country
men 10 liberty hsppiness'--yet very consistent,
concludes with declaring, that It has long been
the sovereign dictator of the liicai Opinion OF
YTsiLia.' 4 most liberal compliment iorsooth
he good people OF Virginia who thus s,,fTe,
themselves TO be led about by weak aud a wick Ell
Editor! IL il unnecessary - waste any more ink
in exposing the sbsurdiiy Of ASSERTION which ls
designed only to bring into jealousy and lll-yri
The effort Is unavailing people are NOT TO
be aiken In by charitable intent, and so uR-
founded assertion. y ! that v e seek is o as
ser' our principles . through good report ,hroug
evil report" For our own parts, we dsclaim all
pTetensi0ns & all dIciauon. We think for ourselv-s
land onr feow-cuzens viii think for themselves.
Nor do we believe there 10 people the face oil
| the earth, who will more resoiutely exercise his
splendid privilege OF ireemen, una~ II by men in
power; and unseduced by their meIcenary pre- ses
But we have one proof OF The csadour oil the Nat
Journal before us, which superced=s the nscessiiy
OF any TO NAL rsfutation OF ~ remarks That pa
per attempts 10 Yindicate itself ffom the charge
OF circulating -ander against AJrs Jack ON and
by what wreIched sophlsfy does il aiteutt 10 do
% II does no den that on the 20 M cA u 70.
p biIshed Arnoid's elter II does not deny Inst u
rspu0ished, d, the time, bi, er, though b ief
commentary from newspaper thu CITY, by way
OF p, eiude TO tbe let;e Il Is compelled 10 admit
that al the very laid before lts readers
the following editorial paragraph OF its own COM
position, W.:
- The circular, from which an extract is copied
into days paper, from the Richmond Whig of The
10Th instant, has been some tlme before The public
aud remains, we believe, unc0niTadicted by an, OF
The presses devoted TO the supp0ri of Cen. Jack
son. Ia paper which Is nov before US The e,ii-
Tor says Nj. Adams ''Iobbsd his country - and
calls him - pluoderer OF the Treasury How
does 1t happen that the who Is base enough
10 fa5Tcate this infamous csumny for party pui-
poses, permitO the Tennessee circular TO pass I'M
oicedl'
rhisl- side wind rem ,rls attempting 10 bo.ler
up the pure statement OF the liberal Ar.oid. - I'm
contr~dic ed by any OF me Presses" thus. by a
sort Of nnendO, Intimatng lba, II Cannot W eli be
cnntradicted and therefore, is emitted 10 notice
Is not this lending ourtenance 10 tic statement
OF Arnold?
Now, how does the Journal attempt to evade this
conclusion? By TWO OF the most miserable sub
terfuges tina; we're ever in eri,d -t- % that the
prominent subject Of AfDold's letter H. the opin-
ions Of Gen. Jackson the Tariff, and that M
ArnOld's main obecl was 10 show from TIE &c, -
RAILS silence when written TO b' Arnold on the sut-
Jet, that there good reason TO infer a chang
of opinion on the part Of The General and 81
ths " The aliedged Islander was not against Mrs.
Jackson" bui q" the rbafges are all, against Gen.
Jarh-on' What this The editor who undertakes o
c1nduc, National JouFoali Doe be eoodescend g.
ori such vile yhisry this The prominent
sutisc OF AS ieuer-vefy wtli-if the Journal
wished TO present ibis prominent point only. Why
did exiract 1t OIL from the extract from
his CIRCULAR Why did the J0urnsl also bring The
Dig aretui transaction" ~ " ch Gen Is said TO
have breu concerned; his caring away % from hus-
band the wife of his b SOM, g during Roberts life
time % living with HE wife in way cha wupil
have .uhiec ed ans other man TO an i'dc'n.ea' 10
the Couniy Gut Tor open and notorious lew
ness
Not only did the n. Journal not omit ,hls So
soae bu' it j. the most prominent passage On Ar
n0ld's letter,as every man who read IL must have
felt The time and a. u appeared 10 be consi-
dered by Tire prefsce with which % was intEodu
red Ant how sfand- the seroud poor apology :
that he alleged -j4nter against General jack
on-- and not against Sire Jsrs+onf We Wi
not insult tie under tstj rss OF cuf iesles iy
posing ihis papable subteriugc- &. hose were 90 %
pen and motor QUE iewdnes-," tfi % not TuYrh
contsninaia her character hiss- Tie tug.
that afterwards when Nr. W alsh denounced such
nnmanly add liibersi attacks, tie ~ Joufna. did
subscIibe 20 iae son iment: " hrtbsr from c0usci
e1ce or from prudence; whe heT o. thought 'hs thing
wrong or befsuse 10 ionnd thc charges not to be
ppor 81, and therefore AFRAID OF reaction,
~ because retaliation was Threatened ON some Of
rs awn. fiends-- lst those deci'e, who hove W.T.
messed he coUrsc ~ hi Oh u has iai On tins auair
and no.g, the contefopubls subteguges Ia which D
resorts Tor iis hollow vipdcsnonA
IL. I..l M. D.. .lli.,nce, ~ 2 nrnnf OF