Phenix gazette. [volume] (Alexandria [D.C.]) 1825-1833, 1827-06-08

c.. ssss;on os the nineteenth Congress. IL
M ~, 80 van saw. a resolution, "to urge me
erecutipe to come into the terms Vi '"e -,
1905" 1t was to inquire into tue eAPeu." ~,
Of amending the act, Of March LIST, 1879, ~ 10
authorize the President to remove the aise'i"
mating duties" =, ,roe
Instead of being intended las you say 10 arse
tho txecutiye Government OF the Y Staes "
eomo into the terms Of your act, Mr.. Camnre,
leno. who moved the resolution, SAID me "aa
70 ason To believe the measure would be accepe
.ble 70 our own government" and that with
-, sor,e modification Of the Law OF 1928, the
FYecu,iye could not remove the discriminating
duty. c, ,r,.v of
your information! ..,,,sd
This resolution which you say was ceDatea
and finally rejected by majority OF two votes,
I saw was not opposed by any one; ana aver
single remark from the chairma', OF the com'n,.-
t.. Of commerce, (Mr Newton) and from Mr.
Cambreleng was passed nen'ine coniraa'ce"s e.;
So saws at least the journal Of the House OF Ne
nresen,a,ives. and so says the National ln'eili'
pencer for Jan. 26, 1926.
What think YOU again Of the accuracy oil your
details, The debate TO which you allude as nav
ind taken place on a resolution in the House
nj REPRESENTATIVES, took place on oil! I'D
the Senate. of which the object, IN like man
ner was not to urge the executive, as you,
think, with great indelicacy slludc, but 10 alter
the law. :.
sunpose. sir, that Mr. Clay, in his cores
:, pondence with Mr.. Vaughan, affecting grea,
. DISPLAY Of minute information, shauid SPEAK Of
bill in the House Of Lords TO amend law, a.
!, resolution in the House Of Commnns 10 urge
" the King. what should you think OF the accuracy
y Of his statements? What should you think
his sense of decorum, in undertaking 10 ARA!
the legislative and executive branches OF your
:, government against each other, oy s'a!en .r
y :, Wholly unfounded in fact? Even in an inditier
= ent matter, you would have thought the erro
: extremely discreditable; the intention extreme
y ly impertinent. r.,
% Take the case on the late debate Oh the "a
a. tholic question, in the House OF commons
E that debate. in the course Of which, as under
~ stand it, you say "your honor and honesty IA Nc,
:, been impeached," by the master OF the ho''s
Zone of the highest judicial ohcers o. Inc teal"
' That debate. | believe, was on resolution
~ Sir Francis Burdett, looking 10 modlfo a'lo
q of the law in regard 10 the, Catholics SuPpos
IT, Mr. CLAW should next year, in writing an oil
:: cial note 10 the British Minister at Washing
u, ION. transfer the scene Of that debate 20 u
House OF Lords, and convert the proposiuo
!, ~ from measure Of legislative tendency ih'o
y resolution 10 urge the King to take some SIC
AZ Of executive discretion. Would not such
mis,a,emen, have filled you with disdam! =,
e, Your own is precisely of the same quar-
ID. with this difference against you, that instead
-. being (as the Catholic question Is to usJ an
:. differen: matter on which we are not concern
~ to be minu,ely informed, your mista.eme
mr. refers 10 the subise. matter OF q very lmpe
led through Congress you expressly undertake
A. describe.
In my next letter shall take you in the
ICE nate ofthe U States, and when have subm
is ted to you the contrast Of what really there to-
no place with your account Of it, should not
% surprised if you come to the resolution tn
rn- your letter Of Jan. 81 should be not merely
lat word" in this discussion, but your last wo
on for ever on this subject.
%. Be pleased, meantime, to accept, SC.
10 AN AMERICAN CITIZEN
Al Persian Heroism.- Twelve men had be-