Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1827-09-26

order be forthwith inserted in some newsnaner nnbl;sb-
ed in the city of Richmond, two months successive
~ posted at Tie front door of the capitol in the said
city.
60 COPY. Teste, VIM. w. HENING. C. c.
| FIRGIyNI4:
At rules, holden in the clerks Office of the superior
court OF chancery for the Richmond district The oud
! day of July, 1927:
Daniel ]. Justice, y1,
against
Je'man Y. Stokes and .Eosepi, S. Clarke, d,1s.
The defendant Joseph S. Clarke not having entered
his appearance and given security according 10 the act
oil assembly and the rules OF this court, and il appear
ing by satisfactory evidence, that he is an inab-
tant of this country; il ordered, that the said delen-
dan do appear here the first day of the next tenn
and answer the bill of the plaintiff; aid that copy Of
this order be forthwith inserted in some nevspaprr rub
ished in the city of Richmond, for months sue
cessivey and posted the front door the capitol in
The said CITY.
63 copy. Teste, WIN. W. HENING, C. c.
PiRLLVI9:
AT rules, holden in the clerks Office of the superior
court OF ciancey for tue Richmond district, tie 2ud
day of July, 1927
John Humes, Mn
against
George FIomerfc and Daniel Molcng ard David Flo-
lncrirh: dfts
and given security according to the act of assembly
and the rules of this court and appearing by saiisa
tory evidence, that they not Inhabitants of this cou<
try: 1t is ordered that the said defendants do appear
here on the first day OF the next and answer the
bill of the raintif; and that cory of this order be
forthwith inserted in newspaper published in the
city OF Richmond, for months successfully and
posted al the front door of the capitol in the said civ
65 A copy. Teste, WIN. w. TENINCi. C. C.
PIRGLNL4:
At rules holden the clerks Office of the superior
court OF chancery for the Richmond district, the ID
day OF July, 1897
john S. Atkinson, ,,n
against
Frances Elicit widow and dcviscc of Robert Elicit,
decd, William Cunningham, X'or of Robert Elicit
decd, James b. Clopton, surviving trustee of Fran
Ges Elicit and others. and Nelson Elicit, dis.
The defendant James B. Clopton, not having enter
edhis appearance and given security according TO the
act OF assembly and the rules of this court and il an
Pearng by satisfactory evidence, that he is not an in
habant OF this country: is ordered that the said de-
iendaht DO appear here the first day of the next
term and answer the bill of the plaintiff; and that ::
copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in some news
paper published in the city of Richmond, for two
the capitol, in the said city.
60 a copy Teste, VIM. w. HENTNG, c. c.
pIRGL.Kq:
AZ rules holden in the clerks Office of the superior
court OF chancery for the Richmond district tie 9th
day OF August, 1927:
George Stoyall, mr.
against
Francis S. O'Rciliv, 1r
This defendant having entered his appearance and
given security according 10 the act of assembly and
he rules OF tins court and appearing by satisfactory
evidence that he is not an nhabitan of this country:
II ordered, that the said defendant do appear here on
the first day of the next term and answer the bill of the
plaintiff and that copy OF this order be forthwith in
serted IN some newspaper published in the city Of
tichmohd for Two months successfully, and posted az
the front door Of the capitol, in the said CITY
% a copy: Teste, WhI. w. HENING, C. C.
FIkGLNL4:
at rules, holden in the Clerks Office oftbe superior
court OF CHANGER! for the Richmond district the G;h
day of August, 1927:
Austin Smith admor with the will annexed of Henry
Wright, mn
against |
Lewis Madison aud JOHN Sheppard cx'or of BENJAMIN
Coleman decd, ,iGa
The defendant Lewis Madison not bayinn e1tcrof
us appearance and given security according TO tie
act of assembly and the rules Of this court and if an
Peahg BY satisfactory evidence, that he is not an in
naoant OF TINS country, IL is ordered, that the sad de-
tendaut do appear here The first da, of the ne.t
term and answer The bill fhe plaintiff; and that n CO.
ny OF this order be othwit inserted in some ncwsna
per published IN The city OF Richmond, for two months
SuccessiYey and posted az the front door the Can't
tot, in The said city.
60 a copy. Tet:e, VIM w. HENING. C. c.
PIRGLNI9:
AT rules, holden in the clerks Office of The superior
court OF chancery for the Richmond district the cd
day of July, 1927:
William LowDdes ~,
against
Peter Townaette, Richard Wallace and 1oso.,, D..
tyPool, IUts
The defendants Peter TownaIette not having epfe.
ed MS appearance and given security according TO lie
act OF assembly tie rules Of this court and il appear.
ing oy saiiiactory evidence, that lie is not an nbob
liant OF this country: it is ordered, that the said defeu
dan do appear here The first day of the next fern
and answer the bill Of the PLAINTIFF and that COPY of
this order be forthwith inserted in some ne,vsbanor
published in the city of Richmond, for two months s1c
cessifcIy, and posted at the front door of the canoi
in the said city.
63 COPY. Tesre, WIN. w. HENfNG. c. G.
TUlGLNT9:
At superior OF cfancery loden at the capi,o IN
the city OF Richmond, the Eth day Of June, 1897:
Nathaniel Dick and James Dick n
against
Edward Cunningham e@or Of Archibald Moore. decd.
o-,.-c- mn.
y" notion Of John T. Robertson Maria his vile Inv
LneI counsoI The court doth order.