Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1827-05-18

" VI. w iSENiNS, c. C.
VIRGINIA:
At rules. holden in the clerks Office of t,s sro.
court of chaucery for the Richmond district the sth
day OF March, 1897: -'''
Theodorick Robertson, M
against
Peter +. Archer, John T. DIoselcy, Edward Hrs.
kins. John a Archer, Peter I. Archer, Jr Ron
ert Hasliins and Martha his wife, Mary Ann Ar
cHer cod Jones and elizabeth his wife, John Jones
ana sarah X. his wife, and Ym. W. Archer and
Louisa Caroline Archer, 5(3s
The defendants John Jones and Sarah R. his wife,
ho having entered their appearance and given securj
according to the act of assembly aud the rules of fbs
court and appearing by satisfactory evidence thai
ey are not inhabitants of this country: il is ordered
iat the said defendants DO appear here on the tenth Nv
.'e next TERM and answer the petition Of the plain
W. ned by way of an amended bill heretofore exhil
led by Joseph G. Wilder and others; and Thai cow ~
TINS order be forthwith inserted in some newsnno-
pu0iished IN The city of Richmond for two months si,c
cessTey and posted at the front door of the capol in
the said city. l'' ~
l2 copy. Tesle, WI. w. TENING. &C.
FIRGLNy.q:
At rules, holden in the clerks office Of the s,nc,;o,
court of chancey for the Richmond district, The an day
of March, 1927:
John Cooke, pr
against
Lucy g. Markham. and Bernard NJ. Markham, Champc
+. Markham, Wm. f. Markham Mary o. j Atari
ham, Judith V. Markham, George w. Markham Ii
neus L. Markham, Alfred II. Markham, Martha l. f.
Markha"' A"b"" NJ Markham, John N. Markham,
d,
George Markham and Thomas Harris, ms.
ine Defendants Lneus e., Alfred H., and judith V.
Markham not having entered their appearance and
%Eeh security according 10 the act Of assembly and tire
nes oil this court and it appearing by satisfactory evil
Gence that they inhaba this country; IS
ordered that the said defendant appear here on Tie
tenth day OF the and the bill the plain
It'll; and that copy of this order be forthwith, inserted in
some newspaper published in The city Richmond for two
capitol, i'll the said city.
10 Copy. Tcsre, JV.N ". E!.NLNG;, =. t.
VIRGINIA:
Al rules, holden in the clerks Office of the superior
court of chancery for the Richmond district the SIT,
day OF March, 1922:
Gray t. Dunn and w lille Harrison, executors of tie
testament and last will OF Herbert Hill, decd, pits.
against
Henry Pennington administrator with the viii anmrx.
ed Of John Smith decd, and in his own right as sur,
ViVor OF his wife Polly who Polly Smith, Thoin-
as Smith, lchabod S'nith, Daniel Middagh, admir- o
John r. Smith, decd, Charles Ogburne, ex'or of
Robert w Smith, and the admir- OF
Pau lima Smith decd I6e
The defendant Ichabod Smith not having entered
his appearance and given security according 10 the act
OF assembly and the rules OF this court and it appear-
ing by satisfactory evidence, that he is inabi
tao Of this country: il is ordered that the SAID defen-
dant do appear here the tenth day Of The next term
and answer tie bill of the plaintiffs and that copy
OF this order &c forthwith inserted some peyyspapr
published in the city Of Richmond for two months sir
ocssvcy and posted at the front door of the capitol in
the said city.
70 COPY. Tesle, WA. w. HENING, c. c.
VIRGIgNI.4:
at rules, holden in the clerks office of the superior
court OF chsncery for the Richmond district tue 5th
day Of March, 1927
albert Gallain, and Robert iexsudgr devisee OF
Savary de Vacoulon, gis
against
Henry Banks. and Henry Wood, Valentine Wood and
Julius Wood, heirs of Henry Wood, decd, Thomas
Tees, and JOHN Preston, DTS.
The scirefacias awarded IN this cause not being re-
turned executed the defendants Henry Banks and
Henry Wood, and they not having entered their APP
Pearance and given security according TO the act Of
assembly and the rules of this court and il appearing
by satisfactory evidence that they are not inhabitants
of this country it is ordered that the said defendants
do appear here the tenth day of the next term and
show cause if any they can, against the revival sought
by the said process and that copy Of this order be
forthwith inserted in newspaper published in the
cityI Of Richmond for two months successiveIy and