Virginia advocate. [volume] (Charlottesville, Va.) 1827-1860, 1827-12-01
CHEARLOTE' HsvEE4EE.
Thursday, NOV. 20.

sslTrs,si
ani Nv Bay OF the truth OF Which appeared
Faiadu written by
former evidence has been ehted ~
the charge the contrary, To he The general inn
preston of believe substantially correct,
ina, particulars is inaccurate The letter containing
pledge been witenty
Bsley, ale hoDI altered hy Mr.. Ad,n
been ny M W. to influence members
Th EdSr Richmond Enquirer, their paper of the 2h
h say We pledged ourselves the piblic, us
Mr.. B.o's the contradiction made " Y Amer
.UrHouiry,'' viz that President
o u stos the truth OF the strement had made,S lay she
RESULT researches possible boc.e thc We
forward statetat Mr. Webster STATE, before the cleo
fcn that he had in his possession letter
IN from Correspondents which had been read
AoA4s modified suggestion finally approved
ny him relative ly to pursue
ctaralisthat Webster proposed
II! Of MD Correspondence, Mr.. Adams should
icicd and seeing
Ne dsi9 M Webster TO contradict this statement
contradiction part of Webster arnea
ularodabl6, that it is true and
This charge against President having
support a parts by promise Office
then by altering and approving
the Webster Bailey else, clearly
rie question is was the pledge ei,ennot through whom il wa,
so aud that twas gvenhe silence Of Mr. ". ant e evidence
point p.rtule bs,ooa this bg1n Win the ferai oar
~ and tht which large oron of The poople believe
he concerted with Nj Clay The motive the same
aud both equally contributed election contrary to the
will OF the people.
Contrast the conduct on that occasion with TINT or
ven. Jackson Whilst tho former every Of
e OF support at whatever saciice,to confidence
r whom he desped, AID into favor party which he mad re-
nouAcei condition that they Tor him Gen Jackson
-.el aio" from the arts and iniigues prevailing
around ana alse say whom nc would no, apDont
odce,and good that salts
factory reply the question would success
WIN those who have anousy defended Mr. Adams
Stige OF having barganed i SIR Clay ,Sug
form the public what plea they accr
'aon That Of NOT oUiLsT,i seems would be coniadicted
the record
M. Td7y-This gentleman in his famou
Noh Inn Speech. asserted that he peateI Senator OF
Untea states, when M sbud be taken up
the Senate the appointment, Of committee Of inquiry
should appear TO hin be altogcb unnecessary that he
forwards informed by this that vixen the nomination
scd upon, every present.
Sd"t q" 4" thc iadoES '' aRs no one PresRirgfo question:
hiss honor gryr Shortly after wards sena
Tor from North expressly for purpose correcting the
pre.slgn sought to DO created published The
speech which lie had delivered the occasion of
air. Cay's norAnation which opposed the noanina
f'on opdc ground Of the corruption believed to have
MINCED with the election His opposition declared i'm the
mrf decided manner and bis reasons unelavocaIy expressed
Up;l Lately not known who cHator alluded TO bv Mr.
Clay OF how this pabe Misrepresentation facts had occurred
Recently ms Informant has become known, though
WIS committed romans unexplained.
Sea Harrison OF Ohio in letter of the scioo Ca.
E declares i he was the Senator applied by CIaybut
mat he I'D no, consider tile Branch Of snc char
c' as 70 render II necessary fr him inquiry and
fa nc informed Mr. Clay nothing had nlsse in the So,
"'i h'l u necessary TO move FOR the Investigation which he
IA" so'eic Nihol now entering into enquiry how far
hia course pursued by Gen. H. Justified by Che ALLEGED
- tf, apparent that the maize statement ,i
hvarSed by the facts which occurred aud by the Information
derived rom the former. Cen H. nay told him that nobinc had
passed which made necessary for committee dc,,
to io public that he was informed to whom he an
pics Gen. ~ that Cen Jackson and every other Senator res ri
te"t as f'tfc iHPtgoas Jgae 10 his
foN0r iategrhy That this by " hosoyo given
vas inorIec Gov nrch speech sufficiently proved thai vas
not given b. any one is al3o established
As this Gen. IIarrisons clcqdv convict, ",
is nte statement which true, difficult to conceive
on "b" ground has been ocxuney received by his friend.
re'p' thc apprehension lest every who speak. so
tne charge OF eoTaoa they aud therefore re-
~ "i' ''' i"''S''yrai SIN ofJaisskood only proved.
----secs:----
he friends OF Mr. Adams insist last election o
ho seeohd CHOICE Of Frsinti If this 3d. wih what reason can
leyio" contend mat her oppesou dictated by
"fcd Of tue NoT:" c Northern candidate ,e
~ She, 1t Is fair to presume, much influences, bv the
considerations ih1 ne w'sso The therefore, that within @
yerS nc has b;eI these consistent gentlemen a,,, , h
OF ts Siai Is alone ssieb,n that the alleged ol
IS u einhy operated hfmsy yesencan have M i,au
''ef' us friends must seek some other cause 10 , o.
ecipe ms uiF1puanty in CHS State. Without prasi,, n
- NON, we F'nd Suggest th rather t, be found IN m 800
' '' '''''5'' udh IN his birthplace pareItagc.
sgEEe.zs1s1 ezzsze2.s@gsss1zssa
1e,,., Ter aEs adgeodte.
propose to trouble You, Messrs Editors, with