American watchman and Delaware advertiser. [volume] (Wilmington, Del.) 1822-1828, 1827-08-07

HTS 10 1nsinuate that the proposal winch was re-
,jectei with dlsdain by General Jackson, was &c
cepted with prompttnde by MIR. Adams. This
renders the fact as to the time nf the alleged
ciation very important. 1t is to be regretted that
Genei al jackson had not been little m0re precise.
1t was fory in January that the overture was made
and tie second day after, the anBunclatinn OF my
Intention took place. Now, will not assert that
there may not have been some speculat,ons IN the
newspapers about that time, (althoush do not be-
ieve that there even any Speculafl0ns so ear
~ as to the probable vote which should give
but should be glad to see any newspaper which
the second day after early in January, asserted in
its columns, that had come out .open.y and
ayowetly in favor Of Mr. Adams" | challenge
the production at such paper. l do not believe
that my intention so to vote for Mr. Adams was an
nounced IN the newspapers openly and avowedly
during the whole month Of January, or at any rate
until late in the month. The only droral Of my
intention to vote for him, which was publicly made
IN the newspapers, prior to the election, is con-
tanned in my letter to Judge Brooke, which is da-
ted the 2Sth January. 1t was first published in
the Enquirer at Richmond, some time in the eEsu
lng month. go further; do not believe that any
newspaper at Washington can be produced announ-
eng, before the latter part Of January, the fact,
whether upon nv avowal or not, of my intention
70 vote tor MIR. Adams. Gen. Jackson's memory
must deceive him. lie must have confounded
events and circumstances. His friend, Mr.. George
kreiner, in ls letter to the Columbian Observer,
bearing date the 25th January, has according 10 my
recollection Of the public prints, claim 10 the
nett of being the first, or among the first to an
n0Hnce to the public my intended vote. That let
fer was first published at Philadelphia and return
ed IN the Columbian Observer to Washington CITY
on the 3lst January. How long before its date
that letter was written for Mr.. kremcr does
not appear. Whether there be any connection be.
tween the communication made by the distineu sh-
ed member OF Congress, and that letter, perhaps
Gen. Jackson can explain
Al the end OF more than two wears after cor
rupt overture is made to Gen. Jackson, he now
Tor the first time, openly procaims It. 1t is true,
as have ascerta'ned since the publication of Mr..
Beverley Fayetteville letter, the General has been
Tor long time secretly circulating the charge
Immediately OH the appearance at Washington Of
that letter IN the public prints, the Editor Of the
telegraph asserted, in his paper, that Gen. Jack
son had communicated the overture TO him about
Inc period OF the election, not as he now states i
but according to Mr.. Beverle,'s version OF the
tale Since left Washington on the 10th Of last
month, have understood that Gen. Jackson has
made a similar communication to several other per.
Suns, at different and distant points. WHY has
che overture been thus handsomely circulated
va, It that through the medium Of the Telegraph,
me leading paper supporting the interest Of Gen
era jackson, and through his otsr Repositories,
the belief Of the charge should be daily and gradu
ally infused into the public mind and thus contri
butte to the support Of his cause The zeal and
INDUSTRY with winch II has been propagated, the
daily columns of certain newspapers can testify
Finding the public still unconyinced, has The Gen.
e'a found It to be necessary to come out in proper
person, through the thin veil of Mr.. Carter beyer.
iey's agencys
When the aledged overture was made. the cleo
lion remained undecided. Why did not Gen. lack
son then hold up TO universal scorn and indirna
on the infamous bearer Of the proposal, and Ii ose
VINO dared to insult his honor, and tampcr with hi,
integrity II he had, at that time, denounced ali
shc infamous parties concerned, demanded an in
qunv ~ the House Of Representatives, am, estab
shed, By satisfactory proof the truth Of his acru
sauon, There might, and probably would have !
been different result to the election Wbv Y
Wheh AZ my instance, Committee was on the sin
'ay Of Feb uary, 1925, (ouly four DAYS before th
election appointed to investigate the charges of
Hr. kremer. did not Gen. Jackson present himself
anu establish their trnth' Why, on the 9TH Of that
month, two days before the election, when thr
Committee reported tina. Mr.. Kremer declined "a
come forward. and that /" il thpy kneu of any rea
son ior such investigation, they would have asked
Q pe ciotheu with the proper power, but not hav
:ng themselves any such knowledge. they have fell
i 70 be thef duty only to lay before the House The
COMMUNICATION which they have received - wby
Wv Ho. ueh' 'aeksoh authorize motion to re- !
commit the report, and manfullv come forward
with all his information? The Congress Of the :
Nation IS IN session. An important election has
oevoised on It All eyes turned towards Wash. I,
'ngton. lhe result is awaited with intense anxiety
and GREATNESS expectation. A corrupt propnsi. I
non, Affecting the election. is made to one Of the
cahuluates. ne receives 1t, is advised to accept .
it, deiiberates. decides upon it. A Committee {. .
IN session to investigate the very charge. The
candidate, notwithstanding. remains profoundly
silent. and, after the lapse Of more than two wears
wen the period of another election is rapidly an