Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1826-04-21

onANoEiiY. Arsa ,nvrss ,.us COAL, ,s on s.. nee!
Tor Es1 county at sh courthouse in raPpahnncst The
John min,er and Ann his wife, Robert Mann and Susan ii.
wife, Peter Campbell, and nary his wife, Fon,ane Wood.
the age of en,yone years, by Elizabeth undlcy their
guardian and nea, friend, and Josiah Ryland, PaintiGs
Lewis Wnttemore and Jane hi. wife, who Jane Rylsni
sS Esms4S RS, and SsnsS bis wife who Nancy
Polly Ryland Joseph Timsn and Sally hi. wife, Who
Rysnd deed, Huney kylanl John simmons and Nancy bis
Wife who was Nancy Ryapd Thomas Sheer, Joseph Se,or
dren of Elizabeth she,or, dec, was Elizabeth Ryand
Parker Tod Hunter and Catherine hi, wife, wa. Catherine
labeth Ryland, John Ryand Joseph Ryland dec
James Ryland, Edwin Ryland and Joanna Ryland Lewis
Hale, Joseph MsryIs, and Polly n wife Who was Poly
Halle, Joseph Halle and Johnahan ,ile, benjamin Jones,
and Betsy Jones' infant children of Joseph Jones'
and Sally his WIFE, who was sav JoS,, pua
and Peggy his wife who was Peggy Jones. Robert Jsc and
Ter and Joanna his wife, who Joanna Rylan George
Samuel Durham nfan, children of Mary Durhan dec WHO
dren of Nancy Wood, dec. and Richard Hundey Drfat
This day came the plaintiffs by their attorney filed their
containing about two hundred and IS re- "a IN
this county, which wa, late the property of Richard hyand
and defendants according to their respective rights aud pro-
cess awarded against the defendants TO them appear
against The sale of the land aforesaid and the division Of the
thereof between III. pi,n and defendants a. a.
the defendants Parker Hunter and Catene his vile
.eph Burnett Elizabeth his wife, John Ryand Jane, Ry
land Edwin land Jacob Hunter and Joanna his vile
benjamin Jones and Richard Hundley inhabitants OF
this commonwealth, is therefore ordered decreed that
he said defendants do appear here before the
Monday IN May next and answer the plaintiffs bill, and
cause any they eau, against the sale of the land aforesaid,
and that ofth' order be forthwith the Rich
mcnd Enquirer, and continued for months succeyeIy
and that another copy be posted the front door of
nous: .s o. n county on two successive court previous TO
So. ''-'' ~ VIM T. M SIIf VS. elk.
;s SsAScEKz' In Hanover county court November ESa
Thona, Duke Henry Duke, John T. Duke and John lal-
'ory ane Elizabeth his wife Plaintiffs
Duke and Sally hi, wife, Susanna cngdon d,tr
Stee susanna Longdvn dec age of
and attributes Richard Duke dee aid infants under de
ase y years and William D. Winston, Admr. of Thomas
This well the Plaintiff. as the Defendanis Mary
Duke susanna Sam Lengdon William Duke Thoma. Duke The
a: Duke, dee by William D. Funston their counsel and the
BILL and exhibit being filed and read Edmund Ions
defendant Susanna Lousdon, Edward Valentine is by the
sSuT appointed guardian ad Item Of the infant defendants
defendants Thomas Duke and Sally his wife, having enter
the as II % ss act
satisfaction OF the court that they inhabitants this
do appear here the t the next court Of sus,ter
session to be held for This county and the plaintiffs said
bill and that copy Of this order he forthwith in some
newspaper printed in the city Of Richmond month.
81 Gee and that be posted the
! - ~ WILLIAM foI iirSi s' e. II. c.
VMaINIA Als Superior Court of chaneeTy holden q.
Jan, 1894 "e '''" '"' u
Thomas Bass, Plaintiff
Zaehariah McGrader adur. of Elizabeth Johnson decd
Miller, admir- of Denamin Johnson the said John
Miller and Frances his wife, William Trabue and Mary his
WIFE, Thomas Puryesr Jane his wife, Pleasant Baird Nj:
n, we hisas.h Frances Nancy Mccall benjamin Ne
The defendants Joha KILLER and France. his ws Pleasant
, SIIId and MARY his wife Elizabeth Frances Nancy Nc
this country and the plaintiff sppear, 10
proceeded in The mode prescribed by law,
plaintiff counsel court doth take his bill for 0'ion ~ i
against those defendants and the coming on 10 he
h,bt was argued by counsel On consider whereof the
court do order that the defendant John Miller do render an
fore commissoner of the court who is directed 10 examine
with ' spy ns a seiG1S and report the
himself OF which may be required by parties to be so
1sFyo Ms'f isa &M "a "a nmSIns s S;ss
pare, interested are desiredto fake notice that have
commencing the directed ky the foreros
court, en- which day. at o'clock A. d. their
: ready for examination and settlement.
br.rsh.a THOMAS Lapp, NJ C.
VIRGINIA AtraIes holden in the clerk Office OF ,Ss
county court Of Charlotte The 10th day of February 1865
Jane: Vaughan and Martha Cook plaintiffs
Jane watson Daniel Crensbaw aud Lucinda wife Nan
eey w Pettu Elizabeth Y. g. Pettu Wyatt H. Pett e;eorr
re,iu CIaa w Petn and Barbara Petu,, William
boswell and Eliza his wife, Thomas White and Eiizab,,b b
wife james A. Vaughan and Mary his wife the said J
nus own 5ishi and as admir- Of John Vaughan dec Robert
Vaughan baskerville Vaughan Albert Vaughan Aug,,,
Vaughan Asa Vaughan, and benjamin Vaughan John r.
COOK and Judith his wife Hugh Raine and Anne hi. wife
Joseph Red and Else his wife, George Red Samuel
ted Edwin Jhed and Martha Red, James p Vaughan John
L. vaughan, Sarah Vaughan, Agernon Sydney Vaurbar
M n%s vSsgh,u Henderson Vaughan, Es a Vaughan
TT" j. au3SpH, ,,,.,r - Defendants.
Inc defendants William Boswell! and Eliza his wife ans,
Thomas White ant Elizabeth his wife not having entered
appearance according the Act of Assembly and the rules Of
court ana Il appearing 10 the satisfaction court that
'hey are not inhabitants Of this on the motion of a.