Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1826-10-10
2s6e9eeeg Otto SGs1s6@.
TUESDAY MORNING. OCT. 10. 1895.


given the public this speech worthy of Mr.. Giles
best days We should feel sympathy for Mr.. Archer, but
for which we shall proceed state the pub
lic;he most obvious OF which is, That Mr.. Archer vo
luaa,ily placed Himself in The situation Which lie
have found equally hard endure and escape from
Ills challenge TO his antagonist meet him the
ial Cour'-Iouscs Of Inc District was mpolilc in pur
pose, and ungraCious in language.
Had this been all, should, nevertheless have con,
tinucd TO entertain towards MIR. Archer, those good
wishes with which we tie canvass commence. But
Inc has displayed in Tie OF it, such an exlraord
nary degree Of Inconsistency TO have revoutonized
our opinions of his political filmness. We did believe
That ii there in Virginia. whose manly indie
pendcncc elevated him above the gar considerations
which sway the demagoguc, and would keep him true
20 opinions deliberately formed and expressed
that was WIN. S. Archer. The events of the
canvass have dissraud this notion and proved that Mr.
Archer is no above exercising the of polite
ccctioncerers, than oil,er wooers Of popular favor
Previous to the late Presidential election Mr. Arch
reported 10 have said at If required to vote for
Gen. jackson President he would resign his seat in
Congress" we have heard him express the greatest
adherence Of that event, and ayow his decided choice
to have been Adams, after Crawlord-and It's Too
since the termination of the election, unless our me.
nory of dates dcccivcs us. OF al The opponents of
Cen Jackson MIR. Archer the most unequiyocal
and decided whom we heard converse on the subject
unless perhaps, worthy representative Mr. Steven
son, WED with hin, if he did not surpass him. in ami
mostly. His opposition was based on his repeated
violations of the Constitution with arms in his hands
and on the purely military nature of his prelensons-
and as Mr. Archer cannot have changed his opinions
OF Cen Jacksons unconstitutional and violcn, exer-
exercise OF military anthority-and as the Generals
pfeiens'on7 arc as purely military now, they
formerly is impossible TO conceive that Mr. Archers
present tender Affection for the Hero can have pro
ceedcd from. estimate cf his character and Pre-
sidental claims. Eighteen months ago. Cen Jackson
in the opinion of Mr. Archer was the lust man in
the Union who ought 10 be Prcsidcnl-now he is the
T'r"i. 1hen, tie precedent of e!ectipg military
'dcSPot." and the immediate danger of entrusing to
his hands the Liberties of the country, were above all
things TO be deprecatedao,o, Mr.. Archer is not only
warm advocate for the General, himself, urging il
as strong claim upon his constituents TO re.elect
HIM, but he even deuounccs Mr. Giles for moi having
likewise declared for him! APPLY did MIR. Giles say
chat his speeches Ike uniformed blundcrbuss
which did as much execution behind as beforehand
pat to the purpose" says McFingaI
But some muskcts so cnntrive IT,
A. Of, to MISS the mark thew dive a.,
sud Tho well am'd duck poyer
So fI nr an, n''N ''er " na over,
Would often on himself recu,
And 81 much worse appeard lis side,
's",',''''s .. 'Pi",e"'
% 'epnca''o"' VIZ
''''''' ne IS ''r roads
''.''' ''," -, "''''9 IA ,"e '"'cS' "ei' sup
A''" II, "hch was
=, w. nun '''o' >']"'o''-aooYe ALL does
"i''''''',' "''Ne zen jack
,To' '','i "' "'S-or diminish
VI "''''"s " military leader
,''oe'' " ,''0 '"''VU '''''C'-o' "oaI Tie wounds
o9 o'" ''''''o' Oh INC constitution with
arms ,n 40 l',a''r 'e0'" Aron'hn'i and Ambris
'9' 10 nc D'''' ''''s IS not Ger" Jackson Tor roads