Constitutional Whig. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1824-1832, 1825-09-30
For he Richmond Jthip,

collect them, this distance of time, in relation TO INV
leaving Richmond before and directly AFTER the act passed
IN the session of 1913, (on the Goth January 3I4)
For the inst three years after the conrna ton of INV
appointments to wit: in 1907, 1905 and 1909 we lived in
one OF Mr.. Complaints houses.
For the three yeos witt in 1910 1911 and 131
in of Mr.. EHiors
In the latter part of 1870 in the early mart of 1911
Mrs 1aOrs health (ot get resored) so bad ,ha she
had to leave RicmOnd for Seeddn which look me very
often there, until the passed. in the Of 1873
have, but very indstimct recoectio of a note adj
dressed to the bar this occasion But be it a, il nav
publish it, and it will be found that every thing on NV ma
10 relation TO it, can be accounted for having been per-
fectly correct.
have recollection ,ha be fore act PASSED in the
session oi 1913, out Of Richmond for month
at une unless owing circumstances which had
no control, and to of which have lust adyerted
Tins much know, that was with as much good faith,
resident of Richmond, until the passed. in the session
oil 1913, as have been since OF this place
In 1878, rented small house M Iorr's which
was sufficient for all my purposes Ms. Taylor could
NOT, on account Of her health, return Richmond: and
having no occasion for women, sent one that
mat had family, either BEFORE about this tme to
''eed"dm The other remained until the spring after the
act passed. in the session of 1918: for, immediately was
let of from the of 1911 upon the vmen of the frs,
quarters rent; and, before the middle of February,
was to the best of my recollection, my way to this
place. o' think left the Assembly sitting tut be all this
as 1t may in relation dates corrected by the re-
cords for every vacation order WILL unless accident be
ouho dated vt the place where ii made; so may
now be ascertaned. by orders if be uecessarv
where was befuIc this C passed.
The application To the Legislature, for permission To
reside IN hGnchestey before pa sssd in the ses
SION 1915 and proves nothing than my constant de-
Vouon to the laws and service of my country as would
NOT move from ittchnond the then place the court of the
district for which elected even to Ha,rbes,.r win
OUT e authority n the law for it, and, have uniform
" acted; and for the evidence refer to the records Of
he two COURTS assigned Inc at Richmond and at Lynch
burg.
The resolutions of the Senate confirm what have said
OF them, according my Judgment: but without ,h
least "putaiions of the motives OF honora BILE body
aS solutions were not, aud agreeably 10 the consti-
ul d not be sent TO tie House of Delegates for their
coHcnIF but, there is nothing them. which can dis
cern that proves any thing tina clear
OF the acts of 1901 aud 1913 as to my residence for th
ninth resolution expressly arms that it does nat nDneo
10 your committee Gf any condition aras suDeradd5
6y me lar Of 1873 The provision of that Inc an reafjo
10 me residence OF the Chancellor being nothing more Than
afeera"t q ne same provision IN lie tar Of 1901" Not
s and here all the error es for these acts as to my resi-
dence are not alike either terms in effect lst not in
terms rs 'h would maxi" RchmOnd Ga noun proper the
Term used IN the act of the session of 1885, and pace"
va noun coh0H) the term used of the session of
1901. convertible Terms. This cannot be So
~. Not in effect as p'ace AMI RGImond do not mean
'e same thing the act for tie given i'm this pa ne
OIL the I'D of August last: the provision i'm the lat
ter act i'll relation my residence is moi re,tecatio of
the same provision in the former The latter then Is a
e'c provision and of effect: and was understood AZ
ie Hne' III the House OF Delegates, and have acted
upon IT ever siRce.s
Feeling, at all times well disposed towards NV fellow
czens' was that had offended any one and
should be much pleased, if opportunity could ba d
ed me, to remove the complaint.
me districts so far am informed are every where
satsn'd' the ways to Needta, well known as to
i''It'oa, ana Lynch6urg, aud the Post ce, near me-
'' fa'mfiGe, regularly attended, all official letters az
regularly answered Nay, my residence ar NErnu.s
mas not only been recCgniSeGby that distinct
YIN many of the members of the House Of Delegates in
the session of 1915 but by the almost uuannous vote n
mat house III the session of 1877, passing the bill reject
ed by the Senate after their reSoluiions fer hof 1oo
"een agreed 10; as also by my appointment by tina
vast majority OF both Houses of the General AsseuhI
(hat nguiated the first election of COL Uo,roo f ~
Presidency of the u. s. the named member of ra
committee of MiS county, correspond if it had been ne
cessay, in relation that election; (hese duties under
tooN with Peasure but by the acqucscence too of all the
country with the exception OF a few disconten,s) and
s"ih ny my appointments by the ErecvtiUe Con,nis-
SsT mas county, TO obtain subscriptions, for the pro-
peSed monuments 10 the memory of General UasbjnG,o
towards which on account judicial duties could do
hohing' but subscribe my money! but by my appointment
also oy the Erec're, as Commissioner for ifis Seaao
"rt TO meet other Commissioners at the Rock Fish
gap, to Tx upon pope. SITE for Uairersify of Ilr;
aa; and tor other purposes in relation institution
iheee duties also discharged, with pleasure.
Alter these expressed and implied sanctions of nv, :
dGe hele and of the oPminu had formed aud expressed
OF the acts IN question: by all concerned for more Than
weive years, had right, think, expect as very
reasonable compensation, that might pa my few remain
ing days without such Interpretations the acLs nd of
my conduct. '' VI
For the train told and naff sci down in malice the ac
count might be read by all perhaps, with some interest
80 That feel confident that my elow-citizens viii 500
that have been maintaining, and not riolafng the law
oy hV''g at NEEDHAM CREED TAYLOR
CUMBERLAND County, Ntedbdm
10th Sept. 1925.
For the authority Of this opnop to the memorial
OF the Court Appeals, signed by EDMUND PENDLEToN
GEORGE WYTHE, JOHN BLAIR. PAU. CARRIwcro,
PETER LYONS WILLIAM FLEMING, HENRY TAzwEI.I
RICHARD Cary, JAMES HENeY, and JOHN TyIrR
Virg. cases, 90. LEN
10 the case of Peter Kamper vs. Mary Hawkins il on
10 the letters OF the individual Judges of the U 6 thar
oec"ed the execution OF an act of Congress in relation TO
pensioners hese were all cases which directly affected the
Judges PeTSont andI refer also TO that chater of
mon sense which, IN reference to the fundamental pncpe
OF orr Government, deneaes constitutional and
duties ~ 5 - % '""
This is substantially the same with like communication
TO the Enquirer. = -,
BALTIMORE, Sept 26.
BRAZlL.-By the ship Arethusa, captain Merrill, at
ns port on Saturday from ST. Salvador we learn that
Sir Charles Stuart the british Ambassador to the Court
OF Brazil had arrived at Rio de Janero about the latter
end OF July, but nothing had transprcd respecting his
/ IL has been ALREADY opnorrcaI IL,