Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1825-07-12

" iR0iNIA: At Superior Coar. Of Ciacey holden at
the Capitol n the City ORiehond the DAY q june,
h1nund Bailey Plaintiff,
Alexander ApKip, Elizabeth MKm widow Of R.be,, AZ
KIM and Mnghet M'k,m, Mary M'Kim, WIN. M,Kim DO
'sPh Nj Kun and ,ne Ann Mkn children OF Robert Mkm
aud infants by the Maishal OF this Court specia,
Their guardian james Fisher . and Elizabeth hi. wife late
Emao.h ~ Mkn also child Of said Rober, Kiu deed
dnd'idge, The President Directors and Company Of m, RAJ
Ut xvms, and Of The farms Bank Of vsna William
ucana Marion iSuch and Joanna and Jane,
SSo. srd E.o Winston and VIM d. Wren, Sergeant OF the
Guy OF i'ot"nond TO whom has been for admii,.
uon the estate efRohert MKim dec. D.fend,n,.
against the defendants, James Fisher r and Ei,,hh TO-
we, Nathi Shepherd james Scott George Winston and A.
exandtr Buchanan and the Bank vnyin,s and in ;Lt
iamh appears 10 have proceeded the mode H.
law against the defendants, Alexander MKim Man;on am,
Joanna Buchanan, this dsy he heard ON The ; III
answers Of the other defendants exhibits, and a. 49,,
1y counsel On consideration whereof eou, doth I'd.
at he reierredt2 commissioner ofhe court To take an az
count oi the mon,epaid by the plaintiff surety Of Rob.
amt alexander M'kim, administrators And,ey M,kir
ana Guardians OF ms children and appoon the ssrue amen
all DE snr'ie TO the administration and yua,disubin h"d
80 ok any evidence which may be Produced before
NM w"'eh o, the said suree IL any, nsolven, and an
portion the loss oecasioned by such insolvency ,mnn
n % 'ns, me- "a hAe manntr take the mo-
re uue "h te administration guardianship account
10 Robert Nj kn the infant said Andrew and ~
portion the same as before directed ing the dT,,.ni &
ties to the said bonds And Count doll, fnb, d %
tieSSnie Bnehanando render before same Comm,n
IN account oil his administration the estate of Wm NJ
hrehn- dec and set forth all the estate left by h ,e,,,a
hd me profits thereof, which have his hand,
any matters specially stated deemed pertinent bx with
w"ch may y" required by the parties So stated AMI OF
Ii ~ w M Fleet the court doth further order thai L
appointed receiver Of tue and i,,ue. Of he
real estate of Robert MKhn dec and that he reni , a
TO interfere with the possession Mrs. MKn II, Tho M 80
A'opy. re''e, wM. w. nENING, &C.
coMniiSSioNER'S OFFICE, Richmond, June o.. ,aa+
The parties interested will please take nocc tb L
appointed the 9Th day Angus, next 10 co na nave
counts directed IN the foregoing of tou, mn ,x;
>. oeioc (, a. M, they required attend at NV oI
tins city with their and voucher, ready I'm la
ton aud settlement ' ''' eAaaiua-
r,,rs II. BAKER, NC.
ShANCEkY--in Hanover County UVurl, AoTI 2S,;.
Daniel Williams, William C. Williams. Ei,,h,h H.,
Wow. o John Holloway, Psey Hapnabass who is,c
riage paey willian. Lucy To,h Who nrr ,ad mar
-, i9,l' aud before her said marriage was Lcy W; n
nv Jane. p,,, hlan under The age of years
Tributes OF Jacob Williams dec, Ps anS DIS
Susanna Murray, widow Of Marx Murray Sarah p.,..
VIM ,.erma',ed with Samuel Patterson and the aid '
=, Isaac Williams and John Wii.sm,; and ~,
a'er, admir- Of Jacob Williams, dec and M, MS, %
THIS day well The plaintiffs as the defsna,.
IIe.' adh'r I Jacob Williams, dee. aud Nancy l ,;,
ames Ly on' mn their COUNSEL bill and
n last named defendants being filed and read s
us''nuah Susanna Murray, Sarah Patterson and Samn, P,
@ ss nnhani Isaac Williams and Ohn Williams not b,
me att OF Assembly and the of hi. court ,pJ !, %
ms TO the satisfaction OF the court that Ib az u u Hlear-
.n country, on the motion of plaintiff n IS
nat the ,a'd last named defendants do Appear 5
10y " 'ne heM court OF quarterly session Of TIN, eonn, @
.wti me plaintiffs said bill, aud copy Of th; ' t
inserted IN some public newspaper printed IL, a.
cay y, h'' hnond for two months succesyely and tLs
opy 'e Po''sH at the front dor the f ~
| MAY 81 f'' Ae''e' WAL POLLARD, O. Ii.C.
| ~ 7--wBw
SGHANoERY In Hemieo county court Jun. the 7h
james Uranium aud Nancy his wife, formerly Nancy b
n ana Anhead GinhsI and Lucy his wife formerly Imcy
| Against 'l'H'1',
Ty imam in'nal Nathaniel Thomas and Christopher John
| dgceled, y. lanes lhones
ihis day came the Plaintiff. their counsel and N. ~
"G w MAN and Nathaniel Thomas having entered
If .ho gwen security according 10 the ac.
:" assembly aud the rules of this court; ami no..
s " 'aisCory evidence that they inhabitants ~ ,I
0mhonwelh on motion Of the plaintiff by their counsel Il
ou.rrd mat the said lillian and Nathaniel Thomas do an
Pe e Sh me ht monday in Sept next, aud answer III.
.",iuS oi and that copy ofth order he forthwith ;
~ !ht Enquirer newspaper published in the CITY a.
oi two moHthS successfully, and that another co,
al me front door of the Courthouse of This
! r copy; leslie, LOFrIN n. ELLETr q. H. g"
l------- 1S--w8w
| N CHANCERf MeuLleubury f,o,,,..