Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1824-03-23
February 26.

CHANUkRY.!li Rale1 h'ld in the clerks Office ii
Virginia district, the first Monday in January
Robert Randolph and Richard Randolph, Plaintiffs,
Ror! Bate aimor of John Bate decd Who was adu,or
Of John Randcph who e.or Of Henry Randolph, VIII
linn Clarke. sheriff Chesterfield unnsnin-
errd John Randolph by his former adm r
ton Richard Randolph. Mary An" Wnndoph Wilism
NJ C,ahl'n"d sally Lee his wife, children heirs The
, ~ ATn'I' surviving eAorS OF John Archer of the
Hundred VII" WAS security for John handoph faithful
and was adnlor de honis with the will The
said Henry randolph William l. Archer, acimor Of Jehn
Archer, who the eSors Archer OF The
Hundred Edward Randolph, exor OF William Randolph
The defendant Edward Randolph las to whom The hin
of the plaintiffs hath heen taken for concsed having
rule the court, aud it appearing that he is not a. this
TIME an inhaiant g" this district, it ordered, the
said defendant appear day mex, term and
answer the bill of the plaintiffs and that copy
lie or inserted in some new,paper printed in the
at the front door of the capitol in CITY.
r.,r,, eoPy-reste, RID. JEEFRIEs, elk.
Il January, 1921
John Franciscus, Plaintiff
Against
Peter George Robertson, James Haynir, Moses Luns-
lnr, rho w ians, JOhn D0nnhp JOSEPH UUuIin Thomas
Bell, Charles Cameron and Seth LHnsinTd Dns.
The defendants Prier George Robertson having
entered helr appearance and according
the act of Assembly and the court nsd IL APP
pea!ng TO The satisfaction of the that they
counsel II ordered that the said defendants appear her.
phini and that copy of this order be forthwith inserted
ior two months successfully
IN the city of Richmond posted at the front door OF the
courthouse oi this county.
copy-Teste, L. BATES, G. c..
rtnruNrv ~ 91-w8w
4 CiiANCEhY-in Louisa Coanly Court, February tie
Il 9ih, 1924
Sarah Narper George Napper Stephen Napier Light
foot Napier, p,,s
Against
Lucy Napier. Richard Napier, William Harper Burriu
Nnrper and md Nathan Napier il his right
ecm,or oi WllIaIn oihson deed, Defrs.
The defendants Lucy Napier and Richard Napier not
having entered their appearance security accord
ing tolaw and the rules af this court appearing 10
the satisfaction otie that they are moi nj
this state; the melton the plaintiffs by Charles "
Kimhrough, their attorney Il ordered thai The said de-
PENDANTS Lucy and Richard Napier apnear on the
hrst day oil May court pIantifs' hill
and That copy OF ibis order be forthwith in soue
one OF the public newspapers printed in the
mOnd for eight weeks aud M the oor
OF the courthouse of this county some rnurt day.
copy-Teste, ROBERT COWHERi. H. c.
February 10. s3-w9SE
| NOhANCE In Amclia County Clerks on,ce De
Thomas Mumford John c. HILL merchants and Do-,-
ners trading under The firm Of Mumforu K Hill PiIS
Against ~
Coleman DeHren and William Denrrn Dans
Ihe ucItnuhnt Coleman Deareu having entered his
ann gwen security
S snu Tue rules OF this and Appearing to the
Satisfaction 81 the that he not an nj ,is
coH"OhweaIh on the motion of the plaintiffs nv their
S"'e - ordered, that the said Coleman penren mn
tne iotrth thursday in March answsi the
o OF the plaintiffs and cspy OF this orr or he (rfb-
WIN published in some the newspapers ubshed In
'r cry ol Hicbmond months sue au, t
copy be posted at the OF the
vi 'h's county on Two successive DAYS
February ~ '''' " e. e. Il, ~ ~