Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1824-03-02

voice iowaiu the conclusion, was truly tniill
| ing and aflrcting-and never Witnessed sue.
| IN effect from any burst of rloquencs-evcr
ace WAS filed with The fine transport and pro
| -hetic fury of the orator. and all united il,
applaudiog the prroration, as alfording foi
matter, diction, manner, happy application.
and striking effect the most powerful display
oil real oratory that they ever Witnessed. Mr..
whose TASTE you know TO he even fas-
| tldlous, protests il the finest effort Of human
genius he ever knew exhibited in court of
justice. hope the whole arguments will be
fully and accurately reported, irit be possible,
which doubt, from my being able to retain
as few ofthe precise words, which faded from
the memory overpowcred by the general eff
feet.
The National ovrna, seems very much chagrined at the
overwhelming results sf the caucus at Northumberland
hurres itself Into assertions which are utterly unouuded
We confidently appeal to the list of Mr. Crawor friends
in the Virginia Legl1ure Consider them in whatever
pect please for the irresistible proofs Of his unques
tonabe superiority in this staie.-No but man pro-
oundiy ignorant Of the facts would hazard assertion
the contrary On another point, the Journal is also
grossly mistaken. For the Time since The ancient
dominion" became free and sovereign state the
bers OF her legislature have undertaken ros.isa!e Pre-
sdenfj and TO do this, at meeting called Tor the
vowed purpose Of nominating Electors only" Is the
nal ignorant vi the proceedings OF Legislature in 1904
and 1905 when only the Electors nominated
they were called upon to state the particular csadae
whom they would for the condition their being
retained the ticketn Iao9 tickets rum one
for Madison the other for Monroe-but present such
the appearance of unanimy among citizens, that
shall have in all probability but ticket run.
The Cincinnati Republican 18th ult comes
TO state, that bad Mr. Gazays private letter (repor
cd TO contain charges OF corruption against Congress
the DepurmentsJ but there such charge contained
IN The letter to inih alluded Is there any
uaioH, any expression ;phich can DC con,,led"
letter from Washington Feb. 81, appears In the N. Y.
American-stating that " the news from Richmond has
produced dsmdythst since attack on the Che
sapeake had there been dark day upon receiving
of the proceedings of the i4ththa the minority
was humiating"-n fact that Crawford damned" in
Virginia Now what is the fact, The caucus account
reached Richmond the Ietbon the nth the call was
made for caucus in Richmond-on the 2ist it met
ana an overwhelming majority given for Crawford aud
Gallan. More than 34hs OF votes for Crawford
gans four other candidates. This way damn
Ing" man.
The " Y. Patriot of the 2iih Feb. sI eIclaims that
the prospects Of Mr. Calhoun cheering
the present !nIs this deiusion or deception
For, no impartial in his believe it, Or is
II 10 put the hest face the matter assume the
OF strength until tue best made tor Mr. Cal
h"un aud his bosom friends In PENNSYLVANIA (xthou
which stale Mr. g. had prctcnsos) he is deserted as
principal and all bis chance Isl be up lie I'd
office Chat OF " Presidency by the coalition between his
and Gen Jacksons riendsThis coalition will in all pro-
liability SECURE to Gen j. nomination Harrisburg
Convention; Mr. Cs pc is, that the coalition may
run him on the ticket Pice. meeting at Harris
burg (sinee Mr. Dalls Speech &c. have actually re
commended unanimously J. as r. and c. us v. P-Some
thing like This sort OF arrangement anticipated by
some persons at Washington, early rs the 9t. as an
pears from the following letter in the y. American:
Mr.. Calhoun's friends are looking W i.h great
soiciiude to PENNSYLVANIA and ia The event oithe
choice OF delegar-s the Harrisburg Convention
not being favorable 10 him, he will he .rihdrara from
The contest for the first office, and come IN second 10
either Adams or Jack~on-be latter Of whom 10 I'M
queStionahly very strong in Pennsylvania.
Was Ms. Calhoun aware OF this arrangement Was The
treaty signed and sealed by himsel the movement
in Philadelphia really spontaneous
Another question presents itself future Will the
supporters of Rr Calhoun, who have zealousy
themselves To his interests, sill SuGcr themselves 10 be
dragged along with any which be or his
artfc mi (riend MAJ fo farm