The Virginian. [volume] (Lynchburg [Va.]) 1822-1829, 1824-04-09
yTIRGlNTa.-At Superior Cont {.

IhaucerY holden the town OF Lynch
burg on the an day oi November, ls2d--
hoheu scott pit
against
Dudley Jones. Milton Bennett, Thomas ID
Bennett, iruis Bennett, Doreas Moormau,
Thomns !. Mooiniau, George Martin and Eli.
zahefh bis wife. John Fowler aud iarla -
vile, William Shaw mud Patsy his vile, lio"
ard Martin and Larry bis wife, john Webb
Gcarge / MerWeihct TOR Thomas Zones, An
.clui Clark son and Mildred his Mic, James
Marlin, John Burton, t'eofgc I've, Charles
Nlnndy, Thomas u. Wait, Martha Goodei
Grief Barksdale, Moses Preston aud John
Garnier dciis.
And
Robert G. Scott pit.
against
Oliver Mcgeynolds, sheriff Of the county
OF Campbell, Gabriel l. Scott, William W al-
Ter Scott aud William Peadeton detis.
On The molion oil the plaintiff in The first
suit, by COUNSEL 10 reinstaie the injunction
awarded him therein on the twenty fourth
day Of Nav, one thousand eight hundred aud
twenty two, which Stands dissolved by the
non-perlornancc of the conditions of the or
der OF the iwcbfy-ll,ird day OF May last, il
relation thereto, aud on the motion of The
defendant Oliver Mclteynolds, ~ The second
suit by counsel, 10 dissolve the Injunction n
wnrdrd the plantih in that suit on the twenty
third day eli May, one thousand eight hun.
drcd aud twenty two, the court, on consde-
ration thereof, and OF The bills, answers, e1-
hibits aud examinations of Witnesses. as well
rs The record of the proceedings In this count
OF The case ol Charles .Uuudy against Robert
/ &. Scott and others, rs OF the report OF Com
missioner Benagb, made in pursuance of the
! said order OF the twenty third day OF May
last, with exceptions thereto 10y the plaintiff,
and after hearing counsel IN opposition to the
motions, being OF opinion that II Is competent
to Tire plaintiff Robert e. Scott 10 convey rs
good title 10 the heirs OF Thomas Jones,
dec Il 10 the land in the proceedings men
/ TONED, wherein he resides, containing two
hundred and two acres, more or less, rs he
derived from them, any supposed lien by Viz
tue of the execution OF caplas ad satlslucien-
dun in the name Of Charles Nuudy, assignee
! Of james Huntington, against the said Robert
& Scott, in the proceedings also mentioned,
! io the contrary notwithstanding and disap-
proving so much OF the report ui the oommIs.
sioner rs may conflict with what foliowetb,
doth order, that the injunction awarded the
/ plaintiff in the first suit, rs aforesaid, on the
i twenty fourth day of May, one thousand eight
/ hundred aud twenty two, be relnshted, upon
these conditions: TINT the plaintiff shall,
within thirty days from this day deliver pos
session of the tract of land aforesaid wherein
/ he lives, 70 those entitled thereto, agreeablN
| to The written articles OF agreement made and
! entered into on the thirteenth day OF October,
/ eighteen hundred aud twenty one, under the
! hands and seals of the parties thereto sub
/ scrihed, and filed as one OF the exhibits niOre-
said, marked 4 that he shalt, before Com
missioner Benagh, deliver in q schedule, upon
oath, OF all his estate, real or personal, whe-
| Their in possession, remainder on reVcrsiun,
in his own right, or in the right OF any other
! person, aud sub scribing such schedule, shall
thereupon execute n proper deed OF convey
ance Tor all the property comprised therein,
TO the marshal OF this court, Ia be held in
trust by him for the use aud benefit of the
creditors of the said Robert G.. Scott, accord
ing to the true intent and meaning OF the deed
of the tenth OF December, one thousand eight
hundred aud twenty one, made between The
| said Robert {. Scott, OF the one part, and
Oliver McReynolds, sheriff of Campbell
county, of the other part, filed as one of the
exhibits aforesaid, marked {, subject To any
| future order OF the court aud thefenpon the
! court setting aside SO much of the order made
in the secnud suit on 3lst October, 1922, as
| conflicts with what tulloweth, doth order that
! the said Commissioner state the several claims
against the said Robert c. Scott, for which
he stood charged ia execution, on the said
teutb of December, eighteen hundred aud
! twenty Que, rs well as every other claim II
/ ghust him nj that time, as also the claims OF
Gabriel |. Scott and William Waller Scott, at-
! ter due notice for that purpose, and report the
/ same Ia the court with any matters specially
stated thought pertinent by himself or rcqui-
red by the PRIZES to be So stated auI the
court doth further order that unless the said
/ Robert {. Scott shall well aud truly, within
! the time allowed him rs aforesaid, perform
! the conditions aforesaid, the injunction Hwar-
! died him in the second suit ON the twenty
! third day of May, one thousand eight hun
] dred and twenty two, rs aforesaid, shall also
stand dissolved as an act of this day and the
! court doth further order, that il the sBid 10
bert {. Scott shall attempt in any man1er 10
remove the whole or any part of his personal
estate bound by the lien Of his creditors, ac-
curding to the true intent aud meaning of the
! said deed of the tenth ol December, eighteen
hundred aud twenty one, and OF the act in
such cases made and provided, for the relief
] at lnsolvcnt debtors, that the marshal OF this
| court do thcrcnpon take possession of the
| same, and hold il, subject 10 the future order
! of the court unless the said Robert {, Scott
! will give bond with sufficient security for that
purpose, in penalty equal to double the va
lne OF the said property and the cout doth
! urther order that the said commissioner do
also take an account of the rents and profits
of the tract of land aforesaid, from the date
of the articles et agreement aforesaid, To- the
| time when the possession thereof shall be de
to the court with any matters specially stated
| thought pertinent by himself, or required by
the parties to be SO stated.
A copy-Tcsie,
JOHN WILLS, c. G.