American watchman and Delaware advertiser. [volume] (Wilmington, Del.) 1822-1828, 1823-06-13
first to b and dis the democratic party, Is rot Won

first to s and di, the democratic party It is not won
derui his conduct at the late session. when coupled
what was imputed to him at the former one has occasion
ed him to be viewed with nstrttst with Jealousy and with
suco and this it believed is the that has
casloned the accusations against him, perhaps, would
not be going far to say that if the republican mem.
bers OF that legislature had the question put to them they
would say they believed Mr.. Dupont voted for Mr. MLane,
as senator.
Mr. Dupont further asswhat had the election of 1922
to do wi tn that of 1928?
In addition to what has been stated in the foregoing
ply, is believed, it has this additional connexon with it.
for it be forgotten that Mr. George Read r was the
active agent in fncnng the excitement against the
representatives. OF 1821-on account of certain obnoxious
laws and that when the Representatives had been changed
under this excitement he applied to John Harlan to
Tor LOUIS NJ Lane, as Senator against Mr.. Rodney This
fact in conjunction with the conversation Mr. Dupont adj
mits he had with Mr.. Alrich yland the Speaker, about
Mr.. MLane's election, and the belief entertained uni
versay that Mr.. Dupont voted for Mr.. MLane HIMSELF
has led to the idea that the democratic party be
made subservien, by this intrigue, to the election of Mr.
MLaneand that the elevation of MIR Read Sen thereaf-
ter had ienbeen planned between Mr. George Read, Jr
MIR. MLane oaggraize their t1nly; and his belief has
been slrenghenedby the declaration made by MIR Dupont
his friends, that they to vote for Mr. George
Read Sen by their constituents, and would vote for him
alone, and that, in this the federasts would lend their support
force Mr. Reads election against the wish Of he majority
is believed these circumstances furnish well grounded
room for the conviction that has gone abroad that
secret understanding ubsistcd between kr Dupont anti
Mr. George Read relative these mdtterS that other
wise the proposition of the ma ory just, reGSona5
and so h IN 1tSe tn have been adopted, OF selecting
who should have united the suages of ALL would not have
been so uncourteousy uncerenonousy rejected and
hence it is conceived the elections 1922 and of 1928 have
direct and complete bearing on each other.
Mr. Dupont asks, was it heard that uryman was
bound to find guilty because had expressed
that opinion, tha this principle is badly applied, which
assmates the responsibility Of representative TO this sit
uaton.
No man will contend for moment that iuryman
be called find man guilty. if he is dissatisfied with
the evidence, although he stands alone but it believed
this principle does not apply to the minority of party,
who elected the implied assurance the honorable
dence, that subssts between candidate and his constu
ents, that he will with the majority of that party, where
the vitality OF that party at stake. This axiom, it is
ceved, applies in the present case, and especially
when the majority offered second time give up their
candidate, fer the vitality of the party here at issue
And the minority rejected this it shews they acted from
faciOs from hidden purposes and that til principle,
ing 1t on its broadcast grounds, sta ed by NJ Dupont,
Cannot screen them from the dspeasure OF the people.
1t very curious that in $780, Mr. Dupont voted against
Mr. Hall for representative to Congress because, he made
him the scape goat governor Collins message the e
gsature, the enemy Of domestic manufactures. And
yet in Is g. voted for him to be taken senator in
Congress- when the question respecting domestic manu-
features sands exactly on the ground it did in 1920
and when senator, he would have far in his
power to have shown his enmiy if he had any, to
utactures This solecism i'll contradiction, winch
plain like myself neither comprehend nor UNDER
stands but may possibly be solved by referring that Mr.
George Read r. and Mr. Dupont might then perfectly
kaow each others sentiments
The foregoing desultoy remarks not intended as
answerto this pamphlet they merely designed to put
he public their guard against suppression Of facts and
Misrepresentation Of motives. MAJORITATIS.