Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1823-07-22

rest arc satisfied with t.,e winch Me- SecIc-
tary Crawford has gone IN that part of his report
But, admit that The lnteigeucer consider il
rs mere tariff report, WOULD that make it So Are
we TO Judge MIR. {. concIusively 10y the columns OF
that pap-rs
But il we were to appeal TO this sort of evidences
tors de record, zee Have authorities also. We fud
in the Weekly Register OF Saturday last, ,he mos.
decided Tariff jnurna IN This country, Mr.. Niles en-
pioNin the following language:
The INDIRECT GouNTY Policy" This is u
newly coined term believe, but shall soon ascer.
tain its meaning, aud find out its application
GA wiiter IN the Richmond" Enquirer'-an able
man, aud, dare say honest one who " rites over
The signature uf" Farmer''-is evidently disciple
oi the old school, whose doctrines were long snca
exploded 10y every commercial aud manufacturing
nation iu the world, aud SO, certainly, including the
american. He makes vigorous attack upon Mr..
Crawford, and charges him with heiny iiendl, to
the " policy of forcing manufactures byp,oiecIing
duties, against which, it that the editors o the
" Enquirer had prev iousiy endeavo,ed defend
h'n- correspond with the latter in this case ; for,
Though MIR. G has several times mentioned dome silk.
manufactures IN his reports, ALWAYS supposed ihat
he had an entire regard and reference rereHue,
derived from the payGept of duties other tsreS-
But II Is NOT my intention either to attack teirnd
ht' gentleman the iacis ave mentioned only Tor the
purpose of Introducing readers the first para
graph ~ the essay of the " Farmer, follows Sc"
Aud we eau state from knowledge that
ge"iehih", the most Distinguished IN the u. 5. for his
personal and literary shors the side of the tariff,
expressly declared within few days past, that lie
did not consider Nj. Crswlurd's Proposition, ~
made with any eye to the tariff, hut with eye
revenue:-So then we wosid have Construction
ceTSmS Construction.
We have ret received the No. of the H. r. Anerican that
contains the article, which die following paragraph from
the National Advocate refers:
The little Lawyer of the American alias Cafo Marcus,
e. eesra is hard pushed for proofs tina, Mr. Jensrso~is a-
Se'vaton with one or his dad, qnadraniS THINKS
party the other a old school democratic party latter
ngg ,r'enaY TO Mr. Adams. Now we use no q"sdranto
The po'ar fdemocracy Virginia sheds no iuse on
rue candidate who declares the Rights dl Man,"
uian worthless Mr. Jefferson in nf Mr. Adams for
know better, SIR"
The division Of the republican party in this state
TWO pare we have than had occasion nail
TO the II base coin and not fit TO circulate
among honest and nteg poiiiicans-Asi Mr. Jeer-
sons prediction ior Mr. Adams, have already taken
the liberty OF giving good advice the N Amer
cam Let him be insured, that tue less lie says publishes
on that subject the 6,t.er.
His ncighbor OF The Commercial Advertiser Office has
ventured 60 step beyond him. in the following rid
cuous paragraph:
letter is published in the Cherry Valley Gazette from
MI daie april SO, 1928 in which he declines
k nh opinion A. 10 lis iavorie candidate for the office
ct tesitht lie IS wary old gentleman does not like
n,ong tue knowing ones, that heis Cu,onian Mex TO-
nie Clinton he prefers Mr Adams-hr having in
np turing NE great Controversy between his father and
forgive him for cannon nenr N.Y. crnwIord nor
1" wh't was called the dark day of 49,"
Be advised, MIR. Stone-You are completely out Tbera.
IS not an assertion you have rke in this dashing para
graph, which is not idle and falacious. jefferson
mIres the inleHts OF DE Witt Clinton John O. Adams
does he therefore prefer the president Nonoes
he dislike W. II Crawford No-poes he object TO him a
the president NoDoes lie wish him be the president
Fill up this blank YOU please Mr.. Stone. We do
not wish speak out as you do Bu we are ra-
er Mr. jefferson than you are-and do not speak
rs much a random as YOU do.