Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1823-12-11

Nancy his wife, ad William S. Branch aud nicy WIFE,
The defendants VIM Archer and Prudence his wife Ta
vid Robertson and Nancy his wife, and William s Branch
cordirg tho act of Assembly This court
md ial"aring 10 the satisfaction o: the that they
inhabitants N uf he
tn ny counsel, it ordered that the said defendants
security for performing the decree OF The court
civ ieaa@ of two ,non'hs s%eee.re and p pc ie
" tue '%% SSr e eour9pSs Of h sSspy
ocsnneI u. 4S-v8wf
y ChANckRY.-A rules held in clerks office Of
Prince william county court for the month OF Septem
Isaac Brdwell and Mary his WIFE Edward Homes. vii
liam Manned aud Sebhn his wife, Peggy omrs Thornton
G. Calvert and Ann his wife, and Timothy Drdwel and
Lyiha bus wife, COmPiainants,
Richard Ford aud Isabella bis wife, Elizabeth Homes and
thomas Homes in his right aud as administrator of
Thomas Homes deceased, Dsfendanfs
The defendant Ezabcb Homes no, having entered her
appearance and given security according the As
senby and tie rules OF this court appearing by
factory evidence thar she inhabian COM
m7nweah it IS Ordered, that The said Elizabeth Homes do
appear here ON the fast day January
order be forthwith inserted in Richmond Enquirer pub
ished in he city Of Richmond for months successfully,
OF the courthouse Of Ibis county
Ct a eOPy-restr, NJ. B. SINCLAIR, &C.
y CHANCERY.-At a monthly seS-i1n Co01I held for
Louisa County nj the courthouse Monday the 9th day
Nathaniel Thompson Jun PiaintG;
Waer o,erton aud John ciaybrooke. Dea,
The deiendan, Waller Overflow not having entered his
rules court, appearing To tie satisfaction &c
tie court, hnI lie is no, nhaban of this ON tie
motion OF tue plaintiff by his counsel, II is
The sd defendant Overton appear first dav of
January couf next and answer the PLAINTIFF BILL and hat
copy OF ms order be forthwith inserted in ncwsa
per Published in tie city of Richmond for
this county day.
Aeopy-res'e JNo. HUNTER, c. J.. C.
TIRGIS IA: court he tor Charlotte county the 9Th
Iny OF October, ia95;
sue by their guardian and next friend Isham Harvey
,,. Plaintiffs
IL zekiah Ford md Simeon W. Hines, Defnsnnts.
The deiendaol simeon W. Hines not having entered his
OF s court and IT appearing 10 she satisfaction tbs
lion Of The plaintiff 10y COUNSEL il is ordered, that tn said
dern nj DO appear here The FIRST Monday in January
bill, and give security performing tie decree Of tbe
court and ai copy of This order be inserted in pa
per printed in The city of Richmond for success
y aud posted AZ the front door Of the courthouse
o,., Ass.sry-Tese, wINsIow ROBINSON, C.
oU-prI - -1S--w8wf
NihGINlA: AZ Rules held the CLERKS Office OF DE
Clanecry District Court Of Williamsburg the filth
day of June, 1925.
James s Jones Plaintiff;
samne u Lessee and Thomns g. oritcnden OF
The defendant Samuel jesse not having entered his
apre"rHnc7 ana given security according to the Of
satisfactory evidence TINT he nIiabant az his
country or be motion ~ he plaintiff y his counsel
IS ordered That the said defendant do appear here ON The
Irs day Of die next tenn, aud answer ill of the
plaintiffs and that copy this order he forthwith in
serted IN some newsg' yer published the borough OF
Norfolk Tor two mo" succrssiyeiy posted At the
front door OF the former Capitol city OF Williams
burg
Noy a ,opy7,Te''e' Ed. cnRsTIAN.c.c.
NTIHdl,tA. Al superior C,ar uI CIsUcery 5oJde,at
The G'poi ia the city Of Richmond, 18th day OF
Thoias Priee Ir in his own right, ard rs surviving ex
ecal'r Of tie testament aud last vii OF William NJ Ncmar
"ece"stn, Plaintiff,
William Temple. Dec,dauf
rue Defendant = no is ont Of 'h country n6J against
horn ,he raind appears TO have proceeded the mode
prescribed 10y law against absnt defendants still failing
hs court doth take bis bill fo confessed; and
argued by counsel consideration whereof ,he court
doh refr thr accounts between the parties one Of It's
same and make ferorl thereof the court will, any mat
ter specially slated Seemed pertinent by himself or which
a copy--Tesie WIN ". HENING, G. c.
co1nIlssioNER's oFFIcE,} The parties interested
bave npoonicd the 22l day Of December next 70 CON-
mfncr ne nccognS directed 10 The foregoing order fcour
al ny office IN i eity with their accounts vouchers
ready FOR examination and settlement.
Noyfmlrr rs. 56-w4wt n. BAKER. N. c.
NlG6lNlA ~ Superior CoWt OF ChanceTy 6oIJerist
he Capitol in the city Of Richmond The len dsy ot
fe'eG x , Ieverly Pa
Dyrd beverly AID BsnieIc.u no.
he ssicndan Gyid Beverly, WHO out ofihs coanirr
r. m sn,t LON we runua apresrs to have proceeded
SUI "ing to appeal and answer motion OF the plaintiff
olse Tue court doth take his bill Tor conesse against
wa hrrhdnni nnd the plaintiff withdrawing renlirs-
80" entered ~ rules, 10 The The defendant Ca
We cause came on 20 be heard that defendant ON he
M go "nswer onl and argued hy counsel On con-
s"e'nn whereof. HE doth the accounts be-
tween ie plaintiff asd Byrd beverly TO one Of lis compi
siones who j. directed 10 examine state and settle the
srpe anj make report thereof tue court with any matters
pec"iy 'inied decn' pertinent ny himself or which may
hf required Ivy The PARTIES 90 be stated
1920. a tnps--Ieste. WIN w uENING, Q. e.
cOMNlSSlONEk'S OFFICER TIE paffics ;o,eresfet
Hiehaeud, 7A No. 49, 1875 Rare desired r., al ooc
that have appointed The erth lay of lie te,b month,
eclnibcf) uex for commencing ihf accounts direc,e5 m
The above order o tue courts which dse ~ nine e~t
A. W. their Attendance - reqnifed my office in b;s re
w'h Their accounts ard The evidence n supporl OF The |
ready ior examination md settlement '
oct. 20. d. waw Tpo,fse am a -
NAPr CorroNs s. POIxr BLtNKrr.