Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1822-02-28


IL something, 20 he sure, considering the effect he
aiienpts TO give it, by the insertion OF the potent
hcrey>. aud by The constructive apology lac derives
iconl il afterwards But, sir, how weak, how watery,
compared with this more than fourth proof evidence
signed by myself!
now turn TO the accusing part Of General Jack
suns letter . acknowledged that had icied!as-
" ,y wiihuci due considerations and without proper
" Information a. 10 the facts Of ke case"
Cpnn endeUOrimg To- recoiect the vhule coversa-
ton, think General Jackson, in his usual mild way,
made use himself of those words, some others to
the effect. But that acknowledge the truth
OF those facts ,cmains to he proved, and viii prove
the very reverse, by the evidence supplied by Gene
raj Jackson himself. :
Upon thu opportunities of John lnncrariiy and
some other Spanish gentlemen" But General
note ut the 10Th, marked No. 3. ,liai IL expressed
by me-, that the writ was ISSUED the verbal Gppti
e@i9'. vast difference, General, between alpii-
cation and opportunities
And NOW let mo pause "a moment and consider
General jackson insists that must sign declara-
uon, stating, that issued writ nf habeas corpus
on verbal applications yenial sin, under all posi-
bic circumstances, sit, in comparison with the airoc
Gus CRIME Aud lac does not ask me, who sc
.uhm'ssi,c, 80 compliant whom he could so easil,
Tighten INTO al irresistible submission by the ea,
OF conference.-the does not ask me- TO put the. inl
nous sign, OF nv hcncelorw,rd nr,mous name I,
nc revolving catalogue OF crimes, which, thank God
have no existence bat in General jackson : own i'm
aeinton
Is possible, sir, is il credible tha, if had made
the concessions stated in Genera, Jackson's lcucr
me nenerii would not, under the malevo!ence to-
wards me which he BETRAYED in every ptrt of his
co"iuct ~ince nay arrival here, in the proper
u"n IA which, myself, evincc,i noderaiiou--is il
possible. say to- believe tina, he would no, have had
,hi ari OF our conversation too reduced 10 writing,
nv d. Bio1rugh, and ii he has not had il educe,
!" wIiiin' i''ef those circumstances, isit not
hfe'f,gahi. proof, th,t such conversation never
passed Another proof, no less weight is the
lpt,
WHO hVe' M General jackson f:,my, who was pre-
sem ~ INC whole oi The conversations, and yet does
MOI STA" amy o! the facts above enumerated. See
AIR. haie,ec' letter Ia General Jackson, No. L. =
Ana tiat hId iiecn appraised that 'ulouei Gala
. VI hid been committed u, him for conienp, of
. frrcd."
Sr, j, WAS unnecessary Tor me 10 enter into . dis.
CusHion as tn the iuiicia authority Of General Jack
SON 'or, as before observed tn case hatalrcady
e''n referred Ia the President But without insist
ing "pon That pomt, comtendei that had right 10
Interfere ~ the here, ~ the same time that
grated should have. no rich, "a interfere II GIN.
vernon jackson, instead of being the Governor of 4
teriiiory was the Governor Of an independent state
"' 'na' Governor - 'e WAS, Colonel Callava was
6" course detained prisoner under the color OF The
1";hnris ur the Upt-t States and that in ,ha, case
II W''S NV ri-hi aid INV duty Interfere
o"' WY q" 81" n"v thing myself on the subject
SF' ~ 80 goo" rs 'n iuin To the last paragraph but
one. IN General JickSnus FIRST urter of tho Ri Sen.
temhrr, MA krd M. . There Won road as follows
hnd stated Ia you, that IL YOU eerc in the states
N"n would have 40 shi interfere in the manner
~ Which Non had attempted here, and referred you
- I" The laws of Congress"
Sir, can there h. - mare nr,nIe rouGrm,,;o, .,
Tue truth OF that part % The conversation aboye sta
'e"' HAN those very woods of General jack >on for
10 what rlNe than nv own observations on the subrc
cnH'd those Remarks Of he General anDiv Bn, sir
IS not al Those words of General I,ckso,, nn
ih'n a positive admission that liad here The rinb Ia
n'eTieif. a''h"neh might NOT have had it IN the
''n,eS what, ar! II was with his ewes OPEN and
wan the copSOuSncSS that had the rp,t Ia do what
d! that General Ickson rendered himself guil,v
oi t'ie minny 1nrtyrs offered To me in my ofci Al
character Oh, M country, Oh, the liberties OF
America
Give NE leave now sir, 10 take a retrosnec,iye
view oi my letter To General Jackson To which the
on" winch have iuS done analy sing i, an answer
and what does 1t contain positive assertion on
my part That, irom the beginning 10 the end OF the
conversation with General Jackson I insisted botb
on tie 'rht nh div of Judge Of the United States
10 grant ih't wit. DOES Genera! Jack son deny that
tct IN hIS ietter sir! Yet dis cannot he l,,r If
'eid me inughage aiiriiinted TO Inv General Jack
son liI "" shall see, presently IN what STYLE (;r-
neral Jackson answers when Ceseral I,t.tso
writes, Under the real or affected impression that The
i'is winch ie ~ gnitg refu,e are not true Thus
n"' now nv authorizations 10 confirm, by the silence
o' G"nera Jackson, the truth of the facts contained
~ my hrSi letter ia him Of the 8 inst which had
rue ii"nor to send You bv The last mail
ne ncN' document IN order is nv second letter
o! the I? Hepiemher, 10 General Jackson, marked
10 :, ~ rfpiY to hiS answer. This letter contain
arg scarcely any thing but respectful denial or the
charges made against ME Nv General Jackson ia his
f't letter OF Tie same day. conveyed, in 81, decorous
l'hg"'@t as INV knowledge of il permitted me To use
an some idfthrr comparatively imnIaicrial state
memis oi facts. which sufficiently eXpau themselves
ana requires o course; comment from me Lei
ihe letter speak for itself will only observe thar
Sehi ii7 letter, by MIR Scott. Within cs lIinn half
1h Ho,E aiier receiving Cen JlckSOns first letter Of
ne 81 September, but, owing TO Gen jackson, heiu,
otherwise engaged Mr. Scout had ~, opportunity TO
nave the letter delivered TO him until hetwern six nn
sever c,nck, OF the same div, L. vi. The ucxt
hOrinT, ScDic1Ib"r the it, .bDnt eivht a lock
a. NJ received, from the hand OF Mr. OCnunrg
move meni'oueJ. the second letter Of Genera, jack
son mar kcd No. b. dated September 81 in answer 10
ny Ser"nd letter which has drawn upoO me the IN
ii2nluon aud coutempt Of Gen Jackson The iuds-
Iaiinn and contempt of Gen jackson -
heS pardon, Or, for the scandd.ous, nn!ocorous
'nu u,'SnS''"g Sc'ne which AN nOw compelled ia
'p'h 30 yonr view But, Sir, hccaisc my enemy,
iNc the swine, which delight IN nothing ss mI,,c, -,
ii, b;is Thought II convenient to seek refuge i'm the
lndgmire u bnnzsShte abuse, shall let 90 The hold
nave of nm? No, Sir covered witt, Dirt Il is true
'"' nobiy covered with dirt, which, coming Ia con
tC' win such IN enemy, | ciGnOf protect ntSeif
fom WI hoi'll'im, still drag him heoi the lribu-
MAJ OF his country, OF his muc injured country.
on must again bcg pardon. | shuddcr at en-
ef'h9 on TIC sutgeci. But must. ! cannot help
,nWhchilnr upon rfcTy line, upOn every VOID, OF
us most Infamous document. The letter runs thu, :
, oif, nave tins moncut received your sccund note
OF this day. The first created my establishment, il
> Is true but the second my Indignation aud con.
, tempt. For, did moi suppose, Until yOur note
: now before NE furnished the conclusive evidence
,iat you were captb!c OF stating wilfIl and deli.
= brrate fiisehoud"
What, Sir General jackson, before he received
ny second note, did not suppose iIit wa, capable
u stating = wIliul and deliberate Gilschood Dut.
or, what Is my FIRST lraer, which did not create the
hu! Snahon a"d contempt of General Jackson, but
"'iiGl and deliberate iaIsehUod, il the accnsaion
contained against me, 10 General Jacson's first cttcr
pc wen o"nded Is il possible Sir, that the man
Yho from The beginning Of the conversation to the
'"d, c0uld have INSISTED upoH his rights aud duties
IS Judge OF tie United STATES, could have made
he concessions stated ~ General Jacksons frs let.
ei md, u the two statements are irrecoucilealie
NhN. MLL-r Ll.Lln Hr.i Ir.L..r