Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1822-03-26
SUPRENIE COuRT

.'londay, March 13.-Mr. Chief Justice
MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court
- the case Of the .Nereydo, the Spanish Consul
| ciamant. The cause was ordered TO further
pronl.
The case of EimcndoC against Taylor was
argued by Dir. Talbot for the rainia'in error,
AND hy '!r Hardin for the defendant in error.
.Harch i9.-Mr. Justice JOHNSON delivered
The opinion Of the court in the ease of the
.4rrogante Barcelona, the Spanish Consul
claimant. Decree affirmed, and property re-
stored to the original spanish owner.
The argument of the case or Elmendorf
against Taylor was argued by dr. Bib for
The defendant IN error, and by Mr. Clan for
the paintif'm error
March e0.-Mr. Chief Justice MARsuALI,
delivered the opinion of the Court in ibe case
of the Monte .4liegrc, and the Reynha dos
.fnios. Drcrces affirmed, and the property
restored TO the Portuguese owners.
Mr.. Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the
OPINION ~ The Court in the case of Blight
against Rochester. Judgment affirmed
Mr.. Justice SrorY delivered The opinion in
the case of GoldSborouga against Orr. judy
ment affirmed.
The ease Of the United States against the
Irresistible, was argued by Mr. Wot attorney
General) for the United States.
March 91.-Mr Justice Johnson delivered
the opinion u the Court in the case of Dorr
| against the Pacific Insurance Company. Ger
| ticrari awarded.
Mr.. Justice SToRY delivered the opinion of
| The Court in the case of Exams VS.. Eaton. and
| Exams vs.. Heiiick. Judgment affirmed.
Mr.. Justice Johnson, Mr. Justice LIvINes-
TON, and Mr.. Justice DUvALL dissented
The C0URT affirmed the decree of the
Court below, in the case Of the United States
against the Irresistible. and qlashcd the writ
| OF error in the case of the Columbian Insur-
ance Company against WheelrrigM
The cases of the Society for Pyopugnting
The Gospel against the T6,cn Of .Mec Haren,
largued by Mr.. HopkinsOn for the plaintiffs, and
by Mr. Webster for the defendant y and of
Hunt against Rousmdnier's Administrators.
(argued by Mr.. Wheaton for the appellant, and
by Mr. Hunter for the rcspondents,) were con-
tnued IN The next term for advisement.
The CouRT established rules for the go
vernment Of the equity practice, in all the
Courts OF The United States, TO fake effect on
the LIST ofJuy next
March 22.-The Chief Justice delivered the
opinion of the Court in The case of Narburay
VS.. BrookeS. The Judgment below was re-
versed.
WAsnINGToN, March GA paragraph is
going the rounds Of the newspapers, copied
from Boston print, which speaks, as if APP
pears tn us, with unbeComng levity, Of the
Court Martial about to be held there, for the
trial of an officer of high rank. Not desir-
ing TO initiate the example Of discussion
IN the newspapers Of charges pending before
a Court Martial, and still less to express any
opinion Of their merit or demerit, il is suffci-
ent TO say that the statement is calculated 10
produce unjust impressions, not so much BIZ
its assertion as by its suppression Of facts.
The publication could moi have been made by
any friend Of the navy, being calculated to
reflect discredit on the service. fyNat Int.
March a5.--The SUPREME CoURT, after a
session Of seven weeks. and hearing all the
causes which were ready for argument, adj
journed, last evening" until the next term
The bill authorizing transfer of govern
ment stocks, being one Of general interest, we
shall give IN our next paper pretty cOpious
report Of the discussion, and particular state
ment Of the proceedings which have taken
place on it, during the last three DAYS II is
proper 10 state, in the meantime, Ito correct
40 error in the proceedings published yes,er-
! day. that although The amcndnent Offered by
| MIR. Cdmjreleng was negatived on Thursday
in committee or The whole. il was afterwards
adopted, IN he House, 1903 votes to 80, with
no maicriai nodi6csiion, cxrept The reduction
! OF The amount of stock from so 10 rs miIIionsf