Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1822-03-22
CIVIS.



4 lie Editor oi. the National Gazette berins n long
'rucIe WIN an acrimonious attack upon the Editors
oil me view YORK american, and National Advocate
ana winds Up with the following paragraph y
may be INDUCED further word apu, our Wash.
Ing'o correspondence, in general, which has prnok pJ
several wtacres To give pubc maniie afiDn Of tlrir
shrewdnes' particularly Correspondent of The R;r,mn
Elhil'ef' whp mistakes quotation from Swirl for scra
Oh ChHucsf NO tact has been stated any phrase ,ntpj
nor any opinion alleged, in that Corresponcnce as 6y-
occurred ~ Washington which did come from ,hat ri;y
ana Goes mol rest upon a. good authority
AZ distance respecting thing done thought or r
there easy hc aicei, as well inf1r,usd ai pb In
ue!phia, o what passes ia Washington spot. We
nave tHen pains 10 be veil informed. and rre no reason
way We should not have bad access authentic sources
CONNER oi ieuers with persons IN Waslu,ion. rare
occurrence Ia regard to the debates Of Cnneres tir fi
OF ,lf sem"@aphers has been Psrd b. the w,icr wnc,
u wa s1I,'i io obvious reasons; lot much o. both in
cident and dialogue has been .cn which i. NOT f I've fr
IN me printed REPORTS We baye entered r p,nn-
l '"e s'al'r satisfaction 81 Tie many distant editors
who have repulished tue articles que.tiruur e,dp
We Know arc pleased that ihey should nc thus spared he
tas of unniHnrian and unutfresfire proceedings Am
inh we IN the transactions OF Congress hr-
ts "at rs stated IN The Correspondence regularly ropi-
Cd into our columns from the iricigenccr.n
And his Is Sir Peter Tcazlc saws Of Joseph Sur.
race, Mr.. Walsh would call Gdi and clear accOD,f
u the Uii0ie nDier
Mark the evasion. Mr W. has been in the In.
hit OF publishing as" Editors Lnrse,pon4,pce" certain
,}ng nIties p"rporilng 10 tee from " Nishnr'nn ="
lie has been charged With writing ihosr himself
l(id he publish these cttrrs us he rercitcd d,cr,
We're lh'y wrien for hin in hc l.ape IN which flcy
are published Ale or no II was casg for him 10
'''N '''''if i'u HtNt FfEN UlfrfS Wpte written ~
'tey purpoTed 10 be that there was no NICK i'm
The matter. Not 80, however, docs he s1y lut bp
cvudcs II by saying, thai there is no fact stated nor
any ni,ose quoted, any opinion alleged IN that cor
iespondeprc, rs hiring occurred at Easiipgfop
when dd not come from that citv" Tie fact Them
ana me ptraSeS Quoted, We presume, he means &,
say hum the Debaies,) and the oyiDi9ps ahoatlhprc
came rom washington well then did the Lsurr,
come IRON that city, Why did he not "a, so wiz
DOES he cvade the question by Starring an entirely dis
ilnct proposition The very c,a-i0n iisclr proves
TINT The p"bic suspicion Is well founded--,laf hc
does not get thc citers I've eires them to u~-but
ihai, WIN the eXccpuOn uf fcw iacts which he re
ccNcs from his Correspondent, the letters are oil his
own manufacture.
The prescription, then, of orr Correspondent innsi
he altered accordingly Take = lew ntcis furnished
by Mr. W NJ of p mix tl,rn, on with
copi9us extracts of debates from The columns or The
Inteigcncer, and occasional, ct tire Washington G.
~ Gazette pour in q large portion of his own ptN
aniipdhy TO the NTgnans, aud scraps 0f leatuug
from he pages OF various authors-and YOU have n
sort oil " hodge-pndge, made up Of rs many maicri-
ais, Is those which thrown into the cauiilron Of
Macbeth switches
OF the case Of Mr. Irish, we know or course yery
little BIZ, unless we have been very much riisiu-
formed, il Not Mr.. Van Buren, WHO made tie re-.
marks tho SeHdie of the q. s. ascribed to Lin, Nv
Mt Walsh Washington partner. We understand
that MIR Van Burcn did not peak AZ III on tir sah
jet The Senators hom Pcnnsylynia themse vcs
urged The OBJECTIONS ;In; rgrSic 10 Mr. Itisf--