Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1821-03-13

cia',nant tNo. 49,] was argued Inv a.
Hopa'nsoa aud The Attorney General ior 49,,
claimant. aud by Mr.. Winder and AZ
"ncdfon tor the Baenos Ayrean can,o,s
MIR. Hunt moved TO dismiss ,br a.,
yea, =" me case OF Spring and other, We
Motion refused. 'P""y,
80, WEDNESDAY, MARCH
10" argument ot the case of Cibyo,.
Os"en h,d not take place this day 40 v.as
eApec,en, a difi'chlty OF form having o.
CURED ia TIE manner in which the cans. =
"a- brought ir"m the State Court
We shall publsh in a few dave H.
Opin,on otthe Couri in the case of To5
VS.. The State IF Virginia. - wi
THURSDAY, MARCHs.
Mr.. Chief Justice MARSHALL. del;
en ,hr "pini"n OF The Court in the ca.
H'"ihs vs.. HoidHgs@O'th. which WINS
pr ceediuSs.
MIR. Sss'lre STORY delivered the oS
ni"n ut the Court IN Tile case of the en-
go "i the Spanish ship Conception. resiorH
'"s we ca'g 4" Tie original Spanish oM N.
-eis' Tue capture having been made by a
pf""ir,r. bu'!i, equipped, armed. and
manned, IN the United States. and sail
Ing under Bucnos Ayres colors.
MI. Justice STORY delivered the on;. I
mon "i me Count M The case of HE Ami.
ao'e Isabella q Cargo, (argucd at the LAST
term by ne attorney General, MIR. PINK
nfy' an" hir. wheaton, tor The capiors. and
M. harper ana Mr.. CASTOR for the clai.
h'ah's condenning The ship and carg
az la"iu! prize ot war. The Couri We
ct "piSio" ma, tho property did M, /,
Long, rs Claimed, 10 a Spanish suhiect
was british property, and not prutectt!
"n"ei IFe Spanish treaty uf 1895. whicI,
shpnia'es HAL free ships shall make Gse
S"""s' vac form or passport provided INV
,na' treaty never having bvcu anupre1
by The high contracting parties TO the
original treaty
MIR. Jasticc JOHNSON delivered The a.
.pihioh o! ihe C"ufi IN the case or M'Clu-
ny vs.. S"hmd" Judgment affirmed.
MIR. Justice STORY Delivered The oo;.
Mon oi The Cour, in the case of Grec, "
Bsd'!"', and promulgated a general r,la
ofcour'. applicable 10 similar casts aud
pioV'Hiua iEai wherever, ppndinp n vr,,
Oh error of appeal, either party shall die
we proper representatives ut such marry
III TIC PERSONALITY or realty, nav voiunts.
THY come In and be Admired uur,;.as,
ii'e SUI and II they 'io mol bus spSea,
tne other parry f0aS suggest the death an
me ftc"'d, aih obtain an order Thar nm
i'ss shch representatives, shall becont.
P"'''S "i'i'iH 'ife HTSi ten ,fayS OF The
ensuing terra. The parry moving for such
"i"e!' "'iehdanl IN error, STALL be en-
i,tird 10 have the writ Of C:,cr Or apne.,i
dismissed: aud it HE pariy so mny,nm
shall be- plaintiff Ia error, la s!,ali he en-.
lhien to op u l!ir record, ana, on hearing
nave ihe same reversed, 4. ertuneuus.
F!oVi"eu, that copy OF every such or
d.r shall be printed IN some newsoaner
Al the Seat OF Government, in which In.
laws Of the Unued States shall be nriu,-
cd by authority. iiiree successive weeks
at least. sixty days before the beginning,
OF lie term OF ihis Courl then ncst eps,'.
ing.
Tile case Of Otis vs. Waiter was arrued
ny HE attorney General fnr The plalniitF
IN error, ami by MIR. Webster and Mir
Wheaton, Tor the Defendant.
The case Of Turtle VS. Coleman was ar.
aucd by MIR. S'comn Tor ihe plaintiff in
error, aud by Mr.. Jones anu No. IagIoy
Tor ihe defendant.
FRIDAY, MARCH
The case OF Lceds vs.. The AIayinc In.
sHrHncs Company. mas argued by Mr..
S~o'm and Mr.. Jones for The appellant,
and bv Mr.. Ire amt The Auorneg General
Tor the respondent.
liz the case al The cargo of The Spanish
snip La Conception, deciued on Thursday
- ~ S'Nb''i i'C dtUfu 20 lie note
lie Judgment of the Court, contained i'm
our paper Yesterday. that. if The case
had stood solely upon The evidence
before tie Circuit Cou,t This Cour, would
have had no difficulty IN affirming the
decree q! tie circuit Court, restoring the
soods 10 he captors: bal, upon HE new
proofs taken since tie appeal, IL appear.
eh HAL tn" rr!vaieer was HOt only origin.
aiig bu II, equipped, armed, ana manned
ii the Uuiied States, bul thai pretend.
ed sale took place al Buen0s Ayrcs, of
which there WAS no sufficient evidence
10 s'icw HAT II was Il rial b0pa j;de irans~
fir 50 That The prvd'etr stl continued
10 lie owned by Citizens of The Unised
States wben she sailed on the second
cr2c fion Buenos Ayrcs, in which the
captuft 10 question Vas mada. The case
therefore fell precisely within the anhori-
~ of the Bette Corr'taeS, decided few
days since.
FIRE