Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1821-02-08

Virginia District made IN the suit, VIM. KirApatrs,k
testament andiast will OF Mary Eeasty, dec. the said
James brown and Agnes his wife, which said Agnes is
the only daughter 1.-The said MARY Heas,, Johu Gibson
wm. Gibson. WIZ. Cameron and Agnes bis N.fe Robe,t
Gibton Peter Gibson, James Gibson and Thomas 9Th
s son en..arrn aud next Of Kin, aud administrators
anu aonihisiiatiix, &c. Of Peter Gibson, dec. who
died without issre.. Plaintiffs
Alexander Henderson, John Spence and Jane, Reed
eA'c"'ofs' Sc' OF The said John Gibson, dec.
Their respective claims before at my Office a, Com
missioner IN The city OF Riehucnd at any time with i'm
len months i'om the 22d day of December, isa0-and
that those who tail 10 Go go, wil be barred OF an
WIN. MACKENZIE, NJ. c.
.sn .. -- 7i..am
n cHaNchRY...UnneaS States Court 5Ih C,reni,
II aud Virginia pisuici, Dee. "a, 1870
WIN KThpa'rek, James trown and John M'Culloch
ereeut"is o the ieamtnt :nd lastw Of Mary lIeasly
sec. the said James Brown aud Agnes his wife which
SAID Aenes is the only daughter the said Mar, Heasy
his vile Robert Gibson, Peter Gibson James Gibson
an" th"mas Iihs"n, thidien ard nsxi OF Mn, and
anc administrative. &C. OF Peter Gibon
"eo' WI" "Ie" "fiont issue..... plaintiffs,
AGAINST 81
Ale.ande, henderson. John Spence and Jamss Reae.
executors, ~t. of he said Jshn Gibson, dec.
, Defendants.
This sui, ahsie, as 10 the pla.aiins John Gibson
ahh "n 6its"n by their dra,bs sud leave 10 given A.,
helf representatives TO tile hill revive the same .
!" iht'n aud npon the motion of the plaintiff. James
ho"n aud Agnes his wife, Mm Cameron and Arre,
MS WIZ Robert Gtssn. te,er 6ibson James Gibson
aud ih"''as Gi,s"n, tie couri doth empower the
Defendant, 10 assign 10 Alexander Henderson his
PARTON Of ,be lands In the wes,+rn paiis Of y,,ppis
under The coptracis between him and the testator Job
GIhsoD alluded to IN the answer, of The
a"n tb'Ieurhn. IL is Oraercd, bat the said
Do, after having advertised the time and place "a ,gIe
Tor eight weeks suceessiye!v in NOR. Of The
Newspapers published in the city Of Richmond sen
The osidue OF the said lands the highest bidder 10
p."'le anchor, upon credit Of one aud two yeaI
Noe p"ichas'f 10 give bond and secpfiiy and does az
trust upon The lands b. hin puf.ha.ed TO ,eeure
payment 81 tie purchase mopty and the said def.n..
premises 10 the AND mon The frtLer uo,inn
oi tue plaintiffs, the cou,, withap, secdirc any thing
t'h'ns 'he ternit ny he commissioners appointed
ny me county court az pr,rce William In andi, he
standardization account OF the Defendants doh di,ert
one OF MS eoniinssiooers to take and report 10 the
CAN'T tst, an account az The acinistI a,,on Of he
otle"dsnis upon h.i tesatoI's estate, from The dale
81 the las, item M the If the said con,ms
OF The COUNTY couit with such nattsrs speeaiIy .tot,d
as he may thns pertinent or either pariy ma, ,snira
tcbe q stated Secend an account OF tie .pbi,ris
deyi.s hy the tesaior TO hi, sister MARY Hes,, ~, -,
/ The children of his broiheis Peier and Ungh ana
whai wiil he the respective proportions OF the isr,n.
ihe'en Third, AZ accounir The debts dye thereon 10
the s'aios al his dsath and hse due D. his estate
ai'e'@ ards aud whether due diligence haiH been used
oi'co'.r The sans vita secb matters sprcalIy stated
"s nc may th!nS peEtn at either of The patti,s nav
.ha's 90 ne 81 stated. Zenith, an account q ihe
nts due from the essaor and all creditors are Ia he
PERMITTED within leu nsnhs rom lhs ,a- 10 rom. -,
"no pi"ve ihtir claims bJ proper evidence heete The
commissioner .nois, ngIhout DELAY TO DIV. no,;rs
nr"- papers tuhiahrd In the cit, OF Ricbmond ~
iihh L" enquire aud report IA. cau wteil,r w.ry
mtasi.. John GIBSON s~n OF Peter Gibson dec and
VIA "hs"h ais" son Of The said Peer Gb.on dtc or
e'heI Of liicm ever in the Tinted s,a,e,
o. "",d any G,bts there elsewhere ard the rr,diro
OF each Of ibsm il Any, likewise TO 4. p>rmi,,.S
"b'n zen in"ib. from this day to pto,e their rs;ms
~ profc evidence before The Ct minissnner VIM !.
without delay, 10 give like motto rof IL, ~ ~.
newspapers r"h'ishtd ~ lie city of RitImond. Ard
npon the further motion The said p!an,s The ,on.
o. "a "iu.t maj NE Defendant. bring hill. permii
Tue paihHS 7" hfina " 10 their name .sanst
son, God ~. Eide Company To .iiisaie The ,ou
1919 ~, =" me cram which hey are alleged to have
~ De asains the estate o the Job Gibson
asa np"n TIE thriller motion o;le said PLAINTIFF ,,av.
gwen thtin and The other plaintiffs Ia amend ih,i,
'"'' ahu 10 nnese new parties If they think proper
Iesie. RICHARD JETTRirS en-
, p.''es concerned a' Sesisd to take notice tLae
Iva. "a.s spponttd The i2ih da, Of February next for
TOE above written order into effect; az VII ca
time they are attend at my office in, bs
BOOKS papers and accounts Rad, far examination.
WV. ntCKtNziE d. c.
--0-------------- 74..t,2F
IN ChANctAI. 1t iuIrs Loiacn IN lie cItfk57 caie.
OF 'he county cout Of Charlotte the eth GA, of
December, 1870 10Y -
Ea"afo D. fo"eSes.'.-.. PiaintiG,
VIM Fowler, executor of Edward Keeline dec and
enLanttn hes'ihg....:. Dfjsndaats.
ih. se'endan' Eh1aheih Keeins not having entered
her appearance according ~ Tie act 81 Ass,mhi, and
tue rules Of ts court, appearing 10 The saissr
non OF the cott that she IS no' nhah,ian df This
ttste on the moiioh OF The piainti by bis cogns
Is Ordered, That sh. appear here on The Gst Monday
IN March next aud enier her app.aran,e aud answer
the plaintiffs bill, and give bond Tor perfoJmjng ,"S
decree as the NAV make in the can.e and ,a,
cop, OF this order he inserted in one Of The newspapers
printed III The city 81 Richmond fer two months spe-
essslveb and that another o-py thereof be posted a,
the 'front.' door OF The courteous. the said county.
AcopN, Teste,
wiNsLow ROBINSON, c. C.
~ ~. :. 6s..wsw'
~ IkGlNts, 30 wa :-ln Halifax couuI, a. CLar,
Gerry, 25ih DECEMBER, 1870
Robertson Owen, administrator OF ROBERTSON Osep
...''''''..'.'''...... Plaintiff,
AGAINST ~
Samuel Ednrnndson and Caroline hi, wife 1ohn
Murphy aHd Polly his wife, Edward Siubblen,id and
Saiiy D's wife, Caroline Brooks aud Josiah be-, son
DEFENDANTS.
The defendants Edward 5iuhbleheId and sail, lis
VIE, "Hd Josiah Robertson, not having entered i.r
appearance and gwen security according To The arr M
Asseph'y aud the rules OF The couri and il apptsrnz
w TIE Subsection ef the c0urt that sais
Edward Siub5!eBed and sally his wife, and Josiah
ROBERTSON, are not Inhabitants Of this commonwealth
on 9non OF the plaintiff, by hi; counsel, is ORDER
en- lbat lie said defendant, do appear here Oh the
i"nrih hoDday IN March next, and answer the bill ~
Use painH and That OF ibis order BE (orlbp in
inserted ~ the Richmond Enquirer for eight weeks
snecs'si'ei and posted at the front door ofthe eour-
mouse OF ths County Acopy-Ieste,
MICHAU ROBERTS, ID. C. H.
------S------ 81. .~sW'
Az CHHHCEI(I.-Ai d court hriO Tor PruIt, Fde az
y comfy, November the 2Ist 1920
stephen bedtoTd, late sheriff Of Charlotte, coontv
and administrator With The will annexed Of ymIa1,
"o"'"'"' Complainant,
Samuel Booker, Richard Robertson and Sam mel Va,
kins sheriff OF Prince Edward count, =. Defe1doats
MS oay came The npaiGant. by his counsel a,d
hieu MS bn ~ TevvoT, and Subpoena is awarded him
against The defendant and, IL is ordered That ~,
defendant Samuel Watkins. sheriff Of Prince Fdusyd
county, he restrained from paying away or secre,jne
any money or effects IN his hands belonging 10 the
oeienuan Booket hntil the further order Of the cout