Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1821-01-06
GREAT BARGAINS.

tlW"U0e, CHHeiJ ana Ir0nmongeJg
NEOhGt WATT, 4 his store n Main street ,r.rIv
~ opposite the Bell Tavern has a large general and
wen tescird assortment of ihe above nentonec sIii
cies OF superior quality; in adoiionsbarp,'s Torry
Proof Fo"lins Pieces consignment % Audfus.' ustv
celebrated Planes wingEan'r Z. Bex Lacking (Iss.e,
&c &c. all OF which .iih .i,ss OF cLsrg,ng hi,
line Of bniiHrss he is selling of at yer, reduced
prices, all fdng an opportunity purchasers h, whole
'aa or retail 10 great ba,saus rher for cssb
u Nppvovsu mott. Dec 30. U..Nswif
IL cu.NCtRY 80. United siales, ccurI Gin cI,c0;,
and virginia District. Dee 10, ls20--
"m hhApeirick, JAMES .royn ana John M'CpIIoch
executors o the estauent and idst viii Mary fi.asty
dec the said James Brown and Agnes bis wife which
said aenes is i5e only daughter Of IN. Mar, ieasty
John Gibson, We. GIhsoa, VIM. Cam roll aud Aen,s
bis wife. Rober GIbscH, Peter Gibson Jsnss Ci; sor
aud lhomas Giltnh. budisn aud nex OF kim ana
administrator anc adin,.tratrs &C OF Peter C;Ib,a.
Gee. VINO hiss without issue...... Plaintiffs
AGAIHsT
Alexander Henderson, John Spence and lame, Read
executors, &c. Of the said Jehn Gibson, dec.
This suit abates as to The pIaiutins lam 49,,
ard WIN. Gibson, by ;heir deaths sud leave IL o;y,n 40
heir representative; 10 Hls hill 10 The same AZ
TO them aud upon the usl.on IF the plaintiff Ism,x
his wife Robert Gibson, Peter Gibso James Gibson
and ihomal. Gibson, the oourl dol6 empower tbe
oeielhanls 10 assign 10 Alexander Henderson his oIo
portion OF the lands IN The western part. OF ypiuis
under The contracts between him ami the tesa(or Job
Gibson alindse TO in The answers Of the desenaaats
and thereHpon, Is Ordered That ths saIt
DO, after having advertised the time and place az sale
for eight weeks excessively in ~ lafa Of the
newspaper published IN the city OF Rch,ncnd sell
the iesidne OF the said sEd5 the highest h,daer ,,
pubic ancnonj upon credit ~ and two yea,s
ihe purckat give bond aud secnr,y and A does ~
| tinst upon The lands r. him purehas,d in secure
payment ~ The purchase usoEey and the said de;en
dants directed to repoIt Their p,oe,sa,nos ia a..
premises To the court Ana npen the ,tLer potion
OF the plaintiffs, the court Hithsut deciding any thing
once'h'ng he report = The commissioners appointed
by the county court VI Prince William 10 sudf, The
administration of the defendants doth direct
one Of is commissioners to take and report TO the
court tifsi an sccOunt,of the adnnisfait Of ,ke
defendants upon their tsitatoTs esia from tle dae
Of The last Item IN the report - the said conn
OF me county court with '"cb matters specially STATED
as he tsy think pertinent eiibsr par NAY rs,uirs
10 be 81 stated Second, ascoami Of iks subjects
devised by the teatOr to his Mary less and To-
| ihe chi'oien OF his brothers rtter and Hugh aud
what viii be The respective proportions tie plsst,s
heTsiD Third 40 sceonniof the debts due ,Ecreon 10
Tue Ie'aior az ms DEAN and ib Sc due 10 estate
AFTERWARDS, aud whether due lKence bath been used
toteeo'eI ths :ae, with such matters tpeosy stated
as ne may thbk pertinent, ceT Of The pal ei.s may
require to he 50 stated. fourth, an account Of i,s
debts due hom The ieststor aud all creditors ere u he
pefH'ts Hilhin ten nsnihs from Ibis day, rome Ia
aud grove their claims 10y proper evidence hetate the
comms'ioneL who IT,, without delay, give Botioe
thereof, for foeT uorths spccessIveiy w one ~ n
newspapers published in the ciiJ Of I,ltbnlopd 49,.
finh I" enquire and report the cont phcthef Mary
Heasv, John Gibson son OF Fetef Gibson 0sc an I
wnI. Gibson also The said Peief Gtbfon dec OF
either oitheu we're iu the t'rtted gfsies
or Owed any debts there or elsrWbtse and fis
Of each "f them, " aay, are likewise To he united
within ten moutha tom this IN prove their cls,nS
by proper evidence before the commissioners Who is
without dsiay, 10 give ke notice thereof IN one u The
neSspapcrs published In the CITY 6f Rickiaond nj
upcH the further motion Of The said plsnis the couit
4 permit
The plaintiffs e. bfinp II 10 their grne afsnst Bsndef
son, Gordon, Riddle & COMPANY htgats the question
relative 70 the slain which tieY slltesd 10 hsv,
nsde 'gana' he eitsie olthe tesator John Glhson
And npouibe iuiher motion ofihe ssd plaintiff iesv,
y gwen tsem aud the other plaintiffs, anisHa tbr
bill, aud % nske new par'irs ifthey ihirk pr,pef
! lesie, RICHARD JPffRifs Gu.
The p7fes concerssd as desired ~ takt notce ths-
hase appointed The i2ih day " fehfpsfy rcst III
carrying the above written order into eject a VI es
ims shey a'e requested 10 attend "a ny Office b 10 sii
sooks,pdPsfs Snd accounis rSads fof examination.
WA btCKtN/fE. ~. G.
comniSslo"f'' t6ic0, 6i1imsAa. len S s2i
: ''"'1. 7i.,02F