Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1821-09-07

FROM t. Rs;rlec tacm 10 the happy days, when nc
lHd lew or no Datks andtesi position. Eut most
vi te men VINO !csisiated the mischief have strut
TED their hour upon the su,se'-,ieir SUCCESSORS,
though the iesa, heirs, deny responsibility, and turn
deal ear 10 the unhappy sufferers, who have every
claim upon them Tor relief from miserit,S not of tle;
own creating. While thousands and thousand, of en-
saved iIccmen, the distracted parents of children
who cry to them IN vain ioi daily bread; k the pro-
cciion aud rcliei 10 which they have right-tlcir
legislators nave too much occupation NTH me,y schemes
OF resiric'i03 of one another 10 devote a short
time TO provisions for relief. The bankruptcy of
merchants, mechanics aud TURNER'S but ton wl =, sub
S,t'eS 'he views OF mon'cd men, with such designs.
We al know that the wretch, who Is dependant for
bread AND that, Tor his crying nimts Will seH his
Suffrage I'M virtue Is not cOmn,ou la any country
which can Withstand such need.
" The ara Of necessities l. Srangc
That can make vile things preciouS.'
endcavorcd when began To write To limit my re-
marhs-bGt my thoughts and feelings have been swept
INTO al eddy, which wished 20 avoid. | wish no.
farther To exhaust Your patience, but remark.
tha sous correspondent has taken no notice of the
piohs, afsin. out OF trade here in British vessels,
10 the mechanic and lahoring classes. generally, as
wen as The GiHftctHycr who would have Sufficient
employment, II other classes were NOT made idle,
nom The suspension OF all circulation, and exchange
OF lahoGr. wished also give ycu another evidence
Of the policy Of Great Britain drawn from "A pam
phet, written by AN enemy t. restriction in England
ans sent NE 10y friend. intended to send ,Ou c,>-
tracts. Ii shows what Great Britain has paid and
continues To pay 10y indirect taxation at home, for the
encouragement at the timber trade from her North
american colonics-in preference 10 re-opcnng her
trade TO Norway.-Itis repete with argument and
daii, ana AYERS, that the prohibiorv duties on Nor
way TIMBER, including fair estimate of the cost to
Tie consumer in the great infcriority of the qaY of
tie loriner; and the difference in the price, makes
dead tax oil i 500 00O-Bcsidos a loss of IA balance
Cue 10y Norway, 10 tlIe merchants of England when
uie RESTRICTION was imposed, OF t-10O,UO0 which they
nave not the means OF paving without demand for
uicir tinlDer 10 the sufferers the only is,
ula IL SUITS the policy OF the government, cncou-
ul her
manufactures, within her Ocn dominions-in prefer
enGc to precarious dependence upon foreigners.
we are Kind enough 10 aid her views, and what
she can not do, we will do for her-we will assist 10
establish on our frontier nursery for scameu, and
recruiting district for her future demonstrations on oar
coaSl-since she has hitherto been put to too mUcn
inconvenience fer reinOrcements and provisions from
distance ofthrcc thousand miles
II the advocates of this system, aay of them
honestly believe, thar it will procure u.s. Il success
fui, carrying TRUE, do not hesitate as "A ateychlt
To say whatever NAV be the reputation Of NV prolc
sion Tor cupcity, that would pay the price for
the ruition.- anticipate the answer that SeIne.5 Tor
our navy Is one object, aud the future and perna-
hcht interests OF agriculture, will be the reward oi
present sicrccS. But maintain, from - true theo-
~, formed by experience, and deducible from it,
uhGer "a policy IN oar national infancy, adapted our
natural aud peculiar circumstances that our navigl-
ton and agriculture vii! flourish best when left to
hehselNts-l consider the agriculture of my country
ITS MAN Pl!!ar-Ihat ii is paying "A tax. for which
mas no nope OF 'e'urnsthat us proper influence is too
fast dimishing to add precisely in tue ratio of its
loss, TO the gaia ant, the prepondeance ofinterests
less stable, aud therefore les to be relied on as
guarantee of future happiness and Independence
Ibe abstract question of loss or gain TO he uro,!uc.d
by restriction, should not he permitted To obscure our
usion--l he most objectionable view Of the subject
aud which had limited before, is tie dhfribl 'ion
y me Ice1lat Of the 'e'iioa-eiiected suddenly, an
throwing too large a proportion into the hands ofthe
fer, AT the expense OF the man.
England, (Stid intelligent member of congress,
al ue close OF the last SESSION. ahcres her system
fha lla-F l.Nr.
which II is understood she willing 10 agree TO
h'e years ago, we probably could not now get