Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1821-11-16

cuANcERy- aIccklenburg County ectober court isa,
= Jane Nicholson and Lucy Nicholson, Piaintigs,
Arn Nicholson, Anderson Nicholson Pamela A. Michel.
Sehnny W. Nicholson Nancy Nicholson, and George r.
The defendants Anderson Nicholson PAMELA A. Nicholson
given security, according To the act OF Assembly and the
rucs OF 'nis courts aud il appearing the satisfaction
court tina, they inhabans this commonwealth
on me motion 1.-THE plaintiffs by their attorney Odsrd
Ina. the said defendants Anderson, Paelia A. and Henry
eeeer next andanswer the bill the plaintiffs; and that
copy Of this order be forthwith inserted in the Richmond
front door OF the courthouse of this county ~ '
o.. ASeOpy-Tcs,c W. d. EASILY, C.
chAAcLki-in Chesterfield Uonuiy Court, October
h'f" 1, .i"%m"il' P'aia,i9;
'phm Brummal chas;ain pr,mmsl, Josiah Elliott Josi-
Irena Br@ma gree" Hancock and irena his wife late
on inc motion fihe plaintiff by counsel and il appearing
Brum%nll chasian Brumma and josiah BrmmnlI are
orn m @ o TINS commonwealth that process
cree that the ai defendants John hastain and osa Rr
@ 40 appear here on the second Monday January next
, n @ tier appearance, and give security according 10
.e az. o, Assembly, aud the rules this court and that
paose ~ me city OF Richmond tor months success
a "@1'ner cop posted at the iron, door of the
seys sa" A sTS ;SsSf Sd%S sssT' days
oc,o,er i. 4s--wswt
IN Goochland County CoMf 18Th October 1901
SON r Harrison, Thomas r.. Harri-
dgo;n,, Pi9i,aD4
Martin Walker and Aara his wife, and Thomas T. ,ifn
Which laid saria and Thomas children heirs of John
This day came the plaintiffs hs ,leir y s.
their bin against the Northumberland appearing 10 The ~
action OF the court tha, the said cinhn, are MOI %
an Of mi, sirc and are out of The sa; a,e ON % ;
OF the plaintiffs Ivy their attorney il is ordered and ereea
ny the curt that the said defendants appear here ON or
before the third Monday January next and answer the
plaintiffs bill and give sccmriy according to the nci Of AS
smhy and The rqles of Ibis ccur; that COPY Of ibis
oruer I've forthwith Inserted in apcr published in
e GUY OF t,chmond and continued for two months success
% n ,a' another copy be posted ut the front of
court DAYS and that commission ar the plaintiffs 10
giving The defendants legal noce Of The time md inr OF
taking KIM the same Acopy-Teste.W MILLER, G. g. g.
2Seooer -. 4s-wsw
Robert Smith, Tl@;ai0 ~
derinst ""'D'
Farray. ~ 1855 ~. ' , .o'i
The defendant Hume Il. Field not having entered his an
NY ana fr re of this court and appearing 10 the sa,;
faction o. the court that he nabtant OF This com
o'er, That the said defendant Hume T. Field do snnca
he on te tird Monday in November answer the
inserted in the Richmond Enquirer for eight weeks sncccs
sey and posted at the front door courthouse OF this
oet: &c: 4a-w9w W II. rasrEv. DC.
v ikGlAIA Al Euies Eoden in the Clerks Once of lie
inc 2oth day Of September 1924.
-i'eN ino;a.i heia' PLAINTIFF
Autumn ,am Chewning and benjamin Pollard and Edmund
The defendant William Chewing rot hayigg nn,ersd
his appearance and given security accoding ~ ~ me-
assembly and The Rules ofhis Court and II nnnear;n b
country u as ordered That the said neendnn; do annear
nSre ON c irSt day of Term answer the Bill ofiIe
ed IN some Newspaper published in ,hc,ity Of Rchmond
n Two months sTccessively and posted at the front doorYt
October 4 eory-res'e, WIN. w. uENING, &C