Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1821-04-13

raj observations which he had Ibrowa ont.
ne circular oi the 18th OF January. he
would eonenJ, contained a clear dis
iinct. and Ineligible exposition OF the
views and sense OF government on The
matter, 10 which il referred, and the min.
ciples on WHICH Tia. .lics pr6fesse,I Ia ACT.
Although he had heen willing Ia grant
the papers moved inr by the noble Earl
he could not sanction motion which
was introduced Tor the purpose of eensur
my me conduct of government, without
sorea,ing 20 allow The business of that
nre. His Lnrdshnp then said. he
sheoid shortly apply himself 10 the views
s"ich tbe noble Earl appeared 10 take of
NV" pn.h' :, w. The manner in which The
revolution was effected, and the cnns,;-
tution They adopted. lie said, "Yau
o'nN' expect III grea; national CONVERSIONS
thai The military will take one side or the
oiher, and u would be most lamentar
Gle Tang II They took part with despite
power adi Ge a!ii,,ied to what took
place 10 oar own country, when the ar.
INV a. fnnuslow muiinied against King
'dmts. That. however, was case IN
"n'cn 'n' revolution was effected bv ihsse
"no look Il iowatds competent const;.
"iiohd' authority tor Ike redress OF their
wrongs, aud he could noi conceive anv
TWO Gases 10 present more striking points
VI difference. The case of Nantes was
MOI Mat OF a people demanding a re dress
81 grievances, receiving refusal. and
tue hi'ilary standing up la order IN as.
sist Them IN proc ur;ng thai redress. Such
however, was the CASE in 1858. and with
'eSp'ci 10 other revolutions that had been
ehec'eh ia tins country. AT Naples the
.s."'u,ion was The effect OF a military
Nu''ny, carried on in secret by sec,
"nom he would presently notice, no
s;"'ene"' o, grievances having been PIE
Nio"s'y made. IL was the act OF d militia.
"uuny III me nrsi instance, by which
.he "hoie business had been brought a.
at.--(Hear.) -ile slated this nnt 40
sron'd for interfering with Naples. hut
rs isFnins very great distinction from
me case 10 which iIIe noble Earl hal rr.
fsrfed. There was, however, another
Question which. he likewise admitted.
a""fuah no practical Justification tor in
's'iVrnS with The affsITs OF Naples. IL,
uedn' lac mode IN which the revolution
"@S con"utted. Ii ne looked TO The con,
''u'''" U, 'aiS country, nothing could
or more distnvt than the manner -
""'0" 'H'if ancestors had Proceeded. In
III struggle Tor Magma Char,a in the r..
voiu''"h o' lG4D. and in thai OF l6sa III.
oiS'ihct srouhd taken, was decI,ra,;nn
"i spttihc grievances, to whicI, n,ac,,c.,
remedies were 20 be applied. iounds "a az
ihei % ancient rights, urou exis,,ng nro,
posHons. But Tins was very diffeI,n,
t'" me cot'srpU!sncd in Naples. where
'he 'eVGin'ion was effected wi,hout AN,
utcidtdl9i' whatever, and foreign con.
81 .'on was adopted, of which those
ri ."""Sh, III 10 select it knen nothing.
IA L. L.
""o'e Ear then commented with
go severity on Tile conduci oi the Nea-
p'i'.Hns' towards their Siciiian fellow
suolee's. ms Lordshlp concluded by
OPINION thit HE British government, anil,
10 have inieftersi, then they wnuIt lie.
ci'her entirely, Or in part. Ia Tho nh.
OF the noble Earl! if they should he ST -
contrary opinion, he thought tina, he had
shown suaicient cause why the ,,annrs
"iilch The noble Earl had ,rnva,i e.
should not be granted. He hal as,rrsd
tne'r Lortships that there had been no
interference OF The part of slp Pr;,isL
government III the affair Of Naples. lie
iad described 10 them the Ieei,ng ,.;,i,
"mich me MINISTER'S ha1 received the in-
teifigence both of ,Ite Nrtnolitan and Of
Vie Spanish revolution. lie had noin,.J
OUT 10 them ihe manner, in winch ,hn
iorner event differed from The la,I.r ,md
he trusted that he had shown Thai ;, d,J
MOI require Us To take any hos IL. n,rt
elthFr la one way or The other. We had
no' yet taken any hostile steos. and La |
was h'ppy 10 Inform their Lorishios th.t
u vas not intended that we shnuid ,,Ia
Say hosiie Steps. With these oh ,ery.,-
iions lie should leave The suestious In |
tnrif LnrdshIps, and should SET doyn
WIN determinations OF opposing The ore |
sent motion P'I
Lord Holland spoke at great length :,
iaxpF o' me moiion a. Earl Grey H. was
fo!ip"ed by Lor| Ellen boromeh. WHO M.
posed u. ard Lord Calthrope who suS
ported It.. Ear Grey then r, p LED. VIE,
,nt question was put aud uega' vel The
~ .p'f consideration Of The Qneen's an.
'"'y ON vas on the nioiion OF Lord L.
o'mned at III ,'ylock.
NAPLES, Jan l6.-In proportion ~
ia pobilc spiflt IS cdmrd ~ The prnviu.
'es, HE audacity o! lie seriaries incr-as-
$ IA tile capital.
yesterday several bands OF Carbonar;
occupied Inc avcoues 10 the PAfliaiarn,
'ih WIZ great VIOLENCE aud threats cali
- upon NE Deputies, as they VERY uro-
c"ihB I'd I"e sltiIng, immediately 10
shfy t0se notifications o: the Sna1ish
Constitution which the Prince Rrgrni
ad noi yet approved of.-They demand
q also that HE forts should be evarna-
ed by The troops of the inc. ana liar
btiF dtlenc" should be entrusted to ,he
,iiI'ia AMI, lastly, that The ROYAL Gnarbs
bE1'd b@ entirely di>banded. Some san.
'dnary encounters took place in lll,.
reefs beiween tie soIiiers and Csrbo~
ari. O"'o'
January 22.-The intelligence which il
'cfived OF Tie public splTit Of The pro
.nctS becomes daily more sal factory
ne popular enthusiasm is AZ its hrjn,,I
ne whole OF the youth in the Eastern
usst,t, f..,,., 'S"''N'b ,