Thomas's Massachusetts spy, or, Worcester gazette. [volume] (Worcester, Mass.) 1811-1821, 1821-04-04

0ueulOn LQuuoO
ed. Il Mould be clearly undsrilood, thai no gov
eminent can be more prepared than the Britifh
Government IS to uphold the right of any State
or States to interfere where their own immediate
fecurity or eHenfial intereRs arc feroufly endan-
gered by the internal tranlastions Of another State
But as they regard the aGump,ion of iuch right as
only to be juRified by the Rronge& neceliity, and
to be limited and regulated thereby, they cannot
admit that this right can receive general and 10.
discriminate application to all revolutionary
movements, without reference to their immediate
bearing upon Tome particular State States, or be
made profpe9ively the bafis of an alliance. They
regard its exsIcile exception general prin-
cip!es, OF the gTeateA value and importance, and
as one that only properly grows out of the cir
cumaances OF the ipecial cafe; but they at the
lame time confider, that exceptions of this de-
icTiPtion never can, without the utmoa danger,
Dc 10 far reduced to rrle, as to be incorporated
into the ordinary diplomacy of States, or into the
inltitutes of the law of nations.
As it appears that certain Of the MiniAers of the
three Courts have already communicated this Cir.
cular Defpssch to the Courts to which they are
accredited, leave it to your difcreion to make a
corresponding communication on the part Of
your Government, regulating your language in
conformity to the principles laid down in the
Preient Deipatch. You will take care, however,
in making tueh communication, to do Juice, in
the name Of your Government, to the purity Of
intention, which has no doubt aauated theie au.
gun Courts in the adoption of the courie of meal.
ures which they are purifying. The difference of
ientiment which prevail. between them and the
Court of London onthis matter, you may declare,
can make no alteration Whatever in the cordially
aud harmony of the alliance on any other iubje4.
or aba,e, their common zeal in giving the rnoit
complete effe4 to all sheil exiting engagements.
am, &c.
(Sigued) cASTLEREACH.
House of Commons, Feb. 5.-The
following strong and manly assevera-
ton of Mr.. Brougham will be read
with particular pleasure -
sit could be only known said he "to
her Majesty herself, whether the charg.
es were just or otherwise. Her own
conscience told her that she was inno-
cent of those acts which had been false.
Iy imputed to her, in charges which had
been, as they we're now told, finally a.
bandoned. have stated thus much"
continued the honorable and learned
gentleman, "as to the conduct of the
Queen. II is fit should now discharge
what | call debt of gratitude to her.
1 know ii has been invidiously and ma.
levolently asserted, and most industri-
ously circulated, for purposes which
must be obvious to every man, that my
expressed opinions of her Maiesty's
conduct are not the same in fact with
my own conscientious conViction.-
Hear.) 1t is necessary, sir, for me,
with that seriousness and sincerity
which it may be permitted TO man
upon the most solemn occasions to ex-
press, to assert, and | do now assert in
the face of this House-that if, instead
of an advocate, / had been sitting as
judge, at another tribunal, should
have been found among the number of
those men who, laying their hands up.
on their hearts, conscientiously pro.
nounced her Majesty, "Not guilty"
Reiterated cheers. Fer The truth of
this assertion desire to tender every
pledge that may be most valued and
most sacred. wish to make it in eve.
ny form which may be deemed most
solemn and most binding and if be.
lieye ii not, as now advance it, here
imprecate on myself every curse which
is most horrid and most penal" III
would be difficult to describe the earn.
est emphasis with which this assevera-
ton was delivered, the deep interest
with which it was listened to, or the
enthusiastick and general cheering with
which it was greeted.)
The Queen.-Mr. ]. Smith, in the
House of Commons, on the 18th of Feb
ruary, moved that the Queens name
should be restored to the Liturgy. This
occasioned some debate, and the House