Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1820-03-31
March 81.

q.
WiILiSn 5 5. 4 h lSSs Trustees.
eIaI4n 81. 'o5..wids
" IhGiNlA AZ superior QUIT OF Cbaa1cT1 LCId1sf
=, Az c9pol IN tue city OF Richmond lhc siL day
ANA Den' hsses aud Frances C'aibotrs. ys, ,nryiv
~ uef husband William Claiborne. ...., pt5utlfS,
Marina TO de- atministarix .;h The rli, ,,,,,cs
OF Francis GooGc ihr younger csS.aard 49, "a. a.
ainnisirGss with the will ann Aed co. .a. g, t,,.
decreased, and Maxwell rrnkes aud saish - ~. -
nrustY Oooae, audJanes scott u ad,n.utstitl,t nj
sdinIhistfaiis of Richard y Uocde deccasrc vj..as
also an administrator With N VII auurxtd - ,l. III
HObtit Goode deceased vito surviyirg tvrrust Of
william Iiack deceased S. tuue t;oodr strl- fo, ,l.
saiu h"befi 1oodt as executor afotesad az" a!lt,u
ohhnoeis administrator de houis ron vi,h the q In az
neNeo OF the said Robert Coed, deceased W:.lutu
wood administrator OF Sielhtu SuuiLa, Grc.ssyt
VINO WIS executor OF Turner SuulhS ueceRsrd Rthrrt
ANDERSON, administrator ct PISTON souiiah tc.ca,ed
VIM as'ny o. III eNecniors % James Sontha deco
ana iona DangeTh'id he Other tXtcu,rr OF flames
so,i N necedstu "ho Was G" executor with Stephen
souinH' dec ahd s1rsised sn) Gfrurucr sourbalitec
VINO aso was an executor cf the said William PlarE
Markham. Mary Matk ham and lpIrn.
Boiling, executors and exeCutrX Of Bernard MarLb,,
'wh"Was one oithe securities oCiuTner Soha
uoeaee' as executor aforesaid Alice Go"de Tyivns
exs@niTiN Of Francis Geode deceased The eIssr api
caroline Matilda tiaIrs William A. Turpin a. rdvai5
a',ns rAec"iSfssnd eNeeutrix OF Thomas RaIiss
deceased who was executor Of The said Pane.
o"oot deceased thredtr anNIbeT security tor l. and
i"'het Sou'haii' as executor OG william Biack deed
THE caustin which ke bill has been en- tor cSGs5
Is 10 me det Samuel GoOdt and ga whom Ib ,.cre,al
""eI 'ol una" purpose appeats Ia have been du, e,rcnt
ca, ana IN which publication ia the u,ode p,.,,,,t ~,
law against absent defend ms hath h.sn - Wy, ..,,
AaN"eH lrokeS and Sarah H. his " ifr who =. = u,t
inhabitants Of this country, um 10 bs beard or Inc
mn the answer OF he ether drfcEdautG vf II Losr
whoh theA represent, and argued ,y ronus,i ar
consideration whereof the coIri aih ,fcg, ia no
report OF Commissioner Lada ima6r ~ puf.pa,,r or
tht oIusrof The An day eff frhtnary 1872 l. rrcon,i
TED to TIE commissioner WbU made II win nstrp,t,.
l" execute that order so as 10 report the a.sintsal
account o Roberi GoUde, WhOut Intending ta.rrv ,ip
The administration OF Turner Souibau on H., .sts, a.
william BACK decd aud The cpuu Juth iuIlhrf r,r.,
t"" 'a s""e commissioned dn STATE srtr ard irVuic
an ne''Im'"' ihihei So"ihaPs TdHuisti alton ~ Ie
r,tte Of William Hack cec'd as aisn The ioint
OF N"pel' Gooar "nd Turner SOutbali ~ eNecnt,s ~
,''"' n'dcA "ec a. Nlh thrlT teStaiUIs tsatt il tie
iaci ''qi' snct aud also accOms, oi ih- admins.
tr'''" ~ we estate oi St-hen Sou;haI deceased ~
we rhls 81 turner S"hthaI decreased ana a. arceun,
"' thr adHiHl't aii-H ~ dvfenda., viii.r pnf
ne estate Of Ia niSsts'e ih, com uo;h tnriter
"ice' ia'' the same commissioner do .,ti+ -ise ard
ftp"i an account Of the adInini.iratI,n 81 Etet.td
HooHs decetsea aud of Francis GouJe IN. .unpr, 81
the estate Of their tesator Il ben Conc, Il, -. ssy,eo
an COUNT OF ne auniinisiI Atom MaANt Irostsaa
Sarah has wife and James sco, inr az n ,,t-,d
GoOde decd As also an accnunt Of a.. "a , .N
The defendant Marhr Go uithe estate Oi ,tct
thar the defendant Tarltpn Saunders adi.iu,st,,nr ~
nos ne" o. Robert Goode decd, do tyndrr ,nartoutt
ne"ic IN same commissioner OF his ., rt.lta,i a
the estate o'thc SAID Robert; thai tie ~ id ,i,ns.r
40 lnI'aeF ate an account Of The adu;uis,I.t.o of
James soniha' decd o be csIae o. tuner utlall
Gee a. as also an account the administration OF pen
SoulhaI OF the estate Of sara james and o m
NoDeIi Andeson's administration of ihr estate Of me
t 'y."n ooulhad zee d. Ana the court doth iuTthrr
order, that the defeRSanis Caroline Matilda HaTins
Cox
and eNecurx Of hUinas Harriss decd ubS vaS -,
OF FRANCIS Go"de The elder deco do reur, IN acr,v
"i tue administration OF the said Thomas HarTiss Of ts
ete " 'he slu Francis Go6de the elder and oflhcir
Own administration of ihs estate OF he said rous
h"t',ss deceased Aud tie doth fntth.t rrder
lhdl the defendants George Markham, a ed i nil
lng eNech0fs, aud Mary Markham sxrr'x OF Br,tta ii
haikham deceased, d. render M account be,,re tLr
same COMMISSIONER OF their a,Imnisrz -. o.
o' 'hel sdId eslalO, which accounts the sid canis
sohe Is directed to examine state and srtlr ats
IepI, IheIeo 10 The court, wIh suJ matters specially
| Inv htu.s eIf.e
| required bj tie parties to he so s,a,et tut al.
plaihlhS my wave the taking OF such oi the rero.r
accounts as shail appear To them lo he unnecessary
unle's the defendants some Of them he sam,
or he commissioner himself deem them nrces,ag, 10
| Jnsi oecssH Of this cause.
The same Plaintiffs This cause ca"e On ll,s ds;
rhe SANE Defendants former, r.a1 and ,hr ,,rr,
o. commissioner Thomas LsGB MADE Ia par Garcp og
ne i,eIeeut'iy decree ~ rtr Ssh at FehIHar, 1915
anu vas argue" nv counstl-OH confederation whereof
ir cooI, not deciding iepurts of an sit ana
l2t o. Iuhe 1912 aud approving the report OF the stb
"l'dhuMf OIthe same year. as the saur Is NOT
excepted 10 aFd ~ lar u.s. The cnuft dnth rrron
mn WIN The exceptions there for the cc,ntsstoutr
l" reconsider the same aud to tepsrt therenrt ans
| ioT mmiO proceed and tokr Tue accounts 81 gntrf.J
10y 'N' said"Ider 81 ibe 8 day Fehrunrt 1873 Ard
the court doth further order thai If - he
| he1's'ay accounts not ordered in relation 10 d.,
shiJrctR controversy the cOmmis,iortr ma, pr,crsd
|" 'I 1 u ~ iike manner as il specially directed
SOPles-Iest WI W HTkiSG L. G..
! CoMMiSS1UkEF'E OFFtCF,
| 90 Ri"hmOud. 80 Mo. n. 1920.
l. tue p'tues interested are desired !oiaks rutce ts.
have appointed The 18th day oftbe 5,b m nh iysti
next i"f commencing the accounts directed by he
,"iss'hs orders "fcohri; on which day, At o'clnr
a. W. theif attendance is required ~ my NEE IN tl,,i
ny; WIN t"eI accounts aud vouchers teaS Tor esarS
tuation and settlement THOMAS LADD a. a.
Io hr parties iHfsrc're7 IN tie sboas Spi,.
| IAhb NOTICE hat w gLsl proceed no psfson or ~
PI"NSto I'VE 1oh day o. luis next II ten u'cocG a. b.
II his houie ia BeIksvie Cumbcrsnd courty s,ate Of
htntnehy to take the deposition ~ Iuhn Thurman "
ne READ ~ evidence ia suit p-udur i the on 2
ii"r court Of chsncery foi the chnioud Gisttc
| 10 "e are plaintiffs aud yoH defendants when ,ro
"hers you may attend n ysu think grover
| Am BrNI HAYES,
| --- naIch y. loi..vsw FRANCES CLAIBORNE E..
negligence Or TJhaiey
an the IJth May. 1919 The follow Ing hiIs were d.
- posted in Pine Hili r. o. Sruth Cafolina ~
HHetted To Prince Edward c. u Va "A iIFtf Bif.
LAR All on the state Rank Of N,ttt Carniius ma,
he "a Raleigh lsuer a M so d.t.d ts,.r 49, NJ