Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1820-12-16
y-&EH2 80 0

----S-,<slS y = y x2szn4-A---
BALTIMORE. Dec. live are enabled IN
day,io give onr readers some of The Iates, And
mcsi interesting proceedings IN the House of
LORDS OH TIE trial OF the Queen which are con-
tai"ea in tile Enslish papers received bv The
Chatswortl, and We add the remarks nj tic
Euitcrs OF several of the London papers Of
the date of the 2iih October, the day after
ire testimony on behalf Of the Queen wa,
closed.
After the Lord Chancellor had given the IN.
FORMATION To the Counsel, meDticuC Il in the last
paragraph OF the proceedings as ID ublishe,I To-
Gay, The Attorney General proceeded TO call
witnesses 10 contradict the testimony IT The
Witnesses prodnced on behalf OF the Queen;
his FIRST witness, Captain Thomas Briggs OF
the sup Leviaihsn, was under examination
When Tie san, from which we have Copied The
proceedings, was put 10 press
u appears to us TO be wholly impracticahlc
10 ioi'u any correct opinion iron. the Lon.
don papers as 10 the probable result of the
sAtraoi binary proceeding before the Bri,isI,
House oil Lords agaIns, the Queen Of Ene.
Iard a
the or'nions and statements of the London
chi'ofs, are So Vaiions and contradictory, thai
thes do not afford such data as ought 10 h. 40 :
lied or
From files Of London papers rfceired at The o6fce
~ the Federai Ga-efte,
TRIAL OF THE QUEEN-Ocr. Or
Nr. bfOuchan addressed their Lnr,ships
reminding them of statement he had made
on Saturday last, previously TO their Iordships'
anJoufnins oil ihc obstacles throw, in the way
oil bes Majestys defence He carefully abstain
ed then as he did al present. from impuiinp
blame 10 The government OF this country. lie
allowed that every thing had been done on
their part, and his illu>trlous client had only to
lament tins nnfoItnnate part of her case In
order Ia have the circumstances relating 10 ,h,
dIulcniiy thrown IN The way OF the Baron D..
Isnde coming over 10 tins country en- their
i"rdsiilps m'hntes as evidence he should beg
10 can bach Jdincs Lemann, clerk 10 Mr.. Viz
arii.
.Ianes Lcnana Tds then put 10 the Rar.
Inc SoIlcito' tIVner1i observed, that he had
seen this individual in court during the whole
o, 'ne rt>eNailna!ono OF the witnesses and he
appfehendeu' tiai III compliance with the rules
which their iordships had laid down tiIis VIII
ness could not be examined
Nj. BToucham admitted that the witness
had pen IN the court throughout the whole
proceeding bni contended thatas clerk TO MIR.
wizard, he came within the exceptions to the
rule LAID down by their lord ships of counsel
aitorni,s and their clerks,
ihe witness Was allowed 10 proceed.
MIR. Iipdall-When did YOU arrive at Carls-
prne Between the 18Th and 18th of SEN
TENDER.
Was the Baron d'Ende then a, Carlshrue,
i was Informed that he was at Baden, and
wonld return on the i7th
DID yOu set out for Baden in the homes of
hndins IIIm before Ire Came back did nm
Sunday.
Asyon were on the road TO Baden, did Won
meet any ones. ...l met carriage which
thOnght might he thar of the Baron d 'Eude
and alter u had passed me, ask cd and was
informed that il was him.
WhsI did You do theni overlook him, and
gave him tile Queens letter
DID yon speak to him2 Yes.
What did You Sny -. Il said. heIieve
nave the honor of speaking TO Tie Baron a..
letter "''' '"'
Did he open the letter Yes
tDIu uP read Ncs Ia
me INTO his carriage, aud drove me back 10
Carlshrnr.
TO what house did lie drive at Carishrue P
10 his own house
Non had some conversation will, him m tho
road? Yes va '''
From the conversation Won had, have Won any
19nD, mat you were speaking with the Baron
d 1"de Not the slightest.
now long did lie remain at Carlshrue He
,n,ormed me that business wonld deIan him
ui Iue'daY-t'at his minutes wets at BADEN
dha that' without consulting them, he could
Dot answer any questions accurately
pa you remain at Carlshrue2 I went IN
Armstdat, aud returned on Tuesday
when did you next see the BARON I'm
W,fhne'day--he took me in his carriage TO Ba-
uel. whefe we arrived IN the evening
=. men YOU arrived at Baden, what did Won do |
ihere' lie Consulted his j0Hrnal or diary. and |
ioek down his deposition in writing.
Did lie shew youaBy letters he received from |
ner MAJESTY Yes, several that he had received |
ron her Majesty directed to him, the Baron
How long. did you remain at Baden tia,
i'nf flcf il at fiv0 o'clock OIL Tbnrsdav
evening.
When you left, had the Baron said any ,biuy
' , coming over 10 England Yes; lie said |
.Hat Is The Information lie lad 10 give ,Vas in |
'ls 9ihcihl capacity, his friends ,hou.hf hr
Duk- % Tue NTdhu
Dld he afterwards 60 TO the Grand DIXIE
Frnzn III
iI' coming to England ....Yes; and he said
le hhh Dad Dews--for thai ie was not Dor
o do " P'''"iSs'oh
Pa you afterwards 20 10 his honse2 YES
NJ he SAID ice! how my heart heal, from,
" agitation % not beiug perniiisd 90 i,o."
b'' yon MAKE any 0t,er applicstion atier-
'4iHS ffs J 4ro;e IHsI litter. of which
,.s ropy 3e'e Dir"aed TO speak 90 him
hd vent IN bis hnpse for tTat ,,ntno.. +. -, |
lp?osng br might possibly he nor, bo.,o
20 IDS letter ~ readiness. lie vas ont. and
lslt lie letter. '' """
NaS that letter addressed 20 the Baron /,
Did SOB receive any sbsweri Yea. vot- .
~ answer by Jioutepant. WHO was then in
= Lie Guards ~ The Grand Dnke a
20 YOU remember hrs uaneI Yea; Lien'. I
What was iha, s"'vor1,...1'hai the Baron ?
ASH not make Any deposition wighout Inc ! #,
,nseut ct ilie Grand Dnke, aud that hc de. I
inrd sending writtes sos%er 10 Ter Si1irs- =
2, kit,r
l,ogd Liverpool -kllcr yon had prevailed ! &,
oS The Bafon 20 az ihc Grand Dnk, for /,
10 cOmc 10 England, did you consi. I
ri very Important mat The Baron should e
me TO his cOHuify1 N
TIL question was objected to By several M. n
q Peers, aud l0rd Lpcrpsol consented 10 q
l'Ldr4w IL. -
Mr eroHgham-Tn the Courts below +; ,yonid y y
rfqnitti shs, IN affliavii q tl,e p,iocisaI .