Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1820-05-16

l1T virtue ofa deed OF iras, executed by Or. Jain
~ OF The county Of GoOchlaud, and Others,
ca ibe 'th day VI September, 1872 conveying To Jo-
seph Mayo, u. and stephen Duval, tracts of land
Gin The said deed particularly deseTibed) lying aud
beng stuaie IN The cOuny oi H,ntico and being the
same on part whereof the said Crouch Is BOW digging
sud raising coal eich sand made to seizure
the PAYMENT OF suhdIy debts (therein specihed) due
nom the taid Crouch 10 William Goode and Francis
r. Ellis, of the county Heutico and was ou th. a2d
day OF January last, admitted 10 record IN the once
OF Hehrico comfy court ano in compliance with
the request of the said iliIam ':oode, on eaHeSeaH
the 7fh JH"e nert, between the hours OF 10 O'Clock.
A. N. and O'clock r. N ut that day. will be sold at
public auction, on the premises, the TRACTS OF
LAND aforesaid or SO much thereof, Tor ready money
as may be sufficient to sy and sasf, the sum of 500
colias One oithe debts specified IN the deed Aforesaid
which fell due from the said Crouch the said ooie
on the 18Th day of Feb last, with interest th.ecn OF
SO much thereof asSbai theu be due aud deiray
expences OF the trust To, and including the DAY of
sale The sale will be conducted by
March 81. THE TRUSTEES
The above advertisement was inserted without any
authority from we, aud with full knowledge on the
pari OF Mr. Goode, that would unite in the sale
MIA abode is also fully appised Of the my
refusal. These IL Is not deemed necessary to publish
III detail will content myself with saying that there
exists IN the case, circumstances to induce strong
beliei on my mino ibat Mr.. GOOde cannot fairly ne
quiTe sale at this Time. aad IN TINS opinion, / am
confirmed by ,be concurring opinion OF couu
sci & which MI. Goode has been duly informed. 1
shall therefore, not Gni,e III the sale mentioned
until the present disputes between the two parties
sb' ne properly adjusted either between themselves
or by court OF Justice.
April l. JOSEPH MAYo,Jr
one Of the Trustees.
Friday the 2d day OF June next was the da, org,
naJ appointed tor The sale OF the Land mentioned IN
10 which 'hat advertisement was prepared, requires
tbai 90 days previous notice of the sale, shouid he
gwen ia fUO newspapers, printed IN the ei Of Rich.
"u' anu DIS Tue advertisement lowing TO some cause
not known to the subscrbeT) WAS published i'm one
newspaper only. II has therefore become necessary To
aher tie day of sale, which has accordingly been
done, To Wednesday, the 9Th day of June next. The
subscriber cannot imagine bat are tue circumstances
which have induced MT Mayo TO Ihink that a sale of
The land IN question, would he InprOperIn the event
1r Cr1nsh's submitting the case to e Court Of
Justice, II II he possible that his ingenuity help
hun To make out case worthy the alton of
an, Court the subscriber verify believes, that Mr.
Mayo will be an important witness on his mart IN
prove conclusively that there are no circumstances
uhGteCer, Tedfiy belonging 10 the case which could
Jnsny DR.. Crouch in asking the nteIpusio of Il
oi thlty, 10 prevent The sale. The subscriber has
heard. hut tows nothing of thee opinion of eminent
counsel" referred To ny @r. Mayo. That OPINION il
adve'ss 30 The saie mus, be founded Incorrect
statement OF @cs, as nc doubt will hereafter he abun
dainty sh va Is Certain that no inference against
the subscriber ought to be drawn amy such opin
ION, bi"eVrT em'hsht the counsel, because II is
tain, that the same counsel (without pretending 10
Know who that counsel NAV be- would give opinion
precisely opposite to thai referred to, upon correct
statement of facts The subscriber has no dispute TO
adjust with Dr. crouch he ony demands Of HIN tie
payment OF IeOO, due since The 18th day February
last aud the Doctor desires 10 the Justice
OF that claim Ihe subscriber knows no better mode
OF speeding his movements tGan by advertising tbe
Land for sale. Il is true that SIR. Mayo did raise
some difficulty The last week about advertising Nh.
laad for sale but the subscriber never did b.ev tt
upon du consideration Mr Mayo could reconcile IA to
himself TO oppose the sale. II will CONTEXT him
sei th snhJoinng an extract from the deed trust
"iien ~ MI Aayo hitnsel who at the time Of writ
tHs The deed was acquainted with all the circumstances
e'ging 10 the case and the copy letter addressed
~ MT Mayo b. the subscriber the before the date
81 the original advertisement.
WILLIAM GooDE.
Extract from the Deed Of Trust Qbove re,crrrd TO-
Now therefore. II is the Intent meaning OF these
presents that II the sand Crouch his hers executors
or administrators should fail to nav tue said
several Sums OF money as they respectively become
due, and payable that then the said Joseph Mayo Jr
and stephen pnval' or the survivor OF them So soon
thereafter as they or the survivor Of them may be re-
quested ny The SAID Goode Ellis their legal repre
sentatlyes according to whatsoever bond is due and
unpaid shall proceed to sell public auction much
Of the said land herein before described as Nil nav
aud unpaid, &c.
Richmond soth March, 1922.
SIR-UndeT an Impression that have umgnestiona
bly, right To infOICe the sale OF tie lands a
yourself and MIR. Stephen DuyaI to secure lie pays,n
OF certain monies due from Or. Crouch TO myself and
MI Francis Ellis or so much Of those lands as NAV
be s"ihc'eht to discharge the $500 dollars which have
been no" Que me tor more tEan 40 days, shall ad.
veTtise the for sale in orrow's gnqniTer and
Compiler, ageeably to the provisions If deed OF
trust shal Of course IN the Advertisements announce
thai tue sale st0 he conducted 10y the Trustees wtihau
bavng their names subscribed 10 The adversemeui-
MY confidence in yGur justice and good sense, forbid
me ore moment 10 suppose that cAn, upon mature
rejection, hesitate about performing this duty, which
Oi accord, you have taken upon Yourself nv
voluntarily becoming party the decd to the con
tents of which you stranger, you were yuuT
self the writeT of that deed.
am very respectfully, sir, your obd't. servant
WILLIAM GOODE.
JOSEPH MAYO, Jr. Esq. Attorney at Law.
ID hereby ceritf! that on the 3lst ult. delivered
Ia Joseph Mayo, II. ESQ. letter from Mr.. william
Gosde, of which the tot egOlng is COPY.
Given under my hand, this irsl day II April 1920.
FRANCIS PLEDGE.
hpfi 4. 100. ids