Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1820-11-14


the piAinest terms, that lac had taxed hir- 4
self with ngratiude aud YET this u >
nest man, THIS solder Of Bopaparte, shel- |
tered himself under the word say, and be- |
cause he had only Writen that he was in dis. 1
tressed situation, he swoie that he had never |
said IL. Would any honest man think that |
such pit,iul quibb.e would avail himself mn |
der such circumstances But their Lordships |
would renemher what passed after Aards, Tor |
H. now came TO a pIOvidential accident il he !
might use such contradictory terms in com.
pliance with the common understanding of
them. He now came 10 an accident which he
called a prOvidentiat one in tdvor OF innocence,
winch was always the care OF providence.
SaCcti WAS asked why did you change Your
name 90 sCcount OF the tumuii which hap
peBed. aud which made IN, know l sh mid
run a risk When did you change your name 2
Ia answer well deserved observation. a
year ago Whenhe gave his iirS reply, be did
not recoleci that the tumui at Dover took
place IN 1870, and that he changed his name in
july 1919, before he came TO this CountTN-
ihIs was providentiai circumstance. by
which conspisacies were detected, aud with.
ont which every one OF then lO'dshIps mi IA
be d victim tomorrow. Ii, called upon the
house 10 give dut weight TO tins obsei vd,ion,
and TO mark how ~ was borne on, by the e.
dcnce IN page 40. The Attorney Geuerai
very Judiciousiy, seeing It's consequences, did
not pursue tins enquiry but some OF their
lSrdsnips continued u aud thu "A perfect
4 pictui' WAS dr. wn OF d shutting witness, pre-.
yaricaing and beating about the bush TO shei |
tel himseli from the consequences OF az M
| lucky slip, by wsich the whole credit OF his
testimony MAS oseithtOvu. The confusion
| the bairassment. the perpleAity OF Sarchi,
o. TIM OCCASION, cou a not have been lore otteu.
| lie was asked ai whii tiin he mad changed
| Wis name he ausw cred Four OF I've DAYS
| he OF. set on tor England When y a. tndi!
in The month or July, last year. " hal
| your mouv. ioi taking tina, name al the time
al Paris To sneiier myeeli against AN. III.
| ConNenehce that might happen. What III
mutt had taken place at that time. 10 Undue.
| SoS 10 Change Your name Il was warned
| t,sa' Ill witnesses against the QueeUmigh Int run
som risk u they we're known. Had SJu bech
inf I'm Il that they had actually run auy risks
| They had not run any iisk then An Oppor-
| tunity was now Afforded, OF which any hOnest
\ wItuess would have avaied himself OF eX-
| planning the whuie TACT for his former queS-
| ton AVID answe, upon this point were read
| over 10 HIM. Sacchi however, had only in
VOWED himself III new ditiC uiiIes IN endeavor-
| ing 40 eecare from those he had already ell
| cOuatered lie stated, HAT while at Paris a
| gentleman came, accompanied by krOHsp, aus
| told him, that 1t would be necessary tor him
| To change ms name, because IL would be dau-
cerons for INN to come 10 Eng land in his own.
| DID he tell you that any iumult had taktp
place He told me some tsmnli, some disor-
| der. 'On what occasion did he say that ia
mutt had taken place He told we nothing
| else"
Being further pressed upon this point, he
| had Iesorted TO the invarlable eXpedent OF
wItne sses, when driven into corner by STAT
Ing, have repeated what the gentlemen
told me-. Tie mir. B,Ongham) could not deny
what Sacchi might have imagined but he IN
sisted that II was as impossible that a0y gen
tlcman, known or unknown, could at that pc
siOd have given him this Information, us tha.
any man should by chance, have written the
Had. lie was afraid, that their ioIdships did
not feel THIS point with the force II deserved
ut conTse, AT the present. moment, eve
booy talked Of tnmulls at hume on the al.
rival OF witnesses against the Queen but 20.
Inn haTI tn IplN
changed his name, what man, IN his most fan
cIiui mood, even dTcami that such a tnmult
would occur III 1870 ln fact, II was nothing
more than an Invention by the witness TO CO.
yer his retreat from position in wiIIch ht
! mad been unwaiIiy emtrapped. IL was oni,
10y such circumstances as these that perIurIes
| were detected anu this led hun To Temark
that IT witnesses were convicted ~ untrue
swearing on collateral points, h0w TRIVIAL so
ever they might he, u put end 10 al their
cTeduiIty In the man facts OF the conspiracy
| Ou9 OF iheSe main facts, IaT as related 10
tn' evid ace of Saccni and RasIeln, another
! d!SChaI gtd courier, was Of a nature so dis
| sustIng aud offensive. tlIdtli lie felt IL uffCuii
even 10 make the allusion 10 II Dad IbCIT
LOTusi!ips blink II very likely that auy woman
| he might almost say the most miserable
! pro,tIt discharge from BrideweIi-wouid
! Commit, IN the face OF U,itU day, Wuni la.
| Deeu cndfged against the Qheen by Rasieili
| " Onld they believe, that viii the knowledge
| that u COURIER was travelling By the side OF
| the carriage, the blinds OF winch NAV be rails
ed, the Queen would run tive ri>A OF blasting
heT character, sveA among lie most abandOn>
ed OF hVI SEX, by song 10 sIeap III the position
| described by SacChI mat Ia winch tue had
| discovered the Princess ana her Chamber
| lain But the cTeduiIiy Ot the House .husi
ne stretched yer many degrees for II II could
| persuade itself that TINS hal happened once,
:, would be nothing Ia what Sacchi had sworn
iie hdd been III the constant haO'' Oi s,eIar a.
G,air and a.sin. lie thT. BIOughamj dp.
Peaird to their LoI dship> VIE her this sIorS
mad the smallest Appearance of PROFANITY
| whether uness the parties we're absolutely
| insane, such cOhduct could be accounted tor
lie was low saying nothing Of tin physical
impossinIiN OF tie Thug, at time when tie
carriage was travelling at the rate of niue Oi
ten mile an hOni, over such roads a are f0nnd
IN that part of Italy, with their hnnjs placed
across each other, While the parties were
both last asleep, and of course without any
power over their limbs. 10 overcome this
dim u ~ woud require the evidence of phi
iosOpiers who had witnessed au experiment
40 new and so strange. The witness had not
We tuTed upon any description Of the Carriage
excepting that II had curtains aut whaI
WOnld their IoTdSillpS say II 10 should be prov
Ell 20 have been an English carriage, win
glass aud spring blinds What If he (Ir. g. ,
showed that the blinds could not be raised
without Optsng the door TO get al the .prings
upon the iuside aud sstili more, W al if ne
should prove thar Sacchi was not the courier
who went upon that journey? lie did not say
tina IL was necessary fOr him 10 prose tins : ON
IL 90 tiary lie DENIED that he was called
upon TO ds so. Why had mol tile other side
established Their case; audit cast-otl servants
would not afford them sufficient evidence
" had they not resOrted to those still in at
! ,eudance upon her Majesty?
He again cntfested their lordships 10 re
ie'mhcr for Il was a cardinal polGt that
ought not TO he forgotten, that accusrr
D., Is not relieve iiOm producing ufic ent VI
q. oce, 5' cag'e zOod witnesses were to bc fOuut
Dn III ride of tic accused. lie had no gight
10 call upon the accused to produce those
Vitnessrs for il was the business Of the &C.
cnset 10 establish guilt, ~ AL the evidence he
could produce. But was there ans other per.
son ~ the CArriage!" Non M ricordOr WA lie