Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1820-04-28


NOttNE'
sSI virtue OF deed of trust executed by Or. John
~ 1.(Ioush,oi lhe county VI Co0ehiand, anu Others,
on Tue 'th gay vi ssptembeT 1919, conveying TO Jo-
serh Mayo, JT ana stephen nusai two tracts or land
S'n the said dsea paiucniafD described lying ana
being situate IN The county Of RenIteo aud being The
same on Part wbefeoi Tue said Crouch 10 now digging
aud raising coal, which said deed made 10
The payment OF sundfy debts (heIein specihed) due
from The SAID Cro1ch to william Geode aud Francis
H. Ellis, Of the comfy of Henrco. and the 22d
day OF January last admitted 10 record ia the ONCE
OF henrico county court ana in compliance with
the request OF the said William Goode, on UedheSay
The 7th June neat, between the bours of 10 o'clock
n NJ and O'CLOCK p. a. of that day will he sold at
public auction, on the premises, the TRACTS OF
LAND aforesaid, or so much thereof for ready money,
as may he SUFFICIENT TO pay aud satisfy The sum OF 500
collars one Of the debts specified IN hs deed aforesaid
which fell due from the said Crouch to the said GOodc.
on the loth Jay OF Feb last with interest thereon, or
80 uch theteoi as snail tuen be Que AUD 10 de'I the
expences oil the trust up to, md including the day of
sale The sale will be conducted ny
March 81. THE TRUSTEES.
The above advertisement Was inserted without any
authority from ME, and with foil knowledge on the
part OF Mr. Goode, that would not unite in the sale
MI Ge0de 10 also FULLY appised of the reasons for my
REFUSAL These u Ia not deemed necessary To publish
IN detail will content myself with sayiue that there
exists IN the case, circumstances to induce strong
peiief on my inino, tai Mr.. Goode cannot fairly re-
quire sae at this time, and in this opinion, | am
confirmed by the ScncurTing opinion OF eminent
sci VI which Mi. Goode has been duly formed. I
shall therefore, not unite IN the sale above mentioned
unlll the present disputes between the two parties
shan be properly adjusted either between themselves
or by court oi Justice.
".
one Of the Trustees.
Friday the 2d day OF june next, Was the day orgi-
nay appointed Tor the sale OF The Land mentioned IN
he PRECEDING advertisement. The deed III tebiormiiy
10 which that advertisement was prepared, Requires
that 90 days previous notice OF the SALE should he
gwen III "o newspapers printed IN the silly OF Rich-
ohu ana as the advertisement lowing 10 some cause
not known 10 the subscrber) was published in one
newspaper only 1t has therefore become necessary to
al'er Tue day OF sale, which has accordingly been
uohe, 10 wednesday, inc 'in Gay OF June next: The
subscriber cannot imagine what are tue Circumstances
the land IN question, would be inipoper-ln the event
Justice, IL be possible that his ingenuity can help
hm To MAKE out case worthy the consideration OF
any Court, the snhscfiDer verify believes, that Mr.
may" VIII DC an important wllness on his part, TO
prove concusvely thai there are no circumstances
ahdssUsr rtdtty belonging 10 the case, which could
Jusu'y Dr. Ctouch IN asking The nerposon OF court
| OF equity, to prevent the sale. The subscriber has
beafu. hut hbOws Aohlns OF me opinion OF eminent
counsel, referred to BY Mr.. Mayo. That opinion, IL
ADVERSE To TIE sale must be founded on an incorrect
statement ct FACTS MS no doubt VIII hereafter be abun
oaht'J sheNh IL Is certain lhat no inference against
tie subscriber onght TO be drawn from any such opin
ION, however eminent the couGsei, because is Ger
tain, that the same counsel (wlhoui pretending TO
know who that counsel NAV be) would give opinion
precisely opposite 10 that referred to, correct
statement at facts. The subscriber has dispute
adjust with DR.. Crouch he only deIands OF hun the
payment of 1900, due siHCe the 18Th day February
last, and II the Doctor desires To cOu9eveTi the Justice
OF that claim, the subscriber knows no beiier mode
Of spterins his movements than by advei Using the
Land for sale. IL is irue that Mr. Mayo did raise
some diihcu1tl, the last week about advertising the
lard for sale hut tue subscriber did believe that
upon dus consideration Mr. Mayo could reconcile il
himself TO oppose the sale. Tie will content him
self with subj dining from Tue deed of trust
written b Mr. MAYO hlmst'f, who at the time nf ii.
ing the deed wa; aeiuautel with allhe Circumstance
belonging to the and the of letter sddr
To MI. Mayo by The subscriber, tbe day before dale
Of the original advertisement.
Now Therefore il IS ,aelntsn, aud iUS meaning trst