Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1820-04-28


Jesse Barsy and Patsey wife John Foster MARSHALL
walthail Ceise, his wife and Tabi,ha Foster not
haviae entered their appearance and given security
cording ~ OF the Geuel al AsseTub y aud the
rules OF this oouri, aud appearing TO the Satisfaction
of the c"nr that they are not Inhabitants of This state.
on the motion OF the compi9inani by counsel a. IS
ordered, that The said defendants, Martin Smith Sarah
BEDFORD john, Penisk Thomas Polling, ohildieuof
Polling decd. puah Price, iam Williams.
Anne Middleton. Betty Williams, Sally Williams, lab
10y Williams, Williamson Bird, pbete BIRD, Nancy
woddn Jesse Baehy ard Palsy his wife John Foster
Marsia,i wahnii and Belsey his wife, and Talntbs
Foster, do appear here on the drs day OF June
next, and the Compliments bill; aud thata
copy OF this order be forthwith inserted in
OF the public newspapers, printed M the city Of Rich
nond for two uioBhs excessively. aud also posted az
the font door OF the cowil house OF ths county.
3. /. woRsHAm, u. C.
The defendants named in the foregoing order Of pub
lication win take notice that shall proceed have
the land mentioned in this suit and now in possesslon
OF Williamson waiihail, Of The defendants y ing
in The county OF Prince EdN ard surveyed asreeably
to order Of Priuce EDWARD county conrt ON the
second Friday in June. 1870, fair the next
fair day, aud shall proceed take the deposition of
house on the third satuiday in June. 1890, 10
be read as evidence in The same case in which am
plaintiff aud You are defendants, depending in lie
county court Of Prince Edward.
April Is. ilo..vsw HUGH W. PRICE
tIRGiNiA: At rules hoiien IN tie Clerks once of
the Superior 6UuIt OF Chancery fof the Richmond
District, The ST. day of March, 1920
Samuel WiniTee, and James ". MinlTee, trading un-
der the nIm of Samuel winiree Co. james Gray
Pankey, aud Abner winnee, and Theoderics Ferglson
trading under the irm OF WmIee q Ferguson,
rtaiati6r.
williag Battle and Fleming James Co. and WIN.
Cta!e and Samue! Craig. DcftRGagfS.
The defendants William baltic, rad William aud
Samuel Craig, nOt having entered their APPEARANCE
and given security according the act Of assembly
and the Rules Of tis Court and appva ring sails
factory evidence that they ate not inhabitants OF this
country II is ordeTCd bat the said defendants do
appear here the irs day of the next term and an
swer the amended blii at The plaintiffs; and that
OF this o;dey be forthwith inserted in some news
paper published in the Cuv 81 Ricbmgnd, tor Two
months snccsss,velN and posted at the mont door "
| the Capitol. IN the said City
4 c''y-3 &m " p,N,yc
S7iRCINiN; Al rules holdc.l IA lie CirTA's O1Tcg
% the superior Court Of Chamcery Tor TIE Rich
n1ro p's,rici, Tue 18Th day Of aiarch 1856
dal G,wles aud Elizabeth his wife, nd Hanet Smiih
| which said Jacob, Mary, EIzaaeIh Nancy are
"e''s OF n@'iin Sni"D uec'd'.'.'. .F@1'MDS.
Martin }. Hawkins. John T. Hawkins, Smith tiaw-
kns, DANES fiaN kBs Parry Hawkins, Elizabeth ti3w-
kins Scott HAWKINS and ReuaDd Hawkins. chIIGren
and heirs Of Lucy Hawkins, formerly Lucy Smith
deed the last STA of whom are infants, by John 7.
Hawkins their father ans guardian specially assigned
defend them IN this suii
ne subpoena 10 revive awarded IN this cause not
being returned executed on the defendants, ap-
bearing BY satisfaction, evidence. lbal they
haUiiants Of Ibis Connry IS oTderGd, That the said
defendants do appear here the rIst day of the nsu
term, aud shsm cause, il any they against the re-
this order be forthwith inserted IN nspdper
published in the Guy Of Richmond, Ter Two months
/
| piIo, la lhe said city. Il C6pg--7GSte,
WIN: W. hE9liRG, c. C.,
| chANcEkY.:.;Ata Couri OF Qna't,riSs .sIons
conlinued ana held Or Cumberland county, the Isi
| day of March, 1870.
| Rives, Thornton & Giliam.,.......... Plaintiffs
| AGAINST
Leander Cos, and Leonard Bosher, administrator Of
The defendant Leander Coz not having entered bic
appearance aud given security according the act of
Assembly and the rules Of this conrt, aud appearing
Tue Satisfaction OF tie court thai
itant OF tbis commonwealth therefore, The motion
OF tue said plaintiffs by their COUNSEL 1t ORDERED,
that tue said defendant Cox do appear here before
the fourth Monday in May next, answer the bill al
the said plaintiff, aud that Copy of this order be
forthwith inserted in some newspaper published in the
city Of Richmond, for two months successfully aus
eoe 70 ne pos'ea al'he Hoht door OF The courthouse
IO3..w8w r. u. moNrAGUE. Jr d. c.
IN ClIAhCEkI.- 10 7,.teS hst0 gRfAe tIf7h3s Gdre
cut ant Virginia district, B0rch I'M 1870
Iae Umtrd States Of -1Hericd. PI-inIiGs,
Phitip Norborrs Nicholas, Edmund yagIo, ana
R,rhGrd Ande'sOn, trustees o. 7OmpkiA, ond mr..
ray Shhertd"d CotqHJi1un 3 90. y. ChrjSfi0a and
John Tompki5fs. ana 1d0m N41rGR.. .DtfSndaGts
Ihe Geje"d0Rt -9daDi hf"rrag, MT haViaSc7tsrfd
rue ~ ne court and epYearist fhat he is not an
tnha6taHt Of ms district, ne motion " tie II,
toInfy FOR nc On'ed states, ~ IS ordered fhaf tie
SH'd d9end@ht DO dYpedr &c ne city 81 Richmond,
on the frSt day " Tie Hett term, ami 0astrer ne
6Ht ~ me PiaiHtBS-GRd that a copy Of ms rule be
J0fhhfh iHstTfed IL some earSp dIeI printed in the
city Of Richmond, for tioo months sHccesiUsly end
P0Stfd at the fTOt door Of TIE c0}tOi ia ne Suidcfy
| II Copy-JeSte, RD: JEfFRIE.S, Cierk.
| MoTrh ~. l0O. yssr
! 4 n chANCkRI lit rHfes heidM ne Cisrh's once
Of the CoHTt Of The U1iifCd states Jar tie mn cir
4 cut and Virginia district AqTch in, 1870
| >drchiJ0fd ROGeytSOn. .............,... Plaintiff
| AGAINST
| B0yd HittSr, J0meS BT0uH and Bd1earef grotpn
his UDe, EO6Crt MIR Jean Mteir his aiJe Isa-
betta Btack G"d gf0tg BT0nn, and me Lscheat0r Of
ne COMMUNICABLE Of pfysi0 fOT thefcuHoJ LlAcy,.
OHIE DeieuCaHts.
me dcffHd0EfS J0S. BtcIon and BIgre0ret yro7,st
his riff, HODcyt MIR amt JeaH 1fHi' lis sfir. Ha.
6elfa Bf0ek aHd Diorg Br0'rH, met hatiHg sNftrs0
their 0ITf0f0HCf oHH eten Sec1f1ifB accofdf1,r 10
THte 81 me court aRd q 0Jyf0riUC th0frhFp mt
7nhdbfdNfS ~ thiS district me motion ~ me
pt0fftH bQh counsel 10 IS Ordet fbatfhe Sdd de.
JeWd0Ht' do0ppe0t at the Cft Of HichmOHd thCRrss
aagojfhe "eif term a'sd 0"Sirtf Tie yiOiUfiDS JH
and thGf cory OF mis- RITE be torthaHh {nsfyfpd ~
some He,rsPaJ er printed the ctg othichmONd PER
tuO mOnfhS tareiy, 0Hd POJfsGdt ne oAt dooy
| ~ the C0y!tOt M the Sdid citg. 4 fODy-Tfsfc,
m .JEFFHIES C3erk
Aatch "a. 100. nS,o