Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1820-03-24
March al.


IN cHtNCEKY....At Court "f @, su-,iy Sessions
u continued and held Tor Cumberland county the ist
day or March, 1920
Rives, Thornton Gillian ............ piqiuti6.
AGAINST
Leander Cox, and Lesuard Bosher, adminisuator Of
Elizabeth RosheIS decd. DelfRdrDfs
The defendant Leander Cox not having entered his
appearance and given secnTiy according to the act of
Assembly aud The VI this court and II sppearinS
to The Satisfaction of the that he not an inbab
liant of this Iomnonw eaith therefore, the otIon
of the said plaintiffs by their counsel il "a Oaprpvn
that the said defendant Cox do appear on o. before
the fonTh Monday in May next and The Bill nf
the said plaintiff, and that a copy of this order be
forthwith inserted ia some newspaper published IN the
city Of Richmond, Tor two months snceeslWely. and
snoiher TO be poses ttthe front do1r the Costhouse
los..asw r. .. MONTAGUE, Irp.c.
NIkGlNiA: ~ rules hoideu In The Clerks Oni1- n
the Superior court IT Chancrry the Rchulau d
District, the 18th day Of March, 1920
Samuel WinfTee, and James ". winfree, ttahins un
der the drm Of samuel winfree Co. Ja,pes cray
aud Young Pankey, uadiEg uudet The f,m Of Glay &
Fsnkey aud Abuer winfree. ana rheodeIick Fergusva
trading under The hrm Of winfree & Ferguson.
PLAINTIFFS,
William BaiIie and Fleming James & Co. and WIN.
Craig and Samuel Craig. .....;....... DgtendaRfs.
Samuel Craig. not having entered their appearances
and given secnrity according 10 the act ~ assembly
and The Rules Of this Court and IL appearing by 81
factory evidence, that they inhabitants THIS
country is ordered. That the said defendants do
swer the amended bill OF the plsnufs; and that 4
copy Of THIS order he forthwith inserted in news
paper publisbFh IN the City Of RirhmsHd, for "a
months successfully, aud posted The front door Of
tho Capitol in the said City.
4 Copy eas,
VIM W. HENtNG, &C.
NIRGiNIt AIs Superior Court OF Chsncefy held
At the Capitol in the CITY Of Richmond, the l2lh
John Smith and David Mims........ plaintiffs,
AUA1NST
Jacob 4. FOWLER aud Robert Vare.... De)eracpfs.
Tbs cause, ~ which The bill hath been isssn for
contested, asto the defendant Robert Ware, and on
rho tne "t''t'a' oiot' i"I 'h"' ru'put HPPebfs -
have been duly executed aud IN which The plant ss
sppeaT TO bWS proceeded IN the mode pfescTibcd
by law, against the other defendant this day
g. he beard on the bill, cShibits and the examination
Of witness was afgned by csuntel for The plaintiffs.
on confederation whereof the court doth order tbas
the defendant Robert ware do render on account &c
the mones debts. aud effects IN bis hands belonging
20 the defendant Jacob Fowler, before commissioner
of the court Who IL directed to eSamine ftare au6
settle the same az we'll as the sseonBts n the oopsr
mercy Ia the bill ntnioned and make thereof
10 the court with any mattsfs speeaiy states DEEM
ed pertinent ~ himself or which may be required by
| h Coyy-Tesfe,
| wM W. HENtNC {. c.
Co,nr1issouer's Office Richmond. 81 no. IL, isqs
The parties interested IN the foregoing dscresl o.
der Of the csUr dssred 10 iske notice, thar have
appointed The 25th day Of The 9Th month (Bsy) nett
\ to commences The accounts above directed, whieb
my Office in this city with AZ TIE Necessary decu
meuis ready fer examination aud 'eulement
AMOS LApD, NC.
Yareh2s. iol.,ist
XIRGiNiAi AZ Rules holden IN The cIyis'S once q.
! the Superior Court ~ Chancery Tor the hishnoHd
| diairitt, the 18th day 81 March. 1870
James WINSTON .''s''s's.s''s.' FfaiWB,
1 AGafSfT
Simon A. Rtysn aud John y. IaY.... Dc(fndaatg.
| The defendant simon A. bua not having entered
his appearance add Piveu security according The
~ Assembly ann The Rules ~ this Court aud IL appear
ms by satsac'oB evidence that he is Hctsu nhsbsU
Of this country us ORDGtRD that The said 6efendan
~ anresf mere The hFst fay Of TIE term an,
answer tie BIN oi the Plaintiff aud that copy oflhf
he foFibwith int-fied newspaper publish
ed IN The city ~ Richmond or two moa,bs sgece,,yeIy