Elizabeth-Town gazette. [volume] (Elizabeth-Town, N.J.) 1818-1821, 1820-08-29

contents from CONJECTURE dnu icPVlt. This
bag. he said, originated with the Vice
Chancellor Of England, who had sent out
| gentleman practising in his court 10 Mi.
Ian. whose principal Recommendation
seemed to be that he understood no Ian.
euaee but his own. This gentleman had
collected number Of facts and put them
together in bag. He (Sir n. FereusOol
strongly o becied to this mode Of collect.
ting evidence he also complained Of the
appointment Of Score. Committee, and
Of the bill which condemned her Majesty
unheard. This Milan Commission be
said, had cost the country $4,000 Of
| which ll,u00l. was drawn and expended
| in the first Eve monlhs--a sum sufficien,
to destroy the character Of any man or
| woman existing 10 Italy.
The gallant general concluded by NOV.
| ing for copy OF the commission and in.
structions issued for taking the dispositions
on the Continent since her Majesty's De.
parture from England, and the sums ex.
pended, and by whose order issued.
Lord Castlereagh said, that the infcr.
nation asked for could moth consistently
given at present. The commission was
sent out in consequence OF information
(which ministers had received from the
continent, and which they could not pass
lover without inquiry. He defended the
conduct of the Vice Chancellor and Of the
gentleman sent to Italy, and compiimented
the purity Of his manners IA laugh He
should be ready TO give every information
when the proper period arrived. After
some further observations be moved the
previous question.
Mr.. Creevey coritended that the present
was the fit time for bringing forward bis
motion. The House had right to have
the Vice Chancellor before them, as but
FOR such intermeddling, the whole Of the
differences might have been settled. II
was the officious Mr.. Leach that had kept
these unhappy differences alive, and the
vindictive spirit Of the King. (Order, or
der, order. Ministers had negotiated
with the Queen at ST. Omer's, and after
wards 10 London, after they had been IN
possession OF these most serious charges
The question between the King and the
Queen was private matter, and the King
was to be put in the same state as any
other mao who applied for divorce. To
be entitled se the! remedy, the King .n..s.
come with clean hands inte Court (Order)
on such an occasion.
The previous question was then car.
ried, without a division.
Lord Castlereagh must express his
strong sense Of surprise and regret, at the
speech Of the hon. gent. (Mr. Creeyey,}
10 which he had thought proper TO make
a personal attack On the Sovereign. Such
epithets no man was Untitled to apply to
| that illustri0us Parsonage. Nothing could
be less viDdictive than the conduct Of his
| Majesty.
Mr.. Bennett stated, that the country
would 60 along with the sentiments that
had been delivered by his hon. friend Mr..
jCreevey. and the ministers were bound
to stand up for the character Of their mas
tier; as by their advice, he had entered
Into a compromise with woman against
j whom snch odioHs accusations had been
brought. One. however, of the ministers
differed 90 this subject from his colleagues;
for the right hon. gentleman opposite (Mr.
Canning had declared that his attachment
to the Queen was still undated, which
| could not possibly be the case if he be.
lieved her guilty Of the crimes imputed to
her. Hear, hear.) His hon. friend (the
member for Wincbelsea) had 10 his pos.
/ session document, by the late Mr.. Whit.
bread, recommending to the Queen not to
leave the country bat she had preferred
| the advice Of the right honorable gentle
man Mr. Canning,) and that was the
cause Of all that bad taken place. Her
opponent was the King, who had direct
influence in the other House by means Of
! ribbons and garters.
i Lord Castlereagh rose to call for order,
as il was contrary to the rules of that
i House to introduce The name of the Sove-
reign into the debate.
Mr.. Bennett resumed. The people look
ed 10 the fearful odds against the Queen,
aud they hadunanimously taken her part.
He would vote for the motion Of his hon.
! friend.
i After some conversation on the part Of
Lord Castlereagh, MIR. Tierney and the
Speaker. the order Cor taking the Kings
; Message into consideration was discharg'
ed.
i The London Morning Chronicle OBJ
serves. that with respect to the particular
charge of adultery, the Queen 10 provided
with an unanswerable defence. The Queen
has written to nearly 100 persons 10 Italy,
, to come to England, to give evidence.
Many OF whom are Of the first families.
One Of the six Italians who have arrived
as evidence for the King, is an attorney