Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1820-04-18

VIRGINIA :At a Superior Cont OF chane.ry holden
n, v, se |ap,o IN The city of Richmond The 5tb day
Ann Dent Hayes. aud Frances Claiborne who survit.
gu her husband William Claisorn....... Piaihtigs,
Martha 1o"Ge. Administrative with the will anneA,.I
Of Francis Goode the younger deceased, who was Ia
deceased, aud Maxwell rtokes and Sarah a. his wife.
formerly Goode, andJanes Scott administrator anu
stinnisiatx OF richard Is. Goode deceased, whs was
MSo an administrator with the will annexed If the saiv
kobeit Goode deeeasea, who surviving execuor-s
nhiam slack deceased, Samuel GOode, security tor the
SAID Robert Goodt as aforesaid, ana 1atIto.
Saunders, administrator de bouis non with the will an
heNed OF the said Robert GOode deceased, William
NOou aonin'usifator OF stephen Southali deceased,
VINO was executor OF Turner SUGtaaii deceased RoLsft
Anderson, administrator OF PeStou Souihall deceased
Who "as'ne ofihe executors OF Jases Soulhaii deed
and John DangeTiied, the other executor Of James
eon,na,i deceased who was co executor with Stephen
Souiba dec land survived !i) Turner Southal dec
VINO also VAS an executor Of the said William Black
deceased George MAJ khan May Markham aud Lianaeus
buiiiig, executors sna execurix Bernard Markham
deceased whowas oithe Turner Southa
deceased as executor aforesaid Alice Goode surviving
eAesutrN OF Francis Geode deceased the elder and
caroline Matilda Harriss, William A. Tuf pin a Edward
Cox acting executors and eNecurix Of Thomas Harriss
deceased who was executor Of the said Francis
Gooue deceased the elder, another security the said
Turner Sou'hali, as executor OF William Black deed,
This cause in which TIE bill ot confessed
as to the deft Samuel Guode and whom III, aecTetal
order Tor that purpose appears 10 have been duly
ed, and in which publication the mode pre.eris,d by
law against sbseht defendants hath sd. against
: Maxwell rTokes anh Sarah n his wife WHO are NAT
inhabitants OF this county, be heard ON the
h th. answer OF the ether def.p dants OF OF those
whom tbeS represent, and was argued by cou,sel ON
consideration whereof the court doth order thai M.
report OF Commissioner Lada made In pursuance of
the order OF the 4,h day Of FebIuar, 1917 be r,cnmm
ted TO tie commissioner who it, with Instructions
10 execute that order report the
account of Robert Gooue without blending ,h.,srit-
the administration OF Turner sonbaii ON the estate of
william Black deed and The Court further Tder
tnat tue same commissioner do state, settle and port
an acc"nntof Turner Southail's adnins alton OF lh
estate oil William Black decd as aso the ioul aeconu-
Of Robert Goode and tuner souIh,n ~ ,s, az,
fha -
facts require such and also the a,nis-
uati"n ~ The estate Of Stephen Soulha deceased OF
the estate oil Turner SouIha deceased and an account
OF the administration of The defendant william wood OF
the estate OF has the court doth further
ofder tbat Tue same commissioner do settle, state
report an account OF the standardization of Richard H.
Goode deceased and Of Francis Goode The ,ouEeT OF
the estate OF their iestaior Robert DECD rs as
an account OF The admnsti alton OF Maxwell
sarah his wife and oi James jun. OF Richard b
Goode decd as also an the OF
the defendant Martha Goode uhe estate of lr.,aor
mat Tie defendant raiton Saunders ator dc
bohs non Of Robert Geode deed reudeT an account
before the same commissioner u his administrator OF
tue estate othe said Robert; that the said
DO inrther state an account OF the administration OF
James Sontha decd OF the estate of Turner SuuIba
decd AS aso the administration OF Pe,ou
Ssutba OF the estate of said and of The defendant
Robert Anderson's administration of lhe estate OF the
said Peyon SOutha decd. And The court doth further
"faer, that the defendants Caroline Matilda RaIIiss
| William a. Turon and Edward Cox acting eNeeulor.i
aud eAecutrix OF Thomas Hariss decd who Was rxor
OF Francis Goode the elder deed, accoaar
OF the administration the Thomas Haryiss OF t
estate OF the said Francis Go0de the elder and OF ,hcir
own administration Of ths of The said Thomas
tarr'ss deceased. And the court doth further order
that the defendants Geo. ge khan ahd Inurus Roll
ing, executors and Mary Markham extc'k OF Bernard
Maikham deceased, do render an account befpie the
same commissioner of their Tie estate
o. tber said ;esIor, which accounts coninis
sohel is dTecedt o examine, and settle and make.
i"rof thereof 10 the cOuri with any matters specially
! stated deemed pertinent by himself which may he
| required by the parties 10 be so stated Bnt ,be
plaintiffs may The taking such OF the foregoing
accounts Us shall appear 10 them to be ann-cessaTy
| Just decisIoR Of this cause.
| The same Plaintiffs This canse came on Ii,s CAY
| m AGAINST TO be fnTber Leari on the papers
i1e same Defendants formerly read md the IepOrts
OF commissioner Thomas Laid, made ~ pursuance OF
Tie nteTlocnoTy decree 5lh Of February 1919
anu as argued by counse-ou consideration whereof
me court not deciding the reports 4h eth and
l5,h ofJunc 1919, and approving report Of The sth
oi!an"ary oithe same year Ear the saze is noL
excepted 10 and so far IS, the court doIh reco
mt with the exceptions thereto for the commissioner
to reconsider the same aud 10 report tbereupon aud
10y tue OF the 9th day Of February 1915 And
the court Goth further ordSr, Ina; there should he any
necessary accounts not ordered, in relation to the
s"hJeciin controversy, the commissioner may proceed
I" 'aSe ~ ~ i,ke manners as Il specially directed.
| COpIes-Tette, WIN. W. HENlNG c. c.
| CoMMIssIoSRR's OFFICE,
| Richmond, Sd Mo. ~, 1870.
Inc parties interested desired 10 take notice that
have appointed The 27th day ofthe 9Th month NAV
next, for commencing the accounts directed by tit
ioeseine orders OF court; which day. at 0 O'Clock
a. m 'heI attendance is required my ONCE in this
cay, with their accounts and vouchers ready for exam
'Ha'on anu setUthehl THOMAS LADD, NJ. c.
| To ne parties interested in tie QbOge Suit
TAkE NOTICE that we shall proceed in person or hv
PROXY on Tue 20tb day OF July next o'c loo A. NJ
al ms mouse IN BeiksVilie Cum befland county Stale of
Kentucky, 10 take the deposition Of John THURMAN Ia
pe read as evidence in suit now pending s6pe.
nor court Of chanCeTy for the district wheft
| ~ we are plaintiffs and you defendants when ana
where you may attend II ysn Thank proper.
March as. lO4..w4w FINANCES cLaIBoRSE.
| NikGiNlA "a rules, holden IN The Clerks Once
0i The Superior Court Of CBancery Tor the Rich!
| mopd District, the 18Th day Of March, 1870
! Jacob Smith, George King aud Mary his wife Iyd
cal bowles and elizabeth his wife, aud Nancy Smith
| which SAID Jacob, Mary, Elizabeth aud Nancy are
heirs OF Martin Smith, deed. Plaintiffs
| AGAINST
Martin J. Hawkins. John r. Hawkins Smith fIaW.
| Rms. James Hawkins Parry Hawkins, Elizabeth Hau
| INNS, scout HAWKINS aud Reuand Hawkins cbIIdrsu
and helr OF Lucy Hawkins, formerly Lucy Smith now
deCd The last SIX OF whom infants, by John T.
Hawkins, their father guardian specially assigned 10
| ueiehd them III this salt
The subpoena revive awarded in this cause not
helns feiuned executed tie defendants and IL an
peatins by satisfactory evidence, that they are not in
habiianis Of this country E is ordered That The said
defendants o" appear here the day the BeAE
term aHd sbeH cause IL any they can sesnst the re-
this order be forthwith inserted some Newspaper
| published ia the City of Richmond for two months
snccessiNey and posted al the ffont door of the Ca
p'oi' ~ TIC said city Il Copg-Ie1e,
| March 81. los. ,usw
NlRGlNlA; IL rules holden N The CLERKS Office OF
" me superior court OF ChanceTS for the kchnOpd
Disiilct, tue 1874 day Of March, lGaA--
samuel Wintrse, and James W. Ninffee, trading nm
der the arm OF Samuel WnTse & Co. Jaises Gray
ana Young Panhey, trading under the firm of Gray 4
Pankey, and AbBeT Winffee and TheodeTick ferguson
trading under the Gfm Of wiBhee q Ferguson,
Plai1t!6s,
| wiAsg Bale and Fleming james & Co. and VIM.