Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1819-09-24

"US.
ne " Right Hon. the Earl of Dumfies, James oo,an.
Ihis cause eame on this day To be funher heard an
MS ,l ",meny iedu and the report Of The
as uAus IN pursuance OF the order OF the 2ih
d'y OF June, 1878, and was argued by counsel On
soia rno,, %neIsol, The court DOH reconnit the
10 reconsider aud report thereupsn. ~
C0pyIIes,e wM. W. HENlNG, &C.
The parties interested are desired to ake n s,,
have appointed ,he 18th day OF October nsst io con-
which day at O'Clock, A. NJ. they are reou.s,rd -, NJ,
.eu AZ my Office IN this city with their accounts and
vouchers ready Tor examination and settlement.
aognstlo. 1..uSo JOHN BRYCE, c.
" ikGlNiA; Alta Superior Court 81 CEancery noIdr,
~ al the capitol in the City Of RishmOnd, the 22d
Edward AmbIer.. ,,o;n,ir
AGAINST ~
Abel r. urshnr, administrator with the will annexed
", hohas wilson, dec. Li,tieton upshur and mary "
MS wiie Thomas Mann Randolph, IT, and uauiel his
WE Charles L. ningaeld, aud Eliza his wife Harold
L. "iison ihonas V. Wilson, and Anne S. Wilson an
ihiaht by Thomas Mann Randoiph ir her ruardian
which said Mary V. Harriet, ELIZA, Harold L. Iho,nns
a%1 anne >. are children and heirs The said Tho.
mag "Hsoh, DEC. -.................,..Dg, ,ndgnfs
u Abel p: ppshnr, admir-. With the win annexed Of
wilson: dec Luueion upshur, ard Mary v his
VIE ihoias Mann Randolph, r. and liar, let his wife
ohafles l. Wngleld and Eliza his wife iIarod L. vii
son, ,hola. " Wilson, aud Anne Wilson an infant
by Thomas Mann Randolph, jr. her next friend wh,r,
SAID Mary V. Harriet Eliza Harold L. Ihortas and
Anne .. are children and heirs of the said Thon,a.
..PL5s-
william Thompson, Thomas Dunn William Leward
Mathew Beaumont, and William Dunl........ DeHs
iHe s'"'t''''.... rms.
AGAINST
Samuel Travis, and the presideu, and p,s
And
David p,g.
AGAINST V'
Abel p. upshur, admir-. with the will annexed Of Tho
These cause. cam. on hi: day 10 he .,,a t
e hist ON The papers iormeIy read the second ON the
bills answers aud exhibits The hind aud fourth nv con-
sent on thebis and answers, and we've gued y coun
sell ON consideration whereof the cour, doib order
,ha one OF The commissioners d" rst an account
OF Tue monies, debts Effects of William Thompson
ueenuaht ~ me second suit in the bands OF Thomas
bnnn aud William MoOte, defendants in lie sine sn,
the commissioner, and HON lie is authorized To eva
mine III solemn form iouc same also th, ,nouu,
que by the defendant william oh the col trct
WIN the painn's esiator. Thomas wilson in the biu
mentioned, secondly an Of The balance dne nm
The contract Of the said Thomas Wilson III, testator Of
te defendants IN the trst suiI 10 Edw ara Amber HE
piaintif IN that snt, thirdly an accorit Of The b,
lance due TO Samuel Travis and the esident and mas
tiers, or professors efWiam aud Mary CoIepe ,esnec
lively, defendants in The third .uit by the ies,ntor NJ
we plaintiffs III al suit, and fourihy the amount due
Tue fourth suit aud the said commissioner is directed
Ia repent the same To the count with any matters sne
oiaily stated deemed pertinent by himself or which
may We required by the parties TO lie so stated.
Copy-Ieste, WIN. ". HrNING c.
commissioners Once, Richmond, July rs, 1919.
thot hare appointed the 25th d9U Of OcfoJs,1s
FOR commencing ne accounts direcied 6s lie nUIin
Il. III. u H1-,
requested 10 attend at g office in his city tcifh fhfr
accounts and vouchers r6dGy for clu,neiio, ANA Sef
etMeW: 26..t250 J0HN BE1 CE, ~. C..
VIRGINIA Al Rules holden IN the Cletk,s fItiire n
" the Superior Court of Chancery for The Richmond
district, the 2slI day of July 1870
yer' ate" g. A1renrs Harris an infant, by Hiam 4.
IIWP", nS sHard'dh ara near JFi6nd, and UiliiaDq
L's0" and E0ctiHa lis wie............. Plaintifs,
HKtiam Saanders and Sarah his uiGs. E,ssey, Bor-
I,S,oeorec hosefs admir- 81 GASoR Harris dec. and
Hary am Harris, mido,r ofthe said ~ ilson Harris
hd,1's, INFANTS oHd heirs Of tie said iIson Harris
~ the m@Tshdt shs court, specially assigned their
e"r III, 20 Hf"d thf ~ his s"t ana John De1p,
g , or n'th Inc "H 0nTcred Of Benjamin Harris
S6s .:i,. .Deendans.
me sc're iaeas drd'1cd in mis- not being re-
a"'"tn t'fcWed o" hedJead0ptS UHliCm .Sdahders-
and 5or"h nv "iJe, anu Eg6ert Harris, ana fEey
mot hgs1s entered their appearance ana syen seca,
rnH decorating TO tie act Of 4SSe6iv ana me ruies
9f This cont, and appearing 6y Satisfactory epi.
TeMce that neg are not Inhabitants Of mis- country
mere on FrSt Gay Of the Term and sket canre
any Mey can against the retVal byfheSafd process
sought; ana that a copy o. tkiS order be CoythwifI
inserted IN newsp6pe, published In tbe c;tg oc
h'chl7ond for t~O months SUccesSiueiy and osted az
'"eJt0 Co aoOg 81 me capif9, inthe said eitg.
d"g11 10. as..rs,,
ChANCEtY A. rules held in the CLERKS OiEcs
= OF me court of the United States for The nth cir
cu,t and NirsihIa district, August 7th, 1879
James Scott executor Of John Leslie decd and Nor
""' .Piaisti6S,
Archibald Robertson and william BLACK. Jr. sur
WING executors Of VIM. Brown, decd Tue said Ar.
rmpu , hoOsItson ana Wm Black, Jr in their own
rlsht, John Brown Margaret Brown, in her own rieht
aud as administrator of James Brown DECD Agne,y
B,ack' Jr Robert Muir and Jean his WIFE, Isabella
BLACK, William Muir, John TompkhIs James risher
Margaret Muir, Isabella Muir, James Mir Mar, Mu,,
Jean Muir, Jr.i Sarah Muir, Janet Muir Agnes Mnir
Marion Black and Sarah Black. Detenda1ts
The defendants John Brown Margaret Brown Aenev
Biack, ": Robert Muir and Jean his wife, Isabella
James MAR, Mary Muir, Jean Muir Jr Sarah
Muir, Janet Mur, Agnes sur Marion Black and S",sb
Black hot having entered their appearance and given
secnllty according TO rule Of The court-and il an
peariHg that they inhabitants OF this disric
"s .ne motion OF tue plaintiffs 10y tseir counsel MS
Orae'ea, That the said defendants do appear al the
CITY OF Richmond, on Tue first day Of the next Tern,
a9a answer The bill Of The plaiHtins and that COPY
OF nus rule be iotwiih inserted for months success
sivey IN some newspaper printed in The civ of Rirb
nous and posted at the front door of capitol in the
coPy-Tese, RICHARD JEFrRIEs, cpk.
HuEpsl ~. 2T..wSw
IN cHANCEKI....At a court of ouaTIerIy se,,ion
day Of July. 1919 '' 'N
william Bellamy and Ann his wife,. Piqintifs.
AGAINST
Sally Palmore, Minerva Pamore, Eyelina palmore
'hd Joseph Palmore, infants, by George Holman tbe,r
guardian, John Gmhrey and Nancy his wife John pal
more John ABgea ana Poly his wife St.nben No,,siI
aud Judith his wife, and Charles Palmore Defegd0UT
appearing TO The satisfaction Of the court thai the
commonwealth ORDERED, That he appeaT here on or
before The lth Monday ~ October next To shes cause
II any ne cav why certain real property lying in The
a,
beth Pamore deceased SHOULD not be sold in order to
DIVISION among The persons entitled thereto andttat
copy OF this order be inserted in SONS newseapeT
printed III lie city OF Richmond for months sue
ceseively. asvew
copy-Tesie II. ID. MONTAGUE, d. C..
NlR6lNA: Al Rules held IN the Clerk's Office OF the
Cbanccfy District Court of iliamsburR June lie o..
10th, 1870 o.
JOlB GOddin. Observation-Disclosures L,g,f;6
AGAINST
James, Mary, George and Martha Baker infant chill.
dren OF George Baker, deed. Pasey Baker widow of
the said George Baker and Hugh GOddin administrator
hhhti DfJeUr0Dfg.
The defendants not having entered tbtir apuratanrs
ahu gwen secuny according Ia The acts Of Assembly,
ann the Iues ~ uis comTt and b apprarg hN satis