Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1819-05-21

joh" Giliss'. hieASra Gillian. Ipllliam c1iisn.
lsa"at q tii9, JhaApes Gtarsr 1Rd Patseg, MS trs
ris,nua,.
Istdm Es@er, caitdreH ~ soiley Rakey dee soLo
na' motley CUiafa, daughter ii y1samna Ctiiise,
Ga TIE piasts sotia ard ar.e DSisS'I ~ ,ss
setisiiciiO' ~ he court that fhe dc.,dayfs ar nor
IN ososfS ~ fhis S6fe, 1t Is oidered and dec,.ed
fHaf Unless fhe said ",JcifcNts ssuH ayycGr here
"n or before SUsf ro"rt 0sLt aud 0a.rcr he pfdin
yer confessed, ard decree iht mciC' tAe,si accord.
f"ety a"dIhaf copy ofthiS Urder be JortLnish ia
sf,,ea az sSie ose 81 me pneIic neo sY3ters 81 tie
eHg 81 hiehn'ind. FER tho nseAs s0ecessiveig Snd
". @,so.ser cory % posted up at Gee fyon door Of
mssia a@'s a.gs sS 'IY"L EiDSIh t?tg rfi5e
NiRGiNiA-At ,a.ss hcia.n IN the CLERK, ol5,s of
tue superior esuri OF ehaucery Tor tie RichmoGd
uisuiei. 'hs 26sf>day Of Apii,, Isl9-
D'Wse h-nonH. ....................P Plaintiffs
AGAINST
Joseph ""oa~ard, jr. and Baker & Folsom,
The defendant, Joseph Woodward jr. not ha,inr IN
.ses MS appearance aud given seon,iy according TO
.ns ae OF Assembly ana the rules OF this court aud Il
appearing ~ Satisfactory evidence that he is no, an
'nhsotan' OF TINS conniiy, IL is Orderca That the
sau utfendant do appear here the ,ay OF
The neat term aud the bill Of ihe plauiin and
'nat copy of this oider he forthwith user.d m some
newspaper published in the city Richmond for two
, suecess,eb ana posted at The front door Of
tue eapi,"i' ~ NE SAID city, A copy, Teste,
AprIi 50. ll5..9sw WM. W. ntNING, c. c.
NiR1iNiA.-@;t rairS hoid,H IN fhe cltJI,s 60rcs
81 TIE superior court Of chaaceyu Jor me Vim.
m non di,triet, t"e 2Cfh eoy@ ai,ii, 1879
.cAf,sr ''''.'''..'.''.'.Pia'n'iu'
Joseph Hood~ard,jr. and Baker S Toiscan.
The defendant Joseph H'ood,rord, IT. MT iariar
enfered s appearance Snd cipen scrertfy accoraing
ana opScos;s I'm g.,n sns r1sts @ ms c9rrf,
ef an fnhabnaHf Of this cou-iy Il is Ordered JLnf
day critic ge,f fey, AMI ',s 81 'hs .,rfn,sefh
ard faat csy" or ' tS;s o, me I 3, ne yain
j S'et,dna s0s aesropsr published Ia ne city Of
at nc Front door The CAPITOL, in the sei3 cid.
s !, so ~ It'fe. M. ". AENIfG, q. C.
=: :, ~ Ii3..1sp
4 eo,srt isie '''' ""eH"s"aS' CVi"sy'--haneh
soa,Ssr recommendation
Pouhafan B. 7fudoUo,d Rober, g - so
safisJacton Of fs court Ih.t ~. "FtarimF 10 ths
is NOT az iahs5itant or mis- tofc % 10 Iansan
here on or before snrnst Ss,, "ad,s sAah dIpear
Yiainfie,s biz f5e rouyt III H. sma asmtF re
ter fhrys5S az 90 s, ana deere ne mat
Jorth,A bertfs ia some one Of ffe Sns liz
papers ofthe civ Of Ri,h..nJ ~, ,., Ps ri f,"S'
cessirety ona f6? anof5sr ro,J e aao'ths sac
fVnt door OF the courthouse OF his coi,ntu " '
:, Il copy. X. LLDRIDGE,is DC
Nog14 srs,y
IN CIANCETy - =,
i cosrt, 1919 '"'''s'""' ''"'''-"area
AZ INST ''''''''''''.'....Pianliif,
ri.aaa Boor,r oud y,e,be, yy..,.. -, ,
Ioo"r l, ,, aa ".sPMen trooper aHd George
on me giai.ti6,s ,Intis, ,nS - :: ~ Is.
satisjacriou offEs ,ov,I IN ~. 20 fhs
Hooper et an iAa1faaf Of flis sfofei ~ r nnaa
and decreed That anLes Sc fhs .aJd ~, 20
dppeor here ON or b,,oy, J.g,,s, 49,. .looper sh0eS
seer the plaintiffs EiY me covrt ,.;u 49, az,
10 take the SAM for co1fe,sed as H. "em Pyo,eea
fht matter Thereon dcc0Tdi1eiU Qud thar c,n, 80
ms order be torthnifh inserted In some one 81 he
P1ouc newspapers ~ the city Of Richmond, fer tao
mo"hs successfully and that another copy Be POSTED
ny az JroHt 60ofof me rourlhonse Of fhis Comfy.
"a cOPy' n. ELDRIDGE,jr. ID. &.
Nay 10. 2..usho
NyiRGfNiA.-lf rmleS I0lc,1 ~ 10. cTsr6JS o1i,c a.,
rte superior couyf OF cLo,crr. "a, ms R;4S
nlOHG district fbe 9efh d,n ,r 1,sj 90 Wv "'@"
George Observation-Disclosures. - .'f pn;,,;T
AGAINST
Jeremiah .BArronS, Patrick Coutfs 4 f)t;s ms,
"PS &C.,. .......... .Defendans
nc SJt"auH' Jeremiah BE'foary, not hagiRc en-.
~" ms appearance anu gtuen security according
tofHt "ct ~ 6SSeMOty ana TIE rules 81 fhfx ron,J