Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1819-10-15

S""tfS oPi"tF.......... Plainttu.
yrsasra Ea,aonds, nido.e Of E,ies 6d,nonds. dee.
RaiPA hdAr0HdS, fracces 4. Cascack, Beh)aRtia
HaGdg amt jrtstfa II. his rife, Addison Hal and
ronds, HHtisns ha@onds, RoGs,s faanoads EtisG-
6efh hahnoHfs, Philip EdAHoXds, Margaret ~ Ed-
1his day came the piaistie By his ccaDs'f ard the
defe'id0Ht IfAan Spider not hdUiDe snfcrsahts ap.
re r1fes ~ this eoart and appearing 20 TIE safs-
JactlOn critic c0it that ne HOs an inhd6ifont Of
fhs sta;e On ths motion Of the pioifif 6y his come
Stt as ordered, ihaf fhe said dcte"d0ns do appear
here on thsthird Monday ia october neIf and ans,r
.he OIL the pfaintg oWdt hat copy ~ This order
De lorth9uh inseTtedm me hhq11cT, p1biish.d M
me city " Richmond. fer faro months successfully,
and also posted at tae ont door Of me conrAoUse u
fh'S coanty. 4 coPg-Icsfe.
st..@sG' - ". p9BRER, ID. e.
VIRGINIA; AT superior court of chancery holden
al Tue capitol 10 The city of Richmond the 2sih day
OF January, 1875
Christopher rompkins, IT, and Rebecca his wife. for
merry Kebecca Parrar, John w. Farrar, jefferson
Sman executor OF John Swami, deceased, who iuteg
married WIN Polly Fariar, and Reb.eca FarTar idow
oi John Farrar. ec'd..................f iaiati6s
Peter 7. farrar, executor Of John Farrar deceased
Thomas Porter aud Lunon Bishop. :. DrJcndanfs
ms canse came on this day To he heard on the bill
tue answer OF the Defendant Peter 4. Farrar and sx
hblts and as tn the defendant Thoas Porter ON tho
decree nisi taking The bill for confessed which appears
10 nave been duly executed, aud the defendant
Lunon Bssp, by publication in the mode prescribed
by law. against absent defendants and wa. areuedb by
counsel: ON consideration whereof. The CONT doih
ofdef that the defendant Peter r. Farrar render an nc
count OF his administration estate Of his
before commissioner of the court who Is dered 10
examine state and settle the same, and IT. axe report
thereo to The court with any matter specially stated
deemed pertinent by himself or which MAJ be reoured
by the parties to be SO stated.
Acopy-Teste, W w. HsNiNG. C. c.
Commissioners tD5ce, Richmond, 9fh Uo. "a 1910.
The parties interested are desired To take notice iba,
have appointed the % day OF the I2ih month fDe,,n,
eeD next 10 commence the accounts directed by The
FOREGOING order OF the court, which day nj O'clock
A. ~ they are required at my Office in this
city, wh the necessary documents, ready for exalua
lion aud settlement.
i2..uSw' AMOS LADD NJ c.
NlkoiNlA 1T a court htfd for (he,fe rfrld csuil.
~, az me cenTf hO"se, 9" the ath day If -1Hguses
Samuel LocAeH................... plaintiff
JACOB t1Ournoy- also, Hdfthew Hist,ee and Rugh
al. MUIR, JdAiiRistrato1s 81 samuel .yi-er decd
. Delendans.-In an lnjnncton.
Oh the motto" q ne plaintiff, and 10 aIpearisgto
tie Satisfaction " tie that the de jehdanf Ia
coo itoHrnoy, is nor inhd6ifant Of tis Lo,n,aon
tedith sRd thar process cas,,ot be serpra nyo M.
re corrf doth oracr tie said de,sndans
rtomr"oy, do dPPear here, on the second JIonday
siOc security according 10 ne a1t OF 1sseU,bi,r
'Did me rHtes 81 ibis court that n COPY offhis
order inserted Ia some pn6Hsh.
&" Mthe cHy0 RtcAAOnd for ttUO months SHccesspeiy
"Hd th"t another copy De posted at tie front alor OF
dasS. A Couy-T,,fe
3. ". POINDEX7ER, u. q, C. e.
otPetMLtl- "a. 40. .nsr
ohEN.Ehl la rowliataa County court Sept
Robert denunn.. ...,.......,..........P Plaintiff
David Street, Thomas Gordon, John Street BENJAMIN
Do"dy, francis Watkins, Henry Lipscomb Billy
Lipscohh, Francis Bransoid, and William c. Bryant.
This day came the paintinby john W. hisn esquire
us attorney aud 1t appearing 10 the satisfaction OF the
court thai tie deeudani David Sueeis not AN nhabi,
ant Of this state; is therefore decreea ana ordered
That The said David Sweet do appear beie on or befe
The third Thursday in December next and answer The
plaintiffs bill, and give security Tor petiurmnc such
oecee as ihe cou may make berein aud that copy
OF this order forthwith inserted in some newsuautr
ma In
Two months successfully and that anutLer COPY lie
posted up uie front door Of The courthouse OF MS
county on Two successive DAYS pIeA Ious TO ih
SAID th9d Thursday IN December Hexl. 4O..wSw-
COPY. .les,e ". S. DANCE. Clerk.
NcHANCEki....At a coGrt Of Quafie,iy session,
day OF JHly 1910
William Bethany and Ann his wife,. plaintiffs,
AGAINST.
Sally ranore, Minerva raImore, Eyelina Palinore
ana Joseph palnore, infants, by George Holman their
guardian, John Gutbr and Name, his wife, John Pal.
more John Angea ana Polly his wife, Stephen Novel;
aud judith his wife aud Charles Pslmore Ue(,ndanks
appearing to Tue Satisfaction court thai the
defendant Charles PaImore an nhabant OF this
commonwealth ORDERED, That he appear here on OF
before the 4h Monday October next 10 .hew cause
II any he can, why certain real property lying in The
county OF Cumberland belonging the estate Of Eliza
beth Parore deceased should moi be sold in order 10
division among the persons entitled thereto andtai
copy OF this order be inserted i'll som. newsoanrr
printed IN the city OF Richmond Tor two months sue
ceseiNey. 3S..WSw
copy-Teste, RID. MONTAGUE. pc.
VIRGINIA: Al "a Superior Corlt eli chance1y holden
day of June. 1919
EDWARD AhiDier...'.... ..Pi0iati6,
Abel J.. Upshur administrator will, the will annexed
OF Thomas Wilson, dec. Littleon Upshur and MARY T.
MS wife, Thomas Mann Randolph, jr. aud Harriet his
VIE, Charles l. winghed, and Eliza ms wife Harold
l. Wilson, Ihonas V. Wilson, aud Anne s. Wilson. an
lniant by Ihona. slann Randolph il. her guardian,
which said Mary V. Harriet Eliza, Harold l. Thomas
v. ana Anne D. are children aud heirs the said Tho
I Abel g'i P tS sge ; VIM; ~, esmasn
Iho has wilson, dec LueioD upslnr, ard Mary " his
wife, honas Mann Randolph, r and Harriet his NJ.
Charles l.. WingBeld, and Eliza his wife, Harold L. VII
son, Thomas V. wilson, and Anne S. Wilson, an infant
by Thomas Mann Randolph, j.. her fT..md which
SAID Mary V. Harriet, Eliza, II; old l.. Tho,as v and
Anne $. are children and heirs Of the said Thomas
wilson, dte...''... ....''................PL1S.
william Thompson, Thomas Dunn william Guard
Mathew Beaumont, and " lillian Dunn. Dfyt
Use sahe. .'''''''''''.'''..'........ ..PLDS.
samuel Travis, and The president and masters or pr,
lessons OF William aud Mary College. DeJts
Abel p. Upshur, admir-. with the will annexed Of Tho.
These causes came OF this day he heard together
me rs on The papers formerly read second ON The
bis, answers and exhibits the third fourth by con
sent on the bills and answers were gned by conn
sell ON consideration whereof, the doth order
mat one OF The commissioners rst an aeconnr
OF The monies, debts and Effects Of lillian Thompsor
defendant IN The second suit in the hands Thomas
Hunn and William Moore, defendants in The same suit
VINO ATE directed to render snch account before
Tue commissioner and whom he is authorized TO eXa
nlhe III solemn iOm touching The also the atnot
hne by the defendant William Thorn on the eonttact
win The paInlins lesatOr. Thomas Wilson, in the bill
mentioned, secondly Of the balance due ON
Tie contract of lie said Thomas Wilson the testaoT OF
Tue defendants III Tie ITst sIl to Edward Amber ihe
piaIhiIh m that suit, thirdly of tie ba.
aGce due 10 Samuel Travis and The president and mas
teTs OF professors Of iiaIn Mary College resp,c.
lTely, defendants, IN the ibrd salt, by The tesiatOr of
Tue plaintiffs ~ thai suit, and foTTiy, the due
from The estate Of The plaHtiG In
the fourth suit aud the said commissioner is directed
10 fepei TIE same to tie court, with any matters spe-
an r1f
may We required by The parties 10 he stated
CopJ-Tesie, WIN. W. HENlNG, &C
alntlaL u IL ll...I..