Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1819-04-06

,.sassna ,dnliars. or any o'te s"1 teal nsh get
missioner hos no wnbu IN "oNi.dgc, ANY 9th
ca statement or report ,baG tt bic. has
10 The count.
beg leave 10 refer ins former affidavit Gied in this
ease, dated on the s,h OF i.nariy isio suG
~ uue aud thh 4 wasinsde The vesy ueNt DAY ATE
received TIE hrstlas'na"n OF ", bein. charged vii,
havii, tone an act c proptiety ard hcfo;r saw Il.
report, &c suy other paper i",,rntd ~ cominss,n
ca; Ahtithitp fitiLL.af.
Sworn to = cssa court. : aie'itaa rrc.;sua, The
afti oiJsnnap, 1873. wv. u. HtsiNG 4. c.
n.svr madt ANY other clsr or rroin,ss of ,o,,utn.
sa'ion tbastra o. liberal lee tor toe independent Ser.
vices whth conceived be re1rired ty ,,, 90 mar
iicniar sam, was mentioned ARCn'D fFriLiNn.
S~orp to in open court tie 2Iih DAY OF January
as AN answer to the 18th in,eirosai'ry.
wv. W. HgNING.
1gfkc attorney CeUerot.
L. DO you adsete To the siateipsnts made bv vo,
son IN soar ,e'tt aud supplemental rrao.t mad. in
tie case OF wili,anOn AVID Fi-.iand as enniar,r m.
uus rea'i'e TO What passed he,aeen yomrss and Nj
- aud 49, So
2. DMMr rreeland oirer yon airy particular sum for
services he wiah-j p-if.rn and r,s !, ~, 49,
ssentef his success in The caase? ~
-f''sweJ Z. tie iSfihie1rngofo,y.- do.
70 the 2a-Mr freeand twice ir,i.tiuntd The snm
,rat he thought he orsi:t 10 recover, and tvicr
o'ercd to drice that SUN 1t wSad stale N. ac
count IS 10 recover hhscA nthc arsi men
which he proposed TO eitiGe WITH me.
Aterrogataries propcH,see 10 Commissioner. Brses,
~ nc c0Hn,sf FOR Dir. r,.e.unu.
ne counsel iJi ktchlnad Ffetlahh Esvng obiecte
the eAanlii.aiu ~ Nj Brycr ia court, a;.r Mr. NEE
lasd had answered the AteTogatuiiss pronounced to
hiin, ad his objection hein. oyefTn!ed the conn
beng determined b. the couit hear te cxaui, aiio
OF Mr. Byce, provisIonaiiy, subject all rxceptinu
hereafter asaed the follow Ing question: st INSISTING
or his Objection 10 the examination Mr. 81, cc in
court.
In your statement TO the court, yon say, as under.
staud yon that AZ the lasi lime when Mr. Feeiana made
his proposition to you vhieh have set forth Mr.
FTce'2nd discovered something In your countenance
that Indicated snipiisc- ask why you surprised
al an Offer which, according statement had in
substance been repeatedly made by him you before
-5Hsrer.-Because thought, as had done on the
Other two occasions, that SIR. freeland grossly c
noisnt Of my real Character as gentleman worthy the
trust of this coutt.
InferroeGtory By Dir. Frccl0nd's Counsel
Ild you, or dad spu not, then, in any of ,our
previous conversations with Mr. FTeel.nd in which
you say he made you these Offers express disapproba
ton, or tell biin that his offer Improper ia any
Tesprctf
Ansuer-I did not because innir dately deternin
ed on The course which should take; and because
thonsht Mr. himself SUFFICIENT judge of the inpropr
ety OF ms conduct. Copies este,
WM.M. HENING, G. C.
Extract Prom the OyiciRui Report.
Shonld 1t ne The ple sure of the cont, however 10
" order a new settlement of the whole account which
" ~ Is thought wond be atteKded upetah dif
c"'ileA, our commissioned VIII feel It his duty to ac
" ,Gniesce' -
NJ Is. This extract proves ;hat my request was for a
separate aud dstinc, statement. A. r.