Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1818-09-11

r. CuAScEEN.-in Coceh'snd comfy court, August
10, isis.
Aaron Parrish. PsaiafbE
prndey BeIlamy sud molI, Li. lie. sally Hel.o. YIN
Iribericre aud esis.y his wife. John n. Long and
Polly h,s wife, George W. Psrrish, John p. Parrish
Eii,sheth Parrish, Bshjan,ir BRADSHAW, Carter par
Iisb Turner faiiisb, Nancy Parrish, John Farr and
Lucy his wife, John I. rarf,sh 'arrict Parish and
Thomas Parrish which said lily Beila,ny. sai,v
k-iso, Elizabeth Parrish Carter Parrish Turner par
IRISH, Nancy Parrish, Lucy FAIR, aud John T. Parrish
are chidr.n Of the piaintia; sne Bs,.y kuihsrto.s
ahd Polly Long, are children ct Charity Lawreure
dee. daughter of said plsnii6, aud John T. Parrish
ton sfPaisy Parrish dec. also daughter sa,d pair
TN. aud Harriet Parrish and Thomas Parrish which
said Harriet aud Thomas under The age Of wcnty
one tears and children ." Robert Parrish. dec son Of
This day came the pain,,G, by his attorney and died
bis bill against the defendants the drfsndan,s SAIL,
hciso, VIM Rutherford ahd Bttse, his wife, Elizabeth
farrish. Garter Pariish and John rarr and luey M,
wife no liayis. entered their appear and gwen
cuity according TO the act OF Assembly and the rules Of
this corrt, aud appearing the satisfaction Of The
corit that they are not Inhabitants OF this co,ppnn
wealth ON the motion c the plaintiff. by his attarnrv
Is Crdered That the said absent defendants do ai
pear here Oh thettrd Monday hn No.ernher next and
answer the plaintiffs h and shen cause. il any obey
can, against dividing The slaves the bill mem
toned to be given By the plaintiff, betu cen the de-
shuahis IN tins 's"se according To their respective
rights ana iiata copy of this order be forthwith in.
seies III s"ite ne" sraref published in the city Of Rich.
," TOR Two ,ncnihs ssysy aus tier cop,
"' 'h's county. copy, reste,
wM. MILLER, C. C. C.
eep.. .. 35..w4ws
~ kof.
". ot" AZ nc coiiicf mite city Of Richnynd he
eSsG am.u.r. S"'"ir'ns fo'fner Of U5iiam Bronnc'
%'""Ps"E.. '.......'..............PI Plaintiff,
AGAINST
The defendant, 'eho is ont 81 mis- cc.ntru Gn6
against Whom the pioinfR appears 10 kore .rSrcrocS
~ re nodc pretc'1"ed Oytou os~i,st a6sens deJsn.
danfs MW railing 10 o31sar end cp,uer, on n,otio,
Of ne Psointi8 by counsel TIC coait dctk ,ake lis
6ft for conJcsstd; and The conss coming on 10 Ne
hcord, on the 6'H exhibits and TIE caowinafin ora
ntfness, sras argued By counsel on con,idc, otion
,chcreg ne conrt doth rger the accounts 6rfsecn
tie pofrsto one Of It's co'gmss ioners 10 be b. 6,n
examined, stated, settled The court ,e,o,reg
n1fh any matters specially stated, deemed PERTINENT
by hiUSei, nhich may De required Jy me acrfiss
10 DC Sostcte9. Il COPY. 9esfe.
~. ". HEN1NG, q. C.
Commissioners ONCE, Richnono, sih mo- a5,b. 1919
re parties interested are desired to take nofice
Met iha1e appointed the 2dth 6oyefthe 1914 month
octo0ei) "eif tor commencing me accounts drecsed
oy ne ADORE ordor ~ COURT OF srhich dag az o
S S, IN Their "tieadance is required al my
Jor settling The said accounts.
.. THOMAS LAID. NC
-o 9I-.- 3i..~iw
IN cHAhchRi Al y conIt Dc7d Tor lie county of
Il Lancaster, at The courthouse th,reof on Tuesday
the i7th da, .'f March 1918, va i"''u'!'
Joseph Il. Carter John Lunsfo,d ,,,;r, ,,,o. Al.
h'm OF carter q Luns.oid.. i7ioiufi6s
AGAINST D"'
John Hathaway, admir- of Elizabeth Hathaway, dec and
i'icuaIu fayn ................. DeffqGg- rs,
his day came tie paihuns 10y their coniseI al IN.
defendant John Hathaway not having entered h,, 80
peaTance aud given security according 10 law aud lie
rules OF TINS count, and II appearing the sa ic,ion
VI ,ue court th' he 10 not an mlabiiani this com
menwealh, on the moIion of The piaiItfs by their
counsel, IL is OrGeTc4, That the sand defendant do
appear here on the third Monday in April nexi and
answer the bill OF the patn,is IND IL is further Or
dcre0, hat tue defendant Richard Payne do no, nav
.onyey away, "r seereic the money effects IN his
hahds heonping 10 The olleI defendant John Hatba-
way Until the further order and decree Of this conf
concerning The same snd that copy this order lie
io'hwlth inserted in The Enquirer, published In te
l OF Richmond, for two months and amo
he posted al the front OF The courthouse of ibis
COUNT. J. TowLEs, cir.
" IRGiNIA.-At superior court Of chancsry koI en-
a, Tue Capitol n'Le city OF Richmond. the 9th day
Richardson Henley a posbun,ous infant eliza ofpi,h
atos"h henley dec by Pleasant Haskru his neat
"'. ~. ....''''..'- ........... PIaiatlD,
John hennon, exo Of Richa dson IIenie, des william
tnshson aud J"diih his wife, late judith Henley WI
Cow oil SAID Richardson Hrney, Joseph Bicklsy and
Polly his wife, Wilson Henley and Tarl,ou H,niey
Thomas G. Buckley an infant OF tender Yeas which
saiu !uaui, Joseph hickey, and Polly his wife, VIII
son Henley, Tarlton Henley, aud Thomas O. Blclley
are iesaeeS under the will OF said Richardson Henley
TINS cause eams this day he heal d on lie piu
I'M answers of all the defendants except Wilson Henley
s"huiy eAhbiis and examinations OF Witnesses and was
argued by counsel: On consideration the court
without deciding whether the widow II tie iestato
Of Richardson Henley is 10 be considered as trustee
OF the legacy by that tesiaor her or ny
part thereof for Tie benefit of the infant plaintiff bui
iact IN issue between the open or IA er pooi.
ana future decision, doth order thai the Defendant
JoEH hehhOh, eNo'r OF Richardson Henley dec. render
he'oie commissioner of the cout an accom- of
'he Whoie estate of his tesator; secondly an estimate
oil the amount of tie legacy besnralied to eh,h and
ever esaee OF that testaior; aud thirdly an account of
Tue advansenienis made 10y the trsaior in his life
time, TO his chiidIen any of them and the cour,
coth iuriher order that the defendant John Ken.
non, eNor as aoIes@d do, out of estate of his trs
taor, when he admits by ms Ia lis hands
iofthWth pay TO The guardian of the infant pajptin lie
sum oiionf hundred dollars. for the maintenance al .
SAID piaihtih hitherto and the one hundred dol
iaTs per ahnin for bis maintenance hereafter during
Init
lie party defendants shall ultimately sustain tie t.r
then OF The above allowance, is reserved M the fnst
hea'iuR oi the cause coPy-Tesie,
Wm. w. HENNINC c. c.
commissioners Office, RickL1oHd JeIy !, I,,s
The parties Interested desired To i2Lc notice ,b.J
Lave appointed the 22d day ~ September next for com
mencg The account directed by tho above order of Ls
court, on wbieh day at O'Clock d. their ot,riiou -
requested at Slce in this CITY, witl their accoun,
aud vouchers, ready for examination and settlement
,,., JOHN BRYCE, MIC.
80. %. 25-wtI
NlkGlNIA.--4f a superior court OF cb0ncery IoL.
der al the capitc! in The tify of ri. h,noni fIc
l0fh dry Of J0Hnary, 1878 '
N4chotdS j POiHdeIter 0dmr dc bonis non NTH m,
fohE aHHersd, Of James DGbnsy, dec. :. PLAINTIFF
Thomas drdorSon, error Of Michael 5adeysou 6ec
ara fHCHOTN 1WutTSOH. Uef