Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1818-08-25

yIikGISiA.-At = superior court Of ctanecry ho,sSn
al tue capitol IN the city of Kichmono, the zsth
day of January, lsi1-
Reubin winiIee.. .....................P iaj,rgs
AGAINST
Wiiiam Brown, dec William A. o. Brown, and Mary
Jefferson brown. ths last Of whom infant BY Mar
Brown, nov assished her erarGiau, .DejeRdGafs
ms eahse cam. "n 'his da> 10 DC heard oil the bill
answer, and exhibits and MAS argued BY counsel on
consideration whereof the count doth sdjudse, order
anu decree hatone 90 It's commissioners an ac
count Of the balance due the inJemtuie oi
!eI as an EXHIBIT aad neSe Eeput thereof the count
WIN an. mauets specaiA stated, dteued pertinent Il,
himself ~ ~hlca may be required by the paiivs 20 b.
80 stated. 4 COY lestc
~m W nENING, C. c.
viRGlNiA--At rules held in The cleik's elee of III.
superior court ~ chaGcery for the Richmond district
the 25ih DAY nj April. 1873
RsaDin Winirce. ................... PkafufjG
AGAINST
Cornelius Hutk sheriff o The county Of Chesterfield ard
III tbat CHARACTER auri de hOuis non, With " III
annexed, "I William Brown, deco, William A.. q.
Brown. aud May Jefferson Grown. DeJ.s.danfS.
The sciTr iacias awarded this cause beiur returned
executed on The defendant Cornelius Buck and having
iaueu TO hew cause agantthe revival Thereby sought
court ana the proceedings teIen had between i,cubn
W'nitee pianiiG, and james A. Patterson adm, w,iI,
,ne VIII annexed OF VIM Brown. dee. aud YIN. a. -.
bI"W" ahu May IehttsOn Brown, defendants, stand,
and ne revived Ia the oil the present PARTIES and
Ue an AL hnss IA the same pish, and cOnGition as al
"eueA'h vi tue sa'h Ja"es A. Patterson.
wM. W. RBNING, c. c.
Comm'Ssiqaer'S t6icc Rick4oad, 5th lso. pIst isis
Inc parties interested desired 10 take notice thai
ha.e appointed the 2ist day ofihe 9Ih month (s,nI'r
EeNt 10 commence the accounts direc,d nv H.. v,,hn
oiusf OF The court on which diy min. O'Clock A.
they are required Ia az ny office Ia s cily win
settlement. AMOS iAnD Al GO
Jnly .. IswS,y
NiR6iNiA.--At a chanccIy dlstflct coulI held IN
Williamsburg. OctohtI ~. 1917.
Judih Rochelle and William Butts and Nancy his wife
an" "I'''h Johnson. ..,............ Plaintiffs,
AGAINST
Thomas Gillian. Observation-Disclosures. Defer1ont
vi tue mOttOG OF the plaintiffs nd
sons appearing to the court IL is Ordered That the
defendant do appear here on he mrs, da, OF he
''ei ne sbai rave been served with copy this order
and shew cause, il amy he cai why the order
herein The NTH day OF June last should be set aside
anu '"e Sdute ieIhslateu. copy, Testc,
Juiy2,. so ~ 'Ssn ~; T.
NiRGlNfA.--At a superior court OF cbancsII 6oIoc,
OF February, ~ j.. O va VA!
Richardson Henley, pOsthWmous infant child of Rich.
1870, "e'e|, zee. 10y Pleasant Hackett his next
h'ehu-..''.'.... .'........-...........P iaiHffr
AGAINST "'
John Kcnnon exo'r OF Richardson uepe, der ,y,,,i.
hushsoh andJndnh his wife, late Judith Henley wi.
dow OF said Richardson Henley Jo.eph Bickley aud
POLY his wife, wilson Henley and Tarlian Henley
Thomas e. Buckley, infant Of tender wears When
said Judith, Joseph hickey and Polly Ills wife vii
son iien!ey, Iariton Henley. aud Thomas g. Buckley
are iegatees under lie wi OF said Kcardsos HENLEY
ctc.......... Observation-Disclosures. pPCrp,'0DfC
This cause came iiis dry he heard on The bilI
the answers Of all the defendants except Wilson epiey
unuIy eAhIbts anu examinations OF witnesses and was
argued by COUNSEL ON consideration whereof te conf
WITHOUT Oecldlng whether the widow of The sstator
OF i,chatdsOh henley, Is 10 be considered rs ,stee
OF e legacy by That tes,aor 10 her hegueahed or any
part tlefcot, for the benefit Of the infant p,anif hut
hehlnS 10 leave that aud all Other points of in, .rJ
'act ii lssHe betw cen the parties further
ana intufe decision, doth order that the det,,an,
J"Lh hehnon, sNOr Of RichaI Hsmley dec render
betJre commissioner OF the court first. an acccuut f
ln- whole estate of his tesator secondly an estira
OF tAc amount OF The legacy bedneathed to each and
every t2Iee OF that testator; andthrdy AN acrou. NJ
the adNaiSCcnis made by the tesiator In his lii,
unie TO ms children, OF them and the c6nrt
dolh further order that the defendant John Ken
non eNo'r as aforesaid, do OF the estate of his les
tailor which he admits by his to be IN his hands
fo'ihwth pay to the guardian of the piant tb
sum oiIouT hundred ccr.s for The maintenance of Tho
said plaintiff hitherto, and tie Of one hundred doI
iars per aniihm for his maintenance hereafter during
the tendency of this suit bat the question hch of
The party defendants shalt ultimately sustain Tie hrr
thea of the above allowance IS reserved IN HE na
AeaI rag OF Tie cause. copy Tcste,
WIN. W. HENNING. C. c.
ComnisSioaeT'S Office, Eichmoad. .Jtsfy "a Isls
ihe parties Interested are desired lake notice ila
nave appointed The 22d day Of september next for com
mencg the account directed Icy the atoye order Of die
court on which day 1t . O'Clock a. NJ their attention ia
requested at my sice III this city, With their accounts
ana vouchers, ready for examination and settlement
~ JOHN BRYCE, NJ. c.
1nly ~. 25-wif
n Office Is hereby given that the cells m IL urat
Hospital in The city Of Williamsburg approDrifed
Tor male patients, al and fhst uo