Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1818-09-15

said Harriet and Thomas under The age twenty.
one years and children OF Robert Parrish dec sen Of
This day came the painuf by his ation,ey, smdGied
ks bill against The defendants and the defendants Sally
keso VIM. Rutherford aud Betsey his wife Elizabeth
Parrish Carter Parrish, and John Fart aud Lnc, his
wife, not having entered their appear ance and
cnriy uecofdingio the act of Assembly the rules OF
this eonrt and it appearing 10 the satisfaction tb.
court that they rot Inhabitants Of this coni,uou
wealth ON the motion OF the piainif by his aorner
III IS Ordered, That Nh. said absent defendants do a,-
pear here the third Monday N No, emher next ane
answer the plaintiffs bill and shew Cause if any ,he,
can, against dividing the slaves IN the hit ne
toned To be given up b. the psiutG he,u cen tie de-
PENDANTS IN this according their respective
rights aud that copy Of This order be forthwith
ssr,e" IN soe newspaper published in the cit, of kith-
h"nu LOT Two months succt ssvely ant that
be forthwith posted the roni courthouse
wM. MILLER, c. c. c.
NikGiNiA--sf 50 erior coaTl - chancery Ecl
De-, at nc coTtot III the cay Of Ricl.acnd, The
Boyd Miller, SURFING pa,fTer Of UNiiam Brouse
o contrary. .'''.........'........... paiutis,
Stctn"9tr SHARP. .................D efcna MT
Tie dejenaant, rho is omt Of mis- c0rrsT-v. ana,
against 'sL"m The Pt0iW appears 20 haze qfccecne
ia TIE mote prescribed iao agamst absent 6sfen
ddntS St'H fiiiiag 10 az po0r and 0aSner on sactio
q ne ptai9 oy counsel, The court Goth take rs
a'H JOT co'ycsSed ana Ire coming on 10 BE-
heard or ne dit eIhidits, ana the esan1etion Of
nitness, gas Gre"ed 6s counsel consideration
,eFerecj me co'st dcfh TJsr tie accounts 6etee,,
the PoTtosfo ore OF IT'S comaissoners 10 be BE- H.
ehan"e' StGtf6, settled, ana 10 The court reported
~"k ""g asdfte'S specially stated deemed pejtiacnt
% himself or 'ohich 'e &c required oy ne parfies
III. y. HEN1NC, Z. G.
commissioners oa:c f.clm:ad st mo a,,, 1919
nc Parties interested desired 10 take uofjce
that h"ae appointed the 2Gth eay e(fhe IOfh ,ronfh
6y Ire ADORE order 81 c0urJ on r,bJch 49, go
o aS 80 ~ ths'r aneeanee Is required at my
J0r SctfliEg tar said accounts.
THOMAS LApD, NJ.
seT. :, al..wlw
VifotEiA.At rnies holden in the CLERKS oG7ce -,
the superior c6ancery ior the Richo
district. ihe 18th DAY of July, 1873.
heuiy PLAINTIFF
AGAINST
Solomon ". Winchester and WIN. Anderson mercbsr,,
and paiinets, trading under the firm OF Wnchestrr ~
Andersen, and Asa aud Joseph OTIS. :. DcJrnS1nTs
The defendants Winchester and Andersen not bavino
entered their appearance aud given secuTit, sccoIdin
I" The act OF Assembly aud The rules this con and
appearing by satisfactory evidence that tbey are
MAINTAINS oil this country, is Ordered That the sai
defendants do appear here nrs day of the nsx,
term ana answer ihe bill otihe plaintiff and thai a
c"pj OF tins order he forthwith inserted In some news
paper published in The city of Echmend two nop,bs
successvey and posted at the front door ofthe capitol
Sept H. s1..vsw v wM. W. ssf GrNrvc 6 .
IN ChANCiRl.A court held for the county Of
y Lancaster, al the courthouse thereoI on Tuesday
the 18th day of March 1878.
Joseph A. Carter and John rnsfoId acting under An.
urn OF ea'tei Lundfoid.......... PLAINTIFFS,
John Hathaway, admir- sf Elizabeth Hathaway dec and
n nicea,u rayne. Defendaafs.
defendant John Hathaway having entered his an
pearance and gwen security according 10 law and The
Iiss OF ihs court and II appearing 10 The satisfaction
OF the court that lie Is ihhabtant of this com
monwealh ON the motion OF the plaintiffs by their
counsel, III Is Ordered That the said defendant do
appear here an the ihiTd Monday in ApTil next and
answer the bill oi the plaintiffs ARd IL is irficr o..
dero6, That the defendant Richard Payne do not paw
convey away, or secTete The money effects IN his
hanns heiongng TO The other defendant John Hatba.
way. nn ,hs farther order and decree OF Ibis conTs
concerning The same; and that copy this order he
forthwith 9ssried in the Enquirer, published in The
G5 OF fcmond, ior two months snrcrssiyeIy and ano.
/ lS fro dnnF aft la
county. l. ToWIEs ~,
August IA. 2swSv
NIRGiNiA-At superior court Of CHANGER, hoi. ~,
al the Capitol III the city OF Richmond The Glib Gav,
| oi February, I9B. -
Richardson Henley posibumous infant child of RicL-
ardson Henley, dec. by Pleasant Racket his nryt
PidiIIfif,
John kennon exo'r OF Richardson HeaI., dec wii,u
HHghson andJudtb mis- wife, late Juait Henley WI
COW OF said Richardson Henley, Joseph Buckley and
Polly his wife, Wilson Henley and iqrl,en Hrr;,,
Thomas 6. Buckley, ~ infant Of tender Years wheb
SAID judith, Joseph hickey and Polly his VIE. vii
son Henley, Tar!ton Henley, and Thonas G. piSsisr
are iesa'ees under The will Of said Richardson Hebsy
This cause cam: o. lii. asr r. ~ DtendSnts
s answers OF all the defendants except Wilson Henley
sundry EXHIBITS and examinations witnesses and WA
asned ny counsel On consideration whereof the court
without deciding whether The widow Of ihe testai5
oi Richardson Henley - 10 he considered as trustee
part thereof, for the benefit the infant psintG hnt
Intending To leave that and all points Of law aud
aac9 IN issue bew &c" Ihe parties open for further p,eofs
A
John kenBcS, eNor OF Richardson Henley der ;krIsr
before commissioners of the court first A. accouut AZ
ihe Whole aaie of his teStatOr secondly an csms,s
oil The amount of the legacy beqneathed to eec and
every legaee Of that testaor thirdly an accoput 4
The a6NaTGelents made by the said teStator in bts 10
tlmeJ 10 MS Children or any of them and the rou,s
] doih further order that The defendant Jobn Kew
non, eAor as 2oTesad do out Of the estate OF his ties
taior, which he admits ny his answers TO be in his bands
forthwith paw To the guardian the infant uIani TIE
sum Sfour hundred dollars for The maintenance 81 tie
sara plaintiff hitherto and the SUN OF one hundred a.
lars PEI amman Tor his maintenance hereafter dutinr
Tue pendency VI this suit but the GnesoIi when If
ihe party defendants shall ultimately sustain The bur
men oI The ABOVE ALLOW znce, reserved t lie 6las
| he"lhe OF I'VE cause copyTeste,
| <,, WIN. w. BENNING, C. c.
| CO'HmisSioHe''s fl6Hcc, Richsqoa9, ynfy "a Jsia
bbe paties Interested desired take notice thai
nave appointed the god day of September next for corr
nencbg the account directed above OF der OF HE
court, on Which DAY at O'Clock A. NJ their attention h
requested at my sifce in this city with their accounts
and vouchers, ready for examination ard settlement
! $50. JOHN BRYCE,M.C
wv! o.. 2j-wtf
N/iRGiNiA.5t rSes h0kasn IN ne cTeTSIs o56cS 40
the superior coaTf NJ ch0RceryJ for tLe Fic6,,o1a
| district. Tbs l5fh dGg ~ JVfy, 1918.
Henry FoHdtet6H and hary his HiCe..... PIain,ifs
| ACAKST
| James ~. Norris, error Of Samuel Orertou 5ce,,
SAINT OterfO1, TesiduaTy dsy.see oCfLe sgd Sa.ss
OperfoW, dee. and Richard Oterfo,i and Iamss
tVIt Defendants.
The dejeRdaHtS Rich0rd OUertoR aud James ore
ton not haCing eHfered their 1fpearaBrc 1gd zinc,
security according 10 me act Of assembly AMI he