Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1817-10-14
August 20.


CHANCEIl.-United States Court Filth Circuit
n ana virginia District, December 18th, 1915
Apher Nash, surviving executor of John Nash IT, decea
co. "hs was surviving executor Of John Nash the ek
der, deceased, PIainfif
AGAINST
James Robert and Thomas Donald & Company, JohnBih
nps, administrator of Tscharner Degratienredt decea.
SEQ, Thomas Vaughan and John MurChe,
The defendants Jas. Robert and Thomas Donald Co.
filed their ameuded Answer to Which the plaiutif remit
edgenefay tlerenpon, the cause to be heard
on the Record from the Superior Court of Cbancery the
s OF heylyoT Answers thereto Of all the defendants
the Court being of opiuon, that after the exDiration
OF the partnership Of James Robert and Thomas Donald
& Co. Robert Donald had power to bind the other
members of the frm by any partner n is
Deeroed ana Ordered, that the of
Tue Court examne state and settle the between
the parties according to the principles of this Decree
stsng specially such matters either party may REQUIRE
including the said auy monies that the plaintiff
may have received his claim since the insL
tuition OF this su and that report OF in Oh
DER TO a fnGi decree. =
Acopy-Tesfe, ED. JEFFRIRs, Clerk.
Commissioners Ofiee,l
Rtchp1ond, 7fh no. Sd, 1917.
The parties Interested are desired to take notice. that
nave appointed the 2sth day OF The 10th Month ocobrr
next cushing the date hereof for commencing the "a.
counts directed by the above Dsereta order ofhe Court
ON which day at O'clock q. NJ their attendance re-
all other necessary papers and documents relating there
TO- THOMAS LADD, ~. @.
- Augusl 20. 32-wsw'
N cHANCERY.-E1gta,sos County Court, SepfcT 4
IL Der 22d, 1917
Samuel T.. Norris, PLAINTIFF
Robert DSrreH, HHIk~ TYmSertaks and 7obtOs
TIE de(endsat DvryeH net havi,r entered nc an,
P6ara1ce and gip6H security according the act Of s
SeDIbty and the rules Of this Court and arpearing
90 The sGtisGctiOn Of ne Court that eS not an iHha
bifdat Of fhis COmHioUueGih-oa the motion of fbe
pfGinff BY his counsel IL is Ordered That the said
dctfRdaHt Dnfyet do appear here bejore the 4A
boHday iH December Herf aud tie Flainti6's
biLt and that COPY efthis Ordtr tf iaSoyfedR SSpe
newspaper printed The CITY Of Richmond Jor fao
months sEccessgety, and posted at Ihe FROM door az
courthouse Of the said county.
II copy Tcs,e,
IN CHANCERY.-At a Court bcId fsf Cur 6e1and eoTTs
4 ~, the 22d day Of March, 1917
George carson, Pioinf6.
James o. CruD,p De6,yyoyf
The defendant not having entered bis appesrSuee and
gwen security according the Of Assembly aud the
rules Of this Cou aud appearing the satisfaction Of
this Courttha heis notan inhabitant OF this Common
weathon motion Of tie plaintiff by his counsel, II is
Ordcre6 that the said defendant do appear here atJnno
court next and answer the plaintiffs bill aud that copy
OF this order be forthwith inserted IN soipe Of the
newspapers printed City Of Richmond and another
copy posted at the front door Of the Courthouse this
county.
eOpy-7este,
MILLER wsoDsoN. IT, y. c.
TN cHANcERY.-flpeanna County Court, SeDfea.
y her RID, 1917
Robert Liadsag. Plaintiff,
AGAINST
Joseph Uiison and ycsse kun, Defendants.
The 1,k0infi6 biHbcing This day fiea opd he ne
eHddHt UiLsOR not hdUiug entered lis JBearoHcs md
ciyeH security, according tothe 9cf IF 9ssembig ard
the rules offkis Court and appearing TO tie suits
ocfton " the COHrtfh0t ne Is not or iRhobOUf mn
CO,1mOHue0ith-on the motion If tie pioifib BIZ h.s
counsel II ordered Thaf IRE said aeJe5slf no 0p
peor here jCfofs the Ifh H0nd0V ia Drseu beJ
neat and cnsysfr the PLAINTIFFS LH, 0Hdfh0f copy Of
this Otdey be Inserted ~ DelcsyQYey Jgipfed ~
tie city Of Richmond for f1o months sVcccssiUeig 0ad
Posfes al the font door the courthouse gf s sai<
county.
4 copv--Tesfe,
J0HN 7IsfB EgLIKE. c. r. c.
October 10. f5.usR