Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1817-04-11

.
lion, and that Lord James Murray ~
called in and examined TO the fact siate.I
iii the address.
Lord J. Murray was then called TO H..
bar and in answer TO certain question
pnt to him by the Chancellor of the r.
chequer. Mr.. Curwen, MIR. Wynue ara
some other members, stated, that heis
Lord of the Bedchamber to the Princa
Regent, and was iii attendance on HI.
Royal liighBess in the carriage on th.;s
passage from the House of Lords ~,
their return, between Carleton House ana
ST. James,, the glass oftlle-caniage Wa
fractured 1t was the glass or the prn
ce's left hand The fracture appeared ~
be produced by two bullets, for round "
perfumes had been made in the glass. ana
the remainder of il was not broken. h
had not the slightest doubt that ti,e. ir,c
ture was caused by bullets. About am;
mute after this happened, very lar".
stone was thrown at the other glass. and
three or four other stones with yre,.
violence; he had examined the first 9lass
that was broken infinitely; there was No
crowd near the carriage at the time I'm,
II pistol had been fired with gunpowd,r
the person firing it, he tlinks, must har,
been recognized; lie supposcs, as no 70.
port was heard by him, they might com.
from an air gun. There were no bullets
found In the carriage; he supposed thew
were shot from some one ofthe frees ~,
opposite glass was up, it was not hroke
at all; lie got out of the carriage irnm.d;.
ately after the Prince Regent: did NJ,
search the carriage, nor did he knou
whether any bullets were found nv
bottom of it. The Master OF the Uor"e
was IN the carriage; spliniers ofthe ylass
were found: the stone which struck tho
opposite glass, did not enter the carriaa"
The glass was very thick %
IN answer TO question from ord MI.
ION. the witness said, that his ROYAL High.
ness sat IN the middle, between the Mac.
ter OF the Horse and the witness. Tho
stone smashed the window, and pounded
the glass, which was remarkably fb;cl
There was fooiman and a Life Guards
man by the side of the carriaye Wo
could not say whether the supposed bul-
lets perforated any part of the carriage.
The witness having withdrawn. Nlr'Van.
siitart conceived thai no farther inform.
ton could be necessary, after the testima.
ny they had just heard, 10 induce tile
House to concur in the Address.-Heor
heGr!-ife therefore moved that the Adj,
dress he read.
The Address was then read. TO the fol.
LOWING cite. t We, your ROYAL Hirh.
neSs's duiiful and loyal subjects, the Com
mons House ofParliament, beg leave hum
bly, to express our adherence of the QUIZ
rage offered this day 10 the person of
YOUR Royal iighuess, and regret that
iher: should be found person in these
hominions capable of committing so dar-
Ing ana 1ia2itlous an act. 1t is the ear
ta.c ,E r.. al 4 = n,
III which they must be joined by all de-
Royal Highness would be pleased TO di.
rect such measures TO be taken. rs should
lead TO the apprehension of the author,
and abettors of the outrage"
The Address was then agreed 10. ,eu
con.
Mr.Vansittart gave notice that he should
Tomorrow move for vote of thanks 10
Lord Mora, for his conduct in India:
d on Monday TO Lord Viscount Exmouth,
Tor his gallant conduct at Algiers.-Ad-
journed.
HOUSE OF LORDS.
Wedlest'Gy, Jan. 20.
AT two O'Clock the House met. and y
great number of Peers attended TO carry
up an Address voted last night. during
The exclusion of strangers, conpratulatin9
the Prince Regent on his proviiential es.
cape from the atrocious assaults of some
disaifected individuals in ST. James's
Park, on his return from the II. of Lords
yesterday.
The Lord Chancellor adjourned tie
tiouse TIL 5 o'clock, and then their Lord
ships proceeded TO Carleton House with
the Address.
ed. '1
The Lord Chancellor stated. that tlIe
House had waited on lie Prince Regent
with The Address ofCongratnlation voted
Yesterday, TO which his royal hichness had
been pleased TO return The following era-
cIonS answer:
This additional proof of vour LOYALTY
ana attachment affords me the highest
satisfaction. Relying on the affections
OF tie greatest part of his Maiesty's sub
Jects' have nothing 10 regret but breach
OF the laws. | have ordered that The per-
sons concerned ia that daring OUTRAGE,
should be brought before the proper trib.
unais. Ordered 10 be entered on the
Journals
REGENTS SPEECH.
the Earl { Dartmouth regretted that
II had fallen TO his lot to bringthe REGENTS
speech under the consideration of the
House. He praised fhe zeal and in,renii-
NY OF the attack or Algiers, which ol,Iig-
co me Dey to renounce forever the cruel-
" OF making christians slaves. In the
East. the exertiOns of the forces. second
ing the plans of the Governor General,
mai been crowned with success. OF tbe
internal state of the countrv we had some