Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1817-03-18

ihiis. II tlfes Shrii serve 10 correct Any ef-
roiS into which we may have fallen, il /. bat
doing him thar Justice which every press owes
even To its most inye.erite eueny.---fgstmyi
h'r. Y. ought 10 be the last man ia t'ie void
10 complain ot tho ceu'iuct oi his political cue
iri">; Tor wkat OBJ oient bias spa, ed2 whom
las lc not dashed with the whip a. sroryirnss
tu.hi ic Ia complain ct aSpcritN. WHO i,,s
sl'ettn 81 much OF itiovagds Others An enc
ny. l'owcver much we ma! blame LIS gene
tdi nottcat course, YET tbs ~ unqGesunndOis
10. tlC time when we vOa!i take i,ienS.re in
woni'ding hs feelings, row When he is about
counting the shade, Of IctireHiCnt HOW when
n'S own aSrerities 40 wearing away; wien
he SO lately surprised aud delighted as BY lis
m~@naninitv III commend.ng James Madison:
snh ny The todc in which he has spoken Of
scfnr at his other political opponents, we
should I've luta .i.iced 10 rc.us. NJ, iusticc--
we shop u he 10 ii to wound his tceiin.,s--M a
wish all the health which he needs. and all the
Happiness which he seeks in retirement.
BONUS ELL.
"on Friday, Che 7th OF Feb. Mr.2pndoi;h in
very bad health, a;tendei in his place in Tie
Snmed. by Mr.. Calhoups bin Oh tic subject Of
Roads and Canals, which il was expected.
would be- decided on that LAY.
AZ a late hour; the motion for the indefinite
postponemcnt OF the bHl being under discussi-
"n Mr.. Randolph moved adjournment
which was lost. lie then voted AGAINST the
Indefinite poSfrontmeut, IL is to he PRESUMED.
terause 1T does not racet aquesiion, a coI,stiiu
hir 0ecanse he wished 10 deliver his sentiments
which yet he had moi lone, on the bin. 'Ih,,
niotionto nostpone indefinitely being lost tie
| !icnSe adjourned
on The heSt dav, Mr.. Randolph smoke al
| considerable .eugtb Ia IMPOSITION To the bill
| re sail THAI lie Should not discuss the cops,i
| 'ntionns question becau-e lie was ind:sposeJ
! 10 very the patience az Tie hoise by repet.
| ton al second aiid thirl hard Of the rcpefiti.
! tous of Others. THAT branch OF the siihiect
| 'lti been worn tlireaibare l,rt he laid i,
! uoWn as princ'pie moi 10 be contested, illa,
| The tcderal constitution, being delegation
| ~ specified poweis was strictly limited l.,
the terms OF Fthe grant, which could be coz
| StTued 10 convey nothing IN the grantees hat
what could he clearly shown in the hody of tie
| %Tantitseif sand lie declared IL to he his opin
ON mat ~" person who entertained constitt
! iiohri dfuht up"u That or any other prOpoSisi
| tion coming before Congress, could conscieu
tiorsly give it his support
! ANKBiIL
| When Mr.. K. took his seat IN CONGRESS il
January, 1911, the discussion on the question o.
| renewing the charter of the Old bank ofihe It
| y. was at an end in The House OF Ecnrespnta
t,veS, When amoti1n TO POSTPONE indefinitely
me proroS ton fer "A renewal OF that charts
was made Aganst that proposition Mr. r. al
| so voted, probably for the reasons suggested a
move The motion topostpone indefinitely be
ing carried atfImatively, the question was pu
, TO s.eep IN the House. The proposition to 70
new il,e charter in the Senate failed. bv II,
casting vote of Mr.. Clinton, the Vice. Prosi
| dent
During the 1t session ofthe last I.th
Con .ress on the state Of the nation. Mr. Ran
do'phdeiivered his opinions very mich at iarr,
on the subject Of fhe BaGA question We *
ed, whether Tie President rpuld instif, his ~
co'Dnendation Of tfemcasure, q, MS approba
ton OF It, upon any principle that could no
| eHuhsiv support him IN approving re-enact
Inent OF the sedltou Law, in case such hi,
should pass the two Houses ofCongrcsss Tha
II ue8hnk Law had been recognized Nv sub
seGuent acts Of Congress AMI adiniicafiuns q
tue Soqfis 50 had ihe Sed{tion Law, whic
Congress bad refused Ia repeal on The ne tition
and rernonStrdnces Of large norton OF Ire 4
inHrcan peorle, conplsniu. of It's unconstitu
| tionai character that convictions had tsk 81
pace unfer 1T and the sentence of the coui
been CARRIED; into execution ai,ho' the rncnr
sutulionality Of the Law had ieea objected b
Inc counsel OF die accnssIv