Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1817-02-04

tANrES's-fAkr Is oe1'T ocSfss or s-;~
n Subscriber Is d,spesed TO sell gfes, hsrx.in In
nanoso,ne fath, ano 70 d''de tue payments. for tie
conmouatioh OF a purchaser, into twelve equal pafts
negotiable paper, well e,dorseu, payable ~ cid
OF the Richmond Banks, the 6rst ef~hei to be d
sight ana so on IN succession for every % days.
purchase money be- fiy di,charged. which will be
the END oftwo years from the date of III, Grst note
ib's fnini has been hc'ui. advertised aud petty "a
uescrned-t 10 therefore deemed unnecessary again
go fny into description oft. II lies IN the count,
cooci;iand. ten miles above the cou., boss ON ,rt
hole Creek, auo about forty ililss from Richmond
contains about 7to actes lies we'll for fafnirs and
well vacred and in good ne Abn.,co.. at,,,t hi
acres oi TINS tract lying immediately fickirshs
Creek, is considered eqa a. rich a. al. tame, AZ
Low-ofodhus the resi!ue produces soo. wseat, cor
tobacco ana clover. The holdings neat anu con,
nient-also The Orchards on tie farm nc eNtersiy. =
of the best Kind, fruit.
There also two small fsrn,s near ,SL,.}.-g H.,
belonging 10 the Subscriber, which are also offered
SAFE The t"o contain 800 aches. nta,i, the 81;
Size one of which is encEnbered With the life estate
an oiu iasy very great bargain may also be had
purchase OF tbeSe parcels OF Iant, or either them
the payments made easy
ANY person visiting 20 pr, base is invited IN c,ll
ihe subscriber and enquire OF bun HE prc, tor this IL.
tspie pi@perY--it shall bs made much below It's real
Tue, or The ordinary prices that lands a,e selli
for
- DANIEL rRIPLRTr
reo'ua', =. S0u
NyoTIcE.-Wbe sold 10 The Highest bidder IN ~
- Stance of the last will os airs.Ann sgdnor, dec
la'e OF Hanover Comfy, ccui, vi six and twel,
rft(f
t"Ha- wheeon the d,cedrnt lately resided crut,f.
about iGs acres, more or less.
Bonds with approved secnitics will be rerrred of
purchaser, and the title withheld till payment
~ ne same time and place. Will b. sold Tor cash
quantity OF corn aud 10 oder some household .os k
ell 'nfnitnre, plantation utensils and stock.
he sale Will commence IL O'Clock under the dirre
tion OF
THE EXECUTOR.
1iSsoLCrioN.--i dissointion Of the corarin, SHY
-, hitherto existing between 'T0Nhop porke la,
tv final
oeh,ed to said firm, requested to NAH. i,nmedis,e
p''ment :" JAMts WAuhor Who will aso pay al iebts
Contacted ior tie beneLs ofile said firm.
sighed,
JAMES wAuHoP.
NJ TReA;sS d. SsIAE. |
ELISHA BiRKEsDAIF.
halia> cont house, Va.
January -. 1917.
EetraGryi soGf
XiRGlNi,.--Aia superior Conftof CTan,cr7 I,cIIcn
AZ me oap'nl IN the city OF Richmond the 27th
john ri,inan. adm. of susanna Wilson, lDlei,,t;6
James Bullock, admir- Of James T. Hubbard sud s,,s,h,
Hubbard widow, ami Edmund W. Hnbhaid an inj;nt
ehin 81 ne said Ja'ucs r. Hubbard by ,ames Buock,
ms GUARDIAN, aud Samuel Allen aud Thomas Wesr
trustees Tor ,he said James r. Hubbard ard wife
,xn Dc,eno9Rts
James Bullock, administrator of Jumes r. Hpbbarg
.,,. FlcA1i6.
John Pitman, admir- OF su-ama wilcox Edvard ~
Hubbard and Robert L. Iubhsrd infants by w,m. Ds.
a ,s' sec,ay aSssned their guardian, Samuel Allen
In conformity decree Of the coaft OF a,esas
Ssinea D! The CLERK thereof in these words
a. a Court Of Appeals held atihe Capitol in Richmond
the 23d Gay OF January. 1915. 49,
John Pitran, administrator of Susanna W,leox
.o,, Appellant
James Bullock admir- of JAMES r ,,rh,,rd .,,, g..
ia HUBBARD, widow, and Edmund W. Hubbard an in
iant child al The said James T. Hubbard by James pr
lock his guardian, and Samuel alien and Tho,nas
Il hand aud,s
And the same Appellant against James Briinrt as,,
OF James T. Hubbard, ippellee-npon revived anea,s
iiNnia decree pronounced by the Supe-ior ,orr ,
sers held in Richmond the eleventh d., of se,e,ni
one thousad eight bundled and eleven IL. two sits i'm
one ofwhch Susanna Wilcox WAS plaiuttr aud Iasns, -
uo"asn aug others were Northumberland the OF her
was defendant 'i"ODaiu
This day came the parties by their counsel and the
court haVry maturey considered the irascrp of ,h-
records Of the decree aforesaid and the aro,n,u,s 81
counsel - NJ opinion thar the deed of settlement in The
proceedings mentioned lnconnectcd with Other r,ot in
"a. Ssuse .en"tE 20 explain the Intention Of tie aItca
as 10 MS OBJECTS is not susceptible OF he cnnstruc,io
& ~ oy .ne court OF Shancery 50 far ttat constsc
on lsyeets Tue c''t OF Susanna Wilcox, the elder "a,
dover IN the lands, and 10 her thirds of me
.a a o hef iae husband. Edmund Wilcox. rhc s.yrcs
sion IN the first part of the deed the estate
Iealoi the SAID Susanna Wilcox the, youneer ,ybch @
.alny docs notinclude The OF Sasanua wilcox The
eiue III connection with other nilo,ro -
oieI paris OF the deed-such for examnle as ,be -.
no" o"isc BY her, aud in relation 10 usa,,na ilrnx th
younger, ia the opinion OF tile court annly IL
Intention OF the parties limit It's oneratinn 10 ~ - 80
'cSdhreo hcr interest," exclusively of her uofier,s ~
'a tne court perceive the force oftpat ressn mo- ur6
Iey on General description oftte property i'm otter
p,s VI ue uted, would incHde the estate Of Susatna
W toe eoeI ns conf'unding distinction between
1he property described and the interest offhe otier
anu daughter therein in direct conliadciion of The
Gus expressions and others which mi slit be OH i'm
'nr oecu Inc court Is therefore OF oljs, mar
~ hc uecee IN moth SUIT asreeets the claim Of ensaun
tue eiue: TO dover in the lands of her decreased
""spa"" tu',ihHu wilcox aud thirds OF his ne.
sonar estate, Is eTfOneousad ta there Is M error j.,
M Iesaue thrTeof-therefore Il decfeca nd ordered
,hat 50 much OF the said decree as is lenon,l aboy ~,
hceiloneOhS, he reversed and annlleS and .J tbe r
huhe fhereo be affirmed and thai The anp.iIee in 40
stsus VINO IS administrator of The estate OF his in
w MS MAIDS, to be administered much there
".ne hIu-aIu me ofher a?peliees in heir avn rclf
pay 70 'e ppeilant IN that suitaad the appellee he
second slt oct Of the of his ntesafc IN his hands
I" De administered If much hcreol he hail, nav t
tappeant ~ that suit the cost cxpen ded as b,
MN as Dy te saIs susanna Wilcox in the prosecution NJ
t.'H Appeals Aforesaid heTe--1fNd in IL Ordeyed That
he causes ne Tenided to fbe said touri of ChAcetv
aPpeianfs costs in the Court of App ais OF tie hrst
sun, hityone dollars aud sixty-three crnts-do in fIe
second suit thirythree dollars and ninetgior cents
copy, Taste,
WheTeupon, n is Decrced amt O,1ered Isst iie
commissioner OF this Court, who shall carry INTO az.
ecthe necfee Of the eleventh OF September one thon
SAND eight hundred and eleven made in those c,es do
OF Appeals and make his accounts anon M ,rvri
pies uefein mentioned; aud that tie defeudat r me
st sut, VINO is administrator ont OF lie estate OF ,s in
estate ~ ms hands 10 be administered II so rnm, iete
Oh nc hdh ana the other defendants in their own right
pay I" thc piant Ia tlat su.t-and lhe pain.iF H. ne
seo" siut out OF the estate Of his ntcsiac IN ms hands
to be administered ifso thereof s Is; pay 10 he
ucirHdafi John Putnam admir- Of Qus.r,. xr.,~ 49,.