Richmond enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1815-1867, 1817-02-28

house, granary and stablesa young lourshs, 'ss
Aiso--An interest of one-slxrh Of large bricl 49,.
factory: with thirteen acres vi land, suitable huou
Aiso-A large and csmmodiou. Merchant ,,,.
runnins three pair stones-in good neighbour aai
the purchasing OF wheat aud within two a,l. ior
River, and GU Jones Creek, constant stream,
liable property viii be sold entire divided in
lowing manner to suit purchasers viz an ~ 'ue fo
house, outhonses and orchard with about tour hu..s
acres OF land (ab"ut 10 OF which nre excellent
land and lars south OF the Iacory and H. cs esdow
$50 northwest OF the Factory and bounded
old courthouse road. My interest Ia the Ea,utx we
sold win or without tins $50 acres. The mills Win
mier's house, 3nd Nifty l
AtSo-My equal inoiety with Mr.. win @. Poya,l =.
"a valuable Tract % In"d containing 1851 acres w,h
two miles of James River, we'll known by the n,n'
the Pattsson itact ON which is valuable Coal N.Y.,
leased outoI the present and five succeeding wear. "
u cents per bushel for half quantity thai v al
sed and carried away; At present worked b, Maj, i-
rfhE,he coal !, OF superior quality and connd,ntir ~
ALSO acres of LAND, laying imrrediateiv -
OF and adjoining the fattesoa 7rcct with souvenir
Gweiiirsbonsc and Ont houses with t;risf Az" et
pntoys creek On this tract also coal bias been ra On
and ialse body oil H. it's supposed. may readily =;
found The lilies of this tract within f,w oe
area wards oi the Pits, on the {'0f;cson Tract rrh
lands will be suryc ed and plated before the day ,e
1" enterpriins men, or those who may want i,rd.s
ana agreeable situations for family residence ths e
pert holds ont sirop. Inducements 10 purchase pro-
bce.sa real estate OF .l,ph value with that how oss
for saes rarely in market Ale whole OF il I,ir
20 to23 miles from isichmond. '"s Hom
IEhJfS--One fourth cash, one fourth in 90 dave -
fourth ia 100 days. aud the remaining one ,urrI 'ne
Gays Tor The farming lands. mills SC. the co rps
= u.
credit for the balanceAll with approved eDdor'"I
gotabic notes PAYABLE At either OF The Richmond ra,a
WIN deeds of Trust To secure Tie PAYMENTS A''
THIS sale will lie conducted under the rnanavem.,, :
M Thomas Taylor, of Richniond eorpmcnci,' oi
un, a, =, eleven continue o day 10 dss
As soon as the lands are surveyed, th. Mats u,,
mond w. "eh.
p,a,,,,.. r PETER DupuY
~ =. 9s-tds
ViRGiNIA.--Ata Superior Couftof Chancery hold
az me Capitol in the city of Richmond OH the a;,1
John Putnam, adm. Of Susanna Wilson p,...n
James Bullock. admir- of lanes T. Hubbard and su.,..
HUBBARD widow, aud Edmund w Hubbard an Nina
child Of the said James I. Hubbard nv James pniI'
his guardian, and Samuel Allci, and Thomas ~
trustees for the SAID james I. Hubbard and wife '
AKIN Dejandanfx.
James Bullock, administrator of Jnmes r. ynbn,,,
.c,ssr Pioinp.
John Pi;,nan. admir- Of Susanna wilcox rdv,,, ~
Hubbard and Robert +. Hubbard infants by WIN, NJ
ne,' specially assigned their guardian, Samuel Ann
In c"n:orinty witha decree of the Court OF 49,,
erinisa by The clerk thereof. in these words
Az Court Of Appeals held Capitol il, Ricbmon..
the 23d day OF January, 1915. 'No"e'
'ohh fltinan, administrator of Susanna Wilcox
AGAINST @fpPeRart.
James Bullock, admir- of James r. Hubbard and s.
ma Hubbard. widow and Edmund W. Hubbard on ~;
rant child of the said James 7. Hubbard by james x
lock his guardian, and Samuel Allen snd M Dun
" '> '"" James l. Hubbard aud wife
And the same Appellant against James nnnpt
OF James T. Hubbard. AppeIlee-mpon revived anrs",
from decree pronouncedb by the Superior Cont
Gerry held in Richmond tie eleventh dpy az Sa,,
one thousand eight hundred eleven in two .ni,s ~
one (which Susanna Wilcox plantifT and James r.
Hubbard and others were Northumberland i'm H.. o.
defendant. is huoDMa
This day the parties by their couns., -. a..
ccur; having matnrcly considered The anu .he
records OF the decree aforesaid aud the arrnn,.n, s
counsel is OF opinion that the deed of settes ..
cfat uitl.,
the ennse tending 10 explain the intention o ne o,,
as 10 Us OBJECTS Is not susceptible OF the construction oil
ton rrJcrfs the claim OF Susanna WiIcox ;he eIder
tate OF her late husband. Edmund Wiicox IN. sy"re
SION IN the first part Of the deed the estate ana
@ the salo susanna Wilcox, the younger whichcsr
elder, In connection with other cxprrssiors ,iin,n ~
other parts Of the deed-s,,cb f, , iollowhg m
now owned by her, and in relation 10 Susanna WIFE, &
Younger in the opinion of the court aJrDly eyincss M
n'n.oh -, inc parties to limit its operation to The con-
Veyance OF her interest, of her ,uotl.r
can the court perceive the force of thar reasonng
eyng ON general description ofibc property in ohef
parts OF the deed would include the estate ~
Wi cox, the elder, by confonndirp the ~,
me propery described and the Interest OF the otLer
ana daughter therein in direct contradiction M rho
Gus expressions and others which might he relied on in
me deed The court is therefore opuan that SO ,,rh
OF Inc decree III both sHs the claim ~
wilcox the elder, to dover in the lands OF nor dsccad
huspana Edmund Wilcox, aud to her thirds of his per
"a estate IS erroneous and that there is no error in
te fesdme thereof-heTeorc it is decreed ana ordered
at so mich OF the said decree mentioned above 10
he
siuuc tnereof be affirmed, and that the appeee in The
tsut VINO administrator the estate of bis in.
ttsRe ~ MS hands, 10 be administered If so ucht there
eIheha;h-andihe other appelees in their own right
a' othe appellant in that spit-and the aDpelee in
secohu st oit OF the estate ofhis in his hands
% ne administered 10 much thereof he hath nav 10
tue appellant ~ that suit the expended as we'll r.,
nun as the SAID Susanna Wilcox In The prosecution Of
neir appeals aforesaid hcre-5Hd IL is ordered That
me causes ne renlandcdtO the said Court OF Cbaucery
ApDeaits costs IN the Court Of AppeaIs on lie dst
s"H ny-one dollars aud sxtythree csnis--do in the
second st thirtyihree dollars ninety four cents
AcoPy, IcsfC,
,v,o n. DANCE. &C.
WheTeupon, ~ IS Dfcrfed 0nd Ordered That the
commissioner Of this Court shall carry ;nto IL
ectthe decree OF the eleventh September one tbou
sAio eisht hundred and eleven made i'm those canes do
conform 70 the aforesaid decree aud pinien Of The ,t
OF appeals, ana make mp his sccornts upon the prnc;
PIES theren mentioned and that the defendant in The
bsl SUIT who IS administrator, OF the estate of his in.
estste III his hands to be administered If so r fbeye.
OIL ne haih, and the other defendants in their own riet
pay 10 The plaintiff m that suit-and the plainiiG in The
secohn sat out ofthe estate of his ntestae II, his hand,
suni,tered ifso much thereof he hath pa, to the
o',ehdan John Piirnan, admir- Of Susanna wilcox dec
ne'ehoant III that suit, the costs expended as weI hv
nun as ny The said Susanna Wilcox in Me Court OF 40.
pedls. " nv ~'"'' " Tf'
copy, JfSse,
HENRY SIIURLDs, y. c. C.
Io""'Sdo1er's once, Richmond Isl No o,th IsI7
ne parties interested are desired take notice tha1