The enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1804-1815, 1815-07-22


ses bbtaincl hY the Emperor ON the 10Th and
f1sh. which relates 60 tao actions taught Ia
Champagne on the 10th C nth March,
1871. The letter., such rs quoted by
Loo Castereagh, beghs with these WORDS:
--'' do nor speak TO you OF my us
satisfaction withyour conduct, &c we nave
before Us the minute of a letter from tie t.n-
;.eror 70 the KING of Naples, dated Fonts
bleau, Ian. 26, 1913. beginning thus -" do
nor speak OF my % satisfaction at your Con-
duct since rleft the army" The latter hall OF
the phrase his been suppresscr, when wouiI
have indcaeed the true date, and the remain
der of the letter substituted to circumstances
which occurred when the E.hperur l.tt rhS
army after the campaignin RusSi;'. The fol-
lowing are tlle passages which answer the
purposes cf the falsifiers:
"PrUfitby an act of tire ,son which / attri
butte to fear Ia order To serve me NY good m
formation. depend on you, On your contri~
ton, on your priacipleS. hit were Otherwise,
remember that you shall repent 1t. defeated
the Atstrians yesterday, am IN pursuit o
the remainder OF their columns. Ano'her such
victory, and you will see my prospects are not
so desperate as you have been taught To be-
lieve them. Keep your promise"
Lord Castlereagh did not quote IN his
speech, but he distributed copies of another
letter of the emperor TO the kmg OF Naples.
To this printed copy the date 7ih NJ arch is at
liked, and as 1t contains detans winch, relats
only to the year 1914, it is, therefore, the 7th
March, 1914, ulati pUrports 20 be dated.
We read in this letter the following words:
You are surrounded with men who hate
France, and who wish to ruin you / have
often told you of it. All that you write to
me is too strongly contrasted by that which
you do &c. we have also before US mi
mute of another letter from the emperor to
the king of Naples but this letter is dated
{ f1Nl Clltl, A NIL.
we find in it literally the passage which we
have just quoted. Hence it is that letter
which is falsified. They have retained only
the expansions which enable us to discover
the real letter, otherwise, how could
speak in 1911, as supposed in the printed let
ter: E" shall see, b your manner of acting
at Anc, ma, II your heart is Erench--continue
to correspond with the vccroy. and take
care your letters be not intercepted"
The original minutes of these letters are
in our hands-the autographs are not, and
cannot be but at Naples, and they will con-
firm our assertios, for it is not doubtful that
they will be published. What then are the
p Ces from winch Lord Castlereagh has print
ed the documents which he has published? 1t
is for him to prove that they are true, and not
tor us 20 prove that they are false. Never
theess we shall furnish the proof.
We are authorised to declare, that we shall
show 10 every Engshman of distinction who
! may be at Paris K requires it.
1st. The original minutes of the emperor's
letters.
ID. The minutes Of the same letters falsih-
| cd and written by the hand of to Able
fleuriel, who, during nineteen years, has full
filed the Office of the secretary in the cabinet
! OF Count de Lille, and IN that of Count dc
| Blacas We shall, moreover, communicate
| TIE minute OF letter written by Count de
.Blacas To Lord Castlereagh, the 4th March
| 1915, f ms Lordship has not preserved the o.
! rlgiIial.--It contains these words:
! have since also found, in another draw
! er, three minutes OF letters written by Napo-
| leon, one of which has no date. have the
| honour of addressing copies of them to you,
and these are not the least interesting pieces
| which have been discoveries 4Tii0ng tue I'M
mense quantity of papers which It is neceSsa-
| ny to send"
| These copies are evidently those of the
| three letters, of which we have been speak
/ ing, to OF them bear dates demonstrated to
be falls, and the other is really without date
we therefore know perfectly that it was the
9TH OF Marc5, 1915, that the pretended copies
! OF these letters was sent to Lord Castle
| reagh.
We shall also communicate an original let
! ter from parsonage whose testimony Lord
| Castlereagh will not reject. This letter was
| written the 9TH ofJanuary, 1915. to Count
|
at thC end of this note. We have hence the
right - Ceduce the following facts, which no
one Can dispute.
The Goycrnment of CONT de Lille COM
muacated to the English Ambassador the pa
| pers which concerned the king Of Naples
At that time it was not int led to fals-
| ty them aud Lord Welliue, on drew the
| only intcrence that the real paper could pre-
sent.
" return Yos the papers, which have
read. They Contain 40 proof against Mu-
such on authority leaves us nothing more
to say. Lord WeIlmgton attests that the lrt-
tiers which we have quoted are true, because
they contain more ct the proofs that were
wanted against the Klog Of Naples, and that
those that are produced to Pari lrnentby l..
Cast'ereagh are false, s.nce they strongly in
Gu pate the King of Naples in his relations
WITH the allies. No one can refuse this tcsti-
inopy.
w nat then has happened in the interval be
tween the eth of jan. aud the 4th of Mach.
1872 The Count de Lille, who never cea-
ses 10 insist, at the Congress OF Vienna, that
the branch Of the Bourbons OF Sicily shonlcl
Fedscead the throne Of Naples, observed that
the powers which have contracted treaties