The enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1804-1815, 1814-12-15
tN0L. 41.---NO. II.

IS, n
same time To show, that the p,t.seot cor,i,,c,
of Great britain is Inconsistent with her Tor
| "ef praCuSe and principles, the Am.r,cen
piehiPote: tdileS have retcrr, q 10 tin, tc.,,, &c
peace OF 1888, to that Of 1865, and ~ .he'ne-
SociatonS OF 1901, during ,ile administrator IS
munster, whom the american ,ieni,,otc,,ti
ariss have truly stated, 10 be bi,-h in .b. -,
tmation OF hrs country.
nc omission 10 provide in the treaty of
1855, Ter the p;.ciiication of the Ir,i.,, a.,
tioha' WHICH "erc TO be included within ~
PIopoSeu boundary OF tie ~. D. capro, pre-
N-uSe ~. -. IRON now negoc,atinr. ia l,Ah.,tt ~
SuC.i tr'>es or nations, uncss il be aSy,,,,,ed
lhae me occasional noit-eHerc,sa OF : ,iob, =
an aoanaonInent IF 1t. Nor Cal, the riSbt 49,.
protecuon' winch the american plcnipoten-
uaifeS nave failed in showing 70 have bron :.
Yer ciain'>d by q. Britain as inci,,ent 20 So,
eregnty, have been TRANSFORMED bv {; n,
.i'e =. .. "} treaty TO WHICH thc Indian m
tons were not parties. ~
III inc peace OF 1903, i was nor pecess.r,,
Ior ~. bi1tain 20 treat for the pacific; t,,, s
..e iiid.an nations and. the maintenance NJ
."eir rights and privileges. because there had
o O no ine'ian nations living without the
~ D'"uIs'les, VINO had so co-operated
France. val "6@ihst
WIN Tespect to the nepociations of 1z61
between I. Britain and France. on ,.,h:rb
the American plrnipoteutaries more ,,.,,.t;r,.
.alY rev. they appear, in the jt,igine;,, ,f
the Undersigned, to have much nisutde,sico,;
the whoie course of that nerocia,i,r,
1t Is very true that the French po,err,,o,.
Drought io'Nv ard at one period of tba re,,,,ci-
aton' a prop stion, by which a certain ,c,
i''otys lying between the Coniuio,,s of ~.
TWO Ion''achnS parties, was to have been ~.
iO''NH W ''le lnSIan nations Bur - Toee , !,
appear tna.-.his formed part of thrf, ma
"'I'"in' and It is Clear tilat Mr.. Pint in his ~,
S|er o'u not object 70 the proposition Es
ooJ1IteC' MoSed, to the propose line of de-
20 N''',H" between the two countries. beJon
'.'e t~o contracting parties, upon two
grounds list that the proDoscd yo,.,Jas,
me would nave given to France VIII ~.
f'e''li hSn themselves Acknowledged ~ ~.
p'ttt .! ~ ,rda, the whole Of wtli-I, &C ,.,;.,
uu y i''s i!i's1 Christian Majesty, i had Ls.,,
STIPULATED vas to be coded eu,iyelv m Z, y
%ui{, uat the southern part Of tLe .,,-.,
SCI i!t@ of oemarkat;on would ha,e ircItltci
,c 'i'e poNnoaiy Of Louisiana, the <,.t r
@ets' wrecks, ChiCkasaws, Choc.ay,S s,,5 T.
mother nation, 'yl,o occupied ;e,,.i-o,7,, 80,
never had oscn inoluded within the ba,i,ia-
re" 'i :n'1 settlement. So tar was az mr.
rom 'eJecIing, as alIedged by the Ai,a,;..a,-
N'I'PU'o'ual les, tse proposition Of c,.,s;,.e-
1 4'si''i' nations as a barrier, thu. ~ ce no.
.nN' Vi "e heSociation hc complained ,b.:~.
"'-'' NV l'i'NiSiJ!l such N.,t-i.-t. S-
enefgetcaly urges his ohiectic,,. i,;si
20 MY Stanley, the British pler.i,,n;p,,,i.,., -
arts, dated on the 25th July 1851 4. H.
me l2iatlon of new limits to Cana,,a fon.o..,,.
tiie INC II is captious and ins;;lions Il, yovh
Uu' h n pc, ii agrcefl TO, to shorten +he,..I,.
the extent OF Canada, and to len,r,bsn ~
ooundai1cS OF Louisiana, and in tht, ,;",y -
es'aol'sn "nat must not be admitted! n,re,v
,nS al "tHch is not Canada is Louisiana.
"Meieoy al the intermediate nations and
eou.tileS, the true barrier to each n,cy,-,re
would be given up to Fl ance.
ne undersigned confidently eyrect H.
'hs Am rlcan Pl(lipotentiaries viii NOT ar,..;,,
ie'oach the british government with acti,.-
l"consistent!y with its i,orluer ,.ractice 81
principles, or repeat the assertion n,oJe j.,
FORMER note, tilata definition 81 Indian bonn,
gary win view to neAtrai 5aI,'cr VS. !.
~" az" Unprecedented demand BY an Euro
Rea, Po"eF' and most u all by C. i}iita;,
me very instance selected by the An,c,ic.
flenpotentiares, untleniaby proves f},at go.
4 proposition had been entertained nv Z; p,;
t"lh and France. and that Mr.. pit+' m -
part OF u BritaIn, had more Dartic,lItr,v ON.
forced it. 'iy eh-
II remains only to notice two .ol;ect;oos.
WINCH the American plenipotentiarjeg Lay,.
urged 5ainst the proposal of Indian ,aci6ca-
:; .'I "u'""Ceu oy the undersigned first, that
9. N''t SONONtty, IN the u
state could have NO security that the indian
nations would Conclude peace on tbt. te,,,,'
prop 'sed' the proposition would be IN eftc,
nc article now proposed BY the rntler.;,,,-
ca, ana herewith enclosed, IS free from bStt,
OBJECTIONS ana appear tC them so cbar,ct,,.-
!Iea py spirit OF moderation and peace th,
they earnestly antiripe-c rhc corc,,r,fnr.. -
'AG american pien:po5eati4rics.
In InakIng lust cfc,r, =. 80.
war We undersigned are not ar,rotc,,. ;,i'
that inc motive which have i,drccr@', &c
i'"yai fEl'ae'a .he Prince Regent f. ,,' l hi9
rencwai 81 ihe proposition, WIN urect 4
'dhcauol. can DC misundergt. :. ~ present
| presented, ca on hlisIe-
" h..tever maybe the res. n oftho.
S'Noh thus offered, tile und,.,..;, '.,1 PVoPo-
az th.r uitmatun, and ,cw -. "si''ef r.
eiy 'hc ans" er Of tho dmrr;csn al "n a7zI-
aries on which ncir coIt1,I E'c"i;,te MI
| place will depend. '''i's "a this
~ ultlefSlf ned avail Themselves of
uPPoI'uh"y & renewing to the 80. ms
Plch,Po1cniafrs tile assurance Of t,,e;, i:r
(nshed) GAMBLER.
ttii GOULBJRN
= EeTatrabluyy efAAc Ulf,ly o..