Virginia Argus. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1796-1816, 1814-09-03
VIRGINIA.
At a Superior Court Of Chancery,

VIRGINIA. I
At a Superior Court Of cAancesy,t
holden az the Cohisol, in the Civ Of Rich. |
hoisd. the aiss day V June. 1911.
Mathew Clay. Plaintiff. |
sarah willisms, exssutrix Of Joseph williams.
and sdmiH'trix Of Robert Williams. JohnC an
and Lucinda his VIE. WIN. Williams md John
B. Scott executors, Eiisabefh Williams VIZ
dow, and John Robert williams an infant son
Ok John Williams deceased, by the said Eli.
beth Williams his guardian, James Chalmers,
Sarah Chalmers, latc Sarah WAtkias widow
and administratfix, and Mourning Micsiah
Watkins an infant daughter Of Micaiah Watx
Rims DECD, yHehfy e. Coleman her Guardian
and Nathaniel Wssh,ngtba Williams, Martha
Williams and Fanny Williams BY Sarah VIII
'-~' s's'' z'a'0'a AND. Dt'sad'''
Sarah Williams. executrix Of Joseph Williams.
Mathew Clay Defendant
II N CONFORMITY with. decree OF the Court Of
knpess, certified by the ClsSk thereof IN
the following words, to wit: " Virginia to wit:
AZ = Court Of Appeals held Al the czpitol in the
City Of Iiichnioid, The 5fst day Of March, 1911,
--Msthew Clay, appellant, ajsajnSt safah vii.
iisHs. exsc,lsrh Of Joseph Williams aud ADM.
nistratrix Of Robert Williams, dec. Jokh Call
and Lucinda his wife, William Williams & JOHN
B. Scott, executors, and Elizabeth Williams
widow Of John Williams dee: John Robert vii.
liams. an infant son Of the said John Williams
dec by the said E.izabeth williams his guar.
dian. iafnes ChAl1n<rs, Sarah Chalmers, late Sa.
rsh WstkiBs, widow and administrators, and
Mourning Micajah Watkins, an infant daughter
of Micai.h Watkins dec. by Henry z, Coleman,
her guardian, and Nathaniel Washingten. VIII
liams, Martha Williams and Fanny Williams In I.
tnhts, by Sarah Williams eheir guardian. Appel.
lees and the sane Appellant against SafAhWii-'
lian1s, execurix &c. of Joseph Williams decd.
appellee: Upon appeals from decree prono.in,
ced by the Superior Court of Chancery held in
Richmond the; 10th day Of May, 1904, in two
tiff and the, appellees in the Fret suit were de-
fendipts, and in the other the appellee in the
second suit was plaintiff and the appellant de-
PENDANT This day came the parties by the II
counsel and the Court having inaturely COM
sidered the transcripts OF tic DEGREES Aforesaid
and the arguments Of counsel, pronounced the
following opinion and decree 1.-THE sole OBJ
ject d these suits, which. IS between the appel
faut Mathew Clay and the appellee Sarah viii
liams. only may be considered as cross suits
between those parties, had been, On the one
hands TO compet discovery OF the assets ofJo.
seph Williams dec. in the hands of the appellee
Sarah, hs executrix, to satisfy the iud@men,
confessed by her, on a note given to fbs onnei.
LIANT. for the purpose stated in the denosit;on of
rheodorick BlaicI,absrts, in the FIRST suit. and
charged by the appellee Sarah, in her cross siii.
and, on the other, to be wholly relieved from
that judgment. as obtained by fraud and imp.-
sition aud collusion between those pastes To de.
teat just claim against the estate of the said
Joseph Williams. tins Court would have apprs.
we'd Of the disrnissa, Of the appellants ORIGINAL