Virginia Argus. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1796-1816, 1814-10-05

liant m right OF his said wife, by the said Robert
IN h's ihe-time. And ifupon a Just and equitx>s
Die settlement ard aajastnlenf of such account,
II shall appear that the estate of the saiaRobert:
Williams in the hands Of his administrative or OIL
MS distributes, IS Indebted to the estate of the
said Joseph, the said administrators out of the
assets in her hands to be administered, or tl,es
several distributes respectively, according to-
tthe portions OF the said Roberts estate whiclj
they may have received since his death, ought
$50 satisfy and pay to the appellant the amountl
cot has Just proportion the said Josepb's estate
latter payment OF all his Just debts, not exceed
sing seven thousand five hundred pounds, Viz.
gina currency, the amount of his judgment
sgamst the Administrative from which account
cot the said aobertWiiiams, in the hands of his
siis'sioutees, Is to be excluded whatever may
>ha'e been recovered ard eived by John Call.
eas the marriage portion of his wife Lucinda, inI
ethe lire time OF the said Robert, or by virtue oil
tne decree OF the court of Pittsyvania county forl
Ethat account since his death, liberty being re
sersea To the piamiif in the original bill, to con
Troyert the validity OF sach marriage contract.
Cor to shew If he can, that such decree was .,,s
famed by fraud and coiiusion between the par.i
''es 10 that suit it necessary. for the discharge!
Got ms Claim against the asid Roberts estate
z ms court is further of opinion that the said
nstlisw Clay, the defendant in, the cross bill
shavng, by his answer to that bill SO far admit.
leu mat he possessed a knowledge Of the dis.
:Poasi OF the cersiicates belonging to the es,atel
g. ei'c saio "opert Williams, IN the cross bill
scharSed to have been delivered to him TO make
{sa.e OF, US to have the accounts and receip,s re
spscs ng the same, in his hands, which he reisrss
go ~ ms said answer exhibits bus does no,t
appear to have produced them, he ought 10 pro
kquce such accounts and receipts or to answe,
f,o 'n.eroS1ories respecting item, if required
20 CO. ana TINS court approving ofso muchI
80 -, inc decree IN the cross suit directs thai
sthe appellant shall give bond 10 contribute Ia.
wards the discharge of the testator JossphI
?; w niims's debts, afEirnieth the same and re.
SSserseth SO much oil both DEGREES AS is not ri,
Sproved ofby this decree, with the costs in th,sI
3court, the suits are remandcd to the said sup:,
Z 'or court OF chancery, TO be proceeded in ac.l
( 'ordlng to the principles OF this decree, which,
ordered 10 be certified TO the superior courts
sot cbancery. Appellant costs in the court
soi appeals, 10 the first suit, fifty seven dollars
q iItto, M the second suit, twenty four dollars,
~ cents. \ copy--,esse, IA. Dance, G .''-l
i Taereupon he court doth adjudge, order anu
AdecTre, That the several matters and things con
! famed IN the decree aforesaid, be had and OBJ
2sefVsd by the parties therein also mentioned
lana doth direct ore of the commissioners O.
: iix court 20 state the accounts directed by the
Sssid cscree, aud IN conformity TO the principles
3thereot, aud TO report the same to lnis court
With any matter deemed pertinent by himself or
occurred ~ Tie parties 10 DC specially stated.
: FEBRUARY 9th, 1912.
q on motion OF the Defendants in the frs, suit
ied The P.aint.:f IN the second, and for reasons
8 ppearins 70 the court, CommissionerNioh o,so,..
T's prrs,itted 10 withdraw lis report in tl,eseS
leases, filed tie seventeenth day of December:
22."st, ana to make such further and supplement
atai report, as may be required by either of theS
afaities, Or IS TO Inn shall seem proper.
JANuAnr Goth, 1878.
4Matthew Clay, : 7: Plaintiff;
against
sSarah Williams execuirix of Joseph WilliamsI
and administrative of Robert Williams, John!
Ian ana Others defendants
5For reasons appearing TO the Court, this cause;
is sent to the rules to be there iurther pro.I
! JAwrAnY 9Th, 1914
3"la.t''ew Gay fiailtiff
xSarah Williams cxecutrix OF joseph William.
!. ai.d ADMINISTRATIVE OF Robert Williams, Johr
4 Call and Lucinda his vile, WilliamWiliia,ns
aud JOHN u. Scott, executors, Elizabeth Vii
q hams, widow, and joiin Robert Williams AMI
los.uit son Of John Williams, decd. By thu
1 sad Elizabeth Williams, lis guardian, j.m,.
Z Chalmers, Sarah Chalmers, late Saral, Wat,
kuis widow and admiGistratrix aud Mourn
Il rig MicaJah Watkins deed, ty Henry EE
Coleman her guardian and Nathaniel Wash. B
ington W1iiiains, Martha Williams and FanrE
ny Williams 81 Sarah Williams their guardi.
an, James vaughn executor OF EhoD,ls La
7 nier, Joseph Williams WHO WA appontedk
by the Sai.. Joseph Williams, decd, an excl
Gator OF his viii, and lie heirs, executors K
or administrators OF Richard HARRISON dec'dt
Deiendants.s
] This cause Came on this day TO be heard ont
the papers formerly read, and the report oiE
ico-h missioner Nicholson pursuant To tue orieyE
rof tic twenty first day Of june, one thous IND
;sight hundred aud eleven, and was sseued b,
.Soansel. On consideration hereof, and beca,,s.
,,ie new parties. made by the ainenued biz, filed
since the said order OF reference 10 4 connis,
ssioner, were not properly before the court az
sde time the said order was entered, and agains,
swhom the plaintiff now appears to have prod
.eeeded in the mode prescribed by law arains,
:absent defendants: (and they Sill falling 20 ap-s
1pear and auswer) the court doth recommit ,Iies
3repcrt to the commissioner who made it, all
ltorgh the aamc, la otiier respects, may lie rirhts
land correct, Tor him to reconsider and reports
:tbereupon. I
NEEDHAM CUMBERLAND. Z
In the Vaea.ioa sjis, .Taae Term, 1914.
Clay, :. Plaintiff,!
against
sWliiams and others, defendants \
Upon consideration OF the true intent and !
'fneaiiing OF the act aothoiising the judges off
che chancery District Courts, to direct act
scc'Tts, iayacation, III cases depending in theirt
prospective Courts, do, as judge Of the supe-k
Srior Court OF Chancery holden al Richmond, orr
sdcr, ct the instance of the plaintiff b. COUNSEL