Virginia Argus. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1796-1816, 1814-09-17

hu court tssstate the accounts directed by the
'aid decree, and in conformity to the principles
thereof, and to report the same to- this court.
with any matter deemea pertinent by himself or
required by the parties to be SPECIALLY stated.
FEBRUARY 9th, 1872
On motion OF the defendants in The first snit,
and the plaintiff in the second. and tor reasons
appearing to the court. CommissionerNichp son
IS pernitted TO withdraw his report in these
cases, hled the seventeenth day OF December
last, and to make such further and supplement
tai report, us may be required by either of the
parties, or as to him shall seem proper.
JANUARY 29th. 1913.
Matthew Clay, piaint.ff.
against VI.
Sarah Williams executrix of Joseph Williams
and administrative Of Robert " ll.ians, John
Cali and others Defendants.
For reasons appearing to the Court. THIS cause
is sent to the rules to be there iur,her pro.
ceeded in. ~ 4
JAsuAnr 9th. 1914
Matthew Clay Plaintiff
SrSah Williams executrix OF Joseph Williams
and administrative Of Robert Willisms. yohn
Gail and Lucinda his wife, Wiliamw Williams
snd John b. Scott, executors, Elizabeth VIII
soS "AooUS diiu JVhu hOOGrt Williams
infant son of John Williams decd. bv the
sad Elizabeth Williams, his guardian, James
Chalmers, Sarah Chalmers, late Sarah Wat
kIns widow and administrators and Mourn
ing Micajab Watkins decd, by Henry T..
Coleman her guardian and Nathaniel wash
ington Williams, Martha Williams and Fam
ny Williams by Sarah Williams their guard.
an, james Vaughn executor of Thomas La
nier, Joseph Williams who was appoint,d
by the said Joseph Williams, decd. an eye
eusor OF his will. and the heirs, executors.
or administrators OF Richard Harrison decd
III; |: /: {: Defendants
This cause came on this day to be heard on
the papers formerly read. and the report of
commissioners Nicholson pursuant to the order
OF the twenty first day of June, one thousand
eight hundred and eleven, and was argued bv
counsel On consideration whereof, and because
the new parties, made by the amended bill, filed
since the said order of reference to commis-
sloner, were not properly before the court at
the time he said order was entered, and against
whom the plaintiff now appears to have pro-
ceeded in the mode prescribed by law against
absent defendants (and they still failing to APP
pear and answer) the court doth recom.nit the
report TO the commissioner who made it, al /
though the same, in other respects, may be right
and correct, FOR him to reconsider and report
thereupon.
NEEDHAf CUMBERLAND.
Iatde VaeatiOn ette, Jams Term, 1914.
Clay, ..&. pIsintif.
against
Williams and others, . /. Defendants
Upon consideration of the true intent and
meaning OF the act authorising the judges o.
the Chancery District Courts, to direct &C.
counts, IN vacation, in cases depending in their
respective Courts, do, as judge OF the supe.
rior Court OF Chancery holiien at Richmond, or |
DER, at the instance of the plaintiff, by codnse,
that the accounts required by the decretal or
der OF the Supreme Court Of Appeals in this
case, be taken by any commissioners OF the
court, IN conformity with the principles stated
by that Court, in their said decreta order ana
in conformity also with the principles of this |
Court, after due notice to oil parties and. TO |
enable tire commissioners, who may act, to per-
form this order he maybe 1t liberty to withdraw
the reports in this case made by the late CON-.
missioner Nicholson: And the judge doth Earth, |,
or order that the Commissioners, after stating ali
the accounts, upon the principles of the court. |
may then, if required, state the accounts, as ei
tier or any of the parties may direct, together
with any matters which they may require to he |
specially stated, or which he may think peril |
nent. Let a copy of, this order be forthwith
furnished TO the counsel of the defendants
Given from under my hand this 18th July, 1914. |
CREED TAYLOR.
ST. A copy-Tes.e,
VIM w HENINC, n =,