Virginia Argus. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1796-1816, 1814-08-31

this Court to state the accounts directed b. n
sari decree. and an conformity to the princip
thereof, and to report the same to this court
with any matter deemed pert usnt by hmsclf y
| iequired BY the parties to be specially stated.
FeDnuARY 9th, 1912.
On motion OF the defendants i'm the first suit
and the plaintiff in the second, and for reasons
appearing to the Court, Commissioner Nicho son
IS persiitted TO withdraw his report in these
cases, filed the seventeenth day of December
last, and to make such further and supplemen-
tai report, AS may be required by either OF the
parties, or rs to him shall seem proper.
JASvAaY 2oth. 1916.
Matthew cay eyai., l.. r "a.
Sarah Williams execntrix Of Joseph Williams
and administrators of Robert Williams, John
Call ant, others Dei,a ,an;s
For reasons appearing to the Court, this cause
is sent to the rules to be there further pro-
JAsuAaY s7,t. 1914.
Matthew Clay Plaintiff
Sarah Williams executriS of Joseph Williams
and administrators at Robert Williams. John
Call and Lucinda his wife, WillismW Williams
and John Is. Scott, executors, Elizabet.r Wi.
liams, widow, and John Robert Williams AN
infant son of John Williams, decd, by the
said Elizabeth Williams, his guardian, James
Chaimers, Sarah Chalmers, late Sarah Wat
kins widow and Administrative and Mourn
Ing MIcelah Watkins decd, by Henry z.
Coleman her guardian and Nathaniel Wash.
inl,ton Williams, Martha Williams and FAM
( NY Williams by Sarah Williams their guard.
m, James Vaughn executor Of Thomas La
nier, Joseph WIliisais who WAS appointed
7 by The sail Joseph Williams, decd an exc
cutor OF his wilt, and the heirs, executors,
) or administrators OF Richard Harrison decd
g 80: Defendants
{ This cause came on This day 10 be heard on
the papers formerly read, and the report OF
commissioners Nicholson pursuant to the order
OF the twenty first day of June. one thousand
eight hundred and eleven, and was argued by
counsel, On consideration whereof, and because
the new parties. made by the amended bill, filed
since the said order of reference to cOmmisr
sioner, were not properly before the court al
the time The said order was entered, and against
whom the plaintiff now appears to have pro.
csedes In the mode prescribed by Law against
absent defendants: (and they still failing to APP
pear and aIswer) the court doth recsmmit the
report to the commissioner who made il, al
thongh the same, in other respects, may lie right
and eorrse,, ioy him to reconsider and report
thereupon.
-
iafhe Taeation after Jurc Term. 1914.
Clay, -. Plaintiff,
against
Williams and others, /. Defendants
Upon consideration of the true intent ..nd
meaning of the act authorisipg the judges OF,
aie Chanccry District Courts, to direct &C
tsoun's, in vacation, in cases depending IN their
respective Courts, 80, as Judge OF the Supe
rior Court of Chancery hol al ,tichmond, or
der, at the instance of The plaintiff, by counsel,
that the accounts required by the decretsl ar
der otthe Supreme Court Of Appess in this
SCI De taken by any commissioner OF til
couri,ia conformity with the principles stated
b that court, in their said decrstal order and
IN conformity also with tie principles OF this
Co0r', AFTER due notice to al. y.vties, and, 10
enabie tie commissioner, who may act, 10 per
iorIn this order, lac may be at liberty tn withdraw
the reports in this case made ny the late COM
missioner Nicholson; And the judge doth fartn
er crdcr tlitt the commissioners, aft, staIine ali
tlle accounts, upon the principles OF The curt
msy t!sns il <quired, state the accounts, as eli
ther or aHy OF lie parties may direct, together
with any inatters which they may require to be
specially stated, or which he may ;Liilk peril
nent Let copy of >this order be forthwith
furnished to the counsel Of the dcfsndants---
Gwen from under my hand this 18th July, 1914
CREED TAYLOR
A copy-Teste,