Virginia Argus. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1796-1816, 1814-12-14

they brought forward the oponnst;ors eoc. I
tanned in their forr,er NJ. rs.rsc,;.. =
boundaries Of the Br;t;.s douc;n;nrs !. Nor.s
America. M
They do not wish To insist ,,n,, ,h.m H..
vord whs, = y .'ss. upon tnem oe'
ou;re sThsm may larry re
cuss th. d.ss;. r. Sauys au'cao!, 20 un,
adon,;nn IS -. msIc"." nv view 20 tue
merican ny tne a
80 rsen'poes = eaeies. or their goyerns
ncomn,,:i,. -. su6Ssss Snsl are rot
yv;,h :. .uo voyoSt itseif.
tr;.. .specr.o sns boundary at the dis
..s .a"ne, ana that OF the North West
49, % tps u .. the Undersigned
t;cns .no Si,ifeu 20 anticipate the oIjec-
pie.;r~."sIe ~ tue note OF the American
ss.astaris nat they were instruct
H. - 10y ios .ns revision OF their boundary
49, "..nene s.atament which they have
r;,. ~ n'sue, tnat they mad no autho.
esue any part, however insignificant
p tue territories OF the U. S;ates. althoa Sh
an equivalent for such cession either in from
TS s.nerw'se.
.wasS ,h"..r p'eniposentiarics must be
M,;,s sas ~ ooundary OF the district OF
ria, ,ha 49, Correct'y ascertained;
,nsr;caa ~u asseleen AZ present oy the a"
am~a sosern,sent oy which the direct
hsann 'ca.on oesween Halifax and Quebec
49, IS .n. N was not IN contempia-
cnnc, as nritisn Pienipotentiaries, who
yrea,sr -. lay %. i1eo' ana ina the
tmal:v ,rocs,.-:aS y hqucssionis acc
(
arrargemsn. pa u.s sre persesoea nat an
made IS er.s,s-, An .s po'n. ru'Ens DC easily
lia,ion 60 a.o |. ~ sPiueoi conciS
of Tie d;str;ct =, p,:jade ee INTERESTS
AS the necess;,r s.. 81
for the nor,h wesr.r' ea.Ss 'v'nc uounosry
.u.,in anhnn Western frontier has been mu.
cns.;o. ~, ,s" "euSeu q proposal Tor = disc
as a ,,em,rd g. o'eo. Ssnnos oe considered
less the d" 80 Scss'on =, .elri1ory' IN
there IL mo i; -, !. ysspe.su 70 assert tnat
| direct;on .na 49, 'e ..rrieoties IN ina.
| the peoa 70 ,,h;c '.Ssu,cisSs OIL
of the trsary ns ,Soo sPsu 's'Cn .ua. part
| acknowledya ~ t..na lucy whi
nnones,;oass No boundary Wnatever, then
IL what :, 10y guy propos'''on ''hx ohesOe
mandinr . 80 .u &c Sonsloereu as de
! the u. '' serr"ory ron
Is The
- ~ sucn an unlimited right. so contrary
Or. Is his ma;.s,a'a .. tne treaty itself
stand thar the 80 20 under
are willing To ,ctnnra P'enpo,en'aties
from tha aIhnowiedBe the boundary
sinni m. oous 10 the missis-
rior in 1eoa Inssnent made ov a conven-
which tbs;r no. raeineu) as hat by
The Rr;,;se - ready 20 ao,def
! ed to acc-rs !. are instruce-
| to discrss ~, sucn a proposition. er
| NAV he snhrn.s llne .. boundary which
4, :. .ssNN ZOE considerations. .
,he ,ndsrs;aeaa a. as.onishment aud regret
N; oot~o,;. rs, h.. at,nc ninSTlCan pte-
nv rn.S~;sSaI not ehiy declined signing
n,;;dns Snhawa .S'e, oy winch the Indian
in ,be ,ress,, u part VIII =. britain
the n.ars "a "st may DC included ID
s;o,ad - ,ts~ A.ay Tvs q boundary as
re- svrrsss hasc a'so thought proper
snh,eet h 80. e'aoy proposition on the
The rusahces
thar th.;r $3.50 Piepipoteruarie state,
,,.c,sd in"lchscool not have ex-
ed. ~ orc-S .ss:ussiou. ana appear resolv,
head ny Proposltiun on this
10 The arkno,vIaat = 80 2 ueniaoa contrary
law. n..m,nn pflnc'pies ot pubic
Nh. ,er,;to.;ai a. VI one tnird OF
aud ,eo,,;rs, - t"A :, sne ~. otates.
sion : Ascu "iuioht discuss
The nro,os;,;.. ..,.,.x. NJ.
Il tsat H. I.a:" = mn - nus represented
dvr;no H. go :. ssos. y n.St rave nssn
80 sho,.t -. .tN wNn ssreat bii-
in ,he nac;Hc. -. oe. i~neiudcd
ythe;r : e''e VIEW 70
-. h tiahqusil'y anu security,
80 60 800 S'en !" "n'nS 70
go to,nsa.m 81. /" ale.'e on INC subject
,;oo. u,L;ch -. s.s. ~s'oii 'ne supuias
$500 - ,zoS -. bose'''ens Con
s..,o.s ohiouin