Virginia Argus. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1796-1816, 1814-09-10

lncFeol, ana 10 report the same To this cOur
with any matter deemed pertinent by himself q
required BY the parties TO be specially stated.
FEBRUAnv Bib, 1912.
On motor Of the defendants in the first suit
and the plaintiff in the second. and for reason
appearing to the court, Commissioned Nicholson
is permitted to withdraw his report in thes,
cases, filed the seventeenth day of Decembe
last, and to make such further and supplement
tai report, as may be requi red by either of Tn,
parties, or as to him shah seem proper.
JASuARy s9,h. 1873.
Matthew Clay, Plaintiff
Sarah Williams exscutrix Of Joseph Williams
and administrative of Robert Williams, John
Cal. and others Defendants
For reasons appearing TO the Court, this cause
is sent to the rules to BE- there further pro-
JAsuARy, 9th, 1914.
Matthew Clay Plaintiff
Sarah Williams executr;x Of Joseph Williams
and administrators of Robert Williams, John
Call and Lucinda bis wife, wiiteiaWilliams
aud John -. Scott, executors, Elizabeth Viii
liams, widow, end John Robert Williams an
infant son of John Williams, decd. by the
h
Chalmers, Sarah Clr~!meis, late Sarah Wat
kins widow and administrative and Mourn,
ing Micajah Watkins deed, by Henry r..
Coleman her guardian and Naihahie, Wa.h
ington Williams, Afaftsia Williams aud FAM
y ny Williams by Sarah ssaiifs,ns their guards
an, James Vaughn executor Of Thomas La
MGR, Joseph Williams WHO WAS appointed
by the said Joseph Wiilisms, deed, an exc
eutor OF his will, and the heirs, execu,o rs,
M of H.
n IS: ~: So: ~. Defendants
This cause came on this day TO b. heard on
the papers formerly read, and the report OF
commissioner Nicholson pursuant to the order
of the twenty first day of June. one Thousand
eight hundred and eleven, and was argued by
counsel On consideration whereof, ard because
the new parties, made by the amended bill, filed
since the said order of reference to commisr
soner, were not properly before the court at
the time the said order was entered, and against
whom the plaintiff now appears to have pro-
ceeded in the mode prescribed by law against
absent defendants: (and they still falling TO APP
pear and answer) the court doth recommt the
report to the commissioner who made it, al
though the same, i'll other respects, may be right
and correct, for him to reconsider and report
thereupon.
NEEDHhM CUMBERLAND.
Inthe Vacation after J5flne Term, 1914.
Clay, -. 80. Plaintiff,
against
Williams and others, -. ~. Defendants
Upon consideration of the true intent and
mesning Of the actauthorising the judges OF
the Chancery District Courts, to ditect &C.
counts, in vacation, in cases depending in their
respective Courts, ! do, as judge Of the supe-
rior Court Of Chancery holden at Richmond or.
der, at the instance OF the plaintiff, by comiseI
that tie accounts required by the decretAt or.
der ofthe Supreme Court OF Appe ais in TIM.
case, be taken by any commissioner Of The
court, in conformity with the principles stated
by that Court, in their said decretal order ant
| in conformity also with the principles of thi.
Court, after due notice to oN parties and, ts
enable tie commissioner, who msy aci, to per
form this order, ne maybe at l;bert5 to witEdr4v
| the reports in this case made by the late com.
| missioner Nicholson; And the judge doth iarth
order that sssr, sitsr slaiiGs- al
| the accounts, upon the principles OF the court
| may then, if required, state the accounts, es
| Their or any OF the parties may direct, togethe
with any matters which they may require to 81
! specially stated, or which he may think pert,
| nsnt. Let copy of this order be forthwith
I furnished 10 the counsel Of the defend ANTS
| Given from under my hand this 18th July, 6l4
1 M CREED TAYLOR.
| A copy--Teste,
WIN w. HENING, c. G.
| Commissioners Office,
| Richmond. afh month fsf, Is: q
The parties Interested are desired 70 tax
notice that have appointed the oath day c
day of the 10Th month (October) next 70
commencing the accounts by the foregoin
! decrctal orders Of the Courts Greeted 20
! which day, at 9 o'clock. A. M their attend
ance is required at my Office in this city, wit
! their accounts, documents and vouchers
also copy Of the Court papers, for the pur
pose of enabling ms to stale and settle tn
same.
THo's LAID. NC.
Virginia :
at a Superior Court Of Chaucery, hold
| en- az the capit0i in fhs CRY Of Richmond, "
| secend day Of jane. 1914
john q. Jones, =. Plain,i
| Cornelius and Andrew Conrad, trading undt
| the firm Of Cornelius and Andrew Conrad an
Company, Samuel Peasants junior, John S.
| mervilie and Cornelius and Andrew Conrat
trading under the firm of Somerville & Cor
rsd, Caleb Bonsal and the same Cornelius an
Andrew Conrad. trading under the firm
Bousai, Conrad snd Company, and the sal
/ john somerville in his individual capacity,
the said Caleb Bonssl in his individual cap
pacity, Cornelius, AFdrew 6 John Conrad 81
ting 6. trading under the iirTn on John Conra
and company, Leroy AKyxsson, Heery Ande
son and Robert Gray. Def
I II ME DEFENDANTS Cornelius Conra,
Il Andrew Conrad and John Conrad, WI
are out osths country ana against whom II
Plaintiff appears to have proceeded in the mol
prescribed by law, against absent Deicsosn
sull falling to appear aud answers and the eau.
coming on to he heard, as TO the Delcndan
John SomsrVie Caleb f,oDssl and Samuel pie
SAINTS on the bill, the answers Of those Defend
ants and exhibits, and being argued by Co1i
sci, The Court on confederation thereof doth q
l der that one of it, lnIn inrsrs do 49, .