Portland gazette and Maine advertiser. (Portland, Me.) 1805-1818, 1812-04-20

Z FSSaIo' DdJ dl11 DNs1
German, Giles, Gilman, Goodrich
! Gregg, Horsey, Hunter, Lambert
| Lloyd, Reed, Smith, of Maryland.
Those who voted in the negative
are
HIcssrs. Anderson, Eibb, Campbell Q
Tennessee, Condit, Crawford, QUITS
Franklin, Gaillard, Howell, Lelb, Pope
Robinson, Smith of New-lork, ! alt
Taylor, Turner, Varnum.
A motion was made by MT Bay
ard, to amend the bill by adding
thereto the following section.
Ind be il further enacted, That the act,
entitled " An act concerning he coMme'-
cial intercourse between the Unl,ed s's.eS
and Great Britain and France and their &c
tendencies, and for other purposes !" ana
also the third section of the act, entitled
An act supplementaryto the act, entitled,
: An act concerning the commercial inter-
course between the United siates ana
Great Britain and France anu their dePen-
cencies, and for other purposes" DC and
ihs same are hereby repealed"
On the question to adopt the amend
ment, it was determined III the mega
tive-Yeas Is, NAYS lQ.
On motion by MIR. Bayard,
The yeas and nays having been re.
quired by one fifth of the senators pres
ent-Those who voted in the affirma-
tive, are
Messrs. Bayard, Bradley, Dana,
German, Gilman, Goodrich, Horsey,
Hunter, Lambert, Lloyd, Reed, Smith
of Maryland, Worthington.
Those who voted in the negative,
are
Mcssrs. Anderson, Bib, Campbell,
Of Tennessee, Condit, Crawford, Cuts,
Franklin, GsiIlard, Giles, Gregg, How
ell, Leib, Pope, Robinson, Smith Of
New-York, TAFT, Taylor, Turner, Var
nun.
The following are the Yeas and Noes in
the House Of Representatives, on the tnAl
passage Of the Embargo Law:
YEAS -Messrs. Aston, Anderson,
Bacon, Bard, Bib, Blackledge, Boyd,
Brown, Burnwell, Calhoun, Cheves,
Crawford, Davis, Dawson, Earle, Find
ley, Gholson, Goodwin, Green, Grun-
dy, B. Hall, 0. Hall, Harper, Hyneman,
King, Lacock, I.efever, Little, Lyle,
Macon, M'Kim, Morrow, Nelson, New
ton, Ormsby, Pickens, Piper, Peasants,
Pond, Porter, Rhea, Roane, Roberts,
Sage, Seavcr, Sevlsr Seybert, Smile,
Stanford, Srong, Taliaterro, TrouP,
Turner, Williams, WIDGERY, Winn
so.
'NAYS-Messrs. Archer, Baker,
Bassett, BigcLou, Blocker, breckenridge,
Brigham, Butler, ChamfioH, ChincHdeH,
NJ. Clay, DaUeHh9Tf, Hes = Dinsmoor,
Ely, Emo.s, Fitch, Gotf, Ilawes, lax
son, Johnson, Kent, Key, Lam, LervIs,
Livingston, Lowndes, 1rByyae, M'Kee,
Metcalf, Minor, Mitchell, llosieyi New,
Pearson, PitL1H, Potter, Quincy, Rand
olph, Reed, Kidgtey Rodman, ShcSry,
q. Smith, J. Smith, Stuart, Sturges,
TaggarS zaltmGdge, Tracy, Hhsafon,
Hhiie, Wilson'S.
IP The names u the federal members
are printed III LIa!IcE-and II will be seen
that not single F1deralist disgrAced him.
self by vot.ag for the rulnous TerrApln Sys
TEN.
The EmBayro.-The reasons which could
have induced our democratic rulers again 10
resort to TINS ruinous Jeftersonisn expedIent,
will undoubtedly be eagerly sought tor by
the people, but they must be- content TO re-
main as they are in regard to most OF the
proceedings Of our exclusive patriots, IN The
dayk; unless Mr. Randolph has let the Sc
cret out, which is not improbable. The
President, in his Message, recommending
the law, gives none. The Committee OF
Foreign Relations considered the Embargo
As measure preparatory to WAR-but by
the following extracts from the remarks u
some Of the members, It appears that there
Is much diversity of opinion on the subject ;
Mr.. Seybert said the question came be-
fore the House IN a questionable shape.
He called upon the committee d Foreign Rc
lations TO say whether il was peace Or war
measure One of them (Mr. Crundy) an
swered, that he understood that i was in
tended T. lead directly TO war. Mr. Porter.
who introduced the bill, said It was framed
according to the views and directions Of Mir.
Call4tin. Mr.. Stow, of n. York, objec cd
10 it, on account Of our detenceiess situation
Mr.. Clay, the speaker, approved Of it, be
cause it was precursor Of war. lie SAID
after our pledges, shall we be covered with
shame and indelable disgrace lie also
said we were not, upon the p. esent OccaslOn
embarrassed with the conduct of France IL
burning our vessels, IS some suppose-tha