The enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1804-1815, 1811-08-13

e us '"S manner III which the com.
"eic'"' ie'ations betweeen Gtes. Britain &.
America has been treated by hf;r;s,a >.
naVin5 u. ms hand tive doc IL mcnts Minister'S
"au ietuAeu to produce, and which had
s."Sc oe.n published in America. cumpri-
'p5 liiS uipioinatic CORE spondepce between
iS t"u counties; and steing in that cor
espo'uence me most gross and wanton
ieptecI OF the ,rIe interests of England. he,
(" IL 10 De ms intention Lcf.re he SAT
Gown, To move or The production of al the
| papers lac was convinced IL " ouId pnea,,
TO the house tiiat America. ;, conn,,, IL.
! serving the highest consitle ra,ion and re-
sP'1'' bau Oeen uea, cd by Great I;,itai,
| more as an humble dependant On an i,lib.
a. P'otec'oi, than rs an equal stare In
'seu' .he "ho,e ct our Political relations
WIN America had been carr,ed ON as -
wal were the ultimate expectation How
i"i 'ne probability OF such an event ,,as in
~ 80 "''"s' Tie recent inteilige ice from Ame-
TIA 'ni6ht enable the house to Judge: aithf,
nc siixwed 1t to be possible ma, the oc,,,,,.
renee TO whicn he anuded might have ori.
Slhated IN accident. The wcayers con,.
i'"i''nS otueep distress, proposed dc sperste
ie"euies. n CotnmIttee of that house de-
ciated 1t as their opinion; an opin,on i,
"h'ch he conceded, that nothing could be
done Tor them But let the house recollect
some piiCr circumstance
''NN ~ 'iieC'' that bnt a few DAYS
neIore tue Presentaiions of these pst,scns
from so numerous class of ,he con, ,,n,i'
~, complaining Of such uuexamp!es Gala
"'y' 'he Gnanceiiur OF the Excheouer /,
"LoSeo 'he house by eAtoliing The hnanciai
60 W '"e couhtry; by eXpatIatIng on the.
NtS"Se o' me Customs and excise and
40 III sPor, by attempting to impose a tax
y" snaI very raw material which was thu.
pS,i,;'. u. the manufactures IN HIGH the
:, I'nio''e'S were engaged 1t was true that
.he hiSnt iionoraDlc Gentleman s,bseoueot-
~ ao"iiooned his intention; bu, even ,bi..
"e uid al Icasiful manner asser,;n,r $50
'he revenue Of the country was SO flonri.b.
iii6, a. 20 allow hinf 10 wave. the imnos;,;,
oi me proposed duty. What did the bon...
suppose the DIST essed manufacturers ,n,,s,
iiiihA ot TINS empty vaunt Would il he.
e"Sy 10 persuade them that general
prosperity and such individual suffering
1ou'o oe co existent! He h ped The houss.
"Uuia DO hiIn the honor to listen T., ez,,a,,.,
from Int correspondence for which he wa.
"ooue 10 move. IN order that they might see
.'S Necessity u having the whole On the
.''"'e not with view to found any nro.
1eeui"E upon the documents this Session
M me Expectation of ronsinp tho /,
~ W armament the subject. br.
ON the conviction that America ,yo,.I,s
2 W ~ x a on The attsntien at
VITA N(m Dight not be found so necl.cft.,s
oi their auty as 10 have omitted an atten,ns
10 lay on tae abe OF The House such p,pers
as might en- Noie the natioi to unee rs and the.
SUBJECT, and might prepare ParliA,.e@, To
eo"ie 10 some DECISION upon Ii in n, ext
session Ii would appear in he Corresnon
dence that OH January 2, 1910. Mr.. Pinknev
wrote a letter t. Lord Wellesley OH the sub.
ject OF the recat ui Ms Jackson. T., his
letter no answer was returned Until Msrch
IA ' "fen
Oh THIS hardness the American ministe,.
observed, Although was aware that am
answer would not be hastily given. Ger
t"ihiy ana moi expect such q delay" I'm
ques'i"haoiy 1t was a delay which ourbt 10
Ue accounted tor. On Fenrnary Is Mr..
"khey wrote a letter 10 Lord Wciie,t ev ON
the subject of the blockade, which ;,,e,.
was nos answered until March O. On Anrit
% Mr Pinkney wlole letter on the snh
Jcct oi The Berlin and Milan dec,ees tn
"h'Ch ne received No answer On MavIA
nt "roie letter complaining Of the corn.
tenance gwen 10 the iuig, g Of Aueric,n
papers, l" winch he received no, ausw.r
Or june Is Mr.. Pinkney w,o,ea leitsr 70
Lore w etlesiey, teques ing a reply 10 il. TO
'h.s Ss0o"u ie'tei Oh the same subject he re-
ceiVeu 40 answer On July z. he wrote %
ietter complaining OF the DELAY in the NON;
nation OF d b,i sh minister to America ~
TINS letter verbal assurance Of AN in,.e1,
a'e aFp"iH'Ineht was the only return. On
August The 18th he wrote another letter,
referring to his former letters of Ami, 90,
ana jUhe ", respecting the Berlin ana MI
Ia" deereeS' I o this third application, ON
ihls subject, MIR Pinkne received an snsyc,-
-On August u, he adore ssed lord INelles.
icy ssain Oh the subject OF Bs ckade hue
received no answer On Angus q M
rinEney announced TO Lord WeIiesIev III
revocation OF the Berlin and MILAN De crese
anu demanded The abolition of the o,ders
III co.hcil Tits letter was not ans.ered
unui TIC list On September the 15tR MIR.
Pmkncy wrote to Lord w llea,sy al, ,ha
Lh'ee SeNsrai subjects ol the ~, isston NJ
James o2nmare2, 90 blockade EI,ine,r. he
CONTAMINATION OF an American vessel and
INC 'InpresSment Of some American ..-iiore
1 MS ielterwas not answered until Ssn rno
per ~ and thtn only as it regarded Inc
D.'Ckade Oh Eisineur the Inatter of the.
American Vessel was referred 10 Sir W.
oCc''' ny "hom tt was sub equenh ,esto.
rtu ana 10 mention whats ,er was made,
Oi the Impressed scamen, al houqh thc,,
were afterwards released by al, order r..
Use Admiralty. fiis sst Ct cuns,srce va.
most Gioss neglect. Mnscr
f"c'5H oiate ttade repre- enta,ion - ao
Verh"ent; o. lac justice of winch 49,,
! intimate CUhduct was IN aCkn0yiea ,,.,,,
sho ytl t6ey did not cOndc sccnJ h -.
ttlg EgDIgsuff .ttau freAtft A No.