The enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1804-1815, 1810-01-30

my stable IN the night Of the 1911 instant.
aORREL HORSE He had on ms forehead
scar and snip; a bob tail his left hind inot
white 10 the f,otiock Tie sight of enc Of ms
eyes IL also mpaired. 1t may not be amlss 10
styte, that it is the same horse i have been in
the habit OF riding some years III tbs citv
JAMES GREENROw.
Richmond. January2o If
En- CHANCkRY In CIie ,ielfied Count,
4 Court, November 18th, 1900.
Thomas smith, PgimiE vs.. Stephen Fam
and Judith Bass. Defendants.
TINS day came the plaintiff by James Robert.
son. Ir esquire, his attorney, and it appearing to
the satisfaction of the court, that the Defendant
Eiam is not an inh.bitant OF this commonwealth,
1t is ordered, that the SAID Elan do enter his ap.
pearance in this suit on or before the second
Monday in January next and gave security Tor
performing such decree as the court may here
amer make in the premises 1t is further order
ed, that the defendant Bass, of the effects ir
her hands belonging the defendant Eiam -
retain suicien; to satisfy to the plaintiff the SUN
o' 4, 6s 81 with SIX per cent interest thereon
from the Btu day OF January 1907, gpti paid, and
- , 80 cts. costs. and also the costs of this SUIT
and that copy oftiis order be publ sIe5 in some
newspaper The city of Richmond iei two months
successfully, and at the front door of the court
house OF th. coulty.
~ Copy. Tcste,
December 10 wsw
IN CHANCERY-Ata Govt held for Cum.
5erlAnd County, the 27tli day of November,
1909
William Moore & Mary his wife, Piaipigs-
Against Jpnn Hu ison Henry Noise HUDSON,
Ihomas Hudson Francis Hudson William Hud
soa, Samuel Hudson, WIN raylor and sebecca
has wue, and John Rdlow and Elizabeth his wife.
legal representatives OF William Hudson, de-
ceased
This day came the plaintiff By their attorney,
and u appearing TO the satisfaction of The court
thn two of the de!endsnts, Henry Moore Hud.
SON and Francis Hudson, are uoi inhabitants of
THIS stete, on the motion Of the plaintiffs by their
counsel, II is ordered, that the said defendants do
appear here on the FIRST day of February term
next and answer the bill of the plaintiffs, or the
same shall then be taken as confessed, and the
mstter thereof decrced accordingly, and that a
copy OF this order be forth with inserted in some
one OF the newspapers published IN the city of
Richmond, and posted at the front door OF the
courthouse oftbis county.
A Copy Attest,
MILLER WooDSoN j,. Deco
December w2m
Z northumberland County
4 Court 18Th November, 1859
. joseph Rogers, PIT Against Elizabeth B. Ba-
keF, Virginia Baker, Walter C. Baker and HON.
er Webb, defs.
The Defendants Elizabeth b. Baker, Vjrpipis
EaSer and Walter G. Baker rot having eat red
tlIeiF appearance and given security according to
the act OF Assembly, and the rules Of this court.
and 1t appearing to tie satisfaction of the co,rt
that they are not inhabitants of this state, o. the
notion OF the plaintiff, tits Gecyeed and oyde,rd
That the said defendants appear mere on the FIRST
cay OF March court next, and answer the bill OF
the plaintiff end that copy of t,s order be forth.
with inserted for two months succe ssiyclv in
some newspaper published in the city of Rjch-
rnono, and posted at the front door of the court.
house OF this county :--6ad .fis further oydeyed,
Fhst the defendant We,b retain N his hands AN,
money he may have belonging to the estate OF the
late Doctor Corban Baker, till the further order
Of the court.
Httest
FILMING BATES, eve
December :. - ,.o,ns