Alexandria daily gazette, commercial & political. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1808-1812, 1810-01-03

& was not % blame 10 oisaso"ns -
kpgised act!
i sick of this subject, and return To
Bsion Of Mr.. Jackson. He Is re-
sc Minister res::len, and the success
III. Erskine. His conduct soon In
e president to require of. him writ.
muniea,ions to prevent his equivo-
He was vested with no extraordi-
,xe..-hs had no propositions TO
bon the subject of commercial in-,
IL. including the ordets IN council ;
vas authorised to receive Tor con.
4 II propositions from, u.s.. We. the
s. par,y must make. overtares and he
stem TO them and ger the hnal an
I'm his master in the mean time
l,ied 10 our governments that in ad-
b,a the orders in council would 40.
Nk.tibus upon three conditions. /
blush 20 state those conditions,
were 20 pure base rights that belong
IA ss neutral nation. -"
khe United States must abandon their
live system, .non-in,.rcourse, Sc, u
;. Britain admit the British navy
|borrs and harbors and continue this
against the commerce OF France,
Hes and dependencies. ..s T..
hat the United States must abandon
bnial trade during the war, direct
kui,ous. :
he British navy mus. be called in to
the laws of congress against our ei-
viz. the non.in,srcourse against
and to capture our merchant yes.
ing to France. with declared in.
n TINT this measure would be necessa-
. cure the bona 6de intention Of the
les. D..
4 here did ,tese conditions originate !
mind, so sickly and feverish at the
lty of the United States, as>to pro-
sm, particularly the last, which asks
II surrender Of one of the attributes
reignsy! 1t was first attempted TO
ptiginof these propositions on con.
bns which Mr.. Erskine had with
5 Madison, GaIlatin and Smith, then
bf departments. This was denied
Erskine in positive terms, in an
the enquiries of this government.
les that any such concessions or con-
sRere made or mentioned. 1t is then
led to fix the blame of calling in the
b navy to execute our laws upon Mr..
y. To prove it we call for papers,
kw does it appear? That Canning
he proposition TO Pinkney, who nc
|etinned 10 anv manner such a de-
proposal. The tru:h is, that these
hons originated and were Matched
brain of Canning. No o:hsr mind,
aud trust in God, would have been
,pt and autlaciou1. Lo. we make a
Fuggls to Ak every blame ON Our adj
htion, and when that cannot be done
,re i, attached to the foreign govern
Dur administration has been SO un-
se as never to be in the light with
litiei ms, and some foreign govern.
ever to be in tie wrong. We are
D that We are not able to execute our
h that British cruisers in all their
lsness must BE- permitted to cap.
own northumberland I sup.
nrxt condition would be that we
B ~t the British Parliament to make
for Us, and then the British navy
etter execute them--and thas we
rpd our soldiers to the continent to
battles. Omnipo,cns Orders in
ihe door 10 negotiation was closed;
pjeed some should suppose that
ndi,ions should be complied with
art These conditions being urged
time after they had been rejected
gnation BY the Executive, was good
have dismissed the British ennis.
Aou, waiting for personal INSULT
in the case Of the Chesapeake was
raeeful aud unacceptable. Keeping
shat has be.n said, I come to the
as charge made BY Jaekson, the Bri!
sser. against the President OF the
States. The British minister is
repeatedly TO give explanations
ons for the di,avowal Of the ar.
nt with his predecessor. After
Invocation he commences his task.
. Ia SD with nharr; .k. d;sa.o,unl