The enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1804-1815, 1810-02-08

|eo, vre por.s o. r-rs--- were Pc rn,-- 'o>-.,,.
ded by the non Intercourse law as berore
and no Information of this amicabie adjust.
ment could be there known only thrSarb
the medium OF a despatch vessel Now had
The despatch vessel sailed from New yort
lie very day the Proclaim alton was received
IN that city, which was April IS, il would
he impossible thar by her the news of the
arrangement could be received in Paris ON
the 10th of May. II is we think three DAYS
post to the port at which the despatch res
sci entered this upon the most favorable
calculation. would leave only IA DAYS for
the vessel to perform her passage from
dock to dock, an occurrence not very pro-
bable.
The vile meanness throughout this poliit-
cal juggling OF the English cabinet, her ennis
saries in this country, and her spies !,
France to involve us in the European con.
test in favor OF England is perceptibie
throughout this Htste piece of diplomatic
iinesse. To us it is immateral whether the
letters signed u. G. which appeared in Cole
mans paper iii the beginning of August,
were written by some member of the Eng,is.,
CABINET and circulated by her spies in france
IN the French language in the hiacard form
(the incendiary mcasure.) or whetherit was
manufactured bv an English emissary in die
United States before the sailing of the ,les
pa'ch vessel, as rhcy are in opinion conclu-
siveiy forgery, and the qualms of consci-
ence evInced by :. Coleman in withnoid-
ing tue name OF the person who furnished
him the copy. fully confirm our opinion.
Mr Coleman. without taking the trouble
to compare this letter with the one he pul,.
bshed, says it is a third of a series--ir, how
ever, happens to be the very identical one he
published, translated by a different hand.
fha.lettcrs of this cast should be suppressed
by the French government, is very natural.
as that government must know the intent of
such inhammatory pieces. Webelieve we are
correct, when we say, the letters signed
u \. which appeared in the New York
Evening Pos, last August, were never pub
.ished iii the French papers, and if the OBJ
Ject ascrbed to them was contemplated, they
would undoubtedly have appeared in the Pa
rs Moniieur. L.. T.. affords another Incl
dent which not only may have a ten
dency to discover the forgery but TO con-
wet Nsr. Canning of a falsehood on another
occasion; when It is said TO be asserted
IN London papers of April %, yhat Mr..
Ersk'ne's arrangement was adjusted to the
satisfaction OF both countries. II London pa
pcTs OF April %, have asserted, that the ar
rangement between the United States and
England was agreeable to both countries.
such information must have sprung from tho.
British cabinet, and this must be evidence
against Mr.. Canning, when he says, that
his letter of January Esd, to Mr.. :irskine.
was the only authority upon which that mi
mister acted, as Mr.. G was we'll assured.
that the terms prescribed in that despatch
would neverbe acceded to on The part of the
United States.
The following is Mr. Coiernan's introduce
ton to the letter ascribed to Champagny,
which fist appeared in his paper Two
thousand dollars per annum is worth labor
ing for.