Alexandria daily gazette, commercial & political. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1808-1812, 1810-02-12

~ IW mrr asrits 81 psss lisy that sas
ss,rea., every thing ,ha, i re 1 qsA s.I
houorabie and ~ combining p:"n.
rating With itseE all ,has isStiepnIss. d
h.,nkrup. 10 honor and credit, anMs nv; 80
aud public virtue Il Is q strung !,
10 sad svea, fv the state, but how 49,,
is, read for yourselves and judy. A,,a
Let. %. -, -. ~ : -.
On Saturday morning last, the foilovi.
me ssags .was addressed TO the house of ~.
.presc natives, or rather 70 the speaker for
them. Ipray you to read it with disuas.
sionats and unbiased attention.
To 3ames Eask, E*q..Speaksr .fMe H:sse
- Of Representatives,. ...s
Sra, - 81.
Since printing the documents relative +,
the case Of Gideon Olmstcad, it has BE-,
discovered that there is an error in tie aatr
efens Of the kfters directed to gynrrJ
Bright, aclasissed By Anistake in copying.
The date in the printed letter i. 29,hliana,
instead of the 14th April, as will app AZ
from the original, which ! herewith enclose
for the salts faction OF the house, with y
reques. that the clerk be directed, aztec hs
ss,.l' have made the necessary entry, to re-.
.urn the original letter. 81
Very respectfully, dc. .-...
N. B. BOILEAU, sse'y-
Upon the surface of this; though it is noe
entirely free from suspicion yet If there
were no fraud before, if the men conceln,a
10 this new act of imb.eility. and ioiquity,
for will prove both imbec;Gfy of mimi, anil
the uuckeduess Of purPossd deceit in the
act; if il came from nen with pure HANDS
and fair reputation; it would not have been
necessary for shemto have sent the origin
al for If they knew themselves worthy Of
confidence, they would not anticipate, ,h,y
would disdaia doubt; thy knew them.
selves and sent a paper purporsing to 10
original, and what does it prove? Il proves
m attempt to cover one fraud. which migNs
have been imputed 70 the bluuderins IT,.
no,anre and ineapacity Of the men; by
another fraud more deliberate, BY fraud
Of double degree ef impostuse, and this
fraud detected by the very evidence OF
their ow1docums u.s. .
Fret. a letter 10 written from B ileaa
to Bright, dated eo,h Marei,,
Second. In that letter he saw, a ictttr r.
expected from the Pr, sill ne
in answ.r IL one. wri,.vn H.
the governor tn him.
Third. II appears by the message at
the 18th Dec. that 90 lecer
was written until the 7ih OF
April, TO the President th1s
Is, t"r .es, days after the dat,
Of the letter saying IL was
written. ~. 49, =
This Justification Of themselves, W.,
their own act il was econ il their mes.
sage il was talked of in the L. sisa,use o..
pvnly but Conrad Wsiscr brought it be.
fore the pubic, il was not thought worthy
OF notice. Lit us now see how j, stands
bv this new message.
Fourth. MIR. Secretary now tell. tia
legislature that the date ot
the 29:h March was ms.
take OF the transcriber, that
it should have been the 18th
ofAprl. ,r - .~.
But the next point 10 the worst Of all; for
although Mr.. Boi!eau tells u. that III. Lett
Ter should be dated ON the 14.h, meaning
that it was written on the l4:h April, va
have in the documents 4 fact more extra.
ordinary than the answer expected from
the president ten days before any lett rwas
written to him, we have here IN answer
written by Gen. Bright, to letter which
was, if We could believe in coajuriug ianI
every one believes ,hls General BrISn: i.
40 conjurer] written Eve days before tbs
et,rr to which il was IN ans .r.
Fin. General Brigh,'s 7 ee.h March or
answer to the ! l4,h April.
etter IS dated on the s1st March, and 81
il is published in the governors nes.ag. Of
he 18th December. -.
Here is fraud Of the loves. eontemptible
quality; there is mortifyias ,neannsss in
nc manaer, IS well u shocking d.msn-
~x-f