Alexandria daily gazette, commercial & political. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1808-1812, 1809-04-13

,.4,a mischief Tor the linen manu-
5r'na .a s leland. It was true that at the
vslaIs . pa, i it might occasion iinconve-
rsssh1 b s that would only be of a tempo
psnes '.' 80 for large quantities were IN
l4fy ssr,lements in North America; but
y l, rs it was frczen up m the river ss'
PIC %, and could not arrive until June,
La - certainly would be too late tor The
shich .o,x;nr season. It was, however,
PtstlI' Mt likely to recur, because, in add
We y - this supply, large tracts IN irsiand
I'D : So r with seed designed purpose
! Ss a. f sowings. i would also appear
! ~ 0'fSrrncs 70 the papers before the aoase,
b ils.l,boorh. in consequence OF the embar-
i0l' III the ports being shut in the Baltic,
: s ~ importation from them had been but
uls' = ,.as, % counterbalance it, we had in
'na'' from our own colony OF Canada,
Fo' :. # timber, lumber, and all those art
rV,s mich we usually, obtained from the
q "a ports, than we had before imported
s's'E Nose states. This, De need not say-,,
~, one advantage arising from the embar
i, led us 10 improve our own resoarc-
y "a i rendered US independeps. His lord
2 p - ,bep a,lyerted 20 the justice and expe
- .,,.of the orders, aud argued, that they
We; orrieetly according to the law OF ma
-, 49, and that it was the necessary coase-
'' '.o,r of the state warfare, that neutra!s
s,sntl,r in the enjoylrrnt OF their COM
me. when ykrir nriShbors were engaged
lard Sidmouth defend " the legality OF
4. order OF the 7th OF January, 1906,
4 related to the coasting trade, which
!. .,;1 neutral had no right 10 carry on
& AZ ~ beneht of one of tbs beliigcrents, at
M sxneuce of the other. For a neutral
,o,d acquire no new rights by the state OF
var. and that was trade in which IN
,..cs he could not pursue. But he insist
4 that new ara arose IN the question
v6sn the Americans offered Co rescind their
,pbargo, with respect to us and continue
/ only with respect to, France, Il We would
,opdon our orders in.council, he thought
hen it became the duty OF this country TO
,.mnt Cancellation, and 20 that pacific pro-
poition, we ought to assume q suitable
EspCsi,ion TO Cancellation He insisted taat
S i was not done, ministers had skewn a
sstils disposition, and, therefore. be COZ
aired in the motion of his hon. friend,
Lord Melville said he should not lptrude
mon their lordlships' time but he wished
aoSserye, that the question seemed to be
saoIy misunderstood, both BY the noble
never and the noble yiscount (oidmouth).
The one said that bis object was to discuss
he entire merits of the case; the other,
bat he was DESTROYS Of submitting to the
lotce Of his majesty, the disrrust he te't OF
hepsrsons at the head of government; the
hymer abiding to the transactions, ana tie
after to those who were concerned IN con-
tuctng them. He Cord Meiviile) should
have thought it more manly to have taken a
direct course, instead of attempting 70 pass
ayote okcensure thus blended, IN which the
real design was rendered obscure. re Re
asted this address, because it was an uniie-
t'ssary interpretation of the house, during
.negotlatlon now pending with the y. D.
V'hsr motives he had for opposing toe mo-
aon Of the noble baron, which ne woula
sleHy explain: the origin of the orders IA
council was the edicts of Berlin, which vlo'
lated all the maritime rights which had e Pc,
recognized in Europe for centuries ne
Ha proceeding in consequence OF those e
uc's was on the 9TH January, 1907, ana the
'a,are Of 1t had been misapprehended' nc
,'s Of the war II 1856 was supposed 10 DC
VIC tifect OF the order in council but II this
'ae all, the order itself would have been
productive and nugatorY if sucn were
uF whole result,it would have been neon
Fe0t to encounter with it the Berlla de-
vets, which extended NOT only to France,
y 70 all nations dependant upon her au-
~Onry. The rule of the war OF 1850
4SS0S merely be considered as a coast
= regulation; the orders in council were
WllGPd IL, oil a.