Portland gazette and Maine advertiser., 1809-03-20

has year
Sd Sir this lies will pronounce
1 (. 1 s s e.. % sSs 1 a be bad so
had Intended the would have feter with
the claim to search merchant descrters utterly
ed this expected
insisted Impossible to expect And yet rather than tenn
pze the point rather than accept the sco abandonment ofe
principle without IS orma renan@ treaty. the work Of years.
hs existing between the two nations. is rejected
You will bear with me Sir While say Ina, this prsep,a'e and f
which feeling and Which likely suffer II ask why
against nessmen, Of
% ss.s.s Oh 'sS %slss Of the British
that England retained the right to retaae upon France the principles e
from public documents furnished Pes
the footing which ministers placed the point Of impress
given
vision treaty given,
treat, -o not a ". s our . , or mos
prepared
psnx discover our President this strong uneg attachment.
he t S % 50 ni 70 our n our and our
mad thought that he woud rather exchang for fam
ing utensils and our sea"en converted into hubandnn But now
50 highly does ne value our n'vs a thai he prefers s
believe seriously intended eoncue
treaty formally Gag should
The neion qua suci4nt
@ mind that sincerity the negotiation which
by gentleman Virginia. (s
p.ekney would executive they
have borne edenee Of bis rnceiy if such had been the fact Mr.
Conscience and attachment Mr. MONROE lie Of disposition
ton and Mr. p.nekney IS said also to be isderal.t
All this The gentleman ks But Mr. King sir
clearly aequ, any with the President because
iavnst ar TO doubt lie sincere disposition
sr Gs @ ss s % s.ss ss, ss ss
time public and upon .e nature 81 the @ wso nave
ratification of the treaty, was The deca
ration of Holland and Auckland which ae9mpanisd It. VIVA, did
you perait ask whether your intention to submit to thar
S or more disclosed submit to France than 10 England No. hope
shall agree fight before consent that either OF those powers
Ikaow pretended the Berlin dc de-
signed only municipal regulation municipal when declared Ing
produce liable i 's 20 capture
France such explanation of the decree from The French mnsr
France and the United States apl
proper express any his there ground make
any the execution with respect to any thing wh.tsoese When the
his opinion but affected not TO be the rsr org organ
for the mos, destructive execution decree
allowed sleep for nearly year-a pubic rnr
property to an immense amount sured by
$ s's ss. .s s s s s 's' s Ks
exception in , decree and therefore is prS.ssns were 10
dollars snxeto consider this decree as municipal
p 1,'sq sss oeEaSs Of the B.
% wa Our nave % the esee
rights II France had confined the eSeenon Of The
could have complained The
within jurisdiction, and should have had
nothing which resistance But suppose the decree
lad become bound its
usertak have been greater than the
England, she would repeal Der orders III
council
view this subject in another o Of
igh, but present pnkne, tell Mr. Csnfng
instructions from m President that Great Britain woG e
Ued States would the
DEGREES This the letter OF Mr. Canning to M
Phkney, 25d August 1909 and dmted nat dd
the letter Pkne Canning so tie
Your then, would agree 10 the terms vii Gu e
divine Ito
which, part they refused the which their ministers hid neEo
would then Other material ground mans for
the formal clause
merchant impressnent
Is with Britain the
continue in of and contention You were offered
o
1900 The president aud point
lac will be ceeded, and
without III, which, made Docs all
this look like dlsosio dis erce with
MIR Presdcn, consider late
Cannu