The enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1804-1815, 1809-12-01
REMARKS.

NEW ANsAso.
Gag Let us pass over THIS miserable G.uE A.
bout the GahereRts OF Napoleon, the virtues of T
PICKERING, and The Vaccinations of Trench parti-
| Fans Bclievc them gVho may
(6J The facts, which show that these Orders
Were not only most strongly expected, but were a
Leading motive to this measure, are these
That Extracts and letters announcing their
existence, were published IN our Newspapers,
| and seen at Washington. That letters were
received and published in this place from mem
bers OF Congress in Washington, not only speak
ing OF these Orders, but pointing out the EN-
hargo az our best shield az lnst them, and these
letters were ota prior date 10 the Presidents
message, recommending the Embargo s That
from the very tone of the ministry and the senti-
ments which they had expressed on the dis
| cussion of those of January, there were rea-
Sors to believe that some such sweeping orders
as these would have been issued, more especial
ly after the French Decree lad been carried into
effect in the case of the Horison
90 And what say written, incontrovertible
documents in opposition to- these bold and UNI
blushing assertions Mr.. Pinkney's letter To Mr.
Canning, of Angus, 49, 1893, uses these expires.
SONS :" have the honor to ssate TO YOU, Sir
tilht ~ was the intention the President, IN case
u H. repealed her orders, as regarded the u s.
toeNercise the power vested in him by the act of
the last session of Congress, EMIL d" an act to
authorize the president Of the United States. I'M
oer certain, conditions, to suspend the operation of
The Rctiaytig An embargo all siiips and vessels
"a the Dn,t5 and larbDrs of the u 5 f." bv suspend
n'S the embargo Jaw and ITS supplements, as re-
CARDS c. 81 nm 0ufhoriSed to g,vc you this as
Sard'Ice IN the 1ost fo,mdi nlunney and trust
Chat upon impartial enquiry it iii be found TO
leave no InIucenent TO perseverance in the Bri.
ush orders, while il creates the raost powerful
inducements Of equity and policy to abandon
them - Now, how stands the veracity of the yin.
dicltor of Jackson!
az IHis is not the psint--ihe point is thst Mr.
Jackson chose to throw the Lie direct into the
teeth Of the Secretary Of State, by repeating the
nsinuation that the instructions OF Mr. Z. had
been submitted 90 Mr. Smith, after that gentle.
man had assured him of the contrary-f,r which
Mfr. ]. was told and deservcdly too, that his com
mu cations with the Z o1eGlcaG government were
at end
CeJ The point is here mistaken. What is the
real git cf tie question II IS not, whather these
three conditions ypere Su5ntitfed to the Secretary
OF state, nor whether they fwDlsd the substance
oi the instructions, bat whether they were known
by the Secretary OF State TO have formed the sine
qua nan Of E's instructions '--Unless he knew
HIis fact. there WAS no sin in concluding tie ar.
rIngcment with trskine-And yet SO far is Mr.
Smith from admitting this, that lie even expressly
AMI pcremp' brv denies it.
or What f.msy cQ.fivocatior Mr. Smith did
not Ga1lit. what Jackson bad wgea Unon him
on tie contrary he dsuicd ue insiauatio7s or lack.
son. il was because Jackson re-eciioed these in.
situations in the very teetb u the denis that the
door was closed against han - Mr. Wagner has
boWe7e Only repeated tlic c3oiyoca.io6 q! c.