Portland gazette and Maine advertiser. (Portland, Me.) 1805-1818, 1808-08-08

~ rl.44cNs Tendency CT tbs inca Ere. Wih
.eiPeet u America. understanding az q .eso
eiasmH 1914 hszv fsadizg, he ihould abRain Y,
preien1 IRON aiking any explanation upon tha
Nuheet Ills Lordihip concluded bv repeat
Eng ms convieiion 81 the malignant influerct
q rms mcclure. aud sxprehing a hone thai
MS Msieiiy N!Ihi.ers would be induced y
ret with magnanmity in refeinding thefe Or.
aers IN Council, from conviction IF the ne.
ceiA.y OF 10 dong and in the hope If IN
fpesdy accomplishment, his I.ordihip int;rna
ted that u was not hs intention NJ .orefeut 4.
prei' the motion upon this hbleG of Thic h
ne had gwen notice previous 10 the recefs.
Lord HawkeibTy yindicated at length the
orders in council. He admitted there was 4
ccnhaerable diminution in The commerce 81
the country, bur az lealt one half Of that pre-
seded tie iiluipg of thoie orders; aud ne con-
tended that the exports in January and Febrr
sgv, !S0S, were mere than thofe Of the cores
bonding slonths IN 1876.
Lord Lsuder6a,e warmly supported the
motion and fsFcngy Condemned the orders il
ccnncil.
TIE Lord Chancellor did not mean 10 op-
poie the motion but could not LEI it Pafs with
out entering lie pro,ef againf the interior
snce, that becsuieit Hay Re ihewn that there
Is Girninuiion of commerce, therefore il is
proved that this dimihution was ia conEe-
quence of the orders in council.
Lord Holland again reprobated the orders
n council an frsng terms. and conhdered that
the osas frsSaHG lay upon the Nobie Lord OPP
polite 70 Thew thai the orders il council did
not produce The evils complained of
After a few words ia explanation, from
t.Srds Auckland, Ba,hurG, GrenyilIe, and STAN
hoPe, the motion was agreed %.
May 10. The Dutch olGcial Gazette con-
tains the fnbnanoe Of the decree ifuad by Be-
naparte, a. BayouRe, ia thels words. OSds,s
II bil Mgyay ~ En- srar, tired % Bey0ase, April
", AS0e - The american Government hay-
ing placed general EMBARGO in all the
ports ct tbs United States, has fuipended our
commerce AL Auerirsn hips fhall IN
C0NSEQt ENCE be coniidered a. from En-
gland, and put under feQheara,ion And
there 1ial be IN, ~ The Dutch Councillor
Of State an order 70 be laid before his MajettY,
a itatetaert OF All the American vAlels which
pnered our ports hhce tie f1lt Of Ian
gary, 1903"
~ What viii the harS- driven htreliaes of
lie .smericsD aininiRrstion fsy 70 al this p
Here We have proof Poliive THAI one s>gsgAsres
Of their darling E@bDge has been the pro-
mitigation II anloEe lcvese decree, by their
good fsien4 BopsParte than any before iFusd
BY hiE.-HeFe We 6nd : that the hrf fruits OF
theiFEmbsge has been At order TO fequeftrate
ali Arlspean vefeB which the French can
E,1s aud We have no doubtfi 4 he account
ordered TO ID AIKEN If the American veaeis
which arrived il Dutch ports sfyer the fr1 Of
January was for the lole Purpole Of Fequefter-
ing ttem aifo.--Alsny Of shele muR have fail
~ from liz Z. States ports long before an
Er9bargo WIS dreamed Of Many Of them
Re O. thci: voyages from diaant regions OF
tie globe, falling under the fsith or treaties,
and tie laws % nations; ard many OF them
among thofe who have obtained Mr.. Jeffer-
fon's 5an1fsa 70 60 toiea. E1F We hope the
apo ogItts Of tie adminiHrafion will nO+ attri-
butte this " Of their Slsr Embargo to the Fed
er.5gis NJ, no, Mears, Ttfe,is., Evts,gs q Co.
are iuiIt "a 70 al the efsaif cf this effect.