Alexandria daily advertiser. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1803-1808, 1808-02-10
!. IS he hsd rosexret dto Geese
= On b, moving IT, 1'sSx

On bt moving L. Guy,
! Mr.. Neuton from the toma
commerce alo nanufac,urts ,rsa. s It
resolution to au!hoEtse the dlspo.iN,@
cresain charts Of she soas: Of Nor,b' . "a II
lina; which was agreed 10. va
The house hssing taken Up for Con-,
ration Mr.. Sloan's Resolution Tor ~
moval Of the sea. Of gcvrrnalea. 10 pta q
dsIphis. u'l'
MI. Sloan Withdrew his seso(,,;,,
And
Mr.. Blouat renewed the uoaion y
did not renew i. bscaase he irseatea
vote tor il, but because il was. nro,,, ~
since il had beee aglta,ed. tia. il shculS
decided; aud because suce ,as,srdayg,
tier meeting (caueusl had been held :,
the Trends Ut The rasssule 10 deee,u,irr ),
the Course proper TO be pursued lie s,s
said yesterday and tie would ,epcs; ~
day !; sEas the sdcpf,oa q his resalu,o,
would be raost haer4nt ,lota!ipn Of /.
Iaiih of the raslvn. iii sb2uId puw l.
dopied he would immediately lay uptl 4,
table a resolution 10 repeal he / uodr,
syssem-no, 70 tc.e tey II Ejnsst, bal :
auirs the fears Of the people which s5v.
be excited by sueh q meesuse lie 90
yesterday and nov ceFtised u sss1,
much that he very mutt. wished 70 sai a
his subject by severe paia IN tax he'd
M, \ ,n,r ,cl, &c ,.eto
peal the furding system, tj.at lesoEe,is
should be laid on the table .ol that Lur,,s.
and that both the resolutions shou.d bc rce.
red to "a committee En- discussion. con5s
ior my own part, said Air, D. tina: am il,
perfectly satisfied OF the propriety OF renar
ing the seat OF goyerEEent; and wheh Il.
question comes, Snail Vote against it L. /
cause | would not vote for ally positive mea.
sure without being perfectly satisfied Of il /
propriety. Blu: as to all this noise, this talk
ing of the breach Of faith, CT tie publcdtt, /
and these menaces to individuals, they uobc 4
influence lie. We are not sent here byor
constituents several hundred miles, to becCi.
troled CT Influenced to deylatc from the csi
nary course by the feelings Or dlspleasQgeG
those interested in this district. II this gpt
rated in any way, it would induce nae to 7tE
tor removing tie seat OF government, becaua
the attempt to control the freedom ct lcIllt'
ration is not to lie tolerated. He COIrat
course for every individual, IS, lot tc sofe
his mature OF better Judgment to be lniaues
cd by such considerations. Not being pey!ed-
ly satisfied &c tie subject, | wished to give
a fair discussion. This was my opinion
should vote fer reference OF any moton enge
neral principle and give any subjecta .siFalE
cussion in the usual course except Il wen
SO ,,alpably wrong that no man OF sease oFie
formation could support It. was moi at !:
berry to refuse {. reference 10 this, Oh LIB
ground, from a knowledge ct rs adYo:aeS
As gentlemen wish a decision on tAls quesaS'
my own vote viii be against removal oe'aN"
] have not beeen convinced CT us PFoPiEg
AS to the breach Of public taith, tbs aS
ment does not influence me. GO no' Io'%
der that there is constitutional lnJuncaon
gainst removal. I consider it as an honofal
pledge of the public faith, which c0hSI' 'l,
not perfect obligation, as IN case o. :rD'
but an imperfect obligation, a case OF es',1 a.,
ion aid uncertainty. l would rathef cl''n
2 caution as respects deviation from the 'Ou as.
IF public faith; would rather err from tH Nv.
sive scrupulousness than from too inaen . T5,
y. This is nv view CT the sui ;ee' = 81 SIS
real question is che on which sentlenlls-n,i lr
ability and unsuiled m 'os1;n,
may well differ; it takes in so many q's No MI
geographical, political ard moral tr"s y obis.
we'll differ; and It's being an lmperleo' , ost
ion renders ii a peculiarly difficult qu p.rM e
The arguments in favor Of the 'reiliOod
aavipg been sufficient 10 satisfy II! .,ney IN
shall Vote ' against i from.my preset l"P',
ions. -, +hs Ia
possessing the SAME Sehui lid yo. r
he gentleman from Connecticut coS S'renoa X
IS that gentleman had done tor !. iI 1ared 70 81
,ut gentIeren who could not be Du1I waat d
/.