Berkeley and Jefferson intelligencer. [volume] (Martinsburg, Va.) 1802-1810, 1807-03-13

IL ~ ohOuId he Ninth 10 give bail.
II lie party should b eonhnsd by pro-
eeaa iron ) staec court, there are rnany
additional reas6nS a6ainsf Tie ussof this
writ ID such : case. z s IS B .s 90.
The st.se courts are MOI, IN any sense
Of he word, intsrisv courts, except Ia
the particular eases u which % sppsal
lies from their Judgment 10 this court,
andin those cases the mode Of proceeding
ispartieulafly prescribed, and . noe 81
Hsbeas Corpus. They ere NOT inferior
coufts because they eShnnate from 4 DIFF
fsrent authority, and ore die creatures q
% distinct govrTnment. \.
"a. The writ Of Hdbe6s CSrtus "a q.
sisfaciendhm .svhen = prisoner hath had
judgmehs against him q IN action, and
the plansiG e DESTROYS, q bring himupto
some superior court 9 charge him with
process Of execution. tsa8 ~
This case can never occur Ia the courts
ofthe United States. One court never:
awards execution On the Judgment &C
anoshev. Our whole juridieal system
forhids Il.
81. ~ prosegnendIsm, teefi seandnss,
defitershdsp, &c. I" which isshe when Il
isueeessary 20 remove Q prisoner, ID or.
der . prosecute, or bear testimony, in
any court. or % Be ried In the proper
jusisdietion wherein die faet was commit
ted ~ s.55z.ttF@7 l<st4
This vrit night upquestionably be
employed 70 bring up . prisoner 70 bear
|. testimony II . eonEf sepnsistently,t with
the mostlimiled onstrucsion fine words
u the acfof congress. but he power 70
bring ! heFson up thas Dc may Be tried il
che ppoper jurisdietion l. understood 10
D Dc very susstion nov before the
solft. q = = -. E. +, ~.
u sndlsss, |. The comtaon writ ad
(stisahus e reeitiendiss,," which issues
enl of any of The courts Of Westminster.
hnA Nhsa person u suea II some IN.
fsriof jurisdiction. andis desirous 10 Re.
mose the setion into the superior court,
eommsnding tie inferior j6dges TO pro-
dnce he body ofthe defendant. together
viii the day md cause ofhis caption and
1etainer Ewhen the writ b Frequently de-
: 6onainated N Aabsas certss canii ransa1
% % anlyeceipe whafevsf the king, scourt
shah consider IN thar behalf. This writ
i sranszbleof COMMON right, vithout
my moeiou n court and L Instantly %.
psrcedes = proceedinss inths eOar, be-.
low. go I SIS &. {,
csna ssema sransafppweYt % 4 ,conrti
10 a0ard . eris Be considered % appliea.
BE Do case ID which thas wiz, nissus.
BE stall issuesby Aw without she leave
81 the courti ~
Itwould not Be diaiculk % demonstrate
that the writ Of kabaes cprpss cum caissa
eannos b The particular writ contemplae-
cd By he lsgislatnre IN he section under
eousiderat,oa but twill b snlieient 70
obserse generally, that the same aet pre-.
scribes different mode for bringing into
the courts of de United States, suits
brought In state court ae1inss person
having right 70 chin she Jurisdiction
ofthe courts Of the United Ssates. He
may, % his krst appearances, Sic his Be.
eision md authenucate the faet, upon
which The cause d ip.s lscse remoyedin.
% the courts Of The u. States.
The only power then, which ON this
imitted eonssruetion would Be granted
BY the section under consideration,
would Be shas ofissuing wriis of hakeas
corpus adfesfif oaadsm. The section Il.
selfproresthal this vas not ths insentioa
of he leeislatuFe. Il concludes vish
the following preoiss :--a Thas wits of
Aateas esspss ,shAll il no ease sxseud 70
prisonery IN jail. unlesg where th-y are
= custody pn1sg % ~ color q The %.
thority eide UIilsf Sales, orsre con.
millsd Tor sliSl before zone eoust0 f de
sanle, % aFs neeessary 10 Be hropghs IN
eoeourt - ssssify.
hitpsoviso sslends to de whole see.
tioa. . nmin The powers previously
eB1niaA % she courts beeanse Il specifies
aeass Il y partieulariy Applicable 70 the
me oftAs power By eoarts--where ths
L.