Alexandria daily advertiser. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1803-1808, 1807-03-03
From tie IoNDos COURIER q DEC
THE NEGocIATIoN.
ICsneluaed.1
,TCsneluaed.J

assume determined form. II was agreed,
however. between the negotiating n1inis.
ters orboth sides, ,hatlhs Pro1et should
first come from the part OF .tas tnaglisn a..
oen,s. and that the French minisiers-shoald
isp.y 90 i, bv c0ntre pro1s:. =.
.-s~;ess apswi,hin the pur pose OF this deiais.
i 4cfolsew. ua...hy aote the alternately abrupt
!, and retarded progress OF this nesocla,ion.4
Let It su,1es ~ say generally sha. noihinS
s was neslxe.ed on the part ekts> French go-ss
ycrnmens which could sluas. or deceive the
British esSaci ssors. 4Ssch were the end
: lsss Conferences upon The subject Ct Mal-
Ia; the maaac=<i il, which the conir NATION
of the l1.rish sovereignty over IT shon.l
Ee expressed ;s,he extent tos~aieh II saoasa
Be coa6rc ed whether it shac.d be Passsa
: s,tb Sihvsfio, ~shoa.ei be mentioned as q Cess
s:aa 90 lhe par, Of France, or simply con.
sijsYea as mar, oe the ssate Of actual pos.
/. session 2uhrthsrs glaod should posseas
il ia peIpetc;, y,soE> Tor term os' years !.
These several points,r wihraaay sthefs o.
the same kind, were debated w!,a iee usa-
/. al diplomatic dsxteTiY on.the part OF the
French nsgociasass. Tie complaints a.
gainst the .lhex.y Of the English press were
revived. and iarreply to the answer OF ihs
81 Bri,ish negeciator, that the Eng.'sa 50.
vsrnmens could not prevent even ssrlsiufes
l. upon itself, a sioga!ar demand vas mace,
! whether IAN act OF parliament. was not OF
force 10 effect every ,hing 10 another OF
the conference. ,he French negosia'ef ex.
pressed his condolences aud. as it would
appear from the language eHsP!oyed' ex. :.
pressed i, as the direct organ 4ct his sose.
5 reign, that 10 the event CT the -sneeessful
termination Of the negotiation, the peace
of the two governments would not ss again
interrupted by the es,entssious reception,
according 10 theirseveral titles and orders
of the French emigraa,s ID ths-6lsriush
court; that such acknowledgment would
ever BE considered as cheriahlng the afreet
enemies OF the French government. aud
mast moreover render imposslble the do
nestle Intercourse of the two courts. aese
kind Of topics heightened every conference,
and were distinctly the, subject cs many.
Itis asinposssb;e, as it.woald be useless,
10 relate them ali sniuutely; sakice tito
sav, that after the exchange OF many pro-
iets and contre broJets, the following. whish
was proposed by the ncgociators 90 the
part OF England, va. the one undsl DIS.
.cussion so late as the middle OF July last J:
1 France to coa6rm the Cape OF Good
Hope in perpetual! sovereignty to Ing.
land.
2. France to procure shsihnsdiste re-.
.,oraticn of Hanover.
S. France in he same manner to conhrm-
,he island of NJ alta in perpetual sovereign
~ TO England. This article to -be express
cd simply. s,
4. France to evacua,e the kingdona OF
Naples, and become a party in general
guarantee of the integrity Of the Turkish
empire.
s.. That If, inretnrn fer a doe valuable
consideration, the Sublime Porte could be
Sndaced 10 the surrender or exchange OF
the district of Montenegro his Russian
majesty, France should not oppose, bu !.
should on, the cher hand faithfully and
s,rsuuously concur to give effect 70 such
negotiation.
s. That the republicsof, Ragusa should
be declared independent, but uader the pro-
tec.,on of Russia.
=. England, on her part, 10 return tor
the above cessions, aud the restoration OF
the ordinary amicabte Intercourse between
nations a, peace, TO acknowledge the ia )
perial and royal title, aad the state of as
,ual possession on the part of France and
her allies, .u5jsc. to the, asovs.sxemptionss
only.
S. The several settlements aud islands,
conquered on the part ofhis Britannia ma
icsty from France or her allies, IN Asia,
Africa and America, with the exception o.
the Cape of Good Hope, and the settle.