Alexandria daily advertiser. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1803-1808, 1807-01-09
To the Public.

n the charges have Ial-ssss stiiu eaic ~ 9ois
81 rneir a1fi6ce ans. iaisei acers Mnash s.ssss
examined, win pass nrnotleed bs the puaiiitcs
s,.c,,.se /. & sen do not a ee1 fall1ifssa 70
s,,sssfv their conduct, ia their base aftempt 10
strsr;se "a, and my children OF our llvlIg ior
Srf, tho they caaase to assert the con-
t-.-sl ,hat the income from the estate OF nay
deceased husband is not competent 10 board
and educate his children
What have they said TO niyaldatr my assn
tinn If their establishment las they ponpoasiy
tsr,,, ia being but Jew months In existence
NOTHING hat, to disprDye That they
have ,aeanIy endeayored to Fangaer Wilh my
aperts In vasiosss places NO IA M t g
They said shey had aot ss'taara7Sn an equls
yocal alv srtisement, and say : there IS not al
editor in Baltimore but will pronounce 4
downright falsehoed, and then aPPeaa 10 nay
conscience, and my agent, Ac---l nave gwen
the dates of the publications, the time 7p'4en
the eouiyoci advertisement zras svlfaar '''A
and an extract from the letter OF thas same 81
gent, 20 whom they had the bareiacea ahapu-
Sence to appeal these az f'roDe, ana WI. re-
chia,s Gle lin this instance1 4saF demonstrate
taesr .1ezi5eszte se.-vrrston 81 truth 81 all this
thrv ray,r-NOTHING. Full proof OF the
sa.sebs,tsa d,f fheir insinnation respecting my
brothers employment, Is before TIE plofse-~
Sto this they reply--NoIHlNG- neg assert
ed nv Brother saw IN Baltimore the o11ginaa
recises &c.-isis deposition proving the iaisf-
hood Of this, Is also before the putdle, enc mas
for an answer--NDTHiN1s- 10 my faf0sf
(fya,, raeir ozvm sJ1.syflssmeuf} ct their asser-
ton being false, where they say they are the
onIy PERSONS that ever prepared any OF tas
r,ey,iei.es,s what have they lepiied--Nt5,-
THING: ard in saying nothing. they act With
that cautious cunning whoa always marked
their conduct they tear examination, . snail
ae of from os,e thing to another, foF anvesfi-
CATION Is what they dread The tact IS, that
s.,x,eyal prrss,rs IN New York, and one person
r., & navy i, Baltimore, worked In the same
.,,,rtx,,snt. pith r. L. ana Son. These per-
sons can prove, thar Il. A. and aon ssofAea ~
NO oder uaTsesst hlaa WHAT Tisgs so'nho'' 20 GU
the ger Enaes.-Shcnid r. L. ana Son deny this,
j viii produce satisfactory proof here, s'sd re-
fe- 30 N. II. the person now IN Baltimore
n. and Son pretend they wish people to
,,5,,.;r. ;;,tn tlscir private characters, Il sup
nose hv way of exfenuation They ought
70 wow That even If their private characters
were esteemed good, ii would not affect the
trosfI have qsiduced Of their falsehood' nor
eh,,nye a l;e INC fruth. If the public really
did kpsogy their private characters, would Ms
ver trouble myself TO answer any hes they
chuse 10 print. No person can confer or ne
: Greater faynr than by making the eteipfy X.
L. and Son requests: Let the enquiry be s''ade
n any reiigtlborhood where they have hereto
fore lived, or OF any uainfsrsstsd person who
has known taeu for length Of tin'f perhaps
the Senior viii refer TO sore soetety with whom
, he has beer connected. by fireseaif business IS
not with their Private characters they have
foolishly introduced the subjeet-they Will act
srsss,, not to renew it. Cunning is apt to o
,ershoot its mark presume K. l.. < Son,
when they said s we had no occasion 10 cory
f,o,g tie yeeite book" did not remember that
en- affidavit was before the public, frozang tbs
IDENTICAL rreihe book to Be ia mig possession nor
had they brains To reflect, they zoere Producing
anouestiona6ie taroef that my 'sedaesnes arc ge-
ssane.