The enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1804-1815, 1807-08-25

d
Oh 4 Jungle individual mir Swartwout.} Col Burr ak
ed me, thought could ,a,fv pimenr in Wan.
MSton county, or whether could raife one W rh more
ea'e III New Icriey Mr. Wirt. You have lived
IN New Jefiey A Yes) At Warrington, we
TOOK walk; Col. Eurr, Col. DupieAer and myfelf
me town and pointed out to him the houie
where Mr. Bradford lived who lad been at the head
oil the Wettern Inurrsction. lie enquired about Mr..
Bradford (he was at Baton Rouge) ] told him.
hiS ION Was IN town, aud Col Burr expreded with
10 Ice nm Col Burr n,ei.tonsd to me- that he had
as. wth ieSe!a'' who had been engaged in the Wer-
.'n ,",arreet'on; ard particularly Major in the
North Weern Territory (,thoie ran,e | do NOT re-.
eoheS ~ who had told HIM, that if he was ever en-
gagged IN iimilar bunei, he pledged himielf i, ioud
n"' end without biood!bed, lie iaid that he Was :,
"ne ,e""w it was on thefe eire um aaces tina, adj
Viea my iather to appre the p.iident of the Uui-
's' ''1'eS' that son'e'nng was going forward.
Qa5f'esef By b. P,sjsentien.
Mr.. HHy. Which way did lie go' A. / iaw
him leave Warrington or Wheeling MIR. Mir.
were the separation oil TIE union and nl;ltary far.
the predominant features in his oonvefiatious a..
Our eonseratlon was general and mixed but ,h.ie
ieemed TO be the leading ilbjetis. Mr.. Hay. Do
you reeo!ea any thing he aid about Bradiords auA
iueasions Tor iuoh an enterpriie a. | lecot q
we'll lie iaid that Bradford vas very inoon,pet.ns
10 'ucb an undertaking aud that in uch CAFE there
ought to be the utnloit confidence in the leader MI
tins v.tit "A. Somewhere between the cCth and
z9'n' Nr. Hdy. Perhaps the date OF this letter
Vrom the priioher 10 your faiher) may f,iow. l.is
is'ter is dated onthe zlG. Mr.. Parkey, "a is,orA
Did he approve or condemn that ientn,ent OF IN.
MAJORS which you have quoted "a, 90 not recol
iect. HE imprcion my mind was, that he tho'e
him fine fellow
CrsG Examin.a.
W.T.. 6HSr. Ycufpoke OF letter from me to your
iat'er. DO you know whether h.. wrote me- ums
time before, letter of invitation to his houie A
4 rs he had written about year before to YOU
at FittfDurg. That letter is yer uniea.ed IN nv
brother icms Bureau. 9. Did your father oommu-
n''a'e to you, next morning, nights converlat-
On! a. Yes. g Before rode a. No O
DO you recolle6 oil my having made ievera enuai-
res aio about the ienii.arys OF leaning; and OF enc
mat =" as projected in your neghburhood aud of nv
luggening the neceillty OF encouraging it? A. You
ipoke mueh too Oh that fubiec.. .. Did t.em To
know any thing of Bradford, before you told me A.
gu ieeiied to know good deal OF the Inlurre Siou
Z. pld you not tell me, that Bradford W as ,.ofy
!ort OF demagoeue a. did uot.-I have no Obj
Jec'ions TO give my opinion of r. Bradford
l.'fh'i"ned INN to you as mere lawyer. O. Did d
iesr' to know that Bridiord lived at Pit,i0,rr be-
lore You mentioned i: and pointed out his houfep a,
I OH d' not ieenl TO know It. o Who were at Din
ner at your ia,her'sa My father, m,ss..r, wife If
ter Col. Dupieaer, MIR. T. E., my brother
I ON ~
discrimination Of Col. GEORGE A7oscAw.
Col. Morgan was proceeding, when Mr.. R,,r-
Objected to this kind of evidence, con(it;n., 81
conversations and previous declarations Someu
u,luI'o,y converft'i"n eniurd upon this point
when The CD. Jt.J9ile id tha, he undeyl,,od N
is"e otjs etio"s ", uld hereafter apnlv 70 ~.
confederation as 10 the Introduction of te7imoI
ny; that tbe|c objections might be berenfie,I
WGr@ and that it was inpoiiibe for the cHurA
20 H'i"w TIE nature OF the evidence before III
was Introduced
:. Mr. iie1 If the gentlemen win only wait j
'neY vii lind thai other circumstances Nj
l"'pe on! 20 prove the maeristy of this tefliI
a'o"Y' ! MS w'tneis will prove what was tn
nf'e 81 tie p'iioner's mind IL AueuGlaR MI
Lee hope, then, the jury will diain9jv nnl
oerhand, that they are not to infer from III
courts declining to interfere on the prefrnt Oh
e"n"n, mat every thing which drops from ~
"'tneis, i to PAT. without objection.
COL ;moRcAN (the father of the lsif witnefs
ne,e mas been long quaintance hrtweeA
col Burr and myfeh. He had introduced III
my "o''Ie TWO OK bis nephews by the name oil
"uu t"'rd by tse name of Edwards
fieTrepont Edwards's- I had received m al
ny cNi'!fies from col. Burr in New-York. afeI
'heie thihGs bad pafird: which had formed fscI
q" attachment To him, that never G,ovId hal
I"'eo''en ~ had not this late buGnefs tskeI
pace. hHou' tbre- years ago, col. B. was MI
Ger c"o"Gerahie, md rs Thought unirt peTreI
I"t'"".--l FAD tnrn a Younger fpn. who is noyl
"e'e' hury'nG iaw at P'tfbnrg. I vifIed "A
MAKE nm known to col. B. and in conf enen1
OF my trIeha'hip for hin, aod of the great ~
% Periecni'on againlt him, Iin,i,ed him in III
,et'er 10 Morgan4a. In all Probability, 1,ouu
nave uonS the iIne thing, from the fame m
'Fe' VI not Tor the attachment which Ihad coa
ce'ved toe him. Col p. however had lief, Pm
uu;E' o5'ore my tfter irached il, ard it n
mans now IN my fou's S.ru.oire At Phi. (hnro u
ga me 2ith i"t haSuG, received lette, frcu
Co'. Is. dated at Pitt.bdrs, Informing me III
n If hou'd d'ne With me next day. (H-re M
nay danded the letter TO col. M. who c,id ~
,he letter was dated on the gI:. and ,l,t n
mao not for fnme time fepn il. az he had ~
ntttd It to the Pr, idcft Of the Uaited san
.'S iettsr was banded 10 nc by man. Vii
ca yea bImie'tCouDt willie. bei;ry. NV III
III" ""t cdI on me that evening: Int ~
morning informed him, if was abis. ICbcrA
cSesFta'n'y go and met Col. B. and 7 rtoueNA
nun ana Dis brother To DO it, with letter Of III
'o'uC''oh explanatory of their names and ,h1
'"tenuon. WHAT coUverfition took place M
tween him add my fon, nalI not c3
ID mentioned to- me ~ convetfa,jon. Co!-r,1
p'euer' As ore ofthe 6f.t military chsraq, Il
ne age. ihail paGs over the conversation N
incidents during dinner. After dinner Co..
oi our 1ne country obieived that vbep f u
wv '"e'e, tbere was not a hngle family N
tween the Ale b2ny trc,,.,.;-