Alexandria daily advertiser. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1803-1808, 1807-08-10

y. r,.scr;be. Lie therefore that
sesss .; ss s, The court TO make az iDmedl'
Pc yss y T,s,;.e. The court IS unwilling
txa ~, aoy particular course; tor a'sno,
70 d'e'- s..d some books Of practice, my
e '';e. d this polo. is not hoaily mace
op''' Vp.,h,p, the best system IS pursued
sp g,;,sin, unless iodeed some o:nsr
a;rc had beeo previously establish
.ad long cosrse Of experience 10
So g; e an has perhaps a'sestsd ITS cen
'0a; sor;es. lam unwilling e wave alto.
ss .s.r The practice of Xirginia, That
gs'a. which appears Is me the best IN this
cow considering the sseat numsrr OF coun,
e1 1sho are employed, am shs beach: OF
'..,r;I;nr the saving oftime with the clear
Is' &c Il The case, is perhaps toe follow
W. I.es the case be fully opened on DC.
VII vi C he y. S. asd the testimony on
49, .,ae gene through: Let one q the
s.a,s;.e couassei Afterwards open ttsf cass
sssshyhalf Of ss.c accused, and tue test'nor
- - - Ina, side 3. fully eShib;.ed then
y. e The re remaining counsel tor the y. >.
~ -, ,onnsen, on the whole evidences woo
a =, s. answered BY the counsel for tie ac-
...,d until at length the argument IS
.so.,a. by The remaining COUNSEL tor the
s,o..m,ioa. However, ibis IS q Case IN
rs;.h doro, prstendsto dictate.
Mr. Hcu.s Were this q solitary case,
!. I .honid feeibr little solici: ude on the
..s;.e,, Batas We have repeated labors
Is ne same sort 70 undergo, ! must con.
G.. ,ha, ills with much regret trar tss
l,e;.;ou q the court. The opposite coaH..
g, bsys 90, so much labor upon their
,hool2ers; because they are 50 numerous
shs. they may easily divide ADD reduce
j. ).
Mr.. Bat: suggested the propriesy OF sd
;,urniog The conr. sill 10 morrow. when
some srsegea ens IA 3bs be adopted on
lhe suhl~cs.
Mr.. Hay. There is this serious otjec-
ton 10 the arrangement Of The coort. |
rndss.aad s!ia, after one Of shs eounscl
fis ownea The case, he is 10 retire from
the scliou eaiess 10 cross examine the
testimony exhibited On behalf of the &C
cused. Nov hog many cou5ssl are oD
the other eide !? Five or six: perhaps as
nauv assryen. And { understand you.
slr, that the two remaining couosel among
ouselyrsat to ass@er sirem all. /, would
Pc most oppressive labor upen The last,
who Einda up The Prosecuiion,. tohe com
rslsd TO auss:er all those who preceded
him and i.soaad reasy suppose ,aa, the
ansvhc openedshe Gaze, shousd' DE per.
mlasd TO come tsat shc close Of the arr,
gumsus 81
Mr. &aa''fs. We hate ne objections, sir,
al dsthrcc wore to come in.
Gasf tasfsce. j repeat it, that Fl m not so-
lHaSas TO aaopi the arrangement which has
eesa saggeScd. But as to thepbjection which
nF 0eea urged, it seems to INC, that the same.
argument VII! often be repeated by all the
eounsel Tor TIE accused, ana ,hat ofeousse the
.sanSeiSho closes the afgssnent viii have no.
uaaS more to do than to collect these argu-
msps together & answer them all at the same
!. uIc' nc labor cannot therefore be as great
= mas oecn represented. However, IS the 6rss
sssuse' wishes toscolne In, certainly can
ase 70 objection.
.,S n. "'rA It's scarcely necessary, sir, to
A ur Court tosether tomorrow, for this
d sa,eoss clone Whatever arrangement be a.
typ 49, ~ vs. sir, shall readily acquiesce, if
hui. m ss.,senen at least may be permitted to
NJ Inc oarv'sn of.answering six or eight.
many. s's0io "S'aiu 's91 oe %
,.n - Question wal then wsyed for the pre-
Col s a INC court was about g adjourn, when
ns,sus sa 7, Darlington, of this city, rose and
;nH .su0a inc court, that he had been SO much
HIM y on Monday, it was impossible for
led oS. a''sad that his name having been CAT
I'd. ~ ss otsae jury, and not having answer
nav :. - . ono it Incumbent upon him to
pearh.sa. sn respect to the court as to APP