Alexandria daily advertiser. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1803-1808, 1807-09-01
!, & ! ,,ra.t vsas hi. visit a. Somewhere

between the goth and 25sf,.
Mr.. Huy. Perhaps the date Of this let.
ter from the prisoner TO your fathsfJ
may show. This lesser is date9 90 shs
21af.
Mr.. Parker a juror. Did be approy,s
or conde mn that sensiment of the maJ 81 :
which YOU have quoted? A. 1 do not re-
collect. The Impression on my MAD was
that he thought him = hne fellow.
Gross. Examined,
Mr.. Barr. on spoke OF aletter fsem
mc 10 your father. Do you know whether
he wrote me, some time before, aletier OF
inyitation 20 his house a. Yes; he9had
written 10 yAu abous year before airisis.
burg. The letter is yet unsealedin my bro o..
thefT's bureau. @. Did your father COM
maaicate 10 you next morning o.w nights
| conversation! A. Yes. G. Before we
rode? Il. No. Q. Do you recollect OF
my having made several enquiries also a. !.
boa, the srma,irasiea Of learning, and OF
one Thar was psojected 10 your nelghbor.
hoeei, aud Of my suggesting Ire necessary
of co eouraging its It You spoke much
100 90 sha. subject. G. Did ! seem TO
know any thing ST Bradford before you
told me !? A You seemed to know agcod
eaesI of the Insurrection, q. Did you not
Tell me thar Bradford was q noisy sort OF
demagcgue? 4. did not, have no
objection 70 give my opinion OF Mr. Brad
ford. mentioned him TO you as raere
LAWYER. @. Ed seem TO know that
Bradford lived at Pittsburgh, before YOU
mentioned il and pointed OF. his house
Il. You did no. seem TO know 10. e WAC
were a, Dinner a, your fathers? a My
fs,her, mother, wife, sister. col. Duplestcr,
Mr.. +. E my bfoiher Tom.
Examination Of Cal Gorge Morgan.
Gel. Morgan was proceeding, whea Mr..
Barr objected 10 this kind Of evidence,
consisting &C conversations aud previous
aeclaratioGs. Same desrltsry converse
lion eosued upon this point, when TIC
C.. 5fustice said ,ha. he uadess.oo! thai the
same objections would hereafter apply TO
lhe consideration as toa,he ;ntroduction OF
testimony; that these affections nsghi BIZ
Aereafser urged; snd that i, was impossi.
evidence before it wss introduced.
Mr.. Hay. IT she gentlemen will only
wall, tAey will fn,i that other citcums,aa-
ces will come out to prove the materially
of this Il stimany. This witness viii prove
what was the state Of the prisoners n,ird
in August last. ).
Mr.. Lee. hope. thec, the Jury will
-TTJ1C rU
infer from the courts DE- c|ioing 50 interfere
90 the presens occasion, ;has every thing
which drops from the witness is 10 pass
without objection.
Col. Morgao. Che fasher of the last
wi,aess.l There has been a leng acquaint.
ance between col. Burr and myself He
had introduced 10 my notice Two Of his
nephe ws by the name of -, and third
by the name Of Edwards. pierrepont Ed.
wards. I had received may cyili.
ties from col. Burr 10 New York, after
these things bad passed, which had formed
such an at.achmen, for him, thar ] never
should have forgotten it, had not this late
business taken place. Aboa: three years
ago, col. B. was under considerable, and
as I shoughs unjus, persecu:ica. had
then younger son, who is now here,
ssudyiag law at piilsburg. 1 wished to
make hin, known TO col. B. and 10 conse.
9quence of my friendship for him and OF
the great rage of persecution agaipss him,
| L invited him 10 that letter 70, Morganza
10 all probability should have done the
same thing, iron the same motive, It not
for the s.,achmens had conceived tor
him. Col. B. however, had lefs Pit:sburg
before my letter reaehsdi,, and i re mans ,
nav In my sons scsHtoire at Pntsoarg'
| On the oath las, August, l received a let.
Ter from col. E. dated al PitseDa'g, 'n-