Alexandria daily advertiser. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1803-1808, 1807-08-19

X
6fys 70 know the objection, ol s.
! rors,S Sind then to hold oas rs,s Y.
nentto settle the principles , Iss'a
applicable to all !; instead of H.. s'se
an argument on each particular ;.
might successivrly occur, ts
Mr.. Martin. And does thee
sirs pretend to dive iuso our H S.su.
he thus understands whether =. 's
hold tweive separate arguments, i y
SIR, Of economy Of time. Apd;a.'s,s
way TO cconomizesna | had ..t
of this mode when ! was here on psae
er occasion. Yes, sir, H. we'll l,. -
these gentlemen would save our NV
They would. if they could, dso,''
BIS cocnsel efan opportunity Of ds
hims that they might as soon !. s,sa
hing up their victim to CRAFTY The t ~
of the government. = sS''
lIr. MIRA. That 10 a mae
plcd and unf0unded assertion: I ,s. .l''
TO Ibis face. .A
Mr.. BnYr. We have entered i.
argument, becauae. We though, Iss
precise to FIX the principles on ~. .'a
at ouce;- and then to apply ,h,,, 'a :
particular cases. wy
Mr.. Hay. Isis-our wish, sir !,
sue this enquiry as soon as oos,;N.
.os.ave time: bu;. sir, i. is inpo,,n, /
US to hear such gross insults as ba,. 5
cast upon as /; insults which are off,.
to humanity itself. '''
The Chief 1Estice had hoped H., ]
such allus;ons would-have been ,nsd,. r
government ought to &c treated cid n
,seect.
Mr.. Burr had hoped, when he VA I
before, tina. be had made suG Glen, 4,
g'es, were any necessary, forany e,pnE
sions which bad been used; aud br'
illusions would be made 10 The suE.c
In hisown person he had carefully a,o3|
such language, though the Frcsscu,u,hl
certainly furnished him reasons for ia
when il had been used by his coupsL 4
had met his decided displeasure. H, \
gain repeated his hope that ro sua,,
would be made to the past: he, would n
swer for it that his own counsel sS,l
furnish no occasion for eensure.
Mr.. Mart;s declared tina. it wassaSI
wish TO hurt any ones feelings; but ID
when he was 80 of.ea in;errup,eg sad al
cused Of a disposition to waste ,n. 4
could noi repress them. As % the ra
before the courr, what does the ccn.a.
ton mos. empha,ically require? THAI;
jury should te,impartial; that they .put
have no Impressions on their p;ud TO h
prejudice OF the prisoner ;/bat that hs
should come here TO taks all their iapu
sions from the facts exhibited on cyjdsnr
and upon oath. 20 this eject he Woa
takeithe libertytoi quoting Rsesea'' HI
tory Of the English Law, vol. I, ?. 81
and vol 2, p. ,446, and Ca,ey's En!A
Liberties, p. 245. 24s, 24s, toprcvs b
rigid degree of impartiality rtguirsdO lFt
laws of England. These authorizes TaH
show that q jatyman ,ough. to be conP'
~ indifferent 90 either party; dat s''5
| to have neither enml,y nor hisad''l
! and that even particular Familiarity 80
at the same table, was Sufficient TO d:99
lily him. Bat if a man was 10 be d''s'
ed OF all affection aud all relationship %
civil case, how much mere should 1t
10 that situation. 10 case CT lie a
death? 1t was one of the mos. 'a'
maxims OF the law too, tina. every 50
was presumed to be innoceut, uu!'' '''
was sufieieu, evidence produced 70 IsS'
this presumption. Mr.. NJ. did DOT pa''
stand this having and quarter'ug o.
JUDGES. 1t was not sufficient that lbs "
should have one fourth OF the pTspv,,'
! sion of that; or that he shosll be w. :,
or .z-7shs less prejadiced than a'' ~
but the law. requires tina. he sh'u, ;,
wholly and perfectly impartial. Inc e,
ssi,ution forbids courts ofjus1lce eve! :
ing upon criminal any juror 'Aa' !,
!. perfectly unbiased. Ger. ealsp alSy