Alexandria daily advertiser. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1803-1808, 1806-11-05

which did thew givs us The slightest reason
~ believrtha. they PLACED the leass conl.
Ieuce ii Russia, or that they knew the
motives or the objects of her negotiating,
thew avail the mssivss of hss refusal TO fati.
~ the treaty 10 induce us to-suppose that
they knew frcm the beginning she would
not ratify il, and that" il was obvious'y an
arrangement between Great Britain ADD
Russia that each should treas separately /;
bur no doubt is was mutually understood
upon what basis a. leass they we're rscipso-
caly 10 act w. have JUST alluded TO-
the expressions used by the miuistsrial-
lists, that 1t was possible Russia nrgociased
10 save Austria, when she WAS msnacsd
Rby France in consequence OF the sffair ct
Gaia If thar were the case, the date
Of the commencement of her negocia,!en
must have BEEN ct course after B.napaf,e
had mepaced Austria in consequence Of
Cs,,aro having been cedel to the Russians
--bu. we had begun to negotiate before The
event took place. But il is added, :. :i,izt
the negotiations with Ena!asa had bssn
actually concluded when some new & ti.
cutie. occurred. Ia all probability tiils
treaty, exserted by subtisty, whlcn went
beyond the arrangement, was Vic difficult
sy.." Now had ina. been the fact, thar
each had agreed to trea, separately upon
mutually understood bases, how comes it
that 10 al!usion was made TO that agree.
m sos ia The prorogasicn speech! would ii
net haye'-been an advantageous circum.
stance 10 the ministers to have had il sup-
PnAed that they were negotiating in some
kInd Ct concert and understanding with so
powerful an ally as Russia? would ls rot
have beea advantageous to them in th-
svss Of Europe that they should no. be
supposed sc be :reaiipg sepa a.sly upcn the
ErinciPle oi abandoning the continent g.
would II have been Of any disadvantage 10
our ncgociasion? would rae svowal If !te
tact IL solemn communication from his
ma]esy 60 bis parliament aud.his people,
have disabled Us from demaal:ipg bs,,e.
terms! Besides, it each had agreed 10
treass poa cauluai.y Understood basis. why
did ne, BON bsgin their segocis.fons u,
the same tine, a circuGass-.,-e iI.at would
have been OF c,ntuaI advsu,age, because
IT would lets afforded boneear,e deci.
siee prcof Of ;he cancer, and coed under.
standing tns. sub5issed between lhsm?-
could no' Russia h2re b4xun 70 ps2ocias@
at the ssas sine We did? Do wc not
k1.'77 rs, Booaparts was zager to uepoeii,e
w''h ksossia: Of couyss sae pesaciasoss Of
The TVS countries nigh. aavs Sc, out in
The business of negcc;a.ion ;5aii bassn.
Did Russia bsgln to negec:a.e sl!l long
after We did ass II 80, been asserted & |
not ccntradessd that our segee asier begin
10 March Had nliasleTs ,iisse 10 consull |
th@ cours of PstersbGrga before they ha,!
entered n'u acme sert Ut psriac later.
courss with Frapcs Did -. D'Onbrii F.
leave Pe'ersburgh til long 4fssr March +? !
Wren the intelligence. ct the sigsiug q !
tbs treaty by D.Oassii 6fss srfiv-.! 10 ibis
c. uatry, did minister's bsli.se hs; it xeu;.!
not be rsuh q !: Did they l;ss es rsssap 20
suppose tia stac Russian negotiation and
treaty would b e the least advantage 70 |
this ceusuy or 80 Earops? W,iaeo shsv
tothSe ~ FeESS. '-iift-SJ HIs -a.'iiGc AL
their observations to'yha, VIZ should OBJ.
saia? Did they say that snv thing you'd be
iaue for The sdvanssg4 Of Earose By Rns
sis? Die they cot 'alk as i. we a.cna had
ab.aiped any concessions fsf the wild
strides Bonaparsr had n3de!D The secur
i,y of por,rsa Il and Sicily were stated 20 be
achieved solsiy by Us II Russia asd Eng
land were aegocissing upoa az andefs;oad
basis, part Of tse meets Of any advantages
Gus terms procured far any European pew.
er, would ST carrss have s@rn dae 30 the
government iha aegocis:ed upos a multi
ally understood basis with US But sow i.
seems the treaty sigaed by D'Onoril, which
went beyond she arrange meat, was the DIFF.
6cul.y that occurred after the negotiation
= .s,I I&v 4