Alexandria daily advertiser. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1803-1808, 1806-01-30

!, rsyiag d u e. ther question fsia-
:, s' % The roy |, s. HI, oua use,' which
n; Is found in the report, ai, a,s only .ha.
intended . shall Be- American, !. aud l, mol
properly s enemy by a-i@i''las the : Is sas
send % ~ r,.res Of Europe, II is not pos,
snefal s0 .ao.e ,srn,s should convey any .,
that = ,aI sanss is 1lssh q
Rhsrlds..' , = 10 % &c satisfied BY .hs landing
nc Ja' & paying the duties. mus s 'ns : :
loTsi'' T I doctrine is again lald down
fi'loo n ,naIs explicit terms oy the govern
p sslD : u' II in correspondence between
'rlsoi a s.I and my predecessor MI +
'Td nsg "rSs case was precisely similar TO
k-iag' h,,h have been lately before the
boss W. MIR. King complained IN is1,
pc 'Iui March IS, slgnteen hundred ana
|Fr Q, 80, the cargo of an American vessel
Rnt, = = ,bs United States TO a Spanlsh
'lng tys been condemned by the vice ad,
pray - : Of the growth OF spain, which
VA. W. con.eaded was contrary to the
ss'sl g ns,io.,s, aud requested that suitable
w. s.sa,,;oas.a gas be dispasehsd TO the
nstrac'.at n the West Indies, TO pre-,
Plopf a., - bases III future. Lord Hawkes..
sas ia : rsplyx { aprilthe ! lth, communal.
Ivy 3 : - rro ! x Inc kings advocate &c.
A'ss !. wbichiS is expressly stated that
II produce Of ~ easny may DC I'M
sa,,.a 3 neutral ;iaso ms owa country,
!, = rssxoor,sd Ike ace TO- the mother
|p - anaia ike ma amer IN tina. circuit,
Nd mode. that thesproduce aud mannfae-
-. e ,be mother counn y might find their
~ = is colonies; thar the landing the
,oods and paving the du:ies in the neutral
'ouo,rv, broke The cousinuiy Of the voyage
nd lraaliz ID the trade alshoaAyh the goods
we're shipped in the same vessl .op account
# the same neutral p5oprietorss aud Tor.
yarded for sale 20 the mother country OF
he colooy. II merits attention in thisfre.
ort, $50 clearly and positively in the doc
riue laid down, tina, the landing the goods
nd paying the. duties in the neutral coun-
" broke the een1iauity of the voyage, J
IA. il is srsysdas ad...bsful point whether
ie mere touching in the neu,raltcountry
, obtain fresh clearances will De consider
linthe iigh, Of the direct trade; that no
ositive inhi5Mioa isiusisled on any but the
lrec, trade. between the. mother country
nd the colonies. This doctrine In the
ghl heretofore stated, is also to be found,
, the treaty between Great Britain and
,ussia. Iuoe II, 1891. Blythe I'd section
t the Sd article, the commerce ohpeutralsj
APPROPRIATIONS or manufactures of the
nsmies of Great Britain. which have be.
ONE the properly Of the neutral, is declar-
d4o be free; that section was afterwards
xplaloed by a derlssaeosy article of Octo-
CT 20, at the same year, By which it is
greed that il shall not be understood TO
utnorlze neutrals To carry the produce or
nercaandize OF ar esemy either directly
fom thescolon4es - the parent country, or
rom the parent iruotry to the coloaies, I
o other respects 'Che commerce was Left
% the footing ca which it was placed by
aa' section, perfectly free, except in the
arect trade be,wezn the colony and the
aren't coanFy. II is worthy of remark
1a'' asSg re reference made IN the ex,
Of The treaty with Russia,
'as United S;a,es of America, it was
u'''asa HAT those states and Russia,
'enmafk and Sweden, had common in,
''ssS u 0eatrat qlss;ioas, SO il was obvi,
asiy ia'eade9, ffom he similarity Of sep
us'' "alch IS observable between sha'
), as amend d, aud the. report of the
l'Oca,e general above mentioned, TO
' :. az the payues 90 the same footing
I s;.L 'oese aes Of The British gayernmvn!,
ue0 oelag o6ieial were made pubic, 1t
$50 49, 70 o. expected that any greater re.
a'1' would have been conre mp.ated by
'" mat Commerce. than they lmoosc.