Alexandria daily advertiser. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1803-1808, 1806-11-05
--latest Foa-si;gyn Intelligence.
LONDON, September 8.
e u S 81 A.

Now that the ee5peror Of Russia hasre
fused 10 rarify the treaty Of peace signed by
M D'DobyiI, the ,sinistefia',sts take gTsas
,cred,; ID themselves for the delay thai has
taken Place IN The negotiation. They de-
sire as. 10 as ire /" The striking proof the
British minister has gisen Mr.. Fog, W.
suppose they mean) OF his hrmness and
sagacity r'- iie" would moi believe IL pos
s,bls that his honorable ally could have -s;y-
en- his consent TO treaty d iierenl from ,he
articles of The nRion,o Est. s. accordingly
isturns out,hat IL formed JUST estimate
of the honar Of The emperor Of Russia"
Ihs emperor is aow g sn Assecia.e Of To-
,cgrity and Ffush,' who has manifsssed
the most g honorable fidelity 20 his ali.
aacr.n They wish US 70 believe that they
never suspected hin.~-Yet it did happen,
and We are sure DOR readers rememoer II.
hat at the .sty sta,s bis ma sa:si Taj@sfT
was afo'd.ng the mos uudoubled preQis
Of his fidelity and truth, he was char&cier'
sised by tl,e Supporters of those very minis
ters as a" dIuaken drivsller," who wou!d
nos tail 70 giolase saleeln cath. The n1i
nisiefialis,s therefore dill aos, and could
no, be prepared sn expecs,hat his Russian
rrajes,y would DC faithful 10 his allisnce.
) HE whole tenor OF ,helr coaduc,aa Ian
gusge since they came -ipte power has
shewu Ina, they did rot.expecs il. IL put
ting aa sedto the session, hey nsser once
alluded 10 Risssls as aa allv; and thaug}l
shey adserted 70 the negocialiou they wsre
or, hey cever once sailerctl 1t 20
DC supposed tha, tSGy yiywea itussis rs NJ
ally, CT tka, there YVES any understanding
bsfweeu them with respect to she principle
or basis Of negaciat,an. % the contrary.
when re sdrerted TO the subject, they told
W that il Russia had made sepsraIe
peace, g il wa, owing to iiisgust at tie
events OF the last campaign they hint
ed that We had been indu Ell TO negociaSs
by the determination of r nssia to mcgee. :.
ale. IF they were always so assured q,
the fidelity and truth eff .thefseme eror ol
Russia, why did they suppose i. probable,
or even possible, ,,ha, he mlghs enter into
confederacs against Us? Yet they. did
distinctly alleds TO the dissolution Ct our!
alliance with Ra.sia, and 10 he formation
Of a northern canfsderacy headed by Rus.
STA against az. \ They declared 500 ;heis
moss complete ignorance ct the cauaas and
objects of the Russiaa negotiation they
did not knaw !. why ". Q Olbril was
sens TO negotiate al. all" But wandering
into the field Of conjecture, in order toiaf-
ford Us noas convincing psoof that shey
did not really know any ihing, they conjee-
tursd il TO be |. possible hal the whole
| ght have been concsssed TO save Austria
at the tins she was menaocd BY France 70
consequence of the affair of Cat,aro.n We
| beg the particular attention ofsour readers
to these last expressions.
IS After having delivered these sentiments
and used these expressions, in not one OF
We quote their expressions" can we
forget thar Our former alliance with Russia
] when dissolved was followed by the Northern
confederacy Is such a thing now irnpossi.
bic - And yet they wish us to believe that
they had always the most steady reliance upor
the fidelity Of his imperial majesty.