Virginia Argus. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1796-1816, 1806-02-21
Advertisement.

TN consequence of resolution of
Il the General Assembly, passed at
their late session, 1 am instructed by
the Executive to make enquiry res
pecting the situation of all Ordnance
and military Stores, belonging to the
state mot including those in the ser!
vice of the United States or of this
State) and make report thereof to the
Governor.
obedience to this instruction, and
as the most probable mean of effect
ing the object contemplated by the Elk
ecative, have thought proper thus
publicly to request of such OF the citi-
zens of the commonwealth as may
have any knowledge of the situation;
number, quality and size or weight of
any cannon or other ordnance, and
muskets cannon balls, shells or other
military stores, supposed to belong to
the state, and not in immediate use, to
communicate particular report there
of to me as soon as convenient.
SAMUEL COLEMAN,
CLERK TO tie E,eecutiVe.
Richmond, Feb. Z, 1906. (f)
Louisa County Court, Move mber
18th, 1905.
Charles Barrett, surviving partner on 5
CHARLES and Thomas Barrett. pl'f 2
AGAINST
John Lemay, heir at law of John Lemay 3
Decd deft J ]
T5EHs defendant not having entered his appear
ance. and given security, according 30 the aet
of assembly and the rules of this court; ard 1t
appearing TO the satisfaction of the court. that
he is nor an inhabitant of this stare: Therefore,
on t,s motion of the said plaintiff by his attors
ney. I. IS ordered ana decyred by the court, that
the said defendant do appear here on the second
Monday in March and answer the plain
tiG's bill and that a copy of this order be forth
with inserted in some OF the newspapers print
ed in The city of Richmond for eight weeks sue
cessvsIy, and published ar the front doVr of the
courthouse OF this county on some court DAY.
John PoINpgX.rER 10
Goochlanet County Court, 1otn De-
cember, 1905.
John Niche. pit On an IynHe
AGAINST tion ia Gban-
John Salmon, deft. Gerry.
's5HE defendant not having entered BIZ appear
ance and given security according TO the ad
OF assembly ann the rueS OF t1iS court anSl II
appearing TO the satisfaction of the court that
ne is nos an inhahitant of this state on the mo
ticn OF The plaintiff by his attorney, Il - .; Ger
ed. tina, the said defendant do appear here and
answer the bill of the plaintiff on or before the
third Monday in April next, and that copy of
this order be forthwith inserted fyr tWo months
successfully IN some newspaper published in .hc
city Of Richmond (; and that snoter copy Ds
posted ar the front door of the courthouse CT
this county.
copy-Testc,
WILLIAM MILLER, C
At court held for Cumberland coun-
~, the 25sh of November, 1905.
James Merton X Co. Plaintiffs, \ In
AGAINST chan
Drury WATSON and John Bibb, Defts. csry.
THIS day came the plaintiffs by Henry e Wat
kins their attorney. and the Defendant Drnry
Watson no; having entered mis- appearance Az
given security according to the acts of assembly
and the rules of ti,is court, and II appearing 70
the satisfaction of the court that he said Wat
sou is not inhab;Iant Of this s,atc on the mo-
ton OF the compainao.S by their Attorney, Il is
ordered, that the said defendant do appear here
on the fourth Monday in Marohnex t and answer
The compainants' bill and that copy Of this
newspapers prtlished in the city of isich;ond for
two months Excessively, and posted at the front
door OF the COURTHOUSE OH some court day.
A copy--Artest,
Sam. Ho9son, ID. c. C., c.
VTpGTN/H.