The enquirer. [volume] (Richmond, Va.) 1804-1815, 1805-02-19

was ii'd by agentlenan from Virginia MIR. (.
iilndolph.) He itill hoped that the hou.e.
would proceed IN manner worthy OF that be-.
dy.
Mr.. K. G,JFavo!G aiked if the Impeachment,
had been wire drawn rs was reprvfented By I
gentleman from Virginia (Mr. j. Rendolph) by
whom had II been done 1t certainly was not
by him. Since the fubject had been firf under
confederation he had not occupied thirty mi
nutes Of the time of the houie upon it. He
wished not to ProtraG the trial, as he conceived
mat the perion accuted and the public were
coin entitled to an immediate decifon. But
upon iubed ofio much Importance, upon
report drawn IN iuch an unuiuaftlile as the pre-
lent, he deemed IT improper 10 ac in 70 haitv
manner. The anfwsr had not been read in The
houie, but r'ott of the members had he,rS; :,
read IN the ienatc.-Probaby fomr of then, L,',
not and therefore could not decide upon ,r,,
Per rePhcation' luhdcrt hefe circumftancrs l,
deemed It proper 20 refer the full. q - ~
committee of thc whole and had felt il HI. d,.,,.
70 make the motion he had done-Hiyin M az
charged his duty, he ihouid acquiefce in IT,.
decIiion OF majority in the houie.
L he queitlon was then lakeland the motion
20 refer tnS report TO a committee of the whol-
honie was lof-Yeas 3l-Nays 60.
The queition then returned upon coucu,,in,
with the managers of their report.
Mr.. x. GrItavod called for the yeas and nav,
WI AHo"' 'aid thar 1t Appeared to him pro,
pI ~ i:"ui inc further confederation of the
replication until they iiould have tbe 1T.
printed. 1t appeared prepoftcrous to are ~
arepiication to the anfwer when that snE,,s,
was not before them. He underitood ,b,t ~.
ani"er would be printed on the next tav mi
then they might act upon it. He therefore me-
we'd to pohpone the further confederation of ,b.
report or the managers until tomorrow
MIR. i. RGnaolpb had no great objection n
poitponc the fubiect for the time moved nv The
gentleman from Pennsylvania. He wifhet tn
inform that gentleman that this homie ,yss i,
potieliion of the anfyyer of Samuel OF
copy of it had been fent them from the fns,e
< whetherpriutedOrin manufcript, il wasin,,ot
ieihon OF the hou!e. After the able and n,aisr
~ manner IN which the anfwer had been 49,,
IN the ienate, he Pretumed If NUT be frel, man
the minds of every gentleman who had atta,5
ca there. For his own part the Glence ,,L;,r,
prevailed in the lenate, added to the arin,sted
manner in which it was read, had made, an ~,
preiiion upon his mind not eafv to be efTacsi
i ne atiwer was on the clerk 81 table, he hadno
objection to hearing it read by The clerl, p,,.
as well as The clerk of the houfe NJ i,ue
tives read, he conceived it would be no dero,,,
ton to him to fay, that thew would ,e~s;re ~.
Ieint Impreinon OF II after having heard II resd
III the ichate. Should they pofpone Il un,ilto.
morrow, what would happen then nr;,t.d
copy Of the aniwor would he laid unon tba ~
Ole OF every member, and If would reorire 60.
hours to read IT. He thought that afor or.
peiuhAglt they could not have fuch retention
or It as from hearlgg it read in the fnate. H,v,.
es'i, .IE gentleman from Pennsylvania. with
Cd the iubject to be poffpoued until to-n7r-ra,..
he had no great objection TO it.WbH. h.. 40 40
up' ne would notice one obiervltion which f.u
from the gentleman from Connections M p
GrlWoio) that gentleman had no objection 70
''e ming or ageneral replication; provided :,
were done In different Ryie from the ona -,
ported oy the managers, in aniwer to this Mr
NanuoiPn obierved that the refpondept had
maze the proceedings in this celebrated cafe or
warren Hatlngs authority for his anfwer: th-
managers mad ALTO adopted an authority which
nc co'ce'ved that the gentleman from Connec.
hcut, would conIider as entitled TO refneA !.
was the authority OF Edmund Burke. Dit;.'vsr -
ing that the aniwer was ftuffed full ofevaron,
ahadid containa g!oiS s. coloring ,fslfr 3,
untrue, me managers thought it their dutv ~
araft replication fimilar to the one put in Nv
tne nou'e OF Commons, in reply to the anrysr
oi ~ aTTen fiiings. lie found .;c,;;,r;,. 49,
the theories OF the Ri. Hon. Edmund Burke a.
greco netter with the gentleman from Copnrc-
ticnt (Mr. X. Gitwold) than the practice.
Mr.. Treas obferved that he had heard tbe an
=. Va J"HSN S'idiC read III the Senate. and he
oeheVed the ret of the members did alto h.
would withdraw his motion for a pof none1oe,.
OF inc iuoIect until tomorrow.
mr.. Dennis moved to amend the ReDI;co.;o,
by ttrlEIng ont, after the words "and nhC.ry.U ,
thc following :" that the flid Samuel Chat. batb
endeavouredto cover the high crimes and ro;c.
" deneanors, laid 10 his charge, by evalive in
mutations, and INTERPRETATION of e,fs.
that me iald an!wer docs give agIof3 & conl-
orlng utterly falie and untrue. TO tbe y,.io,,,
i y, FI matters contained in the faid art.
cle'' lie obieryed that thofe words were 70,
i"etl 'perate 10 comport with the dignity of the
houie: lithey were expungcd, the renlicat;o,
would be general one, and would anf,,,,- -
very purpofe. He did not believe that ~. ror
pendent wllhed delay. It was trur tba+ 80
the beginning Of the FELTON, he had wiC1ed 81.
tr'ai 10 be Poitponed until the next felton,. bnt
having failed in that, he was now attending ,,,;,h
MS witneiies at comfortable expence. ana ,y,a
no doubt anxious for fpeedv deciGon tTs
mould vote agaInft the Replication if the word,
ProPoied to be expunged, were retained. as h.
Wou'd 90 no act which would commit the do
nifty Of the houfe. '''e o'S-
Mr. HuGER called for the yeas and n,vs.
ne quenion was taken upon aoreein,, 20
the amendment, By yeas and navs, and wers d.
yeas II, nays 10. "'e
The queition was then taken mon sgre.;r,.
to the Replication, and paTed in The s,Frr,se
tive, yeas 77--DGys ~. "'''' '''"-
/ ne above Cebate isfro1 the War5no.o, P.d.r,te,
--==-.=--- . ~ ecer1!htJ
SPANISH HIDES.