Alexandria daily advertiser. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1803-1808, 1804-03-12

.,s,,t l,fsf ii 10 b. sossstied ? Oh
N.Y. -. sgfs.ts lie aided that the papers
fds g vi s;veo g much oferss had bccn called
'a !, - ,hIus that he fad that they hsa been
an1 : d,ltroyed. | obieiyea that s'though
p'isa : q. CAFE, wnh ryfp-tt to The papers
Il '''s, -, {, With respsa TO the Ple,dsssfmi5la
wa y .se minds Of the julgcs, which FIJI! re-
20 ~ an .ol wosld have she taHc eff & as # the
|'''es 'sere All 10 exiasnee- added that many
p;'' ; ~r who had been prefsns aod heafed
'a' IA ~ oaasd, misst be on the trial virh all
a" 1s; which the dscls,asions from the
g'S so III. preceding day had crested The
mn s. s anxious TO indsce Mr.. Dallas and
'a's ~ rsaa.,t. k ths prfonsr.s defence, and Ger
= otRferea 20 rcmoxe every pre- sions fcitrction
n03 s.d been inilseS On Ihe d IS besose. We
nv. i, All emit Cd On !sssFsa Of the groin $
lsss, haiask1a On The E .c,isng day, and
S, s,,Iy ,sluiec II have agy thiag iustheE 70 do
y's Z i, or:s,aer's defence before the court. ]
ss,its q not reccilef to- have bsea.
s s. sssip ousl was informed Of his trial ana
"as;s IL soi shefclore cannon Fay, what
'a.,a,ae.s ate sded his fscond trial. IL is
49, ) sal, mat when judg- Chafc deiircd.
M, ID has aAa me on the lecond day 70 Coon
Eso'5 81 \ vav, ard as we rleassd, b: laid It
.s'Ia 81 J. the nix or hszzlld Of our characters
4 e sste.pvteJ to conduct cuIfslvss improperly,
\ ,as, i mull be under The d non OF the coaEt,
Which woosd j,dge Of what was right, or verbs
Is tbs effect
Tai j have always understood and believed
Is, nr;.ossr was condemned without cnlassl be-
H. s,,ra il his defence, bas not having been
|rs;.ns a. tic. sesOad ,riat Cannot assert Il 81
Eag oga kscsle e.
Thar sapn after sentences Of Death had, as /
||ra,,,ssc. O. brea pronounced on lacs, MI. Thg-
H., Adams, sac so,s- eff tie sacu President A
|d,ms. s.ake TO nc ii conrs, and said his father
||vslhsa 70 en.,w The points and autheTites which
Et,. G.las aud / had intended 20 rely Oh, in ia.
n, IF Ffes, if VIC had defended h'n ca his last
HAL; and asked il had any objections TO his
SEEING them said that 1 bid not; bat the
President never sent 10 me for them, nor did |
lever send them 70 him. Shortly afecr this Charles
lie, Esq. the than Attorney General, made.
SIMILAR rrqaes. of me, and assigned as a reason
ioit, thar he might perhaps be consulted OF The
President on the occasion, and wished to consider
ss case; bat he did not tell me that the request
cam: i.om the President, nor that he intended
Living the s,atemsnt, which he aGsd for, be-
fss HIN. spoke to Nj. Dallas. and ue a
seed IS comply with Ms. L-s's request. Mr..
Daas prepared statement ia the form Of let.
Ter lion, han and ne, TO Mr.. Lee, sn3 sentit
10 me. made some alterations init, had il Coz
pied, and sent to Mr.. Dallas, the original draft
and alterations, together with the copy signed by
me. The letter was, as understood, signed bJ
Mr., Dallas, and scas 70 Mr.. Lee. Mr.. Dallas
being 10 possession Of the original q aft and al
erstions, is more capable ofProyiHg the contents
,AanI an. H. hss sent me- a copy, which
supposc 10 &correei: bot as hayenot compared
j. with the original, cannon prove it to be 50.
Heis also in possession of a letter in answer 10
It, from Mr.. LIE 10 him aud me, and can better
Prove its contents than can, although lie has
furnished NE with copy which suppose TO be
sOtlea.
know Of no oth-r correspondence that ever
passed between the executive of the U. States
and ne, on The ,ccssion mentioned n the last m
isrroSasoly. w. LEWIS.
YTo Re Continued.