Alexandria advertiser and commercial intelligencer. [volume] (Alexandria [Va.]) 1800-1803, 1803-04-16

shole snited ia he toas, itfofnea arors I
isdiiit,e Of the purpof.s Of his mind. Hay
ing gore over the evidence, his Loralhip |
continued, q Genslcnes this Is the whole |
of the evidence aad you have been pro
perry told, there is no gueaion Of law IN i
this safe. Isis admitted that 3 tfaitorous /
icheme did exit but It is denied that
it was the pfifoner's. lit was not has
treaion, Whole was il? If The witnehss
produced upon their oath were not to be
believed, il was Of n to il1peach them |
but no iach thing is done. Then, with
refped 70 accomplices, we hnd IN the law
books particularly in the cafe Of King,
Charnock, and another, that the evidence
was wholly that Of aecomplices, without
half 10 many circumstances Of correlation
as are found in this cafe. The main cir
cumftance of the cafe is con6rmed-that
of the t.eafon. Then who is the trail
tor The prifoner is found IN the To-
ciety Of thofe moG urht fo. his rank and
fsuation, no account is given Why he at
tended thoie meetings we find him fitting
down and aflociating with common ioldi-
ers, and paItaking of their ordinary fare.
No other explanation is given OF this
but his former character happy, indeed,
would il have been for him if he had pre-
ferved that character down TO this mo-
ment Of peril. Now, gentlemen, this is
the whole evidence on the one hde, and
on the other fee bow it applies to the
charge: hrf, with refped to an overt ats,
committed within tie county. Il is
proved at the Oakley Arms, and at the
Flying Eorf.; that point Of law j: there.
fore latished. The only remaining con-
liberation is, whether you will believe
the evidence OF Blades, Windfor, Emblin,
and Francis, or either Of them? If you
have any heGtaticn you will look at The
circumstances ofthe confirmation. When
he va: taken with them, they had aboct
them she milchievops furniture of their
deiigns, / mean the printed papers He
was found alnloa in the ACT OF command,
and they Of obedience. Follow me,
one snd ALI" was the language be ufed.
Il was il confirmation that be was at the
Coach ard Hories, in Whitecapel, by
Campbell and Dean, two folders totally
rnlonneQed with the contributors, and 10
different witnenes. Their tcltin,ony PER
fetaly agreed with that of Windfor. If
YOU, therefore, believe F1nbIin ADD Wind
for HI re is an end Of the quehion. You
have ALTO heard The high character given
Of him by man, on whom to pronounce
an culogy were 10 waite words bur you
arc TO conlder whether change has nor
taken place free the period he fpeaks Of.
Itycu DO not believe the witneiiss, then
he will fand exempted from the COME
qusnces Of the charge imputed to him
bot fyou do believe them, shen, as there
is no queision upon the law, 70 there will
De none upon tie fact. Gentlemen, you
will conGder Of your verdidr"
The lord PRECEDENT addreR.d the priion-
era 70 the following effect
I" Ycu, Edwsrd Marcus Defpard you
John Wood /; you, Thomas Brooghton
you, John Francis you, Thomas New
man; yen Daniel Tyndall you, John
Sedgwick Wrattan; you, William Ian
der; yop, Arthur Graham; ard you,
john M Namara, have been fsverally in.
ditted for having traitorouily confpired a
esinif bis m4jeity's perfon, his crown, an6
government, for the purpofes of fubvcrt-
ing the fame, and changing the govern
ment oFthis realm. To ;his indictment you
have fcverally pleaded notgaily, ard put
yourfelyes for trial upon God and your
coun'ry, which country has found you
guilty. After Icing. patienr, and !
hope, juit and impartial trial, you have
beenall aud ieverally convicted, by mcR
respectable jniy of your country, upon
The ieveral crimes laid to your charge. In
the courfe of evidence upon your trial,
iach difclolures have heen made, as TO
prove beyond The pofIbility of doubt, thai