Hawkers in Hong Kong

Hawkers in Hong Kong(Chinese:小販) arevendorsofstreet foodand inexpensive goods. They are found in urban areas and new towns alike, although certain districts such asMong Kok,Sham Shui Po, andKwun Tongare known for high concentrations of hawkers.
For many decades, hawking has served as a means for the lower class to make a living inHong Kong, and allowed patrons to benefit from the convenience and low cost of hawker goods. However, the government has long considered the practice to be detrimental to public hygiene, and it has therefore been controlled by theUrban Counciland its successor, theFood and Environmental Hygiene Department.
Hawkers may be divided into the categories of fixed-pitch and itinerant (travelling). Both categories may sell a variety of goods, including food or dry goods. Street food hawkers commonly sell foods such asfishballsand fake shark fin soup (碗仔翅) relatively cheaply, from roadside vendor stalls.
The Hong Kong government has attempted to reduce the number of illegal vendors by designating hawker-permitted areas, but a large percentage of street vendors still operate illegally.According to Leung Yin Ling, author of the book消失中的小販文化(Disappearing Hawker Culture), hawkers exemplify the spirit of determination in the face of adversity that is an indelible part of Hong Kong culture.Local scholar Ma Kwok Ming has claimed that the economy of Hong Kong relies to a large extent on the street food industry, and that if hawkers are too harshly regulated, there will be little room for the development of Hong Kong food culture.
TheCantonesephrasejau gwei(Chinese:走鬼;Jyutping: zau2 gwai2;lit.running [away from] ghosts) refers to the sudden abandonment of these stalls when Hawker Control Teams (Chinese: 小販管理隊, or 販管隊 in short) are imminent and the vendors are operating illegally or selling prohibited items, such ascounterfeit branded goods.Gwei, meaning ghosts, refers to the Hawker Control Officers, who were traditionally Westerners. The phrase is shouted by vendors to warn others of the approaching squads, and can also be heard inMacaoandGuangdong Province, where similar situations exist with illegal street vendors.
Between the 1940s and 60s, there was an influx of migrants from rural areas of mainlandChinainto Hong Kong due to political instabilities in China (influenced by theChinese Civil Warand theCultural Revolution) as well as famine. Many of these migrants were unskilled and uneducated, and became itinerant hawkers to earn a living with low operating costs, selling daily necessities such as food and clothing to those of the working classes.At that time, the economic condition in Hong Kong was low and working-class families were large, giving rise to 'family consumption'.These families bought their basic necessities from hawkers.
According to the Hong Kong Hawkers Association, there were an estimated 70,000 or more street hawkers in Hong Kong in 1949.At that time, while hawking provided employment opportunities, the large numbers of hawkers also led to noise pollution and congestion. In addition, it was statedthat street hawking discouraged market development, since hawkers paid lower licence fees (HK$1,000-HK$3,000) than shop and stall tenants who also had to pay rents.
In the 1960s and 70s, at a time when there were few shopping malls and markets and little governmental regulation, the number of hawkers exceeded 300,000.Hawker numbers rose with the unemployment caused by the1973-74 stock market crashand1970s energy crisis, which led to factory closures and the decline of the manufacturing sector in Hong Kong.
However, as industrialisation and urbanisation increased, theBritish governmentbecame concerned about the health and hygiene issues posed by itinerant hawkers. In the 1970s, Itinerant Hawker Licences were issued and the succession and transfer of licenses was banned. The system granted licenses to 39,033 hawkers and prohibited 6,000 from the practice.Thereafter, the number of itinerant hawkers continued to decline.
In 2002, a five-year voluntary surrender scheme was implemented to encourage itinerant hawkers to surrender their licenses in exchange for "a one-off ex gratia payment, rental of a vacant stall in public markets under concessionary terms, or becoming a (non-cooked food) fixed pitch hawker.”The scheme drastically decreased the number of licensed hawkers, from 50,000 in 1974 to about 6,000 in 2007.
As of 30 November 2008, the total number of Fixed-Pitch Hawker Licenses (includingdai pai dongs) and Itinerant Hawker Licenses were 6,594 and 552 respectively.
In 2009, the Hong Kong Food and Health Bureau (FHB) in conjunction with the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD) reviewed the hawker licensing policy, with a view to potentially issuing new licenses to fixed-pitch hawkers.
In recent years, the FEHD has taken action duringChinese New Yearnight markets, targeting unlicensed food hawkers on grounds of unsanitary practices, obstruction of roadways, noise pollution, and other nuisances.At the same time, members of the community have increasingly valued hawking as an element of Hong Kong's cultural heritage and collective memory, and as a valuable means of support for grassroots people.
During the 2014 Lunar New Year, unannounced inspections were conducted atKweilin Street Night Market, with FEHD officers making arrests and confiscating a food cart. These actions led to public disquiet, with accusations of officers' opposition to ordinary citizens. Hawkers returned and the night market resumed as normal shortly after the officers' departure.
In November 2014,Sham Shui Po District Council, controlled by thepro-Beijing camp, passed a vote for zero-tolerance of unlicensed hawkers during the upcoming Lunar New Year,although other District Council members includingFrederick Fungof theAssociation for Democracy and People's Livelihood(ADPL) obtained an exception for vendors selling dry goods.In reaction, grassroots organisations claimed that due to the government refusal to issue new hawker licences or construct new markets, vendors could only subsist in defiance of the law. It was further asserted that Kweilin Street Night Market was enjoying a resurgence in popularity and that a zero-tolerance hawker policy would only serve to exacerbate grievances.During the 2015 Lunar New Year, there were at least three groups in Sham Shui Po giving vocal support for street vendors,and Hong Kong locals embarked on a campaign of street cleaning of the night market in order to allay concerns over hygiene.
On 2 February 2016, in the approach to the Lunar New Year, a conflict occurred when hawkers were prevented from setting up stall atLeung King Estate, so as not to disrupt activity at the nearby shopping mall operated byLink REIT.On 7 February, Lunar New Year's Eve, multiple hawkers set up stall in Kweilin Street Night Market and were chased away or arrested, as was teacher and activist Siu Lai, who acted in defiance of the policy.
During the 2016 Lunar New Year, aviolent bout of civil unrestdubbed the 'fishball revolution' (魚蛋革命) broke out inMong Kokin response to the hardline approach taken by the FEHD to crack down on hawking in Hong Kong.
On 22 May 2016 unrest broke out at Yat Tung Estate in Tung Chung, where residents had held a bazaar in defiance of ongoing rent increases byLink REIT, which owns the shopping centre and market in Yat Tung and many other estates. Staff from the Housing Authority called the police and stated that the bazaar was causing "obstruction", a claim that was dismissed by some residents.