Trans-Siberian Railway

TheTrans-Siberian Railway,historically known as theGreat Siberian Routeand often shortened toTranssib,is a large railway system that connectsEuropean Russiato theRussian Far East.Spanning a length of over 9,289 kilometers (5,772 miles), it is the longest railway line in the world.It runs from the city ofMoscowin the west to the city ofVladivostokin the east.
During the period of theRussian Empire, government ministers—personally appointed byAlexander IIIand his sonNicholas II—supervised the building of the railway network between 1891 and 1916. Even before its completion, the line attracted travelers who documented their experiences.Since 1916, the Trans-Siberian Railway has directly connected Moscow with Vladivostok. As of 2021, expansion projects remain underway, with connections being built to Russia's neighborsMongolia,China, andNorth Korea.Additionally, there have been proposals and talks to expand the network toTokyo, Japan, with new bridges ortunnelsthat would connect the mainland railway via the Russian island ofSakhalinand the Japanese island ofHokkaido.
The railway is often associated with the main transcontinental Russian line that connects many large and small cities of the European and Asian parts of Russia. At a Moscow–Vladivostok track length of 9,289 kilometers (5,772 miles),it spans a record eighttime zones.Taking eight days to complete the journey, it was the third-longest single continuous service in the world,after the Moscow–Pyongyangservice 10,267 kilometers (6,380 mi)and the formerKyiv(Kiev)–Vladivostok service 11,085 kilometers (6,888 mi),both of which also follow the Trans-Siberian for much of their routes.
The main route begins in Moscow atYaroslavsky Vokzal, runs throughYaroslavlorChelyabinsk,Omsk,Novosibirsk,Krasnoyarsk,Irkutsk,Ulan-Ude,Chita, andKhabarovsktoVladivostokvia southern Siberia. A second primary route is the Trans-Manchurian, which coincides with the Trans-Siberian east of Chita as far as Tarskaya (a stop 12 km (7 mi) east of Karymskoye, inChita Oblast), about 1,000 km (621 mi) east ofLake Baikal. From Tarskaya the Trans-Manchurian heads southeast, viaHarbinHarbin–Manzhouli railwayandMudanjiangHarbin–Suifenhe railwayin China'sNortheastern provinces(from where a connection to Beijing is used by one of the Moscow–Beijing trains), joining the main route inUssuriyskjust north ofVladivostok.
The third primary route is theTrans-Mongolian Railway, which coincides with the Trans-Siberian as far asUlan-UdeonLake Baikal's eastern shore. From Ulan-Ude the Trans-Mongolian heads south toUlaanbaatarbefore making its way southeast to Beijing. In 1991, a fourth route running further to the north was finally completed, after more than five decades of sporadic work. Known as theBaikal–Amur Mainline(BAM), this recent extension departs from the Trans-Siberian line atTaishetseveral hundred miles west ofLake Baikaland passes the lake at its northernmost extremity. It crosses theAmur RiveratKomsomolsk-na-Amure(north ofKhabarovsk), and reaches theTatar StraitatSovetskaya Gavan.
In the late 19th century, the development of Siberia was hampered by poor transport links within the region and with the rest of the country. Aside from theGreat Siberian Route, roads suitable for wheeled transport were rare. For about five months of the year, rivers were the main means of transport. During winter, cargo and passengers traveled by horse-drawn sledges over thewinter roads, many of which were the same rivers but frozen.
The first steamboat on theRiver Ob, Nikita Myasnikov'sOsnova, was launched in 1844. However, early innovation had proven to be difficult, and it was not until 1857 that steamboat shipping had begun major development on the Ob system. Steamboats began operation on theYeniseiin 1863, and on theLenaandAmurin the 1870s. While the comparative flatness ofWestern Siberiawas served by good river systems, the major river systemsOb–Irtysh–Tobol–ChulymofEastern Siberiahad difficulties. The Yenisei, the upper course of theAngara RiverbelowBratskwhich was not easily navigable because of the rapids, and the Lena, were mostly navigable only in the north–south direction, making west–east transportation difficult. An attempt to partially remedy the situation by building theOb–Yenisei Canalhad not yielded great success. These issues in the region created the need for a railway to be constructed.
The first railway projects in Siberia emerged after the completion of theSaint Petersburg–Moscow Railwayin 1851.One of the first was theIrkutsk–Chitaproject, proposed by the American entrepreneurPerry Collinsand supported by Transport MinisterConstantine Possietwith a view toward connecting Moscow to theAmur River, and consequently the Pacific Ocean. Siberia's governor,Nikolay Muravyov-Amursky, was anxious to advanceRussian colonizationof the nowRussian Far East, but his plans were unfeasible due to colonists importing grain and food from China and Korea.It was on Muravyov's initiative that surveys for a railway in theKhabarovskregion were conducted.
Before 1880, the central government had virtually ignored these projects, due to weaknesses in Siberian enterprises, an inefficient bureaucracy, and financial risk. By 1880, there was a large number of rejected and upcoming applications for permission to construct railways in order to connect Siberia with the Pacific, but not Eastern Russia. This worried the government and made connecting Siberia with Central Russia a pressing concern. The design process lasted 10 years. Along with the actual route constructed, alternative projects were proposed:
The line was divided into seven sections, most or all of which was simultaneously worked on by 62,000 workers. With financial support provided by leading European financier,Baron Henri Hottinguerof the Parisian bankersHottinger & Cie, the total cost estimated at £35 million was raised with the first section (Chelyabinsk to the River Ob) and finished at a cost of £900,000 lower than anticipated.Railwaymen argued against suggestions to save funds, such as installing ferryboats instead of bridges over the rivers until traffic increased.
Unlike the rejected private projects that intended to connect the existing cities that required transport, the Trans-Siberian did not have such a priority. Thus, to save money and avoid clashes with land owners, it was decided to lay the railway outside the existing cities. However, due to the swampy banks of the Ob River nearTomsk(the largest settlement at the time), the idea to construct a bridge was rejected.
The railway was laid 70 km (43 mi) to the south (instead crossing the Ob at Novonikolaevsk, later renamedNovosibirsk); a dead-end branch line connected with Tomsk, depriving the city of the prospective transit railway traffic and trade.
On 9 March 1891, the Russian government issued animperial rescriptin which it announced its intention to construct a railway across Siberia.Tsarevich Nicholas (later Tsar Nicholas II) inaugurated the construction of the railway in Vladivostok on 19 May that year.
Lake Baikal is more than 640 kilometers (400 miles) long and more than 1,600 meters (5,200 feet) deep. Until theCircum-Baikal Railwaywas built the line ended on either side of the lake. Theice-breakingtrain ferrySSBaikalbuilt in 1897 and smaller ferrySS Angarabuilt in about 1900 made the four-hour crossing to link the two railheads.
The Russian admiral and explorerStepan Makarov(1849–1904) designedBaikalandAngarabut they were built inNewcastle upon Tyne, byArmstrong Whitworth. They were "knock down" vessels; that is, each ship was bolted together in the United Kingdom, every part of the ship was marked with a number, the ship was disassembled into many hundreds of parts and transported in kit form toListvyankawhere a shipyard was built especially to reassemble them.Their boilers, engines and some other components were built inSaint Petersburgand transported to Listvyanka to be installed.Baikalhad 15 boilers, four funnels, and was 64 meters (210 ft) long. it could carry 24 railway coaches and one locomotive on the middle deck.Angarawas smaller, with two funnels.
Completion of the Circum-Baikal Railway in 1904 bypassed the ferries, but from time to time the Circum-Baikal Railway suffered from derailments or rockfalls so both ships were held in reserve until 1916.Baikalwas burnt out and destroyed in theRussian Civil WarbutAngarasurvives. It has been restored and is permanently moored at Irkutsk where it serves as an office and a museum.
In winter, sleighs were used to move passengers and cargo from one side of the lake to the other until the completion of the Lake Baikal spur along the southern edge of the lake. With the Amur River Line north of the Chinese border being completed in 1916, there was a continuous railway fromPetrogradto Vladivostok that, to this day, is the world's second longest railway line. Electrification of the line, begun in 1929 and completed in 2002, allowed a doubling of train weights to 6,000 metric tons (5,900 long tons; 6,600 short tons). There were expectations upon electrification that it would increase rail traffic on the line by 40 percent.
The entire length of the Trans-Siberian Railway was double track by 1939.
Siberian agriculture began to send cheap grain westwards beginning around 1869.Agriculture in Central Russia was still under economic pressure after the end ofserfdom, which wasformally abolishedin 1861. To defend the central territory and prevent possible social destabilization, the Tsarist government introduced theChelyabinsktariff-break (Челябинский тарифный перелом) in 1896, a tariff barrier for grain passing through Chelyabinsk, and a similar barrier inManchuria. This measure changed the nature of export: mills emerged to produce bread from grain inAltai Krai,NovosibirskandTomsk, and many farms switched tocorn(maize) production.
The railway immediately filled to capacity with local traffic, mostly wheat. From 1896 until 1913 Siberia exported on average 501,932 metric tons (494,005 long tons; 553,285 short tons) (30,643,000pood) of grain and flour annually.During theRusso-Japanese Warof 1904–1905, military traffic to the east disrupted the flow of civil freight.
The Trans-Siberian Railway brought with it millions of peasant-migrants from the Western regions of Russia and Ukraine.Between 1906 and 1914, the peak migration years, about 4 million peasants arrived in Siberia.
HistorianChristian Wolmarargues that the railroad was a failure, because it was built for narrow political reasons, with poor supervision and planning. The costs were vastly exaggerated to enrich greedy bureaucrats. The planners hoped it would stimulate settlement, but the Siberian lands were too infertile and cold and distant. There was little settlement beyond 30 miles from the line. The fragile system could not handle the heavy traffic demanded in wartime, so the Japanese in 1904 knew they were safe intheir war with Russia. Wolmar concludes:
In theRusso-Japanese War(1904–1905), the strategic importance and limitations of the Trans-Siberian Railway contributed to Russia's defeat in the war. As the line was single track, transit was slower as trains had to wait in crossing sidings for opposing trains to cross. This limited the capacity of the line and increased transit times. A troop train or a train carrying injured personnel traveling from east to west would delay the arrival of troops or supplies and ammunition in a train traveling from west to east. The supply difficulties meant the Russian forces had limited troops and supplies while Japanese forces with shorter lines of communication were able to attack and advance.
After theRussian Revolutionof 1917, the railway served as the vital line of communication for theCzechoslovak Legionand the allied armies that landed troops at Vladivostok during theSiberian Interventionof theRussian Civil War. These forces supported theWhite Russiangovernment of AdmiralAlexander Kolchak, based inOmsk, and White Russian soldiers fighting the Bolsheviks on theUralfront. The intervention was weakened, and ultimately defeated, by partisan fighters who blew up bridges and sections of track, particularly in the volatile region betweenKrasnoyarskandChita.
The leader of legions politicianMilan Rastislav Stefaniktraveled from Moscow to Vladivostok in March to August 1918, on his journey to Japan and the United States of America.The Trans-Siberian Railway also played a very direct role during parts of Russia's history, with theCzechoslovak Legionusing heavily armed andarmored trainsto control large amounts of the railway (and of Russia itself) during theRussian Civil Warat the end of World War I.As one of the few fighting forces left in the aftermath of the imperial collapse, and before theRed Armytook control, theCzechsandSlovakswere able to use their organization and the resources of the railway to establish a temporary zone of control before eventually continuing onwards towards Vladivostok, from where they emigrated back toCzechoslovakia.
During World War II, the Trans-Siberian Railway played an important role in the supply of the powers fighting in Europe.  In 1939–1941 it was a source of rubber for Germany thanks to theUSSR-Germany pact. While Germany's merchant shipping was shut down, the Trans-Siberian Railway (along with itsTrans-Manchurian branch) served as the essential link between Germany and Japan, especially for rubber. By March 1941, 300 metric tons (300 long tons; 330 short tons) of this material would, on average, traverse the Trans-Siberian Railway every day on its way to Germany.
At the same time, a number of Jews and anti-Nazis used the Trans-Siberian Railway to escape Europe, including the mathematicianKurt Gödeland Betty Ehrlich Löwenstein, mother of British actor, director and producerHeinz Bernard.Several thousand Jewish refugees were able to make this trip thanks to the Curaçao visas issued by the Dutch consulJan Zwartendijkand the Japanese visas issued by the Japanese consul,Chiune Sugihara, inKaunas, Lithuania. Typically, they took the TSR toVladivostok, then by ship to US. Until June 1941, pro-Nazi ethnic Germans from the Americas used the TSR to go to Germany.
The situation reversed after 22 June 1941. Byinvading the Soviet Union, Germany cut off its only reliable trade route to Japan. Instead, it had to use fast merchant ships and later large oceanic submarines to evade the Allied blockade. On the other hand, the USSR receivedLend-Leasesupplies from the US. Even after Japan went to war with the US, despite German complaints, Japan usually allowed Soviet ships to sail between the US and Vladivostok unmolested.As a result, thePacific Route– via northern Pacific Ocean and the TSR – became the safest connection between the US and the USSR.
Accordingly, it accounted for as much freight as theNorth Atlantic–ArcticandIranianroutes combined, though cargoes were limited to raw materials and non-military goods. From 1941 to 1942 the TSR also played an important role in relocating Soviet industries from European Russia to Siberia in the face of the German invasion. The TSR also transported Soviet troops west from the Far East to take part inthe Soviet counter-offensive in December 1941.
In 1944–45 the TSR was used to prepare for theSoviet–Japanese Warof August 1945; seePacific Route.  When an Anglo-American delegation visited Moscow in October 1944 to discuss the Soviet Union joining the war against Japan,Alanbrookewas told by General Antonov and Stalin himself that the line capacity was 36 pairs of trains per day, but only 26 could be counted on for military traffic; seePacific Route. The capacity of each train was from 600 to 700 tons.
Although the Japanese estimated that an attack was not likely before Spring 1946,Stavkahad planned for a mid-August 1945 offensive, and had concealed the buildup of a force of 90 divisions; many had crossed Siberia in their vehicles to avoid straining the rail link.
A trainload of containers can be taken from Beijing toHamburg, via the Trans-Mongolian and Trans-Siberian lines in as little as 15 days, but typical cargo transit times are usually significantly longerand typical cargo transit time from Japan to major destinations in European Russia was reported as around 25 days.
According to a 2009 report, the best travel times for cargoblock trainsfrom Russia's Pacific ports to the western border (of Russia, or perhaps ofBelarus) were around 12 days, with trains making around 900 km (559 mi) per day, at a maximum operating speed of 80 km/h (50 mph). In early 2009; however, Russian Railways announced an ambitious "Trans-Siberian in Seven Days" plan. According to this plan, $11 billion will be invested over the next five years to make it possible for goods traffic to cover the same 9,000 km (5,592 mi) distance in just seven days. The plan will involve increasing the cargo trains' speed to 90 km/h (56 mph) in 2010–2012, and, at least on some sections, to 100 km/h (62 mph) by 2015. At these speeds, goods trains will be able to cover 1,500 km (932 mi) per day.
On January 11, 2008, China, Mongolia, Russia, Belarus, Poland, and Germany agreed to collaborate on a cargo train service between Beijing and Hamburg.
The railway can typically deliver containers in1⁄3to1⁄2of the time of a sea voyage, and in late 2009 announced a 20% reduction in its container shipping rates.With its 2009 rate schedule, the Trans-Siberian Railway will transport a forty-foot container to Poland fromYokohamafor $2,820, or fromBusanfor $2,154.
A commonly used main line route is as follows. Distances and travel times are from the schedule of train No. 002M, Moscow–Vladivostok.
There are many alternative routings between Moscow and Siberia. For example:
Depending on the route taken, the distances from Moscow to the same station in Siberia may differ by several tens of km (a few dozen miles).
The Trans–Manchurian line, as e.g. used by train No.020, Moscow–Beijingfollows the same route as the Trans-Siberian between Moscow andChitaand then follows this
route to China:
The express train (No. 020) travel time from Moscow to Beijing is just over six days. There is no direct passenger service along the entire original Trans-Manchurian route (i.e., from Moscow or anywhere in Russia, west of Manchuria, to Vladivostok via Harbin), due to the obvious administrative and technical (gaugebreak) inconveniences of crossing the border twice. Assuming sufficient patience and possession of appropriate visas, however, it is still possible to travel all the way along the original route, with a few stopovers (e.g. inHarbin,GrodekovoandUssuriysk).
Such an itinerary would pass through the following points from Harbin east:
The Trans–Mongolian line follows the same route as the Trans-Siberian between Moscow andUlan Ude, and then follows this route toMongoliaand China:
The highest point of Trans–Siberian Railroad is at Yablonovy pass at an altitude of 1070m situated in theYablonoi Mountains, inTransbaikal(mainly inZabaykalsky Krai),Siberia, Russia. The Trans–Siberian Railroad passes the mountains at Chita and runs parallel to the range before going through a tunnel to bypass the heights.