Belarusian language

Belarusian(endonym:беларуская мова,romanized:bielaruskaja mova,pronounced[bʲɛɫaˈruskajaˈmɔva]) is anEast Slavic language. It is one of the twoofficial languagesinBelarus, alongsideRussian. Additionally, it is spoken in some parts ofRussia,Lithuania,Latvia,Poland, andUkrainebyBelarusian minoritiesin those countries.
Before Belarusgained independencein 1991, the language was known inEnglishasByelorussianorBelorussian, or alternatively asWhite Russian. Following independence, it became known asBelarusian, or alternatively asBelarusan.
As one of the East Slavic languages, Belarusian shares many grammatical and lexical features with other members of the group. To some extent, Russian,Ukrainian, and Belarusian retain a degree ofmutual intelligibility. Belarusian descends from a language generally referred to asRuthenian(13th to 18th centuries), which had, in turn, descended from what is referred to asOld East Slavic(10th to 13th centuries).
In the firstBelarusian censusin 1999, the Belarusian language was declared as a "language spoken at home" by about 3,686,000 Belarusian citizens (36.7% of the population).About 6,984,000 (85.6%) ofBelarusiansdeclared it their "mother tongue". Other sources, such asEthnologue, put the figure at approximately 3.5 million active speakers in Belarus.InRussia, the Belarusian language is declared as a "familiar language" by about 316,000 inhabitants, among them about 248,000 Belarusians, comprising about 30.7% of Belarusians living in Russia.InUkraine, the Belarusian language is declared as a "native language" by about 55,000 Belarusians, which comprise about 19.7% of Belarusians living in Ukraine.InPoland, the Belarusian language is declared as a "language spoken at home" by about 40,000 inhabitantsAccording to a study done by the Belarusian government in 2009, 72% of Belarusians speak Russian at home, while Belarusian is actively used by only 11.9% of Belarusians (others speak a mixture of Russian and Belarusian, known asTrasianka). Approximately 29.4% of Belarusians can write, speak, and read Belarusian, while 52.5% can only read and speak it.Nevertheless, there are no Belarusian-language universities in Belarus.
The Belarusian language has been known under a number of names, both contemporary and historical. Some of the most dissimilar are from the Old Belarusian period.
Although closely related to otherEast Slavic languages, especiallyUkrainian, Belarusianphonologyis distinct in a number of ways. Thephonemeinventory of the modern Belarusian language consists of 45 to 54 phonemes: 6 vowels and 39 to 48consonants, depending on how they are counted. When the ninegeminateconsonants are excluded as mere variations, there are 39 consonants, and excluding rare consonants further decreases the count. The number 48 includesallconsonant sounds, including variations and rare sounds, which may be phonetically distinct in the modern Belarusian language.
The Belarusian alphabet is a variant of theCyrillic script, which was first used as an alphabet for theOld Church Slavoniclanguage. The modern Belarusian form was defined in 1918, and consists of thirty-two letters. Before that, Belarusian had also been written in theBelarusian Latin alphabet(Łacinka / Лацінка), theBelarusian Arabic alphabet(byLipka Tatars) and theHebrew alphabet(byBelarusian Jews).TheGlagolitic scriptwas used, sporadically, until the 11th or 12th century.
There are several systems ofromanization of Belarusianwritten texts. TheBelarusian Latin alphabetis rarely used.
StandardizedBelarusian grammarin its modern form was adopted in 1959, with minor amendments in 1985 and 2008. It was developed from the initial form set down byBranislaw Tarashkyevich(first printed inVilnius, 1918), and it is mainly based on the Belarusian folk dialects ofMinsk-Vilniusregion. Historically, there have been several other alternative standardized forms of Belarusian grammar.
Belarusian grammar is mostly synthetic and partly analytic, and overall quite similar toRussian grammar. Belarusian orthography, however, differs significantly fromRussian orthographyin some respects, due to the fact that it is aphonemic orthographythat closely represents the surface phonology, whereas Russian orthography represents the underlyingmorphophonology.
The most significant instance of this is found in the representation of vowel reduction, and in particularakanje, the merger of unstressed /a/ and /o/, which exists in both Russian and Belarusian. Belarusian always spells this merged sound as⟨a⟩, whereas Russian uses either⟨a⟩or⟨o⟩, according to what the "underlying" phoneme is (determined by identifying the related words where the vowel is being stressed or, if no such words exist, by written tradition, mostly but not always conforming to etymology). This means that Belarusian noun and verb paradigms, in their written form, have numerous instances of alternations between written⟨a⟩and⟨o⟩, whereas no such alternations exist in the corresponding written paradigms in Russian. This can significantly complicate the foreign speakers' task of learning these paradigms; on the other hand, though, it makes spelling easier for native speakers.
An example illustrating the contrast between the treatment ofakanjein Russian and Belarusian orthography is the spelling of the word for "products; food":
Besides thestandardized lect, there are two maindialectsof the Belarusian language, the North-Eastern and the South-Western. In addition, there is a transitional Middle Belarusian dialect group and the separate West Polesian dialect group.
The North-Eastern and the South-Western dialects are separated by a hypothetical lineAshmyany–Minsk–Babruysk–Gomel, with the area of the Middle Belarusian dialect group placed on and along this line.
The North-Eastern dialect is chiefly characterized by the "soft sounding R" (мякка-эравы) and "strongakanye" (моцнае аканне), and the South-Western dialect is chiefly characterized by the "hard sounding R" (цвёрда-эравы) and "moderate akanye" (умеранае аканне).
TheWest Polesian dialect groupis separated from the rest of the country by the conventional linePruzhany–Ivatsevichy–Tsyelyakhany–Luninyets–Stolin.
There is a high degree ofmutual intelligibilityamong the Belarusian, Russian, and Ukrainian languages.
Within East Slavic, the Belarusian language is most closely related toUkrainian.
The modern Belarusian language was redeveloped on the base of thevernacularspoken remnants of theRuthenian language, surviving in the ethnic Belarusian territories in the 19th century. The end of the 18th century (the times of theDivisions of Commonwealth) is the usual conventional borderline between theRuthenianand Modern Belarusian stages of development.
By the end of the 18th century, (Old) Belarusian was still common among the minor nobility in the eastern part, in the territory of present-day Belarus, of theGrand Duchy of Lithuania(hereafter GDL).Jan Czeczotin the 1840s had mentioned that even his generation's grandfathers preferred speaking (Old) Belarusian.According to A. N. Pypin, the Belarusian language was spoken in some areas among the minor nobility during the 19th century.In its vernacular form, it was the language of the smaller town dwellers and of the peasantry and it had been the language of oral folklore. Teaching in Belarusian was conducted mainly in schools run by theBasilian order.
The development of Belarusian in the 19th century was strongly influenced by the political conflict in the territories of the former GDL, between the Russian Imperial authorities, trying to consolidate their rule over the "joined provinces", and the Polish and Polonized nobility, trying to bring back itspre-Partitionsrule(see alsoPolonization in times of Partitions).
One of the important manifestations of this conflict was the struggle for ideological control over the educational system. The Polish and Russian languages were being introduced and re-introduced, while the general state of the people's education remained poor until the very end of the Russian Empire.
In summary, the first two decades of the 19th century had seen the unprecedented prosperity of Polish culture and language in the former GDL lands, and had prepared the era of such famous Polish writers asAdam MickiewiczandWładysław Syrokomla. The era had seen the effective completion of the Polonization of the lowest level of the nobility, the further reduction of the area of use of contemporary Belarusian, and the effective folklorization of Belarusian culture.Nevertheless, at the beginning of the 19th century "there began a revival of national pride within the country ... and a growth in interest [in Belarusian] from outside".
Due both to the state of the people's education and to the strong positions of Polish and Polonized nobility, it was only after the 1880s–1890s that the educated Belarusian element, still shunned because of "peasant origin", began to appear in state offices.
In 1846, ethnographer Pavel Shpilevskiy prepared a Belarusian grammar (using the Cyrillic alphabet) on the basis of the folk dialects of theMinskregion. However, theRussian Academy of Sciencesrefused to print his submission, on the basis that it had not been prepared in a sufficiently scientific manner.
From the mid-1830s ethnographic works began to appear, and tentative attempts to study the language were instigated (e.g. Shpilevskiy's grammar). The Belarusian literary tradition began to re-form, based on the folk language, initiated by the works ofVintsent Dunin-Martsinkyevich.See also:Jan Czeczot,Jan Barszczewski.
At the beginning of the 1860s, both the Russian and Polish parties in Belarusian lands had begun to realise that the decisive role in theupcoming conflictswas shifting to the peasantry, overwhelmingly Belarusian. So a large amount of propaganda appeared, targeted at the peasantry and written in Belarusian;notably, the anti-Russian, anti-Tsarist,anti-Eastern Orthodox"Manifesto" and the first newspaperMužyckaja prauda(Peasants' Truth) (1862–1863) byKonstanty Kalinowski, and anti-Polish, anti-Revolutionary, pro-Orthodox booklets and poems (1862).
The advent of the all-Russian "narodniki" and Belarusian national movements (late 1870s–early 1880s) renewed interest in the Belarusian language (See also:Homan (1884),Bahushevich,Yefim Karskiy,Dovnar-Zapol'skiy, Bessonov, Pypin, Sheyn, Nasovič). The Belarusian literary tradition was also renewed (see also:F. Bahushevich). It was in these times that F. Bahushevich made his famous appeal to Belarusians: "Do not forsake our language, lest you pass away" (Belarusian:Не пакідайце ж мовы нашай, каб не ўмёрлі).
Thefirst dictionary of the modern Belarusian languageauthored by Nasovič was published in 1870. In the editorial introduction to the dictionary, it is noted that:
In 1891, in theprefaceto theBelarusian Flute,Francišak Bahuševičwrote, "There have been many peoples, which first lost their language… and then they perished entirely. So do not abandon our Belarusian language, lest we perish!"
According to the 1897Russian Empire census, about 5.89 million people declared themselves speakers of Belarusian (then known as White Russian).
The end of the 19th century, however, still showed that the urban language of Belarusian towns remained either Polish or Russian. The same census showed that towns with a population greater than 50,000 had fewer than a tenth Belarusian speakers. This state of affairs greatly contributed to a perception that Belarusian was a "rural" and "uneducated" language.
However, the census was a major breakthrough for the first steps of the Belarusian national self-awareness and identity, since it clearly showed to the Imperial authorities and the still-strong Polish minority that the population and the language were neither Polish nor Russian.
The rising influence of Socialist ideas advanced the emancipation of the Belarusian language even further (see also:Belarusian Socialist Assembly,Circle of Belarusian People's Education and Belarusian Culture,Belarusian Socialist Lot,Socialist Party "White Russia",Alaiza Pashkevich,Nasha Dolya). The fundamental works ofYefim Karskymarked a turning point in the scientific perception of Belarusian. The ban on publishing books and papers in Belarusian was officially removed (25 December 1904). The unprecedented surge of national feeling in the 20th century, especially among the workers and peasants, particularly after the events of 1905,gave momentum to the intensive development of Belarusian literature and press (See also:Nasha Niva,Yanka Kupala,Yakub Kolas).
During the 19th and early 20th century, there was no normative Belarusian grammar. Authors wrote as they saw fit, usually representing the particularities of different Belarusian dialects. The scientific groundwork for the introduction of a truly scientific and modern grammar of the Belarusian language was laid down by the linguist Yefim Karsky.
By the early 1910s, the continuing lack of a codified Belarusian grammar was becoming intolerably obstructive in the opinion of uniformitarian prescriptivists. Then Russian academicianShakhmatov, chair of the Russian language and literature department of St. Petersburg University, approached the board of the Belarusian newspaperNasha Nivawith a proposal that a Belarusian linguist be trained under his supervision in order to be able to create documentation of the grammar. Initially, the famous Belarusian poetMaksim Bahdanovičwas to be entrusted with this work. However, Bahdanovič's poor health (tuberculosis) precluded his living in the climate of St. Petersburg, soBranislaw Tarashkyevich, a fresh graduate of theVilnya Liceum No. 2, was selected for the task.
In the Belarusian community, great interest was vested in this enterprise. The already famous Belarusian poetYanka Kupala, in his letter to Tarashkyevich, urged him to "hurry with his much-needed work". Tarashkyevich had been working on the preparation of the grammar during 1912–1917, with the help and supervision of Shakhmatov and Karskiy. Tarashkyevich had completed the work by the autumn of 1917, even moving from the tumultuous Petrograd of 1917 to the relative calm of Finland in order to be able to complete it uninterrupted.
By the summer of 1918, it became obvious that there were insurmountable problems with the printing of Tarashkyevich's grammar in Petrograd: a lack of paper, type and qualified personnel. Meanwhile, his grammar had apparently been planned to be adopted in the workers' and peasants' schools of Belarus that were to be set up, so Tarashkyevich was permitted to print his book abroad.  In June 1918, he arrived inVilnius, via Finland. TheBelarusian Committeepetitioned the administration to allow the book to be printed. Finally, the first edition of the "Belarusian grammar for schools" was printed (Vil'nya, 1918).
There existed at least two other contemporary attempts at codifying the Belarusian grammar. In 1915, Rev.Balyaslaw Pachopkahad prepared a Belarusian grammar using the Latin script. Belarusian linguist S. M.Nyekrashevichconsidered Pachopka's grammar unscientific and ignorant of the principles of the language. But Pachopka's grammar was reportedly taught in an unidentified number of schools, from 1918 for an unspecified period. Another grammar was supposedly jointly prepared by A. Lutskyevich and Ya. Stankyevich, and differed from Tarashkyevich's grammar somewhat in the resolution of some key aspects.
On 22 December 1915,Paul von Hindenburgissued an order on schooling in German Army-occupied territories in theRussian Empire(Ober Ost), banning schooling inRussianand including the Belarusian language in an exclusive list of four languages made mandatory in the respective native schooling systems (Belarusian,Lithuanian,Polish,Yiddish). School attendance was not made mandatory, though. Passports at this time were bilingual, inGermanand in one of the "native languages".Also at this time, Belarusian preparatory schools, printing houses, press organs were opened (see also:Homan (1916)).
After the 1917February Revolutionin Russia, the Belarusian language became an important factor in political activities in the Belarusian lands (see also:Central Council of Belarusian Organisations,Great Belarusian Council,First All-Belarusian Congress,Belnatskom). In theBelarusian Democratic Republic, Belarusian was used as the only official language (decreed by Belarusian People's Secretariat on 28 April 1918). Subsequently, in theByelorussian SSR, Belarusian was decreed to be one of the four (Belarusian, Polish, Russian, and Yiddish) official languages (decreed by Central Executive Committee of BSSR in February 1921).
A decree of 15 July 1924 confirmed that the Belarusian, Russian, Yiddish and Polish languages had equal status in Soviet Belarus.
In the BSSR, Tarashkyevich's grammar had been officially accepted for use in state schooling after its re-publication in unchanged form, first in 1922 byYazep Lyosikunder his own name asPractical grammar. Part I, then in 1923 by the Belarusian State Publishing House under the titleBelarusian language. Grammar. Ed. I. 1923, also by "Ya. Lyosik".
In 1925, Lyosik added two new chapters, addressing the orthography of compound words and partly modifying the orthography of assimilated words. From this point on, Belarusian grammar had been popularized and taught in the educational system in that form. The ambiguous and insufficient development of several components of Tarashkyevich's grammar was perceived to be the cause of some problems in practical usage, and this led to discontent with the grammar.
In 1924–25, Lyosik and his brother Anton Lyosik prepared and published their project of orthographic reform, proposing a number of radical changes. A fullyphonetic orthographywas introduced. One of the most distinctive changes brought in was the principle ofakanye(Belarusian:а́канне), wherein unstressed "o", pronounced in both Russian and Belarusian as/a/, is written as "а".
The Belarusian Academic Conference on Reform of the Orthography and Alphabet was convened in 1926. After discussions on the project, the Conference made resolutions on some of the problems. However, the Lyosik brothers' project had not addressed all the problematic issues, so the Conference was not able to address all of those.
As the outcome of the conference, the Orthographic Commission was created to prepare the project of the actual reform. This was instigated on 1 October 1927, headed by S. Nyekrashevich, with the following principal guidelines of its work adopted:
During its work in 1927–29, the Commission had actually prepared the project for spelling reform. The resulting project had included both completely new rules and existing rules in unchanged and changed forms, some of the changes being the work of the Commission itself, and others resulting from the resolutions of the Belarusian Academic Conference (1926), re-approved by the Commission.
Notably, the use of theЬ(soft sign) before the combinations "consonant+iotated vowel" ("softened consonants"), which had been previously denounced as highly redundant (e.g., in the proceedings of the Belarusian Academic Conference (1926)), was cancelled. However, the complete resolution of the highly important issue of the orthography of unstressedЕ(IE) was not achieved.
Both the resolutions of the Belarusian Academic Conference (1926) and the project of the Orthographic Commission (1930) caused much disagreement in the Belarusian academic environment. Several elements of the project were to be put under appeal in the "higher (political) bodies of power".
InWest Belarus, under Polish rule, the Belarusian language was at a disadvantage. Schooling in the Belarusian language was obstructed, and the printing in Belarusian experienced political oppression.
The prestige of the Belarusian language in Western Belarus during this period hinged significantly on the image of the BSSR being the "true Belarusian home".This image, however, was strongly disrupted by the"purges" of "national-democrats" in the BSSR(1929–30) and by the subsequent grammar reform (1933).
Tarashkyevich's grammar was re-published five times in Western Belarus. However, the 5th edition (1929) (reprinted verbatim in Belarus in 1991 and often referred to) was the version diverging from the previously published one, which Tarashkyevich had prepared disregarding the Belarusian Academic Conference (1926) resolutions. (Тарашкевіч 1991, Foreword)
In 1929–30, the Communist authorities of Soviet Belarus made a series of drastic crackdowns against the supposed "national-democratic counter-revolution" (informally "nats-dems" (Belarusian:нац-дэмы)). Effectively, entire generations of Socialist Belarusian national activists in the first quarter of the 20th century were wiped out of political, scientific and social existence. Only the most famous cult figures (e.g.Yanka Kupala) were spared.
However, a new power group in Belarusian science quickly formed during these power shifts, under the virtual leadership of the Head of the Philosophy Institute of the Belarusian Academy of Sciences, academician S. Ya. Vol’fson (С. Я. Вольфсон). The book published under his editorship,Science in Service of Nats-Dems' Counter-Revolution(1931), represented the new spirit of political life in Soviet Belarus.
The Reform of Belarusian Grammar (1933) had been brought out quite unexpectedly, supposedly [Stank 1936], with the project published in the central newspaper of the Belarusian Communist Party (Zviazda)on 1933-06-28 and the decree of the Council of People's Commissars (Council of Ministers) of BSSR issued on 1933-08-28, to gain the status of law on 1933-09-16.
There had been some post-facto speculations, too, that the 1930 project of the reform (as prepared by people who were no longer seen as politically "clean"), had been given for the "purification" to the "nats-dems" competition in the Academy of Sciences, which would explain the "block" nature of the differences between the 1930 and 1933 versions. Peculiarly,Jan Stankievičin his notable critique of the reform [Stank 1936] failed to mention the 1930 project, dating the reform project to 1932.
The reform resulted in the grammar officially used, with further amendments, inByelorussian SSRand modernBelarus. Sometimes this grammar is called theofficialgrammar of the Belarusian language, to distinguish it from thepre-reformgrammar, known as theclassicgrammar orTaraškievica. It is also known asnarkamaŭka, after the wordnarkamat, a Belarusian abbreviation forPeople's Commissariat(ministry). The latter term bears a derogatory connotation.
The officially announced causes for the reform were:
The reform had been accompanied by a fervent press campaign directed against the "nats-dems not yet giving up."
The decree had been namedOn Changing and Simplifying Belarusian Spelling(«Аб зменах і спрашчэнні беларускага правапісу»), but the bulk of the changes had been introduced into the grammar.Jan Stankievič, in his critique of the reform talked about 25 changes, with one of them being strictly orthographical and 24 relating to both orthography and grammar. [Stank 1936]
Many of the changes in the orthography proper ("stronger principle of AH-ing," "no redundant soft sign," "uniformnyeandbyez") were, in fact, simply implementations of earlier proposals made by people who had subsequently suffered political suppression (e.g., Yazep Lyosik, Lastowski, Nyekrashevich, 1930 project).[Padluzhny 2004]
The morphological principle in the orthography had been strengthened, which also had been proposed in 1920s.
The "removal of the influences of the Polonisation" had been represented, effectively, by the:
The "removing of the artificial barriers between the Russian and Belarusian languages" (virtually the often-quoted "Russification of the Belarusian language", which may well happen to be a term coined by Yan Stankyevich) had, according to Stankyevich, moved the normative Belarusian morphology and syntax closer to their Russian counterparts, often removing from use the indigenous features of the Belarusian language. [Stank 1936]
Stankyevich also observed that some components of the reform had moved the Belarusian grammar closer to the grammars of other Slavonic languages, which would hardly be its goal. [Stank 1936]
InWest Belarus, there had been some voices raised against the reform, chiefly by the non-Communist/non-socialist wing of the Belarusian national scene. Yan Stankyevich was named to the Belarusian Scientific Society, Belarusian National Committee and Society of the Friends of Belarusian Linguistics at Wilno University. Certain political and scientific groups and figures went on using the pre-reform orthography and grammar, however, thus multiplying and differing versions.
However, the reformed grammar and orthography had been used, too, for example during the process ofSiarhei Prytytskiin 1936.
During theOccupation of Belarus by Nazi Germany(1941–1944), the Belarusian collaborationists influenced newspapers and schools to use the Belarusian language. This variant did not use any of the post-1933 changes in vocabulary, orthography and grammar. Much publishing inBelarusian Latin scriptwas done. In general, in the publications of theSoviet partisan movementin Belarus, the normative 1934 grammar was used.
After the Second World War, several major factors influenced the development of the Belarusian language. The most important was the implementation of the "rapprochement and unification of Soviet people" policy, which resulted by the 1980s in the Russian language effectively and officially assuming the role of the principal means of communication, with Belarusian relegated to a secondary role. The post-war growth in the number of publications in the Belarusian language in BSSR drastically lagged behind those in Russian. The use of Belarusian as the main language of education was gradually limited to rural schools and humanitarian faculties. The BSSR counterpart of the USSR law "On strengthening of ties between school and real life and on the further development of popular education in the USSR" (1958), adopted in 1959, along with introduction of a mandatory 8-year school education, made it possible for the parents of pupils to opt for non-mandatory studying of the "second language of instruction," which would be Belarusian in a Russian language school and vice versa. However, for example in the 1955/56 school year, there were 95% of schools with Russian as the primary language of instruction, and 5% with Belarusian as the primary language of instruction.The Belarusian was mostly used as a language of instruction in Belarusian rural schools orhumanitiesfaculties and was popularly regarded as an "uncultured, rural language of rural people".Consequently, Belarusian cities became Russian-speaking in the 1960s due to the lack of education in Belarusian language in schools and universities.
That was the source of concern for the nationally minded and caused, for example, the series of publications byBarys Sachankain 1957–61 and the text named "Letter to a Russian Friend" byAlyaksyey Kawka(1979). The BSSR Communist party leaderKirill Mazurovmade some tentative moves to strengthen the role of Belarusian language in the second half of the 1950s.
After the beginning of Perestroika and the relaxing of political control in the late 1980s, a new campaign in support of the Belarusian language was mounted in BSSR, expressed in the "Letter of 58" and other publications, producing a certain level of popular support and resulting in the BSSR Supreme Soviet ratifying the "Law on Languages" ("Закон аб мовах"; 26 January 1990) requiring the strengthening of the role of Belarusian in state and civic structures.
A discussion on problems in Belarusian orthography and on the further development of the language was held from 1935 to 1941. From 1949 to 1957 this continued, although it was deemed there was a need to amend some unwarranted changes to the 1933 reform. The Orthography Commission, headed byYakub Kolas, set up the project in about 1951, but it was approved only in 1957, and the normative rules were published in 1959.These rules had been accepted as normative for the Belarusian language since then, receiving minor practical changes in the 1985 edition.
A project to correct parts of the 1959 rules was conducted from 2006 to 2007.
The process of government support for "Belarusization" began even before the breakup of the Soviet Union, with the Supreme Soviet of the BSSR passing a law on languages in 1990 that aimed for the gradual increase in prestige and general use of the Belarusian language over the next 10 years, followed by the creation that same year of a National Language Program to support this endeavor.After Belarus became independent in 1991, support for the cause of the Belarusian language gained prestige and popular interest, with the post-Soviet Belarusian government the continued creation of policies to actively promote the use of the Belarusian language, especially in education.The creation of the 1994 Constitution declared Belarusian to be the sole official language, though Russian was given the status as "language of inter-ethnic communication".However, the implementation of the 1992–94 "Law on Languages" took place in such a way that it provoked public protests and was dubbed "Landslide Belarusization" and "undemocratic" by those opposing it in 1992–94.
After the election ofAlexander Lukashenkoas the President of Belarus in the1994 elections, the positions of Belarusian language in Belarusian education system worsened as the number of first graders who were taught in Belarusian significantly decreased (e.g. in capitalMinskfrom 58.6% in 1994 to just 4.8% in 1998) and by 2001 most of the major Belarusian cities had no schools where its pupils were instructed in Belarusian, however Minsk still had 20 Belarusian-language schools.In 1996, Russian language was given equal status to Belarusian following changes in theConstitution of Belarusand subsequently became Belarus's language of administration, business and education.In 1999, only 17% of pupils attended Belarusian-language elementary schools in Belarus.Moreover, a complete minority (~10.5%) of single-circulation newspapers were printed in Belarusian and the amounts decreases each year.
In areferendumheld on 14 May 1995 the Belarusian language lost its exclusive status as the onlystate language. State support for Belarusian language and culture in general has dwindled since then, and Russian is dominant in everyday life in today's Belarus.In a 2006 article,Roy Medvedevcompared the position of the Belarusian language in Belarus with that of theIrish languagein the Republic of Ireland.Adam Maldzisconsiders that one of typological similarities is the official bilinguism both in Belarus and Ireland, and the low real status of the mother-tongue.
A spelling reform of the official Belarusian language, making the spelling of some words more similar to Taraškievič's system, was decided on 23 July 2008, and went into effect on 1 September 2010.
Under the regime of Belarus's current president,Alexander Lukashenko, members of the Belarusian speaking minority in Belarus have complained about the discrimination against the Belarusian language in Belarus.
Despite a formally equal status of Russian and Belarusian, Russian is primarily used by the Belarusian government, and cases of discrimination against the Belarusian language are not rare, even though the discrimination is not institutionalized. Authorities occasionally make minor concessions to demands for a widening of the usage of the Belarusian language.
Organisations promoting Belarusian language such as theFrancišak Skaryna Belarusian Language Societywere reported as being the object of attacks by Belarus-basedRussian neo-Nazi groupsin the 1990s and 2000s.
The Frantsishak Skaryna Society has reported about the following categories of violations against the rights of Belarusian speakers in Belarus:
Belarusian speakers are facing numerous obstacles when trying to arrange Belarusian language education for their children.As of 2016there are no Belarusian-language universities in the country.
In its 2016 human rights in Belarus report, the US State Department also stated that there was "discrimination against ... those who sought to use the Belarusian language.""Because the government viewed many proponents of the Belarusian language as political opponents, authorities continued to harass and intimidate academic and cultural groups that sought to promote Belarusian and routinely rejected proposals to widen use of the language,".
In the 2010s, the situation of Belarusian has started to change slightly due to the efforts of language-advocacy institutions, of individual representatives of such educational, cultural, scientific and linguistic organizations as theFrancišak Skaryna Belarusian Language Society, theNational Academy of Sciences of Belarus, theUnion of Belarusian Writers[be], and in response to the endeavours of pro-Belarusian public figures from the media and communication field, musicians, philosophers, entrepreneurs and benefactors.
Despite the language losing its exclusive position in the wake of the1995 Belarusian referendum, new signs of the spread of Belarusian have appeared, trickling down into Belarusian society — with advertising campaigns supporting the cause (outdoor billboards promotingand acquainting people with the Belarusian language, branding campaigns for the leading telecommunication providers like Velcom, etc.), the simplified version of theBelarusian Latin alphabeton the metro map being introduced into the messages of the transport network, dedicated advertising festivals like AD!NAK upholding marketing communication in Belarusian, and informal language-courses (such asMova Nanova, Mova ci kava, Movavedy) having sprung up in Minsk and around Belarus and spurring further interest of people, especially of young people, in developing good Belarusian communication skills ineveryday life.
President Lukashenko, in his 2014 State of the Nation address, emphasized that losing the ability to speak Belarusian will be losing a part of the country's history.
The2019 Belarusian censusdemonstrated that the Belarusian language is perceived as a native language of Belarus by ~60% of its population, however only ~25% use it in their everyday life.The Belarusian language has marginalized status in terms of usage in Belarus, despite being officially recognized as itsstate language(along with Russian language).The usage of Belarusian in major Belarusian cities is rare.Approximately 95% of Belarusian state operates in the Russian language and the Belarusian language is mostly absent in Belarusian education, state media and government affairs where the main information is provided in Russian.For example, in 2011 Russian-language broadcasts on the Belarusian "state package" TV channels accounted for 35,302 hours of air time and highly overshadowed 626 hours of air time in Belarusian-language (only 1.7% of all air time).None of theuniversities in Belarusare providing a Belarusian-language education and Belarusian language lessons in schools are declining.In 2016, only 13% of pupils in Belarus attendedelementary schoolswhere the language of instruction was Belarusian.The Belarusian language is still partly used in some cultural, traditional and folklore activities.According to Belarusian poetValzhyna Mort, who grew up in Belarus, the Belarusian language is mocked for its "village sound" and is considered "useless" in Belarus.According to Belarusian poetJulija Cimafiejeva, the majority of the books sold in Belarus were imported from Russia in 2019 and in comparison to Russian books the Belarusian language books are not common and mostly are related with educational purposes.The annual circulation of Belarusian language literature significantly decreased from 1990 to 2020: magazines (from 312 mil to 39.6 mil), books and brochures (from 9.3 mil to 3.1 mil).
Belarusian speakers in Belarus are viewed as those who are against the Lukashenko's government and politically-motivated charges were applied to them.In 2020, following the beginning of the2020–2021 Belarusian protests, many Belarusian writers and artists were repressed in Belarus.In August 2021, Belarusian PEN Centre, Union of Belarusian Writers and the Belarusian Association of Journalists were liquidated and theMinistry of Justice of Belarusapplied for liquidation of theFrancišak Skaryna Belarusian Language Societyin theSupreme Court of Belarus.
There exists an alternative literary norm of the Belarusian language, namedTaraškievica(Tarashkevica). Its promoters and users prevalently refer to it asKlasyčny pravapis(Classic orthography). Generally Taraškievica favors Polish-inspired pronunciations (плян,plan,філязофія,filazofia) while regular Belarusian follows Russian-inspired pronunciations (план,płan,філасофія,fiłasofia). Taraškievica also features a more phonetic spelling system, particularly using a separate letter for the [ɡ] sound, which is argued to be an allophone of [ɣ] rather than a phoneme.
Belarusian is represented by theISO 639codebeorbel, or more specifically byIETF language tagsbe-1959acad(so-called "Academic" ["governmental"] variant of Belarusian as codified in 1959) orbe-tarask(Belarusian in Taraskievica orthography).
Article 1 of theUniversal Declaration of Human Rightsin Belarusian (be-1959acad):
The same text using the Taraškievica orthography (be-tarask):
Theromanizationof the text intoLatin alphabet:
Article 1 of theUniversal Declaration of Human Rightsin English:
The following are examples of independent Belarusian-language print and television news media for students interested in learning Belarusian language by reading current news articles and watching television news programs in Belarusian in order to practice reading and listening comprehension. (The following two examples are independent Belarusian-language news organizations that happen to be based in Poland; currently as of 2021news organizations based in Belarus are tightly controlled by the State and have limited journalistic independence.)