Mine shell

Amine shell(fromGerman:Minengeschoss, "mine shot") orhigh-explosive, high-capacity(HEHC)inBritish militarynomenclature,is a military explosiveshell typecharacterized by thin (usually steel) shell walls and a correspondingly high quantity ofexplosives, much higher than the traditionalhigh-explosive shelltype percaliber, meaning that mine shells tradefragmentation effect(due to the thinner shell walls) for a higher pressure wave effect when comparing to traditional high-explosive shells.
Mine shells were originally developed during the mid- to late 1800s againstfortressesprior torebarbut got a new role duringWorld War IIagainst air targets as reinforced fortresses had made the original use of the type obsolete aroundWorld War I.
The mine shell is a more explosive version of the commonhigh-explosiveandhigh-explosive fragmentationshells, relying on inflicting damage primarily through theblast(pressure wave) alone rather than via the combination offragmentationand a correspondingly smaller blast achieved by classichigh-explosive shells. This is referred to as pressure wave effect/damage in for example Swedish (Swedish:tryckvågsverkan).This effect is desirable when attacking non-reinforcedmaterials such asbrick,concreteoraircraft skin, as these are relativelybrittleand easy to penetrate and therefore do not need to be tackled with heavy, hard projectiles, but are tough enough to maintain their structure despite being pierced by shellfire and fragmentation. The larger explosions generated by mine shells are more efficient at inflicting damage on such targets than the greater kinetic impact but smaller detonations delivered by conventional rounds. To achieve this effect mine shells feature very thin shell walls and thus more room for explosive filler; though at the cost of generating lighter and thus somewhat less formidable shrapnel (fragmentation).Against thicker targets, such as brick or concrete walls, they often also feature a delayed action on the fuze so they can penetrate into the wall and burst inside it, forcing larger pieces of the targets to break loose.
An additional advantage of the mine shell approach is that, with explosives being lighter than metal, the projectiles weigh correspondingly less, which gives them higher muzzle velocity compared to heavier shells. For the same reason, they also generate less recoil. However less desirably, the reduced mass inevitably entails that they will possess less momentum, which reduces their range as velocity falls off more rapidly than in a heavier projectile with more inertia. It is also a consideration that the lower recoil makes them unsuitable to be fired from the same gun as standard shells of comparable power, if it uses arecoil operatedoradvanced primer ignitionmechanism. Mine shells are thus often longer in construction compared to other projectile types of the same caliber to increase the weight with more mass in an attempt to reduce the weight difference, but also to further increase the damage-output.
The word 'mine' in the name "mine shell" can in the modern world seem confusing, as military use of the word is mainly associated withland minesandnaval mines. However the word "mine" is very old and originally had the same meaning as "miningmines".As mines were used duringsiege warfarein past eras to collapsefortifications, and later blowing up fortifications (seetunnel warfare), the first proto-landmines developed received the name mine.These were basic explosives dug down into the ground like a mine. This eventually led to mine-ordnance being defined as "contained explosions", which is alluded to in the name mine shell as its original purpose was to penetrate into fortification walls and burst inside.
However, as mine shells became obsolete against fortresses the definition changed with time from "shells damaging through a contained explosion" to "shells damaging through theshock wavecreated from theexplosionof their payload, rather than the combination offragmentationand pressure wave damage like traditionalhigh-explosive shells, which have thicker shell walls and smaller explosive load".
The name 'mine shell' inEnglishis a modern term directly translated from theGermanmilitary termMinengeschoß("mine shot").The historical equivalent English military term isHigh-Explosive, High-Capacity,abbreviated asHEHC,which has become uncommon or obsolete in modern times. The name mine shell is or has however been present in several different militarynomenclaturesaround the world besides Germany and the United Kingdom; although in modern times only a few countries still use the term "mine shell" (or equivalent) and its umbrella terms in military nomenclature.
Examples of militarynomenclaturesaround the world using the term mine shell or equivalent:
The damage effect of mine shells, often described as "pressure wave damage" or simply named "mine damage/mine effect", has historically been applied to other types of ordnance than cannon shells, most notablyaerial bombs(example names: German:Minenbombe,English:High-Capacity bomb).
Air-to-air rocketsconfigured with mine-shell equivalent warheads have also at times featured "mine" in their name. For example, the German WW2 rocketR4Mwas an abbreviation ofRakete, 4 Kg, Minenkopf, meaning "Rocket, 4 kg (8.8 lb), Mine-head" in English.Interestingly, mine-rockets developed inSwedenafter WW2 were namedsprängraketer(high-explosive rockets), even though their initial design was directly based on the German R4M.
Dedicated mine shells originate inEurope. The origin of the name "mine shell" is unknown butItalywas using the name by 1884 (Italian:Granata Mina).
Mine shells were used in a lot of different types of high calibercannons,howitzers, andmortarson both land and on water around the turn of the century, before seeing a decline afterWorld War I. (See the articleMinenwerferfor the use of mine shells in mortars duringWorld War I.) The use ofrebar-reinforced fortifications during World War I probably made the shell obsolete as its effect on fortifications was negated by therebar.
DuringWorld War II, mine shells would see a resurgence as the Germans started to use the type in small caliber (initially 20 mm)automatic weapons, both to arm the Luftwaffe's fighter aircraft and forFlak. This was an innovation, as prior to this, mine shells had only been constructed in large calibers for technical reasons. Larger shells were usually produced by casting, smaller calibers by drilling the cavity for fuse and explosives into a solid steel shot, and neither process was effective at making small projectiles with walls that were sufficiently thin yet strong enough to work as a mine shell. While small thick-walled shells fired from automatic guns performed well against ground targets, they were more limited in anti-aircraft use.
In the late 1930s, the Germans began to pay attention to these shortcomings during the trials of the 20 mmMG FF cannon.Its conventional high-explosive rounds were judged unsatisfactory in the anti-aircraft role, for the reasons mentioned above. As a result of these trials, the German air ministry, theReichsluftfahrtministerium, or RLM for short, ordered the development of mine shells for the 20 mm MG FF cannon in 1937.To make such shells in 20 mm (0.787 in) caliber, German ordnance engineers had to try new methods of construction; what they came up with was a round made from high qualitydrawing steel, manufactured in the same way in which cartridge cases are made.These new 20 mm mine shells were first used against the RAF in 1940, and proved highly successful. Even when the British and later, to a limited extent the Americans equipped their fighters with autocannon, they always used conventional ammunition. The difference in payloads between these rounds and the Luftwaffe's mine shells was significant. Considering the high-explosive rounds alone as an example: the 20 mm mine shells used in MG FF/M cannons (and later in the MG 151/20) both had a 17 g (0.60 oz) HE filling while British and American autocannon shells of the same calibre, but markedly heavier, could carry only 10–12 g (0.35–0.42 oz), while the typical filler load in the conventional 20 mm shells of the original MG-FF was a mere 4.5–6.5 g (0.16–0.23 oz).
As mentioned above, one problem with the new ammunition was that due to their lightweight nature, the new 20 mm mine shells produced insufficient recoil to operate the 20 mm MG FF cannon. This required a modification of the recoil mechanism so the cannon could fire this new shell, but this in turn made it unsafe to fire the old, conventional rounds. In an effort to avoid the chambering of incorrect ammunition, the modified weapon was redesignated the 20 mm MG FF/M,MforMinengeschoß.
Germany first used Minengeschoß ammunition during theBattle of BritainwhenMG FF/M armedBf 109E's andBf 110C's flew missions over from mainland Europe to Britain. Although the shells themselves proved deadly, the guns had a poor rate of fire, relatively sluggish muzzle velocity and an inadequate magazine ammunition feed, and were soon to be replaced by the belt-fedMG 151. This new type was originally introduced as a Minengeschoß-firing heavy machine gun, in 15 mm; but then it was realised that the earlier cannon-sized mine shells were more effective, and so a new larger cartridge (20x82mm) was created for the weapon. The adapted gun, (more precisely designated the MG 151/20), became the Luftwaffe's standard 20 mm autocannon until the end of the war,and with its highfire ratecoupled with goodballisticsand high-explosives payload for its caliber was overall among the best aircraft armament of the conflict.
As the possibilities of this new application for mine shells became better understood, the Luftwaffe found they had created a potential game-changer as the recoil/velocity ratio made it possible to create larger caliber guns that would have low enough recoil to be effectively mounted on conventional aircraft, while at the same time achieving useful velocities. Moreover, as the volume of a cylinder is proportional to the square of its radius, and as cannon shells tend to the shape of a cylinder, the Minengeschoß design when applied to larger calibers allowed a dramatic increase in explosive payload and power. One such weapon was the 30 mm (1.18 in)MK 108which became highly militarily significant during the second half of the war, when the Allies began to mount their enormous bombing onslaught on German cities. So large was the increase in internal volume indeed that it proved worthwhile to the Germans to refine these projectiles by making them more streamlined, sacrificing a little of this capacity, but thus partly compensating for the lower momentum characteristic of the Minengeschoß design. These streamlined mine shells for the 30 mmMK 108were designated Ausf.C.and featured 72 grams (2.54 ounces) ofnitropenta(PETN), compared to the original blunt-nosed Ausf.A which had 85 grams (3.00 ounces) of PETN.(Note that the Ausf.B was a training shell without explosives.)See below for a comparison with modern ammunition loads.
Mine shells where also adopted for use in ground attack cannons like the high-velocity 30 mmMK 103, among others,as well asanti-aircraft gunslike the2 cm Flak 30/38,3.7 cm Flak 18/36/37/43and5 cm FlaK 41.
At the end of the WWII the Germans started to develop several autocannons in caliber 55 mm (2.17 in) for use inaircraftandanti-aircraft gunsagainst allied aircraft. Some examples being the Gerät 58anti-aircraft gunand theMK 112andMK 115aircraft cannons. The reason the Germans settled on an unconventional caliber of 55 mm was due to it being the smallest caliber that could shoot down aheavy bomberwith a single mine shell.Calculations and tests had revealed that a single explosion of 400 grams (0.882 pounds) ofPETNorRDXexplosive mixes could effectively take out a heavy bomber in a single hit.Due to requirements for minimalism, it was calculated that a caliber of at least 55 mm (2.17 in) was needed to deliver this load. Interestingly Germany already manufactured mine shells in caliber 50 mm (1.97 in) for guns like the5 cm FlaK 41, but these only had an explosive charge capacity of 360 grams (0.794 pounds).
In the end, no 55 mm mine shells seems to have been deployed by Germany during World War II. Theallied bombing of Germanydelayed weapons-research and made production of the 55 mm weapons impossible.
However, the Germans did manage to deploy a 55 mmair-to-air rocketnamed "Rakete, 4 Kg, Minenkopf" (Rocket, 4 kg, Mine-head), orR4Mfor short, at the end of 1944.It was fitted with a 55 mm "high-capacity", or "mine"warheadfilled with 520 gram of the explosive-mixture "HTA 41"(also known as "HTA 15"),which consists of 40%Hexogen(RDX), 45%TNTand 15%aluminium.The shell walls of the warhead were only 0.8 mm (0.0315 in) thick.These rockets were fitted to several German aircraft at the end of the war, most notably theMe 262, which used them to great effect during their limited service life.On one occasion, Me 262s armed with R4M rockets shot down 25B-17 bombersout of a group of 425 within a very short time without any losses.
After the defeat of Germany in World War II, several countries started using mine shells for their own post-war aircraft and anti-aircraft armament, for example the "high-explosive" shells of Britain'sADEN cannonand the FrenchDEFA 540were effectively clones of German wartime equivalents.The guns themselves were developments of the GermanMauser MK 213.
Even in comparison to modern designs, some of the WW2 payloads quoted above are impressive as not even the PGU-13/B HEI round for theGAU-8/A Avenger gun of theA-10Warthog or the 30 mm OFZ shell of RussianGSh-30-1andGSh-30-6cannons come close to the German WW2 mine shells of the same caliber - 72–85 g (2.54–3.00 oz) compared to 58 g (2.05 oz) and 48.5 g (1.71 oz) respectively for the PGU-13B and OFZ.
Sweden having experience with the shell type from earlier developed several different mine shells in several different calibers after the war. Some examples being a mine shell variant for the 20 x 110 Hispano cartridgeand one for the 57 x 230R Bofors cartridge.
The type is still used today in autocannons such as theMauser BK-27but there is no known use of the type as it was originally used.