Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station

TheRancho Seco Nuclear Generating Stationis adecommissionednuclear power plantbuilt by theSacramento Municipal Utility District(SMUD) inHerald, California.
In 1966, SMUD purchased 2,100 acres (850 ha) in southeastSacramento Countyfor anuclear powerplant, which was built in Herald, 25 miles (40 km) south-east of downtown Sacramento.
In the early 1970s, a small pond was expanded to a 160-acre (65 ha) lake to serve as an emergency backup water supply for the station. The lake has always received its water from the Folsom South Canal and has no relationship with the power plant's daily water supply. Surrounding the lake is 400 acres (160 ha) of recreational area originally operated by the County of Sacramento for day-use activities.
The 2,772 MWtBabcock & Wilcoxpressurized water reactor (913 MWe) achieved initial criticality on September 16, 1974, and entered commercial operation on April 17, 1975.
On March 20, 1978, a power supply failure for the plant's non-nuclear instrumentation system led to steam generator dryout (ref NRC LER 312/78-001). This triggered an automatic reactor shutdown. In a 2005 document, theUnited States Nuclear Regulatory Commissionindicated that it was the third most serious safety-related occurrence in the United States as of 2005 (behind theThree Mile Island accidentand theBrowns Ferrycable tray fire).The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff concluded that fundamental design flaws which were known by plant operators and the NRC itself were at the heart of the problem and should have been fixed years before. “In summary, the information was available and known which could have prevented this overcooling transient; but in the absence of adequate plant modifications, the incident should have been expected,” the staff wrote.
The plant operated from April 1975 to June 1989, with a lifetimecapacity factorof less than 40%; it was closed by public vote in June 1989 (53% to 47%) after half of its intended lifetime primarily for economic reasons: ratepayers had seen their rates doubled in the last four years to pay for improvements to the plant, and electricity from natural gas was priced at half that of the electricity generated by Rancho Seco. (2.3 cents / kWh, vs. 5.4 cents / kWh)
All power-generating equipment has been removed from the plant, and the 425-foot  high (130 m) cooling towers remain a prominent part of the local landscape as the tallest buildings in theCentral Valley.Also scattered throughout the area around the plant are abandonedcivil defense sirensthat at one time would have warned people of a radioactivity release from the station. Additions to SMUD's Rancho Seco property have included an 11 MW solar installation and, in 2006, the 600 MW natural gas-fired Cosumnes Power Plant.
On October 23, 2009, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission released the majority of the site for unrestricted public use, while approximately 11 acres (4.5 ha) of land including a storage building for low-level radioactive waste and a dry-cask spent fuel storage facility remain under NRC licenses.
According to a study published in the journalBiomedicine International, the statistically significant drop in cancer rates observed in Sacramento County between 1988 and 2009 (plant closed in 1989) might be partially attributable to the closure of the Rancho Seco plant, and the resultant decline in nuclear emissions.The result has been questioned by radiation expert and health physicist Robert Emery, who suggested it being the result of thesharpshooter fallacyand highlighted the author Joseph Mangano's history of exaggerated claims about radiological risks.
The plant cost $375 millionwhen it was built in 1974 ($1.8 billion in 2023 dollars) and it cost about $120 million in 1974 dollars to decommission ($577 million in 2023 dollars), according to the SMUD Rancho Seco Nuclear Education Center.