Going Dutch

"Going Dutch" (sometimes written with lower-casedutch) is a term that indicates that each person participating in a paid activity covers their own expenses, rather than any one person in the group defraying the cost for the entire group. The term stems from restaurant diningetiquettein theWestern world, where each person pays for their meal. It is also calledDutch date,Dutch treat(the oldest form, apejorative),anddoing Dutch.
A derivative is "sharing Dutch", having a joint ownership of luxury goods. For example: four people share the ownership of a plane, boat, car, or any other sharable high-end product. This in order to minimize cost, sharing the same passion for that particular product and to have the maximum usage of this product.
TheOxford English Dictionaryconnects "go Dutch" / "Dutch treat" to other phrases which have "an opprobrious or derisive application, largely due to the rivalry and enmity between the English and Dutch in the 17th century", the period of theAnglo-Dutch Wars. Another example is "Dutch courage".A term bearing some similarities isDutch oven.
InEgypt, it is calledEnglizy, meaning 'English-style', and traditionally is considered rude.
In the United States of America, the practice of "going Dutch" is often related to specific situations or events. During meals such as birthdays, first dates or company business lunches, an expectation develops based on social traditions, personal income, and the strength of relationship between the parties. Moreover, the increase in prevalence for mobile sharing payment platforms such asVenmoorZellehas resulted in a cultural rethinking of meal payments.
SomeLatin Americancountries use the Spanish phrasepagar a la americana(literally 'to pay American-style') which refers to a trait attributed to people from the United States or Canada.
InChileandUruguay, the phrase used ishacer una vaca('to make/build/create a cow') which means that each participant pays into a common pool to either pay the bill afterwards, or beforehand, when buying for a meeting or party at a home. In this case, a person is designated as the "bank" (the one who collects the money). This system is used either when planning the things to buy for a party, or when paying the bill in a restaurant or pub. It still is splitting the bill, but one person pays for all of it and is reimbursed by the others. In more formal settings (office party) the participants may require to see the supermarket bill to check that the money was spent as agreed.
InPanama, the phrasemita[ormiti]y mita(using colloquial contractions ofmitad y mitad, with the stress on the first syllablemi); this is literally 'half and half', and refers to both "going Dutch" and to splitting the check equally.
InGuatemala, a sing-song phrase is used: "A la ley de Cristo, cada quien con su pisto", literally 'By the law of Christ, each one with his own stew'.Pistois a stewed dish similar toratatouille, and is used in this phrase as a stand-in for food in general.
It is almost the same inHonduras, where the phrase is "Como dijo Cristo, cada quien con su pisto", 'As Christ said, everyone with their own stew.' However, the word "pisto" is commonly used to denote money, rather than the stew itself.
InEl Salvador, a different rhyming phrase is used: "Ley de Esparta: cada quien paga lo que se harta", which means 'Spartanlaw: each pays [for] what they eat'.
ACosta Ricansystem is known asir con Cuyo, literally 'to go with Cuyo' (Cuyo being supposedly a person; this is a stand-in name, like "John Doe" in English). If one of the diners asks "Quien es Cuyo?('Who is Cuyo?') another may respond that he or she is (i.e that this person will pay the bill), or may suggest "cada uno con lo suyo", 'each with his own', meaning each person should pay for what they ate.
InBrazil, the slang word “rachar” is used for the same purpose, or when it’s too expensive, the group shares the total so everyone pays the same.
InMexico, the phrase[Evento] de traje, literally 'A white-tie Event' is used in the context where all participants are expected to contribute, either monetarily or in kind--derived from the homonyms 'traje,' first person preterit conjugation of the verb 'traer' ('I brought'), and the generic term for formal male attire, 'traje' ('suit').
InJapan, it is calledwarikan(割勘), which translates into 'splitting the cost'.
InNorth Korea, where rigid social systems are still in place, it is most common for the person of the highest social standing, such as a boss or an elder figure, to pay the bill. This not only applies in a 1 to 1 situation but also in groups. Among the younger generation, it is quite common for friends to alternate when paying the bill, or for one to pay for dinner and another to pay for drinks.
InSouth Korea, "going Dutch" is called "Dutch pay" (더치페이), aKonglishloan phrase. For romantic dates, men usually pay.
In thePeople's Republic of China, after a group meal, it is expected that the bill be paid by the person who has highest social standing or highest income, or by the person who made the invitation. A group of friends or colleagues who dine together regularly will often take turns paying the bill. Men often pay for the initial romantic dates, however after several dates, it is not uncommon for women to take a turn at paying for dates. It is not uncommon among groups of strangers or sometimes younger generations to split the bill; payment platforms andsuper-appsWeChat PayandAlipayhave a built-in bill-sharing feature.
InIndia,Pakistan,Bangladesh,NepalandAfghanistanwas not the prevailing method due to complex societal pressures. It has become somewhat common amongst the younger generation.
InAfghanistan, they call it "Bandar" which means group food but contribution from all participants. The word "going Dutch" is common amongst the younger generation, especially students. The same practice is considered negative in family meetings. Afghan people consider themselves as the best in hospitality. They take loans for their guests and disallow guests to pay for themselves.
InPakistan, going Dutch is sometimes referred to as the "American system". This practice is more prevalent among the younger age group, friends, colleagues and some family members to request separate bills. InUrdu, the practice is calledapna apna, which means 'each his own'. In a group, going Dutch generally means splitting the bill equally.
InBangladeshit is common to use the termje je, jar jar(যে যে,যার যার) 'his his, whose whose'.
InNepal, people would say “aafno aafno” literally means ‘yours, yours’ that equivalents to pay for your own. However, sometimes youngsters use their own made up English phrases such as “going together, paying separate”.
"Going Dutch" is not a common practice in most ofIndia. Being a country known for hospitality, it is common for someone to pay the whole bill, sometimes even if it is large group. Recently however, the practice of going Dutch has become more common amongst colleagues and  couples.
In India there are many names for the practice, in different languages: it is called TTMM fortu tera mein merainHindi;je jaar shey taarinBengali;tujhe tu majhe miinMarathi;neenu nindu koodu, nanu nandu kodthiniinKannada; EDVD forevadi dabbulu vaadi dabbuleinTelugu; andthantrathu, thaaninMalayalam.  These all generally translate to 'you pay yours and I pay mine', though in practice it refers to splitting the bill equally. Since the concept of freely dating is comparatively new in India – a culture with a long history ofarranged marriage– going Dutch is primarily not applied to dating but to outings among friends and colleagues.  When the expression going Dutch is used, it often refers to splitting the bill equally.
InIndonesia, the term is BSS and BMM, as acronym forbayar sendiri-sendiriandbayar masing-masing, which both mean 'pay for yourself'. This term is most commonly used in less formal settings, such as among friends. In a more formal setting the commonly accepted convention is person with higher social standing to take the payments. Among equal members of group it is considered polite to offer payments for all the meals and drinks in which the other party have the opportunity to refuse or accept out of respect for the other party.
In thePhilippines, it is referred to as KKB, an acronym forkanya-kanyang bayadwhich means 'pay for your own self'.  KKB would generally be the norm among friends or people of similar financial standing.  As in most Asian countries, the person footing the bill is generally dictated by gender roles or their standing in the community or work.  It is still general practice to have the male answer the bill especially during courtship or when in romantic relationships.
InThailand, the practice is referred to asอเมริกันแชร์, 'American share'.
In most West Asian cultures, asking to "go Dutch" is seen as rude. Traditions of hospitality play a great part in determining who pays, therefore an invitation will be given only when the host feels that he or she is able to afford the expenses of all. Similarly, gender roles and age play a more important role than they would in Western societies.
InIraq, the expression isMaṣlawiya(مصلاوية), referring to the people ofMosulwho are supposedly stingy.
In theSyria,Palestine,Lebanon, andJordan, the expression isshamia(شامية), referring to the people ofDamascusin Syria, who are supposedly stingy. A similar expression issherke halabieh(meaning 'sharing theAleppoway'), bearing a similar connotation.
InTurkeyThe corresponding phrase inTurkishishesabı Alman usulü ödemek, which can be translated into English as 'to pay the bill the German way'; in short form, it isAlman usûlü, 'German-style'.
InIran, it is calledDongi(دنگی), which translates into 'sharing equally' and is used usually among close friends and the young when they are not invited by a specific host. Otherwise, the host will not allow anybody to pay, according to Persian hospitality norms. The practice has become quite common in Iran.
InItaly,Spain,Portugal,Greece, andMalta, it is rather uncommon for most locals to have separate bills, and is sometimes even regarded as rude, especially when in larger groups. In urban areas or places frequented by tourists, this has changed over the last decades.
In theNordic countriesand theNetherlands, going Dutch is the norm for almost every visit to a restaurant, with larger groups being the exception, especially on more formal occasions.Though the Scandinavian countries are some of the most gender-equal in the world, it is still common and mostly expected for men (in a heterosexual context) to pay for lunch/dinner on romantic dates.One exception to this norm is in the case of a woman asking a man out, where it would be considered polite for the woman to pay the bill. If a date is overfika(inSweden), the parties usually go Dutch, because of the usually smaller price tag.
InItalythere is specific phrase to describe sharing a bill in equal parts that ispagare alla romana('to pay as theRomans[do]', 'to pay Roman-style') but there is not an equivalent to "going dutch" since it is very uncommon.
In Greece, the practice is colloquially calledrefené.
InCatalonia"going Dutch" is the rule among Catalans.
InFrance,faire moitié-moitié(colloquiallyfaire moit'-moit'), literally 'make half-[and]-half', which means each one pays an equal portion of the bill. For romantic dates, the traditional practice is that the man pays. In a business meeting, the hosting party usually pays for all – it is considered rude not to do so.
InPortugalis calledcontas à moda do PortomeaningOporto's style bills ora meiasmeaning half-half/splitting the cost.